UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20‑F
☐ |
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR |
|
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 |
|
OR |
|
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR |
|
☐ |
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001‑16429
ABB Ltd
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Switzerland
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Affolternstrasse 44
CH‑8050 Zurich
Switzerland
(Address of principal executive offices)
Richard A. Brown
Affolternstrasse 44
CH‑8050 Zurich
Switzerland
Telephone: +41‑43‑317‑7111
Facsimile: +41‑43‑317‑7992
(Name, Telephone, E‑mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
American Depositary
Shares, |
New York Stock Exchange |
Registered Shares, par value CHF 0.12 |
New York Stock Exchange* |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None.
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 2,138,706,835 Registered Shares
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ⬜
If this is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ⬜ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ⬜
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ⬜
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non‑accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
Accelerated filer ⬜ |
Non‑accelerated filer ⬜ |
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP ☒
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ⬜ Other ⬜
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. item 17 ⬜ item 18 ⬜
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ⬜ No ☒
* Listed on the New York Stock Exchange not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page |
PART I |
3 |
|
Item 1. |
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
3 |
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
3 |
Item 3. |
Key Information |
4 |
Item 4. |
Information on the Company |
15 |
Item 4A. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
31 |
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |
31 |
Item 6. |
Directors, Senior Management and Employees |
73 |
Item 7. |
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |
111 |
Item 8. |
Financial Information |
112 |
Item 9. |
The Offer and Listing |
113 |
Item 10. |
Additional Information |
114 |
Item 11. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
124 |
Item 12. |
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities |
125 |
PART II |
126 |
|
Item 13. |
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
126 |
Item 14. |
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
126 |
Item 15. |
Controls and Procedures |
126 |
Item 15T. |
Controls and Procedures |
128 |
Item 16A. |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
128 |
Item 16B. |
Code of Ethics |
128 |
Item 16C. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
128 |
Item 16D. |
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
129 |
Item 16E. |
Purchase of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
129 |
Item 16F. |
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant |
129 |
Item 16G. |
Corporate Governance |
130 |
Item 16H. |
Mine Safety Disclosure |
130 |
PART III |
130 |
|
Item 17. |
Financial Statements |
130 |
Item 18. |
Financial Statements |
130 |
Item 19. |
Exhibits |
131 |
(i)
INTRODUCTION
ABB Ltd is a corporation organized under the laws of Switzerland. In this Annual Report, “the ABB Group,” “ABB,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to ABB Ltd and its consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise requires). We also use these terms to refer to ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd and its subsidiaries prior to the establishment of ABB Ltd as the holding company for the entire ABB Group in 1999, as described in this Annual Report under “Item 4. Information on the Company—Introduction—History of the ABB Group”. Our American Depositary Shares (each representing one registered share of ABB Ltd) are referred to as “ADSs”. The registered shares of ABB Ltd are referred to as “shares”. Our principal corporate offices are located at Affolternstrasse 44, CH‑8050 Zurich, Switzerland, telephone number +41‑43‑317‑7111.
FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
The Consolidated Financial Statements of ABB Ltd, including the notes thereto, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016 (our Consolidated Financial Statements) have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). ABB Ltd has separately prepared its statutory unconsolidated financial statements in accordance with the Swiss Code of Obligations.
In this Annual Report: (i) “$,” “U.S. dollar” and “USD” refer to the lawful currency of the United States of America; (ii) “CHF” and “Swiss franc” refer to the lawful currency of Switzerland; (iii) “EUR” and “euro” refer to the lawful currency of the participating member states of the European Economic and Monetary Union (Eurozone); (iv) “SEK” and “Swedish krona” refer to the lawful currency of Sweden; (v) “Chinese renminbi” refers to the lawful currency of the People’s Republic of China; (vi) “AED” refers to the lawful currency of the United Arab Emirates; (vii) “AUD” and “Australian dollar” refer to the lawful currency of Australia; and (viii) “INR” and “Indian Rupee” refer to the lawful currency of India.
Except as otherwise stated, all monetary amounts in this Annual Report are presented in U.S. dollars. Where specifically indicated, amounts in Swiss francs have been translated into U.S. dollars. These translations are provided for convenience only, and they are not representations that the Swiss franc could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. These translations have been made using the twelve o’clock buying rate in the City of New York for cable transfers as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of December 30, 2016, unless otherwise indicated. The twelve o’clock buying rate for Swiss francs on December 30, 2016, was $1.00 = CHF 1.0160. The twelve o’clock buying rate for Swiss francs on March 3, 2017, was $1.00 = CHF 1.0118.
FORWARD‑LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report includes forward‑looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward‑looking statements can be identified by the use of forward‑looking terminology, including the terms “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” or “should” or, in each case, their negative, or other variations or comparable terminology. These forward‑looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this Annual Report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, dispositions, strategies and the countries and industries in which we operate.
These forward‑looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our financial condition and performance, operating results, liquidity and our ability to fund our business operations and initiatives, capital expenditure and debt service obligations, plans regarding our capital structure, ability to take advantage of market opportunities and drive growth, our products and service offerings, anticipated benefits to the shareholders (including in connection with our share buyback program), acquisitions and integration, investment and risk management strategies, volatility in the credit markets and other market conditions and trends, industry trends and expectations regarding consumer behavior, our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions, our comparative advantages, our commitments and contingencies, availability of raw materials, and other plans, goals, strategies, priorities and initiatives related to our business, including our brand management initiative, Next Level Strategy, white collar productivity program, and other cost-saving measures, as well as, the following:
1
• statements in “Item 3. Key Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy” regarding our policy on future dividend payments,
• statements in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors,”
• statements in “Item 4. Information on the Company” regarding the timing of intended capital expenditures,
• statements in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” regarding our management objectives, including our mid‑term outlook, as well as trends in results, prices, volumes, operations, margins and overall market trends, and
• statements in “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” regarding the outcome of certain legal and compliance matters.
By their nature, forward‑looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. We caution you that forward‑looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the countries and industries in which we operate, may differ materially from those described in or suggested by the forward‑looking statements contained in this Annual Report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the countries and industries in which we operate, are consistent with the forward‑looking statements contained in this Annual Report, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are contained in cautionary statements in this Annual Report and include, without limitation, the following:
• Our business is exposed to risks associated with the volatile global economic environment and political conditions.
• Illegal behavior by any of our employees or agents could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated operating results, cash flows, and financial position as well as on our reputation and our ability to do business.
• We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that could, if not remediated, result in material inaccuracies in our consolidated financial statements and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
• Our operations in emerging markets expose us to risks associated with conditions in those markets.
• Undertaking long-term, fixed price or turnkey projects or technically complex projects exposes our businesses to risk of loss should our actual costs exceed our estimated or budgeted costs or should we fail to perform in line with the technical requirements.
• We operate in very competitive markets and could be adversely affected if we fail to keep pace with technological changes.
• Our multi‑national operations expose us to the risk of fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
• Our hedging activities may not protect us against the consequences of significant fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates or commodity prices on our earnings and cash flows.
• Increases in costs or limitation of supplies of raw materials may adversely affect our financial performance.
• An inability to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.
• Many of our contracts contain performance obligations that require innovative design capabilities, are technologically complex, require state-of‑the‑art manufacturing expertise or are dependent upon factors not wholly within our control. Failure to meet these obligations could adversely affect our profitability and future prospects.
2
• Industry consolidation could result in more powerful competitors and fewer customers.
• We are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate. We incur costs to comply with such regulations, and our ongoing operations may expose us to environmental liabilities.
• We may be the subject of product liability claims.
• The results of the United Kingdom’s referendum on withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business.
• We may encounter difficulty in managing our business due to the global nature of our operations.
• If we are unable to obtain performance and other guarantees from financial institutions, we may be prevented from bidding on, or obtaining, some contracts, or our costs with respect to such contracts could be higher.
• Examinations by tax authorities and changes in tax regulations could result in lower earnings and cash flows.
• If we are unable to attract and retain qualified management and personnel then our business may be adversely affected.
• Anticipated benefits of existing and potential future mergers, acquisitions, divestments, joint ventures or strategic alliances may not be realized.
• There is no guarantee that our ongoing efforts to reduce costs will be successful.
• Our business strategy may include making strategic divestitures. There can be no assurance that any divestitures will provide business benefit.
• We could be affected by future laws or regulations enacted to address climate change concerns as well as the physical effects of climate change.
• Increased information technology (IT) security threats and more sophisticated cyber‑attacks could pose a risk to our systems, networks, products, solutions and services.
We urge you to read the other important factors set forth under sections of this Annual Report entitled “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a more complete discussion of the important factors that could affect our future performance and the countries and industries in which we operate. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward‑looking circumstances described in this Annual Report and the assumptions underlying them may not occur.
Except as required by law or applicable stock exchange rules or regulations, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward‑looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward‑looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements referred to above and contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable
Item 3. Key Information
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our selected financial and operating information at the dates and for each of the periods indicated. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. Due to our global operations, a significant amount of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in other currencies. As a consequence, movements in exchange rates between currencies may affect our profitability, the comparability of our results between periods, as well as the reported carrying value of our assets and liabilities. You should read the following information together with the information contained in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” as well as our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Our selected financial data are presented in the following tables in accordance with U.S. GAAP and have been derived from our published Consolidated Financial Statements. Our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, were audited by Ernst & Young AG.
INCOME STATEMENT DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share data in $) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
Total revenues |
33,828 |
|
35,481 |
|
39,830 |
|
41,848 |
|
39,336 |
Total cost of sales |
(24,081) |
|
(25,347) |
|
(28,615) |
|
(29,856) |
|
(27,958) |
Gross profit |
9,747 |
|
10,134 |
|
11,215 |
|
11,992 |
|
11,378 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(5,349) |
|
(5,574) |
|
(6,067) |
|
(6,094) |
|
(5,756) |
Non-order related research and development expenses |
(1,300) |
|
(1,406) |
|
(1,499) |
|
(1,470) |
|
(1,464) |
Other income (expense), net |
(111) |
|
(105) |
|
529 |
|
(41) |
|
(100) |
Income from operations |
2,987 |
|
3,049 |
|
4,178 |
|
4,387 |
|
4,058 |
Interest and dividend income |
73 |
|
77 |
|
80 |
|
69 |
|
73 |
Interest and other finance expense |
(261) |
|
(286) |
|
(362) |
|
(390) |
|
(293) |
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
2,799 |
|
2,840 |
|
3,896 |
|
4,066 |
|
3,838 |
Provision for taxes |
(781) |
|
(788) |
|
(1,202) |
|
(1,122) |
|
(1,030) |
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
2,018 |
|
2,052 |
|
2,694 |
|
2,944 |
|
2,808 |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
16 |
|
3 |
|
24 |
|
(37) |
|
4 |
Net income |
2,034 |
|
2,055 |
|
2,718 |
|
2,907 |
|
2,812 |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(135) |
|
(122) |
|
(124) |
|
(120) |
|
(108) |
Net income attributable to ABB |
1,899 |
|
1,933 |
|
2,594 |
|
2,787 |
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to ABB shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
1,883 |
|
1,930 |
|
2,570 |
|
2,824 |
|
2,700 |
Net income |
1,899 |
|
1,933 |
|
2,594 |
|
2,787 |
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to ABB shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.12 |
|
1.23 |
|
1.18 |
Net income |
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.13 |
|
1.21 |
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to ABB shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
0.87 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.12 |
|
1.23 |
|
1.18 |
Net income |
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.13 |
|
1.21 |
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to compute: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to ABB shareholders |
2,151 |
|
2,226 |
|
2,288 |
|
2,297 |
|
2,293 |
Diluted earnings per share attributable to ABB shareholders |
2,154 |
|
2,230 |
|
2,295 |
|
2,305 |
|
2,295 |
4
BALANCE SHEET DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
||||||||
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
Cash and equivalents |
3,644 |
|
4,565 |
|
5,443 |
|
6,021 |
|
6,875 |
Marketable securities and short-term investments |
1,953 |
|
1,633 |
|
1,325 |
|
464 |
|
1,606 |
Total assets |
39,499 |
|
41,356 |
|
44,852 |
|
48,032 |
|
49,033 |
Long-term debt (excluding current maturities of long-term debt) |
5,800 |
|
5,985 |
|
7,312 |
|
7,538 |
|
7,497 |
Total debt(1) |
6,803 |
|
7,439 |
|
7,665 |
|
7,991 |
|
10,034 |
Capital stock and additional paid-in capital |
216 |
|
1,444 |
|
1,777 |
|
1,750 |
|
1,691 |
Total stockholders’ equity (including noncontrolling interests) |
13,897 |
|
14,988 |
|
16,815 |
|
19,208 |
|
17,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,843 |
|
3,818 |
|
3,845 |
|
3,653 |
|
3,779 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,305) |
|
(974) |
|
(1,121) |
|
(717) |
|
(5,575) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(3,355) |
|
(3,380) |
|
(3,024) |
|
(3,856) |
|
3,762 |
(1) Total debt is equal to the sum of short‑term debt (including current maturities of long‑term debt) and long‑term debt.
DIVIDENDS AND DIVIDEND POLICY
Payment of dividends is subject to general business conditions, ABB’s current and expected financial condition and performance and other relevant factors including growth opportunities. ABB’s current dividend policy is to pay a steadily rising, sustainable annual dividend over time.
The unconsolidated statutory financial statements of ABB Ltd are prepared in accordance with Swiss law. Based on these financial statements, dividends may be paid only if ABB Ltd has sufficient distributable profits from previous years or sufficient free reserves to allow the distribution of a dividend. As a holding company, ABB Ltd’s main sources of income are dividend and interest payments from its subsidiaries.
At December 31, 2016, the total unconsolidated stockholders’ equity of ABB Ltd was CHF 9,029 million, including CHF 266 million representing share capital, CHF 10,283 million representing reserves and CHF 1,520 million representing a reduction of equity for own shares (treasury stock). Of the reserves, CHF 1,520 million relating to own shares and CHF 53 million representing 20 percent of share capital, are restricted and not available for distribution.
With respect to the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, ABB Ltd paid a dividend of CHF 0.68 (USD 0.71) per share and CHF 0.70 (USD 0.79) per share, respectively. With respect to the year ended December 31, 2014, ABB Ltd distributed a total of CHF 0.72 per share to shareholders, which comprised a dividend of CHF 0.55 (USD 0.59) paid out of ABB Ltd’s capital contribution reserves and a distribution of CHF 0.17 (USD 0.18) by way of a nominal value reduction (a reduction of CHF 0.17 in the par value of each share from CHF 1.03 to CHF 0.86). With respect to the year ended December 31, 2015, ABB Ltd distributed a total of CHF 0.74 (USD 0.75) per share to shareholders by way of a nominal value reduction (a reduction of CHF 0.74 in the par value of each share from CHF 0.86 to CHF 0.12). The USD amounts for each of the foregoing dividend payments made in CHF have been translated using the average rates of the month in which the dividends were paid.
With respect to the year ended December 31, 2016, ABB Ltd’s Board of Directors has proposed to pay a dividend of CHF 0.76 per share to shareholders. The distribution is subject to approval by shareholders at ABB Ltd’s 2017 Annual General Meeting (AGM).
For further information on dividends and dividend policy see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Shareholders—Shareholders’ rights— Shareholders’ dividend rights”.
5
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider all of the information set forth in this Annual Report and the following description of risks and uncertainties that we currently believe may exist. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected by any of these risks. Additional risks of which we are unaware or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. This Annual Report also contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward‑looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report. See “Forward‑Looking Statements”.
Our business is exposed to risks associated with the volatile global economic environment and political conditions.
Adverse changes in economic or political conditions as well as concerns about global health pandemics, terrorist activities and the longevity of the euro, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Economic volatility including developments in the price of oil and financial market disruptions may adversely impact the demand for our products and services. These and other factors may prevent our customers and suppliers from obtaining the financing required to pursue their business activities as planned, which may force them to modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase or supply our products or services. In addition, if our customers do not generate sufficient revenue, or fail to obtain access to the capital markets, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, the amounts they owe us. Customers with liquidity issues may lead to additional bad debt expense for us, which may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. We are also subject to the risk that the counterparties to our credit agreements and hedging transactions may go bankrupt if they suffer catastrophic demand on their liquidity that prevents them from fulfilling their contractual obligations to us.
Our business environment is influenced also by numerous other economic or political uncertainties which will affect the global economy and the international capital markets. In periods of slow economic growth or decline, our customers are more likely to decrease expenditures on the types of products and systems we supply and we are more likely to experience decreased revenues as a result. Our power and automation divisions are affected by the level of investments in the markets that we serve, principally utilities, industry and transport & infrastructure. At various times during the last several years, we also have experienced, and may experience in the future, gross margin declines in certain businesses, reflecting the effect of items such as competitive pricing pressures, inventory write‑downs, charges associated with the cancellation of planned expansion, increases in pension and postretirement benefit expenses, and increases in component and manufacturing costs resulting from higher labor and material costs borne by our manufacturers and suppliers that, as a result of competitive pricing pressures or other factors, we are unable to pass on to our customers. Economic downturns also may lead to restructuring actions and associated expenses. Uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments.
In addition, we are subject to the risks that our business operations in or with certain countries may be adversely affected by trade or economic sanctions or other restrictions imposed on these countries and that actual or potential investors that object to these business operations may adversely affect the price of our shares by disposing of, or deciding not to, purchase our shares. These countries may from time to time include countries that are identified by the United States as state sponsors of terrorism. If any countries where or with whom we do business are subject to such sanctions or restrictions, our business, consolidated operating results, financial condition and the trading price of our shares may be adversely affected. In 2016, our total revenues from business with countries identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism represented a very small percentage of our total revenues. Based on the amount of revenues and other relevant quantitative and qualitative factors, we have determined that our business in 2016 with countries identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism was not material.
6
Illegal behavior by any of our employees or agents could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated operating results, cash flows, and financial position as well as on our reputation and our ability to do business.
Certain of our employees or agents have taken, and may in the future take, actions that violate or are alleged to violate the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (FCPA), legislation promulgated pursuant to the 1997 Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, applicable antitrust laws and other applicable laws or regulations. For more information regarding investigations of past actions taken by certain of our employees, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”. Such actions have resulted, and in the future could result, in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, civil and criminal penalties, including monetary penalties and other sanctions, and civil litigation. It is possible that any governmental investigation or enforcement action arising from such matters could conclude that a violation of applicable law has occurred and the consequences of any such investigation or enforcement action may have a material adverse impact on our consolidated operating results, cash flows and financial position. In addition, such actions, whether actual or alleged, could damage our reputation and ability to do business.
Further, detecting, investigating and resolving such actions could be expensive and could consume significant time and attention of our senior management. While we are committed to conducting business in a legal and ethical manner, our internal control systems have not been, and in the future may not be, completely effective to prevent and detect such improper activities by our employees and agents.
Our operations in emerging markets expose us to risks associated with conditions in those markets.
A significant amount of our operations is conducted in the emerging markets in South America, Asia, and the Middle East and Africa. In 2016, approximately 46 percent of our consolidated revenues were generated from these emerging markets. Operations in emerging markets can present risks that are not encountered in countries with well‑established economic and political systems, including:
• economic instability, which could make it difficult for us to anticipate future business conditions in these markets, cause delays in the placement of orders for projects that we have been awarded and subject us to volatile geographic markets,
• political or social instability which could make our customers less willing to make cross‑border investments in such regions and could complicate our dealings with governments regarding permits or other regulatory matters, local businesses and workforces,
• boycotts and embargoes that may be imposed by the international community on countries in which we do business or where we seek to do business could adversely affect the ability of our operations in those countries to obtain the materials necessary to fulfill contracts and our ability to pursue business or establish operations in those countries,
• foreign state takeovers of our facilities,
• significant fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates,
• the imposition of unexpected taxes or other payments on our revenues in these markets,
• the ability to obtain financing and/or insurance coverage from export credit agencies, and
• the introduction of exchange controls and other restrictions by foreign governments.
Additionally, political and social instability resulting from increased violence in certain countries in which we do business has raised concerns about the safety of our personnel. These concerns may hinder our ability to send personnel abroad and to hire and retain local personnel. Such concerns may require us to increase security for personnel traveling to such facilities or to conduct more operations from our other facilities rather than from facilities located in such countries, which may negatively impact our operations and result in higher costs and inefficiencies.
In addition, the legal and regulatory systems of many emerging market countries are less developed and less well‑enforced than in industrialized countries. Therefore, our ability to protect our contractual and other legal rights in these countries could be limited. Consequently, our exposure to the conditions in or affecting emerging markets may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Undertaking long‑term, fixed price or turnkey projects or technically complex projects exposes our businesses to risk of loss should our actual costs exceed our estimated or budgeted costs or should we fail to perform in line with the technical requirements.
We derive a portion of our revenues from long‑term, fixed price or turnkey projects or from technically complex projects that are awarded on a competitive basis and can take many months, or even years, to complete. Such contracts involve substantial risks, including the possibility that we may underbid and the fact that we typically assume substantially all of the risks associated with completing the project and the post‑completion warranty obligations. These risks include the project’s technical risk, meaning that we must tailor our products and systems to satisfy the technical requirements of a project even though, at the time we are awarded the project, we may not have previously produced such a product or system. The revenue, cost and gross profit realized on such contracts can vary, sometimes substantially, from our original projections because of changes in conditions, including but not limited to:
• unanticipated technical problems with the equipment being supplied or developed by us which may require us to incur incremental expenses to remedy the problem,
• changes in the cost of components, materials or labor,
• difficulties in obtaining required governmental permits or approvals,
• project modifications that create unanticipated costs,
• delays caused by force majeure or local weather and geological conditions, including natural disasters,
• customer delays,
• shortages of construction equipment,
• changes in law or government policy,
• supply bottlenecks, especially of key components, and
• suppliers’, subcontractors’ or consortium partners’ failure to perform.
These risks are exacerbated if the duration of the project is extended because then there is an increased risk that the circumstances upon which we originally bid and quoted a price change in a manner that increases our costs. In addition, we sometimes bear the risk of delays caused by unexpected conditions or events. Our project contracts often make us subject to penalties or damages if we cannot complete portions of the project in accordance with agreed‑upon time limits and guaranteed performance levels.
We operate in very competitive markets and could be adversely affected if we fail to keep pace with technological changes.
We operate in very competitive markets in particular with respect to product performance, developing integrated systems and applications that address the business challenges faced by our customers, pricing, new product introduction time and customer service. The relative importance of these factors differs across the geographic markets and product areas that we serve. The markets for our products and services are characterized by evolving industry standards (particularly for our automation technology products and systems), rapidly changing technology and increased competition as a result of privatization (particularly for our power products and systems). For example, as power transmission and distribution providers throughout the world have been undergoing substantial privatization, their need has increased for timely product and service innovations that increase efficiency and allow them to compete in a deregulated environment. Additionally, the continual development of advanced technologies for new products and product enhancements is an important way in which we maintain acceptable pricing levels. If we fail to keep pace with technological changes in the industrial sectors that we serve, we may experience price erosion and lower margins.
8
All of our primary competitors are sophisticated companies with significant resources that may develop products and services that are superior to our products and services or may adapt more quickly than we do to new technologies, industry changes or evolving customer requirements. We are also facing increased competition from low cost competitors in emerging markets, which may give rise to increased pressure to reduce our prices. Our failure to anticipate or respond quickly to technological developments or customer requirements could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Our multi‑national operations expose us to the risk of fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Exchange rate fluctuations have had, and could continue to have, a material impact on our operating results, the comparability of our results between periods, the value of assets or liabilities as recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the price of our securities. Volatility in exchange rates makes it harder to predict exchange rates and perform accurate financial planning. Changes in exchange rates can unpredictably and adversely affect our consolidated operating results and could result in exchange losses.
Currency Translation Risk. The results of operations and financial position of most of our non‑U.S. companies are initially recorded in the currency, which we call “local currency,” of the country in which the respective company resides. That financial information is then translated into U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange rates for inclusion in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The exchange rates between local currencies and the U.S. dollar can fluctuate substantially, which could have a significant translation effect on our reported consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Increases and decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar versus local currencies will affect the reported value of our local currency assets, liabilities, revenues and costs in our Consolidated Financial Statements, even if the value of these items has not changed in local currency terms. These translations could significantly and adversely affect our results of operations and financial position from period to period.
Currency Transaction Risk. Currency risk exposure also affects our operations when our sales are denominated in currencies that are different from those in which our manufacturing or sourcing costs are incurred. In this case, if after the parties agree on a price, the value of the currency in which the price is to be paid were to weaken relative to the currency in which we incur manufacturing or sourcing costs, there would be a negative impact on the profit margin for any such transaction. This transaction risk may exist regardless of whether or not there is also a currency translation risk as described above.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations in those currencies in which we incur our principal manufacturing expenses or sourcing costs may adversely affect our ability to compete with companies whose costs are incurred in other currencies. If our principal expense currencies appreciate in value against such other currencies, our competitive position may be weakened.
Our hedging activities may not protect us against the consequences of significant fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates or commodity prices on our earnings and cash flows.
Our policy is to hedge material currency exposures by entering into offsetting transactions with third‑party financial institutions. Given the effective horizons of our risk management activities and the anticipatory nature of the exposures intended to be hedged, there can be no assurance that our currency hedging activities will fully offset the adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable movements in foreign exchange rates. In addition, the timing of the accounting for recognition of gains and losses related to a hedging instrument may not coincide with the timing of gains and losses related to the underlying economic exposures.
As a resource‑intensive operation, we are exposed to a variety of market and asset risks, including the effects of changes in commodity prices and interest rates. We monitor and manage these exposures as an integral part of our overall risk management program, which recognizes the unpredictability of markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects on our business. As part of our effort to manage these exposures, we may enter into commodity price and interest rate hedging arrangements. Nevertheless, changes in commodity prices and interest rates cannot always be predicted or hedged.
If we are unable to successfully manage the risk of changes in exchange rates, interest rates or commodity prices or if our hedging counterparties are unable to perform their obligations under our hedging agreements with them, then changes in these rates and prices could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
9
Increases in costs or limitation of supplies of raw materials may adversely affect our financial performance.
We purchase large amounts of commodity‑based raw materials, including steel, copper, aluminum and oil. Prevailing prices for such commodities are subject to fluctuations due to changes in supply and demand and a variety of additional factors beyond our control, such as global political and economic conditions. Historically, prices for some of these raw materials have been volatile and unpredictable, and such volatility is expected to continue. Therefore, commodity price changes may result in unexpected increases in raw material costs, and we may be unable to increase our prices to offset these increased costs without suffering reduced volumes, revenues or operating income. We do not fully hedge against changes in commodity prices and our hedging procedures may not work as planned.
We depend on third parties to supply raw materials and other components and may not be able to obtain sufficient quantities of these materials and components, which could limit our ability to manufacture products on a timely basis and could harm our profitability. For some raw materials and components, we rely on a single supplier or a small number of suppliers. If one of these suppliers were unable to provide us with a raw material or component we need, our ability to manufacture some of our products could be adversely affected until we are able to establish a new supply arrangement. We may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply channel in a reasonable time period or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If our suppliers are unable to deliver sufficient quantities of materials on a timely basis, the manufacture and sale of our products may be disrupted, we might have obligations under our performance guarantees and our sales and profitability could be materially adversely affected.
An inability to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.
Our intellectual property rights are fundamental to all of our businesses. We generate, maintain, utilize and enforce a substantial portfolio of trademarks, trade dress, patents and other intellectual property rights globally. Intellectual property protection is subject to applicable laws in various local jurisdictions where interpretations and protections vary or can be unpredictable and costly to enforce. We use our intellectual property rights to protect the goodwill of our products, promote our product recognition, protect our proprietary technology and development activities, enhance our competitiveness and otherwise support our business goals and objectives. However, there can be no assurance that the steps we take to obtain, maintain and protect our intellectual property rights will be adequate. Our intellectual property rights may fail to provide us with significant competitive advantages, particularly in foreign jurisdictions that do not have, or do not enforce, strong intellectual property rights. The weakening of protection of our trademarks, trade dress, patents and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.
Many of our contracts contain performance obligations that require innovative design capabilities, are technologically complex, require state‑of‑the‑art manufacturing expertise or are dependent upon factors not wholly within our control. Failure to meet these obligations could adversely affect our profitability and future prospects.
We design, develop and manufacture technologically advanced and innovative products and services applied by our customers in a variety of environments. Problems and delays in our development or delivery of products or services as a result of issues with respect to design, technology, licensing and patent rights, labor, learning curve assumptions or materials and components could prevent us from achieving contractual requirements.
In addition, the quality and efficacy of our products cannot be tested and proven in all situations and are otherwise subject to unforeseen problems. Examples of unforeseen problems that could negatively affect revenue and profitability include premature failure of products that cannot be accessed for repair or replacement, problems with quality, country of origin, delivery of subcontractor components or services and unplanned degradation of product performance. In addition, factors such as unforeseen costs and expenses not covered by insurance or indemnification from the customer, diversion of management focus in responding to unforeseen problems, loss of follow‑on work, and, in the case of certain contracts, repayment to the customer of contract cost and fee payments we previously received as well as potential damages, which may significantly exceed the contract price, may affect revenue and profitability.
Industry consolidation could result in more powerful competitors and fewer customers.
Competitors in the industries in which we operate are consolidating. In particular, the automation industry is undergoing consolidation that is reducing the number but increasing the size of companies that compete with us. As our competitors consolidate, they likely will increase their market share, gain economies of scale that enhance their ability to compete with us and/or acquire additional products and technologies that could displace our product offerings.
10
Our customer base also is undergoing consolidation. Consolidation within our customers’ industries (such as the marine and cruise industry, the automotive, aluminum, steel, pulp and paper and pharmaceutical industries and the oil and gas industry) could affect our customers and their relationships with us. If one of our competitors’ customers acquires any of our customers, we may lose that business. Additionally, as our customers become larger and more concentrated, they could exert pricing pressure on all suppliers, including us. For example, in an industry such as power transmission, which historically has consisted of large and concentrated customers such as utilities, price competition can be a factor in determining which products and services will be selected by a customer. If we were to lose market share or customers or face pricing pressure due to consolidation, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate. We incur costs to comply with such regulations, and our ongoing operations may expose us to environmental liabilities.
Our operations are subject to U.S., European and other laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Our manufacturing facilities use and produce paint residues, solvents, metals, oils and related residues. We use petroleum‑based insulation in transformers, polyvinylchloride (PVC) resin to manufacture PVC cable and chloroparaffin as a flame retardant. We have manufactured and sold, and we are using in some of our factories, certain types of transformers and capacitors containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). These are considered to be hazardous substances in many jurisdictions in which we operate. We may be subject to substantial liabilities for environmental contamination arising from the use of such substances. All of our manufacturing operations are subject to ongoing compliance costs in respect of environmental matters and the associated capital expenditure requirements.
In addition, we may be subject to significant fines and penalties if we do not comply with environmental laws and regulations including those referred to above. Some environmental laws provide for joint and several or strict liability for remediation of releases of hazardous substances, which could result in us incurring a liability for environmental damage without regard to our negligence or fault. Such laws and regulations could expose us to liability arising out of the conduct of operations or conditions caused by others, or for our acts which were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time the acts were performed. Additionally, we may be subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as a result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances. Changes in the environmental laws and regulations, or claims for damages to persons, property, natural resources or the environment, could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us.
We may be the subject of product liability claims.
We may be required to pay for losses or injuries purportedly caused by the design, manufacture or operation of our products and systems. Additionally, we may be subject to product liability claims for the improper installation of products and systems designed and manufactured by others.
Product liability claims brought against us may be based in tort or in contract, and typically involve claims seeking compensation for personal injury or property damage. If the claimant runs a commercial business, claims are often made also for financial losses arising from interruption of operations. Based on the nature and application of many of the products we manufacture, a defect or alleged defect in one of these products could have serious consequences. For example:
• If the products produced by our power technology divisions are defective, there is a risk of fires, explosions and power surges, and significant damage to electricity generating, transmission and distribution facilities as well as electrical shock causing injury or death.
• If the products produced by our automation technology divisions are defective, our customers could suffer significant damage to facilities and equipment that rely on these products and systems to properly monitor and control their manufacturing processes. Additionally, people could be exposed to electrical shock and/or other harm causing injury or death.
• If any of the products produced by us contain hazardous substances then there is a risk that such products or substances could cause injury or death.
• If any protective products produced by us were to fail to function properly, there is a risk that such failure could cause injury or death.
11
If we were to incur a very large product liability claim, our insurance protection might not be adequate or sufficient to cover such a claim in terms of paying any awards or settlements, and/or paying for our defense costs. Further, some claims may be outside the scope of our insurance coverage. If a litigant were successful against us, a lack or insufficiency of insurance coverage could result in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Additionally, a well‑publicized actual or perceived problem could adversely affect our market reputation which could result in a decline in demand for our products and reduce the trading price of our shares. Furthermore, if we were required or we otherwise determined to make a product recall, the costs could be significant.
The results of the United Kingdom’s referendum on withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business.
We are a multinational company with material business operations in Europe. In June 2016, voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union in an advisory national referendum that has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and has given rise to calls for the governments of other European Union member states to consider withdrawal.
These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, have had and may continue to have a material effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and could significantly reduce global market liquidity. Lack of clarity about future United Kingdom laws and regulations or future developments in the European Union could depress economic activity, reduce demand for our products and services and restrict our access to capital. The terms of any United Kingdom exit from the European Union or the decision by any other European Union member state to pursue withdrawal, could diminish or eliminate barrier-free access between the United Kingdom and other European Union member states or among the European economic area overall. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may encounter difficulty in managing our business due to the global nature of our operations.
