UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-35167
Kosmos Energy Ltd.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda |
|
98-0686001 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
Clarendon House |
|
|
2 Church Street |
|
|
Hamilton, Bermuda |
|
HM 11 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: +1 441 295 5950
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at April 27, 2015 |
Common Shares, $0.01 par value |
|
387,407,506 |
Unless otherwise stated in this report, references to Kosmos, we, us or the company refer to Kosmos Energy Ltd. and its subsidiaries. We have provided definitions for some of the industry terms used in this report in the Glossary and Selected Abbreviations beginning on page 3.
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
GLOSSARY AND SELECTED ABBREVIATIONS
The following are abbreviations and definitions of certain terms that may be used in this report. Unless listed below, all defined terms under Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X shall have their statutorily prescribed meanings.
2D seismic data |
|
Two-dimensional seismic data, serving as interpretive data that allows a view of a vertical cross-section beneath a prospective area. |
|
|
|
3D seismic data |
|
Three-dimensional seismic data, serving as geophysical data that depicts the subsurface strata in three dimensions. 3D seismic data typically provides a more detailed and accurate interpretation of the subsurface strata than 2D seismic data. |
|
|
|
API |
|
A specific gravity scale, expressed in degrees, that denotes the relative density of various petroleum liquids. The scale increases inversely with density. Thus lighter petroleum liquids will have a higher API than heavier ones. |
|
|
|
ASC |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification. |
|
|
|
ASU |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update. |
|
|
|
Barrel or Bbl |
|
A standard measure of volume for petroleum corresponding to approximately 42 gallons at 60 degrees Fahrenheit. |
|
|
|
BBbl |
|
Billion barrels of oil. |
|
|
|
BBoe |
|
Billion barrels of oil equivalent. |
|
|
|
Bcf |
|
Billion cubic feet. |
|
|
|
Boe |
|
Barrels of oil equivalent. Volumes of natural gas converted to barrels of oil using a conversion factor of 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil. |
|
|
|
Boepd |
|
Barrels of oil equivalent per day. |
|
|
|
Bopd |
|
Barrels of oil per day. |
|
|
|
Bwpd |
|
Barrels of water per day. |
|
|
|
Debt cover ratio |
|
The debt cover ratio is broadly defined, for each applicable calculation date, as the ratio of (x) total long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, to (y) the aggregate EBITDAX (see below) of the Company for the previous twelve months. |
|
|
|
Developed acreage |
|
The number of acres that are allocated or assignable to productive wells or wells capable of production. |
|
|
|
Development |
|
The phase in which an oil or natural gas field is brought into production by drilling development wells and installing appropriate production systems. |
|
|
|
Dry hole |
|
A well that has not encountered a hydrocarbon bearing reservoir expected to produce in commercial quantities. |
|
|
|
EBITDAX |
|
Net income (loss) plus (i) exploration expense, (ii) depletion, depreciation and amortization expense, (iii) equity-based compensation expense, (iv) unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivatives, (v) (gain) loss on sale of oil and gas properties, (vi) interest (income) expense, (vii) income taxes, (viii) loss on extinguishment of debt, (ix) doubtful accounts expense and (x) similar other material items which management believes affect the comparability of operating results. |
|
|
|
E&P |
|
Exploration and production. |
|
|
|
FASB |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board. |
|
|
|
Farm-in |
|
An agreement whereby a party acquires a portion of the participating interest in a block from the owner of such interest, usually in return for cash and for taking on a portion of the drilling costs of one or more specific wells or other performance by the assignee as a condition of the assignment. |
|
|
|
Farm-out |
|
An agreement whereby the owner of the participating interest agrees to assign a portion of its participating interest in a block to another party for cash and/or for the assignee taking on a portion of the drilling costs of one or more specific wells and/or other work as a condition of the assignment. |
|
|
|
Field life cover ratio |
|
The field life cover ratio is broadly defined, for each applicable forecast period, as the ratio of (x) the forecasted net present value of net cash flow through the depletion of the Jubilee Field plus the net present value of the forecast of certain capital expenditures incurred in relation to the Jubilee Field and certain other fields in Ghana, to (y) the aggregate loan amounts outstanding under the Facility less the Resource Bridge, as applicable. |
|
|
|
FPSO |
|
Floating production, storage and offloading vessel. |
Interest cover ratio |
|
The interest cover ratio is broadly defined, for each applicable calculation date, as the ratio of (x) the aggregate EBITDAX (see above) of the Company for the previous twelve months, to (y) interest expense less interest income for the Company for the previous twelve months. |
|
|
|
Loan life cover ratio |
|
The loan life cover ratio is broadly defined, for each applicable forecast period, as the ratio of (x) net present value of forecasted net cash flow through the final maturity date of the Facility plus the net present value of forecasted capital expenditures incurred in relation to the Jubilee Field and certain other fields in Ghana, to (y) the aggregate loan amounts outstanding under the Facility less the Resource Bridge, as applicable. |
|
|
|
Make-whole redemption price |
|
The make-whole redemption price is equal to the outstanding principal amount of such notes plus the greater of 1) 1% of the then outstanding principal amount of such notes and 2) the present value of the notes at 103.9% and required interest payments thereon through August 1, 2017 at such redemption date. |
|
|
|
MBbl |
|
Thousand barrels of oil. |
|
|
|
Mcf |
|
Thousand cubic feet of natural gas. |
|
|
|
Mcfpd |
|
Thousand cubic feet per day of natural gas. |
|
|
|
MMBbl |
|
Million barrels of oil. |
|
|
|
MMBoe |
|
Million barrels of oil equivalent. |
|
|
|
MMcf |
|
Million cubic feet of natural gas. |
|
|
|
Natural gas liquid or NGL |
|
Components of natural gas that are separated from the gas state in the form of liquids. These include propane, butane and ethane, among others. |
|
|
|
Petroleum contract |
|
A contract in which the owner of hydrocarbons gives an E&P company temporary and limited rights, including an exclusive option to explore for, develop, and produce hydrocarbons from the lease area. |
|
|
|
Petroleum system |
|
A petroleum system consists of organic material that has been buried at a sufficient depth to allow adequate temperature and pressure to expel hydrocarbons and cause the movement of oil and natural gas from the area in which it was formed to a reservoir rock where it can accumulate. |
|
|
|
Plan of development or PoD |
|
A written document outlining the steps to be undertaken to develop a field. |
|
|
|
Productive well |
|
An exploratory or development well found to be capable of producing either oil or natural gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or natural gas well. |
|
|
|
Prospect(s) |
|
A potential trap that may contain hydrocarbons and is supported by the necessary amount and quality of geologic and geophysical data to indicate a probability of oil and/or natural gas accumulation ready to be drilled. The five required elements (generation, migration, reservoir, seal and trap) must be present for a prospect to work and if any of these fail neither oil nor natural gas may be present, at least not in commercial volumes. |
|
|
|
Proved reserves |
|
Estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be economically recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, as well as additional reserves expected to be obtained through confirmed improved recovery techniques, as defined in SEC Regulation S-X 4-10(a)(2). |
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves |
|
Those proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells and facilities and by existing operating methods. |
|
|
|
Proved undeveloped reserves |
|
Those proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from future wells and facilities, including future improved recovery projects which are anticipated with a high degree of certainty in reservoirs which have previously shown favorable response to improved recovery projects. |
|
|
|
Reconnaissance contract |
|
A contract in which the owner of hydrocarbons gives an E&P company rights to perform evaluation of existing data or potentially acquire additional data but may not convey an exclusive option to explore for, develop, and/or produce hydrocarbons from the lease area. |
|
|
|
Resource Bridge |
|
Borrowing Base availability attributable to probable reserves and contingent resources from Jubilee Field Future Phases, Tweneboa, Enyenra and Ntomme fields and potentially Mahogany, Teak and Akasa fields. |
|
|
|
Shelf margin |
|
The path created by the change in direction of the shoreline in reaction to the filling of a sedimentary basin. |
|
|
|
Stratigraphy |
