As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2011

Registration No. 333-175850

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

 

Amendment No. 1

to

Form S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

 

 

APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100

Denver, Colorado 80237

(303) 757-8101

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

John Bezzant

Executive Vice President

Apartment Investment and Management Company

4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100

Denver, Colorado 80237

(303) 757-8101

(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code of agent for service)

Copy to:

Paul J. Nozick

Alston & Bird LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, GA 30309

(404) 881-7000

 

 

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective and all other conditions to the merger as described in the enclosed information statement/prospectus are satisfied or waived.

 

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box:  o

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

 

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)         o

 

Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)  o

 

The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants will file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement will thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement will become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED DECEMBER 19, 2011

 

INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XV

 

Century Properties Fund XV, or CPF XV, has entered into an amended and restated agreement and plan of merger, or merger agreement, with a wholly owned subsidiary of AIMCO Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP. Under the merger agreement:

 

(i) First, CPF XV will be merged with and into Aimco OP’s subsidiary, Century Properties Fund XV, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or New CPF XV, with New CPF XV as the surviving entity. New CPF XV was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In this merger, each unit of limited partnership interest in CPF XV, or CPF XV Unit, will be converted into an identical unit of limited partnership in New CPF XV, or New CPF XV Unit, and each general partnership interest in CPF XV now held by the general partners of CPF XV will be converted into a general partnership interest in New CPF XV. All interests in New CPF XV outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be cancelled in the merger; and

 

(ii) Second, Aimco OP’s subsidiary, Aimco CPF XV Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or the Aimco Subsidiary, will be merged with and into New CPF XV, with New CPF XV as the surviving entity. The Aimco Subsidiary was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In this merger, each New CPF XV Unit will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such unit, either:

 

 

 

The merger consideration of $41.83 per New CPF XV Unit was based on an independent third party appraisal of CPF XV’s property by Cogent Realty Advisors, LLC, or CRA, an independent valuation firm.

 

The number of OP Units offered for each New CPF XV Unit will be calculated by dividing $41.83 by the average closing price of common stock of Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. For example, as of December 14, 2011, the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading days was $21.62, which would have resulted in 1.93 OP Units offered for each New CPF XV Unit. However, if Aimco OP determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will not be entitled to elect OP Units, and will receive cash.

 

The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do they trade in an active secondary market. However, after a one-year holding period, OP Units are redeemable for shares of Aimco common stock (on a one-for-one basis) or cash equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco elects. As a result, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. Aimco’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.”

 

In the second merger, Aimco OP’s interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be converted into New CPF XV Units. As a result, after the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New CPF XV and will own all of the outstanding New CPF XV Units.

 

Within ten days after the effective time of the mergers, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to the former holders of CPF XV Units an election form pursuant to which they can elect to receive cash or OP Units. Holders of CPF XV Units may elect their form of consideration by completing and returning the election form in accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does not receive a properly completed election form from a holder before 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the 30th day after the mailing of the election form, the holder will be deemed to have elected to receive cash. Former holders of CPF XV Units may also use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the appraised value of their New CPF XV Units, determined through an arbitration proceeding.

 

Under applicable law, the merger agreement and the mergers must be approved by CPF XV’s general partners and a majority in interest of the CPF XV Units. Fox Capital Management Corporation, CPF XV’s managing general partner, or FCMC, has determined that the merger agreement and the mergers are advisable and in the best interests of CPF XV and its limited partners, and along with Fox Realty Investors, or FRI, CPF XV’s other general partner, has approved the merger agreement and the mergers. FCMC, as well as the managing general partner of FRI, are subsidiaries of Aimco. As of December 14, 2011, there were issued and outstanding 89,975 CPF XV Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 65,841.34 of those units, or approximately 73.18% of the number of units outstanding. As more fully described herein, approximately 35,473.17 of the CPF XV Units owned by an affiliate of Aimco OP are subject to a voting restriction, which requires such CPF XV Units to be voted in proportion to the votes cast with respect to CPF XV Units not subject to this voting restriction. Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they will vote all of their CPF XV Units that are not subject to this restriction, approximately 30,368.17 CPF XV Units or approximately 33.75% of the outstanding CPF XV Units, in favor of the merger agreement and the mergers. As a result, affiliates of Aimco OP will vote a total of approximately 50,133 CPF XV Units, or approximately 55.72% of the outstanding CPF XV Units in favor of the merger agreement and the mergers.

 

Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the mergers on or about [ • ], 2011. As a result, approval of the mergers is assured, and your consent to the mergers is not required.

 

WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND
YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY

 

This information statement/prospectus contains information about the mergers and the securities offered hereby, and the reasons that FCMC has decided that the mergers are in the best interests of CPF XV and its limited partners. CPF XV’s general partners have conflicts of interest with respect to the mergers that are described in greater detail herein. Please read this information statement/prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 20. It provides you with detailed information about the mergers and the securities offered hereby. The merger agreement is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex A.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in connection with the mergers, determined if this information statement/prospectus is truthful or complete, approved or disapproved of the mergers, passed upon the merits or fairness of the mergers, or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this information statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

This information statement/prospectus is dated [ • ], 2011, and is first being mailed to limited partners on or about [ • ], 2011.

 

WE ARE CURRENTLY SEEKING QUALIFICATION TO ALLOW ALL HOLDERS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS OF CPF XV THE ABILITY TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGERS. HOWEVER, AT THE PRESENT TIME, IF YOU ARE A RESIDENT OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATES, YOU ARE NOT PERMITTED TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGERS:

 

CALIFORNIA

 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED ON OR ENDORSED THE MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

This information statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Aimco from documents that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, but that have not been included in or delivered with this information statement/prospectus. For a listing of documents incorporated by reference into this information statement/prospectus, please see “Where You Can Find Additional Information” beginning on page 94 of this information statement/prospectus.

 

Aimco will provide you with copies of such documents relating to Aimco (excluding all exhibits unless Aimco has specifically incorporated by reference an exhibit in this information statement/prospectus), without charge, upon written or oral request to:

 

ISTC Corporation
P.O. Box 2347
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(864) 239-1029

 

If you have any questions or require any assistance, please contact our information agent, Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at (908) 497-2349; or by telephone at (800) 217-9608.

 

ABOUT THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

 

This information statement/prospectus, which forms a part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Aimco and Aimco OP, constitutes a prospectus of Aimco OP under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, with respect to the OP Units that may be issued to holders of CPF XV’s Units in connection with the mergers, and a prospectus of Aimco under Section 5 of the Securities Act with respect to shares of Aimco common stock that may be issued in exchange for such OP Units tendered for redemption. This document also constitutes an information statement under Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to the action to be taken by written consent to approve the mergers.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

	•	The Mergers:  CPF XV has entered into an agreement and plan of merger with New CPF XV, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary. Under the merger agreement:

	•	First, CPF XV will be merged with and into New CPF XV, with New CPF XV as the surviving entity. New CPF XV was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In this merger, each CPF XV Unit will be converted into a New CPF XV Unit, and each general partnership interest in CPF XV will be converted into a general partnership interest in New CPF XV. All interests in CPF XV outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be cancelled in the merger.
	•	Second, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into New CPF XV, with New CPF XV as the surviving entity. The Aimco Subsidiary was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In this merger, each New CPF XV Unit will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration described below.

	•	Merger Consideration:  In the second merger, each New CPF XV Unit will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such New CPF XV Unit, either $41.83 in cash or equivalent value in OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly). The number of OP Units issuable with respect to each New CPF XV Unit will be calculated by dividing the $41.83 per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. For a full description of the determination of the merger consideration, see “The Mergers — Determination of Merger Consideration” beginning on page 40.

	•	Fairness of Merger:  Although the Aimco Entities have interests that may conflict with those of CPF XV’s unaffiliated limited partners, each of the Aimco Entities believes that the merger agreement and the mergers are fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV. The merger consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit was based on an independent third party appraisal of CPF XV’s property by CRA, an independent valuation firm. See “Special Factors — Fairness of the Transactions” beginning on page 7.

	•	Opinion of Financial Advisor:  In connection with the merger, Duff & Phelps, LLC, or Duff & Phelps, has delivered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI to the effect that, as of December 19, 2011, the cash consideration offered in the mergers is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV.

	•	Effects of the Mergers:  After the mergers, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in New CPF XV, and will own all of the outstanding New CPF XV Units. As a result, after the mergers, you will cease to have any rights in CPF XV or New CPF XV as a limited partner. See “Special Factors — Effects of the Mergers,” beginning on page 6.

	•	Appraisal Rights:  Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each CPF XV limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a constituent corporation in a merger under Delaware law, and which will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s CPF XV Units in connection with the mergers. See “The Mergers — Appraisal Rights,” beginning on page 42. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.

	•	List of Investors:  Under CPF XV’s partnership agreement and applicable law, upon written request and at the cost of the limited partner, a limited partner who holds CPF XV Units has the right to receive by mail a list of the names and addresses of the partners of CPF XV and the number of units of partnership interest held by each of them. This list may be obtained by making written request to the general partners of CPF XV, c/o Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016, or by fax at (908) 497-2349.

	•	Parties Involved:

	•	Century Properties Fund XV, or CPF XV, is a California limited partnership organized in May 1980 for the purpose of operating income-producing residential real estate. Its managing general partner, the general partner responsible for managing CPF XV, is Fox Capital Management Corporation, or FCMC. FCMC is a California corporation and a subsidiary of Aimco. The other general partner of CPF XV is Fox Realty Investors, or FRI. FRI is a California general partnership and the managing general partner of FRI is a subsidiary of Aimco. CPF XV presently owns and operates one investment property, Lakeside Place Apartments, a 734 unit apartment project located in Houston, Texas. See “Information About CPF XV,” beginning on page 34. CPF XV’s principal address is 55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089, Greenville, South Carolina 29602, and its telephone number is (864) 239-1000.

	•	Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is a Maryland corporation that is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Aimco’s principal financial objective is to provide predictable and attractive returns to its stockholders. Aimco’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 29. Aimco’s principal address is 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, and its telephone number is (303) 757-8101.

	•	AIMCO Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP, is a Delaware limited partnership which, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, holds substantially all of Aimco’s assets and manages the daily operations of Aimco’s business and assets. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 31. Aimco OP’s principal address is 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, and its telephone number is (303) 757-8101.

	•	Century Properties Fund XV, LP, or New CPF XV, is a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the merger with CPF XV. New CPF XV’s general partner is Aimco OP and its sole limited partner is the Aimco Subsidiary. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 31.

	•	Aimco CPF XV Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a Delaware limited liability company formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of acting as limited partner of New CPF XV prior to the merger, and consummating the merger with New CPF XV. The Aimco Subsidiary is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco OP. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 31.

	•	Reasons for the Mergers:  Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing apartment properties such as the one owned by CPF XV, and have decided to proceed with the transactions as

		a means of acquiring the property currently owned by CPF XV in a manner that they believe (i) provides fair value to limited partners, (ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly), and (iii) relieves CPF XV of the expenses associated with a sale of the property, including marketing and other transaction costs. The Aimco Entities decided to proceed with the mergers at this time for the following reasons:

	•	In the absence of a transaction, CPF XV limited partners have only limited options to liquidate their investment in CPF XV. The CPF XV Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the securities are limited and sporadic.
	•	The value of the single property owned by CPF XV is not sufficient to justify its continued operation as a public company. As a public company with a significant number of unaffiliated limited partners, CPF XV incurs costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns and partner Schedule K-1s, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these costs to be approximately $95,000 per year. The mergers will eliminate a significant amount of these costs.

	•	CPF XV has been operating at a loss from operations for two of the last three years, and depends, in part, on loans from Aimco OP to fund its operations and capital improvements at its property. At September 30, 2011, the total amount of loans owed by CPF XV to Aimco OP was approximately $8,621,000. CPF XV may receive additional advances of funds from Aimco OP, although Aimco OP is not obligated to provide such advances. If the Aimco Entities acquire 100% of the limited partnership interests of CPF XV, they will have greater flexibility in financing and operating its property.

	•	Conflicts of Interest:  FCMC and FRI have a conflict of interest with respect to the mergers. FCMC and FRI are the general partners of CPF XV. Both FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI are wholly owned by AIMCO/IPT, Inc. which in turn is wholly owned by Aimco. Each of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI has fiduciary duties to its ultimate sole stockholder, Aimco, on the one hand, and each of FCMC and FRI has fiduciary duties to CPF XV and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of FCMC and FRI to CPF XV and its limited partners conflict with the duties of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI to Aimco and its affiliates, which could result in FCMC and FRI approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. As the managing general partner of CPF XV, FCMC seeks the best possible terms for CPF XV’s limited partners. This conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP. See “The Mergers — Conflicts of Interest,” beginning on page 41.

	•	Risk Factors:  In evaluating the merger agreement and the mergers, CPF XV limited partners should carefully read this information statement/prospectus and especially consider the factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 20. Some of the risk factors associated with the mergers are summarized below:

	•	FCMC and FRI are the general partners of CPF XV. Both FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI are indirectly owned by Aimco. As a result, FCMC and FRI have a conflict of interest in the mergers. A transaction with a third party in the absence of this conflict could result in better terms or greater consideration to CPF XV limited partners.
	•	CPF XV limited partners who receive cash may recognize taxable gain in the transactions and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.

	•	There are a number of significant differences between CPF XV Units and Aimco OP Units relating to, among other things, the nature of the investment, voting rights, distributions and liquidity and transferability/redemption. For more information regarding those differences, see “Comparison of CPF XV Units and Aimco OP Units,” beginning on page 63.

	•	CPF XV limited partners may elect to receive OP Units as merger consideration in the second merger and there are risks related to an investment in OP Units, including the fact that there are restrictions on transferability of OP Units; there is no public market for OP Units; and there is no assurance as to the value that might be realized upon a future redemption of OP Units. See “Comparison of CPF XV Units and Aimco OP Units,” beginning on page 63.

	•	Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Mergers:  New CPF XV, the Delaware partnership, will be considered a continuation of CPF XV, the California partnership, for tax purposes. CPF XV will not recognize gain. New CPF XV will have the same federal identification number as that of CPF XV and will have the same tax basis, holding period, and depreciation method for each of its assets as that of CPF XV. The partners of CPF XV will not recognize any gain from the merger of CPF XV with and into New CPF XV. The bases of the partners in New CPF XV will be equal to their bases in CPF XV, and their holding periods in their units in New CPF XV will be the same as their holding periods in the CPF XV units. Aimco believes that completion of the conversion will not result in any tax consequences to the limited partners of CPF XV.

 

Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing apartment properties such as the one owned by CPF XV, and have decided to proceed with the mergers as a means of acquiring the property currently owned by CPF XV in a manner that they and the other Aimco Entities believe (i) provides fair value to limited partners, (ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly), and (iii) relieves CPF XV of the expenses associated with a sale of the property, including marketing and other transaction costs.

 

The Aimco Entities determined to proceed with the transactions at this time for the following reasons:

 

 

 

Before deciding to proceed with the transactions, FCMC and the other Aimco Entities considered the alternatives described below:

 

Continuation of CPF XV as a Public Company Operating the Property.  FCMC and the other Aimco Entities did not consider the continuation of CPF XV as a public company operating the property to be a viable alternative primarily because the costs associated with preparing financial statements, tax returns, periodic SEC reports and other expenses, and the inability of CPF XV to generate sufficient funds to cover operating expenses without advances from Aimco OP which may not be available in the future.

 

Liquidation of CPF XV.  FCMC and the other Aimco Entities considered a liquidation of CPF XV in which CPF XV’s property would be marketed and sold to a third party for cash, with any net proceeds remaining, after payment of all liabilities, distributed to CPF XV’s limited partners. The primary advantage of such a transaction would be that the sale price would reflect arm’s-length negotiations and might therefore be higher than the appraised value which has been used to determine the merger consideration. FCMC and the other Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because of: (i) the risk that a third party purchaser might not be found that would offer a satisfactory price; (ii) the costs imposed on CPF XV in connection with marketing and selling the property; (iii) the fact that limited partners would recognize taxable gain on the sale without the option of deferring that gain; and (iv) the fact that, in FCMC’s judgment, the costs imposed on CPF XV in connection with marketing and selling its property, as well as the fact that in such a sale limited partners would recognize taxable gain on the sale without the option of deferring that gain, would likely make the sale of the property and dissolution of CPF XV less advantageous to the limited partners than the mergers.

 

Contribution of the property to Aimco OP.  The Aimco Entities considered a transaction in which CPF XV’s property would be contributed to Aimco OP in exchange for OP Units. The primary advantage of such a transaction

would be that CPF XV limited partners would not recognize taxable gain. The Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because it would not offer limited partners an opportunity for immediate liquidity.

 

The Aimco Entities believe that the mergers will have the following benefits and detriments to unaffiliated limited partners, CPF XV and the Aimco Entities:

 

Benefits to Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The mergers are expected to have the following principal benefits to unaffiliated limited partners:

 

Liquidity.  Limited partners are given a choice of merger consideration in the second merger, and may elect to receive either cash or OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly). Limited partners who receive the cash consideration will receive immediate liquidity with respect to their investment.

 

Option to Defer Taxable Gain.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger may defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly).

 

Diversification.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger will have the opportunity to participate in Aimco OP, which has a more diversified property portfolio than CPF XV.

 

Benefits to CPF XV and New CPF XV.  The mergers are expected to have the following principal benefits to CPF XV and New CPF XV:

 

Elimination of Costs Associated with SEC Reporting Requirements and Multiple Limited Partners.  After the mergers, the Aimco Entities will own all of the limited partner interests in CPF XV, and CPF XV will terminate its registration and cease filing periodic reports with the SEC. As a result, CPF XV will no longer incur costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns and partner Schedule K-1s, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these expenses to be approximately $95,000 per year. The mergers will eliminate a significant amount of these costs.

 

Benefits to the Aimco Entities.  The mergers are expected to have the following principal benefits to the Aimco Entities:

 

Increased Interest in CPF XV.  Upon completion of the mergers, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New CPF XV, the successor to CPF XV. As a result, the Aimco Entities will receive all of the benefit from any future appreciation in value of the property after the mergers, and any future income from such property.

 

Detriments to Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The mergers are expected to have the following principal detriments to unaffiliated limited partners:

 

Taxable Gain.  CPF XV limited partners who receive the cash consideration in the second merger may recognize taxable gain in the merger that could exceed the merger consideration. CPF XV limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger could recognize taxable gain if Aimco subsequently sells the property.

 

Risks Related to OP Units.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger will be subject to the risks related to an investment in OP Units, as described in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors — Risks Related to an Investment in OP Units.”

 

Conflicts of Interest; No Separate Representation of Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  FCMC and FRI have a conflict of interest with respect to the mergers. Both FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI are wholly owned by AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which is wholly owned by Aimco. Each of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI has fiduciary duties to its ultimate sole stockholder, Aimco, on the one hand, and each of FCMC and FRI has fiduciary duties to CPF XV and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of FCMC and FRI to CPF XV and its limited partners conflict with the duties of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI to Aimco and its affiliates, which could result in FCMC and FRI approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might

be the case absent such conflict of interest. As the managing general partner of CPF XV, FCMC seeks the best possible terms for CPF XV’s limited partners. This conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP. In negotiating the merger agreement, no one separately represented the interests of the unaffiliated limited partners. If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms for CPF XV’s unaffiliated limited partners.

 

Decreased Interest in CPF XV.  Upon completion of the mergers, unaffiliated limited partners will no longer hold an interest in CPF XV, and Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of CPF XV. As a result, unaffiliated limited partners will no longer benefit from any future appreciation in the value of the property after the mergers, or any future income from such property.

 

Detriments to CPF XV and New CPF XV.  The transactions are not expected to have any detriments to CPF XV or New CPF XV.

 

Detriments to the Aimco Entities.  The transactions are expected to have the following principal detriments to the Aimco Entities:

 

Increased Interest in CPF XV.  Upon completion of the mergers, the Aimco Entities’ limited partner interest in the net book value of CPF XV will increase from 73.18% to 100%, or from a deficit of $11,401,000 to a deficit of $15,579,000 as of December 31, 2010, and their limited partner interest in the losses from continuing operations of CPF XV will increase from 73.18% to 100%, or from $631,000 to $862,000 for the period ended December 31, 2010. Upon completion of the mergers, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of CPF XV. As a result, Aimco OP will bear the burden of all future operating or other losses, as well as any decline in the value of CPF XV’s property.

 

Burden of Capital Expenditures.  Upon completion of the transactions, the Aimco Entities will have sole responsibility for providing any funds necessary to pay for capital expenditures at the property.

 

For a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the mergers, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Mergers.”

 

Factors in Favor of Fairness Determination.  The Aimco Entities (including the general partners of CPF XV) believe that the mergers are fair and in the best interests of CPF XV and its unaffiliated limited partners. In support of this determination, the Aimco Entities considered the following factors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Factors Not in Favor of Fairness Determination.  In addition to the foregoing factors, the Aimco Entities also considered the following countervailing factors:

 

 

 

 

 

The Aimco Entities did not assign relative weights to the above factors in reaching their decision that the mergers are fair to CPF XV and its unaffiliated limited partners. However, in determining that the benefits of the mergers outweigh the costs and risks, they relied primarily on the following factors: (i) the merger consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit is based on an independent third party appraisal of CPF XV’s property; (ii) the Duff & Phelps opinion that, as of December 19, 2011, and based on and subject to the various assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth therein, the cash consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit offered in the second merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV; (iii) limited partners may defer recognition of taxable gain by electing to receive OP Units in the second merger, except in certain jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly); and (iv) limited partners are entitled to contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights. The Aimco Entities were aware of, but did not place much emphasis on, information regarding prices at which CPF XV Units may have sold in the secondary market because they do not view that information as a reliable measure of value. The CPF XV Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the secondary market are very limited and sporadic. In addition, some of the historical prices are not comparable to current value because of intervening events, including advances to CPF XV by the Aimco Entities.

 

Procedural Fairness.  The Aimco Entities determined that the transactions are fair from a procedural standpoint despite the absence of any customary procedural safeguards, such as the engagement of an unaffiliated representative, the approval of independent directors or approval by a majority of unaffiliated limited partners. In making this determination, the Aimco Entities relied primarily on the dissenters’ appraisal rights provided to unaffiliated limited partners under the merger agreement that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to stockholders in a corporate merger under Delaware law.

 

Selection and Qualifications of Independent Appraiser.  FRI, in its capacity as a general partner of CPF XV, retained the services of CRA to appraise the market value of CPF XV’s property. CRA is an experienced independent valuation consulting firm that has performed appraisal services for Aimco OP and its affiliates in the past. Aimco OP believes that its relationship with CRA had no negative impact on its independence in conducting the appraisal related to the mergers.

 

Factors Considered.  CRA performed a complete appraisal of Lakeside Place Apartments. CRA has represented that its report was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. CPF XV furnished CRA with all of the necessary information requested by CRA in connection with the appraisal. The appraisal was not prepared in conjunction with a request for a specific value or a value within a given range or predicated upon loan approval. In preparing its valuation of the property, CRA, among other things:

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of Approaches and Methodologies Employed.  The following summary describes the approaches and analyses employed by CRA in preparing the appraisal. CRA principally relied on two approaches to valuation: (i) the income capitalization approach and (ii) the sales comparison approach.

 

The income capitalization approach is based on the premise that value is derived by converting anticipated benefits into property value. Anticipated benefits include the present value of the net income and the present value of the net proceeds resulting from the re-sale of the property. CRA reported that the property has an adequate operations history to determine its income-producing capabilities over the near future. In addition, performance levels of competitive properties served as an adequate check as to the reasonableness of the property’s actual performance. As such, the income capitalization approach was utilized in the appraisal of the property.

 

As part of the income capitalization approach, CRA used the direct capitalization method to estimate a value for Lakeside Place Apartments. According to CRA’s report, the basic steps in the direct capitalization analysis to valuing the property are as follows: (i) calculate potential gross income from all sources that a competent owner could legally generate; (ii) estimate and deduct an appropriate vacancy and collection loss factor to arrive at effective gross income; (iii) estimate and deduct operating expenses that would be expected during a stabilized year to arrive at a probable net operating income; (iv) develop an appropriate overall capitalization rate to apply to the net operating income; and (v) estimate value by dividing the net operating income by the overall capitalization rate. In addition, any adjustments to account for differences between the current conditions and stabilized conditions are also considered. The assumptions utilized by CRA with respect to the property are set forth below. The property-specific assumptions were determined by CRA to be reasonable based on its review of historical operating and financial data for the property and comparison of said data to the operating statistics of similar properties in the influencing market areas. The capitalization rate for the property was determined to be reasonable by CRA based on its review of applicable data ascertained within the market in which the property is located.

 

The sales comparison approach is an estimate of value based upon a process of comparing recent sales of similar properties in the surrounding or competing areas to the subject property. This comparative process involves judgment as to the similarity of the subject property and the comparable sales with respect to many value factors such as location, contract rent levels, quality of construction, reputation and prestige, age and condition, and the interest transferred, among others. The value estimated through this approach represents the probable price at which the subject property would be sold by a willing seller to a willing and knowledgeable buyer as of the date of value. The reliability of this technique is dependent upon the availability of comparable sales data, the verification of the sales data, the degree of comparability and extent of adjustment necessary for differences, and the absence of atypical conditions affecting the individual sales prices. CRA reported that its research revealed adequate sales activity to form a reasonable estimation of the subject property’s market value pursuant to the sales comparison approach.

 

For the appraisal, CRA conducted research in the market in an attempt to locate sales of properties similar to the appraised property. In the appraisal, numerous sales were uncovered and the specific sales included in the appraisal report were deemed representative of the most comparable data available at the time the appraisal was prepared. Important criteria utilized in selecting the most comparable data included: conditions under which the sale occurred (i.e. seller and buyer were typically motivated); date of sale — every attempt was made to utilize recent sales transactions; sales were selected based on their physical similarity to the appraised property;

transactions were selected based on the similarity of location between the comparable and appraised property; and, similarity of economic characteristics between the comparable and appraised property. Sales data that may have been uncovered during the course of research that was not included in the appraisal did not meet the described criteria and/or could not be adequately confirmed.

 

According to CRA’s report, the basic steps in processing the sales comparison approach are outlined as follows: (i) research the market for recent sales transactions, listings, and offers to purchase or sell of properties similar to the subject property; (ii) select a relevant unit of comparison and develop a comparative analysis; (iii) compare comparable sale properties with the subject property using the elements of comparison and adjust the price of each comparable to the subject property; and (iv) reconcile the various value indications produced by the analysis of the comparables.

 

The final step in the appraisal process is the reconciliation of the value indicators into a single value estimate. CRA reviewed each approach in order to determine its appropriateness relative to the property. The accuracy of the data available and the quantity of evidence were weighted in each approach. For the appraisal of Lakeside Place Apartments, CRA placed primary emphasis on the income capitalization approach to valuation, and the direct capitalization approach was considered in the conclusion of value under this approach. CRA relied secondarily on the sales comparison approach, and reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach was utilized as a means to support the value conclusion rendered for Lakeside Place Apartments pursuant to the income capitalization approach.

 

Summary of Independent Appraisal of Lakeside Place Apartments.  CRA performed a complete appraisal of Lakeside Place Apartments. The appraisal report of Lakeside Place Apartments is dated March 15, 2011 and indicates that the estimated market value of the Lakeside Place Apartments was $44,600,000 as of February 16, 2011. The appraisal report was updated by CRA as reflected in CRA’s supplemental letters dated June 8, 2011 and December 7, 2011. The appraisal report, as updated by the supplemental letter dated June 8, 2011, provides an estimate of the property’s market value of $43,500,000 as of May 31, 2011. The appraisal report, as updated by the supplemental letter dated December 7, 2011, provides an estimate of the property’s market value as of November 1, 2011. The summary set forth below describes the material conclusions reached by CRA based on the value determined under the valuation approaches and subject to the assumptions and limitations described below. According to CRA’s report as updated by the supplemental letters, the estimated market value of Lakeside Place Apartments was $44,200,000 as of November 1, 2011. The decrease in the estimated market value of the Lakeside Place Apartments is mainly due to changes in the assumptions employed by CRA to determine the value of the Lakeside Place Apartments under the income capitalization approach (including a higher allowance attributable to loss to lease) and the fact that CRA placed the greatest reliance upon the income capitalization approach to valuation. The following is a summary of the appraisal report dated March 15, 2011, as updated by the supplemental letters dated June 8, 2011 and December 7, 2011. There is no present intention to further update the appraisal report. The Aimco Entities are not aware of any events that have occurred or conditions that have changed since the December 7 supplemental letter that may have caused a material change in the value of Lakeside Place Apartments.

 

Valuation Under Income Capitalization Approach.  Using the income capitalization approach, CRA performed a direct capitalization analysis to derive a value for Lakeside Place Apartments. The direct capitalization analysis resulted in a valuation conclusion for Lakeside Place Apartments of approximately $44,200,000 as of November 1, 2011.

 

The assumptions employed by CRA to determine the value of Lakeside Place Apartments as of November 1, 2011 under the income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization analysis included:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Using a direct capitalization method, CRA calculated the value of Lakeside Place Apartments by dividing the stabilized net operating income (including an allowance for reserves) by the concluded capitalization rate of 7.0%. CRA calculated the value conclusion of Lakeside Place Apartments under the income capitalization approach of approximately $44,200,000 as of November 1, 2011.

 

Valuation Under Sales Comparison Approach.  CRA estimated the property value of Lakeside Place Apartments under the sales comparison approach by analyzing sales from the influencing market that were most similar to Lakeside Place Apartments in terms of age, size, tenant profile and location. CRA reported that adequate sales existed to formulate a value for Lakeside Place Apartments under the sales comparison approach.

 

The sales comparison approach resulted in a valuation conclusion for Lakeside Place Apartments of approximately $42,200,000 as of November 1, 2011.

 

In reaching a valuation conclusion for Lakeside Place Apartments, CRA examined and analyzed comparable sales of four properties in the influencing market. The sales reflected unadjusted sales prices ranging from $37,636 to $69,000 per unit. After adjustment, the comparable sales illustrated a value range of $48,465 to $63,553 per unit, with mean and median adjusted sale prices of $57,814 and $59,622 per unit, respectively. CRA reported that no one of the comparable sales required a significant degree of overall adjustment and equal emphasis was placed on each in the final reconciliation. CRA estimated a value of $57,500 per unit for Lakeside Place Apartments. Applied to Lakeside Place Apartment’s 734 units, this resulted in CRA’s total value estimate for Lakeside Place Apartments of approximately $42,200,000 as of November 1, 2011.

 

Reconciliation of Values and Conclusion of Appraisal.  For the appraisal of Lakeside Place Apartments, CRA placed primary emphasis on the value indicator produced by the income capitalization approach to valuation. CRA relied secondarily on the sales comparison approach, and reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach is utilized as a means to support the value conclusion rendered for Lakeside Place Apartments pursuant to the income capitalization approach. The income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization method resulted in a value of $44,200,000 and the sales comparison approach resulted in a value of $42,200,000. CRA concluded that the market value of Lakeside Place Apartments as of November 1, 2011 was $44,200,000.

 

Assumptions, Limitations and Qualifications of CRA’s Valuations.  CRA’s appraisal report was subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: no responsibility was assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title considerations, and title to the property was assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated; the property was appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated; responsible ownership and competent property management were assumed; the information furnished by others was believed to be reliable, and no warranty was given by CRA for the accuracy of such information; all engineering was assumed to be correct; there were no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable, and no responsibility was assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them; there was full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance was stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless nonconformity had been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in the appraisal report was based; the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the appraisal report; the distribution, if any, of the total valuation in the appraisal report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization; unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without limitation, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental

conditions, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during the appraiser’s inspection, and the appraiser had no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated; the appraiser has not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; and former personal property items such as kitchen and bathroom appliances were, at the time of the appraisal report, either permanently affixed to the real estate or were implicitly part of the real estate in that tenants expected the use of such items in exchange for rent and never gained any of the rights of ownership, and the intention of the owners was not to remove the articles which are required under the implied or express warranty of habitability.

 

Extraordinary Assumption.  In connection with the preparation of its March 2011 appraisal report of the Lakeside Place Apartments, CRA inspected the property on February 16, 2011. CRA noted that the scope of the work of the June 2011 appraisal report of the Lakeside Place Apartments did not include a physical inspection of the Lakeside Place Apartments, and that the values derived in the report are based on the extraordinary assumption that the physical condition of the Lakeside Place Apartments has not materially changed since February 16, 2011.

 

Compensation of Appraiser.  CRA’s fee for the appraisal was approximately $14,100. Aimco OP paid for the costs of the appraisal. CRA’s fee for the appraisal was not contingent on the approval or completion of the merger. Aimco OP also has agreed to indemnify CRA for certain liabilities that may arise out of the rendering of the appraisal. During the past two years, in addition to these fees, Aimco OP and its affiliates have paid CRA approximately $263,700 for other appraisal services, including but not limited to, fees of approximately $161,700 for appraisal services related to certain other merger transactions that are being effected concurrently with these mergers. Except as set forth above, during the prior two years, no material relationship has existed between CRA and CPF XV or Aimco OP or any of their affiliates. Aimco OP believes that its relationship with CRA had no negative impact on its independence in conducting the appraisal.

 

Availability of Appraisal Report.  You may obtain a full copy of CRA’s appraisal upon request, without charge, by contacting Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at (908) 497-2349; or by telephone at (800) 217-9608. In addition, the appraisal report has been filed with the SEC. For more information about how to obtain a copy of the appraisal report see “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”

 

Aimco OP retained Duff & Phelps to act as financial advisor to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, and the general partners of CPF XV in connection with their evaluation of the proposed terms of the mergers.

 

On December 19, 2011, Duff & Phelps rendered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI, to the effect that, as of December 19, 2011, based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken, the cash consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit offered in the second merger is fair from a financial point of view to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV.

 

The full text of the written opinion of Duff & Phelps, dated December 19, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex C to this information statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. The summary of Duff & Phelps’s opinion in this information statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.

 

Duff & Phelps’ opinion was directed to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI, and addressed only the fairness from a financial point of view of the cash consideration offered in the mergers, as of the date of the opinion. Duff & Phelps provided its opinion for the information and assistance of the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI in connection with their evaluation of the mergers. Neither Duff & Phelps’ opinion nor the summary of the opinion and the related analyses set forth in

this information statement/prospectus are intended to be, and do not constitute, advice or a recommendation as to how any person should act with respect to any matters relating to the mergers, or whether to proceed with the mergers or any related transaction.

 

In connection with its opinion, Duff & Phelps made such reviews, analyses and inquiries as it deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions, as well as its experience in securities and business valuation, in general, and with respect to similar transactions, in particular. Duff & Phelps’ procedures, investigations, and financial analysis with respect to the preparation of its opinion included, but were not limited to, the items summarized below:

 

1. Reviewed the following documents:

 

a. Reviewed CPF XV’s property level internal unaudited financial statements for the ten months ended October 31, 2011 and CPF XV’s property level unaudited annual financial statements for each of the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2010;

 

b. Reviewed other internal documents relating to the history, current operations, and probable future outlook of CPF XV, including financial projections, provided to Duff & Phelps by the management of Aimco OP; and

 

c. Reviewed documents related to the mergers, including certain portions of a draft of this information statement/prospectus, including a draft of the merger agreement dated as of December 13, 2011, and certain other documents related to the mergers;

 

2. Reviewed the following information and/or documents related to the real estate holdings of CPF XV:

 

a. Reviewed previously completed appraisal report associated with the property owned by CPF XV prepared by CRA as of May 31, 2011 and provided to Duff & Phelps by management of Aimco OP (and as described under the heading “Special Factors — The Appraisal” and Annex E — Summary of Appraisals Table);

 

b. Reviewed facts and circumstances related to the property owned by CPF XV to understand factors relevant to the appraisal;

 

c. Performed a site visit of the property owned by CPF XV; and

 

d. Reviewed market data for the subject market and assessed current supply and demand trends;

 

3. Reviewed the following information and/or documents related to the property owned by CPF XV:

 

a. Reviewed operating statements and balance sheets for the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010;

 

b. Reviewed the year-to-date operating statement and balance sheet for the ten month period ending October 31, 2011;

 

c. Reviewed budgeted financial statements for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2011;

 

d. Reviewed rent rolls prepared as of October 2011; and

 

e. Discussed the information referred to above and the background and other elements of the mergers with the management of Aimco OP; and

 

4. Conducted such other analyses and considered such other factors as Duff & Phelps deemed appropriate.

 

In performing its analyses and rendering its opinion with respect to the mergers, Duff & Phelps made certain assumptions, qualifications and limiting conditions, which included, but were not limited to, the items summarized below:

 

1. Relied upon the accuracy, completeness, reliability, and fair presentation of all information, data, advice, opinions and representations obtained from public sources or provided to it from private sources regarding or

otherwise relating to the property owned by CPF XV, CPF XV, the mergers and/or otherwise received by it in connection with the opinion, including information obtained from Aimco OP management, and did not independently verify such information;

 

2. Assumed that any estimates, evaluations, forecasts or projections furnished to Duff & Phelps by management of Aimco OP were reasonably prepared and based upon the best currently available information and good faith judgment of the person furnishing the same;

 

3. Assumed that the final versions of all documents reviewed by Duff & Phelps in draft form conform in all material respects to the drafts reviewed;

 

4. Assumed that there has been no material change in the assets, financial condition, business, or prospects of CPF XV or any of its owned properties since the respective dates of the appraisal report, the most recent financial statements and the other information made available to Duff & Phelps;

 

5. Assumed that title to the property owned by CPF XV is good and marketable, that all material licenses and related regulatory approvals that are required or advisable to be obtained with respect to the properties owned by CPF XV have been obtained and are current, and that, except as expressly disclosed in the appraisal report, the property owned by CPF XV is in compliance with applicable material zoning, use, occupancy, environmental, and similar laws and regulations;

 

6. Assumed responsible ownership and competent property management of the property owned by CPF XV, that, except as expressly disclosed in the appraisal report, there are no unapparent conditions with respect to the property owned by CPF XV that could affect the value of such property, and that, except as expressly disclosed in the appraisal report, there are no hazardous substances on or near the property owned by CPF XV that could affect the value of such property;

 

7. Assumed that all of the conditions required to implement the mergers will be satisfied and that the mergers will be completed in accordance with the merger agreement without any amendments thereto or any waivers of any terms or conditions thereof; and

 

8. Assumed that each of the unaffiliated limited partners elects to receive the cash consideration offered, and therefore, Duff & Phelps made no determination as to the fair value of, or fairness, with respect to the OP Unit consideration.

