form10-k.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For fiscal year ended January 31,
2008,
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period From to
Commission File Number
1-16497
MOVADO GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
New
York
|
|
13-2595932
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction
|
|
(IRS
Employer
|
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
650
From Road,
Paramus,
New Jersey
|
|
07652
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
|
Registrant's Telephone Number,
Including Area Code:(201) 267-8000
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
Name of Each
Exchange
|
Title of Each
Class
|
|
on which
Registered
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per
share
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
Indicate by check mark
if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. Yes ¨ No
x
Indicate by check mark
if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No
x
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes x No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer,'' "accelerated filer'' and "smaller
reporting company'' in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨ Accelerated filer
x Non-accelerated filer
¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No
x
The aggregate market value of the voting
stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 31, 2007 was
approximately $588,207,656 (based on the closing sale price of the registrant's
Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange). For
purposes of this computation, each share of Class A Common Stock is assumed to
have the same market value as one share of Common Stock into which it is
convertible and only shares of stock held by directors and executive officers
were excluded.
The number of shares outstanding of the
registrant's Common Stock and Class A Common Stock as of March 14, 2008 were
19,013,480 and 6,634,319, respectively.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE
Portions
of the definitive proxy statement relating to registrant's 2008 annual meeting
of shareholders (the "Proxy Statement'') are incorporated by reference in Part
III hereof.
PART
I
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Statements
in this annual report on Form 10-K, including, without limitation, statements
under Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation” and elsewhere in this report, as well as statements in
future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
the Company’s press releases and oral statements made by or with the approval of
an authorized executive officer of the Company, which are not historical in
nature, are intended to be, and are hereby identified as, “forward-looking
statements” for purposes of the safe harbor provided by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current
expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the Company, its future
performance, the industry in which the Company operates and management’s
assumptions. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “targets”, “goals”,
“projects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “may”, “will”,
“should” and variations of such words and similar expressions are also intended
to identify such forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers that
forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to the
Company’s future business prospects, projected operating or financial results,
revenues, working capital, liquidity, capital needs, plans for future
operations, expectations regarding capital expenditures and operating expenses,
effective tax rates, margins, interest costs, and income as well as assumptions
relating to the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or
quantified. Actual results and future events could differ materially
from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, due to several important
factors herein identified, among others, and other risks and factors identified
from time to time in the Company’s reports filed with the SEC including, without
limitation, the following: general economic and business conditions which may
impact disposable income of consumers in the United States and the other
significant markets where the Company’s products are sold, general uncertainty
related to possible terrorist attacks and the impact on consumer spending,
changes in consumer preferences and popularity of particular designs, new
product development and introduction, competitive products and pricing,
seasonality, availability of alternative sources of supply in the case of the
loss of any significant supplier, the loss of significant customers,
the Company’s dependence on key employees and officers, the ability
to successfully integrate the operations of acquired businesses without
disruption to other business activities, the continuation of licensing
arrangements with third parties, the ability to secure and protect trademarks,
patents and other intellectual property rights, the ability to lease new stores
on suitable terms in desired markets and to complete construction on a timely
basis, the continued availability to the Company of financing and credit on
favorable terms, business disruptions, disease, general risks associated with
doing business outside the United States including, without limitation, import
duties, tariffs, quotas, political and economic stability, and success of
hedging strategies with respect to currency exchange rate
fluctuations.
These
risks and uncertainties, along with the risk factors discussed under Item 1A
“Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K, should be considered in
evaluating any forward-looking statements contained in this report or
incorporated by reference herein. All forward-looking statements speak only as
of the date of this report or, in the case of any document incorporated by
reference, the date of that document. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or any person acting on
its behalf are qualified by the cautionary statements in this section. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update or publicly release any revisions to
forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances or changes in
expectations after the date of this report.
Item
1. Business
GENERAL
In this
Form 10-K, all references to the “Company”, “Movado Group” or “MGI” include
Movado Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires
otherwise.
Movado
Group, Inc. designs, sources, markets and distributes fine watches and
jewelry. Its portfolio of brands is comprised of Movado®, Ebel®,
Concord®, ESQ®, Coach® Watches, HUGO BOSS® Watches, Juicy Couture® Watches,
Tommy Hilfiger® Watches and LACOSTE® Watches. The Company is a leader
in the design, development, marketing and distribution of watch brands sold in
almost every major category comprising the watch industry. The
Company also designs, develops and markets proprietary Movado-branded jewelry
which it retails in its luxury Movado Boutiques.
The
Company was incorporated in New York in 1967 under the name North American Watch
Corporation, to acquire Piaget Watch Corporation and Corum Watch Corporation,
which had been, respectively, the exclusive importers and distributors of Piaget
and Corum watches in the United States since the 1950’s. The Company
sold its Piaget and Corum distribution businesses in 1999 and 2000,
respectively, to focus on its own portfolio of brands. Since its
incorporation, the Company has developed its brand-building reputation and
distinctive image across an expanding number of brands and geographic
markets. Strategic acquisitions of watch brands and their subsequent
growth, along with license agreements have played an important role in the
expansion of the Company’s brand portfolio.
In 1970,
the Company acquired the Concord brand and the Swiss company that had been
manufacturing Concord watches since 1908. In 1983, the Company
acquired the U.S. distributor of Movado watches and substantially all of the
assets related to the Movado brand from the Swiss manufacturer of Movado
watches. The Company changed its name to Movado Group, Inc. in
1996. In March 2004, the Company completed its acquisition of Ebel,
one of the world’s premier luxury watch brands that was established in La
Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland in 1911.
The
Company is very selective in its licensing strategy and chooses to enter
long-term partnerships with only powerful brands that are leaders in their
respective businesses. The following table sets forth the brands
licensed by the Company and the year in which the Company launched each licensed
brand for watches. All of the Company’s license agreements are
exclusive.
Brand
|
Licensor
|
Year
Launched
|
ESQ
|
Hearst
Communication, Inc.
|
1993
|
Coach
|
Coach,
Inc.
|
1999
|
Tommy
Hilfiger
|
Tommy
Hilfiger Licensing, Inc.
|
2001
|
HUGO
BOSS
|
HUGO
BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co KG
|
2006
|
Juicy
Couture
|
L.C.
Licensing, Inc.
|
2007
|
LACOSTE
|
Lacoste
S.A., Sporloisirs S.A. and Lacoste Alligator S.A.
|
2007
|
On
October 7, 1993, the Company completed a public offering of 2,666,667 shares of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share. On October 21, 1997, the Company
completed a secondary stock offering in
which
1,500,000 shares of common stock were issued. On May 21, 2001, the Company moved
from the NASDAQ National Market to the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”). The Company’s common stock is traded on the NYSE under the
trading symbol MOV.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
On
February 25, 2008, the Company announced a unified strategy designed to leverage
the strength of the Movado brand across all distribution
channels. The Company intends to optimize its wholesale distribution
network and enhance the performance of its Movado Boutiques to contribute
further to the brand’s long-term growth. The new Movado brand
strategy is designed to unite the areas of product development, merchandising,
and marketing across the Company’s wholesale and retail channels, specifically
addressing product, pricing, marketing and point-of-sale
presentation.
As part
of the strategy, the Company is in the process of streamlining the Movado brand
wholesale distribution in the United States from 4,000 wholesale customer doors
to approximately 2,600 doors, representing a 35% reduction, by the close of its
fiscal year ending January 31, 2009. These least productive doors
represented approximately $10.0 million of Movado brand sales during the year
ended January 31, 2008, or less than 5% of the overall brand’s revenue and less
than 2% of the Company’s consolidated revenue. The Company recorded a
one-time accrual of $15.0 million during its 2008 fiscal year related to future
sales returns associated with the reduction of these wholesale customer
doors.
On May
11, 2007, the Company signed a joint venture agreement (the "JV Agreement") with
Swico Limited ("Swico"), an English company with established distribution,
marketing and sales operations in the UK. Swico had been the Company's exclusive
distributor of HUGO BOSS watches in the UK since 2005. Under the JV Agreement,
the Company and Swico control 51% and 49%, respectively, of MGS Distribution
Limited, a newly formed English company ("MGS") that is responsible for the
marketing, distribution and sale in the UK of the Company's licensed HUGO BOSS,
Tommy Hilfiger, LACOSTE and Juicy Couture brands, as well as future brands
licensed to the Company, subject to the terms of the applicable license
agreement. Swico is responsible for the day to day management of MGS, including
staffing and providing logistical support, inventory management, order
fulfillment, distribution and after sale services, systems and back office
support. The terms of the JV Agreement include financial performance
measures which, if not attained, give either party the right to terminate the JV
Agreement after the fifth (5th) and the tenth (10th) years (January 31,
2012 and January 31, 2017); restrictions on the transfer of shares in MGS;
and a buy out right whereby the Company can purchase all of Swico's shares
in MGS as of July 1, 2017 and every 5th anniversary thereafter at a
pre-determined price.
On April
11, 2007, the Company further amended its license agreement, dated June 3, 1999
with Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc. ("THLI"), pursuant to which THLI licenses to
the Company the trademark TOMMY HILFIGER and related marks. The amendment
changes the definition of "Territory" to include China, clarifies what countries
are meant by the terms "Eastern Europe" and "Middle East" and adjusts sales
minimums and minimum royalties to take into account the expansion of the
geographic scope comprising the Territory.
On March
9, 2007, the Company further amended its license agreement with Coach, Inc.,
dated December 9, 1996 (as amended, the “Coach License Agreement”), pursuant to
which Coach, Inc. licenses the trademark COACH and related trademarks to the
Company. The amendment extends the
term of
the Coach License Agreement through June 30, 2015, changes the definition of
“contract year” to be coincident with Coach, Inc.’s fiscal year (ending June 30)
and establishes sales minimums for each contract year through the end of the
term. In addition, among other things, the amendment added provisions
dealing with the Company’s reporting requirements to Coach, Inc., staffing
levels and exhibitions at trade shows.
On February 15, 2007, the Company further amended its license
agreement, dated as of January 1, 1992 (as amended, the "Hearst License
Agreement"), with Hearst Magazines, a Division of Hearst Communications, Inc.
("Hearst"), under which Hearst licenses to the Company the trademarks ESQUIRE,
ESQ and related marks. Under the amendment, Hearst granted the Company eleven
consecutively exercisable options, each for the renewal of the Hearst License
Agreement for an additional three-year period, with the final option renewal
period concluding on December 31, 2042, unless further extended by both parties.
By execution of the amendment, the Company exercised the first renewal option,
thereby extending the Hearst License Agreement through December 31, 2012. In
addition, the amendment changed the terms of the royalties payable by the
Company to Hearst.
INDUSTRY
OVERVIEW
The
largest markets for watches are North America, Western Europe and
Asia. The Company divides the watch market into six principal
categories as set forth in the following table.
Market
Category
|
|
Suggested
Retail Price Range
|
|
Primary
Category of Movado Group, Inc. Brands
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive
|
|
$10,000
and over
|
|
Concord
|
Luxury
|
|
$1,500
to $9,999
|
|
Ebel
|
Premium
|
|
$500
to $1,499
|
|
Movado
|
Moderate
|
|
$100
to $499
|
|
ESQ,
Coach, HUGO BOSS, Juicy Couture and LACOSTE
|
Fashion
|
|
$55
to $99
|
|
Tommy
Hilfiger
|
Mass
Market
|
|
Less
than $55
|
|
-
|
Exclusive
Watches
Exclusive
watches are usually made of precious metals, including 18 karat gold or
platinum, and are often set with precious gems. These watches are
primarily mechanical or quartz-analog watches. Mechanical watches keep time with
intricate mechanical movements consisting of an arrangement of wheels, jewels
and winding and regulating mechanisms. Quartz-analog watches have quartz
movements in which time is precisely calibrated to the regular frequency of the
vibration of quartz crystal. Exclusive watches are manufactured almost entirely
in Switzerland. In addition to the Company’s Concord watches,
well-known brand names of exclusive watches include Audemars Piguet, Patek
Philippe, Piaget and Vacheron Constantin.
Luxury
Watches
Luxury
watches are either quartz-analog watches or mechanical watches. These
watches typically are made with either 14 or 18 karat gold, stainless steel or a
combination of gold and stainless steel, and are occasionally set with precious
gems. Luxury watches are primarily manufactured in
Switzerland. In addition to a majority of the Company’s Ebel watches,
well-known brand names of luxury watches include Baume & Mercier, Breitling,
Cartier, Omega, Rolex and TAG Heuer.
Premium
Watches
The
majority of premium watches are quartz-analog watches. These watches
typically are made with gold finish, stainless steel or a combination of gold
finish and stainless steel. Premium watches are manufactured
primarily in Switzerland, although some are manufactured in Asia. In
addition to a majority of the Company’s Movado watches, well-known brand names
of premium watches include Gucci, Rado and Raymond Weil.
Moderate
Watches
Most
moderate watches are quartz-analog watches. Moderate watches are
manufactured primarily in Asia and Switzerland. These watches
typically are made with gold finish, stainless steel, brass or a combination of
gold finish and stainless steel. In addition to the Company’s ESQ,
Coach, HUGO BOSS, Juicy Couture and LACOSTE brands, well-known brand names of
watches in the moderate category include Anne Klein, Bulova, Citizen, Guess,
Seiko and Wittnauer.
Fashion
Watches
Watches
comprising the fashion market are primarily quartz-analog watches but also
include some digital watches. Watches in the fashion category are
generally made with stainless steel, gold finish, brass and/or plastic and are
manufactured primarily in Asia. Fashion watches feature designs that
reflect current and emerging fashion trends. Many are sold under
licensed designer and brand names that are well-known principally in the apparel
industry. In addition to the Company’s Tommy Hilfiger brand,
well-known brands of fashion watches include Anne Klein II, DKNY, Fossil, Guess,
Kenneth Cole and Swatch.
Mass
Market Watches
Mass
market watches typically consist of digital watches and analog watches made from
stainless steel, brass and/or plastic and are manufactured in
Asia. Well-known brands include Casio, Citizen, Pulsar, Seiko and
Timex. The Company does not compete in the mass market watch
category.
BRANDS
The
Company designs, develops, sources, markets and distributes products under the
following watch brands:
Movado
Founded
in 1881 in La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland, Movado is an icon of modern
design. Today the brand includes a line of watches, inspired by the
simplicity of the Bauhaus movement, including the world famous Movado Museum
watch and a number of other watch collections with more
traditional
dial
designs. The design for the Movado Museum watch was the first watch
design chosen by the Museum of Modern Art for its permanent collection. It has
since been honored by other museums throughout the world. The Movado
brand also includes Series 800, a sport watch collection that incorporates
Movado quality and craftsmanship with the characteristics of a true sport
watch. Movado watches have Swiss movements and are made with 14 or 18
karat gold, 18 karat gold finish, stainless steel or a combination of 18 karat
gold finish and stainless steel. The core collection of Movado
watches has suggested retail prices between $495 and $1,495, with select models
exceeding this range.
Ebel
The Ebel
brand, one of the world’s premier luxury watch brands, was established in La
Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland in 1911. Since acquiring Ebel, Movado
Group has returned Ebel to its roots as the “Architects of Time” through its
product development, marketing initiatives and global advertising campaigns. All
Ebel watches feature Swiss movements and are made with solid 18 karat gold,
stainless steel or a combination of 18 karat gold and stainless
steel. The core collection of Ebel watches has suggested retail
prices between $1,600 and $10,100, with select models exceeding this
range.
Concord
Concord
was founded in 1908 in Bienne, Switzerland. Inspired by its avant
garde roots, Concord is designed to be resolutely upscale with a modern, edgy
point of view and has been repositioned as a niche luxury brand with exclusive
distribution. The brand’s products center on its iconic C1
collection, a breakthrough in modern design. Concord watches have
Swiss movements and are made with solid 18 karat or 14 karat gold, stainless
steel or a combination of 18 karat gold and stainless steel. The core
collection of Concord watches has suggested retail prices between $9,450 and
$29,900, with select models exceeding this range.
Coach
Watches
Coach
Watches are an extension of the Coach leathergoods brand and reflect the Coach
brand image. A distinctive American brand, Coach delivers stylish,
aspirational, well-made products that represent excellent
value. Coach watches contain Swiss movements and are made with
stainless steel, gold finish or a combination of stainless steel and gold finish
with leather straps, stainless steel bracelets or gold finish
bracelets. The core collection of Coach watches has suggested retail
prices between $248 and $498, with select models exceeding this
range.
ESQ
ESQ
competes in the entry level Swiss watch category and is defined by bold sport
and fashion designs. All ESQ watches contain Swiss movements and are
made with stainless steel, gold finish or a combination of stainless steel and
gold finish, with leather straps, stainless steel bracelets or gold finish
bracelets. The core collection of ESQ watches has suggested retail prices
between $195 and $495, with select models exceeding this range.
Tommy
Hilfiger Watches
Reflecting
the fresh, fun all-American style for which Tommy Hilfiger is known, Tommy
Hilfiger watches feature quartz, digital or analog-digital movements, with
stainless steel, titanium, aluminum, silver-tone, two-tone or gold-tone cases
and bracelets, and leather, fabric, plastic or rubber
straps. The
line
includes fashion and sport models with the core collection of Tommy Hilfiger
watches having suggested retail prices between $75 and $125, with select models
exceeding this range.
HUGO
BOSS Watches
HUGO BOSS
is a global market leader in the world of fashion. The HUGO BOSS
watch collection is an extension of the parent brand and includes classy,
sporty, elegant and fashion timepieces with distinctive features, giving this
collection a strong and coherent identity. The core collection of
HUGO BOSS watches has suggested retail prices between $245 and $495, with select
models exceeding this range.
Juicy
Couture Timepieces
Juicy
Couture is a premium designer, marketer and wholesaler of sophisticated, yet fun
fashion for women, men and children. Liz Claiborne, Inc. (NYSE: LIZ)
purchased Juicy Couture in the spring of 2003, and has facilitated Juicy
Couture’s growth into a powerhouse lifestyle brand. Juicy Couture
timepieces reflect the brand’s clear vision, unique identity and leading brand
position in the upscale contemporary category, encompassing both trend-right and
core styling contemporary watches having suggested retail prices for its core
collection between $195 and $495, with select models exceeding this
range.
LACOSTE
Watches
The
LACOSTE watch collection embraces the LACOSTE lifestyle proposition which
encompasses elegance, refinement and comfort, as well as a dedication to quality
and innovation. Mirroring key attributes of the LACOSTE brand, the
collection features stylish timepieces with a contemporary sport elegant feel,
having suggested retail prices for its core collection between $150 to $395,
with select models exceeding this range.
DESIGN
The
Company’s offerings undergo two phases before they are produced for sale to
customers; design and product development. The design phase includes the
formation of artistic and conceptual renderings while product development
involves the construction of prototypes. The Company’s ESQ and licensed
brands are designed by in-house design teams in Switzerland and the United
States in cooperation with outside sources, including licensors’ design
teams. Product development for these watches takes place in the Company’s
Asia operations. For the Company’s Movado, Ebel and Concord brands, the
design phase is performed by a combination of in house and freelance designers
in Europe while product development is carried out in the Company’s Swiss
operations. Senior management of the Company is actively involved in the
design and product development process.
MARKETING
The
Company’s marketing strategy is to communicate a consistent brand-specific
message to the consumer. Recognizing that advertising is an integral
component to the successful marketing of its product offerings, the Company
devotes significant resources to advertising and, since 1972, has maintained its
own in-house advertising department. The Company’s advertising
department focuses primarily on the implementation and management of global
marketing and advertising strategies for each of its brands, ensuring
consistency of presentation. The Company utilizes outside agencies
for the
creative
development of advertising campaigns which are developed individually for each
of the Company’s brands and are directed primarily to the end consumer rather
than to trade customers. The Company’s advertising targets consumers
with particular demographic characteristics appropriate to the image and price
range of the brand. Most Company advertising is placed predominantly
in magazines and other print media but some is also created for radio and
television campaigns, catalogs, outdoor and other promotional
materials. Marketing expenses totaled 15.4%, 14.9% and 16.1% of net
sales in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
OPERATING
SEGMENTS
The
Company conducts its business primarily in two operating segments: Wholesale and
Retail. For operating segment data and geographic segment data for the years
ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements regarding Segment Information.
The
Company’s wholesale segment includes the design, development, sourcing,
marketing and distribution of high quality watches, in addition to revenue
generated from after-sales service activities and shipping. The retail segment
includes the Company’s Movado Boutiques and its outlet stores.
The
Company divides its business into two major geographic
segments: United States operations, and International, which includes
the results of all other Company operations. The allocation of
geographic revenue is based upon the location of the customer. The Company’s
international operations are principally conducted in Europe, Asia, Canada, the
Middle East, South America and the Caribbean. The Company’s
international assets are substantially located in Switzerland.
Wholesale
United
States Wholesale
The
Company sells all of its brands in the U.S. wholesale market primarily to major
jewelry store chains such as Helzberg Diamonds Corp., Sterling, Inc. and Zale
Corporation; department stores, such as Macy’s, Nordstrom and Saks Fifth Avenue,
as well as independent jewelers. Sales to trade customers in the
United States are made directly by the Company’s U.S. sales force of
approximately 130 employees. Of these employees, sales
representatives are responsible for a defined geographic territory, specialize
in a particular brand and sell to and service independent jewelers within their
territory. Their compensation is based on salary plus commission. The sales
force also consists of account executives and account representatives who,
respectively, sell to and service chain and department store accounts. The
latter typically handle more than one of the Company’s brands and are
compensated based on salary and incentives.
International
Wholesale
Internationally,
the Company’s brands are sold in department stores such as El Cortes Ingles in
Spain and Galeries Lafayette in France, jewelry chain stores such as Christ in
Switzerland and Germany and independent jewelers. The Company employs
its own international sales force of approximately 70 employees operating at the
Company’s sales and distribution offices in Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong
Kong, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United Arab
Emirates. In addition, the Company sells all of its brands other than ESQ
through a network of independent distributors operating in numerous countries
around the world. Distribution of ESQ watches which, outside of the
United States are sold only in Canada and the Caribbean, is handled by the
Company’s Canadian subsidiary and Caribbean based sales team. A
majority of the Company’s
arrangements
with its international distributors are long-term, generally require certain
minimum purchases and minimum advertising expenditures and restrict the
distributor from selling competitive products.
In France
and Germany, the Company’s licensed brands are marketed and distributed by
subsidiaries of a joint venture company owned 51% by the Company and 49% by
Financiere TWC SA ("TWC"), a French company with established distribution,
marketing and sales operations in France and Germany. The terms of the
joint venture agreement include financial performance measures which, if not
attained, give either party the right to terminate the agreement after the fifth
(5th) and the tenth (10th) years (January 31, 2011 and January 31, 2016);
restrictions on the transfer of shares in the joint venture company; and a buy
out right whereby the Company can purchase all of TWC's shares in the joint
venture company as of July 1, 2016 and every fifth (5th) anniversary thereafter
at a pre-determined price.
In the
UK, the marketing, distribution and sale of the Company’s licensed brands is
handled by MGS, the joint venture company which is owned by the Company and
Swico, 51% and 49%, respectively, as described above under “Recent
Developments”.
Retail
The
Company operates in two retail markets, the luxury boutique market and the
outlet market. Movado Boutiques reinforce the luxury image and are a
primary strategic focus of the Movado brand. The Company operates 30
Movado Boutiques in North America that are located in upscale regional shopping
centers and metropolitan areas. Movado Boutiques are merchandised
with select models of Movado watches, as well as proprietary Movado-branded
jewelry and clocks. The modern store design creates a distinctive
environment that showcases these products and provides consumers with the
ability to fully experience the complete Movado design
philosophy. The Company’s 32 outlet stores are multi-branded and
serve as an effective vehicle to sell discontinued models and factory seconds of
all of the Company’s watches and jewelry. One additional outlet store
is scheduled to open in fiscal year 2009.
SEASONALITY
The
Company’s U.S. sales are traditionally greater during the Christmas and holiday
season. Consequently, the Company’s net sales historically have been
higher during the second half of the fiscal year. The second half of
each year accounted for 57.0%, 57.9% and 56.9% of the Company’s net sales for
the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The amount of net sales and operating profit generated
during the second half of each fiscal year depends upon the general level of
retail sales during the Christmas and holiday season, as well as economic
conditions and other factors beyond the Company’s control. The
Company does not expect any significant change in the seasonality of its U.S.
business in the foreseeable future. Major selling seasons in certain
international markets center on significant local holidays that occur in late
winter or early spring.
BACKLOG
At March
14, 2008, the Company had unfilled orders of $42.4 million compared to $55.8
million at March 15, 2007 and $43.5 million at March 31,
2006. Unfilled orders include both confirmed orders and orders the
Company believes will be confirmed based on the historic experience with the
customers. It is customary for many of the Company’s customers not to
confirm their future orders with a formal purchase order until shortly before
their desired delivery.
CUSTOMER
SERVICE, WARRANTY AND REPAIR
The
Company has developed an approach to managing the retail sales process of its
wholesale customers that involves monitoring their sales and inventories by
product category and style. The Company also assists in the
conception, development and implementation of customers’ marketing vehicles. The
Company places considerable emphasis on cooperative advertising programs with
its major retail customers. The Company’s retail sales process has
resulted in close relationships with its principal customers, often allowing for
influence on the mix, quantity and timing of their purchasing
decisions. The Company believes that customers’ familiarity with its
sales approach has facilitated, and should continue to facilitate, the
introduction of new products through its distribution network.
The
Company permits the return of damaged or defective products. In addition,
although the Company has no obligation to do so, it does accept other returns
from customers in certain instances.
The
Company has service facilities around the world including seven Company-owned
service facilities and approximately 300 independent service centers which are
authorized to perform warranty repairs. In order to maintain
consistency and quality at its service facilities and authorized independent
service centers, the Company conducts training sessions for and distributes
technical information and updates to repair personnel. All watches
sold by the Company come with limited warranties covering the movement against
defects in material and workmanship for periods ranging from two to three years
from the date of purchase, with the exception of Tommy Hilfiger watches, for
which the warranty period is ten years. In addition, the warranty
period is five years for the gold plating on certain Movado watch cases and
bracelets. Products that are returned under warranty to the Company
are generally serviced by the Company’s employees at its service
facilities.
The
Company retains adequate levels of component parts to facilitate after-sales
service of its watches for an extended period of time after the discontinuance
of such watches.
The
Company makes available Customer Wins, a web-based system providing immediate
access for the Company’s retail partners and consumers to the information they
may want or need about after sales service issues. Customer Wins
allows the Company’s retailers and end consumers to track their repair status
online 24 hours a day. The system also permits customers to
authorize repairs, track repair status through the entire repair life cycle,
view repair information and obtain service order history. Customer
Wins can be accessed online at www.mgiservice.com.
SOURCING,
PRODUCTION AND QUALITY
The
Company does not own any product manufacturing facilities, with the exception of
a small manufacturing facility for proprietary movements for its Ebel brand. The
Company employs a flexible manufacturing model that relies primarily on
independent manufacturers to meet shifts in marketplace demand and changes in
consumer preferences. All product sources must achieve and maintain the
Company’s high quality standards and specifications. With strong
supply chain organizations in Switzerland, China and Hong Kong, the Company
maintains control over the quality of its products, wherever they are
manufactured. Compliance is monitored with strictly implemented quality control
standards, including on-site quality inspections.
A
majority of the Swiss watch movements used in the manufacture of Movado, Ebel,
Concord and ESQ watches are purchased from two suppliers. Additionally, the
Company manufactures some proprietary movements for its Ebel
brand. The Company obtains other watch components for all of its
brands,
including
movements, cases, hands, dials, bracelets and straps from a number of other
suppliers. The Company does not have long-term supply contract
commitments with any of its component parts suppliers.
Movado,
Ebel and Concord watches are generally manufactured in Switzerland by
independent third party assemblers with some in-house assembly in Bienne and La
Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland. Movado, Ebel and Concord watches are
manufactured using Swiss movements and other components obtained from third
party suppliers. Coach, ESQ, Tommy Hilfiger, HUGO BOSS, Juicy
Couture, and LACOSTE watches are manufactured by independent contractors. Coach
and ESQ watches are manufactured using Swiss movements and other components
purchased from third party suppliers. Tommy Hilfiger, HUGO BOSS,
Juicy Couture, and LACOSTE watches are manufactured using movements and other
components purchased from third party suppliers.
TRADEMARKS,
PATENTS AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS
The
Company owns the trademarks MOVADO®, EBEL® and CONCORD®, as well as trademarks
for the Movado Museum dial design, and related trademarks for watches and
jewelry in the United States and in numerous other countries.
The
Company licenses ESQUIRE®, ESQ® and related trademarks on an exclusive worldwide
basis for use in connection with the manufacture, distribution, advertising and
sale of watches pursuant to the Hearst License Agreement. The current
term of the Hearst License Agreement, as amended, expires December 31, 2012, but
contains options for renewal at the Company’s discretion through December 31,
2042.
The
Company licenses the trademark COACH® and related trademarks on an exclusive
worldwide basis for use in connection with the manufacture, distribution,
advertising and sale of watches pursuant to the Coach License
Agreement. The Coach License Agreement, as amended, expires on June
30, 2015.
Under an
agreement with Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc., the Company has the exclusive
license to use the trademark TOMMY HILFIGER® and related trademarks in
connection with the manufacture of watches worldwide and in connection with the
marketing, advertising, sale and distribution of watches at wholesale (and at
retail through its outlet stores) in the Western Hemisphere, Europe, Pan Pacific
(excluding Japan), Latin America, the Middle East, China and
Korea. The term of the license agreement with THLI expires March 31,
2012.
Under its
2004 agreement with HUGO BOSS Trademark Management GmbH & Co, the Company
received a worldwide exclusive license to use the trademark HUGO BOSS® and any
other trademarks containing the names “HUGO” or “BOSS”, in connection with the
production, promotion and sale of watches. The term of the license
continues through December 31, 2013, with an optional five-year renewal
period.
On
November 21, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with L.C. Licensing,
Inc. ("L.C. Licensing"), for the
exclusive worldwide
license to use the
trademarks JUICY
COUTURE™ and COUTURE COUTURE LOS ANGELES™, in connection with the manufacture,
advertising, merchandising, promotion, sale and distribution of timepieces and
components. The term of the license is through December 31, 2011,
with a four-year renewal period at the option of the Company, provided that
certain sales thresholds are met.
On March
27, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive worldwide license agreement with
Lacoste S.A., Sporloisirs, S.A. and Lacoste Alligator, S.A. to design, produce,
market and distribute Lacoste watches under the LACOSTE® name and the
distinctive “alligator” logo beginning in the first half of 2007. The
agreement continues through December 31, 2014 and renews automatically for
successive five year periods unless either party notifies the other of
non-renewal at least six months before the end of the initial term or any
renewal period.
The
Company also owns, and has pending applications for, a number of design patents
in the United States and internationally for various watch designs, as well as
designs of watch cases, bracelets and jewelry.
The
Company actively seeks to protect and enforce its intellectual property rights
by working with industry associations, anti-counterfeiting organizations,
private investigators and law enforcement authorities, including customs
authorities in the United States and internationally, and, when necessary, suing
infringers of its trademarks and patents. Consequently, the Company
is involved from time to time in litigation or other proceedings to determine
the enforceability, scope and validity of these rights. With respect to the
trademarks MOVADO®, EBEL®, CONCORD® and certain other related trademarks, the
Company has received exclusion orders that prohibit the importation of
counterfeit goods or goods bearing confusingly similar trademarks into the
United States and other countries. In accordance with customs
regulations, these exclusion orders, however, do not cover the importation of
genuine Movado, Ebel and Concord watches because the Company is the manufacturer
of such watches. All of the Company’s exclusion orders are
renewable.
COMPETITION
The
markets for each of the Company’s watch brands are highly
competitive. With the exception of Swatch Group, Ltd., a large
Swiss-based competitor, no single company competes with the Company across all
of its brands. Certain companies, however, compete with Movado Group, Inc. with
respect to one or more of its watch brands. Certain of these
companies have, and other companies that may enter the Company’s markets in the
future may have, greater financial, distribution, marketing and advertising
resources than the Company. The Company’s future success will depend,
to a significant degree, upon its continued ability to compete effectively with
regard to, among other things, the style, quality, price, advertising,
marketing, distribution and availability of supply of the Company’s watches and
other products.
EMPLOYEES
As of
January 31, 2008, the Company had approximately 1,500 full-time employees in its
global operations. No employee of the Company is represented by a
labor union or is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. The
Company has never experienced a work stoppage due to labor difficulties and
believes that its employee relations are good.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
The
Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, are available free of charge on the Company’s website, located at www.movadogroup.com,
as soon as reasonably practicable after the same are electronically filed with,
or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The public
may read any materials
filed by
the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F. Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C., 20549. The public may obtain information on
the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company at
www.sec.gov.
The
Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all
directors, officers and employees, including the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting and financial
officers, which is posted on the Company’s website. The Company will
post any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waivers
that are required to be disclosed by SEC regulations on the Company’s website.
In addition, the committee charters for the audit committee, the compensation
committee and the nominating/corporate governance committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company and the Company’s corporate governance guidelines have
been posted on the Company’s website.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors and the
forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K should be read carefully
in connection with evaluating Movado Group, Inc.’s business. These risks and uncertainties could cause
actual results and events to differ materially from those anticipated.
Additional risks which the Company does
not presently consider material, or of which it is not currently aware, may also
have an adverse impact on the business. Please also see “Forward-Looking
Statements” on page 1.
The
Company faces intense competition in the worldwide watch industry.
The watch
industry is highly competitive and the Company competes globally with numerous
manufacturers, importers and distributors, some of which are larger and have
greater financial, distribution, advertising and marketing
resources. The Company’s products compete on the basis of price,
features, perceived desirability, reliability and perceived
attractiveness. The Company also faces increased competition from
internet-based retailers. The Company’s future results of operations
may be adversely affected by these and other competitors.
Maintaining
favorable brand recognition is essential to the success of the Company, and
failure to do so could materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of
operations.
Favorable
brand recognition is an important factor to the future success of the
Company. The Company sells its products under a variety of owned and
licensed brands. Factors affecting brand recognition are often
outside the Company’s control, and the Company’s efforts to create or enhance
favorable brand recognition, such as making significant investments in marketing
and advertising campaigns, product design and anticipation of fashion trends,
may not have their desired effects. Additionally, the Company relies
on its license partners to maintain favorable brand recognition of their
respective parent brands, and the Company often has no control over the brand
management efforts of its license partners. Finally, although the
Company’s independent distributors are subject to contractual requirements to
protect the Company’s brands, it may be difficult to monitor or enforce such
requirements, particularly in foreign jurisdictions. Any decline in
perceived favorable recognition of the Company’s owned or licensed brands could
materially and adversely affect future results of operations and
profitability.
If the Company
is unable to respond to changes
in consumer demands and fashion trends in a timely manner, sales and
profitability could be adversely
affected.
Fashion
trends and consumer demands and tastes often shift quickly. The
Company attempts to monitor these trends in order to adapt its product offerings
to suit customer demand. There is a risk that the Company will not
properly perceive changes in trends or tastes, which may result in the failure
to adapt the Company’s products accordingly. In addition, new model designs are regularly introduced
into the market for all brands to keep ahead of evolving fashion trends as well
as to initiate new trends of their own. There is risk that the public
may not favor these new models or that the models may not be ready for sale
until after the trend has passed. If the Company fails to
respond to and keep up to date with fashion trends and consumer demands and
tastes, its brand image, sales, profitability and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
If
the Company misjudges the demand for its products, high inventory levels could
adversely affect future operating results and profitability.
Consumer
demand for the Company’s products can affect inventory levels. If
consumer demand is lower than expected, inventory levels can rise causing a
strain on operating cash flow. If the inventory cannot be sold
through the Company’s wholesale or retail outlets, additional reserves or
write-offs to future earnings could be necessary. Conversely, if consumer demand
is higher than expected, insufficient inventory levels could result in
unfulfilled customer orders, loss of revenue and an unfavorable impact on
customer relationships. Failure to properly judge consumer demand and
properly manage inventory could have a material adverse effect on profitability
and liquidity.
An
increase in product returns could negatively impact the Company’s operating
results and profitability.
The
Company recognizes revenue as sales when merchandise is shipped and title
transfers to the customer. The Company permits the return of damaged
or defective products and accepts limited amounts of product returns in certain
instances. Accordingly, the Company provides allowances for the
estimated amounts of these returns at the time of revenue recognition based on
historical experience. While such returns have historically been
within management’s expectations and the provisions established, future return
rates may differ from those experienced in the past. Any significant
increase in damaged or defective products or expected returns could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results for the period or
periods in which such returns materialize. Additionally, in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company recorded a one-time accrual of $15.0
million related to estimated future sales returns associated with the
streamlining of the Movado brand wholesale distribution in the U.S. for the
planned reduction of approximately 1,400 wholesale customer doors.
The
Company’s business relies on the use of independent parties to manufacture its
products. Any loss of an independent manufacturer, or the Company’s
inability to deliver quality goods in a timely manner, could have an adverse
effect on customer relations, brand image, net sales and results of
operations.
The
Company employs a flexible manufacturing model that relies primarily on
independent manufacturers to meet shifts in marketplace demand. All such
independent manufacturers must achieve and maintain the Company’s high quality
standards and specifications. The inability of a manufacturer to ship
orders in a timely manner or to meet the Company’s high quality standards and
specifications could cause the Company to miss committed delivery dates with
customers, which could result in
cancellation
of the customers’ orders. In addition, delays in delivery of
satisfactory products could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
profitability, particularly if the delays cause the Company to be unable to
market certain products during the seasonal periods when its sales are typically
higher. See “Risk Factors – The Company’s business is seasonal, with
sales traditionally greater during certain holiday seasons, so events and
circumstances that adversely affect holiday consumer spending will have a
disproportionately adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.”
A majority of the Swiss watch movements used in the manufacture of Movado, Ebel,
Concord and ESQ watches are purchased from two suppliers, one of which is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of one of the Company’s
competitors. Additionally, the Company does not have long-term supply
commitments with its manufacturers and thus competes for production facilities
with other organizations, some of which are larger and have greater
resources. Any loss of an independent manufacturer, or the Company’s
inability to deliver quality goods in a timely manner, could have an adverse
effect on customer relations, brand image, net sales and results of
operations.
If the Company loses any of its
license agreements, there may be significant loss of revenues and a negative
effect on business.
The
Company has the right to produce, market and distribute watches under the brand
names of ESQ, Coach, Tommy Hilfiger, HUGO BOSS, Juicy Couture and LACOSTE
pursuant to license agreements with the respective owners of those
trademarks. There are certain minimum royalty payments as well as
other requirements associated with these agreements. Failure to meet
any of these requirements could result in the loss of the
license. Additionally, after the term of any license agreement has
concluded, the licensor may decide not to renew with the Company. Any
loss of one or more of the Company’s licenses could result in loss of future
revenues which could adversely affect its financial condition.
Changes
in the sales mix of the Company’s products could impact gross profit
margins.
The
individual brands that are sold by the Company are sold at a wide range of price
points and yield a variety of gross profit margins. Thus, the mix of
sales by brand can have an impact on the gross profit margins of the
Company. If the Company’s sales mix shifts unfavorably toward brands
with lower gross profit margins than the Company’s historical consolidated gross
profit margin or if the mix of business changes significantly in the Movado
Boutiques, it could have an adverse effect on the results of
operations.
The
Company’s business is seasonal, with sales traditionally greater during certain
holiday seasons, so events and circumstances that adversely affect holiday
consumer spending will have a disproportionately adverse effect on the Company’s
results of operations.
The
Company’s sales are seasonal by nature. The Company’s U.S. sales are
traditionally greater during the Christmas and holiday
season. Internationally, major selling seasons center on significant
local holidays that occur in late winter or early spring. The amount
of net sales and operating income generated during these seasons depends upon
the general level of retail sales at such times, as well as economic conditions
and other factors beyond the Company’s control. If events or
circumstances were to occur that negatively impact consumer spending during such
holiday seasons, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s sales,
profitability and results of operations.
Sale of the
Company’sproducts may be
adversely affected by negative economic
conditions.
The
Company’s products fall into categories that are considered discretionary
items. Consumer purchases of discretionary items can change due to
many economic and global factors. Declining confidence in the U.S. or
international economies, inflation, falling stock prices or home values, loss of
confidence in the banking or financial services industries, decreases in the
wealth of potential customers, rising interest costs, increased unemployment,
and taxation issues could adversely affect the level of available discretionary
income for consumers to spend. In particular, the Company experienced
lower sales and lower levels of post-holiday replenishment of inventories during
its 2008 fiscal year due to weakness in the U.S. economy. In
addition, events such as war, terrorism, natural disasters or outbreaks of
disease could further dampen consumer spending on discretionary
items. If any of these events should occur, the Company’s future
sales could decline.
Sales
in the Company’s retail stores are dependent upon customer foot
traffic.
The
success of the Company’s retail stores is, to a certain extent, dependent upon
the amount of customer foot traffic generated by the mall or outlet center in
which those stores are located. The majority of the Company’s Movado
Boutiques are located in upscale regional shopping centers throughout the United
States, while the Company’s outlet stores are located primarily near vacation
destinations. Factors that can affect customer foot traffic
include:
·
|
the
location of the mall;
|
·
|
the
location of the Company’s store within the
mall;
|
·
|
the
other tenants in the mall;
|
·
|
the
occupancy rate of the mall;
|
·
|
the
success of mall and tenant advertising to attract
customers;
|
·
|
increased
competition in areas surrounding the mall;
and
|
·
|
increased
competition from shopping over the internet and other alternatives such as
mail-order.
|
Additionally,
since a number of the Company’s outlet stores are located near vacation
destinations, factors that affect travel could decrease mall
traffic. Such factors include the price and supply of fuel, travel
concerns and restrictions, international instability, terrorism and inclement
weather.
A
reduction in foot traffic in relevant malls or shopping centers could have a
material adverse effect on retail sales and profitability.
If the Company
is
unable to successfully implement its growth strategies or manage its growing
business, its future operating results could suffer.
There are
certain risks involved as the Company continues expanding its business through
acquisitions, license agreements, joint ventures and new initiatives such as the
growing Movado Boutique business. There is risk involved with each of
these. Acquisitions and new license agreements require the Company to
ensure that new brands will successfully complement the other brands in its
portfolio. The Company assumes the risk that the new brand will not
be viewed by the public as favorably as its other brands. In
addition, the integration of an acquired company or licensed brand into the
Company’s existing business can strain the Company’s current infrastructure with
the additional work required and there can be no assurance that the integration
of acquisitions or licensed brands will be successful or that acquisitions or
licensed brands will generate sales increases. The Company needs to
ensure it has the
adequate
human resources and systems in place to allow for successful assimilation of new
businesses. The risk involved in growing the Movado Boutique business
is that the Company will not be able to successfully implement its business
model. In addition, the costs associated with leasehold improvements
to current Boutiques and the costs associated with opening new Boutiques could
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results
of operations. The inability to successfully implement its growth
strategies could adversely affect the Company’s future financial condition and
results of operations.
The
loss or infringement of the Company’s trademarks or other intellectual property
rights could have an adverse effect on future results of
operations.
The
Company believes that its trademarks and other intellectual property rights are
vital to the competitiveness and success of its business and therefore it takes
all appropriate actions to register and protect them. There can be no
assurance, however, that such actions will be adequate to prevent imitation of
the Company’s products or infringement of its intellectual property rights, or
that others will not challenge the Company’s rights, or that such rights will be
successfully defended. In addition, six of the Company’s nine brands
are subject to license agreements with third parties under which the Company is
required to make royalty payments and perform other
obligations. Default by the Company under any of these agreements
could result in the licensor terminating the agreement and the Company losing
its rights under the license. Moreover, the laws of some foreign
countries, including some in which the Company sells its products, may not
protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the
United States, which could make it more difficult to successfully defend such
challenges to them. The Company’s inability to obtain or maintain
rights in its trademarks, including its licensed marks, could have an adverse
effect on brand image and future results of operations.
Fluctuations
in the pricing of commodities or the cost of labor could adversely affect the
Company’s ability to produce products at favorable prices.
Some of
the Company’s higher-end watch offerings are made with materials such as
diamonds, precious metals and gold. The Company’s proprietary jewelry
is manufactured with silver, gold and platinum, semi-precious and precious
stones, and diamonds. The Company relies on independent contractors
to manufacture and assemble the majority of its watch brands and its entire
jewelry offering. A significant change in the prices of these
commodities or the cost of third-party labor could adversely affect the
Company’s business by:
|
·
|
reducing
gross profit margins;
|
|
·
|
forcing
an increase in suggested retail prices; which could lead to
|
|
·
|
decreasing
consumer demand; which could lead to
|
|
·
|
higher
inventory levels.
|
Any and
all of the above events could adversely affect the Company’s future cash flow
and results of operations.
The
Company’s business is subject to foreign currency exchange rate
risk.
The
majority of the Company’s inventory purchases are denominated in Swiss
francs. The Company operates under a hedging program which utilizes
forward exchange contracts and purchased foreign currency options to mitigate
foreign currency risk. If these hedge instruments are unsuccessful
at
minimizing
the risk or are deemed ineffective, any fluctuation of the Swiss franc exchange
rate could impact the future results of operations. Changes in
currency exchange rates may also affect relative prices at which the Company and
its foreign competitors sell products in the same market. A portion
of the Company’s net sales are derived from international subsidiaries and are
denominated in Canadian dollars, Swiss francs, Euros, Hong Kong dollars,
Singapore dollars, Japanese yen and British pounds. Future revenues
derived in these currencies could be affected by currency
fluctuations. Furthermore, since the Company’s consolidated financial
statements are presented in U.S. dollars, revenues, income and expenses, as well
as assets and liabilities of foreign currency denominated subsidiaries must be
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of
each reporting period. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
could adversely affect the Company’s reported earnings, financial position and
the comparability of results of operations from period to period.
The
Grinberg family owns a majority of the voting power of the Company’s
stock.
Each
share of common stock of the Company is entitled to one vote per share while
each share of Class A Common Stock of the Company is entitled to ten votes per
share. While the members of the Grinberg family do not own a majority
of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, by their significant holdings of
Class A Common Stock they control a majority of the voting power represented by
all outstanding shares of both classes of stock. Consequently, the
Grinberg family is in a position to significantly influence any matters that are
brought to a vote of the shareholders including, but not limited to, the
election of the board of directors and any action requiring the approval of
shareholders, including any amendments to the Company’s certificate of
incorporation, mergers or sales of all or substantially all of the Company’s
assets. This concentration of ownership also may delay, defer or even prevent a
change in control of the Company and make some transactions more difficult or
impossible without the support of the Grinberg family. These transactions might
include proxy contests, tender offers, mergers or other purchases of common
stock that could give stockholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the
then-prevailing market price for shares of the Company’s Common
Stock.
The
Company’s stock price could fluctuate and possibly decline due to changes in
revenue, operating results and cash flow.
The
Company’s revenue, results of operations and cash flow can be affected by
several factors, some of which are not within its control. Those
factors include, but are not limited to, those described as risk factors in this
Item 1A and under “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 1.
Any or
all of these factors could cause a decline in revenues or increased expenses,
both of which could have an adverse effect on the results of
operations. If the Company’s earnings failed to meet the expectations
of the public in any given period, the Company’s stock price could fluctuate and
possibly decline.
If
the Company were to lose its relationship with any of its key customers or
distributors or any of such customers or distributors were to experience
financial difficulties, there may be a significant loss of revenue and operating
results.
The
Company’s customer base covers a wide range of distribution including national
jewelry store chains, department stores, independent regional jewelers, licensed
partner retail stores and a network of distributors in many countries throughout
the world. The Company does not have long-term purchase contracts with its
customers, nor does it have a significant backlog of unfilled orders.
Customer
purchasing
decisions could vary with each selling season. A material change in the
Company’s customers’ purchasing decisions could have an adverse effect on its
revenue and operating results.
As part
of the Company’s new Movado brand strategy, the Company is in the process of
streamlining the Movado brand wholesale distribution in the United States from
4,000 wholesale customer doors to approximately 2,600 doors, representing a 35%
reduction, by the close of its fiscal year ending January 31,
2009. Included in the strategy are wholesale customers that will
continue to do business with the Company through their more profitable
doors. There is a risk that these customers will have a negative
response to the strategy of reducing their number of doors that can sell Movado
brand products. This could potentially damage current
relationships and hinder future business done with these customers.
The
Company extends credit to its customers based on an evaluation of each
customer's financial condition usually without requiring collateral. Should any
of the Company’s larger customers experience financial difficulties, it could
result in the Company’s curtailing doing business with them or an increase in
its exposure related to its accounts receivable. The inability to collect on
these receivables could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial
results.
The
Company’s wholesale business could be negatively affected by changes of
ownership and consolidation in the retail industry.
A large
portion of the Company’s U.S. wholesale business is derived from major jewelry
store chains and department stores. In recent years, the retail
industry has experienced changes in ownership and consolidations, none of which
has had a material effect on the Company’s wholesale business. Future
reorganizations, changes of ownership and consolidations could reduce the number
of retail doors in which the Company’s products are sold and could increase the
concentration of sales for any customers involved in such
transactions. Future changes of ownership and structure in the retail
industry may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s wholesale
business.
If
the Company were to lose key members of management or be unable to attract and
retain the talent required for the business, operating results could
suffer.
The
Company’s ability to execute key operating initiatives as well as to deliver
product and marketing concepts appealing to target consumers depends largely on
the efforts and abilities of key executives and senior management’s
competencies. The unexpected loss of one or more of these individuals
could have an adverse effect on the future business. The Company cannot
guarantee that it will be able to attract and retain the talent and skills
needed in the future.
If
the Company were unable to maintain existing space or to lease new space for its
retail stores in prime mall locations or be unable to complete construction on a
timely basis, the Company’s ability to achieve profitable results in the retail
business could be adversely affected.
The
Company’s strategy to create a Movado lifestyle image and build retail presence
with product assortments that complement successful wholesale watch distribution
is a key element in the Company’s Movado Boutique business plan. The
Company’s outlet stores are multi-branded and serve solely as an effective
vehicle to sell discontinued models and factory seconds of all of the Company’s
watches, jewelry and accessories. The Company’s Boutiques and outlet
stores are strategically located, respectively, in top malls throughout the
United States and outlet centers located primarily near vacation
destinations. If the Company could not maintain and secure locations
in the prime malls and outlet centers for both the Movado Boutiques and outlet
businesses, it could jeopardize the operations of the
stores
and business plans for the future. Additionally, if the Company could not
complete construction in new stores within the planned timeframes, cost overruns
and lost revenue could adversely affect the profitability of the retail
segment.
If
the Company could not secure financing and credit with favorable terms, the
Company could suffer high borrowing costs which could impact financial
results.
The
Company has been able to secure financing and credit facilities with very
favorable terms due to the Company’s financial stability and good relationships
with its lending partners. If conditions were to change such that the Company
was unable to comply with any of the covenants in its lending agreements or if
relationships were to deteriorate, borrowing rates could increase and have an
adverse effect on financial results.
A
significant portion of the Company’s business is conducted outside of the United
States. Many factors affecting business activities outside the United
States could adversely impact this business.
The
Company produces all of its watches and a portion of its proprietary jewelry
outside the United States and primarily in Europe and Asia. The Company also
generates approximately 41% of its revenue from international sources. Factors
that could affect the business activity vary by region and market and generally
include without limitation:
|
·
|
changes
in social, political and/or economic conditions that could disrupt the
trade activity in the countries where the Company’s manufacturers,
suppliers and customers are located;
|
|
·
|
the
imposition of additional duties, taxes and other charges on imports and
exports;
|
|
·
|
changes
in foreign laws and regulations;
|
|
·
|
the
adoption or expansion of trade sanctions; and
|
|
·
|
a
significant change in currency valuation in specific countries or markets.
|
The
occurrence or consequences of any of these risks could affect the Company’s
ability to operate in the affected regions. This could have an adverse effect on
the Company’s financial results.
The
Company is in the process of implementing a new business enterprise system. If
not successfully implemented, it could disrupt the Company’s operations and data
retrieval process.
The
Company is in the process of implementing SAP which is an end-to-end business
enterprise solution as the core enterprise system. The implementation
of SAP will support the Company’s growth strategy and integrate its global
sourcing, wholesale and retail operations, consolidating the business operating
systems into a single platform. The majority of the Company’s
subsidiaries will be migrating from the current systems to SAP for all areas
including finance, supply chain, sales and distribution, human resources,
quality control and customer service. The point-of-sale and inventory
systems of the retail segment will be implemented separately. Some
difficulties may occur during the migration from the existing systems to this
new platform. If not successfully implemented, the Company’s
operations could be disrupted, and its ability to retrieve data, produce and
ship products on a timely basis could be adversely affected, all of which could
have an adverse effect on financial results. Additionally, if the Company is unable
to implement SAP within its planned time frame it could incur costs above what
was originally planned, causing increased capital expenditures and higher
capitalized costs to be depreciated over the useful life of the
system.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
The
Company leases various facilities in North America, Europe, the Middle East and
Asia for its corporate, manufacturing, distribution and sales operations. As of
January 31, 2008, the Company’s leased facilities were as follows:
Location
|
Function
|
Square
Footage
|
Lease
Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
Moonachie,
New Jersey
|
Watch
assembly, distribution and repair
|
100,000
|
May
2010
|
Paramus,
New Jersey
|
Executive
offices
|
99,000
|
June
2013
|
Bienne,
Switzerland
|
Corporate
functions, watch sales, distribution, assembly and repair
|
53,560
|
January
2012
|
Kowloon,
Hong Kong
|
Watch
sales, distribution and repair
|
13,960
|
March
2013
|
Villers
le Lac, France
|
European
service and watch distribution
|
12,800
|
January
2015
|
New
York, New York
|
Public
relations office, licensed brand showroom
|
12,600
|
August
2016
|
Markham,
Canada
|
Office,
distribution and repair
|
11,200
|
August
2012
|
ChangAn
Dongguan, China
|
Quality
control and engineering
|
7,535
|
March
2009
|
Hackensack,
New Jersey
|
Warehouse
|
6,600
|
August
2008
|
Munich,
Germany
|
Watch
sales
|
4,290
|
January
2012
|
Tokyo,
Japan
|
Watch
sales
|
2,970
|
July
2010
|
Grenchen,
Switzerland
|
Watch
sales
|
2,800
|
December
2008
|
Coral
Gables, Florida
|
Caribbean
office, watch sales
|
2,340
|
January
2012
|
Singapore
|
Watch
sales, distribution and repair
|
1,330
|
August
2008
|
Shanghai,
China
|
Public
relations office
|
1,100
|
June
2008
|
Crown
House, United Kingdom
|
Watch
sales
|
850
|
February
2008
|
Dubai,
United Arab Emirates
|
Watch
sales
|
730
|
July
2008
|
All of
the foregoing facilities are used exclusively in connection with the wholesale
segment of the Company’s business except that a portion of the Company’s
executive office space in Paramus, New Jersey is used in connection with
management of its retail business.
The
Company owns three properties totaling approximately 40,400 square feet located
in La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland used for manufacturing, storage and public
relations. In addition, the Company acquired an architecturally
significant building in La Chaux-de-Fonds in 2004 as part of its acquisition of
Ebel.
The
Company also owns approximately 2,500 square feet of office space in Hanau,
Germany, which it previously used for sales, distribution and watch repair
functions.
The
Company also leases retail space for the operation of 30 Movado Boutiques in the
United States, each of which averages 2,200 square feet per store with leases
expiring from August 2008 to June 2017. In addition, the Company
leases retail space averaging 1,700 square feet per store with leases
expiring
from
April 2008 to February 2018 for the operation of the Company’s 32 outlet stores
in the United States.
The
Company believes that its existing facilities are suitable and adequate for its
current operations.
Item
3. Legal Proceedings
The
Company is involved in certain legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
its business. The Company believes that none of these proceedings,
either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s operating results, liquidity or its financial
position.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No
matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
PART
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
As of
March 14, 2008, there were 45 holders of record of Class A Common Stock and, the
Company estimates, 10,100 beneficial owners of the Common Stock represented by
465 holders of record. The Common Stock is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol “MOV” and on March 14, 2008, the closing price
of the Common Stock was $17.62. The quarterly high and low split-adjusted
closing prices for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January
31, 2008
|
|
|
January
31, 2007
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
30
|
|
$ |
27.53 |
|
|
$ |
34.58 |
|
|
$ |
19.37 |
|
|
$ |
24.47 |
|
July
31
|
|
$ |
28.24 |
|
|
$ |
34.66 |
|
|
$ |
18.10 |
|
|
$ |
23.71 |
|
October
31
|
|
$ |
27.55 |
|
|
$ |
34.48 |
|
|
$ |
21.26 |
|
|
$ |
27.27 |
|
January
31
|
|
$ |
21.41 |
|
|
$ |
30.97 |
|
|
$ |
24.59 |
|
|
$ |
29.01 |
|
In
connection with the October 7, 1993 public offering, each share of the then
currently existing Class A Common Stock was converted into 10.46 shares of new
Class A Common Stock, par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class A Common
Stock”). Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share
and each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to 10 votes per share on all
matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders. Each holder of Class
A Common Stock is entitled to convert, at any time, any and all such shares into
the same number of shares of Common Stock. Each share of Class A
Common Stock is converted automatically into Common Stock in the event that the
beneficial or record ownership of such shares of Class A Common Stock is
transferred to any person, except to certain family members or affiliated
persons deemed “permitted transferees” pursuant to the Company’s Restated
Certificate of Incorporation as amended. The Class A Common Stock is not
publicly traded and consequently, there is currently no established public
trading market for these shares.
On March
27, 2007, the Board approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend rate
from $0.06 to $0.08 per share. The declaration and payment of future
dividends, if any, will be at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and
will depend upon the Company’s profitability, financial condition, capital and
surplus requirements, future prospects, terms of indebtedness and other factors
deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. See Notes 4 and 5 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding contractual restrictions on the
Company’s ability to pay dividends.
On
December 4, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up
to one million shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Shares of Common
Stock will be repurchased from time to time as market conditions warrant either
through open market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or other
means. No time limit has been set for the completion of the program.
The objective of the program is to reduce or eliminate earnings per share
dilution caused by the shares of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock
options and in connection with other equity based compensation
plans. Under this share repurchase program, the Company has
repurchased a total of 43,957 shares of Common Stock in the open market, all of
which were repurchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2008.
The
following table summarizes information about the Company’s purchases during the
year ended January 31, 2008 of equity securities that are registered by the
Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934:
Issuer
Repurchase of Equity Securities
|
|
Period
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
|
|
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs
|
|
April
1, 2007 - April 31, 2007
|
|
|
28,660 |
|
|
$ |
30.16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
June
1, 2007 - June 30, 2007
|
|
|
78,797 |
|
|
$ |
34.16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
October
1, 2007 - October 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
$ |
30.21 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
January
1, 2008 - January 31, 2008
|
|
|
43,957 |
|
|
$ |
23.39 |
|
|
|
43,957 |
|
|
|
956,043 |
|
In
addition to the 43,957 shares of Common Stock repurchased pursuant to the
Company’s share repurchase program, an aggregate of 108,468 shares of Common
Stock were repurchased during fiscal year 2008 which reflects the surrender of
shares of Common Stock in connection with the vesting of certain restricted
stock awards and the exercise of certain stock options. At the
election of an employee, shares of Common Stock having an aggregate value on the
vesting date of a stock award equal to the employee’s withholding tax obligation
may be surrendered to the Company.
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The
performance graph set forth below compares the cumulative total shareholder
return of the Company’s Common Stock for the last five fiscal years through the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 with that of the Broad Market (NYSE Stock
Market – US Companies), a peer group index used by the Company in its preceding
fiscal year ("old peer group") consisting of: Fossil, Inc. and Tiffany &
Co., the S&P SmallCap 600 index and the Russell 2000 index. The
Company will no longer use the old peer group as a comparison and instead, will
use the S&P SmallCap 600 and Russell 2000 indices. The Company
believes that a comparison with the performance of the old peer group is not
meaningful because the old peer group consisted of only two other
companies. The S&P SmallCap 600 and Russell 2000 indices provide a
better comparison to a collection of companies with similar market
capitalization to that of the Company. The returns of each company in
the old peer group index have been weighted according to the respective issuer’s
stock market capitalization. Each index assumes an initial investment of
$100 on January 31, 2003 and the reinvestment of dividends (where
applicable).
Company
Name / Index
|
|
1/31/03
|
|
|
1/31/04
|
|
|
1/31/05
|
|
|
1/31/06
|
|
|
1/31/07
|
|
|
1/31/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movado
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
156.9 |
|
|
|
202.5 |
|
|
|
212.2 |
|
|
|
325.7 |
|
|
|
277.9 |
|
NYSE
(U.S. Companies)
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
143.5 |
|
|
|
160.8 |
|
|
|
185.9 |
|
|
|
180.3 |
|
Old
Peer Group*
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
168.4 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
170.6 |
|
|
|
175.4 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
S&P
SmallCap 600 Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
147.9 |
|
|
|
172.3 |
|
|
|
205.7 |
|
|
|
223.0 |
|
|
|
207.2 |
|
Russell
2000 Index
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
158.0 |
|
|
|
171.7 |
|
|
|
204.2 |
|
|
|
225.5 |
|
|
|
203.4 |
|
*Companies
in Self-Determined Old Peer Group:
Fossil,
Inc.
Tiffany & Co.
Item
6. Selected Financial Data
The
selected financial data presented below has been derived from the Consolidated
Financial Statements. This information should be read in conjunction
with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Consolidated Financial Statements
and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation” contained in Item 7 of this report. Amounts are in
thousands except per share amounts:
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Statement
of income data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales (1)
|
|
$ |
559,550 |
|
|
$ |
532,865 |
|
|
$ |
470,941 |
|
|
$ |
418,966 |
|
|
$ |
330,214 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
222,868 |
|
|
|
209,922 |
|
|
|
184,621 |
|
|
|
168,818 |
|
|
|
129,908 |
|
Gross
profit (1)
|
|
|
336,682 |
|
|
|
322,943 |
|
|
|
286,320 |
|
|
|
250,148 |
|
|
|
200,306 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative (2) (3)
|
|
|
285,905 |
|
|
|
270,624 |
|
|
|
238,283 |
|
|
|
215,072 |
|
|
|
165,525 |
|
Operating
income (1) (2) (3)
|
|
|
50,777 |
|
|
|
52,319 |
|
|
|
48,037 |
|
|
|
35,076 |
|
|
|
34,781 |
|
Other
income, net (4) (5) (6)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(3,472 |
) |
|
|
(3,785 |
) |
|
|
(4,574 |
) |
|
|
(3,544 |
) |
|
|
(3,232 |
) |
Interest
income
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Income
before taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
51,971 |
|
|
|
53,161 |
|
|
|
44,936 |
|
|
|
33,090 |
|
|
|
31,737 |
|
(Benefit)/provision
for income taxes (7) (8) (9) (10)
|
|
|
(9,471 |
) |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
18,319 |
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
8,886 |
|
Minority
interests
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
60,805 |
|
|
$ |
50,138 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
$ |
26,307 |
|
|
$ |
22,851 |
|
Net
income per share-Basic (11)
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
Net
income per share-Diluted (11)
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Basic
shares outstanding (11)
|
|
|
26,049 |
|
|
|
25,670 |
|
|
|
25,273 |
|
|
|
24,708 |
|
|
|
24,101 |
|
Diluted
shares outstanding (11)
|
|
|
27,293 |
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
25,583 |
|
|
|
24,877 |
|
Cash
dividends declared per share (11)
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.105 |
|
Balance
sheet data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital (12)
|
|
$ |
419,632 |
|
|
$ |
383,422 |
|
|
$ |
366,530 |
|
|
$ |
303,225 |
|
|
$ |
252,883 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
646,216 |
|
|
$ |
577,618 |
|
|
$ |
549,919 |
|
|
$ |
477,074 |
|
|
$ |
390,967 |
|
Total
long-term debt
|
|
$ |
60,895 |
|
|
$ |
80,196 |
|
|
$ |
109,955 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
$ |
463,195 |
|
|
$ |
378,381 |
|
|
$ |
321,678 |
|
|
$ |
316,557 |
|
|
$ |
274,713 |
|
(1)
|
Fiscal
2008 net sales includes a non-cash charge for estimated returns in the
amount of $15.0 million and gross profit and operating income include a
non-cash charge of $11.0 million, related to the closing of certain
wholesale customer doors in the U.S.
|
(2)
|
Fiscal
2007 includes a one-time benefit of $2.2 million for an out-of-period
adjustment related to foreign currency.
|
(3)
|
Fiscal
2005 includes a non-cash impairment charge of $2.0 million recorded in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
|
(4)
|
The
fiscal 2007 other income consists of a pre-tax gain of $0.8 million on the
sale of artwork, a pre-tax gain of $0.4 million on the sale of a building
and a pre-tax gain of $0.1 million on the sale of rights to a web domain
name.
|
(5)
|
The
fiscal 2006 other income consists of a pre-tax gain of $2.6 million on the
sale of a building offset by a pre-tax loss of $1.6 million representing
the impact of the discontinuation of foreign currency cash flow hedges
because it was not probable that the forecasted transactions would occur
by the end of the originally specified time period.
|
(6)
|
The
fiscal 2005 other income consists of a $1.4 million litigation settlement.
|
(7)
|
The
fiscal 2008 effective tax benefit of $9.5 million or rate of -18.2%,
reflects a result of the recognition of previously unrecognized tax
benefits due to the settlement of the IRS audit for fiscal years 2004
through 2006 ($12.5 million) and the release of valuation allowances in
whole or part on Swiss, German and UK tax losses ($7.6 million).
|
(8)
|
The
fiscal 2007 effective tax rate of 5.4% reflects a partial release of the
valuation allowance on Swiss tax losses.
|
(9)
|
The
fiscal 2006 effective tax rate of 40.8% reflects a tax charge of $7.5
million associated with repatriated foreign earnings under the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
|
(10)
|
The
fiscal 2005 effective tax rate of 20.5% reflects the adjustments in the
fourth quarter relating to refunds from a retroactive Swiss tax ruling and
a favorable U.S. tax accrual adjustment.
|
(11)
|
For
all periods presented, basic and diluted shares outstanding, and the
related “per share” amounts reflect the effect of the fiscal 2005
two-for-one stock split.
|
(12)
|
The
Company defines working capital as current assets less current
liabilities.
|
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation
GENERAL
Net sales. The
Company operates and manages its business in two principal business segments –
Wholesale and Retail. The Company also operates in two geographic
segments – United States and International. The Company divides its
watch brands into three distinct categories: luxury, accessible luxury and
licensed brands. The luxury category consists of the Ebel and Concord
brands. The accessible luxury category consists of the Movado and ESQ
brands. The licensed brands category represents brands distributed
under license agreements and includes Coach, HUGO BOSS, Juicy Couture, LACOSTE
and Tommy Hilfiger.
The
primary factors that influence annual sales are general economic conditions in
the Company’s U.S. and international markets, new product introductions, the
level and effectiveness of advertising and marketing expenditures and product
pricing decisions.
Approximately
41% of the Company’s total sales are from international markets and therefore
reported sales made in those markets are affected by foreign exchange rates. The
Company’s international sales are billed in local currencies (predominantly
Euros and Swiss francs) and translated to U.S. dollars at average exchange rates
for financial reporting purposes. With the acquisition of Ebel in March of 2004,
and the international market expansion of the Company’s licensed brands, the
Company expects that a higher percentage of its total sales will be derived from
international markets in the future.
The
Company’s business is seasonal. There are two major selling seasons
in the Company’s markets: the spring season, which includes school graduations
and several holidays and, most importantly, the Christmas and holiday season.
Major selling seasons in certain international markets center on significant
local holidays that occur in late winter or early spring. The
Company’s net sales historically have been higher during the second half of the
fiscal year. The second half of the fiscal year ended January 31,
2008 accounted for 57.0% of the Company’s net sales.
The
Company’s retail operations consist of 30 Movado Boutiques and 32 outlet stores
located throughout the United States. The Company does not have any retail
operations outside of the United States.
The
significant factors that influence annual sales volumes in the Company’s retail
operations are similar to those that influence U.S. wholesale
sales. In addition, many of the Company’s outlet stores are located
near vacation destinations and, therefore, the seasonality of these stores is
driven by the peak tourist seasons associated with these locations.
As part
of the Company’s new Movado brand strategy, the Company is in the process of
streamlining the Movado brand wholesale distribution in the United States from
4,000 wholesale customer doors to approximately 2,600 doors, representing a 35%
reduction, by the close of its fiscal year ending January 31,
2009. These least productive doors represented approximately $10.0
million of Movado brand sales during the year ended January 31, 2008, or less
than 5% of the overall brand’s revenue and less than 2% of the Company’s
consolidated revenue. The Company recorded a one-time accrual of $15.0
million during its 2008 fiscal year related to future sales returns associated
with the reduction of these wholesale customer doors. See “Item 1.
Business – Recent Developments.”
Gross Margins. The
Company’s overall gross margins are primarily affected by four major factors:
brand and product sales mix, product pricing strategy, manufacturing costs and
fluctuation in currency rates, in particular the relationship between the U.S.
dollar and the Swiss franc and the Euro. Gross margins for the
Company may not be comparable to those of other companies, since some companies
include all the costs related to their distribution networks in cost of sales
whereas the Company does not include the costs associated with its U.S. and Asia
warehousing and distribution facilities nor the occupancy costs for the retail
segment in the cost of sales line item.
Gross
margins vary among the brands included in the Company’s portfolio and also among
watch models within each brand. Watches in the luxury category
generally earn lower gross margin percentages than watches in the accessible
luxury category. Gross margins in the Company’s outlet business are
lower than those of the wholesale business since the outlets primarily sell
seconds and discontinued models that generally command lower selling
prices. Gross margins in the Movado Boutiques are affected by the mix
of product sold. The margins from the sale of watches are greater
than those from the sale of jewelry and accessories. Gross margins
from the sale of watches in the Movado Boutiques also exceed those of the
wholesale business since the Company earns margins from manufacture to point of
sale to the consumer.
All of
the Company’s brands compete with a number of other brands on the basis of not
only styling but also wholesale and retail price. The Company’s
ability to improve margins through price increases is therefore, to some extent,
constrained by competitors’ actions.
Costs of
sales of the Company’s products consist primarily of component costs, assembly
costs and unit overhead costs associated with the Company’s supply chain
operations in Switzerland and Asia. The Company’s supply chain
operations consist of logistics management of assembly operations and product
sourcing in Switzerland and Asia and assembly in Switzerland. Through
productivity improvement efforts, the Company has controlled the level of
overhead costs and maintained flexibility in its cost structure by outsourcing a
significant portion of its component and assembly requirements.
Since a
substantial amount of the Company’s product costs are incurred in Swiss francs,
fluctuations in the U.S. dollar/Swiss franc exchange rate can impact the
Company’s cost of goods sold and, therefore, its gross margins. The
Company hedges its Swiss franc purchases using a combination of forward
contracts, purchased currency options and spot purchases. The
Company’s hedging program had the effect of minimizing the exchange rate impact
on product costs and gross margins.
Selling, General and Administrative
(“SG&A”) Expenses. The Company’s SG&A expenses consist primarily
of marketing, selling, distribution and general and administrative
expenses. Annual marketing expenditures are based principally on
overall strategic considerations relative to maintaining or increasing market
share in markets that management considers to be crucial to the Company’s
continued success as well as on general economic conditions in the various
markets around the world in which the Company sells its products. Marketing
expenses include various forms of media advertising, co-operative advertising
with customers and distributors and other point-of-sale marketing and promotion
spending.
Selling
expenses consist primarily of salaries, sales commissions, sales force travel
and related expenses, expenses associated with Baselworld, the annual watch and
jewelry trade show and other industry trade shows and operating costs incurred
in connection with the Company’s retail business. Sales commissions vary with
overall sales levels. Retail selling expenses consist primarily of payroll
related and store occupancy costs.
Distribution
expenses consist primarily of salaries of distribution staff, rental and other
occupancy costs, security, depreciation and amortization of furniture and
leasehold improvements and shipping supplies.
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other employee
compensation, employee benefit plan costs, office rent, management information
systems costs, professional fees, bad debts, depreciation and amortization of
furniture and leasehold improvements, patent and trademark expenses and various
other general corporate expenses.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and those
significant policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of these financial
statements and the application of certain critical accounting policies require
management to make judgments based on estimates and assumptions that affect the
information reported. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates
and judgments, including those related to sales discounts and markdowns, product
returns, bad debt, inventories, income taxes, warranty obligations, and
contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources on historical experience, contractual
commitments and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates. Management believes the following are the critical
accounting policies requiring significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
In the
wholesale segment, the Company recognizes revenue upon transfer of title and
risk of loss in accordance with its FOB shipping point terms of sale and after
the sales price is fixed and determinable and collectibility is reasonably
assured. In the retail segment, transfer of title and risk of loss
occurs at the time of register receipt. The Company records estimates
for sales returns, volume-based programs and sales and cash discount allowances
as a reduction of revenue in the same period that the sales are
recorded. These estimates are based upon historical analysis,
customer agreements and/or currently known factors that arise in the normal
course of business. While returns have historically been within our
expectations and the provisions established, future return rates may differ from
those experienced in the past. In the event that returns are
authorized at a rate significantly higher than our historic rate, the resulting
returns could have an adverse impact on our operating results for the period in
which such results materialize. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008,
the Company recorded a one-time charge of $15.0 million related to estimated
future sales returns associated with the streamlining of the Movado brand
wholesale distribution in the U.S. for the planned reduction of approximately
1,400 wholesale customer doors.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts
receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may be uncollectible in
the future. Estimates are used in determining the allowance for doubtful
accounts and are based on an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable,
assessments of collectibility based on historic trends, the financial condition
of the Company’s customers and an evaluation of economic conditions.
During fiscal 2007, as a result of a change in these estimates, the Company
recorded a charge to allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $6.0
million. In general, while the actual bad debt losses have
historically
been
within the Company’s expectations and the allowances established, there can be
no guarantee that the Company will continue to experience the same bad debt loss
rates in the future. As of January 31, 2008, except for those accounts provided
for in the reserve for doubtful accounts, the Company knew of no situations with
any of the Company’s major customers which would indicate the customer’s
inability to make their required payments.
Inventories
The
Company values its inventory at the lower of cost or market. The
Company’s U.S. inventory is valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. The cost of finished goods and component inventories, held by
international subsidiaries, are determined using average cost. The Company’s
management regularly reviews its sales to customers and customers’ sell through
at retail to evaluate the adequacy of inventory reserves. Inventory with less
than acceptable turn rates is classified as discontinued and, together with the
related component parts which can be assembled into saleable finished goods, is
sold primarily through the Company’s outlet stores. When management determines
that finished product is unsaleable or that it is impractical to build the
remaining components into watches for sale, a reserve is established for the
cost of those products and components to value the inventory at the lower of
cost or market. During the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company conducted an in depth review of all its discontinued components and
watches. In doing so, the Company identified what it projected to be
excess quantities of discontinued products beyond what it believed to be
reasonable supplies for sale through its outlets or other promotional
distribution. As a result, the Company engaged in a liquidation
through an independent third party to sell the excess product for
cash. In addition, where it was not deemed economically feasible to
invest the time, effort and/or cost, the Company initiated efforts to cleanse
the inventory and scrap the product. The Company’s estimates, based
on which it establishes its inventory reserves, could vary significantly, either
favorably or unfavorably, from actual requirements depending on future economic
conditions, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions.
Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company periodically reviews the estimated useful lives of its depreciable
assets based on factors including historical experience, the expected beneficial
service period of the asset, the quality and durability of the asset and the
Company’s maintenance policy including periodic upgrades. Changes in useful
lives are made on a prospective basis unless factors indicate the carrying
amounts of the assets may not be recoverable and an impairment write-down is
necessary.
The
Company performs an impairment review, at a minimum, on an annual
basis. However, the Company will review its long-lived assets for
impairment once events or changes in circumstances indicate, in management's
judgment, that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets”. When such a determination has been made, management compares
the carrying value of the assets with their estimated future undiscounted cash
flows. If it is determined that an impairment loss has occurred, the loss is
recognized during that period. The impairment loss is calculated as the
difference between asset carrying values and the fair value of the long-lived
assets.
During
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company performed the reviews, which resulted in
no impairment charges.
Warranties
All
watches sold by the Company come with limited warranties covering the movement
against defects in material and workmanship for periods ranging from two to
three years from the date of purchase, with the exception of Tommy Hilfiger
watches, for which the warranty period is ten years. In addition, the
warranty period is five years for the gold plating on certain Movado watch cases
and bracelets. The Company records an estimate for future warranty
costs based on historical repair costs. Warranty costs have
historically been within the Company’s expectations and the provisions
established. If such costs were to substantially exceed estimates, this could
have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On
February 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
“Share-Based Payment”, electing to use the modified prospective application
transition method, and accordingly, prior period financial statements have not
been restated. Under this method, the fair value of all stock
options granted after adoption and the unvested portion of previously granted
awards must be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Income. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
to calculate the fair value of each option at the grant date which requires that
certain assumptions be made. The expected life of stock option grants
is determined using historical data and represents the time period which the
stock option is expected to be outstanding until it is exercised. The
risk free interest rate is the yield on the grant date of U.S. Treasury constant
maturities with a maturity date closest to the expected life of the stock
option. The expected stock price volatility is derived from
historical volatility and calculated based on the estimated term structure of
the stock option grant. The expected dividend yield is calculated
using the expected annualized dividend which remains constant during the
expected term of the option.
Income
Taxes
The
Company follows SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No.
109"). Under the asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax laws
and tax rates in each jurisdiction where the Company operates, and applied to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities due
to a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. In addition, the amounts of any future tax benefits are reduced
by a valuation allowance to the extent such benefits are not expected to be
realized on a more-likely-than-not basis. The Company calculates estimated
income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process
involves estimating actual current tax expense along with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items for both book and tax
purposes.
The
Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes"
(“FIN 48”), on February 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements
in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosures and transitions. The
Company
previously recognized income tax positions based on management’s estimate of
whether it was reasonably possible that a liability had been incurred for
unrecognized tax benefits by applying SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. The provisions of FIN 48 became effective for the
Company on February 1, 2007. For additional information related to
income taxes see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following is a discussion of the results of operations for fiscal 2008 compared
to fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 along with a discussion
of the changes in financial condition during fiscal 2008.
The
following are net sales by business segment (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Wholesale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
232,828 |
|
|
$ |
276,988 |
|
|
$ |
241,379 |
|
International
|
|
|
231,338 |
|
|
|
166,209 |
|
|
|
144,004 |
|
Retail
|
|
|
95,384 |
|
|
|
89,668 |
|
|
|
85,558 |
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
559,550 |
|
|
$ |
532,865 |
|
|
$ |
470,941 |
|
The
following table presents the Company’s results of operations expressed as a
percentage of net sales for the fiscal years indicated:
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
%
of net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross
margin
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
60.8 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
50.6 |
% |
Operating
income
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
Other
income
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Interest
income
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
(Benefit)/
provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Minority
interests
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Net
income
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net
Sales
Net sales
in fiscal 2008 were $559.6 million, above prior year by $26.7 million or
5.0%. For the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, liquidation
sales of excess discontinued inventory were $31.1 million and $16.6 million,
respectively. In addition, net sales in fiscal 2008 include a
one-time charge of $15.0
million
related to estimated future sales returns associated with the streamlining of
the Movado brand wholesale distribution in the U.S. for the planned reduction of
approximately 1,400 wholesale customer doors. Excluding the
liquidation of excess discontinued inventory in both periods and the charge for
the planned reduction of approximately 1,400 wholesale customer doors in fiscal
2008, net sales were $543.3 million, representing an increase of $27.0 million,
or 5.2% over prior year.
United
States Wholesale Net Sales
Net sales
in the U.S. wholesale segment were $232.8 million, representing a 15.9% decrease
from prior year sales of $277.0 million. The decrease of $44.2
million was primarily due to lower sales in the accessible luxury category of
$37.7 million or 19.1% over the prior year. The lower sales is
attributable to a $20.5 million reduction in volume, which was primarily the
result of lower holiday replenishment sales, a one-time charge of $15.0 million
related to estimated future sales returns and lower liquidation sales of excess
discontinued inventory of $2.2 million. Additionally, lower sales
were recorded in the luxury category of $7.1 million due to the repositioning of
the Concord brand. The licensed brand category was flat year on
year.
International
Wholesale Net Sales
Net sales
in the international wholesale segment were $231.3 million, representing a 39.2%
increase over prior year sales of $166.2 million. All categories were
above prior year. The licensed brand category was above prior year by
$37.3 million or 63.1%. This increase was primarily the result of
market expansion in the HUGO BOSS and Tommy Hilfiger brands, as well as the
launches of the LACOSTE and Juicy Couture brands. The luxury category
was above prior year by $22.3 million or 37.9%. This increase was
primarily due to higher liquidation sales of excess discontinued inventory of
$17.0 million, as well as sales increases in the Ebel brand primarily due to
sales of new product introductions. As a result of the weak U.S.
dollar, international wholesale net sales increased by $13.2
million.
Retail
Net Sales
Net sales
in the retail segment were $95.4 million, representing a 6.4% increase above
prior year sales of $89.7 million. The increase was driven by an
overall 8.9% increase in outlet store sales, resulting from higher sales from
non-comparable stores. Comparable outlet store sales were relatively
flat year over year. Sales in the Movado Boutiques were above prior
year by 3.6%, resulting from higher sales from non-comparable
stores. Comparable store sales in the Movado Boutiques decreased by
2.3% when compared to prior year. The Company operated 32 outlet
stores and 30 Movado Boutiques as of January 31, 2008, compared to 30 outlet
stores and 31 Movado Boutiques as of January 31, 2007.
The
Company considers comparable store sales to be sales of stores that were open as
of February 1st of the
last year through January 31st of the
current year. The Company had 24 comparable Movado Boutiques and 28
comparable outlet stores for the year ended January 31, 2008. The
sales from stores that have been relocated, renovated or refurbished are
included in the calculation of comparable store sales. The method of
calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a
result, the calculation of comparable store sales may not be the same as
measures reported by other companies.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit for the 2008 fiscal year was $336.7 million or 60.2% of net sales as
compared to $322.9 million or 60.6% of net sales in the prior
year. The increase in gross profit of $13.7 million was primarily the
result of the increase in sales volume, in addition to a higher gross margin
percentage in the base business sales. These increases were somewhat
offset by the negative gross profit impact related to the one-time charge of
$15.0 million for the estimated future sales returns. The gross
margin percentage was negatively impacted in both years by the liquidation sales
of excess discontinued inventory. Excluding the liquidation sales of
excess discontinued inventory in both periods and the margin effect of the
one-time sales return reserve in fiscal 2008, the gross margin percentage was
64.0% for fiscal year 2008 compared to 62.5% in the prior year. This
increase in gross margin percentage was the result of higher margins across most
brands resulting from better margins on new model introductions, the favorable
impact of price increases, and the favorable impact of foreign currency exchange
on the growing international business.
Selling,
General and Administrative
SG&A
expenses for fiscal 2008 were $285.9 million as compared to $270.6 million in
the prior year. The increase of $15.3 million or 5.7% was the result of higher
marketing spending of $6.9 million as the Company continues to invest in brands,
higher spending in support of the retail business of $6.2 million, the negative
impact of foreign exchange from translating the European subsidiaries’ financial
results of $2.9 million, increased third party fees of $2.2 million primarily
related to the Movado brand strategy, the non-recurrence of the fiscal 2007
out-of-period adjustment of $2.2 million related to foreign currency and
increased expenses of $1.6 million in consolidating the Company’s joint venture
operations in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. These increases
were somewhat offset by lower accounts receivable related expense of $6.5
million.
Wholesale
Operating Income
Operating
income in the wholesale segment increased by $2.2 million to $48.6
million. The increase was the net result of higher gross profit of $11.8
million, somewhat offset by the increase in SG&A expenses of $9.6
million. The higher gross profit of $11.8 million was primarily the result
of an increase in sales volume over the prior year. The increase in sales
volume was primarily the net result of higher sales in the international
licensed brands and higher liquidation sales of excess discontinued inventory,
somewhat offset by the one-time charge related to estimated future sales
returns. The increase in SG&A expenses of $9.6 million related
principally to higher marketing spending of $7.3 million as the Company
continues to invest in brands, the negative impact of foreign exchange from
translating the European subsidiaries’ financial results of $2.9 million,
increased third party fees of $2.2 million primarily related to the Movado brand
strategy, the negative impact of the prior year out-of-period adjustment of $2.2
million related to foreign currency and increased expenses of $1.6 million in
consolidating the Company’s joint venture operations in France, Germany and the
United Kingdom. These increases were somewhat offset by lower
accounts receivable related expense of $6.5 million.
Retail
Operating Income
Operating
income of $2.1 million and $5.8 million was recorded in the retail segment for
the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
$3.7 million decrease was the net result of higher gross profit of $2.0 million,
more than offset by higher SG&A expenses of $5.7 million. The
increased gross profit was primarily attributable to higher
sales. The increase in SG&A expenses was
primarily
the result of increased selling and occupancy expenses due to the opening of new
stores during fiscal 2008 and the full year impact of stores opened in the prior
fiscal year.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense for fiscal 2008 was $3.5 million as compared to $3.8 million in the
prior year period. Interest expense declined due to lower borrowings
somewhat offset by a higher average borrowing rate. Average
borrowings were $70.9 million for fiscal 2008 compared to average borrowings of
$97.2 million for fiscal 2007.
Interest
Income
Interest
income was $4.7 million for fiscal 2008 as compared to $3.3 million for the
prior year. The higher interest income resulted from the increase in
cash invested. The increase in cash was the result of the Company’s
favorable cash flow from operations.
For
borrowings data for the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, see Notes 4 and 5
to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding Bank Credit Arrangements and
Lines of Credit and Long-Term Debt.
Other
Income
The
Company recorded other income for fiscal 2007 of $1.3 million resulting from a
pre-tax gain of $0.4 million on the sale of a building acquired on March 1, 2004
in the acquisition of Ebel, a pre-tax gain of $0.8 million on the sale of a
piece of artwork acquired in 1988, and a pre-tax gain of $0.1 million on the
sale of the rights to a web domain name.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes for the twelve months ended January 31, 2008 was a benefit of $9.5 million
and for the twelve months ended January 31, 2007 was a provision of $2.9
million. The tax on income for fiscal 2008 was the net result of an
effective tax rate on base business operations of 20.6%, which was more than
offset by the recognition of a $12.5 million previously unrecognized tax benefit
as a result of the effective settlement of the IRS audit (see Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements). The tax on income was also favorably
impacted by the Company’s expected utilization of a greater portion of its net
operating loss carryforwards. The tax expense for fiscal 2007
reflected an effective tax rate on base business operations of 23.26% which
excluded the benefit from the release of the valuation allowance on the net
operating loss carryforwards.
Net
Income
For
fiscal 2008, the Company recorded net income of $60.8 million as compared to
$50.1 million for the prior year.
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net
Sales
Net sales
in fiscal 2007 were $532.9 million, or 13.1% above fiscal 2006 sales of $470.9
million. The liquidation of excess discontinued inventory accounted for
approximately $16.6 million of the increase. Net sales excluding the
liquidation of excess discontinued inventory were $516.3 million, representing
an increase of $45.4 million, or 9.6% above prior year.
United
States Wholesale Net Sales
Net sales
in the U.S. wholesale segment were $277.0 million, representing a 14.8% increase
above prior year sales of $241.4 million. The increase in net sales
was primarily attributed to higher sales in the accessible luxury brands of
$22.8 million and in the licensed brand category of $6.6 million. In
the accessible luxury category, Movado was above prior year by $19.4 million,
which includes the sale of approximately $7.5 million of excess discontinued
inventory as well as higher sales resulting from the launch of the new Series
800 sport models. ESQ was above the prior year by $3.4 million
primarily the result of new door expansion. In the licensed brand
category, Tommy Hilfiger was above prior year by $2.5 million and Juicy Couture,
which was launched during the year, contributed $3.4 million. The
luxury brand category was above prior year by $5.7 million. In the
luxury brand category, Concord was above prior year by $3.2 million, which
includes the sale of approximately $9.1 million of excess discontinued
inventory. Excluding the liquidation sales of excess discontinued
inventory, Concord sales were below prior year as the Company repositioned the
brand for fiscal 2008. Ebel was above prior year by $2.5 million
primarily the result of increased new product launches throughout the
year. Excluding $16.6 million of net sales from the liquidation of
excess discontinued inventory, net sales were $260.4 million, representing an
increase of $19.0 million or 7.9% above the prior year.
International
Wholesale Net Sales
Net sales
in the international segment were $166.2 million, representing a 15.4% increase
above prior year sales of $144.0 million. The increase of $22.2
million was attributed to higher sales in the licensed brand
category. The licensed brand category was above prior year by $21.7
million. In the licensed brand category, increases were recorded in
Tommy Hilfiger of $7.4 million and HUGO BOSS of $13.8 million, primarily the
result of new market expansion.
Retail
Net Sales
Net sales
in the retail segment were $89.7 million, representing a 4.8% increase above
prior year sales of $85.6 million. The increase was driven by an
overall 9.0% increase in Movado Boutique sales, resulting from a 2.3% comparable
store sales increase along with sales from non-comparable
stores. Sales by the Company’s outlet stores were slightly above
prior year by 1.3%, resulting from a 2.1% comparable store decrease, more than
offset by higher sales from non-comparable stores. The Company
operated 31 Movado Boutiques and 30 outlet stores at January 31, 2007, compared
to 27 Movado Boutiques and 28 outlet stores at January 31, 2006.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit for the 2007 fiscal year was $322.9 million or 60.6% of net sales as
compared to $286.3 million or 60.8% of net sales in the prior
year. The increase in dollar gross profit of $36.6 million
was
primarily
the result of the higher sales volume. Gross margin percentage
excluding the liquidation of excess discontinued inventory was 62.5%, as
compared to the 60.8% margin recorded in the prior year. The increase
in that gross margin percentage was partially driven by higher margins in the
Movado Boutiques due to both product mix and improved jewelry
margins. In addition, increases were recorded in the accessible
luxury and licensed brand categories, largely due to higher margins on new
product introductions as well as favorable foreign currency exchange gains
recorded in the current year period.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A
expenses for the year were $270.6 million, representing a 13.6% increase above
prior year expenses of $238.3 million. The increase of $32.3 million
includes higher payroll and related costs of $15.5 million reflecting
compensation and benefit cost increases, increased headcount to support the
growth of both new and existing brands and higher equity compensation
costs. The increase also includes higher bad debt expense of
approximately $7.3 million, primarily the result of a change in estimate to
provide for aged customer receivables. In addition, in fiscal 2007
there was higher spending on marketing and customer support of $6.3 million,
increased spending in support of further retail expansion of $4.2 million and
increased spending of $2.3 million occurred as a result of the consolidation of
the Company’s majority owned joint venture with TWC established to distribute
the licensed brands in France and Germany. The increase in SG&A
was partially offset by a $2.2 million out-of-period adjustment recorded in the
third quarter of fiscal 2007 related to foreign currency
transactions.
Wholesale
Operating Income
Operating
income in the wholesale segment increased by $4.2 million to $46.5
million. The increase was the net result of higher gross profit of
$32.3 million, partially offset by the increase in SG&A expenses
attributable to the wholesale segment of $28.1 million. The higher
gross profit of $32.3 million was the result of the increase in net sales of
$57.8 million. The increase in SG&A expenses attributed to the
wholesale segment related principally to higher compensation and benefit costs
of $15.5 million, higher bad debt expense of $7.3 million, higher marketing and
customer support spending of $6.3 million and $2.3 million of TWC-related
spending, offset partially by the $2.2 million out-of-period adjustment, each as
described above under “Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses”.
Retail
Operating Income
Operating
income in the retail segment increased $0.1 million to $5.8
million. The increase was the net result of higher gross profit of
$4.3 million partially offset by higher SG&A expenses attributable to the
retail segment of $4.2 million. The increased gross profit was
attributed to increased sales volume as well as increased gross profit
percentages due to product mix and improved margins on jewelry. The
increase in SG&A expenses was primarily the result of increased spending for
the non-comparable door expansion.
Other
Income
The
Company recorded other income for the year ended January 31, 2007 and 2006 of
$1.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively. During the year ended
January 31, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $0.4 million on the
sale of a building acquired on March 1, 2004 in the acquisition of Ebel, a
pre-tax gain of $0.8 million on the sale of a piece of artwork acquired in 1988,
and a pre-tax gain of $0.1 million on the sale of the rights to a web domain
name. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the
Company
recorded a pre-tax gain of $2.6 million on the sale of another building acquired
in the acquisition of Ebel. Additionally, during the year ended
January 31, 2006, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.6 million
representing the impact of the discontinuation of foreign currency cash flow
hedges because it was not probable that the forecasted transactions would occur
by the end of the originally specified time period.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense recorded for the years ended January 31, 2007 and 2006 was $3.8 million
and $4.6 million, respectively. Average borrowings were $97.2 million
at an average borrowing rate of 3.7% for fiscal year 2007 compared to average
borrowings of $78.7 million at an average borrowing rate of 5.2% for fiscal year
2006. The lower average borrowing rate was due to the shifting of
debt from the United States to Switzerland, which had a more favorable borrowing
rate.
Interest
Income
Interest
income recorded for the years ended January 31, 2007 and 2006 was $3.3 million
and $0.5 million, respectively. The repatriated foreign earnings of
approximately $150 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 under the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 resulted in significantly higher cash
balances in the United States. The cash invested in the United States
generated interest income at the rate of 4.9%.
Income
Taxes
The
Company’s income tax provision amounted to $2.9 million and $18.3 million in
fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. This represented an effective
tax rate of 5.4% in fiscal 2007 compared to 40.8% for fiscal 2006. The
lower effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was primarily the result of a partial
release of the valuation allowance on Swiss tax losses related to the acquired
Ebel net operating loss carryforward. The effective tax rate for
fiscal 2007 excluding the benefit from the release of the valuation allowance
was 23.26%. The higher effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 was
primarily due to the fourth quarter 2006 tax charge of $7.5 million associated
with repatriated foreign earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 excluding the
repatriation related tax charge was 24.06%.
Net
Income
For
fiscal 2007, the Company recorded net income of $50.1 million as compared to
$26.6 million for the fiscal 2006 year.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At
January 31, 2008, the Company had $169.6 million of cash and cash equivalents as
compared to $133.0 million in the comparable prior year period.
Cash
generated by operating activities continues to be the Company’s primary source
of cash to fund its growth initiatives, pay down debt and to pay
dividends. In the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the
Company generated cash from operations of $83.6 million, $67.8 million and $29.7
million, respectively. Cash flow from operations for all three years
was driven by net income of $60.8 million, $50.1 million and $26.6 million for
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Accounts
receivable at January 31, 2008 were $94.3 million as compared to $111.4 million
in the comparable prior year period. Foreign currency
translation had the effect of increasing the accounts receivable at January 31,
2008 by $4.2 million. Excluding this increase, accounts receivable
was below prior year by $21.3 million. The decrease in receivables is
attributed to the effect of the change in the mix of sales, the net receivable
reduction resulting from the estimated future sales return reserve as well as
stronger cash collections year over year. The accounts receivable
days outstanding were 60 days and 62 days for the fiscal years ended January 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Inventories
at January 31, 2008 were $205.1 million as compared to $193.3 million in the
comparable prior year period. Foreign currency translation had the effect
of increasing the value of the inventory at January 31, 2008 by $15.3
million. Excluding this increase, the value of the inventory was
below prior year by $3.5 million. The decrease was the net result of
the favorable impact of the liquidation sales of the excess discontinued
inventory and was somewhat offset by increased inventory levels, primarily in
the licensed brand category of $6.9 million. The increase in the
licensed brand inventory was the result of the new brand launches of LACOSTE and
Juicy Couture as well as the expansion of HUGO BOSS.
Cash used
in investing activities amounted to $28.0 million, $19.1 million and $13.2
million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash used in
investing activities for each of these three years was primarily related to the
acquisition of computer hardware and software, renovations and expansions of the
Company’s retail stores and other fixed asset additions for facility related
automation and improvements. During fiscal 2008, the acquisition of
computer hardware and software included $7.6 million related to the development
and implementation of the new enterprise resource planning system from
SAP. In the fiscal years ended January 31, 2007 and 2006, the use of
cash was partially offset by proceeds from the sale of assets, primarily
buildings acquired in connection with the acquisition of Ebel.
Cash used
in financing activities for the years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted
to $29.6 million and $32.8 million, respectively. The use of cash was
primarily to pay down long-term debt and to pay dividends. For the
year ended January 31, 2006, cash was provided by financing activities of $60.8
million. This was the result of an increase in borrowings to
repatriate foreign earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,
slightly offset by the payment of dividends.
During
fiscal 1999, the Company issued $25.0 million of Series A Senior Notes under a
Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated November 30,
1998. These notes bear interest of 6.90% per annum, mature on October
30, 2010 and are subject to annual repayments of $5.0 million commencing October
31, 2006. These notes contain certain financial covenants including
an interest coverage ratio and maintenance of consolidated net worth and certain
non-financial covenants that restrict the Company’s activities regarding
investments and acquisitions, mergers, certain transactions with affiliates,
creation of liens, asset transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the
amount of debt outstanding. At January 31, 2008, the Company believes
it was in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and $15.0
million of these notes were issued and outstanding.
As of
March 21, 2004, the Company amended its Note Purchase and Private Shelf
Agreement, originally dated March 21, 2001. This agreement, which
expired on March 21, 2007, allowed for the issuance of senior promissory notes
in the aggregate principal amount of up to $40.0 million with maturities up to
12 years from their original date of issuance. On October 8, 2004, the Company issued
4.79% Senior Series A-2004 Notes due 2011 (the "Senior Series A-2004 Notes")
pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement in an aggregate principal amount of
$20.0 million, which will mature on October 8, 2011 and are subject to annual
repayments of $5.0 million commencing on October 8, 2008. Proceeds of
the
Senior Series A-2004 Notes have been
used by the Company for capital expenditures, repayment of certain of its debt
obligations and general corporate purposes. These notes
contain certain financial covenants, including an interest coverage ratio and
maintenance of consolidated net worth and certain non-financial covenants that
restrict the Company’s activities regarding investments and acquisitions,
mergers, certain transactions with affiliates, creation of liens, asset
transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the amount of debt
outstanding. As of January 31, 2008, the Company believes it was in
compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and $20.0 million of
these notes were issued and outstanding.
On
December 15, 2005, the Company as parent guarantor, and its Swiss subsidiaries,
MGI Luxury Group S.A. and Movado Watch Company SA as borrowers, entered into a
credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Securities, Inc., Bank
of America, N.A., PNC Bank and Citibank, N.A. (the "Swiss Credit Agreement")
which provides for a revolving credit facility of 90.0 million Swiss francs and
matures on December 15, 2010. The obligations of the Company’s two
Swiss subsidiaries under this credit agreement are guaranteed by the Company
under a Parent Guarantee, dated as of December 15, 2005, in favor of the
lenders. The Swiss Credit Agreement contains financial covenants,
including an interest coverage ratio, average debt coverage ratio and
limitations on capital expenditures and certain non-financial covenants that
restrict the Company’s activities regarding investments and acquisitions,
mergers, certain transactions with affiliates, creation of liens, asset
transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the amount of debt
outstanding. Borrowings under the Swiss Credit Agreement bear
interest at a rate equal to LIBOR (as defined in the Swiss Credit Agreement)
plus a margin ranging from .50% per annum to .875% per annum (depending upon a
leverage ratio). As of January 31, 2008, the Company believes it was
in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and had 28.0
million Swiss francs, with a dollar equivalent of $25.9 million, outstanding
under this revolving credit facility.
On
December 15, 2005, the Company and its Swiss subsidiaries, MGI Luxury Group S.A.
and Movado Watch Company SA, entered into a credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Securities, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., PNC Bank and
Citibank, N.A. (the "US Credit Agreement") which provides for a revolving credit
facility of $50.0 million (including a sublimit for borrowings in Swiss francs
of up to $25.0 million) with a provision to allow for an increase of an
additional $50.0 million subject to certain terms and conditions. The US Credit
Agreement will mature on December 15, 2010. The obligations of MGI
Luxury Group S.A. and Movado Watch Company SA are guaranteed by the Company
under a Parent Guarantee, dated as of December 15, 2005, in favor of the
lenders. The obligations of the Company are guaranteed by certain domestic
subsidiaries of the Company under subsidiary guarantees, in favor of the
lenders. The US Credit Agreement contains financial covenants,
including an interest coverage ratio, average debt coverage ratio and
limitations on capital expenditures and certain non-financial covenants that
restrict the Company’s activities regarding investments and acquisitions,
mergers, certain transactions with affiliates, creation of liens, asset
transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the amount of debt
outstanding. Borrowings under the US Credit Agreement bear interest,
at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the US
Credit Agreement) plus a margin ranging from .50% per annum to .875% per annum
(depending upon a leverage ratio), or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the
US Credit Agreement). As of January 31, 2008, the Company believes it
was in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants, and there were
no outstanding borrowings against this line.
On June 15, 2007, the Company renewed a
line of credit letter agreement with Bank of America and an amended and restated promissory
note in the principal amount of up to $20.0 million payable to Bank of America,
originally dated December 12, 2005. Pursuant to the line of credit
letter agreement, Bank of
America will consider requests for
short-term loans and documentary letters of credit for the importation of
merchandise inventory, the aggregate amount of which at any time outstanding
shall not exceed $20.0 million. The Company's obligations under the agreement
are guaranteed by its subsidiaries, Movado Retail Group, Inc. and Movado
LLC. Pursuant to the amended and restated promissory note, the
Company promised to pay Bank of America $20.0 million, or such lesser amount as
may then be the unpaid balance of all loans made by Bank of America to the
Company thereunder, in immediately available funds upon the maturity date of June 16,
2008. The Company has the
right to prepay all or part of any outstanding amounts under the promissory note
without penalty at any time prior to the maturity date. The amended and restated
promissory note bears interest at an annual rate equal to either (i) a floating
rate equal to the prime rate or (ii) such fixed rate as may be agreed upon by
the Company and Bank of America for an interest period which is also then agreed
upon. The amended and restated promissory note contains various representations
and warranties and events of default that are customary for instruments of that
type. As
of January 31, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings against this
line.
On July
31, 2007, the Company renewed a promissory note, originally dated December 13,
2005, in the principal amount of up to $37.0 million, at a revised amount of up
to $7.0 million, payable to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
("Chase"). Pursuant to
the promissory note, the Company promised to pay Chase $7.0 million, or such
lesser amount as may then be the unpaid balance of each loan made or letter of
credit issued by Chase to the Company thereunder, upon the maturity date of
July 31, 2008. The Company
has the right to prepay all or part of any outstanding amounts under the
promissory note without penalty at any time prior to the maturity date. The
promissory note bears interest at an annual rate equal to (i) a floating rate
equal to the prime rate, (ii) a fixed rate equal to an adjusted LIBOR plus
0.625% or (iii) a fixed rate equal to a rate of interest offered by Chase from
time to time on any single commercial borrowing. The promissory note contains
various events of default that are customary for instruments of that type. In
addition, it is an event of default for any security interest or other
encumbrance to be created or imposed on the Company's property, other than as
permitted in the lien covenant of the US Credit Agreement. Chase issued 11
irrevocable standby letters of credit for retail and operating facility leases
to various landlords, for the administration of the Movado Boutique
private-label credit card and Canadian payroll to the Royal Bank of Canada
totaling $1.2 million with expiration dates through March 18,
2009. As of January 31, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings
against this promissory note.
A Swiss
subsidiary of the Company maintains unsecured lines of credit with an
unspecified length of time with a Swiss bank. Available credit under these lines
totaled 8.0 million Swiss francs, with dollar equivalents of $7.4 million and
$6.4 million at January 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of
January 31, 2008, two European banks have guaranteed obligations to third
parties on behalf of two of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in the equivalent
amount of $2.1 million in various foreign currencies. As of January
31, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings against these lines.
On
December 4, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the Company’s share
repurchase program, with a total authorization to repurchase up to one million
shares of Common Stock. For fiscal 2008, treasury shares increased by
152,425 as the result of 43,957 shares of Common Stock repurchased pursuant to
the Company’s share repurchase program and 108,468 shares of Common Stock
repurchased during fiscal 2008 which reflect the surrender of shares in
connection with the vesting of certain restricted stock awards and the exercise
of certain stock options.
Cash
dividends were $8.3 million, $6.2 million and $5.1 million in fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
At
January 31, 2008, the Company had working capital of $419.6 million as compared
to $383.4 million in the prior year. The Company defines working capital
as the difference between current assets and current liabilities. The
Company expects that annual capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 will be
approximately $27.0 million as compared to $27.4 million in fiscal
2008. Management believes that the cash on hand in addition to the
expected cash flow from operations and the Company’s short-term borrowing
capacity will be sufficient to meet its working capital needs for at least the
next 12 months.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Payments
due by period (in thousands):
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
than 1 year
|
|
|
2-3
years
|
|
|
4-5
years
|
|
|
More
than 5 years
|
|
Contractual
Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Debt Obligations (1)
|
|
$ |
60,895 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,895 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Interest
Payments on Long-Term Debt (1)
|
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating
Lease Obligations (2)
|
|
|
87,238 |
|
|
|
15,121 |
|
|
|
27,740 |
|
|
|
22,999 |
|
|
|
21,378 |
|
Purchase
Obligations (3)
|
|
|
59,937 |
|
|
|
59,937 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
FIN
48 Liability (4)
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
Long-Term Obligations (5)
|
|
|
125,470 |
|
|
|
19,138 |
|
|
|
41,169 |
|
|
|
37,559 |
|
|
|
27,604 |
|
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
|
$ |
343,260 |
|
|
$ |
110,793 |
|
|
$ |
117,687 |
|
|
$ |
65,798 |
|
|
$ |
48,982 |
|
(1) The
Company has long-term debt obligations and related interest payments of $39.5
million related to Series A-2004 Senior Notes and Series A Senior Notes further
discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”. Additionally, the
Company has long-term debt obligations and related interest payments of $27.3
million related to the Swiss revolving credit facility entered into in fiscal
2006.
(2)
Includes store operating leases, which generally provide for payment of direct
operating costs in addition to rent. These obligation amounts include
future minimum lease payments and exclude direct operating costs.
(3) The
Company had outstanding purchase obligations with suppliers at the end of fiscal
2008 for raw materials, finished watches, jewelry and packaging in the normal
course of business. These purchase obligation amounts do not
represent total anticipated purchases but represent only amounts to be paid for
items required to be purchased under agreements that are enforceable, legally
binding and specify minimum quantity, price and term.
(4)
Management has only included its current FIN 48 liability in the table
above. The long-term amount of $3.3 million has been excluded because
future payments cannot be reasonably estimated.
(5) Other
long-term obligations primarily consist of two items: minimum obligations
related to the Company’s license agreements and endorsement agreements with
brand ambassadors. The Company sources, distributes, advertises and
sells watches pursuant to its exclusive license agreements with unaffiliated
licensors. Royalty amounts are generally based on a stipulated
percentage of revenues, although most of these agreements contain provisions for
the payment of minimum annual royalty amounts. The license agreements
have various terms and some have additional renewal options, provided that
minimum sales levels are achieved. Additionally, the license
agreements require the Company to pay minimum annual advertising
amounts.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company does not have off-balance sheet financing or unconsolidated
special-purpose entities.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, ‘‘Fair Value Measurements’’ (“SFAS
No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FAS 115”
(“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 159 on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) states that all
business combinations (whether full, partial or step acquisitions) will result
in all assets and liabilities of an acquired business being recorded at their
acquisition date fair values. Earn-outs and other forms of contingent
consideration and certain acquired contingencies will also be recorded at fair
value at the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141(R) also states
acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; in-process research
and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible
asset at the acquisition date; changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally
will affect income tax expense; and restructuring costs will be expensed in
periods after the acquisition date. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the provisions of this
standard to any acquisitions that it completes on or after December 15,
2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). This statement amends ARB No. 51
to
establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption,
noncontrolling interests will be classified as equity in the
consolidated balance
sheets. This
statement also provides guidance on a subsidiary deconsolidation as well as
stating that entities need to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests
of the noncontrolling owners. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS No. 160
on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No.
161”). This statement requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 also requires that objectives for using
derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting
designation and requires cross-referencing within the footnotes. This
statement also suggests disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and
their gains and losses in a tabular format. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS No.
161 on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The
Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to foreign currency exchange risk
(see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The majority
of the Company’s purchases are denominated in Swiss francs. The
Company reduces its exposure to the Swiss franc exchange rate risk through a
hedging program. Under the hedging program, the Company manages most
of its foreign currency exposures on a consolidated basis, which allows it to
net certain exposures and take advantage of natural offsets. The
Company uses various derivative financial instruments to further reduce the net
exposures to currency fluctuations, predominately forward and option
contracts. These derivatives either (a) are used to hedge the
Company’s Swiss franc liabilities and are recorded at fair value with the
changes in fair value reflected in earnings or (b) are documented as cash flow
hedges, as defined in issued SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”) with the gains and losses
on this latter hedging activity first reflected in other comprehensive income,
and then later classified into earnings. In both cases, the earnings
impact is partially offset by the effects of currency movements on the
underlying hedged transactions. If the Company did not engage in a
hedging program, any change in the Swiss franc to local currency would have an
equal effect on the Company’s cost of sales. In addition, the Company
hedges its Swiss franc payable exposure with forward contracts. As of
January 31, 2008, the Company’s entire net forward contracts hedging portfolio
consisted of 115.0 million Swiss francs equivalent for various expiry dates
ranging through November 14, 2008 compared to a portfolio of 117.0 million Swiss
francs equivalent for various expiry dates ranging through January 8, 2008 as of
January 31, 2007. If
the Company were to settle its Swiss franc forward
contracts at January 31, 2008, the net result would be a gain of
$4.2 million, net of tax of $2.8 million. The Company had a 5.0
million Swiss franc option contract related to cash flow hedges with an expiry
date of April 30, 2008 as of January 31, 2008 compared to 24.0 million Swiss
franc option contracts with various expiry dates ranging through October 31,
2007 as of January 31, 2007. If the Company were to settle its Swiss franc
option contract at January
31, 2008, the net result would be a gain of $0.2 million, net of tax of
$0.1 million.
The
Company’s Board of Directors authorized the hedging of the Company’s Swiss franc
denominated investment in its wholly-owned Swiss subsidiaries using purchase
options under certain limitations. These hedges are treated as net investment
hedges under SFAS No. 133. As of January 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company did not hold a purchased option hedge portfolio related to net
investment hedging.
Commodity
Risk
Additionally,
the Company has the ability under the hedging program to reduce its exposure to
fluctuations in commodity prices, primarily related to gold used in the
manufacturing of the Company’s watches. Under this hedging program, the Company
can purchase various commodity derivative instruments, primarily future
contracts. These derivatives are documented as SFAS No. 133 cash flow hedges,
and gains and losses on these derivative instruments are first reflected in
other comprehensive income, and later reclassified into earnings, partially
offset by the effects of gold market price changes on the underlying actual gold
purchases. The Company did not hold any futures contracts in its gold
hedge portfolio related to cash flow hedges as of January 31, 2008 and 2007,
thus any changes in the gold price will have an equal effect on the Company’s
cost of sales.
Debt
and Interest Rate Risk
In
addition, the Company has certain debt obligations with variable interest rates,
which are based on LIBOR plus a fixed additional interest rate. The
Company does not hedge these interest rate risks. The Company also
has certain debt obligations with fixed interest rates. The
differences between the market based interest rates at January 31, 2008, and the
fixed rates were unfavorable. The Company believes that a 1% change in interest
rates would affect the Company’s net income by approximately $0.3
million.
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Schedule
Number
|
Page
Number
|
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at January 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended
January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-8
to F-36
|
|
|
|
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
|
II
|
S-1
|
Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as such
terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by
this report.
Changes in Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting
There has
been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended
January 31, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
It should
be noted that while the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer believe that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures provide a
reasonable level of assurance that they are effective, they do not expect that
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over
financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are
met.
See
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for Management’s Annual
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm containing an attestation
thereto.
Item
9B. Other Information
None.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
The
information required by this item is included in the Company’s Proxy Statement
for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders under the captions “Election of
Directors” and “Management” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Information
on the beneficial ownership reporting for the Company’s directors and executive
officers is contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 annual
meeting of shareholders under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Information
on the Company’s Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert is
contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders under the caption “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and
Its Committees” and is incorporated herein by reference.
The
Company has adopted and posted on its website at www.movadogroup.com a
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and
employees, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and principal financial and accounting officers. The Company will post
any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any waivers that
are required to be disclosed by SEC regulations, on the Company’s
website.
Item
11. Executive Compensation
The
information required by this item is included in the Company’s Proxy Statement
for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders under the captions “Executive
Compensation” and “Compensation of Directors” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
The
information required by this item is included in the Company’s Proxy Statement
for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders under the caption “Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
The
information required by this item is included in the Company’s Proxy Statement
for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders under the caption “Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The
information required by this item is included in the Company’s Proxy Statement
for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders under the caption “Fees Paid to
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
Documents filed as
part of this report
1. Financial
Statements:
See Financial Statements Index on page
47 included in Item 8 of Part II of this annual report.
2. Financial
Statement Schedule:
Schedule
II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
|
All
other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not
required, or because the required information is included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
|
3.
Exhibits:
|
Incorporated
herein by reference is a list of the Exhibits contained in the Exhibit
Index on pages 53 through 60 of this annual report.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
MOVADO
GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Gedalio Grinberg
|
|
|
Gedalio
Grinberg
|
|
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated.
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Gedalio Grinberg
|
|
|
Gedalio
Grinberg
|
|
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Efraim Grinberg
|
|
|
Efraim
Grinberg
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Richard J. Coté
|
|
|
Richard
J. Coté
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and
|
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Eugene J. Karpovich
|
|
|
Eugene
J. Karpovich
|
|
|
Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
and
Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Margaret Hayes Adame
|
|
|
Margaret
Hayes Adame
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Alan H. Howard
|
|
|
Alan
H. Howard
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Richard D. Isserman
|
|
|
Richard
D. Isserman
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Nathan Leventhal
|
|
|
Nathan
Leventhal
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Donald Oresman
|
|
|
Donald
Oresman
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 27, 2008
|
|
/s/ Leonard L.
Silverstein
|
|
|
Leonard
L. Silverstein
|
|
|
Director
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Restated
By-Laws of the Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 11,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant as amended. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended July 31, 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificate. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 31, 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
Note
Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated as of November 30, 1998 between
the Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of America.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
1999.
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
Note
Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated as of March 21, 2001 between
the Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of
America. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2001.
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
Amendment
dated as of March 21, 2004 to Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement
dated as of March 21, 2001 between the Registrant and The Prudential
Insurance Company of America. Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
Amendment
Number 1 to License Agreement dated December 9, 1996 between the
Registrant as Licensee and Coach, a division of Sara Lee Corporation as
Licensor, dated as of February 1, 1998. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 1998.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
Agreement
dated January 1, 1992, between The Hearst Corporation and the Registrant,
as amended on January 17, 1992. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33-666000).
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
Letter
Agreement between the Registrant and The Hearst Corporation dated October
24, 1994 executed October 25, 1995 amending License Agreement dated as of
January 1, 1992, as amended. Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 31, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
Registrant's
1996 Stock Incentive Plan amending and restating the 1993 Employee Stock
Option Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
31, 1996. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
Lease
dated August 10, 1994 between Rockefeller Center Properties, as landlord
and SwissAm, Inc., as tenant for space at 630 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
1994.
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
Death
and Disability Benefit Plan Agreement dated September 23, 1994 between the
Registrant and Gedalio Grinberg. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 31, 1994. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
Registrant's
amended and restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives effective
June 17, 2004. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2005. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
License
Agreement dated December 9, 1996 between the Registrant and Sara Lee
Corporation. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32
to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 1997.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
First
Amendment to Lease dated April 8, 1998 between RCPI Trust, successor in
interest to Rockefeller Center Properties (“Landlord”) and Movado Retail
Group, Inc., successor in interest to SwissAm, Inc. (“Tenant”) amending
lease dated August 10, 1994 between Landlord and Tenant for space at 630
Fifth Avenue, New York, New York. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 31, 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
Second
Amendment dated as of September 1, 1999 to the December 1, 1996 License
Agreement between Sara Lee Corporation and
Registrant. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 31, 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
License
Agreement entered into as of June 3, 1999 between Tommy Hilfiger
Licensing, Inc. and Registrant. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
Severance
Agreement dated December 15, 1999, and entered into December 16, 1999
between the Registrant and Richard J. Coté. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 31, 2000. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
Lease
made December 21, 2000 between the Registrant and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
for premises in Paramus, New Jersey together with First Amendment thereto
made December 21, 2000. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 31, 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
Lease
Agreement dated May 22, 2000 between Forsgate Industrial Complex and the
Registrant for premises located at 105 State Street, Moonachie, New
Jersey. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended
April 30, 2000.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
Second
Amendment of Lease dated July 26, 2001 between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as
landlord, and Movado Group, Inc., as tenant, further amending lease dated
as of December 21, 2000. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter
ended October 31, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
Third
Amendment of Lease dated November 6, 2001 between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.,
as lessor, and Movado Group, Inc., as lessee, for additional space at
Mack-Cali II, One Mack Drive, Paramus, New Jersey. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed for the quarter ended October 31, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
Amendment
Number 2 to Registrant’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan dated March 16, 2001.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2002.*
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment
Number 3 to Registrant’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan approved June 19, 2001.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2002.*
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
Amendment
Number 3 to License Agreement dated December 9, 1996, as previously
amended, between the Registrant, Movado Watch Company S.A. and Coach, Inc.
dated as of January 30, 2003. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.29 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
First
Amendment to the License Agreement dated June 3, 1999 between Tommy
Hilfiger Licensing, Inc., Registrant and Movado Watch Company S.A. entered
into January 16, 2002. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July
31, 2002.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
Second
Amendment to the License Agreement dated June 3, 1999 between Tommy
Hilfiger Licensing, Inc., Registrant and Movado Watch Company S.A. entered
into August 1, 2002. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July
31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
Endorsement
Agreement dated as of April 4, 2003 between the Registrant and The
Grinberg Family Trust. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28
to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
Third
Amendment to License Agreement dated June 3, 1999 between Tommy Hilfiger
Licensing, Inc. and the Registrant entered into as of May 7, 2004.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2004.
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
Employment
Agreement dated August 27, 2004 between the Registrant and Mr. Eugene J.
Karpovich. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
31, 2004. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
Employment
Agreement dated August 27, 2004 between the Registrant and Mr. Timothy F.
Michno. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
31, 2004. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
Master
Credit Agreement dated August 17, 2004 and August 20, 2004 between MGI
Luxury Group S.A. and UBS AG. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
Fourth
Amendment to License Agreement dated June 3, 1999 between Tommy Hilfiger
Licensing, Inc. and the Registrant entered into as of June 25, 2004.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2004.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
Fifth
Amendment of Lease dated October 20, 2003 between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P.
as landlord, and the Registrant as tenant further amending the lease dated
as of December 21, 2000. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29
to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
Registrant’s
1996 Stock Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of April 8,
2004. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2005.*
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
License
Agreement entered into December 15, 2004 between MGI Luxury Group S.A. and
HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
10.31
|
$50
million Credit Agreement dated as of December 15, 2005 between the
Registrant, MGI Luxury Group S.A. and Movado Watch Company S.A., as
borrowers, the Lenders signatory thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as
Administrative Agent, Swingline Bank and Issuing
Bank. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
CHF
90 million Credit Agreement dated as of December 15, 2005 between MGI
Luxury Group S.A. and Movado Watch Company S.A., as borrowers, the
Registrant as Parent, each of the lenders signatory thereto and JPMorgan
Chase Bank as administrative agent. Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
License
Agreement dated as of November 18, 2005 by and between the Registrant,
Swissam Products Limited and L.C. Licensing, Inc. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
From 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2006.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
License
Agreement entered into effective March 27, 2006 between MGI Luxury Group
S.A. and Lacoste S.A., Sporloisirs S.A. and Lacoste Alligator
S.A. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
Third
Amendment to License Agreement dated as of January 1, 1992 between the
Registrant and Hearst Magazines, a Division of Hearst Communications,
Inc., effective February 15, 2007. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended April 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
Fifth
Amendment to License Agreement dated December 9, 1996 between the
Registrant and Coach, Inc., effective March 9, 2007. Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
Sixth
Amendment to License Agreement dated June 3, 1999 between the Registrant
and Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc., effective April 11, 2007. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
Form
of Long-Term Incentive Plan Award Notice under the Registrant’s Executive
Long-Term Incentive Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 4, 2007.
*
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
Line
of Credit Letter Agreement dated as of June 15, 2007 between the
Registrant and Bank of America, N.A. and Amended and Restated Promissory
Note dated as of June 15, 2007 to Bank of America, N.A. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Sequentially
|
Number
|
Description
|
Numbered Page
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
Promissory
Note dated as of July 31, 2007 to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
Movado
Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 6,
2006. *
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
Movado
Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan form of award agreement. Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed June 6, 2006. *
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant.
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
Consent
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*
Constitutes a compensatory plan or arrangement.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The
management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, for the Company. With the participation of the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s
management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria
established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the
Company’s management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2008.
Our
internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2008 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears
herein.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Movado Group, Inc.:
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the
accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Movado Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries at January 31, 2008 and
2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended January 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In
addition, in our opinion, the financial
statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also
in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2008,
based on criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management
is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement
schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in "Management's Annual Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting" appearing in the accompanying
index. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal
control over financial reporting based on our
integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed the manner in which it accounts for uncertain income tax positions in
2008 and share-based compensation in 2007.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Florham
Park, New Jersey
March 27,
2008
MOVADO
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
559,550 |
|
|
$ |
532,865 |
|
|
$ |
470,941 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
222,868 |
|
|
|
209,922 |
|
|
|
184,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
336,682 |
|
|
|
322,943 |
|
|
|
286,320 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
285,905 |
|
|
|
270,624 |
|
|
|
238,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
50,777 |
|
|
|
52,319 |
|
|
|
48,037 |
|
Other
income, net (Note 18)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(3,472 |
) |
|
|
(3,785 |
) |
|
|
(4,574 |
) |
Interest
income
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
51,971 |
|
|
|
53,161 |
|
|
|
44,936 |
|
(Benefit)
/ provision for income taxes (Note 8)
|
|
|
(9,471 |
) |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
18,319 |
|
Minority
interests
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
60,805 |
|
|
$ |
50,138 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
Weighted
basic average shares outstanding
|
|
|
26,049 |
|
|
|
25,670 |
|
|
|
25,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Weighted
diluted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,293 |
|
|
|
26,794 |
|
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
paid per share |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MOVADO
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
January
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
169,551 |
|
|
$ |
133,011 |
|
Trade
receivables, net
|
|
|
94,328 |
|
|
|
111,417 |
|
Inventories,
net
|
|
|
205,129 |
|
|
|
193,342 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
50,317 |
|
|
|
35,109 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
519,325 |
|
|
|
472,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
68,513 |
|
|
|
56,823 |
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
58,378 |
|
|
|
47,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
646,216 |
|
|
$ |
577,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
38,397 |
|
|
|
32,901 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
29,591 |
|
|
|
30,859 |
|
Accrued
payroll and benefits
|
|
|
13,179 |
|
|
|
14,751 |
|
Deferred
and current income taxes payable
|
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
99,693 |
|
|
|
89,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
50,895 |
|
|
|
75,196 |
|
Deferred
and non-current income taxes payable
|
|
|
6,363 |
|
|
|
11,054 |
|
Other
non-current liabilities
|
|
|
24,205 |
|
|
|
23,087 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
181,156 |
|
|
|
198,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Notes 10 and 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interests
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 24,266,873 and
23,872,262 shares issued, respectively
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Class
A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 6,634,319
and 6,642,159 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Capital
in excess of par value
|
|
|
128,902 |
|
|
|
117,811 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
325,296 |
|
|
|
280,495 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
65,890 |
|
|
|
32,307 |
|
Treasury
Stock, 4,830,669 and 4,678,244 shares at cost,
respectively
|
|
|
(57,202 |
) |
|
|
(52,537 |
) |
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
463,195 |
|
|
|
378,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
646,216 |
|
|
$ |
577,618 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MOVADO
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
60,805 |
|
|
$ |
50,138 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
16,684 |
|
|
|
16,580 |
|
|
|
16,780 |
|
Utilization
of NOL
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
(8,717 |
) |
|
|
(10,655 |
) |
|
|
(4,575 |
) |
Provision
for losses on accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
Provision
for losses on inventory
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(1,883 |
) |
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Loss
on disposition of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Gain
on sale of assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,347 |
) |
|
|
(2,630 |
) |
Loss
on hedge derivatives
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Tax
benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
18,976 |
|
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(5,496 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
7,627 |
|
|
|
(18,282 |
) |
Other
current assets
|
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(5,990 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(1,662 |
) |
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
(3,429 |
) |
|
|
351 |
|
Accrued
payroll and benefits
|
|
|
(1,572 |
) |
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
Income taxes
payable
|
|
|
(12,006 |
) |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
7,727 |
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
(2,408 |
) |
|
|
(4,072 |
) |
|
|
(2,808 |
) |
Other
non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
83,634 |
|
|
|
67,834 |
|
|
|
29,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(27,392 |
) |
|
|
(20,178 |
) |
|
|
(16,367 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
(798 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(28,033 |
) |
|
|
(19,098 |
) |
|
|
(13,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayments)
/ proceeds of bank borrowings
|
|
|
(18,618 |
) |
|
|
(26,512 |
) |
|
|
64,955 |
|
Repayment
of Senior Notes
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
|
|
(3,090 |
) |
Stock
options exercised and other changes
|
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
Investments
from JV interest |
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Dividends
paid
|
|
|
(8,327 |
) |
|
|
(6,158 |
) |
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
Net
cash (used in) / provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(29,639 |
) |
|
|
(32,808 |
) |
|
|
60,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
(6,542 |
) |
|
|
(17,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
36,540 |
|
|
|
9,386 |
|
|
|
59,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
133,011 |
|
|
|
123,625 |
|
|
|
63,782 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
169,551 |
|
|
$ |
133,011 |
|
|
$ |
123,625 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MOVADO
GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A
|
|
|
Capital
in
Excess
of
Par
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
January 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
100,289 |
|
|
$ |
214,953 |
|
|
$ |
48,706 |
|
|
$ |
(47,685 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
($0.20 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options exercised, net of tax of $2,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,090 |
) |
Supplemental
executive retirement plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized gain on investments, net of tax of
$19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in effective portion of hedging contracts,
net of tax of $2,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance,
January 31, 2006
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
107,965 |
|
|
|
236,515 |
|
|
|
27,673 |
|
|
|
(50,775 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
($0.24 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options exercised, net of tax of $2,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
Supplemental
executive retirement plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of Class A Stock to Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized gain on investments, net of tax of
$50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in effective portion of hedging contracts,
net of tax of $771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
117,811 |
|
|
|
280,495 |
|
|
|
32,307 |
|
|
|
(52,537 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
($0.32 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN
48 transition adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
Stock
options exercised, net of tax of $2,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,635 |
) |
Supplemental
executive retirement plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized loss on nvestments, net of tax of
$72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net
change in effective portion of hedging contracts,
net of tax of $2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
January 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
128,902 |
|
|
$ |
325,296 |
|
|
$ |
65,890 |
|
|
$ |
(57,202 |
) |
(Shares
information in thousands)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Class
A Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
Balance,
January 31, 2005
|
|
|
22,580 |
|
|
|
6,802 |
|
|
|
(4,434 |
) |
Stock
issued to employees exercising stock options
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
Conversion
of Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Balance,
January 31, 2006
|
|
|
23,216 |
|
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
(4,614 |
) |
Stock
issued to employees exercising stock options
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Conversion
of Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Restricted
stock and other stock plans, less cancellations
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Balance,
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
23,872 |
|
|
|
6,642 |
|
|
|
(4,678 |
) |
Stock
issued to employees exercising stock options
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Conversion
of Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Stock
repurchase
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Restricted
stock and other stock plans, less cancellations
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Balance,
January 31, 2008
|
|
|
24,267 |
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTES
TO MOVADO GROUP, INC.’S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
and Business
Movado
Group, Inc. (the "Company") designs, sources, markets and distributes quality
watches with prominent brands in almost every price category comprising the
watch industry. In fiscal 2008, the Company marketed nine distinctive brands of
watches: Movado, Ebel, Concord, ESQ, Coach, HUGO BOSS, Juicy Couture, Tommy
Hilfiger and LACOSTE, which compete in most segments of the watch
market.
Movado,
Ebel and Concord watches are generally manufactured in Switzerland by
independent third party assemblers with some in-house assembly in Bienne and La
Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland. Movado, Ebel and Concord watches are
manufactured using Swiss movements and other components obtained from third
party suppliers. Coach, ESQ, Tommy Hilfiger, Juicy Couture, HUGO BOSS
and LACOSTE watches are manufactured by independent contractors. Coach and ESQ
watches are manufactured using Swiss movements and other components purchased
from third party suppliers. Tommy Hilfiger, Juicy Couture, HUGO BOSS and LACOSTE
watches are manufactured using movements and other components purchased from
third party suppliers.
In
addition to its sales to trade customers and independent distributors, through a
wholly-owned domestic subsidiary, the Company sells select models of Movado
watches, as well as proprietary Movado-branded jewelry and clocks directly to
consumers in its Movado Boutiques and operates outlet stores throughout the
United States, through which it sells discontinued models and factory
seconds.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated.
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The Company uses estimates when accounting for sales
discounts, rebates, allowances and incentives, warranty, income taxes,
depreciation, amortization, contingencies and asset and liability
valuations.
Reclassification
Certain
reclassifications were made to prior years’ financial statement amounts and
related note disclosures to conform to the fiscal 2008
presentation.
Translation
of Foreign Currency Financial Statements and Foreign Currency
Transactions
The
financial statements of the Company's international subsidiaries have been
translated into United States dollars by translating balance sheet accounts at
year-end exchange rates and statement of operations accounts at average exchange
rates for the year. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are charged or
credited to earnings as incurred. Foreign currency translation gains and losses
are reflected in the equity section of the Company's consolidated balance sheet
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The balance of the foreign
currency translation adjustment, included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income, was $62.0 million and $32.2 million as of January 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash
equivalents are considered all highly liquid investments with original
maturities at date of purchase of three months or less.
Trade
Receivables
Trade
receivables as shown on the consolidated balance sheet are net of
allowances. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through
an analysis of the aging of accounts receivable, assessments of collectibility
based on historic trends, the financial condition of the Company’s customers and
an evaluation of economic conditions. The Company writes off
uncollectible trade receivables once collection efforts have been exhausted and
third parties confirm the balance is not recoverable.
The
Company's trade customers include department stores, jewelry store chains and
independent jewelers. All of the Company’s watch brands, except ESQ, are also
marketed outside the U.S. through a network of independent distributors.
Accounts receivable are stated net of doubtful accounts, returns and allowances
of $36.3 million, $26.1 million and $25.7 million at January 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company
recorded a one-time charge of $15.0 million related to estimated sales returns
associated with the closing of certain wholesale doors in the U.S.
The
Company's concentrations of credit risk arise primarily from accounts receivable
related to trade customers during the peak selling seasons. The Company has
significant accounts receivable balances due from major national chain and
department stores. The Company's results of operations could be materially
adversely affected in the event any of these customers or a group of these
customers defaulted on all or a significant portion of their obligations to the
Company as a result of financial difficulties. As of January 31, 2008, except
for those accounts provided for in the reserve for doubtful accounts, the
Company knew of no situations with any of the Company’s major customers which
would indicate any such customer’s inability to make its required
payments.
Inventories
The
Company values its inventory at the lower of cost or market. The
Company’s U.S. inventory is valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. The cost of finished goods and component inventories, held by
international subsidiaries, are determined using average cost. The Company’s
management regularly reviews its sales to customers and customers’ sell through
at retail to determine excess or obsolete inventory. Inventory with less
than acceptable turn rates is classified as discontinued
and,
together with the related component parts which can be assembled into saleable
finished goods, is sold primarily through the Company’s outlet stores. When
management determines that finished product is unsaleable or when it is
impractical to build the remaining components into watches for sale, a reserve
is established for the cost of those products and components to value the
inventory at the lower of cost or market. In addition, as part of the
acquisition of Ebel, a significant value of parts and components were acquired
that could not readily be identifiable to be produced as watches or for future
after sales service needs. These parts and components have been
reserved for based on future expected usage. During the fiscal years
ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company conducted an in depth review of all
its discontinued components and watches. In doing so, the Company
identified what it projected to be excess quantities of discontinued products
beyond what it believed to be reasonable supplies for sale through its outlets
or other promotional distribution. As a result, the Company engaged
in a liquidation through an independent third party to sell the excess product
for cash. In addition, where it was not deemed economically feasible
to invest the time, effort and/or cost, the Company initiated efforts to cleanse
the inventory and scrap the product. The Company’s estimates, based
on which it establishes its inventory reserves, could vary significantly, either
favorably or unfavorably, from actual requirements depending on future economic
conditions, customer inventory levels, expected usage or competitive
conditions.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation of buildings is amortized using the
straight-line method based on the useful life of 40
years. Depreciation of furniture and equipment is provided using the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of assets, which range
from four to ten years. Computer software is amortized using the straight-line
method over the useful life of five to ten years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the
term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the leasehold
improvement. Design fees and tooling costs are amortized using the
straight-line method based on the useful life of three years. Upon
the disposition of property, plant and equipment, the accumulated depreciation
is deducted from the original cost and any gain or loss is reflected in current
earnings.
Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company periodically reviews the estimated useful lives of its depreciable
assets based on factors including historical experience, the expected beneficial
service period of the asset, the quality and durability of the asset and the
Company’s maintenance policy including periodic upgrades. Changes in useful
lives are made on a prospective basis unless factors indicate the carrying
amounts of the assets may not be recoverable and an impairment write-down is
necessary.
The
Company performs an impairment review, at a minimum, on an annual
basis. However, the Company will review its long-lived assets for
impairment once events or changes in circumstances indicate, in management's
judgment, that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. When
such a determination has been made, management compares the carrying value of
the assets with their estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If it is
determined that an impairment loss has occurred, the loss is recognized during
that period. The impairment loss is calculated as the difference between asset
carrying values and the fair value of the long-lived assets. During
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company performed the review which resulted in
no impairment charge.
Deferred
Rent Obligations and Contributions from Landlords
The
Company accounts for rent expense under non-cancelable operating leases with
scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the lease
term. The excess of straight-line rent expense over scheduled
payments is recorded as a deferred liability. In addition, the
Company receives build out contributions from landlords primarily as an
incentive for the Company to lease retail store space from the
landlords. This is also recorded as a deferred
liability. Such amounts are amortized as a reduction of rent expense
over the life of the related lease.
Capitalized
Software Costs
The
Company capitalizes certain computer software costs after technological
feasibility has been established. The costs are amortized utilizing the
straight-line method over the economic lives of the related products ranging
from five to seven years. Additionally, the Company is in the process
of implementing SAP which is an end-to-end business enterprise solution as the
core enterprise system. As of January 31, 2008, $10.5 million of
costs related to SAP have been capitalized. When the SAP system goes
live, it will begin to be amortized over a period of 10 years, utilizing the
straight-line method.
Intangibles
Intangible
assets consist primarily of trademarks and are recorded at
cost. Trademarks are amortized over ten years. The Company
periodically reviews intangible assets to evaluate whether events or changes
have occurred that would suggest an impairment of carrying value. An
impairment would be recognized when expected undiscounted future operating cash
flows are lower than the carrying value. At January 31, 2008 and
2007, intangible assets at cost were $11.3 million and $9.8 million,
respectively, and related accumulated amortization of intangibles was $6.9
million and $5.5 million, respectively. Amortization expense for fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006 was $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $1.2 million,
respectively.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The
Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce foreign currency
fluctuation risks. The Company accounts for its derivative financial instruments
in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities", (“SFAS No. 133”) as amended and interpreted, which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and
hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives
as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and
measure those instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of those
instruments will be reported in earnings or other comprehensive income depending
on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The
accounting for gains and losses associated with changes in the fair value of the
derivative and the effect on the consolidated financial statements will depend
on its hedge designation and whether the hedge is highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in the fair value of cash flows of the asset or liability
hedged.
The
Company’s risk management policy is to enter into forward exchange contracts and
purchase foreign currency options, under certain limitations, to reduce exposure
to adverse fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and, to a lesser extent, in
commodity prices related to its purchases of watches. When entered into, the
Company designates and documents these derivative instruments as a cash flow
hedge of a specific underlying exposure, as well as the risk management
objectives and strategies for
undertaking
the hedge transactions. Changes in the fair value of a derivative
that is designated and documented as a cash flow hedge and is highly effective,
are recorded in other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction
affects earnings, and then are later reclassified into earnings in the same
account as the hedged transaction. The Company formally assesses,
both at the inception and at each financial quarter thereafter, the
effectiveness of the derivative instrument hedging the underlying forecasted
cash flow transaction. Any ineffectiveness related to the derivative
financial instruments’ change in fair value will be recognized in the period in
which the ineffectiveness was calculated.
The
Company uses forward exchange contracts to offset its exposure to certain
foreign currency liabilities. These forward contracts are not designated as SFAS
No. 133 hedges and, therefore, changes in the fair value of these derivatives
are recognized into earnings, thereby offsetting the current earnings effect of
the related foreign currency liabilities.
The
Company’s risk management policy includes net investment hedging of the
Company’s Swiss franc-denominated investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries
located in Switzerland using purchase foreign currency options under certain
limitations. When entered into for this purpose, the Company designates and
documents the derivative instrument as a net investment hedge of a specific
underlying exposure, as well as the risk management objectives and strategies
for undertaking the hedge transactions. Changes in the fair value of a
derivative that is designated and documented as a net investment hedge are
recorded in other comprehensive income in the same manner as the cumulative
translation adjustment of the Company’s Swiss franc-denominated investment. The
Company formally assesses, both at the inception and at each financial quarter
thereafter, the effectiveness of the derivative instrument hedging the net
investment.
All of
the Company’s derivative instruments have liquid markets to assess fair
value. The Company does not enter into any derivative instruments for
trading purposes.
During
fiscal 2006, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.6 million in other
expense, representing the impact of the discontinuation of foreign currency cash
flow hedges because it was not probable that the forecasted transactions would
occur by the end of the originally specified time period.
Revenue
Recognition
In the
wholesale segment, the Company recognizes its revenues upon transfer of title
and risk of loss in accordance with its FOB shipping point terms of sale and
after the sales price is fixed and determinable and collectibility is reasonably
assured. In the retail segment, transfer of title and risk of loss
occurs at the time of register receipt. The Company records estimates
for sales returns, volume-based programs and sales and cash discount allowances
as a reduction of revenue in the same period that the sales are
recorded. These estimates are based upon historical analysis,
customer agreements and/or currently known factors that arise in the normal
course of business. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company
recorded a one-time accrual of $15.0 million related to estimated future sales
returns associated with the streamlining of the Movado brand wholesale
distribution in the U.S. for the planned reduction of approximately 1,400
wholesale customer doors.
Cost
of Sales
Costs of
sales of the Company’s products consist primarily of component costs, assembly
costs and unit overhead costs associated with the Company’s supply chain
operations in Switzerland and Asia. The
Company’s
supply chain operations consist of logistics management of assembly operations
and product sourcing in Switzerland and Asia and minor assembly in
Switzerland.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
Company’s SG&A expenses consist primarily of marketing, selling,
distribution and general and administrative expenses. Annual
marketing expenditures are based principally on overall strategic considerations
relative to maintaining or increasing market share in markets that management
considers to be crucial to the Company’s continued success as well as on general
economic conditions in the various markets around the world in which the Company
sells its products.
Selling
expenses consist primarily of salaries, sales commissions, sales force travel
and related expenses, expenses associated with Baselworld, the annual watch and
jewelry trade show and other industry trade shows and operating costs incurred
in connection with the Company’s retail business. Sales commissions vary with
overall sales levels. Retail selling expenses consist primarily of payroll
related and store occupancy costs.
Distribution
expenses consist primarily of salaries of distribution staff, rental and other
occupancy costs, security, depreciation and amortization of furniture and
leasehold improvements and shipping supplies.
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other employee
compensation, employee benefit plan costs, office rent, management information
systems costs, professional fees, bad debts, depreciation and amortization of
furniture and leasehold improvements, patent and trademark expenses and various
other general corporate expenses.
Warranty
Costs
The
Company has warranty obligations in connection with the sale of its
watches. All watches sold by the Company come with limited warranties
covering the movement against defects in material and workmanship for periods
ranging from two to three years from the date of purchase, with the exception of
Tommy Hilfiger watches, for which the warranty period is ten
years. In addition, the warranty period is five years for the gold
plating for Movado watch cases and bracelets. As a practice, warranty
costs are expensed as incurred and recorded in the consolidated statement of
income. The warranty obligations are evaluated quarterly and reviewed
in detail on an annual basis to determine if any material changes
occurred. When changes in warranty costs are experienced, the Company
will adjust the warranty accrual as required. Warranty liability for
the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
beginning of year
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
$ |
3,979 |
|
Provision
charged to operations
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
Settlements
made
|
|
|
(1,954 |
) |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
(3,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
end of year
|
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
Pre-opening
Costs
Costs
associated with the opening of new boutique and outlet stores, including
pre-opening rent, are expensed in the period incurred.
Marketing
The
Company expenses the production costs of an advertising campaign at the
commencement date of the advertising campaign. Included in marketing
expenses are costs associated with co-operative advertising, media advertising,
production costs and costs of point-of-sale materials and
displays. These costs are recorded as SG&A
expenses. The Company participates in cooperative advertising
programs on a voluntary basis and receives a “separately identifiable benefit in
exchange for the consideration”. Since the amount of consideration
paid to the retailer does not exceed the fair value of the benefit received by
the Company, these costs are recorded as SG&A expenses as opposed to being
recorded as a reduction of revenue. Marketing expense for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $86.2 million, $79.4 million and $75.9 million,
respectively.
Included
in the other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets as of January 31,
2008 and 2007 are prepaid advertising costs of $2.6 million and $2.3 million,
respectively. These prepaid costs represent advertising costs paid to
licensors in advance, pursuant to the Company’s licensing agreements and
sponsorships.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Amounts
charged to customers and costs incurred by the Company related to shipping and
handling are included in net sales and cost of goods sold,
respectively. The amounts recorded for the fiscal years ended January
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were insignificant.
Income
Taxes
The
Company follows SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under the asset and
liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax laws and tax rates, in each jurisdiction the Company operates,
and applies to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities due to a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date. In addition, the amounts of any future tax
benefits are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent such benefits are
not expected to be realized on a more-likely-than-not basis. The Company
calculates estimated income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it
operates. This process involves estimating actual current tax expense along with
assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for
both book and tax purposes.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes", on February 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 also
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also
provides
guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosures and transitions. The Company
previously recognized income tax positions based on management’s estimate of
whether it was reasonably possible that a liability had been incurred for
unrecognized tax benefits by applying SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. The provisions of FIN 48 became effective for the
Company on February 1, 2007.
Earnings
Per Share
The
Company presents net income per share on a basic and diluted
basis. Basic earnings per share is computed using weighted-average
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is
computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding adjusted for
dilutive common stock equivalents.
The
weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share were
26,049,000, 25,670,000 and 25,273,000 for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. For diluted earnings per share, these amounts were
increased by 1,244,000, 1,124,000 and 907,000 in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, due to potentially dilutive common stock equivalents issuable
under the Company’s stock compensation plans.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On
February 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
“Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), electing to use the modified
prospective application transition method, and accordingly, prior period
financial statements have not been restated. Under this method, the fair
value of all employee stock options granted after adoption and the unvested
portion of previously granted awards must be recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. Prior to February 1, 2006, employee stock option
grants were accounted for under the intrinsic value method, which measures
compensation cost as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock
at grant date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the
stock. Accordingly, compensation expense had not been recognized for
employee stock options granted at or above fair value. Prior to
February 1, 2006, compensation expense for restricted stock grants was reduced
as actual forfeitures of the awards occurred. SFAS No. 123(R)
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant in order to estimate
the amount of share-based awards that will ultimately vest and thus, current
period compensation expense for both stock options and restricted stock have
been adjusted for estimated forfeitures. See Note 12 to the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding stock-based
compensation.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 157, ‘‘Fair Value Measurements’’
(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FAS 115”
(“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 159 on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) “Business
Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) states that all business combinations
(whether full, partial or step acquisitions) will result in all assets and
liabilities of an acquired business being recorded at their acquisition date
fair values. Earn-outs and other forms of contingent consideration
and certain acquired contingencies will also be recorded at fair value at the
acquisition date. SFAS No. 141(R) also states acquisition costs will
generally be expensed as incurred; in-process research and development will be
recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the
acquisition date; changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income
tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax
expense; and restructuring costs will be expensed in periods after the
acquisition date. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December
15, 2008. The
Company will apply the
provisions of this standard to any acquisitions that it completes on or after
December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No. 51.” This statement amends ARB
No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary
and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, noncontrolling
interests will be classified as equity in the consolidated balance sheets. This statement also
provides guidance on a subsidiary deconsolidation as well as stating that
entities need to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December
15, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 160 on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No.
161”). This statement requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and
why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 also requires that objectives for using
derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting
designation and requires cross-referencing within the footnotes. This
statement also suggests disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and
their gains and losses in a tabular format. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS No.
161 on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
2 - INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories,
net at January 31, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Finished
goods
|
|
$ |
117,027 |
|
|
$ |
129,082 |
|
Component
parts
|
|
|
76,222 |
|
|
|
55,930 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
11,880 |
|
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
$ |
205,129 |
|
|
$ |
193,342 |
|
NOTE
3 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property,
plant and equipment at January 31, at cost, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Land
and buildings
|
|
$ |
4,285 |
|
|
$ |
3,591 |
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
|
62,434 |
|
|
|
60,536 |
|
Computer
software
|
|
|
41,529 |
|
|
|
34,028 |
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
42,930 |
|
|
|
43,093 |
|
Design
fees and tooling costs
|
|
|
10,690 |
|
|
|
7,469 |
|
|
|
|
161,868 |
|
|
|
148,717 |
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(93,355 |
) |
|
|
(91,894 |
) |
|
|
$ |
68,513 |
|
|
$ |
56,823 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 was $15.8 million, $15.7 million and $15.4 million,
respectively, which includes computer software amortization expense for fiscal
2008, 2007 and 2006 of $2.0 million, $3.7 million and $4.4 million,
respectively.
NOTE
4 - BANK CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS AND LINES OF CREDIT
On
December 15, 2005, the Company as parent guarantor, and its Swiss subsidiaries,
MGI Luxury Group S.A. and Movado Watch Company SA as borrowers, entered into a
credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Securities, Inc., Bank
of America, N.A., PNC Bank and Citibank, N.A. (the "Swiss Credit Agreement")
which provides for a revolving credit facility of 90.0 million Swiss francs and
matures on December 15, 2010. The obligations of the Company’s two
Swiss subsidiaries under this credit agreement are guaranteed by the Company
under a Parent Guarantee, dated as of December 15, 2005, in favor of the
lenders. The Swiss Credit Agreement contains financial covenants,
including an interest coverage ratio, average debt coverage ratio and
limitations on capital expenditures and certain non-financial covenants that
restrict the Company’s activities regarding investments and acquisitions,
mergers, certain transactions with affiliates, creation of liens, asset
transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the amount of debt
outstanding. Borrowings under the Swiss Credit Agreement bear
interest at a rate equal to LIBOR (as defined in the Swiss
Credit
Agreement)
plus a margin ranging from .50% per annum to .875% per annum (depending upon a
leverage ratio). As of January 31, 2008, the Company believes it was
in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and had 28.0
million Swiss francs, with a dollar equivalent of $25.9 million, outstanding
under this revolving credit facility.
On
December 15, 2005, the Company and its Swiss subsidiaries, MGI Luxury Group S.A.
and Movado Watch Company SA, entered into a credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Securities, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., PNC Bank and
Citibank, N.A. (the "US Credit Agreement") which provides for a revolving credit
facility of $50.0 million (including a sublimit for borrowings in Swiss francs
of up to $25.0 million) with a provision to allow for an increase of an
additional $50.0 million subject to certain terms and conditions. The US Credit
Agreement will mature on December 15, 2010. The obligations of MGI
Luxury Group S.A. and Movado Watch Company SA are guaranteed by the Company
under a Parent Guarantee, dated as of December 15, 2005, in favor of the
lenders. The obligations of the Company are guaranteed by certain domestic
subsidiaries of the Company under subsidiary guarantees, in favor of the
lenders. The US Credit Agreement contains financial covenants,
including an interest coverage ratio, average debt coverage ratio and
limitations on capital expenditures and certain non-financial covenants that
restrict the Company’s activities regarding investments and acquisitions,
mergers, certain transactions with affiliates, creation of liens, asset
transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the amount of debt
outstanding. Borrowings under the US Credit Agreement bear interest,
at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the US
Credit Agreement) plus a margin ranging from .50% per annum to .875% per annum
(depending upon a leverage ratio), or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the
US Credit Agreement). As of January 31, 2008, the Company believes it
was in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants, and there were
no outstanding borrowings against this line.
On June 15, 2007, the Company renewed a
line of credit letter agreement with Bank of America and an amended and restated promissory
note in the principal amount of up to $20.0 million payable to Bank of America,
originally dated December 12, 2005. Pursuant to the line of credit
letter agreement, Bank of America will consider requests for short-term loans
and documentary letters of credit for the importation of merchandise inventory,
the aggregate amount of which at any time outstanding shall not exceed $20.0
million. The Company's obligations under the agreement are guaranteed by its
subsidiaries, Movado Retail Group, Inc. and Movado LLC. Pursuant to
the amended and restated promissory note, the Company promised to pay Bank of
America $20.0 million, or such lesser amount as may then be the unpaid balance
of all loans made by Bank of America to the Company thereunder, in immediately
available funds upon the
maturity date of June 16, 2008. The Company has the right to prepay
all or part of any outstanding amounts under the promissory note without penalty
at any time prior to the maturity date. The amended and restated promissory note
bears interest at an annual rate equal to either (i) a floating rate equal to
the prime rate or (ii) such fixed rate as may be agreed upon by the Company and
Bank of America for an interest period which is also then agreed upon. The
amended and restated promissory note contains various representations and
warranties and events of default that are customary for instruments of that
type. As
of January 31, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings against this
line.
On July
31, 2007, the Company renewed a promissory note, originally dated December 13,
2005, in the principal amount of up to $37.0 million, at a revised amount of up
to $7.0 million, payable to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
("Chase"). Pursuant to
the promissory note, the Company promised to pay Chase $7.0 million, or such
lesser amount as may then be the unpaid balance of each loan made or letter of
credit issued by Chase to the Company thereunder, upon the maturity date of
July 31, 2008.
The
Company has the right to prepay all or
part of any outstanding amounts under the promissory note without penalty at any
time prior to the maturity date. The promissory note bears interest at an annual
rate equal to (i) a floating rate equal to the prime rate, (ii) a fixed rate
equal to an adjusted LIBOR plus 0.625% or (iii) a fixed rate equal to a rate of
interest offered by Chase from time to time on any single commercial borrowing.
The promissory note contains various events of default that are customary for
instruments of that type. In addition, it is an event of default for any
security interest or other encumbrance to be created or imposed on the Company's
property, other than as permitted in the lien covenant of the US Credit Agreement. Chase issued 11
irrevocable standby letters of credit for retail and operating facility leases
to various landlords, for the administration of the Movado Boutique
private-label credit card and Canadian payroll to the Royal Bank of Canada
totaling $1.2 million with expiration dates through March 18,
2009. As of January 31, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings
against this promissory note.
A Swiss
subsidiary of the Company maintains unsecured lines of credit with an
unspecified length of time with a Swiss bank. Available credit under these lines
totaled 8.0 million Swiss francs, with dollar equivalents of $7.4 million and
$6.4 million at January 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of
January 31, 2008, two European banks have guaranteed obligations to third
parties on behalf of two of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in the equivalent
amount of $2.1 million in various foreign currencies. As of January
31, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings against these lines.
The
Company pays a facility fee on the unused portion of the committed lines of the
Swiss Credit Agreement and the US Credit Agreement. The unused line
of credit of the committed lines was $107.3 million at January 31,
2008.
Aggregate
maximum and average monthly outstanding borrowings against the Company's lines
of credit and related weighted-average interest rates during fiscal 2008 and
2007 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
borrowings
|
|
$ |
40,900 |
|
|
$ |
63,974 |
|
Average
monthly borrowings
|
|
$ |
32,200 |
|
|
$ |
53,564 |
|
Weighted-average
interest rate
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Weighted-average
interest rates were computed based on average month-end outstanding borrowings
and applicable average month-end interest rates.
NOTE
5 - LONG-TERM DEBT
The
components of long-term debt as of January 31, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swiss
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
$ |
25,895 |
|
|
$ |
40,196 |
|
Series
A Senior Notes
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Senior
Series A-2004 Notes
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
60,895 |
|
|
|
80,196 |
|
Less:
current portion
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
Long-term
debt
|
|
$ |
50,895 |
|
|
$ |
75,196 |
|
For
information related to the Swiss Revolving Credit Facility, see Note 4 on Bank
Credit Arrangements and Lines of Credit.
During
fiscal 1999, the Company issued $25.0 million of Series A Senior Notes under a
Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated November 30,
1998. These notes bear interest of 6.90% per annum, mature on October
30, 2010 and are subject to annual repayments of $5.0 million commencing October
31, 2006. These notes contain certain financial covenants including
an interest coverage ratio and maintenance of consolidated net worth and certain
non-financial covenants that restrict the Company’s activities regarding
investments and acquisitions, mergers, certain transactions with affiliates,
creation of liens, asset transfers, payment of dividends and limitation of the
amount of debt outstanding. At January 31, 2008, the Company believes
it was in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and $15.0
million of these notes were issued and outstanding.
As of
March 21, 2004, the Company amended its Note Purchase and Private Shelf
Agreement, originally dated March 21, 2001. This agreement, which
expired on March 21, 2007, allowed for the issuance of senior promissory notes
in the aggregate principal amount of up to $40.0 million with maturities up to
12 years from their original date of issuance. On October 8, 2004, the Company issued
4.79% Senior Series A-2004 Notes due 2011 (the "Senior Series A-2004
Notes") pursuant to the
Note Purchase Agreement in
an aggregate principal amount of $20.0 million, which will mature on October 8,
2011 and are subject to annual repayments of $5.0 million commencing on
October 8, 2008. Proceeds of the Senior
Series A-2004 Notes have been used by the Company for capital expenditures,
repayment of certain of its debt obligations and general corporate
purposes. These notes contain certain financial covenants,
including an interest coverage ratio and maintenance of consolidated net worth
and certain non-financial covenants that restrict the Company’s activities
regarding investments and acquisitions, mergers, certain transactions with
affiliates, creation of liens, asset transfers, payment of dividends and
limitation of the amount of debt outstanding. As of January 31, 2008,
the Company believes it was in compliance with all financial and non-financial
covenants and $20.0 million of these notes were issued and
outstanding.
Aggregate
maturities of long-term obligations at January 31, 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended
January 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
10,000 |
|
2010
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
2011
|
|
|
35,895 |
|
2012
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
60,895 |
|
NOTE
6 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 133 requiring that all derivative
financial instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair
value.
As of
January 31, 2008, the balance of deferred net gains on derivative financial
instruments documented as cash flow hedges included in accumulated other
comprehensive income (“AOCI”) was $3.8 million in net gains, net of tax of $2.5
million, compared to $0.1 million in net losses at January 31, 2007, net of tax
benefit of $0.1 million and $1.4 million in net losses at January 31, 2006, net
of tax benefit of $0.8 million. The Company estimates that a substantial portion
of the deferred net gains at January 31, 2008 will be realized into earnings
over the next 12 months as a result of transactions that are expected to occur
over that period. The primary underlying transaction which will cause the amount
in AOCI to affect cost of goods sold consists of the Company’s sell through of
inventory purchased in Swiss francs. The maximum length of time the Company is
hedging its exposure to the fluctuation in future cash flows for forecasted
transactions is 24 months. For the years ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
the Company reclassified from AOCI to earnings $0.6 million of net gains, net of
tax of $0.4 million, $0.1 million in net losses, net of tax benefit of $0.1
million, and $1.8 million in net losses, net of tax benefit of $1.1 million,
respectively.
During
fiscal 2006, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.6 million in other
expense, representing the impact of the discontinuation of foreign currency cash
flow hedges because it was not probable that the forecasted transactions would
occur by the end of the originally specified time period.
During
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded no charge related to its
assessment of the effectiveness of its derivative hedge portfolio because of the
high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the underlying
exposure being hedged.
Changes
in the contracts’ fair value due to spot-forward differences are excluded from
the designated hedge relationship. The Company records these
transactions in the cost of sales of the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
The
balance of the net loss included in the cumulative foreign currency translation
adjustment associated with derivatives documented as net investment hedges was
$1.5 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.9 million as of January 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006. Under SFAS No. 133, changes in fair value of these
instruments are recognized in currency translation adjustment, a component of
AOCI, to offset the change in the value of the net investment being
hedged.
The
following presents fair value and maturities of the Company’s foreign currency
derivatives outstanding as of January 31, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
Fair
Value of Asset
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
exchange contracts
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
Fiscal
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
foreign currency options
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Fiscal
2009
|
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
The
Company estimates the fair value of its foreign currency derivatives based on
quoted market prices or pricing models using current market
rates. These derivative financial instruments are currently reflected
in other current assets.
NOTE
7 - FAIR VALUE OF OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair
value of the Company's 4.79% Senior Notes and 6.90% Series A Senior Notes
approximate 97% and 104% of the carrying value of the notes, respectively, as of
January 31, 2008. The fair value was calculated based upon the
present value of future cash flows discounted at estimated borrowing rates for
similar debt instruments or upon estimated prices based on current yields for
debt issues of similar quality and terms.
NOTE
8 - INCOME TAXES
The
(benefit) provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended January 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 consists of the following components (in
thousands):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$ |
3,414 |
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
$ |
13,205 |
|
U.S. State and
Local
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
13,483 |
|
|
|
18,807 |
|
Noncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
|
(10,635 |
) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
- |
|
U.S. State and
Local
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(458 |
) |
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(11,598 |
) |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
|
(5,214 |
) |
|
|
(3,972 |
) |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
U.S. State and
Local
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
(6,675 |
) |
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
|
|
(11,013 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
(9,471 |
) |
|
$ |
2,890 |
|
|
$ |
18,319 |
|
(Loss)
income before taxes for U.S. operations was ($4.3 million), $12.9 million, and
$15.9 million for periods ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Income before taxes for non-U.S. operations was $56.2
million, $39.8 million, and $29.0 million for periods ended January 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Significant
components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
2008
Deferred Taxes
|
|
|
2007
Deferred Taxes
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
17,364 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
21,014 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
5,957 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Unprocessed
returns |
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Receivable
allowance
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
Deferred
compensation
|
|
|
10,435 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Hedge
derivatives
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Depreciation/amortization
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
45,888 |
|
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
|
41,777 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(10,689 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(16,741 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Total
deferred tax assets and liabilities
|
|
$ |
35,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,425 |
|
|
$ |
25,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
As of
January 31, 2008, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $72.2 million, which are available to offset taxable income in
future years. The majority of the carryforward tax losses ($58.3
million) were incurred in Switzerland in the Ebel business prior to the
Company’s acquisition of the Ebel business on March 1,
2004. Effective March 1, 2004, Ebel S.A. was merged into another
wholly-owned Swiss subsidiary, and a Swiss tax ruling was obtained that allows
the Ebel tax losses to offset taxable income in the surviving
entity. As part of purchase accounting, the Company recorded net
deferred tax assets for the Swiss tax losses and for the temporary differences
between the Swiss tax basis and the assigned values of the net Ebel
assets. The Company has established a partial valuation allowance on
the deferred tax assets as a result of an evaluation of expected utilization of
such tax benefits within the expiry of the tax losses through fiscal 2011. The
recognition of the tax benefit had been applied to reduce the carrying value of
acquired intangible assets to zero during fiscal 2007; thereafter releases of
the valuation allowance have been recorded as a reduction to income tax expense.
The Company recognized cash tax savings of $5.1 million on the utilization of
the Swiss tax losses during the year, and released an additional $6.7 million
valuation allowance, based on revised income forecasts.
The
remaining tax losses ($13.9 million) are related to the Company’s operations in
Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. A full valuation allowance has been
established on the deferred tax assets resulting from the losses attributable to
Japan due to the Company’s assessment that it is more-likely-than-not the
deferred tax assets will not be utilized within the 7 year expiry
period. The Company has three subsidiaries in Germany. Two
subsidiaries are inactive; as a result the Company has determined that a full
valuation allowance is appropriate for the losses of these two subsidiaries,
even though there is no time limitation for utilization of the
losses. The third German subsidiary is currently profitable; however,
certain expected changes in the business prevent management from concluding it
is more-likely-than-not the present level of profitability will be sustained in
future years. As a result, the Company adjusted the valuation
allowance to offset current German income tax expense of $0.3
million,
but
continues to maintain a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets of
this subsidiary. During fiscal 2008, due to sustained profitability and positive
earnings projections for the Company’s United Kingdom operations, the Company
concluded it is more-likely-than-not that the deferred tax assets will be
realized; as a result, the related valuation allowance of $0.6 million was no
longer required.
Management
will continue to evaluate the appropriate level of allowance on all deferred tax
assets, considering such factors as prior earnings history, expected future
earnings, carryback and carryforward periods, and tax and business strategies
that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax
asset.
The
provision for income taxes differs from the amount determined by applying the
U.S. federal statutory rate as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes at the U.S. statutory rate
|
|
$ |
18,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,607 |
|
|
$ |
15,728 |
|
Lower
effective foreign income tax rate
|
|
|
(9,303 |
) |
|
|
(5,359 |
) |
|
|
(5,958 |
) |
Change
in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(7,292 |
) |
|
|
(11,182 |
) |
|
|
901 |
|
Tax
provided on repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,506 |
|
Change
in unrecognized tax benefits, net
|
|
|
(11,598 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
State
and local taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
Total
(benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
(9,471 |
) |
|
$ |
2,890 |
|
|
$ |
18,319 |
|
No
provision has been made for federal income or withholding taxes which may be
payable on the remittance of the undistributed retained earnings of foreign
subsidiaries approximating $170.3 million at January 31, 2008, as those earnings
are considered permanently reinvested. It is not practical to
estimate the amount of tax, if any, that may be payable on the eventual
distribution of these earnings.
During
the year, the effective tax rate decreased to -18.23%, primarily as a result of
the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the settlement of
the IRS audit for fiscal years 2004 through 2006, and the release of valuation
allowances in whole or in part on Swiss, German and UK tax
losses. The effective tax rate excluding the benefits from release of
the valuation allowances and the settlement of the IRS audit was
20.62%. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was 5.44%, primarily
as a result of a partial release of the valuation allowance on the Swiss tax
losses. The effective tax rate excluding the benefit from release of
the valuation allowance was 23.26%. The effective tax rate for fiscal
2006 was 40.8%, including the tax charge of $7.5 million associated with
repatriated foreign earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 excluding the
repatriation related tax charge was 24.06%.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes", on February 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized
in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No.
109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosures and transitions. The Company previously
recognized income tax positions based on management’s estimate of whether it was
reasonably possible that a liability had been incurred for unrecognized tax
benefits by applying FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. The provisions of FIN 48 became effective for the
Company on February 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company
recognized a charge of approximately $7.7 million to the February 1, 2007
retained earnings balance.
The
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) commenced examinations of the Company’s
consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2004 through 2006
in September 2006. Due to uncertainty in the U.S. tax law, primarily
with regard to payment terms on purchases with related foreign suppliers in
Switzerland and Hong Kong, as of October 31, 2007 the Company had recorded gross
unrecognized tax benefits of $25.9 million ($13.7 million that would affect the
effective tax rate) for the audit years. The examination phase
concluded in January 2008, when the Company and the IRS came to a final
agreement that resulted in the effective settlement of all three years. Pursuant
to the settlement, the Company agreed to a total tax assessment for the three
years of $3.3 million ($4.8 million gross less $1.5 million foreign tax
credits). As a result, in the fourth quarter, the Company reduced its
gross unrecognized tax benefits by $21.1 million and recognized a federal tax
benefit of $10.4 million. Related net interest accruals of $2.1
million were also adjusted.
A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax
benefits (exclusive of interest) is as follows (in thousands):
Balance,
at February 1, 2007
|
|
$ |
30,052 |
|
Additions
based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
477 |
|
Additions
for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
Lapse
of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
Decreases
for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(21,153 |
) |
Cash
settlements
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
F/X
fluctuations
|
|
|
35 |
|
Balance,
at January 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
10,089 |
|
Included
in the balance at January 31, 2008 is $2.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits
which would impact the Company’s effective tax rate, if
recognized. Interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized
tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense. As of January 31,
2008 the Company had $1.3 million of accrued interest (net of tax benefit)
related to unrecognized tax benefits. The balance of gross unrecognized tax
benefits remaining at January 31, 2008 includes the $4.8 million gross IRS tax
assessment that will be paid during fiscal year 2009. During fiscal
year 2008, the Company accrued $1.0 million of interest (net of tax
benefit).
The
Company conducts business globally and, as a result, files income tax returns in
the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign
jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is
subject to examination by taxing authorities in many countries, including such
major jurisdictions as Switzerland, Hong Kong, Canada and the United
States. The Company, with few
exceptions,
is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in state,
local and foreign taxing jurisdictions for years before the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2004.
NOTE
9 - OTHER ASSETS
In fiscal
1996, the Company entered into an agreement with a trust which owned an
insurance policy issued on the lives of the Company's Chairman and his spouse.
Under this agreement, the trust assigned the insurance policy to the Company as
collateral to secure repayment by the trust of interest-free loans made by the
Company to the trust in amounts equal to the premiums on said insurance policy
(approximately $0.7 million per annum). The agreement required the trust to
repay the loans from the proceeds of the policy. At January 31, 2003, the
Company had outstanding loans from the trust of $5.2 million. On April 4, 2003,
the agreement was amended and restated to transfer the policy from the trust to
the Company in partial repayment of the loan balance. The Company is the
beneficiary of the policy insofar as upon the death of the Company's Chairman
and his spouse, the proceeds of the policy would first be distributed to the
Company to repay the premiums paid by the Company with the remaining proceeds
distributed to the trust. As of January 31, 2008, total premiums paid were $9.6
million and the cash surrender value of the policy was $10.5
million.
NOTE
10 – LEASES
The
Company leases office, distribution, retail and manufacturing facilities, and
office equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates through
February 2018. Certain leases include renewal options and the payment
of real estate taxes and other occupancy costs. Some leases also contain
rent escalation clauses (step rents) that require additional rent amounts in the
later years of the term. Rent expense for leases with step rents is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. Likewise,
capital funding and other lease concessions that are occasionally provided to
the Company, are recorded as deferred rent and amortized on a straight-line
basis over the minimum lease term as adjustments to rent
expense. Rent expense for equipment and distribution, factory and
office facilities under operating leases was approximately $16.8 million, $14.4
million and $13.3 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Minimum annual rentals at January 31, 2008 under
noncancelable operating leases, which do not include real estate taxes and
operating costs, are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended January
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
15,121 |
|
2010
|
|
|
14,468 |
|
2011
|
|
|
13,272 |
|
2012
|
|
|
12,313 |
|
2013
|
|
|
10,686 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
21,378 |
|
|
|
$ |
87,238 |
|
Due to
the nature of its business as a luxury consumer goods distributor, the Company
is exposed to various commercial losses, such as misappropriation of
assets. The Company believes it is adequately insured against such
losses.
NOTE
11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At
January 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $1.2
million with expiration dates through March 18, 2009 compared to $1.2 million
with expiration dates through March 15, 2008 as of January 31,
2007. One bank in the domestic bank group has issued irrevocable
standby letters of credit for retail and operating facility leases to various
landlords, for the administration of the Movado Boutique private-label credit
card and for Canadian payroll to the Royal Bank of Canada.
As of
January 31, 2008, two European banks have guaranteed obligations to third
parties on behalf of two of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in the equivalent
amount of $2.1 million in various foreign currencies compared to $1.6 million as
of January 31, 2007.
Pursuant
to the Company’s agreements with its licensors, the Company is required to pay
minimum royalties and advertising. As of January 31, 2008, the
Company’s obligation related to its license agreements was $115.9
million.
The
Company had outstanding purchase obligations of $59.9 million with suppliers at
the end of fiscal 2008 for raw materials, finished watches and packaging in the
normal course of business. These purchase obligation amounts do not
represent total anticipated purchases but represent only amounts to be paid for
items required to be purchased under agreements that are enforceable, legally
binding and specify minimum quantity, price and term.
The
Company is involved from time to time in legal claims involving trademarks and
intellectual property, licensing, employee relations and other matters
incidental to the Company’s business. Although the outcome of such
items cannot be determined with certainty, the Company’s general counsel and
management believe that the final outcome would not have a material effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
NOTE
12 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Effective
concurrently with the consummation of the Company's public offering in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1994, the Board of Directors and the shareholders of
the Company approved the adoption of the Movado Group, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock
Option Plan (the "Employee Stock Option Plan") for the benefit of certain
officers, directors and key employees of the Company. The Employee Stock Option
Plan was amended in fiscal 1997 and restated as the Movado Group, Inc. 1996
Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). Under the Plan, as amended and restated as of
April 8, 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which
consists of four of the Company's outside directors, has the authority to grant
incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to purchase, as well as
stock appreciation rights and stock awards, up to 9,000,000 shares of Common
Stock. Options granted to participants under the Plan generally become
exercisable in equal installments over three or five years and remain
exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. The option price
may not be less than the fair market value of the stock at the time the options
are granted.
On
February 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
“Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), electing to use the modified
prospective application transition method, and accordingly, prior period
financial statements have not been restated. Under this method,
the fair value of all stock options granted after adoption and the unvested
portion of previously granted awards must be recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. The Company utilizes the
Black-Scholes
option-pricing
model to calculate the fair value of each option at the grant date which
requires certain assumptions be made. The expected life of stock
option grants is determined using historical data and represents the time period
which the stock option is expected to be outstanding until it is
exercised. The risk free interest rate is the yield on the grant date
of U.S. Treasury constant maturities with a maturity date closest to the
expected life of the stock option. The expected stock price
volatility is derived from historical volatility and calculated based on the
estimated term structure of the stock option grant. The expected
dividend yield is calculated using the expected annualized dividend which
remains constant during the expected term of the option.
The
weighted-average assumptions used with the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
for the calculation of the fair value of stock option grants during the fiscal
years 2008 and 2007 were: expected term of 6.0 years for fiscal 2008 and 5.3
years for fiscal 2007; risk-free interest rate of 4.32% for fiscal 2008 and
4.92% for fiscal 2007; expected volatility of 35.32% for fiscal 2008 and 31.78%
for fiscal 2007 and dividend yield of 1.03% for fiscal 2008 and 1.22% for fiscal
2007. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 was $12.06 and $6.58,
respectively.
Total
compensation expense for unvested stock option grants recognized during the
fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $1.1 million, net
of a tax benefit of $0.7 million and $0.8 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.5
million, respectively. Expense related to stock option compensation
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting term. As of
January 31, 2008, there was approximately $1.9 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested stock options. These costs are expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. Total
cash received for stock option exercises during the fiscal year ended January
31, 2008 amounted to approximately $3.4 million. Windfall tax benefits
realized on these exercises were approximately $1.3 million.
Prior to
February 1, 2006, employee stock options were accounted for under the intrinsic
value method, which measures compensation cost as the excess, if any, of the
quoted market price of the stock at grant date over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock. Accordingly, compensation expense had not
been recognized for stock options granted at or above fair
value. Had compensation expense been determined and recorded
based upon the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation", net income and net income per share would have
been reduced to pro forma amounts for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 as
follows:
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
January
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income as reported
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
Fair
value based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
Pro
forma net income
|
|
$ |
24,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
Pro
forma under SFAS No. 123
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Pro
forma under SFAS No. 123
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
The
weighted-average assumptions used with the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
for the calculation of the fair value of stock option grants during fiscal year
2006 were: expected term of three to seven years; risk-free interest rate of
3.77%; expected volatility of 47% and dividend yield of 1.74%. The
weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during fiscal year
ending January 31, 2006 was $8.11.
Transactions
for stock options under the Plan since fiscal 2005 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
31, 2005
|
|
|
3,621,034 |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
166,500 |
|
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
(596,221 |
) |
|
$ |
6.54 |
|
Options
cancelled
|
|
|
(21,700 |
) |
|
$ |
12.88 |
|
January
31, 2006
|
|
|
3,169,613 |
|
|
$ |
12.96 |
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.86 |
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
(430,873 |
) |
|
$ |
8.96 |
|
Options
cancelled
|
|
|
(28,800 |
) |
|
$ |
13.85 |
|
January
31, 2007
|
|
|
2,853,940 |
|
|
$ |
13.91 |
|
Options
granted
|
|
|
89,500 |
|
|
$ |
31.57 |
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
(269,319 |
) |
|
$ |
12.64 |
|
Options
cancelled
|
|
|
(20,666 |
) |
|
$ |
14.18 |
|
January
31, 2008
|
|
|
2,653,455 |
|
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
The total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the fiscal years ended January
31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $5.3 million and $6.5 million,
respectively. The total fair value of the stock options vested for
the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $8.7 million
and $2.3 million, respectively.
The
following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable stock options as of
January 31, 2008:
Range
of Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Life (years)
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
- |
|
$ |
6.22 |
|
|
|
108,740 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
108,740 |
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
$ |
6.23 |
|
- |
|
$ |
9.34 |
|
|
|
84,066 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.32 |
|
|
|
84,066 |
|
|
$ |
7.32 |
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
- |
|
$ |
12.45 |
|
|
|
669,082 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
|
|
669,082 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
$ |
12.46 |
|
- |
|
$ |
15.57 |
|
|
|
947,026 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.65 |
|
|
|
780,363 |
|
|
$ |
14.73 |
|
$ |
15.58 |
|
- |
|
$ |
18.68 |
|
|
|
711,041 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
18.14 |
|
|
|
519,548 |
|
|
$ |
18.27 |
|
$ |
18.69 |
|
- |
|
$ |
21.80 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.76 |
|
|
|
8,003 |
|
|
$ |
19.53 |
|
$ |
21.81 |
|
- |
|
$ |
24.91 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.65 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
$ |
22.45 |
|
$ |
24.92 |
|
- |
|
$ |
28.03 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
25.88 |
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
$ |
25.85 |
|
$ |
28.04 |
|
- |
|
$ |
31.14 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
30.65 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
31.15 |
|
- |
|
$ |
35.00 |
|
|
|
74,500 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
32.92 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653,455 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
|
|
2,178,470 |
|
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
The total
intrinsic value of outstanding stock options for the fiscal years ended January
31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $25.4 million and $42.2 million,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of exercisable stock options
for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $23.2
million and $33.9 million, respectively.
Under the
Plan, the Company has the ability to grant restricted stock to certain
employees. Restricted stock grants generally vest three to five years
from the date of grant. Expense for these grants is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of
restricted stock grants is equal to the closing price of the Company’s
publicly-traded common stock on the grant date.
On May
31, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors adopted the
Executive Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) authorized by section 9 of the
Plan. The LTIP provides for the award of “Performance Share Units”
that are equivalent, one for one, to shares of the Company’s common stock and
that vest based on the Company’s achievement of its operating margin goal for a
target fiscal year. The number of actual shares earned by a
participant is based on the Company’s actual performance at the end of the award
period and can range from 0% to 150% of the participant’s target
award. Total target awards of 189,500 and 119,375 Performance Share
Units were granted by the Compensation Committee on May 31, 2006 and April 30,
2007, respectively, that vest over three and five year periods.
Total
compensation expense for restricted stock grants and for grants of Performance
Share Units under the LTIP (together “restricted stock”) recognized during the
fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $1.9 million, net
of a tax benefit of $1.2 million, and $1.2 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.7
million, respectively. Prior to February 1, 2006, compensation
expense for restricted stock grants was reduced as actual forfeitures of the
awards occurred. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated
at the time of grant in order to estimate the amount of share-based awards that
will ultimately vest and thus, current period compensation expense has been
adjusted for estimated
forfeitures
based on historical data. As of January 31, 2008,
there was approximately $6.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested restricted stock. These costs are expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
Transactions
for restricted stock under the Plan since fiscal 2005 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
Number
of Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
31,2005
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
12.90 |
|
Units
granted
|
|
|
96,160 |
|
|
$ |
17.94 |
|
Units
vested
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
$ |
9.83 |
|
Units
forfeited
|
|
|
(13,070 |
) |
|
$ |
13.62 |
|
January
31, 2006
|
|
|
321,090 |
|
|
$ |
14.39 |
|
Units
granted
|
|
|
255,450 |
|
|
$ |
19.02 |
|
Units
vested
|
|
|
(102,940 |
) |
|
$ |
10.01 |
|
Units
forfeited
|
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
|
$ |
16.78 |
|
January
31, 2007
|
|
|
463,345 |
|
|
$ |
17.87 |
|
Units
granted
|
|
|
164,185 |
|
|
$ |
32.06 |
|
Units
vested
|
|
|
(113,410 |
) |
|
$ |
15.28 |
|
Units
forfeited
|
|
|
(17,390 |
) |
|
$ |
18.84 |
|
January
31, 2008
|
|
|
496,730 |
|
|
$ |
23.12 |
|
Restricted
stock units are exercised simultaneously when they vest and are issued from the
pool of authorized shares. The total intrinsic value
of restricted stock units that vested during the fiscal years ended January 31,
2008 and 2007 was approximately $3.5 million and $2.1 million,
respectively. The
windfall tax benefits realized on the vested restricted stock grants for fiscal
year ended January 31, 2008 were $0.6 million. The weighted-average grant
date fair values for restricted stock grants for the years ended January 31,
2008 and 2007 were $32.06 and $19.02, respectively. Outstanding
restricted stock units had a total intrinsic value of approximately $12.0
million and $13.3 million for fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and
2007.
NOTE
13 – OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLANS
The
Company maintains an Employee Savings Plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code. In addition, the Company maintains defined contribution
employee benefit plans for its employees located in
Switzerland. Company contributions and expenses of administering the
plans amounted to $2.5 million, $2.4 million and $2.0 million in fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Effective
June 1, 1995, the Company adopted a defined contribution supplemental executive
retirement plan ("SERP"). The SERP provides eligible executives with
supplemental pension benefits in addition to amounts received under the
Company's other retirement plan. The Company makes a matching contribution which
vests equally over five years. During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
recorded an expense related to the SERP of $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.7
million, respectively.
During
fiscal 1999, the Company adopted a Stock Bonus Plan for all employees not in the
SERP. Under the terms of this Stock Bonus Plan, the Company
contributes a discretionary amount to the trust established under the
plan. Each plan participant vests after five years in 100% of their
respective prorata portion of such contribution. Effective for fiscal
2006, in lieu of making any further contributions to the Stock Bonus Plan, the
Company increased the maximum amount of its 401(k) match.
On
September 23, 1994, the Company entered into a Death and Disability Benefit Plan
agreement with the Company's Chairman. Under the terms of the agreement, in the
event of the Chairman's death or disability, the Company is required to make an
annual benefit payment of approximately $0.3 million to his spouse for the
lesser of ten years or her remaining lifetime. Neither the agreement nor the
benefits payable thereunder are assignable and no benefits are payable to the
estates or heirs of the Chairman or his spouse. Results of operations for each
period include an actuarially determined charge related to this plan of $0.3
million for fiscal 2008, and $0.2 million for fiscal 2007 and 2006.
NOTE
14 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The
components of comprehensive income for the twelve months ended January 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
60,805 |
|
|
$ |
50,138 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
unrealized (loss) gain on investments, net of tax
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net
change in effective portion of hedging contracts, net of
tax
|
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
(3,318 |
) |
Foreign
currency translation adjustment (1)
|
|
|
29,817 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
(17,716 |
) |
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
94,388 |
|
|
$ |
54,772 |
|
|
$ |
5,584 |
|
(1) The
currency translation adjustment is not adjusted for income taxes as they relate
to permanent investments in international subsidiaries.
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income at January 31, consisted of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
Net
unrealized gain (loss) on hedging contracts, net of tax
|
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Cumulative
foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
61,983 |
|
|
|
32,166 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
65,890 |
|
|
$ |
32,307 |
|
NOTE
15 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company follows SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information." The statement requires disclosure of segment data
based on how management makes decisions about allocating resources to segments
and measuring their performance.
The
Company conducts its business primarily in two operating
segments: Wholesale and Retail. The Company’s Wholesale
segment includes the designing, manufacturing and distribution of quality
watches, in addition to revenue generated from after sales service activities
and shipping. The Retail segment includes the Movado Boutiques and outlet
stores.
The
Company divides its business into two major geographic
segments: United States operations, and International, which includes
the results of all other Company operations. The allocation of
geographic revenue is based upon the location of the customer. The Company’s
international operations are principally conducted in Europe, Asia, Canada, the
Middle East, South America and the Caribbean. The Company’s
international assets are substantially located in Switzerland.
Operating
Segment Data as of and for the Fiscal Year Ended January 31, (in
thousands):
|
|
Net
Sales
|
|
|
Operating
Income
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$ |
464,166 |
|
|
$ |
443,197 |
|
|
$ |
385,383 |
|
|
$ |
48,646 |
|
|
$ |
46,473 |
|
|
$ |
42,289 |
|
Retail
|
|
|
95,384 |
|
|
|
89,668 |
|
|
|
85,558 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
5,846 |
|
|
|
5,748 |
|
Consolidated
total
|
|
$ |
559,550 |
|
|
$ |
532,865 |
|
|
$ |
470,941 |
|
|
$ |
50,777 |
|
|
$ |
52,319 |
|
|
$ |
48,037 |
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$ |
580,665 |
|
|
$ |
510,380 |
|
|
$ |
19,684 |
|
|
$ |
12,757 |
|
|
$ |
9,659 |
|
Retail
|
|
|
65,551 |
|
|
|
67,238 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
6,708 |
|
Consolidated
total
|
|
$ |
646,216 |
|
|
$ |
577,618 |
|
|
$ |
27,392 |
|
|
$ |
20,178 |
|
|
$ |
16,367 |
|
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$ |
11,466 |
|
|
$ |
11,617 |
|
|
$ |
11,880 |
|
Retail
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
4,963 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
Consolidated
total
|
|
$ |
16,684 |
|
|
$ |
16,580 |
|
|
$ |
16,780 |
|
Geographic
Segment Data as of and for the Fiscal Year Ended January 31, (in
thousands):
|
|
Net
Sales (1)
|
|
|
Operating
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
328,212 |
|
|
$ |
366,656 |
|
|
$ |
326,937 |
|
|
$ |
(18,066 |
) |
|
$ |
7,704 |
|
|
$ |
10,142 |
|
International
|
|
|
231,338 |
|
|
|
166,209 |
|
|
|
144,004 |
|
|
|
68,843 |
|
|
|
44,615 |
|
|
|
37,895 |
|
Consolidated
total
|
|
$ |
559,550 |
|
|
$ |
532,865 |
|
|
$ |
470,941 |
|
|
$ |
50,777 |
|
|
$ |
52,319 |
|
|
$ |
48,037 |
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
Long-Lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
344,495 |
|
|
$ |
357,650 |
|
|
$ |
51,544 |
|
|
$ |
42,702 |
|
International
|
|
|
301,721 |
|
|
|
219,968 |
|
|
|
16,969 |
|
|
|
14,121 |
|
Consolidated
total
|
|
$ |
646,216 |
|
|
$ |
577,618 |
|
|
$ |
68,513 |
|
|
$ |
56,823 |
|
(1)
|
The
United States and international net sales are net of intercompany sales of
$275.2 million, $258.3 million and $241.9 million for the twelve months
ended January 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
NOTE
16 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The
following table presents unaudited selected interim operating results of the
Company for fiscal 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
Fiscal
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
101,363 |
|
|
$ |
139,467 |
|
|
$ |
180,153 |
|
|
$ |
138,567 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
$ |
61,652 |
|
|
$ |
83,346 |
|
|
$ |
109,887 |
|
|
$ |
81,797 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
12,264 |
|
|
$ |
26,528 |
|
|
$ |
19,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
97,744 |
|
|
$ |
126,588 |
|
|
$ |
166,272 |
|
|
$ |
142,261 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
$ |
59,590 |
|
|
$ |
78,512 |
|
|
$ |
97,902 |
|
|
$ |
86,939 |
|
Net
income (1)
|
|
$ |
2,855 |
|
|
$ |
11,349 |
|
|
$ |
21,885 |
|
|
$ |
14,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
In
the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company recorded a one-time out
of period benefit adjustment of $2.2 million related to foreign currency
transactions. This adjustment was recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses and the Company has concluded that the amount is
not material to the third quarter or any of the prior quarters impacted.
|
As each
quarter is calculated as a discrete period, the sum of the four quarters may not
equal the calculated full year amount. This is in accordance with
prescribed reporting requirements.
NOTE
17 - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
The
following is provided as supplemental information to the consolidated statements
of cash flows (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
3,407 |
|
|
$ |
3,760 |
|
|
$ |
4,520 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
11,542 |
|
|
$ |
13,751 |
|
|
$ |
6,096 |
|
NOTE 18– OTHER INCOME, NET
The
components of other income, net for fiscal 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended January 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on sale of building (a) (b)
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
2,630 |
|
Discontinued
cash flow hedges (c)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,622 |
) |
Sale
of artwork (d)
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Sale
of rights to web domain (e)
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
income, net
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
(a) The
Company recorded a pre-tax gain for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 of
$0.4 million on the sale of a building acquired on March 1, 2004 in the
acquisition of Ebel. The Company received cash proceeds from the sale
of $0.7 million. The building was classified as an asset held for sale in other
current assets.
(b) The
Company recorded a pre-tax gain for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 of
$2.6 million on the sale of a building acquired on March 1, 2004 in connection
with the acquisition of Ebel. The Company received cash proceeds from
the sale of $4.0 million. The building was classified as an asset held for sale
in other current assets.
(c) The
Company recorded a pre-tax loss for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 of
$1.6 million in other expense, representing the impact of the discontinuation of
foreign currency cash flow hedges because it was not probable that the
forecasted transactions would occur by the end of the originally specified time
period.
(d) The
Company recorded a pre-tax gain for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 of
$0.8 million on the sale of a piece of artwork acquired in February
1988. The Company received cash proceeds from the sale of $1.0
million. The artwork was classified as a non-current
asset.
(e) The
Company recorded a pre-tax gain for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 of
$0.1 million on the sale of the rights to a web domain name. The
Company received cash from the sale of $0.1 million. There was no
cost basis on the balance sheet for the domain name.
NOTE 19– TREASURY STOCK
On
December 4, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up
to one million shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares will be
repurchased from time to time as market conditions warrant either through open
market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or other
means. No time limit has been set for the completion of the program.
The objective of the program is to reduce or eliminate earnings per share
dilution caused by the shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of stock
options and in connection with other equity based compensation plans.
As of
January 31, 2008, the Company purchased 43,957 shares at a total cost of $1.0
million pursuant to this authorized program.
In
addition to the 43,957 shares repurchased pursuant to the Company’s share
repurchase program, an aggregate of 108,468 shares were repurchased during
fiscal year 2008 which reflects the surrender of shares in connection with the
vesting of certain restricted stock awards and the exercise of certain stock
options. At the election of an employee, shares having an aggregate
value on the vesting date equal to the employee’s withholding tax obligation may
be surrendered to the Company.
Schedule
II
MOVADO
GROUP, INC.
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(in
thousands)
Description
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
|
Net
provision charged to operations
|
|
|
Currency
revaluation
|
|
|
Net
write-offs
|
|
|
Balance
at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful accounts, returns and
allowances
|
|
$ |
26,079 |
|
|
$ |
49,091 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
(39,479 |
) |
|
$ |
36,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful accounts, returns and
allowances
|
|
$ |
25,693 |
|
|
$ |
41,184 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
(40,889 |
) |
|
$ |
26,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful accounts, returns and
allowances
|
|
$ |
28,079 |
|
|
$ |
35,799 |
|
|
$ |
(208 |
) |
|
$ |
(37,977 |
) |
|
$ |
25,693 |
|
Description
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
|
Net
provision charged to operations
|
|
|
Currency
revaluation
|
|
|
Net
write-offs
|
|
|
Balance
at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserve
(1)
|
|
$ |
48,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,809 |
|
|
$ |
3,754 |
|
|
$ |
(33,968 |
) |
|
$ |
21,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
reserve
|
|
$ |
49,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,953 |
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
(4,976 |
) |
|
$ |
48,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
reserve
|
|
$ |
54,447 |
|
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
$ |
(3,623 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,103 |
) |
|
$ |
49,250 |
|
(1)
The inventory reserve net write-offs in fiscal 2008 were the result of
efforts to cleanse discontinued component and watch inventory by scrapping
the product, resulting in a reduction to existing reserves with no impact
to the consolidated statement of
income.
|
Description
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
|
Net
provision/ (benefit) to operations
|
|
|
Currency
revaluation
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Balance
at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation
(2)
|
|
$ |
16,741 |
|
|
$ |
(7,407 |
) |
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
|
$ |
(1,036 |
) |
|
$ |
10,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation
(3)
|
|
$ |
29,555 |
|
|
$ |
(9,544 |
) |
|
$ |
976 |
|
|
$ |
(4,246 |
) |
|
$ |
16,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended January 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation
(4)
|
|
$ |
33,393 |
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
(2,186 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,562 |
) |
|
$ |
29,555 |
|
(2)
The detail of adjustments is as follows:
|
|
|
(3)
The detail of adjustments is as follows:
|
|
Statutory
tax rate changes
|
($731)
|
|
Release
of valuation allowance – Ebel NOL’s
|
($273)
|
Ebel
NOL’s expired
|
(609)
|
|
Ebel
NOL’s expired
|
(2,541)
|
Prior
year adjustments
|
304
|
|
Ebel
Germany pre-acquisition NOL’s
|
(1,017)
|
|
($1,036)
|
|
Prior
year adjustments
|
(415)
|
|
|
|
|
($4,246)
|
(4)
The detail of adjustments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Release
of valuation allowance – Ebel NOL’s
|
($3,843)
|
|
|
Ebel
Germany pre-acquisition NOL’s
|
1,141
|
|
|
UK
and Germany tax return accrual adjustments
|
140
|
|
|
|
($2,562)
|
|
|