Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-12110
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
76-6088377 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1300
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77046
(Zip Code) |
(713) 354-2500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
On
April 25, 2011, 70,181,138 common shares of the registrant were outstanding, net of treasury
shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements.
CAMDEN
PROPERTY TRUST
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate assets, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
760,397 |
|
|
$ |
760,397 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
4,690,741 |
|
|
|
4,680,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,451,138 |
|
|
|
5,440,758 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,335,831 |
) |
|
|
(1,292,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating real estate assets |
|
|
4,115,307 |
|
|
|
4,147,834 |
|
Properties under development, including land |
|
|
220,641 |
|
|
|
206,919 |
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
21,196 |
|
|
|
27,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate assets |
|
|
4,357,144 |
|
|
|
4,382,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
29,973 |
|
|
|
31,895 |
|
Notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
92,051 |
|
|
|
106,175 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
98,771 |
|
|
|
170,575 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,583,293 |
|
|
$ |
4,699,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
$ |
1,419,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,507,757 |
|
Secured |
|
|
1,054,839 |
|
|
|
1,055,997 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
81,972 |
|
|
|
81,556 |
|
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
16,585 |
|
|
|
22,338 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
38,662 |
|
|
|
35,295 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
134,608 |
|
|
|
141,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,746,347 |
|
|
|
2,844,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred units |
|
|
97,925 |
|
|
|
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest; $0.01
par value per share; 100,000 shares
authorized; 85,641 and 85,130 issued;
82,743 and 82,386 outstanding at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,783,621 |
|
|
|
2,775,625 |
|
Distributions in excess of net income
attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(623,740 |
) |
|
|
(595,317 |
) |
Treasury shares, at cost (12,744 and 12,766
common shares at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
(460,467 |
) |
|
|
(461,255 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(31,504 |
) |
|
|
(33,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common equity |
|
|
1,668,737 |
|
|
|
1,686,419 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
70,284 |
|
|
|
70,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,739,021 |
|
|
|
1,757,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
4,583,293 |
|
|
$ |
4,699,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Property revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
138,780 |
|
|
$ |
128,851 |
|
Other property revenues |
|
|
22,367 |
|
|
|
20,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
161,147 |
|
|
|
149,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance |
|
|
46,225 |
|
|
|
43,771 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
17,707 |
|
|
|
18,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property expenses |
|
|
63,932 |
|
|
|
61,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
Income on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-property income |
|
|
12,563 |
|
|
|
8,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management |
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
5,183 |
|
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9,788 |
|
|
|
7,404 |
|
Interest |
|
|
29,737 |
|
|
|
31,555 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
46,822 |
|
|
|
42,968 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
Expense on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
100,367 |
|
|
|
92,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of unconsolidated joint venture interests |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
10,921 |
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
9,601 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,601 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
Less (income) loss allocated to noncontrolling
interests from continuing operations |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
71,906 |
|
|
|
66,475 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive equivalent
common shares outstanding |
|
|
72,783 |
|
|
|
66,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
9,601 |
|
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
Less (income) loss allocated to noncontrolling interests from
continuing operations |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,601 |
|
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging activities |
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(6,817 |
) |
Reclassification of net losses on cash flow hedging activities |
|
|
5,766 |
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
Reclassification of gain on available-for-sale investment to
earnings, net of tax |
|
|
(3,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
Less (income) loss allocated to noncontrolling interests from
continuing operations |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
Less income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
9,240 |
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
secured by |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beneficial |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
in excess of |
|
|
common |
|
|
shares, at |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
interest |
|
|
capital |
|
|
net income |
|
|
shares |
|
|
cost |
|
|
loss |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
2,775,625 |
|
|
$ |
(595,317 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(461,255 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,458 |
) |
|
$ |
70,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,757,373 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
7,851 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share awards placed into deferred
plans |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions and redemptions of
operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to perpetual
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
Cash distributions to equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
(36,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
2,783,621 |
|
|
$ |
(623,740 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(460,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,504 |
) |
|
$ |
70,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,739,021 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
2,525,656 |
|
|
$ |
(492,571 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(462,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,155 |
) |
|
$ |
78,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,013 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net share awards |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share awards placed into deferred
plans |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions and redemptions of
operating partnership units |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to perpetual
preferred units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
Cash distributions to equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
(31,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
2,548,722 |
|
|
$ |
(520,798 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
(461,517 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,093 |
) |
|
$ |
75,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,891 |
|
|
$ |
97,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
CAMDEN
PROPERTY TRUST
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,601 |
|
|
$ |
3,781 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
46,593 |
|
|
|
43,507 |
|
Gain on sale of unconsolidated joint venture interests |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of available-for-sale investment |
|
|
(4,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions of income from joint ventures |
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
Net change in operating accounts and other |
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
(10,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
$ |
54,407 |
|
|
$ |
41,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and capital improvements |
|
$ |
(23,141 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,063 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investment |
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in notes receivable affiliates |
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Proceeds from sale of joint venture interests |
|
|
19,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
(12,320 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
Distribution
of investments from joint ventures |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Other |
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
$ |
(7,776 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(89,128 |
) |
|
|
(56,120 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
17,200 |
|
Distributions to common shareholders, perpetual preferred units and
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(35,300 |
) |
|
|
(33,155 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
Net decrease in accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
$ |
(118,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(71,804 |
) |
|
|
(35,603 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
170,575 |
|
|
|
64,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
98,771 |
|
|
$ |
28,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized |
|
$ |
19,352 |
|
|
$ |
23,006 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared but not paid |
|
$ |
38,662 |
|
|
$ |
33,403 |
|
Value of shares issued under benefit plans, net of cancellations |
|
|
18,146 |
|
|
|
13,709 |
|
Conversion of operating partnership units to common shares |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Accrual associated with construction and capital expenditures |
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
Business. Formed on May 25, 1993, Camden Property Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust
(REIT), is engaged in the ownership, management, development, acquisition, and construction of
multifamily apartment communities. Our multifamily apartment communities are referred to as
communities, multifamily communities, properties, or multifamily properties in the
following discussion. As of March 31, 2011, we owned interests in, operated, or were developing
190 multifamily properties comprising 64,509 apartment homes across the United States. Of the 190
properties, three properties were under development, and when completed will consist of a total of
711 apartment homes. In addition, we own land parcels we may develop into multifamily apartment
communities.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. Our condensed consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries and joint ventures (including partnerships and
limited liability companies) over which we have control. All intercompany transactions, balances,
and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments acquired or created are continuously
evaluated based on the accounting guidance relating to variable interest entities (VIEs), which
requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. If the
investment is determined not to be a VIE, then the investment is evaluated for consolidation
(primarily using a voting interest model) under the remaining consolidation guidance relating to
real estate entities. If we are the general partner of a limited partnership, or manager of a
limited liability company, we also consider the consolidation guidance relating to the rights of
limited partners (non-managing members) to assess whether any rights held by the limited partners
overcome the presumption of control by us.
Interim Financial Reporting. We have prepared these financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial statements and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Accordingly, these statements do not include all information and footnote
disclosures required for annual financial statements. While we believe the disclosures presented
are adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair representation of our financial statements for the
interim period reported have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31,
2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the full year.
Asset Impairment. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Impairment exists if estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with long-lived assets are
not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets. We consider projected future
discounted and undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development
plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist. When impairment
exists, the long-lived asset is adjusted to its fair value. While we believe our estimates of
future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding a number of factors, including
market rents, economic conditions, and occupancies, could significantly affect these estimates. In
estimating fair value, management uses appraisals, management estimates, and discounted cash flow
calculations which maximize inputs from a marketplace participants perspective. In addition, we
evaluate our equity investments in joint ventures and if we believe there is an other than
temporary decline in market value of our investment, we will record an impairment charge.
The value of our properties under development depends on market conditions, including
estimates of the project start date as well as estimates of demand for multifamily communities. We
have reviewed market trends and other marketplace information and have incorporated this
information as well as our current outlook into the assumptions we use in our impairment analyses.
Due to, among other factors, the judgment and assumptions applied in the impairment analyses and
the fact limited market information regarding the value of comparable land exists at this time, it
is possible actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
8
We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets, properties under
development, and land is currently recoverable. However, if market conditions deteriorate or if
changes in our development strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value
calculations, we may need to take material charges in future periods for impairments related to
existing assets. Any such material non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. All cash and investments in money market accounts and other highly
liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to
be cash and cash equivalents. We maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents at major
financial institutions in the United States and deposits with these financial institutions may
exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, we regularly monitor the
financial stability of these financial institutions and believe we are not currently exposed to any
significant default risk with respect to these deposits.
Cost Capitalization. Real estate assets are carried at cost plus capitalized carrying
charges. Carrying charges are primarily interest and real estate taxes which are capitalized as
part of properties under development. Capitalized interest is generally based on the weighted
average interest rate of our unsecured debt. Transaction costs associated with the acquisition of
real estate assets are expensed. Expenditures directly related to the development and improvement
of real estate assets are capitalized at cost as land and buildings and improvements. Indirect
development costs, including salaries and benefits and other related costs directly attributable to
the development of properties, are also capitalized. All construction and carrying costs are
capitalized and reported in the balance sheet as properties under development until the apartment
homes are substantially completed. Upon substantial completion of the apartment homes, the total
cost for the apartment homes and the associated land is transferred to buildings and improvements
and land, respectively.
As discussed above, carrying charges are principally interest and real estate taxes
capitalized as part of properties under development and buildings and improvements. Capitalized
interest was approximately $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and
approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Capitalized real estate
taxes were approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and approximately
$0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Where possible, we stage our construction to allow leasing and occupancy during the
construction period, which we believe minimizes the duration of the lease-up period following
completion of construction. Our accounting policy related to properties in the development and
leasing phase is to expense all operating expenses associated with completed apartment homes. We
capitalize renovation and improvement costs we believe extend the economic lives of depreciable
property. Capital expenditures subsequent to initial construction are capitalized and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives.
Depreciation and amortization is computed over the expected useful lives of depreciable
property on a straight-line basis with lives generally as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Useful Life |
Buildings and improvements |
|
5-35 years |
Furniture, fixtures, equipment, and other |
|
3-20 years |
Intangible assets (in-place leases and above and below market leases) |
|
underlying lease term |
Derivative Financial Instruments. Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value and we do not apply master netting for
financial reporting purposes. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on
the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging
relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the
criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of
the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows or other types of forecasted transactions
are cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or
loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes attributable to the
earnings effect of the hedged transactions. We may enter into derivative contracts which are
intended to economically hedge certain of our risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or
we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
9
Income Recognition. Our rental and other property revenue is recorded when due from residents
and is recognized monthly as it is earned. Other property revenue consists primarily of utility
rebillings and administrative, application, and other transactional fees charged to our residents.
Our apartment homes are rented to residents on lease terms generally ranging from six to fifteen
months, with monthly payments due in advance. All other sources of income, including from interest
and fee and asset management income, are recognized as earned.
Nine of our properties are subject to rent control. Operations of multifamily properties acquired are recorded from the date of
acquisition in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. In managements opinion, due
to the number of residents, the types and diversity of submarkets in which our properties operate,
and the collection terms, there is no significant concentration of credit risk.
Reportable Segments. Our multifamily communities are geographically diversified throughout
the United States, and management evaluates operating performance on an individual property level.
As each of our apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, and products
and services, our apartment communities have been aggregated into one reportable segment. Our
multifamily communities generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of apartment
homes, which comprised approximately 96.1% and 96.8% of our total property revenues and total
non-property income, excluding income on deferred compensation plans, for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Use of Estimates. In the application of GAAP, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, results of operations during the reporting periods, and related disclosures.
Our more significant estimates include estimates supporting our impairment analysis related to the
carrying values of our real estate assets, estimates related to the valuation of our investments in
joint ventures and estimates and assumptions used to determine the entity with the power to direct
activities that most significantly impacts economic performance of potential variable interest
entities. These estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the
best estimates routinely require adjustment.
3. Share Data
Basic earnings per share are computed using net income attributable to common shareholders and
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect
common shares issuable from the assumed conversion of common share options and share awards granted
and units convertible into common shares. Only those items having a dilutive impact on our basic
earnings per share are included in diluted earnings per share. Our unvested share-based awards are
considered participating securities and are reflected in the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share using the two-class method. The number of common share equivalent securities
excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2011,
and 2010 was approximately 4.1 million and 5.1 million, respectively. These securities, which
include common share options and share awards granted and units convertible into common shares,
were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they are anti-dilutive.
10
The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted earnings per
share for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic earnings per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
Amount allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, net of amount allocated to participating securities |
|
$ |
7,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, adjusted basic |
|
$ |
7,182 |
|
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
71,906 |
|
|
|
66,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, net of amount allocated to participating securities |
|
$ |
7,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
Income allocated to common units |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted |
|
|
7,192 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted |
|
$ |
7,192 |
|
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders, as adjusted per share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
71,906 |
|
|
|
66,475 |
|
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and share awards granted |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Common units |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of dilutive equivalent common shares outstanding, as adjusted |
|
|
72,783 |
|
|
|
66,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
4. Common Shares
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC which allows
us to offer, from time to time, an unlimited amount of common shares, preferred shares, debt
securities, or warrants. Our declaration of trust provides we may issue up to 110.0 million shares
of beneficial interest, consisting of 100.0 million common shares and 10.0 million preferred
shares. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately 70.0 million common shares outstanding, net of
treasury shares and shares held in our deferred compensation plans, and no preferred shares
outstanding.
In March 2010, we originated an at-the-market (ATM) share offering program through which we
can sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250 million from time to time
into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated
transactions. We may, but shall have no obligation to, sell common shares through the ATM share
offering program in amounts and at times as we determine. Actual sales from time to time may
depend on a variety of factors including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of our
common shares, and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for us. During the three
months ended March 31, 2011, we issued approximately 0.1 million common shares at an average price
of $54.06 per share for total net consideration of approximately $3.8 million. In April 2011, we
issued an additional 0.2 million common shares at an average price of $56.50 per share for total
net considerations of approximately $10.1 million. Cumulative to date, we have issued
approximately 5.1 million common shares at an average price of $48.73 for total net consideration
of approximately $245.3 million. As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an
aggregate offering price of up to $0.5 million remaining available for sale under the ATM program.
5. Investments in Joint Ventures
As of March 31, 2011, our equity investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, which we
account for utilizing the equity method of accounting, consisted of 17 joint ventures, with our
ownership percentages ranging from 15% to 50%. We currently provide property management services
to each of these joint ventures which own operating properties and may provide construction and
development services to the joint ventures which own properties under development. The following
table summarizes aggregate balance sheet and statement of income data for the unconsolidated joint
ventures as of and for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011(1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
959.2 |
|
|
$ |
935.3 |
|
Total third-party debt |
|
|
811.3 |
|
|
|
810.1 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Equity in income (loss)(2) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months
ended March 31, 2011, we sold our ownership interests in
three joint ventures and one of our discretionary funds (the Funds) acquired three
multifamily properties as further discussed below. |
|
(2) |
|
Equity in income (loss) excludes our ownership interest of fee income from various
property management services with our joint ventures. |
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured,
third-party debt. As of March 31, 2011, we have no outstanding guarantees related to loans
utilized for construction and development activities for our unconsolidated joint ventures.
We may earn fees for property management, construction, development, and other services
related to joint ventures in which we own an interest. Fees earned for these services, excluding
third-party construction fees, amounted to approximately $1.5 million and $1.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We eliminate fee income from property
management services provided to these joint ventures to the extent of our ownership.
12
During March 2011, we sold our ownership interests in three unconsolidated joint venture
communities for total proceeds of approximately $19.3 million and recognized a gain of
approximately $1.1 million.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, one of our Funds, in which we have a 20%
interest, acquired three multifamily properties for an aggregate net purchase price of
approximately $122.6 million. The acquisitions were comprised of 352 units located in Houston,
Texas, 355 units located in Dallas, Texas and 234 units located in Atlanta, Georgia.
In April 2011, we sold one of our development properties in Washington, D.C. to one of the
Funds for approximately $9.4 million and we were reimbursed for
previously written-off development costs, resulting in a gain of
approximately $4.7 million.
6. Notes Payable
The following is a summary of our indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Commercial Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured line of credit and short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Term loan, due 2012 |
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.69% Notes, due 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
5.93% Notes, due 2012 |
|
|
189.5 |
|
|
|
189.5 |
|
5.45% Notes, due 2013 |
|
|
199.6 |
|
|
|
199.6 |
|
5.08% Notes, due 2015 |
|
|
249.2 |
|
|
|
249.2 |
|
5.75% Notes, due 2017 |
|
|
246.2 |
|
|
|
246.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884.5 |
|
|
|
972.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.99% Notes, due 2011 |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unsecured notes payable |
|
|
1,419.7 |
|
|
|
1,507.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.12% - 6.00% Conventional Mortgage Notes, due 2011 2045 |
|
|
1,014.8 |
|
|
|
1,015.7 |
|
1.74% Tax-exempt Mortgage Note, due 2028 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054.8 |
|
|
|
1,056.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
2,474.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,563.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate tax-exempt debt included in secured notes (1.74%) |
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
Floating rate debt included in secured notes (1.12% - 1.70%) |
|
|
189.9 |
|
|
|
189.9 |
|
We have a $500 million unsecured credit facility, with the option to increase this credit
facility to $600 million at our election, which matures in August 2012 and may be extended at our
option to August 2013. Interest rate spreads float on a margin based on LIBOR and are subject to
change as our credit ratings change. Advances under the line of credit may be priced at the
scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with participating banks at rates below the
scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of 180 days or less and may not exceed the lesser
of $250 million or the remaining amount available under the line of credit. The line of credit is
subject to customary financial covenants and limitations, all of which we are in compliance.
Our line of credit provides us with the ability to issue up to $100 million in letters of
credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under
our line of credit, it does reduce the amount available. At March 31, 2011, we had outstanding
letters of credit totaling approximately $10.2 million, leaving approximately $489.8 million
available under our unsecured line of credit.
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the weighted average interest rate on our floating rate debt,
which includes our unsecured line of credit, was 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively.
13
We repaid the remaining principal amount of our 7.69% senior unsecured notes, which matured on
February 15, 2011, for a total of approximately $88.0 million.
Our indebtedness, including our unsecured line of credit, had a weighted average maturity of
5.5 years at March 31, 2011. Scheduled repayments on outstanding debt assuming all contractual
extensions, including our line of credit and scheduled principal amortizations, and the weighted
average interest rate on maturing debt at March 31, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
(in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
69.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
763.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
2013 |
|
|
228.4 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
2014 |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
2015 |
|
|
252.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
2016 and thereafter |
|
|
1,149.3 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,474.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives. We are exposed to certain risks arising from
both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposures to a
wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities.
We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by
managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and the use of derivative financial
instruments. Specifically, we may enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures
arising from business activities resulting in differences in the amount, timing, and duration of
our known or expected cash payments principally related to our borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are
to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To
accomplish these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps as part of our interest
rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable rate amounts
from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements
without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of
variable rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the
contract in exchange for an upfront premium.
Designated Hedges. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives
designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
or loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period the hedged forecasted
transaction affects earnings. Over the next twelve months, we estimate $22.3 million will be
reclassified to interest expense. During the three months ending March 31, 2011 and 2010, such
derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable rate debt.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives, if any, is recognized
directly in earnings. No portion was ineffective during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010.
As of March 31, 2011, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Number of Instruments |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$516.6 million |
Non-designated Hedges. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used
to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks. Non-designated
hedges are either specifically
non-designated by management or do not meet strict hedge accounting requirements. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in
earnings in other income or other expense.
14
As of March 31, 2011, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivative which was not
designated as a hedge of interest rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Number of Instruments |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$175.0 million |
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as the
classification in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below present the effect of our derivative financial instruments in the condensed
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
(OCI) on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Income (Effective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Testing) |
|
Relationships |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized |
|
Derivatives not designated as |
|
Location of Gain Recognized in Income on |
|
|
in Income on Derivative |
|
hedging instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features. Derivative financial investments expose us to credit
risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest rate
hedge agreements. We believe we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by transacting with
major creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our on-going control procedures, we monitor
the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, which we believe
minimizes credit risk concentration.
Our agreements with each of our derivative counterparties contain provisions which provide the
counterparty the right to declare a default on our derivative obligations if we are in default on
any of our indebtedness, subject to certain thresholds. For all instances, these provisions
include a default even if there is no acceleration of the indebtedness. Our agreements with each
of our derivative counterparties also provide if we consolidate with, merge with or into, or
transfer all or substantially all our assets to another entity and the creditworthiness of the
resulting, surviving, or transferee entity is materially weaker than ours, the counterparty has the
right to terminate the derivative obligations.
15
At March 31, 2011, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes
accrued interest
but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk (the termination value), related to
these agreements was approximately $33.5 million. As of March 31, 2011, we had not posted any
collateral related to these agreements. If we were in breach of any of these provisions at March
31, 2011, or terminated these agreements, we would have been required to settle our obligations at
their aggregate termination value of approximately $33.5 million.
8. Share-based Compensation
Options. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, 0.2 million options were exercised at
prices ranging from $30.06 to $48.02 per option. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $3.7 million. As of March 31, 2011,
there was approximately $2.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
options, which is expected to be amortized over the next three years. At March 31, 2011,
outstanding options and exercisable options had a weighted average remaining life of approximately
5.0 years and 3.9 years respectively.
The following table summarizes outstanding share options and exercisable options at March 31,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options (1) |
|
|
Exercisable Options (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
$30.06-$41.91 |
|
|
560,668 |
|
|
$ |
33.10 |
|
|
|
266,963 |
|
|
$ |
36.45 |
|
$42.90-$44.00 |
|
|
350,063 |
|
|
|
43.52 |
|
|
|
312,800 |
|
|
|
43.47 |
|
$45.53-$73.32 |
|
|
680,681 |
|
|
|
49.68 |
|
|
|
527,530 |
|
|
|
50.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options |
|
|
1,591,412 |
|
|
$ |
42.48 |
|
|
|
1,107,293 |
|
|
$ |
44.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic values of outstanding options and exercisable options at March
31, 2011 were $23.5 million and $13.8 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic
values were calculated as the excess, if any, between our closing share price of $56.82 per
share on March 31, 2011 and the strike price of the underlying award. |
Valuation Assumptions. Options generally have a vesting period of three to five years. We
estimate the fair values of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. No new options have been granted in 2011.
Share Awards and Vesting. Share awards generally have a vesting period of five years. The
compensation cost for share awards is based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant
and is amortized over the vesting period. To estimate forfeitures, we use actual forfeiture
history. At March 31, 2011, the unamortized value of previously issued unvested share awards was
approximately $36.7 million which is expected to be amortized over the next five years. The total
fair value of shares vested during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately
$10.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, and approximately 2.6 million vested share awards
were outstanding at March 31, 2011 with a weighted average issuance price of $39.41 per share.
Total compensation cost for option and share awards charged against income was approximately
$2.9 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Total capitalized compensation cost for option and share awards was approximately $0.3 million and
$0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
16
The following table summarizes activity under our Share Incentive Plans for the three months
ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Nonvested |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise / |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Exercise / |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Grant Price |
|
Total options and nonvested share awards
outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,837,990 |
|
|
$ |
42.39 |
|
|
|
741,505 |
|
|
$ |
42.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,599 |
|
|
|
56.68 |
|
Exercised/vested |
|
|
(246,578 |
) |
|
|
41.81 |
|
|
|
(227,529 |
) |
|
|
46.70 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,826 |
) |
|
|
43.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net activity |
|
|
(246,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options and nonvested share awards
outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
1,591,412 |
|
|
$ |
42.48 |
|
|
|
832,749 |
|
|
$ |
46.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Net Change in Operating Accounts
The effect of changes in the operating accounts on cash flows from operating activities is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
$ |
3,633 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
(3,678 |
) |
Accrued real estate taxes |
|
|
(5,753 |
) |
|
|
(6,236 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating accounts |
|
$ |
(1,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Construction
Contracts. As of March 31, 2011, we have construction
commitments of approximately $56.6 million
of additional expenditures on our construction projects currently under development. We expect to
fund these amounts through available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, draws on
our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, and the use of debt and equity
offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement.
Litigation. One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries previously acted as a general contractor for
the construction of three apartment projects in Florida which were subsequently sold and converted
to condominium units by unrelated third-parties. Each condominium association of those projects
has asserted claims against our subsidiary alleging, in general, defective construction as a result
of alleged negligence and an alleged failure to comply with building codes. Two of the associations have filed suit
against our subsidiary and other unrelated third parties in Florida claiming damages, in
unspecified amounts, for the costs of repair arising out of the alleged defective construction as
well as the recovery of incidental and consequential damages resulting from such alleged
negligence. Each of the suits is in a very early stage, and no significant discovery has been
conducted. While we have denied liability to the associations, it is not possible to determine the
potential outcome nor is it possible to estimate the amount of loss, if any, that would be
associated with any potential adverse decision.
17
We are also subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course
of business.
Matters which arise out of allegations of bodily injury, property damage, and employment
practices are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these legal proceedings and
claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters
will not have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Other Contingencies. In the ordinary course of our business, we issue letters of intent
indicating a willingness to negotiate for acquisitions, dispositions, or joint ventures and also
enter into arrangements contemplating various transactions. Such letters of intent and other
arrangements are non-binding as to either party unless and until a definitive contract is entered
into by the parties. Even if definitive contracts relating to the purchase or sale of real
property are entered into, these contracts generally provide the purchaser with time to evaluate
the property and conduct due diligence, during which periods the purchaser will have the ability to
terminate the contracts without penalty or forfeiture of any deposit or earnest money. There can be
no assurance definitive contracts will be entered into with respect to any matter covered by
letters of intent or we will consummate any transaction contemplated by any definitive contract.
Furthermore, due diligence periods for real property are frequently extended as needed. An
acquisition or sale of real property becomes probable at the time the due diligence period expires
and the definitive contract has not been terminated. We are then at risk under a real property
acquisition contract, but generally only to the extent of any earnest money deposits associated
with the contract, and are obligated to sell under a real property sales contract.
Lease Commitments. At March 31, 2011, we had long-term leases covering certain land, office
facilities, and equipment. Rental expense totaled approximately $0.7 million and $0.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments
for the remainder of 2011 are $1.8 million, and for the years ending December 31, 2012 through 2015
are approximately $2.1 million, $2.0 million, $1.9 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, and
$0.6 million in the aggregate thereafter.
Investments in Joint Ventures. We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter
into, joint ventures or partnerships (including limited liability companies) through which we own
an indirect economic interest in less than 100% of the community or communities owned directly by
the joint venture or partnership. Our decision whether to hold the entire interest in an apartment
community ourselves, or to have an indirect interest in the community through a joint venture or
partnership, is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) our projection, in
some circumstances, that we will achieve higher returns on our invested capital or reduce our risk
if a joint venture or partnership vehicle is used; (ii) our desire to diversify our portfolio of
communities by market; (iii) our desire at times to preserve our capital resources to maintain
liquidity or balance sheet strength; and (iv) the economic and tax terms required by a seller of
land or of a community, who may prefer or who may require less payment if the land or community is
contributed to a joint venture or partnership. Investments in joint ventures or partnerships are
not limited to a specified percentage of our assets. Each joint venture or partnership agreement is
individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole
discretion is limited to varying degrees in our existing joint venture agreements and may be
limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of future joint venture agreements.
11. Income Taxes
We have maintained and intend to maintain our election as a REIT under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number
of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual
dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed
without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. As a REIT, we generally
will not be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate level to the
extent such income is distributed to our shareholders annually. If our taxable income exceeds our
dividends in a tax year, REIT tax rules allow us to designate dividends from the subsequent tax
year in order to avoid current taxation on undistributed income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT
in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate
rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax. In addition, we may not be able to
requalify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Historically, we have incurred only
state and local income, franchise, and excise taxes. Taxable income from non-REIT activities
managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income
taxes. Our operating partnerships are flow-through entities and are not subject to federal income
taxes at the entity level.
18
We have provided for income, franchise, and state income taxes in the condensed consolidated
statements
of income and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The
income taxes during the three months ended March 31, 2011 are primarily related to approximately $1.0
million associated with the gain recognized on the sale of our available-for-sale investment
discussed in Footnote 12, Fair Value Disclosures, below. Other tax expense is related to entity
level taxes on certain ventures, state taxes, and federal taxes on certain of our taxable REIT
subsidiaries. We have no significant temporary differences or tax credits associated with our
taxable REIT subsidiaries.
We believe we have no uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits requiring
disclosure as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
12. Fair Value Disclosures
For financial assets and liabilities fair valued on a recurring basis, fair value is the price
we would receive to sell an asset, or pay to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction with a
market participant at the measurement date. In the absence of such data, fair value is estimated
using internal information consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical
transaction which occurs at the transaction date.
Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable
inputs reflect our market assumptions; preference is given to observable inputs. These two types
of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
|
|
Level 1: |
Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
Level 2: |
Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value
drivers are observable. |
|
|
Level 3: |
Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable. |
The following table presents information about our financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 under the fair value hierarchy discussed
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
(in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Balance |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
plan investments |
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
Available-for-sale
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
Deferred Compensation Plan Investments. The estimated fair values of investment securities
classified as deferred compensation plan investments are included in Level 1 and are based on
quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same transactions or information provided
through third-party advisors. Our deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in other
assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The balance at March 31, 2011 also reflects
approximately $8.6 million of participant withdrawals from our deferred compensation plan
investments during the quarter.
Available-for-sale Investment. During February 2011, we received proceeds from the sale of
our available-for-sale investment of approximately $4.5 million, resulting in a gross realized gain
of approximately $4.3 million. This available-for-sale investment was included in Level 1 in the
preceding table as of December 31, 2010 and was valued using quoted market prices.
19
Derivative Financial Instruments. The estimated fair values of derivative financial
instruments are included in Level 2 and are valued using widely accepted valuation techniques
including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This
analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair
values of interest rate swaps and caps are estimated using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The
variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from
observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit
valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts,
are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk, including our own
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk. The fair value of
interest rate caps are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future
expected cash receipts which would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of
the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are
based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves
and volatilities.
Although we have determined the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our
derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the
likelihood of default. However, as of March 31, 2011, we have assessed the significance of the
impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and
have determined the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of
our derivatives. As a result, we have determined our derivative valuations in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Fair Value Disclosures. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value
of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities, and distributions payable approximated fair value based on the
short-term nature of these instruments.
In calculating the fair value of our notes receivable and notes payable, interest rates and
spreads reflect current creditworthiness and market conditions available for the issuance of notes
receivable and notes payable with similar terms and remaining maturities. The following table
presents the carrying and estimated fair value of our notes receivable and notes payable at March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in millions) |
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable affiliates |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
Fixed rate notes payable (1) |
|
|
2,244.6 |
|
|
|
2,308.6 |
|
|
|
2,333.5 |
|
|
|
2,386.0 |
|
Floating rate notes payable |
|
|
229.9 |
|
|
|
212.9 |
|
|
|
230.3 |
|
|
|
212.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a $500 million term loan entered into in 2007 and $16.6
million of a construction loan entered into in 2008 which are
effectively fixed by the use of interest rate swaps but evaluated for
estimated fair value at the floating rate. |
Nonrecurring Fair Value Disclosures. Nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
measured on a nonrecurring basis primarily relate to impairment of long-lived assets or
investments. There were no events during the three months ended March 31, 2011 which required fair
value adjustments of our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.
20
13. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale. For the three months ended March 31, 2010,
income from discontinued operations included the results of operations of two operating properties,
containing 1,066 apartment homes, classified as held for sale subsequent to March 31, 2010 and sold
in the fourth quarter of 2010. We had no assets classified as held for sale as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2011, and, accordingly, there was no income from discontinued
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
Property revenues |
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
Property expenses |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Noncontrolling Interests
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in our ownership interest in subsidiaries
on the equity attributable to us for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
Transfers from the noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in equity for conversion of operating partnership units |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in common equity and net transfers from noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
7,290 |
|
|
$ |
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report, as well as Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Historical results and trends which might appear in the condensed consolidated financial statements
should not be interpreted as being indicative of future operations.
We consider portions of this report to be forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as
amended, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not
discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections,
intentions, or other items relating to the future; forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performances, results, or events. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our
forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance our
expectations will be achieved. Any statements contained herein which are not statements of
historical fact should be deemed forward-looking statements. Reliance should not be placed on
these forward-looking statements as they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and
other factors beyond our control and could differ materially from our actual results and
performance.
Factors which may cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those
contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
volatility in capital and credit markets, or other unfavorable changes in economic
conditions could adversely impact us; short-term leases expose us to the effects of
declining market rents; |
|
|
|
we face risks associated with land holdings and related activities; |
|
|
|
difficulties of selling real estate could limit our flexibility; |
|
|
|
we could be negatively impacted by the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac; |
|
|
|
compliance or failure to comply with laws requiring access to our properties by disabled
persons could result in substantial cost; |
|
|
|
competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental
income; |
|
|
|
development and construction risks could impact our profitability; |
|
|
|
our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected; |
|
|
|
competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties; |
|
|
|
losses from catastrophes may exceed our insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
investments through joint ventures involve risks not present in investments in which we
are the sole investor; |
|
|
|
we face risks associated with investments in and management of discretionary funds; |
|
|
|
we depend on our key personnel; |
|
|
|
changes in litigation risks could affect our business; |
|
|
|
tax matters, including failure to qualify as a REIT, could have adverse consequences; |
|
|
|
insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt
obligations or pay distributions to shareholders; |
|
|
|
we have significant debt, which could have important adverse consequences; |
|
|
|
we may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt; |
|
|
|
variable rate debt is subject to interest rate risk; |
|
|
|
we may incur losses on interest rate hedging arrangements; |
|
|
|
issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition; |
|
|
|
failure to maintain our current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds,
related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets; |
|
|
|
share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent
takeovers beneficial to shareholders; |
|
|
|
our share price will fluctuate; and |
|
|
|
the form, timing and/or amount of dividend distributions in future periods may vary and
be impacted by economic or other considerations. |
These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of
this report, and we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements because
of subsequent events.
22
Executive Summary
We are primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, acquisition and
construction of multifamily apartment communities. As of March 31, 2011, we owned interests in,
operated, or were developing 190 multifamily properties comprising 64,509 apartment homes across
the United States as detailed in the following Property Portfolio table. In addition, we own other
land parcels we may develop into multifamily apartment communities.
Despite unemployment rates remaining at high levels, our results for the most recent quarter
reflect an increase in rental revenue growth for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared
to the same period in 2010 primarily due to improvements in rental rates and average occupancy
levels. We believe these improvements may be due in part to the continued decline in home
ownership rates and the limited supply of new rental housing. We expect improvements in rental
rates and occupancy to continue in 2011 and believe sustained revenue growth will depend on, among
other things, the timing and extent of employment growth, supply levels of new multifamily housing,
and the continuation of the decline in home ownership rates.
In the first quarter of 2011, one of our discretionary investment funds (the Funds), in
which we have a 20% ownership interest, acquired three multifamily properties, totaling 941 units,
for an aggregate net purchase price of approximately $122.6 million. During March 2011, we sold
our ownership interests in three unconsolidated joint ventures for total proceeds of approximately
$19.3 million and recognized a gain of approximately $1.1 million. Two of the joint ventures sold
own multifamily properties in Houston, Texas and comprised 459 units, and one joint venture owns
6.1 pre-development acres in Houston, Texas. In April 2011, we sold one of our land development
properties in Washington, D.C. to one of the Funds for approximately
$9.4 million and we were reimbursed for previously written-off
development costs, resulting in a gain of approximately $4.7 million. Construction commenced on this project subsequent to
quarter-end and will comprise approximately 276 units.
During the second half of 2010, we began construction on two development projects, comprised
of approximately 607 units with initial occupancy expected in the last half of 2011. During the
three months ended March 31, 2011, we began construction on one development project comprising
approximately 104 units with initial occupancy expected in early
2012. As of March 31, 2011, we have construction commitments of approximately $56.6 million of additional costs on these projects. Subsequent to
quarter-end, we began construction on three development projects comprised of approximately 978
units and we expect to start several additional development projects currently held in our
development pipeline later in 2011 and beyond.
Subject to market conditions, we intend to continue to look for opportunities to develop and
acquire existing communities, expand our development pipeline, and complete selective dispositions.
We also intend to continue to strengthen our capital and liquidity
positions by continuing to focus
on our core fundamentals, generating positive cash flows from operations, maintaining appropriate
debt levels and leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs. We intend to meet our liquidity
requirements through available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our
unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, and the use of debt and equity
offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement.
As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $98.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and no
balances outstanding on our $500 million unsecured line of credit. We have approximately $66.5
million of remaining debt maturities in 2011, excluding scheduled principal amortizations. We
believe we are well-positioned with a strong balance sheet and sufficient liquidity to cover
near-term debt maturities and new development funding requirements. We will, however, continue to
assess and take further actions where prudent to meet our objectives and capital requirements.
23
Property Portfolio
Our multifamily property portfolio, excluding land and joint venture properties which we did
not manage, is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Properties |
|
Operating Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
8,016 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Houston, Texas (1) |
|
|
6,860 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
|
5,872 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,517 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Washington, D.C. Metro (2) |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Tampa, Florida |
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Southeast Florida |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Los Angeles/Orange County, California (3) |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
San Diego/Inland Empire, California |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Properties |
|
|
63,798 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
63,316 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties Under Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Washington, D. C. Metro |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties Under Development |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties |
|
|
64,509 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
63,923 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Unconsolidated Joint Venture Properties (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Austin, Texas |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Los Angeles/Orange County, California |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Denver, Colorado |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Joint Venture Properties |
|
|
12,917 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
12,435 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties Fully Consolidated |
|
|
51,592 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
51,488 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes two fully consolidated joint ventures: Camden Travis Street, a fully
consolidated joint venture, of which we retain a 25% ownership, and Camden Plaza, of which we
retain a 99.99% ownership. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Camden College Park, a fully consolidated joint venture, of which we retain a 99.99%
ownership. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes Camden Main and Jamboree, a fully consolidated joint venture of which we retain a
99.99% ownership. |
|
(4) |
|
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of our joint venture investments. |
24
Stabilized Communities
We generally consider a property stabilized once it reaches 90% occupancy at the beginning of
a period. No consolidated properties reached stabilization during the three months ended March 31,
2011.
Acquisitions and Dispositions of Joint Ventures
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, one of the Funds in which we have a 20% interest
acquired three multifamily properties for an aggregate net purchase price of approximately $122.6
million. The acquisitions were comprised of 352 units located in Houston, Texas; 355 units located
in Dallas, Texas; and 234 units located in Atlanta, Georgia.
During March 2011, we sold our ownership interests in three unconsolidated joint ventures for
total proceeds of approximately $19.3 million and recognized a gain of approximately $1.1 million.
Two of the joint ventures own multifamily properties in Houston, Texas with 459 units, and one
joint venture owns 6.1 acres of land in Houston, Texas which is in pre-development.
Development and Lease-Up Properties
We did not have any consolidated properties in lease-up at March 31, 2011.
At March 31, 2011, we had three consolidated properties under construction as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Date of |
|
|
Estimated |
|
($ in millions) |
|
Apartment |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Under |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Date of |
|
Property and Location |
|
Homes |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Completion |
|
|
Stabilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden La Vina
Orlando, FL |
|
|
420 |
|
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
|
2Q12 |
|
|
|
3Q14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Summerfield II
Landover, MD |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
1Q12 |
|
|
|
4Q12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Royal Oaks II
Houston, TX |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2Q12 |
|
|
|
3Q13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
711 |
|
|
$ |
107.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.7 |
|
|
$ |
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2011 included approximately $220.6
million related to properties under development and land. Of this amount, approximately $48.7
million related to our projects currently under development. In addition, we had approximately
$171.9 million primarily invested in land held for future development, which includes approximately
$93.2 million related to projects we expect to begin constructing during the next two years, and
approximately $78.7 million related to land tracts which we may develop in the future.
At March 31, 2011, we had an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture community which was
in lease-up:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% Leased |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
At |
|
Property and Location |
|
Ownership % |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
4/24/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Ivy Hall
Atlanta, GA |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
110 |
|
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
25
Refer to Note 5, Investments in Joint Ventures in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of our joint venture investments.
Results of Operations
Changes in revenues and expenses related to our operating properties from period to period are
due primarily to the performance of stabilized properties in the portfolio, the lease-up of newly
constructed properties, acquisitions, and dispositions. Where appropriate, comparisons of income
and expense on communities included in continuing operations are made on a dollars-per-weighted
average apartment home basis in order to adjust for such changes in the number of apartment homes
owned during each period. Selected weighted averages for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Average monthly property revenue per apartment home |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
Annualized total property expenses per apartment home |
|
$ |
5,026 |
|
|
$ |
4,997 |
|
Weighted average number of operating apartment homes owned 100% |
|
|
50,881 |
|
|
|
49,512 |
|
Weighted average occupancy of operating apartment homes owned 100% |
|
|
93.9 |
% |
|
|
93.3 |
% |
Property-level operating results
The following tables present the property-level revenues and property-level expenses,
excluding discontinued operations, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the
same period in 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes At |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
3/31/11 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Property revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities |
|
|
47,600 |
|
|
$ |
147,697 |
|
|
$ |
142,398 |
|
|
$ |
5,299 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Non-same store communities |
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
12,219 |
|
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
|
|
109.1 |
|
Development and lease-up communities |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions/other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property revenues |
|
|
51,592 |
|
|
$ |
161,147 |
|
|
$ |
149,452 |
|
|
$ |
11,695 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities |
|
|
47,600 |
|
|
$ |
58,401 |
|
|
$ |
58,296 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Non-same store communities |
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
Development and lease-up communities |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions/other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property expenses |
|
|
51,592 |
|
|
$ |
63,932 |
|
|
$ |
61,847 |
|
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store communities are communities we owned and were stabilized as of January 1, 2010.
Non-same store communities are stabilized communities we have acquired, developed or re-developed
after January 1, 2010. Development and lease-up communities are non-stabilized communities we have
acquired or developed after January 1, 2010. Other includes results from non-multifamily rental
properties and expenses relating to land holdings no longer under active development.
Same store analysis
Same store property revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased $5.3 million,
or 3.7%, from the same period in 2010. Same store rental revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2011 increased $4.2 million from the same period in 2010 due to a 3.1% increase in average
rental rates and a 0.5% increase in average occupancy for our same store portfolio which we believe
is due in part to the continued decline in home ownership rates and the limited supply of new
rental housing. Additionally, there was a $1.1 million increase for the three months ended March
31, 2011 in other property revenue primarily due to increases from our utility rebilling programs.
Property expenses from our same store communities increased $0.1 million, or 0.2%, for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in same
store property expenses was primarily due to increases in utility expenses, increased salaries and
benefits due to increases in base salaries, and higher medical benefit costs, and slightly higher
repairs and maintenance expenses. These increases were partially offset by lower real estate taxes
as a result of declining property tax rates and property valuations at a number of our
communities, and reduced property insurance costs due to lower self-insured property losses.
Excluding the expenses associated with our utility rebilling programs, same store property expenses
for this period decreased approximately $0.3 million, or 0.5%, as compared to the same period in
2010.