|
The study of the composition, relative ages and distribution of layers of sedimentary rock. |
Stratigraphic trap |
|
A stratigraphic trap is formed from a change in the character of the rock rather than faulting or folding of the rock and oil and/or natural gas is held in place by changes in the porosity and permeability of overlying rocks. |
|
|
|
Structural trap |
|
A topographic feature in the earths subsurface that forms a high point in the rock strata. This facilitates the accumulation of oil and natural gas in the strata. |
|
|
|
Structural-stratigraphic trap |
|
A structural-stratigraphic trap is a combination trap with structural and stratigraphic features. |
|
|
|
Submarine fan |
|
A fan-shaped deposit of sediments occurring in a deep water setting where sediments have been transported via mass flow, gravity induced, processes from the shallow to deep water. These systems commonly develop at the bottom of sedimentary basins or at the end of large rivers. |
|
|
|
Three-way fault trap |
|
A structural trap where at least one of the components of closure is formed by offset of rock layers across a fault. |
|
|
|
Trap |
|
A configuration of rocks suitable for containing hydrocarbons and sealed by a relatively impermeable formation through which hydrocarbons will not migrate. |
|
|
|
Undeveloped acreage |
|
Lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and/or natural gas regardless of whether such acreage contains discovered resources. |
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
360,465 |
|
$ |
554,831 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
15,985 |
|
15,926 |
| ||
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Joint interest billings |
|
49,870 |
|
60,592 |
| ||
Oil sales |
|
49,913 |
|
61,731 |
| ||
Other |
|
53,446 |
|
41,221 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
73,750 |
|
55,354 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
29,677 |
|
25,278 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets |
|
34,462 |
|
32,268 |
| ||
Derivatives |
|
163,869 |
|
163,275 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
831,437 |
|
1,010,476 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil and gas properties, net |
|
1,810,421 |
|
1,773,186 |
| ||
Other property, net |
|
10,733 |
|
11,660 |
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
|
1,821,154 |
|
1,784,846 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Restricted cash |
|
16,125 |
|
16,125 |
| ||
Long-term receivables joint interest billings |
|
18,321 |
|
14,174 |
| ||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $35,999 and $33,389 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively |
|
46,143 |
|
48,753 |
| ||
Long-term deferred tax assets |
|
11,237 |
|
9,182 |
| ||
Derivatives |
|
77,475 |
|
89,210 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,821,892 |
|
$ |
2,972,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
126,114 |
|
$ |
184,400 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
141,672 |
|
201,967 |
| ||
Deferred tax liability |
|
63,211 |
|
61,683 |
| ||
Derivatives |
|
973 |
|
721 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
331,970 |
|
448,771 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
794,434 |
|
794,269 |
| ||
Derivatives |
|
7,821 |
|
68 |
| ||
Asset retirement obligations |
|
46,604 |
|
44,023 |
| ||
Deferred tax liability |
|
346,465 |
|
337,961 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
9,648 |
|
8,715 |
| ||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
1,204,972 |
|
1,185,036 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preference shares, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 authorized shares; zero issued at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common shares, $0.01 par value; 2,000,000,000 authorized shares; 393,149,315 and 392,443,048 issued at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively |
|
3,931 |
|
3,924 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,885,326 |
|
1,860,190 |
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(573,759 |
) |
(494,850 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
573 |
|
767 |
| ||
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,560,579 and 5,555,088 shares at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively |
|
(31,121 |
) |
(31,072 |
) | ||
Total shareholders equity |
|
1,284,950 |
|
1,338,959 |
| ||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,821,892 |
|
$ |
2,972,766 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
Revenues and other income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil and gas revenue |
|
$ |
109,164 |
|
$ |
212,853 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
22,751 |
|
23,769 |
| ||
Other income |
|
642 |
|
439 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total revenues and other income |
|
132,557 |
|
237,061 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil and gas production |
|
32,100 |
|
16,323 |
| ||
Exploration expenses |
|
98,941 |
|
12,809 |
| ||
General and administrative |
|
38,667 |
|
27,413 |
| ||
Depletion and depreciation |
|
37,007 |
|
46,378 |
| ||
Interest and other financing costs, net |
|
10,751 |
|
9,137 |
| ||
Derivatives, net |
|
(32,327 |
) |
(2,028 |
) | ||
Other expenses, net |
|
628 |
|
1,277 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total costs and expenses |
|
185,767 |
|
111,309 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
(53,210 |
) |
125,752 |
| ||
Income tax expense |
|
25,699 |
|
50,783 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,909 |
) |
$ |
74,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
$ |
0.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average number of shares used to compute net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
380,355 |
|
377,830 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
380,355 |
|
381,472 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,909 |
) |
$ |
74,969 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reclassification adjustments for derivative gains included in net income |
|
(194 |
) |
(406 |
) | ||
Other comprehensive income |
|
(194 |
) |
(406 |
) | ||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(79,103 |
) |
$ |
74,563 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common Shares |
|
Additional |
|
Accumulated |
|
Accumulated |
|
Treasury |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Deficit |
|
Income |
|
Stock |
|
Total |
| ||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2014 |
|
392,443 |
|
$ |
3,924 |
|
$ |
1,860,190 |
|
$ |
(494,850 |
) |
$ |
767 |
|
$ |
(31,072 |
) |
$ |
1,338,959 |
|
Equity-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
25,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,242 |
| ||||||
Derivatives, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) | ||||||
Restricted stock awards and units |
|
706 |
|
7 |
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
(148 |
) | ||||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(78,909 |
) | ||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2015 |
|
393,149 |
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
$ |
1,885,326 |
|
$ |
(573,759 |
) |
$ |
573 |
|
$ |
(31,121 |
) |
$ |
1,284,950 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,909 |
) |
$ |
74,969 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
39,617 |
|
49,164 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
5,783 |
|
30,267 |
| ||
Unsuccessful well costs |
|
83,627 |
|
(245 |
) | ||
Change in fair value of derivatives |
|
(34,980 |
) |
(810 |
) | ||
Cash settlements on derivatives |
|
53,932 |
|
(1,555 |
) | ||
Equity-based compensation |
|
25,183 |
|
17,900 |
| ||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
(22,751 |
) |
(23,769 |
) | ||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
2,898 |
| ||
Other |
|
1,171 |
|
(4,220 |
) | ||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
(Increase) decrease in receivables |
|
35,926 |
|
(63,566 |
) | ||
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
|
(18,443 |
) |
4,872 |
| ||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other |
|
(4,399 |
) |
(10,484 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
(58,286 |
) |
9,391 |
| ||
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities |
|
(36,451 |
) |
28,774 |
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
(8,980 |
) |
113,586 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil and gas assets |
|
(184,899 |
) |
(96,486 |
) | ||
Other property |
|
(280 |
) |
(428 |
) | ||
Proceeds on sale of assets |
|
|
|
34,581 |
| ||
Restricted cash |
|
(59 |
) |
(2,410 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(185,238 |
) |
(64,743 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) | ||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
(148 |
) |
(71 |
) | ||
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
(18,852 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(148 |
) |
(118,923 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(194,366 |
) |
(70,080 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
554,831 |
|
598,108 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
360,465 |
|
$ |
528,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest |
|
$ |
32,179 |
|
$ |
7,280 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
$ |
20,431 |
|
See accompanying notes.
KOSMOS ENERGY LTD.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Organization
Kosmos Energy Ltd. was incorporated pursuant to the laws of Bermuda in January 2011 to become a holding company for Kosmos Energy Holdings. Kosmos Energy Holdings is a privately held Cayman Islands company that was formed in March 2004. As a holding company, Kosmos Energy Ltd.s management operations are conducted through a wholly owned subsidiary, Kosmos Energy, LLC. The terms Kosmos, the Company, we, us, our, ours, and similar terms refer to Kosmos Energy Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Kosmos is a leading independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on frontier and emerging areas along the Atlantic Margin. Our assets include existing production and other major development projects offshore Ghana, as well as exploration licenses with significant hydrocarbon potential offshore Ireland, Mauritania, Morocco, Portugal, Senegal, Suriname and Western Sahara. Kosmos is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is traded under the ticker symbol KOS.
We have one reportable segment, which is the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. Substantially all of our long-lived assets and product sales are currently related to production located offshore Ghana.
2. Accounting Policies
General
The interim-period financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements included in this report is unaudited and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2015, the changes in the consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the three months ended March 31, 2015, the consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, and consolidated cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The results of the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the final results to be expected for the full year. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain notes or other financial information that are normally required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted from these interim consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on our reported net income (loss), current assets, total assets, current liabilities, total liabilities or shareholders equity.
Restricted Cash
In accordance with our commercial debt facility (the Facility), we are required to maintain a restricted cash balance that is sufficient to meet the payment of interest and fees for the next six-month period on the 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (Senior Notes) plus the Corporate Revolver or the Facility, whichever is greater. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had $16.0 million and $15.9 million, respectively, in current restricted cash to meet this requirement.
In addition, in accordance with certain of our petroleum contracts, we have posted letters of credit related to performance guarantees for our minimum work obligations. These letters of credit are cash collateralized in accounts held by us and as such are classified as restricted cash. Upon completion of the minimum work obligations and/or entering into the next phase of the petroleum contract, the requirement to post the existing letters of credit will be satisfied and the cash collateral will be released. However, additional letters of credit may be required should we choose to move into the next phase of certain of our petroleum contracts. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had $16.1 million of long-term restricted cash used to collateralize performance guarantees related to our petroleum contracts.
Inventories
Inventories consisted of $73.7 million and $55.3 million of materials and supplies and $0.1 million and $0.1 million of hydrocarbons as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Companys materials and supplies inventory primarily consists of casing and wellheads and is stated at the lower of cost, using the weighted average cost method, or market.
Hydrocarbon inventory is carried at the lower of cost, using the weighted average cost method, or market. Hydrocarbon inventory costs include expenditures and other charges incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition. Selling expenses and general and administrative expenses are reported as period costs and excluded from inventory costs.
Recent Accounting Standards
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 modifies existing consolidation guidance related to limited partnerships and similar legal entities, eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and provides a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. This guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
3. Acquisitions and Divestitures
In March 2015, we closed a farm-in agreement with Repsol Exploración, S.A. (Repsol), acquiring a non-operated interest in the Camarao, Ameijoa, Mexilhao and Ostra blocks in the Peniche Basin offshore Portugal. As part of the agreement, we will reimburse a portion of Repsols previously incurred exploration costs, as well as partially carry Repsols share of the costs of a planned 3D seismic program. After giving effect to the farm-in agreement, our participating interest is 31% in each of the blocks.
In March 2015, we closed a farm-out agreement with Chevron Mauritania Exploration Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (Chevron), covering the C8, C12 and C13 petroleum contracts offshore Mauritania. Under the terms of the farm-out agreement, Chevron acquired a 30% non-operated working interest in each of the contract areas. Chevron will pay a disproportionate share of the costs of one exploration well and a second contingent exploration well, subject to maximum expenditure caps. In addition, Chevron will pay its proportionate share of certain previously incurred exploration costs. Chevron is not funding drilling of the Tortue prospect, but retains the option to elect to participate in this prospect subject to Chevron paying a disproportionate share of its costs related to the Tortue prospect. The sales proceeds of the farm-out were $29.7 million. After giving effect to the farm-out agreements, Kosmos, Chevron and Société Mauritanienne des Hydrocarbures et de Patrimoine Miniers (SMHPM) (Mauritanias national oil company) participating interest in Block C8, Block C12 and Block C13 is 60%, 30% and 10%, respectively, and we remain as operator. The proceeds on the sale of the interest exceeded our book basis in the assets, resulting in a $22.8 million gain on the transaction.
4. Joint Interest Billings
The Companys joint interest billings consist of receivables from partners with interests in common oil and gas properties operated by the Company. Joint interest billings are classified on the face of the consolidated balance sheets as current and long-term receivables based on when collection is expected to occur.
In 2014, the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC) notified us and our block partners that it would exercise its right for the contractor group to pay its 5% share of the Tweneboa, Enyenra and Ntomme (TEN) development costs. The block partners will be reimbursed for such costs plus interest out of a portion of GNPCs TEN production revenues under the terms of the Deepwater Tano (DT) petroleum contract. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the joint interest billing receivables due from GNPC for the TEN development costs were $18.3 million and $14.2 million, respectively, which were classified as long-term on the consolidated balance sheets.
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost and consisted of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Oil and gas properties: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proved properties |
|
$ |
1,177,379 |
|
$ |
1,156,868 |
|
Unproved properties |
|
366,717 |
|
363,717 |
| ||
Support equipment and facilities |
|
1,017,103 |
|
968,722 |
| ||
Total oil and gas properties |
|
2,561,199 |
|
2,489,307 |
| ||
Less: accumulated depletion |
|
(750,778 |
) |
(716,121 |
) | ||
Oil and gas properties, net |
|
1,810,421 |
|
1,773,186 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other property |
|
33,950 |
|
33,718 |
| ||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(23,217 |
) |
(22,058 |
) | ||
Other property, net |
|
10,733 |
|
11,660 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,821,154 |
|
$ |
1,784,846 |
|
We recorded depletion expense of $34.7 million and $44.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
6. Suspended Well Costs
The following table reflects the Companys capitalized exploratory well costs on completed wells as of and during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The table excludes $60.3 million in costs that were capitalized and subsequently expensed during the same period.
|
|
Three Months |
| |
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
226,714 |
|
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending the determination of proved reserves |
|
24,168 |
| |
Reclassification due to determination of proved reserves |
|
|
| |
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense |
|
(23,375 |
) | |
Ending balance |
|
$ |
227,507 |
|
The following table provides an aging of capitalized exploratory well costs based on the date drilling was completed and the number of projects for which exploratory well costs have been capitalized for more than one year since the completion of drilling:
|
|
March 31, 2015 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
(In thousands, except well counts) |
| ||||
Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period of one year or less |
|
$ |
13,723 |
|
$ |
16,814 |
|
Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period of one to two years |
|
44,655 |
|
40,865 |
| ||
Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period of three to six years |
|
169,129 |
|
169,035 |
| ||
Ending balance |
|
$ |
227,507 |
|
$ |
226,714 |
|
Number of projects that have exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for a period greater than one year |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
As of March 31, 2015, the projects with exploratory well costs capitalized for more than one year since the completion of drilling are related to the Mahogany, Teak (formerly Teak-1 and Teak-2) and Akasa discoveries in the West Cape Three Points (WCTP) Block and the Wawa discovery in the DT Block, which are all in Ghana.
Mahogany In March 2015, we submitted a declaration of commerciality to Ghanas Ministry of Energy and Petroleum and expect to submit a PoD concerning the Mahogany discovery later this year.
Teak DiscoveryWe are currently in discussions with the government of Ghana regarding the declaration of commerciality for the Teak discovery. Upon resolution of such discussions and declaration of commerciality, a PoD would be prepared and submitted to Ghanas Ministry of Energy and Petroleum, as required under the WCTP petroleum contract. The Teak-1 and Teak-2 discoveries are being treated as a single discovery area.
Akasa DiscoveryWe performed a drill stem test and gauge installation on the discovery well and drilled one appraisal well, the Akasa-2. We are currently in discussions with the government of Ghana regarding additional technical studies and evaluation that we want to conduct before we are able to make a determination regarding commerciality of the discovery. If we determine the discovery to be commercial, a declaration of commerciality would be provided and a PoD would be prepared and submitted to Ghanas Ministry of Energy and Petroleum, as required under the WCTP petroleum contract.
Wawa DiscoveryWe are currently reprocessing seismic data and have acquired a high resolution seismic survey over the discovery area. Following additional evaluation and potential appraisal activities, a decision regarding commerciality of the Wawa discovery is expected to be made by the DT Block partners in 2016. Within six months of such declaration, a PoD would be prepared and submitted to Ghanas Ministry of Energy and Petroleum, as required under the DT petroleum contract.
7. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exploration, development and production |
|
$ |
118,525 |
|
$ |
139,393 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
9,435 |
|
21,926 |
| ||
Income taxes |
|
5,543 |
|
9,233 |
| ||
Interest |
|
4,318 |
|
10,271 |
| ||
Taxes other than income |
|
2,796 |
|
20,315 |
| ||
Other |
|
1,055 |
|
829 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
141,672 |
|
$ |
201,967 |
|
8. Debt
Debt consists of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Outstanding debt principal balances: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Facility |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes(1) |
|
300,000 |
|
300,000 |
| ||
Total |
|
800,000 |
|
800,000 |
| ||
Unamortized issuance discounts |
|
(5,566 |
) |
(5,731 |
) | ||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
794,434 |
|
$ |
794,269 |
|
(1) During April 2015, we issued an additional $225.0 million Senior Notes and received net proceeds of $206.8 million after deducting discounts, commissions and other expenses.
Facility
In March 2014, the Company amended and restated the Facility with a total commitment of $1.5 billion from a number of financial institutions, including the International Finance Corporation. The Facility supports our oil and gas exploration, appraisal and development programs and corporate activities.
As part of the debt refinancing in March 2014, the repayment of borrowings under the existing facility attributable to financial institutions that did not participate in the amended Facility was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt, and existing unamortized debt issuance costs attributable to those participants were expensed. As a result, we recorded a $2.9 million loss on the extinguishment of debt. As of March 31, 2015, we have $42.8 million of net deferred financing costs related to the Facility, which will be amortized over the remaining term of the Facility, including certain costs related to the amendment.
As of March 31, 2015, borrowings under the Facility totaled $500.0 million and the undrawn availability under the Facility was $1.0 billion.
The Facility provides a revolving-credit and letter of credit facility. The availability period for the revolving-credit facility, as amended in March 2014 expires on March 31, 2018. However the Facility has a revolving-credit sublimit, which will be the lesser of $500.0 million and the total available facility at that time, that will be available for drawing until the date falling one month prior to the final maturity date. The letter of credit sublimit expires on the final maturity date. The available facility amount is subject to borrowing base constraints and, beginning on March 31, 2018, outstanding borrowings will be constrained by an amortization schedule. The Facility has a final maturity date of March 31, 2021. As of March 31, 2015, we had no letters of credit issued under the Facility.
We were in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Facility as of March 31, 2015. The Facility contains customary cross default provisions.
Corporate Revolver
In November 2012, we secured a Corporate Revolver from a number of financial institutions, which as amended, has an availability of $300.0 million. The Corporate Revolver is available for all subsidiaries for general corporate purposes and for oil and gas exploration; appraisal and development programs. As of March 31, 2015, we have $2.1 million of net deferred financing costs related to the Corporate Revolver, which will be amortized over the remaining term, or November 20, 2015.
As of March 31, 2015, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Corporate Revolver and the undrawn availability under the Corporate Revolver was $300.0 million. We were in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Corporate Revolver as of March 31, 2015. The Corporate Revolver contains customary cross default provisions.
Revolving Letter of Credit Facility
In July 2013, we entered into a revolving letter of credit facility agreement (LC Facility). The size of the LC Facility is $100.0 million, with additional commitments up to $50.0 million being available if the existing lender increases its commitment or if commitments from new financial institutions are added. As of March 31, 2015, there were seven outstanding letters of credit totaling $21.5 million under the LC Facility. The LC Facility contains customary cross default provisions.
7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2021
In August 2014, the Company issued $300.0 million of Senior Notes and received net proceeds of approximately $292.5 million after deducting discounts, commissions and deferred financing costs. The Company used the net proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under the Facility and for general corporate purposes.
In April 2015, we issued an additional $225.0 million Senior Notes and received net proceeds of $206.8 million after deducting discounts, commissions and other expenses. The net proceeds were used to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under the Facility and for general corporate purposes. The additional $225.0 million of Senior Notes have identical terms to the existing $300.0 million of Senior Notes, other than the date of issue, the initial price, the first interest payment date and the first date from which interest will accrue.
The Senior Notes mature on August 1, 2021. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears each February 1 and August 1 commencing on February 1, 2015 for the existing $300.0 million Senior Notes and August 1, 2015 for the additional $225.0 million Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are secured (subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens) by a first ranking fixed equitable charge on all shares held by us in our direct subsidiary, Kosmos Energy Holdings. The Senior Notes are currently guaranteed on a subordinated, unsecured basis by our existing restricted subsidiaries that guarantee the Facility and the Corporate Revolver, and, in certain circumstances, the Senior Notes will become guaranteed by certain of our other existing or future restricted subsidiaries.