 

Duff & Phelps did not evaluate CPF XV’s solvency or conduct an independent appraisal or physical inspection of any specific liabilities (contingent or otherwise). Duff & Phelps did not evaluate the tax consequences the mergers may have on any person, including any unaffiliated limited partner, and did not take any such consequences into account in rendering the opinion. Duff & Phelps was not requested to, and did not, (i) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the mergers, the assets, businesses or operations of CPF XV, or any alternatives to the mergers, (ii) negotiate the terms of the mergers, or (iii) advise Aimco OP or any other party with respect to alternatives to the mergers.

 

Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion as to the market price or value of CPF XV’s or Aimco OP’s equity (or anything else) after the announcement or the consummation of the mergers. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion as to the liquidity of, rights and/or risks associated with owning, or any other feature or characteristic of, the OP Units. The opinion should not be construed as a valuation opinion, credit rating, solvency opinion, an analysis of CPF XV’s or Aimco OP’s credit worthiness, as tax advice, or as accounting advice. Duff & Phelps did not make, and assumed no responsibility to make, any representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter (including with respect to title to or any encumbrances relating to the property owned by CPF XV).

 

Duff & Phelps did not investigate any of the physical conditions of the property owned by CPF XV and has not made, and assumed no responsibility to make, any representation, or render any opinion, as to the physical condition of the property owned by CPF XV. No independent surveys of the property owned by CPF XV were conducted by Duff & Phelps. Duff & Phelps did not arrange for any engineering studies that may be required to discover any unapparent condition in the property owned by CPF XV. Duff & Phelps did not arrange for or conduct any soil analysis or geological studies or any investigation of any water, oil, gas, coal, or other subsurface mineral and use

rights or conditions or arrange for or conduct any other environmental analysis, including with respect to any hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on, in or near the property owned by CPF XV.

 

In rendering its opinion, Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any of Aimco OP’s and/or Aimco’s respective officers, directors, or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the consideration offered to the unaffiliated limited partners in the mergers, or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.

 

The opinion (i) does not address the merits of the underlying business decision to enter into the mergers versus any alternative strategy or transaction, (ii) does not address any transaction related to the mergers, (iii) is not a recommendation as to how any party should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the mergers or any related transaction, or whether to proceed with the mergers or any related transaction, and (iv) does not indicate that the consideration offered is the best possibly attainable under any circumstances; instead, the opinion merely states whether the consideration offered in the mergers is within a range suggested by certain financial analyses. The decision as to whether to proceed with the mergers or any related transaction may depend on an assessment of factors unrelated to the financial analysis on which the opinion was based.

 

Duff & Phelps prepared its opinion effective as of December 19, 2011. The opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic, financial and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated as of such date, and Duff & Phelps disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting the opinion which may come or be brought to the attention of Duff & Phelps after such date.

 

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Duff & Phelps in connection with providing its opinion. The summary of Duff & Phelps’s valuation analyses is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Duff & Phelps’s opinion. The preparation of an opinion regarding fairness is a complex process involving various quantitative and qualitative judgments and determinations with respect to the financial, comparative and other analytic methods employed and the adaptation and application of these methods to the unique facts and circumstances presented. As a consequence, neither an opinion regarding fairness nor its underlying analyses is readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Duff & Phelps arrived at its opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any individual analysis, analytic method or factor. Accordingly, Duff & Phelps believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, analytic methods and factors, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.

 

Valuation Analysis

 

Duff & Phelps estimated the value attributable to the interests of the unaffiliated limited partners as follows:

 

 

 

Estimated Value of Limited Partnership Units

 

The table below provides a summary of (i) the estimated range of value for the property owned by CPF XV by applying a capitalization rate range that was 25 basis points above and below the capitalization rate used by the third party appraiser to the appropriate measure of income from the property owned by CPF XV used by the third party appraiser, (ii) a summary of the estimated fair market value of mortgage debt associated with the property owned by CPF XV, and (iii) the proposed merger consideration (which was determined by the Aimco Entities) and Duff & Phelps’ range of value for the CPF XV Units.

 

 

 

 

Based on an aggregate range of value for the property owned by CPF XV of $42.7 million to $45.9 million, Duff & Phelps estimated the range of value per CPF XV Unit to be approximately $25.66 to $60.16, compared to the cash merger consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit.

 

Other Matters

 

By letter agreement dated June 10, 2011 between Duff & Phelps and Aimco OP, Duff & Phelps was engaged to opine, as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of each of certain limited partnerships (including CPF XV) of the cash consideration offered in the proposed mergers relating to that limited partnership. Duff & Phelps was engaged based on its experience as a leading global independent provider of financial advisory and investment banking services. Duff & Phelps delivers advice principally in the areas of valuation, transactions, financial restructuring, dispute and taxation. Since 2005, Duff & Phelps has completed hundreds of valuations in the real estate investment trust and real estate operating company industry and rendered over 308 fairness opinions in transactions aggregating over $103 billion. Duff & Phelps has also rendered over 222 solvency opinions in transactions aggregating over $1.02 trillion.

 

Duff & Phelps has received a fee in the aggregate amount of $450,000 for its services with respect to all of the partnerships pursuant to this engagement (which includes a retainer in the amount of $200,000 allocated among eleven partnerships, including CPF XV and a partnership that ultimately did not pursue a merger transaction, and $50,000 for a bring-down of eight of the initial fairness opinions dated July 28, 2011) as well as reimbursement for its expenses in the amount of $50,000. No portion of Duff & Phelps’ fee is contingent upon either the conclusion expressed in this (or any other) opinion or whether or not the mergers (or any other merger) are successfully consummated. Aimco OP also has agreed to indemnify Duff & Phelps for certain liabilities that may arise out of the

rendering of this opinion and any related to Duff & Phelps’ engagement. Other than this engagement, during the two years preceding the date of this opinion, Duff & Phelps has been paid approximately $219,340 for property tax consulting services by Aimco OP and its affiliates for which Duff & Phelps received customary fees and indemnification. Except as set forth above, during the two years preceding the date of this opinion, Duff & Phelps had not had any material relationship with any party to the mergers for which compensation has been received or is intended to be received, nor is any such material relationship or related compensation mutually understood to be contemplated.

 

Estimated Operating Budget for the Property

 

At the end of each calendar year, Aimco OP’s management prepares an estimated operating budget for the next calendar year for CPF XV’s property. Aimco OP’s management provided the 2011 estimated operating budget for the property to Duff & Phelps for use in connection with the preparation of its fairness opinion and to CRA in connection with the preparation of its appraisal.

 

In preparing the 2011 estimated operating budget, Aimco OP’s management made a number of assumptions and estimates, including the following:

 

 

 

 

 

Aimco OP’s management believed these assumptions and estimates were reasonable at the time the budget was prepared, but these assumptions and estimates may not be realized and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, including, among others, the risks and uncertainties described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in CPF XV’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is included as Annex G to this information statement/prospectus. All of these uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and many are beyond the control of Aimco, Aimco OP and CPF XV.

 

The 2011 estimated operating budget has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Aimco OP’s management. The 2011 estimated operating budget was prepared solely for internal use and not with a view toward public disclosure and, accordingly, does not comply with generally accepted accounting principles, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections, or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information. Neither Aimco’s independent registered public accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants, has compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the 2011 estimated operating budget, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and they assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the 2011 estimated operating budget. Furthermore, the 2011 estimated operating budget does not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date it was prepared.

 

The inclusion of the 2011 estimated operating budget in this information statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication that any of Aimco, Aimco OP or their respective affiliates, advisors or representatives consider the 2011 estimated operating budget to be predictive of actual future results, and it should not be relied upon as such. There can be no assurance that the underlying assumptions will prove to be accurate or that the estimated results will be realized, and actual results likely will differ, and may differ materially, from those reflected in the 2011 estimated operating budget. None of Aimco, Aimco OP or their respective affiliates, advisors, officers, directors or representatives undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise revise the 2011 estimated operating budget to reflect circumstances existing after the date it was prepared, or to reflect the occurrence of future events, even if any or all of the assumptions underlying the 2011 estimated operating budget are no longer appropriate,

except as required by law. In light of the foregoing factors and the uncertainties inherent in the 2011 estimated operating budget, holders of CPF XV Units are cautioned not to place undue, if any, reliance on it.

 

The following table summarizes the 2011 estimated operating budget for the property:

 

 

Limited Partners are urged to review CPF XV’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is included as Annex G to this information statement/prospectus, for information regarding CPF XV’s results of operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

Conflicts of Interest.  FCMC and FRI, the general partners of CPF XV, have a conflict of interest with respect to the mergers. Both FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI are wholly owned by AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which is in turn wholly owned by Aimco. Each of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI has fiduciary duties to its ultimate sole stockholder, Aimco, on the one hand, and each of FCMC and FRI has fiduciary duties to CPF XV and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of FCMC and FRI to CPF XV and its limited partners conflict with the duties of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI to Aimco and its affiliates, which could result in FCMC and FRI approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. As the managing general partner of CPF XV, FCMC seeks the best possible terms for CPF XV’s limited partners. This conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP.

 

No independent representative was engaged to represent the unaffiliated limited partners in negotiating the terms of the mergers.  If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms for CPF XV’s unaffiliated limited partners.

 

The terms of the mergers have not been determined in arm’s-length negotiations.  The terms of the mergers, including the merger consideration, were determined through discussions between officers and directors of FCMC, on the one hand, and officers of Aimco, on the other. All of the officers and directors of FCMC are also officers of Aimco. There are no independent directors of FCMC. If the terms of the mergers had been determined through arm’s-length negotiations, the terms might be more favorable to CPF XV and its limited partners.

 

The merger agreement does not require approval by a majority of the unaffiliated limited partners.  Under applicable law, the merger agreement and the mergers must be approved by CPF XV’s general partners and a majority in interest of the limited partnership units. FCMC, CPF XV’s managing general partner, has determined that the merger agreement and the mergers are advisable and in the best interests of CPF XV and its limited partners and FCMC and FRI have approved the merger agreement and the mergers. FCMC, as well as the managing general partner of FRI, are subsidiaries of Aimco. As of December 14, 2011, there were issued and outstanding 89,975 CPF XV Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 65,841.34 of those units, or approximately 73.18% of the number of units outstanding. Of the CPF XV Units owned by affiliates of Aimco OP, approximately 35,473.17 of such units are subject to a voting restriction, which requires the units to be voted in proportion to the votes cast with respect to CPF XV Units not subject to this voting restriction. Aimco OP’s affiliates have indicated that they will vote all of their CPF XV Units that are not subject to this restriction, approximately 30,368.17 CPF XV Units or approximately 33.75% of the outstanding CPF XV Units, in favor of the merger agreement and the mergers. As a result, affiliates of Aimco OP will vote a total of approximately 50,133 CPF XV Units, or approximately 55.72% of the outstanding CPF XV Units in favor of the merger agreement and the mergers.

 

In connection with previous partnership merger transactions, lawsuits have been filed alleging that Aimco and certain of its affiliates breached their fiduciary duties to the unaffiliated limited partners. In February 2011, Aimco and Aimco OP completed six partnership mergers. In each merger, the limited partners who were not affiliated with Aimco received cash or OP Units with a value calculated based on the estimated proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners if the partnership’s properties were sold at prices equal to their appraised values. In March 2011, counsel representing a putative class consisting of former limited partners in each of those partnerships contacted Aimco alleging that the merger transactions were unfair to the unaffiliated limited partners because the appraisals used were not of a recent date and no fairness opinions were obtained, among other reasons. Aimco denied the purported class allegations, but agreed to mediate plaintiffs’ claims in June 2011, and agreed to settle this dispute by paying the unaffiliated limited partners additional consideration of $7.5 million. The mergers contemplated hereby may also be subject to claims that the merger consideration is unfair and a result of self-dealing.

 

The merger consideration was determined based on the appraised value of the property as of the date of the appraisal, and there can be no assurance that the value of the property will not increase as of the date of the consummation of the mergers. CRA appraised the property as of November 1, 2011, and FCMC calculated the amount of the merger consideration based on the appraised value of the property as of such date. FCMC has made no

other attempt to asses, nor has FCMC accounted for, any changes in the value of the property since the date of CRA’s appraisal in its determination of the merger consideration.

 

Alternative valuations of CPF XV’s property might exceed the appraised value relied on to determine the merger consideration.  Aimco determined the merger consideration in reliance on the appraised value of CPF XV’s property. See “Special Factors — The Appraisal,” beginning on page 9, for more information about the appraisal. Although an independent appraiser was engaged to perform a complete appraisal of the property, valuation is not an exact science. There are a number of other methods available to value real estate, each of which may result in different valuations of the property. Also, others using the same valuation methodology could make different assumptions and judgments, and obtain different results.

 

The actual sale price of CPF XV’s property could exceed the appraised value that Aimco relied on to determine the merger consideration.  No recent attempt has been made to market Lakeside Place Apartments to unaffiliated third parties. There can be no assurance that Lakeside Place Apartments could not be sold for a value higher than the appraised value used to determine the merger consideration if it was marketed to third-party buyers interested in a property of this type.

 

The merger consideration may not represent the price limited partners could obtain for their CPF XV Units in an open market.  There is no established or regular trading market for CPF XV Units, nor is there another reliable standard for determining the fair market value of the CPF XV Units. The merger consideration does not necessarily reflect the price that CPF XV limited partners would receive in an open market for their CPF XV Units. Such prices could be higher than the aggregate value of the merger consideration.

 

Limited partners may recognize taxable gain in the mergers that could exceed the merger consideration.  Limited partners who elect to receive cash in the second merger will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between their “amount realized” and their adjusted tax basis in the New CPF XV Units sold. The resulting tax liability could exceed the value of the cash received in the merger.

 

Limited partners in certain jurisdictions will not be able to elect OP Units.  In those states or jurisdictions where the offering of the OP Units hereby is not permitted (or where the registration or qualification of OP Units in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), residents of those states will receive only the cash consideration in the mergers.

 

For a description of risks related to an investment in Aimco and Aimco OP, please see the information set forth under “Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of each of Aimco and Aimco OP. Aimco’s Annual Report is incorporated herein by reference and is available electronically through the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or by request to Aimco. Aimco OP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (excluding the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, the financial statements and the notes thereto) is included as Annex H to this information statement/prospectus.

 

There are restrictions on the ability to transfer OP Units, and there is no public market for Aimco OP Units.  The Aimco OP partnership agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units. Until the expiration of a one-year holding period, subject to certain exceptions, investors may not transfer OP Units without the consent of Aimco OP’s general partner. Thereafter, investors may transfer such OP Units subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the general partner’s right of first refusal. There is no public market for the OP Units. Aimco OP has no plans to list any OP Units on a securities exchange. It is unlikely that any person will make a market in the OP Units, or that an active market for the OP Units will develop. If a market for the OP Units develops and the OP Units are considered “readily tradable” on a “secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof),” Aimco OP would be classified as a publicly traded partnership for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, which could have a material adverse effect on Aimco OP.

Cash distributions by Aimco OP are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with partnership performance.  Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions to holders of OP Units (on a per unit basis) that generally are equal to dividends paid on the Aimco common stock (on a per share basis). However, such distributions will not necessarily continue to be equal to such dividends. Although Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions on its OP Units, there can be no assurance regarding the amounts of available cash that Aimco OP will generate or the portion that its general partner will choose to distribute. The actual amounts of available cash will depend upon numerous factors, including profitability of operations, required principal and interest payments on our debt, the cost of acquisitions (including related debt service payments), its issuance of debt and equity securities, fluctuations in working capital, capital expenditures, adjustments in reserves, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which may be beyond Aimco OP’s control. Cash distributions depend primarily on cash flow, including from reserves, and not on profitability, which is affected by non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions may be made during periods when Aimco OP records losses and may not be made during periods when it records profits. The Aimco OP partnership agreement gives the general partner discretion in establishing reserves for the proper conduct of the partnership’s business that will affect the amount of available cash. Aimco is required to make reserves for the future payment of principal and interest under its credit facilities and other indebtedness. In addition, Aimco OP’s credit facility limits its ability to distribute cash to holders of OP Units. As a result of these and other factors, there can be no assurance regarding actual levels of cash distributions on OP Units, and Aimco OP’s ability to distribute cash may be limited during the existence of any events of default under any of its debt instruments.

 

Holders of OP Units are limited in their ability to effect a change of control.  The limited partners of Aimco OP are unable to remove the general partner of Aimco OP or to vote in the election of Aimco’s directors unless they own shares of Aimco. In order to comply with specific REIT tax requirements, Aimco’s charter has restrictions on the ownership of its equity securities. As a result, Aimco OP limited partners and Aimco stockholders are limited in their ability to effect a change of control of Aimco OP and Aimco, respectively.

 

Holders of OP Units have limited voting rights.  Aimco OP is managed and operated by its general partner. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, holders of OP Units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting Aimco OP’s business. Such matters relate to certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the admission of a successor general partner. Holders of OP Units have no right to elect the general partner on an annual or other continuing basis, or to remove the general partner. As a result, holders of OP Units have limited influence on matters affecting the operation of Aimco OP, and third parties may find it difficult to attempt to gain control over, or influence the activities of, Aimco OP.

 

Holders of OP Units are subject to dilution.  Aimco OP may issue an unlimited number of additional OP Units or other securities for such consideration and on such terms as it may establish, without the approval of the holders of OP Units. Such securities could have priority over the OP Units as to cash flow, distributions and liquidation proceeds. The effect of any such issuance may be to dilute the interests of holders of OP Units.

 

Holders of OP Units may not have limited liability in specific circumstances.  The limitations on the liability of limited partners for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some states. If it were determined that Aimco OP had been conducting business in any state without compliance with the applicable limited partnership statute, or that the right or the exercise of the right by the OP Unitholders as a group to make specific amendments to the agreement of limited partnership or to take other action under the agreement of limited partnership constituted participation in the “control” of Aimco OP’s business, then a holder of OP Units could be held liable under specific circumstances for Aimco OP’s obligations to the same extent as the general partner.

 

Aimco may have conflicts of interest with holders of OP Units.  Conflicts of interest have arisen and could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between the general partner of Aimco OP and its affiliates (including Aimco), on the one hand, and Aimco OP or any partner thereof, on the other. The directors and officers of the general partner have fiduciary duties to manage the general partner in a manner beneficial to Aimco, as the sole stockholder of the general partner. At the same time, as the general partner of Aimco OP, it has fiduciary duties to manage Aimco OP in a manner beneficial to Aimco OP and its limited partners. The duties of the general partner of Aimco OP to Aimco OP and its partners may therefore come into conflict with the duties of the directors and

officers of the general partner to its sole stockholder, Aimco. Such conflicts of interest might arise in the following situations, among others:

 

 

Provisions in the Aimco OP partnership agreement may limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge actions taken by the general partner.  Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners. The Aimco OP partnership agreement expressly authorizes the general partner to enter into, on behalf of Aimco OP, a right of first opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance agreements with various affiliates of Aimco OP and the general partner, on such terms as the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, believes are advisable. The latitude given in the Aimco OP partnership agreement to the general partner in resolving conflicts of interest may significantly limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge what might otherwise be a breach of fiduciary duty. The general partner believes, however, that such latitude is necessary and appropriate to enable it to serve as the general partner of Aimco OP without undue risk of liability.

 

The Aimco OP partnership agreement limits the liability of the general partner for actions taken in good faith. Aimco OP’s partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the general partner by providing that the general partner, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in damages to Aimco OP, the limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if the general partner or such director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, Aimco OP is required to indemnify the general partner, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by the general partner or such other persons, provided that Aimco OP will not indemnify for (i) willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or (ii) for any transaction for which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement. The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and the general partner has not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the Aimco OP partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict the fiduciary duties of the general partner that would be in effect under common law were it not for the partnership agreement.

 

The following are among the U.S. Federal income tax considerations to be taken into account in connection with an investment in OP Units. For a general discussion of material U.S. Federal income tax consequences resulting from acquiring, holding, exchanging, and otherwise disposing of OP Units, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders.”

 

Aimco OP may be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation.  If Aimco OP were treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxed as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, material adverse consequences to the partners would result. Moreover, in such case, a holder of CPF XV Units receiving OP Units in the mergers would be required to recognize gain or loss on the transaction. In addition, Aimco would not qualify as a REIT for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, which would have a material adverse impact on Aimco and its shareholders. Aimco believes and intends to take the position that Aimco OP should not be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation. No assurances can be given that the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a contrary position. Accordingly, each prospective investor is urged to consult his tax advisor regarding the classification and treatment of Aimco OP as a “partnership” for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

 

The limited partners may recognize gain on the transaction.  If a CPF XV limited partner receives or is deemed to receive cash or consideration other than OP Units in connection with the mergers, the receipt of such cash or other consideration would be taxable to the limited partner. Subject to certain exceptions, including exceptions applicable to periodic distributions of operating cash flow, any transfer or deemed transfer of cash by Aimco OP to the limited partner within two years before or after the mergers, including cash paid at closing, will generally be treated as part of a disguised sale. The application of the disguised sale rules is complex and depends, in part, upon the facts and circumstances applicable to the limited partner, which Aimco has not undertaken to review. Accordingly, limited partners are particularly urged to consult with their tax advisors concerning the extent to which the disguised sale rules would apply.

 

A contribution of appreciated or depreciated property may result in special allocations to the contributing partner.  If property is contributed to Aimco OP and the adjusted tax basis of the property differs from its fair market value, then Aimco OP tax items must be specially allocated for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, in a manner chosen by Aimco OP, such that the contributing partner is charged with and recognizes the unrealized gain, or benefits from the unrealized loss, associated with the property at the time of the contribution. As a result of such special allocations, the amount of net taxable income allocated to a contributing partner may exceed the amount of cash distributions, if any, to which such contributing partner is entitled.

 

The Aimco OP general partner could take actions that would impose tax liability on a contributing partner.  There are a variety of transactions that Aimco OP may in its sole discretion undertake following a property contribution that could cause the transferor (or its partners) to incur a tax liability without a corresponding receipt of cash. Such transactions include, but are not limited to, the sale or distribution of a particular property and a reduction in nonrecourse debt, or the making of certain tax elections by Aimco OP. In addition, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause Aimco OP to dispose of the contributed property or to reduce its debt. As permitted by the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner intends to make decisions in its capacity as general partner of Aimco OP so as to maximize the profitability of Aimco OP as a whole, independent of the tax effects on individual holders of OP Units.

 

An investor’s tax liability from OP Units could exceed the cash distributions received on such OP Units.  A holder of OP Units will be required to pay U.S. Federal income tax on such holder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s income, even if such holder receives no cash distributions from Aimco OP. No assurance can be given that a holder of OP Units will receive cash distributions equal to such holder’s allocable share of taxable income from Aimco OP or equal to the tax liability to such holder resulting from that income. Further, upon the sale, exchange or redemption of any OP Units, a reduction in nonrecourse debt, or upon the special allocation at the liquidation of Aimco OP, an investor may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash received.

 

OP Unitholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation.  OP Unitholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which Aimco OP transacts business and owns property. It should be noted that Aimco OP owns properties located in a number of states and local jurisdictions, and an OP Unitholder may be required to file income tax returns in some or all of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of OP Unitholders may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in OP Units, as described in “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” beginning on page 69.

 

The following table sets forth Aimco’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Aimco’s historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2010, are derived from information included in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011. Aimco’s unaudited historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the unaudited historical consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011, are derived from information included in Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2011.

 

You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2011, which are incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” in this information statement/prospectus.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth Aimco OP’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Aimco OP’s historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2010, are derived from information included in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and included as Annex J to this information statement/prospectus. Aimco OP’s unaudited historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the unaudited historical consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011, are derived from information included in Aimco OP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is included as Annex I to this information statement/prospectus.

 

You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and included as Annex J to this information statement/prospectus, and in Aimco OP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2011, which is included as Annex I to this information statement/prospectus.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth CPF XV’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. CPF XV’s historical consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data set forth below for each of the two fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, are derived from CPF XV’s consolidated financial statements included in CPF XV’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. CPF XV’s unaudited historical consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data set forth below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the unaudited historical consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, are derived from CPF XV’s unaudited historical consolidated financial statements included in CPF XV’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 included in CPF XV’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011, and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 filed with the SEC on November 10, 2011, which are included as Annex F and Annex G to this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” in this information statement/prospectus.

 

 

Aimco common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange and do not trade in an active secondary market. However, as described below, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit.

 

After a one-year holding period, OP Units are redeemable for shares of Aimco common stock (on a one-for-one basis) or cash equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco elects. As a result, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. The number of OP Units offered in the merger with respect to each CPF XV Unit was calculated by dividing the per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the mergers. The closing price of Aimco common stock as reported on the NYSE on December 14, 2011 was $21.22.

 

The CPF XV Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do they trade in an active secondary market. The per unit cash merger consideration payable to each holder of CPF XV Units is greater than FCMC’s estimate of the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners of CPF XV if the property was sold at a price equal to its appraised value.

 

The following tables summarize the historical per share/unit information for Aimco, Aimco OP and CPF XV for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aimco is a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994. Aimco is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Aimco’s principal financial objective is to provide predictable and attractive returns to its stockholders. Aimco’s business plan to achieve this objective is to:

 

 

As of September 30, 2011, Aimco:

 

 

 

 

Of these properties, Aimco consolidated 199 conventional properties with 63,335 units and 160 affordable properties with 19,969 units.

 

For conventional assets, Aimco focuses on the ownership of primarily B/B+ assets. Aimco measures conventional property asset quality based on average rents of its units compared to local market average rents as reported by a third-party provider of commercial real estate performance and analysis, with A-quality assets earning rents greater than 125% of local market average, B-quality assets earning rents 90% to 125% of local market average and C-quality assets earning rents less than 90% of local market average. Aimco classifies as B/B+ those assets earning rents ranging from 100% to 125% of local market average. Although some companies and analysts within the multifamily real estate industry use asset class ratings of A, B and C, some of which are tied to local market rent averages, the metrics used to classify asset quality as well as the timing for which local markets rents are calculated may vary from company to company. Accordingly, Aimco’s rating system for measuring asset quality is neither broadly nor consistently used in the multifamily real estate industry.

 

Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, AIMCO-GP, Inc., the general partner of Aimco OP, and AIMCO-LP Trust, Aimco owns a majority of the ownership interests in Aimco OP. As of September 30, 2011, Aimco held approximately 94% of the OP Units and equivalents. Aimco conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets through Aimco OP. Interests in Aimco OP that are held by limited partners other than Aimco include partnership common Units, high performance partnership units, or HPUs, and partnership preferred units. The holders of OP Units receive distributions, prorated from the date of issuance, in an amount equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of Aimco common stock. Holders of OP Units may redeem such units for cash or, at Aimco OP’s option, Aimco common stock. Partnership preferred units entitle the holders thereof to a preference with respect to distributions or upon liquidation. At September 30, 2011, after elimination of shares held by consolidated subsidiaries, 120,916,144 shares of Aimco common stock were outstanding, and Aimco OP had 8,289,841 OP Units and equivalents outstanding for a combined total of 129,205,985 shares of Aimco common stock, OP Units and equivalents outstanding.

 

Through its wholly owned subsidiary, AIMCO/IPT, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Aimco owns all of the outstanding common stock of Fox Capital Management Corporation, the managing general partner of CPF XV.

 

AIMCO/IPT, Inc. holds a 70% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as its general partner. AIMCO Properties, L.P. holds a 30.0% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as the limited partner. AIMCO/IPT, Inc. and AIMCO IPLP, L.P. share

voting and dispositive power over 39,802.17 CPF XV Units, or approximately 44.24% of the outstanding CPF XV Units.

 

AIMCO IPLP L.P. is the sole member of Madison River Properties, L.L.C. Madison River Properties, L.L.C., AIMCO IPLP, L.P. and AIMCO/IPT, Inc. share voting and dispositive power over 4,222 CPF XV Units held by Madison River Properties, L.L.C., representing approximately 4.69% of the class. AIMCO/IPT, Inc. is the sole shareholder of FCMC. FCMC and AIMCO/IPT, Inc. share voting and dispositive power over 100 CPF XV Units held by FCMC, representing approximately 0.11% of the class.

 

Century Properties Fund XV, LP, or New CPF XV, is a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the merger with CPF XV. New CPF XV’s general partner is Aimco OP and its sole limited partner is the Aimco Subsidiary. New CPF XV has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

 

Aimco CPF XV Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a Delaware limited liability company formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the merger with New CPF XV. The Aimco Subsidiary is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco OP. The Aimco Subsidiary has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

 

The names, positions and business addresses of the directors and executive officers of Aimco, AIMCO-GP, Inc., AIMCO/IPT, Inc. and FCMC, as well as a biographical summary of the experience of such persons for the past five years or more, are set forth in Annex D attached hereto and are incorporated in this information statement/prospectus by reference. None of Aimco OP, AIMCO IPLP, L.P., Madison River Properties, L.L.C. nor the Aimco Subsidiary has any directors or officers. During the last five years, none of Aimco, Aimco-GP, AIMCO/IPT, Inc., AIMCO IPLP, L.P., Madison River Properties, L.L.C., Aimco OP, CPF XV or FCMC, nor, to the best of their knowledge, any of the persons listed in Annex D of this information statement/prospectus (i) has been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors) or (ii) was a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining further violations of or prohibiting activities subject to federal or state securities laws or finding any violation with respect to such laws. Additional information about Aimco is included in documents incorporated by reference into this information statement/prospectus. Additional information about Aimco OP is included as Annexes H, I and J to this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”

The following chart represents the organizational structure of the Aimco Entities:

 

 

CPF XV is a California limited partnership organized in May 1980 under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the California Corporation Code. The general partners are Fox Capital Management Corporation, a California corporation, or FCMC, and Fox Realty Investors, a California general partnership, or FRI. FCMC, as well as the managing general partner of FRI, are subsidiaries of Aimco. CPF XV’s partnership agreement provides that CPF XV is to terminate on December 31, 2020 unless terminated prior to such date.

 

CPF XV registered the CPF XV Units pursuant to a registration statement, filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (File No. 2-66459), which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 1980. Beginning in July 1980 through April 1981, CPF XV offered $90,000,000 in CPF XV Units and sold units having an initial cost of $89,980,000. The net proceeds of the offering were used to acquire 17 income-producing real estate properties. FCMC purchased 100 CPF XV Units for a 4% interest in CPF XV. Since its initial offering, CPF XV has not received, nor are limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions.

 

CPF XV has no employees. FCMC is vested with full authority as to the general management and supervision of the business and affairs of CPF XV. The limited partners have no right to participate in the management or conduct of such business and affairs. An affiliate of FCMC provides day-to-day management services to the CPF XV’s investment property.

 

CPF XV’s primary business and only industry segment is real estate related operations. At September 30, 2011, CPF XV owned one property, Lakeside Place Apartments, a 734 unit apartment project located in Houston, Texas.

 

The average annual rental rates for each of the five years ended December 31, 2010 for the property are as follows:

 

 

The average occupancy for each of the five years ended December 31, 2010 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 for the property is as follows:

 

 

The real estate industry is highly competitive. The property is subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. FCMC, the managing general partner of CPF XV, believes that the property is adequately insured. The property is an apartment complex which generally leases units for lease terms of one year or less. No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space. The property is in good physical condition, subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical for assets of this type and age.

 

CPF XV regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. During the year ended December 31, 2010, CPF XV completed approximately $1,855,000 of capital improvements at the property consisting primarily of building improvements, floor covering replacements, kitchen and bath resurfacing and construction related to a fire at the property during January 2010. These improvements were funded from operations, insurance proceeds and advances from Aimco OP. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, CPF XV completed approximately $771,000 of capital improvements at the property, which consisted primarily of kitchen and bath resurfacing, appliance and floor covering replacement and construction related to the 2010 fire at the property. The improvements were funded from operations, insurance proceeds and advances from Aimco OP. While CPF XV has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2011. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

 

Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, partnership reserves, insurance proceeds or advances from Aimco OP, although Aimco OP does not have an obligation to fund such advances. To

the extent that capital improvements are completed, CPF XV’s distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

 

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the mortgages encumbering CPF XV’s property at September 30, 2011.

 

 

 

 

As of December 14, 2011, there were 89,975 CPF XV Units outstanding, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 65,841.34 of those units, or approximately 73.18% of those units. CPF XV made no distributions during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 or during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations and the timing of debt maturity, property sale and/or refinancings. CPF XV’s cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. Given the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of FCMC at September 30, 2011, there can be no assurance that CPF XV will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital improvement expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners in 2011 or for the foreseeable future.

 

CPF XV has no employees and depends on FCMC and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The CPF XV partnership agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of CPF XV.

 

Under the CPF XV partnership agreement, affiliates of FCMC receive 5% of gross receipts from the property as compensation for providing property management services. CPF XV paid to such affiliates approximately $240,000 and $234,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $313,000 and $392,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

An affiliate of FCMC charged CPF XV for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $64,000 and $71,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $94,000 and $110,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At September 30, 2011, approximately $20,000 of reimbursements were due to affiliates of FCMC. No reimbursements were owed at December 31, 2010.

 

Under the CPF XV partnership agreement, for managing the affairs of CPF XV, FCMC is entitled to receive a partnership management fee equal to 10% of CPF XV’s adjusted cash from operations as distributed. No such partnership management fees were paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 or during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, as there were no distributions from operations during such periods.

 

Aimco OP has made available to CPF XV a credit line of up to $150,000 per property owned by CPF XV. This credit line was exceeded and Aimco OP advanced CPF XV approximately $1,293,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, to fund real estate taxes and casualty repairs, and approximately $1,653,000 for the nine

months ended September 30, 2010, to fund real estate taxes, operating expenses and capital improvements at Lakeside Place Apartments. Aimco OP advanced CPF XV approximately $1,653,000 and $2,856,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to fund operating expenses, real estate taxes and capital improvements at Lakeside Place Apartments. Interest accrues at the prime rate plus 2% per anum (5.25% at September 30, 2011). Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $330,000 and $289,000, respectively, and during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, was approximately $389,000 and $297,000 respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, CPF XV repaid approximately $612,000 and $280,000, respectively, of advances and accrued interest. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, CPF XV repaid approximately $280,000 and $3,194,000, respectively, of advances and accrued interest. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of advances and accrued interest due to Aimco OP was approximately $8,621,000 and $7,610,000, respectively. CPF XV may receive additional advances of funds from Aimco OP although Aimco OP is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on Aimco OP, including its audited balance sheets, see Annexes H, I and J to this information statement/prospectus.

 

CPF XV insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco, which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. CPF XV insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with FCMC. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, CPF XV was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $326,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by CPF XV during 2011 as other insurance polices renew later in the year. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, CPF XV was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $421,000 and $230,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

 

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in CPF XV, Aimco and its affiliates owned 65,841.34 CPF XV Units representing 73.18% of the outstanding CPF XV Units at December 14, 2011. A number of these CPF XV Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by Aimco or its affiliates. Pursuant to the CPF XV partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the CPF XV Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the CPF XV partnership agreement and voting to remove FCMC. As a result of its ownership of 73.18% of the outstanding CPF XV Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to influence all such voting decisions with respect to CPF XV. However, with respect to 35,473.17 CPF XV units owned by AIMCO IPLP, L.P., an affiliate of FCMC and of Aimco, such affiliate agreed to vote such CPF XV Units: (i) against any increase in compensation payable by CPF XV to FCMC or to its affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by FCMC or its affiliates, in proportion to the vote cast by third party unitholders. Except for the foregoing, no other limitations are imposed on AIMCO IPLP, L.P.’s, Aimco’s or any other affiliates’ right to vote each CPF XV Unit held. Although FCMC and FRI owe fiduciary duties to the limited partners of CPF XV, FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI also owe fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., their sole stockholder and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco. As a result, the duties of FCMC and FRI, as general partners of CPF XV, to CPF XV and its limited partners on the one hand may come into conflict with the duties of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI to AIMCO/IPT, Inc. as their sole stockholder and to Aimco, as the sole stockholder of AIMCO/IPT, Inc., on the other hand.

 

CPF XV has no directors or executive officers of its own. FCMC manages and controls substantially all of CPF XV’s affairs and has general responsibility in all matters affecting its business. The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by, the present directors and officers of FCMC, as of September 30, 2011, are set forth in Annex D to this information statement/prospectus. One or more of those persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Further, one or more of those persons are also officers of Aimco and the general partner of Aimco OP, entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. There are no family

relationships between or among any officers or directors. None of the directors or officers of FCMC or FRI received remuneration from CPF XV during the year ended December 31, 2010 or during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

The board of directors of FCMC does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of FCMC fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an “audit committee financial expert.”

 

The directors and officers of FCMC with authority over CPF XV are all employees of subsidiaries of Aimco. Aimco has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com). Aimco’s website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.

 

FCMC and FRI own all of the outstanding general partner interests in CPF XV, which constitutes 2% of the total interests in the partnership. CPF XV has no directors or executive officers of its own. FCMC is a California corporation which is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. FRI is a California general partnership, the managing partner of which is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. No director or officer of FCMC owns any of the limited partnership interests of CPF XV. FCMC owns 100 CPF XV Units as required by the terms of the partnership agreement governing CPF XV. The following table sets forth certain information as of December 14, 2011 with respect to the ownership by any person (including any “group,” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the CPF XV Units.

 

 

 

 

 

For additional information about CPF XV and its property and operating data related to the property, see CPF XV’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, attached hereto as Annex F and CPF XV’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, attached hereto as Annex G.

 

As the managing general partner of CPF XV, FCMC regularly evaluates CPF XV’s property by considering various factors, such as CPF XV’s financial position and real estate and capital markets conditions. FCMC monitors the property’s specific locale and sub-market conditions (including stability of the surrounding neighborhood), evaluating current trends, competition, new construction and economic changes. It oversees the operating performance of the property and continuously evaluates the physical improvement requirements. In addition, the financing structure for the property (including any prepayment penalties), tax implications to limited partners, availability of attractive mortgage financing to a purchaser, and the investment climate are all considered. Any of these factors, and possibly others, could potentially contribute to any decision FCMC to sell, refinance, upgrade with capital improvements or hold the partnership property.

 

After taking into account the foregoing considerations, during January 2011, officers of FCMC, who are also officers of Aimco, met several times to discuss strategic alternatives for CPF XV. During these meetings, they considered the costs of maintaining CPF XV’s current ownership structure, including audit, tax and SEC reporting costs, given Aimco OP’s ownership of 73.18% of the CPF XV’s Units and the outstanding debt owed to Aimco OP. The participants also noted that CPF XV owed approximately $7,853,000 to Aimco OP as of March 31, 2011, and that CPF XV had been operating at a loss from operations for two of the past three years. In light of the amounts already then owed to Aimco OP and CPF XV’s ongoing losses, the officers concluded that additional loans from Aimco OP would be unlikely.

 

After considering all of these factors, the officers agreed to explore the possibility of Aimco OP acquiring Lakeside Place Apartments through a transaction that would provide the unaffiliated limited partners with the opportunity to defer taxable gain through an exchange of CPF XV Units for OP Units.

 

During January and February of 2011, FCMC’s management sought advice from outside counsel to determine whether a transaction would be feasible that would result in Aimco OP’s ownership of Lakeside Place Apartments while also providing potential tax deferral to limited partners who are unaffiliated with Aimco OP. At the same time, they spoke with appraisers regarding the possibility of appraising the property for purposes of evaluating a potential transaction with Aimco OP. FCMC engaged CRA on February 11, 2011 to appraise the property. CRA delivered the appraisal for Lakeside Place Apartments on March 15, 2011. Pursuant to this appraisal, CRA valued the property at $44,600,000.

 

Over the following weeks, FCMC’s management reviewed the appraisal report and discussed both CRA’s assumptions and its valuation of the property and determined that CRA’s assumptions were reasonable and the valuation was appropriate. As part of their review, they considered the fiduciary duties owed by FCMC to unaffiliated limited partners, as well as the property’s appraised value, and the amount of indebtedness secured by the property, which at March 31, 2011 was approximately $26.6 million.

 

In April and May 2011, Aimco OP and FCMC continued discussions regarding a possible merger transaction between CPF XV and Aimco OP. In connection with these discussions, Aimco OP and FCMC agreed that, if they were to pursue the mergers, they should consider retaining an independent financial advisor to opine as to the fairness of the merger to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV. Aimco OP and FCMC, together with outside counsel, conducted interviews with representatives of Duff & Phelps and two other financial advisory firms.

 

On June 8, 2011, at the request of Aimco OP and FCMC, CRA delivered an updated appraisal for Lakeside Place Apartments, pursuant to which it valued the property at $43,500,000 as of May 31, 2011. Aimco OP and FCMC reviewed the updated appraisal report and calculated the equity value of CPF XV’s Units based on this updated appraisal.

 

On June 10, 2011, Aimco OP engaged Duff & Phelps to provide a fairness opinion and, if requested, an updated fairness opinion with respect to the proposed merger transaction and ten other possible merger transactions. In the following weeks, Duff & Phelps had due diligence calls with FCMC’s management and received due diligence materials in response to its diligence requests.

 

On July 28, 2011, Duff & Phelps delivered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP and the managing general partner of FRI to the effect that, as of July 28, 2011, based on and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, the cash consideration of $45.61 per CPF XV Unit is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV.

 

On July 28, 2011, FCMC, FRI and the general partner of Aimco OP approved an agreement and plan of merger that provided consideration of $45.61 per CPF XV Unit, payable in cash or OP Units. Before doing so, FCMC and the Aimco Entities considered a number of possible alternatives to the proposed transaction, as described in greater detail in this information statement/prospectus. However, FCMC and the Aimco Entities ultimately determined that the proposed mergers are in the best interests of CPF XV and its unaffiliated limited partners that hold CPF XV Units. On July 28, 2011, CPF XV, New CPF XV and Aimco OP entered into an agreement and plan of merger.

 

Also on July 28, 2011, Aimco and Aimco OP filed with the SEC a registration statement relating to the merger. In addition, the Aimco Entities made certain other filings required in connection with the merger. From August through December 2011, Aimco and Aimco OP responded to SEC comments and revised the registration statement.

 

On September 20, 2011, FCMC’s management met to discuss the merger transactions and the valuation of CPF XV’s property. On October 4, 2011, FCMC’s management met again to discuss the timing of the merger transactions and considered updating the valuations of CPF XV’s property. On November 18, 2011, FCMC engaged CRA to update the appraisal and Duff & Phelps to provide an updated fairness opinion with respect to the equity value resulting from such updated appraisal.

 

On December 7, 2011, CRA delivered an updated appraisal for Lakeside Place Apartments, pursuant to which it valued the property at $44,200,000 as of November 1, 2011. Aimco OP and FCMC reviewed and discussed the updated appraisal report and calculated the equity value of the CPF XV Units based on the updated appraisal, CPF XV’s updated financial position and the updated mark-to-market adjustment of the mortgage debt encumbering CPF XV’s property. This calculation resulted in a decrease of the equity value of CPF XV’s Units from $45.61 per unit to $41.83 per unit.

 

On December 19, 2011, Duff & Phelps delivered its updated written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco, and the general partner of Aimco OP and FCMC, to the effect that, as of December 19, 2011, based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, the cash consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of CPF XV.

 

On December 19, 2011, the board of directors of FCMC and the general partner of Aimco OP approved an amendment and restatement of the agreement and plan of merger that provides for consideration of $41.83 per CPF XV Unit, payable in cash or OP Units. On December 19, 2011, CPF XV, New CPF XV, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary entered into the amended and estated agreement and plan of merger.

 

Upon completion of the mergers, limited partners in CPF XV will receive, for each CPF XV Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the mergers, at the election of the holder, either $41.83 in cash or equivalent value in Aimco OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units in this transaction (or registration would be prohibitively costly). Because Aimco indirectly wholly owns FCMC as well as the managing general partner of FRI, the merger consideration has not been determined in an arm’s-length negotiation. In order to arrive at a fair consideration, CRA, an independent real estate appraisal firm, was engaged to perform a complete appraisal of CPF XV’s property. For more detailed information about the independent appraiser’s determination of the estimated value of the property, see “Special Factors — The Appraisal.” The per unit cash merger consideration payable to each holder of CPF XV Units is greater than the FCMC’s estimate of the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners (following the repayment of debt and other liabilities of CPF XV) if the property was sold at a price equal to its appraised value. FCMC did not deduct certain amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the partnership’s property, such as prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt of the property. The estimated prepayment penalty would have been approximately $6,949,100. FCMC calculated the equity of the partnership by (i) adding to the appraised value the value of

any other non-real estate assets of CPF XV that would not be included in the appraisal; and (ii) deducting all liabilities, including the market value of mortgage debt, debt owed to FCMC or its affiliates, accounts payable and accrued expenses and certain other costs. The amount of liabilities deducted includes an estimate of $293,600 for expenses attributable to the property that would be incurred prior to the transactions but payable after the transactions. This calculation, which is summarized below, resulted in per unit cash merger consideration of $41.83.

 

 

 

 

 

The number of OP Units offered per CPF XV Unit was calculated by dividing the per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the mergers. Although there is no public market for OP Units, after a one-year holding period, each OP Unit is generally redeemable for cash in an amount equal to the value of one share of Aimco common stock at the time, subject to Aimco’s right to acquire each OP Unit in exchange for one share of Aimco common stock (subject to antidilution adjustments). Therefore, FCMC considers the trading price of Aimco common stock to be a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. As of December 14, 2011, the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading days was $21.62, which would have resulted in OP Unit consideration of 1.93 OP Units per CPF XV Unit.

 

FCMC and FRI have a conflict of interest with respect to the mergers. FCMC and FRI are the general partners of CPF XV. Both FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI are wholly owned by AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which in turn is wholly owned by Aimco. Each of FCMC and the managing general partner of FRI have fiduciary duties to its ultimate sole stockholder, Aimco, on the one hand, and each of FCMC and FRI have fiduciary duties to CPF XV and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of FCMC and FRI to CPF XV and its limited partners conflict with its duties of FCMC and the managing general partner to Aimco and its affiliates, which could result in FCMC and FRI approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest.

As the managing general partner of CPF XV, FCMC seeks the best possible terms for CPF XV’s limited partners. This conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP.

 

After the mergers, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in New CPF XV, and will own all of the outstanding New CPF XV Units. FCMC and FRI will continue to be the general partners of New CPF XV after the mergers, and CPF XV’s partnership agreement in effect immediately prior to the mergers will be adopted as the partnership agreement of New CPF XV, with the following changes: (i) references therein to the California Act will be amended to refer to the Delaware Act, (ii) a description of the merger will be added and (iii) the name of the partnership will be “Century Properties Fund XV, LP”. Aimco OP intends to retain the New CPF XV Units after the mergers. After the mergers, Aimco will evaluate the capital improvement needs of Lakeside Place Apartments, and anticipates making certain routine capital expenditures with respect to the property during the remainder of 2011.

 

For a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the transactions, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Transactions.”

 

No material federal or state regulatory requirements must be satisfied or approvals obtained in connection with the transactions, except (1) filing a registration statement that includes this information statement/prospectus with the SEC and obtaining the SEC’s declaration that the registration statement is effective under the Securities Act, (2) registration or qualification of the issuance of OP Units under state securities laws, and (3) filing certificates of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the Secretary of State of the State of California.

 

Aimco and Aimco OP will treat the mergers as a purchase of noncontrolling interests for financial accounting purposes. This means that Aimco and Aimco OP will recognize any difference between the purchase price for these noncontrolling interests and the carrying amount of such noncontrolling interests in Aimco and Aimco OP’s consolidated financial statements as an adjustment to the amounts of consolidated equity and partners’ capital attributed to Aimco and Aimco OP, respectively.

 

Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law or CPF XV’s partnership agreement in connection with the mergers. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a constituent corporation in a merger under Delaware law. These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s New CPF XV Units in connection with the mergers. Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in a taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.

 

List of Investors

 

Under CPF XV’s partnership agreement and applicable law, upon written request and at the cost of the limited partner, a limited partner who holds CPF XV Units has the right to receive by mail a list of the names and addresses of the partners of CPF XV and the number of units of partnership interest held by each of them. This list may be obtained by making written request to the general partners of CPF XV, c/o Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016, or by fax at (908) 497-2349.

 

The costs of planning and implementing the mergers, including the cash merger consideration and the preparation of this information statement/prospectus, will be borne by Aimco OP without regard to whether the mergers are effectuated. The estimated amount of these costs is approximately $1,556,200, assuming all limited partners elect to receive the cash merger consideration. Aimco OP is paying for the costs of the mergers with funds on hand or from drawings under its revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility is pursuant to Aimco OP’s Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated December 13, 2011, with a syndicate of financial institutions, with KeyBank National Association as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a pricing grid determined by leverage (at Aimco OP’s option, either at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or a base rate (equal to the greatest of (x) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%, (y) KeyBank National Association’s prime rate and (z) one month LIBOR plus 1.25%) plus an applicable margin). The applicable margin is currently 2.75% for LIBOR based loans and 1.50% for base rate based loans, and is subject to adjustment based on Aimco OP’s leverage ratio. The revolving commitments will expire on December 13, 2014 and may be extended for an additional year on two occasions, subject to certain conditions. Aimco OP’s obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Agreement are secured by equity interests in certain of its subsidiaries.

 

Under applicable law, the merger agreement and the mergers must be approved by CPF XV’s general partners and a majority in interest of the limited partnership units. FCMC, CPF XV’s managing general partner, has determined that the merger agreement and the mergers are advisable and in the best interests of CPF XV and its limited partners, and FCMC and FRI, CPF XV’s general partners, have approved the merger agreement and the mergers. FCMC, as well as the managing general partner of FRI, are subsidiaries of Aimco. As of December 14, 2011, there were issued and outstanding 89,975 CPF XV Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 65,841.34 of those units, or approximately 73.18% of the number of units outstanding. Of the CPF XV Units owned by affiliates of Aimco OP, approximately 35,473.17 of such units are subject to a voting restriction, which requires the units to be voted in proportion to the votes cast with respect to CPF XV Units not subject to this voting restriction. Aimco OP’s affiliates have indicated that they will vote all of their CPF XV Units that are not subject to this restriction, approximately 30,368.17 CPF XV Units or approximately 33.75% of the outstanding CPF XV Units, in favor of the merger agreement and the mergers. As a result, affiliates of Aimco OP will vote a total of approximately 50,133 CPF XV Units, or approximately 55.72% of the outstanding CPF XV Units in favor of the merger agreement and the mergers. Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the mergers on or about [ • ], 2011. Therefore, approval of the mergers is assured and your consent is not required.

 

The following is a summary of the material terms of the merger agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex A. You should read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety as it is the legal document that governs this merger.

 

CPF XV has entered into the merger agreement with Aimco OP and its wholly owned subsidiaries, New CPF XV and the Aimco Subsidiary. The merger agreement amends and restates a prior agreement and plan of merger to reflect a decrease in the merger consideration from $45.61 per CPF XV Unit to $41.83 per CPF XV Unit. Pursuant to the merger agreement, there will be two mergers.

 

Merger of CPF XV with and into New CPF XV.  First, CPF XV will be merged with and into New CPF XV with New CPF XV as the surviving entity. In this merger, each CPF XV Unit will be converted into an identical unit of limited partnership in New CPF XV and each general partnership interest in CPF XV now held by the general partners will be converted into a general partnership interest in New CPF XV. All interests in New CPF XV outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be cancelled in the merger. CPF XV’s partnership agreement in effect immediately prior to the merger will be adopted as the partnership agreement of New CPF XV, with the following changes: (i) references therein to the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, or the California Act, will be amended to refer to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, or the Delaware Act, (ii) a description of the merger will be added and (iii) the name of the partnership will be “Century Properties Fund XV, LP”.

 

Merger of the Aimco Subsidiary with and into New CPF XV.  Second, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into New CPF XV, with New CPF XV as the surviving entity. In the merger, each New CPF XV Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the merger will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder, either $41.83 in cash or equivalent value in OP Units (calculated by dividing $41.83 by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger); provided, however, that if Aimco OP determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of Aimco OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will only be entitled to receive $41.83 in cash for each New CPF XV Unit. Each holder of CPF XV Units must make the same election (cash or OP Units) for all of his or her CPF XV Units.

 

In the second merger, Aimco OP’s interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be converted into New CPF XV Units. After the second merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New CPF XV, and will own all of the outstanding New CPF XV Units. The agreement of limited partnership of New CPF XV, as in effect immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger, will be the agreement of limited partnership of the surviving entity after the second merger, until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law.

 

 

CPF XV.  Under the merger agreement, each CPF XV Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the mergers will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such CPF XV Unit, either $41.83 in cash or equivalent value in Aimco OP Units (calculated by dividing $41.83 by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger), except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the issuance of Aimco OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly). The general partners of CPF XV will continue to serve as the general partners of CPF XV after the mergers, and the current general partner interests will remain unchanged after the merger.

 

Aimco Subsidiary.  All membership interests in the Aimco Subsidiary immediately prior to the effective time of the mergers will be converted into CPF XV Units after the mergers.

 

None of the parties to the merger agreement are required to consummate the mergers if any third party consent, authorization or approval that any of the parties deems necessary or desirable in connection with the merger agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, has not been obtained or received.

 

 

The merger agreement may be terminated, and the mergers may be abandoned, at any time prior to consummation of the mergers, without liability to any party to the merger agreement, by CPF XV, New CPF XV, Aimco OP or the Aimco Subsidiary, in each case, acting in its sole discretion and for any reason or for no reason, notwithstanding the approval of the merger agreement by any of the partners of CPF XV or the member of the Aimco Subsidiary.

 

 

Subject to applicable law, the merger agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented by written agreement of the parties at any time prior to the consummation of the mergers with respect to any of the terms contained therein.

 

 

The merger agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to the conflict of law provisions thereof.

 

 

Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law or CPF XV’s partnership agreement in connection with the mergers. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a constituent corporation in a merger under Delaware law. These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s CPF XV Units in connection with the mergers. Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in a taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.

 

 

Within 10 days after the effective time of the mergers, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to the former holders of CPF XV Units an election form pursuant to which such holders can elect to receive cash or OP Units. Each holder of CPF XV Units must make the same election (cash or OP Units) for all of his or her CPF XV Units. Limited partners may also elect appraisal of their CPF XV Units pursuant to the election form. Holders of CPF XV Units may elect their form of consideration by completing and returning the election form in accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does not receive a properly completed election form from a holder before 5:00 p.m., New York time on the 30th day after the mailing of the election form, the holder will be deemed to have elected to receive the cash consideration. Former holders of CPF XV Units may also use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the appraised value of their CPF XV Units, determined through an arbitration proceeding.

 

The following description sets forth some general terms and provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The following description of the Aimco OP partnership agreement is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the agreement.

 

Aimco OP is a limited partnership organized under the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor to such statute, or the Delaware Act, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in its agreement of limited partnership. AIMCO-GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco, is the sole general partner of Aimco OP. Another wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco, AIMCO-LP Trust, a Delaware trust, or the special limited partner, is a limited partner in Aimco OP. The term of Aimco OP commenced on May 16, 1994, and will continue in perpetuity, unless Aimco OP is dissolved sooner under the provisions of the partnership agreement or as otherwise provided by law.

 

The purpose and nature of Aimco OP is to conduct any business, enterprise or activity permitted by or under the Delaware Act, including, but not limited to, (i) conducting the business of ownership, construction, development and operation of multifamily rental apartment communities, (ii) entering into any partnership, joint venture, business trust arrangement, limited liability company or other similar arrangement to engage in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, or to own interests in any entity engaged in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, (iii) conducting the business of providing property and asset management and brokerage services, whether directly or through one or more partnerships, joint ventures, subsidiaries, business trusts, limited liability companies or other similar arrangements, and (iv) doing anything necessary or incidental to the foregoing; provided, however, such business and arrangements and interests may be limited to and conducted in such a manner as to permit Aimco, in the sole and absolute discretion of the general partner, at all times to be classified as a REIT.

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, all management powers over the business and affairs of Aimco OP are exclusively vested in the general partner. No limited partner of Aimco OP or any other person to whom one or more OP Units have been transferred (each, an “assignee”) may take part in the operations, management or control (within the meaning of the Delaware Act) of Aimco OP’s business, transact any business in Aimco OP’s name or have the power to sign documents for or otherwise bind Aimco OP. The general partner may not be removed by the limited partners with or without cause, except with the consent of the general partner. In addition to the powers granted to a general partner of a limited partnership under applicable law or that are granted to the general partner under any other provision of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner, subject to the other provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, has full power and authority to do all things deemed necessary or desirable by it to conduct the business of Aimco OP, to exercise all powers of Aimco OP and to effectuate the purposes of Aimco OP. Aimco OP may incur debt or enter into other similar credit, guarantee, financing or refinancing arrangements for any purpose (including, without limitation, in connection with any acquisition of properties) upon such terms as the general partner determines to be appropriate. The general partner is authorized to execute, deliver and perform specific agreements and transactions on behalf of Aimco OP without any further act, approval or vote of the limited partners.

 

Restrictions on General Partner’s Authority.  The general partner may not take any action in contravention of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The general partner may not, without the prior consent of the limited partners, undertake, on behalf of Aimco OP, any of the following actions or enter into any transaction that would have the effect of such transactions: (i) except as provided in the partnership agreement, amend, modify or terminate the partnership agreement other than to reflect the admission, substitution, termination or withdrawal of partners; (ii) make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or appoint or acquiesce in the appointment of a custodian, receiver or trustee for all or any part of the assets of Aimco OP; (iii) institute any proceeding for bankruptcy on

behalf of Aimco OP; or (iv) subject to specific exceptions, approve or acquiesce to the transfer of the Aimco OP general partner interest, or admit into Aimco OP any additional or successor general partners.

 

Additional Limited Partners.  The general partner is authorized to admit additional limited partners to Aimco OP from time to time, on terms and conditions and for such capital contributions as may be established by the general partner in its reasonable discretion. The net capital contribution need not be equal for all partners. No action or consent by the limited partners is required in connection with the admission of any additional limited partner. The general partner is expressly authorized to cause Aimco OP to issue additional interests (i) upon the conversion, redemption or exchange of any debt, OP Units or other securities issued by Aimco OP, (ii) for less than fair market value, so long as the general partner concludes in good faith that such issuance is in the best interests of the general partner and Aimco OP, and (iii) in connection with any merger of any other entity into Aimco OP if the applicable merger agreement provides that persons are to receive interests in Aimco OP in exchange for their interests in the entity merging into Aimco OP. Subject to Delaware law, any additional partnership interests may be issued in one or more classes, or one or more series of any of such classes, with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties as shall be determined by the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion without the approval of any limited partner, and set forth in a written document thereafter attached to and made an exhibit to the partnership agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the general partner has authority to specify (a) the allocations of items of partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and credit to each such class or series of partnership interests; (b) the right of each such class or series of partnership interests to share in distributions; (c) the rights of each such class or series of partnership interests upon dissolution and liquidation of Aimco OP; (d) the voting rights, if any, of each such class or series of partnership interests; and (e) the conversion, redemption or exchange rights applicable to each such class or series of partnership interests. No person may be admitted as an additional limited partner without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be given or withheld in the general partner’s sole and absolute discretion.

 

Indemnification.  As a part of conducting the mergers described herein, the general partner has agreed not to seek indemnification from, or to be held harmless by, Aimco OP, or its affiliates, for any liability or loss suffered by the general partner related to the mergers, unless (i) the general partner has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the loss or liability was in the best interests of Aimco OP, (ii) the general partner was acting on behalf of or performing services for Aimco OP, (iii) such liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by the general partner, and (iv) such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of the assets of Aimco OP and not from the limited partners of Aimco OP. In addition, the general partner, and any of its affiliates that are performing services on behalf of Aimco OP, have agreed that they will not seek indemnification for any losses, liabilities or expenses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless (i) there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations as to the particular indemnitee, (ii) such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction as to the particular indemnitee, or (iii) a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against a particular indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made, and, as relates to (iii), the court of law considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the SEC and the position of any state securities regulatory authority in which securities of Aimco OP were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws. Aimco OP shall not incur the cost of that portion of liability insurance, if any, which insures the general partner for any liability as to which the general partner is prohibited from being indemnified as described in this paragraph. Finally, the general partner has agreed that the provision of advancement from Aimco OP funds to the general partner or any of its affiliates for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action is permissible if (i) the legal action relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services on behalf of Aimco OP; (ii) the legal action is initiated by a third party who is not a limited partner of Aimco OP, or the legal action is initiated by a limited partner and a court of competent jurisdiction specifically approves such advancement; and (iii) the general partner or its affiliates undertake to repay the advanced funds to Aimco OP in cases in which such person is not entitled to indemnification under this paragraph.

 

As of November 30, 2011, Aimco OP had issued and outstanding the following partnership interests: