e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-32747
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
86-0460233 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
One BriarLake Plaza, Suite 2000
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South
Houston, Texas 77042
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(713) 954-5500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 3, 2006, there were 86,365,035 shares outstanding of the issuers common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
PART I
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
$ |
4,556 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $337 at September
30, 2006 and $500 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
163,579 |
|
|
|
84,109 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
61,586 |
|
|
|
4,542 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
55,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid seismic |
|
|
16,956 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
15,149 |
|
|
|
15,666 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
10,215 |
|
|
|
26,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
327,624 |
|
|
|
141,432 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method: Proved |
|
|
2,217,982 |
|
|
|
574,725 |
|
Unproved, not subject to amortization |
|
|
121,297 |
|
|
|
40,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,339,279 |
|
|
|
614,901 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
13,749 |
|
|
|
11,048 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(291,124 |
) |
|
|
(110,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,061,904 |
|
|
|
515,943 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
263,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
18,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
28,772 |
|
|
|
8,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,700,724 |
|
|
$ |
665,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
35,806 |
|
|
$ |
37,530 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
107,765 |
|
|
|
75,324 |
|
Accrued
capital costs |
|
|
129,308 |
|
|
|
37,006 |
|
Abandonment
liability |
|
|
51,952 |
|
|
|
11,359 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12,580 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
337,411 |
|
|
|
204,006 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
170,495 |
|
|
|
38,176 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
305,756 |
|
|
|
25,886 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,632 |
|
Long term debt, revolving credit facility |
|
|
314,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
Long term debt, senior unsecured notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,096,251 |
|
|
|
248,194 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares
authorized, 86,269,563 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2006; 70,000,000
shares authorized, 35,615,400 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000
shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,042,544 |
|
|
|
160,705 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
52,185 |
|
|
|
(41,473 |
) |
Accumulated retained earnings |
|
|
172,324 |
|
|
|
94,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,267,062 |
|
|
|
213,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,700,724 |
|
|
$ |
665,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales |
|
$ |
63,256 |
|
|
$ |
15,144 |
|
|
$ |
150,982 |
|
|
$ |
53,579 |
|
Gas sales |
|
|
126,432 |
|
|
|
27,823 |
|
|
|
285,008 |
|
|
|
94,913 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
190,466 |
|
|
|
43,662 |
|
|
|
438,391 |
|
|
|
151,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
28,744 |
|
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
62,863 |
|
|
|
17,678 |
|
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
Transportation expense |
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
11,326 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
26,726 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
82,416 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
|
192,222 |
|
|
|
43,457 |
|
Impairment of production equipment held
for use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
122,753 |
|
|
|
31,399 |
|
|
|
289,876 |
|
|
|
92,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
67,713 |
|
|
|
12,263 |
|
|
|
148,515 |
|
|
|
58,697 |
|
Interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
Expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(11,724 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(26,392 |
) |
|
|
(5,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
56,226 |
|
|
|
10,549 |
|
|
|
122,609 |
|
|
|
53,977 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(19,836 |
) |
|
|
(3,606 |
) |
|
|
(44,385 |
) |
|
|
(18,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
36,390 |
|
|
$ |
6,943 |
|
|
$ |
78,224 |
|
|
$ |
35,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
Net income per sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
85,493,237 |
|
|
|
33,348,130 |
|
|
|
73,270,309 |
|
|
|
32,438,240 |
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
85,581,108 |
|
|
|
34,806,842 |
|
|
|
73,694,727 |
|
|
|
33,312,831 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
78,224 |
|
|
$ |
35,563 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
44,243 |
|
|
|
15,862 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
194,963 |
|
|
|
44,321 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
9,016 |
|
|
|
17,614 |
|
Impairment of production equipment held for use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
Net realized loss on derivative contracts acquired |
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(25,390 |
) |
|
|
2,476 |
|
Insurance receivable |
|
|
(41,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
12,226 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(99,781 |
) |
|
|
19,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
172,794 |
|
|
|
135,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to properties and equipment |
|
|
(404,675 |
) |
|
|
(142,102 |
) |
Proceeds from property conveyances |
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Purchase price adjustment |
|
|
(20,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(423,471 |
) |
|
|
(142,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term note |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,000 |
) |
Credit facility borrowings (repayments), net |
|
|
162,000 |
|
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
Debt and working capital acquired from Forest Energy Resources, Inc. |
|
|
(176,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from note offering |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of stock |
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred offering costs |
|
|
(12,343 |
) |
|
|
(2,680 |
) |
Net realized loss on derivative contracts acquired |
|
|
(5,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from private equity offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,534 |
|
Capital contribution from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
250,995 |
|
|
|
8,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
2,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
$ |
4,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
OperationsMariner Energy, Inc. (Mariner or the Company) is an independent oil and gas
exploration, development and production company with principal operations in the Gulf of Mexico,
both shelf and deepwater, and in West Texas. Effective March 2, 2006, a subsidiary of the Company
completed a merger transaction with Forest Energy Resources, Inc. pursuant to which the Company
acquired the Gulf of Mexico operations of Forest Oil Corporation. Please see Note 3, Acquisitions
for further discussion of this transaction. Unless otherwise indicated, references to Mariner,
the Company, we, our, ours and us refer to Mariner Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries
collectively.
Interim Financial StatementsThe accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted, although we believe that the disclosures
contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. Our balance sheet at December
31, 2005 is derived from the December 31, 2005 audited financial statements, but does not include
all disclosures required by GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Use of EstimatesThe preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Our most significant financial estimates are based on remaining proved natural gas and oil
reserves. Estimates of proved reserves are key components of our depletion rate for natural gas and
oil properties, our unevaluated properties and our full cost ceiling test. In addition, estimates
are used in computing taxes, preparing accruals of operating costs and production revenues, asset
retirement obligations, fair value and effectiveness of derivative instruments and fair value of
stock options and the related compensation expense. Because of the inherent nature of the
estimation process, actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
Principles of ConsolidationOur consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
ReclassificationsCertain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation.
Income Tax ProvisionOur provision for taxes includes both state and federal taxes. In May
2006, the State of Texas enacted substantial changes to its tax structure beginning in 2007 by
implementing a new margin tax of 1% to be imposed on revenues less certain costs, as specified in
the legislation. As a result, we increased our provision by an additional $1.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 to provide for deferred taxes to the State of Texas under the newly
enacted state margin tax.
Recent Accounting PronouncementsIn July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN No. 48
clarifies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and requires us to evaluate our tax positions
for all jurisdictions and all years where the statute of limitations has not expired. FIN No. 48
requires companies to meet a more-likely-than-not threshold (i.e. greater than a 50 percent
likelihood of being sustained under examination) prior to recording a benefit for their
6
tax positions. Additionally, for tax positions meeting this more-likely-than-not threshold,
the amount of benefit is limited to the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent
probability of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of applying the
provisions of the new interpretation will be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning balance of
retained earnings, or other components of stockholders equity, as appropriate, in the period of
adoption. We will adopt the provisions of this interpretation effective January 1, 2007, and are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this interpretation will have on our financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No.
157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements but rather it eliminates inconsistencies in the guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. Earlier adoption is encouraged, provided the company has not yet issued financial statements,
including for interim periods, for that fiscal year. Although we are still evaluating the potential
effects of this standard, we do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission released Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Quantifying Financial Statement Misstatements (SAB 108). SAB 108 gives
guidance on how errors, built up over time in the balance sheet, should be considered from a
materiality perspective and corrected. SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of
the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current
year misstatement. SAB 108 represents the SEC Staffs views on the proper interpretation of
existing rules and as such has no effective date. We do not expect the adoption of SAB No. 108 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-03,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should be Presented in
the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation). EITF 06-03 requires that companies
disclose the gross amounts of taxes reported. The consensus is effective for interim or annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of this EITF
issue to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
2. Related Party Transactions
Organization and Ownership of the CompanyOn March 2, 2004, Mariner Energy LLC, the Companys
indirect parent, merged with a subsidiary of MEI Acquisitions Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of the
private equity funds Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund II, L.P. and ACON Investments
LLC (the Merger). Prior to the Merger, Joint Energy Development Investments Limited Partnership
(JEDI), which was an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Enron Corp. (Enron), owned
approximately 96% of the common stock of Mariner Energy LLC. In the Merger, all the shares of
common stock in Mariner Energy LLC were converted into the right to receive cash and certain other
consideration. As a result, JEDI no longer owned any interest in Mariner Energy LLC, and the
Company ceased to be affiliated with JEDI or Enron.
Until February 10, 2005, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mariner Holdings, Inc.,
which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mariner Energy LLC. On February 10, 2005, in anticipation of
the private placement by the Company and its sole stockholder of an aggregate 31,452,500 shares of
the Companys common stock in March 2005 (the Private Equity Placement), Mariner Holdings, Inc.
and Mariner Energy LLC were merged into the Company and ceased to exist. The mergers of Mariner
Holdings, Inc. and Mariner Energy LLC into the Company had no operational or financial impact on
the Company; however, intercompany receivables of $0.2 million and $2.9 million in cash held by the
affiliates were transferred to the Company in February 2005 and accounted for as additional paid in
capital. In the Private Equity Placement, the Company sold 16,350,000 shares of its common stock
and its sole stockholder sold 15,102,500 shares of the Companys common stock. The Companys net
proceeds in the Private Equity Placement were $212.9 million, before offering costs of $2.2
million, of which $166.0 million was paid to its sole stockholder to redeem 12,750,000 shares of
the Companys common stock in March 2005.
The
Company was previously party to management agreements with two
affiliates of its former parent company. These agreements provided
for the payment by Mariner Energy LLC of an aggregate of
$2.5 million to the affiliates in connection with the provision
of management services. Such payments have been made. Mariner Energy
LLC also entered into monitoring agreements with two affiliates of
its former parent, providing for the payment by Mariner Energy LLC of
an aggregate of one percent of its annual EBITDA to the affiliates in
connection with certain monitoring activities. Under the terms of the
monitoring agreements, the affiliates provided financial advisory
services in connection with the ongoing operations of Mariner.
Effective February 7, 2005, these contracts were terminated in
consideration of lump sum cash payments by Mariner totaling
$2.3 million. The Company recorded the termination payments as
general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended March 31,
2005.
3. Acquisitions
Forest Gulf of Mexico OperationsOn March 2, 2006, a subsidiary of the Company completed a
merger transaction with Forest Energy Resources, Inc. (the Forest Transaction). Prior to the
consummation of the merger, Forest Oil Corporation (Forest) transferred and contributed the
assets of, and certain liabilities associated with, its offshore Gulf of Mexico operations to
Forest Energy Resources, Inc. Immediately prior to the merger, Forest distributed all of the
outstanding shares of Forest Energy Resources, Inc. to Forest shareholders on a pro rata basis.
Forest Energy Resources, Inc. then merged with a newly formed subsidiary of Mariner, became a new
wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner and changed its name to Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. (MERI).
Immediately following the merger, approximately 59% of the Mariner common stock was held by
shareholders of Forest and approximately 41% of Mariner common stock was held by the pre-merger
stockholders of Mariner.
To acquire MERI, Mariner issued 50,637,010 shares of its common stock to Forest shareholders.
The aggregate consideration was valued at $890.0 million, comprised of $3.8 million in pre-merger
costs and $886.2 million in common stock, based on the closing price of the Companys common stock
of $17.50 per share on September 12, 2005 (which was the date that the terms of the acquisition
were announced).
The Forest Transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting under the
accounting standards established in SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations (SFAS 141) and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result, the
assets and liabilities acquired by Mariner in the Forest Transaction are included in the Companys
September 30, 2006 balance sheet. The Company reflected the results of operations of the Forest
Transaction beginning March 2, 2006. The Company recorded the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the March 2, 2006 closing date, which are summarized in the
following table:
7
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties |
|
$ |
1,211.4 |
|
Abandonment liabilities |
|
|
(165.2 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(176.2 |
) |
Fair value of oil and natural gas derivatives |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(199.4 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
263.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired |
|
$ |
890.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Forest Transaction includes a large undeveloped offshore acreage position which
complements the Companys large seismic database and a large portfolio of potential exploratory
prospects. The initial fair value estimate of the underlying assets and liabilities acquired is
determined by estimating the value of the underlying proved reserves at the transaction date plus
or minus the fair value of other assets and liabilities, including inventory, unproved oil and gas
properties, gas imbalances, debt (at face value), derivatives, and abandonment liabilities. The
deferred tax liability recognizes the difference between the historical tax basis of the assets of
Forest Energy Resources, Inc. and the acquisition cost recorded for book purposes. The purchase
price allocation is preliminary and will be subject to change as additional information becomes
available, including the final amount of the cash payment to be agreed to by Mariner and Forest under the
distribution agreement that is part of the merger documentation. The
cash payment is consideration to Forest, pertains to the period from
July 1, 2005 to March 2, 2006, and is reflected in the purchase price
allocation. In April 2006, Mariner made a preliminary cash payment to Forest of $20.8 million under the distribution agreement. The final purchase price
allocation may differ in material respects from that presented
above depending primarily upon final settlement of the cash payment under the distribution agreement. Carryover basis accounting applies for tax purposes.
Goodwill represents
the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired net of the fair value of liabilities assumed in the acquisition. SFAS No. 142 requires that intangible assets with indefinite lives, including
goodwill, be evaluated on an annual basis or more frequently if an
event occurs or circumstances change that could potentially result
in an impairment. The Company has elected November 30 as its assessment date.
On
March 2, 2006, Mariner and MERI entered into a $500 million
senior secured revolving credit facility and an additional $40 million senior secured letter of
credit facility. Please refer to Note 4, Long Term Debt for further discussion of the amended and
restated bank credit facility.
Payable to Forest Forest
and MERI entered into a transition services agreement under which
Forest provided services to MERI on an as-needed basis for a limited period of time after the
Forest Transaction until the services could be transitioned to Mariner. As a result of these
arrangements, MERI incurred working capital charges that were payable to Forest. All amounts have
been settled as of September 30, 2006 and no further charges are anticipated under the
transition services agreement.
Pro Forma Financial InformationThe pro forma information set forth below gives effect to our
merger with Forest Energy Resources, Inc. as if it had been consummated as of the beginning of the
applicable period. The merger was consummated on March 2, 2006. The pro forma information has been
derived from the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and the statements of
revenues and direct operating expenses of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. The pro forma
information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different had
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations been an independent company and had the companies always been
combined. You should not rely on the pro forma financial information as being indicative of the
historical results that would have been achieved had the merger occurred in the past or the future
financial results that the Company will achieve after the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30. |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30. |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Pro Forma: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
190,466 |
|
|
$ |
136,052 |
|
|
$ |
505,873 |
|
|
$ |
477,967 |
|
Net income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
36,390 |
|
|
$ |
14,913 |
|
|
$ |
92,622 |
|
|
$ |
71,221 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
8
4. Long-Term Debt
Secured Bank Credit FacilityOn March 2, 2004, the Company obtained a revolving line of credit
with initial advances of $135 million from a group of banks led by Union Bank of California, N.A.
and BNP Paribas. The bank credit facility initially provided up to $150 million of revolving
borrowing capacity, subject to a borrowing base, and a $25 million term loan. The initial advance
was made in two tranches: a $110 million Tranche A and a $25 million Tranche B. The Tranche B loan
was converted to a Tranche A note in July 2004 and all subsequent advances under the credit
facility were Tranche A advances.
The borrowing base is based upon the evaluation by the lenders of the Companys oil and gas
reserves and other factors. Any increase in the borrowing base requires the consent of all lenders.
Substantially all of the Companys assets are pledged to secure the bank credit facility.
Amendments of Secured Bank Credit Facility In connection with the Forest Transaction, the Company
amended and restated its existing secured credit facility on March 2, 2006 to, among other things,
increase maximum credit availability to $500 million for revolving loans, including up to $50
million in letters of credit, with a $400 million borrowing base as of that date; add an additional
dedicated $40 million letter of credit facility that does not affect the borrowing base; and add
MERI as a co-borrower. The revolving credit facility will mature on March
2, 2010, and the $40 million letter of credit facility will mature on March 2, 2009. The Company
used borrowings under its revolving credit facility to facilitate the Forest Transaction and to
retire existing debt, and it may use borrowings in the future for general corporate purposes. The
$40 million letter of credit facility was used to obtain a letter of credit in favor of Forest to
secure the Companys performance of its obligations to drill and complete 150 wells under an
existing drill-to-earn program and is not included as a use of the borrowing base. This letter of
credit will reduce periodically by an amount equal to the product of $0.5 million times the number
of wells exceeding 75 that are drilled and completed. The first reduction of approximately $4.3
million occurred in October 2006 based upon the 83 wells drilled and completed as of September 30,
2006. The Company expects additional reductions based upon quarterly drilling activity, with the
next reduction anticipated in January 2007.
At September 30, 2006, the Company had approximately $328.6 million in advances outstanding
under its revolving credit facility, including two letters of credit for $4.2 million and $10.4
million required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of its offshore fields. The
outstanding principal balance of loans under the revolving credit facility may not exceed the
borrowing base. If the borrowing base falls below the outstanding balance under the revolving
credit facility, the Company will be required to prepay the deficit, pledge additional unencumbered
collateral, repay the deficit and cash collateralize certain letters of credit, or effect some
combination of such prepayment, pledge and repayment and collateralization. On April 7, 2006, the
borrowing base was increased to $430 million, subject to redetermination or adjustment. On April
24, 2006, the borrowing base was reduced to $362.5 million in accordance with an amendment to the
revolving credit facility related to the Companys offering of $300 million of senior notes. For
subsequent qualifying bond issuances, the amendment provides that the borrowing base in effect on
the closing date of such a bond issuance will automatically reduce by 25% of the aggregate
principal amount of such bond issuance to the extent that it does not refinance the principal
amount of an existing bond issuance. The bank credit facility permits the Companys issuance of
certain unsecured bonds of up to $350 million in aggregate principal amount that have a non-default
interest rate of 10% or less per annum and a scheduled maturity date after March 1, 2012. The
Companys sale and issuance of $300 million of senior notes in April 2006 constituted such a
qualifying bond issuance. In October 2006, the borrowing base was increased to $450 million,
subject to redetermination or adjustment.
The secured bank credit facility contains various restrictive covenants and other usual and
customary terms and conditions of a revolving bank credit facility, including limitations on the
payment of cash dividends and other restricted payments, the incurrence of additional debt, the
sale of assets, and speculative hedging. The financial covenants were modified under the amended
and restated bank credit facility to require the Company to, among other things:
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and |
|
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA of not more than 2.5 to 1.0. |
9
The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the secured bank credit facility
as of September 30, 2006.
As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $314.0 million and $152.0 million,
respectively, was outstanding under the secured bank credit facility, and the weighted average
interest rate was 7.16% and 7.15%, respectively.
The Company must pay a commitment fee of 0.25% to 0.50% per year on the unused availability
under the bank credit facility.
Private Offering of Senior Unsecured Notes due 2013On April 24, 2006, the Company sold and
issued to eligible purchasers $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 7 1/2% senior notes
due 2013 (the Notes) pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
Notes were priced to yield 7.75% to maturity. Net proceeds, after deducting initial purchasers
discounts and commissions and offering expenses, were approximately $287.9 million. Mariner used
the net proceeds of the offering to repay debt under the bank credit facility. The issuance of the
Notes was a qualifying bond issuance under Mariners secured bank credit facility and resulted in
an automatic reduction of its borrowing base to $362.5 million as of April 24, 2006.
The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, rank senior in right of payment to
any future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with the Companys existing
and future senior unsecured indebtedness and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to
the Companys senior secured indebtedness, including its obligations under its credit facility, to
the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future
indebtedness and other liabilities of any non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Companys
existing and future domestic subsidiaries. In the future, the guarantees may be released or
terminated under certain circumstances. Each subsidiary guarantee ranks senior in right of payment
to any future subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, ranks equally in right of
payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary and
effectively subordinate to all existing and future secured indebtedness of the guarantor
subsidiary, including its guarantees of indebtedness under the Companys credit facility, to the
extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
The Company will pay interest on the Notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning
on October 15, 2006. The Notes mature on April 15, 2013. There is no sinking fund for the Notes.
The Company may redeem the Notes at any time prior to April 15, 2010 at a price equal to the
principal amount redeemed plus a make-whole premium, using a discount rate of the Treasury rate
plus 0.50% and accrued but unpaid interest. Beginning on April 15 of the years indicated below, the
Company may redeem the Notes from time to time, in whole or in part, at the prices set forth below
(expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) plus accrued but unpaid interest:
2010 at 103.750%
2011 at 101.875%
2012 and thereafter at 100.000%
In addition, prior to April 15, 2009, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the Notes with the
proceeds of equity offerings at a price equal to 107.50% of the principal amount of the Notes
redeemed. If the Company experiences a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the
Notes), subject to certain exceptions, the Company must give holders of the Notes the opportunity
to sell to the Company their Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages to the date of purchase.
The Company and its restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain negative covenants under
the indenture governing the Notes. The indenture governing the Notes limits the Companys and each
of its restricted subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
10
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
|
create certain liens; |
|
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from its subsidiaries to itself; |
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets; |
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
|
create unrestricted subsidiaries. |
Under an Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement executed on April 24, 2006 relating to the
Notes, the Company agreed to:
|
|
|
file a registration statement within 180 days after the closing date of the offering
enabling holders of Notes to exchange the privately placed Notes for publicly registered Notes with substantially identical terms; |
|
|
|
|
use its reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective
within 270 days after the closing date of the offering and to complete the exchange offer
within 360 days after the closing of the offering; and |
|
|
|
|
file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes if it cannot effect an
exchange offer within the time periods listed above and in other circumstances. |
If the Company fails to comply with its obligations to register the Notes within the specified time
periods, it will be required to pay special interest on the Notes. In September 2006, the Company
filed a registration statement with the SEC covering an offer to exchange the privately placed
Notes for registered notes with substantially identical terms. The SEC declared the registration
statement effective in October 2006. The Company anticipates completing the exchange offer in
November 2006.
Costs associated with the Notes offering were approximately $8.5 million, excluding discounts
of $3.8 million.
JEDI Term Promissory NoteOn March 2, 2004, the Company issued a $10 million term promissory
note to JEDI as a part of merger consideration. The note matured on March 2, 2006, and bore
interest, payable in kind at our option, at a rate of 10% per annum until March 2, 2005, and 12%
per annum thereafter unless paid in cash in which event the rate remained 10% per annum. We chose
to pay interest in cash rather than in kind. The JEDI note was secured by a lien on three of the
Companys non-proven, non-producing properties located in the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf
of Mexico. The Company could offset against the note the amount of certain claims for
indemnification that could be asserted against JEDI under the terms of the merger agreement. The
JEDI term promissory note contained customary events of default, including the occurrence of an
event of default under the Companys bank credit facility. In March 2005, the Company repaid $6.0
million of the note utilizing proceeds from the Private Equity Placement in March 2005. The $4.0
million balance remaining on the JEDI note was repaid in full on its maturity date of March 2,
2006.
Cash Interest ExpenseCash paid for interest was $3.1 million and $1.3 million for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, interest payments were $11.5 million and $4.1 million,
respectively.
11
Bank Debt Issuance CostsThe Company capitalizes certain direct costs associated with the
issuance of long term debt. In conjunction with the Forest Transaction, the Companys bank credit
facility was amended and restated to, among other things, increase the borrowing capacity from $185
million to $400 million, based upon an initial borrowing base of that amount. The amendment and
restatement was treated as an extinguishment of debt for accounting purposes. This treatment
resulted in a charge of approximately $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2006. This charge is
included in the interest expense line of the consolidated statement of operations.
5. Oil and Gas Properties
Oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting. All direct
costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of
oil and gas properties are capitalized. Amortization of oil and gas properties is provided using
the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves. No gains or losses
are recognized upon the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties unless the sale or
disposition represents a significant quantity of oil and gas reserves, which would have a
significant impact on the depreciation, depletion and amortization rate.
Under full cost accounting rules, total capitalized costs are limited to a ceiling equal to
the present value of future net revenues (which excludes future cash outflows associated with settlement of asset retirement obligations), discounted at 10% per annum, plus the lower of cost or
fair value of unproved properties less income tax effects (the ceiling limitation). We perform a
quarterly ceiling test to evaluate whether the net book value of our full cost pool exceeds the
ceiling limitation. If capitalized costs (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization) less related deferred taxes are greater than the discounted future net revenues or
ceiling limitation, a write-down or impairment of the full cost pool is required. A write-down of
the carrying value of the full cost pool is a non-cash charge that reduces earnings and impacts
stockholders equity in the period of occurrence and typically results in lower depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense in future periods. Once incurred, a write-down is not reversible
at a later date.
The ceiling test is calculated using natural gas and oil prices in effect as of the balance
sheet date and adjusted for basis or location differential, held constant over the life of the
reserves. We use derivative financial instruments that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities to hedge against the
volatility of natural gas prices and, in accordance with SEC guidelines, we include estimated
future cash flows from our hedging program in our ceiling test calculation. At September 30, 2006, the effects of the cash flow hedges impacted the ceiling test by $209.0 million. Without the hedges, a write-down of the carrying value of the full cost pool of $125.3 million on a pre-tax basis would have been indicated. On an after-tax basis, the write-down would have been $81.5 million.
6. Accrual for Future Abandonment Costs
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, addresses accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the
associated asset retirement costs. The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. SFAS No.
143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an assets retirement obligation be recorded in
the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the
carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then present
value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related
asset. If the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, a gain or loss is
recognized.
The following roll-forward is provided as a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
aggregate carrying amounts of the asset retirement obligation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Abandonment liability as of December 31, 2005 (1) |
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
Liabilities Incurred |
|
|
17.3 |
|
Claims Settled |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
Accretion Expense |
|
|
11.1 |
|
Revisions to previous estimates |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Liabilities incurred from assets acquired (2) |
|
|
165.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment Liability as of September 30, 2006 (3) |
|
$ |
222.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $11.4 million classified as a current accrued liability at December 31, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the fair value of the asset retirement obligation acquired through the Forest
Transaction. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes $52.0 million classified as a current accrued liability at September 30, 2006. |
12
7. Stockholders Equity
Increase
in Number of Shares AuthorizedOn March 2, 2006, the Companys certificate of
incorporation was amended to increase its authorized stock to 200,000,000 shares, of which
180,000,000 shares are common stock and 20,000,000 shares are preferred stock.
Equity Participation PlanWe adopted an Equity Participation Plan, as amended, that provided
for the one-time grant at the closing of our Private Equity Placement on March 11, 2005 of
2,267,270 restricted shares of our common stock to certain of our employees. No further grants will
be made under the Equity Participation Plan, although persons who received such a grant are
eligible for future awards of restricted stock or stock options under our Amended and Restated
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, described below. We intended the grants of restricted stock under
the Equity Participation Plan to serve as a means of incentive compensation for performance and not
primarily as an opportunity to participate in the equity appreciation of our common stock.
Therefore, Equity Participation Plan grantees did not pay any consideration for the common stock
they received, and we received no remuneration for the stock. As a result of closing the Forest
Transaction, all shares of restricted stock granted under the Equity Participation Plan vested as
follows: (i) the 463,656 shares of restricted stock held by non-executive employees vested on March
2, 2006, and (ii) the 1,803,614 shares of restricted stock held by executive officers vested on May
31, 2006 pursuant to an agreement, made in exchange for a cash payment of $1,000 to each officer,
that his or her shares of restricted stock would not vest before the later of March 11, 2006 or
ninety days after the effective date of the merger. The Equity Participation Plan expired upon the
vesting of all shares granted thereunder. Stock could be withheld by us upon vesting to satisfy our
tax withholding obligations with respect to the vesting of the restricted stock. Participants in
the Equity Participation Plan had the right to elect to have us withhold and cancel shares of the
restricted stock to satisfy our tax withholding obligations. In such events, we would be required
to pay any tax withholding obligation in cash. As a result of such participant elections, we
withheld an aggregate 807,376 shares that otherwise would have remained outstanding upon vesting of
the restricted stock, reducing the aggregate outstanding vested stock grants made under the Equity
Participation Plan to 1,459,894 shares. The 807,376 shares withheld became treasury shares that
were retired and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares of common stock. The
Company reduced the number of common shares outstanding and additional paid in capital for this
transaction. We paid in cash the associated withholding taxes of $14.0 million.
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive PlanWe adopted a Stock Incentive Plan that became
effective March 11, 2005, was amended and restated on March 2, 2006 and further amended on March
16, 2006. Awards to participants under the Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan may be made in
the form of incentive stock options, or ISOs, non-qualified stock options or restricted stock. The
participants to whom awards are granted, the type or types of awards granted to a participant, the
number of shares covered by each award, and the purchase price, conditions and other terms of each
award are determined by the Board of Directors or a committee thereof. A total of 6,500,000 shares
of Mariners common stock is subject to the Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. No more than
2,850,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options or as restricted stock can be issued to any
individual. Unless sooner terminated, no award may be granted under the Amended and Restated Stock
Incentive Plan after October 12, 2015.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we granted 796,171 shares of restricted
common stock under the Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2006, 772,593
shares of unvested restricted common stock and options exercisable for 709,400 shares of common
stock (of which 346,736 were presently exercisable) remained outstanding under the Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan, and 4,966,071 shares remained available thereunder for future
issuance to participants.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we granted options to purchase 809,000 shares
of common
13
stock under the Stock Incentive Plan.
Rollover OptionsIn connection with the Forest Transaction and during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, the Company granted options to acquire 156,626 shares of its common stock to
certain former employees of Forest or Forest Energy Resources, Inc. (Rollover Options). The
Rollover Options are evidenced by non-qualified stock option agreements and are not covered by the
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2006, Rollover Options to purchase
108,662 shares of the Companys common stock remained outstanding, of which 2,641 were presently
exercisable.
Accounting for Stock Options and Restricted StockThe Company adopted SFAS No. 123-Revised
2004 (SFAS No. 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, using the modified retrospective application
effective January 1, 2005. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we recorded compensation
expense for the value of restricted stock that was granted pursuant to our Equity Participation
Plan. We also record compensation expense for the value of restricted stock and options granted
under the Stock Incentive Plan before March 2, 2006 and the Amended and Restated Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended, on and after March 2, 2006. In general,
compensation expense will be determined at the date of grant based on
the fair value of the stock or options granted. The fair value will
then be amortized to compensation expense over the applicable vesting
period. We recorded compensation expense
of $9.0 million and $17.6 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $1.1 million and $8.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, related to restricted stock grants in 2005 and 2006 and stock options
outstanding for the periods then ended. As of May 31, 2006, the participants were fully vested in
the restricted stock granted under the Equity Participation Plan and no unrecognized compensation
remains. Under the Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, unrecognized compensation expense at
September 30, 2006 for the unvested portion of restricted stock granted was $13.5 million and for
unvested options was $0.8 million.
14
A summary of stock option activity as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
changes during the nine-month periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period: January 1, |
|
|
809,000 |
|
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
156,626 |
(1) |
|
|
8.31 |
|
|
|
809,000 |
(1) |
|
|
14.02 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(50,600 |
) |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(96,964 |
)(2) |
|
|
12.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period: September 30, |
|
|
818,062 |
|
|
|
13.69 |
|
|
|
809,000 |
|
|
|
14.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding exercisable at end of period: September 30, |
|
|
349,377 |
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for future grant as options or restricted stock |
|
|
4,966,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The options exercisable for an aggregate 156,626 shares were Rollover Options granted
pursuant to the Forest Transaction merger agreement. The options exercisable for an aggregate
809,000 shares were granted under the Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Rollover Options exercisable for an aggregate 47,964 shares and an option exercisable for
40,000 shares granted under the Stock Incentive Plan were forfeited due to terminations of
employment, but are not indicative of a historical forfeiture rate. In-the-money options
exercisable for an aggregate 9,000 shares granted under the Stock Incentive Plan to two
directors of the Company were cancelled on March 31, 2006 and replaced by restricted stock
grants. |
The following table summarizes certain information about stock options outstanding at
September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Range of Exercise |
|
Number |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Price |
|
Exercisable |
|
Price |
$8.81 $17.00 |
|
|
818,062 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.69 |
|
|
|
349,377 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
The following table summarizes certain information about stock options outstanding at September 30,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Price |
|
Exercisable |
|
Price |
$14.00 $17.00 |
|
|
809,000 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options generally vest over one to three-year periods and are exercisable for periods ranging
from seven to ten years. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the quarters
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $2.61 and $2.72, respectively. The fair value of each option
award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses
the assumptions noted in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2006: |
|
|
Amended and |
|
|
|
|
Restated Stock |
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Rollover Options |
Expected Life (years) |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Risk Free Interest Rate |
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
Expected Volatility |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Dividend Yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2006: |
|
|
Amended and |
|
|
|
|
Restated Stock |
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Rollover Options |
Expected Life (years) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Risk Free Interest Rate |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
Expected Volatility |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Dividend Yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
15
The Black-Scholes option valuation model assumptions were for the nine-month and three-month period
ended September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
Plan |
Expected Life (years) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
Risk Free Interest Rate |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Expected Volatility |
|
|
38 |
% |
Dividend Yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of options granted was estimated. The
expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock options
expected life. The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time
of grant. The dividend yield is based on the Companys ability to pay dividends.
A summary of the activity for unvested restricted stock share awards under the Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and changes during
the nine-month period is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares under the |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock |
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Total unvested shares at beginning of period: January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted |
|
|
796,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(22,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unvested shares at end of period: September 30 |
|
|
772,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vested shares at end of period: September 30 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available for future grant as options or restricted stock |
|
|
4,966,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average fair value of shares granted during the period |
|
$ |
19.44 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
A summary of the activity for unvested restricted stock share awards under the Equity
Participation Plan as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and changes during the
nine-month periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares under the |
|
|
|
Equity Participation Plan |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Total unvested shares at beginning of period: January 1 |
|
|
2,267,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267,270 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(2,267,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unvested shares at end of period: September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,267,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vested shares at end of period: September 30 |
|
|
2,267,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available for future grant under Equity Participation Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average fair value of shares granted during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
Private Equity Placement. In March 2005, the Company sold and issued 16,350,000 shares of its
common stock in the Private Equity Placement for net proceeds of $212.9 million, before offering
expenses of $2.2 million, of which $166.0 million were used to redeem 12,750,000 shares of the
Companys common stock from its sole stockholder.
16
8. Commitments And Contingencies
Minimum Future Lease PaymentsThe Company leases certain office facilities and other equipment
under long-term operating lease arrangements. Minimum rental obligations under the Companys
operating leases in effect at September 30, 2006 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
2011 and thereafter |
|
|
2.4 |
|
Hedging ProgramThe energy markets have historically been very volatile, and we expect that
oil and gas prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the
effects of the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on the Companys operations,
management has elected to hedge oil and natural gas prices from time to time through the use of
commodity price swap agreements and costless collars. While the use of these hedging arrangements
limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from favorable
movements. In addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used to assess
and measure the ineffectiveness of our open contracts at the end of each period. If open contracts
cease to qualify for hedge accounting, the mark to market change in fair value is recognized in the
income statement. Loss of hedge accounting and cash flow designation will cause volatility in
earnings. The fair values we report in our financial statements change as estimates are revised to
reflect actual results, changes in market conditions or other factors, many of which are beyond our
control.
The cash activity on contracts settled for natural gas and oil produced during the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was a $3.5 million gain and an $8.3 million loss,
respectively. A $4.4 million and an $8.3 million non-cash gain was also recorded for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 relating to the hedges acquired through the Forest
transaction. Additionally, an unrealized gain of $2.5 million
and $1.4 million was recognized for
the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 related to the ineffective portion of
open contracts that were not eligible for deferral under SFAS 133 due primarily to the basis
differentials between the contract price, which is NYMEX-based for oil and Henry Hub-based for gas,
and the indexed price at the point of sale.
As of September 30, 2006, Mariner had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Fair Value |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Fixed Price |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
644,920 |
|
|
$ |
72.24 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
9,315,000 |
|
|
|
7.97 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
January 1December 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,846,323 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
January 1September 30, 2008 |
|
|
3,059,689 |
|
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
As of September 30, 2006, the Company had the following costless collars outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Fair Value |
|
Costless Collars |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Floor |
|
|
Cap |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
63,480 |
|
|
$ |
32.65 |
|
|
$ |
41.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
January 1December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,032,689 |
|
|
|
59.84 |
|
|
|
84.21 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
January 1December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,195,495 |
|
|
|
61.66 |
|
|
|
86.80 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,851,960 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
January 1December 31, 2007 |
|
|
14,106,750 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
|
11.82 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
January 1December 31, 2008 |
|
|
12,347,000 |
|
|
|
7.83 |
|
|
|
14.60 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of November 3, 2006, there were no hedging transactions entered into subsequent to
September 30, 2006. The Company has reviewed the financial strength of its counterparties and
believes the credit risk associated with these swaps and costless collars to be minimal.
Other CommitmentsIn the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into long-term
commitments to purchase seismic data. The minimum annual payments under these contracts are $22.9
million, $19.5 million and $4.0 million in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. In 2005, the Company
entered into a joint exploration agreement granting the joint venture partner the right to
participate in prospects covered by certain seismic data licensed by the Company in return for $6.0
million in scheduled payments to be received by the Company over a two-year period.
MMS
ProceedingsMariner and a subsidiary own numerous properties in the Gulf of Mexico. Certain of
such properties were leased from the Minerals Management Service (MMS) subject to the 1996
Royalty Relief Act. This Act relieved the obligation to pay royalties on certain leases until a
designated volume is produced. Two of these leases held by the Company and one held by MERI
contained language that limited royalty relief if commodity prices exceeded predetermined levels.
Since 2000, commodity prices have exceeded the predetermined levels, except in 2002. The Company
and its subsidiary believe the MMS did not have the authority to set pricing limits in these leases
and have withheld payment of royalties on the leases while disputing the MMS authority in two
pending proceedings. The Company has recorded a liability for 100% of the exposure on its two
leases, which at September 30, 2006 was $19.9 million. Various legal proceedings are pending concerning this potential liability and further proceedings
may be initiated with respect to years not covered by the pending
proceedings. In April 2005, the MMS denied Mariners
administrative appeal of the MMS April 2001 order asserting royalties were due because price
limits had been exceeded. In October 2005, Mariner filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Texas seeking judicial review of the dismissal. Upon motion of the MMS, the
Companys lawsuit was dismissed on procedural grounds. In August 2006, the Company filed an appeal
of such dismissal. The Company had also filed an administrative appeal of a December 2005 order of
the MMS demanding royalties for calendar year 2004 under the same leases at issue in the April 2001
MMS order. However, the MMS withdrew such order, rendering the appeal moot. Thereafter, in May
2006, the MMS issued an order asserting price limits were exceeded in calendar years 2001, 2003 and
2004 and, accordingly, that royalties were due under such leases on oil and gas produced in those
years. Mariner has filed and is pursuing an administrative appeal of that order.
The potential liability of MERI under its lease subject to the 1996 Royalty Relief Act
containing such commodity price threshold language is approximately $2.2 million as of September
30, 2006. This potential liability relates to production from the lease commencing July 1, 2005,
the effective date of Mariners acquisition of MERI. A reserve for this possible liability will be
made when deemed appropriate. The MMS has not yet made demand for non-payment of royalties alleged
to be due for calendar years subsequent to 2004 on the basis of price thresholds being exceeded.
Insurance Matters In September 2004, the Company incurred damage from Hurricane Ivan that affected
its Mississippi Canyon 66 (Ochre) and Mississippi Canyon 357 fields. Production from Ochre was
shut-in until September 2006, when repairs to a host platform were completed and production
recommenced at about the same net rate of approximately 6.5 MMcfe per day as it was prior to
Hurricane Ivan. Production from Mississippi Canyon 357 was shut-in until March 2005, when necessary
repairs were completed and production recommenced. It
18
subsequently has been shut-in since Hurricane Katrina, with production expected to recommence in
the first quarter of 2007 after completion of host platform repairs. The Company expects to be
reimbursed for costs expended in excess of its annual deductible of $1.25 million plus a single
occurrence deductible of $.375 million in effect for the insurance period ended September 30, 2004.
Through September 30, 2006, the Company has recovered approximately $2.4 million in insurance
proceeds pertaining to damage caused by Hurricane Ivan.
In 2005, the Companys operations were adversely affected by one of the most active and severe
hurricane seasons in recorded history, resulting in shut-in production and startup delays. The
Company estimates that as of September 30, 2006, approximately 12 MMcfe per day of production
remained shut-in and approximately 33 MMcfe per day of production had recommenced since June 30,
2006. The four deepwater projects that experienced startup delays have recommenced production. As a
result of ongoing repairs to pipelines, facilities, terminals and host facilities, the Company
expects most of the remaining shut-in production to recommence by the end of 2006 and the balance
in 2007, except that an immaterial amount of production is not expected to recommence. Actual
commencement or recommencement of deferred or shut-in production will vary based on circumstances
beyond the Companys control, including the timing of repairs to both onshore and offshore
platforms, pipelines and facilities, the actions of operators on its fields, availability of
service equipment, and weather.
As of September 30, 2006, we had paid $72.8 million toward the repair of physical damage caused by
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and we estimate that total hurricane-related repairs during 2006 and
2007 will be approximately $85.0 million. While this is our current estimate of the cost of all
hurricane-related repairs, the ultimate cost cannot be ascertained until we are able to complete
all of the repairs. Approximately $82.4 million of this amount relates to the Gulf of Mexico
assets which Mariner acquired from Forest and which were more directly affected by the path of the
hurricanes than were Mariners historical assets. As a result of the Forest Transaction, Mariner
is responsible for the 2005 season hurricane-related repairs to the
Forest assets and is entitled to
the proceeds from Forests insurance policies applicable to such repairs. Mariners historical
Gulf assets sustained only $2.6 million in physical damage from the hurricanes.
Forests insurance coverage for the hurricane damage is subject to a $10 million deductible.
Forests primary carrier has advised the Company that, inasmuch as aggregate claims resulting from
the hurricanes are expected to exceed the carriers $500 million per occurrence loss limit, the
Companys primary claim pertaining to the Forest assets is expected to be reduced pro rata with all
other competing claims from the storms. To the extent insurance recovery under the primary policy
relating to the Forest assets is reduced, Mariner believes the shortfall would be collectible under
Forests excess insurance coverage. The insurance coverage pertaining to Mariners historical
properties is subject to an aggregate $3.75 million deductible, which we do not expect to exceed
given the limited physical damage sustained by Mariners historical properties.