At March 31, 2015, the estimated repayments of debt during the five fiscal year periods and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
Payments Due by Year |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
2015(2) |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
Thereafter |
| ||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Principal debt repayments(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
(1) Includes the scheduled principal maturities for the $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes issued in August 2014 and the Facility. The scheduled maturities of debt related to the Facility are based on the level of borrowings and the estimated future available borrowing base as of March 31, 2015. Any increases or decreases in the level of borrowings or increases or decreases in the available borrowing base would impact the scheduled maturities of debt during the next five years and thereafter. As of March 31, 2015, there were no borrowings under the Corporate Revolver.
(2) Represents payments for the period April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
Interest and other financing costs, net
Interest and other financing costs, net incurred during the period comprised of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
15,397 |
|
$ |
10,996 |
|
Amortizationdeferred financing costs |
|
2,610 |
|
2,786 |
| ||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
2,898 |
| ||
Capitalized interest |
|
(8,840 |
) |
(3,801 |
) | ||
Deferred interest |
|
1,154 |
|
(4,111 |
) | ||
Interest income |
|
(168 |
) |
(58 |
) | ||
Other, net |
|
598 |
|
427 |
| ||
Interest and other financing costs, net |
|
$ |
10,751 |
|
$ |
9,137 |
|
9. Derivative Financial Instruments
We use financial derivative contracts to manage exposures to commodity price and interest rate fluctuations. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. We manage market and counterparty credit risk in accordance with our policies and guidelines. In accordance with these policies and guidelines, our management determines the appropriate timing and extent of derivative transactions.
Oil Derivative Contracts
The following table sets forth the volumes in barrels underlying the Companys outstanding oil derivative contracts and the weighted average Dated Brent prices per Bbl for those contracts as of March 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Dated Brent Price per Bbl |
| ||||||||||||||||
Term |
|
Type of Contract |
|
MBbl |
|
Net Deferred |
|
Swap |
|
Put |
|
Floor |
|
Ceiling |
|
Call |
| ||||||
2015: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
April December |
|
Three-way collars |
|
3,184 |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
87.43 |
|
$ |
110.00 |
|
$ |
133.82 |
|
April December |
|
Swaps with calls |
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
93.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.00 |
| ||||||
2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
January December |
|
Purchased puts |
|
2,000 |
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
85.00 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
January December |
|
Three-way collars |
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.00 |
|
110.00 |
|
135.00 |
| ||||||
January December |
|
Swaps with puts |
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
75.00 |
|
60.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
2017(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
January December |
|
Sold calls |
|
2,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
85.00 |
|
$ |
|
|
(1) In April 2015, we entered into swaps, sold puts and purchased call contracts for 2.0 MMBbl from January 2017 through December 2017 with a fixed price of $72.50 per barrel, a short put price of $55.00 per barrel and a call price of $90.00 per barrel. The contracts are indexed to Dated Brent prices and have a weighted average deferred premium payable of $2.13 per barrel.
Interest Rate Derivative Contracts
The following table summarizes our open interest rate swaps, whereby we pay a fixed rate of interest and the counterparty pays a variable LIBOR-based rate, and our capped interest rate swaps whereby we pay a fixed rate of interest if LIBOR is below the cap, and pay the market rate less the spread between the cap (sold call) and the fixed rate of interest if LIBOR is above the cap as of March 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
| |||||
Term |
|
Type of Contract |
|
Floating Rate |
|
Notional |
|
Swap |
|
Sold Call |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |
April 2015 December 2015 |
|
Swap |
|
6-month LIBOR |
|
$ |
45,319 |
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
January 2016 June 2016 |
|
Swap |
|
6-month LIBOR |
|
12,500 |
|
2.27 |
% |
|
| |
January 2016 December 2018 |
|
Capped swap |
|
1-month LIBOR |
|
200,000 |
|
1.23 |
% |
3.00 |
% | |
The following tables disclose the Companys derivative instruments as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and gain/(loss) from derivatives during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Type of Contract |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commodity(1) |
|
Derivatives assetscurrent |
|
$ |
163,869 |
|
$ |
163,275 |
|
Commodity(2) |
|
Derivatives assetslong-term |
|
77,375 |
|
89,210 |
| ||
Interest rate |
|
Derivatives assetslong-term |
|
100 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate |
|
Derivatives liabilitiescurrent |
|
(973 |
) |
(721 |
) | ||
Commodity |
|
Derivatives liabilitieslong-term |
|
(7,731 |
) |
|
| ||
Interest rate |
|
Derivatives liabilitieslong-term |
|
(90 |
) |
(68 |
) | ||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
232,550 |
|
$ |
251,696 |
|
(1) Includes net deferred premiums payable of $2.6 million and $1.8 million related to commodity derivative contracts as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
(2) Includes net deferred premiums payable of $5.6 million and $6.9 million related to commodity derivative contracts as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
Type of Contract |
|
Location of Gain/(Loss) |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate(1) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
406 |
|
Total derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships |
|
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commodity(2) |
|
Oil and gas revenue |
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
$ |
(1,526 |
) |
Commodity |
|
Derivatives, net |
|
32,327 |
|
2,028 |
| ||
Interest rate |
|
Interest expense |
|
(174 |
) |
(98 |
) | ||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
34,786 |
|
$ |
404 |
|
(1) Amounts were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (AOCI) into earnings upon settlement.
(2) Amounts represent the mark-to-market portion of our provisional oil sales contracts.
Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities
Our derivative instruments which are subject to master netting arrangements with our counterparties only have the right of offset when there is an event of default. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was not an event of default and, therefore, the associated gross asset or gross liability amounts related to these arrangements are presented on the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, if an event of default occurred the offsetting amounts would be immaterial as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
10. Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value measurements are based upon inputs that market participants use in pricing an asset or liability, which are classified into two categories: observable inputs and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs represent market data obtained from independent sources, whereas unobservable inputs reflect a companys own market assumptions, which are used if observable inputs are not reasonably available without undue cost and effort. We prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following fair value hierarchy:
· Level 1quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
· Level 2quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
· Level 3unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. The fair value input hierarchy level to which an asset or liability measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.
The following tables present the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, for each fair value hierarchy level:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using: |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
| ||||||
March 31, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commodity derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
241,244 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
241,244 |
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
| ||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commodity derivatives |
|
|
|
(7,731 |
) |
|
|
(7,731 |
) | ||||
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
232,550 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
232,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commodity derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
252,485 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
252,485 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
(789 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
251,696 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
251,696 |
|
The book values of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value based on Level 1 inputs. Joint interest billings, oil sales and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Our long-term receivables, if any, after any allowances for doubtful accounts approximate fair value. The estimates of fair value of these items are based on Level 2 inputs.
Commodity Derivatives
Our commodity derivatives represent crude oil three-way collars, put options, call options and swaps for notional barrels of oil at fixed Dated Brent oil prices. The values attributable to the our oil derivatives are based on (i) the contracted notional volumes, (ii) independent active futures price quotes for Dated Brent, (iii) a credit-adjusted yield curve applicable to each counterparty by reference to the credit default swap (CDS) market and (iv) an independently sourced estimate of volatility for Dated Brent. The volatility estimate was provided by certain independent brokers who are active in buying and selling oil options and was corroborated by market-quoted volatility factors. The deferred premium is included in the fair market value of the commodity derivatives. See Note 9Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information regarding the Companys derivative instruments.
Provisional Oil Sales
The value attributable to the provisional oil sales derivative is based on (i) the sales volumes and (ii) the difference in the independent active futures price quotes for Dated Brent over the term of the pricing period designated in the sales contract and the spot price on the lifting date.