We operate in approximately 100 countries around the world and, as of December 31, 2016, employed about 132,000 people, of which approximately 46 percent were located in Europe, approximately 22 percent in Asia, Middle East and Africa and approximately 32 percent in the Americas. In order to manage our day‑to‑day operations, we must overcome cultural and language barriers and assimilate different business practices. In addition, we are required to create compensation programs, employment policies and other administrative programs that comply with the laws of multiple countries. We also must communicate and monitor group‑wide standards and directives across our global network. Our failure to manage successfully our geographically diverse operations could impair our ability to react quickly to changing business and market conditions and to enforce compliance with group‑wide standards and procedures.
If we are unable to obtain performance and other guarantees from financial institutions, we may be prevented from bidding on, or obtaining, some contracts, or our costs with respect to such contracts could be higher.
In the normal course of our business and in accordance with industry practice, we provide a number of guarantees including bid‑bonds, advance payment guarantees and performance guarantees, which guarantee our own performance. These guarantees may include guarantees that a project will be completed or that a project or particular equipment will achieve defined performance criteria. If we fail to attain the defined criteria, we must make payments in cash or in kind. Performance guarantees frequently are requested in relation to large projects in our power and automation businesses.
Some customers require that performance guarantees be issued by a financial institution. In considering whether to issue a guarantee on our behalf, financial institutions consider our credit ratings. In addition, the global financial crisis has made it more difficult and expensive to obtain these guarantees. If, in the future, we cannot obtain such a guarantee from a financial institution on commercially reasonable terms or at all, we could be prevented from bidding on, or obtaining, some contracts, or our costs with respect to such contracts could be higher, which would reduce the profitability of the contracts. If we cannot obtain guarantees on commercially reasonable terms or at all from financial institutions in the future, there could be a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
12
Examinations by tax authorities and changes in tax regulations could result in lower earnings and cash flows.
We operate in approximately 100 countries and therefore are subject to different tax regulations. Changes in tax law could result in higher tax expense and payments. Furthermore, this could materially impact our tax receivables and liabilities as well as deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. In addition, the uncertainty of tax environment in some regions could limit our ability to enforce our rights. As a globally operating organization, we conduct business in countries subject to complex tax rules, which may be interpreted in different ways. Future interpretations or developments of tax regimes may affect our tax liability, return on investments and business operations. We are regularly examined by tax authorities in various jurisdictions. An adverse decision by a tax authority could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified management and personnel then our business may be adversely affected.
Our success depends in part on our continued ability to hire, assimilate and retain highly qualified personnel, particularly our senior management team and key employees. Competition for highly qualified management and technical personnel remains intense in the industries and regions in which we operate. If we are unable to attract and retain members of our senior management team and key employees this could have an adverse effect on our business.
Anticipated benefits of existing and potential future mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic alliances may not be realized.
As part of our overall strategy, we may, from time to time, acquire businesses or interests in businesses, including noncontrolling interests, or form joint ventures or create strategic alliances. Whether we realize the anticipated benefits from these transactions depends, in part, upon the integration between the businesses involved, the performance and development of the underlying products, capabilities or technologies, our correct assessment of assumed liabilities and the management of the operations in question. Accordingly, our financial results could be adversely affected by unanticipated performance and liability issues, transaction‑related charges, amortization related to intangibles, charges for impairment of long‑term assets and partner performance.
There is no guarantee that our ongoing efforts to reduce costs will be successful.
We have announced our intention to reduce costs by approximately $1.3 billion in connection with our ongoing white-collar productivity savings program. Lowering our cost base is important for our business and future competitiveness. However, there is no guarantee that we will achieve this goal. In the event that we are unsuccessful and the shortfall is significant, there could be an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our business strategy may include making strategic divestitures. There can be no assurance that any divestitures will provide business benefit.
Our strategy includes divesting certain non-core businesses. The divestiture of an existing business could reduce our future profits and operating cash flows and make our financial results more volatile. We may not find suitable purchasers for our non-core businesses and may continue to pay operating costs associated with these businesses. Failed attempts to divest non-core businesses may distract management’s attention from other business activities, erode employee morale and customers’ confidence, and harm our business. A divestiture could also cause a decline in the price of our shares and increased reliance on other elements of our core business operations. If we do not successfully manage the risks associated with a divestiture, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We could be affected by future laws or regulations enacted to address climate change concerns as well as the physical effects of climate change.
Existing or pending laws and regulations intended to address climate change concerns could materially affect us in the future. We may need to incur additional costs to comply with these laws and regulations. We could also be affected indirectly by increased prices for goods or services provided to us by companies that are directly affected by these laws and regulations and pass their increased costs through to their customers. At this time, we cannot estimate what impact such costs may have on our business, results of operations or financial condition. We could also be affected by the physical consequences of climate change itself, although we cannot estimate what impact those consequences might have on our business or operations.
13
Increased information technology (IT) security threats and more sophisticated cyber‑attacks could pose a risk to our systems, networks, products, solutions and services.
We have observed a global increase in IT security threats and more sophisticated cyber‑attacks, both in general and against us, which pose a risk to the security of systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of data stored and transmitted on those systems and networks. While we attempt to mitigate these risks through a number of measures, including employee training, comprehensive monitoring of our networks and systems, and maintenance of backup and protective systems such as firewalls and virus scanners, our systems, networks, products, solutions and services remain potentially vulnerable to attacks. Similarly, we have observed a continued increase in attacks generally against industrial control systems as well as against our customers and the systems we supplied to them, which pose a risk to the security of those systems and networks. Depending on their nature and scope, such attacks could potentially lead to the compromising of confidential information, improper use of our systems and networks, or those we supplied to our customers, manipulation and destruction of data, defective products, production downtimes and supply shortages, which in turn could adversely affect our reputation, competitiveness and results of operations.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that could, if not remediated, result in material inaccuracies in our consolidated financial statements and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
As described in “Item 15. Controls and Procedures,” we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2016, due to a material weakness, which resulted in a failure to prevent and detect a misappropriation in our subsidiary in South Korea on a timely basis, and therefore, affected our ability to safeguard cash. In addition, the control deficiencies resulted in a failure to prevent the Company from being bound to unauthorized financial contracts, resulting in undetected financial obligations at December 31, 2016.
We are currently working to remediate the material weakness. We cannot be certain that the measures we have taken, and expect to take, will be sufficient to address the deficiencies identified or ensure that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Moreover, as our investigation is ongoing, other material weaknesses or deficiencies may develop or be identified in the future. Although we believe that we will be able to remediate the deficiencies identified and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting, it may be that our efforts will not be sufficient. If this happens then there may be material inaccuracies in our consolidated financial statements and our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
14
Item 4. Information on the Company
INTRODUCTION
About ABB
ABB is a pioneering technology leader in electrification products, robotics and motion, industrial automation and power grids serving customers in utilities, industry and transport & infrastructure globally. For more than four decades, ABB has been part of the industrial digitalization. With more than 70 million devices connected through its installed base of more than 70,000 control systems across all customer segments it serves, ABB is well-positioned to benefit from the Energy and Fourth Industrial Revolution. With a heritage of more than 130 years, ABB operates in more than 100 countries with about 132,000 employees.
History of the ABB Group
The ABB Group was formed in 1988 through a merger between Asea AB and BBC Brown Boveri AG. Initially founded in 1883, Asea AB was a major participant in the introduction of electricity into Swedish homes and businesses and in the development of Sweden’s railway network. In the 1940s and 1950s, Asea AB expanded into the power, mining and steel industries. Brown Boveri and Cie. (later renamed BBC Brown Boveri AG) was formed in Switzerland in 1891 and initially specialized in power generation and turbines. In the early to mid‑1900s, it expanded its operations throughout Europe and broadened its business operations to include a wide range of electrical engineering activities.
In January 1988, Asea AB and BBC Brown Boveri AG each contributed almost all of their businesses to the newly formed ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd, of which they each owned 50 percent. In 1996, Asea AB was renamed ABB AB and BBC Brown Boveri AG was renamed ABB AG. In February 1999, the ABB Group announced a group reconfiguration designed to establish a single parent holding company and a single class of shares. ABB Ltd was incorporated on March 5, 1999, under the laws of Switzerland. In June 1999, ABB Ltd became the holding company for the entire ABB Group. This was accomplished by having ABB Ltd issue shares to the shareholders of ABB AG and ABB AB, the two companies that formerly owned the ABB Group. The ABB Ltd shares were exchanged for the shares of those two companies, which, as a result of the share exchange and certain related transactions, became wholly‑owned subsidiaries of ABB Ltd. ABB Ltd shares are currently listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange, the NASDAQ OMX Stockholm Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange (in the form of American Depositary Shares).
Organizational structure
Our business is international in scope and we generate revenues in numerous currencies. We operate in approximately 100 countries across three regions: Europe, the Americas, and Asia, Middle East and Africa (AMEA). We are headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.
We manage our business based on a divisional structure, which until December 31, 2016, comprised of four divisions: Electrification Products, Discrete Automation and Motion, Process Automation and Power Grids. For a breakdown of our consolidated revenues (i) by operating division and (ii) derived from each geographic region in which we operate, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Analysis of Results of Operations—Revenues”.
Effective January 1, 2017, ABB operates in a streamlined set-up of four divisions: Electrification Products, Robotics and Motion, Industrial Automation and Power Grids. The divisions will be empowered as entrepreneurial units within ABB, reflected in an enhancement of their performance and compensation model focusing on individual accountability and responsibility. The divisions benefit from sales collaboration orchestrated by regions and countries as well as from the group-wide digital offering, ABB’s low‑cost centralized administrative structure, common supply chain management and corporate research centers. ABB intends to continue to strengthen its divisions through active portfolio management. This includes pursuing strategic additions, transforming business models and pruning non-core businesses. Electrification Products strives to be the partner of choice for electrification across numerous consumption points, Robotics and Motion strives to be the partner of choice for robotics and intelligent motion solutions, Industrial Automation strives to be the partner of choice for industrial automation and Power Grids strives to be the partner of choice for stronger, smarter and greener grids. See “Business Divisions – Division realignment” for additional information related to the realignment of certain business divisions.
15
Except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, the information below is presented to reflect our business prior to this realignment to be consistent with the basis used in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our principal corporate offices are located at Affolternstrasse 44, CH‑8050 Zurich, Switzerland, telephone number +41‑43‑317‑7111. Our agent for U.S. federal securities law purposes is ABB Holdings Inc., located at 12040 Regency Parkway, Suite 200, Cary, North Carolina 27518.
BUSINESS DIVISIONS
Our markets
As a pioneering technology leader serving the utilities, industry, and transport & infrastructure markets, ABB is at the heart of the energy and fourth industrial revolutions. The rise of renewable energy is dramatically increasing the complexity of the grid, as the number of feed-in points from solar and wind sources multiply and transmission distances lengthen thus driving the energy revolution. As the contribution of renewables in the energy mix increases, supply becomes less predictable, driving the need for more equipment and technology to balance demand and supply in the grid. At the same time, the shift from industrial to service-based economies is changing consumption patterns, making them more prone to peaks, and new consumer types, including prosumers, and electric vehicles are already having an impact on grid performance in some parts of the world. These changes are increasing complexity in the grid. At the same time, demand for electricity is rising, driven by significant increases in the volume of data and the accelerating take-up of electric vehicles. The impact of digitalization is accelerating as more and more devices and systems are equipped with sensors and connectors. With the substantial increase in processing power, it is now possible to remotely monitor the health of equipment, machines and robots, and through state-of-the-art performance modelling, to diagnose potential problems and to intervene before an interruption of service.
Utilities Market
ABB focuses on the changing needs of utility customers with its complete offering for transmission and distribution. The ongoing shift in the electricity value chain such as the growth in renewable power generation creates opportunities for companies that are able to deliver intelligent solutions to the challenges customers face with regard to increased grid complexity and stability. Renewables are also making stand-alone grids possible for remote, off-grid communities. Currently, these must be equipped with back-up (diesel) generators to cope with intermittent supply, but innovations in power storage technology promise to dramatically expand the application of these micro-grids, which are another key focus for ABB.
With the significant shift in the electricity value chain, integration of renewables, micro-grids and automation solutions to control the flow are key growth drivers for the future. The grid of tomorrow will increase in complexity as there will be numerous feed-in points and a shift from uni-directional to bi-directional electricity flow. At the same time, market de-regulation and re-regulation continues. Generation, transmission and distribution are being unbundled, long-standing monopolies now have competitors and new entrants (e.g. pension funds, insurance funds, project developers) are investing in the sector. Many traditional utilities are being forced to reinvent themselves; some are refocusing on renewables while others on providing additional services to the consumers they serve. These new grid challenges provide numerous opportunities. More than 30 percent of the market we operate in are in these high-growth segments, such as grid automation, high-voltage direct current (HVDC), software and micro-grids. Our solutions help utilities, which generally are public or government-owned entities and tend to be more consolidated in nature, address these challenges.
Utilities remained cautious in 2016 but continued to make selective investments in infrastructure-critical power transmission projects. For example, ABB has teamed up with India’s national electricity grid operator Power Grid Corporation of India Limited in a project with an order value over $640 million for ABB to deliver a transmission link that will have the capacity to bring reliable electricity to more than 80 million people. Furthermore, ABB won $300 million of orders in China to supply advanced converter transformers for two long-distance ultra-high-voltage direct current (UHVDC) transmission links setting a new world record by enabling 10 gigawatts (GW) of power to be transmitted at 800 kilovolts (kV). Additionally, in China ABB won orders of more than $300 million to deliver key equipment for a 1,100 kV UHVDC power link. ABB also won a $250 million order to deliver a 220 kV high-voltage submarine cable system to Danish utility DONG Energy.
16
Industry Market
On the industry side, we serve factories all around the world from discrete to process industries. Energy efficiency and productivity improvements are the hallmarks of ABB’s offerings in this customer segment. Industry customers are diverse in nature and may be publicly traded or privately held companies. Our energy efficient products, systems and services reduce consumption and therefore electricity cost and carbon emissions, while our automation systems increase productivity, quality and efficiency, and keep workplaces safe. Since industrial customers have increasingly been focusing on enhancing energy efficiency and asset productivity, our offering is a key value proposition for them. Demand from industrial customers in 2016 varied by sector and region. However, low oil prices resulted in a continued constraint in spending by oil and gas customers. The need for cutting-edge solutions to increase efficiency and to use renewable power generation to lower the environmental impact continued to be important demand drivers. In this context, we launched ABB’s smart sensor solution for electric motors which can deliver downtime reductions of up to 70 percent, extend the lifetime of the motors by up to 30 percent, and reduce energy consumption by 10 percent. In addition, demand for robotics solutions in general industry is growing as there is an increased need for automated processes and productivity. YuMi, ABB’s collaborative robot, helps meet this need.
Transport & Infrastructure Market
Alongside ABB’s offering for utilities and industry, we provide solutions for transport & infrastructure customers. As transport customers focus on energy efficiency and reduced operating costs, our offerings are key. Another key growth driver for this customer segment is the move to increased electric transportation as well as urbanization and growth in data centers. Our expertise has given us the edge when it comes to providing clean and reliable power solutions for transport networks and infrastructure. Demand from the transport & infrastructure market in 2016 was mixed, with continued demand for energy efficient solutions, particularly in data centers, rail and electric mobility. For example, ABB continued its collaboration with Stadler Rail to deliver its newest traction equipment for reliable and energy-efficient trains and has received an order to provide additional fast chargers for hybrid electric buses in the city of Luxembourg. Demand for specialty vessel solutions remained strong and ABB won orders to supply the complete power, propulsion and automation package for a series of new cruise vessels being built by MV WERFTEN. ABB’s proven Azipod propulsion solutions will improve the safety and efficiency of the new generation of ships.
As a global pioneering technology leader, we serve utilities, industry and transport & infrastructure customers through our business divisions. These markets and our divisions are discussed in more detail below. Revenue figures presented in this Business Divisions section are before interdivisional eliminations.
Electrification Products Division
Overview
The Electrification Products division provides solutions across the full electrical value chain from the substation to the point of consumption. The innovations from this business enable a safer and more reliable electrical flow, with a full range of low- and medium-voltage products and solutions for intelligent protection and connection as well as pre-engineered packaged solutions and services tailored to customers’ needs. The portfolio – within increasingly digital and connected solutions – includes modular substation packages, distribution automation products, switchgear, circuit breakers, measuring and sensing devices, control products, wiring accessories, and enclosures and cabling systems, including KNX systems (global standard for home and building control) designed to integrate and automate a building’s lighting, heating and ventilation, and security and data communication networks.
Most of the division’s revenue is derived from sales through distributors, wholesalers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), system integrators, utilities and panel builders, with some direct sales to end-users, utilities and other ABB divisions.
The Electrification Products division had approximately 40,600 employees as of December 31, 2016, and generated $9.3 billion of revenues in 2016.
17
Customers
The Electrification Products division serves a wide range of customers who are connecting, protecting and controlling electricity from a number of industry segments including buildings, data centers, rail, wind and solar, food and beverage, marine and oil and gas.
Products and Services
The businesses of the Electrification Products division are more fully described below.
