Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant      ☒                 Filed by a Party other than the Registrant      ☐

Check the appropriate box:

RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.

RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Restaurant Brands International Inc.

130 King Street West, Suite 300

Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E1, Canada

April 30, 2019

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR AND PROXY STATEMENT

Management Information Circular and Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual General Meeting of

Shareholders

This management information circular and proxy statement (the “proxy statement”), including all schedules and appendices hereto, is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by or on behalf of management of Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”) for use at the annual general meeting (the “Meeting”) of the shareholders of RBI to be held at the offices of RBI located at 130 King Street West, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5X 1E1, Canada on June 11, 2019 at 8:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), or at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof, for the purposes set out in the Notice of Meeting.

RBI is the sole general partner of Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership (“Partnership”), which is the indirect parent of Burger King Worldwide, Inc. (“BKW”), The TDL Group Corp., formerly known as Tim Hortons, Inc. (“THI”), and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. (“PLK”). RBI’s common shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) under the ticker symbol “QSR”. As a result, RBI is subject to the applicable governance rules and listing standards of both the NYSE and TSX. The Class B exchangeable limited partnership units (“Partnership exchangeable units”) of Partnership trade on the TSX under the ticker symbol “QSP”. Partnership is subject to the applicable governance rules and listing standards of the TSX to the extent not satisfied by RBI. In addition, each of RBI and Partnership is a reporting issuer in each of the provinces and territories of Canada and, as a result, is subject to Canadian continuous disclosure and other reporting obligations under applicable Canadian securities laws. Partnership has received exemptive relief dated October 31, 2014 from the Canadian securities regulators. This exemptive relief effectively allows Partnership to satisfy its Canadian continuous disclosure obligations by relying on the Canadian continuous disclosure documents filed by RBI, for so long as certain conditions are satisfied. For more discussion of this exemptive relief and the disclosure required by such relief, please see Appendix A.

We expect that the solicitation of proxies will be by mail. Proxies may also be solicited personally, by telephone, e-mail, Internet, facsimile or other means of communication by officers, employees and agents of RBI. The cost of solicitation will be borne by RBI.

We are providing access to this proxy statement and our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (collectively the “proxy materials”) via the Internet using the U.S. “notice and access” system. On or about May 1, 2019, we will begin mailing a Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all holders of record of common shares and Partnership exchangeable units as of April 15, 2019, and posted the proxy materials on the website referenced in the Notice (www.envisionreports.com/RBI2019). In the case of beneficial owners of these securities, the Notice is being sent indirectly through such shareholders’ or unitholders’ brokers or other intermediaries. We intend to reimburse these brokers or other intermediaries for permitted fees and costs incurred by them in mailing the Notice to beneficial owners of securities.

As more fully described in the Notice, all holders of common shares and Partnership exchangeable units may choose to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or may request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the Notice and website provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

In this proxy statement, the words, “RBI”, “we”, “our”, “ours” and “us” refer to Restaurant Brands International Inc. Except as otherwise stated, the information contained herein is given as of April 30, 2019. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “$” or “dollars” are to the currency of the United States and “Canadian dollars” or “C$” are to the currency of Canada.

The date of this proxy statement is April 30, 2019.

Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Company at a Glance

We are one of the largest quick service restaurant companies with more than $30 billion in system-wide sales¹ and over 25,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries and U.S. territories. We own three of the world’s most prominent and iconic quick service restaurant brands – TIM HORTONS®, BURGER KING® and POPEYES®. These independently operated brands have been serving their respective guests, franchisees and communities for over 40 years.

We are committed to growing the TIM HORTONS^®, BURGER KING^® and POPEYES^® brands by leveraging their respective core values, employee and franchisee relationships, and long track records of community support. The brands benefit from the global scale and shared best practices that come through common ownership under RBI.

2018 Business Performance

Executive Summary

Shareholder Value Creation

Compensation Highlights

Our incentive plans and programs ensure alignment of executives’ and shareholders’ interests and provide for a strong link between pay and performance.

Executive Summary

Roadmap of Voting Items

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

For the 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 11, 2019

This proxy statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by or on behalf of management of RBI for use at the Meeting of the shareholders of RBI to be held at the offices of RBI located at 130 King Street West, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E1, Canada on June 11, 2019 at 8:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), or at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof, for the purposes set out in the Notice of Meeting.

We will mail an Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Notice”) on or about May 1, 2019. The proxy materials are available at www.envisionreports.com/RBI2019.

GENERAL VOTING INFORMATION

Who may vote at the Meeting?

There are two classes of voting shares eligible to vote at the Meeting:

You may vote if you were the record holder or beneficial owner of shares of either of these two classes as of the close of business on April 15, 2019 (the “Record Date”).

If you are a record holder or beneficial owner of Partnership exchangeable units as of the close of business on the Record Date, you are entitled to vote indirectly through the special voting share which is held by Computershare Trust Company of Canada (the “Trustee”), pursuant to a voting trust agreement, dated December 12, 2014, among RBI, Partnership and the Trustee (the “voting trust agreement”). See “– What are my voting rights if I hold Partnership exchangeable units” for more information about the voting rights associated with Partnership exchangeable units. Holders of common shares vote together as a single class with the holder of the special voting share, except as otherwise provided by law.

How many votes are eligible to be cast at the Meeting?

As of the close of business on the Record Date, we had outstanding 253,893,613 common shares and one special voting share. In addition, as of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 207,380,256 Partnership exchangeable units outstanding. As the record holder of the special voting share, the Trustee is entitled to a number of votes on matters on which holders of common shares are entitled to vote equal to the number of Partnership exchangeable units outstanding as of the close of business on the Record Date (excluding any such units held by RBI and its subsidiaries) that provided voting instructions to the Trustee. Consequently, there are a total of 461,273,869 votes eligible to be cast at the Meeting.

What are my voting rights if I hold common shares?

Each common share is entitled to one vote.

What are my voting rights if I hold Partnership exchangeable units?

If you are a record holder of Partnership exchangeable units, you are entitled to vote indirectly through the special voting share pursuant to the voting trust agreement. The special voting share entitles the Trustee to vote a number of votes equal to the number of Partnership exchangeable units outstanding as of the close of business on the Record Date, to the extent that the Trustee has received voting instructions from the holders of such Partnership exchangeable units. The Trustee will exercise each vote attached to the special voting share only as

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

directed by the relevant record holder of the Partnership exchangeable units and, in the absence of instructions from a record holder as to voting, will not exercise those voting rights. However, a record holder of Partnership exchangeable units may obtain a proxy from the Trustee entitling the holder or its designee to attend and vote in person at the Meeting. A record holder of Partnership exchangeable units is entitled to give voting instructions to the Trustee (or obtain a proxy, as applicable) for a number of votes equal to the number of Partnership exchangeable units that the holder held as of the close of business on the Record Date. See “– Can I vote in person at the Meeting?” below for instructions on attending and voting at the Meeting and the attached Appendix A for further details as to the voting rights associated with the Partnership exchangeable units.

How many votes must be present to hold the Meeting?

Two persons holding or representing by proxy at least a majority of the votes eligible to be cast at the Meeting, or 230,636,935 votes, will constitute a quorum. Common shares and the special voting share represented in person or by proxy, including such shares which withhold or do not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented for shareholder approval, will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. If we do not have a quorum we will adjourn the Meeting and reconvene the Meeting at a later date. At any such reconvened Meeting, two persons holding or representing by proxy at least twenty-five percent of the votes eligible to be cast at the Meeting will constitute a quorum.

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a beneficial owner?

If your common shares are registered directly in your name with Computershare Trust Company of Canada, our transfer agent (the “Transfer Agent”), you are considered the “shareholder of record” with respect to those shares. If your shares are held by a brokerage firm, bank, trustee or other intermediary (“nominee”), you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name”.

I am a shareholder of record of common shares – How do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record of common shares as of the close of business on the Record Date, you may vote in person at the Meeting or you may vote by proxy prior to the Meeting. There are three ways to vote prior to the Meeting:

Proxies, whether submitted through the Internet or by telephone or mail as described above, must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on June 7, 2019. If the Meeting is adjourned or postponed, your proxy must be received by 8:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on the last business day preceding the day of the reconvened Meeting.

What if I hold my common shares in “street name”?

Holders in “street name”, or beneficial owners, of common shares, will receive a Notice indirectly through such holders’ brokers or other intermediaries. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online. You should follow the voting instructions of your broker or other intermediary. Brokers or other intermediaries may set deadlines for voting that are further in advance of the Meeting than those set out above. You should contact your broker or intermediary for further details.

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

I am a holder of record of Partnership exchangeable units – How do I vote?

If you are a record holder of Partnership exchangeable units on the Record Date, you are entitled to instruct the Trustee as to the exercise of the voting rights attached to the special voting share for each Partnership exchangeable unit that you owned of record as of the Record Date.

You may instruct the Trustee as to the exercise of your votes by following the instructions in the Notice or by logging on to www.envisionreports.com/RBI2019 and clicking on “Cast your Vote”. Please follow the website prompts that allow you to exercise your votes with respect to the Partnership exchangeable units that you hold, and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

Alternatively, if you have requested the proxy materials by mail, you may direct the Trustee as to the exercise of your votes by completing, signing and returning the voting instruction form (the “voting instruction”) in the postage-paid envelope provided with the proxy materials.

You may also instruct the Trustee to give a proxy to a nominee of management or other designee of your selection (which may be you, if you intend on attending the Meeting) to exercise those votes in accordance with your instructions or to you or your designee so that you (or your designee) may attend the Meeting and exercise those votes in person, as proxy of the Trustee.

Regardless of the manner by which you choose to give your voting instruction to the Trustee, the Trustee must receive your voting instruction, including any proxy request in that instruction, by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on June 7, 2019. A voting instruction received after this time will not be binding on the Trustee. If the Meeting is adjourned or postponed, your voting instruction must be received by 8:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on the last business day preceding the day of the reconvened Meeting. Further details on how to instruct the Trustee to vote, or to obtain a proxy from the Trustee, are included in the voting instruction.

What if I hold my Partnership exchangeable units in “street name”?

Holders in “street name”, or beneficial owners, of Partnership exchangeable units, will receive a Notice indirectly through such holders’ brokers or other intermediaries. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials online and how to vote. You should follow the voting instructions of your broker or other intermediary. If you provide specific voting instructions by mail, or the Internet, your broker or nominee will instruct the Trustee as you have directed. Brokers or other intermediaries may set deadlines for voting that are further in advance of the Meeting than those set out above. You should contact your broker or intermediary for further details.

What am I voting on and how does the Board recommend that I vote?

You will be voting on the following six proposals at the Meeting. Our Board’s recommendation for each of these proposals is set forth below:

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

We will also consider any other business properly brought before the Meeting.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

Holders of common shares and the special voting share will vote together as a single class for each proposal.

What is the effect of the say-on-pay advisory vote on Proposal 2?

Although the advisory say-on-pay vote on Proposal 2 is non-binding, our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into account in making a determination concerning executive compensation.

What are my voting options with respect to each of the proposals?

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

You will not have the option of voting to “Abstain” with respect to (i) Proposal 1, the election of directors, or (ii) Proposal 3, the appointment of the auditors. As Proposal 2, Proposal 4, Proposal 5 and Proposal 6 are advisory votes, we have provided the option to vote “Withhold”, as well as “For” or “Against” and, therefore, your “Withhold” vote for these four matters will be the equivalent of an abstention and will not impact whether or not any of such proposals is approved. “Withhold” votes will however, be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

Will my securities be voted if I do not return my proxy or provide my voting instruction?

No. If you are the shareholder of record or a beneficial owner of common shares and you do not attend and vote your shares at the Meeting or vote by proxy, your shares will not be voted. If you are the holder of record of Partnership exchangeable units and do not provide your voting instructions to the Trustee, the Trustee will not exercise the voting rights in respect of your Partnership exchangeable units. However, a record holder of Partnership exchangeable units may instruct the Trustee to give a proxy to the holder or its designee entitling the holder or that designee to attend and vote in person at the Meeting. See “– Can I vote in person at the Meeting?” below.

What if I provide my proxy or give my voting instruction without making any selections or if I vote or provide voting instructions on only some, but not all, of the proposals?

The common shares or Partnership exchangeable units represented by your proxy voting instruction form will be voted in accordance with the instructions you provide.

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

What if other matters are presented for consideration at the Meeting?

As of the date of this proxy statement, our management is not aware of any matters that will be presented for consideration at the Meeting other than those matters identified in the Notice of Meeting, nor does our management know of any amendments or variations of any of the matters identified in the Notice of Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) of the Meeting, or if any of the matters identified in the Notice of Meeting are amended or varied, and such new matter, amendment or variation calls for a vote of shareholders, validly completed proxies (including any proxies given at the instruction of a holder of Partnership exchangeable units) will be voted in respect of such new matter, amendment or variation in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders pursuant to the discretionary authority conferred upon them by the enclosed form of proxy or voting instruction, as applicable.

Can I vote in person at the Meeting?

Common shares that are registered directly in your name may be voted in person at the Meeting. In addition, you have the right to appoint some other person of your choice, who need not be a shareholder, to attend and act on your behalf at the Meeting. To do so, insert the name of your chosen proxy in the space provided on the form of proxy. If you hold common shares in street name and you wish to vote those shares in person at the Meeting (or have another person attend and vote on your behalf), you should contact the broker or nominee that holds your shares to obtain the necessary proxy.

If you are a holder of record of Partnership exchangeable units, you may obtain from the Trustee a proxy that will entitle you (or another person designated by you) to attend the Meeting and personally exercise (as proxy of the Trustee) the votes attached to the special voting share that you (as holder of the Partnership exchangeable units) would otherwise be entitled to instruct the Trustee to vote. If you hold Partnership exchangeable units in street name and you wish to vote those units in person at the Meeting (or have another person attend and vote on your behalf), you should contact the broker or nominee that holds those units and follow their instructions to obtain the necessary proxy.

Can I change my mind after I deliver my proxy or submit my voting instruction?

Yes. If you are a shareholder of record of common shares, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy by:

Any written instructions must be executed by the shareholder or the shareholder’s authorized attorney or, if the shareholder is a corporation, under its corporate seal or by a duly authorized officer.

If you hold your common shares in street name, and wish to change your vote or proxy nominee, you should consult your broker or nominee with respect to submitting new voting instructions. Intermediaries may set deadlines for the receipt of revocation notices that are farther in advance of the Meeting than those set out above and, accordingly, any such revocation should be completed well in advance of the deadline prescribed in the form of proxy or voting instruction form, to ensure it is given effect at the Meeting.

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

If you are a holder of record of Partnership exchangeable units, you may revoke or amend your voting instruction by:

If you hold your Partnership exchangeable units in street name, you should consult your broker or nominee with respect to revoking or amending your prior voting instructions.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice or proxy card?

If you receive more than one Notice or proxy card it means that you have multiple accounts with brokers or other nominees or with the Transfer Agent, as applicable, through which you hold common shares or Partnership exchangeable units. Please vote or provide voting instructions for all of the common shares or Partnership exchangeable units you own. We encourage you to register all of these securities in the same name and address. You may do this by contacting your broker or other nominee or the Transfer Agent. The Transfer Agent may be reached through the following methods:

ATTENDING THE MEETING

Who may attend the Meeting?

The Meeting is open to all record holders of common shares as of the close of business on the Record Date and their duly appointed proxy nominees. Beneficial owners of common shares and record holders and beneficial owners of Partnership exchangeable units who owned such shares or Partnership exchangeable units, as the case may be, as of the close of business on the Record Date may obtain a proxy that will entitle them (or another person designated by them) to attend and vote at the Meeting. See “– Can I vote in person at the Meeting?” above for instructions on how to obtain a proxy for that purpose.

How can I get directions to the meeting?

The meeting will be held at the offices of Restaurant Brands International Inc. at 130 King Street West, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5X 1E1, Canada. If you require directions, please contact Investor Relations by e-mail at investor@rbi.com.

What do I need to bring to attend the Meeting?

If you are a record holder or beneficial owner of common shares:

Questions and Answers About the Meeting and Voting

If you are a record holder or beneficial owner of Partnership exchangeable units:

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE VALID PICTURE IDENTIFICATION AND PROOF THAT YOU OWN COMMON SHARES OR PARTNERSHIP EXCHANGEABLE UNITS, YOU MAY NOT BE ADMITTED INTO THE MEETING.

MORE INFORMATION

Where can I find voting results of the Meeting?

In accordance with TSX rules, following the Meeting we will promptly issue a news release disclosing the detailed voting results for the election of each director. In addition, promptly following the Meeting, but not more than four business days thereafter, we will announce the results for the proposals voted upon at the Meeting and publish final detailed voting results for each matter voted upon in a report filed on www.sedar.com and in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

I am a holder of Partnership exchangeable units. Why am I receiving proxy solicitation materials that relate solely to RBI?

RBI is the sole general partner of Partnership and manages all of Partnership’s operations and activities in accordance with the partnership agreement of Partnership. The Partnership exchangeable units are intended to provide voting rights with respect to RBI that are equivalent to the corresponding rights afforded to holders of common shares. In addition to making provision for these voting rights, the voting trust agreement requires that each record holder of Partnership exchangeable units be provided a copy of the notice of each meeting at which the holders of common shares are entitled to vote. Except as otherwise required by the partnership agreement, voting trust agreement or applicable law, the holders of the Partnership exchangeable units are not directly entitled to receive notice of or to attend any meeting of the unitholders of Partnership or to vote at any such meeting. Accordingly, you will not receive notice of, or an information circular or proxy in respect of, an annual meeting of Partnership.

Where can I find further information in respect of the Partnership exchangeable units?

A summary of certain terms of the Partnership exchangeable units is included in Appendix A to this proxy statement.

Who should I contact with other questions?

If you have additional questions about this proxy statement or the Meeting, please contact Investor Relations by e-mail at investor@rbi.com.

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our by-laws permit the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to determine the number of directors that constitute the Board, provided that the Board shall not consist of fewer than three or greater than fifteen members. In addition, our by-laws provide that at least twenty-five percent of the directors shall be resident Canadians, as required by the CBCA.

Our Board consists of twelve directors. We believe a board of this size and composition is appropriate, giving us a diverse set of perspectives around the boardroom. Our current Board is also appropriately sized to allow effective committee organization and to facilitate efficient meetings and decision-making.

Our director nominees are: Messrs. Behring, Caira, Castro-Neves, Franklin, Fribourg, Golden, Hedayat, Schwartz, Sicupira, Thompson Motta and Van Damme and Ms. Khosrowshahi. Messrs. Caira and Hedayat and Ms. Khosrowshahi are each a resident Canadian as defined by the CBCA.

As we discuss under “Corporate Governance – Board Independence” on page 23 of this proxy statement, our Board conducts an evaluation of the independence of each director and has determined that all of our director nominees, except Messrs. Schwartz and Caira, qualify as “independent” directors under the NYSE listing standards, the rules of the TSX and Canadian securities laws.

We believe that each of our director nominees possesses the experience, skills and qualities to fully perform his or her duties as a director and contribute to our success. Our director nominees were nominated because each is of high ethical character, is highly accomplished in his or her field with superior credentials and recognition, has a sound personal and professional reputation, has the ability to exercise sound business judgment, and is able to dedicate sufficient time to fulfilling his or her obligations as a director. Further, it is our view that these director nominees complement each other as a group. Our director nominees appear on the following pages. Each director nominee’s principal occupation and other pertinent information about particular experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that such person should serve as a director, appears on the following pages.

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Nominees For Director

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

If elected, each of the aforementioned nominees has consented to serve as directors and hold office until the close of the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors have been elected or appointed.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” each of the director nominees.

Corporate Governance

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Governance Guidelines

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. Our Board believes that good corporate governance is a critical factor in achieving business success and in fulfilling the Board’s responsibilities to shareholders. The Restaurant Brands International Inc. Board of Directors Governance Guidelines, as amended (the “Governance Guidelines”) provide a framework for corporate governance in accordance with the Canadian and U.S. securities laws, the NYSE listing standards, the TSX rules, the requirements under the CBCA and our organizational documents.

Highlights of our Governance Guidelines are described below:

The NCG Committee monitors compliance with the Governance Guidelines. In addition, the NCG Committee periodically reviews our Governance Guidelines, and, if appropriate, will recommend changes to the Board. The full text of our Governance Guidelines is available in the “Investors – Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.rbi.com, as well as under the RBI issuer profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and is incorporated herein by reference. No other information on our website or any other website referenced in this document is incorporated into this proxy statement, and such information should not be considered part of this proxy statement. Any request for a copy of the Governance Guidelines may be directed to Restaurant Brands International Inc., 130 King Street West, Suite 300, P.O. Box 339, Toronto, Ontario M5X 1E1, Canada, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Upon receipt of a request, a copy will be provided free of charge.

Corporate Governance

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board has an independent Chairman, Alexandre Behring, and a Vice Chairman, Marc Caira. On January 22, 2019, our Board created the position of Co-Chairman and appointed Daniel Schwartz, our former Chief Executive Officer and the current Executive Chairman of RBI, to serve in such role. Mr. Schwartz will serve as Executive Chairman of RBI for a transition period that ends on September 30, 2019. While our Board has not developed a written position description for the Chairman or Co-Chairman of the Board or the Chairpersons of our committees, our Governance Guidelines set forth the role of the Chairman, Co-Chairman and Vice Chairman and the charter of each committee sets forth the role of the Chairperson of each committee. Specifically, the Chairman and Co-Chairman of the Board are responsible for facilitating a highly functioning and effective Board, providing overall leadership and encouraging open communications, and the Vice Chairman of the Board assists the Chairman and Co-Chairman and serves at meetings at which the Chairman or Co-Chairman is not in attendance or is unable to participate in a motion. The Chairperson of each committee is responsible for setting the frequency and length of the meetings, setting meeting agendas consistent with the committee’s charter and reporting on the activities of that committee to the full Board on a periodic basis.

Our Board has not adopted a formal policy regarding the need to separate or combine the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer as the Board believes it is important to retain its flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of the offices of the Chairman, Co-Chairman and CEO in any way that it deems in the best interests of RBI at a given point in time. At the present time, the positions of Chairman of the Board, Co-Chairman of the Board and CEO are filled by different individuals and our CEO does not sit on the Board. Under the authority of the Board, the CEO is responsible for the general management of the business and affairs of RBI, with the objective of enhancing long-term shareholder value. We believe that the current separation of roles provides a more effective monitoring and objective evaluation of the CEO’s performance.

Our Board has not developed a written position description for our CEO. Our Board and CEO develop, on an annual basis, corporate goals and objectives and parameters within which the CEO operates our business. Our Board and CEO also establish annual performance goals to measure the CEO’s individual achievement for purposes of our annual bonus program. The Compensation Committee of the Board is also responsible for annually evaluating the CEO against these objectives. For a further discussion of the corporate goals and objectives and the measures by which our CEO is evaluated, please see our Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”) beginning on page 34 of this proxy statement.

Meetings

During 2018, the Board held a total of 4 meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (1) the total number of meetings of the Board held during the period for which he or she had been a director and (2) the total number of meetings of the committee(s) of which he was a member during the period that he served. Mr. Castro-Neves and Ms. Khosrowshahi were elected to the Board at the 2018 annual and special meeting of shareholders on June 7, 2018, and therefore attended only two of the four meetings held during 2018. The specific number of board meetings attended last year by each of our incumbent directors was as follows:

Corporate Governance

In accordance with our Governance Guidelines, the Chairman of the Board will generally determine the frequency and length of Board meetings and will set the agenda for each Board meeting. Board members are encouraged to suggest the inclusion of additional items on an agenda, and any director may request that an item be placed on an agenda. Board meetings are generally held pursuant to a pre-determined schedule, with additional meetings scheduled as necessary.

We encourage all directors to attend the annual meetings of our shareholders. Mr. Schwartz attended the 2018 Annual Meeting.

Board Independence

It is the policy of the Board that a majority of directors must (i) be independent with no direct or indirect material relationship or business conflict with RBI and (ii) otherwise meet the definition of an “independent” director under U.S. and Canadian securities laws and listing standards of the NYSE and the TSX. Our Board has affirmatively determined that the following directors have no material relationship with RBI and otherwise qualify as independent based on all of the foregoing criteria: Messrs. Behring, Castro-Neves, Franklin, Fribourg, Hedayat, Golden, Sicupira, Thompson Motta and Van Damme and Ms. Khosrowshahi.

Under the NYSE listing standards, a director qualifies as “independent” if the board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the listed company. While the focus of the inquiry is independence from management, the board is required to consider broadly all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination.

National Instrument 58-201, or NI 58-201, provides guidance on corporate governance practices with respect to director independence, which reflect best practices established by the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”), but are not intended to be prescriptive. Such best practices provide, among other things, that: (i) a company’s board of directors should have a majority of independent directors; (ii) the chairman of the board should be an independent director; (iii) the board should appoint a nominating committee composed entirely of independent directors; and (iv) the board should appoint a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. Determinations in respect of “independence” for these purposes are similar to the requirements under the NYSE listing standards.

In conducting its evaluations of Messrs. Behring, Sicupira and Thompson Motta, the Board considered their affiliation with 3G Capital and with 3G Restaurant Brands Holdings General Partner Ltd., which currently controls over 92% of the outstanding Partnership exchangeable units, which represents over 43% of the combined voting interest in the company. In conducting its evaluation of Messrs. Behring and Van Damme, the Board also considered their service on the board of directors of the Kraft Heinz Company, a supplier to restaurants for all of our brands.

Mr. Behring presides over the executive sessions of the Board. In 2018, the Board met in executive session four times.

Director Term Limits

All directors are elected at the annual meeting of our shareholders for a term of one year. The Board does not believe it should expressly limit a director’s tenure on the Board. RBI values the contribution of directors who over time have developed increasing insight into our company and operations and therefore provide an increasing contribution to the Board as a whole. As an alternative to term limits, prior to recommending to the Board that one or more current directors be submitted to the shareholders for re-election, the NCG Committee reviews the performance of each director potentially standing for election or re-election, and makes appropriate recommendations to the Board concerning that director’s candidacy.