Interest Rate Derivatives
We have interest rate swaps, whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of interest and the counterparty pays a variable LIBOR-based rate. We also have capped interest rate swaps, whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of interest if LIBOR is below the cap, and pays the market rate less the spread between the cap and the fixed rate of interest if LIBOR is above the cap. The values attributable to the Companys interest rate derivative contracts are based on (i) the contracted notional amounts, (ii) LIBOR yield curves provided by independent third parties and corroborated with forward active market-quoted LIBOR yield curves and (iii) a credit-adjusted yield curve as applicable to each counterparty by reference to the CDS market.
Debt
The following table presents the carrying values and fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
March 31, 2015 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
| ||||||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
794,434 |
|
$ |
782,750 |
|
$ |
794,269 |
|
$ |
755,000 |
|
The carrying value of the Facility approximates fair value since it is subject to short-term floating interest rates that approximate the rates available to us for those periods. The fair value of our Senior Notes is based on quoted market prices, which results in a Level 1 fair value measurement.
11. Equity-based Compensation
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units
We record compensation expense equal to the fair value of share-based payments over the vesting periods of the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) awards. We recorded compensation expense from awards granted under our LTIP of $25.2 million and $17.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The total tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $8.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively. Additionally, we expensed a tax shortfall related to equity-based compensation of $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively. The fair value of awards vested during the three months ended, March 31, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The Company granted both restricted stock awards and restricted stock units with service vesting criteria and granted both restricted stock awards and restricted stock units with a combination of market and service criteria under the LTIP. Our outstanding awards vest over a three or four year period. Restricted stock awards are issued and included in the number of outstanding shares upon the date of grant and, if such awards are forfeited, they become treasury stock. Upon vesting, restricted stock units become issued and outstanding stock.
The following table reflects the outstanding restricted stock awards as of March 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Market / Service |
|
Weighted- |
| ||
|
|
Service Vesting |
|
Average |
|
Vesting |
|
Average |
| ||
|
|
Awards |
|
Fair Value |
|
Awards |
|
Fair Value |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 |
|
3,240 |
|
$ |
16.95 |
|
3,361 |
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
Granted |
|
660 |
|
8.64 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Vested |
|
(28 |
) |
9.61 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at March 31, 2015 |
|
3,872 |
|
15.59 |
|
3,361 |
|
13.00 |
| ||
The following table reflects the outstanding restricted stock units as of March 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Market / Service |
|
Weighted- |
| ||
|
|
Service Vesting |
|
Average |
|
Vesting |
|
Average |
| ||
|
|
Units |
|
Fair Value |
|
Units |
|
Fair Value |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 |
|
3,367 |
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
3,246 |
|
$ |
15.66 |
|
Granted |
|
1,062 |
|
8.64 |
|
3,308 |
|
12.96 |
| ||
Forfeited |
|
(13 |
) |
11.15 |
|
(4 |
) |
16.82 |
| ||
Vested |
|
(58 |
) |
11.36 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at March 31, 2015 |
|
4,358 |
|
10.23 |
|
6,550 |
|
14.29 |
| ||
As of March 31, 2015, total equity-based compensation to be recognized on unvested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is $109.8 million over a weighted average period of 1.64 years. In January 2015, the board of directors approved an amendment to the May 16, 2011 LTIP to add 15.0 million shares to the plan, subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting in June 2015. At March 31, 2015, the Company had approximately 8.8 million shares that remain available for issuance under the LTIP.
For restricted stock awards and restricted stock units with a combination of market and service vesting criteria, the number of common shares to be issued is determined by comparing the Companys total shareholder return with the total shareholder return of a predetermined group of peer companies over the performance period and can vest in up to 100% of the awards granted for restricted stock awards and up to 200% of the awards granted for restricted stock units. The grant date fair value of these awards ranged from $6.70 to $13.57 per award for restricted stock awards and $12.96 to $15.81 per award for restricted stock units. The Monte Carlo simulation model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award. The expected volatility utilized in the model was estimated using a combination of our historical volatility and implied volatility and the historical and implied volatilities of our peer companies and ranged from 30% to 76%. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. treasury rate for a term commensurate with the expected life of the grant and ranged from 0.5% to 1.1% for restricted stock awards and 0.5% to 1.2% for restricted stock units.
12. Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $25.7 million and $50.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The income tax provision consists of United States and Ghanaian income and Texas margin taxes.
The components of income (loss) before income taxes were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Bermuda |
|
$ |
(13,662 |
) |
$ |
(5,315 |
) |
United States |
|
4,667 |
|
3,286 |
| ||
Foreignother |
|
(44,215 |
) |
127,781 |
| ||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(53,210 |
) |
$ |
125,752 |
|
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 is (48%) and 40%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the United States is approximately 44% and 45% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective tax rate in the United States is impacted by the effect of tax shortfalls related to equity-based compensation. The effective tax rate for Ghana is approximately 35% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Our other foreign jurisdictions have a 0% effective tax rate because they reside in countries with a 0% statutory rate, or we have experienced losses in those countries and have a full valuation allowance reserved against the corresponding net deferred tax assets.
A subsidiary of the Company files a U.S. federal income tax return and a Texas margin tax return. In addition to the United States, the Company files income tax returns in the countries in which the Company operates. The Company is open to U.S. federal income tax examinations for tax years 2012 through 2014 and to Texas margin tax examinations for the tax years 2010 through 2014. In addition, the Company is open to income tax examinations for years 2011 through 2014 in its significant other foreign jurisdictions.
As of March 31, 2015, the Company had no material uncertain tax positions. The Companys policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense, but has had no need to accrue any to date.
13. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following table is a reconciliation between net income and the amounts used to compute basic and diluted net income per share and the weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted net income per share:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
| ||||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(78,909 |
) |
$ |
74,969 |
|
Less: Basic income allocable to participating securities(1) |
|
|
|
1,234 |
| ||
Basic net income (loss) allocable to common shareholders |
|
(78,909 |
) |
73,735 |
| ||
Diluted adjustments to income allocable to participating securities(1) |
|
|
|
12 |
| ||
Diluted net income (loss) allocable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(78,909 |
) |
$ |
73,747 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average number of shares used to compute net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
380,355 |
|
377,830 |
| ||
Restricted stock awards and units(1)(2) |
|
|
|
3,642 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
380,355 |
|
381,472 |
| ||
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
$ |
0.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
$ |
0.19 |
|
(1) Our service vesting restricted stock awards represent participating securities because they participate in non-forfeitable dividends with common equity owners. Income allocable to participating securities represents the distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to the participating securities. Our restricted stock awards with market and service vesting criteria and all restricted stock units are not considered to be participating securities and, therefore, are excluded from the basic net income per common share calculation. Our service vesting restricted stock awards do not participate in undistributed net losses and, therefore, are excluded from the basic net income per common share calculation in periods we are in a net loss position.
(2) We excluded outstanding restricted stock awards and units of 18.1 million and 6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, from the computations of diluted net income per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, regulatory examinations and administrative proceedings primarily arising in the ordinary course of our business in jurisdictions in which we do business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes none of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, would have a material effect upon the Companys financial position; however, an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our results from operations for a specific interim period or year.
In June 2013, we signed a long-term rig agreement with a subsidiary of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. for the new build 6th generation drillship Atwood Achiever. We took delivery of the Atwood Achiever in September 2014. The rig agreement covers an initial period of three years at a day rate of approximately $0.6 million, with an option to extend the agreement for an additional three-year term. We have entered into a rig sharing agreement, whereby two rig slots (estimated to be 102 days during 2015) were assigned to a third-party.
The estimated future minimum commitments as of March 31, 2015, are:
|
|
Payments Due By Year(1) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
2015(2) |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
Thereafter |
| |||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases(3) |
|
$ |
15,282 |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
$ |
3,158 |
|
$ |
3,223 |
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
$ |
|
|
Atwood Achiever drilling rig contract(4) |
|
467,075 |
|
102,935 |
|
217,770 |
|
146,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
(1) Does not include purchase commitments for jointly owned fields and facilities where we are not the operator and excludes commitments for exploration activities, including well commitments, in our petroleum contracts.
(2) Represents payments for the period from April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.
(3) Primarily relates to corporate office and foreign office leases.
(4) Commitments calculated using a day rate of $595,000, excluding applicable taxes. The rig commitments reflect the execution of a rig sharing agreement, whereby two rig slots (estimated to be 102 days during 2015) were assigned to a third-party.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained herein and our annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, included in our annual report on Form 10-K along with the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and Results of Operations contained in such annual report. Any terms used but not defined in the following discussion have the same meaning given to them in the annual report. Our discussion and analysis includes forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties and should be read in conjunction with Risk Factors under Item 1A of this report and in the annual report, along with Forward-Looking Information at the end of this section for information about the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than our forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a leading independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on frontier and emerging areas along the Atlantic Margin. Our assets include existing production and other major development projects offshore Ghana, as well as exploration licenses with significant hydrocarbon potential offshore Ireland, Mauritania, Morocco, Portugal, Senegal, Suriname and Western Sahara.
Recent Developments
Corporate
During April 2015, we issued an additional $225.0 million of 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (Senior Notes) and received net proceeds of $206.8 million after deducting discounts, commissions and other expenses. We used the net proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under the Facility and for general corporate purposes. The additional $225.0 million of Senior Notes have identical terms to the existing $300.0 million of Senior Notes issued in August 2014, other than the date of issue, the initial price, the first interest payment date and the first date from which interest will accrue.
Ghana
We submitted a declaration of commerciality on the Mahogany discovery in March 2015. We expect to submit a plan of development concerning the Mahogany discovery area later this year.
We are currently in discussions with the government of Ghana regarding the declaration of commerciality for the Teak discovery. Upon resolution of such discussions and declaration of commerciality, we expect to submit a plan of development concerning the Teak discovery later this year.
We are currently in discussions with the government of Ghana regarding additional technical studies and evaluation that we want to conduct before we are able to make a determination regarding commerciality of the Akasa discovery.
In April 2015, the Special Chamber of the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea (the ITLOS) issued an order in response to the provisional measures requested by the Government of Cote dIvoire in its ongoing maritime boundary dispute with the Government of Ghana. ITLOS rejected the request that Ghana suspend all ongoing exploration and development operations in the disputed area in which the TEN project is situated until ITLOS gives its decision on the maritime boundary dispute, which is expected in late 2017. ITLOS ordered Ghana to suspend new drilling in the disputed area. The project is now more than 55 percent complete with all of the wells expected to be online at first oil already drilled. We expect TEN development activities will continue as planned with first oil expected in the second half of 2016. See Part II. Other Information; Item 1A. Risk Factors for more information.
Mauritania
In March 2015, we closed a farm-out agreement with Chevron Mauritania Exploration Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (Chevron), covering the C8, C12 and C13 petroleum contracts offshore Mauritania. Under the terms of the farm-out agreement, Chevron acquired a 30% non-operated working interest in each of the contract areas. Chevron will pay a disproportionate share of the costs of one exploration well and a second contingent exploration well, subject to maximum expenditure caps. In addition, Chevron will pay its proportionate share of certain previously incurred exploration costs. Chevron is not funding drilling of the Tortue prospect, but retains the option to elect to participate in this prospect subject to Chevron paying a disproportionate share of its costs related to the Tortue prospect. The sales proceeds of the farm-out were $29.7 million. After giving effect to the farm-out agreements, Kosmos, Chevron and Société Mauritanienne des Hydrocarbures et de Patrimoine Miniers (SMHPM) (Mauritanias national oil company) participating interest in Block C8, Block C12 and Block C13 is 60%, 30% and 10%, respectively, and we remain as operator. The proceeds on the sale of the interest exceeded our book basis in the assets, resulting in a $22.8 million gain on the transaction.
In April 2015, we announced the Tortue-1 exploration well on block C8 offshore Mauritania had made a significant, play-opening gas discovery. Based on preliminary analysis of drilling results and intermediate logging to a depth of 4,630 meters, the Tortue-1 exploration well has intersected 107 meters (351 feet) of net hydrocarbon pay. A single gas pool was encountered in the Lower Cenomanian objective, which is comprised of three reservoirs totaling 88 meters (288 feet) in thickness over a gross hydrocarbon interval of 160 meters (528 feet). A fourth reservoir totaling 19 meters (62 feet) was penetrated within the Upper Cenomanian target over a gross hydrocarbon interval of 150 meters (492 feet). The Tortue-1 exploration well is now drilling to the planned total depth, with results from this section expected in the second quarter of 2015. Our acreage offers substantial follow-on prospectivity and an appraisal program is being planned to delineate the Tortue West discovery.
Western Sahara
Drilling of the CB-1 exploration well on the Cap Boujdour Offshore block was completed in March 2015. The well penetrated approximately 14 meters of net gas and condensate pay in clastic reservoirs over a gross hydrocarbon bearing interval of approximately 500 meters. The discovery is sub-commercial, and the well was plugged and abandoned. However, the well demonstrated a working petroleum system including the presence of a hydrocarbon charge. The results will be integrated with the ongoing geological evaluation to determine future exploration activity. Total well and other related costs of $83.7 million are included in exploration expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Portugal
In March 2015, we closed a farm-in agreement with Repsol Exploración, S.A. (Repsol), to acquire a non-operated interest in the Camarao, Ameijoa, Mexilhao and Ostra blocks in the Peniche Basin offshore Portugal. As part of the farm-in agreement, we will reimburse a portion of Repsols previously incurred exploration costs, as well as partially carry Repsols share of the costs of a planned 3D seismic survey. After giving effect to the farm-in agreement, our participating interest is 31% in each of the blocks.
We plan to acquire a 3D seismic survey, scheduled to begin in 2015, and to further assess the prospectivity of the blocks.
Senegal
In January 2015, we completed a 3D seismic survey of approximately 7,000 square kilometers over the Cayar Offshore Profond and Saint Louis Offshore Profond Contract Areas.