The Protection and Connection business offers products that protect, control and connect people, plants and systems. ABB offers solutions to restore power rapidly in case of a fault and helps provide optimum protection for people and electrical installations. The product offering ranges from miniature circuit breakers to high‑capacity molded‑case and air-circuit breakers and includes safety switches used for power distribution in factories and buildings, switchgear systems for short circuit and overload protection as well as cabling and connection components. In addition, the business offers terminal blocks, a range of contactors, soft starters, starters, proximity sensors, safety products for industrial protection, limit switches and manual motor starters, along with electronic relays and overload relays.
The Building Products business provides smart home and intelligent building control systems, also known as KNX protocol, to optimize efficiency, safety and comfort through the automated management of lighting, shutters and security. In addition, the business supplies conventional wiring accessories, industrial plugs and sockets, and enclosures ideal for single family homes, multiple dwellings, commercial buildings, infrastructure and industrial applications.
The Installation Products business offers products for low-voltage wire and cable management, making the task of fastening, protecting, insulating and connecting wires easier and quicker for industrial applications, construction, communications, utility and OEM professionals, as well as do-it-yourself specialists. The business offers emergency lighting and lighting for explosive environments, as well as lightning protection and earth grounding apparatus.
The Medium Voltage Products business helps utility, industry and transport & infrastructure customers to improve power quality and control, reduce outage time and enhance operational reliability and efficiency. The business offers products and services that largely serve the power distribution sector, often providing the link between high‑voltage transmission systems and low‑voltage users. Its comprehensive offering includes medium‑voltage equipment (1 to 50 kilovolts), indoor and outdoor circuit breakers, reclosers, fuses, contactors, relays, instrument transformers, sensors, motor control centers, ring main units for primary and secondary distribution, as well as a range of air‑ and gas‑insulated switchgear. It also produces indoor and outdoor modular systems and other solutions to facilitate efficient and reliable power distribution.
The Electrification Solutions business offers systems solutions to customers across low- and medium-voltage applications, integrating the entire offering from the division into complete solutions for customers, adding value through design, engineering, project management and service.
In addition, the service offerings of the Electrification Products division span the entire value chain, from the moment a customer makes the first inquiry to disposal and recycling of the product. Throughout the value chain, ABB provides training, technical support and customized contracts. All of this is supported by an extensive global sales and service network.
Sales and Marketing
Sales are primarily made through indirect sales channels such as distributors and wholesalers to end customers including installers and system integrators. Direct customers include utilities, panel builders and machine builders, as well as other ABB divisions. The proportion of direct sales compared to channel partner sales varies among the different industries, product technologies and geographic markets. The business is focused on creating demand to support its channel sales, with a range of promotional activities and support services including configuration and other digital solutions.
18
Competition
The Electrification Products division’s principal competitors vary by product line, but they include Eaton Corporation, Legrand, Schneider, Siemens, Hubbell, Leviton, Rittal and Chint Electrical.
Capital Expenditures
The Electrification Products division’s capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $200 million in 2016, compared to $210 million and $248 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Investments in 2016 were primarily related to footprint changes, equipment replacement and upgrades. Geographically, in 2016, Europe represented 52 percent of the capital expenditures, followed by the Americas (32 percent) and AMEA (16 percent).
Discrete Automation and Motion Division
Overview
The Discrete Automation and Motion division provides products, solutions and related services that increase industrial productivity and energy efficiency. Our key products such as motors, generators, drives, power electronics and robotics provide power, motion and control for a wide range of automation applications. The leading position in wind generators and a growing offering in solar complement the industrial focus, leveraging joint technology, channels and operations platforms.
Revenues are generated both from direct sales to end-users as well as from indirect sales through distributors, machine builders, system integrators, and panel builders.
The Discrete Automation and Motion division had approximately 29,100 employees as of December 31, 2016, and generated $8.7 billion of revenues in 2016.
Products and Services
The businesses of the Discrete Automation and Motion division are more fully described below.
The Robotics business offers robots, controllers, software systems, as well as complete robot automation solutions and a comprehensive range of advanced services for automotive and Tier One OEMs as well as for the general industry. These improve flexibility, quality, productivity and connectivity, as part of the factory of the future. Robots are also used in activities or environments which may be hazardous to employee health and safety, such as repetitive or strenuous lifting, dusty, hot or cold rooms, or painting booths. In the automotive industry, robot products and systems are used in such areas as press shop, body shop, paint shop, power train assembly, trim and final assembly. General industry segments in which robotics solutions are used range from metal fabrication, foundry, plastics, food and beverage, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and electronics. Typical robotic applications in general industry include welding, material handling, machine tending, painting, picking, packing, palletizing and small parts assembly automation.
The Motors and Generators business supplies a comprehensive range of electrical motors, generators, and mechanical power transmission products. The range of electrical motors includes high efficiency motors that conform to leading environmental and Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS). Efficiency is an important selection criterion for customers, because electric motors account for nearly two‑thirds of the electricity consumed by industrial plants. The business unit manufactures synchronous motors for the most demanding applications and a full range of low‑ and high‑voltage induction motors, for both IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) and NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) standards. The business unit has recently launched a new condition monitoring solution for low voltage (LV) motors that monitors and provides vital motor performance intelligence to help improve uptime, extend motor lifetimes, and increase machine performance and productivity. It connects motors with the Internet of Things (IoT).
The Drives and Controls business provides low‑voltage and medium‑voltage drives and systems for industrial, commercial and residential applications. Drives provide speed, torque and motion control for equipment such as fans, pumps, compressors, conveyors, centrifuges, mixers, hoists, cranes, extruders, printing and textile machines. They are used in industries such as building automation, marine, power, transportation, food and beverage, metals, mining, oil and gas.
19
The Power Conversion business produces excitation and synchronizing systems that provide stability for power stations and high power rectifiers that convert alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) for high‑current applications such as electric arc furnaces and aluminum smelters. It also manufactures solar inverters, wind turbine converters, uninterruptible power supply systems and converters for power protection, as well as rail traction converters, DC wayside power solutions and a range of solutions for charging of electric vehicles.
The division also offers services that complement its products, including design and project management, engineering, installation, training and life‑cycle care, energy efficiency appraisals and preventive maintenance.
Customers
The Discrete Automation and Motion division serves a wide range of customers. Customers include machinery manufacturers, process industries such as pulp and paper, oil and gas, and metals and mining companies, hybrid and batch manufacturers such as food and beverage companies, rail equipment manufacturers, discrete manufacturing companies such as ‘3C’ (computer, communication and consumer electronic), utilities and renewable energy suppliers, particularly in the wind and solar sectors, as well as customers in the automotive industry and electric vehicle charging networks.
Sales and Marketing
Sales are made both through direct sales forces as well as through third‑party channel partners, such as distributors, wholesalers, installers, machine builders and OEMs, system integrators, and panel builders. The proportion of direct sales compared to channel partner sales varies among the different industries, product technologies and geographic markets.
Competition
The Discrete Automation and Motion division’s principal competitors vary by product line but include Fanuc Robotics, Kuka Robot Group, Rockwell Automation, Schneider, Siemens, Yaskawa, SMA and WEG Industries.
Capital Expenditures
The Discrete Automation and Motion division’s capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $128 million in 2016, compared to $145 million and $192 million in 2015 and in 2014, respectively. Principal investments in 2016 were primarily related to equipment replacement and upgrades. Geographically, in 2016, Europe represented 47 percent of the capital expenditures, followed by the Americas (30 percent) and AMEA (23 percent).
Process Automation Division
Overview
The Process Automation division offers customers solutions that are designed to optimize the productivity, energy efficiency and safety of their industrial processes by combining the division’s integrated control products, systems and service offerings with deep domain and process expertise of each end market. Solutions include turnkey engineering, control systems, measurement products, lifecycle services, outsourced maintenance and industry-specific products such as electric propulsion for ships, Azipods, mine hoists, turbochargers and pulp and paper quality control equipment. The systems can link various processes and information flows which allows customers to manage their entire manufacturing and business process based on real‑time access to plant information. Additionally, the systems allow customers to increase production efficiency, optimize their assets and reduce environmental waste. Some of the products from the Discrete Automation and Motion, Power Grids and Electrification Products divisions are integrated into the process control and electrification solutions offered by the Process Automation division.
The Process Automation division offerings are available as separately sold products or as part of a total automation, electrification and/or instrumentation system. The division’s technologies are sold primarily through direct sales forces as well as third‑party channels.
The division had approximately 23,600 employees as of December 31, 2016, and generated revenues of $6.6 billion in 2016.
20
Customers
The Process Automation division’s end customers are primarily companies in the oil and gas, minerals and mining, metals, pulp and paper, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, power generation and marine industries. These customers are looking for complete automation, instrumentation, and electrification solutions that deliver value mainly through lower capital costs, increased plant availability, lower lifecycle costs and reduced project costs.
Products and Services
The businesses of the Process Automation division are described in more detail below; solutions by end market as well as the stand alone products and solutions offerings.
The Oil, Gas and Chemicals business provides solutions across the entire hydrocarbon value chain, from exploration and production to supply, transport and distribution, as well as refining, chemicals and petrochemicals. ABB specializes in mastering the control loop and transforming client operations through actionable insights that optimize performance in real time. From the well head to the refinery, ABB technologies connect people with data to optimize performance, improve reliability, enhance efficiency and minimize environmental impact from project start-up throughout the entire plant life cycle.
Other Process Industry markets served include mining, minerals processing, metals, pharmaceuticals and pulp and paper as well as their associated service industries. The business’ added value is deep industry expertise coupled with the ability to integrate both automation and electronics, resulting in faster start-up times, increased plant productivity and reduced overall capital and operating costs for customers. For mining, metals and cement industries, solutions include specialized products and services, as well as total production systems. The business designs, plans, engineers, supplies, erects and commissions electric equipment, drives, motors and equipment for automation and supervisory control within a variety of areas including mineral handling, mining operations, aluminum smelting, hot and cold steel applications and cement production. In the pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals areas, the business offers applications to support manufacturing, packaging, quality control and compliance with regulatory agencies. The offering for the pulp and paper industries includes quality control systems, control systems, drive systems, on‑line sensors, actuators and field instruments.
ABB serves the Power Generation market with leading automation solutions for all types of power generation such as coal, gas, combined‑cycle, waste‑to‑energy as well as renewable sources such as hydro, solar, wind and biomass. With an offering that includes instrumentation and control systems, ABB technologies help optimize performance, improve reliability, enhance efficiency and minimize environmental impact throughout the plant life cycle. The business also serves the water industry, including applications such as pumping stations and desalination plants.
ABB services the Marine and Ports business through its leading solutions for specialty vessels, container and bulk cargo handling. For the shipping industry, ABB offers an extensive portfolio of integrated marine systems and solutions that improve the flexibility, reliability and energy efficiency of vessels. By coupling power, automation and marine software, proven fuel-efficient technologies and services that ensure maximum vessel uptime, ABB is in the position to improve the profitability of a customer’s business throughout the entire lifecycle of a fleet. ABB designs, engineers, builds, supplies and commissions automation and electrical systems for marine power generation, power distribution and electric propulsion, as well as turbochargers to improve efficiency. With ABB’s integrated operations centers around the world and marine software solutions, owners and operators can run their fleets at lower fuel and maintenance cost, while improving crew, passenger, and cargo safety and overall productivity of their operations. In addition, ABB delivers automation and electrical systems for container and bulk cargo handling - from ship to gate. The systems and services help terminal operators meet the challenge of larger ships, taller cranes and bigger volumes per call, and make terminal operations safer, greener and more productive.
21
ABB offers an extensive portfolio of products and software from stand-alone basic control to integrated collaborative systems for complex or critical processes. One of the solutions, System 800xA, provides a scalable extended automation system for process and production control, safety, and production monitoring. Freelance, another solution, is a full-fledged, easy-to-use distributed control system for small to medium size applications. The PLC Automation portfolio offers a scalable range for small, middle and high-end applications. Components for basic automation solutions, process and safety controllers, field interfaces, panels, process recorders and Human Machine Interfaces are available through our Compact Product Suite offering. The product portfolio is complemented by Automation Sentinel, a subscription-based life cycle management program that provides services to maintain and continually advance and enhance ABB control systems (e.g. cyber security patches) and thus allows it to manage a customer’s life cycle costs. The Advanced Services offering provides individual software-based services to continuously improve automation and processes. ABB also offers Manufacturing Execution Systems that create agility and transparency for production processes by synchronizing and orchestrating a flow across individual automation islands. An interactive software platform, Decathlon Software, combines plant operations data from control systems, enterprise resource planning (ERP) and other data sources into actionable information for decision-makers creates additional customer value. ABB focuses strongly on the human factor and thus offers operator interfaces from panels to holistic control room solutions with ergonomic furniture and control centers to drive productivity, quality and safety to new levels.
The offerings of the Measurement and Analytics business are designed to measure product properties, such as weight, thickness, color, brightness, moisture content and additive content. Actuators allow the customer to make automatic adjustments during the production process to improve the quality and consistency of the product. Field instruments measure properties of the process, such as flow rate, chemical content and temperature. The business also offers a full line of instrumentation and analytical products to analyze, measure and record industrial and power processes.
ABB manufactures and maintains turbochargers for diesel and gas engines having power levels ranging from 500 kilowatts to over 80 megawatts. The business provides engine builders and application operators with advanced turbocharging solutions for efficient and flexible application operations and in compliance with the most stringent environmental requirements.
In addition, ABB offers a complete range of lifecycle services across all customer segments to help customers optimize their assets. Demand for process automation services is driven by customers seeking to increase productivity by improving the performance of existing equipment.
Sales and Marketing
The Process Automation division primarily uses its direct sales force as well as third‑party channel partners, such as distributors, system integrators and OEMs. The majority of revenues are derived through the division’s own direct sales channels.
Competition
The Process Automation division’s principal competitors vary by industry or product line. Competitors include Emerson, Honeywell, Metso Automation, Rockwell Automation, Schneider, Siemens, Voith, and Yokogawa Electric Corporation.
Capital Expenditures
The Process Automation division’s capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $51 million in 2016, compared to $56 million and $47 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Principal investments in 2016 were in turbocharging and the measurement products businesses. Geographically, in 2016, Europe represented 57 percent of the capital expenditures, followed by AMEA (23 percent) and Americas (20 percent).
22
Power Grids Division
Overview
The Power Grids division is a global leader in power and automation technologies that help balance the growing need for electricity with minimum environmental impact, by enabling a stronger, smarter and greener grid. The Power Grids division provides electrical and automation product, system, software and service solutions across the power value chain. These solutions support utility, industry and transport & infrastructure customers to plan, build, operate and maintain their power infrastructure. They are designed to facilitate the safe, reliable and efficient integration, transmission and distribution of bulk and distributed energy generated from conventional and renewable sources.
Around three quarters of the division’s revenues come from utility customers but a significant portion is generated from industry and transport & infrastructure customers. Power Grids has a worldwide customer base, with a wide spread of revenues from a regional perspective across the Americas, Europe and AMEA. The division also has a globally diversified and well balanced manufacturing and engineering footprint. Direct sales account for a significant part of the division’s total revenues and external channel partners such as wholesalers, distributors and OEMs account for the rest.
The division had approximately 37,000 employees as of December 31, 2016, and generated $11.0 billion of revenues in 2016.
Customers
The Power Grids division’s principal customers include utilities, transmission and distribution owners and operators as well as industrial, transportation and infrastructure customers.
Products and Services
The businesses of the Power Grids division are more fully described below.
The Grid Systems business is the world’s largest provider of HVDC systems. These systems use Line Commutated Converter (HVDC Classic) technology or Voltage Sourced Converter (HVDC Light) technology. The portfolio also encompassed high-voltage AC and DC cables, mainly used for subsea or underground applications and HVDC links. It also includes a range of high power semi-conductors, a core technology for power electronics deployed in HVDC, Flexible Alternating Current Transmission Systems (FACTS) and rail applications.
The Grid Integration business is one of the world’s leading providers of transmission and distribution substations and associated life-cycle services. The substations are provided either as engineered solutions (system integration) or on a turnkey, engineering, procurement, construction (EPC) basis, for utility and non-utility applications including renewables, rail, data-centers, industry, battery energy storage and shore-to-ship power supply. This business is also the leading global provider of FACTS, which includes Static Var Compensation (SVC) and static compensator (STATCOM) technology. These systems stabilize voltages, minimize losses, and keep power quality in accordance with grid codes.
The Transformers business supplies transformers that are an integral component found across the power value chain, enabling the efficient and safe conversion of electricity to different voltages. ABB is the world’s largest maker of transformers. The product range is designed for reliability, durability and efficiency with a portfolio that includes power transformers, dry- and liquid-distribution transformers, traction transformers for rail applications, and special application transformers and related components such as insulation kits, bushings and other transformer accessories. In addition, ABB’s power transformers are pushing the voltage barrier to unprecedented levels of 1100 kV DC and 1200 kV AC, facilitating more power to be transported longer distances with minimum losses. Other technology developments include grid-resilient transformers designed to withstand physical attack, eco-efficient transformers using biodegradable oil and innovative sensor-based as well as software-leveraging solutions for remote maintenance and asset optimization.