Corporate Governance

Majority Voting Policy

The Board has adopted a Majority Voting Policy as required by the rules of the TSX. The policy is included in the Governance Guidelines and provides that, in an uncontested election, a director must be elected to the Board by at least a “majority of the votes cast,” which means that the number of shares voted “FOR” a director’s election must exceed 50% of the number of votes cast with respect to that director’s election. Votes cast with respect to a director’s election include votes to withhold authority. An “uncontested election” means an election where the number of nominees for director is equal to the number of directors to be elected. In a contested election, a plurality voting standard will apply.

If a nominee for director in an uncontested election does not receive the affirmative vote of at least the majority of the votes cast, the director must immediately tender his or her resignation to the NCG Committee. The NCG Committee will consider and recommend, and the Board will determine, whether or not to accept the offer of resignation. The Board will accept the offer of resignation absent exceptional circumstances that would warrant the director continuing to serve on the Board, as determined by the Board in accordance with its fiduciary duties to RBI, and the resignation will be effective upon the Board’s acceptance. The decision of the Board shall be made within 90 days after the date of the shareholders’ meeting. Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy shall not participate in the recommendation of the NCG Committee or the decision of the Board with respect to his or her resignation. A press release disclosing the Board’s determination (and the reasons for rejecting the resignation, if applicable) shall promptly be issued and furnished to the SEC, the CSA and the TSX.

If the Board accepts any tendered resignation, the Board may either proceed to fill the vacancy through the appointment of a new director, or determine not to fill the vacancy and instead decrease the size of the Board.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

We provide access to appropriate orientation programs, sessions or materials for new members of the Board for their benefit either prior to or within a reasonable period of time after their nomination or election to the Board, which shall include written materials and presentations by senior management regarding our business, strategic plans and policies. We and our Board encourage, but do not require, directors to participate in outside continuing education programs.

Board Committees

The Board has four standing committees – the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the NCG Committee, and the Operations and Strategy Committee – as well as the Conflicts Committee. Each of the existing committees operates under a written charter. These charters set forth the responsibilities of each committee and are available in the “Investors – Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.rbi.com, and such information is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it through our Corporate Secretary.

Corporate Governance

Set forth below is a description of the responsibilities of each of our current Board committees, its current membership and the number of meetings (including actions by written consent in lieu of meetings) during 2018.

Audit Committee

Directors serving on our Audit Committee may not simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies, unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of the director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. Mr. Hedayat was appointed to serve on the Audit Committee effective June 7, 2018 and was appointed Chairman on January 22, 2019. Ms. Khosrowshahi was appointed to serve on the Audit Committee effective January 22, 2019.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements and is financially literate according to the NYSE listing standards and Canadian securities laws and that each member of the Audit Committee meets the enhanced independence standards for audit committee members required by the SEC. In 2018, the Board determined that Mr. Fribourg is qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC rules and has accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. In addition, in January 2019 in connection with his appointment as Chair of the Audit Committee, the Board has determined that Mr. Hedayat is qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC rules. For more information regarding the business experience of Messrs. Fribourg and Hedayat, see their biographies under “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors.” The discussion leader for executive sessions of the Audit Committee is generally Mr. Hedayat, the chair of the Committee.

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

The Compensation Committee establishes, reviews and approves executive compensation based on, among other factors, an evaluation of the performance of the CEO and CEO Direct Reports in light of corporate goals and objectives relevant to executive compensation, including annual performance objectives, and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the CEO’s compensation. For further details on executive compensation, see the CD&A, beginning on page 34 of this proxy statement.

Non-management director compensation is determined by the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, taking into account general and specific demands of Board and committee service, Company performance, comparisons with other organizations of similar size and complexity, competitive factors, other forms of compensation received by directors, if any, and other factors which it deems relevant, all with the intent of aligning directors’ interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. A management director receives no additional compensation for his or her service as a director. For more details on director compensation, see the discussion under the heading “– Director Compensation” below on page 32.

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more officers of RBI the authority to make grants and awards of stock rights or options to any persons other than the CEO, any CEO Direct Report, and any person covered by Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Compensation Committee has delegated this authority to the CEO. In addition, as permitted under applicable law and the NYSE listing standards, the Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to one or more subcommittees or the Chairman of the Compensation Committee when it deems appropriate and in the best interests of RBI.

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant assisting the Compensation Committee in the evaluation of executive officer compensation, including sole authority to approve all such compensation consultant’s fees and other retention terms. During 2018, the Compensation Committee did not engage any compensation consultants.

The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee (i) meets the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards, including the heightened independence requirements specific to compensation committee members and (ii) meets the requirements of a non-employee director under the Exchange Act.

Our Board believes that the Compensation Committee charter outlines an objective process for determining executive compensation based on objective criteria such as evaluating the performance of our executive officers in light of defined performance objectives. The discussion leader for executive sessions of the Compensation Committee is generally Mr. Behring, the chair of the Committee.

Corporate Governance

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board is responsible for selecting and nominating directors for election, acting on the recommendation of the NCG Committee, and giving attention to the following qualifications and criteria:

Corporate Governance

The NCG Committee believes that the Board should possess a broad range of skills, knowledge, business experience and diversity of backgrounds that provides effective oversight of our business. In connection with the selection of any new director nominee, the NCG Committee will assess the skills and experience of the Board, as a whole, and of each of the individual directors. The NCG Committee will then seek to identify those qualifications and experience sought in any new candidate that will maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capabilities on the Board and produce an effective Board.

Selection of candidates is based on, first, the needs of RBI, and, second, identification of persons responsive to those needs. Although we do not have a formal, written policy relating to the identification and nomination of women directors, the NCG Committee seeks a diverse group of director candidates, including diversity with respect to race and gender. The NCG Committee believes that its goal is to assemble the best Board possible that will bring to us a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience. There are no specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by each nominee; however, the NCG Committee will evaluate a candidate’s experience, integrity and judgment as well other factors deemed appropriate in adding value to the composition of the Board as set forth in the Governance Guidelines.

With regard to diversity, RBI is committed to seeking to attain a balance among directors. Specifically, any search firm retained to assist the NCG Committee in seeking new director candidates for the Board will be instructed to seek to include diverse candidates in terms of race, gender, geography, thought, viewpoints, backgrounds, skills, experience, and expertise. The NCG Committee has the sole authority to negotiate and approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms.

We have not adopted a target regarding the number of women on our Board because we believe that a less formulaic approach to board composition, together with a rigorous search for qualified candidates based on the above qualifications and criteria, will best serve our needs. Our Board believes it is paramount to maintain flexibility in the nominating process in order to ensure that the most qualified available candidates are selected as circumstances dictate and the needs of the company evolve. There is currently one female director on the Board, Ms. Khosrowshahi, representing 8% of our current directors.

As noted above, the Board is responsible for selecting and nominating director candidates based on the NCG Committee’s recommendation. The Board believes that its Governance Guidelines outline objective qualifications and criteria (described above) that promote its objective selection and nomination of director candidates. Potential director candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as other candidates recommended to the NCG Committee. The discussion leader for executive sessions of the NCG Committee is generally Mr. Behring, the chair of the Committee.

Operations and Strategy Committee

The Operations and Strategy Committee assists the Board in overseeing the development and implementation of the menu, marketing and restaurant operations strategies for our brands. The role of the Operations and Strategy Committee is advisory.

Corporate Governance

The Operations and Strategy Committee reviews and makes recommendations to management and the Board regarding the following:

Conflicts Committee

In addition to the four standing committees, the Board of RBI, as the general partner of the Partnership, has established a Conflicts Committee which will be required to consent to, approve and/or direct a number of enumerated actions under the partnership agreement where a real or potential conflict of interest could exist or arise as between RBI, the Partnership or holders of Partnership exchangeable units.

Each of the members of the Conflicts Committee is “independent” (as such term is defined in the partnership agreement) in accordance with the requirements of the partnership agreement. Mr. Hedayat was appointed to serve on the Conflicts Committee effective June 7, 2018.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of Messrs. Behring, Fribourg or Sicupira was, during 2018, an officer (as defined in Rule 3b-2 under the Exchange Act) or employee of RBI, or formerly an officer of RBI. None of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of the Compensation Committee or our Board.

Code of Ethics/Conduct

Each of the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct for Non-Restaurant Employees, the Code of Ethics for Executive Officers and the Code of Conduct for Directors is available in the “Investors – Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.rbi.com.

Our General Counsel and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer monitors compliance with the Codes and reports any violations to the Board. Furthermore, each of the Code of Ethics for Executive Officers and the Code of

Corporate Governance

Conduct for Directors contemplates that questions or concerns under the Code, as applicable, can be brought directly to the Chairman of the Board.

In addition, we have adopted the Restaurant Brands International Inc. Whistle Blowing Policy in order to provide for the receipt and treatment of complaints received by RBI with respect to violations of the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct for Non-Restaurant Employees, as well as other RBI policies and controls. According to the Whistle Blowing Policy, the General Counsel is responsible for conducting the investigation of any complaint received and reporting to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the secure reporting process and determining what action should be taken with respect to a complaint. The Restaurant Brands International Inc. Whistle Blowing Policy is available in the “Investors – Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.rbi.com.

Related Party Transaction Policy

The Board has adopted a written related person transactions policy, which is administered by the Audit Committee. This policy applies to any transaction or series of related transactions or any material amendment to any such transaction involving a related person and RBI or any subsidiary. However, under U.S. securities laws, RBI may not make any loan or other extension of credit to any of its directors or executive officers.

For purposes of the policy, “related persons” consist of executive officers, directors, director nominees, any shareholder beneficially owning more than five percent of any class of our voting securities, and immediate family members of any such persons. In reviewing related person transactions, the Audit Committee takes into account all factors that it deems appropriate, including whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. No member of the Audit Committee may participate in any review, consideration or approval of any related person transaction in which the director or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person. All related person transactions will be disclosed in filings as required under applicable securities laws.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Registration Rights Agreements

In connection with our initial public offering and our acquisition of Tim Hortons, we entered into registration rights agreements with three of our major shareholders. In 2012, in connection with the merger of Burger King Worldwide Holdings, Inc. with and into Justice Holdco LLC, and the transactions related thereto, BKW entered into separate registration rights agreements with 3G Special Situations Fund II, L.P. (the “3G Special Situations Fund”) and with Pershing Square, L.P. and affiliated entities (collectively, the “Pershing Shareholders”), with respect to shares of BKW common stock purchased by such shareholders in the transaction. In 2014, in connection with our acquisition of Tim Hortons, we assumed the obligations under these registration rights agreements with respect to the registration of common shares of RBI issued and issuable upon exchange of Partnership exchangeable units to these shareholders and their permitted transferees. In addition, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with National Indemnity Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“National Indemnity”), with respect to its common shares of RBI. These registration rights agreements give these shareholders and any permitted transferee the ability to require us to register RBI common shares for resale, in certain circumstances and subject to limitations, either (i) upon demand, (ii) in a shelf registration statement or (iii) by “piggybacking” on another offering that we are conducting. Pursuant to these registration rights agreements, we are required to pay all expenses of any such registration, other than transfer taxes and underwriting discounts and commissions.

Consulting Agreement

In December 2014, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Caira, Vice Chairman of our Board, pursuant to which he agreed to provide transition services and assistance in connection with our efforts to expand certain of our brands globally (the “Consulting Agreement”). Recognizing that substantially all the services would be

Corporate Governance

provided in 2015, we subsequently amended the Consulting Agreement. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Caira received $1,425,000 in 2015, $37,500 in 2016 and $37,500 in 2017. In October 2017, the term of the Consulting Agreement was extended through December 31, 2018, and we agreed to pay Mr. Caira $100,000 in four equal installments during 2018. Mr. Caira received a payment of $25,000 in each of March, June, September and December of 2018. The Consulting Agreement expired on December 31, 2018.

Employee Indebtedness

None of our current or former directors or executive officers has any amount of indebtedness outstanding to us. As of March 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of indebtedness outstanding by all current and former employees of RBI and any of its subsidiaries, and their respective associates, is as follows:

Executive Officer Diversity

We do not have a formal policy that specifically targets the representation of women in executive officer positions. While we believe that diversity – including gender diversity – is an important consideration in determining the makeup of our executive team, it is only one of a number of factors (which include merit, talent, experience, expertise, leadership capabilities, innovative thinking and strategic agility) that are considered in selecting the best candidates for executive positions. We currently have two female executive officers, Jacqueline Friesner, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer and Jill Granat, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, who comprise 22% of our nine executive officers.

Risk Management

Board Role in Management of Risk

The Board is actively involved in the oversight and management of risks that could affect RBI. This oversight and management is conducted primarily through its committees, but the full Board has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the risk management function, specifically with respect to management’s assessment of risk exposures (including risks related to liquidity, operations and regulatory compliance), and the processes in place to monitor and control such exposures. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee works closely with members of our management team responsible for monitoring such risks. The other committees of the Board consider the risks within their areas of responsibility. The Board satisfies its oversight responsibility through reports by each committee chair regarding the committee’s considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within RBI.

Compensation Risks

Based on a comprehensive review and analysis of our incentive plans and programs, the Compensation Committee believes these programs are not reasonably likely to give rise to risks that would have a material adverse effect on our business. The Compensation Committee considered the following factors as part of its review and analysis of our incentive plans and programs:

Corporate Governance

Director Compensation

General. The Board maintains a compensation arrangement for the non-management directors of the Board. The Board compensation arrangement is comprised of the following:

Non-management directors have the opportunity to elect to defer their annual retainer and committee fees and, in lieu of the cash fees, to receive a grant of restricted share units (RSUs) with a value of two times the forgone fees. The RSUs are fully vested at the time of grant and will be settled upon termination of board service.

The following table summarizes compensation paid to each of our non-management directors during 2018. Mr. Schwartz, our former Chief Executive Officer and current Executive Chairman, is omitted from the table as he did not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director in 2018.

Corporate Governance

The table below sets forth the aggregate number of RSUs and unexercised stock options held by each non-management director as of December 31, 2018:

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

General Overview

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which we refer to as the CD&A, outlines our compensation philosophy and objectives and describes our executive pay programs for 2018 and our compensation of our 2018 named executive officers, whom we refer to as our NEOs:

In early 2018, Mr. Kobza transitioned from his role of CFO to the role of Chief Technology Officer and Mr. Dunnigan was appointed to serve as CFO. On January 23, 2019, Mr. Schwartz transitioned from the position of CEO to the role of Co-Chairman of the Board and Mr. Cil was appointed as CEO. The Board also appointed Mr. Schwartz to the role of Executive Chairman, an officer position, effective January 23, 2019 to assist in a smooth transition of responsibilities to Mr. Cil. Mr. Schwartz will serve in such capacity until September 30, 2019, at which time his employment with RBI will terminate. However, he will continue to serve as Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors after his employment terminates. Effective January 23, 2019, Mr. Kobza was named COO.

Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation philosophy is based on pay-for-performance and meritocratic principles. Our compensation programs are designed to accomplish each of the following goals:

As described in further detail below, consistent with these goals, our compensation programs are designed to complement each other to provide a clear link between what we pay our NEOs and RBI’s performance over both short- and long-term periods. Our NEO compensation package for 2018 reflects this commitment. For 2018, 96% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and an average of 93% of our other NEOs’ target total direct compensation was performance-based or equity-based.

Oversight of Executive Compensation Programs

Role of Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing our compensation philosophy and for setting our executive compensation and benefits policies and programs generally. In formulating our executive compensation packages, the Compensation Committee does not benchmark to a particular industry or group of companies, but it draws information from general experience and the experience of other companies in which principals of 3G Capital have an ownership interest.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Consideration of Stockholder Advisory Vote

As part of its compensation setting process, the Compensation Committee also reviews the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote, including the fact that 96.2% of the votes cast were voted in favor of RBI’s executive compensation at the 2018 Annual Meeting. The Compensation Committee intends to annually review the results of the advisory vote and will be cognizant of this feedback as it completes its annual review of each pay element and the total compensation packages of our NEOs.

Role of Executives in Establishing Compensation

Annually, the CEO proposes the financial metric and threshold, target and maximum performance levels for the Annual Bonus Program, subject to Board approval. The CEO also proposes the individual performance goals that will determine Individual Achievement under our Annual Bonus Program. These individual performance goals are then approved by the Board for the CEO and by the Compensation Committee for the CEO Direct Reports, including the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the CEO, determines the CEO’s final Individual Achievement, and recommends to the full Board for approval the bonus payout of the CEO. The Compensation Committee approves the final Individual Achievement and bonus payout for each of the other NEOs based on the CEO’s recommendation. In addition, our CEO provides the Compensation Committee with recommendations regarding base salary and annual target bonus levels for the upcoming year and the aggregate total long-term incentive value that each NEO (other than the CEO) should receive.

Elements of Compensation Program

As noted above, our compensation program is based on a pay-for-performance philosophy. This section of the CD&A provides an overview of each element of our compensation program and describes both the process for determining such compensation and how such compensation relates to RBI’s pay-for-performance philosophy and meritocratic principles. The following table summarizes the primary elements and objectives of our 2018 compensation program for executive officers, including NEOs.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Base Salaries

Objectives and Considerations. Base salary is the “fixed” element of executive compensation at RBI. We provide a base salary to recognize the skills, competencies, experience and individual performance that the CEO and each CEO Direct Report brings to his or her position. In addition, because our executive officers operate as a team, the Compensation Committee also considers internal pay equity in establishing the base salary of the CEO Direct Reports. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salary of the CEO and each CEO Direct Report. We believe that the base salary review process serves our pay-for-performance philosophy because pay increases are generally performance-based and dependent on the NEO’s success and achievement in his role. In addition, each NEO’s target annual incentive award opportunity, as described below, is based on a percentage of his base salary. Therefore, as NEOs earn performance-based salary increases, their annual incentive award opportunities also increase proportionately.

2018 Actions. In January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the 2018 base salary of (1) Mr. Dunnigan from $250,000 to $400,000 in recognition of his promotion to the position of CFO and (2) Mr. Macedo from $480,000 to $600,000 in recognition of his promotion to the position of President, Tim Hortons, in December 2017. There were no other changes to the base salaries of our NEOs during 2018.

Annual Bonus Program

Objectives and Considerations. Annual cash incentives are performance-based and designed to motivate and reward employees who contribute positively towards our business strategy and achieve their individual performance goals. Annual cash incentives are only paid if we achieve our minimum financial goals for the calendar year.

Plan Design. Most corporate employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to receive an annual performance-based cash bonus based on (1) business performance and (2) their individual performance.

The formula for determining an eligible employee’s annual cash bonus under the 2018 Annual Bonus Program (the “bonus payout” or “payout”) is set forth below.

However, the actual bonus payout is subject to (1) a reduction of up to 30% if RBI does not meet its minimum free cash flow target and (2) an up or down adjustment of up to 20% based on a qualitative evaluation of RBI’s performance and the executive’s performance. (See “Free Cash Flow Adjustment and Performance Adjustment Factor” discussed below).

The actual bonus amounts are set forth in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement. As discussed below, all of the NEOs with the exception of Mr. Goncalves, whose employment terminated on March 31, 2019, elected to use a portion of their cash bonus to purchase common shares of RBI in the 2018 Bonus Swap Program, which, we believe, demonstrates our NEOs’ alignment with our shareholders and their confidence in our long-term success. Mr. Goncalves did not elect to purchase common shares in the 2018 Bonus Swap Program because he would have forfeited the related RSUs upon termination.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Target Bonus. The annual target bonus for each participating employee is expressed as a percentage of base salary as of September 30^th of the preceding year. Target bonuses are set based on the employee’s level, his experience, responsibilities, internal equity considerations and prior year’s performance. Due to the nature of the CEO’s role and responsibilities, the CEO’s target bonus as a percentage of base salary is greater than that of the other NEOs.

2018 Actions. In January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the target bonus for 2018 (as a percentage of base salary) for Mr. Dunnigan from 70% to 130% and for Mr. Macedo from 150% to 200% in recognition of the promotions described above as well as internal equity considerations. The increase in their target bonus was effective as of January 1, 2018 in accordance with our standard practice under the Annual Bonus Program.

Achievement Percentage. An executive’s Achievement Percentage is comprised of Business Achievement (weighted 50%) and Individual Achievement (weighted 50%).

Business Achievement – Each year the board of directors of RBI establishes (1) the financial metric used to measure the financial performance of RBI and for our business units and (2) the threshold, target and maximum performance levels which will apply to the calculation of each executive’s bonus based on the scope of the executive’s role within RBI. Under the 2018 Bonus Program, for each NEO, of the 50% allocated to Business Achievement, the maximum payout was subject to a cap of 65% should the maximum performance level be achieved.

For 2018, the Board again selected Organic Adjusted EBITDA Growth, measured year-over-year, assuming budgeted currency exchange rates, as the financial measure for Business Achievement to facilitate performance comparisons from period to period. Business Achievement was measured solely on RBI Organic Adjusted EBITDA Growth Achievement for each of Messrs. Schwartz, Dunnigan, Kobza and Goncalves based on their roles and scope of responsibility at the RBI level. For Mr. Cil, of the 50% allocated to Business Achievement, 20% was measured on RBI Organic Adjusted EBITDA Growth Achievement and the remaining 30% was measured on BK Brand Organic Adjusted EBITDA Growth Achievement, excluding the impact of allocated shared services expenses. For Mr. Macedo, of the 50% allocated to Business Achievement, 20% was measured on RBI Organic Adjusted EBITDA Growth Achievement and the remaining 30% was measured on the TH Core Operations business unit’s Organic Adjusted EBITDA growth excluding the impact of allocated shared services expenses. The TH Core Operations business unit’s Organic Adjusted EBITDA growth measures only consumer-facing core operations of the Tim Hortons business.

In this CD&A, we refer to the year-over-year growth of RBI’s Organic Adjusted EBITDA as “RBI EBITDA Growth Achievement”, the year-over-year growth of our BK Brand Organic Adjusted EBITDA as “BK Brand EBITDA Growth Achievement” and the year-over year growth of the TH Core Operations business unit’s Organic Adjusted EBITDA as the “TH Core Operations EBITDA Growth Achievement”.

For 2018, the Compensation Committee also established the threshold, target and maximum performance levels, using the prior year’s actual results as a baseline to determine the growth achievement in the current year, taking into consideration the combined annual results of PLK for 2017 (both prior to and subsequent to its acquisition). The Compensation Committee set the year-over-year Organic Adjusted EBITDA threshold, target and performance level growth targets for the BK Brand EBITDA Growth Achievement and the TH Core Operations EBITDA Growth Achievement based on the confidential business plan and budget for each business unit in 2018. The maximum performance targets for the BK Brand EBITDA Growth Achievement and the TH Core Operations EBITDA Growth Achievement were set at ambitious levels and could only be attained upon achievement of strong financial results of the respective business unit.

In January 2018, the Compensation Committee modified the threshold and maximum performance levels for the 2018 Bonus Program. During prior years, the threshold for each metric was set at 80% of the target performance level, while the maximum was set at 120% of the target performance level. For 2018, the threshold for each

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

metric was set at 50% of the target performance level, while the maximum was set at 150% of the target performance level. If a business unit’s EBITDA Growth Achievement is less than the threshold, there would be no payout for such business unit.

Our threshold, target and maximum performance levels as well as the EBITDA Growth Achievement for RBI were as follows:

2018 EBITDA Growth Performance Levels

In January 2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed actual performance of RBI and each business unit. RBI Growth Achievement was +6% for 2018, or 88.8% of target. BK Brand EBITDA Growth Achievement was awarded at 140.9% to reflect achievement between the target and maximum performance levels. For 2018, actual TH Core Operations EBITDA Growth Achievement was below the threshold performance level of 50%. Accordingly, under the 2018 Bonus Program, none of the employees, including Mr. Macedo, evaluated on TH Core Operations EBITDA Growth Achievement would have earned any bonus payout with respect to this component of their bonus. However, the Compensation Committee approved a deemed achievement of 50% for all bonus eligible employees of the TH Core Operations business unit. In making this decision, the Compensation Committee considered the improved performance of the brand as a result of the implementation of the “Winning Together Plan”, including consistent sequential improvement in same store sales, successful product initiatives, the renovation of more than 370 Tim Hortons restaurants in Canada to the brand’s new “Welcome Image”, the launch and testing of our loyalty program in Canada and improved communications, marketing and franchisee relations. The Committee also considered the fact that participants who were measured on TH business unit results in 2017 received no business achievement payout on account of TH for 2017 and decided that it was important for retention purposes and to recognize the significant improvements made at TH during the year.

Based on the foregoing results, the Business Achievement for each NEO was as follows: Messrs. Schwartz, Dunnigan, Kobza and Goncalves: 44.4%; Mr. Cil, 60.0%; and Mr. Macedo, 32.76% (17.76% if calculated based on actual TH Core Operations Growth Achievement).

Individual Achievement – We measure Individual Achievement based on a participant’s overall achievement of his individual performance goals. At the beginning of the year, a participant is assigned multiple quantitative and qualitative metrics called “Key Performance Indicators” or “KPIs” and each KPI is assigned a weighting. The Board approves the KPIs for the CEO and the Compensation Committee approves the KPIs for the CEO Direct Reports. None of the individual KPIs is material to understanding how the bonus program operated, or how annual cash incentive amounts were determined, in 2018.

At the end of each year, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee evaluates the individual performance of the CEO, and the CEO evaluates the individual performance of the CEO Direct Reports, including the other NEOs. Each KPI is expressed as a percentage of completion and is assigned a corresponding weight (with 100% being full completion of each KPI and reflective of the maximum award applicable to each KPI). Individual Achievement represents the sum of the percentage completion of each KPI after the appropriate weight has been applied to each. If a participant’s Individual Achievement is less than 50%, then he or she will not receive a bonus payout for that year even if the Business Achievement target is met or exceeded.

Individual Achievement for the NEOs for 2018 was 57.3%, 93.5%, 73.0%, 54.5%, 56.0% and 96.8% for Messrs. Schwartz, Dunnigan, Kobza, Cil, Macedo and Goncalves, respectively.

Global Multiplier. Each executive’s bonus is subject to a “Global Multiplier” which can increase or decrease the bonus payout by up to 50%. For 2018, as in prior years, our Global Multiplier was based on RBI EBITDA Growth

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Achievement. If RBI EBITDA Growth Achievement is below threshold, then no bonuses would be paid by the Company. If RBI EBITDA Growth Achievement meets the “threshold” level, there would be a 50% reduction to the payout, achievement at the “target” level would represent no adjustment to the payout, while achievement at the “maximum” level would represent a 50% increase to the payout. If RBI EBITDA Growth Achievement falls between the threshold level and the target level or between the target level and the maximum level, the Global Multiplier percentage would be calculated on a linear basis. Based on 2018 RBI EBITDA Growth Achievement, our Global Multiplier was 88.8%.

Free Cash Flow Adjustment and Performance Adjustment Factor. If we do not achieve the minimum free cash flow target that we established for 2018, then the bonus payout for all participants would be reduced by 30%. For 2018, we exceeded the 2018 free cash flow target. In addition, the CEO may recommend an adjustment to the bonus payout for any employee (other than the CEO) up or down by up to 20% based on a qualitative evaluation of our performance and the individual executive’s contribution to such performance, subject to final approval of any such adjustment and the amount of the overall bonus payout by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may adjust the bonus payout of the CEO up or down by up to 20% based on a similar evaluation. Upon evaluation of the improved performance of the TH Core Operations business unit, the CEO recommended and the Compensation Committee approved an upward adjustment to the bonus payout for Mr. Macedo of 20%.

Discretionary Annual Bonus. Upon evaluation of the improved performance of the Tim Hortons brand over the course of 2018, including the considerations regarding the TH Core Operations business unit set forth above, in January 2019, the Compensation Committee approved an overall bonus to Mr. Macedo of $800,000, which includes the $555,886 bonus payable under the 2018 Annual Bonus Plan (reflecting the actual TH Core Operations results and the 20% adjustment provided by the 2018 Annual Bonus Plan) and a discretionary component that reflected the deemed achievement by the TH business unit and an additional amount that the Compensation Committee approved in light of the significant progress made by TH during 2018 and Mr. Macedo’s role in developing and successfully implementing the “Winning Together” plan.

Annual Bonus Swap Program

Objectives and Considerations. As part of its commitment to fostering an ownership mentality, RBI provides its executives with an opportunity to invest a portion of their annual cash bonus into RBI common shares (we refer to these purchased shares as “Investment Shares”), and leverage that investment through the issuance of matching RSUs (we refer to these RSUs as “Bonus Matching RSUs”).

2018 Bonus Swap Program. Under the 2018 Bonus Swap Program, eligible employees were offered an opportunity to use either 25% or 50% (the “Swap Election Percentage”) of their calculated net bonus for 2018 (after deducting an amount based on a theoretical tax rate of 40%) to purchase Investment Shares. The number of Investment Shares purchased was calculated as the product of the theoretical net bonus and the Swap Election Percentage, divided by the closing price reported on the TSX (denominated in Canadian dollars) for Canadian participants or on the NYSE (denominated in U.S. dollars) for all other participants, in each case on the trading day prior to the date of purchase. Each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Goncalves, elected a Swap Election Percentage of 50%. As Mr. Goncalves’s employment terminated on March 31, 2019, he did not participate in the 2018 Bonus Swap Program.

Employees who elected to purchase Investment Shares also received Bonus Matching RSUs, based on their Swap Election Percentage and their level within the organization. For each NEO, the Bonus Matching RSUs were calculated by (1) multiplying the NEO’s gross bonus by the Swap Election Percentage, or 50%, (2) multiplying this amount by two (the RSU matching multiplier), and (3) dividing the total by the closing price reported on the NYSE on the trading day prior to the grant date, which was $64.75. Both the purchase date of the Investment Shares and the grant date for the Bonus Matching RSUs were the same as the bonus payment date under the 2018 Annual Bonus Program, which was February 22, 2019.

Dividend equivalents accrue on the Bonus Matching RSUs in additional RSUs having a fair market value as of the applicable dividend payment date equal to the value of the dividend that would have been distributed if a Bonus

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Matching RSU was an issued and outstanding common share (the “Dividend Equivalents”). The Dividend Equivalents are subject to the same terms and conditions as the Bonus Matching RSUs to which they relate and will be settled on the relevant settlement date of the Bonus Matching RSUs.

The Bonus Matching RSUs cliff vest on December 31, 2023. All of the Bonus Matching RSUs will be forfeited if an NEO’s service to RBI is terminated for any reason other than death or disability (including due to retirement or termination without cause) prior to December 31, 2020. If an NEO sells more than 50% of his Investment Shares before the vesting date, he will forfeit 100% of the Bonus Matching RSUs. An NEO who sells 50% or less of the Investment Shares before the vesting date will forfeit 50% of the Bonus Matching RSUs and a proportional amount of the remaining Bonus Matching RSUs. The Compensation Committee approved the grants of Bonus Matching RSUs to the participants in the 2018 Bonus Swap Program in January 2019.

The following table sets forth, for each NEO, the number of Bonus Matching RSUs issued to such NEO:

The Bonus Matching RSUs will be reported in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table and 2019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

2017 Bonus Swap Program. The terms of the 2017 Bonus Swap Program are substantially the same as the 2018 Bonus Swap Program. The amounts set forth below reflect the Bonus Matching RSUs issued to each NEO on the grant date:

Additional information regarding these Bonus Matching RSUs is provided in the 2018 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table and the 2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table.

Discretionary Equity Grants

From time to time, we may make discretionary stock option awards to employees, at such time as the Compensation Committee or our CEO determines appropriate. Stock options are granted with an exercise price based on the fair market value of an RBI common share on the grant date and thus have value only to the extent that the value of our common shares increases after the grant date. Stock options typically cliff vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant date.

In February 2018, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary awards of 250,000, 220,000 and 200,000 performance-based RSUs (or “PBRSUs”) to Messrs. Schwartz, Cil and Macedo for retention purposes based on the prior vesting of a significant portion of each executive’s equity awards. The performance target for purposes of determining the number of units earned by Messrs. Schwartz, Cil and Macedo was a compounded annual growth

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

of Organic Adjusted EBITDA of 10.0% for the period beginning on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2018 (the “Performance Goal”), subject to adjustment from a threshold performance of 80%, which would earn 60% of the award, target performance at 100%, which would earn 100% of the award and maximum performance of 120%, which would earn 120% of the award (and any achievement in between the performance levels to be linearly calculated). In early 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that the compounded annual growth of Organic Adjusted EBITDA was 10.1% for the performance period (or 101% of the performance goal). Consequently, the number of PBRSUs earned by Messrs. Schwartz, Cil and Macedo (subject to vesting) based on RBI’s 101% achievement was 252,500, 222,200 and 202,000 for Messrs. Schwartz, Cil and Macedo, respectively (not including accrued dividend equivalents). In addition, Messrs. Dunnigan and Kobza, who had each been awarded PBRSUs in 2016 under the same terms, earned a total of 60,600 PBRSUs and 353,500 PBRSUs, respectively (101% of the PBRSUs awarded in 2016). The PBRSUs granted in February 2018 will cliff vest on February 23, 2023. Messrs. Schwartz, Cil and Macedo are required to maintain ownership of 750,000, 617,762 and 220,000 common shares and Partnership exchangeable units (and any combination thereof), respectively, through the end of the vesting period. If an executive fails to comply with these holding requirements, he will forfeit all of the PBRSUs. In addition, if an executive’s service with RBI, which for this purpose includes service on the RBI Board of Directors, is terminated (other than due to death or disability) prior to February 23, 2021, he will forfeit the entire award.

Additional information regarding these PBRSU grants is provided in the 2018 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table and the 2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table.

Discretionary Relocation Bonus

From time to time, in connection with relocation or promotions, the Compensation Committee will also approve discretionary cash bonuses that are not performance based. In 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a $250,000 bonus to Mr. Macedo in connection with his relocation to Canada.

Stock Incentive Plans

Any equity-based awards described in this section are subject to the terms of the relevant stock incentive plans pursuant to which they have been issued. Our stock incentive plans are described in Appendix C to this proxy statement.

Benefits and Perquisites

In addition to base salary, annual cash bonuses and long-term equity incentives, we provided and continue to provide the following executive benefit programs to our NEOs and other executives:

Executive Life Insurance Program

The Executive Life Insurance Program provides life insurance coverage which is paid by us and allows our U.S. executives to purchase additional life insurance coverage at their own expense. Coverage for our NEOs is limited to the lesser of $1.3 million or 2.75 times base salary.

Executive Health Plan

Mr. Macedo received medical and dental coverage through Cigna International for 2018. Under this program, we pay the premiums for this insurance coverage, which pays 100% of most of the medical and dental expenses of Mr. Macedo and his eligible dependents. Further details are provided in the 2018 All Other Compensation Table.

Other Benefits

We also maintain a comprehensive benefits program consisting of retirement income and health and welfare plans, which are available to the NEOs on the same basis as all other full-time employees. The objective of the program is to provide full-time employees with reasonable and competitive levels of financial support in the event

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

of retirement, death, disability or illness, which may interrupt the eligible employee’s employment or income received as an active employee. Our health and welfare plans consist of life, disability and health insurance benefit plans that are available to all eligible full-time employees. We also provide a 401(k) plan that is available to all eligible full-time U.S. employees. The 401(k) plan includes a matching feature of up to four percent of the employee’s base salary, subject to IRS limits.

RBI provides tax support in the form of tax equalization and tax preparation services to each of the NEOs for business reasons. We also pay for annual comprehensive physicals for employees at the level of vice president and above. Beginning in 2018, we offered, at our cost, long term disability insurance of up to 50% of eligible earnings, not to exceed $5,000 per month. From time to time, RBI provides other limited perquisite benefits. Further details are provided in the 2018 All Other Compensation Table.

Clawback and Anti-Hedging Policies

In January 2017, the Compensation Committee adopted a clawback policy which requires RBI to seek to recoup incentive awards made to RBI’s executive officers if the financial results on which such awards were based are subsequently restated within a two year period and the executive officer’s intentional misconduct contributed to the restatement. In January 2017, our Board approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan to provide that any awards granted under the plan on or after January 1, 2017 are subject to recoupment pursuant to the clawback policy and applicable law. In addition, our stock option and RSU award agreements provide that, in certain circumstances, the award and any proceeds or other benefits a participant may receive may be subject to forfeiture and/or repayment to RBI. Our insider trading policy limits the timing and types of transactions in RBI securities by executive officers, including our NEOs. Among other restrictions, the policy prohibits short-selling RBI securities and transacting in puts or calls on RBI securities.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

To further align the interests of RBI’s executive officers with those of its stockholders and ensure a long-term perspective, the Compensation Committee adopted minimum stock ownership guidelines for executive officers in January 2017.

The minimum ownerships levels are as follows:

Executive officers have five years from the adoption date of the policy or from their initial promotion into an eligible position to achieve the required ownership levels. The Compensation Committee may allow exceptions to these guidelines in the event of hardship or other extraordinary circumstances.

These guidelines provide that (1) outstanding RBI common shares and Partnership exchangeable units directly owned, (2) outstanding RBI common shares and Partnership exchangeable units held by an executive officer’s spouse or dependent children or by a trust held for the benefit of the executive officer’s dependent children and (3) vested options (calculated on after-tax net proceeds, assuming a 45% tax rate) may be included in determining whether an officer has met the minimum ownership requirement. Until such time as an executive officer has met his or her minimum required ownership, he or she must retain 100% of all shares, net of taxes, received from the settlement of restricted stock awards granted under our incentive plans.

Employment Agreements

During 2018, RBI and two of its subsidiaries (a subsidiary of Burger King Corporation and The TDL Group Corp.) had employment agreements (the “Tri-Party Employment Agreements”) in place with each of Messrs. Schwartz, Dunnigan, Kobza and Goncalves due to the fact that these executives allocate their working hours among RBI and the subsidiaries. In early 2019, in connection with his appointment as CEO, Mr. Cil also entered into Tri-Party

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Employment Agreements with us. Pursuant to the Tri-Party Employment Agreements, each company is responsible for paying that portion of the executive’s salary and annual bonus based on the percentage of the executive’s working hours allocated to such company. Each Tri-Party Employment Agreement sets forth the base salary and the target bonus (as a percentage of base salary) of the executive (as described above). The Tri-Party Employment Agreements also provide that (i) each of the executives is tax equalized to the U.S. to help ensure that the executive does not gain or lose financially due to the different tax and social security implications or consequences of the executive’s employment with the three companies and (ii) that RBI will pay for tax preparation services for such executive. Either the company or the executive may terminate the employment relationship at any time. If a company terminates the employment of an executive under its respective employment agreement without cause or due to the executive’s death or disability, the provisions of RBI’s policies relating to termination of employment applicable to employees at the executive’s grade level as in effect at the time of termination, including, if applicable, RBI’s severance policy, or provincial employment standards legislation, if such legislation provides for greater severance benefits, will apply. This severance will be paid to the executives by the respective companies based on the same allocation applied to base compensation. If an executive is terminated by one company, his employment with the other companies will also terminate.

In connection with Mr. Schwartz’s transition to Executive Chairman through September 30, 2019, Mr. Schwartz’s Tri-Party Employment Agreements were amended to remove his eligibility for the 2019 Annual Bonus program. In connection with Mr. Kobza’s appointment to Chief Operating Officer, his Tri-Party Employment Agreements were also amended to reflect his new position and compensation as described above. As discussed above, Mr. Goncalves’ Tri-Party Employment Agreements terminated effective March 31, 2019.

Non-Competition and Confidentiality

Each of the NEOs has agreed in his employment agreement or in a non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement (i) not to compete with us during the term of his employment and for one year after the termination of employment, (ii) not to solicit our employees or franchisees during the term of his employment and for one year after termination, and (iii) to maintain the confidentiality of our information. If the executive breaches any of these covenants, we will cease providing any severance (if applicable) or other benefits to him or her.

Actions Regarding 2019 Compensation

Changes in Base Salary. In January 2019, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the base salary of Mr. Cil from $600,000 to $800,000 in connection with his promotion to CEO and of Mr. Kobza from $600,000 to $650,000 in recognition of his promotion to COO. The Compensation Committee approved an increase in the base salary of Mr. Dunnigan from $400,000 to $480,000 due to exemplary performance and to make his base salary competitive for his role as CFO.

Changes in Target Bonuses. In January 2019, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the target bonus percentage of the following NEOs in recognition of the promotions referred to above and for exemplary performance: Mr. Cil from 200% to 300%; Mr. Dunnigan from 130% to 150%; Mr. Kobza from 200% to 250%; and Mr. Macedo from 200% to 250%.

2019 PBRSU Grants. In January 2019, the Compensation Committee approved PBRSUs awards of 275,000, 100,000, 225,000 and 125,000 to Messrs. Cil, Dunnigan, Kobza and Macedo. The performance measure for purposes of determining the number of units earned by Messrs. Cil, Dunnigan, Kobza and Macedo is RBI’s annual year-over-year growth of Organic Adjusted EBITDA for 2019, 2020 and 2021. If, at the end of the three-year performance period, the threshold performance has not been achieved, the performance period will be extended for an additional year, and a 20% reduction to the payout will apply. The Committee established an 85.7% performance threshold below which no shares are earned and a 128.6% maximum performance level. If achievement falls between the threshold level and the target level or between the target level and the maximum level, the number of shares earned by Messrs. Cil, Dunnigan, Kobza and Macedo would be calculated on a linear basis. Once earned, the PBRSUs will cliff vest on February 22, 2024. In addition, if an executive’s service to RBI is terminated (other than due to death or disability) prior to February 22, 2022, he will forfeit the entire award.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Additional information regarding these awards will be provided in the 2019 Grant of Plan Based Awards Table and the 2019 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table.

Compensation Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussions with management, we have approved the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis in this proxy statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Alexandre Behring, Chairman

Paul Fribourg

Carlos Alberto Sicupira

April 15, 2019

Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables provide information on the compensation of the NEOs for our 2018 fiscal year. Our NEOs include the individual who served as our CEO during 2018, each of the two individuals who served as CFO during any part of 2018 and our three other most highly compensated officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2018.

2018 Summary Compensation Table

Executive Compensation

2018 All Other Compensation Table

The following table contains a breakdown of the compensation and benefits included under All Other Compensation in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table.

Executive Compensation

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table provides information about cash (non-equity) and equity compensation awarded to our named executive officers in 2018, including: (1) the range of possible cash payouts under our 2018 Annual Bonus Program; (2) the grant date and approval date of equity awards; (3) the number of Bonus Matching RSUs awarded in February 2019 in connection with the 2018 Annual Bonus Program; (4) the number and exercise price of discretionary options awarded during 2018; and (5) the grant date fair value of the Bonus Matching RSUs, PBRSUs and discretionary options awarded during 2018 as described above in Notes 6, 7 and 8 to the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, respectively. The Bonus Matching RSUs are discussed in greater detail in the CD&A above.

Executive Compensation

2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table