26
Non-same store analysis
Property revenues and expenses from non-same store and development and lease-up communities
increased $6.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as
compared to the same period in 2010. The increases during the period were primarily due to
approximately $4.9 million of revenue and approximately $2.0 million of expense recognized during
the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to three joint venture communities we consolidated
during the second half of 2010, which were previously accounted for in accordance with the equity
method of accounting. The increases were also related to two properties in our re-development and
development pipelines reaching stabilization during the second and third quarters of 2010.
Other property analysis
Other property expenses decreased $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as
compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily related to decreases in property
taxes expensed on land holdings for five projects which were approved in 2010 and 2011 for
development activities. As a result, we started capitalizing expenses, including property taxes,
on these five projects.
Non-property income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Fee and asset management |
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
Income on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-property income |
|
$ |
12,563 |
|
|
$ |
8,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,198 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee
and asset management income was $1.8 million for each of the
three month periods ended March 31,
2011 and 2010. Increases in property management fees due to acquisitions by one of the Funds were
offset by a corresponding decrease due to our consolidation of three joint venture communities in
the second half of 2010, which were previously accounted for in accordance with the equity method
of accounting.
Interest and other income increased $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as
compared to the same period in 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized
approximately $4.3 million in other income from the sale of our available-for-sale investment.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized approximately $2.7 million of other
income relating to the expiration of an indemnification provision related to one of our operating
joint ventures.
27
Income on deferred compensation plans increased $2.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was related to the performance of
the investments held in deferred compensation plans for participants and was directly offset by the
expense related to these plans, as discussed below.
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Property management |
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
5,183 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Fee and asset management |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9,788 |
|
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Interest |
|
|
29,737 |
|
|
|
31,555 |
|
|
|
(1,818 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
46,822 |
|
|
|
42,968 |
|
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
Expense on deferred compensation plans |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
100,367 |
|
|
$ |
92,512 |
|
|
$ |
7,855 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management expense, which represents regional supervision and accounting costs
related to property operations, increased approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. Property management expenses were 3.3% and
3.5% of total property revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The increase in 2011 was primarily due to an increase in training costs for our property management
personnel.
Fee and asset management expense, which represents expenses related to third-party
construction projects and property management, remained relatively flat for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This was primarily due to an increase in
costs associated with additional properties acquired by the Fund during the second half of 2010
through the first quarter of 2011, which was offset by lower legal and other discretionary expenses
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010.
General and administrative expense increased $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to $2.1 million for
one-time bonuses awarded to all non-executive employees, and an approximate $0.2 million increase
in long-term incentive compensation during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the
same period in 2010. Excluding the one-time bonus awards, general and administrative expenses were
4.6% and 4.8% of total property revenues and non-property income for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased approximately $1.8
million as compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to retirement of
maturing unsecured notes payable during 2010 and 2011. The decrease was also due to increased
capitalized interest of approximately $0.5 million during the first quarter 2011 as compared to the
same period in 2010 due to higher average balances in our development pipeline. These decreases
were partially offset by an increase in secured notes payable relating to debt assumed in
conjunction with the consolidation of two joint venture communities during the second half of 2010
which were previously accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
Depreciation and amortization increased $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
as compared to the same period in 2010 due to an increase in new development and capital
improvements placed in service during 2010, and the consolidation of three joint venture
communities during the second half of 2010 which were previously accounted for using the equity
method of accounting.
Amortization of deferred financing costs increased approximately $0.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily
due to the amortization of the financing costs incurred on our $500 million unsecured credit
facility entered into in August 2010.
Expense on deferred compensation plans increased $2.5 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was related to the
performance of the investments held in deferred compensation plans for participants and was
directly offset by the income related to these plans, as discussed above.
28
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Gain on sale of unconsolidated joint venture interests |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Not a meaningful percentage |
Gain on sale of unconsolidated joint venture interests totaled approximately $1.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to the sale of our ownership interests in three
unconsolidated joint venture communities.
Equity in income (loss) of joint ventures increased approximately $0.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily the
result of development properties held by our joint ventures reaching stabilization in late 2010 and
early 2011 of approximately $0.5 million and an overall increase in earnings by our stabilized
operating joint ventures of approximately $0.1 million primarily due to increases in rental income.
These increases were partially offset by losses recognized by one of our Funds of approximately
$0.2 million, primarily due to increased amortization of in-place leases over the underlying lease
term.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we incurred entity-level taxes for our
operating partnerships and taxable REIT subsidiaries and other state and local taxes totaling
approximately $1.3 million. The increase during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared
to the same period in 2010 was due to approximately $1.0 million associated with income taxes
associated with the gain recognized on the sale of our available-for-sale investment.
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Income) loss allocated to noncontrolling
interests from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(565 |
) |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
(819 |
) |
|
|
(322.4 |
%) |
Income allocated to perpetual preferred units |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations increased $0.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in earnings within a fully-consolidated joint venture which reached
stabilization during the third quarter 2010, of which we retain a 25% ownership.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
Management considers FFO to be an appropriate measure of the financial performance of an
equity REIT. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) currently
defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses)
associated with the sale of previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation
and amortization, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures. Our calculation of diluted
FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain
noncontrolling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an
appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on
dispositions of operating properties and depreciation, FFO can help in the comparison of the
operating performance of a companys real estate investments between periods or as compared to
different companies.
29
To facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, we
believe FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income attributable to common shareholders
as presented in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and data
included elsewhere in this report. FFO is
not defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable
to common shareholders as an indication of our operating performance. Additionally, FFO as
disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation.
Reconciliations of net income attributable to common shareholders to diluted FFO for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Funds from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,285 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
45,574 |
|
|
|
42,639 |
|
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
Gain on sale of unconsolidated joint venture interests |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) allocated to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations diluted |
|
$ |
54,113 |
|
|
$ |
46,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
71,906 |
|
|
|
66,475 |
|
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share options and awards granted |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Common units |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
75,021 |
|
|
|
69,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity
We intend to maintain a strong balance sheet and preserve our financial flexibility, which we
believe should enhance our ability to identify and capitalize on investment opportunities as they
become available. We intend to maintain what management believes is a conservative capital
structure by:
|
|
|
extending and sequencing the maturity dates of our debt where practicable; |
|
|
|
managing interest rate exposure using what management believes to be prudent levels
of fixed and floating rate debt; |
|
|
|
maintaining what management believes to be conservative coverage ratios; and |
|
|
|
using what management believes to be a prudent combination of debt and common and
preferred equity. |
Our interest expense coverage ratio, net of capitalized interest, was 2.9 and 2.5 times for
the three months ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively. This ratio is a method for
calculating the amount of operating cash flows available to cover interest expense and is
calculated by dividing interest expense for the period into the sum of property revenues and
expenses, non-property income, other expenses, income from discontinued operations, after adding
back depreciation, amortization, and interest expense from both continuing and discontinued
operations. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, 71.2% and 72.8%, respectively, of our properties (based on
invested capital) were unencumbered. Our weighted average maturity of debt, including our line of
credit, was 5.5 years at March 31, 2011.
For the longer term, we intend to continue to focus on strengthening our capital and liquidity
position by generating positive cash flows from operations, maintaining appropriate debt levels and
leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs.
