e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-32747
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
86-0460233 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
One BriarLake Plaza, Suite 2000
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South
Houston, Texas 77042
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(713) 954-5500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of August 4, 2009, there were 101,845,592 shares issued and outstanding of the
issuers common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
PART I
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
33,648 |
|
|
$ |
3,209 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $7,254 and $3,868 as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
157,009 |
|
|
|
219,920 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
25,826 |
|
|
|
13,123 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
70,849 |
|
|
|
121,929 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
25,535 |
|
|
|
14,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
314,200 |
|
|
|
374,953 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, full-cost method |
|
|
4,719,635 |
|
|
|
4,448,146 |
|
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization |
|
|
237,058 |
|
|
|
201,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas properties |
|
|
4,956,693 |
|
|
|
4,649,267 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
53,704 |
|
|
|
53,115 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
(2,648,343 |
) |
|
|
(1,767,028 |
) |
Other property and equipment |
|
|
(6,860 |
) |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(2,655,203 |
) |
|
|
(1,772,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,355,194 |
|
|
|
2,929,877 |
|
Insurance Receivables |
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
22,132 |
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
65,409 |
|
|
|
65,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,739,885 |
|
|
$ |
3,392,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,925 |
|
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
112,722 |
|
|
|
107,815 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
131,174 |
|
|
|
195,833 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
28,625 |
|
|
|
23,148 |
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
40,386 |
|
|
|
82,364 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12,873 |
|
|
|
12,567 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
333,304 |
|
|
|
425,564 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
406,733 |
|
|
|
325,880 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
77,801 |
|
|
|
319,766 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
16,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,029,189 |
|
|
|
1,170,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
30,525 |
|
|
|
31,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,560,422 |
|
|
|
1,846,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares
authorized, 101,848,191 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2009; 180,000,000 shares authorized, 88,846,073
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,243,277 |
|
|
|
1,071,347 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
38,994 |
|
|
|
78,181 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(436,122 |
) |
|
|
(29,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
846,159 |
|
|
|
1,120,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,739,885 |
|
|
$ |
3,392,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
3
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
142,363 |
|
|
$ |
250,278 |
|
|
$ |
295,701 |
|
|
$ |
429,901 |
|
Oil |
|
|
78,954 |
|
|
|
144,556 |
|
|
|
139,879 |
|
|
|
258,170 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
8,193 |
|
|
|
33,057 |
|
|
|
14,662 |
|
|
|
54,038 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
25,064 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
231,970 |
|
|
|
429,452 |
|
|
|
475,306 |
|
|
|
745,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
47,092 |
|
|
|
56,427 |
|
|
|
100,491 |
|
|
|
102,074 |
|
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
7,262 |
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
Transportation expense |
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
21,122 |
|
|
|
13,615 |
|
|
|
38,533 |
|
|
|
24,726 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
100,282 |
|
|
|
141,454 |
|
|
|
195,087 |
|
|
|
260,772 |
|
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
179,559 |
|
|
|
221,266 |
|
|
|
1,066,030 |
|
|
|
405,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
52,411 |
|
|
|
208,186 |
|
|
|
(590,724 |
) |
|
|
339,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(16,972 |
) |
|
|
(17,563 |
) |
|
|
(31,374 |
) |
|
|
(36,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
35,741 |
|
|
|
190,904 |
|
|
|
(621,711 |
) |
|
|
304,314 |
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
(18,528 |
) |
|
|
(67,416 |
) |
|
|
214,806 |
|
|
|
(108,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
17,213 |
|
|
|
123,488 |
|
|
|
(406,905 |
) |
|
|
195,704 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO MARINER
ENERGY, INC. |
|
$ |
17,213 |
|
|
$ |
123,390 |
|
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
$ |
195,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per share attributable to
Mariner Energy, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
(4.50 |
) |
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
(4.50 |
) |
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
91,798,761 |
|
|
|
87,983,902 |
|
|
|
90,339,810 |
|
|
|
87,638,816 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
92,152,933 |
|
|
|
88,828,904 |
|
|
|
90,339,810 |
|
|
|
88,430,344 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
4
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Paid-In- |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
88,846 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1,071,347 |
|
|
$ |
78,181 |
|
|
$ |
(29,217 |
) |
|
$ |
1,120,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued equity offering |
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
159,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,674 |
|
Common shares issued restricted stock |
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock bought and cancelled on
same day |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
Forfeiture of restricted stock |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,143 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(406,905 |
) |
|
|
(406,905 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative
hedging instruments net of income
taxes of $(26,327) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,250 |
) |
Hedge settlements reclassified to
income net of income taxes of
$48,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,187 |
) |
|
|
(406,905 |
) |
|
|
(446,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
101,848 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,243,277 |
|
|
$ |
38,994 |
|
|
$ |
(436,122 |
) |
|
$ |
846,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Paid-In- |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
87,229 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1,054,089 |
|
|
$ |
(22,576 |
) |
|
$ |
359,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,391,018 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,391,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued restricted
stock |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock bought and cancelled
on same day |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,014 |
) |
Forfeiture of restricted stock |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,516 |
|
|
|
195,516 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
195,704 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative
hedging instruments net of income
taxes of $(124,800) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203,157 |
) |
Hedge settlements reclassified to
income net of income taxes of
$(28,977) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255,568 |
) |
|
|
195,516 |
|
|
|
(60,052 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(59,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
88,820 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1,057,787 |
|
|
$ |
(278,144 |
) |
|
$ |
555,012 |
|
|
$ |
1,334,664 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
1,334,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
5
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
$ |
195,516 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income (benefit) tax |
|
|
(214,806 |
) |
|
|
105,075 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
195,087 |
|
|
|
260,772 |
|
Ineffectiveness of derivative instruments |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6,474 |
|
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
704,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
12,208 |
|
|
|
7,172 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(10,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
66,302 |
|
|
|
(131,078 |
) |
Insurance receivables |
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
57,083 |
|
Cash from liquidation of hedges |
|
|
20,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(8,052 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(25,917 |
) |
|
|
48,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
337,731 |
|
|
|
551,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(318,625 |
) |
|
|
(652,910 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(48,605 |
) |
Restricted cash designated for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(319,241 |
) |
|
|
(696,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
261,221 |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(691,221 |
) |
|
|
(459,000 |
) |
Repurchase of stock |
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
|
|
(4,014 |
) |
Debt redetermination costs |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt offering costs |
|
|
(5,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity offering |
|
|
160,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt issuance |
|
|
291,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
167,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
30,439 |
|
|
|
22,680 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
33,648 |
|
|
$ |
41,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of amount capitalized) |
|
$ |
28,765 |
|
|
$ |
31,101 |
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
6
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Operations Mariner Energy, Inc. (Mariner or the Company) is an independent oil and gas
exploration, development and production company with principal operations in the Permian Basin and
in the Gulf of Mexico, both shelf and deepwater. Unless otherwise indicated, references to
Mariner, the Company, we, our, ours and us refer to Mariner Energy, Inc. and its
subsidiaries collectively.
Interim Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal and recurring nature)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in
conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended.
Use of Estimates The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. The Companys most significant financial estimates are based on remaining proved natural
gas and oil reserves. Estimates of proved reserves are key components of Mariners depletion rate
for natural gas and oil properties, its unevaluated properties and its full cost ceiling test. In
addition, estimates are used in computing taxes, preparing accruals of operating costs and
production revenues, asset retirement obligations, fair value and effectiveness of derivative
instruments and fair value of stock options and the related compensation expense. Because of the
inherent nature of the estimation process, actual results could differ materially from these
estimates.
Principles of Consolidation Mariners condensed consolidated financial statements as of June
30, 2009 and consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 include its accounts and the
accounts of its subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current
year presentation. Amounts for certain producing well overhead were presented as Lease operating expense
in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2008. These amounts are presented herein as General and administrative
expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009. Other reclassifications are
insignificant in nature. These reclassifications had no effect on total operating income or net
income.
Income Taxes The Companys provision for taxes includes both federal and state taxes. The
Company records its federal income taxes using an asset and liability approach which results in the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the book carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carryforwards are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely
than not to be recovered.
There were no significant changes to the Companys uncertain tax positions during the six
months ended June 30, 2009. For a detail of the Companys uncertain tax positions, please refer to
Note 10 Income Taxes to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended.
7
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of GAAP,
authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All
other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become
non-authoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting
periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company will begin to use the new guidelines and
numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in respect of the third
quarter ending September 30, 2009. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter
existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, cash
flows or results of operations.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). SFAS 165
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS
165 sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for periods beginning after June 15,
2009. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position,
cash flows or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) to provide additional
application guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of
securities. FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,
provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles
presented in SFAS No. 157. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, enhance consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of
fair value disclosures. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, provides additional guidance designed to create greater clarity
and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities. These three FSPs
are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of these FSPs for the
period ending March 31, 2009. The adoption of these FSPs did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued the final rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting
(Final Rule), which adopts revisions to the SECs oil and gas reporting disclosure requirements
and is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for years ending on or after December 31, 2009.
Early adoption of the Final Rule is prohibited. The revisions are intended to provide investors
with a more meaningful and comprehensive understanding of oil and gas reserves to help investors
evaluate their investments in oil and gas companies. The amendments are also designed to modernize
the oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them with current practices and changes in
technology. Revised requirements in the SECs Final Rule include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
Oil and gas reserves must be reported using average prices over the prior 12 month
period, rather than year-end prices; |
|
|
|
Companies will be allowed to report, on an optional basis, probable and possible
reserves; |
|
|
|
Non-traditional reserves, such as oil and gas extracted from coal and shales, will
be included in the definition of oil and gas producing activities; |
|
|
|
Companies will be permitted to use new technologies to determine proved reserves, as
long as those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable
conclusions with respect to reserve volumes; |
8
|
|
|
Companies will be required to disclose, in narrative form, additional details on
their proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs), including the total quantity of PUDs at year
end, any material changes to PUDs that occurred during the year, investments and
progress made to convert PUDs to developed oil and gas reserves and an explanation of
the reasons why material concentrations of PUDs in individual fields or countries have
remained undeveloped for five years or more after disclosure as PUDs;
and |
|
|
|
Companies will be required to report the qualifications and measures taken to assure
the independence and objectivity of any business entity or employee primarily
responsible for preparing or auditing the reserves estimates. |
The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the Final Rule. The SEC
is discussing the Final Rule with the FASB staff to align FASB accounting standards with the new
SEC rules. These discussions may delay the required compliance date. Absent any change in the
effective date, Mariner will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in its annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS 160), which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and
to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the valuation of
retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also
establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS
160 beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position, cash flows or results of operations. However, it did impact the
presentation and disclosure of noncontrolling (minority) interests in the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes
criteria to be considered when measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for all recurring measures of financial assets and financial
liabilities (e.g. derivatives and investment securities) for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for all recurring measures of
financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2), which granted a
one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 as it applies to non-financial assets and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. Beginning January 1,
2009, Mariner applied SFAS 157 to non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of SFAS 157
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, cash flows or results of
operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This statement requires
enhanced disclosures about the Companys derivative and hedging activities. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 161 beginning January 1,
2009. See Note 8 Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities for additional
disclosures. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
2. Acquisitions
Gulf of Mexico Shelf Acquisition. On January 31, 2008, Mariner acquired 100% of the equity in
a subsidiary of Hydro Gulf of Mexico, Inc. pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
executed on December 23, 2007. The acquired subsidiary, now known as Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC
(MGOM), was an indirect subsidiary of StatoilHydro ASA and owns substantially all of its former
Gulf of Mexico shelf operations. Mariner paid $228.8 million for the acquisition of MGOM.
Pro Forma Financial Information The pro forma information set forth below gives effect to
the acquisition of MGOM as if it had been consummated as of the beginning of the applicable period.
The pro forma information has
9
been derived from the historical Consolidated Financial Statements of
the Company and the statements of revenues and direct operating expenses of MGOM. The pro forma
information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different had
MGOM been an independent company and had the companies always been combined. You should not rely on
the pro forma financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have
been achieved had the acquisition occurred in the past or the future financial results that the
Company will achieve after the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Pro Forma: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
429,168 |
|
|
$ |
760,042 |
|
Net income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
123,443 |
|
|
$ |
199,071 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
Permian Basin Acquisitions. On February 29, 2008 and December 1, 2008, Mariner acquired
additional working interests in certain of its existing properties in the Spraberry field in the
Permian Basin. Mariner operates substantially all of the assets. The purchase prices were $23.5
million for the February 2008 acquisition and $19.4 million for the December 2008 acquisition.
Bass Lite On December 19, 2008, Mariner acquired additional working interests in its
existing property, Atwater Valley Block 426 (Bass Lite), for approximately $30.6 million,
increasing its working interest by 11.6% to 53.8%. Mariner internally estimated proved reserves
attributable to the acquisition of approximately 17.6 Bcfe (100% natural gas).
3. Long-Term Debt
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Companys long-term debt was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Bank credit facility |
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
570,000 |
|
7 1/2% Senior Notes, due April 15, 2013, net of discount |
|
|
297,841 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
8% Senior Notes, due May 15, 2017 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
11 3/4% Senior Notes, due June 30, 2016, net of discount |
|
|
291,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,029,189 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Credit Facility The Company has a secured revolving credit facility with a group
of banks pursuant to an amended and restated credit agreement dated March 2, 2006, as further
amended, with the latest amendment made as of June 2, 2009. The credit facility matures January 31,
2012 and is subject to a borrowing base which is redetermined periodically. The outstanding
principal balance of loans under the credit facility may not exceed the borrowing base. Pursuant to
the June 2009 amendment, the borrowing base automatically reduced by $50.0 million to $800.0
million upon the Companys June 10, 2009 issuance of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of
its
113/4% senior notes due 2016 discussed below. The next borrowing base
redetermination is expected in August 2009.
On June 10, 2009, the Company used aggregate proceeds from concurrent offerings of its 113/4%
senior notes due 2016 and common stock, before deducting estimated offering expenses but after
deducting underwriters discounts and commissions, of approximately $446.2 million to repay debt
under its bank credit facility. These offerings are discussed further below in this Note 3 and in
Note 4 Stockholders Equity.
As of June 30, 2009, maximum credit availability under the facility was $1.0 billion,
including up to $50.0 million in letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base of $800.0 million.
As of June 30, 2009, there were $140.0 million in advances outstanding under the credit facility
and four letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.7 million, of which $4.2 million is required for
plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of the Companys offshore fields. As of June 30,
2009, after accounting for the $4.7 million of letters of credit, the Company had $655.3 million
available to borrow under the credit facility.
10
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the commitment fee on unused capacity was 0.250% to
0.375% per annum through March 23, 2009 and 0.5% per annum thereafter. Commitment fees are included
in Accrued interest in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in Item 1 of Part I of this
Quarterly Report. Borrowings under the bank credit facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based
rate or a prime-based rate, at the Companys option, plus a
specified margin. At June 30, 2009, when borrowings at both LIBOR and
prime-based rates were outstanding, the blended interest rate was
2.75% on all amounts borrowed.
The credit facility subjects the Company to various restrictive covenants and contains other
usual and customary terms and conditions, including limits on additional debt, cash dividends and
other restricted payments, liens, investments, asset dispositions, mergers and speculative hedging.
Financial covenants under the credit facility require the Company to, among other things:
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and |
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of not
more than 2.5 to 1.0. |
The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the bank credit facility as of
June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused
borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities was 3.45 to 1.0
and the ratio of total debt to EBITDA was
1.46 to 1.0.
The Companys payment and performance of its obligations under the credit facility (including
any obligations under commodity and interest rate hedges entered into with facility lenders) are
secured by liens upon substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, and
guaranteed by its subsidiaries, other than Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. which is a co-borrower.
Senior Notes On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate
principal amount of its 113/4% senior notes due 2016 (the 113/4% Notes). In 2007, the Company sold
and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 8% senior notes due 2017 (the 8%
Notes). In 2006, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 71/2%
senior notes due 2013 (the 71/2% Notes and together with the 113/4% Notes and the 8% Notes, the
Notes). The Notes are governed by indentures that are substantially identical for each series.
The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. The 113/4% Notes mature on June 30, 2016
with interest payable on June 30 and December 30 of each year beginning December 30, 2009. The 8%
Notes mature on May 15, 2017 with interest payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 71/2%
Notes mature on April 15, 2013 with interest payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. There
is no sinking fund for the Notes. The Company and its restricted subsidiaries are subject to
certain financial and non-financial covenants under each of the indentures governing the Notes. The
Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Notes as of June 30, 2009.
113/4% Notes The 113/4% Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among
the Company, the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (the Base
Indenture), as amended and supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of
June 10, 2009, among the same parties (the Supplemental Indenture and together with the Base
Indenture, the Indenture). Pursuant to the Base Indenture, the Company may issue multiple series
of debt securities from time to time.
The 113/4% Notes were sold at 97.093% of principal amount, for an initial yield to maturity of
12.375%, in an underwritten offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
1933 Act). Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters discounts and estimated offering
expenses but before
giving effect to the underwriters reimbursement of up to $0.5
million for offering expenses, were approximately $284.8 million. The Company used net offering proceeds (before
deducting estimated offering expenses) to repay debt under its bank credit facility.
The 113/4% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, rank senior in right of
payment to any future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with the
Companys existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including the 71/2% Notes and the 8%
Notes, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to the Companys senior secured
indebtedness, including its obligations under its bank credit facility, to the
11
extent of the
collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future indebtedness and other
liabilities of any non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The 113/4% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the
Companys existing and future domestic subsidiaries. In the future, the guarantees may be released
or terminated under certain circumstances. Each subsidiary guarantee ranks senior in right of
payment to any future subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, ranks equally in right
of payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary and
effectively subordinate to all existing and future secured indebtedness of the guarantor
subsidiary, including its guarantees of indebtedness under the Companys bank credit facility, to
the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
The Company may redeem the 113/4% Notes at any time before June 30, 2013 at a price equal to the
principal amount redeemed plus a make-whole premium, using a discount rate of the Treasury rate
plus 0.50% and accrued but unpaid interest. Beginning on June 30 of the years indicated below, the
Company may redeem the 113/4% Notes from time to time, in whole or in part, at the prices set forth
below (expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) plus accrued but unpaid interest:
2013 at 105.875%
2014 at 102.938%
2015 and thereafter at 100.000%
In addition, before June 30, 2012, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 113/4% Notes with the
proceeds of equity offerings at a price equal to 111.750% of the principal amount of the 113/4% Notes
redeemed plus accrued but unpaid interest.
If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the Indenture) occurs, subject to
certain exceptions, the Company must give holders of the 113/4% Notes the opportunity to sell to the
Company their 113/4% Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages to the date of purchase.
The Company and its restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain negative covenants under
the Indenture governing the 113/4% Notes which are consistent with the negative covenants under each
of the indentures governing the71/2% Notes and 8% Notes. The Indenture limits the ability of the
Company and each of its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from its
subsidiaries to itself; |
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets; |
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated
indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
create unrestricted subsidiaries. |
Capitalized Interest For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized
interest totaled $3.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized interest totaled $5.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
4. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock Offering On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued 11.5 million shares of
its common stock, par value $.0001 per share, at a public offering price of $14.50 per share in an
underwritten offering registered under the 1933 Act. The total sold includes 1.5 million shares
issued upon full exercise of the underwriters overallotment option. Net offering proceeds, after
deducting underwriters discounts and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the
underwriters reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses,
12
were approximately
$159.2 million. The Company used net offering proceeds (before deducting estimated offering
expenses of approximately $0.5 million) to repay debt under its bank credit facility.
5. Oil and Gas Properties
The Companys oil and gas properties are accounted for using the full-cost method of
accounting. All direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition,
exploration and development of oil and gas properties are capitalized, including eligible general
and administrative costs (G&A). G&A costs associated with production, operations, marketing and
general corporate activities are expensed as incurred. These capitalized costs, coupled with the
Companys estimated asset retirement obligations recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143),
are included in the amortization base and amortized to expense using the unit-of-production method.
Amortization is calculated based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Proceeds from the sale
or disposition of oil and gas properties are applied to reduce net capitalized costs unless the
sale or disposition causes a significant change in the relationship between costs and the estimated
value of proved reserves. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, capitalized G&A
totaled $5.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, capitalized G&A totaled $10.3 million and $9.7 million, respectively.
Capitalized costs (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization and deferred
income taxes) of proved oil and gas properties are subject to a full-cost ceiling limitation. The
ceiling limits these costs to an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated
future net cash flows from estimated proved reserves less estimated future operating and
development costs, abandonment costs (net of salvage value) and estimated related future income
taxes. The full-cost ceiling limitation is calculated using natural gas and oil prices in effect as
of the balance sheet date and is adjusted for basis or location differentials. Price is held
constant over the life of the reserves. The Company uses derivative financial instruments that
qualify for cash flow hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133) to hedge against the volatility of oil and natural gas
prices. In accordance with SEC guidelines, Mariner includes estimated future cash flows from its
hedging program in the ceiling test calculation. If net capitalized costs related to proved
properties exceed the ceiling limit, the excess is impaired and recorded in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
At June 30, 2009, the ceiling limit exceeded the net capitalized costs of the Companys proved
oil and gas properties and therefore no ceiling test impairment was recorded for the second
quarter. At March 31, 2009, the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties exceeded the
ceiling limit and the Company recorded a non-cash ceiling test impairment of $704.7 million ($454.6
million, net of tax) for the first quarter. The impairment would have been $808.0 million ($521.3
million, net of tax) if the Company had not used hedge adjusted prices for the volumes that were
subject to hedges. The ceiling limit of its proved reserves was calculated based upon quoted market
prices of $3.89 and $3.63 per Mcf for gas and $70.00 and $49.65 per barrel for oil, adjusted for
market differentials for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. No ceiling test impairment was recorded for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
6. Accrual for Future Abandonment Liabilities
In accordance with SFAS 143, the Company records the fair value of a liability for the legal
obligation to retire an asset in the period in which it is incurred with the corresponding cost
capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Upon adoption of
SFAS 143, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation to reflect the Companys legal
obligations related to future plugging and abandonment of its oil and natural gas wells. The
liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. If the liability is settled for an amount
other than the recorded amount, the difference is recognized in proved oil and gas properties.
To estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation, the Company employs a present
value technique, which reflects certain assumptions, including its credit-adjusted risk-free
interest rate, the estimated settlement date of the liability and the estimated current cost to
settle the liability. Changes in timing or to the original estimate of cash flows will result in
changes to the carrying amount of the liability.
13
The following roll forward is provided as a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
aggregate carrying amounts of the asset retirement obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Abandonment liability as of January 1, 2009 (1) |
|
$ |
408,244 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
12,177 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(29,742 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
17,119 |
|
Revisions to previous estimates |
|
|
39,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment Liability as of June 30, 2009 (2) |
|
$ |
447,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $82.4 million classified as a current liability at December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $40.4 million classified as a current liability at June 30, 2009. |
7. Share-Based Compensation
Applicable Plans ¯ On May 11, 2009, the Companys stockholders approved the Mariner Energy,
Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan). Restricted
common stock and non-qualified stock options are outstanding under the Stock Incentive Plan.
Options to purchase the Companys common stock granted to certain employees in connection with a
March 2006 merger transaction also are outstanding but are not governed by the Stock Incentive Plan
(Rollover Options).
The Companys directors, employees and consultants are eligible to participate in the Stock
Incentive Plan. Awards to participants may be made in the form of incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options or restricted stock. Effective May 11, 2009, the Stock Incentive Plan
increased to 12,500,000 from 6,500,000 the maximum number of shares of the Companys common stock
that can be issued to participants, and increased the number of shares that can be issued to any
one employee to 5,700,000 from 2,850,000. Subject to the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan, the
participants to whom awards are granted, the type or types of awards granted, the number of shares
covered by each award, and the purchase price, conditions and other terms of each award are
determined by the Companys board of directors or a committee thereof appointed by the board to
administer the Plan (the committee).
Unless sooner terminated, no award may be granted under the Stock Incentive Plan after
October 12, 2015. The Companys board of directors or the committee may amend, alter, suspend,
discontinue, or terminate (collectively, change) the Stock Incentive Plan without the consent of
any stockholder, participant, other holder or beneficiary of an award, or other person, except
that:
|
|
|
without the approval of the Companys stockholders, no change can be made that would |
|
(i) |
|
increase the total number of shares that may be issued under
the Stock Incentive Plan, except as provided in the Stock Incentive Plan with
respect to stock dividends or splits, or with respect to mergers,
recapitalizations, reorganizations, spin-offs or other unusual transactions or
events, |
|
(ii) |
|
permit the exercise price of any outstanding option that is
underwater to be reduced or for an underwater option to be cancelled and
replaced with a new award, |
|
(iii) |
|
include participants other than employees, non-employee
directors and consultants, or |
|
(iv) |
|
materially increase benefits accrued to participants under the
Stock Incentive Plan; and |
|
|
|
no change can materially adversely affect the rights of a participant under an award
without the participants written consent.
|
14
In addition, the Stock Incentive Plan may not be amended or terminated in any manner that
would cause the Plan or any amounts or benefits payable under the Stock Incentive Plan to fail to
comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to the extent
applicable.
Plan Activity ¯ The Company recorded total compensation expense related to restricted stock
and stock options of $7.3 million and $4.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively and $14.1 million and $7.2 million for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Under the Stock Incentive Plan, unrecognized compensation expense at
June 30, 2009 for the unvested portion of restricted stock granted was $59.1 million and for
unvested options was $0.
The following table presents a summary of stock option activity under the Stock Incentive Plan
and under Rollover Options for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
645,348 |
|
|
$ |
13.88 |
|
|
$ |
(1,376 |
) |
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
11.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
644,886 |
|
|
$ |
13.88 |
|
|
$ |
(1,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon the difference between the closing price per share of the common stock on the last
trading date of the quarter of $11.75 and the option exercise price of in-the-money options. |
A summary of the activity for unvested restricted stock awards under the Stock Incentive Plan
as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and changes during the six-month periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares under |
|
|
Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Total unvested shares at beginning of period: January 1 |
|
|
2,697,926 |
|
|
|
1,484,552 |
|
Shares granted (1) |
|
|
1,689,342 |
|
|
|
1,683,316 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(562,798 |
) |
|
|
(432,606 |
) |
Shares forfeited (1) |
|
|
(20,426 |
) |
|
|
(17,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unvested shares at end of period: June 30 |
|
|
3,804,044 |
|
|
|
2,718,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for future grant as options or restricted stock |
|
|
7,028,732 |
|
|
|
2,554,720 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Current year activity includes 4,741 shares granted and forfeited under the Stock
Incentive Plans 2008 Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program discussed below
during the six months ended June 30, 2009. |
The
following table summarizes the status under the provisions of SFAS
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123(R)), of the Companys
restricted stock, including long-term performance based restricted stock, at June 30, 2009 and the
changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
($ thousands) |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,697,926 |
|
|
$ |
28.22 |
|
|
$ |
76,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,689,342 |
|
|
|
11.18 |
|
|
|
18,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(562,798 |
) |
|
|
22.48 |
|
|
|
(12,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(20,426 |
) |
|
|
13.68 |
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,804,044 |
|
|
|
21.58 |
|
|
$ |
82,083 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program In June 2008, Mariners Board of
Directors adopted a Long-Term Performance-Based Restricted Stock Program (the Program) under the
Stock Incentive Plan. Shares of restricted common stock subject to the Program were granted in 2008
and 2009. Vesting of these shares is contingent, begins upon satisfaction of specified thresholds
of $38.00 and $46.00 for the market price per share of Mariners common stock, and continues in
installments over five to seven years thereafter, assuming, in most instances, continued employment
by Mariner. The fair value of restricted stock grants made under the Program is estimated using a
Monte Carlo simulation. Stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock grants
totaled $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Weighted average fair values and valuation assumptions used to value Program grants for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of grants
|
|
$ |
33.73 |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
42.29 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected life
|
|
10 years
|
Expected volatility is calculated based on the average historical stock price volatility
of Mariner and a peer group as of June 30, 2009. The peer group consisted of the following seven
independent oil and gas exploration and production companies: ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Callon
Petroleum Co., Energy Partners, Ltd., McMoRan Exploration Co., Plains Exploration & Production
Company, Stone Energy Corporation, and W&T Offshore, Inc. The risk-free interest rate is determined
at the grant date and is based on 10-year, zero-coupon government bonds with maturity equal to the
contractual term of the awards, converted to a continuously compounded rate. The expected life is
based upon the contractual terms of the restricted stock grants under the Program.
8. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The energy markets historically have been very volatile, and Mariner expects oil and gas
prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the effects of
the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on the Companys operations, management has
elected to hedge oil and natural gas prices from time to time through the use of commodity price
swap agreements and costless collars. While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the
downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from favorable movements. In
addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used to assess and measure
the ineffectiveness of the Companys open contracts at the end of each period.
For derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges pursuant to SFAS
133, the portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument that is effective in offsetting
the variable cash flows associated with the hedged forecasted transaction is reported as a
component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item
associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings (e.g., in revenues when the hedged transactions are commodity
sales). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative contract in excess of the cumulative change in
the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion)
is recognized in earnings during the current period. The Company currently does not exclude any
component of the derivative contracts gain or loss from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
On January 29, 2009, the Company liquidated crude oil fixed price swaps that previously had
been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 977,000 barrels of crude
oil in exchange for a cash payment to Mariner of $10.0 million and installment payments of
$13.5 million to be paid monthly to Mariner through 2009. On April 16, 2009, the Company received a
$10.5 million cash settlement on the hedges that were settled in monthly installments at January
29, 2009. Since the forecasted sales of crude oil volumes are still expected to occur, the
accumulated gains through January 29, 2009 on the related derivative contracts remained in
accumulated other comprehensive income, and will not be reclassified into earnings until the
physical transactions occur. Any changes
16
in the value of these derivative contracts subsequent to
January 29, 2009 will no longer be deferred in other comprehensive income, but rather will impact
current period income.
Derivative gains and losses are recorded by commodity type in oil and gas revenues in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effects on the Companys oil and gas revenues
from its hedging activities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Gain (Loss) on Settlements (1) |
|
$ |
63,547 |
|
|
$ |
(64,607 |
) |
|
$ |
121,004 |
|
|
$ |
(74,914 |
) |
Gain on liquidated swaps (2) |
|
|
6,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Hedge Ineffectiveness (3) |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
70,400 |
|
|
$ |
(67,157 |
) |
|
$ |
134,201 |
|
|
$ |
(81,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to SFAS 133. |
|
(2) |
|
Crude oil fixed price swaps liquidated on January 29, 2009 that do not qualify for hedge
accounting. Includes a $0.3 million net gain related to the liquidation of hedges on January
29, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized loss recognized in natural gas revenue related to the ineffective portion of open
contracts that are not eligible for deferral under SFAS 133 due primarily to the basis
differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. |
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Fixed Price |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1December 31, 2009 |
|
|
22,220,024 |
|
|
$ |
7.62 |
|
|
$ |
72,156 |
|
January 1December 31, 2010 |
|
|
12,775,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
|
(2,470 |
) |
January 1June 30, 2011 |
|
|
4,525,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
(732 |
) |
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1December 31, 2009 |
|
|
484,564 |
|
|
$ |
76.45 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
January 1December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,277,500 |
|
|
$ |
62.28 |
|
|
|
(15,336 |
) |
January 1June 30, 2011 |
|
|
452,500 |
|
|
$ |
65.65 |
|
|
|
(4,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has reviewed the financial strength of its counterparties and believes the
credit risk associated with these swaps to be minimal. Hedges with counterparties that are lenders
under the Companys bank credit facility are secured under the bank credit facility.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes, all
realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the statement of income during the
current period. This will result in non-cash gains or losses reported in Mariners operating
results.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company expects to realize within the next 12 months approximately
$67.3 million in net gains resulting from hedging activities and $10.3 million resulting from
liquidated fixed price swaps that are currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
These hedging gains are expected to be realized as a decrease of $5.2 million to oil revenues and
an increase of $72.4 million to natural gas revenues.
As of August 4, 2009, the Company has not entered into any hedge transactions subsequent to
June 30, 2009.
17
Additional Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
At June 30, 2009, the Company had derivative financial instruments under SFAS 133 recorded in
its balance sheet as set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Contracts |
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging contracts under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Current Assets: Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$ |
70,849 |
|
|
Current Assets: Derivative
financial
instruments
|
|
$ |
121,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging contracts under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
10,250 |
|
|
Current Assets: Derivative
financial
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,099 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
121,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Contracts |
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair value |
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging contracts under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Current
Liabilities: Derivative
financial
instruments
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Liabilities: Derivative
financial
instruments
|
|
|
16,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the effect on income of derivative financial
instruments under SFAS 133 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of gain/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain/(loss) |
|
|
gain/(loss) reclassified |
|
reclassified from |
|
|
Location of (loss) |
|
Amount of (loss) |
|
Derivatives |
|
recognized in OCI on |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
recognized in income |
|
recognized in income |
|
designated as cash |
|
derivative (effective |
|
|
OCI into income |
|
into income (effective |
|
|
on derivative |
|
on derivative |
|
flow hedging |
|
portion) |
|
|
(effective portion) |
|
portion) |
|
|
(ineffective portion) |
|
(ineffective portion) |
|
contracts under |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
SFAS 133 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
$ |
51,076 |
|
|
$ |
(403,989 |
) |
|
Revenues-Natural Gas
|
|
$ |
58,844 |
|
|
$ |
(28,839 |
) |
|
Revenues-Natural Gas
|
|
$ |
(176 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,550 |
) |
Fixed Price Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,886 |
) |
|
Revenues-Crude Oil
|
|
|
11,556 |
|
|
|
(38,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
51,076 |
|
|
$ |
(435,875 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
70,400 |
|
|
$ |
(67,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain/(loss) recognized |
|
|
Location of gain/(loss) |
|
in income on derivative |
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging contracts |
|
recognized in income on |
|
Second Quarter |
under SFAS 133 |
|
derivative |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Fixed Price Swaps
|
|
Revenues-Crude Oil
|
|
$ |
6,677 |
|
|
|
18
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Minimum Future Lease Payments The Company leases certain office facilities and other
equipment under long-term operating lease arrangements. Minimum future lease obligations under the
Companys operating leases in effect at June 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,499 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,414 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,084 |
|
2014 and thereafter |
|
|
9,877 |
|
Other Commitments In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into long-term
commitments to purchase seismic data. The minimum annual payments under these contracts are $0.7
million in 2010.
Insurance Matters
Current Insurance Against Hurricanes
Mariner is a member of OIL Insurance, Limited (OIL), an energy industry insurance
cooperative, which provides Mariner physical damage and windstorm insurance coverage subject to a
$10.0 million per-occurrence deductible, a $250.0 million per occurrence loss limit, and a $750.0
million industry aggregate loss limit per event. Each year, Mariner considers whether to purchase
supplemental windstorm, physical damage and business interruption insurance which in the past has
provided coverage when OIL limits have been exceeded (see discussion below under Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita (2005)). The supplemental insurance coverage offered by the commercial market in
2009 would not provide similar coverage, and Mariner elected not to purchase it when it expired on
June 1, 2009. Mariner believes its assets are sufficiently insured for 2009 through OIL and Mariners expected
ability to cover losses in excess of OIL coverage. Mariner intends to monitor the commercial
market for insurance that would, based on Mariners historical experience, cover its expected
hurricane-related risks on a cost-effective basis once OIL limits are exceeded.
As of June 30, 2009, approximately $36.0 million was accrued for an OIL withdrawal premium
contingency. As part of its OIL membership, the Company is obligated to pay a withdrawal premium if
it elects to withdraw from OIL. Mariner does not anticipate withdrawing from OIL; however, due to
the contingency, Mariner periodically reassesses the sufficiency of its accrued withdrawal premium
based on OILs periodic calculation of the potential withdrawal premium in light of past losses,
and Mariner may adjust its accrual accordingly in the future.
OIL requires smaller members to provide a letter of credit or other acceptable security in
favor of OIL to secure payment of the withdrawal premium. Acceptable security has included a letter
of credit or a security agreement pursuant to which a member grants OIL a security interest in
certain claim proceeds payable by OIL to the member. Mariner anticipates that it will enter into
such a security agreement, granting to OIL a security interest in a portion of Mariners Hurricane
Ike claim proceeds payable by OIL. Mariner would have the ability to replace the security agreement
with a letter of credit or other acceptable security in favor of OIL.
Hurricane Ike (2008)
In 2008, the Companys operations were adversely affected by Hurricane Ike. The hurricane
resulted in shut-in and delayed production as well as facility repairs and replacement expenses.
The Company estimates that repairs and plugging and abandonment costs resulting from Hurricane Ike
will total approximately $140.0 million net to Mariners interest. With respect to
Hurricane Ike, Mariners OIL coverage has a $10.0 million per occurrence deductible and a $250.0
million per occurrence limit, subject to an industry-wide loss limit of $750.0 million per
occurrence. OIL has advised the Company that industry-wide damages from Hurricane Ike are expected
to substantially exceed OILs $750.0 million limit and that OIL expects to initially prorate the
payout of all OIL members Hurricane Ike claims at approximately 60%, subject to further
adjustment. Mariner expects that approximately 75% of the shortfall in its primary insurance
coverage will be covered under its commercial excess coverage. In respect of Hurricane Ike claims
that the Company submitted to OIL through June 2009, the Company received $12.0 million from OIL
and as of June 30, 2009 had a receivable balance of approximately $30.7 million, of which $5.1
million is classified as a long-term asset. Although in 2009 Mariner has started receiving payment
in respect of its Hurricane Ike claims, due to the magnitude of the storm and the complexity of the
insurance claims being processed by the insurance industry, Mariner expects to maintain a
potentially significant insurance receivable through 2010 while it actively pursues settlement of
its Hurricane Ike claims to minimize the impact to its working capital and liquidity.
19
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (2005)
In 2005, the Companys operations were adversely affected by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita,
resulting in substantial shut-in and delayed production, as well as necessitating extensive
facility repairs and hurricane-related abandonment operations. Since 2005, the Company has incurred
approximately $202.0 million in hurricane expenditures resulting from Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita, of which $128.8 million were capitalized expenditures and $73.2 million were
hurricane-related abandonment costs.
Applicable insurance for the Companys Hurricane Katrina and Rita claims with respect to the
Gulf of Mexico assets acquired from Forest Oil Corporation in March 2006 is provided by OIL.
Mariners coverage for such properties is subject to a deductible of $5.0 million per occurrence
and a $1.0 billion industry-wide loss limit per occurrence. OIL has advised the Company that the
aggregate claims resulting from each of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita are expected to exceed the
$1.0 billion per occurrence loss limit and that therefore; Mariners insurance recovery is expected
to be reduced pro-rata (approximately 47% for Katrina and 67% for Rita) with all other competing
claims from the storms. During 2008, the Company settled its Katrina and Rita claims with its
excess insurers for a one-time cash payment of $48.5 million. The insurance coverage for Mariners
legacy properties is subject to a $3.75 million deductible.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had recovered $52.9 million from OIL and $48.5 million from
its commercial carriers in respect of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. With respect to Hurricane
Katrina, the Company has received full and final settlement and maintains no insurance receivable
balance. With respect to Hurricane Rita, although the Company had not yet submitted final claims
and therefore maintained no insurance receivable balance at June 30, 2009, it expects to submit
final claims and achieve settlement by 2010. Due to the magnitude of the storm and the complexity
of the insurance claims being processed by the insurance industry, the timing of the Companys
ultimate insurance recovery cannot be assured. However, Mariner expects to recover substantially
all of its outstanding OIL claims in respect of Hurricane Rita by 2010. Any differences between
insurance recoveries and insurance receivables will be recorded as adjustments to oil and natural
gas properties.
Litigation The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is a claimant and/or a defendant
in various legal proceedings, including proceedings as to which the Company has insurance coverage
and those that may involve the filing of liens against the Company or its assets. The Company does
not consider its exposure in these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to be material.
Letters of Credit Mariners bank credit facility has a letter of credit subfacility of up to
$50.0 million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of June 30, 2009, four such letters
of credit totaling $4.7 million were outstanding of which $4.2 million is required for plugging and
abandonment obligations at certain of Mariners offshore fields.
10. Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share does not include dilution and is computed by dividing net income or
loss attributed to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur upon
vesting of restricted common stock or exercise of options to purchase common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
17,213 |
|
|
$ |
123,390 |
|
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
$ |
195,516 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
91,799 |
|
|
|
87,984 |
|
|
|
90,340 |
|
|
|
87,639 |
|
Add dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average shares outstanding and dilutive securities |
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
88,829 |
|
|
|
90,340 |
|
|
|
88,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per share attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
(4.50 |
) |
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
Diluted: |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
(4.50 |
) |
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
20
Unvested shares of restricted stock and shares issuable upon exercise of options to
purchase common stock that would have been anti-dilutive are excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share. Due to the Companys net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
all unvested shares of restricted stock and shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
(2,306,203 and 623,461, respectively) were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2009,
1,605,688 unvested shares of restricted stock and 612,805 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2008, 187,722 and 93,861 unvested shares of restricted stock,
respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect
was anti-dilutive and no shares issuable upon exercise of stock options were excluded.
11. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and certain items recorded directly to stockholders
equity and classified as other comprehensive income. The table below summarizes comprehensive
income and provides the components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive income for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
17,213 |
|
|
$ |
123,488 |
|
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
$ |
195,704 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative hedging instruments, net
of income taxes of $(59,152), $(67,487), $(26,327), and
$(124,800) |
|
|
(105,754 |
) |
|
|
(122,068 |
) |
|
|
(125,250 |
) |
|
|
(203,157 |
) |
Derivative contracts settled and reclassified, net of
income taxes of $25,253, $(23,910), $48,138 and $(28,977) |
|
|
45,147 |
|
|
|
(43,247 |
) |
|
|
86,063 |
|
|
|
(52,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(60,607 |
) |
|
|
(165,315 |
) |
|
|
(39,187 |
) |
|
|
(255,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
(43,394 |
) |
|
|
(41,827 |
) |
|
|
(446,092 |
) |
|
|
(59,864 |
) |
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
(43,394 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,925 |
) |
|
$ |
(446,092 |
) |
|
$ |
(60,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Fair Value Measurement
Certain of Mariners assets and liabilities are reported at fair value in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such assets and liabilities include amounts for both
financial and nonfinancial instruments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and accounts payable (including income taxes payable and accrued expenses) approximated
fair value at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These assets and liabilities are not included in
the following tables.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. As presented in the table below, the hierarchy consists of
three broad levels. Level 1 inputs on the hierarchy consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets and liabilities and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs are
market-based and are directly or indirectly observable but not considered Level 1 quoted prices,
including quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active; or valuation techniques whose inputs are
observable. Where observable inputs are available, directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable (meaning they reflect Mariners own assumptions regarding how market participants
would price the asset or liability based on the best available information) and therefore have the
lowest priority. A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Mariner believes it
uses appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of
its assets and liabilities.
21
SFAS 157 requires a credit adjustment for non-performance in calculating the fair value of
financial instruments. The credit adjustment for derivatives in an asset position is determined
based on the credit rating of the counterparty and the credit adjustment for derivatives in a
liability position is determined based on Mariners credit rating.
The following table provides fair value measurement information for the Companys derivative
financial instruments as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Total Fair |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps Short Term |
|
$ |
67,250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67,250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps Long Term |
|
|
(16,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,076 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,076 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of Mariners
derivative financial instruments in the table above.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
The fair values of the natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps are estimated using
internal discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves, terms of each
contract, and a credit adjustment based on the credit rating of the Company and its counterparties
as of June 30, 2009.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The Company had no Level 3 financial instruments as of June 30, 2009.
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in
accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (SFAS 107) and FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, which Mariner adopted effective March 31,
2009 as described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The estimated fair value
amounts have been determined using available market information and valuation methodologies
described below. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the
estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies may
have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank credit facility |
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
570,000 |
|
|
$ |
570,000 |
|
7 1/2% Notes, net of discount |
|
|
297,841 |
|
|
|
134,675 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
70,041 |
|
8% Notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
193,917 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
134,140 |
|
11 3/4% Notes, net of discount |
|
|
291,348 |
|
|
|
134,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,029,189 |
|
|
$ |
602,973 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,000 |
|
|
$ |
774,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the bank credit facility as of June 30, 2009 is based on rates
currently available for debt instruments with similar terms and average maturities from companies
with similar credit ratings in our industry. The fair value of the Notes is based on quoted market
prices based on trades of such debt as of June 30, 2009.
22
13. Segment Information
The FASB issued SFAS No. 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, which establishes standards for reporting information about operating
segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in activities
from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses. Separate financial information is available and
this information is regularly evaluated by the chief decision maker for the purpose of allocating
resources and assessing performance.
The Company measures financial performance as a single enterprise, allocating capital
resources on a project-by-project basis across its entire asset base to maximize profitability.
Mariner utilizes a company-wide management team that administers all enterprise operations
encompassing the exploration, development and production of natural gas and oil. Since Mariner
follows the full cost method of accounting and all of its oil and gas properties and operations are
located in the United States, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. Inasmuch
as Mariner is one enterprise, the Company does not maintain comprehensive financial statement
information by area but does track basic operational data by area.
14. Supplemental Guarantor Information
On June 10, 2009, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its
113/4% Notes. On April 30, 2007, the Company sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its 8% Notes. On April 24, 2006, the Company sold and issued to eligible purchasers
$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 71/2% Notes. The Notes are
jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Companys existing and certain
of its future domestic subsidiaries (Subsidiary Guarantors). The guarantees are full and
unconditional, and the guarantors are wholly-owned. In the future, the guarantees may be released
or terminated under certain circumstances.
The following information sets forth Mariners Consolidating Balance Sheets as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, its Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and its Condensed Consolidating Statements of
Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Mariner accounts for investments in its subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting;
accordingly, entries necessary to consolidate Mariner, the parent company, and its Subsidiary
Guarantors are reflected in the eliminations column.
23
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
June 30, 2009
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
33,648 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,648 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances |
|
|
103,583 |
|
|
|
53,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,009 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
25,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,826 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
70,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,849 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
23,793 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
233,440 |
|
|
|
80,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,200 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, full-cost method |
|
|
2,323,685 |
|
|
|
2,395,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,719,635 |
|
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization |
|
|
223,402 |
|
|
|
13,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas properties |
|
|
2,547,087 |
|
|
|
2,409,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,956,693 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
33,938 |
|
|
|
19,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,704 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
(1,358,429 |
) |
|
|
(1,289,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,648,343 |
) |
Other property and equipment |
|
|
(5,288 |
) |
|
|
(1,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
(1,363,717 |
) |
|
|
(1,291,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,655,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,217,308 |
|
|
|
1,137,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,355,194 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries |
|
|
452,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(452,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Receivables |
|
|
194,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Note Receivable |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance Receivables |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
4,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
64,881 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,170,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,100 |
|
|
$ |
(654,363 |
) |
|
$ |
2,739,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,925 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,925 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
85,401 |
|
|
|
27,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,722 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
89,893 |
|
|
|
41,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,174 |
|
Deferred
income tax |
|
|
28,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,625 |
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
|
31,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,386 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,873 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
233,328 |
|
|
|
99,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,304 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
85,715 |
|
|
|
321,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,733 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
(69,247 |
) |
|
|
147,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,801 |
|
Intercompany payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,802 |
|
|
|
(194,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
16,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,174 |
|
Long-term debt, |
|
|
1,029,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029,189 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
28,830 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,525 |
|
Intercompany note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,090,661 |
|
|
|
671,738 |
|
|
|
(201,977 |
) |
|
|
1,560,422 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June
30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares
authorized, 101,848,191 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,243,277 |
|
|
|
886,142 |
|
|
|
(886,142 |
) |
|
|
1,243,277 |
|
Partner capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
(31,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
38,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,994 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(436,122 |
) |
|
|
(465,688 |
) |
|
|
465,688 |
|
|
|
(436,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
846,159 |
|
|
|
452,386 |
|
|
|
(452,386 |
) |
|
|
846,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,170,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,100 |
|
|
$ |
(654,363 |
) |
|
$ |
2,739,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
December 31, 2008
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,809 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,209 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances |
|
|
157,362 |
|
|
|
62,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,920 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,123 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
121,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,929 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
12,965 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
303,285 |
|
|
|
71,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,953 |
|
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, full-cost method |
|
|
2,181,238 |
|
|
|
2,266,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,448,146 |
|
Unproved properties, not subject to amortization |
|
|
185,012 |
|
|
|
16,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas properties |
|
|
2,366,250 |
|
|
|
2,283,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,649,267 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
33,351 |
|
|
|
19,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,115 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
(911,462 |
) |
|
|
(855,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,767,028 |
) |
Other property and equipment |
|
|
(4,425 |
) |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
(915,887 |
) |
|
|
(856,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,483,714 |
|
|
|
1,446,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,929,877 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries |
|
|
704,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(704,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Receivables |
|
|
123,142 |
|
|
|
113,064 |
|
|
|
(236,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Note Receivable |
|
|
176,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance Receivables |
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
18,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,132 |
|
Other Assets, net of amortization |
|
|
64,726 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,859,962 |
|
|
$ |
1,650,208 |
|
|
$ |
(1,117,377 |
) |
|
$ |
3,392,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
72,743 |
|
|
|
35,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,815 |
|
Accrued capital costs |
|
|
144,710 |
|
|
|
51,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,833 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
23,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,148 |
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
80,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,364 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
258,559 |
|
|
|
167,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,564 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability |
|
|
56,920 |
|
|
|
268,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,880 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
110,431 |
|
|
|
209,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,766 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
113,064 |
|
|
|
123,142 |
|
|
|
(236,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,170,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
30,668 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,263 |
|
Intercompany note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,200 |
|
|
|
(176,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,481,083 |
|
|
|
778,232 |
|
|
|
(412,406 |
) |
|
|
1,846,909 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000 shares
authorized, 88,846,073 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,071,347 |
|
|
|
886,143 |
|
|
|
(886,143 |
) |
|
|
1,071,347 |
|
Partner capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,646 |
|
|
|
(30,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
78,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,181 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(29,217 |
) |
|
|
(211,823 |
) |
|
|
211,823 |
|
|
|
(29,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,120,320 |
|
|
|
704,971 |
|
|
|
(704,971 |
) |
|
|
1,120,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,859,962 |
|
|
$ |
1,650,208 |
|
|
$ |
(1,117,377 |
) |
|
$ |
3,392,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
104,704 |
|
|
$ |
37,659 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
142,363 |
|
Oil |
|
|
57,162 |
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,954 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
6,144 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,193 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
170,470 |
|
|
|
61,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
29,040 |
|
|
|
26,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,397 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
21,421 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,122 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
55,050 |
|
|
|
45,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,282 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
107,110 |
|
|
|
72,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
63,360 |
|
|
|
(10,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,411 |
|
Loss of Affiliates |
|
|
(8,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
|
|
302 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(16,973 |
) |
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
(16,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
39,609 |
|
|
|
(12,829 |
) |
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
35,741 |
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
(22,396 |
) |
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
17,213 |
|
|
$ |
(8,961 |
) |
|
$ |
8,961 |
|
|
$ |
17,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
110,905 |
|
|
$ |
139,373 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
250,278 |
|
Oil |
|
|
76,215 |
|
|
|
68,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,556 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
25,541 |
|
|
|
7,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,057 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
212,702 |
|
|
|
216,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
32,240 |
|
|
|
33,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,894 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
14,092 |
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,615 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
76,425 |
|
|
|
65,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,454 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
123,023 |
|
|
|
98,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
89,679 |
|
|
|
118,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,186 |
|
Earnings of Affiliates |
|
|
88,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(2,225 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(17,433 |
) |
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
(17,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Taxes |
|
|
163,423 |
|
|
|
116,167 |
|
|
|
(88,686 |
) |
|
|
190,904 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(40,033 |
) |
|
|
(27,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
123,390 |
|
|
|
88,784 |
|
|
|
(88,686 |
) |
|
|
123,488 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO MARINER ENERGY, INC. |
|
$ |
123,390 |
|
|
$ |
88,686 |
|
|
$ |
(88,686 |
) |
|
$ |
123,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
208,155 |
|
|
$ |
87,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
295,701 |
|
Oil |
|
|
105,945 |
|
|
|
33,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,879 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
10,190 |
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,662 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
7,420 |
|
|
|
17,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
331,710 |
|
|
|
143,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
63,579 |
|
|
|
53,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,912 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
38,473 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,533 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
106,793 |
|
|
|
88,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,087 |
|
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
342,595 |
|
|
|
362,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
9,037 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
560,477 |
|
|
|
505,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS |
|
|
(228,767 |
) |
|
|
(361,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(590,724 |
) |
Loss of Affiliates |
|
|
(253,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
387 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(31,248 |
) |
|
|
(3,455 |
) |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
(31,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Taxes |
|
|
(510,166 |
) |
|
|
(365,412 |
) |
|
|
253,867 |
|
|
|
(621,711 |
) |
Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
103,261 |
|
|
|
111,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
$ |
(253,867 |
) |
|
$ |
253,867 |
|
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
$ |
196,438 |
|
|
$ |
233,463 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
429,901 |
|
Oil |
|
|
138,146 |
|
|
|
120,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,170 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
37,284 |
|
|
|
16,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,038 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
372,243 |
|
|
|
373,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
53,759 |
|
|
|
65,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,170 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
24,906 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,726 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
136,580 |
|
|
|
124,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,772 |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
216,032 |
|
|
|
189,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
156,211 |
|
|
|
183,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,841 |
|
Earnings of Affiliates |
|
|
133,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
5,534 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(4,949 |
) |
|
|
607 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(35,807 |
) |
|
|
(5,276 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
(36,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Taxes |
|
|
259,812 |
|
|
|
178,376 |
|
|
|
(133,874 |
) |
|
|
304,314 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(64,296 |
) |
|
|
(44,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
195,516 |
|
|
|
134,062 |
|
|
|
(133,874 |
) |
|
|
195,704 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO MARINER ENERGY, INC. |
|
$ |
195,516 |
|
|
$ |
133,874 |
|
|
$ |
(133,874 |
) |
|
$ |
195,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
235,346 |
|
|
$ |
102,385 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
337,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(198,862 |
) |
|
|
(119,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318,625 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(616 |
) |
Repayments of notes from affiliates |
|
|
169,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(30,451 |
) |
|
|
(119,765 |
) |
|
|
(169,025 |
) |
|
|
(319,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
261,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,221 |
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(691,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(691,221 |
) |
Repayments of notes to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,025 |
) |
|
|
169,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
255,944 |
|
|
|
186,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(174,056 |
) |
|
|
16,980 |
|
|
|
169,025 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
30,839 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
33,648 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Mariner |
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Energy, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
188,320 |
|
|
$ |
363,160 |
|
|
$ |
551,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and additions to oil and gas properties |
|
|
(297,858 |
) |
|
|
(355,052 |
) |
|
|
(652,910 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(15,447 |
) |
|
|
(33,158 |
) |
|
|
(48,605 |
) |
Restricted cash designated for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(313,305 |
) |
|
|
(383,210 |
) |
|
|
(696,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(459,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459,000 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
(26,477 |
) |
|
|
23,192 |
|
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
144,523 |
|
|
|
23,192 |
|
|
|
167,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
19,538 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
22,680 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
38,127 |
|
|
$ |
3,142 |
|
|
$ |
41,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our business and results
of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in
conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes
included in this Quarterly Report, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008, as amended. For meanings of natural gas and oil terms used in this
Quarterly Report, please refer to Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas Terms under Business in Part
I, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as
amended.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in our discussion may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future production,
revenues and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. Please see Risk Factors in Item
1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report regarding certain risk factors relating to us.
Overview
We are an independent oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with
principal operations in the Permian Basin and the Gulf of Mexico. As of December 31, 2008,
approximately 70% of our total estimated proved reserves were classified as proved developed, with
approximately 45% of the total estimated proved reserves located in the Permian Basin, 20% in the
Gulf of Mexico deepwater and 35% on the Gulf of Mexico shelf.
Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend substantially on prevailing prices for
oil and natural gas and our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that are
economically recoverable while controlling and reducing costs. The energy markets historically have
been very volatile. Oil and natural gas prices increased to, and then declined significantly from,
historical highs in mid-2008 and may fluctuate and decline significantly in the future. Although we
attempt to mitigate the impact of price declines and provide for more predictable cash flows
through our hedging strategy, a substantial or extended decline in oil and natural gas prices or
poor drilling results could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, cash flows, quantities of natural gas and oil reserves that we can economically produce
and our access to capital. Conversely, the use of derivative instruments also can prevent us from
realizing the full benefit of upward price movements.
One consequence of continued low natural gas prices is the possibility that we may be required
to recognize additional non-cash impairment expense under the full cost method of accounting, which
we use to account for our oil and natural gas exploration and development activities. We recorded
full cost ceiling impairments before income taxes of approximately $704.7 million and $575.6
million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, primarily due to the decrease in the
Henry Hub spot market price to $3.63 per Mmbtu at March 31, 2009 from $5.71 per Mmbtu at December
31, 2008, a decrease from $7.12 per Mmbtu at September 30, 2008. No impairment was required at June
30, 2009, as the Henry Hub spot market gas price increased to $3.89 per Mmbtu. We may be required
to take additional impairment charges in the future if natural gas prices continue to decline. If
the WTI posted price and Henry Hub spot market price had been 10% lower while all other factors
remained constant, the ceiling amount related to the net book value of our oil and natural gas
properties would have been reduced by approximately $215.5 million resulting in a ceiling test
impairment of approximately $6.6 million, before income taxes. In addition to pricing
considerations, changes in production rates, levels of reserves, future development costs, and
other factors will determine our actual ceiling test calculation and impairment analyses in future
periods.
The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and
credit to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The
shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent substantial losses in worldwide equity
markets could lead to an extended worldwide economic recession. A sustained recession or slowdown
in economic activity could further reduce worldwide demand for energy and result in lower oil and
natural gas prices, which could materially adversely affect our profitability and results of
operations.
32
Securities Offerings. On June 10, 2009, we sold and issued in concurrent underwritten
offerings $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 113/4% senior notes due 2016, and 11.5
million shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $14.50 per share. We used
aggregate proceeds from the concurrent offerings, before deducting estimated offering expenses but
after deducting underwriters discounts and commissions, of approximately $446.2 million to repay
debt under our bank credit facility.
Acquisitions. On December 19, 2008, we acquired additional working interests in our existing
property, Atwater Valley Block 426 (Bass Lite), for approximately $30.6 million, subject to
customary purchase price adjustments, increasing our working interest by 11.6% to 53.8%.
On February 29, 2008 and December 1, 2008 we acquired additional working interests in certain
of our existing properties in the Spraberry field in the Permian Basin. We operate substantially
all of the assets. The purchase prices were $23.5 million for the February 2008 acquisition and
$19.4 million for the December 2008 acquisition.
On January 31, 2008, we acquired 100% of the equity in a subsidiary of Hydro Gulf of Mexico,
Inc. pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement executed on December 23, 2007. The
acquired subsidiary, now known as Mariner Gulf of Mexico LLC (MGOM), was an indirect subsidiary
of StatoilHydro ASA and owns substantially all of its former Gulf of Mexico shelf operations. We
paid $228.8 million for MGOM.
Second Quarter 2009 Highlights
In the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, we reported net income attributable to Mariner
Energy, Inc. of $17.2 million, which on a fully-diluted earnings per share (EPS) basis was $0.19.
For second quarter 2008, we reported net income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. of $123.4
million and $1.39 fully-diluted EPS. Other financial and operational items include:
|
|
|
Total revenues for second quarter 2009 decreased 46% to $232.0 million, down from
$429.5 million reported for second quarter 2008. |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009
decreased 37% to $347.7 million, down from $551.5 million for the same period in 2008. |
|
|
|
Estimated average daily production for second quarter 2009 decreased to 361 MMcfe
per day, compared to 400 MMcfe per day for second quarter 2008. |
Operational Update
Offshore We drilled three offshore wells in the second quarter 2009, one of which was
successful. Information regarding this well is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
Well Name |
|
Operator |
|
Working Interest |
|
Water Depth (Ft) |
|
Location |
Vermillion 380 A16
|
|
Mariner
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
340 |
|
|
Conventional Shelf |
As of June 30, 2009 we were drilling three offshore wells in the Gulf of Mexico.
In
addition, we were the high bidder on 12 of 17 blocks on which we bid at the Minerals
Management Service of the United States Department of the Interior (MMS) Central Gulf of Mexico
Lease Sale 208 held on March 18, 2009, of which 11 were awarded.
Our working interest in the awarded blocks ranges from
15% to 100% and our total net exposure is $6.5 million.
Onshore In the second quarter 2009, we drilled five development wells and two exploratory
wells in the Permian Basin, all of which were successful. As of June 30, 2009, no rigs were
operating on our Permian Basin properties.
33
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our oil and gas operations.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% |
|
Summary Operating Information: |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except net production, average sales prices and % |
|
|
|
change) |
|
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
23,811 |
|
|
|
24,359 |
|
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
)% |
Total natural gas equivalent (MMcfe) |
|
|
32,881 |
|
|
|
36,434 |
|
|
|
(3,553 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Average daily production (MMcfe/d) |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Hedging Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
revenue gain (loss) |
|
$ |
58,844 |
|
|
$ |
(28,839 |
) |
|
$ |
87,683 |
|
|
|
304 |
% |
Oil revenue gain (loss) |
|
|
11,556 |
|
|
|
(38,318 |
) |
|
|
49,874 |
|
|
|
130 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hedging revenue gain (loss) |
|
$ |
70,400 |
|
|
$ |
(67,157 |
) |
|
$ |
137,557 |
|
|
|
205 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Sales Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) realized(1) |
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
10.27 |
|
|
$ |
(4.29 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
)% |
Natural gas (per Mcf) unhedged |
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
11.46 |
|
|
|
(7.95 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
66.91 |
|
|
|
96.24 |
|
|
|
(29.33 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
57.12 |
|
|
|
121.75 |
|
|
|
(64.63 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
24.68 |
|
|
|
64.69 |
|
|
|
(40.01 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
24.68 |
|
|
|
64.69 |
|
|
|
(40.01 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
)% |
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) realized(1) |
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
11.74 |
|
|
|
(4.76 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
)% |
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) unhedged |
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
13.59 |
|
|
|
(8.75 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Summary of Financial Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
142,363 |
|
|
$ |
250,278 |
|
|
$ |
(107,915 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
Oil revenue |
|
|
78,954 |
|
|
|
144,556 |
|
|
|
(65,602 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids revenue |
|
|
8,193 |
|
|
|
33,057 |
|
|
|
(24,864 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
)% |
Other revenues |
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
47,092 |
|
|
|
56,427 |
|
|
|
(9,335 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
21,122 |
|
|
|
13,615 |
|
|
|
7,507 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
100,282 |
|
|
|
141,454 |
|
|
|
(41,172 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
810 |
% |
Net interest expense |
|
|
16,670 |
|
|
|
17,282 |
|
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
35,741 |
|
|
|
190,904 |
|
|
|
(155,163 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
18,528 |
|
|
|
67,416 |
|
|
|
(48,888 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
17,213 |
|
|
|
123,488 |
|
|
|
(106,275 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
)% |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
17,213 |
|
|
$ |
123,390 |
|
|
$ |
(106,177 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Unit Costs per Mcfe: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average sales prices include the effects of hedging |
Net Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. for second quarter 2009 was $17.2 million
compared to $123.4 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily
attributable to a decrease in revenue of $197.5 million due to lower realized prices as well as
lower production. Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue were decreases in income tax
expense; depreciation, depletion and amortization; and operating expenses of $48.9 million, $41.2
million and $9.3 million, respectively. Basic and fully-diluted earnings per share for second
quarter 2009 were $0.19 for each measure compared to basic and fully-diluted earnings per share of
$1.40 and $1.39, respectively for second quarter 2008.
34
Net Production for second quarter 2009 was approximately 32.9 Bcfe, down 10% from 36.4 Bcfe
from second quarter 2008. Natural gas production for second quarter 2009 comprised approximately
72% of total net production compared to approximately 67% for second quarter 2008.
Natural gas production for second quarter 2009 decreased 2% to approximately 262 MMcf per day,
compared to approximately 268 MMcf per day for second quarter 2008. Oil production decreased 21%
to approximately 12,964 barrels per day for second quarter 2009, compared to approximately
16,504 barrels per day for second quarter 2008. Natural gas liquids production decreased 35% to
3,648 barrels per day for the second quarter 2009 as compared to 5,611 barrels per day for second
quarter 2008.
Period over period changes in our production were primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
Decreased production of 4.1 Bcfe, or 21%, from our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties
as a result of normal depletion declines and gas balancing adjustments of 7.9 Bcfe,
partially offset by increased production of 3.8 Bcfe at certain of our properties
including High Island 116 (1.1 Bcfe) and South Marsh Island 76 (0.9 Bcfe). |
|
|
|
Decreased production of 0.4 Bcfe, or 3%, from our Gulf of Mexico deepwater
properties primarily due to normal depletion declines at Northwest Nansen (2.8 Bcfe)
located in East Breaks 602 and a paraffin plug in the export pipeline at Pluto (1.8
Bcfe) located in Mississippi Canyon 674. Second quarter 2009 deepwater production was
favorably impacted by a full quarter of production from, and our recently acquired
incremental 11.6% working interest in, Bass Lite (2.7 Bcfe) located in Atwater 426, and
from our March 2009 start up of production from Geauxpher (2.6 Bcfe) located in Garden
Banks 462. |
|
|
|
Increased production of 1.0 Bcfe, or 26%, from our onshore properties primarily as a
result of our recently acquired additional working interests in certain of our existing
properties in the Spraberry field in the Permian Basin. |
Natural gas, oil and NGL revenues for second quarter 2009 decreased 46% to $229.5 million
compared to $427.9 million for second quarter 2008 as a result of decreased pricing (approximately
$156.7 million, net of the effect of hedging), and decreased production (approximately $41.7
million).
During second quarter 2009, our revenues reflected a net recognized hedging gain of $70.4
million comprised of $63.5 million in favorable cash settlements on our hedges, a $6.7 million gain
on our liquidated swaps and an unrealized gain of $0.2 million related to the ineffective portion
of open contracts that are not eligible for deferral under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, (SFAS 133) due primarily to the basis
differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. This compares
to a net recognized hedging loss of $67.2 million for second quarter 2008, comprised of $64.6
million in unfavorable cash settlements and an unrealized loss of $2.6 million related to the
ineffective portion not eligible for deferral under SFAS 133.
Our natural gas and oil average sales prices, and the effects of hedging activities on those
prices, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging |
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
Unhedged |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
% Change |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
3.51 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
66.91 |
|
|
|
57.12 |
|
|
|
9.79 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
10.27 |
|
|
$ |
11.46 |
|
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
96.24 |
|
|
|
121.75 |
|
|
|
(25.51 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Other revenues for second quarter 2009 increased $0.9 million to $2.5 million from $1.6
million for second quarter 2008 primarily as a result of $2.2 million in third-party gas sales
related to commodities purchased (included in other miscellaneous income) to fulfill pipeline
commitments, partially offset by imputed rent income of $1.2 million in 2008 from the lease of
office property acquired in January 2008.
35
Lease operating expense (LOE) for second quarter 2009 decreased approximately $9.3 million
to $47.1 million from $56.4 million for second quarter 2008, primarily attributable to a $7.1
million OIL withdrawal premium contingency recognized in the second quarter 2008 while no such
contingency existed for recognition for second quarter 2009. The remaining decrease in LOE during
second quarter 2009 was a function of lower service costs, lower production and our favorable
determination of the existence of insurance coverage for certain repairs from Hurricane Ike
previously recorded as LOE.
Severance and ad valorem tax for second quarter 2009 decreased approximately $1.6 million to
$3.7 million from $5.3 million for second quarter 2008 due to lower production taxes of $2.6
million, partially offset by increased ad valorem taxes of $1.0 million.
Transportation expense for second quarter 2009 increased approximately $0.4 million to $4.6
million from $4.2 million for second quarter 2008 due primarily to increased production at Bass
Lite located in Atwater Valley 426.
General and administrative expense (G&A) for second quarter 2009 increased approximately $7.5
million to $21.1 million from $13.6 million for second quarter 2008 primarily due to an increase in
stock compensation expense of approximately $2.9 million for long-term performance-based restricted
stock and an increase in salaries, wages and professional fees of $1.8 million due to increased
headcount and non-recurring projects. Additionally, effective January 1, 2009 overhead relating to
field operations is recorded in G&A. In second quarter 2008, overhead relating to field operations
of $3.2 million was recorded in LOE.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense (DD&A) for second quarter 2009 decreased
approximately $41.2 million to $100.3 million ($3.05 Mcfe DD&A rate) from $141.5 million ($3.88
Mcfe DD&A rate) for second quarter 2008. This decrease primarily resulted from the effects of
ceiling test impairments at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 of $525.6 million and $704.6
million, respectively, that substantially lowered the basis of our
oil and gas properties. A change in the depletion rate
resulted in a $31.2 million decrease in expense for second quarter 2009. Additionally, $13.2 million of the decrease is due to lower production for second quarter 2009 as compared to
second quarter 2008.
Other miscellaneous expense for second quarter 2009 increased approximately $2.5 million to
$2.8 million from $0.3 million for second quarter 2008 due primarily to third party gas purchases
of $2.1 million made to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments.
Net interest expense for second quarter 2009 decreased approximately $0.6 million to $16.7
million from $17.3 million for second quarter 2008 due primarily to an increase in capitalized
interest of $2.3 million, partially offset by interest expense of $2.1 million on our 113/4% senior
notes due 2016.
Income before taxes for second quarter 2009 decreased approximately $155.2 million to $35.7
million from $190.9 million for second quarter 2008 due primarily to decreased revenues as a result
of decreased pricing and production, offset by decreased operating expenses as discussed above.
Provision for
income taxes for second quarter 2009 reflected an effective tax rate of 51.8% as
compared to 35.3% for second quarter 2008. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due
to SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)) shortfalls on vested stock awards which increased tax expense by $5.6 million. Without
the impact of the shortfalls, the effective tax rate for second quarter 2009 would have been 36.1%
as compared to 35.3% for second quarter 2008. The remaining increase was primarily due to the
impact of state income tax liabilities.
36
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our oil and gas operations.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
% |
|
Summary Operating Information: |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except net production, average sales prices and % |
|
|
|
change) |
|
Net Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
45,859 |
|
|
|
45,315 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (MBbls) |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
Total natural gas equivalent (MMcfe) |
|
|
62,382 |
|
|
|
67,749 |
|
|
|
(5,367 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Average daily production (MMcfe/d) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Hedging Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue gain (loss) |
|
$ |
101,810 |
|
|
$ |
(26,902 |
) |
|
$ |
128,712 |
|
|
|
478 |
% |
Oil revenue gain (loss) |
|
|
32,391 |
|
|
|
(54,486 |
) |
|
|
86,877 |
|
|
|
159 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hedging revenue gain (loss) |
|
$ |
134,201 |
|
|
$ |
(81,388 |
) |
|
$ |
215,589 |
|
|
|
265 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Sales Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) realized(1) |
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
$ |
9.49 |
|
|
$ |
(3.04 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
Natural gas (per Mcf) unhedged |
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
|
|
(5.85 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
65.09 |
|
|
|
90.55 |
|
|
|
(25.46 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
50.02 |
|
|
|
109.67 |
|
|
|
(59.65 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) realized(1) |
|
|
24.23 |
|
|
|
60.85 |
|
|
|
(36.62 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) unhedged |
|
|
24.23 |
|
|
|
60.85 |
|
|
|
(36.62 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
)% |
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) realized(1) |
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
10.95 |
|
|
|
(3.73 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
)% |
Total natural gas equivalent ($/Mcfe) unhedged |
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
(7.09 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
)% |
Summary of Financial Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
295,701 |
|
|
$ |
429,901 |
|
|
$ |
(134,200 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
)% |
Oil revenue |
|
|
139,879 |
|
|
|
258,170 |
|
|
|
(118,291 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
)% |
Natural gas liquids revenue |
|
|
14,662 |
|
|
|
54,038 |
|
|
|
(39,376 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
)% |
Other revenues |
|
|
25,064 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
21,824 |
|
|
|
674 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
|
100,491 |
|
|
|
102,074 |
|
|
|
(1,583 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
7,262 |
|
|
|
9,873 |
|
|
|
(2,611 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
38,533 |
|
|
|
24,726 |
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
195,087 |
|
|
|
260,772 |
|
|
|
(65,685 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Full cost ceiling test impairment |
|
|
704,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,731 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other miscellaneous expense |
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
9,927 |
|
|
|
1182 |
% |
Net interest expense |
|
|
30,987 |
|
|
|
35,527 |
|
|
|
(4,540 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before taxes |
|
|
(621,711 |
) |
|
|
304,314 |
|
|
|
(926,025 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
)% |
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(214,806 |
) |
|
|
108,610 |
|
|
|
(323,416 |
) |
|
|
(298 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(406,905 |
) |
|
|
195,704 |
|
|
|
(602,609 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
)% |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
$ |
(406,905 |
) |
|
$ |
195,516 |
|
|
$ |
(602,421 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Unit Costs per Mcfe: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense |
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Severance and ad valorem taxes |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Transportation expense |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
General and administrative expense |
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
(0.72 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average sales prices include the effects of hedging |
Net (Loss) Income attributable to Mariner Energy, Inc. for the first six months of 2009 was
$(406.9) million compared to $195.5 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was
attributable to a $704.7 million impairment resulting from our full cost ceiling test in first
quarter 2009, a decrease in revenues of $270.0 million, and an increase in general and
administrative expense of $13.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation, depletion
and amortization of $65.7 million and a decrease in tax provision of $323.4 million. Basic and
fully-
37
diluted
earnings per share for the first six months of 2009 were $(4.50) for each measure
compared to basic and fully-diluted earnings per share of $2.23 and $2.21, respectively, for the
first six months of 2008.
Net Production for the first six months of 2009 was approximately 62.4 Bcfe, down 8% from 67.7
Bcfe from the first six months of 2008. Natural gas production for the first six months of 2009
comprised approximately 74% of total production compared to approximately 67% for the first six
months of 2008.
Natural gas production for the first six months of 2009 remained relatively flat as compared
to the first six months of 2008 (approximately 253 MMcf per day for 2009, compared to approximately
249 MMcf per day for 2008). Oil production for the first six months of 2009 decreased 24% to
approximately 11,874 barrels per day, compared to approximately 15,667 barrels per day for the
first six months of 2008. Natural gas liquids production for the
first six months of 2009 decreased 31% to approximately 3,341 barrels
per day, compared to approximately 4,877 barrels per day for the
first six months of 2008.
Period over period changes in our production were primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
Decreased production of 8.6 Bcfe, or 22%, from our Gulf of Mexico shelf properties
as a result of normal depletion declines and gas balancing adjustments of 15.1 Bcfe,
partially offset by increased production of 6.5 Bcfe at certain of our properties
including High Island 116 (1.8 Bcfe) and South Marsh Island 76 (2.3 Bcfe). |
|
|
|
Increased production of 1.7 Bcfe, or 8%, from our Gulf of Mexico deepwater
properties primarily due to Bass Lite located in Atwater Valley 426 (which contributed
6.7 Bcfe) partially offset by decreased production of 3.4 Bcfe from Pluto located in
Mississippi Canyon 674. |
|
|
|
Increased production of 1.5 Bcfe, or 20%, from our onshore properties primarily as a
result of our drilling and development of acreage in the Permian Basin. |
Natural gas, oil and NGL revenues for the first six months of 2009 decreased 39% to $450.2
million compared to $742.1 million for the first six months of 2008 as a result of decreased
pricing (approximately $233.1 million, net of the effect of hedging), and decreased production
(approximately $58.8 million).
During the first six months of 2009, our revenues reflected a net recognized hedging gain of
$134.2 million comprised of $121.0 million in favorable cash settlements on our hedges and a $13.2
million gain on our liquidated swaps. This compares to a net recognized hedging loss of $81.4
million for the first six months of 2008, comprised of $74.9 million in unfavorable cash
settlements and an unrealized loss of $6.5 million related to the ineffective portion not eligible
for deferral under SFAS 133.
Our natural gas and oil average sales prices, and the effects of hedging activities on those
prices, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging |
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
Unhedged |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
% Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
$ |
4.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
65.09 |
|
|
|
50.02 |
|
|
|
15.07 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
9.49 |
|
|
$ |
10.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
90.55 |
|
|
|
109.67 |
|
|
|
(19.12 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Other revenues for the first six months of 2009 increased approximately $21.9 million to
$25.1 million from $3.2 million for the first six months of 2008 primarily as a result of a $16.6
million cash arbitration award related to a consummated acquisition and $6.4 million in third party
gas sales related to commodities purchased (included in other miscellaneous income) to fulfill
pipeline commitments, partially offset by imputed rent income of $2.3 million in 2008 from the
lease of office property acquired in January 2008.
Lease operating expense (LOE) for the first six months of 2009 decreased approximately $1.6
million to $100.5 million from $102.1 million for the first six months of 2008, primarily
attributable to a $7.1 million OIL
38
withdrawal premium contingency recognized in the first six
months 2008 while no such contingency existed for recognition in the first six months 2009. These
decreases were offset by increased costs of $5.7 million, of which $4.8 million relates to
Hurricane Ike repairs during the first six months of 2009.
Severance and ad valorem tax for the first six months of 2009 decreased approximately $2.6
million to $7.3 million from $9.9 million for the first six months of 2008 due to lower production
taxes of $4.2 million, partially offset by increased ad valorem taxes of $1.6 million.
Transportation expense for the first six months of 2009 increased approximately $2.0 million
to $9.2 million from $7.2 million for the first six months of 2008 due primarily to increased
expense at Bass Lite located in Atwater Valley 426.
General and administrative expense for the first six months of 2009 increased approximately $13.8
million to $38.5 million from $24.7 million for the first six months of 2008 primarily due to an
increase in stock compensation expense of approximately $5.8 million for long-term
performance-based restricted stock and an increase in salaries, wages and professional fees of $3.3
million due to increased headcount and non-recurring projects. Additionally, effective January 1,
2009 overhead relating to field operations is recorded in G&A. In the first six months 2008,
overhead relating to field operations of $5.1 million was recorded in LOE.
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense for the first six months of 2009 decreased
approximately $65.7 million to $195.1 million ($3.13 Mcfe DD&A rate) from $260.8 million ($3.85
Mcfe DD&A rate) for the first six months of 2008. This decrease primarily resulted from the effects
of ceiling test impairments at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 of $525.6 million and $704.6
million, respectively, that substantially lowered the basis of our oil and gas properties. A change in the depletion
rate, resulted in a $53.0 million decrease in expense for the second quarter 2009. Additionally, $19.8 million of the decrease was due to lower production for the first six months of 2009 as
compared to the first six months of 2008.
Full cost ceiling
test impairment of $704.7 million was recognized for the first six months of
2009 as a result of the net capitalized cost of our proved oil and gas properties exceeding our
ceiling limit. See Note 5 Oil and Gas Properties in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for more detail on this impairment.
Other miscellaneous expense for the first six months of 2009 increased approximately $10.0
million to $10.8 million from $0.8 million for the first six months of 2008 due primarily to
increased bad debt of approximately $3.2 million and third party gas purchases of $5.8 million made
to satisfy our pipeline transportation commitments.
Net interest expense for the first six months of 2009 decreased approximately $4.5 million to
$31.0 million from $35.5 million for the first six months of 2008 due primarily to increased
capitalized interest of $4.3 million and decreased interest expense of $1.6 million on our credit
facility as a result of lower interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008, partially offset by
interest expense of $2.1 million on our
113/4% senior notes due 2016.
Income before taxes for the first six months of 2009 decreased approximately $926.0 million to
$(621.7) million from $304.3 million for the first six months of 2008 due primarily to decreased
revenues as a result of decreased pricing and production, offset by decreased operating expenses as
discussed above.
Provision for income taxes for
the first six months of 2009 reflected an effective tax rate of
34.6% as compared to 35.7% for the first six months of 2008. The decrease in our effective tax rate
was primarily due to SFAS 123(R) shortfalls on vested stock awards which increased tax expense by $7.1
million. Due to our net loss for the first six months of 2009, this increase in tax expense
reduced our effective tax rate. Without the impact of the shortfalls, the effective tax rate for
second quarter 2009 would have been 35.7%, the same as for the first six months 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided
by operating activities decreased by $213.8 million to $337.7 million from
$551.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease was due
primarily to lower revenue resulting from decreases in realized price and production of $233.1
million and $58.8 million, respectively. The decrease was partially offset by $20.5 million
received as a result of the liquidation of certain oil hedges and a $16.6 million arbitration
award.
39
As of June 30, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $19.1 million, including non-cash
current derivative assets and liabilities and deferred tax liabilities. In addition, working
capital was negatively impacted by accrued capital expenditures. We expect to fund this deficit
with cash flow from operating activities and borrowings under our bank credit facility, as needed.
Net cash
flows used in investing activities decreased by $377.3 million to $319.2 million from
$696.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due primarily to
decreased capital expenditures attributable to reduced activity in our drilling programs.
Additionally, the six months ended June 30, 2008 were impacted by the acquisition of MGOM
(including approximately $15.0 million of mid-stream assets reflected in other property) and an
investment of approximately $27.4 million in office property.
Net cash flows provided by financing activities decreased by $155.8 million to $11.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to net cash flows provided by financing
activities of $167.7 million for the comparable period in 2008. This decrease was due primarily to
$601.0 million net increased repayments under our credit facility, including the effect of borrowing
$223.5 million in January 2008 to finance the purchase
of MGOM. The decrease was offset by $446.2 million of proceeds from debt and securities offerings
in June 2009.
Capital Expenditures The following table presents major components of our capital
expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Capital Expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore natural gas and oil development |
|
$ |
130,484 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Natural gas and oil exploration |
|
|
100,883 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Onshore natural gas and oil development |
|
|
29,668 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Other items (primarily capitalized overhead) |
|
|
16,131 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Acquisitions (property and leasehold) |
|
|
13,394 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
290,560 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above table reflects decreased non-cash capital accruals of $64.7 million that are a
component of working capital changes in the statement of cash flows.
Bank Credit Facility We have a secured revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks
that matures January 31, 2012. The credit facility is subject to a borrowing base which is
redetermined periodically. The outstanding principal balance of loans under the credit facility may
not exceed the borrowing base. Pursuant to a June 2, 2009 amendment, the borrowing base
automatically reduced by $50.0 million to $800.0 million upon our June 10, 2009 issuance of $300.0
million aggregate principal amount of
our 113/4% senior notes
due 2016 discussed below. The next borrowing base redetermination is expected in August 2009.
On June 10, 2009, we used aggregate proceeds from concurrent offerings of our 113/4% senior
notes due 2016 and common stock, before deducting estimated offering expenses but after deducting
underwriters discounts and commissions, of approximately $446.2 million to repay debt under our
bank credit facility. These offerings are discussed further below.
As of June 30, 2009, maximum credit availability under the facility was $1.0 billion,
including up to $50.0 million in letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base of $800.0 million.
As of June 30, 2009, there were $140.0 million in advances outstanding under the credit
facility and four letters of credit outstanding totaling $4.7 million, of which $4.2 million is
required for plugging and abandonment obligations at certain of our offshore fields. As of June 30,
2009, after accounting for the $4.7 million of letters of credit, we had $655.3 million available
to borrow under the credit facility.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the commitment fee on unused capacity was 0.250% to
0.375% per annum through March 23, 2009 and 0.5% per annum thereafter. Borrowings under the bank
credit facility bear
40
interest at either a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at our option,
plus a specified margin. At June 30, 2009, when borrowings at both LIBOR and prime-based rates were outstanding,
the blended interest rate was 2.75% on all amounts borrowed.
Payment and performance of our obligations under the credit facility (including any
obligations under commodity and interest rate hedges entered into with facility lenders) are
secured by liens upon substantially all of our assets, and guaranteed by our subsidiaries, other
than MERI which is a co-borrower. We also are subject to various restrictive covenants and other
usual and customary terms and conditions, including limits on additional debt, cash dividends and
other restricted payments, liens, investments, asset dispositions, mergers and speculative hedging.
Financial covenants under the credit facility require us to, among other things:
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0; and |
|
|
|
|
maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) of not more
than 2.5 to 1.0. |
We were in compliance with the financial
covenants under the bank credit facility as of June
30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the ratio of consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to consolidated current liabilities was 3.45 to 1.0 and the ratio
of total debt to EBITDA was 1.46 to 1.0. Our breach of these covenants would be an event of default, after which the lenders could
terminate their lending obligations and accelerate maturity of any outstanding indebtedness under
the credit facility which then would become due and payable in full. An unrescinded acceleration of
maturity under the bank credit facility would constitute an event of default under our senior notes
described below, which could trigger acceleration of maturity of the indebtedness evidenced by the
senior notes.
Senior Notes On June 10, 2009, we sold and issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount
of our 113/4% senior notes due 2016 (the 113/4% Notes). In 2007, we sold and issued $300.0 million
aggregate principal amount of our 8% senior notes due 2017 (the 8% Notes). In 2006, we sold and
issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 71/2% senior notes due 2013 (the 71/2% Notes
and together with the 113/4% Notes and the 8% Notes, the Notes). The Notes are senior unsecured
obligations of the Company. The 113/4% Notes mature on June 30, 2016 with interest payable on June 30
and December 30 of each year beginning December 30, 2009. The 8% Notes mature on May 15, 2017 with
interest payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The 71/2% Notes mature on April 15, 2013
with interest payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. There is no sinking fund for the
Notes. We and our restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain financial and non-financial
covenants under each of the indentures governing the Notes. We were in compliance with the
financial covenants under the Notes as of June 30, 2009.
113/4% Notes The 113/4% Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among
the Company, the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (the Base
Indenture), as amended and supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of
June 10, 2009, among the same parties (the Supplemental Indenture and together with the Base
Indenture, the Indenture). Pursuant to the Base Indenture, we may issue multiple series of debt
securities from time to time.
