sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 15, 2007
Registration
No. 333-143719
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Amendment No. 4 to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
71-0987913
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
7372
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
80 Lamberton Road
Windsor, Connecticut
06095
(860) 298-4500
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants
principal executive offices)
William C. Stone
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
SS&C Technologies Holdings,
Inc.
80 Lamberton Road
Windsor, Connecticut
06095
(860) 298-4500
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
John A. Burgess, Esq.
|
|
Keith F. Higgins, Esq.
|
James R. Burke, Esq.
|
|
Christopher J. Austin, Esq.
|
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
|
|
Ropes & Gray LLP
|
60 State Street
|
|
One International Place
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
|
(617) 526-6000
|
|
(617) 951-7000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes
effective. o
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant
to said Section 8(a), shall determine.
The
information contained in this prospectus is not complete and may
be changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell
these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not
soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the
offer or sale is not permitted.
|
PROSPECTUS
(Subject to completion)
Issued October 15, 2007
Shares
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is
offering shares
of its common stock, and the selling stockholders are
offering shares
of common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale
of shares by the selling stockholders. This is our initial
public offering, and no public market currently exists for our
shares. We anticipate that the initial public offering price
will be between $ and
$ per share.
We have applied to list our common stock on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol SSNC.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 13.
Price
$
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting Discounts and
|
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
Selling
|
|
|
|
Price to Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
SS&C Holdings
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters the right
to purchase up to an
additional shares
to cover over-allotments.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities
regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities, or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers
on ,
2007.
|
|
|
Morgan
Stanley |
Credit
Suisse |
JPMorgan |
|
|
Jefferies &
Company |
Wachovia
Securities |
,
2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information different from that contained in this prospectus. We
are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our
common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only
as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of
delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common
stock.
Until ,
2007 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade shares of our common stock,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required
to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in
addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus
when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the
information you should consider before investing in our common
stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully,
especially the risks of investing in our common stock discussed
under Risk Factors beginning on page 13, and
our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes, before making an investment decision.
Unless the context otherwise requires, in this prospectus,
(1) SS&C Holdings means SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc., our top-level holding company that
was formerly known as Sunshine Acquisition Corporation,
(2) SS&C means SS&C Technologies,
Inc., our primary operating company and a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, and (3) we,
us and our mean (a) prior to
November 23, 2005, SS&C and its consolidated
subsidiaries and (b) on and after November 23, 2005,
SS&C Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, including
SS&C.
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Overview
We are a leading provider of mission-critical, sophisticated
software products and software-enabled services that allow
financial services providers to automate complex business
processes and effectively manage their information processing
requirements. Our portfolio of software products and rapidly
deployable software-enabled services allows our clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. Our solutions enable our clients to
focus on core operations, better monitor and manage investment
performance and risk, improve operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs. We provide our solutions globally to more than
4,000 clients, principally within the institutional asset
management, alternative investment management and financial
institutions sectors.
We provide the global financial services industry with a broad
range of both specialized software products, which are deployed
at our clients facilities, and software-enabled services,
which are managed and hosted at our facilities. Our
software-enabled services, which combine the strengths of our
proprietary software with our domain expertise, enable our
clients to contract with us to provide many of their
mission-critical and complex business processes. For example, we
utilize our software to offer comprehensive fund administration
services for alternative investment managers, including fund
manager services, transfer agency services, fund of funds
services, tax processing and accounting and processing. We offer
clients the flexibility to choose from multiple software
delivery options, including on-premise applications and hosted,
multi-tenant or dedicated applications. Our principal software
products and software-enabled services include:
|
|
|
Portfolio Management/Accounting
|
|
Fund Administration Services
|
Financial Modeling
|
|
Loan Management/Accounting
|
Trading/Treasury Operations
|
|
Money Market Processing
|
Our business model is characterized by substantial contractually
recurring revenues, high operating margins and significant cash
flow. We generate revenues primarily through our high-value
software-enabled services, which are typically sold on a
long-term subscription basis and integrated into our
clients business processes. We also generate revenues by
licensing our software to clients through either perpetual or
term licenses, both of which include annually renewable
maintenance contracts. As a consequence, a significant portion
of our revenues consists of subscription payments and
maintenance fees and is contractually recurring in nature. Our
pricing typically scales as a function of our clients
assets under management, the complexity of asset classes managed
and the volume of transactions.
Our contractually recurring revenue model helps us minimize the
fluctuations in revenues and cash flows typically associated
with up-front, perpetual software license revenues and enhances
our ability to manage costs. Our contractually recurring
revenues, which we define as our software-enabled services and
maintenance
1
revenues, increased as a percentage of total revenues from 52%
in the year ended December 31, 2000 to 79% in the year
ended December 31, 2006. We have experienced average
revenue retention rates in each of the last five years of
greater than 90% on our software-enabled services and
maintenance contracts for our core enterprise products.
Through a combination of consistent organic growth and
acquisitions, we generated revenues of $205.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to revenues of
$95.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. We
generated 77% of our revenues in 2006 from clients in North
America and 23% from clients outside North America. Our revenues
are highly diversified, with our largest client in 2006
accounting for 5.5% of our revenues.
Our
Industry
The financial services industry is a large, dynamic and rapidly
growing market. According to a 2006 Gartner report,
worldwide financial services industry spending on IT
services and software is forecasted to grow from
$163.5 billion in 2005 to $230.9 billion in 2010,
representing a 7.2% compound annual growth rate. Additionally,
worldwide financial services spending on outsourced process
management is expected to grow from $26.5 billion in 2005
to $40.7 billion in 2010, representing an 8.9% compound
annual growth rate. We expect our growth to continue due to a
number of factors related to the financial services industry and
evolving challenges faced by industry participants, including:
Rapidly Growing Worldwide Financial Services
Industry. As both transaction volumes and
assets under management increase, financial services providers
require more advanced solutions to automate complex business
processes and manage their information processing requirements.
To keep pace with the rapid growth in the industry and remain
competitive with other industry participants, financial services
providers increasingly need to implement advanced software
applications or utilize service offerings from third parties to
manage their most critical and complex IT processes.
Increasing Willingness to Implement Solutions from
Independent Software Vendors and Outsource IT
Operations. Rather than relying on their
internal IT departments to develop applications that automate
business processes, many financial services providers are
implementing advanced software solutions from independent
software vendors to replace their current systems, which are
often cumbersome, time-consuming to operate and expensive to
implement, customize, update and support. Additionally,
financial services providers globally are outsourcing a growing
percentage of their business processes to increase their
efficiency and time to market.
Asset Classes and Securities Products Growing in Both
Number and Complexity. Investment
professionals must increasingly track and invest in numerous
types of asset classes and securities that are often far more
complex than traditional equity and debt instruments, including
mortgage- and asset-backed securities, derivatives, swaps,
futures, repos and options. These assets require more
sophisticated systems to automate functions such as trading and
modeling, portfolio management, accounting, performance
measurement, reconciliation, reporting, processing and clearing.
Increasing Regulatory
Requirements. Increasing domestic and foreign
regulation is forcing compliance with more complicated and
burdensome requirements for financial services providers. This
has escalated demand for software solutions that both meet
compliance requirements and reduce the burden of compliance
reporting and enforcement.
Intense Global Competition Among Financial Services
Providers. Competition within the financial
services industry has become intense as financial services
providers expand into new markets and offer new services to
their clients. In response to increasingly competitive
conditions worldwide, financial services organizations seek to
rapidly expand into new markets, increase front-office
productivity by offering investment professionals greater
modeling functionality and better tools to solve complex
financial problems, and drive cost savings by utilizing software
to automate and integrate their mission-critical and labor
intensive business processes.
2
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our position in the marketplace results from
several key competitive strengths, including:
Broad Portfolio of Products and Services Focused on
Financial Services Organizations. Our broad
portfolio of over 50 software products and software-enabled
services allows professionals in the financial services industry
to efficiently and rapidly analyze and manage information,
increase productivity, devote more time to critical business
decisions and reduce costs. We provide highly flexible, scalable
and cost-effective solutions that enable our clients to track
complex securities, better employ sophisticated investment
strategies, scale efficiently with growing assets under
management and meet evolving regulatory requirements.
Enhanced Profitability Through Software
Ownership. We use our proprietary software
products and infrastructure to provide our software-enabled
services, strengthening our overall operating margins. Because
we use our own products in the execution of our software-enabled
services and own and control our products source code, we
can quickly identify and deploy product improvements and respond
to client feedback.
