e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549-1004
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2007, or
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
.
|
Commission file number: 1-3754
GMAC LLC
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
38-0572512
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
200 Renaissance Center
P.O. Box 200 Detroit, Michigan
48265-2000
(Address of principal
executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(313) 556-5000
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non- accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). (Check one):
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
þ
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
GMAC
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
see Note 1)
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
$2,528
|
|
|
|
$2,569
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
5,298
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue before
provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
Servicing fees
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Amortization and impairment of
servicing rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Servicing asset valuation and
hedge activities, net
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
Net loan servicing income
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Insurance premiums and service
revenue earned
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of mortgage
and automotive loans
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
364
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
Total net financing revenue and
other income
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense on operating
lease assets
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Compensation and benefits expense
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
717
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
Preferred interests dividends
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
members
|
|
|
($357
|
)
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
3
GMAC
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$9,657
|
|
|
|
$15,459
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
17,516
|
|
|
|
16,791
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
22,086
|
|
|
|
27,718
|
|
Finance receivables and loans, net
of unearned income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
126,023
|
|
|
|
130,542
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
42,727
|
|
|
|
43,904
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
(3,733
|
)
|
|
|
(3,576
|
)
|
|
|
Total finance receivables and
loans, net
|
|
|
165,017
|
|
|
|
170,870
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
|
25,881
|
|
|
|
24,184
|
|
Notes receivable from General
Motors
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
|
4,930
|
|
Premiums and other insurance
receivables
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
25,520
|
|
|
|
23,496
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$275,132
|
|
|
|
$287,439
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
$106,729
|
|
|
|
$113,500
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
116,998
|
|
|
|
123,485
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
223,727
|
|
|
|
236,985
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
Unearned insurance premiums and
service revenue
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
Reserves for insurance losses and
loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
23,083
|
|
|
|
22,659
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
257,840
|
|
|
|
270,875
|
|
Preferred interests
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members interest
|
|
|
7,745
|
|
|
|
6,711
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
6,816
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
15,066
|
|
|
|
14,369
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred
interests and equity
|
|
|
$275,132
|
|
|
|
$287,439
|
|
|
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
4
GMAC
LLC
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Members
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
capital
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated,
see Note 1)
|
|
|
$5,760
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$15,095
|
|
|
|
$830
|
|
|
|
$21,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
$495
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of unrealized loss for
certain available for sale
securities to trading securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognize mortgage servicing
rights at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006
(As restated, see Note 1)
|
|
|
$5,760
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$15,577
|
|
|
|
$932
|
|
|
|
$22,269
|
|
|
|
$584
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$6,711
|
|
|
|
$7,173
|
|
|
|
$485
|
|
|
|
$14,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
Preferred interests dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$7,745
|
|
|
|
$6,816
|
|
|
|
$505
|
|
|
|
$15,066
|
|
|
|
($285
|
)
|
|
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
5
GMAC
LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
$4,872
|
|
|
|
($1,978
|
)
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available for sale
securities
|
|
|
(11,960
|
)
|
|
|
(5,399
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of available
for sale securities
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of
available for sale securities
|
|
|
9,976
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in finance
receivables and loans
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
(24,943
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of finance
receivables and loans
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
|
32,782
|
|
Purchases of operating lease assets
|
|
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
|
(4,524
|
)
|
Disposals of operating lease assets
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
Change in notes receivable from
General Motors
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Purchases of mortgage servicing
rights, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net
of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of business
unit, net of cash (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,943
|
|
Other, net (b)
|
|
|
(984
|
)
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
11,007
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in short-term debt
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of
long-term debt
|
|
|
13,678
|
|
|
|
23,766
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(26,478
|
)
|
|
|
(26,749
|
)
|
Other financing activities (c)
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(12,782
|
)
|
|
|
(7,469
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,802
|
)
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
15,459
|
|
|
|
15,795
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
March 31,
|
|
|
$9,657
|
|
|
|
$17,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes proceeds from the
March 23, 2006, sale of GMAC Commercial Mortgage of
approximately $1.5 billion and proceeds from repayment of
intercompany loans of approximately $7.3 billion, $250 of
which was received in preferred equity and net of cash
transferred to purchaser of approximately $650.
|
(b)
|
Includes $618 and $558 for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
related to securities lending transactions where cash collateral
is received and a corresponding liability is recorded, both of
which are presented in investing activities.
|
(c)
|
Includes $1 billion capital
contribution from General Motors during the three months ended
March 31, 2007, pursuant to the terms of General
Motors November 30, 2006, sale of a 51% interest in
GMAC to FIM Holdings LLC.
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
6
GMAC
LLC
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
1. Basis
of Presentation
GMAC LLC (referred to herein as GMAC, we, our or us) was founded
in 1919 as a wholly owned subsidiary of General Motors
Corporation (General Motors or GM). On November 30, 2006,
GM sold a 51% interest in us for approximately $7.4 billion
(the Sale Transactions) to FIM Holdings LLC (FIM Holdings). FIM
Holdings is an investment consortium led by Cerberus FIM
Investors, LLC, the sole managing member, and also including
Citigroup Inc., Aozora Bank Ltd., and a subsidiary of The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of
March 31, 2007, and for the first quarter ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, are unaudited but, in
managements opinion, include all adjustments consisting of
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the results for the interim periods.
The interim period consolidated financial statements, including
the related notes, are condensed and are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (GAAP) for interim reporting. These interim
period Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be
read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial
Statements, which are included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
March 13, 2007.
Restatement
of Previously Issued Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
As disclosed in our 2006
Form 10-K
and discussed in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, we are restating our historical Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006, our
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, and our Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Equity for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. This restatement relates to the accounting
treatment for certain hedging transactions under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended
and interpreted (SFAS 133). We are also correcting certain
other
out-of-period
errors, which were deemed immaterial, individually and in the
aggregate, in the periods in which they were originally recorded
and identified. These items relate to transactions involving
certain transfers of financial assets, valuations of certain
financial instruments, amortization of unearned income on
certain products, income taxes and other inconsequential items.
Because of this derivative restatement, we are correcting these
amounts to record them in the proper period.
Share-Based
Compensation Plans
The Compensation Committee approved two new shared-based
compensation plans for executives during the fourth quarter of
2006, which include a Long-Term Phantom Interest Plan (LTIP) and
a Management Profits Interest Plan (MPI). These compensation
plans provide our executives with an opportunity to share in the
future growth in value of GMAC. While the plans were formed in
2006, no grants were made until the first quarter of 2007.
The LTIP is an incentive plan for executives based on the
appreciation of GMACs value in excess of a preferred
return of 10% to certain of our investors during a three-year
performance period. The awards vest at the end of the
performance period and are paid in cash following a valuation of
GMAC performed by FIM Holdings. The awards do not entitle
the participant to an equity ownership interest in GMAC. The
plan authorizes 500 units to be granted for the performance
period ending December 31, 2009. GMAC granted 50 units
on January 30, 2007, and 314 units on March 19, 2007.
The LTIP awards are accounted for under
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)), as they meet the definition of
share-based compensation awards. Under SFAS 123(R) the
awards require liability treatment and, are remeasured quarterly
at fair market value until they are settled. The compensation
cost related to these awards will be ratably charged to expense
over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period
ending December 31, 2009. The quarterly remeasurement
will encompass changes in the market and industry, as well as
our latest forecasts for the performance period. Changes in fair
value relating to the portion of the awards
7
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
that have vested will be recognized in earnings in the period in
which such changes occur. The fair market value of the awards
granted during the first quarter of 2007 was approximately
$78 million as of March 31, 2007, of which
$4 million was recognized as expense in the first quarter
of 2007.
The MPI is an incentive plan whereby Class C Membership
interests in GMAC held by a management company are granted to
senior executives. The total Class C Membership interests
are 5,820, of which 3,703 were awarded on January 3, 2007.
Half of the awards vest based on a service requirement and half
vest based on meeting operating performance objectives. The
service portion vests ratably over five years beginning
January 3, 2008, and on each of the next four anniversaries
thereafter. The performance portion vests based on five separate
annual targets established at the beginning of each year. If the
performance objectives are met, that years pro rata share
of the awards vest. If the current year objectives are not met,
but the annual performance objectives of a subsequent year are
met, all unvested shares from previous years will vest. Any
unvested award as of December 31, 2011, shall be forfeited.
The MPI awards are accounted for under SFAS 123(R) as they
meet the definition of share-based compensation awards. Under
SFAS 123(R) the awards require equity treatment and are
fair valued as of their grant date using assumptions such as our
forecasts, historical trends, and the overall industry and
market environment. Annual performance objectives for periods
after 2007 have not been established. Therefore, awards with
these objectives are not deemed to be granted under
SFAS 123(R) as the terms and condition for vesting have not
been communicated to the participants. Compensation expense for
the MPI shares is ratably charged to expense over the five-year
requisite service period for service based awards and over each
one-year requisite service period for the performance based
awards, both to the extent of awards that actually vest. The
fair market value of the 2,221 awards deemed granted in the
first quarter of 2007 was approximately $12 million, of
which $1 million was recognized as expense in the first
quarter of 2007.
Change
in Accounting Principle
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 48 On January 1, 2007, we adopted
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which clarifies SFAS 109
by defining the confidence level that an income tax position
must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements.
FIN 48 requires that the tax effects of a position be
recognized only if it is more-likely-than-not to be
sustained solely on its technical merits. The
more-likely-than-not threshold represents a positive assertion
by management that a company is entitled to the economic
benefits of a tax position. If a tax position is not considered
more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its
technical merits, no benefits of the tax position are to be
recognized. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 is to
be recorded directly to retained earnings and reported as a
change in accounting principle. The adoption of this
interpretation as of January 1, 2007, did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position. Gross
unrecognized tax benefits totaled approximately
$126 million at January 1, 2007, of which
approximately $124 million would affect our effective tax
rate, if recognized.
We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to uncertain
income tax positions in interest expense and other operating
expenses, respectively. As of January 1, 2007, we had
approximately $116 million accrued for the payment of
interest and penalties. There were no significant changes to the
liability for uncertain income tax positions during the quarter
ended March 31, 2007.
Effective November 28, 2006, GMAC, along with certain
U.S. subsidiaries, became disregarded or pass-through entities
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our banking,
insurance and foreign subsidiaries are generally corporations
and continue to be subject to and provide for U.S. federal,
state and local, and foreign income taxes. With few exceptions,
we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or
foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years
before 1999. We anticipate the Internal Revenue Service
examination of our U.S. income tax returns for 2001 through
2003, along with examinations by various state and local
jurisdictions, will be completed by the end of 2007. As such, it
is possible that certain tax positions may be settled and the
unrecognized tax benefits would decrease by approximately
$11 million.
8
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Statement of Position
05-1
In September 2005 the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of
Position
05-1,
Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition
Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance
Contracts
(SOP 05-1).
SOP 05-1
provides guidance on accounting for deferred acquisition costs
on internal replacements of insurance contracts.
SOP 05-1
defines an internal replacement and specifies the conditions
that determine whether the replacement contract is substantially
or unsubstantially changed from the replaced contract. An
internal replacement determined to result in a substantially
changed contract should be accounted for as an extinguishment of
the replaced contract; unamortized deferred acquisition costs
and unearned revenue liabilities of the replaced contract should
no longer be deferred. An internal replacement determined to
result in an unsubstantially changed contract should be
accounted for as a continuation of the replaced asset.
SOP 05-01
introduces the terms integrated and
non-integrated contract features and specifies that
non-integrated features do not change the base contract and are
to be accounted for in a manner similar to a separately issued
contract. Integrated features are evaluated in conjunction with
the base contract.
SOP 05-1
is effective for internal replacements occurring in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. Adoption of
SOP 05-1
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
SFAS No. 155 In February 2006
the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 Accounting for Certain
Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155). This
standard permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation. SFAS 155 allows an
entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid
financial instrument at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis. The standard eliminates the prohibition on a Qualifying
Special Purpose Entity (QSPE) from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest
other than another derivative financial instrument.
SFAS 155 also clarifies which interest-only and
principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of
SFAS 133, as well as determines that concentrations of
credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the fiscal
year that begins after September 15, 2006. Adoption of
SFAS 155 did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 13-2 In
July 2006 the FASB issued FSP
No. 13-2,
Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of
Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged
Lease Transaction (FSP
13-2), which
amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, by
requiring lessors to recalculate the rate of return and periodic
income allocation for leveraged-lease transactions when there is
a change or projected change in the timing of income tax cash
flows related to the lease.
FSP 13-2
requires lessors to use the model in FIN 48 to determine
the timing and amount of expected tax cash flows in
leveraged-lease calculations and recalculations. FSP
13-2 is
effective in the same period as FIN 48. At the date of
adoption, the lessor is required to reassess projected income
tax cash flows related to leveraged leases using the FIN 48
model for recognition and measurement. Revisions to the net
investment in a leveraged lease required when
FSP 13-2
is adopted would be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings and reported as a change in
accounting principle. Adoption of
FSP 13-2
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 In September 2006
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which provides a
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and requires expanded disclosures about fair value
measurements. The standard applies when GAAP requires or allows
assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and
therefore, does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstance. Fair value refers to the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
arms length transaction between market participants, in
such markets where we conduct business. SFAS 157 clarifies
that fair value should be based on the assumptions market
participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices available
in
9
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
active markets and the lowest priority to data lacking
transparency. The level of the reliability of inputs utilized
for fair value calculations drives the extent of disclosure
requirements of the valuation methodologies used under the
standard. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
years. The provisions of SFAS 157 should be applied
prospectively. Management is assessing the potential impact on
our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
SFAS No. 158 In September 2006
the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, which amends SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions,
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits, SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, and SFAS No. 132(R),
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits (revised 2003). This Statement
requires companies to recognize an asset or liability for the
overfunded or underfunded status of their benefit plans in their
financial statements. The asset or liability is the offset to
other comprehensive income, consisting of previously
unrecognized prior service costs and credits, actuarial gains or
losses and transition obligations and assets. SFAS 158 also
required the measurement date for plan assets and liabilities to
coincide with the sponsors year end. The standard provides
two transition alternatives for companies to make the
measurement-date provisions. The recognition of the asset or
liability related to funded status provision is effective for us
for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007, and the change
in measurement is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. Adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
SFAS No. 159 In February 2007
the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to
measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain
other items that are not currently required to be measured at
fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value for designated
items will be required to be reported in earnings in the current
period. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements for similar types of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the
effect of implementing this guidance, which directly depends on
the nature and extent of eligible items elected to be measured
at fair value, upon initial application of the standard on
January 1, 2008.
2. Restatement
of Previously Issued Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
As previously disclosed in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
subsequent to the issuance of our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31,
2006, management concluded that our hedge accounting
documentation and hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies
related to particular hedges of callable fixed rate debt
instruments funding our North American automotive operations did
not satisfy the requirements of SFAS 133. One of the
requirements of SFAS 133 is that hedge accounting is
appropriate only for those hedging relationships for which a
company has a sufficiently documented expectation that such
relationships will be highly effective in achieving offsetting
changes in fair values attributable to the risk being hedged at
the inception of the hedging relationship. To determine whether
transactions continue to satisfy this requirement, companies
must periodically assess the effectiveness of hedging
relationships both prospectively and retrospectively.
Management determined that hedge accounting treatment should not
have been applied to these hedging relationships. As a result,
we should not have recorded any adjustments on the debt
instruments included in the hedging relationships related to
changes in fair value due to movements in the designated
benchmark interest rate. Accordingly, we have restated our
historical Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
March 31, 2006, our Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2006,
and our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from the
amounts previously reported to remove such recorded adjustments
on these debt instruments from our reported interest expense
during 2006. The elimination of hedge accounting treatment
introduces increased
10
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
funding cost volatility in our restated results. The changes in
the fair value of fixed rate debt previously recorded were
affected by changes in the designated benchmark interest rate
(LIBOR). Prior to the restatement, adjustments to record
increases in the value of this debt occurred in periods when
interest rates declined, and adjustments to record decreases in
value were made in periods when interest rates rose. As a
result, changes in the benchmark interest rates caused
volatility in the debts fair value adjustments that were
recognized in our historical earnings, which were mitigated by
the changes in the value of the interest rate swaps in the hedge
relationships. The interest rate swaps, which economically hedge
these debt instruments continue to be recorded at fair value
with changes in fair value recorded in earnings. We are also
correcting certain other
out-of-period
errors, which were deemed immaterial, individually and in the
aggregate, in the periods in which they were originally recorded
and identified. These items relate to transactions involving
certain transfers of financial assets, valuations of certain
financial instruments, amortization of unearned income on
certain products, income taxes and other inconsequential items.
Because of this derivative restatement, we are correcting these
amounts to record them in the proper period.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of previously
reported and restated net income for the period shown. The
restatement decreased January 1, 2006, retained
earnings to $15,095 million from $15,190 million. The
decrease of $95 million was comprised of a
$191 million decrease related to the elimination of a hedge
accounting related to certain debt instruments and an increase
of $96 million related to other immaterial items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the
|
|
|
three months
|
($ in millions)
|
|
ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Previously reported net income
|
|
|
$672
|
|
Elimination of hedge accounting
related to certain debt instruments
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
Total pre-tax
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
Related income tax effects
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
Restated net income
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
11
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table presents the effects of the restatement on
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. Certain amounts
in the previously reported columns have been reclassified to
conform to the 2007 presentation. The most significant
reclassifications relate to servicing fees; amortization and
impairment of servicing rights; servicing asset valuation and
hedge activities, net; and gain on sale of mortgage and
automotive loans, which were previously included in mortgage
banking income and other income and are now reflected as
separate components of total net financing revenue and other
income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
($ in millions)
|
|
reported
|
|
Restated
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
$2,566
|
|
|
|
$2,569
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
5,702
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue before
provision for credit losses
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
Servicing fees
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Amortization and impairment of
servicing rights
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Servicing asset valuation and
hedge activities
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
Net loan servicing income
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Insurance premiums and service
revenue earned
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Gain on sale of mortgage and
automotive loans
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
Total net financing revenue and
other income
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense on operating
lease assets
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Compensation and benefits expense
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
3,928
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
Income before income tax
expense
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$672
|
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
12
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table presents the effects of the restatement on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 ($ in
millions)
|
|
reported
|
|
Restated
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$17,352
|
|
|
|
$17,352
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
18,269
|
|
|
|
18,269
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
18,171
|
|
|
|
18,171
|
|
Finance receivables and loans, net
of unearned income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
139,395
|
|
|
|
139,407
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
44,770
|
|
|
|
44,770
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
|
|
Total finance receivables and
loans, net
|
|
|
181,254
|
|
|
|
181,266
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
|
32,567
|
|
|
|
32,567
|
|
Notes receivable from General
Motors
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
Premiums and other insurance
receivables
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
24,765
|
|
|
|
24,692
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$303,805
|
|
|
|
$303,744
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
$121,654
|
|
|
|
$122,135
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
124,287
|
|
|
|
124,287
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
245,941
|
|
|
|
246,422
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
Unearned insurance premiums and
service revenue
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
Reserves for insurance losses and
loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
2,725
|
|
|
|
2,725
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
20,032
|
|
|
|
19,760
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
281,266
|
|
|
|
281,475
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,760
|
|
|
|
5,760
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
15,849
|
|
|
|
15,577
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
22,539
|
|
|
|
22,269
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
$303,805
|
|
|
|
$303,744
|
|
|
|
13
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table presents the effects of the restatement on
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity at
March 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Previously
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
reported
|
|
Restated
|
|
Common stock and paid-in
capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, and at
March 31,
|
|
|
$5,760
|
|
|
|
$5,760
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
15,190
|
|
|
|
15,095
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of unrealized loss for
certain available for sale securities to trading securities
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Recognize mortgage service rights
at fair value
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
|
|
|
15,849
|
|
|
|
15,577
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
Transfer of unrealized loss for
certain available for sale securities to trading securities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
21,778
|
|
|
|
21,685
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Recognize mortgage servicing
rights at fair value
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
Total equity at March 31,
|
|
|
$22,539
|
|
|
|
$22,269
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$672
|
|
|
|
$495
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Recognize mortgage servicing
rights at fair value
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
$761
|
|
|
|
$584
|
|
|
|
14
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
3. Other
Income
Details of our other income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Real estate related revenue and
other investment income
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
|
$142
|
|
Interest and service fees on
transactions with GM (a)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Interest on cash equivalents
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Other interest revenue
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Full service leasing fees
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Late charges and other
administrative fees
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Mortgage processing fees
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Interest on restricted cash
deposits
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Insurance service fees
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Factoring commissions
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Specialty lending fees
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Fair value adjustment on certain
derivatives (b)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
|
$1,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Refer to Note 9 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
related party transactions.
|
(b)
|
Refer to Note 8 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
derivative instruments and hedging activities.
|
4. Other
Operating Expenses
Details of other operating expenses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Insurance commissions
|
|
|
$240
|
|
|
|
$243
|
|
Technology and communications
expense
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Premises and equipment depreciation
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Rent and storage
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Full service leasing vehicle
maintenance costs
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Lease and loan administration
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Auto remarketing and repossession
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Operating lease disposal loss
(gain)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
|
$1,246
|
|
|
|
$1,152
|
|
|
|
15
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
5. Finance
Receivables and Loans
The composition of finance receivables and loans outstanding was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail automotive
|
|
|
$39,363
|
|
|
|
$21,410
|
|
|
|
$60,773
|
|
|
|
$40,568
|
|
|
|
$20,538
|
|
|
|
$61,106
|
|
Residential mortgages
|
|
|
61,975
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
65,250
|
|
|
|
65,928
|
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
69,436
|
|
|
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
101,338
|
|
|
|
24,685
|
|
|
|
126,023
|
|
|
|
106,496
|
|
|
|
24,046
|
|
|
|
130,542
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
12,502
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
20,966
|
|
|
|
12,723
|
|
|
|
7,854
|
|
|
|
20,577
|
|
Leasing and lease financing
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
Term loans to dealers and other
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
11,657
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
13,915
|
|
|
|
14,068
|
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
16,281
|
|
Real estate construction and other
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
|
|
|
30,166
|
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
|
|
42,727
|
|
|
|
31,929
|
|
|
|
11,975
|
|
|
|
43,904
|
|
|
|
Total finance receivables and
loans (a)
|
|
|
$131,504
|
|
|
|
$37,246
|
|
|
|
$168,750
|
|
|
|
$138,425
|
|
|
|
$36,021
|
|
|
|
$174,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Net of unearned income of
$5.6 billion and $5.7 billion as of
March 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006,
respectively.
|
The following table presents an analysis of the activity in the
allowance for credit losses on finance receivables and loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance at beginning of period
|
|
|
$2,969
|
|
|
|
$607
|
|
|
|
$3,576
|
|
|
|
$2,652
|
|
|
|
$433
|
|
|
|
$3,085
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
Impacts of foreign currency
translation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Securitization activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Allowance at March 31,
|
|
|
$3,070
|
|
|
|
$663
|
|
|
|
$3,733
|
|
|
|
$2,542
|
|
|
|
$369
|
|
|
|
$2,911
|
|
|
|
16
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
6. Mortgage
Servicing Rights
The following table summarizes activity related to mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) carried at fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value at beginning
of period
|
|
|
$4,930
|
|
|
|
$4,021
|
|
Additions obtained from sales of
financial assets
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Changes in fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to changes in valuation inputs
or assumptions used in
the valuation model
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
359
|
|
Other changes in fair value
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
Other changes that affect the
balance
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value at
March 31,
|
|
|
$5,108
|
|
|
|
$4,526
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value, due to changes in valuation inputs or
assumptions used in the valuation models, include all changes
due to a revaluation by a model or by a benchmarking exercise.
This line item also includes changes in fair value due to a
change in valuation assumptions and/or model calculations. Other
changes in fair value primarily include the accretion of the
present value of the discount related to forecasted cash flows
and the economic run-off of the portfolio, as well as foreign
currency adjustments and the extinguishment of MSRs related to
clean-up
calls of securitization transactions.
The following are key assumptions we use in valuing our MSRs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Range of prepayment speeds
|
|
|
1.0 43.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.0 38.4
|
%
|
Range of discount rate
|
|
|
8.0 13.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.0 14.0
|
%
|
|
|
Our servicing rights primary risk is interest rate risk
and the resulting impact on prepayments. A significant decline
in interest rates could lead to higher than expected
prepayments, which could reduce the value of the MSRs. We
economically hedge the income statement impact of these risks
with both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments.
These instruments include interest rate swaps, caps and floors,
options to purchase these items, futures and forward contracts
and/or purchasing or selling U.S. Treasury and principal-only
securities. At March 31, 2007, the fair value of derivative
financial instruments and non-derivative financial instruments
used to mitigate these risks amounted to $188 million and
$1.5 billion, respectively. The change in the fair value of
the derivative financial instruments amounted to a loss of
$41 million and $381 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is
included in servicing asset valuation and hedge activities, net
in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
The components of servicing fees were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Contractual servicing fees, net of
guarantee fees and including subservicing
|
|
|
$380
|
|
|
|
$321
|
|
Late fees
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Ancillary fees
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$447
|
|
|
|
$374
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007, we pledged MSRs of $2.6 billion as
collateral for borrowings. For a description of MSRs and the
related hedging strategy, refer to Notes 9 and 15 to our
2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
17
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
7. Debt
The presentation of debt in the following table is classified
between domestic and foreign based on the location of the office
recording the transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
$707
|
|
|
|
$1,090
|
|
|
|
$1,797
|
|
|
|
$742
|
|
|
|
$781
|
|
|
|
$1,523
|
|
Demand notes
|
|
|
6,444
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
5,917
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
6,074
|
|
Bank loans and overdrafts
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
6,007
|
|
|
|
7,438
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
|
|
6,263
|
|
Repurchase agreements and
other (a)
|
|
|
21,746
|
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
26,925
|
|
|
|
22,506
|
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
|
|
29,738
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt
|
|
|
30,328
|
|
|
|
12,460
|
|
|
|
42,788
|
|
|
|
30,156
|
|
|
|
13,442
|
|
|
|
43,598
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
15,626
|
|
|
|
14,083
|
|
|
|
29,709
|
|
|
|
20,010
|
|
|
|
15,204
|
|
|
|
35,214
|
|
Due after one year
|
|
|
128,495
|
|
|
|
22,804
|
|
|
|
151,299
|
|
|
|
135,693
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
|
|
158,282
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
144,121
|
|
|
|
36,887
|
|
|
|
181,008
|
|
|
|
155,703
|
|
|
|
37,793
|
|
|
|
193,496
|
|
Fair value adjustment (b)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
$174,434
|
|
|
|
$49,293
|
|
|
|
$223,727
|
|
|
|
$185,856
|
|
|
|
$51,129
|
|
|
|
$236,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Repurchase agreements consist of
secured financing arrangements with third parties at our
mortgage operations. Other primarily includes non-bank secured
borrowings, as well as Notes payable to GM. Refer to Note 9
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
details.
|
(b)
|
To adjust designated fixed rate
debt for changes in fair value due to changes in the designated
benchmark interest rate in accordance with SFAS 133.
|
The following summarizes assets that are restricted as
collateral for the payment of the related debt obligation
primarily arising from securitization transactions accounted for
as secured borrowings and repurchase agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
secured
|
|
|
|
|
|
secured
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
debt (a)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
debt (a)
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
$18,387
|
|
|
|
$16,190
|
|
|
|
$22,834
|
|
|
|
$20,525
|
|
Mortgage assets held for
investment and lending receivables
|
|
|
73,896
|
|
|
|
62,422
|
|
|
|
80,343
|
|
|
|
68,333
|
|
Retail automotive finance
receivables
|
|
|
20,389
|
|
|
|
18,344
|
|
|
|
20,944
|
|
|
|
18,858
|
|
Wholesale automotive finance
receivables
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
4,794
|
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
|
10,583
|
|
|
|
9,865
|
|
|
|
6,851
|
|
|
|
6,456
|
|
Real estate investments and other
assets
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
|
8,025
|
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$136,097
|
|
|
|
$116,998
|
|
|
|
$143,035
|
|
|
|
$123,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Included as part of secured debt
are repurchase agreements of $12.6 billion and
$11.5 billion where we have pledged assets, reflected
as investment securities, as collateral for approximately the
same amount of debt at March 31, 2007, and
December 31, 2006, respectively.
|
18
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Liquidity
Facilities
Liquidity facilities represent additional funding sources, if
required. The financial institutions providing the uncommitted
facilities are not legally obligated to advance funds under
them. The following table summarizes the liquidity facilities
maintained by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
Uncommitted
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
|
Unused liquidity
|
|
|
|
facilities
|
|
|
facilities
|
|
|
facilities
|
|
|
facilities
|
|
|
|
Mar 31,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
Mar 31,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
Mar 31,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
Mar 31,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Automotive Finance operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicated multi-currency global
credit facility (a)
|
|
|
$7.6
|
|
|
|
$7.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$7.6
|
|
|
|
$7.6
|
|
|
|
$7.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
ResCap (b)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. asset-backed commercial paper
liquidity and receivables facilities (c)
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
Other foreign facilities (d)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Total bank liquidity facilities
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
Secured funding facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Finance
operations (e)
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
ResCap (f)
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
105.5
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
|
Whole loan forward flow agreements
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
Other (g)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
Total secured funding facilities
|
|
|
123.2
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
198.3
|
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
129.7
|
|
|
|
117.3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$156.4
|
|
|
|
$148.5
|
|
|
|
$86.5
|
|
|
|
$84.0
|
|
|
|
$242.9
|
|
|
|
$232.5
|
|
|
|
$161.2
|
|
|
$
|
149.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The entire $7.6 is available for
use in the U.S., $0.8 is available for use by GMAC (UK) plc and
$0.8 is available for use
by GMAC International Finance B.V. in Europe.
|
(b)
|
ResCap maintains $3.9 of syndicated
bank facilities, consisting of a $1.8 syndicated term loan
committed through
July 2008, an $875 million syndicated line of credit
committed through July 2008, an $875 million syndicated
line of credit committed through July 2007, and a
$354 Canadian syndicated bank line committed through
December 2007.
|
(c)
|
Relates to New Center Asset Trust
(NCAT), which is a special purpose entity administered by us for
the purpose of funding assets as part of our securitization
funding programs. This entity funds assets primarily through the
issuance of asset-backed commercial paper and represents an
important source of liquidity to us. At March 31, 2007,
NCAT had commercial paper outstanding of $7.6, which is not
consolidated in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
(d)
|
Consists primarily of credit
facilities supporting operations in Canada, Europe, Latin
America and Asia-Pacific.
|
(e)
|
In March 2007 we established a new
$6 variable note funding facility. The facility is available to
fund U.S. dealer floor plan receivables in certain
circumstances, including in the event of GM filing for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.
|
(f)
|
ResCaps primary sources of
secured funding include whole-loan sales, secured aggregation
facilities, asset-backed commercial paper facilities and
repurchase agreements. In addition, ResCaps collateralized
borrowings in securitized trusts totaled $48.8 and $53.3 as of
March 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively.
|
(g)
|
Consists primarily of Commercial
Finance secured funding facilities.
|
The syndicated multi-currency global credit facility includes a
$4.35 billion five-year facility (expires June
2008) and a $3.25 billion
364-day
facility (expires June 2007). The
364-day
facility includes a term out option which, if exercised by us
prior to expiration, carries a one-year term. Additionally, a
leverage covenant in the liquidity facilities and certain other
funding facilities restricts the ratio of consolidated borrowed
funds (excluding certain obligations of bankruptcy remote
special purpose entities) to consolidated net worth to no
greater than 11.0:1 under certain conditions. More specifically,
the covenant is only applicable on the last day of any fiscal
quarter (other than the fiscal quarter during which a change in
rating occurs) during such times that we have senior unsecured
long-term debt outstanding, without third-party enhancement,
which is rated
19
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
BBB+ or less (by Standard & Poors), or Baa1 or
less (by Moodys). Our leverage ratio covenant was 9.5:1 at
March 31, 2007, and we are, therefore, in compliance with
this covenant.
8. Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We enter into interest rate and foreign currency futures,
forwards, options and swaps in connection with our market risk
management activities. In accordance with SFAS 133, as
amended, we record derivative financial instruments on the
balance sheet as assets or liabilities at fair value. Changes in
fair value are accounted for depending on the use of the
derivative financial instrument and whether it qualifies for
hedge accounting treatment.
The following table summarizes the pre-tax earnings effect for
each type of hedge classification, segregated by the asset or
liability being hedged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income statement classification
|
|
Fair value hedge ineffectiveness
loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
($1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of mortgage
and automotive loans
|
Cash flow hedge ineffectiveness
gain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Economic hedge change in fair
value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet securitization
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing operations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
Other income
|
Foreign currency debt (a)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Loans held for sale or investment
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of mortgage
and automotive loans, net
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
Servicing asset valuation and
hedge activities, net
|
Mortgage related securities
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
Investment income
|
Callable debt obligations
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
Other
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Other income, Interest expense,
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
Net losses
|
|
|
($30
|
)
|
|
|
($445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amount represents the difference
between the changes in the fair values of the currency swap, net
of the revaluation of
the related foreign currency denominated debt.
|
20
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
9. Related
Party Transactions
Balance
Sheet
A summary of the balance sheet effect of transactions with GM,
FIM Holdings and affiliated companies is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale investment in
asset-backed security (a)
|
|
|
$438
|
|
|
|
$471
|
|
Finance receivables and loans, net
of unearned income (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale auto financing
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
Term loans to dealers
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Investment in operating leases,
net (c)
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Notes receivable from GM (d)
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable related to taxes due
from GM (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Other
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to GM
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale payable
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Subvention receivables (rate and
residual support)
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
Lease pull ahead receivable
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Preferred interests
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to GM (f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,739
|
|
Capital contributions
received (g)
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
Preferred interest accretion to
redemption value and dividends
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
In November 2006 GMAC retained an
investment in a note secured by operating lease assets
transferred to GM. As part of the transfer, GMAC provided a note
to a trust, a wholly owned subsidiary of GM. The note is
classified in Investment securities on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
(b)
|
Represents wholesale financing and
term loans to certain dealerships wholly owned by GM or in which
GM has an interest.
|
|
(c)
|
Includes vehicles, buildings and
other equipment classified as operating lease assets that are
leased to GM affiliated entities.
|
|
(d)
|
Includes borrowing arrangements
with GM Opel and arrangements related to our funding of GM
company-owned vehicles, rental car vehicles awaiting sale at
auction, our funding of the sale of GM vehicles through the use
of overseas distributors and amounts related to GM trade
supplier finance program. In addition, we provide wholesale
financing to GM for vehicles, parts and accessories in which GM
retains title while consigned to us or dealers in the UK, Italy
and Germany. The financing to GM remains outstanding until the
title is transferred to the dealers. The amount of financing
provided to GM under this arrangement varies based on inventory
levels.
|
|
(e)
|
In November 2006 GMAC transferred
NOL tax receivables to GM for entities converting to an LLC. For
all non-converting entities, the amount was reclassified to
deferred income taxes on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. At December 31, 2006, this balance represents
an overpayment of taxes and was included in Accrued expenses and
other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. At
March 31, 2007, this balance was included in Notes
receivable from GM on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
Amount includes cash dividends of
$4.8 billion and non-cash dividends of $4.9 billion in
2006. During the fourth quarter of 2006 in connection with the
Sale Transactions, GMAC made $7.8 billion of dividends to
GM which was comprised of the following (i) a cash dividend
of $2.7 billion representing a one-time distribution to GM
primarily to reflect the increase in GMACs equity
resulting from the elimination of a portion of our net deferred
tax liabilities arising from the conversion of GMAC and certain
of our subsidiaries to a limited liability company,
(ii) certain assets with respect to automotive leases owned
by GMAC and its affiliates having a net book value of
approximately $4.0 billion and related deferred tax
liabilities of $1.8 billion, (iii) certain Michigan
properties with a carrying value of approximately
$1.2 billion to GM, (iv) intercompany receivables from
GM related to tax attributes of $1.1 billion, (v) net
contingent tax assets of $491 and (vi) other miscellaneous
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
During the first quarter of 2007,
under the terms of the purchase and sale agreement between FIM
Holdings and GM, GM made a capital contribution of
$1 billion to GMAC. Amount in 2006 is comprised of the
following: (i) approximately $801 of liabilities related to
U.S. and Canadian based GM sponsored other postretirement
programs and related deferred tax assets of $302,
(ii) contingent tax liabilities of $384 assumed by GM and
(iii) deferred tax assets transferred from GM of $68.
|
21
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Income
Statement
A summary of the income statement effect of transactions with GM
and affiliated companies is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM and affiliates lease residual
value support (a)
|
|
|
$219
|
|
|
|
$167
|
|
Wholesale subvention and service
fees from GM
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Interest received (paid) on loans
with GM
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Consumer lease payments from
GM (b)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Insurance premiums earned from GM
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on notes receivable from
GM and affiliates
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Interest on wholesale
settlements (c)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Revenues from GM leased
properties, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Derivatives (d)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fee income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental car repurchases held for
resale (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
U.S. Automotive operating
leases (f)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee retirement plan costs
allocated by GM
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Off-lease vehicle selling expense
reimbursement (g)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Payments to GM for services, rent
and marketing expenses (h)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents total amount of residual
support and risk sharing paid (or invoiced) under the residual
support and risk sharing programs and deferred revenue related
to the settlement of residual support and risk sharing
obligations in 2006 for a portion of the lease portfolio.
|
|
(b)
|
GM sponsors lease pull-ahead
programs whereby consumers are encouraged to terminate lease
contracts early in conjunction with the acquisition of a new GM
vehicle, with the customers remaining payment obligation
waived. For certain programs, GM compensates us for the waived
payments, adjusted based on the remarketing results associated
with the underlying vehicle.
|
|
(c)
|
The settlement terms related to the
wholesale financing of certain GM products are at shipment date.
To the extent that wholesale settlements with GM are made prior
to the expiration of transit, we receive interest from GM.
|
|
(d)
|
Represents income related to
derivative transactions entered into with GM as counterparty.
|
|
(e)
|
We receive a servicing fee from GM
related to the resale of rental car repurchases. At
December 31, 2006, this program was terminated.
|
|
(f)
|
Represents servicing income related
to automotive leases distributed to GM on November 22, 2006.
|
|
(g)
|
An agreement with GM provides for
the reimbursement of certain selling expenses incurred by us on
off-lease vehicles sold by GM at auction.
|
|
(h)
|
GM provides us certain other
services and facilities services for which we reimburse them.
Included in this amount are rental payments for our primary
executive and administrative offices located in the Renaissance
Center in Detroit, Michigan.
|
22
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Retail
and Lease Programs
GM may elect to sponsor incentive programs (on both retail
contracts and operating leases) by supporting financing rates
below the standard market rates at which we purchase retail
contracts and leases. Such marketing incentives are also
referred to as rate support or subvention. When GM utilizes
these marketing incentives, it pays us the present value of the
difference between the customer rate and our standard rate at
contract inception, which we defer and recognize as a yield
adjustment over the life of the contract.
GM may also sponsor lease residual support programs as a way to
lower customer monthly payments. Under residual support
programs, the customers contractual residual value is
adjusted above our standard residual values. Historically, GM
reimbursed us at the time of the vehicles disposal if
remarketing sales proceeds were less than the customers
contractual residual value limited to our standard residual
value. In addition to residual support programs, GM also
participated in a risk sharing arrangement whereby GM shared
equally in residual losses to the extent that remarketing
proceeds were below our standard residual values (limited to a
floor).
In connection with the Sale Transactions GM settled its
estimated liabilities with respect to residual support and risk
sharing on a portion of our operating lease portfolio and on the
entire U.S. balloon retail receivables portfolio in a series of
lump-sum payments. A negotiated amount totaling approximately
$1.4 billion was agreed to by GM under these leases and
balloon contracts and was paid to us. The payments were recorded
as a deferred amount in Accrued expenses and other liabilities
in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and are treated as
sales proceeds on the underlying assets, as the contracts
terminate and the vehicles are sold at auction, in recognizing
the gain or loss on sale.
In addition, with regard to U.S. lease originations and all U.S.
balloon retail contract originations occurring after
April 30, 2006, that remained with us after the
consummation of the Sale Transactions, GM agreed to begin
payment of the present value of the expected residual support
owed to us at the time of contract origination as opposed to
after contract termination at the time of sale of the related
vehicle. The residual support amount GM actually owes us is
trued up as the leases actually terminate and, in
cases where the estimate was incorrect, GM may be obligated to
pay us, or we may be obligated to reimburse GM, under the terms
of the residual support program. For the affected contracts
originated through March 2007, GM paid or agreed to pay us a
total of $280 million in 2007.
Based on the March 31, 2007, outstanding U.S. operating
lease portfolio, the additional maximum amount that could be
paid by GM under the residual support programs is approximately
$427 million and would only be paid in the unlikely event
that the proceeds from the entire portfolio of lease assets were
lower than both the contractual residual value and our standard
residual rates. Based on the March 31, 2007, outstanding
U.S. operating lease portfolio, the maximum amount that
could be paid under the risk sharing arrangements is
approximately $599 million and would only be paid in the
unlikely event that the proceeds from all outstanding lease
vehicles were lower than our standard residual rates.
Retail and lease contracts acquired by us that included rate and
residual subvention from GM, payable directly or indirectly to
GM dealers as a percent of total new retail and lease contracts
acquired, are noted in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
GM and affiliates subvented
contracts acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American operations
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
89%
|
|
International operations (a)
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The decrease in 2007 is primarily
due to a price repositioning in Mexico which improved the
competitiveness of
non-subvented products and increased Mexicos retail
penetration by 3% in comparison with 2006 levels.
|
As a result of GM sponsored rate incentive programs, our North
American operations recognized $373 million and
$381 million in consumer financing revenue as yield
adjustments on GM subvented retail loans for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
23
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Other
We have entered into various services agreements with GM that
are designed to document and maintain the current and historical
relationship between us. We are required to pay GM fees in
connection with certain of these agreements related to our
financing of GM consumers and dealers in certain parts of the
world.
GM also provides payment guarantees on certain commercial assets
we have outstanding with certain third-party customers. As of
March 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006, commercial
obligations guaranteed by GM were $129 million and
$216 million, respectively. In addition, we have a
consignment arrangement with GM for commercial inventories in
Europe. As of March 31, 2007, and December 31, 2006,
commercial inventories related to this arrangement were
$142 million and $151 million, respectively, and are
reflected in Other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet.
In addition, we may enter into various transactions with
companies that are affiliated with FIM Holdings. At
March 31, 2007, we had $278 million in outstanding
commercial receivables and approximately $7 million of
related revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, from
warehouse loans provided in our mortgage operations with Aegis
Mortgage Corporation, an affiliate of FIM Holdings. In addition,
we are a party to various other immaterial transactions with
other companies that are affiliated or associated with FIM
Holdings.
24
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
10. Segment
Information
Financial results for our reporting segments are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Finance Operations (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
American
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Operations
|
|
Operations (b)
|
|
ResCap
|
|
Operations
|
|
Other (c)
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue before
provision for credit losses
|
|
|
$946
|
|
|
|
$445
|
|
|
|
$173
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
$1,625
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
Total net financing revenue (loss)
and other income
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$305
|
|
|
|
$91
|
|
|
|
($910
|
)
|
|
|
$143
|
|
|
|
$66
|
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$124,273
|
|
|
|
$25,125
|
|
|
|
$121,244
|
|
|
|
$12,878
|
|
|
|
($8,388
|
)
|
|
|
$275,132
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue before
provision for credit losses
|
|
|
$1,031
|
|
|
|
$402
|
|
|
|
$265
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$193
|
|
|
|
$1,891
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2,899
|
|
|
|
Total net financing revenue and
other income
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
717
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$57
|
|
|
|
$129
|
|
|
|
$201
|
|
|
|
$129
|
|
|
|
($21
|
)
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$155,382
|
|
|
|
$27,168
|
|
|
|
$121,914
|
|
|
|
$13,739
|
|
|
|
($14,459
|
)
|
|
|
$303,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
North American Operations consist
of automotive financing in the U.S. and Canada and certain
corporate activities. International Operations consists of
automotive financing and full service leasing in all other
countries and Puerto Rico through March 31, 2006. Beginning
April 1, 2006, Puerto Rico has been included in North
American Operations.
|
(b)
|
Amounts include intra-segment
eliminations between the North American Operations and
International Operations.
|
(c)
|
Represents our Commercial Finance
business, equity interest in Capmark, certain corporate
activities related to mortgage activities, and reclassifications
and elimination between the reporting segments.
|
25
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
Results of Operations
Overview
GMAC is a leading independent global diversified financial
services firm with approximately $275 billion of assets and
operations in approximately 40 countries. Founded in 1919 as a
wholly owned subsidiary of General Motors Corporation (General
Motors or GM), GMAC was originally established to provide GM
dealers with the automotive financing necessary for the dealers
to acquire and maintain vehicle inventories and to provide
retail customers the means by which to finance vehicle purchases
through GM dealers. On November 30, 2006, GM sold a 51%
interest in us for approximately $7.4 billion (the Sale
Transactions) to FIM Holdings LLC (FIM Holdings), an investment
consortium led by Cerberus FIM Investors, LLC, the sole managing
member, and also including Citigroup Inc., Aozora Bank Ltd. and
a subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Our products and services have expanded beyond automotive
financing as we currently operate in the following lines of
business Automotive Finance, Mortgage (Residential
Capital, LLC or ResCap) and Insurance. The following table
summarizes the operating results of each line of business for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Operating
results for each of the lines of business are more fully
described in the MD&A sections that follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007-2006
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
% change
|
|
Net financing revenue and other
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Finance
|
|
$
|
2,143
|
|
|
$
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
ResCap
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Insurance
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Finance
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
ResCap
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Insurance
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Automotive Finance operations offer a wide range of
financial services and products (directly and indirectly) to
retail automotive consumers, automotive dealerships and other
commercial businesses. Our Automotive Finance operations are
comprised of two separate reporting segments North
American Automotive Finance Operations and International
Automotive Finance Operations. The products and services offered
by our Automotive Finance operations include the purchase of
retail installment sales contracts and leases, offering of term
loans, dealer floor plan financing and other lines of credit to
dealers, fleet leasing and vehicle remarketing services. While
most of our operations focus on prime automotive financing to
and through GM or GM affiliated dealers, our Nuvell operation,
which is part of our North American Automotive Finance
Operations, focuses on nonprime automotive financing to
GM-affiliated and non-GM dealers. Our Nuvell operation also
provides private-label automotive financing. In addition, our
Automotive Financing operations utilize asset securitization and
whole loan sales as a critical component of our diversified
funding strategy.
|
|
|
Our ResCap operations engage in the origination, purchase,
servicing, sale and securitization of consumer (i.e.,
residential) and mortgage loans and mortgage-related products
(e.g., real estate services). Typically, mortgage loans are
originated and sold to investors in the secondary market,
including securitization transactions in which the assets are
legally sold but are accounted for as secured financings. In
March 2005 we transferred ownership of GMAC Residential and
GMAC-RFC to a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary holding
company, ResCap. As part of this transfer of ownership, certain
agreements were put in place between ResCap and us that restrict
ResCaps ability to declare dividends or prepay
subordinated indebtedness owed to us. While we believe the
restructuring of these operations and the agreements between
ResCap and us allow ResCap to access more attractive sources of
capital, the agreements inhibit our ability to return funds for
dividends and debt payments. For additional information,
|
26
|
|
|
please refer to ResCaps Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2006, filed separately
with the SEC, which report is not deemed incorporated into any
of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Our Insurance operations offer automobile service contracts and
underwrite personal automobile insurance coverage (ranging from
preferred to non-standard risks) and selected commercial
insurance and reinsurance coverage. We are a leading provider of
automotive extended service contracts with mechanical breakdown
and maintenance coverages. Our automotive extended service
contracts offer vehicle owners and lessees mechanical repair
protection and roadside assistance for new and used vehicles
beyond the manufacturers new vehicle warranty. We
underwrite and market non-standard, standard and preferred risk
physical damage and liability insurance coverages for passenger
automobiles, motorcycles, recreational vehicles and commercial
automobiles through independent agency, direct response and
internet channels. Additionally, we market private-label
insurance through a long-term agency relationship with Homesite
Insurance, a national provider of home insurance products. We
provide commercial insurance, primarily covering dealers
wholesale vehicle inventory, and reinsurance products.
Internationally, ABA Seguros provides certain commercial
business insurance exclusively in Mexico.
|
|
|
Other operations consist of our Commercial Finance Group, an
equity investment in Capmark (our former commercial mortgage
operations), certain corporate activities and reclassifications
and elimination between the reporting segments.
|
Restatement
of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, we restated our historical
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006,
our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, and our
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. This restatement relates
to the accounting treatment for certain hedging transactions
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended and interpreted (SFAS 133). We
also corrected certain other
out-of-period
errors, which were deemed immaterial, individually and in the
aggregate, in the periods in which they were originally recorded
and identified. These items relate to transactions involving
certain transfers of financial assets, valuations of certain
financial instruments, amortization of unearned income on
certain products, income taxes and other inconsequential items.
Because of this derivative restatement, we corrected these
amounts to record them in the proper period.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of previously
reported and restated net income for the period shown. The
restatement decreased January 1, 2006, retained earnings to
$15,095 million from $15,190 million. The decrease of
$95 million was comprised of a $191 million decrease
related to the elimination of a hedge accounting related to
certain debt instruments and an increase of $96 million
related to other immaterial items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the three months
|
($ in millions)
|
|
ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Previously reported net income
|
|
|
$672
|
|
Elimination of hedge accounting
related to certain debt instruments
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
Total pre-tax
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
Related income tax effects
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
Restated net income
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
As a result of a review of our hedge documentation for certain
fair value hedges, management concluded that such documentation
and hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies related to
particular hedges of callable fixed rate debt instruments
funding our North American Automotive Finance operations did not
satisfy the requirements of SFAS 133. One of the
requirements of SFAS 133 is that hedge accounting is
appropriate only for those hedging relationships for which a
company has a sufficiently documented
27
expectation that such relationships will be highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows
attributable to the risk being hedged at the inception of the
hedging relationship. To determine whether transactions continue
to satisfy this requirement, companies must periodically assess
and document the effectiveness of hedging relationships both
prospectively and retrospectively.
Management determined that hedge accounting treatment should not
have been applied to these hedging relationships. As a result,
we should not have recorded any adjustments on the debt
instruments included in the hedging relationships related to
changes in fair value due to movements in the designated
benchmark interest rate. Accordingly, we have restated our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006,
our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, and our
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, from the amounts
previously reported to remove such recorded adjustments on these
debt instruments from our reported interest expense during the
affected years. The elimination of hedge accounting treatment
introduces increased funding cost volatility in our restated
results. The changes in the fair value of fixed rate debt
previously recorded were affected by changes in the designated
benchmark interest rate (LIBOR). Prior to the restatement,
adjustments to record increases in the value of this debt
occurred in periods when interest rates declined, and
adjustments to record decreases in value were made in periods
when interest rates rose. As a result, changes in the benchmark
interest rates caused volatility in the debts fair value
adjustments that were recognized in our historical earnings,
which were mitigated by the changes in the value of the interest
rate swaps in the hedge relationships. The interest rate swaps,
which economically hedge these debt instruments, continue to be
recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in
earnings.
The accompanying MD&A considers the effects of this
restatement described above and described in Notes 1 and 2
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our consolidated operating
results for the periods indicated. Refer to the reporting
segment sections for a more complete discussion of operating
results by line of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007-2006
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
$5,298
|
|
|
|
$5,705
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,673
|
)
|
|
|
(3,814
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Net loan servicing income
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Insurance premiums and service
revenue
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of mortgage
and automotive loans
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net financing revenue and
other income
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Depreciation expense on operating
leases
|
|
|
(1,081
|
)
|
|
|
(1,440
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
|
$495
|
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
We reported a net loss of $305 million in the first quarter
of 2007, as compared to the first quarter 2006 net income of
$495 million. This reflects strong earnings in the global
automotive finance and insurance businesses that provided
earnings support for our ResCap business, which was adversely
affected by a decline in the residential housing market and
deterioration in the nonprime securitization market in the U.S.
Total financing revenue decreased by 7% in the first three
months of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006, primarily
due to decreases in operating lease income. Operating lease
income declined 19% due to a
28
reduction in our operating lease portfolio which was primarily
driven by the transfer of operating lease assets to GM during
November 2006 as part of the Sale Transactions. Similarly,
depreciation expense decreased 25% during the same period as a
result of these reductions in our operating lease portfolio.
Interest expense decreased slightly in 2007 compared to 2006.
The decrease resulted from the reduction in cash and cash
equivalents and our repurchase of deferred interest debentures
during the third quarter of 2006. This decrease was partially
offset by an increase in market interest rates. The provision
for credit losses increased 310% as compared to 2006. The
increase was primarily due to higher delinquencies at ResCap,
attributable to general economic conditions including slower
home price appreciation and deterioration in nonprime credit
performance.
(Loss) gain on sale of mortgage and automotive loans decreased
by 110% in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decline in fair value of our nonprime and
prime second-lien delinquent loans held for sale at ResCap. The
pricing for these mortgage loans declined significantly in the
fourth quarter of 2006 and continued into the first quarter of
2007, as our ability to securitize these loans was severely
restricted as investor uncertainty grew in regards to the
performance of these loans. This trend was partially offset by
gains on sale from the securitization activity of our auto
finance business.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses improved slightly
in 2007 compared to 2006 driven by favorable loss trends
experienced in extended service contract business as well as
decreased losses in our domestic personal lines.
Our consolidated tax expense for the first quarter of 2007 is
$150 million, a decrease of 32% from the first quarter of
2006, primarily due to the mix of earnings in limited liability
company (LLC) and non-LLC entities. Results for the first
quarter of 2007 reflect a change in tax status for certain of
our subsidiaries due to the conversion of a number of our
unregulated U.S. subsidiaries to flow-through LLCs in
conjunction with the Sale Transaction. These domestic
subsidiaries are generally not taxed at the entity level and,
therefore, our effective tax rate on a consolidated basis is
significantly higher in the first quarter of 2007 than the same
period in 2006. The primary reason for this is that the majority
of the net loss at ResCap is attributable to its LLCs and no tax
benefits for these losses are recorded. Excluding ResCap, the
consolidated effective tax rate is approximately 14%, which
represents the provision for taxes at our non-LLC subsidiaries
combined with taxable income that is not subject to tax at our
LLC subsidiaries. The effective tax rates applicable to our
non-LLC subsidiaries remain comparable with 2006.
29
Automotive
Finance Operations
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results of our
Automotive Finance operations for the periods indicated. The
amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and
transactions with our other reporting segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007-2006
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
$1,386
|
|
|
|
$1,430
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,945
|
)
|
|
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Servicing fees
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Net gains on the sale of loans
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net automotive financing
revenue and other income
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Depreciation expense on operating
leases
|
|
|
(1,081
|
)
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$396
|
|
|
|
$186
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$149,398
|
|
|
|
$182,550
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
Automotive Finance operations net income increased 113% for the
first quarter of 2007. These results reflect improved margins in
North America, despite continued margin pressure overseas. The
improvement in North America is due to an increase in servicing
income related to the growth in our whole loan serviced
portfolio and lower debt levels due to the continued use of
whole loan sales, and a favorable mark to market effect of
$59 million related to the accounting treatment for certain
derivative activities.
Total financing revenue decreased 10% in the first quarter of
2007, as compared to the prior year. The decrease in consumer
revenue is consistent with the reduction in consumer asset
levels as a result of continued whole loan sale activity.
Consumer finance receivables declined by $5 billion, or
approximately 8%, since March 31, 2006. Operating lease
revenue (along with the related depreciation expense) decreased
year over year consistent with the decrease in the size of the
operating lease portfolio (approximately 20% since
March 2006), as a result of the dividend of certain
operating lease assets to GM pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Sale Transactions.
Interest expense decreased 15% for the first quarter of 2007 as
compared to the first quarter of 2006. This reduction was
primarily due to lower levels of outstanding debt and the
favorable impact of the mark to market on certain cancelable
swaps which economically hedge callable debt. Our provision for
credit losses increased $128 million during the first
quarter of 2007, as compared to the same period during the
2006 year. The increase in the provision is consistent with
the increase in our delinquency experience and reflects higher
loss frequency and loss severity.
Net gains on the sale of loans increased 267% for the first
three months of 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006.
The increase was primarily the result of higher gains on the
sale of retail installment contracts in the first quarter of
2007, as compared to the same period in 2006, despite a decrease
in volume. Automotive Finance operations continue to utilize
asset securitization and whole loan sales as a critical
component of our diversified funding strategy. As a result of
the growth in the whole loan serviced portfolio, servicing fees
increased 90% during the first quarter of 2007, as compared to
the same period in 2006.
30
Investment income increased 10% for the first three months of
2007, as compared to the same period in 2006. The increase was
largely a result of higher short-term interest rates and asset
balances in 2007. Other income decreased 32% in comparison to
the first quarter of 2006 due to lower revenue on GM loans and
intercompany loans due to lower lending levels.
Total income tax expense decreased by $42 million for the
first three months of 2007, as compared to the same period in
2006, primarily due to our election to be treated as a
disregarded or pass-through entity in connection with our
conversion to an LLC during the third quarter of 2006. As a
result of the conversion, a federal tax provision is no longer
required for the majority of the Automotive Finance operations.
Automotive
Financing Volume
The following table summarizes our new and used vehicle consumer
and wholesale financing volume and our share of GM consumer and
wholesale volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of
|
|
|
|
GMAC volume
|
|
|
|
GM sales
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
(units in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Consumer automotive
financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM new vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail contracts
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
Total North America
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
45%
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
International (retail contracts
and leases)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
Total GM new units financed
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
Non-GM new units financed
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used units financed
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer automotive
financing volume
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale financing of new
vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
73%
|
|
|
|
76%
|
|
International
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
89%
|
|
|
|
89%
|
|
Total GM units financed
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
|
77%
|
|
|
|
82%
|
|
Non-GM units financed
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale volume
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our consumer automotive financing volume and penetration levels
are significantly impacted by the nature, timing and extent of
GMs use of rate, residual and other financing incentives
for marketing purposes on consumer retail automotive contracts
and leases. Our penetration levels were slightly lower in 2007
than what was experienced in 2006, mainly due to a decline in
the use of incentive programs by GM. Our International
operations consumer penetration levels were flat in 2007
compared to 2006.
31
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The following table summarizes activity related to the consumer
allowance for credit losses for our Automotive Finance
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
$1,618
|
|
|
|
$86
|
|
|
|
$1,704
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
$1,410
|
|
|
|
$71
|
|
|
|
$1,481
|
|
|
|
Allowance coverage (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
(a) Represents the related
allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total on-balance
sheet automotive contracts.
The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of the total
on-balance sheet consumer portfolio has experienced an increase
in comparison with the first quarter of 2006. The increase was
related to a slight increase in loss frequency and severity of
our consumer portfolio for North American operations, compared
to 2006 levels.
The consumer allowance for credit losses was $1,410 million
and $1,463 million as of March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The consumer portfolio incurred net charge-offs of
$187 million and $185 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Decreases in
the level of allowance from 2006 levels are reflective of
proportional decreases in the on-balance sheet consumer
portfolio over the same period.
Consumer
Credit
The following tables summarize pertinent loss experience in the
consumer managed and on-balance sheet automotive retail contract
portfolios. The managed portfolio includes retail receivables
held on-balance sheet for investment and off-balance sheet
receivables. The off-balance sheet portion of the managed
portfolio includes receivables securitized and sold that we
continue to service and in which we retain an interest or risk
of loss but excludes securitized and sold finance receivables
that we continue to service but in which we retain no interest
or risk of loss. The process of creating a pool of retail
finance receivables for securitization or sale typically
excludes accounts that are greater than 30 days delinquent
at such time. In addition, the process involves selecting from a
pool of receivables that are currently outstanding and,
therefore, represent seasoned accounts. A seasoned portfolio
that excludes delinquent accounts historically results in better
credit performance in the managed portfolio than in the
on-balance sheet portfolio of retail finance receivables. In
addition, the current off-balance sheet transactions are
comprised mainly of subvented rate retail finance receivables,
which generally attract customers with higher credit quality (or
otherwise cash purchasers) than customers typically associated
with non-subvented receivables.
We believe that the disclosure of the credit experience of the
managed portfolio presents a more complete presentation of our
risk of loss in the underlying assets (typically in the form of
a subordinated retained interest). Consistent with the
presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, retail
contracts
32
presented in the table represent the principal balance of the
finance receivables discounted for any unearned rate support
received from GM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Charge-offs,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retail
|
|
|
net of
|
|
|
Annualized net
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
contracts
|
|
|
recoveries (a)
|
|
|
charge-off
rate (b)
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$50,134
|
|
|
|
$162
|
|
|
|
$164
|
|
|
|
1.29%
|
|
|
|
1.21%
|
|
International
|
|
|
16,318
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.66%
|
|
|
|
0.73%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
$66,452
|
|
|
|
$189
|
|
|
|
$191
|
|
|
|
1.14%
|
|
|
|
1.11%
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$44,047
|
|
|
|
$157
|
|
|
|
$159
|
|
|
|
1.43%
|
|
|
|
1.29%
|
|
International
|
|
|
16,318
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.66%
|
|
|
|
0.73%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total on-balance sheet
|
|
|
$60,365
|
|
|
|
$184
|
|
|
|
$186
|
|
|
|
1.22%
|
|
|
|
1.17%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Net charge-offs exclude amounts
related to the lump-sum payments on balloon finance contracts.
The amount totaled $3 for the first quarter ended March 31,
2007.
|
|
|
(b)
|
North America 2006 annualized
charge-offs, net of recoveries, includes $15 of certain expenses
related to repossessed vehicles, which are included in other
operating expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
|
The following table summarizes pertinent delinquency experience
in the consumer automotive retail contract portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of retail contracts
|
|
|
|
30 days or more past due (a)
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
On-balance sheet
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
2.51%
|
|
|
|
2.34%
|
|
|
|
2.80%
|
|
|
|
2.53%
|
|
International
|
|
|
2.52%
|
|
|
|
2.54%
|
|
|
|
2.52%
|
|
|
|
2.54%
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.51%
|
|
|
|
2.40%
|
|
|
|
2.69%
|
|
|
|
2.53%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Past due contracts are calculated
on the basis of the average number of contracts delinquent
during a month and exclude accounts in bankruptcy.
|
Credit fundamentals in our North American consumer automotive
portfolio have deteriorated in recent quarters. Delinquencies
and loss severity in the North American portfolio deteriorated
as compared to 2006. The increase in delinquency trends is the
result of a shrinking and aging of the asset base due to an
increase in whole loan sales activity and a weaker U.S. economy
as compared to the prior year. The increase in loss severity is
illustrated by an increase in the average loss per new vehicle
repossessed, which increased from $8,248 in the first quarter of
2006 to $8,760 in the first quarter of 2007. International
consumer credit portfolio performance remains strong as both
delinquencies and charge-offs have declined as compared to prior
year levels.
In addition to the preceding loss and delinquency data, the
following table summarizes bankruptcies and repossession
information for the United States consumer automotive retail
contract portfolio (which represents approximately 50% of our
on-balance sheet consumer automotive retail contract portfolio):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
On-balance sheet
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Average retail contracts in
bankruptcy (in units)
|
|
|
67,307
|
|
|
|
103,521
|
|
|
|
66,317
|
|
|
|
101,863
|
|
Bankruptcies as a percent of
average number of contracts outstanding
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
Retail contract repossessions
(in units)
|
|
|
18,936
|
|
|
|
25,133
|
|
|
|
18,155
|
|
|
|
24,883
|
|
Annualized repossessions as a
percent of average number of contracts outstanding
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
New bankruptcy filings in the U.S. increased dramatically in
October 2005, prior to the change in bankruptcy laws that made
it more difficult for some consumers to qualify for certain
protections under prior
33
bankruptcy laws. Subsequent to this change in bankruptcy laws,
we experienced a decrease in bankruptcy filings during 2006, as
well as the first quarter of 2007. Similarly, repossession
experience also improved since the first quarter of 2006.
Commercial
Credit
Our credit risk on the commercial portfolio is markedly
different from that of our consumer portfolio. Whereas the
consumer portfolio represents a homogenous pool of retail
contracts that exhibit fairly predictable and stable loss
patterns, the commercial portfolio exposures are less
predictable. In general, the credit risk of the commercial
portfolio is tied to overall economic conditions in the
countries in which we operate, as well as the particular
circumstances of individual borrowers.
At March 31, 2007, the only commercial receivables that had
been securitized and accounted for as off-balance sheet
transactions represent wholesale lines of credit extended to
automotive dealerships, which historically experience low
charge-offs. As a result, the amount of charge-offs on our
managed portfolio is similar to the on-balance sheet portfolio,
and only the on-balance sheet commercial portfolio credit
experience is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
loans
|
|
Impaired loans (a)
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
$20,966
|
|
|
|
$311
|
|
|
|
$338
|
|
|
|
$294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
Other commercial automotive
financing
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
Total on-balance sheet
|
|
|
25,535
|
|
|
|
$356
|
|
|
|
$390
|
|
|
|
$339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.60
|
%
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes loans where it is probable
that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to
the terms of the loan.
|
Charge-offs on the wholesale portfolio remained at traditionally
low levels in the first quarter of 2007.
ResCap
Operations
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results for ResCap
for the periods indicated. The amounts presented are before the
elimination of balances and transactions with our other
reporting segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-2006
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
$1,874
|
|
|
|
$1,700
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,701
|
)
|
|
|
(1,435
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing (loss) revenue
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
Mortgage servicing fees
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Servicing asset valuation and
hedge activities, net
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan servicing income
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Net (loss) gains on sale of loans
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
($910
|
)
|
|
|
$201
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$121,244
|
|
|
|
$121,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
ResCap experienced a net loss of $910 million in the first
quarter of 2007, down 553% from first quarter 2006 earnings of
$201 million. While ResCaps international business
experienced record performance in the quarter, the U.S.
residential mortgage market continued to experience a radical
slow-down, with declining home prices and weakening consumer
credit, which put significant pressure on performance.
ResCaps first quarter results reflect difficult market
conditions and limited liquidity for nonprime mortgages held for
sale, which were sold or marked at significantly lower market
values.
Net financing revenue decreased 360% and was negatively impacted
by higher interest expense driven by an increase in short-term
market interest rates as well as an increase in the average
amount of interest bearing liabilities outstanding. The increase
in the provision for credit losses was driven by the continued
deterioration in the domestic housing market and the market for
nonprime loans. These market conditions resulted in the increase
of loss estimates for the number and amount of estimated
incurred losses. The increase in interest expense and provision
for credit losses was partially offset by an increase in total
financing revenue from increased yields on outstanding loans.
Net loan servicing income decreased to $145 million, a
decline of 23%, due to negative servicing asset valuations,
which were partially offset by an increase in the size of the
mortgage servicing rights portfolio. Gain (loss) on sales of
loans decreased primarily due to the decline in fair value of
our nonprime and prime second-lien delinquent loans held for
sale. The pricing for various loan product types continued to
deteriorate in the first quarter of 2007, as investor
uncertainty remained high.
Other income increased 22% during the first quarter of 2007 as
compared to the same period in 2006 due to higher residential
real estate income as a result of continued growth in
residential real estate investments and gains on U.S. Treasury
and principal-only securities.
Noninterest expense increased 35% in the first quarter 2007 as
compared to the first quarter of 2006. The increase is primarily
due to an increase for the provision for losses associated with
assets sold with recourse and the necessity for us to include
representations for early-payment defaults due to competitive
pressures.
Income tax expense decreased 57% during the first quarter of
2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006. The decrease in
expense reflects the conversion of principal domestic operations
to LLC, and net pre-tax losses within these operations for which
no tax benefits are recorded at the LLC level. As a result of
the conversion, a federal tax provision is no longer required
for the majority of U.S. based operations.
Mortgage
Loan Production, Sales and Servicing
During the first three months of 2007, our loan production
decreased to approximately $38 billion from approximately
$42 billion in 2006. These decreases were due primarily to
the decrease in non-prime loan production. Our domestic loan
production declined 14% and international loan production
increased 17% compared to the same period in 2006. Our domestic
loan production decreased, while the overall domestic mortgage
origination market remained flat, resulting in a decrease in our
market share.
35
The following summarizes mortgage loan production for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($
in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount by product type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime conforming
|
|
|
$9,569
|
|
|
|
$8,569
|
|
Prime nonconforming
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
Government
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
Nonprime
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
Prime second-lien
|
|
|
5,313
|
|
|
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production
|
|
|
31,042
|
|
|
|
36,068
|
|
International
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$37,514
|
|
|
|
$41,580
|
|
|
|
Principal amount by origination
channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and direct channels
|
|
|
$6,031
|
|
|
|
$6,678
|
|
Correspondent and broker channels
|
|
|
25,011
|
|
|
|
29,390
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production
|
|
|
$31,042
|
|
|
|
$36,068
|
|
|
|
Number of loans (in units):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and direct channels
|
|
|
47,638
|
|
|
|
60,888
|
|
Correspondent and broker channels
|
|
|
163,439
|
|
|
|
190,852
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production
|
|
|
211,077
|
|
|
|
251,740
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the primary domestic mortgage
loan servicing portfolio for which we hold the corresponding
mortgage servicing rights:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. mortgage loan servicing portfolio
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
Number of
|
|
Dollar amount
|
($ in millions)
|
|
loans
|
|
of loans
|
|
loans
|
|
of loans
|
|
Prime conforming
|
|
|
1,469,640
|
|
|
|
$207,038
|
|
|
|
1,456,344
|
|
|
|
$203,927
|
|
Prime nonconforming
|
|
|
325,284
|
|
|
|
104,786
|
|
|
|
319,255
|
|
|
|
101,138
|
|
Government
|
|
|
179,431
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
181,563
|
|
|
|
18,843
|
|
Nonprime
|
|
|
394,523
|
|
|
|
54,307
|
|
|
|
409,516
|
|
|
|
55,750
|
|
Prime second-lien
|
|
|
817,217
|
|
|
|
34,421
|
|
|
|
784,170
|
|
|
|
32,726
|
|
|
|
Total primary servicing portfolio
|
|
|
3,186,095
|
|
|
|
$419,244
|
|
|
|
3,150,848
|
|
|
|
$412,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes loans for which we acted
as a subservicer. Subserviced loans totaled 328,425 with an
unpaid principal balance of approximately $66 billion at
March 31, 2007, and 290,992 with an unpaid principal
balance of approximately $55 billion at December 31,
2006.
|
Our international servicing portfolio was comprised of
approximately $34 billion of mortgage loans as of
March 31, 2007.
36
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
$1,066
|
|
|
|
$187
|
|
|
|
$1,253
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
$1,660
|
|
|
|
$525
|
|
|
|
$2,185
|
|
|
|
Allowance as a percent of total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 (a)
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
March 31, 2007 (a)
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents the related allowance
for credit losses as a percentage of total on-balance sheet
residential mortgage loans.
|
The provision for loan losses was $542 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to
$123 million in the same period in 2006, representing an
increase of $419 million. The increase in the provision was
primarily due to the increase in the mortgage loans held for
investment portfolio, which includes more delinquent loans than
the same period last year. Delinquent mortgage loans held for
investment totaled $13 billion, or 20%, of total mortgage
loans held for investment at March 31, 2007, compared to
$11 billion, or 15%, at March 31, 2006.
Nonperforming
Assets
The following table summarizes the nonperforming assets in our
on-balance sheet held for sale and held for investment
residential mortgage loan portfolios. Nonperforming assets are
nonaccrual loans, foreclosed assets and restructured loans.
Mortgage loans and lending receivables are generally placed on
nonaccrual status when they are 60 and 90 days past due,
respectively, or when the timely collection of the principal of
the loan, in whole or in part, is doubtful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime conforming
|
|
|
$8
|
|
|
|
$11
|
|
|
|
$6
|
|
Prime nonconforming
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Prime second-lien
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Nonprime (a)
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
6,736
|
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
Lending receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse (b)
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Construction (c)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual assets
|
|
|
9,185
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
6,270
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
|
$10,659
|
|
|
|
$9,844
|
|
|
|
$6,915
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
as a percentage of total ResCap assets
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes $481 as of March 31,
2007, $415 as of December 31, 2006, and $242 as of
March 31, 2006, of loans that were purchased distressed and
already in nonaccrual status.
|
|
(b)
|
Includes $406 and $10 million
of nonaccrual restructured loans as of March 31, 2007, and
December 31, 2006, respectively, that are not included
in Restructured loans.
|
|
(c)
|
Includes $18 million as of
March 31, 2007, $19 million as of December 31,
2006, and $9 million as of March 31, 2006, that are
not included in Restructured loans.
|
37
Our classification of a loan as nonperforming does not
necessarily indicate that the principal amount of the loan is
ultimately uncollectible in whole or in part. In certain cases,
borrowers make payments to bring their loans contractually
current and, in all cases, our mortgage loans are collateralized
by residential real estate. As a result, our experience has been
that any amount of ultimate loss is substantially less than the
unpaid principal balance of a nonperforming loan.
Insurance
Operations
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results of our
Insurance operations for the periods indicated. The amounts
presented are before the elimination of balances and
transactions with our other operating segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-2006
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and service
revenue earned
|
|
|
$1,032
|
|
|
|
$1,004
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premiums and other
income
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Acquisition and underwriting
expense
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Premium tax and other expense
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$143
|
|
|
|
$129
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$12,878
|
|
|
|
$13,739
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and service
revenue written
|
|
|
$1,070
|
|
|
|
$1,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio (a)
|
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
|
91.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Management uses combined ratio as a
primary measure of underwriting profitability, with its
components measured using GAAP. Underwriting profitability is
indicated by a combined ratio under 100% and is calculated as
the sum of all reported losses and expenses (excluding interest
and income tax expense) divided by the total of premiums and
service revenues earned and other income.
|
Net income from Insurance operations totaled $143 million
for the first three months of 2007, as compared to
$129 million for the same period in 2006. Net income
increased due to favorable underwriting results and a lower
effective tax rate partially offset by lower realized capital
gains. Underwriting results grew from an increase in insurance
premium and revenue earned coupled with a lower level of losses
and loss adjustment expenses, partially offset by higher
acquisition and underwriting expenses.
Written premium and service revenue remained at
$1.1 billion. Growth has been primarily within the
reinsurance and international product lines. The reinsurance
business, both domestic and international, has been driven by
organic growth and new business initiatives, which have expanded
our product and geographic footprint. The international personal
lines business has experienced revenue and contract growth
primarily through favorable pricing and new fleet contracts.
This growth was offset by challenging conditions being faced by
our domestic personal lines and extended service contract
business, resulting from competition and declining GM retail
sales.
Earned premium was higher in the first three months of 2007, as
compared to the same period in 2006, caused in part by extended
service contracts sold in prior years entering higher earning
rate periods and growth in the reinsurance business and
international markets. However, a portion of this increase in
earned premium was negated by revenue challenges at domestic
personal lines.
Investment income was lower in the first three months of 2007
due to lower capital gains. Investment income, excluding capital
gains, increased 20% in the first three months of 2007, as
compared to the same
38
period in 2006. The rebalancing of the portfolio in the fourth
quarter of 2006 resulted in a larger portion of the portfolio
being comprised of fixed income securities, which led to an
increase in the investment yield. Fixed income securities
comprised 92% of the total portfolio in the first quarter of
2007, as compared to 68% for the same period in 2006. The
investment portfolio was $6.7 billion at
March 31, 2007, comprised of $6.1 billion of
fixed income and $0.6 billion of equity securities. This is
compared to $7.9 billion at March 31, 2006, comprised
of $5.4 billion of fixed income and $2.5 billion of
equity securities. The decrease in the investment portfolio was
largely the result of a $950 million inter-company dividend
payment in the first quarter of 2007.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses decreased slightly
as a result of improved frequency and severity in our extended
service contract business while mild weather drove lower losses
in our domestic personal lines. Conversely, acquisition and
underwriting expenses were greater during the period
commensurate with higher insurance premiums and service revenue
earned.
Other
Operations
Net income for our Other operations was $66 million for the
first quarter of 2007 as compared to a loss of $21 million
in the first quarter of 2006. This increase in net income was
primarily due to our Commercial Finance Group, lower net income
in 2006 driven by losses related to the sale of our former
commercial mortgage business and certain other corporate
activities.
Net income of our Commercial Finance Group increased from
$11 million for the first quarter of 2006 to
$20 million in the first quarter of 2007. The increase was
primarily related to a $12 million favorable net income
impact recognized during February 2007 relating to the sale of
certain loans.
Funding
and Liquidity
Funding
Sources and Strategy
Our liquidity and our ongoing profitability are, in large part,
dependent upon our timely access to capital and the costs
associated with raising funds in different segments of the
capital markets. Over the past several years, our funding
strategy has focused on the development of diversified funding
sources across a global investor base, both public and private
and, as appropriate, the extension of debt maturities. This
diversification has been achieved in a variety of ways,
including whole loan sales, the public debt capital markets,
conduit facilities and asset-backed securities, as well as
through deposit-gathering and other financing activities.
During the first quarter of 2007, under the terms of the Sale
Transactions between FIM Holdings and GM, a final purchase
price adjustment was required to the extent that GMACs
equity upon the November 30, 2006, closing of the sale
transaction differed from a specified level. As a result, we
received a capital contribution from GM of approximately
$1 billion, based on these final settlement provisions.
39
The following table summarizes debt and other sources of funding
by source for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
$1,798
|
|
|
|
$1,523
|
|
Institutional term debt
|
|
|
63,291
|
|
|
|
70,266
|
|
Retail debt programs
|
|
|
28,370
|
|
|
|
29,308
|
|
Secured financings
|
|
|
116,998
|
|
|
|
123,485
|
|
Bank loans and other
|
|
|
13,339
|
|
|
|
12,512
|
|
|
|
Total debt (a)
|
|
|
223,796
|
|
|
|
237,094
|
|
Bank deposits (b)
|
|
|
10,007
|
|
|
|
10,488
|
|
Off-balance sheet securitizations
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail finance receivables
|
|
|
6,375
|
|
|
|
7,456
|
|
Wholesale loans
|
|
|
19,357
|
|
|
|
18,624
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
129,676
|
|
|
|
118,918
|
|
|
|
Total funding
|
|
|
389,211
|
|
|
|
392,580
|
|
Less: cash reserves (d)
|
|
|
(12,816
|
)
|
|
|
(18,252
|
)
|
|
|
Net funding
|
|
|
$376,395
|
|
|
|
$374,328
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio covenant (e)
|
|
|
9.5:1
|
|
|
|
10.8:1
|
|
|
|
Funding Commitments ($ in
billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank liquidity facilities (f)
|
|
|
$44.6
|
|
|
|
$43.8
|
|
Secured funding facilities (g)
|
|
|
$198.3
|
|
|
|
$188.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes fair value adjustment as described in Note 7 to
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(b)
|
Includes consumer and commercial bank deposits and dealer
wholesale deposits.
|
|
(c)
|
Represents net funding from securitizations of retail and
wholesale automotive receivables and mortgage loans accounted
for as sales, as further described in Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
(d)
|
Includes $9.6 billion cash and cash equivalents and
$3.2 billion invested in marketable securities at
March 31, 2007, and $15.5 billion and
$2.8 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2006.
|
|
(e)
|
As described in Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, our liquidity facilities and certain other
funding facilities contain a leverage ratio covenant of 11.0:1,
which excludes from debt certain securitization transactions
that are accounted for on-balance sheet as secured financings
(totaling $80,251 and $81,461 at March 31, 2007, and
December 31, 2006, respectively).
|
|
(f)
|
Represents both committed and uncommitted bank liquidity
facilities. Refer to Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for details.
|
|
(g)
|
Represents both committed and uncommitted secured funding
facilities. Includes commitments with third-party asset-backed
commercial paper conduits, as well as forward flow sale
agreements with third parties, securities purchase commitments
with third parties and repurchase facilities. Refer to
Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for further details.
|
Short-term
Debt
We obtain short-term funding from the sale of floating rate
demand notes under a program referred to as GMAC LLC Demand
Notes. These notes can be redeemed at any time at the option of
the holder thereof without restriction.
Long-term
Unsecured Debt
Our long-term unsecured financings are generated to fund
long-term assets, over-collateralization required to support our
conduits, the liquidity portfolio and the continued growth of
our loan portfolios. We meet these financing needs from a
variety of sources, including public corporate debt and credit
facilities. The public corporate debt markets are a key source
of financing for us. We access these markets by issuing senior
unsecured notes, but are pursuing other structures that will
provide efficient sources of term liquidity. Following the Sale
Transactions and after being absent from the U.S. unsecured debt
markets for approximately two years, on December 15, 2006,
we issued $1 billion of Senior Unsecured Notes due
December 15, 2011.
GMAC has various liquidity facilities with a number of different
lenders in multiple jurisdictions. As a result of having to
restate prior period financial information to eliminate hedge
accounting treatment that had
40
been applied to certain callable debt hedged with derivatives,
it is possible that some of our lenders under certain of our
liquidity facilities could claim that they are not obligated to
honor their commitments. While such a claim would not be
entirely unreasonable, we believe that any such claims would not
be sustainable. Nor do we believe that this matter is likely to
be tested, because we have no current need or intention to draw
on any of the more significant existing facilities, and renewal
and revision of them is imminent, which likely will eliminate
the issue. There can be no assurance that we are correct in our
assessments. If we are not, and multiple claims were asserted
and substantiated, available funding under certain of our
liquidity facilities could be adversely impacted. However, we
believe such an impact is manageable because of our current,
substantial liquidity position, including $12.8 billion of
global cash balances, among various other sources of liquidity.
We have also been able to diversify our unsecured funding
through the formation of ResCap. ResCap, an indirect wholly
owned subsidiary, was formed as the holding company of our
residential mortgage businesses and, in the second quarter of
2005, successfully achieved an investment grade rating (separate
from GMAC). In the fourth quarter of 2005, ResCap filed a
$12 billion shelf registration statement and has
subsequently issued $8.5 billion of notes through
March 31, 2007.
Secured
Financings and Off-Balance Sheet Securitizations
As part of our ongoing funding and risk management practices, we
have established secondary market trading and securitization
arrangements that provide long-term financing primarily for our
automotive and mortgage loans. We have had consistent and
reliable access to these markets through our securitization
activities in the past and expect to continue to access the
securitization markets.
In the first quarter of 2007, approximately 96% of our U.S.
Automotive volume was funded through a secured funding
arrangement or automotive whole loan sale. The increased use of
whole loan sales is part of the migration to an originate
and sell model for our U.S. Automotive Finance business.
In the first quarter of 2007, we executed approximately
$3.5 billion in automotive whole loan sales.
Customer
Deposits
Through our banking activities in our Automotive Finance and
ResCap operations, bank deposits (certificates of deposits and
brokered deposits) have become an important funding source for
us.
Cash
Reserves
We maintain a large cash reserve, including certain marketable
securities that can be utilized to meet our obligations in the
event of any market disruption. Cash and cash equivalents and
certain marketable securities totaled $12.8 billion as of
March 31, 2007, down from $18.3 billion on
December 31, 2006. This decrease largely stems from our
repayment of significant debt maturities during the first
quarter of 2007 without a corresponding amount of new debt
issuances during the same period.
Funding
Commitments
We actively manage our liquidity and mitigate our liquidity risk
by maintaining sufficient short-term and long-term financing,
maintaining diversified secured funding programs and maintaining
sufficient reserve liquidity. In March 2007 we established a new
$6 billion variable not funding facility. The facility is
available to fund U.S. dealer floor plan receivables in
certain circumstances, including in the event of GM filing for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. Refer to Note 7
for further detail.
Credit
Ratings
The cost and availability of unsecured financing is influenced
by credit ratings, which are intended to be an indicator of the
creditworthiness of a particular company, security or
obligation. Lower ratings generally result in higher borrowing
costs as well as reduced access to capital markets. This is
particularly true for certain term debt institutional investors
whose investment guidelines require investment grade term
ratings and for short-term institutional investors (money market
investors in particular) whose investment guidelines require the
two highest rating categories for short-term debt. Substantially
all of our debt has been rated by nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations.
41
The following table summarizes our current ratings and outlook
by the respective nationally recognized rating agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
|
Agency
|
|
Paper
|
|
Debt
|
|
Outlook
|
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
B
|
|
BB+
|
|
Positive
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Not-Prime
|
|
Ba1
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
B-1
|
|
BB+
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
DBRS
|
|
R-2 (low)
|
|
BBB (low)
|
|
Stable
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, ResCap, our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, has
investment grade ratings (separate from GMAC) from the
nationally recognized rating agencies. The following table
summarizes ResCaps current ratings and outlook by the
respective agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
|
Agency
|
|
Paper
|
|
Debt
|
|
Outlook
|
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
F2
|
|
BBB
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
P-3
|
|
Baa3
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
A-3
|
|
BBB
|
|
Stable
|
|
|
DBRS
|
|
R-2 (middle)
|
|
BBB (low)
|
|
Stable
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We use off-balance sheet entities as an integral part of our
operating and funding activities. For further discussion of our
use of off-balance sheet entities, refer to the Off-balance
Sheet Arrangements section in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes assets carried off-balance sheet
in these entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Securitization (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail finance receivables
|
|
|
$7.0
|
|
|
|
$8.2
|
|
|
|
Wholesale loans
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
131.4
|
|
|
|
121.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitization
|
|
|
159.7
|
|
|
|
149.8
|
|
|
|
Other off-balance sheet activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage warehouse
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total off-balance sheet
activities
|
|
|
$160.2
|
|
|
|
$150.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes only securitizations
accounted for as sales under SFAS 140, as further described
in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
Critical
Accounting Estimates
We have identified critical accounting estimates that, as a
result of judgments, uncertainties, uniqueness and complexities
of the underlying accounting standards and operations involved,
could result in material changes to our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows under different conditions
or using different assumptions.
Our most critical accounting estimates are:
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of the allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
Valuation of automotive lease residuals
|
|
|
|
Valuation of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
|
Valuation of interests in securitized assets
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of reserves for insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
There have been no significant changes in the methodologies and
processes used in developing these estimates from what is
described in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Statement of Position
05-1 In
September 2005 the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position
05-1,
Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition
Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance
Contracts
(SOP 05-1).
SOP 05-1
provides guidance on accounting for deferred acquisition costs
on internal replacements of insurance contracts.
SOP 05-1
defines an internal replacement and specifies the conditions
that determine whether the replacement contract is substantially
or unsubstantially changed from the replaced contract. An
internal replacement determined to result in a substantially
changed contract should be accounted for as an extinguishment of
the replaced contract; unamortized deferred acquisition costs
and unearned revenue liabilities of the replaced contract should
no longer be deferred. An internal replacement determined to
result in an unsubstantially changed contract should be
accounted for as a continuation of the replaced asset.
SOP 05-01
introduces the terms integrated and
non-integrated contract features and specifies that
non-integrated features do not change the base contract and are
to be accounted for in a manner similar to a separately issued
contract. Integrated features are evaluated in conjunction with
the base contract.
SOP 05-1
is effective for internal replacements occurring in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. Adoption of
SOP 05-1
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
SFAS No. 155 In February 2006 the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155). This
standard permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation. SFAS 155 allows an
entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid
financial instrument at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis. The standard eliminates the prohibition on a Qualifying
Special Purpose Entity (QSPE) from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest
other than another derivative financial instrument.
SFAS 155 also clarifies which interest-only and
principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of
SFAS 133, as well as determines that concentrations of
credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the fiscal
year that begins after September 15, 2006. Adoption of
SFAS 155 did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 13-2
In July 2006 the FASB issued FSP
No. 13-2,
Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of
Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged
Lease Transaction (FSP
13-2), which
amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, by
requiring lessors to recalculate the rate of return and periodic
income allocation for leveraged-lease transactions when there is
a change or projected change in the timing of income tax cash
flows related to the lease. FSP
13-2
requires lessors to use the model in FIN 48 to determine
the timing and amount of expected tax cash flows in
leveraged-lease calculations and recalculations. FSP
13-2 is
effective in the same period as FIN 48. At the date of
adoption, the lessor is required to reassess projected income
tax cash flows related to leveraged leases using the FIN 48
model for recognition and measurement. Revisions to the net
investment in a leveraged lease required when FSP
13-2 is
adopted would be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings and reported as a change in
accounting principle. Adoption of FSP
13-2 did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 In September 2006
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which provides a definition of
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The
standard applies when GAAP requires or allows assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value, and therefore, does
not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstance. Fair
value refers to the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an arms length
transaction between market participants, in such markets where
we conduct business. SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use
when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices available in active markets and the lowest
priority to data lacking transparency. The level of the
reliability of inputs utilized for
43
fair value calculations drives the extent of disclosure
requirements of the valuation methodologies used under the
standard. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
years. The provisions of SFAS 157 should be applied
prospectively. Management is assessing the potential impact on
our financial condition and results of operations.
SFAS No. 158 In September 2006 the
FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (SFAS 158), which amends SFAS No. 87
Employers Accounting for Pensions,
SFAS No. 88 Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits, SFAS No. 106
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, and SFAS No. 132(R)
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits (revised 2003). This
Statement requires companies to recognize an asset or liability
for the overfunded or underfunded status of their benefit plans
in their financial statements. The asset or liability is the
offset to other comprehensive income, consisting of previously
unrecognized prior service costs and credits, actuarial gains or
losses and transition obligations and assets. SFAS 158 also
required the measurement date for plan assets and liabilities to
coincide with the sponsors year end. The standard provides
two transition alternatives for companies to make the
measurement-date provisions. The recognition of the asset or
liability related to funded status provision is effective for us
for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007, and the change
in measurement is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. Adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
SFAS No. 159 In February 2007 the
FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159).
SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure at fair
value many financial instruments and certain other items that
are not currently required to be measured at fair value.
Subsequent changes in fair value for designated items will be
required to be reported in earnings in the current period.
SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements for similar types of assets and liabilities
measured at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the effect of
implementing this guidance, which directly depends on the nature
and extent of eligible items elected to be measured at fair
value, upon initial application of the standard on
January 1, 2008.
Forward
Looking Statements
The foregoing Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other portions
of this
Form 10-Q
contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning
of applicable federal securities laws, including the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based upon
our current expectations and assumptions concerning future
events, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated.
The words anticipate, estimate,
believe, expect, intend,
may, plan, project,
future and should and any similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks,
uncertainties and other factors, including (but not limited to)
the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of our 2006
Form 10-K,
as updated in this
Form 10-Q,
and which may be revised or supplemented in subsequent reports
on SEC
Forms 10-Q
and 8-K.
Such factors include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Rating agencies may downgrade their ratings for GMAC or ResCap
in the future, which would adversely affect our ability to raise
capital in the debt markets at attractive rates and increase the
interest that we pay on our outstanding publicly traded notes,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition;
|
|
|
|
Our business requires substantial capital, and if we are unable
to maintain adequate financing sources, our profitability and
financial condition will suffer and jeopardize our ability to
continue operations;
|
|
|
|
The profitability and financial condition of our operations are
dependent upon the operations of GM, and we have substantial
credit exposure to GM;
|
|
|
|
Recent developments in the residential mortgage market,
especially in the nonprime sector, may adversely affect our
revenues, profitability and financial condition; and
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
The worldwide financial services industry is highly competitive.
If we are unable to compete successfully or if there is
increased competition in the automotive financing, mortgage
and/or insurance markets or generally in the markets for
securitizations or asset sales, our margins could be materially
adversely affected.
|
Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our automotive financing, mortgage, and insurance activities
give rise to market risk, representing the potential loss in the
fair value of assets or liabilities caused by movements in
market variables, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates
and equity prices. We are primarily exposed to interest rate
risk arising from changes in interest rates related to
financing, investing and cash management activities. More
specifically, we have entered into contracts to provide
financing, to retain mortgage servicing rights and to retain
various assets related to securitization activities, all of
which are exposed in varying degrees to changes in value due to
movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from the
mismatch between assets and the related liabilities used for
funding. We enter into various financial instruments, including
derivatives, to maintain the desired level of exposure to the
risk of interest rate fluctuations. Refer to Note 8 to our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.
We are exposed to foreign currency risk arising from the
possibility that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates will
impact future earnings or asset and liability values related to
our global operations. Our most significant foreign currency
exposures relate to the Euro, the Canadian dollar, the British
pound sterling, Brazilian real, Mexican peso and the Australian
dollar.
We are also exposed to equity price risk, primarily in our
Insurance operations, which invests in equity securities that
are subject to price risk influenced by capital market
movements. Our equity securities are considered investments and
we do not enter into derivatives to modify the risks associated
with our Insurance investment portfolio.
While the diversity of our activities from our complementary
lines of business may partially mitigate market risk, we also
actively manage this risk. We maintain risk management control
systems to monitor interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate
and equity price risks and related hedge positions. Positions
are monitored using a variety of analytical techniques including
market value, sensitivity analysis and value at risk models.
Since December 31, 2006, there have been no material
changes in these market risks. Refer to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for further
discussion on value at risk and sensitivity analysis.
Item 4. Controls
and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended [the
Exchange Act]) designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
specified time periods. As of the end of the period covered by
this report, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer evaluated, with the participation of our management, the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on managements evaluation and solely because of the
material weakness related to our controls over our application
of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, as amended and interpreted, GMACs
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers each concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of
March 31, 2007.
In order to address and remediate this material weakness in our
internal control over financial reporting, we are designing and
implementing a number of enhancements to the hedge accounting
policy and hedge documentation controls to ensure future
applications of hedge accounting for similar transactions
satisfy the initial and periodic documentation as well as the
hedge effectiveness assessment requirements of SFAS 133.
Management will monitor, evaluate and test the operating
effectiveness of these enhanced controls during 2007.
There were no other changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recent fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
45
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings
We are subject to potential liability under laws and government
regulations and various claims and legal actions that are
pending or may be asserted against us. The following update
supplements our Legal Proceedings section in our 2006 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
Please refer to the Legal Proceedings section in our 2006 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for additional information regarding the legal action noted
below and other pending governmental proceedings, claims and
legal actions.
As disclosed in our 2006
Form 10-K,
on February 27, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan issued an opinion
granting the GM and GMAC defendants motion to dismiss and
dismissing the consolidated bondholder class action complaint
with respect to claims filed by plaintiffs
J&R Marketing, Zielezienski and
Mager. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal in this
matter on March 27, 2007.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
The following risk factors, which were disclosed in our 2006
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
have not materially changed since we filed these Reports. Refer
to our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for a complete discussion of these risk factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Rating agencies may downgrade their ratings for GMAC or ResCap
in the future, which would adversely affect our ability to raise
capital in the debt markets at attractive rates and increase the
interest that we pay on our outstanding publicly traded notes,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
Our business requires substantial capital and, if we are unable
to maintain adequate financing sources, our profitability and
financial condition will suffer and jeopardize our ability to
continue operations.
|
|
|
|
Our indebtedness and other obligations are significant and could
materially adversely affect our business.
|
|
|
|
The profitability and financial condition of our operations are
dependent upon the operations of General Motors Corporation.
|
|
|
|
We have substantial credit exposure to General Motors
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Our earnings may decrease because of increases or decreases in
interest rates.
|
|
|
|
Our hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our
risks associated with changes in interest rates and could affect
our profitability and financial condition, as could our failure
to comply with hedge accounting principles and interpretations.
|
|
|
|
Our residential mortgage subsidiarys ability to pay
dividends to us is restricted by contractual arrangements.
|
|
|
|
A failure of or interruption in the communications and
information systems on which we rely to conduct our business
could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
|
|
|
|
We use estimates and assumptions in determining the fair value
of certain of our assets, in determining our allowance for
credit losses, in determining lease residual values and in
determining our reserves for insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses. If our estimates or assumptions prove to be
incorrect, our cash flow, profitability, financial condition and
business prospects could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
Our business outside the United States exposes us to additional
risks that may cause our revenues and profitability to decline.
|
|
|
|
Our business could be adversely affected by changes in currency
exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
We are exposed to credit risk which could affect our
profitability and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
Recent developments in the residential mortgage market,
especially in the nonprime sector, may adversely affect our
revenues, profitability and financial condition.
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
General business and economic conditions of the industries and
geographic areas in which we operate affect our revenues,
profitability and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
Our profitability and financial condition may be materially
adversely affected by decreases in the residual value of
off-lease vehicles.
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in valuation of investment securities or
significant fluctuations in investment market prices could
negatively affect revenues.
|
|
|
|
Changes in existing U.S. government-sponsored mortgage programs,
or disruptions in the secondary markets in the United States or
in other countries in which our mortgage subsidiaries operate,
could adversely affect the profitability and financial condition
of our mortgage business.
|
|
|
|
We may be required to repurchase contracts and provide
indemnification if we breach representations and warranties from
our securitization and whole loan transactions, which could harm
our profitability and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
Significant indemnification payments or contract, lease or loan
repurchase activity of retail contracts or leases or mortgage
loans could harm our profitability and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
A loss of contractual servicing rights could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results
of operations.
|
|
|
|
The regulatory environment in which we operate could have a
material adverse effect on our business and earnings.
|
|
|
|
The worldwide financial services industry is highly competitive.
If we are unable to compete successfully or if there is
increased competition in the automotive financing, mortgage
and/or insurance markets or generally in the markets for
securitizations or asset sales, our margins could be materially
adversely affected.
|
Item 2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
Item 3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
Item 5. Other
Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index of Exhibits are
filed as a part of this report. Such Index is incorporated
herein by reference.
47
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, this
8th day of May, 2007.
GMAC LLC
(Registrant)
Sanjiv Khattri
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Linda K. Zukauckas
Vice President and Corporate Controller
48
INDEX OF
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
Method of Filing
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Intellectual Property License
Agreement, dated November 30, 2006,
by and between General Motors Corporation and GMAC LLC
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
The following exhibit shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the
liability of that Section. In addition Exhibit No. 32
shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
49