Taking into account Forests insurance coverage in effect at the time of Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita, we currently estimate our unreimbursed losses from hurricane-related repairs should not
exceed $15 million. Given the magnitude and complexity of the insurance claims currently being
processed by the insurance industry with respect to these two significant storms, however, the
timing of our ultimate insurance recovery presently cannot be ascertained. Although we expect to
begin receiving insurance proceeds early in 2007, we believe that a complete insurance settlement
of all hurricane-related claims may take several additional quarters. As a result, we expect to
maintain a possibly significant insurance receivable for the indefinite future while we actively
pursue settlement of our claims to minimize the impact to our working capital and liquidity.
Effective March 2, 2006, Mariner has been accepted as a member of OIL Insurance, Ltd., or OIL,
an industry insurance cooperative, through which the assets of both Mariner and the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations are insured. The coverage contains a $5 million annual per occurrence deductible
for the combined assets and a $250 million per occurrence loss limit. However, if a single event
causes losses to OIL insured assets in excess of $500 million, amounts covered for such losses will
be reduced on a pro rata basis among OIL members. We maintained our commercially underwritten
insurance coverage for the pre-merger Mariner assets which expired on September 30, 2006. This
coverage contained a $3 million annual deductible and a $500,000 occurrence deductible, $150
million of aggregate loss limits, and limited business interruption coverage. While the coverage
was in effect, it was primary to the OIL coverage for the pre-Forest Transaction Mariner assets.
We have acquired additional windstorm/physical damage insurance covering all of Mariners assets to
supplement the existing OIL coverage. The coverage provides up to $31 million of annual loss
coverage (with no additional deductible) if recoveries from OIL
19
for insured losses are reduced by the OIL overall loss limit (i.e., if losses to OIL insured
assets from a single event exceed $500 million). We have also acquired additional limited business
interruption insurance on most of our deep water producing fields which becomes effective 60 days
after a field is shut-in due to a covered event. The coverage varies by field and is limited to a
maximum recovery resulting from windstorm damage of approximately $43 million (assuming all covered
fields are shut-in for the full insurance term of 365 days).
LitigationThe Company, in the ordinary course of business, is a claimant and/or a defendant
in various legal proceedings, including proceedings as to which the Company has insurance coverage
and those that may involve the filing of liens against the Company or its assets. The Company does
not consider its exposure in these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to be material.
Letters of Credit On March 2, 2006, Mariner obtained a $40 million letter of credit under its
senior secured credit facility that is not included as a use of the borrowing base. The letter of
credit was issued in favor of Forest to secure performance of our obligations under an existing
drill-to-earn program. This letter of credit will reduce periodically by an amount equal to the
product of $0.5 million times the number of wells exceeding 75 that are drilled and completed. The
first reduction of approximately $4.3 million occurred in October 2006 based upon the 83 wells
drilled and completed as of September 30, 2006. We expect additional reductions based upon
quarterly drilling activity, with the next reduction anticipated in January 2007.
Mariners senior secured credit facility also has a letter of credit facility of up to $50 million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2006, two such letters of credit for $4.2 million and $10.4 million were outstanding. These two letters of credit are required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of Mariners offshore fields.
9. Net Income per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Fully diluted earnings per share assumes
the conversion of all potentially dilutive securities and is calculated by dividing net income by
the sum of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus all potentially
dilutive securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
36,390 |
|
|
$ |
6,943 |
|
|
$ |
78,224 |
|
|
$ |
35,563 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
85,493 |
|
|
|
33,348 |
|
|
|
73,270 |
|
|
|
32,438 |
|
Add dilutive securities |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares
outstanding and dilutive
securities |
|
|
85,581 |
|
|
|
34,807 |
|
|
|
73,695 |
|
|
|
33,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per sharebasic: |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
Earnings per sharediluted: |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
Please refer to Note 7 Stockholders Equity for option and share activity for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. Outstanding restricted stock and unexercised stock
options had no effect on diluted earnings per share for the quarter
and a $0.01 effect on the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006.
20
10. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and certain items recorded directly to stockholders
equity and classified as other comprehensive income. The table below summarizes comprehensive
income and provides the components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive income for the
three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
36,390 |
|
|
$ |
6,943 |
|
|
$ |
78,224 |
|
|
$ |
35,563 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts settled and reclassified, net of tax |
|
|
10,432 |
|
|
|
12,509 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
23,401 |
|
Change in unrealized mark to market gains/(losses)
arising during period, net of tax |
|
|
48,904 |
|
|
|
(49,853 |
) |
|
|
92,152 |
|
|
|
(79,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) |
|
|
59,336 |
|
|
|
(37,344 |
) |
|
|
93,658 |
|
|
|
(56,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
95,726 |
|
|
$ |
(30,401 |
) |
|
$ |
171,882 |
|
|
|
(20,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Supplemental Guarantor Information
On April 24, 2006, the Company sold and issued to eligible purchasers $300 million aggregate
principal amount of its 7 1/2% senior notes due 2013. The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed
on a senior unsecured basis by the Companys existing and future domestic subsidiaries (Subsidiary
Guarantors). In the future, the guarantees may be released or terminated under certain
circumstances. Each subsidiary guarantee ranks senior in right of payment to any future
subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, ranks equally in right of payment to all
existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary and effectively
subordinate to all existing and future secured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, including
its guarantees of indebtedness under the Companys credit facility, to the extent of the collateral
securing such indebtedness.
On March 2, 2006, a subsidiary of the Company completed a merger transaction with Forest
Energy Resources, Inc. Prior to the transaction, Forest transferred and contributed the assets of,
and certain liabilities associated with, its Gulf of Mexico operations to Forest Energy Resources,
Inc. Immediately prior to the merger, Forest distributed all of the outstanding shares of Forest
Energy Resources, Inc. to Forest shareholders on a pro rata basis. Forest Energy Resources, Inc.
then merged with a newly formed subsidiary of Mariner, became a new wholly owned subsidiary of
Mariner and changed its name to MERI. The other two guarantors were formed on December 29, 2004,
did not commence operations prior to January 1, 2005 and did not have material operations in 2005.
The net equity of the guarantors was $0 as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005, therefore,
historical information prior to 2006 is not presented.
The following information sets forth our Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, our Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
as of September 30, 2006 and our Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. Investments in our subsidiaries are accounted for on the equity
method; accordingly, entries necessary to consolidate the Parent Company and the Subsidiary
Guarantors are reflected in the eliminations column. In the opinion of management, separate
complete financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors would not provide additional material
information that would be useful in assessing their financial composition.
21
MARINER ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
September 30, 2006
(In thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
100,344 |
|
|
|
63,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,579 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
4,552 |
|
|
|
57,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,586 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
64,458 |
|
|
|
(9,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,265 |
|
Prepaid seismic |
|
|
16,291 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,956 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,149 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
204,298 |
|
|
|
123,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,624 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method: Proved |
|
|
843,821 |
|
|
|
1,374,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,217,982 |
|
Unproved, not subject to amortization |
|
|
116,644 |
|
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
960,465 |
|
|
|
1,378,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,339,279 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
13,465 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,749 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
(188,412 |
) |
|
|
(102,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
785,518 |
|
|
|
1,276,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,061,904 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
958,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
156,393 |
|
|
|
(156,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,750 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
18,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,674 |
|
Other Assets, Net of Amortization |
|
|
20,968 |
|
|
|
7,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,144,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,514,873 |
|
|
$ |
(958,250 |
) |
|
$ |
2,700,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
34,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,806 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
95,792 |
|
|
|
11,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,765 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
100,201 |
|
|
|
29,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,308 |
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
45,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,952 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12,404 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,580 |
|
Intercompany note payable/(receivable) |
|
|
(176,200 |
) |
|
|
176,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
73,273 |
|
|
|
264,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,411 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
53,398 |
|
|
|
117,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,495 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
123,296 |
|
|
|
182,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,756 |
|
Long term debt, revolving credit facility |
|
|
314,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,000 |
|
Long term debt, senior unsecured notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
796,694 |
|
|
|
299,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096,251 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000
shares authorized, 86,269,563 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000
shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,042,544 |
|
|
|
886,142 |
|
|
|
(886,142 |
) |
|
|
1,042,544 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
59,257 |
|
|
|
(7,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,185 |
|
Accumulated retained earnings |
|
|
172,324 |
|
|
|
72,103 |
|
|
|
(72,103 |
) |
|
|
172,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,274,134 |
|
|
|
951,178 |
|
|
|
(958,250 |
) |
|
|
1,267,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,144,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,514,873 |
|
|
$ |
(958,250 |
) |
|
$ |
2,700,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
MARINER ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Mariner |
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales |
|
$ |
84,009 |
|
|
$ |
66,973 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,982 |
|
Gas sales |
|
|
123,930 |
|
|
|
161,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,008 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
210,340 |
|
|
|
228,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
28,073 |
|
|
|
34,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,863 |
|
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
5,205 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
Transportation expense |
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
23,613 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
82,191 |
|
|
|
110,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
141,810 |
|
|
|
148,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
68,530 |
|
|
|
79,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,515 |
|
Earnings of Affiliates |
|
|
72,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
Expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(18,510 |
) |
|
|
(7,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
122,609 |
|
|
|
72,103 |
|
|
|
(72,103 |
) |
|
|
122,609 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(44,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
78,224 |
|
|
$ |
72,103 |
|
|
$ |
(72,103 |
) |
|
$ |
78,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARINER ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Mariner |
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales |
|
$ |
29,775 |
|
|
$ |
33,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,256 |
|
Gas sales |
|
|
53,822 |
|
|
|
72,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,432 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
84,375 |
|
|
|
106,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
12,175 |
|
|
|
16,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,744 |
|
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
Transportation expense |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
6,947 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,577 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
34,064 |
|
|
|
48,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
56,144 |
|
|
|
66,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
28,231 |
|
|
|
39,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,713 |
|
Earnings of Affiliates |
|
|
35,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
Expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(7,961 |
) |
|
|
(3,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
56,226 |
|
|
|
35,719 |
|
|
|
(35,719 |
) |
|
|
56,226 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(19,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
36,390 |
|
|
$ |
35,719 |
|
|
$ |
(35,719 |
) |
|
$ |
36,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
MARINER ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidated Mariner |
|
|
|
Parent Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
129,880 |
|
|
$ |
42,914 |
|
|
$ |
172,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to properties and equipment |
|
|
(266,853 |
) |
|
|
(137,822 |
) |
|
|
(404,675 |
) |
Proceeds from property conveyances |
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
Purchase price adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,808 |
) |
|
|
(20,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(264,841 |
) |
|
|
(158,630 |
) |
|
|
(423,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term note |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Credit facility repayments, net |
|
|
162,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,000 |
|
Debt and working capital acquired from Forest
Energy Resources, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,200 |
) |
|
|
(176,200 |
) |
Proceeds from note offering |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Repurchase of stock |
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
Deferred offering costs |
|
|
(12,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,343 |
) |
Net realized loss on derivative contracts acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,144 |
) |
|
|
(5,144 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709 |
|
Net activity in investments from subsidiaries |
|
|
(297,060 |
) |
|
|
297,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
135,279 |
|
|
|
115,716 |
|
|
|
250,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our business and the
results of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in
conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included in this
Quarterly Report, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005.
Statements in our discussion
may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future production,
revenues and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. Please see Forward-Looking
Statements and Other Information and Risk Factors
in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report for a
discussion of certain risk factors relating to the Company.
Overview
We are an independent oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with
principal operations in the Gulf of Mexico and West Texas. In the Gulf of Mexico, our areas of
operation include the deepwater and the shelf area. We have been active in the Gulf of Mexico and
West Texas since the mid-1980s. As a result of increased drilling of shelf prospects, the
acquisition of Forests Gulf of Mexico assets located primarily on the shelf, and development
activities in West Texas, we have evolved from a company with primarily a deepwater focus to one
with a balance of exploitation and exploration of the Gulf of Mexico deepwater and shelf, and
longer-lived West Texas properties. Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend
substantially on prevailing prices for oil and gas and our ability to find, develop and acquire oil
and gas reserves that are economically recoverable while controlling and reducing costs. The energy
markets have historically been very volatile. Commodity prices are currently at or near historical
highs and may fluctuate significantly in the future. Although we attempt to mitigate the
24
impact of price declines and provide for more predictable cash flows through our hedging
strategy, a substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices or poor drilling results
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows,
quantities of natural gas and oil reserves that we can economically produce and our access to
capital. Conversely, the use of derivative instruments also can prevent us from realizing the full
benefit of upward price movements.
Recent Developments
Material
Gulf of Mexico Discovery In October 2006, we announced a material conventional shelf
discovery in the High Island 116 #5ST1 well, drilled to a total measured depth of 14,683 feet /
13,150 feet true vertical depth. The well encountered approximately 540 feet of net true vertical
depth pay in 13 sands. We anticipate completion and initial production in the fourth quarter of
2006. High Island 116 is part of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations we acquired in March 2006. We
have a 100% working interest and an approximate 72% net revenue interest in the well.
Results of Operations
Offshore
Mariner drilled six offshore wells in the third quarter 2006, all of which were
successful. Information regarding the six successful wells is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected date of |
|
|
Well Name |
|
Operator |
|
Working Interest |
|
Water Depth (Ft) |
|
Initial Production |
|
Location |
GB 195 #1 (Zloty) |
|
Mariner |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
686 feet |
|
TBD |
|
Shelf |
GB 244#2ST3 (Cottonwood) |
|
Petrobras |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
2,119 feet |
|
1st Quarter 2007 |
|
Deepwater |
EI 337 A10 (Mercury) |
|
Devon |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
268 feet |
|
1st Quarter 2007 |
|
Shelf |
HI 116 #5ST1 |
|
Mariner |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
43 feet |
|
4th Quarter 2006 |
|
Shelf |
HI 46#1 ST1 (Green Pepper) |
|
Mariner |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
28 feet |
|
4th Quarter 2006 |
|
Shelf |
WC 132 #1 (Five Forks) |
|
El Paso |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
36 feet |
|
TBD |
|
Shelf |
Mariner has been successful in 17 of the 22 offshore wells drilled
from January 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006. As of September 30, 2006 three offshore wells are
currently drilling.
In
addition, Mariner has been awarded all six blocks on which it
was the high bidder in the Minerals Management Service (MMS) OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sale 198 held on
August 16, 2006. Our cost for the approximately 25,000 net acres covered by the
six blocks is approximately $4.4 million.
Onshore In the third quarter of 2006, Mariner drilled 44 development wells in West Texas,
all of which were successful. We currently have five rigs operating on our West Texas properties.
25
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Operating and Financial Results for the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2006 Compared to the Three
Months Ended
September 30, 2005 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to the Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
Summary Operating Information: |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In thousands except average sales prices and production volumes) |
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
Natural Gas (MMcf) |
|
|
16,630 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
39,298 |
|
|
|
14,508 |
|
Total (MMcfe) |
|
|
22,686 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
54,503 |
|
|
|
22,521 |
|
Average daily production (MMcfe/d) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Average sales prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl) (1) |
|
$ |
62.68 |
|
|
$ |
43.64 |
|
|
$ |
59.58 |
|
|
$ |
40.12 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) (1) |
|
|
7.60 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
Total natural gas equivalent
($/Mcfe) (1) |
|
|
8.36 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
Oil and gas revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales (1) |
|
$ |
63,256 |
|
|
$ |
15,144 |
|
|
$ |
150,982 |
|
|
$ |
53,579 |
|
Gas sales (1) |
|
|
126,432 |
|
|
|
27,823 |
|
|
|
285,008 |
|
|
|
94,913 |
|
Total oil and gas revenues (1) |
|
|
189,688 |
|
|
|
42,967 |
|
|
|
435,990 |
|
|
|
148,492 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
28,744 |
|
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
62,863 |
|
|
|
17,678 |
|
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
Transportation expenses |
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
82,416 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
|
192,222 |
|
|
|
43,457 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
11,326 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
26,726 |
|
Impairment
of production equipment held for use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
25,906 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
56,226 |
|
|
|
10,549 |
|
|
|
122,609 |
|
|
|
53,977 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
19,836 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
44,385 |
|
|
|
18,414 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
36,390 |
|
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
|
78,224 |
|
|
|
35,563 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the effects of hedging |
Production: Production for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2006 averaged 247 MMcfe
per day (22.7 Bcfe total for the period) and 200 MMcfe per day (54.5 Bcfe total for the period),
respectively, compared to average daily production of 66 MMcfe per day and 82 MMcfe per day for the
third quarter and the first nine months of 2005 (6.1 Bcfe and 22.5 Bcfe total for the period,
respectively). The increased production levels in the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 resulted primarily from the acquisition of the Forest assets. Production continued to be
adversely affected by the 2005 hurricane season, resulting in shut-in production and startup
delays.
26
We estimate that as of September 30, 2006, approximately 12 MMcfe per day of production remained
shut-in and approximately 33 MMcfe per day of production had recommenced since June 30, 2006. The
four deepwater projects that experienced startup delays have recommenced production. As a result of
ongoing repairs to pipelines, facilities, terminals and host facilities, we expect most of the
remaining shut-in production to recommence by the end of 2006 and the balance in 2007, except that
an immaterial amount of production is not expected to recommence.
Production in the Gulf of Mexico for the third quarter 2006 increased 369% to 20.3 Bcfe
compared to 4.3 Bcfe for the third quarter 2005, while onshore production increased 35% to 2.3 Bcfe
for the third quarter 2006 compared to 1.7 Bcfe for the third quarter 2005. Offshore production
increased 167%, to 47.7 Bcfe from 17.9 Bcfe for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively, while onshore production increased 46%, to 6.8 Bcfe from 4.7 Bcfe for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Natural gas production
comprised 73% and 72% of our total production for the third quarter and the first nine months of
2006, respectively, compared to 66% and 65% for the third quarter and the first nine months of
2005. The increase in the gas-to-oil ratio was primarily the result of the Forest Transaction.
Oil and gas revenues: For the third quarter 2006, the Company generated total natural gas
revenues of $126.4 million compared to $27.8 million for third quarter 2005. Total oil revenues for
third quarter 2006 were $63.3 million, compared to $15.1 million in the third quarter 2005. Total
oil and gas revenues increased approximately 341% to $189.7 million in the third quarter 2006
compared to $43.0 million in the third quarter 2005.
Total oil and gas revenues
increased 194%, to $436.0 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 compared to $148.5 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005.
Natural gas revenues were $285.0 million and $94.9 million
for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total oil revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 were
$151.0 million, compared to $53.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005.
Natural gas prices (excluding the effects of hedging) for the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2006 averaged $6.92/Mcf and $7.05/Mcf, respectively, compared to $8.67/Mcf and $7.23/Mcf
for the comparable periods of 2005. Oil prices (excluding the effects of hedging) for the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2006 averaged $63.54/Bbl and $62.13/Bbl, respectively,
compared to $60.33/Bbl and $50.17/Bbl for the comparable periods of 2005. The impact of hedges
during the third quarter 2006 increased average natural gas pricing
by $0.68/Mcf to $7.60/Mcf and
reduced average oil pricing by $0.86/Bbl to $62.68/Bbl, resulting in a net recognized hedging gain
of $10.4 million. For the first nine months of 2006, hedges increased average natural gas pricing by
$0.20/Mcf to $7.25/Mcf and reduced average oil pricing by $2.55/Bbl to $59.58/Bbl, resulting in a
net recognized hedging gain of $1.5 million.
The cash activity on contracts settled for natural gas and oil produced during the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was a $3.5 million gain and an $8.3 million loss,
respectively. A $4.4 million and an $8.3 million non-cash gain was also recorded for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 relating to the hedges acquired through the Forest
transaction. Additionally, an unrealized gain of $2.5 million
and $1.4 million was recognized for
the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 related to the ineffective portion of
open contracts that were not eligible for deferral under SFAS 133 due primarily to the basis
differentials between the contract price, which is NYMEX-based for oil and Henry Hub-based for gas,
and the indexed price at the point of sale.
Lease operating expenses (including workover expenses) for the third quarter 2006 were $28.7
million compared to $5.9 million in the third quarter 2005, and $62.9 million for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $17.7 million for the nine-month period ended September
30, 2005. The increase primarily was attributable to the consolidation of the Forest assets and
increased costs attributable to the addition of new productive wells onshore. Lease operating costs
rose to $1.27 per Mcfe in the third quarter 2006 from $0.97 per Mcfe in the third quarter 2005, and
rose to $1.15 per Mcfe for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $0.78 per
Mcfe for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. Continued shut-in production from the
impact of the 2005 hurricanes contributed to the increased per-unit operating costs.
Severance and ad valorem taxes were $2.3 million for the third quarter 2006 compared to $1.1
million for the
27
third quarter 2005, and $5.7 million and $2.5 million for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase was primarily attributable to the
consolidation of the Forest assets and the resulting increased
production. Severance and ad valorem
taxes were $0.10 per Mcfe in the third quarter 2006, a decrease of $0.08 Mcfe from $0.18 per Mcfe
in the third quarter 2005. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, severance
and ad valorem taxes were $0.10 and $0.11 per Mcfe, respectively.