30
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow generated from operations. Other sources include
available cash balances, the availability under our unsecured credit facility and other short-term
borrowings, proceeds from dispositions of properties and other investments, and the use of debt and
equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement. We believe our liquidity and
financial condition are sufficient to meet all of our reasonably
anticipated cash needs during 2011 including:
|
|
|
normal recurring operating expenses; |
|
|
|
current debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
recurring capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
initial funding of property developments, acquisitions, and joint venture
investments; and |
|
|
|
the minimum dividend payments required to maintain our REIT qualification under the
Code. |
Factors which could increase or decrease our future liquidity include but are not limited to
volatility in capital and credit markets, sources of financing, our ability to complete asset
sales, the effect our debt level and decreases in credit ratings could have on our costs of funds
and our ability to access capital markets.
Cash Flows
Certain sources and uses of cash, such as the level of discretionary capital expenditures, and
repurchases of debt and common shares are within our control and are adjusted as necessary based
upon, among other factors, market conditions. The following is a discussion of our cash flows for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.4 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to $41.8 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was
primarily due to growth in property revenues from our stabilized communities. See further
discussions of our first quarter 2011 operations as compared to 2010 in our Results of Operations
discussion above. The increase in net cash from operating activities was also due to the timing of
payments in operating accounts, primarily relating to accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
offset by the $2.1 million payment of a one-time special bonus awarded to all non-executive
employees during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled
$7.8 million as compared to $11.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Cash
outflows for property development and capital improvements were $23.1 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $11.1 million for the same period in 2010 due primarily
to an increase in construction and development activity in 2011 as compared to 2010. Additionally,
cash outflows for investments in joint ventures were approximately $12.3 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $0.3 million during the same period in 2010. The cash
outflow for 2011 primarily relates to three acquisitions made in the first quarter of 2011 by one
of the Funds in which we own a 20% interest. These outflows were partially offset by proceeds
received from the sale of our available-for-sale investment of $4.5 million, proceeds of $19.3
million from the sale of our interest in three unconsolidated joint venture communities and
payments received on notes receivable from affiliates of approximately $3.3 million.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $118.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011, primarily as a result of the repayment of maturing outstanding unsecured notes payable of
$88.0 million, and distributions paid to common shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders, and
noncontrolling interest holders of $35.3 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by
cash receipts of $3.8 million relating to proceeds received from the issuance of 0.1 million common
shares under our ATM share offering program. Cash outflows were further offset by decreases in
accounts receivable from affiliates of approximately $1.9 million relating to proceeds received
from participant withdrawals from one of our deferred compensation plans. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, we used approximately $65.7 million in financing activities primarily to
repay approximately $55.3 million of outstanding unsecured notes payable and distributions paid to
common shareholders, perpetual preferred unit holders, and noncontrolling interest holders of $33.2
million. The cash outflows were partially offset by cash receipts of $17.2 million relating to
proceeds received from the issuance of 0.4 million common shares under our ATM share offering
program. Cash outflows were further offset by decreases in accounts receivable from affiliates of
approximately $3.5 million relating to proceeds received from participant withdrawals from one of
our deferred compensation plans and approximately $1.8 million for proceeds received from a
construction loan for a consolidated joint venture.
31
Financial Flexibility
We have a $500 million unsecured credit facility, with the option to increase this credit
facility to $600 million at our election, which matures in August 2012 and may be extended at our
option to August 2013. Interest rate spreads float on a margin based on LIBOR and are subject to
change as our credit ratings change. Advances under the line of credit may be priced at the
scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with participating banks at rates below the
scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of 180 days or less and may not exceed the lesser
of $250 million or the remaining amount available under the line of credit. The line of credit is
subject to customary financial covenants and limitations, all of which we are in compliance.
Our line of credit provides us with the ability to issue up to $100 million in letters of
credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under
our line of credit, it does reduce the amount available. At March 31, 2011, we had outstanding
letters of credit totaling approximately $10.2 million, and had approximately $489.8 million
available under our unsecured line of credit.
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement on file with the SEC which allows
us to offer, from time to time, an unlimited amount of common shares, preferred shares, debt
securities, or warrants. Our declaration of trust provides we may issue up to 110.0 million shares
of beneficial interest, consisting of 100.0 million common shares and 10.0 million preferred
shares. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately 70.0 million common shares outstanding, net of
treasury shares and shares held in our deferred compensation plans, and no preferred shares
outstanding.
In March 2010, we originated our ATM share offering program through which we may, but have no
obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $250 million from
time to time into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through
negotiated transactions. We may, but shall have no obligation to, sell common shares through the
ATM share offering program in amounts and at times as we determine. Actual sales from time to time
may depend on a variety of factors including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of
our common shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for us. During the
three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued 0.1 million common shares at an average price of
$54.06 per share for total net consideration of approximately $3.8 million. In April 2011, we
issued an additional 0.2 million common shares at an average price of $56.50 per share for total
net considerations of approximately $10.1 million. Cumulative to date, we have issued
approximately 5.1 million common shares at an average price of $48.73 for total net consideration
of approximately $245.3 million. As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an
aggregate offering price of up to $0.5 million remaining available for sale under the ATM program.
We believe our ability to access capital markets is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt
ratings by Moodys and Standard and Poors, which are currently Baa1 and BBB, respectively, with
stable outlooks, as well as by our ability to borrow on a secured basis from various institutions
including banks, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or life insurance companies. However, we may not be able
to maintain our current credit ratings and may not be able to borrow on a secured or unsecured
basis in the future.
Future Cash Requirements and Contractual Obligations
One of our principal long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt,
including any future borrowings under our unsecured line of credit. During the remainder of 2011,
approximately $66.5 million of debt, excluding scheduled principal amortizations of $3.3
million, is scheduled to mature. Additionally, we have construction
commitments of approximately $56.6 million of
additional capital expenditures on our current development projects and we expect to fund these
amounts through available cash balances and draws on our unsecured line of credit. We intend to
meet our near-term liquidity requirements through available cash balances, cash flows generated
from operations, draws on our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, and
the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement.
In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute annual
dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed
without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gains. In March 2011, we
announced our Board of Trust Managers had declared a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share, which
represented a $0.04 per share increase from the previous $0.45 per share dividend, to our common
shareholders of record as of March 31, 2011. The dividend was subsequently paid on April 18, 2011,
and we paid equivalent amounts per unit to holders of the common operating partnership units.
Assuming similar dividend distributions for the remainder of 2011, our annualized dividend
rate for 2011 would be $1.96 per share or unit.
32
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured,
third-party debt. As of March 31, 2011, we have no outstanding guarantees related to loans
utilized for construction and development activities for our unconsolidated joint ventures.
Inflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term generally ranging from six to fifteen
months. In an inflationary environment, we may realize increased rents at the commencement of new
leases or upon the renewal of existing leases. We believe the short-term nature of our leases
generally minimizes our risk from the adverse effects of inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies have not changed materially from information reported in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
No material changes to our exposures to market risk have occurred since our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act (Exchange Act) Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report are effective to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act
filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) in Rules 13a-15
and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter which have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
33
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
For discussion regarding legal proceedings, see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, to
the condensed consolidated financial statements.
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer dated April 29, 2011. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer dated April 29, 2011. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101.INS |
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael P. Gallagher
Michael P. Gallagher
|
|
|
|
April 29, 2011
Date
|
|
|
Vice President Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer dated April 29, 2011. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer dated April 29, 2011. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101.INS |
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE |
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |