UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

________________

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

Commission File Number 1-8787

American International Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-2592361
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

175 Water Street, New York, New York	10038
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 770-7000

________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☑

Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐

Smaller reporting company ☐

(Do not check if a

smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

As of July 29, 2016, there were 1,070,659,944 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED

June 30, 2016

FORM 10-Q
Item Number	Description		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		2
	Note 1.	Basis of Presentation	7
	Note 2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	8
	Note 3.	Segment Information	13
	Note 4.	Fair Value Measurements	14
	Note 5.	Investments	34
	Note 6.	Lending Activities	43
	Note 7.	Variable Interest Entities	45
	Note 8.	Derivatives and Hedge Accounting	47
	Note 9.	Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees	53
	Note 10.	Equity	59
	Note 11.	Earnings Per Share	63
	Note 12.	Employee Benefits	63
	Note 13.	Income Taxes	65
	Note 14.	Information Provided in Connection with Outstanding Debt	68
	Note 15.	Subsequent Events	73

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
	Operations		74
	· Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information		74
	· Use of Non-GAAP Measures		77
	· Executive Overview		80
	· Results of Operations		96
	· Investments		139
	· Insurance Reserves		159
	· Liquidity and Capital Resources		172
	· Enterprise Risk Management		186
	· Critical Accounting Estimates		191
	· Regulatory Environment		192
	· Glossary		193
	· Acronyms		196

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		197
Item 4	Controls and Procedures		197
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings		198
Item 1A	Risk Factors		198
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		199
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures		199
Item 6	Exhibits		199
SIGNATURES			200

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

	June 30,		December 31,
(in millions, except for share data)		2016		2015
Assets:
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities:
Bonds available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2016 - $244,450; 2015 - $240,968)	$	262,089	$	248,245
Other bond securities, at fair value (See Note 5)		15,335		16,782
Equity Securities:
Common and preferred stock available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2016 - $1,246; 2015 - $1,379)		1,642		2,915
Other common and preferred stock, at fair value (See Note 5)		661		921
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $11; 2015 - $11)		31,261		29,565
Other invested assets (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $7,177; 2015 - $8,912)		27,345		29,794
Short-term investments (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $3,949; 2015 - $2,591)		12,334		10,132
Total investments		350,667		338,354

Cash		1,784		1,629
Accrued investment income		2,590		2,623
Premiums and other receivables, net of allowance		12,078		11,451
Reinsurance assets, net of allowance		21,441		20,413
Deferred income taxes		18,542		20,394
Deferred policy acquisition costs		10,487		11,115
Other assets, including restricted cash of $191 in 2016 and $170 in 2015		12,188		11,289
Separate account assets, at fair value		80,572		79,574
Total assets	$	510,349	$	496,842
Liabilities:
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	74,143	$	74,942
Unearned premiums		22,165		21,318
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health insurance contracts		45,982		43,585
Policyholder contract deposits (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $4,016; 2015 - $2,325)		131,936		127,588
Other policyholder funds (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $5; 2015 - $6)		4,292		4,212
Other liabilities (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $241; 2015 - $62)		27,393		26,164
Long-term debt (portion measured at fair value: 2016 - $3,747; 2015 - $3,670)		33,329		29,249
Separate account liabilities		80,572		79,574
Total liabilities		419,812		406,632
Contingencies, commitments and guarantees (see Note 9)

AIG shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 5,000,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 2016 - 1,906,671,492 and
2015 - 1,906,671,492		4,766		4,766
Treasury stock, at cost; 2016 - 823,982,130 shares; 2015 - 712,754,875 shares of common stock		(36,262)		(30,098)
Additional paid-in capital		81,232		81,510
Retained earnings		31,951		30,943
Accumulated other comprehensive income		8,259		2,537
Total AIG shareholders’ equity		89,946		89,658
Non-redeemable noncontrolling interests		591		552
Total equity		90,537		90,210
Total liabilities and equity	$	510,349	$	496,842

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / Financial statements

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(dollars in millions, except per share data)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	8,751	$	9,545	$	17,557	$	18,367
Policy fees		696		688		1,383		1,365
Net investment income		3,683		3,826		6,696		7,664
Net realized capital gains (losses):
Total other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale securities		(65)		(148)		(274)		(235)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale
fixed maturity securities recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss)		(29)		(4)		(22)		(14)
Net other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale
securities recognized in net income		(94)		(152)		(296)		(249)
Other realized capital gains		1,136		278		232		1,716
Total net realized capital gains (losses)		1,042		126		(64)		1,467
Other income		552		1,514		931		2,811
Total revenues		14,724		15,699		26,503		31,674
Benefits, losses and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		6,872		7,100		13,259		13,651
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		961		942		1,911		1,877
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		1,345		1,356		2,607		2,706
General operating and other expenses		2,586		3,090		5,589		6,039
Interest expense		320		316		626		656
Loss on extinguishment of debt		7		342		90		410
Net (gain) loss on sale of divested businesses		(225)		1		(223)		7
Total benefits, losses and expenses		11,866		13,147		23,859		25,346
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense		2,858		2,552		2,644		6,328
Income tax expense		924		777		866		2,077
Income from continuing operations		1,934		1,775		1,778		4,251
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense		(10)		16		(57)		17
Net income		1,924		1,791		1,721		4,268
Less:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests		11		(9)		(9)		-
Net income attributable to AIG	$	1,913	$	1,800	$	1,730	$	4,268

Income (loss) per common share attributable to AIG:
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.73	$	1.34	$	1.57	$	3.16
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(0.01)	$	0.01	$	(0.05)	$	0.01
Net income attributable to AIG	$	1.72	$	1.35	$	1.52	$	3.17
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.69	$	1.31	$	1.54	$	3.09
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(0.01)	$	0.01	$	(0.05)	$	0.01
Net income attributable to AIG	$	1.68	$	1.32	$	1.49	$	3.10
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		1,113,587,927		1,329,157,366		1,135,068,193		1,347,452,833
Diluted		1,140,045,973		1,365,390,431		1,163,089,748		1,376,325,971
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.320	$	0.125	$	0.640	$	0.250

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / Financial statements

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income	$	1,924	$	1,791	$	1,721	$	4,268
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of fixed maturity investments on
which other-than-temporary credit impairments were taken		22		(36)		(327)		(108)
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of all other investments		2,409		(2,991)		5,836		(2,452)
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments		313		(37)		221		(496)
Change in retirement plan liabilities adjustment		(10)		27		(8)		56
Other comprehensive income (loss)		2,734		(3,037)		5,722		(3,000)
Comprehensive income (loss)		4,658		(1,246)		7,443		1,268
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		11		(9)		(9)		(3)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	4,647	$	(1,237)	$	7,452	$	1,271

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / Financial statements

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED Statements of Equity (unaudited)

														Non-
										Accumulated		Total AIG		redeemable
						Additional				Other		Share-		Non-
		Common		Treasury		Paid-in		Retained	Comprehensive			holders'		controlling		Total
(in millions)		Stock		Stock		Capital		Earnings		Income		Equity		Interests		Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Balance, beginning of year	$	4,766	$	(30,098)	$	81,510	$	30,943	$	2,537	$	89,658	$	552	$	90,210
Common stock issued under stock plans		-		84		(172)		-		-		(88)		-		(88)
Purchase of common stock		-		(6,248)		-		-		-		(6,248)		-		(6,248)
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG or
noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		1,730		-		1,730		(9)		1,721
Dividends		-		-		-		(713)		-		(713)		-		(713)
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-		5,722		5,722		-		5,722
Current and deferred income taxes		-		-		19		-		-		19		-		19
Net increase due to acquisitions and consolidations		-		-		-		-		-		-		44		44
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		3		3
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		(15)		(15)
Other		-		-		(125)		(9)		-		(134)		16		(118)
Balance, end of period	$	4,766	$	(36,262)	$	81,232	$	31,951	$	8,259	$	89,946	$	591	$	90,537

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Balance, beginning of year	$	4,766	$	(19,218)	$	80,958	$	29,775	$	10,617	$	106,898	$	374	$	107,272
Purchase of common stock		-		(3,947)		-		-		-		(3,947)		-		(3,947)
Net income attributable to AIG or
noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		4,268		-		4,268		-		4,268
Dividends		-		-		-		(335)		-		(335)		-		(335)
Other comprehensive loss		-		-		-		-		(2,997)		(2,997)		(3)		(3,000)
Deferred income taxes		-		-		(12)		-		-		(12)		-		(12)
Net increase due to acquisitions and consolidations		-		-		-		-		-		-		9		9
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-		-		-		(3)		(3)
Other		-		-		384		(1)		-		383		7		390
Balance, end of period	$	4,766	$	(23,165)	$	81,330	$	33,707	$	7,620	$	104,258	$	384	$	104,642

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / Financial statements

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	1,721	$	4,268
(Income) loss from discontinued operations		57		(17)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Noncash revenues, expenses, gains and losses included in income:
Net gains on sales of securities available for sale and other assets		(907)		(666)
Net (gain) loss on sale of divested businesses		(223)		7
Losses on extinguishment of debt		90		410
Unrealized (gains) losses in earnings - net		1,130		(1,425)
Equity in (income) loss from equity method investments, net of dividends or distributions		145		(715)
Depreciation and other amortization		2,270		2,410
Impairments of assets		636		471
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Insurance reserves		313		(420)
Premiums and other receivables and payables - net		(614)		(1,359)
Reinsurance assets and funds held under reinsurance treaties		(988)		573
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs		(2,554)		(2,880)
Current and deferred income taxes - net		750		1,739
Other, net		(1,255)		(1,903)
Total adjustments		(1,207)		(3,758)
Net cash provided by operating activities		571		493
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from (payments for)
Sales or distributions of:
Available for sale investments		13,540		14,144
Other securities		2,246		3,998
Other invested assets		3,687		6,218
Maturities of fixed maturity securities available for sale		12,350		12,176
Principal payments received on and sales of mortgage and other loans receivable		2,964		2,470
Purchases of:
Available for sale investments		(27,573)		(24,198)
Other securities		(381)		(583)
Other invested assets		(1,602)		(1,743)
Mortgage and other loans receivable		(5,081)		(4,459)
Net change in restricted cash		(78)		1,462
Net change in short-term investments		(1,755)		(2,693)
Other, net		1,419		(1,506)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(264)		5,286
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from (payments for)
Policyholder contract deposits		9,539		7,541
Policyholder contract withdrawals		(6,787)		(7,225)
Issuance of long-term debt		6,688		2,774
Repayments of long-term debt		(2,919)		(3,701)
Purchase of common stock		(6,248)		(3,743)
Dividends paid		(713)		(335)
Other, net		250		(877)
Net cash used in financing activities		(190)		(5,566)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		38		(34)
Net increase in cash		155		179
Cash at beginning of year		1,629		1,758
Change in cash of businesses held-for-sale		-		-
Cash at end of period	$	1,784	$	1,937

Supplementary Disclosure of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	650	$	760
Taxes	$	117	$	338
Non-cash investing/financing activities:
Interest credited to policyholder contract deposits included in financing activities	$	1,797	$	1,826
Non-cash consideration received from sale of AerCap	$	-	$	500

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

American International Group, Inc. (AIG) is a leading global insurance organization serving customers in more than 100 countries and jurisdictions. AIG companies serve commercial, institutional and individual customers through one of the most extensive worldwide property‑casualty networks of any insurer. In addition, AIG companies are leading providers of life insurance and retirement services in the United States. AIG Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share (AIG Common Stock), is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: AIG) and the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “AIG,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean American International Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and the term “AIG Parent” means American International Group, Inc. and not any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include all disclosures that are normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (2015 Annual Report). The condensed consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2015 included herein has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report.

Certain of our foreign subsidiaries included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements report on different fiscal-period bases. The effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations of all material events occurring at these subsidiaries through the date of each of the periods presented in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements has been considered for adjustment and/or disclosure. In the opinion of management, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain normal recurring adjustments, including eliminations of material intercompany accounts and transactions, necessary for a fair statement of the results presented herein.

Interim-period operating results may not be indicative of the operating results for a full year. We evaluated the need to recognize or disclose events that occurred subsequent to June 30, 2016 and prior to the issuance of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Sale of ILFC

On May 14, 2014, we completed the sale of 100 percent of the common stock of International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC) to AerCap Ireland Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of AerCap Holdings N.V. (AerCap), in exchange for total consideration of approximately $7.6 billion, including cash and 97.6 million newly issued AerCap common shares (the AerCap Transaction). The total value of the consideration was based in part on AerCap’s closing price per share of $47.01 on May 13, 2014.

In June 2015, we sold 86.9 million ordinary shares of AerCap by means of an underwritten public offering of 71.2 million ordinary shares and a private sale of 15.7 million ordinary shares to AerCap. We received cash proceeds of approximately $3.7 billion, reflecting proceeds of approximately $3.4 billion from the underwritten offering and cash proceeds of $250 million from the private sale of shares to AerCap. In connection with the closing of the private sale of shares to AerCap, we also received $500 million of 6.50% fixed-to-floating rate junior subordinated notes issued by AerCap Global Aviation Trust and guaranteed by AerCap and certain of its subsidiaries. These notes, included in Bonds available for sale, mature in 2045 and are callable beginning in 2025. We accounted for our interest in AerCap using the equity method of accounting through the date of the June 2015 sale, and as available for sale thereafter. In August 2015, we sold our remaining 10.7 million ordinary shares of AerCap by means of an underwritten public offering and received proceeds of approximately $500 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment. Accounting policies that we believe are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions are considered our critical accounting estimates and are related to the determination of:

• income tax assets and liabilities, including recoverability of our net deferred tax asset and the predictability of future tax operating profitability of the character necessary to realize the net deferred tax asset;

• liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses;

• reinsurance assets;

• valuation of future policy benefit liabilities and timing and extent of loss recognition;

• valuation of liabilities for guaranteed benefit features of variable annuity products;

• estimated gross profits to value deferred acquisition costs for investment-oriented products;

• impairment charges, including other-than-temporary impairments on available for sale securities, impairments on other invested assets, including investments in life settlements, and goodwill impairment;

• liability for legal contingencies; and

• fair value measurements of certain financial assets and liabilities.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Standards Adopted During 2016

Accounting for Share-Based Payments with Performance Targets

In June 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that clarifies the accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition.

We adopted the standard prospectively on its required effective date of January 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity

In August 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that allows a reporting entity to measure the financial assets and financial liabilities of a qualifying consolidated collateralized financing entity using the fair value of either its financial assets or financial liabilities, whichever is more observable.

We adopted the standard retrospectively on its required effective date of January 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Consolidation: Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis

In February 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard that affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. Specifically, the amendments modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities; eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership; affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships; and provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds.

Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement

In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard that provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance does not change generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a customer's accounting for service contracts. Consequently, all software licenses will be accounted for consistent with other licenses of intangible assets.

We adopted this standard prospectively on its required effective date of January 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard that amends the guidance for debt issuance costs by requiring such costs to be presented as a deduction to the corresponding debt liability, rather than as an asset, and for the amortization of such costs to be reported as interest expense. The amendments are intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs and make it consistent with the presentation of debt discounts or premiums. The amendments, however, do not change the recognition and measurement guidance applicable to debt issuance costs.

We adopted this standard on a retrospective basis on January 1, 2016, its required effective date. Because the new standard did not affect accounting recognition or measurement of debt issuance costs, the adoption of the standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent)

In May 2015, the FASB amended guidance on fair value disclosures for investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value (NAV) per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The amendments in this update remove the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the NAV per share practical expedient. In addition, the amendment removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the NAV per share as a practical expedient.

We adopted the standard on its required effective date of January 1, 2016 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Future Application of Accounting Standards

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance. The standard excludes from its scope the accounting for insurance contracts, leases, financial instruments, and certain other agreements that are governed under other GAAP guidance, but could affect the revenue recognition for certain of our other activities.

The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and may be applied retrospectively or through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. We plan to adopt the standard on its required effective date of January 1, 2018 and do not expect the adoption of the standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Short Duration Insurance Contracts

In May 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard that requires additional disclosures (including accident year information) for short-duration insurance contracts. New disclosures about the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses will be required of public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The annual disclosures by accident year include: disaggregated net incurred and paid claims development tables segregated by business type (not required to exceed 10 years), reconciliation of total net reserves included in development tables to the reported liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported (IBNR) information, quantitative information and a qualitative description about claim frequency, and the average annual percentage payout of incurred claims. Further, the new standard requires, when applicable, disclosures about discounting liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and significant changes and reasons for changes in methodologies and assumptions used to determine unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. In addition, the roll forward of the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses currently disclosed in annual financial statements will be required for interim periods beginning in the first quarter of 2017. Early adoption of the new annual and interim disclosures is permitted.

We plan to adopt the standard on its required effective date. Because the new standard does not affect accounting recognition or measurement, the adoption of the standard will have no effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that affects the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Specifically, under the new standard, equity investments (other than those accounted for using the equity method of accounting or those subject to consolidation) will be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Also, for those financial liabilities for which fair value option accounting has been elected, the new standard requires changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk to be presented separately in other comprehensive income. The standard updates certain fair value disclosure requirements for financial instruments carried at amortized cost.

The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption of certain provisions is permitted. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will require lessees with lease terms of more than 12 months to recognize a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on their balance sheets. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating leases or finance leases.

The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted using a modified retrospective approach. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Derivative Contract Novations

In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that clarifies that a change in the counterparty (novation) to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.

The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of the standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments

In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that clarifies the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The standard requires an evaluation of embedded call (put) options solely on a four-step decision sequence that requires an entity to consider whether (1) the amount paid upon settlement is adjusted based on changes in an index, (2) the amount paid upon settlement is indexed to an underlying other than interest rates or credit risk, (3) the debt involves a substantial premium or discount and (4) the put or call option is contingently exercisable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods during which the investment had been held.

Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued a standard that simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based compensation, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification on the statement of cash flows.

Calculation of Credit Losses

In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will change how entities account for credit losses for most financial assets. The standard will replace the existing incurred loss impairment model with a new “current expected credit loss model” and will apply to financial assets subject to credit losses, those measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. The impairment for available-for-sale debt securities will be measured in a similar manner, except that losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. The standard will also require additional information to be disclosed in the footnotes.

The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for annual and interim periods after December 15, 2018. We are assessing the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 3. SEGMENT INFORMATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

3. SEGMENT INFORMATION

We report our results of operations consistent with the manner in which our chief operating decision makers review the business to assess performance and allocate resources through two reportable segments: Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance as well as a Corporate and Other category. The Corporate and Other category consists of businesses and items not allocated to our reportable segments.

We evaluate performance based on revenues and pre‑tax operating income (loss). Pre-tax operating income (loss) is derived by excluding certain items from net income (loss) attributable to AIG. See the table below for the items excluded from pre-tax operating income (loss).

The following tables present our operations by reportable segment:

	2016				2015
				Pre-Tax				Pre-Tax
Three Months Ended June 30,		Total		Operating		Total		Operating
(in millions)		Revenues		Income (Loss)		Revenues	Income (Loss)
Commercial Insurance
Property Casualty	$	5,540	$	791	$	6,233	$	1,192
Mortgage Guaranty		275		187		261		157
Institutional Markets		695		110		1,172		151
Total Commercial Insurance		6,510		1,088		7,666		1,500
Consumer Insurance
Retirement		2,209		741		2,465		804
Life		1,690		184		1,632		149
Personal Insurance		2,915		179		2,869		70
Total Consumer Insurance		6,814		1,104		6,966		1,023
Corporate and Other^*		450		(544)		1,119		372
AIG consolidation and elimination		(205)		(28)		(116)		(27)
Total AIG consolidated operating revenues and pre-tax operating income		13,569		1,620		15,635		2,868
Reconciling items from Total revenues and Pre-tax operating income
(loss) to revenues and pre-tax income (loss):
Changes in fair values of securities used to hedge guaranteed
living benefits		120		120		(87)		(87)
Changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to
net realized capital gains		-		(64)		-		(28)
Other income - net		-		5		-		-
Loss on extinguishment of debt		-		(7)		-		(342)
Net realized capital gains		1,042		1,042		126		126
Income (loss) from divested businesses		-		225		(33)		(34)
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements		7		7		76		49
Reserve development related to non-operating run-off insurance business		-		-		-		-
Restructuring and other costs		-		(90)		-		-
Other		(14)		-		(18)		-
Revenues and pre-tax income	$	14,724	$	2,858	$	15,699	$	2,552

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 3. SEGMENT INFORMATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

	2016				2015
				Pre-Tax				Pre-Tax
Six Months Ended June 30,		Total		Operating		Total		Operating
(in millions)		Revenues		Income (Loss)		Revenues	Income (Loss)
Commercial Insurance
Property Casualty	$	10,818	$	1,511	$	12,189	$	2,362
Mortgage Guaranty		536		350		525		302
Institutional Markets		1,314		116		1,796		298
Total Commercial Insurance		12,668		1,977		14,510		2,962
Consumer Insurance
Retirement		4,323		1,202		4,853		1,604
Life		3,287		289		3,245		320
Personal Insurance		5,736		401		5,731		44
Total Consumer Insurance		13,346		1,892		13,829		1,968
Corporate and Other^*		656		(1,277)		2,161		534
AIG consolidation and elimination		(364)		(18)		(275)		(69)
Total AIG consolidated operating revenues and pre-tax operating income		26,306		2,574		30,225		5,395
Reconciling items from Total revenues and Pre-tax operating income
(loss) to revenues and pre-tax income (loss):
Changes in fair values of securities used to hedge guaranteed
living benefits		253		253		(43)		(43)
Changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to
net realized capital gains		-		(24)		-		(82)
Other income - net		-		12		-		-
Loss on extinguishment of debt		-		(90)		-		(410)
Net realized capital gains (losses)		(64)		(64)		1,467		1,467
Income (loss) from divested businesses		-		223		(48)		(55)
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements		41		38		91		56
Reserve development related to non-operating run-off insurance business		-		-		-		-
Restructuring and other costs		-		(278)		-		-
Other		(33)		-		(18)		-
Revenues and pre-tax income	$	26,503	$	2,644	$	31,674	$	6,328

* Corporate and Other includes income from assets held by AIG Parent and other corporate subsidiaries.

4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are measured and classified in accordance with a fair value hierarchy consisting of three “levels” based on the observability of valuation inputs:

· Level 1: Fair value measurements based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that we have the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market price data generally is obtained from exchange or dealer markets. We do not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.

· Level 2: Fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

· Level 3: Fair value measurements based on valuation techniques that use significant inputs that are unobservable. Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair values of positions classified in Level 3. The circumstances for using these measurements include those in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Therefore, we must make certain assumptions about the inputs a hypothetical market participant would use to value that asset or liability.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents information about assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the level of the fair value measurement based on the observability of the inputs used:

June 30, 2016							Counterparty		Cash
(in millions)		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting^(b)	Collateral			Total
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	19	$	2,248	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2,267
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		-		26,464		2,313		-		-		28,777
Non-U.S. governments		654		19,410		28		-		-		20,092
Corporate debt		-		141,325		836		-		-		142,161
RMBS		-		20,665		16,779		-		-		37,444
CMBS		-		12,679		2,295		-		-		14,974
CDO/ABS		-		9,299		7,075		-		-		16,374
Total bonds available for sale		673		232,090		29,326		-		-		262,089
Other bond securities:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities		136		3,459		-		-		-		3,595
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		-		-		-		-		-		-
Non-U.S. governments		-		55		-		-		-		55
Corporate debt		-		1,949		18		-		-		1,967
RMBS		-		439		1,486		-		-		1,925
CMBS		-		498		168		-		-		666
CDO/ABS		-		815		6,312		-		-		7,127
Total other bond securities		136		7,215		7,984		-		-		15,335
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		1,117		-		-		-		-		1,117
Preferred stock		23		-		-		-		-		23
Mutual funds		501		1		-		-		-		502
Total equity securities available for sale		1,641		1		-		-		-		1,642
Other equity securities		647		-		14		-		-		661
Mortgage and other loans receivable		-		-		11		-		-		11
Other invested assets^(a)		-		2		241		-		-		243

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts		-		5,014		15		-		-		5,029
Foreign exchange contracts		-		1,495		1		-		-		1,496
Equity contracts		104		123		52		-		-		279
Credit contracts		-		-		3		-		-		3
Other contracts		-		-		23		-		-		23
Counterparty netting and cash collateral		-		-		-		(2,192)		(3,233)		(5,425)
Total derivative assets		104		6,632		94		(2,192)		(3,233)		1,405
Short-term investments		2,453		1,496		-		-		-		3,949
Separate account assets		74,755		5,817		-		-		-		80,572
Total	$	80,409	$	253,253	$	37,670	$	(2,192)	$	(3,233)	$	365,907
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	26	$	3,990	$	-	$	-	$	4,016
Other policyholder funds		5		-		-		-		-		5
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts		-		2,965		61		-		-		3,026
Foreign exchange contracts		-		1,441		10		-		-		1,451
Equity contracts		-		5		-		-		-		5
Credit contracts		-		-		376		-		-		376
Other contracts		-		-		125		-		-		125
Counterparty netting and cash collateral		-		-		-		(2,192)		(738)		(2,930)
Total derivative liabilities		-		4,411		572		(2,192)		(738)		2,053
Long-term debt		-		3,680		67		-		-		3,747
Other liabilities		114		127		-		-		-		241
Total	$	119	$	8,244	$	4,629	$	(2,192)	$	(738)	$	10,062

December 31, 2015							Counterparty		Cash
(in millions)		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting^(b)	Collateral			Total
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	-	$	1,844	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,844
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		-		25,199		2,124		-		-		27,323
Non-U.S. governments		683		17,480		32		-		-		18,195
Corporate debt		-		134,618		1,370		-		-		135,988
RMBS		-		19,690		16,537		-		-		36,227
CMBS		-		10,986		2,585		-		-		13,571
CDO/ABS		-		8,928		6,169		-		-		15,097
Total bonds available for sale		683		218,745		28,817		-		-		248,245
Other bond securities:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities		-		3,369		-		-		-		3,369
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		-		75		-		-		-		75
Non-U.S. governments		-		50		-		-		-		50
Corporate debt		-		2,018		17		-		-		2,035
RMBS		-		649		1,581		-		-		2,230
CMBS		-		557		193		-		-		750
CDO/ABS		-		1,218		7,055		-		-		8,273
Total other bond securities		-		7,936		8,846		-		-		16,782

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		2,401		-		-		-		-		2,401
Preferred stock		22		-		-		-		-		22
Mutual funds		491		1		-		-		-		492
Total equity securities available for sale		2,914		1		-		-		-		2,915
Other equity securities		906		1		14		-		-		921
Mortgage and other loans receivable		-		-		11		-		-		11
Other invested assets^(a)		2		1		332		-		-		335
Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts		-		3,150		12		-		-		3,162
Foreign exchange contracts		-		766		-		-		-		766
Equity contracts		91		32		54		-		-		177
Credit contracts		-		-		3		-		-		3
Other contracts		-		2		21		-		-		23
Counterparty netting and cash collateral		-		-		-		(1,268)		(1,554)		(2,822)
Total derivative assets		91		3,950		90		(1,268)		(1,554)		1,309
Short-term investments		1,416		1,175		-		-		-		2,591
Separate account assets		73,699		5,875		-		-		-		79,574
Total	$	79,711	$	237,684	$	38,110	$	(1,268)	$	(1,554)	$	352,683
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	36	$	2,289	$	-	$	-	$	2,325
Other policyholder funds		6		-		-		-		-		6
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts		-		2,137		62		-		-		2,199
Foreign exchange contracts		-		1,197		7		-		-		1,204
Equity contracts		-		68		-		-		-		68
Credit contracts		-		-		508		-		-		508
Other contracts		-		-		69		-		-		69
Counterparty netting and cash collateral		-		-		-		(1,268)		(760)		(2,028)
Total derivative liabilities		-		3,402		646		(1,268)		(760)		2,020
Long-term debt		-		3,487		183		-		-		3,670
Other liabilities		-		62		-		-		-		62
Total	$	6	$	6,987	$	3,118	$	(1,268)	$	(760)	$	8,083

(a) Excludes investments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent), which totaled $7.0 billion and $8.6 billion as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

(b) Represents netting of derivative exposures covered by qualifying master netting agreements.

Transfers of Level 1 and Level 2 Assets and Liabilities

Our policy is to record transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 at their fair values as of the end of each reporting period, consistent with the date of the determination of fair value. Assets are transferred out of Level 1 when they are no longer transacted with sufficient frequency and volume in an active market. Conversely, assets are transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 when transaction volume and frequency are indicative of an active market.

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, we transferred $229 million and $312 million, respectively, of securities issued by Non-U.S. government entities from Level 1 to Level 2, as they are no longer considered actively traded. For similar reasons, during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 we transferred $16 million of securities issued by the U.S. government and government sponsored entities from Level 1 to Level 2. We had no material transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, we transferred $190 million and $262 million, respectively, of securities issued by Non-U.S. government entities from Level 1 to Level 2, as they are no longer considered actively traded. For similar reasons, during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, we transferred $65 million and $180 million, respectively, of securities issued by the U.S. government and government sponsored entities from Level 1 to Level 2. We had no material transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015.

Changes in Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present changes during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and the realized and unrealized gains (losses) related to the Level 3 assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016 and 2015:

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair Value		Gains (Losses)		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair Value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities
and political subdivisions	$	2,196	$	2	$	136	$	(21)	$	-	$	-	$	2,313	$	-
Non-U.S. governments		30		-		-		2		-		(4)		28		-
Corporate debt		1,024		2		7		(65)		193		(325)		836		-
RMBS		16,162		234		61		61		261		-		16,779		-
CMBS		2,368		16		10		(87)		-		(12)		2,295		-
CDO/ABS		6,592		8		93		382		-		-		7,075		-
Total bonds available for sale		28,372		262		307		272		454		(341)		29,326		-
Other bond securities:
Corporate debt		18		1		-		(1)		-		-		18		1
RMBS		1,513		14		-		(41)		-		-		1,486		(19)
CMBS		170		-		-		(2)		-		-		168		9
CDO/ABS		6,576		109		-		(308)		-		(65)		6,312		(60)
Total other bond securities		8,277		124		-		(352)		-		(65)		7,984		(69)
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total equity securities available for sale		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		15		(1)		-		-		-		-		14		-
Mortgage and other loans receivable		11		-		-		-		-		-		11		-
Other invested assets		263		(12)		6		(16)		-		-		241		-
Total	$	36,938	$	373	$	313	$	(96)	$	454	$	(406)	$	37,576	$	(69)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair Value		(Gains) Losses		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair Value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	3,251	$	598	$	-	$	141	$	-	$	-	$	3,990	$	16
Derivative liabilities, net:
Interest rate contracts		48		3		-		(5)		-		-		46		-
Foreign exchange contracts		9		1		-		(1)		-		-		9		(1)
Equity contracts		(51)		(4)		-		3		-		-		(52)		3
Commodity contracts		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Credit contracts		490		(28)		-		(89)		-		-		373		18
Other contracts		121		(24)		-		5		-		-		102		23
Total derivative liabilities, net^(a)		617		(52)		-		(87)		-		-		478		43
Long-term debt^(b)		184		(2)		-		(2)		-		(113)		67		-
Total	$	4,052	$	544	$	-	$	52	$	-	$	(113)	$	4,535	$	59
				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair Value		Gains (Losses)		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair Value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period^(a)		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities
and political subdivisions	$	2,124	$	2	$	194	$	(7)	$	-	$	-	$	2,313	$	-
Non-U.S. governments		32		-		(2)		2		-		(4)		28		-
Corporate debt		1,370		3		(17)		(36)		314		(798)		836		-
RMBS		16,537		479		(359)		(172)		294		-		16,779		-
CMBS		2,585		58		(78)		(168)		-		(102)		2,295		-
CDO/ABS		6,169		20		43		820		23		-		7,075		-
Total bonds available for sale		28,817		562		(219)		439		631		(904)		29,326		-
Other bond securities:
Corporate debt		17		2		-		(1)		-		-		18		3
RMBS		1,581		(23)		-		(54)		-		(18)		1,486		(61)
CMBS		193		(2)		-		(23)		-		-		168		7
CDO/ABS		7,055		(24)		-		(719)		65		(65)		6,312		(364)
Total other bond securities		8,846		(47)		-		(797)		65		(83)		7,984		(415)
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total equity securities available for sale		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		14		-		-		-		-		-		14		1
Mortgage and other loans receivable		11		-		-		-		-		-		11		-
Other invested assets		332		(1)		1		(37)		-		(54)		241		-
Total	$	38,020	$	514	$	(218)	$	(395)	$	696	$	(1,041)	$	37,576	$	(414)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair Value		(Gains) Losses		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair Value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period^(a)		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	2,289	$	1,443	$	-	$	258	$	-	$	-	$	3,990	$	37
Derivative liabilities, net:
Interest rate contracts		50		7		-		(11)		-		-		46		(5)
Foreign exchange contracts		7		2		-		-		-		-		9		(1)
Equity contracts		(54)		-		-		2		-		-		(52)		-
Commodity contracts		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Credit contracts		505		(34)		-		(98)		-		-		373		28
Other contracts		48		30		-		24		-		-		102		(31)
Total derivative liabilities, net^(a)		556		5		-		(83)		-		-		478		(9)
Long-term debt^(b)		183		-		-		(3)		-		(113)		67		3
Total	$	3,028	$	1,448	$	-	$	172	$	-	$	(113)	$	4,535	$	31

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair value		Gains (Losses)		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities
and political subdivisions	$	2,256	$	-	$	(124)	$	93	$	-	$	(45)	$	2,180	$	-
Non-U.S. governments		34		-		(1)		-		-		-		33		-
Corporate debt		1,827		14		(50)		(85)		412		-		2,118		-
RMBS		17,345		281		(99)		(430)		-		-		17,097		-
CMBS		2,694		22		(40)		17		-		(16)		2,677		-
CDO/ABS		6,453		97		(196)		(283)		-		-		6,071		-
Total bonds available for sale		30,609		414		(510)		(688)		412		(61)		30,176		-
Other bond securities:
Corporate debt		16		-		-		-		-		-		16		-
RMBS		1,288		45		-		16		15		(27)		1,337		31
CMBS		269		8		-		(54)		-		-		223		1
CDO/ABS		7,850		265		-		(688)		-		(1)		7,426		93
Total other bond securities		9,423		318		-		(726)		15		(28)		9,002		125
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		1		2		-		(3)		-		-		-		-
Total equity securities available for sale		1		2		-		(3)		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		22		-		-		-		-		-		22		-
Mortgage and other loans receivable		6		-		-		-		-		-		6		-
Other invested assets		422		62		4		(51)		-		-		437		-
Total	$	40,483	$	796	$	(506)	$	(1,468)	$	427	$	(89)	$	39,643	$	125

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair value		(Gains) Losses		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
		of Period		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	1,835	$	(736)	$	-	$	133	$	-	$	-	$	1,232	$	110
Derivative liabilities, net:
Interest rate contracts		69		(4)		-		(3)		-		-		62		3
Foreign exchange contracts		8		(2)		-		1		-		-		7		1
Equity contracts		(66)		2		-		1		-		-		(63)		(3)
Credit contracts		791		(13)		-		(227)		-		-		551		22
Other contracts		59		(59)		2		14		-		-		16		33
Total derivatives liabilities, net^(a)		861		(76)		2		(214)		-		-		573		56
Long-term debt^(b)		186		13		-		(6)		-		-		193		(6)
Total	$	2,882	$	(799)	$	2	$	(87)	$	-	$	-	$	1,998	$	160

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair value		Gains (Losses)		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities
and political subdivisions^(c)	$	2,159	$	1	$	(79)	$	158	$	-	$	(59)	$	2,180	$	-
Non-U.S. governments		30		-		(1)		4		-		-		33		-
Corporate debt		1,883		14		(33)		(146)		456		(56)		2,118		-
RMBS		16,805		539		(171)		(76)		-		-		17,097		-
CMBS		2,696		46		(30)		47		-		(82)		2,677		-
CDO/ABS		6,110		130		(167)		119		-		(121)		6,071		-
Total bonds available for sale		29,683		730		(481)		106		456		(318)		30,176		-
Other bond securities:
Corporate debt		-		-		-		-		16		-		16		(1)
RMBS		1,105		26		-		220		44		(58)		1,337		1
CMBS		369		8		-		(154)		-		-		223		8
CDO/ABS		7,449		397		-		(926)		581		(75)		7,426		51
Total other bond securities		8,923		431		-		(860)		641		(133)		9,002		59
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		1		2		-		(3)		-		-		-		-
Total equity securities available for sale		1		2		-		(3)		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		-		-		-		-		22		-		22		-
Mortgage and other loans receivable		6		-		-		-		-		-		6		-
Other invested assets		1,042		472		(488)		(589)		-		-		437		-
Total	$	39,655	$	1,635	$	(969)	$	(1,346)	$	1,119	$	(451)	$	39,643	$	59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

				Net												Changes in
				Realized and												Unrealized Gains
				Unrealized				Purchases,								(Losses) Included
		Fair value		(Gains) Losses		Other		Sales,		Gross		Gross		Fair value		in Income on
		Beginning		Included		Comprehensive		Issues and		Transfers		Transfers		End		Instruments Held
(in millions)		of Period		in Income		Income (Loss)		Settlements, Net		In		Out		of Period		at End of Period
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	1,509	$	(461)	$	-	$	184	$	-	$	-	$	1,232	$	40
Derivative liabilities, net:
Interest rate contracts		74		-		-		(12)		-		-		62		(1)
Foreign exchange contracts		8		(3)		-		2		-		-		7		3
Equity contracts		(47)		(6)		-		(10)		-		-		(63)		2
Credit contracts		978		(160)		-		(267)		-		-		551		50
Other contracts		59		(73)		-		30		-		-		16		48
Total derivatives liabilities, net^(a)		1,072		(242)		-		(257)		-		-		573		102
Long-term debt^(b)		213		(2)		-		(18)		-		-		193		13
Total	$	2,794	$	(705)	$	-	$	(91)	$	-	$	-	$	1,998	$	155

(a) Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

(b) Includes guaranteed investment agreements (GIAs), notes, bonds, loans and mortgages payable.

Net realized and unrealized gains and losses included in income related to Level 3 assets and liabilities shown above are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

		Net		Net Realized
		Investment		Capital		Other
(in millions)		Income	Gains (Losses)			Income		Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Bonds available for sale	$	291	$	(30)	$	1	$	262
Other bond securities		26		32		66		124
Other equity securities		(1)		-		-		(1)
Other invested assets		(1)		(19)		8		(12)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Bonds available for sale	$	589	$	(29)	$	2	$	562
Other bond securities		(8)		32		(71)		(47)
Other equity securities		-		-		-		-
Other invested assets		(3)		32		(30)		(1)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Bonds available for sale	$	311	$	10	$	93	$	414
Other bond securities		23		(3)		298		318
Equity securities available for sale		-		2		-		2
Other invested assets		5		2		55		62
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Bonds available for sale	$	622	$	1	$	107	$	730
Other bond securities		41		3		387		431
Equity securities available for sale		-		2		-		2
Other invested assets		(2)		419		55		472

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

		Net		Net Realized
		Investment		Capital		Other
(in millions)		Income	Gains (Losses)			Income		Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	598	$	-	$	598
Derivative liabilities, net		-		-		(52)		(52)
Long-term debt		-		-		(2)		(2)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	1,443	$	-	$	1,443
Derivative liabilities, net		-		4		1		5
Long-term debt		-		-		-		-
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	(736)	$	-	$	(736)
Derivative liabilities, net		19		1		(96)		(76)
Long-term debt		-		-		13		13
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	(461)	$	-	$	(461)
Derivative liabilities, net		-		(5)		(237)		(242)
Long-term debt		-		-		(2)		(2)

The following table presents the gross components of purchases, sales, issues and settlements, net, shown above, for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 related to Level 3 assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

								Purchases,
								Sales, Issues and
(in millions)		Purchases		Sales		Settlements		Settlements, Net^(a)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions	$	17	$	(7)	$	(31)	$	(21)
Non-U.S. governments		2		-		-		2
Corporate debt		-		(25)		(40)		(65)
RMBS		1,040		-		(979)		61
CMBS		4		(27)		(64)		(87)
CDO/ABS		612		(11)		(219)		382
Total bonds available for sale		1,675		(70)		(1,333)		272
Other bond securities:
Corporate debt		-		-		(1)		(1)
RMBS		26		-		(67)		(41)
CMBS		-		-		(2)		(2)
CDO/ABS		61		(19)		(350)		(308)
Total other bond securities		87		(19)		(420)		(352)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Equity securities available for sale		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		-		-		-		-
Other invested assets		9		(2)		(23)		(16)
Total assets	$	1,771	$	(91)	$	(1,776)	$	(96)
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	140	$	1	$	141
Derivative liabilities, net		(1)		-		(86)		(87)
Long-term debt^(b)		-		-		(2)		(2)
Total liabilities	$	(1)	$	140	$	(87)	$	52
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions	$	116	$	-	$	(23)	$	93
Non-U.S. governments		2		-		(2)		-
Corporate debt		182		(10)		(257)		(85)
RMBS		446		(143)		(733)		(430)
CMBS		70		-		(53)		17
CDO/ABS		282		(178)		(387)		(283)
Total bonds available for sale		1,098		(331)		(1,455)		(688)
Other bond securities:
RMBS		64		(4)		(44)		16
CMBS		-		(43)		(11)		(54)
CDO/ABS		12		(331)		(369)		(688)
Total other bond securities		76		(378)		(424)		(726)
Equity securities available for sale		-		(2)		(1)		(3)
Other invested assets		(42)		(2)		(7)		(51)
Total assets	$	1,132	$	(713)	$	(1,887)	$	(1,468)
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	112	$	21	$	133
Derivative liabilities, net		(2)		-		(212)		(214)
Long-term debt^(b)		-		-		(6)		(6)
Total liabilities	$	(2)	$	112	$	(197)	$	(87)
								Purchases,
								Sales, Issues and
(in millions)		Purchases		Sales		Settlements		Settlements, Net^(a)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions	$	46	$	(7)	$	(46)	$	(7)
Non-U.S. governments		3		-		(1)		2
Corporate debt		29		(25)		(40)		(36)
RMBS		1,543		(58)		(1,657)		(172)
CMBS		106		(58)		(216)		(168)
CDO/ABS		1,151		(11)		(320)		820
Total bonds available for sale		2,878		(159)		(2,280)		439

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Other bond securities:
Corporate debt		-		-		(1)		(1)
RMBS		89		(26)		(117)		(54)
CMBS		53		(71)		(5)		(23)
CDO/ABS		69		(36)		(752)		(719)
Total other bond securities		211		(133)		(875)		(797)
Equity securities available for sale		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		14		-		(14)		-
Other invested assets		18		(2)		(53)		(37)
Total assets	$	3,121	$	(294)	$	(3,222)	$	(395)
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	270	$	(12)	$	258
Derivative liabilities, net		(3)		-		(80)		(83)
Long-term debt^(b)		-		-		(3)		(3)
Total liabilities	$	(3)	$	270	$	(95)	$	172
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Assets:
Bonds available for sale:
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions^(c)	$	223	$	(22)	$	(43)	$	158
Non-U.S. governments		8		-		(4)		4
Corporate debt		188		(60)		(274)		(146)
RMBS		1,407		(165)		(1,318)		(76)
CMBS		142		(27)		(68)		47
CDO/ABS		861		(201)		(541)		119
Total bonds available for sale		2,829		(475)		(2,248)		106
Other bond securities:
RMBS		309		(10)		(79)		220
CMBS		-		(79)		(75)		(154)
CDO/ABS		226		(371)		(781)		(926)
Total other bond securities		535		(460)		(935)		(860)
Equity securities available for sale		-		(2)		(1)		(3)
Other invested assets		27		(587)		(29)		(589)
Total assets	$	3,391	$	(1,524)	$	(3,213)	$	(1,346)
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits	$	-	$	185	$	(1)	$	184
Derivative liabilities, net		(17)		-		(240)		(257)
Long-term debt^(b)		-		-		(18)		(18)
Total liabilities	$	(17)	$	185	$	(259)	$	(91)

(a) There were no issuances during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(b) Includes GIAs, notes, bonds, loans and mortgages payable.

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair values of positions classified in Level 3 in the tables above. As a result, the unrealized gains (losses) on instruments held at June 30, 2016 and 2015 may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable inputs (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Transfers of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities

We record transfers of assets and liabilities into or out of Level 3 classification at their fair values as of the end of each reporting period, consistent with the date of the determination of fair value. The Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in income (loss) or Other comprehensive income (loss) as shown in the table above excluded $3 million of net gains and $10 million of net losses, related to assets and liabilities transferred into Level 3 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and included $8 million and $53 million, of net losses related to assets and liabilities transferred out of Level 3 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

The Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in income or Other comprehensive income (loss) as shown in the table above contained no material net gains (losses) related to assets and liabilities transferred into or out of Level 3 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2015. The Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in income or Other comprehensive income (loss) as shown in the table above excluded $18 million of net gains related to assets and liabilities transferred into Level 3, and included $3 million of net gains related to assets and liabilities transferred out of Level 3 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2015.

Transfers of Level 3 Assets

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, transfers into Level 3 assets primarily included certain investments in private placement corporate debt, RMBS and CDO/ABS. Transfers of private placement corporate debt and certain ABS into Level 3 assets were primarily the result of limited market pricing information that required us to determine fair value for these securities based on inputs that are adjusted to better reflect our own assumptions regarding the characteristics of a specific security or associated market liquidity. The transfers of investments in RMBS and CDO and certain ABS into Level 3 assets were due to decreases in market transparency and liquidity for individual security types.

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, transfers out of Level 3 assets primarily included private placement and other corporate debt, CMBS, CDO/ABS, RMBS and certain investments in municipal securities. Transfers of certain investments municipal securities, corporate debt, RMBS, CMBS and CDO/ABS out of Level 3 assets were based on consideration of market liquidity as well as related transparency of pricing and associated observable inputs for these investments. Transfers of certain investments in private placement corporate debt and certain ABS out of Level 3 assets were primarily the result of using observable pricing information that reflects the fair value of those securities without the need for adjustment based on our own assumptions regarding the characteristics of a specific security or the current liquidity in the market.

Transfers of Level 3 Liabilities

There were no significant transfers of derivative or other liabilities into or out of Level 3 for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The table below presents information about the significant unobservable inputs used for recurring fair value measurements for certain Level 3 instruments, and includes only those instruments for which information about the inputs is reasonably available to us, such as data from independent third‑party valuation service providers and from internal valuation models. Because input information from third‑parties with respect to certain Level 3 instruments (primarily CDO/ABS) may not be reasonably available to us, balances shown below may not equal total amounts reported for such Level 3 assets and liabilities:

	Fair Value at
	June 30,		Valuation		Range
(in millions)	2016		Technique	Unobservable Input^(b)	(Weighted Average)
Assets:

Obligations of states,
municipalities and
political subdivisions	$	1,448	Discounted cash flow	Yield	3.44% - 4.29% (3.86%)

Corporate debt		386	Discounted cash flow	Yield	3.80% - 4.77% (4.29%)


RMBS^(a)		17,238	Discounted cash flow	Constant prepayment rate	1.26% - 8.84% (5.05%)
				Loss severity	46.90% - 80.26% (63.58%)
				Constant default rate	3.41% - 9.02% (6.22%)
				Yield	2.78% - 6.07% (4.43%)

CDO/ABS^(a)		3,017	Discounted cash flow	Yield	3.54% - 5.55% (4.54%)

CMBS		73	Discounted cash flow	Yield	1.32% - 2.73% (2.03%)

Liabilities:

Embedded derivatives
within Policyholder
contract deposits:

GMWB and GMAB		2,710	Discounted cash flow	Equity volatility	15.00% - 50.00%
				Base lapse rate	1.00% - 17.00%
				Dynamic lapse rate	0.20% - 25.50%
				Mortality multiplier^(c)	80.00% - 104.27%
				Utilization rate	0.00% - 70.00%
				Equity / interest-rate correlation	20.00% - 40.00%

Index Annuities		963	Discounted cash flow	Lapse rate	0.75% - 66.00%
				Mortality multiplier^(c)	50.00% - 75.00%

Indexed Life		345	Discounted cash flow	Equity volatility	12.62% to 21.70%
				Base lapse rate	2.00% to 19.00%
				Mortality rate	0.00% to 40.00%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)


		Fair Value at
		December 31,	Valuation		Range
(in millions)		2015	Technique	Unobservable Input^(b)	(Weighted Average)
Assets:

Obligations of states,
municipalities and
political subdivisions	$	1,217	Discounted cash flow	Yield	4.32% - 5.10% (4.71%)

Corporate debt		642	Discounted cash flow	Yield	5.63% - 12.45% (9.04%)


RMBS^(a)		17,280	Discounted cash flow	Constant prepayment rate	0.99% - 8.95% (4.97%)
				Loss severity	47.21% - 79.50% (63.35%)
				Constant default rate	3.49% - 9.04% (6.26%)
				Yield	3.13% - 6.14% (4.63%)

CDO/ABS^(a)		3,338	Discounted cash flow	Yield	3.41% - 4.98% (4.19%)

CMBS		2,388	Discounted cash flow	Yield	0.00% - 17.65% (6.62%)

Liabilities:

Embedded derivatives
within Policyholder
contract deposits:

GMWB and GMAB		1,234	Discounted cash flow	Equity volatility	15.00% - 50.00%
				Base lapse rate	1.00% - 17.00%
				Dynamic lapse rate	0.20% - 25.50%
				Mortality multiplier^(c)	80.00% - 104.27%
				Utilization rate	0.00% - 70.00%
				Equity / interest-rate correlation	20.00% - 40.00%

Index Annuities		715	Discounted cash flow	Lapse rate	0.75% - 66.00%
				Mortality multiplier^(c)	50.00% - 75.00%

Indexed Life		332	Discounted cash flow	Equity volatility	13.25% to 22.00%
				Base lapse rate	2.00% to 19.00%
				Mortality rate	0.00% to 40.00%

(a) Information received from third-party valuation service providers. The ranges of the unobservable inputs for constant prepayment rate, loss severity and constant default rate relate to each of the individual underlying mortgage loans that comprise the entire portfolio of securities in the RMBS and CDO securitization vehicles and not necessarily to the securitization vehicle bonds (tranches) purchased by us. The ranges of these inputs do not directly correlate to changes in the fair values of the tranches purchased by us, because there are other factors relevant to the fair values of specific tranches owned by us including, but not limited to, purchase price, position in the waterfall, senior versus subordinated position and attachment points.

(b) Represents discount rates, estimates and assumptions that we believe would be used by market participants when valuing these assets and liabilities.

(c) Mortality inputs are shown as multipliers of the 2012 Individual Annuity Mortality Basic table for GMWB and GMAB, and the 1975-1980 Modified Basic Table for index annuities.

The ranges of reported inputs for Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions, Corporate debt, RMBS, CDO/ABS, and CMBS valued using a discounted cash flow technique consist of one standard deviation in either direction from the value‑weighted average. The preceding table does not give effect to our risk management practices that might offset risks inherent in these Level 3 assets and liabilities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Sensitivity to Changes in Unobservable Inputs

We consider unobservable inputs to be those for which market data is not available and that are developed using the best information available to us about the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. Relevant inputs vary depending on the nature of the instrument being measured at fair value. The following paragraphs provide a general description of sensitivities of significant unobservable inputs along with interrelationships between and among the significant unobservable inputs and their impact on the fair value measurements. The effect of a change in a particular assumption in the sensitivity analysis below is considered independently of changes in any other assumptions. In practice, simultaneous changes in assumptions may not always have a linear effect on the inputs discussed below. Interrelationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs. Such relationships have not been included in the discussion below. For each of the individual relationships described below, the inverse relationship would also generally apply.

Obligations of States, Municipalities and Political Subdivisions

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of certain investments in obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions is yield. In general, increases in the yield would decrease the fair value of investments in obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions.

Corporate Debt

Corporate debt securities included in Level 3 are primarily private placement issuances that are not traded in active markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions. Fair value measurements consider illiquidity and non‑transferability. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on discounted cash flow models using discount rates based on credit spreads, yields or price levels of publicly‑traded debt of the issuer or other comparable securities, considering illiquidity and structure. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of corporate debt is the yield. The yield is affected by the market movements in credit spreads and U.S. Treasury yields. In addition, the migration in credit quality of a given security generally has a corresponding effect on the fair value measurement of the security. For example, a downward migration of credit quality would increase spreads. Holding U.S. Treasury rates constant, an increase in corporate credit spreads would decrease the fair value of corporate debt.

RMBS and CDO/ABS

The significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements of RMBS and certain CDO/ABS valued by third‑party valuation service providers are constant prepayment rates (CPR), loss severity, constant default rates (CDR), and yield. A change in the assumptions used for the probability of default will generally be accompanied by a corresponding change in the assumption used for the loss severity and an inverse change in the assumption used for prepayment rates. In general, increases in CPR, loss severity, CDR, and yield, in isolation, would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship between the directional change of each input is not usually linear.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

CMBS

The significant unobservable input used in fair value measurements for CMBS is the yield. Prepayment assumptions for each mortgage pool are factored into the yield. CMBS generally feature a lower degree of prepayment risk than RMBS because commercial mortgages generally contain a penalty for prepayment. In general, increases in the yield would decrease the fair value of CMBS.

Embedded derivatives within Policyholder contract deposits

Embedded derivatives reported within Policyholder contract deposits include guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB) and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (GMAB) within variable annuity products, and interest crediting rates based on market indices within index annuities, indexed life and guaranteed investment contracts (GICs). For any given contract, assumptions for unobservable inputs vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. The following unobservable inputs are used for valuing embedded derivatives measured at fair value:

• Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. Increases in assumed volatility will generally increase the fair value of both the projected cash flows from rider fees as well as the projected cash flows related to benefit payments. Therefore, the net change in the fair value of the liability may be either a decrease or an increase, depending on the relative changes in projected rider fees and projected benefit payments.

• Equity / interest rate correlation estimates the relationship between changes in equity returns and interest rates in the economic scenario generator used to value our GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives. In general, a higher positive correlation assumes that equity markets and interest rates move in a more correlated fashion, which generally increases the fair value of the liability.

• Base lapse rate assumptions are determined by company experience and are adjusted at the contract level using a dynamic lapse function, which reduces the base lapse rate when the contract is in-the-money (when the contract holder’s guaranteed value, as estimated by the company, is worth more than their underlying account value). Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. Increases in assumed lapse rates will generally decrease the fair value of the liability, as fewer policyholders would persist to collect guaranteed withdrawal amounts, but in certain scenarios, increases in assumed lapse rates may increase the fair value of the liability.

• Mortality rate assumptions, which vary by age and gender, are based on company experience and include a mortality improvement assumption. Increases in assumed mortality rates will decrease the fair value of the liability, while lower mortality rate assumptions will generally increase the fair value of the liability, because guaranteed payments will be made for a longer period of time.

• Utilization rate assumptions estimate the timing when policyholders with a GMWB will elect to utilize their benefit and begin taking withdrawals. The assumptions may vary by the type of guarantee, tax-qualified status, the contract’s withdrawal history and the age of the policyholder. Utilization rate assumptions are based on company experience, which includes partial withdrawal behavior. Increases in assumed utilization rates will generally increase the fair value of the liability.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Investments in Certain Entities Carried at Fair Value Using Net Asset Value Per Share

The following table includes information related to our investments in certain other invested assets, including private equity funds, hedge funds and other alternative investments that calculate NAV per share (or its equivalent). For these investments, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we use the NAV per share to measure fair value.

		June 30, 2016				December 31, 2015
			Fair Value			Fair Value
			Using NAV			Using NAV
			Per Share (or		Unfunded	Per Share (or			Unfunded
(in millions)	Investment Category Includes		its equivalent)		Commitments	its equivalent)			Commitments
Investment Category
Private equity funds:
Leveraged buyout	Debt and/or equity investments made as part of a transaction in which assets of mature companies are acquired from the current shareholders, typically with the use of financial leverage	$	1,560	$	547	$	1,774	$	436

Real Estate / Infrastructure	Investments in real estate properties and infrastructure positions, including power plants and other energy generating facilities		266		227		306		213

Venture capital	Early-stage, high-potential, growth companies expected to generate a return through an eventual realization event, such as an initial public offering or sale of the company		99		34		107		41

Distressed	Securities of companies that are in default, under bankruptcy protection, or troubled		134		42		146		41

Other	Includes multi-strategy, mezzanine and other strategies		282		248		298		239
Total private equity funds			2,341		1,098		2,631		970
Hedge funds:
Event-driven	Securities of companies undergoing material structural changes, including mergers, acquisitions and other reorganizations		700		-		1,194		-

Long-short	Securities that the manager believes are undervalued, with corresponding short positions to hedge market risk		2,240		28		2,978		25

Macro	Investments that take long and short positions in financial instruments based on a top-down view of certain economic and capital market conditions		573		-		555		-

Distressed	Securities of companies that are in default, under bankruptcy protection or troubled		640		7		699		8

Emerging markets	Investments in the financial markets of developing countries		300		-		353		-

Other	Includes multi-strategy, relative value and other strategies		140		-		167		-
Total hedge funds			4,593		35		5,946		33
Total		$	6,934	$	1,133	$	8,577	$	1,003

Private equity fund investments included above are not redeemable, because distributions from the funds will be received when underlying investments of the funds are liquidated. Private equity funds are generally expected to have 10‑year lives at their inception, but these lives may be extended at the fund manager’s discretion, typically in one- or two‑year increments. At June 30, 2016, assuming average original expected lives of 10 years for the funds, 78 percent of the total fair value using NAV per share (or its equivalent) presented above would have expected remaining lives of three years or less, 10 percent between four and six years and 12 percent between seven and 10 years.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The hedge fund investments included above, which are carried at fair value, are generally redeemable monthly (14 percent), quarterly (41 percent), semi‑annually (12 percent) and annually (33 percent), with redemption notices ranging from one day to 180 days. At June 30, 2016, investments representing approximately 81 percent of the total fair value of these hedge fund investments had partial contractual redemption restrictions. These partial redemption restrictions are generally related to one or more investments held in the hedge funds that the fund manager deemed to be illiquid. The majority of these contractual restrictions, which may have been put in place at the fund’s inception or thereafter, have pre‑defined end dates. The majority of these restrictions are generally expected to be lifted by the end of 2017.

Fair Value Option

The following table presents the gains or losses recorded related to the eligible instruments for which we elected the fair value option:

	Gain (Loss) Three Months Ended June 30,				Gain (Loss) Six Months Ended June 30,
	Gain (Loss) Three Months Ended June 30,				Gain (Loss) Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Assets:
Bond and equity securities	$	248	$	460	$	298	$	601
Alternative Investments^(a)		33		118		(214)		263
Other, including Short-term investments		-		-		-		2
Liabilities:
Long-term debt^(b)		(71)		131		(247)		55
Other liabilities		-		-		-		(3)
Total gain (loss)	$	210	$	709	$	(163)	$	918

(a) Includes certain hedge funds, private equity funds and other investment partnerships.

(b) Includes GIAs, notes, bonds and mortgages payable.

We recognized gains of $3 million and $8 million during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and gains of $5 million and $11 million during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, respectively, attributable to the observable effect of changes in credit spreads on our own liabilities for which the fair value option was elected. We calculate the effect of these credit spread changes using discounted cash flow techniques that incorporate current market interest rates, our observable credit spreads on these liabilities and other factors that mitigate the risk of nonperformance such as cash collateral posted.

The following table presents the difference between fair values and the aggregate contractual principal amounts of mortgage and other loans receivable and long-term debt for which the fair value option was elected:

	June 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
			Outstanding						Outstanding
(in millions)	Fair Value		Principal Amount		Difference		Fair Value		Principal Amount		Difference
Assets:
Mortgage and other loans receivable	$	11	$	8	$	3	$	11	$	9	$	2
Liabilities:
Long-term debt^*	$	3,747	$	2,594	$	1,153	$	3,670	$	2,675	$	995

* Includes GIAs, notes, bonds, loans and mortgages payable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis

The following table presents assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the time of impairment and the related impairment charges recorded during the periods presented:

	Assets at Fair Value								Impairment Charges
	Non-Recurring Basis								Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Total		2016		2015		2016		2015
June 30, 2016
Other investments	$	-	$	-	$	176	$	176	$	29	$	27	$	31	$	52
Investments in life settlements		-		-		534		534		92		72		249		142
Other assets		-		-		1		1		9		4		9		8
Total	$	-	$	-	$	711	$	711	$	130	$	103	$	289	$	202
December 31, 2015
Other investments	$	-	$	-	$	1,117	$	1,117
Investments in life settlements		-		-		828		828
Other assets		-		-		129		129
Total	$	-	$	-	$	2,074	$	2,074

Fair Value Information About Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value

The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments not measured at fair value and indicates the level in the fair value hierarchy of the estimated fair value measurement based on the observability of the inputs used:

	Estimated Fair Value									Carrying
(in millions)		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Value
June 30, 2016
Assets:
Mortgage and other loans receivable	$	-	$	174	$	32,795	$	32,969	$	31,250
Other invested assets		-		620		2,897		3,517		4,191
Short-term investments		-		8,385		-		8,385		8,385
Cash		1,784		-		-		1,784		1,784
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits associated
with investment-type contracts		-		366		126,279		126,645		111,459
Other liabilities		-		3,697		-		3,697		3,697
Long-term debt		-		25,918		4,693		30,611		29,582
December 31, 2015
Assets:
Mortgage and other loans receivable	$	-	$	198	$	30,147	$	30,345	$	29,554
Other invested assets		-		563		2,880		3,443		4,169
Short-term investments		-		7,541		-		7,541		7,541
Cash		1,629		-		-		1,629		1,629
Liabilities:
Policyholder contract deposits associated
with investment-type contracts		-		309		117,537		117,846		108,788
Other liabilities		-		2,852		-		2,852		2,852
Long-term debt		-		21,686		4,528		26,214		25,579

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

5. INVESTMENTS

Securities Available for Sale

The following table presents the amortized cost or cost and fair value of our available for sale securities:

										Other-Than-
		Amortized		Gross		Gross				Temporary
		Cost or		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Impairments
(in millions)		Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		in AOCI^(a)
June 30, 2016
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	2,024	$	245	$	(2)	$	2,267	$	-
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		26,244		2,560		(27)		28,777		-
Non-U.S. governments		18,559		1,643		(110)		20,092		-
Corporate debt		132,265		11,026		(1,130)		142,161		(37)
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized:
RMBS		35,072		2,824		(452)		37,444		1,020
CMBS		14,103		928		(57)		14,974		78
CDO/ABS		16,183		398		(207)		16,374		37
Total mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized		65,358		4,150		(716)		68,792		1,135
Total bonds available for sale^(b)		244,450		19,624		(1,985)		262,089		1,098
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		796		332		(11)		1,117		-
Preferred stock		19		4		-		23		-
Mutual funds		431		71		-		502		-
Total equity securities available for sale		1,246		407		(11)		1,642		-
Total	$	245,696	$	20,031	$	(1,996)	$	263,731	$	1,098
December 31, 2015
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	1,698	$	155	$	(9)	$	1,844	$	-
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		26,003		1,424		(104)		27,323		19
Non-U.S. governments		17,752		805		(362)		18,195		-
Corporate debt		133,513		6,462		(3,987)		135,988		(87)
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized:
RMBS		33,878		2,760		(411)		36,227		1,326
CMBS		13,139		561		(129)		13,571		185
CDO/ABS		14,985		360		(248)		15,097		39
Total mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized		62,002		3,681		(788)		64,895		1,550
Total bonds available for sale^(b)		240,968		12,527		(5,250)		248,245		1,482
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		913		1,504		(16)		2,401		-
Preferred stock		19		3		-		22		-
Mutual funds		447		53		(8)		492		-
Total equity securities available for sale		1,379		1,560		(24)		2,915		-
Total	$	242,347	$	14,087	$	(5,274)	$	251,160	$	1,482

(a) Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income. Amount includes unrealized gains and losses on impaired securities relating to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

(b) At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, bonds available for sale held by us that were below investment grade or not rated totaled $35.8 billion and $34.9 billion, respectively.

Securities Available for Sale in a Loss Position

The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses on our available for sale securities, aggregated by major investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
				Gross				Gross				Gross
		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
(in millions)		Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
June 30, 2016
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	51	$	2	$	12	$	-	$	63	$	2
Obligations of states, municipalities and political
subdivisions		163		1		257		26		420		27
Non-U.S. governments		1,236		25		1,005		85		2,241		110
Corporate debt		8,058		302		9,098		828		17,156		1,130
RMBS		4,263		125		4,731		327		8,994		452
CMBS		620		29		639		28		1,259		57
CDO/ABS		4,936		104		2,888		103		7,824		207
Total bonds available for sale		19,327		588		18,630		1,397		37,957		1,985
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		142		10		2		1		144		11
Mutual funds		13		-		-		-		13		-
Total equity securities available for sale		155		10		2		1		157		11
Total	$	19,482	$	598	$	18,632	$	1,398	$	38,114	$	1,996
December 31, 2015
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	483	$	9	$	1	$	-	$	484	$	9
Obligations of states, municipalities and political
subdivisions		2,382		87		268		17		2,650		104
Non-U.S. governments		4,327		203		832		159		5,159		362
Corporate debt		41,317		2,514		5,428		1,473		46,745		3,987
RMBS		7,215		133		4,318		278		11,533		411
CMBS		4,138		108		573		21		4,711		129
CDO/ABS		7,064		104		2,175		144		9,239		248
Total bonds available for sale		66,926		3,158		13,595		2,092		80,521		5,250
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		91		16		-		-		91		16
Mutual funds		200		8		-		-		200		8
Total equity securities available for sale		291		24		-		-		291		24
Total	$	67,217	$	3,182	$	13,595	$	2,092	$	80,812	$	5,274

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

At June 30, 2016, we held 7,153 and 140 individual fixed maturity and equity securities, respectively, that were in an unrealized loss position, of which 3,129 individual fixed maturity securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. We did not recognize the unrealized losses in earnings on these fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2016 because we neither intend to sell the securities nor do we believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis. For fixed maturity securities with significant declines, we performed fundamental credit analyses on a security-by-security basis, which included consideration of credit enhancements, expected defaults on underlying collateral, review of relevant industry analyst reports and forecasts and other available market data.

Contractual Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities Available for Sale

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities available for sale by contractual maturity:

	Total Fixed Maturity Securities				Fixed Maturity Securities in a Loss
June 30, 2016	Available for Sale				Position Available for Sale
(in millions)		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	8,363	$	8,501	$	745	$	734
Due after one year through five years		51,468		54,680		4,813		4,616
Due after five years through ten years		50,399		53,104		7,253		6,779
Due after ten years		68,862		77,012		8,338		7,751
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized		65,358		68,792		18,793		18,077
Total	$	244,450	$	262,089	$	39,942	$	37,957
December 31, 2015
Due in one year or less	$	9,176	$	9,277	$	1,122	$	1,103
Due after one year through five years		47,230		49,196		9,847		9,494
Due after five years through ten years		54,120		54,459		22,296		20,686
Due after ten years		68,440		70,418		26,235		23,755
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized		62,002		64,895		26,271		25,483
Total	$	240,968	$	248,245	$	85,771	$	80,521

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The following table presents the gross realized gains and gross realized losses from sales or maturities of our available for sale securities:

	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2016				2015			2016					2015
		Gross		Gross		Gross		Gross		Gross		Gross		Gross		Gross
	Realized		Realized		Realized		Realized		Realized		Realized		Realized			Realized
(in millions)		Gains		Losses		Gains		Losses		Gains		Losses		Gains		Losses
Fixed maturity securities	$	217	$	93	$	194	$	59	$	404	$	642		$	343	$	177
Equity securities		980		6		24		3		1,012		14			520		8
Total	$	1,197	$	99	$	218	$	62	$	1,416	$	656		$	863	$	185

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, the aggregate fair value of available for sale securities sold was $8.3 billion and $14.4 billion, respectively, which resulted in net realized capital gains of $1.1 billion and net realized capital gains of $760 million, respectively.

For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, the aggregate fair value of available for sale securities sold was $7.1 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, which resulted in net realized capital gains of $156 million and $678 million, respectively.

Other Securities Measured at Fair Value

The following table presents the fair value of other securities measured at fair value based on our election of the fair value option:

		June 30, 2016				December 31, 2015
		Fair	Percent			Fair	Percent
(in millions)		Value	of Total			Value	of Total
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	3,595	23	%	$	3,369	19	%
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		-	-			75	-
Non-U.S. governments		55	-			50	-
Corporate debt		1,967	12			2,035	12
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized:
RMBS		1,925	12			2,230	13
CMBS		666	4			750	4
CDO/ABS and other collateralized^*		7,127	45			8,273	47
Total mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized		9,718	61			11,253	64
Total fixed maturity securities		15,335	96			16,782	95
Equity securities		661	4			921	5
Total	$	15,996	100	%	$	17,703	100	%

* Includes $557 million and $712 million of U.S. Government agency-backed ABS at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Other Invested Assets

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of other invested assets:

		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Alternative investments^{(a) (b)}	$	14,972	$	18,150
Investment real estate^(c)		7,340		6,579
Aircraft asset investments^(d)		427		477
Investments in life settlements		3,565		3,606
All other investments		1,041		982
Total	$	27,345	$	29,794

(a) At June 30, 2016, includes hedge funds of $8.3 billion, private equity funds of $6.0 billion, and affordable housing partnerships of $633 million. At December 31, 2015, includes hedge funds of $10.9 billion, private equity funds of $6.5 billion, and affordable housing partnerships of $701 million.

(b) Approximately 59 percent of our hedge fund portfolio is available for redemption in 2016, an additional 24 percent and 10 percent will be available in 2017 and 2018, respectively.

(c) Net of accumulated depreciation of $579 million and $668 million in June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

(d) Consists of investments in aircraft equipment held in consolidated trusts.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Net Investment Income

The following table presents the components of Net investment income:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Fixed maturity securities, including short-term investments	$	2,992	$	2,800	$	5,928	$	5,683
Equity securities		(22)		66		(44)		81
Interest on mortgage and other loans		376		347		765		686
Alternative investments^*		310		658		(56)		1,244
Real estate		35		24		88		50
Other investments		101		48		238		189
Total investment income		3,792		3,943		6,919		7,933
Investment expenses		109		117		223		269
Net investment income	$	3,683	$	3,826	$	6,696	$	7,664

* Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the presentation of income on alternative investments has been refined to include only income from hedge funds, private equity funds and affordable housing partnerships. Prior period disclosures have been reclassified to conform to this presentation. Hedge funds for which we elected the fair value option are recorded as of the balance sheet date. Other hedge funds are generally reported on a one-month lag, while private equity funds are generally reported on a one-quarter lag.

Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses

The following table presents the components of Net realized capital gains (losses):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Sales of fixed maturity securities	$	124	$	135	$	(238)	$	166
Sales of equity securities		974		21		998		512
Other-than-temporary impairments:
Severity		(3)		-		(5)		(2)
Change in intent		(4)		(88)		(33)		(112)
Foreign currency declines		(1)		(3)		(7)		(32)
Issuer-specific credit events		(95)		(70)		(226)		(138)
Adverse projected cash flows		(5)		(3)		(41)		(8)
Provision for loan losses		(30)		(13)		-		11
Foreign exchange transactions		(38)		66		(558)		320
Derivatives and hedge accounting		170		288		97		496
Impairments on investments in life settlements		(92)		(72)		(249)		(142)
Other^*		42		(135)		198		396
Net realized capital gains (losses)	$	1,042	$	126	$	(64)	$	1,467

* Includes $107 million of realized gains due to a purchase price adjustment on the sale of Class B shares of Prudential Financial Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and $357 million of realized gains due to the sale of common shares of SpringLeaf Holdings, $428 million of realized gains due to the sale of Class B shares of Prudential Financial Inc. and $463 million of realized losses due to the sale of ordinary shares of AerCap for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments

The following table presents the increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of our available for sale securities and other investments:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments:
Fixed maturity securities	$	5,584	$	(6,559)	$	10,362	$	(4,403)
Equity securities		(1,045)		287		(1,140)		(95)
Other investments		(66)		(37)		(214)		(540)
Total Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments	$	4,473	$	(6,309)	$	9,008	$	(5,038)

Evaluating Investments for Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

For a discussion of our policy for evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairments, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report.

Credit Impairments

The following table presents a rollforward of the cumulative credit losses in other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings for available for sale fixed maturity securities:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,523	$	2,466	$	1,747	$	2,659
Increases due to:
Credit impairments on new securities subject to impairment losses		13		35		123		50
Additional credit impairments on previously impaired securities		74		25		129		47
Reductions due to:
Credit impaired securities fully disposed of for which there was no
prior intent or requirement to sell		(93)		(108)		(243)		(150)
Accretion on securities previously impaired due to credit^*		(219)		(180)		(458)		(368)
Balance, end of period	$	1,298	$	2,238	$	1,298	$	2,238

* Represents both accretion recognized due to changes in cash flows expected to be collected over the remaining expected term of the credit impaired securities and the accretion due to the passage of time.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Purchased Credit Impaired (PCI) Securities

We purchase certain RMBS securities that have experienced deterioration in credit quality since their issuance. We determine, based on our expectations as to the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be received, whether it is probable at acquisition that we will not collect all contractually required payments for these PCI securities, including both principal and interest after considering the effects of prepayments. At acquisition, the timing and amount of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be received on each PCI security is determined based on our best estimate using key assumptions, such as interest rates, default rates and prepayment speeds. At acquisition, the difference between the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the PCI securities and the recorded investment in the securities represents the initial accretable yield, which is accreted into Net investment income over their remaining lives on a level-yield basis. Additionally, the difference between the contractually required payments on the PCI securities and the undiscounted expected future cash flows represents the non-accretable difference at acquisition. The accretable yield and the non-accretable difference will change over time, based on actual payments received and changes in estimates of undiscounted expected future cash flows, which are discussed further below.

On a quarterly basis, the undiscounted expected future cash flows associated with PCI securities are re-evaluated based on updates to key assumptions. Declines in undiscounted expected future cash flows due to further credit deterioration as well as changes in the expected timing of the cash flows can result in the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment charge, as PCI securities are subject to our policy for evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairment. Changes to undiscounted expected future cash flows due solely to the changes in the contractual benchmark interest rates on variable rate PCI securities will change the accretable yield prospectively. Significant increases in undiscounted expected future cash flows for reasons other than interest rate changes are recognized prospectively as adjustments to the accretable yield.

The following tables present information on our PCI securities, which are included in bonds available for sale:

(in millions)	At Date of Acquisition
Contractually required payments (principal and interest)	$	34,940
Cash flows expected to be collected^*		28,437
Recorded investment in acquired securities		19,059

* Represents undiscounted expected cash flows, including both principal and interest.

(in millions)	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Outstanding principal balance	$	17,173	$	16,871
Amortized cost		12,397		12,303
Fair value		12,992		13,164

The following table presents activity for the accretable yield on PCI securities:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,622	$	6,765	$	6,846	$	6,865
Newly purchased PCI securities		245		170		451		415
Disposals		-		(13)		-		(13)
Accretion		(209)		(221)		(423)		(441)
Effect of changes in interest rate indices		60		(6)		(239)		(144)
Net reclassification from (to) non-accretable difference,
including effects of prepayments		325		138		408		151
Balance, end of period	$	7,043	$	6,833	$	7,043	$	6,833

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Pledged Investments

Secured Financing and Similar Arrangements

We enter into secured financing transactions whereby certain securities are sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements), in which we transfer securities in exchange for cash, with an agreement by us to repurchase the same or substantially similar securities. Our secured financing transactions also include those that involve the transfer of securities to financial institutions in exchange for cash (securities lending agreements). In all of these secured financing transactions, the securities transferred by us (pledged collateral) may be sold or repledged by the counterparties. These agreements are recorded at their contracted amounts plus accrued interest, other than those that are accounted for at fair value.

Pledged collateral levels are monitored daily and are generally maintained at an agreed-upon percentage of the fair value of the amounts borrowed during the life of the transactions. In the event of a decline in the fair value of the pledged collateral under these secured financing transactions, we may be required to transfer cash or additional securities as pledged collateral under these agreements. At the termination of the transactions, we and our counterparties are obligated to return the amounts borrowed and the securities transferred, respectively.

The following table presents the fair value of securities pledged to counterparties under secured financing transactions, including repurchase and securities lending agreements:

(in millions)		June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Fixed maturity securities available for sale	$	1,704	$	1,145
Other bond securities, at fair value	$	2,093	$	1,740

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, amounts borrowed under repurchase and securities lending agreements totaled $3.8 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively.

The following table presents the fair value of securities pledged under our repurchase agreements by collateral type and by remaining contractual maturity:

	Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(in millions)	Overnight and Continuous			up to 30 days		31 - 90 days		91 - 364 days		365 days or greater		Total
June 30, 2016
Other bond securities:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	116	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	116
Non-U.S. governments		-		-		-		55		-		55
Corporate debt		-		73		734		980		120		1,907
Total	$	116	$	73	$	734	$	1,035	$	120	$	2,078

December 31, 2015
Bonds available for sale:
Non-U.S. governments	$	-	$	50	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	50
Other bond securities:
Non-U.S. governments		-		-		-		49		-		49
Corporate debt		-		33		332		1,326		-		1,691
Total	$	-	$	83	$	332	$	1,375	$	-	$	1,790

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table presents the fair value of securities pledged under our securities lending agreements by collateral type and by remaining contractual maturity:

	Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(in millions)		Overnight and Continuous		up to 30 days		31 - 90 days		91 - 364 days		365 days or greater		Total
June 30, 2016
Bonds available for sale:
Corporate debt	$	-	$	285	$	713	$	243	$	20	$	1,261
RMBS		-		241		201		-		-		442
Other bond securities:
RMBS		-		9		7		-		-		16
Total	$	-	$	535	$	921	$	243	$	20	$	1,719

December 31, 2015
Bonds available for sale:
Non-U.S. governments	$	-	$	-	$	57	$	-	$	-	$	57
Corporate debt		-		-		914		-		-		914
RMBS		-		-		-		124		-		124
Total	$	-	$	-	$	971	$	124	$	-	$	1,095

We also enter into agreements in which securities are purchased by us under agreements to resell (reverse repurchase agreements), which are accounted for as secured financing transactions and reported as short-term investments or other assets, depending on their terms. These agreements are recorded at their contracted resale amounts plus accrued interest, other than those that are accounted for at fair value. In all reverse repurchase transactions, we take possession of or obtain a security interest in the related securities, and we have the right to sell or repledge this collateral received.

The following table presents information on the fair value of securities pledged to us under reverse repurchase agreements:

(in millions)		June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Securities collateral pledged to us	$	1,489	$	1,742
Amount sold or repledged by us	$	105	$	-

Insurance – Statutory and Other Deposits

Total carrying values of cash and securities deposited by our insurance subsidiaries under requirements of regulatory authorities or other insurance-related arrangements, including certain annuity-related obligations and certain reinsurance treaties, were $5.1 billion and $4.9 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Other Pledges and Restrictions

Certain of our subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) and such membership requires the members to own stock in these FHLBs. We owned an aggregate of $107 million and $47 million of stock in FHLBs at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In addition, our subsidiaries have pledged securities available for sale with a fair value of $3.5 billion and $1.2 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, associated with advances from the FHLBs.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Certain GIAs have provisions that require collateral to be posted or payments to be made by us upon a downgrade of our long-term debt ratings. The actual amount of collateral required to be posted to the counterparties in the event of such downgrades, and the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depend on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade. The fair value of securities pledged as collateral with respect to these obligations was approximately $2.3 billion and $2.4 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. This collateral primarily consists of securities of the U.S. government and government sponsored entities and generally cannot be repledged or resold by the counterparties.

Short-term investments held in escrow accounts or otherwise subject to restriction as to their use were $507 million and $439 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

6. LENDING ACTIVITIES

The following table presents the composition of Mortgage and other loans receivable, net:

	June 30,			December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Commercial mortgages^*	$	22,904	$	22,067
Residential mortgages		3,307		2,758
Commercial loans, other loans and notes receivable		2,820		2,451
Life insurance policy loans		2,538		2,597
Total mortgage and other loans receivable		31,569		29,873
Allowance for credit losses		(308)		(308)
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net	$	31,261	$	29,565

* Commercial mortgages primarily represent loans for offices, retail properties and apartments, with exposures in New York and California representing the largest geographic concentrations (aggregating approximately 24 percent and 12 percent, respectively, at June 30, 2016, and 22 percent and 12 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2015).

Credit Quality of Commercial Mortgages

The following table presents debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios for commercial mortgages:

	Debt Service Coverage Ratios^(a)
(in millions)		>1.20X		1.00X - 1.20X		<1.00X		Total
June 30, 2016
Loan-to-Value Ratios^(b)
Less than 65%	$	12,105	$	1,873	$	139	$	14,117
65% to 75%		5,660		352		43		6,055
76% to 80%		1,445		164		84		1,693
Greater than 80%		576		267		196		1,039
Total commercial mortgages	$	19,786	$	2,656	$	462	$	22,904

December 31, 2015
Loan-to-Value Ratios^(b)
Less than 65%	$	10,283	$	1,704	$	150	$	12,137
65% to 75%		6,361		611		45		7,017
76% to 80%		1,370		169		81		1,620
Greater than 80%		646		226		421		1,293
Total commercial mortgages	$	18,660	$	2,710	$	697	$	22,067

(a) The debt service coverage ratio compares a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments, including principal and interest.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 6. LENDING ACTIVITIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

(b) The loan-to-value ratio compares the current unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan.

The following table presents the credit quality performance indicators for commercial mortgages:

	Number															Percent
	of	Class														of
(dollars in millions)	Loans	Apartments			Offices		Retail	Industrial			Hotel		Others		Total^(c)	Total $
June 30, 2016
Credit Quality Performance Indicator:
In good standing	802	$	4,342	$	7,647	$	4,995	$	1,713	$	2,454	$	1,450	$	22,601	99	%
Restructured^(a)	8		-		235		19		-		16		-		270	1
90 days or less delinquent	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-	-
>90 days delinquent or in
process of foreclosure	7		3		12		-		-		6		12		33	-
Total^(b)	817	$	4,345	$	7,894	$	5,014	$	1,713	$	2,476	$	1,462	$	22,904	100	%
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific		$	-	$	4	$	1	$	6	$	1	$	-	$	12	-	%
General			48		55		44		6		21		12		186	1
Total allowance for credit losses		$	48	$	59	$	45	$	12	$	22	$	12	$	198	1	%

December 31, 2015
Credit Quality Performance Indicator:
In good standing	830	$	3,916	$	7,484	$	4,809	$	1,902	$	2,082	$	1,435	$	21,628	98	%
Restructured^(a)	9		-		156		25		6		16		6		209	1
90 days or less delinquent	1		-		-		4		-		-		-		4	-
>90 days delinquent or in
process of foreclosure	9		3		205		-		6		-		12		226	1
Total^(b)	849	$	3,919	$	7,845	$	4,838	$	1,914	$	2,098	$	1,453	$	22,067	100	%
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific		$	-	$	16	$	1	$	6	$	1	$	-	$	24	-	%
General			35		47		29		8		15		13		147	1
Total allowance for credit losses		$	35	$	63	$	30	$	14	$	16	$	13	$	171	1	%

(a) Loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings and are performing according to their restructured terms. For additional discussion of troubled debt restructurings, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report.

(b) Does not reflect allowance for credit losses.

(c) Approximately all of the commercial mortgages held at such respective dates were current as to payments of principal and interest. There were no significant amounts of nonperforming commercial mortgages (defined as those loans where payment of contractual principal or interest is more than 90 days past due) during any of the periods presented.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 6. LENDING ACTIVITIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Allowance for Credit Losses

See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for a discussion of our accounting policy for evaluating Mortgage and other loans receivable for impairment.

The following table presents a rollforward of the changes in the allowance for losses on Mortgage and other loans receivable:

	2016						2015
Six Months Ended June 30,		Commercial		Other				Commercial		Other
(in millions)		Mortgages		Loans		Total		Mortgages		Loans		Total
Allowance, beginning of year	$	171	$	137	$	308	$	159	$	112	$	271
Loans charged off		(13)		-		(13)		(4)		(1)		(5)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		11		-		11		3		1		4
Net charge-offs		(2)		-		(2)		(1)		-		(1)
Provision for loan losses		29		(27)		2		(9)		(3)		(12)
Other		-		-		-		2		2		4
Allowance, end of period	$	198 ^*	$	110	$	308	$	151 ^*	$	111	$	262

* Of the total allowance, $12 million and $30 million relate to individually assessed credit losses on $352 million and $570 million of commercial mortgages at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, loans with a carrying value of $84 million and $97 million, respectively, were modified in troubled debt restructurings.

7. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

We enter into various arrangements with VIEs in the normal course of business and consolidate the VIEs when we determine we are the primary beneficiary. This analysis includes a review of the VIE’s capital structure, related contractual relationships and terms, nature of the VIE’s operations and purpose, nature of the VIE’s interests issued and our involvement with the entity. When assessing the need to consolidate a VIE, we evaluate the design of the VIE as well as the related risks the entity was designed to expose the variable interest holders to.

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 7. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Balance Sheet Classification and Exposure to Loss

The following table presents the total assets and total liabilities associated with our variable interests in consolidated VIEs, as classified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

(in millions)		Real Estate and Investment Entities^(d)		Securitization Vehicles		Structured Investment Vehicle		Affordable Housing Partnerships		Other		Total
June 30, 2016
Assets:
Bonds available for sale	$	-	$	10,116	$	-	$	-	$	8	$	10,124
Other bond securities		-		5,254		334		-		6		5,594
Mortgage and other loans receivable		1		1,654		-		-		118		1,773
Other invested assets		2,043		427		-		2,848		25		5,343
Other ^(a)		570		912		78		296		168		2,024
Total assets^(b)	$	2,614	$	18,363	$	412	$	3,144	$	325	$	24,858
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	1,538	$	845	$	52	$	1,639	$	6	$	4,080
Other ^(c)		216		216		-		235		142		809
Total liabilities	$	1,754	$	1,061	$	52	$	1,874	$	148	$	4,889
December 31, 2015
Assets:
Bonds available for sale	$	-	$	10,309	$	-	$	-	$	15	$	10,324
Other bond securities		-		5,756		387		-		24		6,167
Mortgage and other loans receivable		1		1,960		-		-		132		2,093
Other invested assets		489		477		-		2,608		24		3,598
Other ^(a)		29		1,349		94		293		159		1,924
Total assets^(b)	$	519	$	19,851	$	481	$	2,901	$	354	$	24,106
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	-	$	1,025	$	53	$	1,513	$	6	$	2,597
Other^(c)		34		236		1		214		71		556
Total liabilities	$	34	$	1,261	$	54	$	1,727	$	77	$	3,153

(a) Comprised primarily of Short-term investments and Other assets at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(b) The assets of each VIE can be used only to settle specific obligations of that VIE.

(c) Comprised primarily of Other liabilities and Derivative liabilities, at fair value, at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(d) At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, off-balance sheet exposure primarily consisting of commitments to real estate and investment entities was $119 million and $131 million, respectively.

We calculate our maximum exposure to loss to be (i) the amount invested in the debt or equity of the VIE, (ii) the notional amount of VIE assets or liabilities where we have also provided credit protection to the VIE with the VIE as the referenced obligation, and (iii) other commitments and guarantees to the VIE. Interest holders in VIEs sponsored by us generally have recourse only to the assets and cash flows of the VIEs and do not have recourse to us, except in limited circumstances when we have provided a guarantee to the VIE’s interest holders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 7. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table presents total assets of unconsolidated VIEs in which we hold a variable interest, as well as our maximum exposure to loss associated with these VIEs:

			Maximum Exposure to Loss
		Total VIE		On-Balance		Off-Balance
(in millions)		Assets		Sheet^(a)		Sheet			Total
June 30, 2016
Real estate and investment entities^(d)	$	425,402	$	12,346	$	2,166		$	14,512
Affordable housing partnerships		4,908		825		-			825
Other		4,346		339		779	^(b)		1,118
Total^(c)	$	434,656	$	13,510	$	2,945		$	16,455
December 31, 2015
Real estate and investment entities^(d)	$	21,951	$	3,072	$	398		$	3,470
Affordable housing partnerships		5,255		774		-			774
Other		1,110		215		1,000	^(b)		1,215
Total	$	28,316	$	4,061	$	1,398		$	5,459

(a) At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $ 13.0 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, of our total unconsolidated VIE assets were recorded as Other invested assets.

(b) These amounts primarily represent our estimate of the maximum exposure to loss under certain insurance policies issued to VIEs if a hypothetical loss occurred to the extent of the full amount of the insured value. Our insurance policies cover defined risks and our estimate of liability is included in our insurance reserves on the balance sheet.

(c) As discussed in Note 2, on January 1, 2016, we adopted accounting guidance that resulted in an increase in the number of our investment entities classified as VIEs.

(d) Comprised primarily of hedge funds and private equity funds.

See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for additional information on VIEs.

8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

We use derivatives and other financial instruments as part of our financial risk management programs and as part of our investment operations. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for a discussion of our accounting policies and procedures regarding derivatives and hedge accounting.

Our businesses use derivatives and other instruments as part of their financial risk management. Interest rate derivatives (such as interest rate swaps) are used to manage interest rate risk associated with embedded derivatives contained in insurance contract liabilities, fixed maturity securities, outstanding medium‑ and long‑term notes as well as other interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Foreign exchange derivatives (principally foreign exchange forwards and options) are used to economically mitigate risk associated with non‑U.S. dollar denominated debt, net capital exposures, and foreign currency transactions. Equity derivatives are used to mitigate financial risk embedded in certain insurance liabilities. The derivatives are effective economic hedges of the exposures that they are meant to offset.

In addition to hedging activities, we also enter into derivative instruments with respect to investment operations, which may include, among other things, CDSs and purchases of investments with embedded derivatives, such as equity‑linked notes and convertible bonds.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table presents the notional amounts of our derivative instruments and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

	June 30, 2016								December 31, 2015
	Gross Derivative Assets				Gross Derivative Liabilities				Gross Derivative Assets				Gross Derivative Liabilities
		Notional		Fair		Notional		Fair		Notional		Fair		Notional		Fair
(in millions)		Amount		Value		Amount		Value		Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments:^(a)
Interest rate contracts	$	519	$	4	$	520	$	3	$	301	$	1	$	725	$	2
Foreign exchange contracts		5,081		455		852		32		2,903		207		914		56
Equity contracts		120		1		-		-		-		-		121		23
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments:^(a)
Interest rate contracts		68,331		5,025		30,817		3,023		45,846		3,161		65,733		2,197
Foreign exchange contracts		11,131		1,041		7,784		1,419		9,472		559		8,900		1,148
Equity contracts		11,046		278		7,478		5		6,656		177		5,028		45
Credit contracts^(b)		4		3		967		376		4		3		1,289		508
Other contracts^(c)		38,793		23		192		125		37,586		23		203		69
Total derivatives, gross	$	135,025	$	6,830	$	48,610	$	4,983	$	102,768	$	4,131	$	82,913	$	4,048
Counterparty netting^(d)				(2,192)				(2,192)				(1,268)				(1,268)
Cash collateral^(e)				(3,233)				(738)				(1,554)				(760)
Total derivatives on condensed
consolidated balance sheets^(f)			$	1,405			$	2,053			$	1,309			$	2,020

(a) Fair value amounts are shown before the effects of counterparty netting adjustments and offsetting cash collateral.

(b) As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, included CDSs on super senior multi-sector CDOs with a net notional amount of $0.9 billion and $1.1 billion (fair value liability of $353 million and $483 million), respectively. The expected weighted average maturity as of June 30, 2016 is six years. Because of long-term maturities of the CDSs in the portfolio, we are unable to make reasonable estimates of the periods during which any payments would be made. However, the net notional amount represents the maximum exposure to loss on the portfolio. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no super senior corporate debt/CLOs remaining.

(d) Represents netting of derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement.

(e) Represents cash collateral posted and received that is eligible for netting.

(f) Freestanding derivatives only, excludes Embedded derivatives. Derivative instrument assets and liabilities are recorded in Other Assets and Liabilities, respectively. Fair value of assets related to bifurcated Embedded derivatives was $0 at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Fair value of liabilities related to bifurcated Embedded derivatives was $4.1 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. A bifurcated Embedded derivative is generally presented with the host contract in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Embedded derivatives are primarily related to guarantee features in variable annuity products, which include equity and interest rate components.

Collateral

We engage in derivative transactions that are not subject to a clearing requirement directly with unaffiliated third parties, in most cases, under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) Master Agreements. Many of the ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex (CSA) provisions, which provide for collateral postings that may vary at various ratings and threshold levels. We attempt to reduce our risk with certain counterparties by entering into agreements that enable collateral to be obtained from a counterparty on an upfront or contingent basis. We minimize the risk that counterparties might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value and generally requiring additional collateral to be posted upon the occurrence of certain events or circumstances. In addition, certain derivative transactions have provisions that require collateral to be posted upon a downgrade of our long‑term debt ratings or give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction. In the case of some of the derivative transactions, upon a downgrade of our long‑term debt ratings, as an alternative to posting collateral and subject to certain conditions, we may assign the transaction to an obligor with higher debt ratings or arrange for a substitute guarantee of our obligations by an

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

obligor with higher debt ratings or take other similar action. The actual amount of collateral required to be posted to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade.

Collateral posted by us to third parties for derivative transactions was $3.1 billion and $3.0 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In the case of collateral posted under derivative transactions that are not subject to clearing, this collateral can generally be repledged or resold by the counterparties. Collateral provided to us from third parties for derivative transactions was $3.3 billion and $1.6 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In the case of collateral provided to us under derivative transactions that are not subject to clearing, we generally can repledge or resell collateral.

Offsetting

We have elected to present all derivative receivables and derivative payables, and the related cash collateral received and paid, on a net basis on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets when a legally enforceable ISDA Master Agreement exists between us and our derivative counterparty. An ISDA Master Agreement is an agreement governing multiple derivative transactions between two counterparties. The ISDA Master Agreement generally provides for the net settlement of all, or a specified group, of these derivative transactions, as well as transferred collateral, through a single payment, and in a single currency, as applicable. The net settlement provisions apply in the event of a default on, or affecting any, one derivative transaction or a termination event affecting all, or a specified group of, derivative transactions governed by the ISDA Master Agreement.

Hedge Accounting

We designated certain derivatives entered into with third parties as fair value hedges of available for sale investment securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. The fair value hedges include foreign currency forwards and cross currency swaps designated as hedges of the change in fair value of foreign currency denominated available for sale securities attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. We also designated certain interest rate swaps entered into with third parties as fair value hedges of fixed rate GICs attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates.

We use foreign currency denominated debt and cross-currency swaps as hedging instruments in net investment hedge relationships to mitigate the foreign exchange risk associated with our non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. For net investment hedge relationships where issued debt is used as a hedging instrument, we assess the hedge effectiveness and measure the amount of ineffectiveness based on changes in spot rates. For net investment hedge relationships that use derivatives as hedging instruments, we assess hedge effectiveness and measure hedge ineffectiveness using changes in forward rates. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, we recognized losses of $4 million and $9 million, respectively, and for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, we recognized gains (losses) of $(21) million and $73 million, respectively, included in Change in foreign currency translation adjustment in Other comprehensive income related to the net investment hedge relationships.

A qualitative methodology is utilized to assess hedge effectiveness for net investment hedges, while regression analysis is employed for all other hedges.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table presents the gain (loss) recognized in earnings on our derivative instruments in fair value hedging relationships in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

	Gains/(Losses) Recognized in Earnings for:				Including Gains/(Losses) Attributable to:
	Hedging		Hedged		Hedge		Excluded
(in millions)	Derivatives^(a)		Items		Ineffectiveness		Components		Other^(b)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Interest rate contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		5		-		-		5
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign exchange contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		389		(345)		-		43		1
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		5		-		-		5
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		-		-		-		-
Equity contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		10		(7)		-		3		-
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Interest rate contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		2		-		-		2
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign exchange contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		(60)		73		-		13		-
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		4		-		-		4
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		1		-		-		1
Equity contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		(13)		13		-		-		-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

	Gains/(Losses) Recognized in Earnings for:				Including Gains/(Losses) Attributable to:
	Hedging		Hedged		Hedge		Excluded
(in millions)	Derivatives^(a)		Items		Ineffectiveness		Components		Other^(b)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Interest rate contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)	$	1	$	(7)	$	-	$	-	$	(6)
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		7		-		-		7
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign exchange contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		423		(409)		-		14		-
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		12		-		-		12
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		-		-		-		-
Equity contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		20		(19)		-		1		-
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Interest rate contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)	$	1	$	(1)	$	-	$	-	$	-
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		-		-		-		-
Other income		-		5		-		-		5
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		13		-		-		13
Foreign exchange contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		72		(56)		-		13		3
Interest credited to policyholder
account balances		-		(1)		-		-		(1)
Other income		-		10		-		-		10
Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt		-		17		-		-		17
Equity contracts:
Realized capital gains/(losses)		(19)		18		-		(1)		-

a) The amounts presented do not include the periodic net coupon settlements of the derivative contract or the coupon income (expense) related to the hedged item.

(b) Represents accretion/amortization of opening fair value of the hedged item at inception of hedge relationship, amortization of basis adjustment on hedged item following the discontinuation of hedge accounting, and the release of debt basis adjustment following the repurchase of issued debt that was part of previously-discontinued fair value hedge relationship.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

	Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings
	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
By Derivative Type:
Interest rate contracts	$	603	$	(427)	$	1,373	$	(71)
Foreign exchange contracts		182		(52)		154		270
Equity contracts		(141)		(31)		(272)		(120)
Commodity contracts		-		-		-		(1)
Credit contracts		28		13		34		160
Other contracts		20		(35)		36		(13)
Embedded derivatives		(513)		846		(1,285)		673
Total	$	179	$	314	$	40	$	898
By Classification:
Policy fees	$	20	$	20	$	40	$	39
Net investment income		13		(13)		12		14
Net realized capital gains		123		305		88		476
Other income (losses)		18		8		(112)		370
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred		5		(6)		12		(1)
Total	$	179	$	314	$	40	$	898

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The aggregate fair value of our derivative instruments that contain credit risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was approximately $2.0 billion. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral under these contracts at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was approximately $2.1 billion.

We estimate that at June 30, 2016, based on our outstanding financial derivative transactions, a downgrade of our long-term senior debt ratings to BBB+, BBB or BBB– by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of S&P Global Inc., and/or a downgrade to Baa2 or Baa3 by Moody’s Investors’ Service, Inc. would permit counterparties to make additional collateral calls and permit certain counterparties to elect early termination of contracts, resulting in corresponding collateral postings and termination payments in the total amount of up to approximately $137 million.

Additional collateral postings upon downgrade are estimated based on the factors in the individual collateral posting provisions of the CSA with each counterparty and current exposure as of June 30, 2016. Factors considered in estimating the termination payments upon downgrade include current market conditions and the terms of the respective CSA provisions. Our estimates are also based on the assumption that counterparties will terminate based on their net exposure to us. The actual termination payments could differ from our estimates given market conditions at the time of downgrade and the level of uncertainty in estimating both the number of counterparties who may elect to exercise their right to terminate and the payment that may be triggered in connection with any such exercise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGE ACCOUNTING

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Hybrid Securities with Embedded Credit Derivatives

We invest in hybrid securities (such as credit‑linked notes) with the intent of generating income, and not specifically to acquire exposure to embedded derivative risk. As is the case with our other investments in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS, our investments in these hybrid securities are exposed to losses only up to the amount of our initial investment in the hybrid security. Other than our initial investment in the hybrid securities, we have no further obligation to make payments on the embedded credit derivatives in the related hybrid securities.

We elect to account for our investments in these hybrid securities with embedded written credit derivatives at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in Net investment income and Other income. Our investments in these hybrid securities are reported as Other bond securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair values of these hybrid securities were $5.1 billion and $5.7 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These securities have par amounts of $10.6 billion and $11.2 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and have remaining stated maturity dates that extend to 2052.

9. CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

In the normal course of business, various contingent liabilities and commitments are entered into by AIG and our subsidiaries. In addition, AIG Parent guarantees various obligations of certain subsidiaries.

Although AIG cannot currently quantify its ultimate liability for unresolved litigation and investigation matters, including those referred to below, it is possible that such liability could have a material adverse effect on AIG’s consolidated financial condition or its consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows for an individual reporting period.

Legal Contingencies

Overview. In the normal course of business, AIG and our subsidiaries are, like others in the insurance and financial services industries in general, subject to litigation, including claims for punitive damages. In our insurance and mortgage guaranty operations, litigation arising from claims settlement activities is generally considered in the establishment of our liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. However, the potential for increasing jury awards and settlements makes it difficult to assess the ultimate outcome of such litigation. AIG is also subject to derivative, class action and other claims asserted by its shareholders and others alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties by its directors and officers and violations of insurance laws and regulations, as well as federal and state securities laws. In the case of any derivative action brought on behalf of AIG, any recovery would accrue to the benefit of AIG.

Various regulatory and governmental agencies have been reviewing certain transactions and practices of AIG and our subsidiaries in connection with industry-wide and other inquiries into, among other matters, certain business practices of current and former operating insurance subsidiaries. We have cooperated, and will continue to cooperate, in producing documents and other information in response to subpoenas and other requests.

AIG’s Subprime Exposure, AIGFP Credit Default Swap Portfolio and Related Matters

AIG, AIG Financial Products Corp. and related subsidiaries (collectively AIGFP), and certain directors and officers of AIG, AIGFP and other AIG subsidiaries have been named in various actions relating to our exposure to the U.S. residential subprime mortgage market, unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP’s super senior credit default swap portfolio, losses

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

and liquidity constraints relating to our securities lending program and related disclosure and other matters (Subprime Exposure Issues).

Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation. On May 19, 2009, a consolidated class action complaint, resulting from the consolidation of eight purported securities class actions filed between May 2008 and January 2009, was filed against AIG and certain directors and officers of AIG and AIGFP, AIG’s outside auditors, and the underwriters of various securities offerings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the Southern District of New York) in In re American International Group, Inc. 2008 Securities Litigation (the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation), asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and claims under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), for allegedly materially false and misleading statements in AIG’s public disclosures from March 16, 2006 to September 16, 2008 relating to, among other things, the Subprime Exposure Issues.

On July 15, 2014 and August 1, 2014, lead plaintiff, AIG and AIG’s outside auditor accepted mediators’ proposals to settle the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation against all defendants. On October 22, 2014, AIG made a cash payment of $960 million, which is being held in escrow until all funds are distributed. On March 20, 2015, the Court issued an Order and Final Judgment approving the class settlement and dismissing the action with prejudice, and the AIG settlement became final on June 29, 2015.

Individual Securities Litigations. Between November 18, 2011 and February 9, 2015, eleven separate, though similar, securities actions (Individual Securities Litigations) were filed asserting claims substantially similar to those in the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation against AIG and certain directors and officers of AIG and AIGFP. Two of the actions were voluntarily dismissed. On September 10, 2015, the Southern District of New York granted AIG’s motion to dismiss some of the claims in the Individual Securities Litigations in whole or in part. AIG has settled eight of the nine remaining actions.

On March 27, 2015, an additional securities action was filed in state court in Orange County, California asserting a claim against AIG pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act (the California Action) that is substantially similar to those in the Consolidated 2008 Securities Litigation and the remaining Individual Securities Litigation pending in the Southern District of New York. On July 10, 2015, AIG filed a motion to stay the California Action. On September 18, 2015, the court denied AIG’s motion to stay the California Action. On October 23, 2015, AIG filed an appeal of the court’s denial. On January 28, 2016, the California appellate court summarily denied AIG’s appeal. On February 8, 2016, AIG filed a petition for review in the California Supreme Court, which was denied on March 30, 2016. On April 11, 2016, AIG filed a demurrer to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the California Action. On May 31, 2016, the court overruled AIG’s demurrer in the California Action. On June 24, 2016, AIG filed a petition for writ of mandate in appellate court of the court’s decision overruling AIG’s demurrer.

We have accrued our current estimate of probable loss with respect to these litigations.

Starr International Litigation

On November 21, 2011, Starr International Company, Inc. (SICO) filed a complaint against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims (the Court of Federal Claims), bringing claims, both individually and on behalf of the classes defined below and derivatively on behalf of AIG (the SICO Treasury Action). The complaint challenges the government’s assistance of AIG, pursuant to which AIG entered into a credit facility with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the FRBNY, and such credit facility, the FRBNY Credit Facility) and the United States received an approximately 80 percent ownership in AIG. The complaint alleges that the interest rate imposed on AIG and the appropriation of approximately 80 percent of AIG’s equity was discriminatory, unprecedented, and inconsistent with liquidity assistance offered by the government to other comparable firms at the time and violated the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Takings Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

In the SICO Treasury Action, the only claims naming AIG as a party (as a nominal defendant) are derivative claims on behalf of AIG. On September 21, 2012, SICO made a pre‑litigation demand on our Board demanding that we pursue the derivative claims or allow SICO to pursue the claims on our behalf. On January 9, 2013, our Board unanimously refused SICO’s demand

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

in its entirety and on January 23, 2013, counsel for the Board sent a letter to counsel for SICO describing the process by which our Board considered and refused SICO’s demand and stating the reasons for our Board’s determination.

On March 11, 2013, SICO filed a second amended complaint in the SICO Treasury Action alleging that its demand was wrongfully refused. On June 26, 2013, the Court of Federal Claims granted AIG’s and the United States’ motions to dismiss SICO’s derivative claims in the SICO Treasury Action due to our Board’s refusal of SICO’s demand and denied the United States’ motion to dismiss SICO’s direct, non-derivative claims.

On March 11, 2013, the Court of Federal Claims in the SICO Treasury Action granted SICO’s motion for class certification of two classes with respect to SICO’s non‑derivative claims: (1) persons and entities who held shares of AIG Common Stock on or before September 16, 2008 and who owned those shares on September 22, 2008 (the Credit Agreement Shareholder Class); and (2) persons and entities who owned shares of AIG Common Stock on June 30, 2009 and were eligible to vote those shares at AIG’s June 30, 2009 annual meeting of shareholders (the Reverse Stock Split Shareholder Class). SICO has provided notice of class certification to potential members of the classes, who, pursuant to a court order issued on April 25, 2013, had to return opt‑in consent forms by September 16, 2013 to participate in either class. 286,908 holders of AIG Common Stock during the two class periods have opted into the classes.

On June 15, 2015, the Court of Federal Claims issued its opinion and order in the SICO Treasury Action. The Court found that the United States exceeded its statutory authority by exacting approximately 80 percent of AIG’s equity in exchange for the FRBNY Credit Facility, but that AIG shareholders suffered no damages as a result. SICO argued during trial that the two classes are entitled to a total of approximately $40 billion in damages, plus interest. The Court also found that the United States was not liable to the Reverse Stock Split Class in connection with the reverse stock split vote at the June 30, 2009 annual meeting of shareholders.

On June 17, 2015, the Court of Federal Claims entered judgment stating that “the Credit Agreement Shareholder Class shall prevail on liability due to the Government's illegal exaction, but shall recover zero damages, and that the Reverse Stock Split Shareholder Class shall not prevail on liability or damages.” SICO filed a notice of appeal of the July 2, 2012 dismissal of SICO’s unconstitutional conditions claim, the June 26, 2013 dismissal of SICO’s derivative claims, the Court’s June 15, 2015 opinion and order, and the Court’s June 17, 2015 judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The United States filed a notice of cross appeal of the Court’s July 2, 2012 opinion and order denying in part its motion to dismiss, the Court’s June 26, 2013 opinion and order denying its motion to dismiss SICO’s direct claims, the Court’s June 15, 2015 opinion and order, and the Court’s June 17, 2015 judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

On August 25, 2015, SICO filed its appellate brief, in which it stated SICO does not appeal the dismissal of the derivative claims it asserted on behalf of AIG.

In the Court of Federal Claims, the United States has alleged, as an affirmative defense in its answer, that AIG is obligated to indemnify the FRBNY and its representatives, including the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the United States (as the FRBNY’s principal), for any recovery in the SICO Treasury Action.

AIG believes that any indemnification obligation would arise only if: (a) SICO prevails on its appeal and ultimately receives an award of damages; (b) the United States then commences an action against AIG seeking indemnification; and (c) the United States is successful in such an action through any appellate process. If SICO prevails on its claims and the United States seeks indemnification from AIG, AIG intends to assert defenses thereto. A reversal of the Court of Federal Claim’s June 17, 2015 decision and judgment and a final determination that the United States is liable for damages, together with a final determination that AIG is obligated to indemnify the United States for any such damages, could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

False Claims Act Complaint

On February 25, 2010, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California by two individuals (Relators) seeking to assert claims on behalf of the United States against AIG and certain other defendants, including Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank, under the False Claims Act. Relators filed a first amended complaint on September 30, 2010, adding certain additional defendants, including Bank of America and Société Générale. The first amended complaint alleged that defendants engaged in fraudulent business practices in respect of their activities in the over-the-counter market for collateralized debt obligations, and submitted false claims to the United States in connection with the FRBNY Credit Facility and Maiden Lane II LLC and Maiden Lane III LLC entities (the Maiden Lane Interests) through, among other things, misrepresenting AIG’s ability and intent to repay amounts drawn on the FRBNY Credit Facility, and misrepresenting the value of the securities that the Maiden Lane Interests acquired from AIG and certain of its counterparties. The first amended complaint sought unspecified damages pursuant to the False Claims Act in the amount of three times the damages allegedly sustained by the United States as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. The complaint and the first amended complaint were initially filed and maintained under seal while the United States considered whether to intervene in the action. On or about April 28, 2011, after the United States declined to intervene, the District Court lifted the seal, and Relators served the first amended complaint on AIG on July 11, 2011. On April 19, 2013, the Court granted AIG’s motion to dismiss, dismissing the first amended complaint in its entirety, without prejudice, giving the Relators the opportunity to file a second amended complaint. On May 24, 2013, the Relators filed a second amended complaint, which attempted to plead the same claims as the prior complaints and did not specify an amount of alleged damages. AIG and its co-defendants filed motions to dismiss the second amended complaint on August 9, 2013. On March 29, 2014, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice. On April 30, 2014, the Relators filed a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. On May 5, 2016, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the trial court. We are unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from this litigation.

Litigation Matters Relating to AIG’s Insurance Operations

Caremark. AIG and certain of its subsidiaries have been named defendants in two putative class actions in state court in Alabama that arise out of the 1999 settlement of class and derivative litigation involving Caremark Rx, Inc. (Caremark). The plaintiffs in the second‑filed action intervened in the first‑filed action, and the second‑filed action was dismissed. An excess policy issued by a subsidiary of AIG with respect to the 1999 litigation was expressly stated to be without limit of liability. In the current actions, plaintiffs allege that the judge approving the 1999 settlement was misled as to the extent of available insurance coverage and would not have approved the settlement had he known of the existence and/or unlimited nature of the excess policy. They further allege that AIG, its subsidiaries, and Caremark are liable for fraud and suppression for misrepresenting and/or concealing the nature and extent of coverage.

The complaints filed by the plaintiffs and the intervenors request compensatory damages for the 1999 class in the amount of $3.2 billion, plus punitive damages. AIG and its subsidiaries deny the allegations of fraud and suppression, assert that information concerning the excess policy was publicly disclosed months prior to the approval of the settlement, that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations, and that the statute cannot be tolled in light of the public disclosure of the excess coverage. The plaintiffs and intervenors, in turn, have asserted that the disclosure was insufficient to inform them of the nature of the coverage and did not start the running of the statute of limitations.

On August 15, 2012, the trial court entered an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and on September 12, 2014, the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed that order. AIG and the other defendants’ petition for rehearing of that decision was denied on February 27, 2015. The matter was remanded to the trial court for general discovery and adjudication of the merits. On November 24, 2015, the trial court ruled that the defendants had a duty to disclose the amount of insurance available at the settlement approval hearings and that the defendants breached that duty. The parties have settled this matter in principle, subject to formal documentation and court approval. Preliminary approval of the settlement was entered by the trial

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

court on June 1, 2016. The hearing on final approval is expected in the third quarter. We have accrued our current estimate of loss with respect to this litigation.

Regulatory and Related Matters

In April 2007, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) formed a Settlement Review Working Group, directed by the State of Indiana, to review the Workers’ Compensation Residual Market Assessment portion of the settlement between AIG, the Office of the New York Attorney General, and the New York State Department of Insurance. In late 2007, the Settlement Review Working Group, under the direction of Indiana, Minnesota and Rhode Island, recommended that a multi-state targeted market conduct examination focusing on workers’ compensation insurance be commenced under the direction of the NAIC’s Market Analysis Working Group. AIG was informed of the multi-state targeted market conduct examination in January 2008. The lead states in the multi-state examination were Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. All other states (and the District of Columbia) agreed to participate in the multi-state examination. The examination focused on legacy issues related to certain AIG entities’ writing and reporting of workers compensation insurance between 1985 and 1996.

On December 17, 2010, AIG and the lead states reached an agreement to settle all regulatory liabilities arising out of the subjects of the multistate examination. This regulatory settlement agreement, which was agreed to by all 50 states and the District of Columbia, included, among other terms, (i) AIG’s payment of $100 million in regulatory fines and penalties; (ii) AIG’s payment of $46.5 million in outstanding premium taxes and assessments; (iii) AIG’s agreement to enter into a compliance plan describing agreed-upon specific steps and standards for evaluating AIG’s ongoing compliance with state regulations governing the setting of workers’ compensation insurance premium rates and the reporting of workers’ compensation premiums; and (iv) AIG’s agreement to pay up to $150 million in contingent fines in the event that AIG fails to comply substantially with the compliance plan requirements. In furtherance of the compliance plan, the agreement provided for a monitoring period from May 29, 2012 to May 29, 2014 leading up to a compliance plan examination. After the close of the monitoring period, as part of preparation for the actual conduct of the compliance plan examination, on or about October 1, 2014, AIG and the lead states agreed upon corrective action plans to address particular issues identified during the monitoring period. The compliance plan examination is ongoing. There can be no assurance that the result of the compliance plan examination will not result in a fine, have a material adverse effect on AIG’s ongoing operations or lead to civil litigation.

In connection with a multi‑state examination of certain accident and health products, including travel products, issued by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (National Union), AIG Property Casualty Inc. (formerly Chartis Inc.), on behalf of itself, National Union, and certain of AIG Property Casualty Inc.’s insurance and non‑insurance companies (collectively, the AIG PC parties) entered into a Regulatory Settlement Agreement with regulators from 50 U.S. jurisdictions effective November 29, 2012. Under the agreement, and without admitting any liability for the issues raised in the examination, the AIG PC parties (i) paid a civil penalty of $50 million, (ii) entered into a corrective action plan describing agreed‑upon specific steps and standards for evaluating the AIG PC parties’ ongoing compliance with laws and regulations governing the issues identified in the examination, and (iii) agreed to pay a contingent fine in the event that the AIG PC parties fail to satisfy certain terms of the corrective action plan. On April 29, 2016, National Union and other AIG companies achieved a settlement in principle of civil litigation relating to the conduct of their accident and health business, subject to formal documentation and court approval. We have accrued our current estimate of loss with respect to this settlement. On May 23, 2016, the managing lead state in the multi-state examination ordered that the companies subject to the Regulatory Settlement Agreement have “complied with the terms” of the Regulatory Settlement Agreement and that no contingent fine or civil penalty would be due.

Other Commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into commitments to invest in limited partnerships, private equity funds and hedge funds and to purchase and develop real estate in the U.S. and abroad. These commitments totaled $3.2 billion at June 30, 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Guarantees

Subsidiaries

We have issued unconditional guarantees with respect to the prompt payment, when due, of all present and future payment obligations and liabilities of AIGFP and of AIG Markets arising from transactions entered into by AIG Markets.

In connection with AIGFP’s business activities, AIGFP has issued, in a limited number of transactions, standby letters of credit or similar facilities to equity investors of structured leasing transactions in an amount equal to the termination value owing to the equity investor by the lessee in the event of a lessee default (the equity termination value). The total amount outstanding at June 30, 2016 was $208 million. In those transactions, AIGFP has agreed to pay such amount if the lessee fails to pay. The amount payable by AIGFP is, in certain cases, partially offset by amounts payable under other instruments typically equal to the present value of scheduled payments to be made by AIGFP. In the event that AIGFP is required to make a payment to the equity investor, the lessee is unconditionally obligated to reimburse AIGFP. To the extent that the equity investor is paid the equity termination value from the standby letter of credit and/or other sources, including payments by the lessee, AIGFP takes an assignment of the equity investor’s rights under the lease of the underlying property. Because the obligations of the lessee under the lease transactions are generally economically defeased, lessee bankruptcy is the most likely circumstance in which AIGFP would be required to pay without reimbursement.

Asset Dispositions

General

We are subject to financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements in connection with the completed sales of businesses pursuant to our asset disposition plan. The various arrangements may be triggered by, among other things, declines in asset values, the occurrence of specified business contingencies, the realization of contingent liabilities, developments in litigation or breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by us. These arrangements are typically subject to various time limitations, defined by the contract or by operation of law, such as statutes of limitation. In some cases, the maximum potential obligation is subject to contractual limitations, while in other cases such limitations are not specified or are not applicable.

We are unable to develop a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential payout under certain of these arrangements. Overall, we believe that it is unlikely we will have to make any material payments related to completed sales under these arrangements, and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other

· See Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of commitments and guarantees associated with VIEs.

· See Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures about derivatives.

· See Note 14 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures about guarantees of outstanding debt.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 10. EQUITY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

10. EQUITY

Shares Outstanding

The following table presents a rollforward of outstanding shares:

	Common	Treasury	Common Stock
	Stock Issued	Stock	Outstanding
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Shares, beginning of year	1,906,671,492	(712,754,875)	1,193,916,617
Shares issued	-	2,017,200	2,017,200
Shares repurchased	-	(113,244,455)	(113,244,455)
Shares, end of period	1,906,671,492	(823,982,130)	1,082,689,362

Dividends

Payment of future dividends to our shareholders and repurchases of AIG Common Stock depends in part on the regulatory framework that we are currently subject to and that will ultimately be applicable to us, including as a nonbank systemically important financial institution under the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd‑Frank) and a global systemically important insurer. In addition, dividends are payable on AIG Common Stock only when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors in its discretion, from funds legally available for this purpose. In considering whether to pay a dividend or purchase shares of AIG Common Stock, our Board of Directors considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the capital resources available to support our insurance operations and business strategies, AIG’s funding capacity and capital resources in comparison to internal benchmarks, expectations for capital generation, rating agency expectations for capital, regulatory standards for capital and capital distributions, and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

On March 28, 2016, we paid a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock to shareholders of record on March 14, 2016. On June 27, 2016, we paid a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock to shareholders of record on June 13, 2016.

See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for a discussion of restrictions on payments of dividends to AIG Parent by its subsidiaries.

Repurchase of AIG Common Stock

Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of AIG Common Stock through a series of actions. On February 11, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase of $5.0 billion to its previous share repurchase authorization. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $1.8 billion remained under our share repurchase authorization. Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise (including through the purchase of warrants). Certain of our share repurchases have been and may from time to time be effected through Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans.

We repurchased approximately 113 million shares of AIG Common Stock in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6.2 billion, and we repurchased 15 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $263 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 10. EQUITY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The timing of any future repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents a rollforward of Accumulated other comprehensive income:

		Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Fixed Maturity Investments on Which Other-Than- Temporary Credit Impairments Were Taken
				Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of All Other Investments		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Retirement Plan Liabilities Adjustment


(in millions)										Total
Balance, December 31, 2015, net of tax	$	696	$	5,566	$	(2,879)	$	(846)	$	2,537
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments		(491)		9,499		-		-		9,008
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment and other		(8)		(682)		-		-		(690)
Change in future policy benefits		-		(1,583)		-		-		(1,583)
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments		-		-		158		-		158
Change in net actuarial loss		-		-		-		11		11
Change in prior service cost		-		-		-		(13)		(13)
Change in deferred tax asset (liability)		172		(1,398)		63		(6)		(1,169)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(327)		5,836		221		(8)		5,722
Noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-		-
Balance, June 30, 2016, net of tax	$	369	$	11,402	$	(2,658)	$	(854)	$	8,259

Balance, December 31, 2014, net of tax	$	1,043	$	12,327	$	(1,784)	$	(969)	$	10,617
Change in unrealized depreciation of investments		(195)		(4,843)		-		-		(5,038)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs adjustment and other		(9)		495		-		-		486
Change in future policy benefits		92		804		-		-		896
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments		-		-		(684)		-		(684)
Change in net actuarial loss		-		-		-		91		91
Change in prior service credit		-		-		-		(23)		(23)
Change in deferred tax asset (liability)		4		1,092		188		(12)		1,272
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(108)		(2,452)		(496)		56		(3,000)
Noncontrolling interests		-		-		(3)		-		(3)
Balance, June 30, 2015, net of tax	$	935	$	9,875	$	(2,277)	$	(913)	$	7,620

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 10. EQUITY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table presents the other comprehensive income reclassification adjustments for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

		Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Fixed Maturity Investments on Which Other-Than- Temporary Credit Impairments Were Taken
				Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of All Other Investments		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Retirement Plan Liabilities Adjustment


(in millions)										Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Unrealized change arising during period	$	59	$	4,277	$	290	$	(11)	$	4,615
Less: Reclassification adjustments
included in net income		25		1,038		-		(4)		1,059
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
before income tax expense (benefit)		34		3,239		290		(7)		3,556
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)		12		830		(23)		3		822
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
net of income tax expense (benefit)	$	22	$	2,409	$	313	$	(10)	$	2,734
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Unrealized change arising during period	$	35	$	(4,475)	$	(52)	$	14	$	(4,478)
Less: Reclassification adjustments
included in net income		46		99		-		(23)		122
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
before income tax expense (benefit)		(11)		(4,574)		(52)		37		(4,600)
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)		25		(1,583)		(15)		10		(1,563)
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
net of income tax expense (benefit)	$	(36)	$	(2,991)	$	(37)	$	27	$	(3,037)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Unrealized change arising during period	$	(399)	$	7,917	$	158	$	(10)	$	7,666
Less: Reclassification adjustments
included in net income		100		683		-		(8)		775
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
before income tax expense (benefit)		(499)		7,234		158		(2)		6,891
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)		(172)		1,398		(63)		6		1,169
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
net of income tax expense (benefit)	$	(327)	$	5,836	$	221	$	(8)	$	5,722
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Unrealized change arising during period	$	(57)	$	(2,968)	$	(684)	$	21	$	(3,688)
Less: Reclassification adjustments
included in net income		55		576		-		(47)		584
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
before income tax expense (benefit)		(112)		(3,544)		(684)		68		(4,272)
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)		(4)		(1,092)		(188)		12		(1,272)
Total other comprehensive income (loss),
net of income tax expense (benefit)	$	(108)	$	(2,452)	$	(496)	$	56	$	(3,000)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 10. EQUITY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

The following table presents the effect of the reclassification of significant items out of Accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income					Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

	Three Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of fixed maturity investments on which other-than-temporary credit impairments were taken

Investments		$	25	$	46		Other realized capital gains
Total			25		46
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of all other investments
Investments			1,074		112		Other realized capital gains
Deferred acquisition costs adjustment			(36)		(30)		Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
Future policy benefits			-		17		Policyholder benefits and losses incurred
Total			1,038		99
Change in retirement plan liabilities adjustment
Prior - service cost			5		11		*
Actuarial losses			(9)		(34)		*
Total			(4)		(23)
Total reclassifications for the period		$	1,059	$	122
	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income					Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of fixed maturity investments on which other-than-temporary credit impairments were taken

Investments		$	100	$	55		Other realized capital gains
Total			100		55
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of all other investments
Investments			661		624		Other realized capital gains
Deferred acquisition costs adjustment			22		(65)		Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
Future policy benefits			-		17		Policyholder benefits and losses incurred
Total			683		576
Change in retirement plan liabilities adjustment
Prior - service cost			9		23		*
Actuarial losses			(17)		(70)		*
Total			(8)		(47)		-
Total reclassifications for the period		$	775	$	584		-

* These Accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 11. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

11. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

The basic EPS computation is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits. The diluted EPS computation is based on those shares used in the basic EPS computation plus shares that would have been outstanding assuming issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding and adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits.

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(dollars in millions, except per share data)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Numerator for EPS:
Income from continuing operations	$	1,934	$	1,775	$	1,778	$	4,251
Less: Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests		11		(9)		(9)		-
Income attributable to AIG common shareholders from continuing operations		1,923		1,784		1,787		4,251
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense		(10)		16		(57)		17
Net income attributable to AIG common shareholders		1,913		1,800		1,730		4,268
Denominator for EPS:
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		1,113,587,927		1,329,157,366		1,135,068,193		1,347,452,833
Dilutive shares		26,458,046		36,233,065		28,021,555		28,873,138
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted^*		1,140,045,973		1,365,390,431		1,163,089,748		1,376,325,971
Income per common share attributable to AIG:
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.73	$	1.34	$	1.57	$	3.16
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(0.01)	$	0.01	$	(0.05)	$	0.01
Net income attributable to AIG	$	1.72	$	1.35	$	1.52	$	3.17
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.69	$	1.31	$	1.54	$	3.09
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(0.01)	$	0.01	$	(0.05)	$	0.01
Net income attributable to AIG	$	1.68	$	1.32	$	1.49	$	3.10

* Dilutive shares include our share‑based employee compensation plans and a weighted average portion of the warrants issued to AIG shareholders as part of AIG’s recapitalization in January 2011. The number of shares excluded from diluted shares outstanding was 0.1 million and 0.3 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and 0.2 million and 0.3 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, respectively, because the effect of including those shares in the calculation would have been anti-dilutive.

12. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans, post-retirement medical and life insurance plans for eligible employees and retirees in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. countries. Effective January 1, 2016, the U.S. defined benefit pension plans were frozen for current participants and closed to new hires. Accordingly, compensation-based benefits are no longer credited to the cash balance accounts of plan participants.

Beginning in 2016, interest cost for pension and postretirement benefits for our U.S. plans and largest non-U.S. plans is measured by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve to the plans’ corresponding discounted cash flows that

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 12. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

comprise the obligation (the Spot Rate Approach). This method provides a more precise measurement of interest cost by aligning the timing of the plans’ discounted cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve. Previously, we measured interest cost utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligations.

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost with respect to pensions and other postretirement benefits:

	Pension						Postretirement
		U.S.		Non-U.S.				U.S.		Non-U.S.
(in millions)		Plans		Plans		Total		Plans		Plans		Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	5	$	7	$	12	$	-	$	1	$	1
Interest cost		45		5		50		2		1		3
Expected return on assets		(74)		(6)		(80)		-		-		-
Amortization of prior service credit		-		-		-		(3)		-		(3)
Amortization of net loss		6		2		8		-		-		-
Curtailment gain		-		(1)		(1)		-		-		-
Net periodic benefit (income) cost	$	(18)	$	7	$	(11)	$	(1)	$	2	$	1
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	51	$	10	$	61	$	1	$	1	$	2
Interest cost		55		6		61		2		-		2
Expected return on assets		(72)		(6)		(78)		-		-		-
Amortization of prior service credit		(8)		-		(8)		(2)		-		(2)
Amortization of net loss		33		2		35		-		-		-
Curtailment gain		-		(1)		(1)		-		-		-
Net periodic benefit cost	$	59	$	11	$	70	$	1	$	1	$	2
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	9	$	15	$	24	$	1	$	2	$	3
Interest cost		91		10		101		3		2		5
Expected return on assets		(147)		(13)		(160)		-		-		-
Amortization of prior service credit		-		-		-		(5)		-		(5)
Amortization of net loss		12		4		16		-		-		-
Curtailment gain		-		(3)		(3)		-		-		-
Net periodic benefit (income) cost	$	(35)	$	13	$	(22)	$	(1)	$	4	$	3
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	103	$	21	$	124	$	3	$	2	$	5
Interest cost		110		12		122		4		1		5
Expected return on assets		(144)		(12)		(156)		-		-		-
Amortization of prior service credit		(16)		(1)		(17)		(5)		-		(5)
Amortization of net loss		65		5		70		-		-		-
Curtailment gain		-		(1)		(1)		-		-		-
Net periodic benefit cost	$	118	$	24	$	142	$	2	$	3	$	5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

13. INCOME TAXES

Interim Tax Calculation Method

We use the estimated annual effective tax rate method in computing our interim tax provision. Certain items, including those deemed to be unusual, infrequent or that cannot be reliably estimated, are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. In these cases, the actual tax expense or benefit is reported in the same period as the related item. Certain tax effects are also not reflected in the estimated annual effective tax rate, primarily certain changes in the realizability of deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions.

Interim Tax Expense (Benefit)

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 32.3 percent. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations differs from the statutory tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to tax benefits associated with tax exempt interest income and reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to income from continuing operations related to the disposal of available for sale securities, partially offset by increases in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances associated with certain foreign jurisdictions.

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 32.8 percent. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations differs from the statutory tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to tax benefits associated with tax exempt interest income, the impact of an agreement reached with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) related to certain tax issues under audit and reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to income from continuing operations related to the disposal of available for sale securities, partially offset by a tax charge and related interest associated with increases in uncertain tax positions related to cross border financing transactions.

For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 30.4 percent and 32.8 percent, respectively. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations in both periods differs from the statutory tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to tax benefits associated with tax exempt interest income, reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to income from continuing operations related to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance previously released to accumulated other comprehensive income, and changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance associated with certain foreign jurisdictions. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2015, there was a decrease in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance associated with certain foreign jurisdictions primarily attributable to changes in projections of future taxable income. The six-month period ended June 30, 2015 includes an increase in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance primarily attributable to the effects of changes in the Japanese tax law enacted on March 31, 2015, partially offset by changes in projections of future taxable income.

Assessment of Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance

The evaluation of the recoverability of our deferred tax asset and the need for a valuation allowance requires us to weigh all positive and negative evidence to reach a conclusion that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The weight given to the evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is necessary and the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Our framework for assessing the recoverability of the deferred tax asset requires us to consider all available evidence, including:

· the nature, frequency, and amount of cumulative financial reporting income and losses in recent years;

· the sustainability of recent operating profitability of our subsidiaries;

· the predictability of future operating profitability of the character necessary to realize the net deferred tax asset;

· the carryforward period for the net operating loss, capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards, including the effect of reversing taxable temporary differences; and

· prudent and feasible actions and tax planning strategies that would be implemented, if necessary, to protect against the loss of the deferred tax asset.

In performing our assessment of the recoverability of the deferred tax asset under this framework, we consider tax laws governing the utilization of the net operating loss, capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards in each applicable jurisdiction. Under U.S. tax law, a company generally must use its net operating loss carryforwards before it can use its foreign tax credit carryforwards, even though the carryforward period for the foreign tax credit is shorter than for the net operating loss. Our U.S. federal consolidated income tax group includes both life companies and non-life companies. While the U.S. taxable income of our non-life companies can be offset by the net operating loss carryforwards, only a portion (no more than 35 percent) of the U.S. taxable income of our life companies can be offset by those net operating loss carryforwards. The remaining tax liability of our life companies can be offset by the foreign tax credit carryforwards. Accordingly, we utilize both the net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards concurrently which enables us to realize our tax attributes prior to expiration. As of June 30, 2016, based on all available evidence, it is more likely than not that the U.S. net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards will be utilized prior to expiration and, thus, no valuation allowance has been established.

Estimates of future taxable income, including income generated from prudent and feasible actions and tax planning strategies could change in the near term, perhaps materially, which may require us to consider any potential impact to our assessment of the recoverability of the deferred tax asset. Such potential impact could be material to our consolidated financial condition or results of operations for an individual reporting period.

For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, recent changes in market conditions, including falling interest rates, impacted the unrealized tax gains and losses in the U.S. Life Insurance Companies’ available for sale securities portfolio, resulting in a net deferred tax liability related to net unrealized tax capital gains. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2016, based on all available evidence, we concluded that the valuation allowance should be released. As a result, for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, we released $350 million and $1.2 billion, respectively, of valuation allowance associated with the unrealized tax losses in the U.S. Life Insurance Companies’ available for sale securities portfolio, all of which was recognized in other comprehensive income.

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, we recognized a net increase of $35 million and $1 million, respectively, in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance associated with certain foreign jurisdictions, primarily attributable to factors such as cumulative losses in recent years and the inability to demonstrate profits within the specific jurisdictions over the relevant carryforward periods. The six-month period ended June 30, 2016 also included a decrease in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance resulting from changes in projections of taxable income.

Tax Examinations and Litigation

On August 1, 2012, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment related to the disallowance of foreign tax credits associated with cross border financing transactions in the Southern District of New York. On March 29, 2013, the Southern District of New York denied our motion. On March 17, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the Second Circuit) granted our petition for an immediate appeal of the partial summary judgment decision. On September 9, 2015, the Second Circuit affirmed

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

the decision of the Southern District of New York. On October 13, 2015, we filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S Supreme Court. On March 7, 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court denied our petition for certiorari. As a result, the case will be remanded back to the Southern District of New York for a jury trial.

We will vigorously defend our position and continue to believe that we have adequate reserves for any liability that could result from these government actions. We continue to monitor legal and other developments in this area, including recent decisions affecting other taxpayers, and evaluate their effect, if any, on our position.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $4.5 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively. The six-month period ended June 30, 2016, reflects an increase in amounts associated with cross border financing transactions, partially offset by benefits realized due to an agreement reached with the IRS related to certain tax issues under audit. At both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions that, if recognized, would not affect the effective tax rate because they relate to such factors as the timing, rather the permissibility, of the deduction were $0.1 billion. Accordingly, at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate were $4.4 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively.

Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in income tax expense. At both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had accrued liabilities of $1.2 billion for the payment of interest (net of the federal benefit) and penalties. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we accrued benefits of $48 million for the payment of interest and penalties primarily related to benefits associated with an agreement reached with the IRS related to certain tax issues under audit, partially offset by an increase associated with cross border financing transactions. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, we accrued benefits of $15 million.

We regularly evaluate adjustments proposed by taxing authorities. At June 30, 2016, such proposed adjustments would not have resulted in a material change to our consolidated financial condition, although it is possible that the effect could be material to our consolidated results of operations for an individual reporting period. Although it is reasonably possible that a change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months, based on the information currently available, we do not expect any change to be material to our consolidated financial condition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

The following Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements reflect the results of AIGLH, a holding company and a wholly owned subsidiary of AIG. AIG provides a full and unconditional guarantee of all outstanding debt of AIGLH.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

		American
		International					Reclassifications
		Group, Inc.				Other		and	Consolidated
(in millions)	(As Guarantor)			AIGLH		Subsidiaries		Eliminations		AIG
June 30, 2016
Assets:
Short-term investments	$	3,727	$	-	$	12,769	$	(4,162)	$	12,334
Other investments^(a)		5,790		-		332,543		-		338,333
Total investments		9,517		-		345,312		(4,162)		350,667
Cash		12		6		1,766		-		1,784
Loans to subsidiaries^(b)		35,007		-		395		(35,402)		-
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries^(b)		58,001		33,137		-		(91,138)		-
Other assets, including deferred income taxes		24,455		132		136,529		(3,218)		157,898
Total assets	$	126,992	$	33,275	$	484,002	$	(133,920)	$	510,349
Liabilities:
Insurance liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	278,518	$	-	$	278,518
Long-term debt		22,208		641		10,480		-		33,329
Other liabilities, including intercompany balances^(a)		14,444		65		101,009		(7,553)		107,965
Loans from subsidiaries^(b)		394		-		35,008		(35,402)		-
Total liabilities		37,046		706		425,015		(42,955)		419,812
Total AIG shareholders’ equity		89,946		32,569		58,396		(90,965)		89,946
Non-redeemable noncontrolling interests		-		-		591		-		591
Total equity		89,946		32,569		58,987		(90,965)		90,537
Total liabilities and equity	$	126,992	$	33,275	$	484,002	$	(133,920)	$	510,349

December 31, 2015
Assets:
Short-term investments	$	4,042	$	-	$	9,637	$	(3,547)	$	10,132
Other investments^(a)		7,425		-		320,797		-		328,222
Total investments		11,467		-		330,434		(3,547)		338,354
Cash		34		116		1,479		-		1,629
Loans to subsidiaries^(b)		35,927		-		578		(36,505)		-
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries^(b)		51,151		30,239		-		(81,390)		-
Other assets, including deferred income taxes		23,299		258		135,690		(2,388)		156,859
Total assets	$	121,878	$	30,613	$	468,181	$	(123,830)	$	496,842
Liabilities:
Insurance liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	271,645	$	-	$	271,645
Long-term debt		19,777		704		8,768		-		29,249
Other liabilities, including intercompany balances^(a)		11,869		201		99,777		(6,109)		105,738
Loans from subsidiaries^(b)		574		3		35,928		(36,505)		-
Total liabilities		32,220		908		416,118		(42,614)		406,632
Total AIG shareholders’ equity		89,658		29,705		51,511		(81,216)		89,658
Non-redeemable noncontrolling interests		-		-		552		-		552
Total equity		89,658		29,705		52,063		(81,216)		90,210
Total liabilities and equity	$	121,878	$	30,613	$	468,181	$	(123,830)	$	496,842

(a) Includes intercompany derivative positions, which are reported at fair value before credit valuation adjustment.

(b) Eliminated in consolidation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income


		American
		International						Reclassifications
		Group, Inc.				Other		and		Consolidated
(in millions)		(As Guarantor)		AIGLH		Subsidiaries		Eliminations		AIG
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries^*	$	2,168	$	888	$	-	$	(3,056)	$	-
Other income		127		-		14,843		(246)		14,724
Total revenues		2,295		888		14,843		(3,302)		14,724
Expenses:
Interest expense		250		13		59		(2)		320
Loss on extinguishment of debt		-		-		7		-		7
Other expenses		257		7		11,520		(245)		11,539
Total expenses		507		20		11,586		(247)		11,866
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
expense (benefit)		1,788		868		3,257		(3,055)		2,858
Income tax expense (benefit)		(125)		(7)		1,056		-		924
Income (loss) from continuing operations		1,913		875		2,201		(3,055)		1,934
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		-		-		(10)		-		(10)
Net income (loss)		1,913		875		2,191		(3,055)		1,924
Less:
Net income from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests		-		-		11		-		11
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	1,913	$	875	$	2,180	$	(3,055)	$	1,913
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries^*	$	2,319	$	749	$	-	$	(3,068)	$	-
Other income		14		-		15,916		(231)		15,699
Total revenues		2,333		749		15,916		(3,299)		15,699
Expenses:
Interest expense		267		14		65		(30)		316
Loss on extinguishment of debt		297		-		45		-		342
Other expenses		301		47		12,343		(202)		12,489
Total expenses		865		61		12,453		(232)		13,147
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
expense (benefit)		1,468		688		3,463		(3,067)		2,552
Income tax expense (benefit)		(333)		(20)		1,129		1		777
Income (loss) from continuing operations		1,801		708		2,334		(3,068)		1,775
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(1)		-		17		-		16
Net income (loss)		1,800		708		2,351		(3,068)		1,791
Less:
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests		-		-		(9)		-		(9)
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	1,800	$	708	$	2,360	$	(3,068)	$	1,800

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)


		American
		International						Reclassifications
		Group, Inc.				Other		and		Consolidated
(in millions)		(As Guarantor)		AIGLH		Subsidiaries		Eliminations		AIG
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries^*	$	1,224	$	(795)	$	-	$	(429)	$	-
Other income		64		5		26,881		(447)		26,503
Total revenues		1,288		(790)		26,881		(876)		26,503
Expenses:
Interest expense		494		27		108		(3)		626
Loss on extinguishment of debt		77		-		13		-		90
Other expenses		448		14		23,125		(444)		23,143
Total expenses		1,019		41		23,246		(447)		23,859
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
expense (benefit)		269		(831)		3,635		(429)		2,644
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,462)		(13)		2,341		-		866
Income (loss) from continuing operations		1,731		(818)		1,294		(429)		1,778
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(1)		-		(56)		-		(57)
Net income (loss)		1,730		(818)		1,238		(429)		1,721
Less:
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests		-		-		(9)		-		(9)
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	1,730	$	(818)	$	1,247	$	(429)	$	1,730
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries^*	$	5,076	$	1,522	$	-	$	(6,598)	$	-
Other income		164		-		31,830		(320)		31,674
Total revenues		5,240		1,522		31,830		(6,918)		31,674
Expenses:
Interest expense		556		30		130		(60)		656
Loss on extinguishment of debt		358		-		45		7		410
Other expenses		547		42		23,952		(261)		24,280
Total expenses		1,461		72		24,127		(314)		25,346
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
expense (benefit)		3,779		1,450		7,703		(6,604)		6,328
Income tax expense (benefit)		(490)		(63)		2,630		-		2,077
Income (loss) from continuing operations		4,269		1,513		5,073		(6,604)		4,251
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(1)		-		18		-		17
Net income (loss)		4,268		1,513		5,091		(6,604)		4,268
Less:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests		-		-		-		-		-
Net income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	4,268	$	1,513	$	5,091	$	(6,604)	$	4,268

* Eliminated in consolidation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income

		American
		International						Reclassifications
		Group, Inc.				Other		and		Consolidated
(in millions)		(As Guarantor)		AIGLH		Subsidiaries		Eliminations		AIG
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income (loss)	$	1,913	$	875	$	2,191	$	(3,055)	$	1,924
Other comprehensive income (loss)		2,734		7,734		(7,006)		(728)		2,734
Comprehensive income (loss)		4,647		8,609		(4,815)		(3,783)		4,658
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		-		-		11		-		11
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	4,647	$	8,609	$	(4,826)	$	(3,783)	$	4,647
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Net income (loss)	$	1,800	$	708	$	2,351	$	(3,068)	$	1,791
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(3,037)		3,582		53,694		(57,276)		(3,037)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(1,237)		4,290		56,045		(60,344)		(1,246)
Total comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		-		-		(9)		-		(9)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	(1,237)	$	4,290	$	56,054	$	(60,344)	$	(1,237)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income (loss)	$	1,730	$	(818)	$	1,238	$	(429)	$	1,721
Other comprehensive income (loss)		5,722		7,260		48,548		(55,808)		5,722
Comprehensive income (loss)		7,452		6,442		49,786		(56,237)		7,443
Total comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		-		-		(9)		-		(9)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	7,452	$	6,442	$	49,795	$	(56,237)	$	7,452
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Net income (loss)	$	4,268	$	1,513	$	5,091	$	(6,604)	$	4,268
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(2,997)		4,490		52,633		(57,126)		(3,000)
Comprehensive income (loss)		1,271		6,003		57,724		(63,730)		1,268
Total comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		-		-		(3)		-		(3)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	1,271	$	6,003	$	57,727	$	(63,730)	$	1,271

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

		American
		International						Reclassifications
		Group, Inc.				Other		and		Consolidated
(in millions)		(As Guarantor)		AIGLH		Subsidiaries^*		Eliminations^*		AIG
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	2,734	$	680	$	(1,022)	$	(1,821)	$	571
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of investments		1,944		-		39,689		(6,846)		34,787
Purchase of investments		(606)		-		(40,877)		6,846		(34,637)
Loans to subsidiaries - net		1,050		-		180		(1,230)		-
Contributions from (to) subsidiaries - net		880		-		-		(880)		-
Net change in restricted cash		-		-		(78)		-		(78)
Net change in short-term investments		(733)		-		(1,022)		-		(1,755)
Other, net		(298)		-		1,717		-		1,419
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		2,237		-		(391)		(2,110)		(264)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of long-term debt		3,832		-		2,856		-		6,688
Repayments of long-term debt		(1,421)		(63)		(1,435)		-		(2,919)
Purchase of common stock		(6,248)		-		-		-		(6,248)
Intercompany loans - net		(180)		(3)		(1,047)		1,230		-
Cash dividends paid		(713)		(724)		(1,097)		1,821		(713)
Other, net		(263)		-		2,385		880		3,002
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(4,993)		(790)		1,662		3,931		(190)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		-		-		38		-		38
Change in cash		(22)		(110)		287		-		155
Cash at beginning of year		34		116		1,479		-		1,629
Cash at end of period	$	12	$	6	$	1,766	$	-	$	1,784

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	2,230	$	527	$	2,581	$	(4,845)	$	493
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of investments		4,703		-		36,970		(2,667)		39,006
Purchase of investments		(942)		-		(32,708)		2,667		(30,983)
Loans to subsidiaries - net		189		-		130		(319)		-
Contributions from (to) subsidiaries - net		-		-		-		-		-
Net change in restricted cash		-		-		1,462		-		1,462
Net change in short-term investments		(2,093)		-		(600)		-		(2,693)
Other, net		(65)		-		(1,441)		-		(1,506)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		1,792		-		3,813		(319)		5,286
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of long-term debt		2,342		-		432		-		2,774
Repayments of long-term debt		(2,016)		(114)		(1,571)		-		(3,701)
Purchase of common stock		(3,743)		-		-		-		(3,743)
Intercompany loans - net		(130)		-		(189)		319		-
Cash dividends paid		(335)		(500)		(4,345)		4,845		(335)
Other, net		(75)		-		(486)		-		(561)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(3,957)		(614)		(6,159)		5,164		(5,566)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		-		-		(34)		-		(34)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1 / NOTE 14. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH OUTSTANDING DEBT

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Change in cash		65		(87)		201		-		179
Cash at beginning of year		26		91		1,641		-		1,758
Cash at end of period	$	91	$	4	$	1,842	$	-	$	1,937

Supplementary Disclosure of Condensed Consolidating Cash Flow Information

		American
		International						Reclassifications
		Group, Inc.				Other		and		Consolidated
(in millions)		(As Guarantor)		AIGLH		Subsidiaries^*		Eliminations^*		AIG
Cash (paid) received during the 2016 period for:
Interest:
Third party	$	(515)	$	(27)	$	(108)	$	-	$	(650)
Intercompany		-		-		-		-		-
Taxes:
Income tax authorities	$	(7)	$	-	$	(110)	$	-	$	(117)
Intercompany		629		-		(629)		-		-
Cash (paid) received during the 2015 period for:
Interest:
Third party	$	(585)	$	(32)	$	(143)	$	-	$	(760)
Intercompany		-		-		-		-		-
Taxes:
Income tax authorities	$	(6)	$	-	$	(332)	$	-	$	(338)
Intercompany		1,249		-		(1,249)		-		-

American International Group, Inc. (As Guarantor) supplementary disclosure of non-cash activities:

Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Intercompany non-cash financing and investing activities:
Capital contributions	$	2,915	$	111
Dividends received in the form of securities		1,790		1,551
Return of capital		1		-
Fixed maturity securities received in exchange for equity securities		440		-
Non-cash financing/investing activities:
Consideration received from sale of shares of AerCap		-		500

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Dividends Declared and Increase in Share Repurchase Authorization

On August 2, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on September 29, 2016 to shareholders of record on September 15, 2016.

On August 2, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase to its previous repurchase authorization of AIG Common Stock of $3.0 billion, resulting in an aggregate remaining authorization on such date of approximately $4.0 billion.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 2 / MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS OF SELECTED INSURANCE TERMS AND REFERENCES

Throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), we use certain terms and abbreviations, which are summarized in the Glossary and Acronyms.

American International Group, Inc. (AIG) has incorporated into this discussion a number of cross-references to additional information included throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (2015 Annual Report) to assist readers seeking additional information related to a particular subject.

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise mentioned or unless the context indicates otherwise, we use the terms “AIG,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” to refer to American International Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries. We use the term “AIG Parent” to refer solely to American International Group, Inc., and not to any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other publicly available documents may include, and officers and representatives of American International Group, Inc. (AIG) may from time to time make, projections, goals, assumptions and statements that may constitute “forward‑looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements are not historical facts but instead represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside our control. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements include statements preceded by, followed by or including words such as "will," “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “focused on achieving,” “view,” “target,” "goal" or “estimate.” These projections, goals, assumptions and statements may address, among other things, our:

• exposures to subprime mortgages, monoline insurers, the residential and commercial real estate markets, state and municipal bond issuers, sovereign bond issuers, the energy sector and currency exchange rates;

• exposure to European governments and European financial institutions;

• strategy for risk management;

• sales of businesses;

• restructuring of business operations;

• generation of deployable capital;

• strategies to increase return on equity and earnings per share;

• strategies to grow net investment income, efficiently manage capital, grow book value per common share, and reduce expenses;

• anticipated restructuring charges and annual cost savings;

• anticipated business or asset divestitures or monetizations;

• anticipated organizational and business changes;

• strategies for customer retention, growth, product development, market position, financial results and reserves; and

• subsidiaries' revenues and combined ratios.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

It is possible that our actual results and financial condition will differ, possibly materially, from the results and financial condition indicated in these projections, goals, assumptions and statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections, goals, assumptions and statements include:

• changes in market conditions;

• negative impacts on customers, business partners and other stakeholders;

• the occurrence of catastrophic events, both natural and man-made;

• significant legal proceedings;

• the timing and applicable requirements of any new regulatory framework to which we are subject as a nonbank systemically important financial institution (SIFI) and as a global systemically important insurer (G‑SII);

• concentrations in our investment portfolios;

• actions by credit rating agencies;

• judgments concerning casualty insurance underwriting and insurance liabilities;

• our ability to successfully manage run-off insurance portfolios;

• our ability to successfully reduce costs and expenses and make business and organizational changes without negatively impacting client relationships or our competitive position;

• our ability to successfully dispose of, or monetize, businesses or assets;

• judgments concerning the recognition of deferred tax assets;

• judgments concerning estimated restructuring charges and estimated cost savings; and

• such other factors discussed in:

• Part I, Item 2. MD&A and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q;

• Part I, Item 2. MD&A and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016; and

• Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7. MD&A of our 2015 Annual Report.

We are not under any obligation (and expressly disclaim any obligation) to update or alter any projections, goals, assumptions or other statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The MD&A is organized as follows:

INDEX TO ITEM 2
	Page
USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES	77
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW	80
Executive Summary	81
Strategic Outlook	87
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	96
Segment Results	99
Commercial Insurance	103
Consumer Insurance	119
Corporate and Other	137
INVESTMENTS	139
Overview	139
Investment Highlights	139
Investment Strategies	139
Investments	140
Credit Ratings	143
Available for Sale Investments	145
Impairments	153
INSURANCE RESERVES	159
Non-Life Insurance Companies	159
Life Insurance Companies DAC and Reserves	166
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES	172
Overview	172
Analysis of Sources and Uses of Cash	174
Liquidity and Capital Resources of AIG Parent and Subsidiaries	175
Credit Facilities	178
Contractual Obligations	179
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments	180
Debt	182
Credit Ratings	184
Regulation and Supervision	185
Dividends and Repurchases of AIG Common Stock	185
Dividend Restrictions	185
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT	186
Overview	186
Credit Risk Management	186
Market Risk Management	187
Liquidity Risk Management	190
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES	191
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT	192
Glossary	193
Acronyms	196

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

Throughout this MD&A, we present our financial condition and results of operations in the way we believe will be most meaningful and representative of our business results. Some of the measurements we use are “non‑GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules and regulations. GAAP is the acronym for “accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.” The non‑GAAP financial measures we present may not be comparable to similarly‑named measures reported by other companies.