Attractive Operating Model. By growing
our contractually recurring revenues from our software-enabled
services and our maintenance contracts, we gain greater
predictability in the operation of our business, reduce
volatility in our revenues and earnings, enhance our ability to
manage our business and strengthen long-term relationships with
our clients. We have designed our software and software-enabled
services to be highly scalable to accommodate significant
additional business volumes with limited incremental costs,
providing us with opportunities to improve our operating margins
and generate significant operating cash flows. We utilize a
direct sales force model that benefits from significant direct
participation by senior management and leverages the Internet as
a direct marketing medium.
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. As of June 30, 2007, we had
833 development and service professionals with significant
expertise across the vertical markets that we serve and a deep
working knowledge of our clients businesses. By leveraging
our domain expertise and knowledge, we have developed, and
continue to improve, our mission-critical software products and
services to enable our clients to overcome the complexities
inherent in their businesses.
Trusted Provider to Our Highly Diversified and Growing
Client Base. By providing mission-critical,
reliable software products and services for more than
20 years, we have become a trusted provider to a large and
growing installed base within multiple segments of the financial
services industry. Our clients include some of the largest and
most well-recognized firms in the financial services industry.
Our strong client relationships provide us with a significant
opportunity to sell additional solutions to our existing clients
and drive future revenue growth at lower cost.
Superior Client Support and Focus. Our
ability to rapidly deliver improvements and our reputation for
superior service have proven to be a strong competitive
advantage when developing client relationships. We believe a
close and active service and support relationship, which we
foster through our dedicated client support teams for larger
clients and through our interactive online client community,
significantly enhances client satisfaction, strengthens client
relationships and furnishes us with information regarding
evolving client issues.
Our
Growth Strategy
We intend to be the leading provider of superior technology
solutions to the financial services industry. The key elements
of our growth strategy include:
Continue to Develop Software-Enabled Services and New
Proprietary Software. Since our founding in
1986, we have focused on building substantial financial services
domain expertise, which enables us to respond to our
clients most complex financial, accounting, actuarial, tax
and regulatory needs. We intend to maintain and enhance our
technological leadership by using our domain expertise to build
valuable new software-enabled services, continuing to invest in
internal development and opportunistically acquiring products
and services that address the highly specialized needs of the
financial services industry. Our software-
3
enabled services revenues increased from $30.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 to $107.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006, representing a compound
annual growth rate of 87%.
Expand Our Client Base. Our client base
of more than 4,000 clients represents a fraction of the total
number of financial services providers globally. As a result, we
believe there is substantial opportunity to grow our client base
over time as our products become more widely adopted and to
capitalize on the increasing adoption of mission-critical,
sophisticated software and software-enabled services by
financial services providers as they continue to replace
inadequate legacy solutions and custom in-house solutions that
are inflexible and costly to maintain.
Increase Revenues from Existing
Clients. Revenues from our existing clients
generally grow along with the amount and complexity of assets
that they manage and the volume of transactions that they
execute. Many of our current clients use our products for a
minority of their total assets under management and investment
funds, providing us with significant opportunities to expand our
business relationship and revenues. We have been successful in,
and expect to continue to focus our marketing efforts on,
providing additional modules or features to the products and
services our existing clients already use, as well as
cross-selling our other products and services. Moreover, our
high quality of service helps us maintain significant client
retention rates and longer lasting client relationships.
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions of Complementary
Businesses and Technologies. We intend to
continue to employ a highly disciplined and focused acquisition
strategy to broaden and enhance our product and service
offerings, add new clients, supplement our internal development
efforts and accelerate our expected growth. We believe that our
acquisitions have been an extension of our research and
development effort that has enabled us to purchase proven
products and remove the uncertainties associated with software
development projects. We have a proven ability to integrate
complementary businesses as demonstrated by the 23 businesses
that we have acquired since 1995. Our acquisitions have
contributed marketable products or services that have added to
our revenues and we have been able to improve the operational
performance and profitability of our acquired businesses,
creating significant value for our stockholders.
Strengthen Our International
Presence. We believe that there is a
significant market opportunity to provide software and services
to financial services providers outside North America. In 2006,
we generated 23% of our revenues from clients outside North
America. We are building our international operations in order
to increase our sales outside North America. We plan to expand
our international market presence by leveraging our existing
software products and software-enabled services for alternative
investment managers, which to date have primarily been
implemented by
U.S.-based
alternative investment management firms.
Risks
Associated with Our Business
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, as
more fully described under Risk Factors beginning on
page 13, which you should carefully consider before
purchasing our common stock. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
Our business is affected by changes in the state of the general
economy and the financial markets, and a slowdown or downturn in
the general economy or the financial markets could
disproportionately affect demand for our products and services.
|
|
|
|
We face significant competition with respect to our products and
services, which may result in price reductions, reduced gross
margins or loss of market share.
|
|
|
|
If we cannot attract, train and retain qualified managerial,
technical and sales personnel, we may not be able to provide
adequate technical expertise and customer service to our clients
or maintain focus on our business strategy.
|
|
|
|
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our
financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations
under our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and our senior credit facilities.
|
In addition, the ability of new investors to influence corporate
matters may be limited because a small number of stockholders
will beneficially own a substantial amount of our common stock
after this offering.
4
Following the completion of this offering, investment funds
affiliated with Carlyle will beneficially own
approximately % of the outstanding
shares of our common stock, and William C. Stone, our Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, will
beneficially own approximately % of
the outstanding shares of our common stock, assuming that the
underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional
shares.
Developments
Since 2005
Since 2005, our business has continued to grow and we have made
significant operational improvements. We acquired EisnerFast,
Financial Interactive, Cogent Management and Northport, which
enabled us to expand our software-enabled services for
alternative investment managers, as well as MarginMan, Open
Information Systems and Zoologic, which added software solutions
to complement our product suite. We acquired and integrated the
operations of Financial Models Company, which significantly
increased our client base and product capabilities. Moreover, we
have strengthened our product portfolio through internal
development and introduced new offerings for institutional asset
managers, alternative investment managers and mortgage and
commercial loan managers. On November 23, 2005, SS&C
was acquired by SS&C Holdings, which is currently owned
principally by funds affiliated with The Carlyle Group and by
William C. Stone, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of both SS&C and SS&C Holdings.
Principal
Stockholder The Carlyle Group
The Carlyle Group, or Carlyle, is a global private equity firm
with over $71.4 billion under management. Carlyle invests
in buyouts, venture and growth capital, real estate and
leveraged finance in Asia, Europe and North America. Its
investments focus principally on the technology, aerospace and
defense, automotive and transportation, business services,
consumer and retail, energy and power, healthcare, industrial,
and telecommunications and media industries. Since 1987, the
firm has invested $28.3 billion of equity in 636
transactions for a total purchase price of $132.0 billion.
Carlyle employs more than 800 people in 18 countries.
Carlyle deals have included the acquisitions of Open Solutions
Inc., a leading provider of core processing software to
financial institutions, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., one of
the worlds largest semiconductor companies, The Hertz
Corporation, the largest worldwide car rental brand, Dex Media,
Inc., a leading telephone directory publisher, and Blackboard,
Inc., a leading
e-learning
platform provider.
The
Going-Private Transaction
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings, a Delaware
corporation owned by investment funds affiliated with Carlyle,
acquired SS&C through the merger of Sunshine Merger
Corporation with and into SS&C, with SS&C being the
surviving company and a wholly owned subsidiary of SS&C
Holdings, and SS&Cs outstanding common stock
converted into the right to receive $37.25 per share in
cash. We refer to the acquisition of SS&C by SS&C
Holdings as the Acquisition.
The following transactions occurred in connection with the
Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Carlyle capitalized SS&C Holdings with an aggregate equity
contribution of $381.0 million;
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone, SS&Cs Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, contributed $165.0 million of
equity in the form of stock and rollover options, and certain
other management and employee option holders contributed
approximately $9.0 million of additional equity in the form
of rollover options, to SS&C Holdings;
|
|
|
|
SS&C entered into senior secured credit facilities
consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a $75.0 million revolving credit facility, of which
$10.0 million was drawn at closing; and
|
|
|
|
a $275.0 million term loan B facility, which was fully
drawn at closing and of which the equivalent of
$75.0 million was drawn in Canadian dollars by one of
SS&Cs Canadian subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
SS&C issued and sold $205.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of
113/4%
senior subordinated notes due 2013;
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
all outstanding options to purchase shares of SS&Cs
common stock became fully vested and immediately exercisable,
and each outstanding option (other than options held by
(1) non-employee directors, (2) certain individuals
identified in a schedule to the Merger Agreement and
(3) individuals who held options that were exercisable for
fewer than 100 shares of SS&Cs common stock)
were, subject to certain conditions, assumed by SS&C
Holdings and converted into an option to acquire common stock of
SS&C Holdings; and
|
|
|
|
all in-the-money warrants to purchase shares of SS&Cs
common stock were cancelled in exchange for cash equal to the
excess of the transaction price over the exercise price of the
warrants.
|
We refer to the Acquisition, the equity contributions to
SS&C Holdings, the offering of the senior subordinated
notes and the other transactions described above as the
Transaction.
As a result of the Transaction, as of July 31, 2007,
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle beneficially owned
approximately 72% of the outstanding shares of common stock of
SS&C Holdings and William C. Stone, the Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of each of SS&C and
SS&C Holdings, beneficially owned approximately 31% of the
outstanding shares of common stock of SS&C Holdings. See
Principal and Selling Stockholders for additional
information, including the calculation of beneficial ownership.
The term Successor refers to us following the
Acquisition, and the term Predecessor refers to us
prior to the Acquisition.
The table set forth below compares the per share and aggregate
amounts contributed to SS&C Holdings by William C. Stone,
Carlyle and certain other management and employee option holders
at the time of Transaction with the implied per share and
aggregate value of the shares of our common stock at the time of
this offering, based on an assumed initial public offering price
of $ per share (which represents
the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover of this
prospectus):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time of
|
|
Time of Initial
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Public Offering
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additional
Information
SS&C Holdings was incorporated in Delaware as Sunshine
Acquisition Corporation in July 2005 and changed its name to
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. in June 2007. SS&C
was organized as a Connecticut corporation in March 1986 and
reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in April 1996. On
November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C,
as described above under The Going-Private
Transaction. Our principal executive offices are located
at 80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, Connecticut 06095, and our
telephone number at that location is
(860) 298-4500.
Our website address is www.ssctech.com. Information contained on
our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus.
6
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered by SS&C Technologies Holdings,
Inc.
|
|
shares |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders
|
|
shares |
|
Total |
|
shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
shares |
|
Over-allotment option offered by the selling stockholders
|
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up
to shares
of our common stock. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use substantially all of our net proceeds of this
offering to redeem up to $71.75 million in principal amount
of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 111.75% of
the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and the
balance of our net proceeds for working capital and other
general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions.
See Use of Proceeds for additional information. We
will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders. |
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol
|
|
SSNC |
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding
following this offering is based on the number of shares of our
common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2007, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
1,622,950 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of stock options outstanding as of July 31, 2007 at a
weighted average exercise price of $57.80 per share; and
|
|
|
|
170,641 shares of common stock reserved as of July 31,
2007 for future issuance under our 2006 equity incentive plan.
|
The shares of common stock offered by us and the selling
stockholders in this offering will
represent %
of the total shares of common stock to be outstanding after this
offering.
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus
reflects and assumes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
no exercise of outstanding options after July 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness upon the closing of this offering of our
restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and
restated bylaws, which contain provisions customary for public
companies, as more fully described below under Description
of Capital Stock; and
|
|
|
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
|
7
Summary
Consolidated Financial Data
The tables below summarize our consolidated financial
information as of and for the periods indicated. You should read
the following information together with the more detailed
information contained in Selected Consolidated Financial
Data, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, with and into SS&C,
with SS&C being the surviving company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings. We refer to the acquisition of
SS&C by SS&C Holdings as the Acquisition.
We refer to the Acquisition, together with related transactions
entered into to finance the cash consideration for the
Acquisition, to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness
and to pay related transaction fees and expenses, as the
Transaction.
The term Successor refers to us following the
Acquisition, and the term Predecessor refers to us
prior to the Acquisition. Certain financial information in this
prospectus for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2005
through November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005 has been
presented on a combined basis. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Results of Operations for a
discussion of the presentation of our results for the year ended
December 31, 2005 on a combined basis.
The as adjusted balance sheet data set forth below give effect
to the sale by us
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of
$ per share (the midpoint of
the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, and the use of
substantially all of the net proceeds thereof to redeem
$71.75 million in original principal amount of our
outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 111.75% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
17,250
|
|
|
$
|
20,147
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
23,734
|
|
|
$
|
22,925
|
|
|
$
|
10,362
|
|
|
$
|
11,494
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
36,433
|
|
|
|
44,064
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
47,765
|
|
|
|
55,222
|
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
|
|
30,233
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
11,320
|
|
|
|
12,565
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
15,085
|
|
|
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
10,128
|
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
30,885
|
|
|
|
67,193
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
75,050
|
|
|
|
107,740
|
|
|
|
52,182
|
|
|
|
65,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
95,888
|
|
|
|
143,969
|
|
|
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
161,634
|
|
|
|
205,469
|
|
|
|
99,020
|
|
|
|
116,242
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
33,770
|
|
|
|
59,004
|
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
|
66,631
|
|
|
|
100,016
|
|
|
|
47,801
|
|
|
|
61,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
62,118
|
|
|
|
84,965
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
95,003
|
|
|
|
105,453
|
|
|
|
51,219
|
|
|
|
54,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing, general and
administrative
|
|
|
18,748
|
|
|
|
25,078
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
27,582
|
|
|
|
37,964
|
|
|
|
16,648
|
|
|
|
20,810
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13,957
|
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
21,270
|
|
|
|
23,620
|
|
|
|
11,804
|
|
|
|
13,037
|
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
32,705
|
|
|
|
81,189
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
85,764
|
|
|
|
61,584
|
|
|
|
28,452
|
|
|
|
33,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
29,413
|
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
43,869
|
|
|
|
22,767
|
|
|
|
20,645
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
|
(7,012
|
)
|
|
|
(47,427
|
)
|
|
|
(23,502
|
)
|
|
|
(22,764
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
31,040
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
19,010
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,185
|
|
|
|
23,300
|
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,499
|
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring revenue percentage(3)
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
76.0
|
%
|
|
|
79.3
|
%
|
|
|
79.3
|
%
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
Consolidated EBITDA(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
40,979
|
|
|
$
|
44,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,210
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,177,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility, including
current portion
|
|
|
258,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
586,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) the as adjusted amount of each of cash
and cash equivalents, working (deficit) capital, total assets
and total stockholders equity by
$ , assuming that the number of
shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our combined results for the year ended December 31, 2005
represent the addition of the Predecessor period from
January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and the
Successor period from November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005. This combination does not comply with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or with the
rules for pro forma presentation, but is presented because we
believe it provides the most meaningful comparison of our
results. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts for the Predecessor periods are computed based upon the
capital structure in existence prior to the Acquisition. Amounts
for the Successor periods are computed based upon the capital
structure in existence subsequent to the Acquisition. |
|
(3) |
|
Recurring revenue percentage represents software-enabled
services revenues and maintenance revenues as a percentage of
total revenues. We do not believe that the recurring revenue
percentage for the Successor period of 2005 is meaningful
because such period is only five weeks in duration and not
indicative of our overall trends. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used in key
financial covenants contained in our senior credit facilities,
which are material facilities supporting our capital structure
and providing liquidity to our business. Consolidated EBITDA is
defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA), further adjusted to exclude unusual items
and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant
compliance under our senior credit facilities. We believe that
the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in
presenting Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide
additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance
with the specified financial ratios and other financial
condition tests contained in our senior credit facilities.
Consolidated EBITDA is not presented for the year ended
December 31, 2004 because we did not have any senior credit
facilities that required the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA
for that year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA to gauge the costs of our
capital structure on a day-to-day basis when full financial
statements are unavailable. Management further believes that
providing this information allows our investors greater
transparency and a better understanding of our ability to meet
our debt service obligations and make capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
|
|
The breach of covenants in our senior credit facilities that are
tied to ratios based on Consolidated EBITDA could result in a
default under that agreement, in which case the lenders could
elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable and to
terminate any commitments they have to provide further
borrowings. Any such acceleration would also result in a default
under our indenture. Any default and subsequent acceleration of
payments under our debt agreements would have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash
flows. Additionally, under our debt agreements, our ability to
engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness,
making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios
based on Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not represent net income (loss) or cash
flow from operations as those terms are defined by GAAP and does
not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient
to fund cash needs. Further, our senior credit facilities
require that Consolidated EBITDA be calculated for the most
recent four fiscal quarters. As a result, the measure can be
disproportionately affected by a particularly strong or weak
quarter. Further, it may not be comparable to the measure for
any subsequent four-quarter period or any complete fiscal year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP,
and investors should not consider Consolidated EBITDA as a
substitute for measures of our financial performance and
liquidity as determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net
income, operating income or net cash provided by operating
activities. Because other companies may calculate Consolidated
EBITDA differently than we do, Consolidated EBITDA may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. |
10
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA has other limitations as an analytical tool,
when compared to the use of net income (loss), which is the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the provision of income tax
expense in our various jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense we incur as a result of our debt leverage;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect any attribution of costs to
our operations related to our investments and capital
expenditures through depreciation and amortization charges;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the cost of compensation we
provide to our employees in the form of stock option awards; and
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA excludes expenses that we believe are
unusual or non-recurring, but which others may believe are
normal expenses for the operation of a business.
|
The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and
Consolidated EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
47,039
|
|
|
|
46,320
|
|
|
|
23,273
|
|
|
|
22,555
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,647
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
11,876
|
|
|
|
27,128
|
|
|
|
30,969
|
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
|
|
22,028
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
72,924
|
|
|
|
36,966
|
|
|
|
38,438
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital-based taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges(c)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings(d)
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
Other(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
87,395
|
|
|
$
|
40,979
|
|
|
$
|
44,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007 are
included because our senior credit facilities require the
calculation of our consolidated total leverage and consolidated
net interest coverage ratio for the prior four consecutive
quarters. With the exception of acquired EBITDA and cost
savings, our results for the twelve months ended June 30,
2007 are calculated based on our results for the year ended
December 31, 2006, in addition to our results for the six
months ended June 30, 2007, less our results for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. Acquired EBITDA and cost
savings for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007 reflects
the EBITDA impact of significant businesses that were acquired
during this period as if the acquisitions occurred as of
July 1, 2006 and cost savings to be realized from such
acquisitions. |
11
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments include (1) an adjustment
to increase revenues by the amount that would have been
recognized if deferred revenue were not adjusted to fair value
at the date of the Transaction and (2) an adjustment to
increase rent expense by the amount that would have been
recognized if lease obligations were not adjusted to fair value
at the date of the Transaction. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges include foreign currency gains
and losses, gains and losses on the sales of marketable
securities, proceeds from legal settlements, costs associated
with the closing of a regional office and other one-time
expenses. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings reflects the EBITDA impact of
significant businesses that were acquired during the period as
if the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period and
cost savings to be realized from such acquisitions. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Other includes management fees paid to Carlyle and the non-cash
portion of straight-line rent expense. |
Consolidated
EBITDA and Consolidated Leverage Ratios
Our senior credit facilities require us to maintain both a
maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(currently no more than 6.75) and a minimum Consolidated EBITDA
to consolidated net interest ratio (currently not less than
1.50), in each case calculated for the trailing four quarters.
The table below summarizes our Consolidated EBITDA, consolidated
total leverage ratio and consolidated net interest coverage
ratio for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
(As adjusted)(5)
|
|
|
(In thousands, except ratio data)
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
87,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(current maximum covenant level: 6.75)(2)
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest coverage ratio
(current minimum covenant level: 1.50)(3)
|
|
|
10.87
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We reconcile our Consolidated EBITDA for the trailing four
quarters to net income for the same period using the same
methods set forth above. |
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated total leverage ratio is defined in our senior
credit facilities at the last day of any period of four
consecutive fiscal quarters, as the ratio of (a) the
principal amount of all debt at such date, minus the amount, up
to a maximum amount of $30,000,000, of cash and cash equivalents
to (b) Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
(3) |
|
Consolidated net interest coverage ratio is defined in our
senior credit facilities as for any period, the ratio of
(a) Consolidated EBITDA for such period to (b) total
cash interest expense for such period with respect to all
outstanding indebtedness minus total cash interest income for
such period. |
|
(4) |
|
This ratio is not comparable because we did not incur debt under
our existing senior credit facilities until November 2005 in
connection with the Transaction. |
|
(5) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to the use of substantially all of
our net proceeds of this offering to redeem $71.75 million
in original principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 111.75% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. |
12
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as the other information in this prospectus, before
deciding whether to invest in our common stock. If any of the
following risks materializes, our business, financial condition
and results of operations would suffer. The trading price of our
common stock could decline as a result of any of these risks,
and you might lose all or part of your investment in our common
stock.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
Our
business is affected by changes in the state of the general
economy and the financial markets, and a slowdown or downturn in
the general economy or the financial markets could
disproportionately affect the demand for our products and
services.
Our clients include a range of organizations in the financial
services industry whose success is intrinsically linked to the
health of the economy generally and of the financial markets
specifically. As a result, we believe that fluctuations,
disruptions, instability or downturns in the general economy and
the financial markets could disproportionately affect demand for
our products and services. For example, such fluctuations,
disruptions, instability or downturns may cause our clients to
do the following:
|
|
|
|
|
cancel or reduce planned expenditures for our products and
services;
|
|
|
|
seek to lower their costs by renegotiating their contracts with
us;
|
|
|
|
move their IT solutions in-house;
|
|
|
|
switch to lower-priced solutions provided by our
competitors; or
|
|
|
|
exit the industry.
|
If such conditions occur and persist, our business and financial
results, including our liquidity and our ability to fulfill our
obligations to the holders of our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013, which we refer to as the notes or
senior subordinated notes, and our other lenders, could be
materially adversely affected.
Further
or accelerated consolidations in the financial services industry
could result in a decline in demand for our products and
services.
If financial services firms continue to consolidate, as they
have over the past decade, there could be a decline in demand
for our products and services. For example, if a client merges
with a firm using its own solution or another vendors
solution, it could decide to consolidate its processing on a
non-SS&C system. The resulting decline in demand for our
products and services could have a material adverse effect on
our revenues. For instance, in 2007, a client that represented
5.5% of our revenues in 2006 was acquired in a tender offer
transaction. Although the effect of the acquisition on our
business is not yet known, if that client were to stop using our
products and services as a result of the acquisition, it could
cause a significant decrease in our revenues, at least in the
short term.
We
expect that our operating results, including our profit margins
and profitability, may fluctuate over time.
Historically, our revenues, profit margins and other operating
results have fluctuated from period to period and over time
primarily due to the timing, size and nature of our license and
service transactions. Additional factors that may lead to such
fluctuation include:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction and the market acceptance of new
products, product enhancements or services by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
the lengthy and often unpredictable sales cycles of large client
engagements;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of our operating costs and other expenses;
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
the financial health of our clients;
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume of assets under our clients
management;
|
|
|
|
cancellations of maintenance
and/or
software-enabled services arrangements by our clients;
|
|
|
|
changes in local, national and international regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
|
changes in our personnel;
|
|
|
|
implementation of our licensing contracts and software-enabled
services arrangements;
|
|
|
|
changes in economic and financial market conditions; and
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix in the types of products and services we
provide.
|
If we
are unable to retain and attract clients, our revenues and net
income would remain stagnant or decline.
If we are unable to keep existing clients satisfied, sell
additional products and services to existing clients or attract
new clients, then our revenues and net income would remain
stagnant or decline. A variety of factors could affect our
ability to successfully retain and attract clients, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of demand for our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the level of client spending for information technology;
|
|
|
|
the level of competition from internal client solutions and from
other vendors;
|
|
|
|
the quality of our client service;
|
|
|
|
our ability to update our products and services and develop new
products and services needed by clients;
|
|
|
|
our ability to understand the organization and processes of our
clients; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate and manage acquired businesses.
|
We are
currently subject to a consolidated shareholder class action
lawsuit, the unfavorable outcome of which might have a material
adverse impact on our financial condition, operating results and
cash flows during the period in which a final outcome is
reached.
In connection with the Acquisition, two lawsuits were filed in
the Delaware Chancery Court against SS&C, members of the
SS&C board of directors and, with respect to one lawsuit,
SS&C Holdings. The lawsuits, which were subsequently
consolidated, allege that the Acquisition benefited
SS&Cs senior management at the expense of its public
stockholders, that SS&Cs board breached its fiduciary
duties and that the merger consideration paid to
SS&Cs stockholders was inadequate and did not
represent the best price available in the marketplace for
SS&C. The plaintiffs in the consolidated shareholder class
action lawsuit have not sought a specific amount of monetary
damages. The parties to the consolidated lawsuit entered into a
memorandum of understanding on October 18, 2005, in which
SS&C agreed to make additional disclosures in connection
with the approval of the Acquisition, and executed a settlement
agreement on July 6, 2006. Under the settlement agreement,
SS&C agreed to pay up to $350,000 of plaintiffs legal
fees and expenses. However, the court disapproved the proposed
settlement on November 29, 2006. In its opinion, the court
criticized plaintiffs counsels handling of the
litigation and raised questions regarding managements
involvement in the process leading up to the Acquisition. The
parties are currently in discovery, and the court has set a
trial date for July 2008. We face the expense and burden
incurred in defending the lawsuit, which may divert our
managements efforts and attention from ordinary business
operations. If the final resolution of this litigation is
unfavorable to us, we may have to pay a substantial sum to
SS&Cs former stockholders, which might materially
adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and
cash flows during the period in which a final outcome is reached
if our existing insurance coverage is unavailable or inadequate
to resolve the matter. Please see Business
Legal Proceedings for a discussion of the lawsuits.
14
We
face significant competition with respect to our products and
services, which may result in price reductions, reduced gross
margins or loss of market share.
The market for financial services software and services is
competitive, rapidly evolving and highly sensitive to new
product and service introductions and marketing efforts by
industry participants. The market is also highly fragmented and
served by numerous firms that target only local markets or
specific client types. We also face competition from information
systems developed and serviced internally by the IT departments
of financial services firms.
Some of our current and potential competitors have significantly
greater financial, technical and marketing resources, generate
higher revenues and have greater name recognition. Our current
or potential competitors may develop products comparable or
superior to those developed by us, or adapt more quickly to new
technologies, evolving industry trends or changing client or
regulatory requirements. It is also possible that alliances
among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant
market share. Increased competition may result in price
reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share.
Accordingly, our business may not grow as expected and may
decline.
Catastrophic
events may adversely affect our ability to provide, our
clients ability to use, and the demand for, our products
and services, which may disrupt our business and cause a decline
in revenues.
A war, terrorist attack, natural disaster or other catastrophe
may adversely affect our business. A catastrophic event could
have a direct negative impact on us or an indirect impact on us
by, for example, affecting our clients, the financial markets or
the overall economy and reducing our ability to provide, our
clients ability to use, and the demand for, our products
and services. The potential for a direct impact is due primarily
to our significant investment in infrastructure. Although we
maintain redundant facilities and have contingency plans in
place to protect against both man-made and natural threats, it
is impossible to fully anticipate and protect against all
potential catastrophes. A computer virus, security breach,
criminal act, military action, power or communication failure,
flood, severe storm or the like could lead to service
interruptions and data losses for clients, disruptions to our
operations, or damage to important facilities. In addition, such
an event may cause clients to cancel their agreements with us
for our products or services. Any of these events could cause a
decline in our revenues.
Our
software-enabled services may be subject to disruptions that
could adversely affect our reputation and result in client
dissatisfaction and lost business.
Our software-enabled services maintain and process confidential
data on behalf of our clients, some of which is critical to
their business operations. For example, our trading systems
maintain account and trading information for our clients and
their customers. There is no guarantee that the systems and
procedures that we maintain to protect against unauthorized
access to such information are adequate to protect against all
security breaches. If our software-enabled services are
disrupted or fail for any reason, or if our systems or
facilities are infiltrated or damaged by unauthorized persons,
our clients could experience data loss, financial loss, harm to
their reputation and significant business interruption. If that
happens, we may be exposed to unexpected liability, our clients
may leave, our reputation may be tarnished, and client
dissatisfaction and lost business may result.
We may
not achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions and
may face difficulties in integrating our acquisitions, which
could adversely affect our revenues, subject us to unknown
liabilities, increase costs and place a significant strain on
our management.
We have made and intend in the future to make acquisitions of
companies, products or technologies that we believe could
complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage,
enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth
opportunities. However, acquisitions could subject us to
contingent or unknown liabilities, and we may have to incur debt
or severance liabilities or write off investments,
infrastructure costs or other assets.
15
Our success is also dependent on our ability to complete the
integration of the operations of acquired businesses in an
efficient and effective manner. Successful integration in the
rapidly changing financial services software and services
industry may be more difficult to accomplish than in other
industries. We may not realize the benefits we anticipate from
acquisitions, such as lower costs or increased revenues. We may
also realize such benefits more slowly than anticipated, due to
our inability to:
|
|
|
|
|
combine operations, facilities and differing firm cultures;
|
|
|
|
retain the clients or employees of acquired entities;
|
|
|
|
generate market demand for new products and services;
|
|
|
|
coordinate geographically dispersed operations and successfully
adapt to the complexities of international operations;
|
|
|
|
integrate the technical teams of these companies with our
engineering organization;
|
|
|
|
incorporate acquired technologies and products into our current
and future product lines; and
|
|
|
|
integrate the products and services of these companies with our
business, where we do not have distribution, marketing or
support experience for such products and services.
|
Integration may not be smooth or successful. The inability of
management to successfully integrate the operations of acquired
companies could disrupt our ongoing operations, divert
management from day-to-day responsibilities, increase our
expenses and harm our operating results or financial condition.
Such acquisitions may also place a significant strain on our
administrative, operational, financial and other resources. To
manage growth effectively, we must continue to improve our
management and operational controls, enhance our reporting
systems and procedures, integrate new personnel and manage
expanded operations. If we are unable to manage our growth and
the related expansion in our operations from recent and future
acquisitions, our business may be harmed through a decreased
ability to monitor and control effectively our operations and a
decrease in the quality of work and innovation of our employees.
If we
cannot attract, train and retain qualified managerial, technical
and sales personnel, we may not be able to provide adequate
technical expertise and customer service to our clients or
maintain focus on our business strategy.
We believe that our success is due in part to our experienced
management team. We depend in large part upon the continued
contribution of our senior management and, in particular,
William C. Stone, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of Directors. Losing the services of one or more
members of our senior management could significantly delay or
prevent the achievement of our business objectives.
Mr. Stone has been instrumental in developing our business
strategy and forging our business relationships since he founded
the company in 1986. We maintain no key man life insurance
policies for Mr. Stone or any other senior officers or
managers.
Our success is also dependent upon our ability to attract, train
and retain highly skilled technical and sales personnel. Loss of
the services of these employees could materially affect our
operations. Competition for qualified technical personnel in the
software industry is intense, and we have, at times, found it
difficult to attract and retain skilled personnel for our
operations.
Locating candidates with the appropriate qualifications,
particularly in the desired geographic location and with the
necessary subject matter expertise, is difficult. Our failure to
attract and retain a sufficient number of highly skilled
employees could prevent us from developing and servicing our
products at the same levels as our competitors and we may,
therefore, lose potential clients and suffer a decline in
revenues.
16
If we
are unable to protect our proprietary technology, our success
and our ability to compete will be subject to various risks,
such as third-party infringement claims, unauthorized use of our
technology, disclosure of our proprietary information or
inability to license technology from third
parties.
Our success and ability to compete depends in part upon our
ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on a
combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark law,
nondisclosure agreements and technical measures to protect our
proprietary technology. We have registered trademarks for some
of our products and will continue to evaluate the registration
of additional trademarks as appropriate. We generally enter into
confidentiality
and/or
license agreements with our employees, distributors, clients and
potential clients. We seek to protect our software,
documentation and other written materials under trade secret and
copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. These
efforts may be insufficient to prevent third parties from
asserting intellectual property rights in our technology.
Furthermore, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties
to copy portions of our products or to reverse engineer or
otherwise obtain and use our proprietary information, and third
parties may assert ownership rights in our proprietary
technology.
Existing patent and copyright laws afford only limited
protection. Others may develop substantially equivalent or
superseding proprietary technology, or competitors may offer
equivalent products in competition with our products, thereby
substantially reducing the value of our proprietary rights. We
cannot be sure that our proprietary technology does not include
open-source software, free-ware, share-ware or other publicly
available technology. There are many patents in the financial
services field. As a result, we are subject to the risk that
others will claim that the important technology we have
developed, acquired or incorporated into our products will
infringe the rights, including the patent rights, such persons
may hold. Third parties also could claim that our software
incorporates publicly available software and that, as a result,
we must publicly disclose our source code. Because we rely on
confidentiality for protection, such an event could result in a
material loss of our intellectual property rights. Expensive and
time-consuming litigation may be necessary to protect our
proprietary rights.
We have acquired and may acquire important technology rights
through our acquisitions and have often incorporated and may
incorporate features of this technology across many products and
services. As a result, we are subject to the above risks and the
additional risk that the seller of the technology rights may not
have appropriately protected the intellectual property rights we
acquired. Indemnification and other rights under applicable
acquisition documents are limited in term and scope and
therefore provide us with only limited protection.
In addition, we currently use certain third-party software in
providing our products and services, such as industry standard
databases and report writers. If we lost our licenses to use
such software or if such licenses were found to infringe upon
the rights of others, we would need to seek alternative means of
obtaining the licensed software to continue to provide our
products or services. Our inability to replace such software, or
to replace such software in a timely manner, could have a
negative impact on our operations and financial results.
We
could become subject to litigation regarding intellectual
property rights, which could seriously harm our business and
require us to incur significant costs, which, in turn, could
reduce or eliminate profits.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the
United States involving patents and other intellectual property
rights. While we are not currently a party to any litigation
asserting that we have violated third-party intellectual
property rights, we may be a party to litigation in the future
to enforce our intellectual property rights or as a result of an
allegation that we infringe others intellectual property
rights, including patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time
to time we have received notices claiming our technology may
infringe third-party intellectual property rights. Any parties
asserting that our products or services infringe upon their
proprietary rights could force us to defend ourselves and
possibly our clients against the alleged infringement. These
claims and any resulting lawsuit, if successful, could subject
us to significant liability for damages and invalidation of our
proprietary rights. These lawsuits, regardless of their success,
could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, adversely
affect our revenues, profitability and prospects and divert
management time and attention away from our operations. We may
be required to re-engineer our products or services or obtain a
license of third-party technologies on unfavorable terms.
17
Our
failure to continue to derive substantial revenues from the
licensing of, or the provision of
software-enabled
services relating to, our CAMRA, TradeThru, Pacer, AdvisorWare
and Total Return software, and the provision of maintenance
and professional services in support of such licensed software,
could adversely affect our ability to sustain or grow our
revenues and harm our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The licensing of, and the provision of software-enabled
services, maintenance and professional services relating to, our
CAMRA, TradeThru, Pacer, AdvisorWare and Total Return software
accounted for approximately 51% of our revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2006. We expect that the revenues from
these software products and services will continue to account
for a significant portion of our total revenues for the
foreseeable future. As a result, factors adversely affecting the
pricing of or demand for such products and services, such as
competition or technological change, could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to sustain or grow our revenues
and harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may
be unable to adapt to rapidly changing technology and evolving
industry standards and regulatory requirements, and our
inability to introduce new products and services could result in
a loss of market share.
Rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and
regulatory requirements and new product and service
introductions characterize the market for our products and
services. Our future success will depend in part upon our
ability to enhance our existing products and services and to
develop and introduce new products and services to keep pace
with such changes and developments and to meet changing client
needs. The process of developing our software products is
extremely complex and is expected to become increasingly complex
and expensive in the future due to the introduction of new
platforms, operating systems and technologies. Our ability to
keep up with technology and business and regulatory changes is
subject to a number of risks, including that:
|
|
|
|
|
we may find it difficult or costly to update our services and
software and to develop new products and services quickly enough
to meet our clients needs;
|
|
|
|
we may find it difficult or costly to make some features of our
software work effectively and securely over the Internet or with
new or changed operating systems;
|
|
|
|
we may find it difficult or costly to update our software and
services to keep pace with business, evolving industry
standards, regulatory and other developments in the industries
where our clients operate; and
|
|
|
|
we may be exposed to liability for security breaches that allow
unauthorized persons to gain access to confidential information
stored on our computers or transmitted over our network.
|
Our failure to enhance our existing products and services and to
develop and introduce new products and services to promptly
address the needs of the financial markets could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Undetected
software design defects, errors or failures may result in loss
of our clients data, litigation against us and harm to our
reputation and business.
Our software products are highly complex and sophisticated and
could contain design defects or software errors that are
difficult to detect and correct. Errors or bugs may result in
loss of client data or require design modifications. We cannot
assure you that, despite testing by us and our clients, errors
will not be found in new products, which errors could result in
data unavailability, loss or corruption of client assets,
litigation and other claims for damages against us. The cost of
defending such a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be
substantial and could divert managements attention from
ongoing operations of the company. In addition, if our business
liability insurance coverage proves inadequate with respect to a
claim or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or
at all we may be liable for payment of substantial damages. Any
or all of these potential consequences could have an adverse
impact on our operating results and financial condition.
18
Challenges
in maintaining and expanding our international operations can
result in increased costs, delayed sales efforts and uncertainty
with respect to our intellectual property rights and results of
operations.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
international revenues accounted for 22%, 37% and 40%,
respectively, of our total revenues. We sell certain of our
products, such as Altair, Mabel and Pacer, primarily outside the
United States. Our international business may be subject to a
variety of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic condition;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining U.S. export licenses;
|
|
|
|
potentially longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
|
increased costs associated with maintaining international
marketing efforts;
|
|
|
|
foreign currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of non-tariff barriers and higher duty rates;
|
|
|
|
foreign regulatory compliance; and
|
|
|
|
difficulties in enforcement of third-party contractual
obligations and intellectual property rights.
|
Such factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability
to meet our growth and revenue projections and negatively affect
our results of operations.
Risks
Relating to Our Substantial Indebtedness
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and our senior credit
facilities.
We have incurred a significant amount of indebtedness. As of
June 30, 2007, we had total indebtedness of
$463.8 million and additional available borrowings of
$75.0 million under our revolving credit facility. Our
total indebtedness consisted of $205.0 million of
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and $258.8 million of secured
indebtedness under our term loan B facility.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences.
For example, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to our notes and our senior credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund acquisitions,
working capital, capital expenditures, research and development
efforts and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to and limit our flexibility in
planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the
industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
expose us to the risk of increased interest rates as borrowings
under our senior credit facilities are subject to variable rates
of interest;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
|
In addition, the indenture governing the notes and the agreement
governing our senior credit facilities contain financial and
other restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in
activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our
failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event
of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the
acceleration of all of our debts.
19
To
service our indebtedness, we require a significant amount of
cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors
beyond our control.
We are obligated to make periodic principal and interest
payments on our senior and subordinated debt of approximately
$46 million annually. Our ability to make payments on and
to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned capital
expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the
future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general
economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other factors that are beyond our control.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient
cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be
available to us under our senior credit facilities in an amount
sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our
other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion
of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness,
including our senior credit facilities and the notes, on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we cannot service
our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling
assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying
capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and
alliances. We cannot assure you that any such actions, if
necessary, could be effected on commercially reasonable terms or
at all.
Despite
current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still
be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further
exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial financial
leverage.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial
additional indebtedness in the future because the terms of the
indenture governing the notes and our senior credit facilities
do not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so.
Subject to covenant compliance and certain conditions, our
senior credit facilities permit additional borrowing, including
borrowing up to $75.0 million under our revolving credit
facility. If new debt is added to our and our subsidiaries
current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face
could intensify.
Restrictive
covenants in the indenture governing the notes and the agreement
governing our senior credit facilities may restrict our ability
to pursue our business strategies.
The indenture governing the notes and the agreement governing
our senior credit facilities limit SS&Cs ability,
among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
agree to payment restrictions affecting SS&Cs
restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends;
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of SS&Cs assets;
|
|
|
|
make strategic acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with SS&Cs affiliates;
|
|
|
|
incur liens; and
|
|
|
|
designate any of SS&Cs subsidiaries as unrestricted
subsidiaries.
|
In addition, our senior credit facilities include other
covenants which, subject to permitted exceptions, prohibit us
from making capital expenditures in excess of certain
thresholds, making investments, loans and other advances,
engaging in sale-leaseback transactions, entering into
speculative hedging agreements, and prepaying our other
indebtedness while indebtedness under our senior credit
facilities is outstanding. The agreement governing our senior
credit facilities also requires us to maintain compliance with
specified financial ratios, particularly a leverage ratio and an
interest coverage ratio. Our ability to comply with these
20
ratios may be affected by events beyond our control. See
Description of Certain Indebtedness Senior
Credit Facilities for additional information.
The restrictions contained in the indenture governing the notes
and the agreement governing our senior credit facilities could
limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions,
meet capital needs or make acquisitions or otherwise restrict
our activities or business plans.
A breach of any of these restrictive covenants or our inability
to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a
default under the agreement governing our senior credit
facilities. If a default occurs, the lenders under our senior
credit facilities may elect to:
|
|
|
|
|
declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued
interest and other fees, to be immediately due and
payable; or
|
|
|
|
prevent us from making payments on the notes,
|
either of which would result in an event of default under the
notes. The lenders also have the right in these circumstances to
terminate any commitments they have to provide further
borrowings. If we are unable to repay outstanding borrowings
when due, the lenders under our senior credit facilities also
have the right to proceed against the collateral, including our
available cash, granted to them to secure the indebtedness. If
the indebtedness under our senior credit facilities and the
notes were to be accelerated, we cannot assure you that our
assets would be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness
and our other indebtedness.
We may
not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the
change of control offer required by the indenture governing the
notes.
Upon the occurrence of certain specific kinds of change of
control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase all
outstanding notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus
accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to
the date of repurchase. However, it is possible that we will not
have sufficient funds at the time of the change of control to
make the required repurchase of notes or that restrictions in
our senior credit facilities will not allow such repurchases. In
addition, certain important corporate events, such as leveraged
recapitalizations that would increase the level of our
indebtedness, would not constitute a Change of
Control under the indenture governing the notes.
Risks
Relating to This Offering and Ownership of Our Common
Stock
An
active trading market for our common stock may not develop, and
you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the
initial public offering price.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. Although we have applied to have our common stock
listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, an active and liquid trading
market for shares of our common stock may never develop or be
sustained following this offering. If no trading market
develops, securities analysts may not initiate or maintain
research coverage of our company, which could further depress
the market for our common stock. As a result, investors may not
be able to sell their common stock at or above the initial
public offering price or at the time that they would like to
sell.
If
equity research analysts do not publish research or reports
about our business or if they issue unfavorable commentary or
downgrade our common stock, the price of our common stock could
decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the
research and reports that equity research analysts publish about
us and our business. We do not control these analysts. The price
of our stock could decline if one or more equity analysts
downgrade our stock or if those analysts issue other unfavorable
commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business.
21
The
market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could
result in substantial losses for investors purchasing shares in
this offering.
The initial public offering price for our common stock will be
determined through negotiations with the underwriters. This
initial public offering price may vary from the market price of
our common stock after the offering. Some of the factors that
may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate
include:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly
financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations
by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
failure of any of our products to achieve or maintain market
acceptance;
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
|
|
success of competitive products;
|
|
|
|
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of
securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant products,
contracts, acquisitions or strategic alliances;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States, foreign countries
or both;
|
|
|
|
litigation involving our company, our general industry or both;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
investors general perception of us; and
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic, industry and market conditions.
|
In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock
market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the
trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons
unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of
operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our
stock price to fall and may expose us to class action lawsuits
that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a
distraction to management.
A
significant portion of our total outstanding shares may be sold
into the public market in the near future, which could cause the
market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if
our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the public market could occur at any time after the expiration
of the
lock-up
agreements described in Underwriting. These sales,
or the market perception that the holders of a large number of
shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of
our common stock. After this offering, we will
have shares
of common stock outstanding based on the number of shares
outstanding as of July 31, 2007. This includes
the shares
that we and the selling stockholders are selling in this
offering, which may be resold in the public market immediately.
The
remaining shares,
or % of our outstanding shares
after this offering, are currently restricted as a
22
result of securities laws or
lock-up
agreements but will be able to be sold, subject to any
applicable volume limitations under federal securities laws, in
the near future as set forth below.
|
|
|
Number of Shares and
|
|
Date Available for Sale
|
% of Total Outstanding
|
|
Into Public Market
|
|
shares,
or %
|
|
On the date of this prospectus.
|
shares,
or %
|
|
90 days after the date of this prospectus.
|
shares,
or %
|
|
180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to
extension in specified instances, due to
lock-up
agreements between the holders of these shares and the
underwriters. However, the underwriters can waive the provisions
of these
lock-up
agreements and allow these stockholders to sell their shares at
any time.
|
shares,
or %
|
|
Between 181 and 365 days after the date of this prospectus,
depending on the requirements of the federal securities laws.
|
In addition, as of July 31, 2007, there were
1,622,950 shares subject to outstanding options and an
additional 170,641 shares reserved for future issuance
under our 2006 equity incentive plan that will become eligible
for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by any
applicable vesting requirements, the
lock-up
agreements and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act
of 1933, which we refer to as the Securities Act. Moreover,
after this offering, holders of an aggregate
of shares
of our common stock as of July 31, 2007, will have rights,
subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration
statements covering their shares or to include their shares in
registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other
stockholders. We also intend to register all shares of common
stock that we may issue under our employee benefit plans. Once
we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public
market upon issuance, subject to the
lock-up
agreements and the restrictions imposed on our affiliates under
Rule 144.
You
will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the net
tangible book value of your shares as a result of this
offering.
If you purchase common stock in this offering, you will incur
immediate and substantial dilution of
$ per share, representing the
difference between the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share and our adjusted
net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this
offering. Moreover, we issued options in the past to acquire
common stock at prices significantly below the initial public
offering price. As of July 31, 2007, there were
1,622,950 shares subject to outstanding options with a
weighted average exercise price of $57.80 per share. To the
extent that these outstanding options are ultimately exercised,
you will incur further dilution.
A few
significant stockholders control the direction of our business.
If the ownership of our common stock continues to be highly
concentrated, it will prevent you and other stockholders from
influencing significant corporate decisions.
Following the completion of this offering, investment funds
affiliated with Carlyle will beneficially own
approximately % of the outstanding
shares of our common stock, and William C. Stone will
beneficially own approximately % of
the outstanding shares of our common stock, assuming that the
underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional
shares. We are also party to a stockholders agreement with
Carlyle and Mr. Stone, pursuant to which Carlyle and
Mr. Stone have agreed to vote in favor of nominees to our
board of directors nominated by each other. As a result, Carlyle
and Mr. Stone will continue to exercise control over
matters requiring stockholder approval and our policy and
affairs. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Stockholders Agreement.
The presence of Carlyles nominees on our board of
directors may result in a delay or the deterrence of possible
changes in control of our company, which may reduce the market
price of our common stock. The interests of our existing
stockholders may conflict with the interests of our other
stockholders. Additionally,
23
Carlyle and its affiliates are in the business of making
investments in companies, and may from time to time in the
future acquire interests in businesses that directly or
indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are
suppliers or clients of ours.
We
have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this
offering and may not use them effectively.
We cannot specify with certainty the particular uses of a
portion of the net proceeds we will receive from this offering.
Our management will have broad discretion in the application of
the net proceeds, including for any of the purposes described in
Use of Proceeds. Accordingly, you will have to rely
upon the judgment of our management with respect to the use of
the proceeds, with only limited information concerning
managements specific intentions. Our management may spend
a portion of the net proceeds from this offering in ways that
our stockholders may not desire or that may not yield a
favorable return. The failure by our management to apply these
funds effectively could harm our business. Pending their use, we
may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that
does not produce income or that loses value.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws might discourage,
delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes
in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of
our common stock.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and
Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a merger,
acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may
consider favorable, including transactions in which you might
otherwise receive a premium for your shares of our common stock.
These provisions may also prevent or frustrate attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our management. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on the removal of directors;
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors so that not all members of our
board are elected at one time;
|
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
nominations;
|
|
|
|
the inability of stockholders to call special meetings;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to make, alter or repeal
our bylaws;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of
and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder
approval, which could be used to institute a rights plan, or a
poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a
potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that
have not been approved by our board of directors; and
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholders from acting by written consent if
William C. Stone and investment funds affiliated with Carlyle
cease to collectively hold a majority of our outstanding common
stock.
|
The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti-takeover
measures could limit the price that investors might be willing
to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. They could
also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing
the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your common
stock in an acquisition.
See Description of Capital Stock for additional
information on the anti-takeover measures applicable to us.
As a
result of our operating as a public company, our management will
be required to devote substantial time to new compliance
initiatives. This may divert managements attention from
the growth and operation of the business.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and rules subsequently
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
NASDAQ Stock Market, impose a number of requirements on public
companies, including provisions regarding corporate governance
practices. Our management and other personnel will need to
devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance
initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we
expect these rules and regulations
24
to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain
director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required
to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur
substantial additional costs to maintain the same or similar
coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to
serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as
executive officers.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In
particular, we will need to perform system and process
evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial
reporting to allow management and our independent registered
public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our testing, or the
subsequent testing by our independent registered public
accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal control
over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses. Our compliance with Section 404 will require
that we expend significant management time on compliance-related
issues. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the
requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or
our independent registered public accounting firm identify
deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting
that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of
our common stock could decline and we could be subject to
sanctions or investigations by the NASDAQ Global Market, the
Securities and Exchange Commission or other regulatory
authorities, which would require additional financial and
management resources.
25
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes statements that are, or may be deemed
to be, forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology, including the terms
believes, estimates,
anticipates, expects,
intends, may, will or
should or, in each case, their negative or other
variations or comparable terminology. These forward-looking
statements include all matters that are not historical facts.
They appear in a number of places throughout this prospectus and
include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current
expectations concerning, among other things, our results of
operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth,
technology and strategies and the industry in which we operate.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on
circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. We
caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and that our actual results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the
industry in which we operate may differ materially from those
made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained
in this prospectus. In addition, even if our results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the
development of the industry in which we operate, are consistent
with the forward-looking statements contained in this
prospectus, those results or developments may not be indicative
of results or developments in subsequent periods.