Transportation expenses were
$1.8 million or $0.08 per Mcfe for the third quarter 2006,
compared to $0.2 million or $0.03 per Mcfe for the third quarter 2005. For the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2006, transportation expenses were $4.0 million, or $0.07 Mcfe, compared to
$1.7 million, or $0.08 per Mcfe, for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005. The third quarter
increase in transportation expenses per Mcfe primarily resulted from the consolidation of the
Forest assets and lower offshore production in 2005. Year to date, transportation expenses per
Mcfe remained comparable.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization (DD&A)
expense increased 564% to $82.4 million
from $12.4 million for the third quarters of 2006 and 2005,
respectively and 342% to $192.2 million
from $43.5 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase was a result of increased production due to the consolidation of the Forest assets, as
well as an increase in the unit-of-production depreciation, depletion and amortization rate to
$3.63 per Mcfe for the third quarter 2006 from $2.04 per Mcfe for the third quarter 2005. The rate
increased to $3.53 per Mcfe from $1.93 per Mcfe for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The per unit increase resulted primarily from the increase of offshore
production to 88% of total production at September 30, 2006 as compared to 79% at September 30,
2005 because offshore assets have shorter estimated lives. Another
factor for the rate increase was increased accretion of asset retirement obligations due to the consolidation of the
Forest assets.
General and administrative (G&A)
expenses totaled $7.6 million and $25.1 million in the
third quarter and for the first nine months of 2006, respectively, compared to $11.3 million and
$26.7 million in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2005, respectively. For the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2006, G&A expense includes charges for stock compensation
expense of $1.1 million and $9.0 million, respectively, compared to $8.1 million and $17.6 million
in the third quarter and in the first nine months of 2005, respectively. For the third quarter
2006, stock compensation expense related primarily to new restricted stock grants in 2006 with vesting periods of three to
four years. For the first nine months of 2006, $6.6 million of compensation expense resulted from
amortization of the cost of restricted stock granted at the closing of Mariners private equity
placement in March 2005 and the remaining related to the amortization of new grants. The restricted
stock related to Mariners private equity placement was fully vested in May 2006 and there will be
no future charges related to those stock grants. The 2005 compensation expense relates solely to
the amortization of the restricted stock granted under Mariners private equity placement.
Included in the 2006 G&A expenses are severance, retention, relocation and transition costs related
to the Forest Transaction of approximately $0.1 million and $2.6 million for the third quarter and
the first nine months of 2006, respectively. Salaries and wages in the third quarter and the first
nine months of 2006 increased by $4.6 million and $11.8 million, respectively, compared to year
earlier periods. The increase was primarily the result of staffing additions related to the Forest
Transaction. In addition, the first nine months of 2005 included $2.3 million in payments to our former
stockholders to terminate a services agreement. Reported G&A expenses in the third quarter and the
first nine months of 2006 are net of $4.4 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of overhead
reimbursements billed or received from other working interest owners, compared to $0.7 million and
$3.1 million for the comparable periods of 2005, respectively.
Net interest expense increased 570% to $11.5 million from $1.7 million for the third quarter
2006 and 2005, respectively, and increased 449% to $25.9 million from $4.7 million for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This increase was primarily due
to an increase in average debt levels to $570.0 million for third quarter 2006 compared to $78.3
million for third quarter 2005. Average debt levels were $420.2 million and $81.3 million for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increased debt was
primarily the result of the issuance of $300 million of notes, the assumption of debt in the Forest
Transaction and the use of our bank facility to finance capital expenditures in excess of cash
flows. Additionally, the amendment and restatement of the credit facility on March 2, 2006 was
treated as an extinguishment of debt for accounting purposes, and resulted in a charge of $1.2
million to interest expense.
Income before income taxes increased
to $56.2 million for the third quarter 2006 compared to
$10.5 million for
28
the third
quarter 2005 and to $122.6 million from $54.0 million for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This increase was primarily the result of higher
operating income attributed to the Forest assets.
Provision
for income taxes had an effective tax rate of 35.3% and 36.2% for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, as compared to an effective tax rate of 34.2%
and 34.1% for the comparable periods of 2005. The increase in the effective tax rate
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is primarily a result of the Texas Margins tax, which was enacted during the second quarter of 2006
for all properties residing in Texas. Excluding the effects of the Texas Margins tax, the effective
rate would have been 35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows and Liquidity
Secured Bank Credit Facility In connection with the Forest Transaction, we amended and restated
our existing secured credit facility on March 2, 2006 to, among other things, increase maximum
credit availability to $500 million for revolving loans, including up to $50 million in letters of
credit, subject to a borrowing base; add an additional dedicated $40 million letter of credit
facility that does not affect the borrowing base; and add MERI as a
co-borrower. The revolving credit facility will mature on March 2, 2010, and the $40 million letter
of credit facility will mature on March 2, 2009.
At September 30, 2006, the borrowing base in effect under our revolving credit facility was
$362.5 million, and we had approximately $328.6 million in advances then outstanding, including two
letters of credit for $4.2 million and $10.4 million required for plugging and abandonment
obligations at certain of our offshore fields. In October 2006, the borrowing base was increased
to $450 million, subject to redetermination or adjustment.
During the third quarter of 2006, we utilized our revolving credit facility to fund capital
expenditures incurred in excess of our cash flows, including hurricane repairs. Although we expect
to fund exploration and development capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2006 from
internally generated cash flows, the credit facility may be utilized for such expenditures
exceeding current projections and for acquisitions.
The $40 million letter of credit facility was used to obtain a letter of credit in favor of
Forest to secure performance of our obligation to drill and complete 150 wells under an existing
drill-to-earn program and is not included as a use of the borrowing base. This letter of credit
will reduce periodically by an amount equal to the product of $0.5 million times the number of
wells exceeding 75 that are drilled and completed. The first reduction of approximately $4.3
million occurred in October 2006 based upon the 83 wells drilled and completed as of September 30,
2006. We expect additional reductions based upon quarterly drilling activity, with the next
reduction anticipated in January 2007.
Exchange Offer for Senior Unsecured Notes due 2013On April 24, 2006, we sold and issued to
eligible purchasers $300 million aggregate principal amount of our 7 1/2% senior notes due 2013
pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. Under an Exchange and Registration Rights
Agreement executed on April 24, 2006 relating to the notes, we agreed to:
|
|
|
file a registration statement within 180 days after the closing date of the offering
enabling holders of notes to exchange the privately placed notes for publicly registered notes with substantially identical terms; |
|
|
|
|
use our reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective
within 270 days after the closing date of the offering and to complete the exchange offer
within 360 days after the closing of the offering; and |
|
|
|
|
file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes if we cannot effect an
exchange offer within the time periods listed above and in other circumstances. |
If we fail to comply with our obligations to register the notes within the specified time
periods, we will be required to pay special interest on the notes. In September 2006, we filed a
registration statement with the SEC
29
covering an offer to exchange the privately placed notes for registered notes with
substantially identical terms. The SEC declared the registration statement effective in October
2006. We anticipate completing the exchange offer in November 2006.
Costs associated with the Notes offering were approximately $8.5 million, excluding discounts
of $3.8 million.
Cash
Flows Net cash flows from operations increased by
$37.4 million to $172.8 million from
$135.4 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase was primarily due to increased operating revenues attributable to the Forest assets
acquired.
Net
cash flows used for investing activities increased to $423.5 million from $142.1 million
for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, due to increased
capital expenditures of $117.4 million primarily related to our King Kong and Pluto deepwater
projects as well as development drilling in our West Texas fields and the $70.9 million acquisition
of BPs interests in West Cameron 110/111.
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $251.0 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $8.7 million for the
same period in 2005. Financings in 2006 were primarily used to fund the Forest Transaction, the
West Cameron acquisition and capital expenditures in excess of current cash flows. Mariner also
paid the remaining balance of the JEDI term note on March 2, 2006.
Capital Expenditures During the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, we incurred about
$434.0 million in capital expenditures for exploration and
development activities, with about 39%
($169.1 million) associated with exploration drilling and
activities and 61% ($264.9 million)
associated with development activities (of which about $39.5 million was onshore). In addition, we
expended about $70.9 million on acquisitions (West Cameron 110/111) and an additional $12.1 million on
capitalized overhead and other corporate items. Non-cash capital expenditure accruals of $92.3 million are a component of working capital changes in the statement of cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Our primary market risk exposure continues to be the prices applicable to our
natural gas and oil production. Our sales price is primarily driven by the prevailing market price,
which historically, has been unpredictable and volatile. Commodity prices are currently at or near
historical highs and may fluctuate and decline significantly in the future. Although we attempt to
mitigate the impact of price declines and provide for a more predictable cash flows through our
hedging strategy, a substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices or poor drilling
results could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash
flows, quantities of natural gas and oil reserves that we can economically produce and our access
to capital. Conversely, the use of derivative instruments also can prevent us from realizing the
full benefit of upward price movements.
Commodity Prices and Related Hedging Activities The energy markets have historically been
very volatile, and we can reasonably expect that oil and gas prices will be subject to wide
fluctuations in the future. If an effort to reduce the effects of the volatility of the price of
oil and natural gas on our operations, management has adopted a policy of hedging oil and natural
gas prices from time to time primarily through the use of commodity price sway agreements and
costless collar arrangements. While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the downside risk
of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from favorable movements. In addition,
forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used to assess and measure the
ineffectiveness of our open contracts at the end of each period. If open contracts cease to qualify
for hedge accounting, the mark to market change in fair value is recognized in the income
statement. Loss of hedge accounting and cash flow designation will cause volatility in earnings.
The fair values we report in our financial statements change as estimates are revised to reflect
actual results, changes in market conditions or other factors, many of which are beyond our
control.
The cash activity on contracts settled for natural gas and oil produced during the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was a $3.5 million gain and an $8.3 million loss,
respectively. A $4.4 million and an $8.3 million non-cash gain was also recorded for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 relating to the hedges acquired through the Forest
transaction. Additionally, an unrealized gain of $2.5 million
and $1.4 million
30
was recognized for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 related to the
ineffective portion of open contracts that were not eligible for deferral under SFAS 133 due
primarily to the basis differentials between the contract price, which is NYMEX-based for oil and
Henry Hub-based for gas, and the indexed price at the point of sale.
As of September 30, 2006, Mariner had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Fair Value |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Fixed Price |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
644,920 |
|
|
$ |
72.24 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
9,315,000 |
|
|
|
7.97 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
January 1December 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,846,323 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
January 1September 30, 2008 |
|
|
3,059,689 |
|
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
As of September 30, 2006, the Company had the following costless collars outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Fair Value |
|
Costless Collars |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Floor |
|
|
Cap |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
63,480 |
|
|
$ |
32.65 |
|
|
$ |
41.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
January 1December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,032,689 |
|
|
|
59.84 |
|
|
|
84.21 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
January 1December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,195,495 |
|
|
|
61.66 |
|
|
|
86.80 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,851,960 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
January 1December 31, 2007 |
|
|
14,106,750 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
|
11.82 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
January 1December 31, 2008 |
|
|
12,347,000 |
|
|
|
7.83 |
|
|
|
14.60 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of November 3, 2006, there were no hedging transactions entered into subsequent to
September 30, 2006. The Company has reviewed the financial strength of its counterparties and
believes the credit risk associated with these swaps and costless collars to be minimal.
Interest Rate Market Risk Borrowings under our revolving credit facility mature on March 2,
2010, and bear interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at our option, plus a
specified margin. Both options expose us to risk of earnings loss due to changes in market rates.
We have not entered into interest rate hedges that would mitigate such risk. For the nine-month
period ended and the three-month period ended September 30, 2006, the interest rate on our
outstanding bank debt averaged 7.16% and 7.66%, respectively. If the balance of our bank debt at
September 30, 2006 were to remain constant, a 10% change in market interest rates would impact our
cash flow by approximately $0.4 million per quarter or $1.1 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Mariner, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the
Mariners principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that Mariners disclosure controls and procedures
are effective as of September 30, 2006 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
Mariner in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and
forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
During the three-month period ended September 30, 2006, there were no changes that occurred
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
32
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Please refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
Various statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report), including those
that express a belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements may include projections and estimates
concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, revenues, income
and capital spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as
may, will, estimate, project, predict, believe, expect, anticipate, potential,
plan, goal or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. The
forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report; we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless required by law, and we
caution you not to rely on them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on our
current expectations and assumptions about future events. While our management considers these
expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business,
economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which
are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. We disclose important factors
that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations described in Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. These risks, contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among
other matters, the following:
|
|
|
the volatility of oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
discovery, estimation, development and replacement of oil and natural gas reserves; |
|
|
|
|
cash flow, liquidity and financial position; |
|
|
|
|
business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future development costs; |
|
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital; |
|
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment; |
|
|
|
|
operating costs and other expenses; |
|
|
|
|
prospect development and property acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
risks arising out of our hedging transactions; |
|
|
|
|
marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of weather and the occurrence of natural disasters such as hurricanes,
fires, floods and other catastrophic events and natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation of the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
33
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries; |
|
|
|
|
uninsured or underinsured losses in our oil and natural gas operations; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to our level of indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
our merger with Forest Energy Resources, including strategic plans, expectations and
objectives for future operations, and the realization of expected benefits from the
transaction; and |
|
|
|
|
disruption from the merger with Forest Energy Resources making it more difficult to
manage our business. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Value) of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Price Paid |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
Units) |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
July 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006 (1) |
|
|
164 |
|
|
$ |
17.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 to August 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
164 |
|
|
$ |
17.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These shares were withheld upon the vesting of employee restricted stock grants in connection
with payment of required withholding taxes. |
Item 5. Other Information.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
The merger between a subsidiary of Mariner and Forest Energy Resources, Inc. was consummated
on March 2, 2006. Accordingly, the consolidated balance sheet included in this Quarterly Report
reflects the financial position of the combined company at September 30, 2006 and the consolidated
statement of operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 reflects the results of
operations of the combined company. The following unaudited pro forma combined statement of
operations and explanatory notes present how the combined statement of operations of Mariner and
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations may have appeared had the businesses actually been combined as
of January 1, 2006 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The merger agreement was
executed on September 9, 2005 and provided for Mariner to issue approximately 50.6 million shares
of common stock as consideration to Forest Energy Resources, Inc. common stockholders.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations has been derived from the historical
consolidated statement of operations of Mariner and the statements of revenues and direct operating
expenses of Forest Energy Resources, Inc. The statements of revenues and direct operating expenses
of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations do not include all of the costs of doing business. The
historical Mariner information presented in the unaudited pro forma combined statement of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 excludes the activity related to the Forest
assets as the merger was consummated on March 2, 2006.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations is for illustrative purposes only.
The financial results may have been different had the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations been an
independent company and had the companies always been combined. You should not rely on the
unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information as being indicative of the historical
results that would have been achieved had the merger occurred in the past or the future financial
results that Mariner will achieve after the merger. Please see
Footnote 3, Acquisitions in Part I,
Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for further discussion of the purchase price allocation.
34
Mariner Energy, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations
For the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
Resources, |
|
|
Merger |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Historical(1) |
|
|
Inc.(2) |
|
|
Adjustments(3) |
|
|
Combined |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
213,988 |
|
|
$ |
291,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
505,873 |
|
Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Operating Expenses |
|
|
27,089 |
|
|
|
51,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,854 |
|
Severance
and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
5,205 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,408 |
|
Transportation Expenses |
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
G&A Expenses |
|
|
23,872 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
24,681 |
|
DD&A |
|
|
82,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,797 |
(5) |
|
|
218,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs and Expenses |
|
|
141,088 |
|
|
|
55,235 |
|
|
|
136,797 |
|
|
|
333,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
72,900 |
|
|
|
236,650 |
|
|
|
(136,797 |
) |
|
|
172,753 |
|
Interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
Expense |
|
|
(17,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,786 |
)(6) |
|
|
(28,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
55,694 |
|
|
|
236,650 |
|
|
|
(147,583 |
) |
|
|
144,761 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(20,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,173 |
)(7) |
|
|
(52,139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
34,728 |
|
|
$ |
236,650 |
|
|
$ |
(178,756 |
) |
|
$ |
92,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
34,133,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,637,010 |
|
|
|
84,770,289 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
34,557,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,687,850 |
|
|
|
85,245,547 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Historical Mariner presented excludes the activity related to the Forest assets as the
merger was consummated on March 2, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The Forest Gulf of Mexico operations historically have been operated as part of Forests
total oil and gas operations. No historical GAAP-basis financial statements exist for the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations on a stand-alone basis; however, statements of revenues and
direct operating expenses are presented for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Transaction costs consisting of accounting, consulting and legal fees are anticipated to be
approximately $10.3 million. These costs are directly attributable to the transaction and have
been excluded from the pro forma financial statements as they represent material nonrecurring
charges. |
|
(4) |
|
The pro forma general and administrative expenses do not include costs associated with the
Forest Gulf of Mexico assets. Mariner believes the overhead costs associated with these
operations in 2006 will approximate $6.4 million, net of capitalized amounts. |
|
(5) |
|
To adjust depreciation, depletion and amortization expense to give effect to the acquisition
of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and their step-up in value using the unit of
production method under the full cost method of accounting. |
|
(6) |
|
To adjust interest expense to give effect to the financing activities in connection with the
organization of Forest Energy Resources, Inc. assuming an interest rate of 6.375% based on the
terms of the senior bank credit facility obtained by Forest Energy Resources, Inc. The
interest rates used reflect 30-day LIBOR plus 1.50%, or 6.375% as of September 30, 2006. A
change in interest rates of approximately 10% would result in a change in pro forma combined
interest of approximately $0.9 million at September 30, 2006. |
|
(7) |
|
To record income tax expense on the combined company results of operations based on a
statutory federal tax rate of 35%. |
35
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 9, 2005,
among Forest Oil Corporation, SML Wellhead Corporation, Mariner
Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
2.2*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2006, among Forest
Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy,
Inc., and MEI Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Amendment No. 3 to
Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-129096) filed on February 8, 2006). |
|
|
|
2.3*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006, among Forest
Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy,
Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
2.4*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, among Forest Oil
Corporation, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. and Mariner Energy,
Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April
13, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Mariner Energy, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 333-132800) filed on March 29, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariners
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed
on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy,
Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April
24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party
thereto and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2,
2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources,
Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto from time to
time, as Lenders, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March
3, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.4*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as
Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of
California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and
as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.5*
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender
for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.6*
|
|
Credit Agreement among Mariner Energy Inc., the Lenders party
thereto and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of March
2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed
on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.7*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 and Assignment Agreement among Mariner Energy,
Inc., Mariner Holdings, Inc., Mariner Energy LLC, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of
July 14, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
36
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
4.8*
|
|
Waiver and Consent among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner
Holdings, Inc., Mariner Energy LLC, the Union Bank of
California, N.A. and the Lenders party thereto, dated December
29, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.9*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 and Consent among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner
Holdings, Inc., Mariner Energy LLC, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of February 7,
2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Mariners
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed
on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.10*
|
|
Amendment No. 3 and Consent among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner
LP LLC, Mariner Energy Texas LP, the Lenders party thereto, and
Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of March 3, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Mariners
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed
on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.11*
|
|
Amendment No. 4 among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC,
Mariner Energy Texas LP, the Lenders party thereto, and Union
Bank of California, N.A., dated as of July 14, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Mariners Form
10-Q filed on May 12, 2006.) |
|
|
|
4.12*
|
|
Amendment No. 5 among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC,
Mariner Energy Texas LP, the Lenders party thereto, and Union
Bank of California, N.A., dated as of August 5, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Mariners Form
10-Q filed on May 12, 2006.). |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner
Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc.,
Mariner Energy Texas LP and the initial purchasers party
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners
Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Consulting Agreement between Mariner Energy, Inc. and Ricky G.
Lester, dated effective August 16, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August
17, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Employment Agreement, by and between Mariner Energy, Inc. and
John H. Karnes, dated as of October 16, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
October 18, 2006). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference as indicated. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Mariner Energy, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on November 9, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Scott D. Josey |
|
|
Name: Scott D. Josey |
|
|
Title: Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John H. Karnes |
|
|
Name: John H. Karnes |
|
|
Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
38
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 9, 2005, among Forest Oil Corporation, SML
Wellhead Corporation, Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18,
2005). |
|
|
|
2.2*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy
Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc., and MEI Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Amendment No. 3 to Mariners Registration Statement
on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on February 8, 2006). |
|
|
|
2.3*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy
Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
2.4*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation, Mariner Energy Resources,
Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner Energy, Inc., as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-132800) filed on March 29, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18,
2005). |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto
and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form
8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy,
Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as
Lenders, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.4*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner
Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California,
N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.5*
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy
Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.6*
|
|
Credit Agreement among Mariner Energy Inc., the Lenders party thereto and Union Bank of
California, N.A., dated as of March 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.7*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 and Assignment Agreement among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Holdings, Inc.,
Mariner Energy LLC, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of
July 14, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.8*
|
|
Waiver and Consent among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Holdings, Inc., Mariner Energy LLC, the
Union Bank of California, N.A. and the Lenders party thereto, dated December 29, 2004
(incorporated |
39
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File
No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.9*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 and Consent among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Holdings, Inc., Mariner Energy
LLC, the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of February 7, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File
No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.10*
|
|
Amendment No. 3 and Consent among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Texas LP,
the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of March 3, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File
No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
4.11*
|
|
Amendment No. 4 among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Texas LP, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of July 14, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Mariners Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2006.) |
|
|
|
4.12*
|
|
Amendment No. 5 among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Texas LP, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., dated as of August 5, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Mariners Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2006.). |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC,
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Consulting Agreement between Mariner Energy, Inc. and Ricky G. Lester, dated effective August 16,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Employment Agreement, by and between Mariner Energy, Inc. and John H. Karnes, dated as of October
16, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18,
2006). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference as indicated. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.
40