The 113/4% Notes were sold at 97.093% of principal amount, for an initial yield to maturity of
12.375%, in an underwritten offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
1933 Act). Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters discounts and estimated offering
expenses but before giving effect to the underwriters
reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering expenses, were approximately $284.8 million. We used net offering proceeds (before deducting
estimated offering expenses) to repay debt under our bank credit facility.
The 113/4% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company, rank senior in right of
payment to any future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with our existing
and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including the 71/2% Notes and the 8% Notes, and are
effectively subordinated in right of payment to our senior secured indebtedness, including our
obligations under our bank credit facility, to the extent of the collateral securing such
indebtedness, and to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of any
non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The 113/4% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our
existing and future domestic subsidiaries. In the future, the guarantees may be released or
terminated under certain circumstances. Each subsidiary guarantee ranks senior in right of payment
to any future subordinated indebtedness of the guarantor subsidiary, ranks equally in right of
payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the
41
guarantor subsidiary and
effectively subordinate to all existing and future secured indebtedness of the guarantor
subsidiary, including its guarantees of indebtedness under our bank credit facility, to the extent
of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
We may redeem the 113/4% Notes at any time before June 30, 2013 at a price equal to the
principal amount redeemed plus a make-whole premium, using a discount rate of the Treasury rate
plus 0.50% and accrued but unpaid interest. Beginning on June 30 of the years indicated below, we
may redeem the 113/4% Notes from time to time, in whole or in part, at the prices set forth below
(expressed as percentages of the principal amount redeemed) plus accrued but unpaid interest:
2013 at 105.875%
2014 at 102.938%
2015 and thereafter at 100.000%
In addition, before June 30, 2012, we may redeem up to 35% of the 113/4% Notes with the proceeds
of equity offerings at a price equal to 111.750% of the principal amount of the 113/4% Notes redeemed
plus accrued but unpaid interest.
If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the Indenture) occurs, subject to
certain exceptions, we must give holders of the 113/4% Notes the opportunity to sell to us their 113/4%
Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued
and unpaid interest and liquidated damages to the date of purchase.
We and our restricted subsidiaries are subject to certain negative covenants under the
Indenture governing the 113/4% Notes which are consistent with the negative covenants under each of
the indentures governing the71/2% Notes and 8% Notes. The Indenture limits the ability of us and each
of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments from our
subsidiaries to us; |
|
|
|
consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; |
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or subordinated
indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
create unrestricted subsidiaries. |
Common Stock Offering On June 10, 2009, we sold and issued 11.5 million shares of our common
stock at a public offering price of $14.50 per share in an underwritten offering registered under
the 1933 Act. The total sold includes 1.5 million shares issued upon full exercise of the
underwriters overallotment option. Net offering proceeds, after deducting underwriters discounts
and estimated offering expenses but before giving effect to the
underwriters reimbursement of up to $0.5 million for offering
expenses, were approximately $159.2 million. We used net offering proceeds
(before deducting estimated offering expenses of approximately $0.5 million) to repay debt under
our bank credit facility.
42
Future Uses of Capital. Our identified needs for liquidity in the future are as follows:
|
|
|
funding future capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
funding hurricane repairs and hurricane-related abandonment operations; |
|
|
|
financing any future acquisitions that we may identify; |
|
|
|
paying routine operating and administrative expenses; and |
|
|
|
paying other commitments comprised largely of cash settlement of hedging obligations
and debt service. |
2009
Capital Expenditures. In the second half of 2008
and first half of 2009, a world-wide economic recession and oversupply of natural gas in North America led
to an unprecedented decline in oil and gas prices. However, the inflated cost of oil
field services resulting from sustained historically high commodity prices did not decrease
in line with the decline in commodity prices. The prospect of continued low commodity prices
and persistent high service costs constrained the industrys capital reinvestment and undermined
rates of return in new projects, particularly those in areas characterized by high costs or long reserve lives.
In order to manage our capital program within expected cash flows, we initially reduced our 2009 capital budget
by more than 50% from 2008 and scaled back our infill drilling and development activities in the Permian Basin.
Refer to Item 1. BusinessImpact of Worldwide Financial Crisis
and Lower Commodity Prices on Capital Program
in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended,
for an outline of our planned 2009 activities in the Permian Basin and Gulf of Mexico.
Service costs have started to decline and reached a level that together with existing crude oil
prices we anticipate will allow us to achieve more acceptable rates of return, particularly in
areas such as the Permian Basin where we now anticipate modestly more 2009 drilling activity than
we had budgeted earlier this year.
We have increased our anticipated base
operating capital expenditures for 2009 to approximately $550.0 million
(excluding hurricane-related expenditures and acquisitions), with potential for increase or
decrease depending upon drilling success and cash flow experience during the remainder
of the year. Approximately 48% of the base operating capital program is planned
to be allocated to development activities, 45% to exploration activities, and the remainder
to other items (primarily capitalized overhead and interest). In addition, we expect to incur additional
hurricane-related costs of $33.4 million during 2009 related to Hurricane Ike that we believe are covered
under applicable insurance. Complete recovery or settlement is not expected to occur during the next 12 months.
Future Capital Resources. Our anticipated sources of liquidity in the future are as follows:
|
|
|
cash flow from operations in future periods; |
|
|
|
proceeds under our bank credit facility; |
|
|
|
proceeds from insurance policies relating to hurricane repairs; and |
|
|
|
proceeds from future capital markets transactions as needed. |
As discussed above, we reduced our 2009 operating capital program (exclusive of
hurricane-related expenditures and acquisitions) to remain within our projected operating cash flow
so that our operating capital requirements are largely self-sustaining. We anticipate using
proceeds under our bank credit facility only for working capital needs or acquisitions and not
generally to fund our operations. We would generally expect to fund future acquisitions on a case
by case basis through a combination of bank debt and capital markets activities. Based on our
current operating plan and assumed price case, our expected cash flow from operations and continued
access to our bank credit facility allows us ample liquidity to conduct our operations as planned
for the foreseeable future.
The timing of expenditures (especially regarding deepwater projects) is unpredictable. Also,
our cash flows are heavily dependent on the oil and natural gas commodity markets, and our ability
to hedge oil and natural gas prices. If either oil or natural gas commodity prices decrease from
their current levels, our ability to finance our planned capital expenditures could be affected
negatively. Amounts available for borrowing under our bank credit facility are largely dependent on
our level of estimated proved reserves and current oil and natural gas prices. If either our
estimated proved reserves or commodity prices decrease, amounts available to us to borrow under our
bank credit facility could be reduced. If our cash flows are less than anticipated or amounts
available for borrowing are reduced, we may be forced to defer planned capital expenditures.
In addition, the recent worldwide financial and credit crisis may adversely affect our
liquidity. We may be unable to obtain adequate funding under our bank credit facility because our
lending counterparties may be unwilling or unable to meet their funding obligations or facilitate
changes that would accommodate desired funding, or because our borrowing base under the facility
may be decreased as the result of a redetermination, reducing it due to lower oil or natural gas
prices, operating difficulties, declines in reserves or other reasons. If funding is not available
as needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our obligations as
they
43
come due or we may be unable to implement our business strategies or otherwise take advantage
of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Letters of Credit Our bank credit facility has a letter of credit subfacility of up to $50.0
million that is included as a use of the borrowing base. As of June 30, 2009, four such letters of
credit totaling $4.7 million were outstanding.
Fair Value Measurement
We determine the fair value of our natural gas and crude oil fixed price swaps by reference to
forward pricing curves for natural gas and oil futures contracts. The difference between the
forward price curve and the contractual fixed price is discounted to the measurement date using a
credit-risk adjusted discount rate. The credit risk adjustment for swap liabilities is based on our
credit quality and the credit risk adjustment for swap assets is based on the credit quality of our
counterparty. Our fair value determinations of our swaps have historically approximated our exit
price for such derivatives.
We have determined that the fair value methodology described above for our swaps is consistent
with observable market inputs and have categorized our swaps as Level
2 in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157).
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an asset for the increase in the fair
value of our derivative financial instruments of $60.6 million, principally due to the decrease in
natural gas and oil commodity prices below our swap prices. The increase was comprised of a
decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $125.3 million, net of income
taxes of $26.3 million, approximately $121.0 million of favorable cash hedging settlements and a
$13.2 million gain on liquidated swaps during the period reflected in natural gas and oil revenues
and an unrealized, non-cash loss due to hedging ineffectiveness under SFAS 133 of approximately
$3,000 reflected in natural gas revenues.
The continued volatility of natural gas and oil commodity prices will have a material impact
on the fair value of our derivatives positions. It is our intent to hold all of our derivatives
positions to maturity such that realized gains or losses are generally recognized in income when
the hedged natural gas or oil is produced and sold. While the derivatives settlements may decrease
(or increase) our effective price realized, the ultimate settlement of our derivatives positions is
not expected to materially adversely affect our liquidity, results of operations or cash flows.
Legal Proceedings
MMS Proceedings Mariner and its subsidiary, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. (MERI), own
numerous properties in the Gulf of Mexico. Certain of such properties were leased from the MMS subject to The Outer
Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (RRA), signed into law on November 28, 1995.
Section 304 of the RRA relieves lessees of the obligation to pay royalties on certain leases until
after a designated volume has been produced. Four of these leases held by Mariner and two held by
MERI that are producing or have produced contain lease language (inserted by the MMS) that
conditions royalty relief on commodity prices remaining below specified thresholds. Since 2000,
commodity prices have exceeded some of the predetermined thresholds, except in 2002. In May 2006
and September 2008, the MMS issued orders asserting that the price thresholds had been exceeded in
calendar years 2000, 2001, and each of the years from 2003 through 2007, and, accordingly, that
royalties were due under such leases on oil and gas produced in those years. The potential
liability of MERI under its leases relate to production from the leases commencing July 1, 2005,
the effective date of our acquisition of MERI. Mariner and MERI believe that the MMS did not have
the statutory authority to include commodity price threshold language in the leases governed by
Section 304 of the RRA and accordingly have withheld payment of royalties. Mariner and MERI have
challenged the MMSs authority in pending administrative appeals for those leases for which the MMS
has issued orders to pay.
44
The enforceability of the price threshold provisions in leases granted pursuant to Section 304
of the RRA is currently being litigated in several administrative appeals filed by other companies
in addition to us, as well as in Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. Allred, No. 08-30069 (5th Cir.). In
the Kerr-McGee litigation, the district court in the Western District of Louisiana granted
Kerr-McGees motion for summary judgment, ruling that the price threshold provisions are unlawful
and unenforceable under Section 304 of the RRA. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. Allred, No. 2:06 CV
0439 (W.D. La.) (Mem. Ruling filed Oct. 30, 2007). The Department of the Interior appealed that
judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On January 12, 2009, the
Fifth Circuit affirmed the district courts judgment that the price provisions are unlawful based
on Section 304 of the RRA. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp. v. U.S. Dept of Interior, 554 F.3d 1082 (5th
Cir. 2009). On April 14, 2009, the Fifth Circuit denied the Department of the Interiors Petition
for Rehearing En Banc. On July 13, 2009, the Department of the Interior filed a Petition for a Writ
of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. Until the appeals process is complete,
we will continue to monitor the case. Given the judicial history of the case, we determined that as
of December 31, 2008, we no longer will record a liability for our estimated exposure to the MMS on
leases granted to us pursuant to Section 304 of the RRA. At June 30, 2009, this liability would
have been $67.7 million, including interest. In addition, as of December 31, 2008, we began
including in our estimated proved reserves those reserves attributable to these RRA Section 304
leases which, at December 31, 2008, was approximately 18.1 Bcfe.
U.S. Department of the Interior Five-Year Leasing Program. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands
Act (43. U.S.C. § 1331, et seq.) (OCSLA) directs the U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI) to prepare and approve a five-year leasing program specifying the size, timing and
location of areas on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) to be considered and assessed for natural
gas and oil leasing during the period covered by the program. An OCS area may be offered for oil
and gas leasing only if it has been included in an approved five-year program. The current
five-year leasing program covers the period 2007 though 2012 (the current program). To date, seven
oil and gas lease sales have been held under this program, six of which covered areas in the Gulf
of Mexico Region (GOM). We hold interests in 71 leases awarded pursuant to these sales in respect
of which our net expenditures for lease bonuses were approximately $164.6 million. Six additional
oil and gas lease sales covering GOM areas remain scheduled under this program.
On April 17, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in
the matter entitled Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of the Interior, Nos. 07-1247,
07-1344, 2009 WL 1025375 (C.A.D.C. 2009), vacated the current program and remanded it to DOI for
reconsideration in light of the courts ruling. The case arose as a result of petitions filed by
three non-profit organizations and an Alaskan village challenging the current program, which
includes the expansion of previous lease offerings in areas off the coast of Alaska. The court
found that DOIs environmental sensitivity analysis was irrational and did not comply with certain
OCSLA requirements. The court ordered DOI to conduct a more complete environmental sensitivity
analysis of different OCS areas and reassess timing and location of the leasing program to properly
balance the potential for environmental damage, oil and gas discovery, and adverse impacts on the
coastal zone.
On May 11, 2009, the Department of the Interior filed a motion for rehearing or clarification
of the courts order. On July 23, 2009, the MMS issued a notice to lessees and operators of GOM
oil and gas leases awarded under the current program indicating that their leases and activities
may be impacted by the outcome in the case. The notice also indicates that the impacts of the
courts ruling on the MMS operations, program planning and future sales are under review by the
court.
On July 28, 2009, the court clarified that its April 17 decision applies only to that portion
of the current program involving Alaska, effectively upholding the current program in respect of
the GOM. The DOI has indicated that it is moving forward with the scheduled August 2009 GOM lease
sale.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 168). SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, and establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) will become the source of authoritative,
nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive
45
releases of the SEC, which are sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature
not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial
statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company
will begin to use the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when
referring to GAAP in the third quarter ending September 30, 2009. As the Codification was not
intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on our consolidated
financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). SFAS 165
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS
165 sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for periods beginning after June 15,
2009. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash
flows or results of operations.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued three FASB Staff Positions
(FSPs) to provide additional application guidance and
enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities. FSP FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides guidelines for
making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in SFAS No. 157. FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, enhance
consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. FSP FAS
115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, provides
additional guidance designed to create greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and
presenting impairment losses on securities. These three FSPs are effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March
15, 2009. We adopted the provisions of these FSPs for the period ending March 31, 2009. The
adoption of these FSPs did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows or
results of operations.
On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued the Final Rule, which adopts revisions to the SECs oil
and gas reporting disclosure requirements and is effective for annual reports on Forms 10-K for
years ending on or after December 31, 2009. Early adoption of the Final Rule is prohibited. The
revisions are intended to provide investors with a more meaningful and comprehensive understanding
of oil and gas reserves to help investors evaluate their investments in oil and gas companies. The
amendments are also designed to modernize the oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them
with current practices and changes in technology. Revised requirements in the SECs Final Rule
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
Oil and gas reserves must be reported using average prices over the prior 12 month
period, rather than year-end prices; |
|
|
|
Companies will be allowed to report, on an optional basis, probable and possible
reserves; |
|
|
|
Non-traditional reserves, such as oil and gas extracted from coal and shales, will
be included in the definition of oil and gas producing activities; |
|
|
|
Companies will be permitted to use new technologies to determine proved reserves, as
long as those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable
conclusions with respect to reserve volumes; |
|
|
|
Companies will be required to disclose, in narrative form, additional details on
their proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs), including the total quantity of PUDs at year
end, any material changes to PUDs that occurred during the year, investments and
progress made to convert PUDs to developed oil and gas reserves and an explanation of
the reasons why material concentrations of PUDs in individual fields or countries have
remained undeveloped for five years or more after disclosure as PUDs;
and
|
46
|
|
|
Companies will be required to report the qualifications and measures taken to assure
the independence and objectivity of any business entity or employee primarily
responsible for preparing or auditing the reserves estimates. |
We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the Final Rule. The SEC is
discussing the Final Rule with the staff to align FASB accounting standards with the new SEC rules.
These discussions may delay the required compliance date. Absent any change in the effective date,
we will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS 160), which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and
to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the valuation of
retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also
establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling (minority)
owners. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS
160 beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on
our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. However, it did impact the
presentation and disclosure of noncontrolling (minority) interests in our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes criteria
to be considered when measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for all recurring measures of financial assets and financial liabilities
(e.g. derivatives and investment securities) for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We
adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for all recurring measures of financial assets and liabilities
on January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-2 Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2), which granted a one-year deferral
of the effective date of SFAS 157 as it applies to non-financial assets and liabilities that
are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (e.g. those measured at fair
value in a business combination and asset retirement obligations). Beginning January 1, 2009, we
applied SFAS 157 to non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a
material impact on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This statement requires enhanced disclosures about
our derivative and hedging activities. This statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We adopted the disclosure
requirements of SFAS 161 beginning January 1, 2009. See Note 8 Derivative Financial Instruments
and Hedging Activities in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report for additional disclosures.
The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows
or results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Commodity Prices and Related Hedging Activities
Our major market risk exposure continues to be the prices applicable to our natural gas and
oil production. The sales price of our production is primarily driven by the prevailing market
price. Historically, prices received for our natural gas and oil production have been volatile and
unpredictable.
The energy markets historically have been very volatile, and we can reasonably expect that oil
and gas prices will be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. In an effort to reduce the
effects of the volatility of the price of oil and natural gas on our operations, management has
adopted a policy of hedging oil and natural gas prices from time to time primarily through the use
of commodity price swap agreements and costless collar arrangements. While the use of these hedging
arrangements limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it also limits future gains from
favorable movements. In addition, forward price curves and estimates of future volatility are used
to assess and measure the ineffectiveness of our open contracts at the end of each period. If open
contracts cease to qualify for hedge accounting, the mark-to-market change in fair value is
recognized in oil and natural gas revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Not qualifying for hedge accounting and cash flow hedge designation will cause volatility in Net
Income. The fair values we report in our Condensed Consolidated Financial
47
Statements change as
estimates are revised to reflect actual results, changes in market conditions or other factors,
many of which are beyond our control.
On January 29, 2009, we liquidated crude oil fixed price swaps that previously had been
designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes in respect of 977,000 barrels of crude oil
in exchange for a cash payment to us of $10.0 million and installment payments of $13.5 million to
be paid monthly to us through 2009. On April 16, 2009, the Company received a $10.5 million cash
settlement on the hedges that were settled in monthly installments at January 29, 2009. Since the
forecasted sales of crude oil volumes are still expected to occur, the accumulated gains through
January 29, 2009 on the related derivative contracts remained in accumulated other comprehensive
income, and will not be reclassified into earnings until the physical transactions occur. Any
changes in the value of these derivative contracts subsequent to January 29, 2009 will no longer be
deferred in other comprehensive income, but rather will impact current period income.
Derivative gains and losses are recorded by commodity type in oil and natural gas revenues in
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effects on our oil and gas revenues from
our hedging activities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Gain (Loss) on Settlements (1) |
|
$ |
63,547 |
|
|
$ |
(64,607 |
) |
|
$ |
121,004 |
|
|
$ |
(74,914 |
) |
Gain on liquidated swaps (2) |
|
|
6,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Hedge Ineffectiveness (3) |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
70,400 |
|
|
$ |
(67,157 |
) |
|
$ |
134,201 |
|
|
$ |
(81,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Designated as cash flow hedges pursuant to SFAS 133. |
|
(2) |
|
Crude oil fixed price swaps liquidated on January 29, 2009 that do not qualify for hedge
accounting. Includes a $0.3 million net gain related to the liquidation on January 29, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized loss recognized in natural gas revenue related to the ineffective portion of open
contracts that are not eligible for deferral under SFAS 133 due primarily to the basis
differentials between the contract price and the indexed price at the point of sale. |
As of June 30, 2009, we had the following hedge contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed Price Swaps |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Fixed Price |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Natural Gas (MMbtus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1December 31, 2009 |
|
|
22,220,024 |
|
|
$ |
7.62 |
|
|
$ |
72,156 |
|
January 1December 31, 2010 |
|
|
12,775,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
|
(2,470 |
) |
January 1June 30, 2011 |
|
|
4,525,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
(732 |
) |
Crude Oil (Bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1December 31, 2009 |
|
|
484,564 |
|
|
$ |
76.45 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
January 1December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,277,500 |
|
|
$ |
62.28 |
|
|
|
(15,336 |
) |
January 1June 30, 2011 |
|
|
452,500 |
|
|
$ |
65.65 |
|
|
|
(4,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have reviewed the financial strength of our counterparties and believe the credit risk
associated with these swaps to be minimal. Hedges with counterparties that are lenders under our
bank credit facility are secured under the bank credit facility.
As of June 30, 2009, we expect to realize within the next 12 months approximately
$67.3 million in net gains resulting from hedging activities and $10.3 million resulting from
liquidated fixed price swaps that are currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
These hedging gains are expected to be realized as a decrease of $5.2 million to oil revenues and
an increase of $72.4 million to natural gas revenues.
As of August 4, 2009, we have not entered into any hedge transactions subsequent to June 30,
2009.
48
Interest Rate Market Risk Borrowings under our bank credit facility, as discussed under the
caption Liquidity and Capital Resources, mature on January 31, 2012, and bear interest at either
a LIBOR-based rate or a prime-based rate, at our option, plus a specified margin. Both options
expose us to risk of earnings loss due to changes in market rates. We have not entered into
interest rate hedges that would mitigate such risk. As of June 30, 2009, the interest rate on our
outstanding bank debt was 2.75%. If the balance of our bank debt at June 30, 2009 were to remain
constant, a 10% change in market interest rates would impact our cash flow by approximately $96,000
per quarter.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Mariner, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including
Mariners principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that Mariners disclosure controls and procedures
are effective as of June 30, 2009 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Mariner in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms,
and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
49
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Please refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, as amended.
Various statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report), including those
that express a belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements may include projections and estimates
concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, revenues, income
and capital spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as
may, estimate, project, predict, believe, expect, anticipate, potential, plan,
goal or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. The forward-looking
statements in this Quarterly Report speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report; we disclaim
any obligation to update these statements unless required by law, and we caution you not to rely on
them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
assumptions about future events. While our management considers these expectations and assumptions
to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive,
regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond our control. We disclose important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from our expectations described in Item 2 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Part I and elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report. These risks, contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among other matters, the
following:
|
|
|
the volatility of oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
discovery, estimation, development and replacement of oil and natural gas reserves; |
|
|
|
cash flow, liquidity and financial position; |
|
|
|
amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future development
costs; |
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital; |
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment; |
|
|
|
operating costs and other expenses; |
|
|
|
prospect development and property acquisitions; |
|
|
|
risks arising out of our hedging transactions; |
|
|
|
marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
competition in the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
the impact of weather and the occurrence of natural events and natural disasters
such as loop currents, hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural events, catastrophic
events and natural disasters; |
|
|
|
governmental regulation of the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
environmental liabilities;
|
50
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries; |
|
|
|
uninsured or underinsured losses in our oil and natural gas operations; |
|
|
|
risks related to our level of indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
risks related to significant acquisitions or other strategic transactions, such as
failure to realize expected benefits or objectives for future operations. |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Value) of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Price Paid |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
Units) |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
April 1, 2009 to April 30, 2009 (1) |
|
|
33,975 |
|
|
$ |
10.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2009 to May 31, 2009 (1) |
|
|
79,338 |
|
|
$ |
13.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 (1) |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
$ |
15.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
115,126 |
|
|
$ |
12.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These shares were withheld upon the vesting of employee restricted stock grants in connection
with payment of required withholding taxes. |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
On May 11, 2009, we held our annual meeting of stockholders. At the meeting, the following
proposals were voted upon and approved:
|
1. |
|
Election of directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withhold |
Bernard Aronson (term expires in 2012) |
|
|
38,027,287 |
|
|
|
42,861,020 |
|
H. Clayton Peterson (term expires in 2012) |
|
|
39,065,891 |
|
|
|
41,822,416 |
|
|
2. |
|
Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
80,743,051
|
|
127,502
|
|
17,754 |
|
3. |
|
Approval of the Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive
Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
58,097,951
|
|
18,812,058
|
|
71,813 |
Mariners Board of Directors is composed of six directors. Directors in addition to Messrs.
Aronson and Peterson are Alan R. Crain, Jr. (term expires 2010), John F. Greene (term expires
2010), Jonathan Ginns (term expires 2011) and Scott D. Josey (term expires 2011); these four
directors were not up for reelection at the annual meeting held on May 11, 2009.
51
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
2.1 |
* |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 9, 2005 among Forest Oil
Corporation, SML Wellhead Corporation, Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441) filed on September 19, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
* |
|
Letter Agreement dated as of February 3, 2006 among Forest Oil Corporation,
Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc.
amending the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441)
filed on September 19, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
* |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006, among Forest Oil
Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI
Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
* |
|
Letter Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation,
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc. amended the
transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
* |
|
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and between Hydro Gulf of Mexico,
Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc., executed December 23, 2007 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
* |
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner Energy,
Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariners
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-132800) filed on March 29,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
* |
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
* |
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
* |
|
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
* |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
* |
|
Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on May
1, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
* |
|
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
* |
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006,
among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial
purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
* |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2008, between Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
October 14, 2008). |
52
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
* |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders, and Union Bank of
California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders
and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.10 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 3 and Consent, dated as of April 23, 2007, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.11 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 24, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and
Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and
as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 5 and Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2008, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13 |
* |
|
Master Assignment, Agreement and Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 2, 2008,
among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 3, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.14 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 12, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders
and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.15 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 8 and Consent, dated as of March 24, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.16 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 9, dated as of June 2, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and
Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and
as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated, as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in
Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009). |
53
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.,
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as
Representatives of the several Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and
Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Gulf of Mexico
LLC, MC Beltway 8 LLC and Mariner LP LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, among J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., as Representative of the several Underwriters listed in Schedule 1
thereto, Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner LP
LLC, and Mariner Energy Texas LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner
Energy Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
* |
|
Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference as indicated. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Mariner Energy, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on August 7, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Scott D. Josey
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Josey, |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John H. Karnes
|
|
|
|
John H. Karnes, |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
55
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
2.1 |
* |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 9, 2005 among Forest Oil
Corporation, SML Wellhead Corporation, Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441) filed on September 19, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
* |
|
Letter Agreement dated as of February 3, 2006 among Forest Oil Corporation,
Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI Sub, Inc.
amending the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-137441)
filed on September 19, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
* |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006, among Forest Oil
Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc. and MEI
Sub, Inc. amended the transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
* |
|
Letter Agreement, dated April 12, 2006, among Forest Oil Corporation,
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc. amended the
transaction agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
* |
|
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and between Hydro Gulf of Mexico,
Inc. and Mariner Energy, Inc., executed December 23, 2007 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
* |
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mariner Energy,
Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Mariners
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-132800) filed on March 29,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
* |
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
* |
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Mariners Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-129096) filed on October 18, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
* |
|
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
* |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Mariners Form 8-K
filed on June 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
* |
|
Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on May
1, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
* |
|
Indenture, dated as of April 24, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., the
guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
* |
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006,
among Mariner Energy, Inc., the guarantors party thereto and the initial
purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
* |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2008, between Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
October 14, 2008). |
56
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
* |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2006, among
Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the
Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders, and Union Bank of
California, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Issuing Lender
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
March 3, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 1 and Consent, dated as of April 7, 2006, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 13, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders
and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.10 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 3 and Consent, dated as of April 23, 2007, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.11 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 24, 2007, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and
Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and
as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 5 and Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2008, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13 |
* |
|
Master Assignment, Agreement and Amendment No. 6, dated as of June 2, 2008,
among Mariner Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers,
the Lenders party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as
Administrative Agent for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
June 3, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.14 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 7, dated as of December 12, 2008, among Mariner Energy, Inc.
and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto,
and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders
and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.15 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 8 and Consent, dated as of March 24, 2009, among Mariner
Energy, Inc. and Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders
party thereto, and Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent
for such Lenders and as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.16 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 9, dated as of June 2, 2009, among Mariner Energy, Inc. and
Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., as Borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, and
Union Bank of California, N.A., as Administrative Agent for such Lenders and
as Issuing Lender for such Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated, as Representatives of the several Underwriters named in
Schedule A thereto, and Mariner Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009). |
57
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, among Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.,
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as
Representatives of the several Underwriters named in Schedule A thereto, and
Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Gulf of Mexico
LLC, MC Beltway 8 LLC and Mariner LP LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.2 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, among J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., as Representative of the several Underwriters listed in Schedule 1
thereto, Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner LP
LLC, and Mariner Energy Texas LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1
to Mariners Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2007). |
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among Mariner Energy, Inc., Mariner LP LLC, Mariner Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner
Energy Texas LP and the initial purchasers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on
April 25, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
* |
|
Mariner Energy, Inc. Third Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Mariners Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference as indicated. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.
58