The High Voltage products business is a global leader in high voltage switchgear with a portfolio spanning air-insulated, gas-insulated and hybrid technologies. It also manufactures generator circuit breakers, a key product for integrating large power plants into the grid. The portfolio also includes a broad range of capacitors and filters that facilitate power quality as well as instrument transformers and other substation components.
23
The Grid Automation business is at the forefront of grid automation and digitalization. It supplies substation automation products, systems and services. It also provides Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems for transmission and distribution networks as well as a range of wireless, fiber optic and power line carrier based telecommunication technologies for mission critical applications. This business also offers microgrid solutions that are being increasingly deployed for remote and partially grid connected applications. Also included in this business is the enterprise software portfolio – a provider of an industry-leading suite of software solutions that help utilities and other asset-intensive industries (e.g. rail, mining) manage, maintain and optimize their assets.
The division also provides services which represent an increasing part of each business and which are a growing focus area for the division with its significant installed product base. The portfolio of services offered includes spare parts, installation, commissioning, condition monitoring and maintenance services, on- and off-site repairs as well as retrofits and upgrades. Increasingly more advanced software-based monitoring and advisory services are being added to the portfolio to support the development of the digitalization of the grids.
Competition
On a global basis, the Power Grids division faces worldwide competition across its portfolio mainly from Siemens and General Electric (GE Alstom). It also competes in specific geographies and in parts of the business with companies such as Hyundai, Hyosung, Crompton Greaves, TBEA and NARI. The breadth of its portfolio, technology and innovation, a global footprint and a vast installed base enable the division to maintain its leading position in the power sector.
The Power Grids division’s capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $203 million in 2016, compared to $191 million and $242 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Principal investments in 2016 were related to capacity expansion as well as the replacement of existing equipment, particularly in Sweden, the U.S. and Switzerland. Geographically, in 2016, Europe represented 68 percent of the capital expenditures, followed by the Americas (19 percent) and AMEA (13 percent).
Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other includes headquarters, central research and development, our real estate activities, Group Treasury Operations and other minor business activities. In addition, we have classified the historical business activities of significant divested businesses in Corporate and Other.
Corporate headquarters and stewardship activities include the operations of our corporate headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland, as well as corporate‑related activities in various countries. These activities cover staff functions with group‑wide responsibilities, such as accounting and financial reporting, corporate finance and taxes, planning and controlling, internal audit, legal and integrity, compliance, risk management and insurance, corporate communications, information systems, investor relations and human resources.
Corporate research and development primarily covers our research activities, as our development activities are organized under the four business divisions. We have two global research laboratories, one focused on power technologies and the other focused on automation technologies, which both work on technologies relevant to the future of our four business divisions. Each laboratory works on new and emerging technologies and collaborates with universities and other external partners to support our divisions in advancing relevant technologies and in developing cross‑divisional technology platforms. We have corporate research centers in seven countries (China, India, Germany, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.S.).
Corporate and Other had approximately 2,000 employees at December 31, 2016.
Division realignment
On October 4, 2016, we announced a planned change in the composition of the business portfolio of our four divisions. Effective January 1, 2017, the scope of the Electrification Products division has been expanded to include the electric vehicle charging, solar, and power quality businesses from the Discrete Automation and Motion division.
24
In addition, the Discrete Automation and Motion division has been renamed the Robotics and Motion division while the Process Automation division has been renamed the Industrial Automation division.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Total capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (excluding intangibles acquired through business combinations) amounted to $831 million, $876 million, $1,026 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, capital expenditures were 27 percent, 24 percent and 21 percent lower, respectively, than depreciation and amortization (excluding acquisition-related amortization, capital expenditures were 3 percent lower and 3 percent and 11 percent higher, respectively, than depreciation and amortization).
Capital expenditures in 2016 remained at a significant level in mature markets, reflecting the geographic distribution of our existing production facilities. Capital expenditures in Europe and North America in 2016 were driven primarily by upgrades and maintenance of existing production facilities, mainly in the U.S., Sweden, Switzerland and Germany. Capital expenditures in emerging markets were highest in China, Poland, India, and Turkey. Capital expenditures in emerging markets were made primarily to increase production capacity by investment in new or expanded facilities. The share of emerging markets capital expenditures as a percentage of total capital expenditures in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was 35 percent, 31 percent and 29 percent, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, construction in progress for property, plant and equipment was $515 million, mainly in the U.S., China, Sweden, Switzerland and Germany. At December 31, 2015, construction in progress for property, plant and equipment was $559 million, mainly in Sweden, the U.S., China, Switzerland and Germany, while at December 31, 2014, construction in progress for property, plant and equipment was $653 million mainly in Sweden, the U.S., Switzerland, Saudi Arabia and China.
Our capital expenditures relate primarily to property, plant and equipment. For 2017, we estimate the expenditures for property, plant and equipment will be higher than our annual depreciation and amortization charge (excluding acquisition-related amortization).
SUPPLIES AND RAW MATERIALS
We purchase a variety of raw materials and products which contain raw materials for use in our production and project execution processes. The primary materials used in our products, by weight, are copper, aluminum, carbon steel, mineral oil and various plastics. We also purchase a wide variety of fabricated products and electronic components. We operate a worldwide supply chain management network with employees dedicated to this function in our businesses and key countries. Our supply chain management network consists of a number of teams, each focusing on different product categories. These category teams, on global, divisional and/or regional level, take advantage of opportunities to leverage the scale of ABB and to optimize the efficiency of our supply networks, in a sustainable manner.
Our supply chain management organization’s activities have continued to expand in recent years, to:
• pool and leverage procurement of materials and services,
• provide transparency of ABB’s global spending through a comprehensive performance and reporting system linked to our ERP systems,
• strengthen ABB’s supply chain network by implementing an effective product category management structure and extensive competency‑based training, and
• monitor and develop our supply base to ensure sustainability, both in terms of materials and processes used.
We buy many categories of products which contain steel, copper, aluminum, crude oil and other commodities. Continuing global economic growth in many emerging economies, coupled with the volatility in foreign currency exchange rates, has led to significant fluctuations in these raw material costs over the last few years. While we expect global commodity prices to remain highly volatile, we expect to offset some market volatility through the use of long‑term contracts and global sourcing.
25
We seek to mitigate the majority of our exposure to commodity price risk by entering into hedges. For example, we manage copper and aluminum price risk using principally swap contracts based on prices for these commodities quoted on leading exchanges. ABB’s hedging policy is designed to safeguard margins by minimizing price volatility and providing a stable cost base during order execution. In addition to using hedging to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in raw materials prices, in some cases we can reduce this risk by incorporating changes in raw materials prices into the prices of our products (through price escalation clauses).
Overall, during 2016 supply chain management personnel in our businesses, and in the countries in which we operate, along with the global category teams, continued to focus on value chain optimization efforts in all areas, while maintaining and improving quality and delivery performance.
In August 2012, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued its final rules regarding “Conflict Minerals”, as required by section 1502 of the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. We initiated conflict minerals processes in 2013 and have continuously improved and tailored the processes to our value chain. We continue to work with our suppliers and customers, to enable us to comply with the rules and disclosure obligations. Further information on ABB’s Conflict Minerals policy and supplier requirements can be found under “Material Compliance” at new.abb.com/about/supplying
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
As a technology‑driven company, we believe that intellectual property rights are crucial to protect the assets of our business. Over the past ten years, we have substantially increased the number of first patent filings, and we intend to continue our aggressive approach to seeking patent protection. Currently, we have approximately 25,700 patent applications and registrations, of which more than 9,200 are pending applications. In addition to these patents, we have more than 3,700 utility model and design applications and registrations, of which more than 1,100 are pending applications. In 2016, we filed more than 700 patent, utility model and design applications for more than 1,500 new inventions. Based on our existing intellectual property strategy, we believe that we have adequate control over our core technologies. The “ABB” trademarks and logo are protected in all of the countries in which we operate. We aggressively defend our intellectual property rights to safeguard the reputation associated with the ABB technology and brand. While these intellectual property rights are fundamental to all of our businesses, there is no dependency of the business on any single patent, utility model or design application.
SUSTAINABILITY ACTIVITIES
Sustainability management is one of our highest business priorities. We seek to address sustainability issues in all our business operations in order to improve our social, safety and environmental performance continuously, and to enhance the quality of life in the communities and countries where we operate.
Our social and environmental efforts include:
• implementing sustainability objectives covering all relevant parts of our operations,
• joining initiatives that foster economic, environmental, social and educational development, and strengthen observance of human rights in business practice,
• making positive contributions in the communities where we operate so they welcome us and consider ABB a good neighbor, an attractive employer and a good investment,
• offering our customers eco‑efficient products that save energy and are safe to use, that optimize the use of natural resources, minimize waste and reduce environmental impact over their complete life cycles,
• applying non‑financial risk assessment to key business decision‑making processes, and to projects,
• sharing our latest technologies with emerging markets by, for example, helping customers in developing countries implement environmentally sound processes and technologies and providing environmental awareness and safety training to our business partners,
26
• ensuring that our operations and processes comply with applicable environmental and health and safety standards and social legislation. Specifically, every operating unit must implement an environmental management system that seeks to continuously improve its environmental performance and a health and safety management system that similarly seeks to continuously improve health and safety performance,
• ensuring that our social, health and safety and environmental policies are communicated and implemented,
• working towards achieving best practices in occupational health and safety, and ensuring the health and safety of our employees, contractors and others involved in or affected by our activities,
• ensuring that suppliers have sustainability policies and systems that are comparable with our own, and
• continuing our program to decontaminate sites that were polluted by historical manufacturing processes.
To manage environmental aspects of our own operations, we have implemented environmental management systems according to the ISO 14001 standard at our manufacturing and service sites. For non‑manufacturing sites we have implemented an adapted environmental management system in order to ensure management of environmental aspects and continual improvement of performance. Globally, operations at 392 sites and offices are covered by externally certified environmental management systems.
We have Environmental Product Declarations to communicate the environmental performance of our core products. These describe the significant environmental aspects and impacts of a product line, viewed over its complete life cycle. Declarations are based on Life Cycle Assessment studies, created according to the international standard ISO/TR 14025. Approximately 70 declarations for major product lines are published on our Web site (www.abb.com), some of which have been externally certified.
In 2016, approximately 97 percent of our employees were covered by confirmed data gathered through ABB’s formal environmental reporting system that is verified by an independent verification body. The operations of companies acquired during 2016 are not yet covered by our environmental reporting. We expect that this reporting will be implemented in 2017. The remaining parts of our business that are not yet covered by our environmental reporting system, mainly sales, have very limited environmental exposure. A total of 38 environmental incidents were reported in 2016, none of which had a material environmental impact.
In 2016, substantially all of our employees were covered by confirmed data gathered through ABB’s formal social reporting system that is verified by an independent verification body. The remaining parts of our business that are not yet covered by our social reporting system, mainly sales offices in countries where we do not perform manufacturing, have very limited social exposure.
REGULATION
Our operations are subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations including those governing antitrust and competition, corruption, the environment, securities transactions and disclosures, import and export of products, currency conversions and repatriation, taxation of foreign earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel and use of local employees and suppliers.
As a reporting company under Section 12 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are subject to the FCPA’s anti‑bribery provisions with respect to our conduct around the world.
Our operations are also subject to the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. The convention obliges signatories to adopt national legislation that makes it a crime to bribe foreign public officials. Those countries which have adopted implementing legislation and have ratified the convention include the U.S. and several European nations in which we have significant operations.
27
We conduct business in certain countries known to experience governmental corruption. While we are committed to conducting business in a legal and ethical manner, our employees or agents have taken, and in the future may take, actions that violate the U.S. FCPA, legislation promulgated pursuant to the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, antitrust laws or other laws or regulations. These actions have resulted and could result in monetary or other penalties against us and could damage our reputation and, therefore, our ability to do business. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.
The U.S. Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 requires U.S. listed companies to disclose information relating to certain transactions with Iran. With the partial lifting of international sanctions, from January 2016, ABB started to seek business opportunities in Iran. In 2016, certain non-U.S. subsidiaries of ABB, in accordance with applicable laws, provided electrical equipment to an EPC contracting company and on-site services to a customer in the shipping industry. The revenues attributable to these products and services in 2016 amounted to approximately $6 million. We are abiding by remaining applicable sanctions.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
ABB Ltd is the ultimate parent company of the ABB Group. Its sole shareholding is in ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd which directly or indirectly owns the other companies in the ABB Group. The table below both sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, the name, place of incorporation and ownership interest of the significant direct and indirect subsidiaries of ABB Ltd, Switzerland. ABB’s operational group structure is described above in the “Business Divisions” section of Item 4.
28
Company name/location |
Country |
ABB interest % |
|
SARPI - Société Algérienne pour la réalisation de projets industriels, Alger |
Algeria |
50.00 |
|
ABB S.A., Buenos Aires |
Argentina |
100.00 |
|
ABB Australia Pty Limited, Moorebank, NSW |
Australia |
100.00 |
|
ABB Group Investment Management Pty. Ltd., Moorebank, NSW |
Australia |
100.00 |
|
ABB N.V., Zaventem |
Belgium |
100.00 |
|
ABB Ltda., Osasco |
Brazil |
100.00 |
|
ABB Bulgaria EOOD, Sofia |
Bulgaria |
100.00 |
|
ABB Canada Holding Limited Partnership, Saint-Laurent, Quebec |
Canada |
100.00 |
|
ABB Inc., SaintLaurent, Quebec |
Canada |
100.00 |
|
Thomas & Betts Limited, SaintJeansurRichelieu, Quebec |
Canada |
100.00 |
|
ABB Beijing Drive Systems Co. Ltd., Beijing |
China |
90.00 |
|
ABB (China) Ltd., Beijing |
China |
100.00 |
|
ABB Engineering (Shanghai) Ltd., Shanghai |
China |
100.00 |
|
ABB High Voltage Switchgear Co. Ltd., Beijing |
China |
60.00 |
|
ABB Xiamen Low Voltage Equipment Co. Ltd., Xiamen |
China |
100.00 |
|
ABB Xiamen Switchgear Co. Ltd., Xiamen |
China |
64.30 |
|
ABB Xinhui Low Voltage Switchgear Co. Ltd., Xinhui |
China |
90.00 |
|
ABB s.r.o., Prague |
Czech Republic |
100.00 |
|
ABB A/S, Skovlunde |
Denmark |
100.00 |
|
ABB for Electrical Industries (ABB ARAB) S.A.E., Cairo |
Egypt |
100.00 |
|
Asea Brown Boveri S.A.E., Cairo |
Egypt |
100.00 |
|
ABB AS, Jüri |
Estonia |
100.00 |
|
ABB Oy, Helsinki |
Finland |
100.00 |
|
ABB France, Cergy Pontoise |
France |
99.83 |
|
ABB S.A., Cergy Pontoise |
France |
100.00 |
|
ABB AG, Mannheim |
Germany |
100.00 |
|
ABB Automation GmbH, Mannheim |
Germany |
100.00 |
|
ABB Automation Products GmbH, Ladenburg |
Germany |
100.00 |
|
ABB Beteiligungs und Verwaltungsges. mbH, Mannheim |
Germany |
100.00 |
|
ABB StotzKontakt GmbH, Heidelberg |
Germany |
100.00 |
|
BuschJaeger Elektro GmbH, Lüdenscheid |
Germany |
100.00 |
|
ABB Holding Ltd., Hong Kong |
Hong Kong |
100.00 |
|
ABB (Hong Kong) Ltd., Hong Kong |
Hong Kong |
100.00 |
|
ABB Global Industries and Services Private Limited, Bangalore |
India |
100.00 |
|
ABB India Limited, Bangalore |
India |
75.00 |
|
ABB S.p.A., Milan |
Italy |
100.00 |
|
Power-One Italy S.p.A., Terranuova Bracciolini (AR) |
Italy |
100.00 |
|
ABB K.K., Tokyo |
Japan |
100.00 |
|
ABB Ltd., Seoul |
Korea, Republic of |
100.00 |
|
ABB Holdings Sdn. Bhd., Subang Jaya |
Malaysia |
100.00 |
|
ABB Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Subang Jaya |
Malaysia |
100.00 |
|
ABB Mexico S.A. de C.V., San Luis Potosi SLP |
Mexico |
100.00 |
|
29
Company name/location |
Country |
ABB interest % |
|
Asea Brown Boveri S.A. de C.V., San Luis Potosi SLP |
Mexico |
100.00 |
|
ABB B.V., Rotterdam |
Netherlands |
100.00 |
|
ABB Capital B.V., Rotterdam |
Netherlands |
100.00 |
|
ABB Finance B.V., Rotterdam |
Netherlands |
100.00 |
|
ABB Holdings B.V., Rotterdam |
Netherlands |
100.00 |
|
ABB Investments B.V., Rotterdam |
Netherlands |
100.00 |
|
ABB AS, Billingstad |
Norway |
100.00 |
|
ABB Holding AS, Billingstad |
Norway |
100.00 |
|
ABB Sp. z o.o., Warsaw |
Poland |
99.92 |
|
ABB Ltd., Moscow |
Russian Federation |
100.00 |
|
ABB Contracting Company Ltd., Riyadh |
Saudi Arabia |
65.00 |
|
ABB Electrical Industries Ltd., Riyadh |
Saudi Arabia |
65.00 |
|
ABB Holdings Pte. Ltd., Singapore |
Singapore |
100.00 |
|
ABB Pte. Ltd., Singapore |
Singapore |
100.00 |
|
ABB Holdings (Pty) Ltd., Longmeadow |
South Africa |
100.00 |
|
ABB South Africa (Pty) Ltd., Longmeadow |
South Africa |
74.91 |
|
Asea Brown Boveri S.A., Madrid |
Spain |
100.00 |
|
ABB AB, Västerås |
Sweden |
100.00 |
|
ABB Norden Holding AB, Västerås |
Sweden |
100.00 |
|
ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd, Zurich |
Switzerland |
100.00 |
|
ABB Information Systems Ltd., Zurich |
Switzerland |
100.00 |
|
ABB Investment Holding GmbH, Zurich |
Switzerland |
100.00 |
|
ABB Management Services Ltd., Zurich |
Switzerland |
100.00 |
|
ABB Schweiz AG, Baden |
Switzerland |
100.00 |
|
ABB Turbo Systems AG, Baden |
Switzerland |
100.00 |
|
ABB LIMITED, Bangkok |
Thailand |
100.00 |
|
ABB Elektrik Sanayi A.S., Istanbul |
Turkey |
99.95 |
|
ABB Industries (L.L.C.), Dubai |
United Arab Emirates |
49.00 |
(1) |
ABB Holdings Limited, Warrington |
United Kingdom |
100.00 |
|
ABB Limited, Warrington |
United Kingdom |
100.00 |
|
ABB Finance (USA) Inc., Wilmington, DE |
United States |
100.00 |
|
ABB Holdings Inc., Cary, NC |
United States |
100.00 |
|
ABB Inc., Cary, NC |
United States |
100.00 |
|
ABB Treasury Center (USA), Inc., Wilmington, DE |
United States |
100.00 |
|
Baldor Electric Company, Fort Smith, AR |
United States |
100.00 |
|
Edison Holding Corporation, Wilmington, DE |
United States |
100.00 |
|
Thomas & Betts Corporation, Knoxville, TN |
United States |
100.00 |
|
Verdi Holding Corporation, Wilmington, DE |
United States |
100.00 |
|
(1) Company consolidated as ABB exercises full management control. |
|
|
|
30
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
As of December 31, 2016, we occupy real estate in around 100 countries throughout the world. The facilities consist mainly of manufacturing plants, office buildings, research centers and warehouses. A substantial portion of our production and development facilities are situated in the U.S., China, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Finland, India, Switzerland, Canada and Poland. We also own or lease other properties, including office buildings, warehouses, research and development facilities and sales offices in many countries. We own substantially all of the machinery and equipment used in our manufacturing operations.
From time to time, we have a surplus of space arising from acquisitions, production efficiencies and/or restructuring of operations. Normally, we seek to sell such surplus space which may involve leasing property to third parties for an interim period.
The net book value of our property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2016, was $4,743 million, of which machinery and equipment represented $2,109 million, land and buildings represented $2,119 million and construction in progress represented $515 million. We believe that our current facilities are in good condition and are adequate to meet the requirements of our present and foreseeable future operations.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
In 2016, we continued our Next Level transformation aimed at accelerating sustainable value creation and achieved significant results in our three focus areas: profitable growth, relentless execution and business-led collaboration.
Profitable growth
To drive a growth mindset, we adopted our “PIE” formula of penetration, innovation and expansion, with a focus on greater competitiveness, organic growth, and reducing risks by aligning business models more closely with our core competencies. In 2016, the PIE initiatives helped mitigate market headwinds resulting in a stable revenue development in local currencies (however, in U.S. dollars revenues declined 5 percent). There was positive demand in strategic growth areas such as food and beverage and robotics, while demand from other areas such as process markets remained subdued. Improving growth momentum resulted in order growth in the fourth quarter of 2016, supported by strong growth in key markets such as the U.S. and China.
At our Capital Markets Day in October 2016, we announced our decision related to the strategic portfolio review of our Power Grids division. We intend to continue the Power Grids transformation under ABB’s ownership, with the focus on high-growth segments and digitally enabled services and software. As part of the ongoing transformation, we intend to continue to de-risk the Power Grids business model while tapping growth opportunities through strategic partnerships, such as those with two leading EPC companies, Fluor and Aibel, announced in 2016. The Power Grids division won large orders in the fourth quarter of 2016 reflecting customer trust in ABB’s portfolio. These large orders included a $640 million UHVDC systems order for Raigarh-Pugalur in India and a $100 million order for the upgrade of the Sylmar converter station of the Pacific Intertie high-voltage direct current power link in the U.S.
We laid the groundwork for future growth with our quantum leap in digital – around ABB AbilityTM – which we launched at our Capital Markets Day in October 2016. ABB AbilityTM combines ABB’s portfolio of digital solutions and services across all customer segments, cementing our leading position in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and support the competiveness of our four entrepreneurial divisions. We entered into a far-reaching strategic partnership with Microsoft to develop next‑generation digital solutions on an integrated cloud platform. We believe that our customers will benefit from the unique combination of our deep domain knowledge and extensive portfolio of industrial solutions and Microsoft’s Azure intelligent cloud, as well as B2B engineering competence. Together, we believe the partners will drive digital transformation in customer segments across ABB’s businesses such as robotics, marine and e-mobility. Our digital transformation will be led by our Chief Digital Officer, Guido Jouret, a pioneer in the Internet of Things, who joined ABB on October 1, 2016, reporting to our CEO, Ulrich Spiesshofer.
31
As of 2017, ABB is driving growth in four market-leading entrepreneurial divisions: Electrification Products, Robotics and Motion, Industrial Automation and Power Grids. The new division structure was effective January 1, 2017, and is now fully operational. The divisions are expected to drive growth as entrepreneurial units within ABB, in line with one of our core values – “ownership and performance”. This is reflected in an enhanced performance and compensation model, which focuses on individual accountability and responsibility. The divisions benefit from sales collaboration orchestrated by ABB’s regions and countries as well as from the group‑wide digital offering, a low‑cost centralized administrative structure, common supply chain management and corporate research centers. We plan to continue to strengthen our divisions through active portfolio management. This includes pursuing strategic additions, transforming business models and pruning non-core businesses.
Relentless execution
The transformation of Power Grids continues. In 2016, the division increased Operational EBITA by 16 percent, mainly driven by improved productivity, solid project execution and continued cost savings. These results reflect the success of the previously announced “step change” program to date. Going forward, the division is expected to continue to drive further transformation and value creation through its previously announced “Power Up” program. In light of this strong operational excellence performance, ABB increased the profitability targets for this division effective January 1, 2018.
A key objective of the Next Level strategy is to achieve world‑class operational excellence at all levels of the company. The White Collar Productivity savings program has outperformed expectations since its launch in 2015. As a result we increased the program’s cost reduction target by 30 percent to $1.3 billion. In 2016, the White Collar Productivity savings program amounted to $0.6 billion. We also continued to deliver on our regular cost‑savings program of achieving savings equivalent to an expected 3‑5 percent of cost of sales each year. We continued to execute our Net Working Capital program, which aims to free-up approximately $2 billion from 2015‑2017. In 2016, we reduced working capital by around $550 million bringing the total reduction to $900 million for the first two years of the program.
In addition, we continued to align and drive our new performance-based compensation model, which has been implemented for 70,000 of our 132,000 employees.
Business-led collaboration
We are adopting a single corporate brand, consolidating all our brands around the world under one umbrella. Our portfolio of companies is being unified, showcasing the full breadth and depth of ABB’s global offering under one master brand. The unified brand plays a key part in realizing the value potential of our digital offering, as we expect it will increase brand loyalty, price premiums and purchase probability. The brand features design elements intended to clearly articulate ABB’s vision, direction and unique market position to customers, shareholders, employees and all other stakeholders. Our heritage as a pioneering technology leader and the three focus areas of our Next Level strategy are reflected in our new brand promise: “Let’s write the future.”TM
Over the past two years, we have simplified our organizational setup, reducing the number of global regions from eight to three, and the divisions from five to four. In addition, many business units have been relocated closer to their key markets and customers, leading to a more responsive, customer-focused organization. The work is not over, but today ABB is a simpler, faster and more agile company, positioned at the heart of the Energy and Fourth Industrial Revolutions, and ready to take advantage of the exciting growth opportunities that are emerging across its markets.
Next Level strategy – stage 3
On October 4, 2016, we launched stage 3 of our Next Level strategy to unlock additional value for shareholders and customers. Building on the focus areas of profitable growth, relentless execution and business-led collaboration, stage 3 consists of four actions:
· Driving growth in four market-leading entrepreneurial divisions,
· Quantum leap in digital,
· Accelerating momentum in operational excellence, and
32
· Strengthening the global ABB brand.
Driving growth in four market-leading, entrepreneurial units
We are driving growth in four market leading entrepreneurial divisions: Electrification Products, Robotics and Motion, Industrial Automation and Power Grids. The new division structure was effective January 1, 2017, and is now fully operational.
A quantum leap in digital with ABB Ability TM
The ABB AbilityTM offering combines our portfolio of digital solutions and services across all customer segments, cementing our leading position in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and supporting the competitiveness of our four entrepreneurial divisions. With ABB AbilityTM, we see an annual addressable market of up to $20 billion.
Accelerating momentum in operational excellence
The White Collar Productivity savings program is on track to deliver the increased cost reduction target of $1.3 billion (run rate end of 2017). We intend to achieve these additional savings within the initially announced timeframe and for approximately $200 million lower of total combined restructuring program costs and implementation costs than initially announced in 2015. We are continuing our regular cost-savings programs to achieve savings equivalent to an expected 3‑5 percent of cost of sales each year.
We continue to deliver on our Net Working Capital program which plans to free-up a total of $2 billion by the end of 2017. In the first two years of the program, we have freed up approximately $900 million.
Strengthening ABB’s brand
We are adopting a single corporate brand, consolidating all our brands around the world under one umbrella. Our portfolio of companies is being unified, showcasing the full breadth and depth of our global offering under one master brand. The unified brand plays a key part in realizing the value potential of our digital offering, as we expect it will increase brand loyalty, price premiums and purchase probability.
Capital allocation
Our shareholders are expected to benefit from our expected strong cash generation and financial position through a new share buyback program of up to $3 billion from 2017 through 2019. In addition, the Board of Directors is proposing an eighth consecutive increase in the dividend to 0.76 Swiss francs per share at the 2017 AGM.
ABB’s capital allocation priorities remain unchanged:
· funding organic growth, research and development, and capital expenditures at attractive cash returns,
· paying a steadily rising, sustainable dividend,
· investing in value-creating acquisitions, and
· returning additional cash to shareholders.
As a pioneering technology leader, committed to unlocking value, we believe we are well positioned to capture growth opportunities as the Energy and Fourth Industrial Revolutions unfold. We have a clear transformation plan to drive earnings per share and cash return on invested capital, as well as an efficient balance sheet to generate attractive returns for shareholders.
33
South Korea
One very unfortunate development was that ABB uncovered a sophisticated criminal scheme involving significant embezzlement and misappropriation of funds in its South Korean subsidiary. The company immediately launched a thorough investigation, involving internal and external parties, which is progressing well. The company has checked and reconfirmed the balances of its global bank accounts and can confirm that this situation is limited to South Korea. ABB has a zero-tolerance approach to unethical behavior and maintains the highest standards regarding integrity and ethical business practices. We have started implementing disciplinary consequences and will continue to do so as appropriate. Due to the investigation, ABB had to postpone the publication of its 2016 annual report.
Outlook
Macroeconomic and geopolitical developments are signaling a mixed picture with continued uncertainty. Some macroeconomic signs in the U.S. remain positive and growth in China is expected to continue. The overall global market remains impacted by modest growth and increased uncertainties, such as the United Kingdom’s potential withdrawal from the European Union and geopolitical tensions in various parts of the world. Oil prices and foreign exchange translation effects are expected to continue to influence our results. With this and the ongoing transformation of ABB, we expect 2017 to be a transitional year.
The attractive long-term demand outlook in our three major customer sectors — utilities, industry and transport & infrastructure — is driven by the Energy and Fourth Industrial Revolutions.
We believe we are well positioned to tap into these opportunities for long-term profitable growth with our strong market presence, broad geographic and business scope, technology leadership and financial strength.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and present these in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including, but not limited to, those related to: gross profit margins on long‑term construction‑type contracts; costs of product guarantees and warranties; provisions for bad debts; recoverability of inventories, investments, fixed assets, goodwill and other intangible assets; the fair values of assets and liabilities assumed in business combinations; income tax expenses and provisions related to uncertain tax positions; pensions and other postretirement benefit assumptions; and legal and other contingencies. Where appropriate, we base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from our estimates and assumptions.
We deem an accounting policy to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact our Consolidated Financial Statements. We also deem an accounting policy to be critical when the application of such policy is essential to our ongoing operations. We believe the following critical accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies should be considered when reading our Consolidated Financial Statements.
34
Revenue recognition
We generally recognize revenues for the sale of goods when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. With regard to the sale of products, delivery is not considered to have occurred, and therefore no revenues are recognized, until the customer has taken title to the products and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the products specified in the purchase order or sales agreement. Generally, the transfer of title and risks and rewards of ownership are governed by the contractually‑defined shipping terms. We use various International Commercial shipping terms (as promulgated by the International Chamber of Commerce) such as Ex Works (EXW), Free Carrier (FCA) and Delivered Duty Paid (DDP). Subsequent to delivery of the products, we generally have no further contractual performance obligations that would preclude revenue recognition.
Revenues under long‑term construction‑type contracts are generally recognized using the percentage‑of‑completion method of accounting. We use the cost‑to‑cost method to measure progress towards completion on contracts. Under this method, progress of contracts is measured by actual costs incurred in relation to management’s best estimate of total estimated costs, which are reviewed and updated routinely for contracts in progress. The cumulative effect of any change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the change in estimate is determined.
The percentage‑of‑completion method of accounting involves the use of assumptions and projections, principally relating to future material, labor and project‑related overhead costs. As a consequence, there is a risk that total contract costs will exceed those we originally estimated and the margin will decrease or the long‑term construction‑type contract may become unprofitable. This risk increases if the duration of a contract increases because there is a higher probability that the circumstances upon which we originally developed estimates will change, resulting in increased costs that we may not recover. Factors that could cause costs to increase include:
• unanticipated technical problems with equipment supplied or developed by us which may require us to incur additional costs to remedy,
• changes in the cost of components, materials or labor,
• difficulties in obtaining required governmental permits or approvals,
• project modifications creating unanticipated costs,
• suppliers’ or subcontractors’ failure to perform, and
• delays caused by unexpected conditions or events.
Changes in our initial assumptions, which we review on a regular basis between balance sheet dates, may result in revisions to estimated costs, current earnings and anticipated earnings. We recognize these changes in the period in which the changes in estimates are determined. By recognizing changes in estimates cumulatively, recorded revenue and costs to date reflect the current estimates of the stage of completion of each project. Additionally, losses on long‑term contracts are recognized in the period when they are identified and are based upon the anticipated excess of contract costs over the related contract revenues.
Short‑term construction‑type contracts, or long‑term construction‑type contracts for which reasonably dependable estimates cannot be made or for which inherent hazards make estimates difficult, are accounted for under the completed‑contract method. Revenues under the completed‑contract method are recognized upon substantial completion—that is: acceptance by the customer, compliance with performance specifications demonstrated in a factory acceptance test or similar event.
For non construction‑type contracts that contain customer acceptance provisions, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance occurs or we have demonstrated the customer‑specified objective criteria have been met or the contractual acceptance period has lapsed.
35
Revenues from service transactions are recognized as services are performed. For long‑term service contracts, revenues are recognized on a straight‑line basis over the term of the contract or, if the performance pattern is other than straight‑line, as the services are provided. Service revenues reflect revenues earned from our activities in providing services to customers primarily subsequent to the sale and delivery of a product or complete system. Such revenues consist of maintenance‑type contracts, field service activities that include personnel and accompanying spare parts, and installation and commissioning of products as a stand‑alone service or as part of a service contract.
Revenues for software license fees are recognized when persuasive evidence of a non‑cancelable license agreement exists, delivery has occurred, the license fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. In software arrangements that include rights to multiple software products and/or services, the total arrangement fee is allocated using the residual method, under which revenue is allocated to the undelivered elements based on vendor‑specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value of such undelivered elements and the residual amounts of revenue are allocated to the delivered elements. Elements included in multiple element arrangements may consist of software licenses, maintenance (which includes customer support services and unspecified upgrades), hosting, and consulting services. VSOE is based on the price generally charged when an element is sold separately or, in the case of an element not yet sold separately, the price established by authorized management, if it is probable that the price, once established, will not change once the element is sold separately. If VSOE does not exist for an undelivered element, the total arrangement fee will be recognized as revenue over the life of the contract or upon delivery of the undelivered element.
We offer multiple element arrangements to meet our customers’ needs. These arrangements may involve the delivery of multiple products and/or performance of services (such as installation and training) and the delivery and/or performance may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. Deliverables of such multiple element arrangements are evaluated to determine the unit of accounting and if certain criteria are met, we allocate revenues to each unit of accounting based on its relative selling price. A hierarchy of selling prices is used to determine the selling price of each specific deliverable that includes VSOE (if available), third‑party evidence (if VSOE is not available), or estimated selling price if neither of the first two is available. The estimated selling price reflects our best estimate of what the selling prices of elements would be if the elements were sold on a stand‑alone basis. Revenue is allocated between the elements of an arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement. Such arrangements generally include industry‑specific performance and termination provisions, such as in the event of substantial delays or non‑delivery.
Revenues are reported net of customer rebates and similar incentives. Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on revenue‑producing transactions between us and our customers, such as sales, use, value‑added and some excise taxes, are excluded from revenues.
These revenue recognition methods require the collectability of the revenues recognized to be reasonably assured. When recording the respective accounts receivable, allowances are calculated to estimate those receivables that will not be collected. These reserves assume a level of default based on historical information, as well as knowledge about specific invoices and customers. The risk remains that actual defaults will vary in number and amount from those originally estimated. As such, the amount of revenues recognized might exceed or fall below the amount which will be collected, resulting in a change in earnings in the future. The risk of deterioration is likely to increase during periods of significant negative industry, economic or political trends.
As a result of the above policies, judgment in the selection and application of revenue recognition methods must be made.
36
Contingencies
As more fully described in “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and in “Note 15 Commitments and contingencies” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are subject to proceedings, litigation or threatened litigation and other claims and inquiries related to environmental, labor, product, regulatory, tax (other than income tax) and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the provision required, if any, for these contingencies is made after analysis of each individual issue, often with assistance from both internal and external legal counsel and technical experts. The required amount of a provision for a contingency of any type may change in the future due to new developments in the particular matter, including changes in the approach to its resolution.
We record provisions for our contingent obligations when it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Any such provision is generally recognized on an undiscounted basis using our best estimate of the amount of loss or at the lower end of an estimated range when a single best estimate is not determinable. In some cases, we may be able to recover a portion of the costs relating to these obligations from insurers or other third parties; however, we record such amounts only when it is probable that they will be collected.
We provide for anticipated costs for warranties when we recognize revenues on the related products or contracts. Warranty costs include calculated costs arising from imperfections in design, material and workmanship in our products. We generally make individual assessments on contracts with risks resulting from order‑specific conditions or guarantees and assessments on an overall, statistical basis for similar products sold in larger quantities. There is a risk that actual warranty costs may exceed the amounts provided for, which would result in a deterioration of earnings in the future when these actual costs are determined.
Pension and other postretirement benefits
As more fully described in “Note 17 Employee benefits” to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we have a number of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans and recognize an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We measure such a plan’s assets and obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the year.
Significant differences between assumptions and actual experience, or significant changes in assumptions, may materially affect the pension obligations. The effects of actual results differing from assumptions and the changing of assumptions are included in net actuarial loss within “Accumulated other comprehensive loss”.
We recognize actuarial gains and losses gradually over time. Any cumulative unrecognized actuarial gain or loss that exceeds 10 percent of the greater of the present value of the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and the fair value of plan assets is recognized in earnings over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan, or the expected average remaining lifetime of the inactive plan participants if the plan is comprised of all or almost all inactive participants. Otherwise, the actuarial gain or loss is not recognized in the Consolidated Income Statements.
We use actuarial valuations to determine our pension and postretirement benefit costs and credits. The amounts calculated depend on a variety of key assumptions, including discount rates, mortality rates and expected return on plan assets. Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to consider current market conditions in making these assumptions. In particular, the discount rates are reviewed annually based on changes in long‑term, highly‑rated corporate bond yields. Decreases in the discount rates result in an increase in the PBO and in pension costs. Conversely, an increase in the discount rates results in a decrease in the PBO and in pension costs. The mortality assumptions are reviewed annually by management. Decreases in mortality rates result in an increase in the PBO and in pension costs. Conversely, an increase in mortality rates results in a decrease in the PBO and in pension costs.
Holding all other assumptions constant, a 0.25‑percentage point decrease in the discount rate would have increased the PBO related to our defined benefit pension plans by $394 million while a 0.25‑percentage point increase in the discount rate would have decreased the PBO related to our defined benefit pension plans by $362 million.
37
The expected return on plan assets is reviewed regularly and considered for adjustment annually based upon the target asset allocations and represents the long‑term return expected to be achieved. Decreases in the expected return on plan assets result in an increase to pension costs. Holding all other assumptions constant, an increase or decrease of 0.25 percentage points in the expected long‑term rate of asset return would have decreased or increased, respectively, the net periodic benefit cost in 2016 by $24 million.
The funded status, which can increase or decrease based on the performance of the financial markets or changes in our assumptions, does not represent a mandatory short‑term cash obligation. Instead, the funded status of a defined benefit pension plan is the difference between the PBO and the fair value of the plan assets. At December 31, 2016, our defined benefit pension plans were $1,403 million underfunded compared to an underfunding of $1,481 million at December 31, 2015. Our other postretirement plans were underfunded by $147 million and $178 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
We have multiple non‑pension postretirement benefit plans. Our health care plans are generally contributory with participants’ contributions adjusted annually. For purposes of estimating our health care costs, we have assumed health care cost increases to be 7.33 percent per annum for 2017, gradually declining to 5.00 percent per annum by 2028 and to remain at that level thereafter.
Income taxes
In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax expense from continuing operations is reconciled from the weighted‑average global tax rate (rather than from the Swiss domestic statutory tax rate) as the parent company of the ABB Group, ABB Ltd, is domiciled in Switzerland. Income which has been generated in jurisdictions outside of Switzerland (hereafter “foreign jurisdictions”) and has already been subject to corporate income tax in those foreign jurisdictions is, to a large extent, tax exempt in Switzerland. Therefore, generally no or only limited Swiss income tax has to be provided for on the repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. There is no requirement in Switzerland for a parent company of a group to file a tax return of the group determining domestic and foreign pre‑tax income and as our consolidated income from continuing operations is predominantly earned outside of Switzerland, corporate income tax in foreign jurisdictions largely determines our global weighted‑average tax rate.
We account for deferred taxes by using the asset and liability method. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We recognize a deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that the asset will be realized. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance based upon historical losses, projected future taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. To the extent we increase or decrease this allowance in a period, we recognize the change in the allowance within “Provision for taxes” in the Consolidated Income Statements unless the change relates to discontinued operations, in which case the change is recorded in “Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax”. Unforeseen changes in tax rates and tax laws, as well as differences in the projected taxable income as compared to the actual taxable income, may affect these estimates.
Certain countries levy withholding taxes, dividend distribution taxes or additional corporate income taxes (hereafter “withholding taxes”) on dividend distributions. Such taxes cannot always be fully reclaimed by the shareholder, although they have to be declared and withheld by the subsidiary. Switzerland has concluded double taxation treaties with many countries in which we operate. These treaties either eliminate or reduce such withholding taxes on dividend distributions. It is our policy to distribute retained earnings of subsidiaries, insofar as such earnings are not permanently reinvested or no other reasons exist that would prevent the subsidiary from distributing them. No deferred tax liability is set up, if retained earnings are considered as permanently reinvested, and used for financing current operations as well as business growth through working capital and capital expenditure in those countries.
38
We operate in numerous tax jurisdictions and, as a result, are regularly subject to audit by tax authorities. We provide for tax contingencies whenever it is deemed more likely than not that a tax asset has been impaired or a tax liability has been incurred for events such as tax claims or changes in tax laws. Contingency provisions are recorded based on the technical merits of our filing position, considering the applicable tax laws and OECD guidelines and are based on our evaluations of the facts and circumstances as of the end of each reporting period. Changes in the facts and circumstances could result in a material change to the tax accruals. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable and that appropriate tax reserves have been made, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be different than that which is reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals.
An estimated loss from a tax contingency must be accrued as a charge to income if it is more likely than not that a tax asset has been impaired or a tax liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We apply a two‑step approach to recognize and measure uncertainty in income taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The required amount of provisions for contingencies of any type may change in the future due to new developments.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
We review goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We use either a qualitative or quantitative assessment method for each reporting unit. The qualitative assessment involves determining, based on an evaluation of qualitative factors, whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, based on this qualitative assessment, it is determined to be more likely than not that the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value, the two‑step quantitative impairment test is performed. If we elect not to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit, then we perform the two‑step impairment test.
Our reporting units are the same as our business divisions for Electrification Products, Discrete Automation and Motion, and Power Grids. For the Process Automation division, we determined the reporting units to be one level below the division, as the different products produced or services provided by this division do not share sufficiently similar economic characteristics to permit testing of goodwill on a total division level.
When performing the qualitative assessment, we first determine, for a reporting unit, factors which would affect the fair value of the reporting unit including: (i) macroeconomic conditions related to the business, (ii) industry and market trends, and (iii) the overall future financial performance and future opportunities in the markets in which the business operates. We then consider how these factors would impact the most recent quantitative analysis of the reporting unit’s fair value. Key assumptions in determining the value of the reporting unit include the projected level of business operations, the weighted‑average cost of capital, the income tax rate and the terminal growth rate.
If, after performing the qualitative assessment, we conclude that events or circumstances have occurred which would indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, or if we have elected not to perform a qualitative assessment, the two‑step quantitative impairment test is performed. In the first step, we calculate the fair value of the reporting unit (using an income approach whereby the fair value is calculated based on the present value of future cash flows applying a discount rate that represents our weighted‑average cost of capital) and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. Where the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is performed. However, if the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit is equal to or exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, we would perform the second step of the impairment test. In the second step, we would determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill and compare it to the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill were to exceed its implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss equal to the difference. Any goodwill impairment losses would be recorded as a separate line item in the income statement in continuing operations, unless related to a discontinued operation, in which case the losses would be recorded in “Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax”.
39
In 2016, we performed the two‑step quantitative impairment test for all of our reporting units to reflect new assumptions and forecasts resulting from our newly‑developed strategic plan for the period 2017 to 2020. The quantitative test concluded that the estimated fair values for each of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by more than 100 percent and as no reporting unit had a zero or negative carrying value, we concluded that none of the reporting units was “at risk” of failing the goodwill impairment test. Consequently, the second step of the impairment test was not performed.
The projected future cash flows used in the 2016 fair value calculation were based on approved business plans for the reporting units which covered a period of four years plus a calculated terminal value. The projected future cash flows required significant judgments and estimates involving variables such as future sales volumes, sales prices, awards of large orders, production and other operating costs, capital expenditures, net working capital requirements and other economic factors. The after-tax weighted-average cost of capital of 8 percent was based on variables such as the risk free rate derived from the yield of 10-year U.S. treasury bonds as well as an ABB-specific risk premium. The terminal value growth rate was assumed to be 1 percent. The mid-term tax rate used in the test was 27 percent. We based our fair value estimates on assumptions we believed to be reasonable, but which were inherently uncertain. Consequently, actual future results may differ from those estimates.
We assessed the reasonableness of the fair value calculations of our reporting units by reconciling the sum of the fair values for all our reporting units to our total market capitalization. The assumptions used in the fair value calculation were challenged each year (through the use of sensitivity analysis) to determine the impact on the fair value of the reporting units. Our sensitivity analysis in 2016 showed that, holding all other assumptions constant, a 1-percentage point increase in the discount rate would have reduced the calculated fair value by approximately 12.9 percent, while a 1-percentage point decrease in the terminal value growth rate would have reduced the calculated fair value by approximately 9.7 percent.
For 2015, our reporting units were the same as our former business divisions (Discrete Automation and Motion, Low Voltage Products, Power Products and Power Systems) with the exception of Process Automation, where they were determined to be one level below. In 2015, we performed a qualitative assessment and determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value for each of these reporting units was below the carrying value. As a result, we concluded that it was not necessary to perform the two-step quantitative impairment test.
Intangible assets are reviewed for recoverability upon the occurrence of certain triggering events (such as a decision to divest a business or projected losses of an entity) or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We record impairment charges in “Other income (expense), net”, in our Consolidated Income Statements, unless they relate to a discontinued operation, in which case the charges are recorded in “Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax”.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For a description of accounting changes and recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our Consolidated Financial Statements, see “Note 2 Significant accounting policies” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Each year, we invest significantly in research and development. Our research and development focuses on developing and commercializing the technologies of our businesses that are of strategic importance to our future growth. In 2016, 2015, and 2014, we invested $1,300 million, $1,406 million and $1,499 million, respectively, or approximately 3.8 percent, 4.0 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively, of our annual consolidated revenues on research and development activities. We also had expenditures of $155 million, $271 million and $310 million, respectively, or approximately 0.5 percent, 0.8 percent and 0.8 percent, respectively, of our annual consolidated revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014, on order‑related development activities. These are customer‑ and project‑specific development efforts that we undertake to develop or adapt equipment and systems to the unique needs of our customers in connection with specific orders or projects. Order‑related development amounts are initially recorded in inventories as part of the work in process of a contract and then are reflected in cost of sales at the time revenue is recognized in accordance with our accounting policies.
40
In addition to continuous product development, and order‑related engineering work, we develop platforms for technology applications in our automation and power businesses in our research and development laboratories, which operate on a global basis. Through active management of our investment in research and development, we seek to maintain a balance between short‑term and long‑term research and development programs and optimize our return on investment.
Universities are incubators of future technology, and a central task of our research and development team is to transform university research into industry‑ready technology platforms. We collaborate with a number of universities and research institutions to build research networks and foster new technologies. We believe these collaborations shorten the amount of time required to turn basic ideas into viable products, and they additionally help us recruit and train new personnel. We have built numerous university collaborations in the U.S., Europe and Asia, including long‑term, strategic relationships with the Carnegie Mellon University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, North Carolina State University, ETH Zurich, EPFL Lausanne, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Cambridge University, Imperial College London, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST) and Xi’an Jiaotong University (XJTU). Our collaborative projects include research on materials, sensors, micro‑engineered mechanical systems, robotics, controls, manufacturing, distributed power and communication. Common platforms for power and automation technologies are developed around advanced materials, efficient manufacturing, information technology and data communication, as well as sensor and actuator technology.
Common applications of basic power and automation technologies can also be found in power electronics, electrical insulation, and control and optimization. Our power technologies, including our insulation technologies, current interruption and limitation devices, power electronics, flow control and power protection processes, apply as much to large, reliable, blackout‑free transmission systems as they do to everyday household needs. Our automation technologies, including our control and optimization processes, power electronics, sensors and microelectronics, mechatronics and wireless communication processes, are designed to improve efficiency in plants and factories around the world, including our own.
ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTMENTS
Divestments and Assets held for sale
There were no significant divestments in 2016 and 2015.
During 2014, ABB divested several businesses which were primarily its Full Service business, the Meyer Steel Structures business of Thomas & Betts, the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) business of Thomas & Betts and the Power Solutions business of Power‑One. Total cash proceeds from all business divestments during 2014 amounted to $1,090 million, net of transaction costs and cash disposed.
In September 2016, ABB announced an agreement to divest its high-voltage cable system business (Cables business). The assets and liabilities of this business are shown as assets and liabilities held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2016. The divestment was completed on March 1, 2017.
For more information on our divestments, see “Note 3 Acquisitions and business divestments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
EXCHANGE RATES
We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. Due to our global operations, a significant amount of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in other currencies. As a consequence, movements in exchange rates between currencies may affect: (i) our profitability, (ii) the comparability of our results between periods, and (iii) the reported carrying value of our assets and liabilities.
We translate non‑USD denominated results of operations, assets and liabilities to USD in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Balance sheet items are translated to USD using year‑end currency exchange rates. Income statement and cash flow items are translated to USD using the relevant monthly average currency exchange rate.
41
Increases and decreases in the value of the USD against other currencies will affect the reported results of operations in our Consolidated Income Statements and the value of certain of our assets and liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, even if our results of operations or the value of those assets and liabilities have not changed in their original currency. As foreign exchange rates impact our reported results of operations and the reported value of our assets and liabilities, changes in foreign exchange rates could significantly affect the comparability of our reported results of operations between periods and result in significant changes to the reported value of our assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity.
While we operate globally and report our financial results in USD, exchange rate movements between the USD and both the EUR and the CHF are of particular importance to us due to (i) the location of our significant operations and (ii) our corporate headquarters being in Switzerland.
The exchange rates between the USD and the EUR and the USD and the CHF at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, were as follows:
Exchange rates into $ |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
EUR 1.00 |
1.05 |
1.09 |
1.22 |
CHF 1.00 |
0.98 |
1.01 |
1.01 |
The average exchange rates between the USD and the EUR and the USD and the CHF for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, were as follows:
Exchange rates into $ |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
EUR 1.00 |
1.10 |
1.11 |
1.33 |
CHF 1.00 |
1.01 |
1.04 |
1.09 |
When we incur expenses that are not denominated in the same currency as the related revenues, foreign exchange rate fluctuations could affect our profitability. To mitigate the impact of exchange rate movements on our profitability, it is our policy to enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the foreign exchange transaction risk of our operations.
In 2016, approximately 80 percent of our consolidated revenues were reported in currencies other than the USD. The following percentages of consolidated revenues were reported in the following currencies:
• Euro, approximately 20 percent,
• Chinese renminbi, approximately 13 percent, and
• Swedish krona, approximately 5 percent.
In 2016, approximately 79 percent of our cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses were reported in currencies other than the USD. The following percentages of consolidated cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses were reported in the following currencies:
• Euro, approximately 19 percent,
• Chinese renminbi, approximately 11 percent, and
• Canadian Dollar, approximately 5 percent.
We also incur expenses other than cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses in various currencies.
The results of operations and financial position of many of our subsidiaries outside of the United States are reported in the currencies of the countries in which those subsidiaries are located. We refer to these currencies as “local currencies”. Local currency financial information is then translated into USD at applicable exchange rates for inclusion in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
The discussion of our results of operations below provides certain information with respect to orders, revenues, income from operations and other measures as reported in USD (as well as in local currencies). We measure period‑to‑period variations in local currency results by using a constant foreign exchange rate for all periods under comparison. Differences in our results of operations in local currencies as compared to our results of operations in USD are caused exclusively by changes in currency exchange rates.
While we consider our results of operations as measured in local currencies to be a significant indicator of business performance, local currency information should not be relied upon to the exclusion of U.S. GAAP financial measures. Instead, local currencies reflect an additional measure of comparability and provide a means of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed together with the U.S. GAAP results, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting the business. As local currency information is not standardized, it may not be possible to compare our local currency information to other companies’ financial measures that have the same or a similar title. We encourage investors to review our financial statements and publicly‑filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.
ORDERS
Our policy is to book and report an order when a binding contractual agreement has been concluded with a customer covering, at a minimum, the price and scope of products or services to be supplied, the delivery schedule and the payment terms. The reported value of an order corresponds to the undiscounted value of revenues that we expect to recognize following delivery of the goods or services subject to the order, less any trade discounts and excluding any value added or sales tax. The value of orders received during a given period of time represents the sum of the value of all orders received during the period, adjusted to reflect the aggregate value of any changes to the value of orders received during the period and orders existing at the beginning of the period. These adjustments, which may in the aggregate increase or decrease the orders reported during the period, may include changes in the estimated order price up to the date of contractual performance, changes in the scope of products or services ordered and cancellations of orders.
The undiscounted value of revenues we expect to generate from our orders at any point in time is represented by our order backlog. Approximately 13 percent of the value of total orders we recorded in 2016 were “large orders”, which we define as orders from third parties involving a value of at least $15 million for products or services. Approximately 78 percent of the total value of large orders in 2016 were recorded by our Power Grids division and approximately 14 percent in our Process Automation division. The other divisions accounted for the remainder of the total large orders recorded during 2016. The remaining portion of total orders recorded in 2016 was “base orders”, which we define as orders from third parties with a value of less than $15 million for products or services.
The level of orders fluctuates from year to year. Portions of our business involve orders for long‑term projects that can take months or years to complete and many large orders result in revenues in periods after the order is booked. Consequently, the level of large orders and orders generally cannot be used to accurately predict future revenues or operating performance. Orders that have been placed can be cancelled, delayed or modified by the customer. These actions can reduce or delay any future revenues from the order or may result in the elimination of the order.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
We evaluate the performance of our divisions based on orders received, revenues and Operational EBITA.
In 2016, the Company modified the definition of Operational EBITA to also exclude non-operational pension cost and changes in estimates relating to opening balance sheets of acquired businesses (changes in pre-acquisition estimates). After these revisions, Operational EBITA represents income from operations excluding (i) amortization expense on intangibles arising upon acquisitions (acquisition-related amortization), (ii) restructuring and restructuring‑related expenses, (iii) non-operational pension cost, (iv) changes in pre-acquisition estimates, (v) gains and losses from sale of businesses, acquisition‑related expenses and certain other non‑operational items, as well as (vi) foreign exchange (FX)/commodity timing differences in income from operations consisting of: (a) unrealized gains and losses on derivatives (foreign exchange, commodities, embedded derivatives), (b) realized gains and losses on derivatives where the underlying hedged transaction has not yet been realized, and (c) unrealized foreign exchange movements on receivables/payables (and related assets/liabilities).
43
See “Note 23 Operating segment and geographic data” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a reconciliation of the total consolidated Operational EBITA to income from continuing operations before taxes.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our consolidated results from operations were as follows:
INCOME STATEMENT DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share data in $) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
Orders |
33,379 |
|
36,429 |
|
41,515 |
Order backlog at December 31, |
22,981 |
|
24,121 |
|
24,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
33,828 |
|
35,481 |
|
39,830 |
Cost of sales |
(24,081) |
|
(25,347) |
|
(28,615) |
Gross profit |
9,747 |
|
10,134 |
|
11,215 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(5,349) |
|
(5,574) |
|
(6,067) |
Non-order related research and development expenses |
(1,300) |
|
(1,406) |
|
(1,499) |
Other income (expense), net |
(111) |
|
(105) |
|
529 |
Income from operations |
2,987 |
|
3,049 |
|
4,178 |
Net interest and other finance expense |
(188) |
|
(209) |
|
(282) |
Provision for taxes |
(781) |
|
(788) |
|
(1,202) |
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
2,018 |
|
2,052 |
|
2,694 |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
16 |
|
3 |
|
24 |
Net income |
2,034 |
|
2,055 |
|
2,718 |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(135) |
|
(122) |
|
(124) |
Net income attributable to ABB |
1,899 |
|
1,933 |
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to ABB shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
1,883 |
|
1,930 |
|
2,570 |
Net income |
1,899 |
|
1,933 |
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to ABB shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.12 |
Net income |
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to ABB shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
0.87 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.12 |
Net income |
0.88 |
|
0.87 |
|
1.13 |
A more detailed discussion of the orders, revenues, Operational EBITA and income from operations for our divisions follows in the sections of “Divisional analysis” below entitled “Electrification Products”, “Discrete Automation and Motion”, “Process Automation”, “Power Grids” and “Corporate and Other”. Orders and revenues of our divisions include interdivisional transactions which are eliminated in the “Corporate and Other” line in the tables below.
44
Orders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
||
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
Electrification Products |
9,158 |
|
9,833 |
|
10,861 |
|
(7)% |
|
(9)% |
Discrete Automation and Motion |
8,654 |
|
9,222 |
|
10,559 |
|
(6)% |
|
(13)% |
Process Automation |
5,866 |
|
7,347 |
|
9,213 |
|
(20)% |
|
(20)% |
Power Grids |
11,232 |
|
12,205 |
|
12,768 |
|
(8)% |
|
(4)% |
Operating divisions |
34,910 |
|
38,607 |
|
43,401 |
|
(10)% |
|
(11)% |
Corporate and Other(1) |
(1,531) |
|
(2,178) |
|
(1,886) |
|
n.a. |
|
n.a. |
Total |
33,379 |
|
36,429 |
|
41,515 |
|
(8)% |
|
(12)% |
(1) Includes interdivisional eliminations
In 2016, total orders declined 8 percent (5 percent in local currencies) with orders decreasing in all divisions. The decline reflects ongoing macro-economic and geopolitical uncertainties and challenges in many markets. The low demand from both the onshore and offshore oil segments negatively impacted many businesses, particularly the Process Automation division. This also contributed to the negative order development in the Discrete Automation and Motion division, despite the strong demand from various industries for robotics. Weak market conditions impacted the orders in Electrification Products and in Power Grids.
In 2016, base orders declined 5 percent (2 percent in local currencies) with negative impacts across all divisions. The decline of base orders reflects the uncertain global economic conditions across our key markets. Large orders decreased 27 percent (25 percent in local currencies), impacted by considerable investment delays. For additional information about divisional order performance, please refer to the relevant sections of “Divisional analysis” below.
In 2015, total orders declined 12 percent (2 percent in local currencies) and decreased in all divisions. The decline in reported orders was driven both by lower base orders and lower large orders. The order development reflected ongoing macro-economic uncertainties and challenges in many markets as well as negative impacts from foreign exchange rate movements.
In 2015, orders decreased 9 percent in the Electrification Products division (steady in local currencies) as order growth in the Protection and Connection business was offset by decreases in orders in the Building Products and the Electrification Solutions businesses. Orders in the Discrete Automation and Motion division declined 13 percent (5 percent in local currencies) on lower orders in all businesses, except Robotics, where orders increased in local currencies. Orders in the Process Automation division declined 20 percent (9 percent in local currencies) mainly due to lower capital and operating expenditures in the oil and gas sectors compared to the previous year. Orders declined 4 percent (increased 8 percent in local currencies) in the Power Grids division. The increase in local currencies was driven primarily by the receipt of several large orders in the Grid Systems business.
During 2015, base orders declined 14 percent (5 percent in local currencies) reflecting the global economic conditions which remained mixed across our key markets. Large orders decreased 5 percent (increased 10 percent in local currencies) but were higher in local currencies than the strong large order intake in 2014. Large orders increased in the Power Grids division where several large projects were awarded in 2015.
We determine the geographic distribution of our orders based on the location of the ultimate destination of the products’ end use, if known, or the location of the customer. The geographic distribution of our consolidated orders was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
||
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
Europe |
11,213 |
|
12,568 |
|
14,319 |
|
(11)% |
|
(12)% |
The Americas |
9,351 |
|
10,505 |
|
11,966 |
|
(11)% |
|
(12)% |
Asia, Middle East and Africa |
12,815 |
|
13,356 |
|
15,230 |
|
(4)% |
|
(12)% |
Total |
33,379 |
|
36,429 |
|
41,515 |
|
(8)% |
|
(12)% |
45
Orders in 2016 declined in all regions, although we achieved growth within some divisions in Europe and Asia, Middle East and Africa. Orders in Europe decreased 11 percent (9 percent in local currencies) due primarily to lower large orders compared to 2015. Orders in Europe for the Electrification Products and the Discrete Automation and Motion divisions grew in local currencies but were offset by decreases in the other divisions. In local currencies, orders were lower in Germany, the United Kingdom, Norway, Switzerland, Russia, France, Finland, Turkey and the Netherlands while orders increased in Italy, Sweden and Spain. In the Americas orders declined 11 percent (9 percent in local currencies) on lower base and large orders. In local currencies, orders decreased in the U.S. (mainly due to lower large orders), Canada, Brazil, Chile and Argentina while orders increased in Mexico. In Asia, Middle East and Africa, orders decreased 4 percent (flat in local currencies) as lower base orders were offset by strong demand for our power offering and higher large orders. Orders in China and India increased mainly due to investment activities in the HVDC power transmission technology while orders declined in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, the United Arab Emirates, Australia, Japan, South Africa and Qatar.
Orders in 2015 declined in all regions on lower orders in all divisions. Orders in Europe decreased 12 percent (increased 5 percent in local currencies). Orders in Europe were higher in local currencies due to the receipt of large orders for HVDC interconnections. In local currencies, orders were lower in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, France, Spain and Russia, offset by higher orders in Germany, Norway, Italy, Turkey and the Netherlands. Orders declined 12 percent (6 percent in local currencies) in the Americas on lower base and large orders. In local currencies, orders decreased in the U.S., Canada and Brazil but were higher in Mexico, Chile and Argentina. In Asia, Middle East and Africa, orders decreased 12 percent (7 percent in local currencies) on lower base and large orders. In local currencies, orders declined in China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Australia and Japan while orders were higher in India, the United Arab Emirates, South Africa and Qatar.
Order backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
% Change |
||||||
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
Electrification Products |
2,612 |
|
2,872 |
|
2,798 |
|
(9)% |
|
3% |
Discrete Automation and Motion |
4,078 |
|
4,232 |
|
4,385 |
|
(4)% |
|
(3)% |
Process Automation |
5,258 |
|
6,036 |
|
6,515 |
|
(13)% |
|
(7)% |
Power Grids |
12,437 |
|
12,502 |
|
12,619 |
|
(1)% |
|
(1)% |
Operating divisions |
24,385 |
|
25,642 |
|
26,317 |
|
(5)% |
|
(3)% |
Corporate and Other(1) |
(1,404) |
|
(1,521) |
|
(1,417) |
|
n.a. |
|
n.a. |
Total |
22,981 |
|
24,121 |
|
24,900 |
|
(5)% |
|
(3)% |
(1) Includes interdivisional eliminations
As at December 31, 2016, the consolidated order backlog declined 5 percent (2 percent in local currencies) and was lower in all divisions. The decline in the Electrification Products division was driven by the Medium Voltage Products and Building Products businesses. In the Discrete Automation and Motion division, the backlog was flat in local currencies as the increase in the Robotics and Power Conversion businesses were offset by declines in the other businesses. In the Process Automation division, order backlog declined and was lower across all businesses, except for in the Measurement and Analytics business. In the Power Grids division, local currency order backlog increased, driven by the Transformers and Grid System businesses.
As at December 31, 2015, the consolidated order backlog decreased 3 percent (increased 5 percent in local currencies). Order backlog in all divisions was impacted by the effects of changes in foreign currency rates as the U.S. dollar strengthened against all major currencies during 2015. In local currencies, order backlog increased in all divisions. The increase in the Electrification Products division was driven by the Medium Voltage Products business. In the Discrete Automation and Motion division, the increase was driven by the Robotics and Power Conversion businesses. In the Process Automation division, orders were lower but order backlog increased due to the receipt of higher large orders near the end of 2015. In the Power Grids division, order backlog increased in the High Voltage and Transformers businesses and also benefitted from higher large orders received in the Grid Systems business during the year.
46
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
||
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
Electrification Products |
9,292 |
|
9,547 |
|
10,572 |
|
(3)% |
|
(10)% |
Discrete Automation and Motion |
8,714 |
|
9,127 |
|
10,142 |
|
(5)% |
|
(10)% |
Process Automation |
6,598 |
|
7,224 |
|
8,618 |
|
(9)% |
|
(16)% |
Power Grids |
10,975 |
|
11,621 |
|
12,518 |
|
(6)% |
|
(7)% |
Operating divisions |
35,579 |
|
37,519 |
|
41,850 |
|
(5)% |
|
(10)% |
Corporate and Other(1) |
(1,751) |
|
(2,038) |
|
(2,020) |
|
n.a. |
|
n.a. |
Total |
33,828 |
|
35,481 |
|
39,830 |
|
(5)% |
|
(11)% |
(1) Includes interdivisional eliminations
Revenues in 2016, decreased 5 percent (2 percent in local currencies) and declined in all divisions. Revenues were lower due to declining orders during the year and a lower opening order backlog compared to the beginning of 2015. In the Process Automation division, a continued low level of orders from the oil and gas industry, as well as from mining and metals, negatively impacted revenues. Revenues in the Power Grids division were impacted by weaker order intake, the exit from certain businesses as well as lower pull-through revenues from other divisions. Revenues were positively impacted by growth in the Robotics business, despite market challenges while revenues in the Electrification Products division slightly increased in local currencies. For additional information about the divisional revenues performance, please refer to “Divisional analysis” below.
In 2015, revenues decreased 11 percent (1 percent in local currencies) and declined in all divisions. The decrease was due primarily to the impacts of the lower orders and lower opening order backlog in the Power Grids and Process Automation divisions compared to the beginning of 2014. In addition, the decrease was also due to the impacts of divestments made in 2014 and negative impacts from foreign exchange rate movements.
On a divisional basis, revenues in the Electrification Products division decreased 10 percent (steady in local currencies) and were lower in most businesses. Revenues declined 10 percent (2 percent in local currencies) in the Discrete Automation and Motion division on lower order intake in the short-cycle businesses such as low voltage motors and drives offset partly by local currency revenue increases in the Robotics and Power Conversion businesses. In the Process Automation division revenues decreased 16 percent (5 percent in local currencies) and were lower in local currencies in most businesses. Revenues were impacted primarily by decreases in the systems businesses such as the Marine and Ports, and the Oil, Gas and Chemicals businesses but also by the divestment of the Full Service business at the end of 2014. Revenues in the Power Grids division decreased 7 percent (increased 3 percent in local currencies). In local currencies revenues grew, driven by service revenues and by steady execution of the order backlog.
We determine the geographic distribution of our revenues based on the location of the ultimate destination of the products’ end use, if known, or the location of the customer. The geographic distribution of our consolidated revenues was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
||
($ in millions) |
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
Europe |
11,315 |
|
11,602 |
|
13,745 |
|
(2)% |
|
(16)% |
The Americas |
9,741 |
|
10,554 |
|
11,490 |
|
(8)% |
|
(8)% |
Asia, Middle East and Africa |
12,772 |
|
13,325 |
|
14,595 |