Book Value Per Common Share Excluding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) and Book Value Per Common Share Excluding AOCI and Deferred Tax Assets (DTA) are used to show the amount of our net worth on a per-share basis. We believe these measures are useful to investors because they eliminate items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, including changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio, foreign currency translation adjustments and U.S. tax attribute deferred tax assets. These measures also eliminate the asymmetrical impact resulting from changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio wherein there is largely no offsetting impact for certain related insurance liabilities. We exclude deferred tax assets representing U.S. tax attributes related to net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits as they have not yet been utilized. Amounts for interim periods are estimates based on projections of full-year attribute utilization. As net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits are utilized, the portion of the DTA utilized is included in Book Value Per Common Share. Book Value Per Common Share Excluding AOCI is derived by dividing Total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI, by Total common shares outstanding. Book Value Per Common Share Excluding AOCI and DTA is derived by dividing Total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI and DTA, by Total common shares outstanding. The reconciliation to book value per common share, the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented in the Executive Overview section of this MD&A.

Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI and Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI and DTA are used to show the rate of return on shareholders’ equity. We believe these measures are useful to investors because they eliminate items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, including changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio, foreign currency translation adjustments and U.S. tax attribute deferred tax assets. These measures also eliminate the asymmetrical impact resulting from changes in fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio wherein there is largely no offsetting impact for certain related insurance liabilities. We exclude deferred tax assets representing U.S. tax attributes related to net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits as they have not yet been utilized. Amounts for interim periods are estimates based on projections of full-year attribute utilization. As net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits are utilized, the portion of the DTA utilized is included in Return on Equity. Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI is derived by dividing actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG by average AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding average AOCI. Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI and DTA is derived by dividing actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG by average AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding average AOCI and DTA. The reconciliation to return on equity, the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented in the Executive Overview section of this MD&A.

We use the following operating performance measures because we believe they enhance the understanding of the underlying profitability of continuing operations and trends of our business segments. We believe they also allow for more meaningful comparisons with our insurance competitors. When we use these measures, reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measure are provided in the Results of Operations section of this MD&A on a consolidated basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

After-tax operating income attributable to AIG is derived by excluding the following items from net income attributable to AIG. These items generally fall into one or more of the following broad categories: legacy matters having no relevance to our current businesses or operating performance; adjustments to enhance transparency to the underlying economics of transactions; and measures that we believe to be common to the industry. For example, certain ratios and other metrics described below:

• deferred income tax valuation allowance releases and charges;

• changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits;

• changes in benefit reserves and deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), value of business acquired (VOBA), and sales inducement assets (SIA) related to net realized capital gains and losses;

• other income and expense — net, related to Corporate and Other run-off insurance lines;

• loss on extinguishment of debt;

• net realized capital gains and losses;

• non‑qualifying derivative hedging activities, excluding net realized capital gains and losses;

• income or loss from discontinued operations;

• income and loss from divested businesses, including:

• gain on the sale of International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC); and

• certain post-acquisition transaction expenses incurred by AerCap Holdings N.V. (AerCap) in connection with its acquisition of ILFC and the difference between expensing AerCap’s maintenance rights assets over the remaining lease term as compared to the remaining economic life of the related aircraft and related tax effects;

• legacy tax adjustments primarily related to certain changes in uncertain tax positions and other tax adjustments;

• non-operating litigation reserves and settlements;

• reserve development related to non-operating run-off insurance business; and

• restructuring and other costs related to initiatives designed to reduce operating expenses, improve efficiency and simplify our organization.

Operating revenue excludes Net realized capital gains (losses), income from non-operating litigation settlements (included in Other income for GAAP purposes) and changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits (included in Net investment income for GAAP purposes).

We use the following operating performance measures within our Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance reportable segments as well as Corporate and Other.

• Commercial Insurance: Property Casualty and Mortgage Guaranty; Consumer Insurance: Personal Insurance

• Pre‑tax operating income: includes both underwriting income and loss and net investment income, but excludes net realized capital gains and losses, other income and expense — net, and non-operating litigation reserves and settlements. Underwriting income and loss is derived by reducing net premiums earned by losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred, acquisition expenses and general operating expenses.

· Ratios: We, along with most property and casualty insurance companies, use the loss ratio, the expense ratio and the combined ratio as measures of underwriting performance. These ratios are relative measurements that describe, for every $100 of net premiums earned, the amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses, and the amount of other underwriting expenses that would be incurred. A combined ratio of less than 100 indicates underwriting income and a combined ratio of over 100 indicates an underwriting loss. Our ratios are calculated using the relevant information calculated under GAAP, and thus may not be comparable to similar ratios calculated for regulatory reporting purposes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / USE OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

The underwriting environment varies across countries and products, as does the degree of litigation activity, all of which affect such ratios. In addition, investment returns, local taxes, cost of capital, regulation, product type and competition can have an effect on pricing and consequently on profitability as reflected in underwriting income and associated ratios.

• Accident year loss and combined ratios, as adjusted: both the accident year loss and combined ratios, as adjusted, exclude catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting. Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact in excess of $10 million each. Catastrophes also include certain man-made events, such as terrorism and civil disorders, that meet the $10 million threshold. We believe the as adjusted ratios are meaningful measures of our underwriting results on an on-going basis as they exclude catastrophes and the impact of reserve discounting which are outside of management’s control. We also exclude prior year development to provide transparency related to current accident year results.

· Commercial Insurance: Institutional Markets; Consumer Insurance: Retirement and Life

• Pre‑tax operating income is derived by excluding the following items from pre‑tax income:

• changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits;	• changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to net realized capital gains and losses; and
• net realized capital gains and losses;	• non-operating litigation reserves and settlements.

• Premiums and deposits: includes direct and assumed amounts received and earned on traditional life insurance policies, group benefit policies and life‑contingent payout annuities, as well as deposits received on universal life, investment‑type annuity contracts and mutual funds.

· Corporate and Other — Pre‑tax operating income and loss is derived by excluding the following items from pre‑tax income and loss:

• loss on extinguishment of debt;

• net realized capital gains and losses;

• changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to net realized capital gains and losses;

• income and loss from divested businesses, including Aircraft Leasing;

• net gain or loss on sale of divested businesses, including:

· gain on the sale of ILFC; and

· certain post-acquisition transaction expenses incurred by AerCap in connection with its acquisition of ILFC and the difference between expensing AerCap’s maintenance rights assets over the remaining lease term as compared to the remaining economic life of the related aircraft and our share of AerCap’s income taxes;

• non-operating litigation reserves and settlements;

• reserve development related to non-operating run-off insurance business; and

• restructuring and other costs related to initiatives designed to reduce operating expenses, improve efficiency and simplify our organization.

Results from discontinued operations are excluded from all of these measures.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

This overview of the MD&A highlights selected information and may not contain all of the information that is important to current or potential investors in AIG’s securities. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, together with the 2015 Annual Report, in its entirety for a complete description of events, trends, uncertainties, risks and critical accounting estimates affecting us.

We report our results of operations as follows:

· Commercial Insurance – Commercial Insurance offers insurance products and services to commercial and institutional customers worldwide. Commercial Insurance product lines include Casualty, Property, Specialty, Financial, Mortgage Insurance and Institutional Markets. Commercial Insurance products are distributed through a diversified multichannel distribution network that includes independent insurance brokers, banks, mortgage lenders, and specialized marketing and consulting firms.

· Consumer Insurance – Consumer Insurance offers a broad portfolio of retirement, life insurance and property casualty products and services to individuals and groups. Consumer Insurance products include term life, whole life, universal life, accident and health, variable and index annuities, fixed annuities, group retirement plans, mutual funds, financial planning, automobile and homeowners insurance, travel insurance, and warranty and service programs. Consumer Insurance offers its products and services through a diverse, multi-channel distribution network, which includes broker-dealers, agencies and independent marketing organizations, banks, brokers, partnerships, travel agents, affiliated financial advisors, and direct-to-consumer platforms.

· Corporate and Other – Corporate and Other consists of income from assets held by AIG Parent and other corporate subsidiaries, general operating expenses not attributable to specific reportable segments and interest expense. It also includes run-off lines of insurance business.

On January 26, 2016, we announced several actions designed to create a leaner, more profitable and focused insurer. These actions include a plan to reorganize our operating model into “modular”, more self-contained business units to enhance transparency and accountability. Additionally, we are introducing a new Legacy Portfolio that aims to maximize value and release capital of certain run-off non-strategic assets and highlight progress on improving the return on equity (ROE) of our Operating Portfolio. When the new operating structure is finalized, the presentation of our segment results may be modified and prior periods’ presentation may be revised to conform to the new structure.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Executive Summary

Financial Performance

Commercial Insurance pre‑tax operating income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to an underwriting loss compared to underwriting income from Property Casualty in the same period in the prior year and lower returns on alternative investments which resulted in a decrease in net investment income in Property Casualty and Institutional Markets. The underwriting loss for Property Casualty was driven primarily by higher catastrophe losses and net loss reserve discount charge compared to a benefit in the prior year. This impact was partially offset by an improvement in the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, lower net adverse prior year loss reserve development and lower general operating expenses as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decline in Property Casualty underwriting results was partially offset by an increase in underwriting income from Mortgage Guaranty resulting from an improved combined ratio.

Commercial Insurance pre‑tax operating income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower underwriting income in Property Casualty and lower returns on alternative investments which resulted in a decrease in net investment income partially offset by an increase in underwriting income from Mortgage Guaranty. The underwriting results for Property Casualty were impacted by significantly higher catastrophe losses and a net loss reserve discount charge compared to a benefit in the same period in the prior year as a result of decreases in the forward yield curve rates used for discounting. These results were partially offset by an improvement in the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted and lower net adverse prior year loss reserve development compared to the same period in the prior year.

Consumer Insurance pre-tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due to higher underwriting income in Personal Insurance and improved mortality results in Life, partially offset by lower returns on alternative investments which resulted in a decrease in net investment income for Retirement, Life and Personal Insurance. Personal Insurance pre-tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting strategic actions to reduce expenses and refocus direct marketing activities, partially offset by higher current year accident losses, including a single large loss, and lower net investment income. Retirement pre-tax operating income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower net investment income from alternative investments, partially offset by a decrease in general operating expenses from lower employee-related expenses. Life pre-tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to more favorable mortality experience and lower domestic general operating expenses due to reductions in employee-related expenses.

Consumer Insurance pre-tax operating income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower returns on alternative investments resulting in lower net investment income in Retirement, Life and Personal Insurance. The lower net investment income was partially offset by improved underwriting results in Personal Insurance due to an improved accident year loss ratio, as adjusted and lower general operating expenses, favorable mortality experience in Life and lower domestic general operating expenses in Retirement and Life.

Corporate and Other reported pre-tax operating losses in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to pre-tax operating income in the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to lower earnings on investments for which the fair value option was elected, including ABS CDOs and part of our holdings in People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China Limited (PICC Group) and PICC Property & Casualty Company Limited (PICC P&C) (collectively, our PICC Investment), as well as equity earnings from shares in AerCap in same period in the prior year, which was divested in 2015. Additionally, Run-off insurance lines reported pre-tax operating losses in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to pre-tax operating income in the same periods in the prior year. The pre-tax operating losses in Run-off insurance lines were driven by a charge for the discount on excess workers’ compensation reserves in the three- and six-month periods ended June

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

30, 2016 compared to a benefit in the same periods in the prior year, largely driven by decreases in the forward yield curve rates used for discounting.

Our investment portfolio performance declined in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower returns on alternative investments and lower reinvestment yields as we reinvest cash flows from investments, including increased calls and prepayments of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans, at rates below the average yield of our existing portfolio. These decreases were partially offset by higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected. Our investment portfolio performance declined in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments, primarily related to negative performance in hedge funds, and lower reinvestment yields, partially offset by an increase in invested assets and higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected.

Net realized capital gains increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due primarily to higher realized capital gains from sales of investments, primarily from the sale of a portion of our PICC Investment. In addition, other-than temporary impairment charges decreased due to an impairment charge on our previously held Aercap investment recognized in the second quarter of 2015.

We recorded net realized capital losses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to foreign exchange losses and impairments, which were slightly higher than the gain recognized on the sale of a portion of our PICC Investment, compared to net realized capital gains in the same period in the prior year, which was driven primarily by foreign exchange gains and net gains on the sales of various securities such as the Class B shares of Prudential Financial. See MD&A – Investments – Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses for further discussion.

In keeping with our broad and on-going efforts to transform AIG for long-term competitiveness, results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 included approximately $0.1 billion and $0.3 billion, respectively, of pre-tax restructuring and other costs, primarily composed of employee severance and contract termination charges.

We continue to execute initiatives focused on organizational simplification, operational efficiency, and business rationalization, which are expected to result in pre-tax restructuring and other costs of approximately $1 billion (of which approximately $0.8 billion has been recognized) as well as generate pre-tax annualized savings of approximately $0.8 billion to $0.9 billion when fully implemented.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Our Performance – Selected Indicators

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions, except per share data and ratios)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Results of operations data:
Total revenues	$	14,724	$	15,699	$	26,503	$	31,674
Income from continuing operations		1,934		1,775		1,778		4,251
Net income attributable to AIG		1,913		1,800		1,730		4,268
Net income per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)		1.68		1.32		1.49		3.10
After-tax operating income attributable to AIG	$	1,113	$	1,893	$	1,886	$	3,584
After-tax operating income per common share
attributable to AIG (diluted)		0.98		1.39		1.62		2.60
Key metrics:
Commercial Insurance
Pre-tax operating income	$	1,088	$	1,500	$	1,977	$	2,962
Property Casualty loss ratio		75.0		70.8		71.6		69.5
Property Casualty accident year loss ratio, as adjusted		62.4		66.6		63.4		65.5
Property Casualty combined ratio		102.1		98.8		99.6		97.9
Property Casualty accident year combined ratio, as adjusted		89.5		94.6		91.4		93.9
Property Casualty net premiums written	$	4,424	$	5,583	$	8,731	$	10,630
Mortgage Guaranty domestic first-lien new insurance written		12,985		15,190		21,812		25,732
Institutional Markets premiums		215		643		450		739
Institutional Markets premiums and deposits		506		680		810		826
Consumer Insurance
Pre-tax operating income	$	1,104	$	1,023	$	1,892	$	1,968
Personal Insurance loss ratio		55.7		52.7		54.1		55.8
Personal Insurance accident year loss ratio, as adjusted		55.0		52.8		54.1		54.6
Personal Insurance combined ratio		95.7		99.7		94.8		101.5
Personal Insurance accident year combined ratio, as adjusted		95.0		99.8		94.8		100.3
Personal Insurance net premiums written	$	2,922	$	2,930	$	5,734	$	5,845
Retirement premiums		52		44		106		90
Retirement premiums and deposits		6,431		6,070		13,284		11,579
Life premiums		762		702		1,498		1,410
Life premiums and deposits		1,317		1,249		2,568		2,472
Life Insurance Companies assets under management		355,149		336,881		355,149		336,881

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Common Stock Repurchases:
Aggregate repurchases of common stock		$	2,762	$	2,345		$	6,248		$	3,743
Total number of common shares repurchased			50		40			113			69	^*
Aggregate repurchase of warrants			90		-			263			-
Total number of warrants repurchased			5		-			15			-

* The total number of shares of AIG Common Stock repurchased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 includes (but the aggregate purchase price
does not include) approximately 3.5 million shares of AIG Common Stock received in January 2015 upon the settlement of an ASR agreement executed in
the fourth quarter of 2014.

							June 30,				December 31,
(in millions, except per share data)								2016			2015
Balance sheet data:
Total assets							$	510,349		$	496,842
Long-term debt								33,329			29,249
Total AIG shareholders’ equity								89,946			89,658
Book value per common share								83.08			75.10
Book value per common share, excluding AOCI								75.45			72.97
Book value per common share, excluding AOCI and DTA								61.03			58.94


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended						Year Ended
	June 30,				June 30,						December 31,
	2016		2015		2016			2015			2015
Return on equity	8.6	%	6.8	%	3.9	%		8.0	%		2.2	%
Return on equity - after-tax operating income, excluding
AOCI	5.4		7.8		4.5			7.4			3.1
Return on equity - after-tax operating income, excluding
AOCI and DTA	6.7		9.3		5.6			8.8			3.7

The following table presents a reconciliation of Book value per common share to Book value per common share, excluding AOCI, and Book value per common share, excluding AOCI and DTA, which are non-GAAP measures. See Use of Non‑GAAP Measures for additional information.

		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions, except per share data)		2016		2015
Total AIG shareholders' equity	$	89,946	$	89,658
Accumulated other comprehensive income		8,259		2,537
Total AIG shareholders' equity, excluding AOCI		81,687		87,121

Deferred tax assets		15,614		16,751
Total AIG shareholders' equity, excluding AOCI and DTA	$	66,073	$	70,370

Total common shares outstanding		1,082,689,362		1,193,916,617
Book value per common share	$	83.08	$	75.10
Book value per common share, excluding AOCI		75.45		72.97
Book value per common share, excluding AOCI and DTA	$	61.03	$	58.94

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

The following table presents a reconciliation of Return on equity to Return on equity, after-tax operating income, excluding AOCI, and Return on equity, after-tax operating income, excluding AOCI and DTA, which are non-GAAP measures. See Use of Non‑GAAP Measures for additional information.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Year Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						December 31,
(dollars in millions)		2016			2015			2016			2015			2015
Actual or annualized net income (loss) attributable to AIG	$	7,652		$	7,200		$	3,460		$	8,536		$	2,196
Actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG		4,452			7,572			3,772			7,168			2,927
Average AIG Shareholders' equity		89,232			106,119			89,374			106,378			101,558
Average AOCI		6,892			9,139			5,440			9,631			7,598
Average AIG Shareholders' equity, excluding average AOCI		82,340			96,980			83,934			96,747			93,960
Average DTA		16,220			15,428			16,397			15,671			15,803
Average AIG Shareholders' equity, excluding average AOCI and DTA	$	66,120		$	81,552		$	67,537		$	81,076		$	78,157
ROE		8.6	%		6.8	%		3.9	%		8.0	%		2.2	%
ROE - after-tax operating income, excluding AOCI		5.4			7.8			4.5			7.4			3.1
ROE - after-tax operating income, excluding AOCI and DTA		6.7			9.3			5.6			8.8			3.7

Total revenues (in millions)		Income from continuing operations (in millions)


Net income ATTRIBUTABLE TO AIG (in millions)		Net INCOME PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AIG (DILUTED)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

after-tax operating income attributable to aig (excludes net realized capital gains and certain other items)

(in millions)

Pre-tax operating income (loss) by segment

(in millions)

TOTAL ASSETS

(in millions)

Long-term debt

(in millions)

Total AIG shareholders’ equity

(in millions)

Book value per COMMON share, book value per common share excluding AOCI and book value per common share excluding AOCI and dta

* Includes operating borrowings of other subsidiaries and consolidated investments and hybrid debt securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Investment Highlights

Net investment income decreased to $3.7 billion in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to $3.8 billion in the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments and lower reinvestment yields, partially offset by an increase in invested assets and higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected. Net investment income decreased to $6.7 billion in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to $7.7 billion in the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments, primarily related to negative performance in hedge funds, and lower reinvestment yields, partially offset by an increase in invested assets and higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected. While corporate debt securities represented the core of new investment allocations, we continued to make investments in structured securities, mortgage loans and other fixed income investments with favorable risk versus return characteristics to improve yields and increase net investment income.

Net unrealized gains in our available for sale portfolio increased to approximately $18.0 billion as of June 30, 2016, from approximately $8.8 billion as of December 31, 2015, due to a decline in interest rates and a narrowing of credit spreads.

The overall credit rating of our fixed maturity securities portfolio remains largely unchanged from December 31, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources Highlights

We maintained financial flexibility at AIG Parent in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 through $1.5 billion in dividends in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our Non-Life Insurance Companies and $1.4 billion in dividends and loan repayments in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our Life Insurance Companies. AIG Parent also received $1.6 billion in tax sharing payments in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our insurance businesses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, including $1.1 billion of such payments in the second quarter of 2016.

Our Board of Directors increased our previous share repurchase authorization of AIG Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share (AIG Common Stock), by an additional $3.0 billion on August 2, 2016, resulting in a remaining authorization on such date of approximately $4.0 billion. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we repurchased approximately 113 million shares of AIG Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6.2 billion pursuant to this authorization, and we repurchased 15 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $263 million pursuant to this authorization. Pursuant to a Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan, from July 1 to August 2, 2016, we have repurchased approximately $698 million of additional shares of AIG Common Stock.

We paid a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share on each of March 28, 2016 and June 27, 2016.

Our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock on August 2, 2016 of $0.32 per share, payable on September 29, 2016 to shareholders of record on September 15, 2016.

Strategic Outlook

Industry Trends

Our business is affected by industry and economic factors such as interest rates, currency exchange rates, credit and equity market conditions, catastrophic claims events, regulation, tax policy, competition, and general economic, market and political conditions. We continued to operate under difficult market conditions in 2016, characterized by factors such as historically low interest rates, instability in the global equity markets, volatile energy markets, slowing growth in China and Euro-Zone economies and the United Kingdom (the UK) advisory referendum in which a majority voted for the UK to withdraw its membership in the European Union (the EU) (commonly referred to as Brexit). The recent Brexit vote has also affected the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

U.S. dollar/British pound exchange rate, increased the volatility of exchange rates among the euro, British pound and the Japanese yen (the Major Currencies), and created volatility in the financial markets, which may continue for some time.

Interest rates remain low relative to historical levels, and certain markets in which we operate are experiencing negative interest rates. A sustained low interest rate environment negatively affects sales of interest rate sensitive products in our industry and may negatively impact the profitability of our existing business as we reinvest cash flows from investments, including increased calls and prepayments of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans, at rates below the average yield of our existing portfolios. We actively manage our exposure to the interest rate environment through economic hedging of interest rate risk from guarantee features in our variable annuities and spread management strategies for our investment-oriented products.

For investment-oriented products in our Retirement, Life and Institutional Markets operating segments, our spread management strategies include disciplined pricing and product design for new business, limiting the sale of products that do not achieve targeted spreads, using asset-liability management to match assets to liabilities to the extent practicable, and actively managing crediting rates to help mitigate some of the pressure on investment spreads. Lowering interest crediting rates can help offset the impact of lower investment yields, but our ability to lower crediting rates may be limited by the competitive environment, contractual minimum crediting rates, and provisions that allow rates to be reset only at pre-established intervals. As a result, the timing and extent of crediting rate decreases may differ from the corresponding declines in investment yields, which could reduce our spreads and future profitability. A sustained low interest rate environment may favorably affect surrender activity of contract holders whose contractual minimum crediting rates are above those currently available in the marketplace. In addition, customers are currently seeking fixed annuities with longer surrender charge periods in pursuit of higher returns, which may help mitigate the increase of surrenders if interest rates rise rapidly in the future.

Spreads and surrender rates are important components of the future profit assumptions that drive the rate we use to amortize DAC and related reserves for investment-oriented products. If future profit assumptions change significantly, we may be required to recalculate DAC and related reserves, and reflect any resulting adjustments in current period income. Additionally, for certain traditional long-duration products for which we are unable to adjust interest rates, including structured settlements and other payout annuities, our future earnings may be reduced in a sustained low interest rate environment, and we may be required to record additional reserves.

The impact of low interest rates on our Property Casualty operating segment is primarily on our long-tail Casualty line of business. We expect limited impacts on our existing long-tail Casualty business as the duration of our assets is slightly longer than that of our liabilities. We do expect sustained low interest rates will impact new and renewal business for the long-tail Casualty line as we may not be able to adjust our future pricing to fully offset the impact of investing at lower rates. However, we will continue to maintain pricing discipline and risk selection.

For our Property Casualty operating segment, and run-off insurance lines reported within Corporate and Other, sustained low interest rates may unfavorably affect the net loss reserve discount for workers’ compensation, and to a lesser extent could favorably impact assumptions about future medical costs; the combined net effect of which could result in higher net loss reserves.

Additionally, sustained low interest rates on discounting of projected benefit cash flows for our pension plans may result in higher pension expense.

Currency volatility in the first half of 2016 was acute compared to recent years, as the euro and the British pound weakened considerably against the U.S. dollar, although the Japanese yen strengthened against the U.S. dollar in that period. Such volatility affected line item components of income for those businesses with substantial international operations. In particular, growth trends in net premiums written reported in U.S. dollars can differ significantly from those measured in original currencies. The net effect on underwriting results, however, is significantly mitigated, as both revenues and expenses are similarly affected.

These currencies may continue to fluctuate, in either direction, especially as a result of the UK’s potential exit from the EU, and such fluctuations will affect net premiums written growth trends reported in U.S. dollars, as well as financial statement line item comparability.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

See Results of Operations – Foreign Currency Impact; Results of Operations – Segment Results – Quarterly and Year-to-date Pre-Tax Income Comparison for 2016 and 2015; Results of Operations – Commercial Insurance – Property Casualty Net Premiums Written by Region; and Results of Operations – Consumer Insurance – Personal Insurance Net Premiums Written by Region.

AIG Priorities for 2016

AIG is focused on the following priorities for 2016:

· Improving our ROE

· Creating a leaner, more profitable and focused insurer by reorganizing our operating model into “modular”, more self-contained business units to enhance transparency and accountability, including through the introduction of a new Legacy Portfolio that aims to maximize value and release capital from the run-off of non-strategic assets

· Reducing general operating expenses

· Improving the Commercial Insurance Property Casualty accident year loss ratio

· Returning excess capital to shareholders

· Growing book value per common share

Outlook for Our Operating Businesses

The outlook for each of our businesses and management initiatives to improve growth and performance in 2016 and over the longer term is summarized below. See our 2015 Annual Report for additional information concerning strategic initiatives and opportunities for each of our businesses.

COMMERCIAL INSURANCE Outlook and Strategic initiatives

Market Conditions and Industry Trends

Commercial Insurance expects the current low interest rate environment relative to historical levels, currency volatility, and ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions will continue to limit growth and profitability in some markets and challenge growth of net investment income. Due to these conditions and overcapacity in the property casualty insurance industry, Commercial Insurance has continued to diversify its business focusing on growing profitable segments and geographies, exiting unprofitable lines and developing advanced data and analytics to improve profitability.

Property Casualty

Property Casualty has observed improving trends in certain key indicators that may partially offset the effect of current economic challenges. In the first half of 2016, the property casualty insurance industry experienced growth in certain classes of business in Property and Financial lines. Property Casualty also expects that expansion in certain growth economies will continue at a faster pace than in developed countries, but at levels lower than those previously expected due to revised economic assumptions. As a result of its ongoing strategy to optimize its portfolio and maintain underwriting discipline, Property Casualty expects that net premiums written for the U.S. Casualty line, and to a lesser extent, certain lines within Specialty and Property, will continue to decrease throughout the remainder of the year. In addition, the recent Brexit

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

referendum may negatively affect premium production in the European market, both on a reported basis and in original currency.

Overall, Property Casualty experienced a modest increase in rate pressure in the first half of 2016. Property Casualty expects that trend to continue in the near term, particularly in certain lines including in the U.S. Property Excess and Surplus market. Property Casualty continues to differentiate its underwriting capacity from its peers by leveraging its global footprint, diverse product offering, risk engineering expertise and significant underwriting experience.

In the U.S., Property Casualty’s exposure to terrorism risk is mitigated by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (TRIPRA) in addition to limited private reinsurance protections. For additional information on TRIPRA, see Item 1A. Risk Factors — Reserves and Exposures and Item 7. MD&A — Enterprise Risk Management — Insurance Operations Risks — Non-Life Insurance Companies Key Insurance Risks — Terrorism Risk in our 2015 Annual Report.

Mortgage Guaranty

During the first half of 2016, the U.S. market for purchase originations and refinance volume remained strong, favorably impacted by improving housing prices and low interest rates. In addition, the current economic environment has favorably impacted incurred losses through fewer new delinquencies and higher cure rates. If the current economic environment persists, Mortgage Guaranty expects to benefit through increased purchase volume and increased refinancing activity.

Mortgage Guaranty also expects that the delinquency rate and cure rate will remain near current levels throughout 2016. Mortgage Guaranty believes the combination of the factors described above will result in favorable operating results for 2016. These favorable trends may be partially offset by an increase in competitive pricing pressure.

On December 31, 2015, the Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements (PMIERs) issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (collectively, the GSEs) became effective. Mortgage Guaranty met the PMIERs requirements as of June 30, 2016. Mortgage Guaranty’s minimum required assets under PMIERs were $2.9 billion as of June 30, 2016, and its estimated available assets were $3.3 billion, exceeding the required assets by $400 million. Available assets decreased from $3.6 billion at December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of dividend payments.

Institutional Markets

Institutional Markets is expected to continue growing its assets under management from the structured settlement business and the stable value wrap business, as well as from disciplined growth through the pursuit of select opportunities related to pension buyouts. Volatility in the earnings of our alternative investment portfolio will continue to affect Institutional Markets’ results. In addition, Institutional Markets could incur loss recognition reserve increases, if future yield assumptions were lowered on assets that support certain long-duration products, primarily structured settlements, for which Institutional Markets does not have the ability to adjust interest rates. Lower assumptions for future yields on such assets could result from reinvestment of portfolio cash flows in the sustained low interest rate environment, which may include proceeds from the strategic sale of alternative investments that currently support such products.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Strategic Initiatives

Customer — Strive to be our clients’ most valued insurer by offering innovative products, superior service and access to an extensive global network.

Sharpen Commercial Focus — Achieve ROE in excess of target across our businesses primarily through improvements in our loss ratio. Improve our business portfolio through risk selection by using enhanced data, analytics and the application of science to deliver superior risk-adjusted returns. Exit or remediate targeted sub-segments of underperforming portfolios that do not meet our risk acceptance or profitability objectives.

Drive Efficiency — Reorganize our operating model into “modular”, more self-contained business units to enhance decision making, transparency and accountability, driving performance improvement and strategic flexibility over time; increase capital fungibility and diversification, streamline our legal entity structure, optimize reinsurance, improve tax efficiency and reduce expenses.

Invest to Grow — Grow our higher-value businesses while investing in transformative opportunities, continuing initiatives to modernize our technology and infrastructure, advancing our engineering capabilities, innovating new products and client risk services and delivering a better client experience.

Customer

Our vision is to be our clients’ most valued insurer. We expect that investments in underwriting, claims services, client risk services, science and data will continue to differentiate us from our peers and drive a superior client experience. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2015, we increased global commercial property limits to $2.5 billion per occurrence from $1.5 billion, in response to increased demand for capacity and services from clients managing complex global risks and increasing property values. This increase was the result of recent investments in engineering and analytical capabilities, which in turn allowed us to secure meaningful support from a panel of long-standing reinsurers.

Sharpen Commercial Focus

Exit or remediate targeted underperforming portfolios

Commercial Insurance is focused on serving our clients by providing the products and services where we have the most potential to deliver value. Experience and emerging data indicate that there are consistently under-performing sub-segments of our business. We will invest and grow where we see opportunity and we will exit or remediate underperforming portfolios. For example, in 2015 we transferred approximately $1.2 billion of loss reserves to our run-off insurance lines and in the first half of 2016 we transferred another $1.3 billion. This enables us to focus on growth opportunities while allowing for more proactive management of the transferred reserves by run-off specialists. We also did not renew certain accounts that did not meet our profit objectives in our Casualty lines and, to a lesser extent, in our Property and Specialty lines.

We will continue to further enhance our risk selection process and refine technical pricing through enhanced tools and analytics to achieve this goal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Drive Efficiency

Narrow geographic footprint while continuing to maintain and improve multinational capabilities

Commercial Insurance, along with our other businesses, continues to evaluate the markets and geographies that provide the greatest opportunities, while maintaining the global footprint that our multinational clients greatly value. Additionally, we will continue to leverage our various off-shore centers, taking advantage of opportunities to centralize and standardize processes and platforms. We believe there is great opportunity to further streamline our global operating model.

Expand and optimize the use of reinsurance and other risk mitigating strategies

Commercial Insurance continues to execute capital management initiatives by enhancing broad‑based risk tolerance guidelines for its operating units, implementing underwriting strategies to increase ROE by line of business and reducing exposure to businesses with inadequate pricing and increased loss trends. Commercial Insurance remains focused on enhancing its global reinsurance strategy to improve overall capital efficiency, although this strategy may lead to periodic income statement volatility.

In accordance with our strategic plan, during the first quarter of 2016, we entered into a two-year reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group, under which a proportional share of our new and renewal U.S. Casualty portfolio is being ceded. This arrangement is reducing the impact of the U.S. Casualty loss ratio on our overall loss ratio.

Accelerate micro-segmentation of risks using internal and external data

Property Casualty continues to improve decision-making, risk acceptance and pricing based on its ongoing efforts to refine segmentation by customer, industry and geography. For example, after enhancing the segmentation of workers’ compensation, Property Casualty has observed different experience and trends, which helps inform its risk appetite, pricing and loss mitigation decisions.

Invest to Grow

Grow most profitable lines

Property Casualty continues to focus on growth in our higher-value businesses while investing in transformative opportunities, continuing initiatives to modernize our technology and infrastructure, advancing our engineering capabilities, innovating new products and client risk services and delivering a better client experience. Property Casualty expects to grow in businesses such as Financial lines, including D&O, Cyber and Mergers & Acquisitions, Large Limit and Middle Market Property, Multinational and certain areas internationally.

Mortgage Guaranty expects to continue as a leading provider of mortgage insurance and seeks to differentiate itself from its competitors by utilizing its proprietary risk-based pricing strategy. This pricing strategy provides Mortgage Guaranty’s customers with mortgage insurance products that are priced commensurate with the underwriting risk, which we believe will result in an appropriately priced, high-quality book of business. As announced on January 26, 2016, we plan to conduct an initial public offering of up to 19.9 percent of Mortgage Guaranty, subject to regulatory and GSE approval, as a first step towards a full separation. On March 30, 2016, an initial Form S-1 registration statement relating to Mortgage Guaranty was filed with the SEC. An amendment to the initial Form S-1 was filed on May 20, 2016.

Institutional Markets is expected to continue growing the structured settlement business and continue contributing to growth in assets under management with stable value wraps and utilizing a disciplined approach to growth and diversification of our business by pursuing select opportunities in areas such as the pension buyout business.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

consumer insurance outlook and STRATEGIC INITIATIVES

Market Conditions and Industry Trends

Retirement

Increasing life expectancy and reduced expectations for traditional retirement income from defined benefit programs and fixed income securities are leading Americans to seek additional financial security as they approach retirement. The strong demand for individual variable and fixed index annuities with guaranteed income features has attracted increased competition in this product space. In response to the continued low interest rate environment, which has added pressure to profit margins, we have developed guaranteed income benefits for both variable and fixed index annuities with margins that are less sensitive to the level of interest rates. In addition, higher tax rates and a desire for better investment returns have prompted less risk-averse investors to elect products without guaranteed living benefits.

The sustained low interest rate environment has a significant impact on the annuity industry. Low long-term interest rates put pressure on investment returns, which may negatively affect sales of interest rate sensitive products and reduce future profits on certain existing fixed rate products, although our disciplined rate setting has helped to mitigate some of the pressure on investment spreads. In addition, more highly leveraged competitors have entered the market offering higher crediting rates. As long as the low interest rate environment continues, conditions will be challenging for the fixed annuity market. Rapidly rising interest rates could create the potential for increased sales, but may also drive higher surrenders. Customers are, however, currently buying fixed annuities with longer surrender periods in pursuit of higher returns, which may help mitigate the rate of increase in surrenders in a rapidly rising rate environment. In addition, older contracts have higher minimum interest rates, which continue to be attractive to the contract holders, driving better than expected persistency. Low interest rates have also driven growth in our fixed index annuity products, which provide additional interest crediting tied to favorable performance in certain equity market indices.

Consumer Insurance provides products and services to certain employee benefit plans that are subject to restrictions imposed by ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, including rules that generally restrict the provision of investment advice by a fiduciary to ERISA plans and participants and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) if the investment recommendation results in fees paid to the fiduciary individual advisor, his or her firm or their affiliates that vary according to the investment recommendation chosen. On April 8, 2016, the DOL published its final fiduciary duty rule (the Final Rule), substantially expanding the definition of fiduciary investment advice. As a result, the circumstances under which financial services providers and financial advisors could be deemed a fiduciary under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code when providing investment advice with respect to ERISA plans or IRAs are greatly expanded. For additional information on the Final Rule, see Part I, Item 2. MD&A – Regulatory Environment section of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016. We are analyzing the Final Rule’s potential impact on our customers, distribution partners, financial advisors and us, and preparing to implement the necessary adjustments to come into compliance with the Final Rule. The Final Rule could require us, and our competitors, to make material changes to certain of our business practices and product designs, and could materially affect our ability and the ability of our distribution partners and financial advisors to sell or service certain annuities and other investment products. The initial compliance date of the final rule is April 10, 2017, with full compliance required by January 1, 2018. Once we have completed our analysis of the Final Rule’s potential impact, we intend to strategically invest in the most attractive post-DOL opportunities across the market.

Life

Populations are living longer and have increased needs for financial protection for beneficiaries, estate planning and wealth creation. The Life operating segment addresses these needs with a broad spectrum of products, ranging from the pure protection focus of term life to indexed universal life and investment-oriented products such as variable universal life. Market factors, primarily low interest rates and regulatory changes, have caused the universal life market to shift its focus from guaranteed universal life to indexed universal life products that offer cash accumulation and living benefit options.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Personal Insurance

The need for full life cycle products and coverage, increases in personal wealth accumulation, and awareness of insurance protection and risk management continue to support the growth of the Personal Insurance industry. Our Personal Insurance operations focus on group and corporate clients, together with individual customers within national markets. We expect the demand for multinational cross-boundary coverage and services to increase due to the internationalization of clients and customers. Our global presence provides Personal Insurance a distinct competitive advantage.

In Japan, the competition for auto insurance has intensified, in part driven by a decline in new car sales and the existence of fewer but larger insurers. In addition, the overall market size in homeowners insurance contracted after the duration restriction on long-term fire insurance became effective in October 2015. In the U.S., we compete in the high net worth market and will continue to expand our innovative products and services to distribution partners and clients. Outside of Japan and the U.S., our Personal Insurance operating segment continues to invest selectively in markets where we believe higher potential for sustainable profitability exists.

Strategic Initiatives

Customer — Strive to be our clients’ most valued insurer. Through our unique franchise, which brings together a broad portfolio of retirement, life insurance and personal insurance products offered through multiple distribution networks, Consumer Insurance aims to provide customers with the products and services they desire, delivered through the channels they prefer.

Information-driven Strategy — Utilize customer insight, analytics and the application of science to optimize customer acquisition, product profitability, product mix, channel performance and risk management capabilities.

Sharpen Consumer Focus — Invest in areas where Consumer Insurance can grow profitably and sustainably. Target growth in select markets according to market size, growth potential, market maturity and customer demographics and narrow our footprint in less profitable markets with insufficient scale.

Operational Effectiveness — Simplify processes and enhance operating environments to increase competitiveness, improve service and product capabilities and facilitate delivery of our target customer experience.

Investment Strategy — Maintain a diversified, high quality portfolio of fixed maturity securities that largely matches the duration characteristics of the related insurance liabilities, and pursue selective yield-enhancement opportunities that meet liquidity, risk and return objectives.

Profitability and Capital Management — Deliver solid earnings through disciplined pricing, sustainable underwriting improvements, expense reductions and diversification of risk, and increase capital efficiency within insurance entities to enhance return on equity.

Customer

In striving to be our clients’ most valued insurer, we have implemented initiatives to better serve our target segments. Our focus on ease of doing business for consumers and producers includes enhancements to our platforms and services. We are working to expand relationships with key distribution partners to offer our products across multiple distribution channels.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Information-driven Strategy

We believe that strengthening our information-driven decision making and marketing capabilities through the use of enhanced analytics, stronger platforms and tools, a well-designed product portfolio and expanded relationships may allow us to bring more effective product solutions to our chosen markets.

We focus on rate adequacy through our global underwriting practices and tools and analytics, and seek to optimize the value of our business lines through product and portfolio management and refined technical pricing. We strive to deliver leading customer experience and efficiency through claims best practices, deployment of enhanced operating structures and standardized processes and systems, while managing claims-handling efficiency.

Sharpen Consumer Focus

Retirement Income Solutions intends to continue capitalizing on the opportunity to meet consumer demand for guaranteed income by maintaining competitive variable annuity product offerings, while managing risk from guarantee features through risk-mitigating product design and well-developed economic hedging capabilities. Retirement Income Solutions continues to invest in hedging and market risk management capabilities. Retirement Income Solutions has diversified its product portfolio by offering fixed index annuities that also offer guaranteed withdrawal features, which provide additional lifetime income solutions for consumers approaching retirement.

Fixed Annuities sales will continue to be challenged by the low interest rate environment. Sales of fixed annuities could improve if interest rates rise and the yield curve steepens, as these market conditions make fixed annuity products more attractive compared to alternatives such as bank deposits; however, they could also lead to higher surrender activity. During periods of equity market volatility, our fixed annuity products provide diversity in our annuity product suite by offering stable returns for retirement savings. The growing market for immediate and deferred income products, driven by customers seeking guaranteed income products, provides an opportunity for Fixed Annuities to increase the diversification of its product portfolio.

Life will continue to invest to position itself for growth, serve its customers more effectively, and maintain pricing discipline in its overall strategy. Life’s organization has been aligned to focus on the demographic, governmental and socioeconomic trends unique to each area in which we operate. In January 2016, we announced a plan to improve capital efficiency by using reinsurance to reduce certain statutory reserves that are above economic requirements in our domestic Life business.

Personal Insurance aims to provide clients with the products and services they desire, delivered through the channels they prefer. We continue to focus and invest in the most profitable markets and segments, while narrowing our footprint where appropriate. We are also leveraging our multinational capabilities to meet the increasing demand for cross-border coverage and services. Personal Insurance will continue to utilize its strong risk management and market expertise to foster growth by providing innovative and competitive solutions to its customers and distributors.

Operational Effectiveness

We are continuing to invest in initiatives that we believe will make our operating platforms simpler and more agile, enabling us to provide superior service and accommodate future growth. In Japan, we continue to invest in technology to improve operating efficiency and ease of doing business for our distribution partners and customers. In the U.S. Life business, we are focused on leveraging our most efficient systems and increasing automation of our underwriting process. We believe that simplifying our operating models will enhance productivity and support further profitable growth.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Investment Strategy

Our investment objective is to maintain a diversified, high quality portfolio of fixed maturity securities having weighted average durations that are matched to the duration and cash flow profile of our liabilities, to the extent practicable. Our investment strategy is to maximize net investment income and portfolio value, subject to liquidity requirements, capital constraints, diversification requirements, asset-liability matching and available investment opportunities. While a portfolio of alternative investments remains a fundamental component of the investment strategy of the Life Insurance Companies, we intend to reduce the overall size of the hedge fund portfolio, in light of changing market conditions and perceived market opportunities, and to continue reducing the size of the private equity portfolio. See Investments for additional discussion of investment strategies. If these reductions were to include the sale of alternative investments that support certain payout annuities, we could incur additional loss recognition expense on such products, due to updating assumptions to reflect reinvestment at lower future yields. See Critical Accounting Estimates — Insurance Liabilities — Future Policy Benefits for Life and Accident and Health Insurance Contracts (Life Insurance Companies) for discussion of assumptions related to loss recognition testing in our 2015 Annual Report.

Profitability and Capital Management

We are focused on enhancing profitability and capital efficiency within our insurance entities through disciplined pricing, in-force profitability management, effective management of risk and expense reductions. For product lines where we have significant equity market risk and exposure to changes in interest rates, we use risk management tools, such as the risk mitigation product features and hedging program in our Retirement Income Solutions and Group Retirement annuity businesses. Additionally, our scale and the breadth of our product offerings provide diversification of risk. Within our Non-Life Insurance Companies, we continue to increase capital efficiency.

In conjunction with our strategic divestiture program, in May 2016, we completed the sale of AIG Advisor Group, our network of independent broker-dealers, to investment funds affiliated with Lightyear Capital LLC and PSP Investments, and recognized a pre-tax gain of $225 million.

See Results of Operations — Consumer Insurance and Insurance Reserves for additional information about our Consumer Insurance businesses.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following section provides a comparative discussion of our Results of Operations on a reported basis for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Factors that relate primarily to a specific business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment discussion. For a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates that affect the Results of Operations, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section of this MD&A and Part II, Item 7. MD&A — Critical Accounting Estimates in the 2015 Annual Report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents our consolidated results of operations:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	8,751	$	9,545	(8)	%	$	17,557	$	18,367	(4)	%
Policy fees		696		688	1			1,383		1,365	1
Net investment income		3,683		3,826	(4)			6,696		7,664	(13)
Net realized capital gains (losses)		1,042		126	NM			(64)		1,467	NM
Other income		552		1,514	(64)			931		2,811	(67)
Total revenues		14,724		15,699	(6)			26,503		31,674	(16)
Benefits, losses and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		6,872		7,100	(3)			13,259		13,651	(3)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		961		942	2			1,911		1,877	2
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		1,345		1,356	(1)			2,607		2,706	(4)
General operating and other expenses		2,586		3,090	(16)			5,589		6,039	(7)
Interest expense		320		316	1			626		656	(5)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		7		342	(98)			90		410	(78)
Net (gain) loss on sale of divested businesses		(225)		1	NM			(223)		7	NM
Total benefits, losses and expenses		11,866		13,147	(10)			23,859		25,346	(6)
Income from continuing operations before
income tax expense		2,858		2,552	12			2,644		6,328	(58)
Income tax expense		924		777	19			866		2,077	(58)
Income from continuing operations		1,934		1,775	9			1,778		4,251	(58)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of income tax expense		(10)		16	NM			(57)		17	NM
Net income		1,924		1,791	7			1,721		4,268	(60)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests		11		(9)	NM			(9)		-	NM
Net income attributable to AIG	$	1,913	$	1,800	6	%	$	1,730	$	4,268	(59)	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents a reconciliation of pre-tax operating income to pre-tax income and after-tax operating income to net income (loss) attributable to AIG:

Three Months Ended June 30,	2016						2015

				Total		After				Total		After
(in millions)	Pre-tax			Tax		Tax	Pre-tax			Tax		Tax
Operating income, excluding noncontrolling interests	$	1,620	$	503	$	1,117	$	2,868	$	985	$	1,883
Noncontrolling interest						(4)						10
Operating income, net of noncontrolling interests	$	1,620	$	503	$	1,113	$	2,868	$	985	$	1,893
Uncertain tax positions and other tax adjustments				(63)		63				(49)		49
Deferred income tax valuation allowance releases (charges)				35		(35)				(40)		40
Changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits		120		42		78		(87)		(30)		(57)
Changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to net realized
capital gains (losses)		(64)		(22)		(42)		(28)		(10)		(18)
Other (income) expense - net		5		2		3		-		-		-
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(7)		(2)		(5)		(342)		(120)		(222)
Net realized capital gains		1,042		380		662		126		46		80
Noncontrolling interest on net realized capital gains						(7)						(1)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations						(10)						16
Income (loss) from divested businesses		225		79		146		(34)		(23)		(11)
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements		7		2		5		49		18		31
Restructuring and other costs		(90)		(32)		(58)		-		-		-
Pre-tax income/net income attributable to AIG	$	2,858	$	924	$	1,913	$	2,552	$	777	$	1,800

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding						1,140,045,973						1,365,390,431
Income per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)					$	1.68					$	1.32
After-tax operating income per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)					$	0.98					$	1.39

Six Months Ended June 30,	2016						2015

				Total		After				Total		After
	Pre-tax			Tax		Tax	Pre-tax			Tax		Tax
Operating income, excluding noncontrolling interests	$	2,574	$	686	$	1,888	$	5,395	$	1,810	$	3,585
Noncontrolling interest						(2)						(1)
Operating income, net of noncontrolling interests	$	2,574	$	686	$	1,886	$	5,395	$	1,810	$	3,584
Uncertain tax positions and other tax adjustments				142		(142)				(91)		91
Deferred income tax valuation allowance releases (charges)				(2)		2				53		(53)
Changes in fair value of securities used to hedge guaranteed living benefits		253		89		164		(43)		(15)		(28)
Changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to net realized
capital gains (losses)		(24)		(8)		(16)		(82)		(29)		(53)
Other (income) expense - net		12		4		8		-		-		-
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(90)		(32)		(58)		(410)		(144)		(266)
Net realized capital gains (losses)		(64)		(7)		(57)		1,467		515		952
Noncontrolling interest on net realized capital gains (losses)						11						1
Income (loss) from discontinued operations						(57)						17
Income (loss) from divested businesses		223		78		145		(55)		(42)		(13)
Non-operating litigation reserves and settlements		38		13		25		56		20		36
Restructuring and other costs		(278)		(97)		(181)		-		-		-
Pre-tax income/net income attributable to AIG	$	2,644	$	866	$	1,730	$	6,328	$	2,077	$	4,268

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding						1,163,089,748						1,376,325,971
Income per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)					$	1.49					$	3.10
After-tax operating income per common share attributable to AIG (diluted)					$	1.62					$	2.60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net income attributable to AIG increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to higher net realized capital gains, lower loss on extinguishment of debt and income from divested business, partially offset by a decrease in income from insurance operations, reflecting lower underwriting income, decreased net investment income, and lower income on assets held by AIG Parent.

Net income attributable to AIG decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to a decrease in income from insurance operations, reflecting lower underwriting income, decreased net investment income, lower income on assets held by AIG Parent and lower net realized capital gains, partially offset by lower loss on extinguishment of debt.

After-tax operating income attributable to AIG decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to a decrease in income from insurance operations, reflecting lower underwriting income, decreased net investment income, and lower income on assets held by AIG Parent.

For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, the effective tax rate on pre-tax operating income was 31.0 percent and 26.7 percent, respectively. The significant factors that contributed to the difference from the statutory rate of 35 percent included tax benefits resulting from tax-exempt interest income and other permanent tax items, certain tax benefits associated with an agreement reached with the IRS related to certain tax issues under audit and the impact of other discrete tax benefits.

For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, the effective tax rate on pre-tax operating income was 34.3 percent and 33.5 percent, respectively. The significant factors that contributed to the difference from the statutory rate included tax benefits resulting from tax exempt interest income and other permanent tax items, and the impact of discrete tax benefits.

SEGMENT RESULTS

We report the results of our operations through two reportable segments: Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance. The Corporate and Other category consists of businesses and items not allocated to our reportable segments.

The following table summarizes the operations of each reportable segment and Corporate and Other. See also Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Commercial Insurance	$	1,088	$	1,500	(27)	%	$	1,977	$	2,962	(33)	%
Consumer Insurance		1,104		1,023	8			1,892		1,968	(4)
Corporate and Other		(544)		372	NM			(1,277)		534	NM
Consolidations, eliminations and other adjustments		(28)		(27)	(4)			(18)		(69)	74
Pre-tax operating income	$	1,620	$	2,868	(44)		$	2,574	$	5,395	(52)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

pre-tax operating income

(in millions)

COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

CONSUMER INSURANCE

QUARTERLY PRE-TAX INCOME COMPARISON FOR 2016 AND 2015

Pre-tax results increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to:

• an increase in Consumer Insurance pre-tax operating income due to improved underwriting results in Personal Insurance, more favorable mortality experience in Life, and lower domestic general operating expenses in Retirement and Life due to reductions in employee-related expenses, partially offset by lower net investment income on alternative investments;

• lower loss on extinguishment of debt from ongoing liability management activities;

• higher income from divested businesses due to a gain of $225 million on the sale of AIG Advisor Group; and

• higher realized capital gains from sales of investments, primarily from the sale of a portion of our PICC Investment. In addition, other-than temporary impairment charges decreased due to an impairment charge on our previously held Aercap investment recognized in the second quarter of 2015.

These increases were partially offset by:

• a decrease in Commercial Insurance pre-tax operating income due to lower net investment income, reflecting lower income on alternative investment and fair market value declines on assets accounted for under the fair value option, as well as an underwriting loss in Property Casualty compared to underwriting income in the same period in the prior year, partially offset by higher underwriting income in Mortgage Guaranty;

• a net decrease of $246 million in consolidated pre-tax income related to guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, primarily due to movement in the non-performance or “own credit” spread adjustment (NPA) component of the embedded derivative fair value measurement (see Insurance Reserves – Life Insurance Companies – Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefit Features and Hedging Program);

100

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

• a decrease in Corporate and Other pre-tax operating results, primarily due to lower earnings on investments for which the fair value option was elected, including ABS CDOs and part of our PICC Investment, as well as the absence of equity earnings from shares in AerCap, which was divested in 2015. Additionally, Run-off insurance lines reported a pre-tax operating loss in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a pre-tax operating income in the same period in the prior year. The pre-tax operating loss in Run-off insurance lines was driven by a charge for the discount on excess workers’ compensation reserves in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a benefit in the same period in the prior year, largely driven by interest rate movements; and

• restructuring and other costs incurred in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 but not in the three-month period ended June 30, 2015.

YEAR-TO-DATE PRE-TAX INCOME COMPARISON FOR 2016 AND 2015

Pre-tax results decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to:

• a decrease in Commercial Insurance pre-tax operating income due to lower net investment income, reflecting lower income on alternative investments and fair market value declines on assets accounted for under the fair value option, as well as lower underwriting income from Property Casualty, partially offset by increases in underwriting income from Mortgage Guaranty;

• a decrease in Consumer Insurance pre-tax operating income, primarily due to lower net investment income, reflecting lower income on alternative investments, partially offset by favorable mortality experience in Life, lower domestic general operating expenses in Retirement and Life, and improved underwriting results in Personal Insurance due to lower accident year losses, more favorable net prior year development and strategic actions to reduce general operating expenses and refocus direct marketing activities;

• a loss in Corporate and Other pre-tax operating results, primarily due to lower earnings on investments for which the fair value option was elected, including ABS CDOs and part of our PICC Investment, as well as the absence of equity earnings from shares in AerCap, which was divested in 2015. Additionally, Run-off insurance lines reported a pre-tax operating loss in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a pre-tax operating income in the same period in the prior year. The pre-tax operating loss in Run-off insurance lines was driven by a charge for the discount on excess workers’ compensation reserves in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a benefit in the same period in the prior year, largely driven by interest rate movements. These declines were partially offset by lower interest expense from ongoing liability management activities described in Liquidity and Capital Resources;

• net realized capital losses due primarily to foreign exchange losses compared to net realized gains due to foreign exchange gains and the sale of Class B shares of Prudential Financial Inc. in the same period in the prior year;

• a net decrease of $317 million to consolidated pre-tax income related to guaranteed living benefits, net of hedges, primarily due to movement in the NPA component of the embedded derivative fair value measurement (see Insurance Reserves – Life Insurance Companies – Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefit Features and Hedging Program); and

• restructuring and other costs incurred in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 but not in the six-month period ended June 30, 2015.

These decreases were partially offset by lower loss on extinguishment of debt from ongoing liability management activities and higher income from divested businesses.

101

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Investment Income

Net investment income is attributed to the operating segments of Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance based on internal models consistent with the nature of the underlying businesses.

For Commercial Insurance — Property Casualty and Consumer Insurance — Personal Insurance, we estimate investable funds based primarily on loss reserves and unearned premiums. The net investment income allocation is calculated based on these estimated investable funds consistent with the approximate duration of the liabilities and the capital allocation for each operating segment.

For Commercial Insurance — Institutional Markets, Consumer Insurance — Retirement and Consumer Insurance — Life, net investment income is attributed based on invested assets from segregated product line portfolios held in our Life Insurance Companies. The fundamental investment strategy for these product line portfolios is to maintain primarily a diversified, high quality portfolio of fixed maturity securities and, to the extent practicable, to approximately match established duration targets based on characteristics of the underlying liabilities. All invested assets of the Life Insurance Companies in excess of liabilities are allocated based on internal estimates of target statutory capital for each product line.

Foreign Currency Impact

Property Casualty, International Life and Personal Insurance businesses are transacted in most major foreign currencies. The following table presents the average of the quarterly weighted average exchange rates of the currencies that have the most significant impact on our businesses:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,		Percentage		June 30,		Percentage
Rate for 1 USD *	2016	2015	Change		2016	2015	Change
Currency:
JPY	110.47	120.19	(8)	%	114.31	119.51	(4)	%
EUR	0.89	0.91	(2)	%	0.90	0.88	2	%
GBP	0.70	0.66	6	%	0.70	0.66	6	%

* For the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, foreign currency rates are based on the fiscal quarterly weighted average rate for the three-month period ended May 31, 2016.

Unless otherwise noted, references to the effects of foreign exchange in the Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance discussion of results of operations are with respect to movements in the three Major Currencies included in the preceding table.

102

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Commercial Insurance presents its financial information in three operating segments – Property Casualty, Mortgage Guaranty and Institutional Markets.

Property Casualty provides insurance solutions for large and small businesses. The products offered by the Property Casualty operating segment include general liability, commercial automobile liability, workers’ compensation, excess casualty, crisis management (including customized structured programs for large corporate and multinational customers), commercial, industrial and energy-related property insurance products and services that cover exposures to man-made and natural disasters, including business interruption, aerospace, environmental, political risk, trade credit, surety, marine, various small and medium sized enterprises insurance lines, director and officers’ liability (D&O), errors and omissions (E&O), fidelity, employment practices, fiduciary liability, cybersecurity risk, and kidnap and ransom. Property Casualty products are primarily distributed through a network of independent retail and wholesale brokers, and through an independent agency network.

Mortgage Guaranty provides mortgage insurance that protects mortgage lenders and investors against default on a portion of the unpaid principal balance of a covered mortgage. Mortgage Guaranty products and services are distributed to a comprehensive range of mortgage originators including national and regional mortgage banks, money center banks, credit unions, community banks, builder-owned mortgage lenders and internet-sourced lenders.

Institutional Markets offers retirement and savings products that are marketed to groups or large institutions. The products offered by the Institutional Markets operating segment primarily include stable value wrap products, structured settlement and terminal funding annuities, high net worth products, corporate- and bank-owned life insurance and GICs. Institutional Markets products are primarily distributed through specialized marketing and consulting firms and structured settlement brokers.

See Part I, Item 1. Business in AIG’s 2015 Annual Report for further discussion of our products and geographic regions where we distribute our products.

Commercial Insurance Results

The following table presents Commercial Insurance results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	5,103	$	5,971	(15)	%	$	10,264	$	11,228	(9)	%
Policy fees		50		50	-			101		99	2
Net investment income		1,357		1,645	(18)			2,303		3,183	(28)
Benefits and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		3,971		4,549	(13)			7,702		8,316	(7)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		101		102	(1)			202		204	(1)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		530		593	(11)			1,072		1,189	(10)
General operating and other expenses^*		820		922	(11)			1,715		1,839	(7)
Pre-tax operating income	$	1,088	$	1,500	(27)	%	$	1,977	$	2,962	(33)	%

* Includes general operating expenses, commissions and other acquisition expenses.

Commercial Insurance Results by Operating Segment

The following section provides a comparative discussion of Commercial Insurance results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 by operating segment.

103

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Property Casualty Results

The following table presents Property Casualty results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Underwriting results:
Net premiums written	$	4,424	$	5,583	(21)	%	$	8,731	$	10,630	(18)	%
(Increase) decrease in unearned premiums		225		(481)	NM			619		(597)	NM
Net premiums earned		4,649		5,102	(9)			9,350		10,033	(7)
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		3,489		3,614	(3)			6,697		6,974	(4)
Acquisition expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		521		586	(11)			1,055		1,174	(10)
Other acquisition expenses		196		183	7			427		392	9
Total acquisition expenses		717		769	(7)			1,482		1,566	(5)
General operating expenses		543		658	(17)			1,128		1,287	(12)
Underwriting income (loss)		(100)		61	NM			43		206	(79)
Net investment income		891		1,131	(21)			1,468		2,156	(32)
Pre-tax operating income	$	791	$	1,192	(34)	%	$	1,511	$	2,362	(36)	%

NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN

(in millions)

Pre-Tax oPERATING INCOME

(in millions)

Property Casualty Quarterly Results

Pre‑tax operating income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower net investment income driven by lower returns on alternative investments, as well as an underwriting loss compared to underwriting income for the same period in the prior year. These underwriting results were primarily driven by:

• a net loss reserve discount charge in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a net loss reserve discount benefit for the same period in the prior year;

• higher catastrophe losses compared to the same period in the prior year;

104

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

• lower net adverse prior year loss reserve development in the current year which reflected approximately $100 million reserve charge attributable to Florida court rulings in the second quarter of 2016 that have increased the potential liability for workers’ compensation claims in that state by reversing certain aspects of regulations in place since 2003;

• improvements in the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, from our strategic actions to retain more profitable business; and

• lower general operating expenses resulting from lower employee-related expenses and our expense savings initiatives.

The current accident year losses for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 included four severe losses totaling $130 million compared to eight severe losses totaling $184 million in the same period in the prior year. The net loss reserve discount charge was $191 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net loss reserve discount benefit of $270 million in the same period in the prior year, primarily reflecting a decrease in the reserve discount curve consisting of consisting of the U.S. Treasury forward yield curve and a liquidity margin. See Insurance Reserves – Non-Life Insurance Companies – Discounting of Reserves for further discussion. Net adverse prior year loss reserve development, including return premiums, was $58 million and $279 million in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Insurance Reserves – Non-Life Insurance Companies –Net Loss Development for further discussion. Catastrophe losses were $353 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $209 million in the same period in the prior year.

Acquisition expenses decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in net commission expense, particularly in Casualty and Specialty, reflecting lower production, the effect of reinsurance arrangements, as well as the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound. These decreases were partially offset by higher guaranty fund and other assessments primarily due to favorable guaranty fund and other assessment settlements in the prior year period.

General operating expenses decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower employee-related expenses resulting from actions to streamline our management structure and general cost containment measures commenced in 2015 and continuing through June 30, 2016.

Net investment income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments as well as fair market value declines on assets accounted for under the fair value option. In the same period in the prior year, Property Casualty recorded net investment income related to assets accounted for under the fair value option.

See MD&A — Investments for additional information on the Non-Life Insurance Companies invested assets, investment strategy, and asset-liability management process.

Property Casualty Year-to-Date Results

Pre‑tax operating income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower net investment income driven by lower returns on alternative investments and a decrease in underwriting income. The decrease in underwriting income was primarily driven by:

• a net loss reserve discount charge in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a net loss reserve discount benefit for the same period in the prior year;

• higher catastrophe losses compared to the same period in the prior year;

• improvements in the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, from our strategic actions to retain more profitable business; and

• lower general operating expenses resulting from lower employee-related expenses and our expense savings. Initiatives.

The current accident year losses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 included ten severe losses totaling $239 million compared to 16 severe losses totaling $318 million in the same period in the prior year. The net loss reserve discount

105

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

charge was $165 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to a benefit of $177 million in the same period in the prior year, primarily reflecting a decrease in the reserve discount curve consisting of the U.S. Treasury forward yield curve and a liquidity margin. See Insurance Reserves – Non-Life Insurance Companies – Discounting of Reserves for further discussion. Net adverse prior year loss reserve development, including return premiums, was $48 million and $307 million in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Insurance Reserves – Non-Life Insurance Companies – Net Loss Development for further discussion. Catastrophe losses were $575 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $280 million in the same period in the prior year.

Acquisition expenses decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in net commission expense, particularly in Casualty, reflecting lower production, the effect of reinsurance arrangements, as well as the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and British pound. These decreases were partially offset by higher guaranty fund and other assessments primarily due to favorable guaranty fund and other assessment settlements in the prior year period.

General operating expenses decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower employee-related expenses resulting from actions to streamline our management structure and general cost containment measures commenced in 2015 and continuing through 2016.

Net investment income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments as well as fair market value declines on assets accounted for under the fair value option. In the same period in the prior year, Property Casualty recorded net investment income related to assets accounted for under the fair value option, as well as gains related to hedge funds.

See MD&A — Investments for additional information on the Non-Life Insurance Companies invested assets, investment strategy, and asset-liability management process.

Property Casualty Net Premiums Written

The following table presents Property Casualty’s net premiums written by major line of business:

	Three Months Ended				Percentage Change in				Six Months Ended				Percentage Change in
	June 30,				U.S.		Original		June 30,				U.S.		Original
(in millions)		2016		2015	dollars		Currency			2016		2015	dollars		Currency
Casualty	$	1,109	$	1,812	(39)	%	(39)	%	$	2,472	$	3,694	(33)	%	(32)	%
Property		1,442		1,628	(11)		(11)			2,466		2,635	(6)		(4)
Specialty		760		918	(17)		(16)			1,650		1,872	(12)		(10)
Financial lines		1,113		1,225	(9)		(9)			2,143		2,429	(12)		(10)
Total Property Casualty net
premiums written	$	4,424	$	5,583	(21)	%	(20)	%	$	8,731	$	10,630	(18)	%	(16)	%

106

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Property Casualty NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN by Line of Business

(in millions)

Property Casualty Quarterly and Year-to-Date Net Premiums Written

Property Casualty net premiums written decreased in all lines of business in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, in line with our planned portfolio optimization. This decrease was primarily due to the continued execution of our strategy to enhance risk selection in our Casualty and Property product portfolios, the non-renewal of certain underperforming classes of business, the increased use of reinsurance and adherence to our underwriting discipline in competitive market conditions, as well as the effect of foreign exchange, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound. Additionally, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, net premiums written benefited from the renewal of a multi-year E&O policy in U.S. Financial lines. The following paragraphs discuss the changes within our lines of business exclusive of the effect of foreign exchange.

Casualty net premiums written decreased, particularly in the U.S., in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year reflecting the continued execution of our strategy to enhance risk selection and to optimize our product portfolio, which includes non-renewal of certain underperforming classes of business, revising rates, terms and conditions in certain underperforming portfolios, and the effect of the two-year reinsurance arrangement with the Swiss Re Group.

Property net premiums written decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to lower renewal retention and decreases in new business across all regions reflecting rate pressure and the effort to adhere to our underwriting discipline, partially offset by changes to our catastrophe reinsurance programs to retain more favorable risks.

Specialty net premiums written decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to the execution of our strategy to restructure the U.S environmental business, which includes non-renewal of certain pollution legal liability business in the U.S. and Canada, increased use of reinsurance, and a decline in EMEA Aerospace. These declines were partially offset by an increase in certain targeted growth products, particularly in the U.S. and Asia.

107

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Financial lines net premiums written decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower renewal retention and decreases in new business across all regions reflecting rate pressure and efforts to adhere to our underwriting discipline. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, net premiums written decreased, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower renewal retention and decreases in new business, particularly in the U.S., partially offset by an increase in targeted growth products in EMEA and Asia. Additionally, in the first six months of 2015, net premiums written benefited from the renewal of a multi-year E&O policy in the U.S.

Property Casualty Net Premiums Written by Region

The following table presents Property Casualty’s net premiums written by region:

					Percentage		Percentage						Percentage		Percentage
	Three Months Ended				Change in		Change in		Six Months Ended				Change in		Change in
	June 30,				U.S.		Original		June 30,				U.S.		Original
(in millions)		2016		2015	dollars		Currency			2016		2015	dollars		Currency
Property Casualty:
Americas	$	2,867	$	3,892	(26)	%	(26)	%	$	5,190	$	6,841	(24)	%	(24)	%
Asia Pacific		456		460	(1)		(2)			881		942	(6)		(4)
EMEA		1,101		1,231	(11)		(10)			2,660		2,847	(7)		(3)
Total net premiums written	$	4,424	$	5,583	(21)	%	(20)	%	$	8,731	$	10,630	(18)	%	(16)	%

property casualty NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN by Region

(in millions)

The following paragraphs discuss the changes in net premiums written on a constant dollar basis, which exclude the effect of foreign exchange.

The Americas net premiums written decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to the continued execution of our strategy to optimize our product portfolio in the Casualty and Environmental businesses, increased use of reinsurance, and lower new and renewal business in Property and Financial lines. These declines were partially offset by an increase in certain targeted growth products in Specialty. Additionally, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, net premiums written benefited from the renewal of a multi-year E&O policy in U.S. Financial lines.

108

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Asia Pacific net premiums written decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to lower new and renewal business, particularly in Property, reflecting rate pressure and the effort to adhere to our underwriting discipline, partially offset by an increase in certain targeted growth products in Specialty.

EMEA net premiums written decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting lower new and renewal business across all lines, particularly in Aerospace. Net premiums written decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower new and renewal business, particularly in Specialty and Property, partially offset by an increase in certain targeted growth products in Financial lines.

Property Casualty Underwriting Ratios

Our Commercial Property Casualty business experiences period-to-period volatility, which may affect observable trends in key metrics, particularly underwriting ratios, and makes it difficult to predict future results by extrapolating movements in these metrics from quarter-to-quarter. Future results should not be extrapolated based on quarter-to-quarter movements in these metrics.

The following tables present the Property Casualty combined ratios based on GAAP data and reconciliation to the accident year combined ratio, as adjusted:

	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,		Increase	June 30,		Increase
	2016	2015	(Decrease)	2016	2015	(Decrease)
Loss ratio	75.0	70.8	4.2	71.6	69.5	2.1
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums	(7.5)	(4.1)	(3.4)	(6.1)	(2.8)	(3.3)
Prior year development net of premium adjustments	(1.0)	(5.3)	4.3	(0.3)	(2.9)	2.6
Net reserve discount benefit (charge)	(4.1)	5.2	(9.3)	(1.8)	1.7	(3.5)
Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted	62.4	66.6	(4.2)	63.4	65.5	(2.1)
Acquisition ratio	15.4	15.1	0.3	15.9	15.6	0.3
General operating expense ratio	11.7	12.9	(1.2)	12.1	12.8	(0.7)
Expense ratio	27.1	28.0	(0.9)	28.0	28.4	(0.4)
Combined ratio	102.1	98.8	3.3	99.6	97.9	1.7
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums	(7.5)	(4.1)	(3.4)	(6.1)	(2.8)	(3.3)
Prior year development net of premium adjustments	(1.0)	(5.3)	4.3	(0.3)	(2.9)	2.6
Net reserve discount benefit (charge)	(4.1)	5.2	(9.3)	(1.8)	1.7	(3.5)
Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted	89.5	94.6	(5.1)	91.4	93.9	(2.5)

109

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

property casualty ratios

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

See Insurance Reserves – Non-Life Insurance Companies for further discussion of discounting of reserves and prior year development.

110

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

The following tables present Property Casualty’s accident year catastrophe and severe losses by region and number of events:

Catastrophes ^(a)

	# of			Asia
(in millions)	Events	Americas		Pacific		EMEA			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Natural catastrophes:
Flooding	2	$	37	$	-	$	46	$	83
Windstorms and hailstorms	4		117		8		1		126
Wildfire	1		51		-		10		61
Earthquakes	2		54		24		5		83
Total catastrophe-related charges	9	$	259	$	32	$	62	$	353
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Natural catastrophes:
Flooding	2	$	67	$	-	$	2	$	69
Windstorms and hailstorms	7		103		14		23		140
Total catastrophe-related charges	9	$	170	$	14	$	25	$	209
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Natural catastrophes:
Flooding	2	$	37	$	-	$	46	$	83
Windstorms and hailstorms	11		301		15		2		318
Wildfire	1		51		-		10		61
Earthquakes	2		54		24		5		83
Other events	1		-		-		30		30
Total catastrophe-related charges	17	$	443	$	39	$	93	$	575
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Natural catastrophes:
Flooding	2	$	67	$	-	$	2	$	69
Windstorms and hailstorms	8		174		14		23		211
Total catastrophe-related charges	10	$	241	$	14	$	25	$	280

(a) Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact on AIG in excess of $10 million each. Catastrophes also include certain man-made events, such as terrorism and civil disorders that meet the $10 million threshold.

Severe Losses^(b)

	# of			Asia
(in millions)	Events	Americas		Pacific		EMEA			Total
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016	4	$	96	$	12	$	22	$	130
2015	8	$	122	$	-	$	62	$	184
Six Months Ended June 30,
2016	10	$	106	$	12	$	121	$	239
2015	16	$	235	$	-	$	83	$	318

(b) Severe losses are defined as non-catastrophe individual first party losses and surety losses greater than $10 million, net of related reinsurance and salvage and subrogation.

111

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Property Casualty Quarterly and Year-to-Date Insurance Ratios

The combined ratio increased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in the loss ratio partially offset by a lower expense ratio.

The accident year combined ratio, as adjusted, decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, as well as a lower expense ratio.

The loss ratio increased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a net loss reserve discount charge compared to net loss reserve discount benefit in the same periods in the prior year and higher catastrophe losses. These increases were partially offset by an improvement in the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, as well as lower net adverse prior year loss reserve development.

The accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, reflecting the continued execution of our strategy to enhance risk selection, improve underwriting discipline and manage exposures, including the use of reinsurance, and overall lower severe losses. The accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, improved in Casualty, reflecting the non-renewal of certain underperforming classes of business, as well as the effect of reinsurance. Financial lines improved across all regions due to our pricing discipline, and Specialty benefited from lower severe and attritional losses. These decreases were partially offset by higher attritional and severe losses in Property. Severe losses represented approximately 2.8 points and 2.6 points of the accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to 3.6 points and 3.2 points, respectively, in the same periods in the prior year.

The acquisition ratio increased by 0.3 points in both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to favorable guaranty fund and other assessments settlements in the same periods in the prior year, partially offset by lower net commission expenses, particularly in U.S. Casualty and U.S Specialty, reflecting the effect of reinsurance arrangements.

The general operating expense ratio decreased by 1.2 points and 0.7 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to lower employee-related costs resulting from ongoing actions to streamline our management structure and general cost containment measures commenced in 2015 and continuing through June 30, 2016.

112

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Mortgage Guaranty Results

The following table presents Mortgage Guaranty results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,						Percentage
(dollars in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016			2015		Change
Underwriting results:
Net premiums written	$	244	$	277	(12)	%	$	475		$	535		(11)	%
Increase in unearned premiums		(5)		(51)	90			(11)			(79)		86
Net premiums earned		239		226	6			464			456		2
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		25		44	(43)			67			102		(34)
Acquisition expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		9		7	29			16			14		14
Other acquisition expenses		12		13	(8)			25			28		(11)
Total acquisition expenses		21		20	5			41			42		(2)
General operating expenses		42		40	5			78			79		(1)
Underwriting income		151		122	24			278			233		19
Net investment income		36		35	3			72			69		4
Pre-tax operating income		187		157	19			350			302		16
Key metrics:
Prior year loss reserve development (favorable)/
unfavorable	$	(12)	$	(17)	(29)	%	$	(17)		$	(17)		-	%
Domestic first-lien:
New insurance written	$	12,985	$	15,190	(15)		$	21,812		$	25,732		(15)
Combined ratio		38.1		48.4				41.7			50.9
Primary risk in force							$	47,719		$	44,723		7
60+ day delinquency ratio on primary loans^(a)								2.9	%		3.6	%
Domestic second-lien:
Risk in force^(b)							$	359		$	426		(16)

(a) Based on number of policies.

(b) Represents the full amount of second-lien loans insured reduced for contractual aggregate loss limits on certain pools of loans, which is usually 10 percent of the full amount of loans insured in each pool. Certain second-lien pools have reinstatement provisions, which will expire as the loan balances are repaid.

Pre-Tax oPERATING INCOME

(in millions)

domestic first-lien new insurance written ON MORTGAGE LOANS

(in millions)

113

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

The following table presents Mortgage Guaranty first-lien results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(dollars in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Underwriting results:
Net premiums written	$	231	$	262	(12)	%	$	450	$	504	(11)	%
Increase in unearned premiums		(6)		(51)	88			(11)		(78)	86
Net premiums earned		225		211	7			439		426	3
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		30		46	(35)			76		104	(27)
Acquisition expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		9		7	29			16		14	14
Other acquisition expenses		12		13	(8)			25		27	(7)
Total acquisition expenses		21		20	5			41		41	-
General operating expenses		35		36	(3)			66		72	(8)
Underwriting income		139		109	28			256		209	22
Net investment income		33		32	3			66		63	5
Pre-tax operating income	$	172	$	141	22	%	$	322	$	272	18	%

Mortgage Guaranty Quarterly Results

Pre-tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decline in incurred losses from lower delinquency rates and higher cure rates. The decline in net premiums written primarily reflected reductions in run-off business and in new insurance volume driven by the decline in mortgage refinances in 2016. Mortgage refinances were higher in 2015 due to lower mortgage interest rates in late 2014 and early 2015 resulting in a surge in refinancing activity.

First-Lien Results

First-lien pre-tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting an increase in underwriting income. First-lien net premiums earned increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily from an increase in the policies in-force. First-lien losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $16 million compared to the same period in the prior year driven by lower frequency and severity in new delinquencies and an increase in cure rates. The combined ratio decreased by 10.3 points to 38.1 points in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting an improvement in overall underwriting results.

Acquisition expenses increased slightly in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of increase in the amortization of deferred acquisition costs.

General operating expenses decreased slightly in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a reduction in employee-related expenses compared to the same period in the prior year.

Other Business Results

Other business results include second-lien mortgage insurance, student loan insurance and non-domestic mortgage insurance operations.

The Other business’ pre-tax operating income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 remained unchanged compared to the same period in the prior year at approximately $15 million as a decrease in net premiums earned was entirely offset by a decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses.

114

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Mortgage Guaranty Year-to-Date Results

Pre-tax operating income increased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decline in incurred losses from lower delinquency rates and higher cure rates. The decline in net premiums written primarily reflected lower new insurance written compared to the early part of 2015 when the housing market experienced increased refinancing activity.

First-Lien Results

First-lien pre-tax operating income increased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting an increase in underwriting income. First-lien net premiums earned increased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily from an increase in in-force policies. First-lien losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $28 million compared to the same period in the prior year due to a decline in newly reported delinquencies and an increase in cure rates. The combined ratio decreased by 9.2 points to 41.7 points in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, reflecting an improvement in overall underwriting results.

Acquisition expenses remained unchanged at $41 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, as reductions in expenses related to sales support activities were offset by amortization of deferred acquisition costs.

General operating expenses decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a reduction in employee-related expenses.

Other Business Results

The Other business’ pre-tax operating income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $28 million compared to $30 million in the same period in the prior year. The slight decrease in pre-tax operating income was primarily due to a decrease in net premiums earned as these portfolios continued to run off, partially offset by a decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses.

New Insurance Written on Domestic First-Lien Mortgage Loans

Mortgage Guaranty’s domestic first-lien new insurance written was $13.0 billion and $21.8 billion in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $15.2 billion and $25.7 billion, respectively, in the same periods in the prior year, due to lower mortgage interest rates in late 2014 and early 2015 resulting in an increase in refinancing activity in early 2015.

Delinquency Inventory

The delinquency inventory for domestic first-lien business declined during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of cures and paid claims exceeding the number of newly reported delinquencies. Mortgage Guaranty’s first-lien primary delinquency ratio at June 30, 2016 was 2.9 percent compared to 3.6 percent at June 30, 2015. Over the last several years, Mortgage Guaranty has experienced a decline in newly reported delinquencies and an increase in cure rates.

115

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

The following table provides a summary of activity in Mortgage Guaranty’s domestic first lien delinquency inventory:

Six Months Ended June 30,
(number of policies)	2016	2015^*
Number of primary delinquencies at the beginning of the year	30,471	37,622
Newly reported	17,450	19,063
Cures	(16,944)	(19,487)
Claims paid	(3,209)	(4,429)
Other	(1,508)	(878)
Number of primary delinquencies at the end of the period	26,260	31,891

* In the second quarter of 2016, Mortgage Guaranty’s number of delinquent loans was revised to remove modified pool policies and reflect primary first-lien only policies. The prior period has been revised to conform to the current period presentation.

Mortgage Guaranty Quarterly and Year-to-Date Underwriting Ratios

The following tables present the Mortgage Guaranty combined ratios based on GAAP data:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,			Increase	June 30,			Increase
		2016	2015	(Decrease)		2016	2015	(Decrease)
Loss ratio		10.5	19.5	(9.0)		14.4	22.4	(8.0)
Acquisition ratio		8.8	8.8	-		8.8	9.2	(0.4)
General operating expense ratio		17.6	17.7	(0.1)		16.8	17.3	(0.5)
Expense ratio		26.4	26.5	(0.1)		25.6	26.5	(0.9)
Combined ratio		36.9	46.0	(9.1)		40.0	48.9	(8.9)

The combined ratio decreased by 9.1 points and 8.9 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a lower loss ratio. The decrease in the loss ratio in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 was driven primarily by a decline in incurred losses driven by fewer new delinquencies and higher cure rates.

The acquisition ratio remained flat and decreased by 0.4 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the acquisition ratio decreased primarily due to reduced expenses related to sales activities supporting lower new insurance written.

The general operating expense ratio decreased by 0.1 point and 0.5 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in employee-related expenses.

116

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Institutional Markets Results

The following table presents Institutional Markets results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	215	$	643	(67)	%	$	450	$	739	(39)	%
Policy fees		50		50	-			101		99	2
Net investment income		430		479	(10)			763		958	(20)
Benefits and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		457		891	(49)			938		1,240	(24)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		101		102	(1)			202		204	(1)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		-		-	NM			1		1	-
Other acquisition expenses		7		8	(13)			18		15	20
General operating expenses		20		20	-			39		38	3
Pre-tax operating income	$	110	$	151	(27)	%	$	116	$	298	(61)	%

INSTITUTIONAL MARKETS pre-tax OPERATING INCOME (in millions)

117

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

Institutional Markets Quarterly Results

Pre-tax operating income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower net investment income on alternative investments. Variances in premiums and benefits and expenses are primarily due to premiums received and future policy benefit reserves established from the sale of terminal funding annuities and structured settlements. The decreases in premiums and in benefits and expenses, compared to the same period in the prior year, were due to a large terminal funding annuity issued in the three-month period ended June 30, 2015.

Net investment income in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments, which was positive in the current period but lower than the same period in the prior year. Base net investment income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 increased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to growth in average base invested assets. Certain traditional long-duration products for which Institutional Markets does not have the ability to adjust interest rates, such as life-contingent structured settlements, are exposed to reduced earnings and potential loss recognition reserve increases in a sustained low interest rate environment. See MD&A – Investments – Life Insurance Companies for additional information on the investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested assets of our Life Insurance Companies, which include the invested assets of the Institutional Markets business.

General operating expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 were comparable to the same period in the prior year.

Institutional Markets Year-to-Date Results

Pre-tax operating income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower net investment income on alternative investments. The decreases in premiums and benefits and expenses were primarily due to a large terminal funding annuity issued in the six-month period ended June 30, 2015.

Net investment income in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments, partially offset by higher base net investment income, primarily due to growth in average invested assets.

Base net investment income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 increased compared to the same period in the prior year, due to commercial mortgage loan prepayment income in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 and growth in average base invested assets. See MD&A – Investments – Life Insurance Companies for additional information on the investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested assets of our Life Insurance Companies, which include the invested assets of the Institutional Markets business.

General operating expenses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 increased slightly compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to higher interest expense related to real estate of consolidated partnerships, which was more than offset by related investment income.

Institutional Markets Premiums and Deposits

For Institutional Markets, premiums represent amounts received on traditional life insurance policies and life-contingent payout annuities or structured settlements. Premiums and deposits is a non‑GAAP financial measure that includes direct and assumed premiums as well as deposits received on universal life insurance and investment-type annuity contracts, including GICs and stable value wrap funding agreements.

118

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / COMMERCIAL INSURANCE

The following table presents a reconciliation of Institutional Markets premiums and deposits to GAAP premiums:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Premiums and deposits	$	506	$	680	$	810	$	826
Deposits		(288)		(26)		(349)		(71)
Other		(3)		(11)		(11)		(16)
Premiums	$	215	$	643	$	450	$	739

Premiums for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a large single premium for a terminal funding annuity issued in the three-month period ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in premiums was offset by an increase in deposits in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a $254 million ten-year, floating-rate funding agreement issued to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016.

CONSUMER INSURANCE

Consumer Insurance presents its operating results in three operating segments – Retirement, Life and Personal Insurance.

Retirement provides a broad portfolio of retirement products and services to individual consumers. The primary products offered by the Retirement operating segment include individual fixed and variable annuities, group retirement plans, retail mutual funds and financial planning services. Retirement products are distributed through affiliated channels, including The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC) career financial advisors, and through non-affiliated channels, which include banks, wirehouses, regional and independent broker-dealers, independent marketing organizations and independent insurance agents.

Life products offered in the U.S. primarily include term life and universal life insurance. International products include term and whole life insurance, supplemental health, cancer and critical illness insurance. Life products are primarily distributed through independent marketing organizations, independent insurance agents, financial advisors and direct marketing. The Life operating segment also provides group products distributed through employers (both employer-paid and voluntary) and sponsored organizations, including basic and supplemental term life, universal life and disability insurance.

Personal Insurance provides accident and health and personal lines insurance products to individuals, organizations and families. The products offered by the Personal Insurance operating segment include voluntary and sponsor-paid personal accident and supplemental health products for individuals, employees, associations and other organizations as well as a broad range of travel insurance products and services for leisure and business travelers. Personal Lines products include automobile and homeowners insurance, extended warranty, and consumer specialty products, such as identity theft and credit card protection. Personal Insurance also provides insurance for high net worth individuals offered through AIG Private Client Group, including auto, homeowners, umbrella, yacht, fine art and collections insurance. Personal Insurance products and services are distributed through various channels, including agents, brokers, affinity partners, airlines and travel agents, as well as direct marketing.

See Part I, Item 1. Business in AIG’s 2015 Annual Report for further discussion of our products and geographic regions where we distribute our products.

119

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Consumer Insurance Results

The following table presents Consumer Insurance results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	3,676	$	3,552	3	%	$	7,236	$	7,105	2	%
Policy fees		643		639	1			1,280		1,266	1
Net investment income		2,162		2,232	(3)			3,990		4,407	(9)
Other income		333		543	(39)			840		1,051	(20)
Benefits and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		2,668		2,561	4			5,188		5,240	(1)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		849		837	1			1,694		1,670	1
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		785		737	7			1,554		1,452	7
General operating and other expenses^*		1,408		1,808	(22)			3,018		3,499	(14)
Pre-tax operating income	$	1,104	$	1,023	8	%	$	1,892	$	1,968	(4)	%

* Includes general operating expenses, non deferrable commissions, other acquisition expenses, advisory fee expenses and other expenses.

Consumer Insurance Results by Operating Segment

The following section provides a comparative discussion of Consumer Insurance Results of Operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 by operating segment.

Retirement Results

The following table presents Retirement results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	52	$	44	18	%	$	106	$	90	18	%
Policy fees		272		277	(2)			531		541	(2)
Net investment income		1,567		1,618	(3)			2,876		3,188	(10)
Advisory fee and other income		318		526	(40)			810		1,034	(22)
Benefits and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		114		116	(2)			238		208	14
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		728		715	2			1,451		1,424	2
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		158		158	-			327		300	9
Non deferrable insurance commissions		74		69	7			146		138	6
Advisory fee expenses		173		341	(49)			490		673	(27)
General operating expenses		221		262	(16)			469		506	(7)
Pre-tax operating income	$	741	$	804	(8)	%	$	1,202	$	1,604	(25)	%

120

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

RETIREMENT pre-tax OPERATING INCOME (in millions)

Retirement Quarterly Results

Pre-tax operating income in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower returns on alternative investments resulting in lower net investment income, partially offset by a decrease in general operating expenses from lower employee-related expenses. The sale of AIG Advisor Group in May 2016 resulted in decreases in advisory fee income, advisory fee expense and general operating expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year.

Net investment income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to income on alternative investments, which was positive in the current period but lower than the same period in the prior year. Base net investment income was lower in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, due to lower reinvestment yields and lower accretion income, compared to the same period in the prior year. These decreases were partially offset by higher yield enhancements, which included higher bond call and tender income and gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected.

Base net investment income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, and Retirement fixed maturity portfolio yields in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 declined compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of investment purchases and investment of portfolio cash flows, which continued to be at rates below the weighted average yield of the existing portfolio in the sustained low interest rate environment, as well as additional accretion included in the three-month period ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in base net investment income due to lower yields was partially offset by growth in average invested assets due to positive net flows in the past twelve months. See Investments – Life Insurance Companies for additional information on the investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested assets of our Life Insurance Companies, which include the invested assets of the Retirement business.

In Group Retirement, lower base yields resulted in spread compression in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, as lower base net investment income due to lower yields and lower accretion income was only partially offset by lower average interest crediting rates. In Fixed Annuities, average crediting rates in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 were comparable to the same period in the prior year, and base spreads decreased slightly due to lower base yields. See Spread Management below for additional discussion.

121

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

General operating expenses decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due to decreases in employee-related expenses, as well as the sale of AIG Advisor Group in May 2016. General operating expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 also included interest expense related to real estate of consolidated partnerships, which was more than offset by related investment income.

Retirement Year-to-Date Results

Pre-tax operating income in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower net investment income on alternative investments, partially offset by lower general operating expenses due to lower employee-related expenses. DAC amortization was higher in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due in part to a higher level of amortization in Fixed Annuities resulting from the update of actuarial assumptions in the third quarter of 2015, and growth in Retirement Income Solutions index annuities. The sale of AIG Advisor Group in May 2016 resulted in decreases in advisory fee income, advisory fee expense and general operating expenses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year.

Net investment income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 decreased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments, which included losses in the first three months of 2016, compared to a strong performance in alternative investments in the six-month period ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in alternative investment income in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 was partially offset by higher yield enhancement income, which included higher bond call and tender income, and higher base net investment income, compared to the same period in the prior year.

Base net investment income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 increased compared to the same period in the prior year, as a result of commercial mortgage loan prepayment income in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, which more than offset overall continued lower base yields on investment purchases. Retirement fixed maturity portfolio yields in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 declined compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of investment purchases and reinvestment of portfolio cash flows, which continued to be at rates below the weighted average yield of the existing portfolio in the sustained low interest rate environment. The decrease in base net investment income due to lower yields was partially offset by growth in average invested assets compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to positive net flows in the past twelve months. See Investments – Life Insurance Companies for additional information on the investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested assets of our Life Insurance Companies, which include the invested assets of the Retirement business.

In Group Retirement, base spreads decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due to lower yields on reinvestment of portfolio cash flows and additional accretion in the same period in the prior year, partially offset by lower average interest crediting rates, which are reset annually on January 1 for a large portion of Group Retirement’s fixed option account values. In Fixed Annuities, average crediting rates in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 were comparable to the same period in the prior year, and base spreads decreased slightly due to lower base yields. See Spread Management below for additional discussion.

General operating expenses decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due to decreases in employee-related expenses, as well as the sale of AIG Advisor Group in May 2016. General operating expenses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 also included interest expense related to real estate of consolidated partnerships, which was more than offset by related investment income.

122

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Spread Management

The contractual provisions for renewal of crediting rates and guaranteed minimum crediting rates included in products may reduce spreads in a sustained low interest rate environment and thus reduce future profitability. Although this interest rate risk is partially mitigated through the Life Insurance Companies’ asset‑liability management process, product design elements and crediting rate strategies, a sustained low interest rate environment may negatively affect future profitability.

Disciplined pricing on new business and active crediting rate management are used in the Retirement operating segment to partially offset the impact of a continued decline in base yields resulting from investment of available cash flows in the low interest rate environment.

Disciplined pricing on new business is used to pursue new sales of annuity products at targeted net investment spreads in the current rate environment. Retirement has an active product management process to ensure that new business offerings appropriately reflect the current interest rate environment. To the extent that Retirement cannot achieve targeted net investment spreads on new business, products are re-priced or no longer sold. Additionally, where appropriate, existing products that had higher minimum rate guarantees have been re-filed with lower crediting rates as permitted under state insurance laws for new sales. As a result, new sales of fixed annuity products generally have minimum interest rate guarantees of one percent.

Renewal crediting rate management is done under contractual provisions in annuity products that were designed to allow crediting rates to be reset at pre-established intervals in accordance with state and federal laws and subject to minimum crediting rate guarantees. Retirement will continue to adjust crediting rates on in-force business to mitigate the pressure on spreads from declining base yields. In addition to deferred annuity products, certain traditional long-duration products for which Retirement does not have the ability to adjust interest rates, such as payout annuities, are exposed to reduced earnings and potential loss recognition reserve increases in a sustained low interest rate environment.

As of June 30, 2016, Retirement’s fixed annuity reserves, which include fixed options offered within variable annuities sold in the Group Retirement and Retirement Income Solutions product lines as well as reserves of the Fixed Annuities product line, had minimum guaranteed interest rates ranging from 1.0 percent to 5.5 percent, with the higher rates representing guarantees on older in-force products. As indicated in the table below, approximately 72 percent of annuity account values were at their minimum crediting rates as of June 30, 2016, compared to 73 percent at December 31, 2015. As a result of disciplined pricing on new business and the run-off of older business with higher minimum crediting rates, fixed annuity account values having contractual minimum guaranteed rates above 1 percent decreased from 74 percent of total fixed annuity reserves at December 31, 2015 to 72 percent at June 30, 2016.

The following table presents fixed annuity account values by contractual minimum guaranteed interest rate and current crediting rates:

	Current Crediting Rates
June 30, 2016			1-50 Basis		More than 50
Contractual Minimum Guaranteed	At Contractual		Points Above		Basis Points
Interest Rate	Minimum		Minimum		Above Minimum
(in millions)	Guarantee		Guarantee		Guarantee			Total
Fixed annuities^*
1%	$	6,455	$	5,851	$	14,918	$	27,224
> 1% - 2%		12,148		2,220		2,961		17,329
> 2% - 3%		30,302		431		569		31,302
> 3% - 4%		11,947		48		7		12,002
> 4% - 5%		7,716		-		4		7,720
> 5% - 5.5%		199		-		5		204
Total	$	68,767	$	8,550	$	18,464	$	95,781
Percentage of total		72	%	9	%	19	%	100	%

* Fixed annuities shown include fixed options within variable annuities sold in Group Retirement and Retirement Income Solutions product lines.

123

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Retirement Premiums and Deposits, Surrenders and Net Flows

Premiums

For Retirement, premiums primarily represent amounts received on life-contingent payout annuities. Premiums and deposits is a non‑GAAP financial measure that includes, in addition to direct and assumed premiums, deposits received on investment-type annuity contracts and mutual funds.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Retirement premiums and deposits to GAAP premiums:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Premiums and deposits*	$	6,431	$	6,070	$	13,284	$	11,579
Deposits		(6,377)		(6,046)		(13,178)		(11,537)
Other		(2)		20		-		48
Premiums	$	52	$	44	$	106	$	90

* Excludes activity related to closed blocks of fixed and variable annuities.

Premiums increased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to higher sales of immediate annuities in the Fixed Annuities product line.

Premiums and Deposits and Net Flows

The following table presents Retirement premiums and deposits and net flows by product line:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Fixed Annuities	$	1,208	$	650	86	%	$	2,842	$	1,334	113	%
Retirement Income Solutions		1,976		2,936	(33)			4,014		5,393	(26)
Retail Mutual Funds		1,410		922	53			2,735		1,779	54
Group Retirement		1,837		1,562	18			3,693		3,073	20
Total Retirement premiums and deposits*	$	6,431	$	6,070	6	%	$	13,284	$	11,579	15	%

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Net flows
Fixed Annuities	$	(428)	$	(940)	$	(269)	$	(1,686)
Retirement Income Solutions		1,061		1,922		2,258		3,447
Retail Mutual Funds		702		341		1,245		484
Group Retirement		19		(391)		54		(1,031)
Total Retirement net flows*	$	1,354	$	932	$	3,288	$	1,214

* Excludes activity related to closed blocks of fixed and variable annuities, which had reserves of approximately $4.3 billion and $5.2 billion at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

124

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

RETIREMENT PREMIUMS AND DEPOSITS by Product Line (in millions)

Premiums and deposits for Retirement increased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to higher sales in Fixed Annuities, Retail Mutual Funds and Group Retirement, partially offset by lower sales in Retirement Income Solutions.

Net flows for annuity products included in Fixed Annuities, Retirement Income Solutions and Group Retirement represent premiums and deposits less death, surrender and other withdrawal benefits. Net flows from mutual funds, which are included in both Retail Mutual Funds and Group Retirement, represent deposits less withdrawals.

Total net flows for Retirement in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 increased compared to the same periods in the prior year. Higher sales of Fixed Annuities, higher sales and lower surrenders in Group Retirement, and higher sales of Retail Mutual Funds were the primary drivers of the improvement in net flows compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Premiums and Deposits and Net Flows by Product Line

A discussion of the significant variances in premiums and deposits and net flows for each product line follows:

Fixed Annuities deposits increased significantly in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year, partially offset by a slight increase in surrenders, resulting in net flows that were negative but improved compared to the same periods in the prior year.

125

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Retirement Income Solutions premiums and deposits decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, due to lower sales of variable annuities, which were partially offset by growth in index annuities. Positive net flows exceeded $1 billion per quarter in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, but were significantly lower compared to the same periods in the prior year, due to the decrease in deposits. Surrenders were lower in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, and the improvement in surrender rates (see Surrender Rates below) also reflected the significant growth in account value driven by positive net flows over the past twelve months, which has increased the proportion of business that is within the surrender charge period.

Retail Mutual Fund net flows increased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year due to improvement in the level of deposits driven by activity within the Focused Dividend Strategy Fund.

Group Retirement net flows in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 were positive and improved significantly compared to net outflows in the same periods in the prior year, due to higher premiums and deposits and lower surrender activity. The six-month period ended June 30, 2015 included large group surrenders of approximately $475 million. The large group market has been impacted by the consolidation of healthcare providers and other employers in our target markets.

Surrender Rates

The following table presents reserves for annuity product lines by surrender charge category:

		June 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
						Retirement						Retirement
		Group		Fixed		Income		Group		Fixed		Income
(in millions)		Retirement^(a)		Annuities		Solutions		Retirement^(a)		Annuities		Solutions
No surrender charge^(b)	$	61,993	$	35,141	$	14,883	$	60,720	$	34,331	$	14,184
Greater than 0% - 2%		1,211		1,214		4,215		1,199		1,543		4,517
Greater than 2% - 4%		1,216		2,191		5,047		1,363		2,285		4,565
Greater than 4%		5,603		13,166		34,853		5,952		13,138		31,683
Non-surrenderable		773		3,801		371		676		3,723		358
Total reserves	$	70,796	$	55,513	$	59,369	$	69,910	$	55,020	$	55,307

(a) Excludes mutual fund assets under management of $15.4 billion and $14.5 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

(b) Group Retirement Products in this category include reserves of approximately $6.2 billion at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, that are subject to 20 percent annual withdrawal limitations.

The following table presents annualized surrender rates for deferred annuities by product line:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Surrenders as a percentage of average account value
Fixed Annuities	8.0	%	7.2	%	7.4	%	7.0	%
Retirement Income Solutions	4.9		6.4		4.8		6.3
Group Retirement	7.8		8.4		7.8		8.9

126

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Life Results

The following table presents Life results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	762	$	702	9	%	$	1,498	$	1,410	6	%
Policy fees		371		362	2			749		725	3
Net investment income		542		551	(2)			1,010		1,093	(8)
Other income		15		17	(12)			30		17	76
Benefits and expenses:
Policyholder benefits and losses incurred		961		965	-			1,903		1,907	-
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		121		122	(1)			243		246	(1)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		120		89	35			240		175	37
Non deferrable insurance commissions		47		57	(18)			97		116	(16)
General operating expenses		257		250	3			515		481	7
Pre-tax operating income	$	184	$	149	23		$	289	$	320	(10)

Life pre-tax OPERATING INCOME (in millions)

Life Quarterly Results

Pre-tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to more favorable mortality experience and lower domestic general operating expenses, partially offset by lower net investment income on alternative investments. The increase in DAC amortization was largely offset by higher amortization of unearned revenue reserves, reported in policy fees, and by reserve releases associated with increased lapses of term and traditional life products.

Net investment income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments, partially offset by higher yield enhancement income, which included bond call and tender income. See Investments – Life Insurance Companies for additional discussion of the

127

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested assets of our Life Insurance Companies, which include the invested assets of the Life business.

General operating expenses increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year. A decrease in domestic employee-related expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year was more than offset by higher expenses in Japan and interest expense related to real estate of consolidated partnerships; the latter was more than offset by related investment income.

Life Year-to-Date Results

Pre-tax operating income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, due to lower net investment income on alternative investments and higher general operating expenses from international operations, partially offset by more favorable mortality experience, lower domestic employee-related expenses and an IBNR reserve release. Pre-tax operating income in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 benefited from a $25 million reduction in the reserve for IBNR death claims related to enhanced claims practices, which was recorded in the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. The increase in DAC amortization was largely offset by higher amortization of unearned revenue reserves, reported in policy fees, and by reserve releases associated with increased lapses of term and traditional life products.

Net investment income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower income on alternative investments, partially offset by higher yield enhancement income, which included bond call and tender income. See Investments – Life Insurance Companies for additional discussion of the investment strategy, asset-liability management process and invested assets of our Life Insurance Companies, which include the invested assets of the Life business.

General operating expenses increased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in international expenses from operations in Japan and Laya Healthcare, which was acquired on March 31, 2015, as well as interest expense related to real estate of consolidated partnerships; the latter was more than offset by related investment income. The increases were partially offset by a decrease in domestic operating expenses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year, principally driven by lower employee-related expenses.

Spread Management

Disciplined pricing on new business is used to pursue new sales of life products at targeted net investment spreads in the current interest rate environment. Life has an active product management process to ensure that new business offerings appropriately reflect the current interest rate environment. To the extent that Life cannot achieve targeted net investment spreads on new business, products are re-priced or no longer sold. Additionally, where appropriate, existing products with higher minimum rate guarantees have been re-filed with lower crediting rates, as permitted under state insurance laws for new sales. Universal life insurance interest rate guarantees are generally two to three percent on new non-indexed products and zero to two percent on new indexed products, and are designed to meet targeted net investment spreads.

In-force Management. Crediting rates for in-force policies are adjusted in accordance with contractual provisions that were designed to allow crediting rates to be reset subject to minimum crediting rate guarantees.

128

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

The following table presents universal life account values by contractual minimum guaranteed interest rate and current crediting rates:

	Current Crediting Rates
June 30, 2016			1-50 Basis		More than 50
Contractual Minimum Guaranteed	At Contractual		Points Above		Basis Points
Interest Rate	Minimum		Minimum		Above Minimum
(in millions)	Guarantee		Guarantee		Guarantee			Total
Universal life insurance
1%	$	-	$	-	$	7	$	7
> 1% - 2%		31		168		237		436
> 2% - 3%		528		309		1,476		2,313
> 3% - 4%		1,996		492		1,063		3,551
> 4% - 5%		3,846		205		-		4,051
> 5% - 5.5%		322		-		-		322
Total	$	6,723	$	1,174	$	2,783	$	10,680
Percentage of total		63	%	11	%	26	%	100	%

Life Premiums and Deposits

Premiums for Life represent amounts received on traditional life insurance policies and group benefit policies. Premiums and deposits for Life is a non‑GAAP financial measure that includes direct and assumed premiums as well as deposits received on universal life insurance.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Life premiums and deposits to GAAP premiums:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Premiums and deposits	$	1,317	$	1,249	$	2,568	$	2,472
Deposits		(372)		(380)		(736)		(758)
Other		(183)		(167)		(334)		(304)
Premiums	$	762	$	702	$	1,498	$	1,410

Life premiums grew 8 percent and 7 percent, excluding the effect of foreign exchange, in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, principally driven by growth in international life and health. The growth in premiums resulted in growth in premiums and deposits of 5 percent and 4 percent, excluding the effect of foreign exchange, in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.

129

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Personal Insurance Results

The following table presents Personal Insurance results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Underwriting results:
Net premiums written	$	2,922	$	2,930	-	%	$	5,734	$	5,845	(2)	%
Increase in unearned premiums		(60)		(124)	52			(102)		(240)	58
Net premiums earned		2,862		2,806	2			5,632		5,605	-
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		1,593		1,480	8			3,047		3,125	(2)
Acquisition expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		507		490	3			987		977	1
Other acquisition expenses		233		294	(21)			475		572	(17)
Total acquisition expenses		740		784	(6)			1,462		1,549	(6)
General operating expenses		403		535	(25)			826		1,013	(18)
Underwriting income (loss)		126		7	NM			297		(82)	NM
Net investment income		53		63	(16)			104		126	(17)
Pre-tax operating income	$	179	$	70	156	%	$	401	$	44	NM	%

NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN

(in millions)

Pre-Tax oPERATING INCOME

(in millions)

Personal Insurance Quarterly Results

Pre‑tax operating income increased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to improved underwriting results. The underwriting results reflected strategic actions to reduce expenses and refocus direct marketing activities, partially offset by higher catastrophe losses and a single large loss event, as discussed below, in the current quarter. Net favorable prior year loss reserve development was $39 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $17 million in the same period in the prior year. Catastrophe losses were $59 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $16 million in the same period in the prior year.

Acquisition expenses decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year due to a decrease in non-deferred direct marketing expenses. The non-deferred direct marketing expenses, excluding

130

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

commissions, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, were approximately $32 million, and decreased by approximately $48 million from the same period in the prior year.

General operating expenses decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower employee-related expenses arising from organization realignment activities together with lower strategic investment expenditures and the effect of foreign exchange.

Net investment income decreased in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments, partially offset by higher interest income.

See MD&A — Investments for additional information on the Non-Life Insurance Companies invested assets, investment strategy, and asset-liability management process.

Personal Insurance Year-to-Date Results

Pre‑tax operating income increased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to improved underwriting results, partially offset by a decrease in net investment income. The underwriting results reflected strategic actions to reduce expenses and refocus direct marketing activities together with higher net favorable prior year loss reserve development. Net favorable prior year loss reserve development was $87 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $13 million in the same period in the prior year. Catastrophe losses were $88 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $77 million in the same period in the prior year.

Acquisition expenses decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year due to a decrease in non-deferred direct marketing expenses and the effect of foreign exchange. The non-deferred direct marketing expenses, excluding commissions, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, were approximately $80 million, and decreased by approximately $69 million from the same period in the prior year.

General operating expenses decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower employee-related expenses arising from organization realignment activities together with lower strategic investment expenditures and the effect of foreign exchange.

Net investment income decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments, partially offset by higher interest income.

See MD&A — Investments for additional information on the Non-Life Insurance Companies invested assets, investment strategy, and asset-liability management process.

Personal Insurance Net Premiums Written

The following table presents Personal Insurance net premiums written by major line of business:

	Three Months Ended				Percentage Change in				Six Months Ended				Percentage Change in
	June 30,				U.S.		Original		June 30,				U.S.		Original
(in millions)		2016		2015	dollars		Currency			2016		2015	dollars		Currency
Accident and Health	$	1,239	$	1,238	-	%	(1)	%	$	2,527	$	2,586	(2)	%	(1)	%
Personal Lines		1,683		1,692	(1)		(1)			3,207		3,259	(2)		1
Total Personal Insurance
net premiums written	$	2,922	$	2,930	-	%	(1)	%	$	5,734	$	5,845	(2)	%	-	%

131

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Personal Insurance net premiums written by line of business

(in millions)

Personal Insurance Quarterly and Year-to-Date Net Premiums Written

Personal Insurance net premiums written were broadly flat in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, net premiums written decreased slightly in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year. Personal Insurance net premiums written decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year due to the effect of foreign exchange. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange, net premiums written remained unchanged. The following paragraphs discuss the changes in net premiums written on a constant dollar basis, which excludes the effect of foreign exchange.

Accident and Health net premiums written decreased slightly in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to continued underwriting discipline across our businesses together with lower sales as a result of refocusing our direct marketing activities.

Personal Lines net premiums written decreased slightly in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year as decreases in the automobile and personal property businesses were partially offset by an increase in warranty service programs particularly in the U.S. The increase in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year was due to an increase in personal property business in the U.S. and Asia Pacific outside of Japan and in the automobile business in the Americas partially offset by decreased production in personal property in Japan due to a duration restriction on long-term fire insurance put in place in the fourth quarter of 2015. The increase in the U.S. personal property business in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 was attributable to new business sales in the AIG Private Client Group including changes to optimize our reinsurance structure to retain more favorable risks, while continuing to manage aggregate exposure.

132

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Personal Insurance Net Premiums Written by Region

The following table presents Personal Insurance net premiums written by region:

	Three Months Ended				Percentage		Percentage		Six Months Ended				Percentage		Percentage
	June 30,				Change in		Change in		June 30,				Change in		Change in
(in millions)		2016		2015	U.S. dollars		Original Currency			2016		2015	U.S. dollars		Original Currency
Americas	$	981	$	947	4	%	8	%	$	1,933	$	1,859	4	%	9	%
Asia Pacific		1,522		1,539	(1)		(5)			2,850		2,969	(4)		(4)
EMEA		419		444	(6)		(5)			951		1,017	(6)		(2)
Total net premiums written	$	2,922	$	2,930	-	%	(1)	%	$	5,734	$	5,845	(2)	%	-	%

Personal insurance NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN by Region

(in millions)

The following paragraphs discuss the changes in net premiums written on a constant dollar basis, which exclude the effect of foreign exchange.

Americas net premiums written increased across all lines in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to personal property and automobile businesses and the reinsurance optimization discussed above, partially offset by a small decrease in Accident and Health business.

Asia Pacific net premiums written decreased in three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to decreased production in personal property reflecting the long-term fire insurance duration restriction in Japan discussed above.

EMEA net premiums written decreased in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to decreases in both Accident and Health and Personal lines.

133

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Personal Insurance Underwriting Ratios

The following tables present the Personal Insurance combined ratios based on GAAP data and reconciliation to the accident year combined ratio, as adjusted:

	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,		Increase	June 30,		Increase
	2016	2015	(Decrease)	2016	2015	(Decrease)
Loss ratio	55.7	52.7	3.0	54.1	55.8	(1.7)
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums	(2.1)	(0.5)	(1.6)	(1.6)	(1.4)	(0.2)
Prior year development net of premium adjustments	1.4	0.6	0.8	1.6	0.2	1.4
Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted	55.0	52.8	2.2	54.1	54.6	(0.5)
Acquisition ratio	25.9	27.9	(2.0)	26.0	27.6	(1.6)
General operating expense ratio	14.1	19.1	(5.0)	14.7	18.1	(3.4)
Expense ratio	40.0	47.0	(7.0)	40.7	45.7	(5.0)
Combined ratio	95.7	99.7	(4.0)	94.8	101.5	(6.7)
Catastrophe losses and reinstatement premiums	(2.1)	(0.5)	(1.6)	(1.6)	(1.4)	(0.2)
Prior year development net of premium adjustments	1.4	0.6	0.8	1.6	0.2	1.4
Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted	95.0	99.8	(4.8)	94.8	100.3	(5.5)

Personal Insurance ratios

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

134

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

The following tables present Personal Insurance accident year catastrophe and severe losses by region and the number of events:

Catastrophes^(a)

	# of			Asia
(in millions)	Events	Americas		Pacific		EMEA			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Flooding	2	$	3	$	-	$	2	$	5
Windstorms and hailstorms	3		10		(2)		-		8
Earthquakes	2		24		22		-		46
Total catastrophe-related charges	7	$	37	$	20	$	2	$	59
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Flooding	2	$	4	$	-	$	-	$	4
Windstorms and hailstorms	6		12		-		-		12
Total catastrophe-related charges	8	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	16
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Flooding	2	$	3	$	-	$	2	$	5
Windstorms and hailstorms	10		32		5		-		37
Earthquakes	2		24		22		-		46
Total catastrophe-related charges	14	$	59	$	27	$	2	$	88
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Flooding	2	$	4	$	-	$	-	$	4
Windstorms and hailstorms	7		73		-		-		73
Total catastrophe-related charges	9	$	77	$	-	$	-	$	77

135

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CONSUMER INSURANCE

Severe Losses^(b)

	# of			Asia
(in millions)	Events	Americas		Pacific		EMEA			Total
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016	1	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	16
2015	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Six Months Ended June 30,
2016	1	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	16
2015	1	$	12	$	-	$	-	$	12

(b) Severe losses are defined as non-catastrophe individual first party losses and surety losses greater than $10 million, net of related reinsurance and salvage and subrogation.

Personal Insurance Quarterly and Year-to-Date Insurance Ratios

The combined ratio decreased by 4.0 points and 6.7 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, reflecting an improvement in the expense ratio. The accident year combined ratio, as adjusted, decreased by 4.8 points and 5.5 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to improvement in the expense ratio.

The loss ratio increased by 3.0 points in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase reflected higher catastrophe losses and accident year losses, offset by net favorable prior year loss reserve development. The decrease in the loss ratio by 1.7 points in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to higher net favorable prior year loss reserve development.

The accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, increased by 2.2 points in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a single large loss event which totaled $33 million, of which $16 million was related to first party losses (meeting the definition of severe losses) and $17 million was related to third party losses, impacting the personal property business in the U.S. The accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, decreased by 0.5 points in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to improved performance in warranty service programs and personal property.

The acquisition ratio decreased by 2.0 points and 1.6 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, which reflected lower Accident and Health direct marketing expenses as we refocused our activities.

The general operating expense ratio decreased by 5.0 points and 3.4 points in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to lower employee-related expenses arising from organization realignment activities together with lower strategic investment expenditures.

136

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CORPORATE AND OTHER

CORPORATE AND OTHER

Corporate and Other Results

The following table presents AIG’s Corporate and Other results:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Percentage		June 30,				Percentage
(in millions)		2016		2015	Change			2016		2015	Change
Corporate and Other pre-tax operating income (loss):
Equity in pre-tax operating earnings of AerCap^(a)	$	-	$	127	NM	%	$	-	$	255	NM	%
Fair value of PICC Investment^(b)		(44)		170	NM			(119)		217	NM
Income from other assets, net^(c)		215		509	(58)			77		1,073	(93)
Corporate general operating expenses		(289)		(268)	(8)			(583)		(520)	(12)
Interest expense		(261)		(278)	6			(518)		(583)	11
Run-off insurance Lines		(164)		110	NM			(133)		91	NM
Consolidation and eliminations		(1)		2	NM			(1)		1	NM
Total Corporate and Other pre-tax operating income (loss)	$	(544)	$	372	NM	%	$	(1,277)	$	534	NM	%

(a) Represents our share of AerCap’s pre-tax operating income, which excludes certain post-acquisition transaction expenses incurred by AerCap in connection with its acquisition of ILFC and the difference between expensing AerCap’s maintenance rights assets over the remaining lease term as compared to the remaining economic life of the related aircraft.

(b) During the first quarter of 2015, Non-Life Insurance Companies sold a portion of their PICC Investment to AIG Parent.

(c) Consists of the results of investments held by AIG Parent to support various corporate needs as well as the remaining positions of AIGFP, life settlements, real estate, equipment leasing and lending and other secured lending investments held by AIG Parent and certain subsidiaries.

Corporate and Other Quarterly Results

Corporate and Other reported a pre-tax operating loss in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to pre-tax operating income in the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decline in Income from other assets, net. Income from other assets, net, decreased primarily due to lower fair value gains on ABS CDOs and lower credit valuation adjustments on assets for which the fair value option was elected. The pre-tax operating results also reflected fair value losses on our PICC Investment compared to fair value gains in the same period in the prior year. In addition, the three-month period ended June 30, 2015 included our share of AerCap’s pre-tax income, which was accounted for under the equity method through the date of sale of most of our shares in the second quarter of 2015.

The underwriting loss in run-off insurance lines for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was driven by a charge for the discount on excess workers’ compensation reserves, compared to a benefit in the comparable prior year quarter, largely driven by interest rate movements. In addition, the underwriting loss for the three months ended June 30, 2016 included an $86 million out of period charge to reduce earned premium related to the substantiation of an opening balance brought forward from an earlier ledger conversion initiative prior to 2011. The inclusion of this adjustment in Corporate and Other is consistent with how our results of operations are reported to our chief operating decision makers.

137

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / results of operations / CORPORATE AND OTHER

Corporate and Other Year-to-Date Results

Corporate and Other reported a pre-tax operating loss in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to pre-tax operating income in the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decline in Income from other assets, net. Income from other assets, net decreased primarily due to lower fair value gains on ABS CDOs and lower credit valuation adjustments on assets for which the fair value option was elected and gains recognized in the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 upon the unwinding of certain positions. The pre-tax operating results also reflected fair value losses on our PICC Investment compared to fair value gains in the same period in the prior year. In addition, the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 included our share of AerCap’s pre-tax income, which was accounted for under the equity method through the date of sale of most of our shares in the second quarter of 2015. These declines were partially offset by lower interest expense from ongoing liability management activities described in Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Run-off insurance lines reported a pre-tax operating loss of $131 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to pre-tax operating income of $91 million in the same period in the prior year primarily due to underwriting losses during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to underwriting income in the same period in the prior year, as well as an increase in the allocation of net investment income. The decrease in underwriting results primarily reflected:

· excess workers’ compensation net loss reserve discount charges in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to a benefit in the same period in the prior year, reflecting a decrease in the reserve discount curve consisting of Treasury rates partially offset by an increase in credit spreads. See Insurance Reserves – Non-Life Insurance Companies – Discounting of Reserves for further discussion;

· higher accident year losses, primarily reflecting the transfers of certain casualty lines, including environmental liability, excess casualty and healthcare coverage that ceased to be offered by Commercial Insurance; and

· lower net adverse prior year loss reserve development.

In addition, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the underwriting loss included an $86 million out of period charge that reduced earned premium discussed above.

138

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

INVESTMENTS

Overview

Our investment strategies are tailored to the specific business needs of each operating unit. The investment objectives are driven by the respective business models for Non-Life Insurance Companies, Life Insurance Companies and AIG Parent. The primary objectives are generation of investment income, preservation of capital, liquidity management and growth of surplus to support the insurance products. The majority of assets backing our insurance liabilities consist of fixed maturity securities.

Investments Highlights during the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

• A decline in interest rates resulted in an increase in our net unrealized gain position in our investment portfolio. Net unrealized gains in our available for sale portfolio increased to approximately $18.0 billion as of June 30, 2016 from approximately $8.8 billion as of December 31, 2015.

• We continued to make investments in structured securities and other fixed maturity securities and increased lending activities in mortgage loans with favorable risk versus return characteristics to improve yields and increase net investment income.

• Our alternative investments portfolio performance experienced a significant decline in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to increased volatility in equity markets, which affected the performance of our hedge fund portfolio primarily in the first quarter of 2016. During the six-months ended June 30, 2016, we reduced our hedge fund portfolio by $1.4 billion as a result of redemptions consistent with our planned reduction of exposure.

• Blended investment yields on new investments were lower than blended rates on investments that were sold, matured or called.

• Other-than-temporary impairments increased slightly due to higher impairments within the energy sector and in our structured securities portfolio.

• We recognized gains on sales of securities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to the sale of a portion of our PICC Investment.

• The recent Brexit vote has created increased volatility in exchange rates as well as within the equity markets, which may continue for some time.

Investmen t Strategies

Investment strategies are based on considerations that include the local and general market conditions, liability duration and cash flow characteristics, rating agency and regulatory capital considerations, legal investment limitations, tax optimization and diversification.

Some of our key investment strategies are as follows:

• Fixed maturity securities held by the U.S. insurance companies included in Non-Life Insurance Companies consist of a mix of instruments that meet our current risk-return, tax, liquidity, credit quality and diversification objectives.

139

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

• Outside of the U.S., fixed maturity securities held by Non-Life Insurance Companies consist primarily of high-grade securities generally denominated in the currencies of the countries in which we operate.

• While more of a focus is placed on asset-liability management in Life Insurance Companies, our fundamental strategy across all of our investment portfolios is to optimize the duration characteristics of the assets within a target range based on comparable liability characteristics, to the extent practicable.

• AIG Parent, included in Corporate and Other, actively manages its assets and liabilities in terms of products, counterparties and duration. AIG Parent’s liquidity sources are held primarily in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment-grade rated fixed maturity securities. Based upon an assessment of its immediate and longer-term funding needs, AIG Parent purchases publicly traded, investment-grade rated fixed maturity securities that can be readily monetized through sales or repurchase agreements. These securities allow us to diversify sources of liquidity while reducing the cost of maintaining sufficient liquidity.

Investments by Legal Entity Category

The following tables summarize the composition of AIG's investments:

		Non-Life		Life
		Insurance		Insurance		Corporate
(in millions)		Companies		Companies		and Other^(b)		Total
June 30, 2016
Fixed maturity securities^(a):
Bonds available for sale, at fair value	$	87,657	$	169,237	$	5,195	$	262,089
Other bond securities, at fair value		1,301		3,834		10,200		15,335
Equity securities:
Common and preferred stock available for sale, at fair value		1,954		156		(468)		1,642
Other Common and preferred stock, at fair value		189		2		470		661
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance		8,834		24,768		(2,341)		31,261
Other invested assets		10,314		10,535		6,496		27,345
Short-term investments		4,240		4,680		3,414		12,334
Total investments		114,489		213,212		22,966		350,667
Cash		1,211		482		91		1,784
Total invested assets	$	115,700	$	213,694	$	23,057	$	352,451
December 31, 2015
Fixed maturity securities^(a):
Bonds available for sale, at fair value	$	84,849	$	157,150	$	6,246	$	248,245
Other bond securities, at fair value		1,463		3,589		11,730		16,782
Equity securities:
Common and preferred stock available for sale, at fair value		2,821		144		(50)		2,915
Other Common and preferred stock, at fair value		355		-		566		921
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance		8,278		23,979		(2,692)		29,565
Other invested assets		10,571		12,398		6,825		29,794
Short-term investments		3,189		2,877		4,066		10,132
Total investments		111,526		200,137		26,691		338,354
Cash		1,011		557		61		1,629
Total invested assets	$	112,537	$	200,694	$	26,752	$	339,983

(a) At both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately 90 percent and 10 percent of investments were held by domestic and foreign entities, respectively.

(b) Includes the effect of eliminations and consolidations.

140

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

The following table presents the components of Net Investment Income:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Interest and dividends	$	3,242	$	3,208	$	6,485	$	6,395
Alternative investments^(a)		310		658		(56)		1,244
Other investment income^(b)		240		77		490		294
Total investment income		3,792		3,943		6,919		7,933
Investment expenses		109		117		223		269
Total net investment income	$	3,683	$	3,826	$	6,696	$	7,664

(a) Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the presentation of income on alternative investments has been refined to include only income from hedge funds, private equity funds and affordable housing partnerships. Prior period disclosures have been reclassified to conform to this presentation. Hedge funds for which we elected the fair value option are recorded as of the balance sheet date. Other hedge funds are generally reported on a one-month lag, while private equity funds are generally reported on a one-quarter lag.

(b) Includes changes in fair value of certain fixed maturity securities where the fair value option has been elected and which are used to economically hedge interest rate and other risks related to our variable annuity guaranteed living benefits. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the net investment income (loss) recorded on these securities was $120 million and $(87) million, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the net investment income (loss) recorded on these securities was $253 million and $(43) million, respectively.

Net investment income decreased for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments and lower reinvestment yields, partially offset by higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected. Net investment income decreased for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower income on alternative investments, primarily related to negative performance in hedge funds, and lower reinvestment yields, partially offset by higher gains on securities for which the fair value option was elected.

Non-Life Insurance Companies

For the Non-Life Insurance Companies, the duration of liabilities for long-tail casualty lines is greater than that of other lines. As a result, the investment strategy within the Non-Life Insurance Companies focuses on growth of surplus and preservation of capital, subject to liability and other business considerations.

The Non-Life Insurance Companies invest primarily in fixed maturity securities issued by corporations, municipalities and other governmental agencies and also invest in structured securities collateralized by, among other assets, residential and commercial real estate and commercial mortgage loans. While invested assets backing reserves of the Non-Life Insurance Companies are primarily invested in conventional fixed maturity securities, we have continued to allocate a portion of our investment activity into asset classes that offer higher yields, particularly in the domestic operations. In addition, we continue to invest in both fixed rate and floating rate asset-backed investments for their risk-return attributes, as well as to manage our exposure to potential changes in interest rates. This asset diversification has maintained stable average yields while the overall credit ratings of our fixed maturity securities were largely unchanged. We expect to continue to pursue this investment strategy to meet the Non-Life Insurance Companies’ liquidity, duration and credit quality objectives as well as current risk‑return and tax objectives.

In addition, the Non-Life Insurance Companies seek to enhance returns through selective investments in a diversified portfolio of alternative investments. Although these alternative investments are subject to periodic earnings fluctuations, they have historically achieved yields in excess of the fixed maturity portfolio yields and have provided added diversification to the broader portfolio.

Fixed maturity investments of the Non-Life Insurance Companies domestic operations, with a duration of 4.7 years, are currently comprised primarily of tax-exempt securities, which provide attractive risk-adjusted after-tax returns, as well as taxable municipal bonds, government and agency bonds, and corporate bonds. The majority of these high quality investments are rated A or higher based on composite ratings.

141

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Fixed maturity investments held in the Non-Life Insurance Companies foreign operations are of high quality, primarily rated A or higher based on composite ratings with a duration averaging 3.4 years.

Life Insurance Companies

The investment strategy of the Life Insurance Companies is to maximize net investment income and portfolio value, subject to liquidity requirements, capital constraints, diversification requirements, asset‑liability management and available investment opportunities.

The Life Insurance Companies use asset‑liability management as a primary tool to monitor and manage risk in their businesses. The Life Insurance Companies' fundamental investment strategy is to maintain a diversified, high quality portfolio of fixed maturity securities that, to the extent practicable, complements the characteristics of liabilities, including duration, which is a measure of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The investment portfolio of each product line is tailored to the specific characteristics of its insurance liabilities, and as a result, certain portfolios are shorter in duration and others are longer in duration. An extended low interest rate environment may result in a lengthening of liability durations from initial estimates, primarily due to lower lapses, which may require us to further extend the duration of the investment portfolio.

The Life Insurance Companies invest primarily in fixed maturity securities issued by corporations, municipalities and other governmental agencies; structured securities collateralized by, among other assets, residential and commercial real estate; and commercial mortgage loans.

In addition, the Life Insurance Companies seek to enhance returns through investments in a diversified portfolio of alternative investments. Although these alternative investments are subject to periodic earnings fluctuations, they have historically achieved yields in excess of the fixed maturity portfolio yields. While a diversified portfolio of alternative investments remains a fundamental component of the investment strategy of the Life Insurance Companies, we intend to reduce the overall size of the hedge fund portfolio, in light of changing market conditions and perceived market opportunities, and to continue reducing the size of the private equity portfolio.

The Life Insurance Companies monitor fixed income markets, including the level of interest rates, credit spreads and the shape of the yield curve. The Life Insurance Companies frequently review their interest rate assumptions and actively manage the crediting rates used for their new and in-force business. Business strategies continue to evolve to maintain profitability of the overall business in a historically low interest rate environment. The low interest rate environment makes it more difficult to profitably price many of our products and puts margin pressure on existing products, due to the challenge of investing recurring premiums and deposits and reinvesting investment portfolio cash flows in the low rate environment while maintaining satisfactory investment quality and liquidity. In addition, there is investment risk associated with future premium receipts from certain in‑force business. Specifically, the investment of these future premium receipts may be at a yield below that required to meet future policy liabilities.

Fixed maturity investments of the Life Insurance Companies domestic operations, with a duration of 6.8 years, are comprised of taxable corporate bonds, as well as taxable municipal and government bonds, and agency and non‑agency structured securities. The majority of these investments are held in the available for sale portfolio and are rated investment grade based on its composite ratings.

Fixed maturity investments held in the Life Insurance Companies foreign operations are of high quality, primarily rated A or higher based on composite ratings with a duration averaging 15.3 years.

NAIC Designations of Fixed Maturity Securities

The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of Insurance Companies (NAIC) evaluates the investments of U.S. insurers for statutory reporting purposes and assigns fixed maturity securities to one of six categories called ‘NAIC Designations.’ In general, NAIC Designations of ‘1’ highest quality, or ‘2’ high quality, include fixed maturity securities considered investment grade, while NAIC Designations of ‘3’ through ‘6’ generally include fixed maturity securities referred to

142

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

as below investment grade. The NAIC has adopted revised rating methodologies for certain structured securities, including non-agency RMBS and CMBS, which are intended to enable a more precise assessment of the value of such structured securities and increase the accuracy in assessing expected losses to better determine the appropriate capital requirement for such structured securities. These methodologies result in an improved NAIC Designation for such securities compared to the rating typically assigned by the three major rating agencies. The following tables summarize the ratings distribution of Life Insurance Companies fixed maturity security portfolio by NAIC Designation, and the distribution by composite AIG credit rating, which is generally based on ratings of the three major rating agencies. See Investments – Credit Ratings herein for a full description of the composite AIG credit ratings.

The following table presents the fixed maturity security portfolio of Life Insurance Companies categorized by NAIC Designation, at fair value:

June 30, 2016

(in millions)

Total

Below

Investment

NAIC Designation

Grade

Total

Other fixed maturity securities

48,707

59,795

108,502

5,898

3,202

606

137

9,843

118,345

Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized

45,670

2,328

47,998

276

222

842

1,414

49,412

Total^*

94,377

62,123

156,500

6,174

3,424

680

979

11,257

167,757

* Excludes $5.3 billion of fixed maturity securities for which no NAIC Designation is available because they are held in legal entities within Life Insurance Companies that do not require a statutory filing.

The following table presents the fixed maturity security portfolio of Life Insurance Companies categorized by composite AIG credit rating, at fair value:

June 30, 2016

(in millions)

Total

Below

Investment

CCC and

Investment

Composite AIG Credit Rating

AAA/AA/A

BBB

Grade

Lower

Grade

Total

Other fixed maturity securities

49,374

59,723

109,097

5,173

3,448

627

9,248

118,345

Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized

30,443

3,584

34,027

1,252

813

13,320

15,385

49,412

Total^*

79,817

63,307

143,124

6,425

4,261

13,947

24,633

167,757

Credit Ratings

At June 30, 2016, approximately 90 percent of our fixed maturity securities were held by our domestic entities. Approximately 17 percent of such securities were rated AAA by one or more of the principal rating agencies, and approximately 16 percent were rated below investment grade or not rated. Our investment decision process relies primarily on internally generated fundamental analysis and internal risk ratings. Third-party rating services’ ratings and opinions provide one source of independent perspective for consideration in the internal analysis.

A significant portion of our foreign entities’ fixed maturity securities portfolio is rated by Moody’s Investors’ Service Inc. (Moody’s), Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of S&P Global Inc. (S&P), or similar foreign rating services. Rating services are not available for some foreign-issued securities. Our Credit Risk Management department closely reviews the credit quality of the foreign portfolio’s non-rated fixed maturity securities. At June 30, 2016, approximately 16 percent of such investments were either rated AAA or, on the basis of our internal analysis, were equivalent from a credit standpoint to securities rated AAA, and approximately 7 percent were below investment grade or not rated. Approximately 47 percent of the

143

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

foreign entities’ fixed maturity securities portfolio is comprised of sovereign fixed maturity securities supporting policy liabilities in the country of issuance.

Composite AIG Credit Ratings

With respect to our fixed maturity investments, the credit ratings in the table below and in subsequent tables reflect: (a) a composite of the ratings of the three major rating agencies, or when agency ratings are not available, the rating assigned by the NAIC SVO (over 99 percent of total fixed maturity investments), or (b) our equivalent internal ratings when these investments have not been rated by any of the major rating agencies or the NAIC. The “Non-rated” category in those tables consists of fixed maturity securities that have not been rated by any of the major rating agencies, the NAIC or us.

See Enterprise Risk Management herein for a discussion of credit risks associated with Investments.

The following table presents the composite AIG credit ratings of our fixed maturity securities calculated on the basis of their fair value:

	Available for Sale				Other				Total
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
Rating:
Other fixed maturity
securities
AAA	$	13,175	$	12,274	$	3,440	$	3,222	$	16,615	$	15,496
AA		37,107		35,344		223		207		37,330		35,551
A		54,321		50,741		1,877		1,781		56,198		52,522
BBB		73,636		71,766		77		186		73,713		71,952
Below investment grade		14,142		12,305		-		133		14,142		12,438
Non-rated		916		920		-		-		916		920
Total	$	193,297	$	183,350	$	5,617	$	5,529	$	198,914	$	188,879
Mortgage-backed, asset-
backed and collateralized
AAA	$	28,781	$	26,382	$	1,296	$	1,756	$	30,077	$	28,138
AA		5,544		5,003		507		708		6,051		5,711
A		8,935		7,462		314		416		9,249		7,878
BBB		4,776		4,394		395		497		5,171		4,891
Below investment grade		20,741		21,638		7,159		7,771		27,900		29,409
Non-rated		15		16		47		105		62		121
Total	$	68,792	$	64,895	$	9,718	$	11,253	$	78,510	$	76,148
Total
AAA	$	41,956	$	38,656	$	4,736	$	4,978	$	46,692	$	43,634
AA		42,651		40,347		730		915		43,381		41,262
A		63,256		58,203		2,191		2,197		65,447		60,400
BBB		78,412		76,160		472		683		78,884		76,843
Below investment grade		34,883		33,943		7,159		7,904		42,042		41,847
Non-rated		931		936		47		105		978		1,041
Total	$	262,089	$	248,245	$	15,335	$	16,782	$	277,424	$	265,027

144

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Available for Sale Investments

The following table presents the fair value of our available for sale securities:

		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Bonds available for sale:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities	$	2,267	$	1,844
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions		28,777		27,323
Non-U.S. governments		20,092		18,195
Corporate debt		142,161		135,988
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized:
RMBS		37,444		36,227
CMBS		14,974		13,571
CDO/ABS		16,374		15,097
Total mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized		68,792		64,895
Total bonds available for sale^*		262,089		248,245
Equity securities available for sale:
Common stock		1,117		2,401
Preferred stock		23		22
Mutual funds		502		492
Total equity securities available for sale		1,642		2,915
Total	$	263,731	$	251,160

* At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of bonds available for sale held by us that were below investment grade or not rated totaled $35.8 billion and $34.9 billion, respectively.

The following table presents the fair value of our aggregate credit exposures to non-U.S. governments for our fixed maturity securities:

	June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Japan	$	6,058	$	5,416
Canada		1,341		1,453
France		916		784
Germany		886		832
United Kingdom		764		661
Mexico		725		563
Netherlands		613		511
Norway		490		503
Chile		436		386
Singapore		427		426
Other		7,491		6,710
Total	$	20,147	$	18,245

145

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

The following table presents the fair value of our aggregate European credit exposures by major sector for our fixed maturity securities:

	June 30, 2016
						Non-					December 31,
				Financial		Financial		Structured				2015
(in millions)		Sovereign		Institution		Corporates		Products		Total		Total
Euro-Zone countries:
France	$	916	$	1,091	$	2,186	$	-	$	4,193	$	4,018
Germany		886		157		2,229		3		3,275		3,365
Netherlands		613		891		1,488		161		3,153		3,404
Ireland		-		17		577		782		1,376		1,274
Belgium		237		138		878		-		1,253		855
Italy		2		124		873		12		1,011		1,009
Spain		28		52		903		15		998		1,102
Luxembourg		-		11		445		18		474		496
Finland		91		51		120		-		262		229
Austria		97		3		13		-		113		124
Other - EuroZone		856		36		167		3		1,062		929
Total Euro-Zone	$	3,726	$	2,571	$	9,879	$	994	$	17,170	$	16,805
Remainder of Europe
United Kingdom	$	764	$	3,014	$	8,362	$	3,987	$	16,127	$	15,286
Switzerland		47		1,251		1,299		-		2,597		2,519
Sweden		137		430		186		-		753		827
Norway		490		43		108		-		641		688
Russian Federation		50		6		76		-		132		122
Other - Remainder of Europe		320		138		115		-		573		443
Total - Remainder of Europe	$	1,808	$	4,882	$	10,146	$	3,987	$	20,823	$	19,885
Total	$	5,534	$	7,453	$	20,025	$	4,981	$	37,993	$	36,690

Investments in Municipal Bonds

At June 30, 2016, the U.S. municipal bond portfolio was composed primarily of essential service revenue bonds and high-quality tax-backed bonds with over 95 percent of the portfolio rated A or higher.

The following table presents the fair values of our available for sale U.S. municipal bond portfolio by state and municipal bond type:

	June 30, 2016
		State		Local				Total	December 31,
		General		General				Fair		2015
(in millions)		Obligation		Obligation		Revenue		Value		Total Fair Value
State:
New York	$	32	$	638	$	4,154	$	4,824	$	4,613
California		752		628		2,688		4,068		3,841
Texas		342		1,698		1,769		3,809		3,415
Massachusetts		775		2		734		1,511		1,387
Illinois		127		406		922		1,455		1,486

146

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Washington		523		119		706		1,348		1,359
Florida		150		-		1,054		1,204		1,135
Georgia		290		216		396		902		870
Virginia		48		5		848		901		878
Washington DC		193		-		576		769		705
Pennsylvania		277		24		455		756		676
Arizona		-		96		504		600		576
Ohio		98		-		461		559		531
All other states^(a)		1,070		585		4,416		6,071		5,851
Total^(b)(c)	$	4,677	$	4,417	$	19,683	$	28,777	$	27,323

(a) We did not have material credit exposure to the government of Puerto Rico.

(b) Excludes certain university and not-for-profit entities that issue their bonds in the corporate debt market. Includes industrial revenue bonds.

Investments in Corporate Debt Securities

The following table presents the industry categories of our available for sale corporate debt securities:

		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
Industry Category		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Financial institutions:
Money Center /Global Bank Groups	$	9,501	$	9,104
Regional banks — other		665		568
Life insurance		3,312		3,295
Securities firms and other finance companies		367		380
Insurance non-life		5,726		5,421
Regional banks — North America		7,530		6,823
Other financial institutions		8,189		7,808
Utilities		18,557		18,497
Communications		10,900		10,251
Consumer noncyclical		16,547		15,391
Capital goods		9,085		8,973
Energy		14,560		13,861
Consumer cyclical		9,935		9,767
Basic		7,291		7,512
Other		19,996		18,337
Total ^*	$	142,161	$	135,988

* At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately 90 percent and 91 percent, respectively, of these investments were rated investment grade.

Our investments in the energy category, as a percentage of total investments in available for sale fixed maturities, were 5.6 percent at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. While the energy investments are primarily investment grade and are actively managed, the category continues to experience volatility that could adversely affect credit quality and fair value.

147

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Investments in RMBS

The following table presents AIG’s RMBS available for sale investments by year of vintage:

		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Total RMBS
2016	$	1,962	$	-
2015		2,671		2,273
2014		1,205		1,096
2013		2,259		2,178
2012		1,699		1,944
2011 and prior^*		27,648		28,736
Total RMBS	$	37,444	$	36,227
Agency
2016	$	1,223	$	-
2015		2,400		2,025
2014		1,102		1,000
2013		2,173		2,094
2012		1,687		1,877
2011 and prior		4,977		5,555
Total Agency	$	13,562	$	12,551
Alt-A
2016		-		-
2015		-		-
2014		-		-
2013		-		-
2012	$	-	$	-
2011 and prior		12,582		12,831
Total Alt-A	$	12,582	$	12,831
Subprime
2016		-		-
2015		-		-
2014		-		-
2013		-		-
2012		-		-
2011 and prior	$	2,523	$	2,376
Total Subprime	$	2,523	$	2,376
Prime non-agency
2016	$	671	$	-
2015		13		-
2014		3		-
2013		9		8
2012		-		53
2011 and prior		7,228		7,589
Total Prime non-agency	$	7,924	$	7,650
Total Other housing related	$	853	$	819

* Includes approximately $13.0 billion and $13.2 billion at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, of certain RMBS that had experienced deterioration in credit quality since their origination. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on Purchased Credit Impaired (PCI) Securities.

148

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

The following table presents our RMBS available for sale investments by credit rating:

	Fair Value at		Fair Value at
	June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Rating:
Total RMBS
AAA	$	15,977	$	14,884
AA		449		389
A		1,165		509
BBB		607		661
Below investment grade^(a)		19,241		19,779
Non-rated		5		5
Total RMBS^(b)	$	37,444	$	36,227
Agency RMBS
AAA	$	13,558	$	12,547
AA		4		4
Total Agency	$	13,562	$	12,551
Alt-A RMBS
AAA	$	2	$	5
AA		67		17
A		99		121
BBB		251		216
Below investment grade^(a)		12,163		12,472
Total Alt-A	$	12,582	$	12,831
Subprime RMBS
AAA	$	14	$	15
AA		79		68
A		223		247
BBB		121		200
Below investment grade^(a)		2,086		1,846
Total Subprime	$	2,523	$	2,376
Prime non-agency
AAA	$	1,999	$	1,986
AA		181		188
A		840		138
BBB		200		209
Below investment grade^(a)		4,699		5,124
Non-rated		5		5
Total prime non-agency	$	7,924	$	7,650
Total Other housing related	$	853	$	819

(a) Includes certain RMBS that had experienced deterioration in credit quality since their origination. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on PCI Securities.

(b) The weighted average expected life was six years at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Our underwriting practices for investing in RMBS, other asset‑backed securities and CDOs take into consideration the quality of the originator, the manager, the servicer, security credit ratings, underlying characteristics of the mortgages, borrower characteristics, and the level of credit enhancement in the transaction.

149

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Investments in CMBS

The following table presents our CMBS available for sale investments:

Fair Value at

Fair Value at

June 30,

December 31,

(in millions)

2016

2015

CMBS (traditional)

12,459

11,132

Agency

1,674

1,622

Other

841

817

Total

14,974

13,571

The following table presents the fair value of our CMBS available for sale investments by rating agency designation and by vintage year:

										Below
										Investment
(in millions)		AAA		AA		A		BBB		Grade		Non-Rated		Total
June 30, 2016
Year:
2016	$	779	$	158	$	62	$	131	$	-	$	-	$	1,130
2015		1,225		465		517		246		-		-		2,453
2014		1,749		247		11		-		-		-		2,007
2013		2,711		433		98		25		-		-		3,267
2012		764		63		45		81		-		11		964
2011 and prior		1,902		616		702		611		1,322		-		5,153
Total	$	9,130	$	1,982	$	1,435	$	1,094	$	1,322	$	11	$	14,974
December 31, 2015
Year:
2015	$	824	$	404	$	465	$	240	$	-	$	-	$	1,933
2014		1,604		183		11		-		-		-		1,798
2013		2,611		433		89		54		-		-		3,187
2012		737		60		31		83		-		10		921
2011 and prior		1,936		725		666		759		1,646		-		5,732
Total	$	7,712	$	1,805	$	1,262	$	1,136	$	1,646	$	10	$	13,571

150

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

The following table presents our CMBS available for sale investments by geographic region:

		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Geographic region:
New York	$	3,618	$	3,149
California		1,391		1,244
Texas		899		791
Florida		572		520
New Jersey		479		433
Virginia		392		362
Illinois		366		323
Pennsylvania		336		295
Massachusetts		279		231
Georgia		271		253
Maryland		242		229
North Carolina		241		218
All Other^*		5,888		5,523
Total	$	14,974	$	13,571

* Includes Non-U.S. locations.

The following table presents our CMBS available for sale investments by industry:

		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Industry:
Office	$	4,464	$	3,896
Retail		4,265		3,978
Multi-family^*		3,212		3,036
Lodging		1,133		1,005
Industrial		1,038		868
Other		862		788
Total	$	14,974	$	13,571

* Includes Agency-backed CMBS.

The fair value of CMBS holdings remained stable during the second quarter of 2016. The majority of our investments in CMBS are in tranches that contain substantial protection features through collateral subordination. The majority of CMBS holdings are traditional conduit transactions, broadly diversified across property types and geographical areas.

151

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Investments in CDOs

The following table presents our CDO available for sale investments by collateral type:

Fair value at

Fair value at

June 30,

December 31,

(in millions)

2016

2015

Collateral Type:

Bank loans (CLO)

8,174

7,962

Other

137

153

Total

8,311

8,115

The following table presents our CDO available for sale investments by credit rating:

		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
	June 30,			December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Rating:
AAA	$	2,855	$	2,870
AA		2,701		2,543
A		2,334		2,247
BBB		284		298
Below investment grade		137		157
Total	$	8,311	$	8,115

Commercial Mortgage Loans

At June 30, 2016, we had direct commercial mortgage loans exposure of $22.9 billion, of which approximately all of the loans were current.

The following table presents the commercial mortgage loans exposure by location and class of loan based on amortized cost:

	Number															Percent
	of	Class														of
(dollars in millions)	Loans	Apartments			Offices		Retail	Industrial		Hotel			Others		Total	Total
June 30, 2016
State:
New York	97	$	885	$	3,531	$	550	$	215	$	164	$	186	$	5,531	24	%
California	98		87		565		448		368		906		405		2,779	12
Texas	60		192		692		101		144		187		47		1,363	6
New Jersey	43		452		144		329		-		29		33		987	4
Florida	68		237		95		346		108		19		129		934	4
Massachusetts	18		127		116		363		-		-		28		634	3
Connecticut	19		328		146		23		80		-		-		577	3
Pennsylvania	24		-		28		464		52		27		-		571	2
Illinois	17		148		290		20		54		36		23		571	2
Ohio	33		124		17		208		54		-		5		408	2
Other states	284		1,255		1,237		1,523		376		574		212		5,177	23
Foreign	56		510		1,033		639		262		534		394		3,372	15
Total^*	817	$	4,345	$	7,894	$	5,014	$	1,713	$	2,476	$	1,462	$	22,904	100	%

152

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

December 31, 2015
State:
New York	97	$	823	$	2,968	$	516	$	301	$	166	$	186	$	4,960	22	%
California	95		87		547		433		533		788		308		2,696	12
Texas	60		120		696		106		147		187		48		1,304	6
New Jersey	45		441		338		324		-		29		33		1,165	5
Florida	78		187		113		374		116		20		146		956	4
Illinois	21		174		369		21		32		36		23		655	3
Massachusetts	19		56		168		360		-		-		33		617	3
Connecticut	20		314		152		23		81		-		-		570	3
Pennsylvania	28		6		29		436		62		27		4		564	3
Ohio	37		122		28		211		67		-		5		433	2
Other states	302		1,118		1,203		1,514		414		595		229		5,073	23
Foreign	47		471		1,234		520		161		250		438		3,074	14
Total^*	849	$	3,919	$	7,845	$	4,838	$	1,914	$	2,098	$	1,453	$	22,067	100	%

* Does not reflect allowance for credit losses.

See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for additional discussion on commercial mortgage loans.

Impairments

The following table presents impairments by investment type:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Other-than-temporary Impairments:
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale	$	92	$	73	$	292	$	163
Equity securities, available for sale		2		79		4		86
Private equity funds and hedge funds		14		12		16		43
Subtotal		108		164		312		292
Other impairments:
Investments in life settlements		92		72		249		142
Other investments		26		25		27		47
Real estate		3		2		4		5
Total	$	229	$	263	$	592	$	486

153

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

To determine other-than-temporary impairments, we use fundamental credit analyses of individual securities without regard to rating agency ratings. Based on this analysis, we expect to receive cash flows sufficient to cover the amortized cost of all below investment grade securities for which credit impairments were not recognized.

The following tables present other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded in earnings on fixed maturity securities, equity securities, private equity funds and hedge funds.

Other-than-temporary impairment charges by reportable segment and impairment type:

		Non-Life		Life		Corporate
		Insurance		Insurance		and Other
(in millions)		Companies		Companies		Operations		Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	3	$	-	$	-	$	3
Change in intent		-		4		-		4
Foreign currency declines		1		-		-		1
Issuer-specific credit events		27		66		2		95
Adverse projected cash flows		-		5		-		5
Total	$	31	$	75	$	2	$	108
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Change in intent		-		9		79		88
Foreign currency declines		2		1		-		3
Issuer-specific credit events		27		43		-		70
Adverse projected cash flows		1		2		-		3
Total	$	30	$	55	$	79	$	164
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	5	$	-	$	-	$	5
Change in intent		9		24		-		33
Foreign currency declines		6		1		-		7
Issuer-specific credit events		60		164		2		226
Adverse projected cash flows		13		28		-		41
Total	$	93	$	217	$	2	$	312
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	2	$	-	$	-	$	2
Change in intent		2		31		79		112
Foreign currency declines		14		18		-		32
Issuer-specific credit events		54		84		-		138
Adverse projected cash flows		3		5		-		8
Total	$	75	$	138	$	79	$	292

154

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Other-than-temporary impairment charges by investment type and impairment type:

							Other Fixed		Equities/Other
(in millions)	RMBS		CDO/ABS		CMBS		Maturity		Invested Assets^*			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	3	$	3
Change in intent		-		-		-		4		-		4
Foreign currency declines		-		-		-		1		-		1
Issuer-specific credit events		24		-		4		54		13		95
Adverse projected cash flows		5		-		-		-		-		5
Total	$	29	$	-	$	4	$	59	$	16	$	108
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Change in intent		3		-		-		7		78		88
Foreign currency declines		-		-		-		3		-		3
Issuer-specific credit events		32		2		-		23		13		70
Adverse projected cash flows		3		-		-		-		-		3
Total	$	38	$	2	$	-	$	33	$	91	$	164
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	5	$	5
Change in intent		-		-		-		33		-		33
Foreign currency declines		-		-		-		7		-		7
Issuer-specific credit events		60		1		12		138		15		226
Adverse projected cash flows		41		-		-		-		-		41
Total	$	101	$	1	$	12	$	178	$	20	$	312
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Impairment Type:
Severity	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2	$	2
Change in intent		3		-		-		31		78		112
Foreign currency declines		-		-		-		32		-		32
Issuer-specific credit events		53		2		3		31		49		138
Adverse projected cash flows		8		-		-		-		-		8
Total	$	64	$	2	$	3	$	94	$	129	$	292

* Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges on private equity funds, hedge funds and direct private equity investments.

155

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

Other-than-temporary impairment charges by investment type and credit rating:

							Other Fixed		Equities/Other
(in millions)	RMBS		CDO/ABS		CMBS		Maturity		Invested Assets^*			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Rating:
AAA	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
AA		-		-		-		-		-		-
A		-		-		-		-		-		-
BBB		3		-		-		-		-		3
Below investment grade		26		-		4		59		-		89
Non-rated		-		-		-		-		16		16
Total	$	29	$	-	$	4	$	59	$	16	$	108
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Rating:
AAA	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
AA		-		-		-		-		-		-
A		1		-		-		-		-		1
BBB		1		-		-		8		-		9
Below investment grade		36		2		-		24		-		62
Non-rated		-		-		-		1		91		92
Total	$	38	$	2	$	-	$	33	$	91	$	164
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Rating:
AAA	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2	$	-	$	2
AA		-		-		-		3		-		3
A		-		-		-		5		-		5
BBB		5		-		-		15		-		20
Below investment grade		96		1		12		153		-		262
Non-rated		-		-		-		-		20		20
Total	$	101	$	1	$	12	$	178	$	20	$	312
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Rating:
AAA	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	4	$	-	$	4
AA		-		-		-		6		-		6
A		1		-		-		6		-		7
BBB		1		-		-		20		-		21
Below investment grade		62		2		3		54		-		121
Non-rated		-		-		-		4		129		133
Total	$	64	$	2	$	3	$	94	$	129	$	292

* Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges on private equity funds, hedge funds and direct private equity investments.

We recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 related to:

• issuer-specific credit events;

• securities that we intend to sell or for which it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell;

• declines due to foreign exchange rates;

• adverse changes in estimated cash flows on certain structured securities; and

• securities that experienced severe market valuation declines.

In addition, impairments are recorded on real estate and investments in life settlements.

156

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

In periods subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment charge for available for sale fixed maturity securities that is not foreign-exchange related, we generally prospectively accrete into earnings the difference between the new amortized cost and the expected undiscounted recoverable value over the remaining life of the security. The accretion that was recognized for these securities in earnings was $219 million and $180 million in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $458 million and $368 million in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for a discussion of our other-than-temporary impairment accounting policy.

The following table shows the aging of the pre-tax unrealized losses of fixed maturity and equity securities, the extent to which the fair value is less than amortized cost or cost, and the number of respective items in each category:

June 30, 2016		Less Than or Equal					Greater Than 20%					Greater Than 50%
		to 20% of Cost^(b)					to 50% of Cost^(b)					of Cost^(b)					Total
Aging^(a)			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(dollars in millions)		Cost^(c)		Loss	Items^(e)		Cost^(c)		Loss	Items^(e)		Cost^(c)		Loss	Items^(e)		Cost^(c)		Loss^(d)	Items^(e)
Investment grade
bonds
0-6 months	$	7,985	$	123	1,249	$	-	$	-	-	$	-	$	-	-	$	7,985	$	123	1,249
7-11 months		4,431		120	589		31		7	3		9		6	3		4,471		133	595
12 months or more		11,720		538	1,737		286		68	37		16		10	4		12,022		616	1,778
Total	$	24,136	$	781	3,575	$	317	$	75	40	$	25	$	16	7	$	24,478	$	872	3,622
Below investment
grade bonds
0-6 months	$	4,805	$	123	1,462	$	78	$	23	16	$	1	$	1	2	$	4,884	$	147	1,480
7-11 months		2,305		100	669		260		80	27		10		5	4		2,575		185	700
12 months or more		7,291		530	1,197		567		164	131		147		87	23		8,005		781	1,351
Total	$	14,401	$	753	3,328	$	905	$	267	174	$	158	$	93	29	$	15,464	$	1,113	3,531
Total bonds
0-6 months	$	12,790	$	246	2,711	$	78	$	23	16	$	1	$	1	2	$	12,869	$	270	2,729
7-11 months		6,736		220	1,258		291		87	30		19		11	7		7,046		318	1,295
12 months or more		19,011		1,068	2,934		853		232	168		163		97	27		20,027		1,397	3,129
Total^(e)	$	38,537	$	1,534	6,903	$	1,222	$	342	214	$	183	$	109	36	$	39,942	$	1,985	7,153
Equity securities
0-11 months	$	155	$	8	120	$	10	$	2	16	$	-	$	-	-	$	165	$	10	136
12 months or more		1		-	3		2		1	1		-		-	-		3		1	4
Total	$	156	$	8	123	$	12	$	3	17	$	-	$	-	-	$	168	$	11	140

(a) Represents the number of consecutive months that fair value has been less than cost by any amount.

(b) Represents the percentage by which fair value is less than cost at June 30, 2016.

(d) The effect on Net income of unrealized losses after taxes will be mitigated upon realization because certain realized losses will result in current decreases in the amortization of certain DAC.

(e) Item count is by CUSIP by subsidiary.

Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments

The change in net unrealized gains and losses on investments in the second quarter of 2016 was primarily attributable to increases in the fair value of fixed maturity securities. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, net unrealized gains related to fixed maturity and equity securities increased by $9.2 billion due to a decrease in interest rates and narrowing of credit spreads.

The change in net unrealized gains and losses on investments in the second quarter of 2015 was primarily attributable to decreases in the fair value of fixed maturity securities. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, net unrealized gains

157

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

related to fixed maturity and equity securities decreased by $4.5 billion due to an increase in interest rates and widening of credit spreads.

See also Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our investment portfolio.

Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses

The following table presents the components of Net realized capital gains (losses):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Sales of fixed maturity securities	$	124	$	135	$	(238)	$	166
Sales of equity securities		974		21		998		512
Other-than-temporary impairments:
Severity		(3)		-		(5)		(2)
Change in intent		(4)		(88)		(33)		(112)
Foreign currency declines		(1)		(3)		(7)		(32)
Issuer-specific credit events		(95)		(70)		(226)		(138)
Adverse projected cash flows		(5)		(3)		(41)		(8)
Provision for loan losses		(30)		(13)		-		11
Foreign exchange transactions		(38)		66		(558)		320
Derivatives and hedge accounting		170		288		97		496
Impairments on investments in life settlements		(92)		(72)		(249)		(142)
Other^*		42		(135)		198		396
Net realized capital gains (losses)	$	1,042	$	126	$	(64)	$	1,467

Net realized capital gains on investments in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 were primarily driven by gains on the sale of a portion of our PICC Investment. Net realized capital losses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 were primarily related to foreign exchange losses and impairments, which were slightly higher than the gain recognized on the sale of a portion of our PICC Investment. Foreign exchange gains (losses) were primarily due to $105 million of remeasurement gains and $378 million of remeasurement losses in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, for a short term intercompany balance that was matched with available for sale investments in fixed maturity securities denominated in the same foreign currencies. Unrealized gains and losses on the available for sale investments were recorded in other comprehensive income resulting in an immaterial impact on our overall equity or book value per share from this arrangement.

The short-term intercompany liability and related available for sale securities described above relate to subsidiaries that are recognized on a reporting period that is different from our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements consistent with our accounting policy. Therefore, our results of operations through June 30, 2016 do not include effects of the foreign currency fluctuations for the month ended June 30, 2016 on the intercompany arrangement and related available for sale securities. As a result of the recent Brexit vote and its impact on foreign currency rates, we estimate that the foreign currency remeasurement loss on the intercompany liability through June 2016 amounted to approximately $460 million. Any remeasurement will be reported in Net realized capital gains (losses) for the third quarter of 2016. Such amount is predominantly economically offset by unrealized foreign currency other comprehensive income on available for sale securities. As a result, the impact of recent foreign currency fluctuations on such arrangement has resulted in an immaterial impact on our overall equity or book value per share.

Net realized capital gains in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 were primarily driven by gains on sales of our PICC Investment, Class B shares of Prudential Financial, Inc., and common shares of Springleaf Holdings, Inc. and foreign exchange gains, which included $34 million and $155 million of gains in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,

158

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INVESTMENTS

2015, respectively, related to the intercompany notional cash pooling arrangement, discussed above. These realized gains were partially offset by realized losses related to the sale of ordinary shares of AerCap.

See also Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our investment portfolio.

Insurance Reserves

The following section provides discussion of insurance reserves for both the Non-Life Insurance Companies and the Life Insurance Companies, including Eaglestone Reinsurance Company, which is reported in Corporate and Other.

Non-Life Insurance Companies

The following section provides discussion of the consolidated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for the Non-Life Insurance Companies.

The following table presents the components of AIG’s gross loss reserves by major lines of business on a U.S. statutory basis^*:

	June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Other liability occurrence (including asbestos and environmental)	$	24,057	$	24,856
Workers' compensation (net of discount)		15,348		14,978
Other liability claims made		13,132		14,006
Property		6,235		5,823
Auto liability		5,013		4,692
Accident and health		1,873		1,783
Products liability		1,644		1,681
Medical malpractice		1,495		1,603
Aircraft		1,283		1,286
Mortgage guaranty / credit		643		733
Other		3,420		3,501
Total	$	74,143	$	74,942
Total U.S. & Canada	$	57,504	$	58,890
Total International	$	16,639	$	16,052

* Presented by lines of business pursuant to statutory reporting requirements as prescribed by the NAIC.

Gross loss reserves represent the accumulation of estimates of ultimate losses, including estimates for IBNR and loss expenses, less estimated salvage and subrogation and applicable discount. The Non-Life Insurance Companies regularly review and update the methods and assumptions used to determine loss reserve estimates and to establish the resulting reserves. Any adjustments resulting from this review are reflected in pre‑tax operating income. Because loss reserve estimates are subject to the outcome of future events, changes in estimates are unavoidable given that loss trends vary and time is often required for changes in trends to be recognized and confirmed. Reserve changes that increase prior years’ estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as unfavorable or adverse development or reserve strengthening. Reserve changes that decrease prior years’ estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as favorable development. See MD&A – Critical Accounting Estimates – Details of the Loss Reserving Process in the 2015 Annual Report.

Net loss reserves represent gross loss reserves reduced by reinsurance recoverable, net of an allowance for unrecoverable reinsurance.

159

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

The following table presents the components of net loss reserves:

	June 30,			December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Gross loss reserves before reinsurance and discount	$	77,000	$	78,090
Less: discount		(2,857)		(3,148)
Gross loss reserves, net of discount, before reinsurance		74,143		74,942
Less: reinsurance recoverable^*		(14,520)		(14,339)
Net liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	59,623	$	60,603

* Includes $1.8 billion of reinsurance recoverable under a retroactive reinsurance agreement at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Gross loss reserves before reinsurance and discount are net of contractual deductible recoverable amounts due from policyholders of approximately $13.1 billion and $12.6 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These recoverable amounts are related to certain policies with high deductibles (meaning, the policy attachment point is above high dollar amounts retained by the insured through self-insured retentions, deductibles, retrospective programs, or captive arrangements; each referred here generically as “deductibles”), primarily for U.S. commercial casualty business. With respect to the deductible portion of the claim the Non-Life Insurance Companies manage and pay the entire claim on behalf of the insured and are reimbursed by the insured for the deductible portion of the claim. The Non-Life Insurance Companies held collateral of approximately $9.6 billion at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for these deductible recoverable amounts, consisting primarily of letters of credit and assets in trusts.

The following table classifies the components of net loss reserves by business unit:

	June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Commercial Property Casualty:
Casualty	$	30,662	$	32,620
Financial lines		9,273		9,265
Specialty		4,781		5,197
Property		4,152		4,013
Total Commercial Property Casualty		48,868		51,095
Commercial Mortgage Guaranty		625		713
Consumer Personal Insurance:
Personal lines		2,856		2,661
Accident and health		1,730		1,662
Total Consumer Personal Insurance		4,586		4,323
Other run-off insurance lines^*		5,544		4,472
Net liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	59,623	$	60,603

* In the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 and in the full year 2015, $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of loss reserves for certain environmental liability, casualty, healthcare, and specialty coverages, previously reported in Commercial Casualty and Specialty lines of business, were transferred to Other run-off insurance lines.

160

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Discounting of Reserves

The following table presents the components of loss reserve discount included above:

	June 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
				Run-off						Run-off
		Property		Insurance				Property		Insurance
(in millions)		Casualty		Lines		Total		Casualty		Lines		Total
U.S. workers' compensation:
Tabular	$	635	$	218	$	853	$	635	$	218	$	853
Non-tabular		1,377		622		1,999		1,542		746		2,288
Asbestos		-		5		5		-		7		7
Total reserve discount	$	2,012	$	845	$	2,857	$	2,177	$	971	$	3,148

The following table presents the net reserve discount benefit (charge):

	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016						2015						2016						2015
				Run-off						Run-off						Run-off						Run-off
		Property		Insurance				Property		Insurance				Property		Insurance				Property		Insurance
(in millions)		Casualty		Lines		Total		Casualty		Lines		Total		Casualty		Lines		Total		Casualty		Lines		Total
Current accident year	$	33	$	-	$	33	$	58	$	-	$	58	$	81	$	-	$	81	$	104	$	-	$	104
Accretion and other
adjustments to prior
year discount		(47)		(16)		(63)		(42)		(19)		(61)		(61)		(30)		(91)		(109)		(43)		(152)
Effect of interest rate
changes		(177)		(93)		(270)		254		149		403		(185)		(96)		(281)		182		101		283
Net reserve discount
benefit (charge)	$	(191)	$	(109)	$	(300)	$	270	$	130	$	400	$	(165)	$	(126)	$	(291)	$	177	$	58	$	235
Comprised of:
U.S. Workers'
compensation	$	(191)	$	(108)	$	(299)	$	270	$	131	$	401	$	(165)	$	(124)	$	(289)	$	177	$	60	$	237
Asbestos	$	-	$	(1)	$	(1)	$	-	$	(1)	$	(1)	$	-	$	(2)	$	(2)	$	-	$	(2)	$	(2)

U.S. Workers’ Compensation

The Non-Life Insurance Companies discount certain workers’ compensation reserves in accordance with practices prescribed or permitted by New York, Pennsylvania and Delaware. New York rules generally do not permit non-tabular discounting on IBNR and prescribe a fixed 5 percent discount rate for application to case reserves. Pennsylvania permits non-tabular discounting of IBNR and approved variable discount rates determined using risk-free rates based on the U.S. Treasury forward yield curve plus a liquidity margin, applicable to IBNR and case reserves. Delaware has permitted discounting on the same basis as the Pennsylvania domiciled companies.

The net decreases in workers’ compensation discount in the amounts of $299 million and $289 million, respectively, in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods were primarily due to the decrease in forward yield curve rates used for discounting under the prescribed or permitted practices. The decrease in the forward yield curve component of the discount rates resulted in a $270 million and $281 million decrease in the loss reserve discount in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods, due to a decrease in both Treasury rates and credit spreads which generally decreased along the payout pattern horizon. In addition, there was a $62 million and $89 million reduction for accident years 2015 and prior for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, primarily from accretion of discount on reserves for those periods. This decrease was partially offset by a $33 million and $81 million addition for newly established reserves for accident year 2016 in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The impact of changes in treasury rates and credit spreads on workers' compensation reserve discount generally is economically offset by unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities backing these reserves

161

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

recorded in Other comprehensive income resulting in a modest impact on our overall equity and book value per common share.

Quarterly Reserving Conclusion

AIG net loss reserves represent our best estimate of the liability for net losses and loss adjustment expenses as of June 30, 2016. While we regularly review the adequacy of established loss reserves, there can be no assurance that our recorded loss reserves will not develop adversely in future years and materially exceed our loss reserves as of June 30, 2016. In our opinion, such adverse development and resulting increase in reserves are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, although such events could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for an individual reporting period.

The following table presents the rollforward of net loss reserves:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Net liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at beginning of period	$	59,734	$	60,143	$	60,603	$	61,612
Foreign exchange effect		360		(162)		200		(966)
Change due to retroactive asbestos reinsurance		-		50		-		100
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred:
Current year, undiscounted		5,023		5,185		9,935		10,138
Prior years (favorable) unfavorable development, undiscounted^*		7		317		(59)		341
Change in discount		300		(400)		291		(235)
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		5,330		5,102		10,167		10,244
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid		5,801		6,040		11,347		11,897
Net liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at end of period	$	59,623	$	59,093	$	59,623	$	59,093

* See tables below for details of prior year development by business unit, accident year and major class of business.

The following table summarizes development, (favorable) or unfavorable, of incurred losses and loss expenses for prior years, net of reinsurance, by business unit and major class of business:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Prior accident year development by major class of business:
Commercial Property Casualty - U.S. & Canada:
Excess casualty	$	-	$	211	$	-	$	318
Financial lines including professional liability		-		(2)		-		3
Primary casualty:		-
Loss-sensitive (offset by premium adjustments below)^*		(22)		(12)		(28)		(23)
Primary workers' compensation and other		98		103		98		118
Specialty		-		32		-		46
Property excluding catastrophes		(42)		(51)		(54)		(109)
Catastrophes		45		(9)		125		(41)
All other, net		3		18		2		44
Total Commercial Property Casualty - U.S. & Canada		82		290		143		356

162

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Commercial Property Casualty - International:
Financial lines		-		(25)		-		(27)
Specialty		(18)		(7)		(44)		(17)
Property excluding catastrophes		(16)		-		(66)		(35)
Catastrophes		(10)		-		(9)		(1)
All other, net		(2)		9		(4)		8
Total Commercial Property Casualty - International		(46)		(23)		(123)		(72)
Total Commercial Property Casualty		36		267		20		284
Commercial Mortgage Guaranty		(12)		(17)		(17)		(17)
Consumer Personal Insurance - U.S. & Canada:
Catastrophes		2		(1)		(5)		(5)
All other, net		(15)		(23)		(13)		(37)
Total Consumer Personal Insurance - U.S. & Canada		(13)		(24)		(18)		(42)
Consumer Personal Insurance - International:
Catastrophes		1		-		2		-
All other, net		(27)		7		(71)		29
Total Consumer Personal Insurance - International		(26)		7		(69)		29
Total Consumer Personal Insurance		(39)		(17)		(87)		(13)
Run-off Insurance Lines
Asbestos and environmental (1986 and prior)		-		46		-		49
Run-off environmental		-		37		-		37
All other, net		22		1		25		1
Total Run-off Insurance Lines		22		84		25		87
Total prior year (favorable) unfavorable development	$	7	$	317	$	(59)	$	341

Premium adjustments on primary casualty loss sensitive business		22		12		28		23
Total prior year development, net of premium adjustments	$	29	$	329	$	(31)	$	364

* Represents prior year development on active retrospectively rated components of risk-sharing policies.

Quarterly and Year-to-Date Net Loss Development

Net Loss Development

In determining the loss development from prior accident years, we consider and evaluate inputs from many sources, including actual claims data, the performance of prior reserve estimates, observed industry trends, our internal peer review processes (including challenges and recommendations from our Enterprise Risk Management group) as well as the views of third party actuarial firms. We use these sources to improve our evaluation techniques and to analyze and assess the change in estimated ultimate loss for each accident year by class of business. Our analyses produce a range of indications from various methods, from which we select our best estimate.

We analyze and evaluate the change in estimated ultimate loss for each accident year by class of business. For example, if loss emergence for a class of business is different than expected for certain accident years, we examine the indicated effect such emergence would have on the reserves of that class of business. In some cases, the lower or higher than expected emergence may result in no clear change in the ultimate loss estimate for the accident years in question, and no adjustment would be made to the reserves for the class of business. In other cases, the lower or higher than expected emergence may result in a change, either favorable or unfavorable. As appropriate, we make adjustments in response to the difference between the actual and expected loss emergence for each accident year. As part of our reserving process, we also consider notices of claims received with respect to emerging and/or evolving issues, in particular those related to complex, claims-related class action litigation and latent exposure claims.

In the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, the adverse prior year loss reserve development was $7 million, which was primarily driven by adverse development from Primary Workers’ compensation and other and domestic catastrophes, partially

163

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

offset by Property excluding catastrophes, both domestically and internationally, International Specialty lines, and International Consumer – Personal Insurance.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Florida Supreme Court issued two separate rulings that have increased the potential liability for workers’ compensation claims in that state by undoing certain aspects of regulations in place since 2003. The Castellanos ruling eliminated statutory caps on claimant attorney fees in certain cases, and the Westphal ruling eliminated the 104-week limitation on temporary total disability benefits. Also in the second quarter, the Florida Court of Appeals issued the Miles decision, declaring unconstitutional certain restrictions on claimant-paid attorney fees.

We have evaluated the potential impact of these decisions on our loss reserves, and have recognized adverse prior year development for primary workers’ compensation in the current quarter of approximately $100 million. We are continuing to monitor the impact of these decisions, and may adjust our estimate as new facts and data emerge.

In the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the favorable prior year loss reserve development was $59 million, which was primarily driven by favorable development from Property excluding catastrophes, both domestically and internationally, International Specialty lines, and International Consumer - Personal Insurance, partially offset by domestic catastrophes, as well as Primary Workers’ compensation and other resulting from the Florida court rulings described above.

In the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, the adverse prior year loss reserve development was $317 million and $341 million, respectively, which was driven by increased automobile claim severity in Excess and Primary Casualty, as well as adverse development from Asbestos and Environmental (1986 and prior), and Run-off Environmental (1987 to 2004). This was partially offset by Property excluding catastrophes, both domestically and internationally.

We recognized return premiums on loss sensitive business of $22 million and $28 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, which entirely offset favorable development in that business. We recognized return premiums on loss sensitive business of $12 million and $23 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, respectively, which entirely offset favorable development in that business.

See Results of Operations — Commercial Insurance and Results of Operations — Consumer Personal Insurance Results herein for further discussion of net loss development.

The following table summarizes development, (favorable) or unfavorable, of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses for prior years, net of reinsurance, by accident year:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Prior accident year development by accident year:
Accident Year
2015	$	(67)	$	-	$	(132)	$	-
2014		(25)		40		(68)		(22)
2013		(19)		70		(26)		65
2012		51		119		69		152
2011		(10)		16		16		22
2010		7		(3)		3		2
2009		19		(20)		24		(30)
2008		35		23		39		13
2007		7		(58)		7		(47)
2006		1		(3)		2		(8)
2005		16		(1)		22		(2)
2004 and prior (see table below)		(8)		134		(15)		196
Total prior year (favorable) unfavorable development	$	7	$	317	$	(59)	$	341

164

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

The following table summarizes development, (favorable) or unfavorable, of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses for accident year 2004 and prior by major class of business and driver of development:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
2004 and prior accident year development by major class of
business and driver of development:
Excess Casualty - all other	$	-	$	1	$	-	$	1
Primary Casualty - loss sensitive business^(a)		(7)		(3)		(8)		(15)
Primary Casualty - all other^(b)		5		38		5		36
Run-off environmental (1987 to 2004)		-		47		-		47
Asbestos and environmental (1986 and prior)		-		46		-		49
Commutations and arbitrations^(c)		-		(25)		-		(1)
All Other		(6)		30		(12)		79
Total prior year (favorable) unfavorable development	$	(8)	$	134	$	(15)	$	196

(a) Loss sensitive business that is offset by premium adjustments and has no income statement impact. Approximated based on prior accident year development recognized from policy year premium charges.

(b) Includes loss development on excess of deductible exposures in workers’ compensation, general liability and commercial auto.

(c) The effects of commutations are shown separately from the related classes of business, primarily excess workers’ compensation. Commutations are reflected for the years in which they were contractually binding.

Asbestos and Environmental Reserves

Loss Reserve Estimates - Asbestos and Environmental

The estimation of loss reserves relating to asbestos and environmental claims on insurance policies written many years ago is subject to greater uncertainty than other types of claims due to inconsistent court decisions as well as judicial interpretations and legislative actions that in some cases have tended to broaden coverage beyond the original intent of such policies and in others have expanded theories of liability.

As described more fully in the 2015 Annual Report, our reserves relating to asbestos and environmental claims reflect comprehensive ground‑up and top-down analyses performed periodically. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we increased our gross asbestos incurred losses by $3 million due to accretion of discount, while our net asbestos incurred losses increased by $1 million. For the same period, our gross and net environmental incurred losses remained unchanged. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, we increased our gross asbestos incurred losses by $14 million and our net asbestos reserves by $8 million due to minor changes in estimates, accretion of discount, and anticipated uncollectible reinsurance. For the same period, we increased our gross environmental incurred losses by $66 million and our net environmental reserves by $43 million to reflect the results of a top-down analysis of accident years 2004 and prior completed in the six-month ended June 30, 2015.

In addition to the U.S. asbestos and environmental reserve amounts shown in the tables below, the Non-Life Insurance Companies also have asbestos reserves relating to foreign risks written by non‑U.S. entities of $117 million gross and $91 million net as of June 30, 2016. The asbestos reserves relating to non‑U.S. risks written by non‑U.S. entities were $121 million gross and $93 million net as of December 31, 2015.

165

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

The following table provides a summary of reserve activity, including estimates for applicable IBNR, relating to asbestos and environmental claims:

As of or for the Six Months Ended June 30,		2016				2015
(in millions)	Gross			Net		Gross		Net
Asbestos:
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at beginning of year	$	3,595	$	446	$	4,117	$	388
Change in net loss reserves due to retroactive reinsurance		-		-		-		100
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred:
Undiscounted		-		-		9		5
Change in discount		3		1		5		3
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		3		1		14		8
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid		(325)		(122)		(332)		(193)
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at end of period	$	3,273	$	325	$	3,799	$	303
Environmental:
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at beginning of year	$	545	$	276	$	368	$	185
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		-		-		66		43
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid		(13)		(9)		(21)		(17)
Other changes		-		-		-		6
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at end of period	$	532	$	267	$	413	$	217
Combined:
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at beginning of year	$	4,140	$	722	$	4,485	$	573
Change in net loss reserves due to retroactive reinsurance		-		-		-		100
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred:
Undiscounted		-		-		75		48
Change in discount		3		1		5		3
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred		3		1		80		51
Losses and loss adjustment expenses paid		(338)		(131)		(353)		(210)
Other changes		-		-		-		6
Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
at end of period	$	3,805	$	592	$	4,212	$	520

Life Insurance Companies DAC and Reserves

The following section provides discussion of deferred policy acquisition costs and insurance reserves for Life Insurance Companies.

Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefit Features and Hedging Program

Our Retirement Income Solutions and Group Retirement businesses offer variable annuity products with riders that provide guaranteed living benefit features, which include GMWB and GMAB. The liabilities for GMWB and GMAB are accounted for as embedded derivatives measured at fair value. The fair value of the embedded derivatives may fluctuate significantly based on market interest rates, equity prices, credit spreads and market volatility.

In addition to risk-mitigating features in our variable annuity product design, we have an economic hedging program designed to manage market risk from GMWB and GMAB, including exposures to changes in interest rates, equity prices, credit spreads and volatilities. The hedging program utilizes derivative instruments, including but not limited to equity options, futures contracts and interest rate swap and swaption contracts, as well as fixed maturity securities with a fair value election. See

166

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Enterprise Risk Management – Life Insurance Companies Key Insurance Risks – Variable Annuity Risk Management and Hedging Program in the 2015 Annual Report for additional discussion of market risk management related to these product features.

Impact on Quarterly and Year-to-Date Pre-tax Income

Changes in the fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives, and changes in the fair value of related derivative hedging instruments, are recorded in Other realized capital gains (losses). Realized capital gains (losses), as well as net investment income from changes in the fair value of the fixed maturity securities used in the variable annuity hedging program, for which the fair value option has been elected, are excluded from pre-tax operating income of the Retirement operating segment.

The change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives and the change in the value of the hedging portfolio are not expected to be fully offsetting, primarily due to differences between the GAAP valuation of the embedded derivatives and the economic hedge target. The non-performance or “own credit” spread adjustment (NPA), which adjusts the rate used to discount projected benefit cash flows for the GAAP valuation of the embedded derivatives, is excluded from the economic hedge target. When corporate credit spreads widen, the change in the NPA generally reduces the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities, resulting in a gain, and when corporate credit spreads narrow or tighten, the change in the NPA generally increases the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities, resulting in a loss. See Differences in Valuation of Embedded Derivatives and Economic Hedge Target, below.

The following table presents the net increase (decrease) to consolidated pre-tax income from changes in the fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives and related hedges:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives, excluding NPA	$	(467)	$	652	$	(1,380)	$	318
Change in fair value of variable annuity hedging portfolio:
Fixed maturity securities		120		(87)		253		(43)
Interest rate derivative contracts		534		(462)		1,384		(85)
Equity derivative contracts		(163)		(26)		(300)		(137)
Change in fair value of variable annuity hedging portfolio		491		(575)		1,337		(265)
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives, excluding NPA, net of hedging portfolio		24		77		(43)		53
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives due to NPA		(32)		161		123		344
Net impact on pre-tax income	$	(8)	$	238	$	80	$	397

Losses from the increase in the fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivative liabilities, excluding the NPA, were significantly offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedging portfolio in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016. The increase in the liabilities excluding the NPA was primarily due to decreases in market interest rates during the periods. As a result of corporate spreads tightening, the change in the NPA also increased the embedded derivative liabilities and contributed to the small negative net impact on pre-tax income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016. However, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the change in the NPA partially offset the increase in the liabilities, and contributed to the positive impact on pre-tax income, net of hedging.

Increases in market interest rates and the impact of widening credit spreads on the NPA in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 resulted in decreases in the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivative liabilities during those periods, which were offset by hedging to a lesser extent than in the same periods in the current year, resulting in a net positive impact on consolidated pre-tax income in the periods ended June 30, 2015.

The changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives, including the NPA, were significantly offset in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, and offset to a lesser extent in the same periods in the prior years, by the following changes in the fair value of the variable annuity hedging portfolio:

167

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

• Changes in the fair value of fixed maturity securities, for which the fair value option has been elected, are used as a capital-efficient way to economically hedge interest rate and credit spread-related risk. Effective June 30, 2015, we discontinued our U.S. Treasury bond interest rate hedging program and initiated a corporate bond hedging program, which is intended to provide the same capital efficiency as the previous U.S. Treasury bond hedging program. The three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 reflected increases in the fair value of the corporate bond hedging program, due primarily to decreases in market interest rates, which partially offset the interest rate and credit spread-related increases in the embedded derivative liabilities. The three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 reflected decreases in the fair value of the U.S. Treasury bond hedging program due to increases in market interest rates, which partially offset the interest rate-related decreases in the embedded derivative liabilities. The change in the fair value of these bonds is reported in net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

• Changes in the fair value of interest rate derivative contracts, which included swaps, swaptions and futures, resulted in gains in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 due to decreasing market interest rates, compared to losses in the prior year resulting from increasing market interest rates.

• Losses from the change in the fair value of equity derivative contracts, which included futures and options, were relatively higher in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year, due to more favorable equity market returns.

Differences in Valuation of Embedded Derivatives and Economic Hedge Target

The variable annuity hedging program utilizes an economic hedge target, which represents an estimate of the underlying economic drivers of the embedded derivatives. The economic hedge target differs from the GAAP valuation of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives due to the following:

• Rider fees are 100 percent included in the economic hedge target present value calculations; the GAAP valuation reflects those collected fees attributed to the embedded derivative such that the initial value at contract issue equals zero;

• Actuarial assumptions for GAAP are adjusted to remove explicit risk margins, including margins for policyholder behavior and fund basis risk, and use best estimate assumptions for the economic hedge target; and

• NPA is excluded from the discount rates used for the economic hedge target.

The market value of the hedge portfolio compared to the economic hedge target at any point in time may be different and is not expected to be fully offsetting. In addition to the derivatives held in conjunction with the variable annuity hedging program, the Life Insurance Companies have cash and invested assets available to cover future claims payable under these guarantees. The primary sources of difference between the change in the fair value of the hedging portfolio and the economic hedge target include:

• Basis risk due to the variance between expected and actual fund returns, which may be either positive or negative;

• Realized volatility versus implied volatility;

• Actual versus expected changes in the hedge target related to items not subject to hedging, particularly policyholder behavior; and

• Risk exposures that we have elected not to explicitly or fully hedge.

168

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

DAC

The following table summarizes the major components of the changes in Life Insurance Companies DAC, including VOBA:

Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Balance, beginning of year	$	8,467	$	7,258
Acquisition costs deferred		623		596
Amortization expense:
Related to realized capital gains and losses		22		(64)
All other operating amortization		(568)		(476)
Increase (decrease) in DAC due to foreign exchange		(1)		(19)
Change related to unrealized depreciation (appreciation) of investments		(769)		363
Balance, end of period^*	$	7,774	$	7,658

* DAC balance excluding the amount related to unrealized depreciation (appreciation) of investments was $9.1 billion and $8.6 billion at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Estimated Gross Profits for Investment-Oriented Products

Policy acquisition costs and policy issuance costs that are incremental and directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal of existing contracts for investment-oriented products are deferred and amortized, with interest, in relation to the incidence of estimated gross profits to be realized over a period that approximates the estimated lives of the contracts. Estimated gross profits include net investment income and spreads, net realized capital gains and losses, fees, surrender charges, expenses, and mortality gains and losses. If the assumptions used for estimated gross profits change significantly, DAC and related reserves (which may include VOBA, SIA, guaranteed benefit reserves and unearned revenue reserve) are recalculated using the new assumptions, and any resulting adjustment is included in income. Updating such assumptions may result in acceleration of amortization in some products and deceleration of amortization in other products.

DAC and Reserves Related to Unrealized Appreciation of Investments

DAC for universal life and investment-type products (collectively, investment-oriented products) is adjusted at each balance sheet date to reflect the change in DAC as if fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale had been sold at their stated aggregate fair value and the proceeds reinvested at current yields (shadow DAC). Shadow DAC generally moves in the opposite direction of the change in unrealized appreciation of the available for sale securities portfolio, reducing the reported DAC balance when market interest rates decline. In addition, significant unrealized appreciation of investments in a prolonged low interest rate environment may cause additional future policy benefit liabilities to be recorded (shadow loss reserves). Market interest rates decreased in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016. As a result, the Life Insurance Companies’ unrealized appreciation of investments in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 increased by $5.0 billion compared to December 31, 2015, which resulted in an increase in the shadow DAC offset and an increase in shadow loss reserves. Shadow loss reserves increased by $1.5 billion at June 30, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015.

169

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Life Insurance Companies Reserves

The following table presents a rollforward of Life Insurance Companies’ insurance reserves, including separate accounts and mutual fund assets under management, by operating segment:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015		2016		2015
Institutional Markets:
Balance at beginning of period, gross	$	35,815	$	35,120	$	35,823	$	35,080
Premiums and deposits		506		680		810		826
Surrenders and withdrawals		(102)		(227)		(279)		(256)
Death and other contract benefits		(456)		(418)		(837)		(797)
Subtotal		(52)		35		(306)		(227)
Change in fair value of underlying assets and reserve accretion, net of
policy fees		434		299		672		557
Cost of funds		101		102		202		204
Other reserve changes		(101)		(33)		(194)		(91)
Balance at end of period		36,197		35,523		36,197		35,523
Reserves related to unrealized appreciation of investments		1,382		314		1,382		314
Reinsurance ceded		(5)		(5)		(5)		(5)
Total insurance reserves	$	37,574	$	35,832	$	37,574	$	35,832
Retirement:
Balance at beginning of period, gross	$	212,542	$	207,679	$	208,333	$	204,627
Premiums and deposits		6,448		6,083		13,314		11,605
Surrenders and withdrawals		(4,198)		(4,240)		(8,277)		(8,666)
Death and other contract benefits		(1,041)		(1,041)		(2,004)		(1,968)
Subtotal		1,209		802		3,033		971
Change in fair value of underlying assets and reserve accretion, net of
policy fees		2,142		(1,296)		3,736		892
Cost of funds		686		676		1,365		1,349
Other reserve changes		(2)		7		110		29
Balance at end of period		216,577		207,868		216,577		207,868
Reserves related to unrealized appreciation of investments		109		9		109		9
Reinsurance ceded		(358)		(364)		(358)		(364)
Total insurance reserves and mutual fund assets under management	$	216,328	$	207,513	$	216,328	$	207,513

170

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / INSURANCE RESERVES / LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES

Life:
Balance at beginning of period, gross	$	34,393	$	33,482	$	34,170	$	33,536
Premiums and deposits		1,292		1,249		2,528		2,472
Surrenders and withdrawals		(241)		(164)		(468)		(386)
Death and other contract benefits		(231)		(260)		(489)		(507)
Subtotal		820		825		1,571		1,579
Change in fair value of underlying assets and reserve accretion, net of
policy fees		(241)		(186)		(419)		(328)
Cost of funds		121		122		243		246
Other reserve changes		(335)		(610)		(807)		(1,400)
Balance at end of period		34,758		33,633		34,758		33,633
Reserves related to unrealized appreciation of investments		-		7		-		7
Reinsurance ceded		(1,363)		(1,444)		(1,363)		(1,444)
Total insurance reserves	$	33,395	$	32,196	$	33,395	$	32,196
Total Life Insurance Companies:
Balance at beginning of period, gross	$	282,750	$	276,281	$	278,326	$	273,243
Premiums and deposits		8,246		8,012		16,652		14,903
Surrenders and withdrawals		(4,541)		(4,631)		(9,024)		(9,308)
Death and other contract benefits		(1,728)		(1,719)		(3,330)		(3,272)
Subtotal		1,977		1,662		4,298		2,323
Change in fair value of underlying assets and reserve accretion, net of
policy fees		2,335		(1,183)		3,989		1,121
Cost of funds		908		900		1,810		1,799
Other reserve changes		(438)		(636)		(891)		(1,462)
Balance at end of period		287,532		277,024		287,532		277,024
Reserves related to unrealized appreciation of investments		1,491		330		1,491		330
Reinsurance ceded		(1,726)		(1,813)		(1,726)		(1,813)
Total insurance reserves and mutual fund assets under management	$	287,297	$	275,541	$	287,297	$	275,541

Life Insurance Companies’ insurance reserves including separate accounts and mutual fund assets under management were comprised of the following balances:

		June 30,		December 31,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Future policy benefits*	$	44,127	$	41,820
Policyholder contract deposits		132,092		127,704
Other policy funds		1,591		1,503
Separate account liabilities		80,563		79,564
Total insurance reserves		258,373		250,591
Mutual fund assets under management		30,650		27,735
Total insurance reserves and mutual fund assets under management	$	289,023	$	278,326

* Excludes certain intercompany assumed reinsurance.

171

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

Liquidity refers to the ability to generate sufficient cash resources to meet our payment obligations. It is defined as cash and unencumbered assets that can be monetized in a short period of time at a reasonable cost. We manage our liquidity prudently through various risk committees, policies and procedures, and a stress testing and liquidity risk framework established by Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Our liquidity risk framework is designed to manage liquidity at both AIG Parent and subsidiaries to meet our financial obligations over a twelve-month period under a liquidity stress scenario. See Enterprise Risk Management — Risk Appetite, Limits, Identification, and Measurement in the 2015 Annual Report and Enterprise Risk Management — Liquidity Risk Management below for additional information.

Capital refers to the long-term financial resources available to support the operation of our businesses, fund business growth, and cover financial and operational needs that arise from adverse circumstances. Our primary source of ongoing capital generation is the profitability of our insurance subsidiaries. We must comply with numerous constraints on our minimum capital positions. These constraints drive the requirements for capital adequacy for both AIG and the individual businesses and are based on internally-defined risk tolerances, regulatory requirements, rating agency and creditor expectations and business needs. Actual capital levels are monitored on a regular basis, and using ERM’s stress testing methodology, we evaluate the capital impact of potential macroeconomic, financial and insurance stresses in relation to the relevant capital constraints of both AIG and our insurance subsidiaries.

We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to satisfy future requirements and meet our obligations to policyholders, customers, creditors and debt-holders, including those arising from reasonably foreseeable contingencies or events.

Nevertheless, some circumstances may cause our cash or capital needs to exceed projected liquidity or readily deployable capital resources as was the case in 2008. Additional collateral calls, deterioration in investment portfolios or reserve strengthening affecting statutory surplus, higher surrenders of annuities and other policies, downgrades in credit ratings, or catastrophic losses may result in significant additional cash or capital needs and loss of sources of liquidity and capital. In addition, regulatory and other legal restrictions could limit our ability to transfer funds freely, either to or from our subsidiaries.

Depending on market conditions, regulatory and rating agency considerations and other factors, we may take various liability and capital management actions. Liability management actions may include, but are not limited to, repurchasing or redeeming outstanding debt, issuing new debt or engaging in debt exchange offers. Capital management actions may include, but are not limited to, paying dividends to our shareholders and share repurchases.

172

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity and Capital Resources Activity for the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2016

Sources

• AIG Parent Funding from Subsidiaries

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, AIG Parent received $2.9 billion in dividends and loan repayments from subsidiaries. Of this amount, $1.5 billion was dividends in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our Non-Life Insurance Companies and $1.4 billion was dividends and loan repayments in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our Life Insurance Companies.

AIG Parent also received $1.6 billion in tax sharing payments in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities from our insurance businesses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, including $1.1 billion of such payments in the second quarter of 2016. The tax sharing payments may be subject to adjustment in future periods.

The dividends and tax sharing payments from our Non-Life and Life Insurance Companies were funded, in part, by proceeds from the sale of 740 million ordinary H shares of PICC P&C for approximately $1.25 billion in May 2016 and by the sale of AIG Advisor Group in May 2016.

· Debt Issuances

In February 2016, we issued $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.300% Notes due 2021.

In March 2016, we issued $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.900% Notes due 2026.

In June 2016, we issued €750 million aggregate principal amount of 1.500% Notes due 2023.

· Legacy Assets

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we monetized approximately $2.2 billion of legacy assets.

Uses

• Debt Reduction

In March 2016, we repurchased, through a cash tender offer, approximately $736 million aggregate principal amount of certain notes and debentures issued or guaranteed by AIG for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $825 million.

We also made other repurchases and repayments of approximately $2.2 billion during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016. AIG Parent made interest payments on our debt instruments totaling $515 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016.

• Dividend

We paid a cash dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock during each of the first and second quarters of 2016.

• Repurchase of Common Stock^(*)

We repurchased approximately 113 million shares of AIG Common Stock during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6.2 billion.

• Repurchase of Warrants

We repurchased 15 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, for an aggregate purchase price of $263 million.

• AIG Parent Funding to Subsidiaries

In January 2016, AIG Parent made a capital contribution of approximately $2.9 billion to our Non-Life Insurance Companies.

* Pursuant to an Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan, from July 1 to August 2, 2016, we have repurchased approximately $698 million of additional shares of AIG Common Stock. As of August 2, 2016, approximately $4.0 billion remained under our share repurchase authorization.

173

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Analysis of Sources and Uses of Cash

The following table presents selected data from AIG's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Sources:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	571	$	493
Net cash provided by changes in restricted cash		-		1,462
Net cash provided by (used in) other investing activities		(186)		3,824
Changes in policyholder contract balances		2,752		316
Issuance of long-term debt		6,688		2,774
Total sources		9,825		8,869
Uses:
Change in restricted cash		(78)		-
Repayments of long-term debt		(2,919)		(3,701)
Purchases of AIG Common Stock		(6,248)		(3,743)
Net cash used in other financing activities		(463)		(1,212)
Total uses		(9,708)		(8,656)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		38		(34)
Increase in cash	$	155	$	179

The following table presents a summary of AIG’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2016		2015
Summary:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	571	$	493
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(264)		5,286
Net cash used in financing activities		(190)		(5,566)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		38		(34)
Increase in cash		155		179
Cash at beginning of year		1,629		1,758
Change in cash of businesses held-for-sale		-		-
Cash at end of period	$	1,784	$	1,937

Operating Cash Flow Activities

Insurance companies generally receive most premiums in advance of the payment of claims or policy benefits. The ability of insurance companies to generate positive cash flow is affected by the frequency and severity of losses under their insurance policies, policy retention rates and operating expenses.

Interest payments totaled $650 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to $760 million in the same period in the prior year. Excluding interest payments, AIG generated positive operating cash flow of $1.2 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 compared to $1.3 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, primarily attributable to a greater increase in Other assets and Other liabilities, net.

174

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Investing Cash Flow Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 included approximately $143 million and $204 million, respectively, of cash collateral received in connection with our Life Insurance Companies’ securities lending program. In addition, the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 included approximately $3.7 billion of net cash proceeds from the sale of ordinary shares of AerCap.

Financing Cash Flow Activities

Net cash used in financing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 included:

• approximately $713 million in the aggregate to pay a dividend of $0.32 per share on AIG Common Stock in each of the first and second quarters of 2016;

• approximately $6.2 billion to repurchase approximately 113 million shares of AIG Common Stock;

• $263 million to repurchase 15 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock; and

• approximately $2.9 billion to repay long-term debt.

Net cash used in financing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 included:

• approximately $335 million in the aggregate to pay a dividend of $0.125 per share on AIG Common Stock in each of the first and second quarters of 2015;

· approximately $3.7 billion to repurchase approximately 69 million shares of AIG Common Stock; and

· approximately $3.7 billion to repay long-term debt.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of AIG Parent and Subsidiaries

AIG Parent

As of June 30, 2016, AIG Parent had approximately $11.2 billion in liquidity sources. AIG Parent’s liquidity sources are primarily held in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities. Fixed maturity securities primarily include U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities. AIG Parent actively manages its assets and liabilities in terms of products, counterparties and duration. Based upon an assessment of funding needs, the liquidity sources can be readily monetized through sales, repurchase agreements or contributed as admitted assets to regulated insurance companies. AIG Parent liquidity is monitored through the use of various internal liquidity risk measures. AIG Parent’s primary sources of liquidity are dividends, distributions, loans and other payments from subsidiaries and credit facilities. AIG Parent’s primary uses of liquidity are for debt service, capital and liability management, operating expenses and subsidiary capital needs.

We generally manage capital flows between AIG Parent and its subsidiaries through internal, Board-approved policies and standards. In addition, AIG Parent has unconditional capital maintenance agreements (CMAs) in place with certain subsidiaries. Nevertheless, regulatory and other legal restrictions could limit our ability to transfer capital freely, either to or from our subsidiaries.

We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to satisfy our reasonably foreseeable future requirements and meet our obligations to our creditors, debt-holders and insurance company subsidiaries. We expect to access the debt markets from time to time to meet funding requirements as needed.

175

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We utilize our capital resources to support our businesses, with the majority of capital allocated to our insurance operations. Should we have or generate more capital than is needed to support our business strategies (including organic growth or acquisition opportunities) or mitigate risks inherent to our business, we may develop plans to distribute such capital to shareholders via dividends or share repurchase authorizations or deploy such capital towards liability management.

In the normal course, it is expected that a portion of the capital released by our insurance operations or through the utilization of AIG’s deferred tax assets may be available for distribution to shareholders. Additionally, it is expected that capital associated with businesses or investments that do not directly support our insurance operations may be available for distribution to shareholders or deployment towards liability management upon its monetization.

In developing plans to distribute capital, AIG considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the capital resources available to support our insurance operations and business strategies, AIG’s funding capacity and capital resources in comparison to internal benchmarks, expectations for capital generation, rating agency expectations for capital, as well as regulatory standards and internal stress tests for capital and capital distributions.

In January 2016, AIG Parent made a capital contribution of approximately $2.9 billion to our Non-Life Insurance Companies as a result of our fourth quarter 2015 reserve strengthening.

The following table presents AIG Parent's liquidity sources:

	As of		As of
(In millions)	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Cash and short-term investments^(a)	$	1,970	$	3,497
Unencumbered fixed maturity securities^(b)		4,719		5,723
Total AIG Parent liquidity		6,689		9,220
Available capacity under syndicated credit facility^(c)		4,500		4,500
Total AIG Parent liquidity sources	$	11,189	$	13,720

(a) Cash and short-term investments include reverse repurchase agreements totaling $1.1 billion and $1.5 billion as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

(b) Unencumbered securities consist of publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities. Fixed maturity securities primarily include U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities.

Non-Life Insurance Companies

We expect that our Non-Life Insurance Companies will be able to continue to satisfy reasonably foreseeable future liquidity requirements and meet their obligations, including those arising from reasonably foreseeable contingencies or events, through cash from operations and, to the extent necessary, monetization of invested assets. Our Non-Life Insurance Companies’ liquidity resources are primarily held in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities.

Each of our Non-Life Insurance Companies’ liquidity is monitored through the use of various internal liquidity risk measures. The primary sources of liquidity are premiums, fees, reinsurance recoverables and investment income. The primary uses of liquidity are paid losses, reinsurance payments, dividends, expenses, investments and collateral requirements.

Our Non-Life Insurance Companies may require additional funding to meet capital or liquidity needs under certain circumstances. Large catastrophes may require us to provide additional support to our affected operations. Downgrades in our credit ratings could put pressure on the insurer financial strength ratings of our subsidiaries, which could result in non‑renewals or cancellations by policyholders and adversely affect the subsidiary’s ability to meet its own obligations. Increases in market interest rates may adversely affect the financial strength ratings of our subsidiaries, as rating agency capital models may reduce the amount of available capital relative to required capital. Other potential events that could cause a liquidity strain include an economic collapse of a nation or region significant to our operations, nationalization, catastrophic terrorist acts, pandemics or other events causing economic or political upheaval.

176

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Certain Non-Life Insurance Companies are members of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) in their respective districts. Borrowings from the FHLBs may be used to supplement liquidity or for other uses deemed appropriate by management. Our Non-Life Insurance Companies had outstanding borrowings from the FHLBs in an aggregate amount of approximately $1.2 billion and $0 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The outstanding borrowings are being used primarily for interest rate risk management purposes in connection with certain reinsurance arrangements, and the balances are expected to decline as underlying premiums are collected.

AIG Parent and Ascot Corporate Name Limited (ACNL), a Non-Life Insurance Company, are parties to a $725 million letter of credit facility. ACNL, as a member of the Lloyd’s of London insurance syndicate (Lloyd’s), is required to hold capital at Lloyd’s, known as Funds at Lloyds (FAL). Under the facility, the entire FAL capital requirement of $640 million as of June 30, 2016, which supports the 2016 and 2017 years of account, was satisfied with a letter of credit in that amount issued under the facility.

AIG generally manages capital between AIG Parent and our Non-Life Insurance Companies through internal, Board-approved policies and guidelines. In addition, AIG Parent is party to a CMA with its Mortgage Guaranty insurance company. Among other things, the CMA provides that AIG Parent will maintain capital and surplus of the Mortgage Guaranty insurance company at or above a specified minimum required capital based on a specified risk-to-capital ratio. In addition, the CMA provides that if capital and surplus of the Mortgage Guaranty insurance company is in excess of that same specified minimum required capital, subject to its board approval and compliance with applicable insurance laws, the Mortgage Guaranty insurance company would declare and pay ordinary dividends to its equity holders up to an amount necessary to reduce projected or actual capital and surplus to a level equal to or not materially greater than such specified minimum required capital. As structured, the CMA contemplates that the specified minimum required capital would be reviewed and agreed upon at least annually. As of June 30, 2016, the minimum required capital for the CMA with the Mortgage Guaranty insurance company is based on a risk-to-capital ratio of 19 to 1.

In the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, our Non-Life Insurance Companies paid approximately $1.5 billion to AIG Parent in dividends in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities. The fixed maturity securities primarily include U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities.

Life Insurance Companies

We expect that our Life Insurance Companies will be able to continue to satisfy reasonably foreseeable future liquidity requirements and meet their obligations, including those arising from reasonably foreseeable contingencies or events, through cash from operations and, to the extent necessary, monetization of invested assets. Our Life Insurance Companies’ liquidity sources are primarily held in the form of cash, short-term investments and publicly traded, investment grade rated fixed maturity securities.

Each of our Life Insurance Companies’ liquidity is monitored through the use of various internal liquidity risk measures. The primary sources of liquidity are premiums, fees, reinsurance recoverables and investment income. The primary uses of liquidity are benefit claims, interest payments, surrenders, withdrawals, dividends, expenses, investments and collateral requirements.

Management believes that because of the size and liquidity of our Life Insurance Companies’ investment portfolios, normal deviations from projected claim or surrender experience would not create significant liquidity risk. Furthermore, our Life Insurance Companies’ products contain certain features that mitigate surrender risk, including surrender charges. However, as we saw in 2008, in times of extreme capital markets disruption, liquidity needs could outpace resources. As part of their risk management framework, our Life Insurance Companies continue to evaluate and, where appropriate, pursue strategies and programs to improve their liquidity position and facilitate their ability to maintain a fully invested asset portfolio.

Certain of our U.S. Life Insurance Companies are members of the FHLBs in their respective districts. Borrowings from the FHLBs are used to supplement liquidity or for other uses deemed appropriate by management. Our U.S. Life Insurance Companies had outstanding borrowings from the FHLBs in an aggregate amount of approximately $2 million at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

177

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Certain of our U.S. Life Insurance Companies have programs, which began in 2012, that lend securities from their investment portfolio to supplement liquidity or for other uses as deemed appropriate by management. Under these programs, these U.S. Life Insurance Companies lend securities to financial institutions and receive cash as collateral equal to 102 percent of the fair value of the loaned securities. Cash collateral received is invested in short-term investments. Additionally, the aggregate amount of securities that a Life Insurance Company is able to lend under its program at any time is limited to five percent of its general account statutory-basis admitted assets. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our U.S. Life Insurance Companies had $1.7 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, of securities subject to these agreements and $1.8 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, of liabilities to borrowers for collateral received.

AIG generally manages capital between AIG Parent and our Life Insurance Companies through internal, Board-approved policies and guidelines. In addition, AIG Parent is party to a CMA with AGC Life Insurance Company. Among other things, the CMA provides that AIG Parent will maintain the total adjusted capital of AGC Life Insurance Company at or above a specified minimum percentage of its projected NAIC Company Action Level Risk-Based Capital (RBC). As of June 30, 2016, the specified minimum percentage under this CMA was 250 percent.

In the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, our U.S. Life Insurance Companies paid approximately $1.4 billion to AIG Parent in dividends and loan repayments in the form of cash and fixed maturity securities. The fixed maturity securities primarily included U.S. government and government sponsored entity securities, U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate and municipal bonds and certain other highly rated securities.

Credit Facilities

We maintain a committed, revolving syndicated credit facility (the Five-Year Facility) as a potential source of liquidity for general corporate purposes. The Five-Year Facility provides for aggregate commitments by the bank syndicate to provide unsecured revolving loans and/or standby letters of credit of up to $4.5 billion without any limits on the type of borrowings and is scheduled to expire in November 2020.

As of June 30, 2016, a total of $4.5 billion remains available under the Five-Year Facility. Our ability to borrow under the Five-Year Facility is not contingent on our credit ratings. However, our ability to borrow under the Five-Year Facility is conditioned on the satisfaction of certain legal, operating, administrative and financial covenants and other requirements contained in the Five-Year Facility. These include covenants relating to our maintenance of a specified total consolidated net worth and total consolidated debt to total consolidated capitalization. Failure to satisfy these and other requirements contained in the Five-Year Facility would restrict our access to the Five-Year Facility and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. We expect to borrow under the Five-Year Facility from time to time, and may use the proceeds for general corporate purposes.

178

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes contractual obligations in total, and by remaining maturity:

June 30, 2016

Payments due by Period

Total

Remainder

2017-

2019-

(in millions)

Payments

of 2016

2018

2020

2021

Thereafter

Insurance operations

Loss reserves

77,000

9,733

25,482

14,064

4,665

23,056

Insurance and investment contract liabilities

240,598

7,748

28,262

25,817

12,268

166,503

Borrowings

982

118

223

641

Interest payments on borrowings

976

703

Other long-term obligations

Total

319,564

17,508

53,846

40,100

17,207

190,903

Other

Borrowings

25,960

882

3,291

2,472

280

19,035

Interest payments on borrowings

16,138

534

2,131

1,891

839

10,743

Other long-term obligations

246

Total

42,344

1,435

5,514

4,455

1,119

29,821

Consolidated

Loss reserves

77,000

9,733

25,482

14,064

4,665

23,056

Insurance and investment contract liabilities

240,598

7,748

28,262

25,817

12,268

166,503

Borrowings

26,942

882

3,291

2,590

503

19,676

Interest payments on borrowings

17,114

559

2,230

1,990

889

11,446

Other long-term obligations^(a)

254

Total^(b)

361,908

18,943

59,360

44,555

18,326

220,724

(a) Primarily includes contracts to purchase future services and other capital expenditures.

(b) Does not reflect unrecognized tax benefits of $4.5 billion, the timing of which is uncertain.

Loss Reserves

Loss reserves relate to our Non-Life Insurance Companies and represent future losses and loss adjustment expense payments estimated based on historical loss development payment patterns. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the payments by period presented above could be materially different from actual required payments. We believe that our Non-Life Insurance Companies maintain adequate financial resources to meet the actual required payments under these obligations.

Insurance and Investment Contract Liabilities

Insurance and investment contract liabilities, including GIC liabilities, relate to our Life Insurance Companies. These liabilities include various investment-type products with contractually scheduled maturities, including periodic payments. These liabilities also include benefit and claim liabilities, of which a significant portion represents policies and contracts that do not have stated contractual maturity dates and may not result in any future payment obligations. For these policies and contracts (i) we are not currently making payments until the occurrence of an insurable event, such as death or disability, (ii) payments are conditional on survivorship or (iii) payment may occur due to a surrender or other non-scheduled event beyond our control.

We have made significant assumptions to determine the estimated undiscounted cash flows of these contractual policy benefits. These assumptions include mortality, morbidity, future lapse rates, expenses, investment returns and interest crediting rates, offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in-force policies. Due to the significance of the assumptions, the periodic amounts presented could be materially different from actual required payments. The amounts

179

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

presented in this table are undiscounted and exceed the future policy benefits and policyholder contract deposits included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We believe that our Life Insurance Companies have adequate financial resources to meet the payments actually required under these obligations. These subsidiaries have substantial liquidity in the form of cash and short-term investments. In addition, our Life Insurance Companies maintain significant levels of investment grade rated fixed maturity securities, including substantial holdings in government and corporate bonds, and could seek to monetize those holdings in the event operating cash flows are insufficient. We expect liquidity needs related to GIC liabilities to be funded through cash flows generated from maturities and sales of invested assets.

Borrowings

Our borrowings exclude those incurred by consolidated investments and include hybrid financial instrument liabilities recorded at fair value. We expect to repay the long-term debt maturities and interest accrued on borrowings by AIG through maturing investments and dispositions of invested assets, future cash flows from operations, cash flows generated from invested assets, future debt issuance and other financing arrangements. Borrowings supported by assets of AIG include various notes and bonds payable as well as GIAs that are supported by cash and investments held by AIG Parent and certain non-insurance subsidiaries for the repayment of those obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments in total, and by remaining maturity:

June 30, 2016				Amount of Commitment Expiring
		Total Amounts		Remainder		2017-		2019 -
(in millions)		Committed		of 2016		2018		2020		2021		Thereafter
Insurance operations
Guarantees:
Standby letters of credit	$	820	$	180	$	10	$	627	$	-	$	3
Guarantees of indebtedness		127		100		27		-		-		-
All other guarantees^(a)		3		-		1		-		-		2
Commitments:
Investment commitments^(b)		3,014		1,778		849		292		-		95
Commitments to extend credit		2,283		1,146		795		273		62		7
Letters of credit		5		2		3		-		-		-
Total^(c)	$	6,252	$	3,206	$	1,685	$	1,192	$	62	$	107
Other
Guarantees:
Liquidity facilities^(d)	$	74	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	74
Standby letters of credit		208		208		-		-		-		-
All other guarantees		490		478		12		-		-		-
Commitments:
Investment commitments^(b)		175		26		30		13		10		96
Commitments to extend credit^(e)		500		-		-		500		-		-
Letters of credit		25		25		-		-		-		-
Total^(c)(f)	$	1,472	$	737	$	42	$	513	$	10	$	170

180

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Consolidated
Guarantees:
Liquidity facilities^(d)	$	74	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	74
Standby letters of credit		1,028		388		10		627		-		3
Guarantees of indebtedness		127		100		27		-		-		-
All other guarantees^(a)		493		478		13		-		-		2
Commitments:
Investment commitments^(b)		3,189		1,804		879		305		10		191
Commitments to extend credit^(e)		2,783		1,146		795		773		62		7
Letters of credit		30		27		3		-		-		-
Total^(c)(f)	$	7,724	$	3,943	$	1,727	$	1,705	$	72	$	277

(a) Includes construction guarantees connected to affordable housing investments by our Life Insurance Companies. Excludes potential amounts for indemnification obligations included in asset sales agreements. See Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on indemnification obligations.

(b) Includes commitments to invest in private equity funds, hedge funds and other funds and commitments to purchase and develop real estate in the United States and abroad. The commitments to invest in private equity funds, hedge funds and other funds are called at the discretion of each fund, as needed for funding new investments or expenses of the fund. The expiration of these commitments is estimated in the table above based on the expected life cycle of the related fund, consistent with past trends of requirements for funding. Investors under these commitments are primarily insurance and real estate subsidiaries.

(d) Primarily represents liquidity facilities provided in connection with certain municipal swap transactions and collateralized bond obligations.

(e) Includes a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility of up to $500 million between AerCap Ireland Capital Limited, as borrower, and AIG Parent, as lender (the AerCap Credit Facility) scheduled to mature in May 2019. The AerCap Credit Facility permits loans for general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2016, no amounts were outstanding under the AerCap Credit Facility.

(f) Excludes commitments with respect to pension plans. The remaining annual pension contribution for 2016 is expected to be approximately $17 million for U.S. and non-U.S. plans.

Arrangements with Variable Interest Entities

We enter into various arrangements with variable interest entities (VIEs) in the normal course of business, and we consolidate a VIE when we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. For a further discussion of our involvement with VIEs, see Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Indemnification Agreements

We are subject to financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements in connection with our sales of businesses. These arrangements may be triggered by declines in asset values, specified business contingencies, the realization of contingent liabilities, litigation developments, or breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by us. These arrangements are typically subject to time limitations, defined by contract or by operation of law, such as by prevailing statutes of limitation. Depending on the specific terms of the arrangements, the maximum potential obligation may or may not be subject to contractual limitations. For additional information regarding our indemnification agreements, see Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We have recorded liabilities for certain of these arrangements where it is possible to estimate them. These liabilities are not material in the aggregate. We are unable to develop a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential payout under some of these arrangements. Overall, we believe that it is unlikely we will have to make any material payments under these arrangements.

181

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Debt

The following table provides the rollforward of AIG’s total debt outstanding:

		Balance at				Maturities		Effect of					Balance at
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016		December 31,				and		Foreign		Other		June 30,
(in millions)		2015		Issuances	Repayments			Exchange		Changes			2016
Debt issued or guaranteed by AIG:
AIG general borrowings:
Notes and bonds payable	$	17,047	$	3,832	$	(960)	$	(90)	$	10		$	19,839
Junior subordinated debt		1,327		-		(461)		(10)		5			861
AIG Japan Holdings Kabushiki Kaisha		106		223		-		12		-			341
AIGLH notes and bonds payable		284		-		(3)		-		-			281
AIGLH junior subordinated debt		420		-		(60)		-		-			360
Total AIG general borrowings		19,184		4,055		(1,484)		(88)		15			21,682
AIG borrowings supported by assets:^(a)
MIP notes payable		1,372		-		-		121		(16)			1,477
Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable		34		-		-		-		2			36
GIAs, at fair value		3,276		115		(260)		-		244	^(b)		3,375
Notes and bonds payable, at fair value		394		119		(145)		-		4	^(b)		372
Total AIG borrowings supported by assets		5,076		234		(405)		121		234			5,260
Total debt issued or guaranteed by AIG		24,260		4,289		(1,889)		33		249			26,942
Debt not guaranteed by AIG:
Other subsidiaries' notes, bonds, loans and
mortgages payable		2		2,035		(835)		-		-			1,202
Debt of consolidated investments^(c)		4,987		364		(259)		15		78	^(d)		5,185
Total debt not guaranteed by AIG		4,989		2,399		(1,094)		15		78			6,387
Total debt^(e)	$	29,249	$	6,688	$	(2,983)	$	48	$	327		$	33,329

(a) AIG Parent guarantees all such debt, except for MIP notes payable and Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable, which are direct obligations of AIG Parent. Collateral posted to third parties was $2.3 billion and $2.4 billion at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. This collateral primarily consists of securities of the U.S. government and government sponsored entities and generally cannot be repledged or resold by the counterparties.

(b) Primarily represents adjustments to the fair value of debt.

(c) At June 30, 2016, includes debt of consolidated investment vehicles related to real estate investments of $2.7 billion, affordable housing partnership investments of $1.6 billion and other securitization vehicles of $845 million. At December 31, 2015, includes debt of consolidated investment vehicles related to real estate investments of $2.4 billion, affordable housing partnership investments of $1.5 billion and other securitization vehicles of $1.0 billion.

(d) Includes the effect of consolidating previously unconsolidated partnerships.

(e) Includes debt issuance costs of $92 million and $101 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

182

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Total DEBT OUTSTANDING

(in millions)

Debt Maturities

The following table summarizes maturing debt at June 30, 2016 of AIG (excluding $5.2 billion of borrowings of consolidated investments) for the next four quarters:

		Third		Fourth		First		Second
		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter
(in millions)		2016		2016		2017		2017		Total
AIG general borrowings	$	-	$	308	$	-	$	-	$	308
AIG borrowings supported by assets		202		372		29		659		1,262
Other subsidiaries' notes, bonds, loans and
mortgages payable		575		-		313		314		1,202
Total	$	777	$	680	$	342	$	973	$	2,772

183

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table presents maturities of long-term debt (including unamortized original issue discounts and debt issuance cost, hedge accounting valuation adjustments and fair value adjustments, when applicable), excluding $5.2 billion in borrowings of consolidated investments:

June 30, 2016			Remainder		Year Ending
(in millions)		Total		of 2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		Thereafter
Debt issued or guaranteed by AIG:
AIG general borrowings:
Notes and bonds payable	$	19,839	$	308	$	178	$	1,106	$	997	$	1,342	$	-	$	15,908
Junior subordinated debt		861		-		-		-		-		-		-		861
AIG Japan Holdings Kabushiki Kaisha		341		-		-		-		-		118		223		-
AIGLH notes and bonds payable		281		-		-		-		-		-		-		281
AIGLH junior subordinated debt		360		-		-		-		-		-		-		360
Total AIG general borrowings		21,682		308		178		1,106		997		1,460		223		17,410
AIG borrowings supported by assets:
MIP notes payable		1,477		273		804		400		-		-		-		-
Series AIGFP matched notes and
bonds payable		36		-		10		-		-		-		-		26
GIAs, at fair value		3,375		132		180		482		93		40		280		2,168
Notes and bonds payable, at fair value		372		169		9		122		-		-		-		72
Total AIG borrowings supported by assets		5,260		574		1,003		1,004		93		40		280		2,266
Total debt issued or guaranteed by AIG		26,942		882		1,181		2,110		1,090		1,500		503		19,676
Other subsidiaries' notes, bonds, loans
and mortgages payable		1,202		575		627		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	28,144	$	1,457	$	1,808	$	2,110	$	1,090	$	1,500	$	503	$	19,676

Credit Ratings

Credit ratings estimate a company’s ability to meet its obligations and may directly affect the cost and availability of financing to that company. The following table presents the credit ratings of AIG and certain of its subsidiaries as of July 28, 2016. Figures in parentheses indicate the relative ranking of the ratings within the agency’s rating categories; that ranking refers only to the major rating category and not to the modifiers assigned by the rating agencies.

	Short-Term Debt		Senior Long-Term Debt
	Moody’s	S&P	Moody’s^(a)	S&P^(b)	Fitch^(c)
AIG	P-2 (2nd of 3)	A-2 (2nd of 8)	Baa 1 (4th of 9)	A- (3rd of 8)	BBB+ (4th of 9)
	*Stable Outlook*		*Stable Outlook*	*Negative Outlook*	*Stable Outlook*
AIG Financial Products Corp.^(d)	P-2	A-2	Baa 1	A-	-
	*Stable Outlook*		*Stable Outlook*	*Negative Outlook*

(a) Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 to the generic rating categories to show relative position within the rating categories.

(b) S&P ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

(c) Fitch ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

(d) AIG guarantees all obligations of AIG Financial Products Corp.

These credit ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. They may be changed, suspended or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances. Ratings may also be withdrawn at our request.

We are party to some agreements that contain “ratings triggers.” Depending on the ratings maintained by one or more rating agencies, these triggers could result in (i) the termination or limitation of credit availability or a requirement for accelerated repayment, (ii) the termination of business contracts or (iii) a requirement to post collateral for the benefit of counterparties.

184

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

In the event of adverse actions on our long-term debt ratings by the major rating agencies, AIGFP and certain other AIG entities would be required to post additional collateral under some derivative transactions or could experience termination of the transactions. Such requirements and terminations could adversely affect our business, our consolidated results of operations in a reporting period or our liquidity. In the event of a further downgrade of AIG’s long-term senior debt ratings, AIGFP and certain other AIG entities would be required to post additional collateral, and certain of the counterparties of AIGFP or of such other AIG entities would be permitted to terminate their contracts early.

The actual amount of collateral that we would be required to post to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the aggregate amount of payments that we could be required to make, depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions and other factors prevailing at the time of the downgrade.

For a discussion of the effects of downgrades in the financial strength ratings of our insurance companies or our credit ratings, see Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity, Capital and Credit in our 2015 Annual Report.

Regulation and Supervision

For a discussion of our regulation and supervision by different regulatory authorities in the United States and abroad, including with respect to our liquidity and capital resources, see Item 1. Business — Regulation and Item 1A. Risk Factors — Regulation in our 2015 Annual Report and Item 2. MD&A – Regulatory Environment in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Dividends and Repurchases of AIG Common Stock

On February 11, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on March 28, 2016 to shareholders of record on March 14, 2016. On May 2, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on June 27, 2016 to shareholders of record on June 13, 2016. On August 2, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on AIG Common Stock of $0.32 per share, payable on September 29, 2016 to shareholders of record on September 15, 2016. The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on various factors, including the regulatory framework applicable to us, as discussed further in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report.

Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of AIG Common Stock through a series of actions. On August 2, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase of $3.0 billion to the share repurchase authorization, resulting in an aggregate remaining authorization on such date of approximately $4.0 billion. Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise (including through the purchase of warrants). Certain of our share repurchases have been and may from time to time be effected through Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans. The timing of any future share repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors, including the regulatory framework applicable to us.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we repurchased approximately 113 million shares of AIG Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6.2 billion pursuant to this authorization, and we repurchased 15 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $263 million pursuant to this authorization. Pursuant to an Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan, from July 1 to August 2, 2016, we have repurchased approximately $698 million of additional shares of AIG Common Stock.

Dividend Restrictions

Payments of dividends to AIG by its insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions imposed by regulatory authorities. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report for a discussion of restrictions on payments of dividends by our subsidiaries.

185

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Risk management includes the identification and measurement of various forms of risk, the establishment of risk thresholds and the creation of processes intended to maintain risks within these thresholds while optimizing returns. We consider risk management an integral part of managing our core businesses and a key element of our approach to corporate governance.

Overview

We have an integrated process for managing risks throughout our organization in accordance with our firm‑wide risk appetite. Our Board of Directors has oversight responsibility for the management of risk. Our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Department supervises and integrates the risk management functions in each of our business units, providing senior management with a consolidated view of the firm’s major risk positions. Within each business unit, senior leaders and executives approve risk‑taking policies and targeted risk tolerance within the framework provided by ERM. ERM supports our businesses and management in the embedding of enterprise risk management in our key day-to-day business processes and in identifying, assessing, quantifying, managing, monitoring and reporting, and mitigating the risks taken by us and our businesses. Nevertheless, our risk management efforts may not always be successful and material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity or financial condition may occur.

For a further discussion of AIG’s risk management program, see Part II, Item 7. MD&A ─ Enterprise Risk Management in the 2015 Annual Report.

Credit Risk Management

Overview

Credit risk is defined as the risk that our customers or counterparties are unable or unwilling to repay their contractual obligations when they become due. Credit risk may also result from a downgrade of a counterparty’s credit ratings or a widening of its credit spreads.

We devote considerable resources to managing our direct and indirect credit exposures. These exposures may arise from, but are not limited to, fixed income investments, equity securities, deposits, commercial paper investments, reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements, corporate and consumer loans, leases, reinsurance recoverables, counterparty risk arising from derivatives activities, collateral extended to counterparties, insurance risk cessions to third parties, financial guarantees and letters of credit.

We monitor and control our company-wide credit risk concentrations and attempt to avoid unwanted or excessive risk accumulations, whether funded or unfunded. To minimize the level of credit risk in some circumstances, we may require mitigants, such as third‑party guarantees, reinsurance or collateral, including commercial bank-issued letters of credit and trust collateral accounts. We treat these guarantees, reinsurance recoverables, and letters of credit as credit exposure and include them in our risk concentration exposure data. We also monitor closely the quality of any trust collateral accounts.

See Investments – Available for Sale Investments herein for further information on our credit concentrations and credit exposures.

186

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Market Risk Management

Market risk is defined as the risk of adverse impact due to systemic movements in one or more of the following market risk drivers: equity and commodity prices, residential and commercial real estate values, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange, inflation, and their levels of volatility.

We are engaged in a variety of insurance, investment and other financial services businesses that generate market risk, directly and indirectly. We are exposed to market risks primarily within our insurance and capital markets activities, on both the asset and liability side of our balance sheet through on and off-balance sheet exposures. The chief risk officer within each business is responsible for creating a framework to properly identify these risks, then ensuring that they are appropriately measured, monitored and managed in accordance with the risk governance framework established by the Chief Market Risk Officer (CMRO).

The scope and magnitude of our market risk exposures is managed under a robust framework that contains documented risk-taking authorities, defined risk limits and minimum standards for managing market risk in a manner consistent with our Risk Appetite Statement. Our market risk management framework focuses on quantifying the financial repercussions of changes in these broad market observables, as opposed to from the idiosyncratic risks associated with individual assets that are addressed through our credit risk management function.

Risk Identification

Market risk focuses on quantifying the financial repercussions of changes in broad, external, predominantly market observable risks. Financial repercussions can include an adverse impact on results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital.

Each of the following systemic risks is considered a market risk:

Equity prices. We are exposed to changes in equity market prices affecting a variety of instruments. Changes in equity prices can affect the valuation of publicly-traded equity shares, investments in private equity, hedge funds and mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and other equity-linked capital market instruments as well as equity-linked insurance products, including but not limited to index annuities, variable annuities, universal life insurance and variable universal life insurance.

Residential and commercial real estate values. Our investment portfolios are exposed to the risk of changing values in a variety of residential and commercial real estate investments. Changes in residential/commercial real estate prices can affect the valuation of residential/commercial mortgages, residential/commercial mortgage‑backed securities and other structured securities with underlying assets that include residential/commercial mortgages: trusts that include residential/commercial real estate and/or mortgages, residential mortgage insurance contracts and commercial real estate investments.

Interest rates. Interest rate risk can arise from a mismatch in the interest rate exposure of assets versus liabilities. Lower interest rates generally result in lower investment income and make certain of our product offerings less attractive to investors. Conversely, higher interest rates are typically beneficial for the opposite reasons. However, when rates rise quickly, there can be a temporary asymmetric GAAP accounting effect where the existing securities lose market value, which is largely reported in Other comprehensive income, and the offsetting decrease in the value of related liabilities may not be recognized. Changes in interest rates can affect the valuation of fixed maturity securities, financial liabilities, insurance contracts including but not limited to fixed rate annuities, variable annuities and derivative contracts.

Credit spreads. Credit spreads measure an instrument’s risk premium or yield relative to that of a comparable duration, default‑free instrument. Changes in credit spreads can affect the valuation of fixed maturity securities, including but not limited to corporate bonds, ABS, mortgage-backed securities, AIG-issued debt obligations, credit derivatives and derivative credit valuation adjustments. Much like higher interest rates, wider credit spreads with unchanged default losses mean more investment income in the long‑term. In the short term, quickly rising spreads will cause a loss in the value of existing fixed maturity securities, which is largely reported in Other comprehensive income. A precipitous rise in credit spreads may also signal a fundamental weakness in the credit‑worthiness of bond obligors, potentially resulting in default losses.

187

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Foreign exchange (FX) rates. We are a globally diversified enterprise with significant income, assets and liabilities denominated in, and significant capital deployed in, a variety of currencies. Changes in FX rates can affect the valuation of a broad range of balance sheet and income statement items as well as the settlement of cash flows exchanged in specific transactions.

Commodity Prices. Changes in commodity prices (the value of commodities) can affect the valuation of publicly‑traded commodities, commodity indices and derivatives on commodities and commodity indices. We are exposed to commodity prices primarily through their impact on the prices and credit quality of commodity producers’ debt and equity securities in our investment portfolio.

Inflation. Changes in inflation can affect the valuation of fixed maturity securities, including AIG-issued debt obligations, derivatives and other contracts explicitly linked to inflation indices, and insurance contracts where the claims are linked to inflation either explicitly, via indexing, or implicitly, through medical costs or wage levels.

Risk Measurement

Our market risk measurement framework was developed with the main objective of communicating the range and scale of our market risk exposures. At the firm‑wide level market risk is measured in a manner that is consistent with AIG’s Risk Appetite Statement. This is designed to ensure that we remain within our stated risk tolerance levels and can determine how much additional market risk taking capacity is available within our framework. Our risk appetite is currently defined in terms of capital and liquidity levels. At the market risk level, the framework measures our overall exposure to each systemic market risk change on an economic basis.

In addition, we continue to use enhanced economic, GAAP accounting and statutory capital‑based risk measures at the market risk level, business‑unit level and firm‑wide levels. This process aims to ensure that we have a comprehensive view of the impact of our market risk exposures.

We use a number of approaches to measure our market risk exposure, including:

Sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis measures the impact from a unit change in a market risk input. Examples of such sensitivities include a one basis point increase in yield on fixed maturity securities, a one basis point increase in credit spreads of fixed maturity securities, and a one percent increase in prices of equity securities.

Scenario analysis. Scenario analysis uses historical, hypothetical, or forward‑looking macroeconomic scenarios to assess and report exposures. Examples of hypothetical scenarios include a 100 basis point parallel shift in the yield curve or a 20 percent immediate and simultaneous decrease in world‑wide equity markets. Scenarios may also utilize a stochastic framework to arrive at a probability distribution of losses.

Stress testing. Stress testing is a special form of scenario analysis in which the scenarios are designed to lead to a material adverse outcome. Examples of such scenarios include the stock market crash of October 1987 or the widening of yields or spreads of RMBS or CMBS during 2008.

188

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Market Risk Sensitivities

The following table provides estimates of our sensitivity to changes in yield curves, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates:

Balance Sheet Exposure

Balance Sheet Effect

June 30,

December 31,

June 30,

December 31,

(dollars in millions)

2016

2015

2016

2015

Sensitivity factor

100 bps parallel increase in all yield curves

Interest rate sensitive assets:

Fixed maturity securities

273,754

260,689

(16,273)

(14,549)

Mortgage and other loans receivable

23,802

18,878

(1,333)

(1,092)

Preferred stock

(2)

(1)

Total interest rate sensitive assets

297,575

^(a)

279,587

^(a)

(17,608)

(15,642)

Sensitivity factor

20% decline in stock prices and value of

alternative investments

Equity and alternative investments exposure:

Hedge funds

8,293

10,917

(1,659)

(2,183)

Private equity

6,680

7,233

(1,336)

(1,447)

Real estate investments

7,340

6,579

(1,468)

(1,316)

PICC Investment

600

2,239

(120)

(448)

Common equity

1,680

1,574

(336)

(315)

Aircraft asset investments

427

477

(85)

(95)

Other investments

527

472

(105)

(94)

Total equity and alternative investments

exposure

25,547

29,491

(5,109)

(5,898)

Sensitivity factor

10% depreciation of all foreign currency

exchange rates against the U.S. dollar

Foreign currency-denominated net

asset position:

Japanese yen

2,274

1,745

(227)

(174)

Euro

2,062

2,053

(206)

(205)

Great Britain pound

1,991

2,158

(199)

(216)

All other foreign currencies

3,579

4,703

(359)

(471)

Total foreign currency-denominated net

asset position^(b)

9,906

10,659

(991)

(1,066)

(a) At June 30, 2016, the analysis covered $297.6 billion of $312.8 billion interest-rate sensitive assets. Excluded were $7.5 billion of loans and $3.6 billion of investments in life settlements. In addition, $4.1 billion of assets across various asset categories were excluded due to modeling limitations. At December 31, 2015, the analysis covered $279.6 billion of $298.7 billion interest-rate sensitive assets. Excluded were $10.7 billion of loans and $3.6 billion of investments in life settlements. In addition, $4.8 billion of assets across various asset categories were excluded due to modeling limitations.

(b) The majority of the foreign currency exposure is reported on a one quarter lag.

Foreign currency-denominated net asset position reflects our consolidated non‑U.S. dollar assets less our consolidated non‑U.S dollar liabilities on a GAAP basis. We use a bottom-up approach in managing our foreign currency exchange rate exposures with the objective of protecting statutory capital at the regulated insurance entity level. We manage cash flow risk on our foreign currency-denominated debt issued by AIG Parent and use a variety of techniques to mitigate this risk, including but not limited to the execution of cross-currency swaps and the issuance of new foreign currency-denominated debt to replace equivalent maturing debt. At the AIG Parent level, we monitor our foreign currency exposures against single currency and aggregate currency portfolio limits. As a matter of general practice, we do not typically hedge our foreign currency exposures to net investments in subsidiaries.

Our foreign currency-denominated net asset position at June 30, 2016, decreased by $753 million compared to December 31, 2015. The decrease was mostly due to a $1.3 billion decrease in our Hong Kong dollar position, primarily resulting from the

189

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

sale of our Non-Life Insurance Companies’ PICC Investment, partially offset by a $529 million increase in our Japanese yen position, primarily resulting from unrealized appreciation of investments.

For illustrative purposes, we modeled our sensitivities based on a 100 basis point increase in yield curves, a 20 percent decline in equities and alternative assets, and a 10 percent depreciation of all foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. The estimated results presented in the table above should not be taken as a prediction, but only as a demonstration of the potential effects of such events.

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that our financial condition will be adversely affected by the inability or perceived inability to meet our short-term cash, collateral or other financial obligations. Failure to appropriately manage liquidity risk can result in insolvency, reduced operating flexibility, increased costs, reputational harm and regulatory action.

AIG and its legal entities seek to maintain sufficient liquidity during both the normal course of business and under defined liquidity stress scenarios to ensure that sufficient cash will be available to meet the obligations as they come due.

AIG liquidity risk tolerance levels are designed to allow it to meet its obligations over a twelve month horizon consistent with its risk appetite. We maintain target levels for required liquidity and/or minimum coverage ratios expected to ensure that our short-term financial obligations are met under varying market conditions. If we project that we will breach these tolerances, we will assess and determine appropriate liquidity management actions. However, the market conditions in effect at that time may not permit us to achieve an increase in liquidity sources or a reduction in liquidity requirements.

Risk Identification

The following sources of liquidity and funding risks could impact our ability to meet short-term financial obligations as they come due.

· Market/Monetization Risk: Assets cannot be readily transformed into cash due to unfavorable market conditions. Market liquidity risk may limit our ability to sell assets at reasonable values to meet liquidity needs or cause us to realize losses exceeding our expectations.

· Cash Flow Mismatch Risk: Discrete and cumulative cash flow mismatches or gaps over short-term horizons under both expected and adverse business conditions may create future liquidity shortfalls.

· Event Funding Risk: Additional funding may be required as the result of a trigger event and may result from a downgrade in credit ratings, a market event, or some other event that creates a funding obligation or limits existing funding options.

· Financing Risk: We may be unable to raise additional cash on a secured or unsecured basis due to unfavorable market conditions, AIG-specific issues, or any other issue that impedes access to additional funding.

Risk Measurement

Comprehensive cash flow projections under normal conditions are the primary component for identifying and measuring liquidity risk. We produce comprehensive liquidity projections over varying time horizons that incorporate all relevant liquidity sources and uses and include known and likely cash inflows and outflows. In addition, we perform stress testing by identifying liquidity stress scenarios and assessing the effects of these scenarios on our cash flow and liquidity.

190

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

We use a number of approaches to measure our liquidity risk exposure, including:

Target Liquidity Range: Target Liquidity Range specifies the amount of assets required to be maintained in specific liquidity portfolios to meet obligations as they arise over a twelve month horizon under stressed liquidity conditions.

Coverage Ratios: Coverage Ratios measure the adequacy of available liquidity sources, including the ability to monetize assets to meet the forecasted cash flows over a specified time horizon. The portfolio of potential assets to be monetized is selected based on our ability to convert those assets into cash under the assumed market conditions and within the specified time horizon.

Cash Flow Forecasts: Cash Flow Forecasts measure the liquidity needed for a specific legal entity over a specified time horizon.

Stress Testing: Coverage Ratios are re-measured under defined liquidity stress scenarios that will impact net cash flows, liquid assets and/or other funding sources.

Relevant liquidity reporting is produced and reported regularly to AIG Parent and business unit risk committees. The frequency, content, and nature of reporting will vary for each business unit and legal entity, based on its complexity, risk profile, activities and size.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment.

The accounting policies that we believe are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions, which are critical accounting estimates, are related to the determination of:

• liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses;

• reinsurance assets;

• valuation of future policy benefit liabilities and timing and extent of loss recognition;

• valuation of liabilities for guaranteed benefit features of variable annuity products;

• estimated gross profits to value deferred acquisition costs for investment-oriented products;

• liability for legal contingencies; and

• fair value measurements of certain financial assets and liabilities.

191

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

These accounting estimates require the use of assumptions about matters, some of which are highly uncertain at the time of estimation. To the extent actual experience differs from the assumptions used, our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially affected. For a complete discussion of our critical accounting estimates, you should read Part II, Item 7. MD&A — Critical Accounting Estimates in the 2015 Annual Report.

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

Our operations around the world are subject to regulation by many different types of regulatory authorities, including insurance, securities, derivatives, investment advisory and thrift regulators in the United States and abroad.

Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation and supervision by the states and jurisdictions in which they do business. The insurance and financial services industries generally have been subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny and supervision in recent years.

On June 3, 2016, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) issued for public comment a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) on enhanced prudential standards that would require insurer nonbank SIFIs, such as AIG, to comply with a corporate governance and risk-management standard and a liquidity risk management standard. These proposed standards build on the FRB’s current guidance for large financial institutions supervised by the FRB and have been tailored to insurance companies. We are reviewing the proposals and analyzing how our current practices compare to those required by the NPR. We anticipate that the NPR will attract industry comment. Under the NPR, after the FRB evaluates all comments and adopts a final rule, the insurer nonbank SIFIs would have at least twelve months to comply.

On June 3, 2016, the FRB also released for public comment an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) outlining two conceptual insurance group capital frameworks that could apply to insurance groups supervised by the FRB—a building block approach, proposed for insurance institutions that are savings and loan holding companies or bank holding companies by virtue of owning depository institutions, and a consolidated approach for insurer nonbank SIFIs, such as AIG. In general, the consolidated approach would consolidate an insurance company’s assets and insurance liabilities into risk segments tailored to account for the liability structure and unique features of the insurance company, apply risk factors to each segment and then set minimum capital requirements. The ANPR does not provide details on specific risk weights, risk factors, capital adequacy ratios and other important elements that could be applied to AIG under the consolidated approach, and we cannot predict how such an approach, if applied to AIG, would affect our business, results of operations, financial condition or capital requirements. We are currently reviewing the ANPR and expect it to be subject to significant industry comment.

On June 23, 2016, the UK held a referendum in which a majority voted for the UK to withdraw its membership in the EU, commonly referred to as Brexit. The referendum is advisory, and the terms of withdrawal are subject to a formal negotiation period that has not yet begun and could, by treaty, last up to two years. It is not clear at this stage (and may not be for some time) what form the UK’s future relationship with the remaining EU member states will take. We have significant operations and employees in the UK and other EU member states, including AIG Europe Ltd. (AEL), which enjoys certain benefits based on the UK’s membership in the EU. Depending on the final terms of the UK exit, we may be required to reorganize our operations and legal entity structure in the UK and the EU in a manner that could be less efficient and more expensive.

In addition to the information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our regulatory status is also discussed in Part I, Item 2. MD&A – Regulatory Environment and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 and in Part I, Item 1. Business – Regulation, Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Regulation and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report.

192

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / GLOSSARY

GLOSSARY

Accident year The annual calendar accounting period in which loss events occurred, regardless of when the losses are actually reported, booked or paid.

Accident year combined ratio, as adjusted The combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting.

Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted The loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting.

Acquisition ratio Acquisition costs divided by net premiums earned. Acquisition costs are those costs incurred to acquire new and renewal insurance contracts and also include the amortization of VOBA and DAC. Acquisition costs vary with sales and include, but are not limited to, commissions, premium taxes, direct marketing costs, certain costs of personnel engaged in sales support activities such as underwriting.

Base Spread Net investment income excluding income from alternative investments and enhancements, less interest credited excluding amortization of sales inducement assets.

Base Yield Net investment income excluding income from alternative investments and enhancements, as a percentage of average base invested asset portfolio, which excludes alternative investments, other bond securities and certain other investments for which the fair value option has been elected.

Book Value Per Common Share, Excluding AOCI and Book Value Per Common Share Excluding AOCI and DTA are non-GAAP measures and are used to show the amount of our net worth on a per-share basis. Book Value Per Common Share, Excluding AOCI is derived by dividing Total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI, by Total common shares outstanding. Book Value Per Common Share, Excluding AOCI and DTA is derived by dividing Total AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI and DTA, by Total common shares outstanding.

Casualty insurance Insurance that is primarily associated with the losses caused by injuries to third persons, i.e., not the insured, and the legal liability imposed on the insured as a result.

Combined ratio Sum of the loss ratio and the acquisition and general operating expense ratios.

CSA Credit Support Annex A legal document generally associated with an ISDA Master Agreement that provides for collateral postings which could vary depending on ratings and threshold levels.

CVA Credit Valuation Adjustment The CVA adjusts the valuation of derivatives to account for nonperformance risk of our counterparty with respect to all net derivative assets positions. Also, the CVA reflects the fair value movement in AIGFP's asset portfolio that is attributable to credit movements only, without the impact of other market factors such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Finally, the CVA also accounts for our own credit risk in the fair value measurement of all derivative net liability positions and liabilities where AIG has elected the fair value option, when appropriate.

DAC Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs Deferred costs that are incremental and directly related to the successful acquisition of new business or renewal of existing business.

DAC Related to Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments An adjustment to DAC for investment-oriented products, equal to the change in DAC amortization that would have been recorded if fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale had been sold at their stated aggregate fair value and the proceeds reinvested at current yields (also referred to as “shadow DAC”).

Deferred Gain on Retroactive Reinsurance Retroactive reinsurance is a reinsurance contract in which an assuming entity agrees to reimburse a ceding entity for liabilities incurred as a result of past insurable events. If the amount of premium paid by the ceding reinsurer is less than the related ceded loss reserves, the resulting gain is deferred and amortized over the settlement period of the reserves. Any related development on the ceded loss reserves recoverable under the contract would increase the deferred gain if unfavorable, or decrease the deferred gain if favorable.

Expense ratio Sum of acquisition expenses and general operating expenses, divided by net premiums earned.

First-Lien Priority over all other liens or claims on a property in the event of default on a mortgage.

193

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / GLOSSARY

General operating expense ratio General operating expenses divided by net premiums earned. General operating expenses are those costs that are generally attributed to the support infrastructure of the organization and include but are not limited to personnel costs, projects and bad debt expenses. General operating expenses exclude losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred, acquisition expenses, and investment expenses.

GIC/GIA Guaranteed Investment Contract/Guaranteed Investment Agreement A contract whereby the seller provides a guaranteed repayment of principal and a fixed or floating interest rate for a predetermined period of time.

G-SII Global Systemically Important Insurer An insurer that is deemed globally systemically important (that is, of such size, market importance and global interconnectedness that the distress or failure of the insurer would cause significant dislocation in the global financial system and adverse economic consequences across a range of countries) by the Financial Stability Board, in consultation with and based on a methodology developed by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors.

IBNR Incurred But Not Reported Estimates of claims that have been incurred but not reported to us.

ISDA Master Agreement An agreement between two counterparties, which may have multiple derivative transactions with each other governed by such agreement, that generally provides for the net settlement of all or a specified group of these derivative transactions, as well as pledged collateral, through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of a default on, or affecting any, one derivative transaction or a termination event affecting all, or a specified group of, derivative transactions.

LAE Loss Adjustment Expenses The expenses of settling claims, including legal and other fees and the portion of general expenses allocated to claim settlement costs.

Loss Ratio Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred divided by net premiums earned. Loss adjustment expenses are directly attributed to settling and paying claims of insureds and include, but are not limited to, legal fees, adjuster’s fees, and claims department personnel costs.

Loss reserve development The increase or decrease in incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses as a result of the re-estimation of liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses at successive valuation dates for a given group of claims.

Loss reserves Liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. The estimated ultimate cost of settling claims relating to insured events that have occurred on or before the balance sheet date, whether or not reported to the insurer at that date.

LTV Loan-to-Value Ratio Principal amount of loan amount divided by appraised value of collateral securing the loan.

Master netting agreement An agreement between two counterparties who have multiple derivative contracts with each other that provides for the net settlement of all contracts covered by such agreement, as well as pledged collateral, through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of default on or upon termination of any one such contract.

Natural catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact on AIG in excess of $10 million each. Catastrophes also include certain man-made events, such as terrorism and civil disorders that meet the $10 million threshold.

Net premiums written Represent the sales of an insurer, adjusted for reinsurance premiums assumed and ceded, during a given period. Net premiums earned are the revenue of an insurer for covering risk during a given period. Net premiums written are a measure of performance for a sales period, while Net premiums earned are a measure of performance for a coverage period.

Nonbank SIFI Nonbank Systemically Important Financial Institutions Financial institutions are deemed nonbank systemically important (that is, the failure of the financial institution could pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council based on a three-stage analytical process.

Noncontrolling interest The portion of equity ownership in a consolidated subsidiary not attributable to the controlling parent company.

Policy fees An amount added to a policy premium, or deducted from a policy cash value or contract holder account, to reflect the cost of issuing a policy, establishing the required records, sending premium notices and other related expenses.

194

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / GLOSSARY

Pool A reinsurance arrangement whereby all of the underwriting results of the pool members are combined and then shared by each member in accordance with its pool participation percentage.

Premiums and deposits – Institutional Markets include direct and assumed amounts received and earned on group benefit policies and life-contingent payout annuities, and deposits received on investment-type annuity contracts, including GICs.

Premiums and deposits – Retirement and – Life include direct and assumed amounts received on traditional life insurance policies and group benefit policies, and deposits on life-contingent payout annuities, as well as deposits received on universal life, investment-type annuity contracts and mutual funds.

Prior year development Increase (referred to as unfavorable or adverse development or reserve strengthening) or decrease (referred to as favorable development) in estimates of losses and loss expenses for prior years that is included in earnings.

RBC Risk-Based Capital A formula designed to measure the adequacy of an insurer’s statutory surplus compared to the risks inherent in its business.

Reinstatement premium Additional premiums payable to reinsurers to restore coverage limits that have been exhausted as a result of reinsured losses under certain excess of loss reinsurance treaties.

Reinsurance The practice whereby one insurer, the reinsurer, in consideration of a premium paid to that insurer, agrees to indemnify another insurer, the ceding company, for part or all of the liability of the ceding company under one or more policies or contracts of insurance which it has issued.

Rescission Denial of claims and termination of coverage on loans related to fraudulent or undocumented claims, underwriting guideline violations and other deviations from contractual terms.

Retroactive Reinsurance See Deferred Gain on Retroactive Reinsurance.

Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI and Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI and DTA are non-GAAP measures and are used to show the rate of return on shareholders’ equity. Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI is derived by dividing actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG by average AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding average AOCI. Return on Equity – After-tax Operating Income Excluding AOCI and DTA is derived by dividing actual or annualized after-tax operating income attributable to AIG by average AIG shareholders’ equity, excluding average AOCI and DTA.

Salvage The amount that can be recovered by us for the sale of damaged goods for which our policyholder has been indemnified (and to which title was transferred to us).

Second-lien Subordinate in ranking to the first-lien holder claims on a property in the event of default on a mortgage.

Severe losses Individual non-catastrophe first party losses and surety losses greater than $10 million, net of related reinsurance and salvage and subrogation. Severe losses include claims related to satellite explosions, plane crashes, and shipwrecks.

SIA Sales Inducement Asset Represents enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain annuity and investment contract products that meet the criteria to be deferred and amortized over the life of the contract.

Solvency II Legislation in the European Union which reforms the insurance industry’s solvency framework, including minimum capital and solvency requirements, governance requirements, risk management and public reporting standards. The Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EEC) was adopted on November 25, 2009 and became effective on January 1, 2016.

Subrogation The amount of recovery for claims we have paid our policyholders, generally from a negligent third party or such party’s insurer.

Surrender charge A charge levied against an investor for the early withdrawal of funds from a life insurance or annuity contract, or for the cancellation of the agreement.

Surrender rate represents annualized surrenders and withdrawals as a percentage of average account value.

Unearned premium reserve Liabilities established by insurers and reinsurers to reflect unearned premiums, which are usually refundable to policyholders if an insurance or reinsurance contract is canceled prior to expiration of the contract term.

VOBA Value of Business Acquired Present value of projected future gross profits from in-force policies of acquired businesses.

195

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2 / ACRONYMS

ACRONYMS











ABS Asset-Backed Securities	GMWB Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits
CDO Collateralized Debt Obligations	ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
CDS Credit Default Swap	Moody's Moody's Investors’ Service Inc.
CMA Capital Maintenance Agreement	NAIC National Association of Insurance Commissioners
CMBS Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities	NM Not Meaningful
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board	RMBS Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
FRBNY Federal Reserve Bank of New York	S&P Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC
GAAP Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America	SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
GMAB Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefits	VIE Variable Interest Entity
GMIB Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefits

196

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 3 / QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Item 3. / QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Included in Part I, Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Enterprise Risk Management.

Item 4. / Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by AIG’s management, with the participation of AIG’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of AIG’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, AIG’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that AIG’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2016.

There has been no change in AIG’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, AIG’s internal control over financial reporting.

197

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 / Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A./ Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the following risk factor as well as the other risk factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 and in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2015 Annual Report.

Our foreign operations expose us to risks that may affect our operations. We provide insurance, investment and other financial products and services to both businesses and individuals in more than 100 countries and jurisdictions. A substantial portion of our business is conducted outside the United States, and we intend to continue to grow this business. Operations outside the United States may be affected by regional economic downturns, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, political upheaval, nationalization and other restrictive government actions, which could also affect our other operations.

The degree of regulation and supervision in foreign jurisdictions varies. AIG subsidiaries operating in foreign jurisdictions must satisfy local regulatory requirements and it is possible that local licenses may require AIG Parent to meet certain conditions. Licenses issued by foreign authorities to our subsidiaries are subject to modification and revocation. Consequently, our insurance subsidiaries could be prevented from conducting future business in some of the jurisdictions where they currently operate. Adverse actions from any single country could adversely affect our results of operations, depending on the magnitude of the event and our financial exposure at that time in that country.

On June 23, 2016, the UK held a referendum in which a majority voted for the UK to withdraw its membership in the EU, commonly referred to as Brexit. The referendum is advisory, and the terms of withdrawal are subject to a formal negotiation period that has not yet begun and could, by treaty, last up to two years. It is not clear at this stage (and may not be for some time) what form the UK’s future relationship with the remaining EU member states will take. We have significant operations and employees in the UK and other EU member states, including AEL, which enjoys certain benefits based on the UK’s membership in the EU. Depending on the final terms of the UK exit, we may be required to reorganize our operations and legal entity structure in the UK and the EU in a manner that could be less efficient and more expensive. Brexit has also affected the U.S. dollar/British pound exchange rate, increased the volatility of exchange rates among the Major Currencies, and created volatility in the financial markets, which may continue for some time.

198

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 2 / UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table provides the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of AIG or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b‑18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of AIG Common Stock and warrants to purchase AIG Common Stock during the three months ended June 30, 2016:

	Total Number		Average	Total Number of Shares	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares
	of Shares		Price Paid	Purchased as Part of Publicly	that May Yet Be Purchased Under the
Period	Repurchased		per Share	Announced Plans or Programs	Plans or Programs (in millions)
April 1 - 30	15,118,335	$	54.51	15,118,335		$	3,826
May 1 - 31	17,199,663		56.09	17,199,663			2,772
June 1 - 30^(a)	17,737,231		54.89	17,737,231			1,798	^(b)
Total^(c)	50,055,229	$	55.19	50,055,229		$	1,798	^(b)

(a) During this period, we also repurchased 5 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock, at an average purchase price per warrant of $18.00, for an aggregate purchase price of $90 million.

(b) Reflects the purchase of 5 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock, which reduced the dollar value of AIG Common Stock that may yet be repurchased under the repurchase authorization.

(c) On August 2, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional increase to the repurchase authorization of AIG Common Stock of $3.0 billion, resulting in an aggregate remaining authorization on such date of approximately $4.0 billion. Shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market, private purchases, through forward, derivative, accelerated repurchase or automatic repurchase transactions or otherwise (including through the purchase of warrants). Certain of our share repurchases have been and may from time to time be effected through Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plans. The timing of any future share repurchases will depend on market conditions, our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors.

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, we repurchased approximately 50 million shares of AIG Common Stock under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.8 billion. Pursuant to an Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 plan, from July 1 to August 2, 2016, we have repurchased approximately $698 million of additional shares of AIG Common Stock. We also repurchased 5 million warrants to purchase shares of AIG Common Stock during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 for an aggregate purchase price of $90 million.

Item 4 / Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 6 / Exhibits

See accompanying Exhibit Index.

199

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
	(Registrant)
	/S/ SIDDHARTHA SANKARAN
	Siddhartha Sankaran
	Executive Vice President
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)




	/S/ ELIAS F. HABAYEB
	Elias F. Habayeb
	Senior Vice President,
	Deputy Chief Financial Officer and
	Group Controller
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

Dated: August 2, 2016

200

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description	Location
4	Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures
	(1) Thirty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2016, between AIG and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to AIG's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 8, 2016 (File No. 1-8787).
	(2) Form of the Notes (included in Exhibit 4(1))
10	(1) American International Group, Inc. 2012 Executive Severance Plan (as amended)*	Filed herewith.
	(2) Amendment Letter to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, effective as of July 15, 2016, among AIG, the subsidiary borrowers party thereto, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each Several L/C Agent party thereto	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIG's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 15, 2016 (File No. 1-8787).
11	Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings	Included in Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
12	Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges	Filed herewith.
31	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications	Filed herewith.
32	Section 1350 Certifications**	Filed herewith.
101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and (vi) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.	Filed herewith.

* This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.

** This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

201

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED

June 30, 2016

Table of Contents

Item Number

Description

Page

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

SIGNATURES

200

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited)

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED Statements of Equity (unaudited)

American International Group, Inc.

CONDENSED Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

Transfers of Level 3 Assets

Transfers of Level 3 Liabilities

The following table summarizes the major components of the changes in Life Insurance Companies DAC, including VOBA:

Estimated Gross Profits for Investment-Oriented Products

DAC and Reserves Related to Unrealized Appreciation of Investments

Dividends and Repurchases of AIG Common Stock