We are currently in a one-year extension of the initial exploration period for the Cayar Offshore Profond and Saint Louis Profond Contract Areas, which ends in June 2015. Upon entry into the first renewal of the exploration period, we will relinquish 30% of the contract area of each block. In April 2015, we submitted an application to enter the first renewal of the exploration period beginning in June 2015 and lasting for three years. The first renewal period includes a one well requirement in each block. As part of the farm-in agreement with Timis Corporation Limited (Timis), we will carry the full costs of one exploration well in each of the blocks, subject to maximum gross costs per well of $120.0 million. We retain the option to increase our ownership percentage in both blocks from 60% to 65% by electing to carry Timis costs on an additional well, which may be drilled in either of the blocks.
Suriname
In April 2015, we received an extension of the initial exploration phase for Block 42 and Block 45 offshore Suriname, which now expires in September 2016.
Results of Operations
All of our results, as presented in the table below, represent operations from the Jubilee Field in Ghana. Certain operating results and statistics for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, are included in the following table:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands, except barrel and |
| ||||
Sales volumes: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
MBbl |
|
1,900 |
|
1,937 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil sales |
|
$ |
109,164 |
|
$ |
212,853 |
|
Average sales price per Bbl |
|
57.47 |
|
109.87 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Costs: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil production, excluding workovers |
|
$ |
18,216 |
|
$ |
15,058 |
|
Oil production, workovers |
|
13,884 |
|
1,265 |
| ||
Total oil production costs |
|
$ |
32,100 |
|
$ |
16,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depletion and depreciation |
|
$ |
37,007 |
|
$ |
46,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Average cost per Bbl: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil production, excluding workovers |
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
$ |
7.78 |
|
Oil production, workovers |
|
7.31 |
|
0.65 |
| ||
Total oil production costs |
|
16.90 |
|
8.43 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depletion and depreciation |
|
19.48 |
|
23.94 |
| ||
Oil production cost and depletion costs |
|
$ |
36.38 |
|
$ |
32.37 |
|
The following table shows the number of wells in the process of being drilled or in active completion stages, and the number of wells suspended or waiting on completion as of March 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Suspended or |
| ||||||
|
|
Actively Drilling or Completing |
|
Waiting on Completion |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
Exploration |
|
Development |
|
Exploration |
|
Development |
| ||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
Ghana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jubilee Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0.48 |
|
West Cape Three Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
TEN |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
2.55 |
|
Deepwater Tano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mauritania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block C8(1) |
|
1 |
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
1 |
|
0.90 |
|
2 |
|
0.34 |
|
10 |
|
2.96 |
|
17 |
|
3.03 |
|
(1) In March 2015, we closed a farm-out agreement covering our three license areas in Mauritania with Chevron. If Chevron exercises their option to participate in the Tortue prospect, our net interest will be 60% in the well.
The discussion of the results of operations and the period-to-period comparisons presented below analyze our historical results. The following discussion may not be indicative of future results.
Three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to three months ended March 31, 2014
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Increase |
| |||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
(Decrease) |
| |||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| |||||||
Revenues and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Oil and gas revenue |
|
$ |
109,164 |
|
$ |
212,853 |
|
$ |
(103,689 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
22,751 |
|
23,769 |
|
(1,018 |
) | |||
Other income |
|
642 |
|
439 |
|
203 |
| |||
Total revenues and other income |
|
132,557 |
|
237,061 |
|
(104,504 |
) | |||
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Oil and gas production |
|
32,100 |
|
16,323 |
|
15,777 |
| |||
Exploration expenses |
|
98,941 |
|
12,809 |
|
86,132 |
| |||
General and administrative |
|
38,667 |
|
27,413 |
|
11,254 |
| |||
Depletion and depreciation |
|
37,007 |
|
46,378 |
|
(9,371 |
) | |||
Interest and other financing costs, net |
|
10,751 |
|
9,137 |
|
1,614 |
| |||
Derivatives, net |
|
(32,327 |
) |
(2,028 |
) |
(30,299 |
) | |||
Other expenses, net |
|
628 |
|
1,277 |
|
(649 |
) | |||
Total costs and expenses |
|
185,767 |
|
111,309 |
|
74,458 |
| |||
Income before income taxes |
|
(53,210 |
) |
125,752 |
|
(178,962 |
) | |||
Income tax expense |
|
25,699 |
|
50,783 |
|
(25,084 |
) | |||
Net income |
|
$ |
(78,909 |
) |
$ |
74,969 |
|
$ |
(153,878 |
) |
Oil and gas revenue. Oil and gas revenue decreased by $103.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to a lower realized price per barrel. We lifted and sold approximately 1,900 MBbl at an average realized price per barrel of $57.47 during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and approximately 1,937 MBbl at an average realized price per barrel of $109.87 during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Gain on sale of assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we closed a farm-out agreement with Chevron. The proceeds from the sale are in excess of our book basis, resulting in a gain of $22.8 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we closed three farm-out agreements with BP. As part of the transaction, we received proceeds in excess of our book basis, resulting in a gain of $23.8 million.
Oil and gas production. Oil and gas production costs increased by $15.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily due to an increase in well workover costs. Our workover costs are related to performing workovers on our wells, which are performed on an as needed basis. We expect the amount of costs associated with workovers to fluctuate based on the activity level during each quarter.
Exploration expenses. Exploration expenses increased by $86.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase is primarily due to $83.7 million of unsuccessful well costs for the Western Sahara CB-1exploration well.
General and administrative. General and administrative costs increased by $11.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase is primarily due an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation.
Depletion and depreciation. Depletion and depreciation decreased $9.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2014. The decrease is primarily due to a lower depletion rate during the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to an increase in proved reserves in the fourth quarter of 2014.
Derivatives, net. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded gains of $32.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively, on our outstanding hedge positions. The gains recorded were a result of changes in the forward curve of oil prices during the respective periods.
Income tax expense. The Companys effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were (48%) and 40%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the periods presented are impacted by losses, primarily related to exploration
expenses, incurred in jurisdictions in which we are not subject to taxes and, therefore, do not generate any income tax benefits and losses incurred in jurisdictions in which we have valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets and therefore we do not realize any tax benefit on such losses. Income tax expense decreased $25.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared with March 31, 2014, primarily due to deferred taxes related to our Ghanaian subsidiary.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are actively engaged in an ongoing process of anticipating and meeting our funding requirements related to exploring for and developing oil and natural gas resources along the Atlantic Margin. We have historically met our funding requirements through cash flows generated from our operating activities and obtained funding from issuances of equity and debt. While we are presently in a strong financial position, should the current decline in oil pricing be significantly prolonged or if further deterioration of pricing continues, it could impact our ability to generate sufficient operating cash flows to meet our funding requirements as well as impact the borrowing base available under the Facility. Commodity prices are volatile and future prices cannot be accurately predicted; however, we maintain a hedging program to mitigate the price volatility. Our investment decisions are based on longer-term commodity prices based on the long-term nature of our projects and development plans. Current commodity prices, our hedging program and our current liquidity position support our capital program for 2015.
In March, 2015, following the lenders semi-annual redetermination, the borrowing base under our Facility remained unchanged at $1.5 billion. For the first time, the borrowing base calculation included value related to the TEN development project in Ghana, as well as the Jubilee field. As of March 31, 2015, undrawn availability under the Facility was $1.0 billion.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table presents the sources and uses of our cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
| ||
|
|
(In thousands) |
| ||||
Sources of cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(8,980 |
) |
$ |
113,586 |
|
Proceeds on sale of assets |
|
|
|
34,581 |