UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 6, 2009
BearingPoint, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
001-31451
|
|
22-3680505 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer |
of incorporation)
|
|
|
|
Identification No.) |
1676 International Drive
McLean, VA 22102
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (703) 747-3000
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 8.01. Other Events.
On January 6, 2009, BearingPoint, Inc. (the Company) and the County of San Diego, California (the
County) entered into a Settlement Agreement (the Settlement Agreement) to resolve a dispute
between the Company and the County regarding the scope of work encompassed by a contract to design,
develop and implement an integrated property tax system for the County (the IPTS Contract). The
Company and the County recently entered into voluntary, non-binding mediation to resolve such
dispute. Under the terms of the IPTS Contract, the Companys contractual liability was limited to
$31.8 million plus associated legal fees and costs. To avoid the expense, disruption and
uncertainty of a continuing dispute, the Company and the County entered into the Settlement
Agreement pursuant to which the Company paid $21.0 million to the County; the IPTS Contract is
deemed terminated without cause, without any admission of liability by either party; and the
Company and the County released each other from all liabilities and claims related to the IPTS
Contract. This amount ultimately was paid by drawing down on a letter of credit previously issued
under the Companys $500 million senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility), which
letter of credit was issued as collateral for a surety bond previously provided to the County in
support of the IPTS Contract. The Companys obligation under the Credit Facility to reimburse the
draw down on the letter of credit was funded through the incurrence of additional indebtedness
under the Credit Facility and will not be paid from the Companys current cash on hand.
The Company does not believe that the entry into the Settlement Agreement will impact
the Companys ability to obtain new surety bonds, letters of credit or bank guarantees in support
of client engagements; however, the Company expects that the Companys surety providers will
continue to require full collateralization, through cash or letters of credit, of any new surety
bonds. If the Company is unable to provide full collateralization or is otherwise unable to obtain
new surety bonds, letters of credit or bank guarantees, the Companys ability to generate new
business, particularly in the State, Local and Education sector of its Public Services industry
group, could be materially and adversely affected. At December 31, 2008, the Company had $81.9
million remaining available under the letter of credit facility under its Credit Facility. For a
more detailed analysis of risks that relate to the Companys liquidity, see Item 1A, Risk Factors
Risks that Relate to Our Liquidity, to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and in its 2008 quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
* * * * *
Some of the statements in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the Companys ability to
obtain new surety bonds, letters of credit or bank guarantees, constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These statements are based on the Companys current expectations, estimates and projections.
Words such as will, expects, believes, intends and similar expressions are used to identify
these forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions and as such are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to future events or
the Companys future financial performance that may not prove to be accurate. As a result, these
statements speak only as of the date they were made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in these
forward-looking statements. The reasons for these differences include changes that occur in the
Companys continually changing business environment and certain additional factors included in Item
1A, Risk Factors to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 and in its 2008 quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and available at http://www.sec.gov. Please refer to these
filings for additional information regarding these risks.