The following listing represents some, but not all, of the
factors that may cause actual results to differ from those
anticipated or predicted:
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of a slowdown or downturn in the general economy or
the financial markets;
|
|
|
|
the effect of any further or accelerated consolidations in the
financial services industry;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and attract clients and key personnel;
|
|
|
|
the integration of acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to derive substantial revenues from the
licensing of, or provision of software-enabled services relating
to, certain of our licensed software, and the provision of
maintenance and professional services in support of such
licensed software;
|
|
|
|
our ability to adapt to rapidly changing technology and evolving
industry standards, and our ability to introduce new products
and services;
|
|
|
|
challenges in maintaining and expanding our international
operations;
|
|
|
|
the effects of war, terrorism and other catastrophic events;
|
|
|
|
the risk of increased interest rates due to the variable rates
of interest on certain of our indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the
caption Risk Factors.
|
You should also carefully read the factors described in the
Risk Factors section of this prospectus to better
understand the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business
and underlying any forward-looking statements.
Any forward-looking statements that we make in this prospectus
speak only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no
obligation to update such statements except as required by law.
Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not
intended to express any future trends or indications of future
performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed
as historical data.
26
We estimate that we will receive approximately
$ million in net proceeds
from
the shares
of common stock that we are offering based upon an assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share, the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on
the cover of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the
assumed initial public offering price of
$ would increase (decrease) the
net proceeds to us from this offering by
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover of
this prospectus, remains the same. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock offered by the
selling stockholders.
We currently intend to use:
|
|
|
|
|
substantially all of our net proceeds from this offering to
redeem up to $71.75 million in principal amount of our
outstanding notes, at a redemption price of 111.75% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest; and
|
|
|
|
the balance of our net proceeds from this offering for working
capital and other general corporate purposes, including
potential acquisitions.
|
We believe opportunities may exist from time to time to expand
our current business through acquisitions of complementary
companies, products or technologies. While we have no current
plans for any specific acquisitions at this time, we may use a
portion of the net proceeds for these purposes.
Under the terms of the indenture governing our notes, we are
permitted to use our net proceeds from this offering to redeem
additional outstanding notes at a redemption price of 111.75%,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to an overall
requirement that we may not redeem more than 35% of the
aggregate principal amount of notes originally issued. As a
result, we are permitted to redeem up to $71.75 million in
principal amount of notes with a portion of our net proceeds
from this offering. We have not yet determined the amount of
notes we will redeem with a portion of our net proceeds from
this offering. The amount we redeem will depend on the amount of
our proceeds from this offering, our anticipated cash resources
and needs and other factors we consider relevant. If we redeem
the maximum amount, we will redeem $71.75 million in
principal amount of notes for $80.18 million in cash, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. This redemption will result in a
loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$8.4 million in the period in which the notes are redeemed.
Additionally, we will incur a non-cash charge of approximately
$2.2 million relating to the write-off of deferred
financing fees attributable to the redeemed notes. For each
$1.0 million decrease in the principal amount redeemed, we
will pay $1.12 million less in cash.
We have not yet determined with any certainty the manner in
which we will allocate our net proceeds from this offering, and
as a result management will retain broad discretion in the
allocation and use of the net proceeds. The amounts and timing
of our expenditures will vary depending on a number of factors,
including the amount of cash generated by our operations,
potential acquisitions, competitive developments and the rate of
growth, if any, of our business. For example, if we were to
expand our operations more rapidly than anticipated by our
current plans, a greater portion of the net proceeds would
likely be used for working capital. Alternatively, if we were to
engage in an acquisition that contained a significant cash
component, some or all of the net proceeds might be used for
that purpose.
Pending any use, as described above, we plan to invest the net
proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade
securities.
27
We do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock for the
foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our
earnings in the foreseeable future will be used for the
operation and growth of our business. Our ability to pay
dividends to holders of our common stock is limited as a
practical matter by our senior credit facilities and the
indenture governing our notes, insofar as we may seek to pay
dividends out of funds made available to us by our subsidiaries,
because our debt instruments directly or indirectly impose
certain limitations on our subsidiaries ability to pay
dividends or make loans to us. Any future determination to pay
dividends on our common stock is subject to the discretion of
our board of directors and will depend upon various factors,
including our results of operations, financial condition,
liquidity requirements, restrictions that may be imposed by
applicable law and our contracts, and other factors deemed
relevant by our board of directors. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and note 6 to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
28
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of June 30, 2007, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to reflect the sale
of shares
of common stock that we are offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and
the use of substantially all of the net proceeds thereof to
redeem $71.75 million in original principal amount of our
outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 111.75% of
the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
|
You should read the following table in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes and
the sections entitled Selected Consolidated Financial
Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,210
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facilities
|
|
$
|
258,757
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
|
463,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 10,000 shares
authorized, 7,088 shares issued,
actual; shares
authorized, shares
issued, as adjusted
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
564,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 1 share
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
586,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization, including current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,050,479
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) the as adjusted amount of each of cash
and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total
stockholders equity and total capitalization by
$ , assuming that the number of
shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
The preceding table excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
1,625,355 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2007 at a
weighted average exercise price of $57.83 per share; and
|
|
|
|
168,236 shares of common stock reserved as of June 30,
2007 for future issuance under our 2006 equity incentive plan.
|
29
If you invest in our common stock, your ownership interest will
be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial
public offering price per share of common stock and the net
tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after
this offering.
Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2007 was
$ million, or
$ per share of common stock. Net
tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total
tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the
number of shares of common stock outstanding.
After giving effect to our sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share,
which is the midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of
this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us, our adjusted net tangible book value as of
June 30, 2007 would have been approximately
$ million, or approximately
$ per share. This amount
represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value to
our existing stockholders of $ per
share and an immediate dilution to new investors of
$ per share. Dilution per share to
new investors is determined by subtracting the net tangible book
value per share after this offering from the initial public
offering price per share paid by a new investor. The following
table illustrates the per share dilution without giving effect
to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase per share attributable to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) the net tangible book value per share
after this offering by approximately
$ and dilution per share to new
investors by approximately $ ,
assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
The following table summarizes, as of June 30, 2007, the
differences between the number of shares of common stock
purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the
average price per share paid by our existing stockholders and by
new investors, based upon an assumed initial public offering
price of $ per share and before
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The preceding discussion and table assume no exercise of
outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2007. As of
June 30, 2007, we had outstanding options to purchase a
total of 1,625,355 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $57.83 per share. To the extent any of
these options are exercised, there will be further dilution to
new investors.
If the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in
full, the following will occur:
|
|
|
|
|
the percentage of shares of common stock held by existing
stockholders will decrease to
approximately % of the total number
of shares of our common stock outstanding after this
offering; and
|
|
|
|
the number of shares held by new investors will increase
to ,
or approximately %, of the total
number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this
offering.
|
30
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the selected consolidated financial data with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and the accompanying notes. The selected
consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2007 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 have been derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, for the periods from
January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, and for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 have been derived
from our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus, which have been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm. The selected consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 have been derived from
audited consolidated financial statements not included in this
prospectus.
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, with and into SS&C,
with SS&C being the surviving company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings. We refer to the acquisition of
SS&C by SS&C Holdings as the Acquisition.
We refer to the Acquisition, together with related transactions
entered into to finance the cash consideration for the
Acquisition, to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness
and to pay related transaction fees and expenses, as the
Transaction.
The term Successor refers to us following the
Acquisition, and the term Predecessor refers to us
prior to the Acquisition. Our combined results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005 represent the addition of
the Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005. This
combination does not comply with generally accepted accounting
principles or with the rules for pro forma presentation, but is
presented because we believe it provides the most meaningful
comparison of our results. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Results of Operations for a
discussion of the presentation of our results for the year ended
December 31, 2005 on a combined basis.
31
The selected consolidated financial information set forth below
is not necessarily indicative of the results of future
operations and should be read in conjunction with, and is
qualified in its entirety by, the discussion under the heading
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and in our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
|
|
|
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
15,631
|
|
|
$
|
14,233
|
|
|
$
|
17,250
|
|
|
$
|
20,147
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
23,734
|
|
|
$
|
22,925
|
|
|
$
|
10,362
|
|
|
$
|
11,494
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
27,850
|
|
|
|
31,318
|
|
|
|
36,433
|
|
|
|
44,064
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
47,765
|
|
|
|
55,222
|
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
|
|
30,233
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
6,757
|
|
|
|
11,320
|
|
|
|
12,565
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
15,085
|
|
|
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
10,128
|
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
30,885
|
|
|
|
67,193
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
75,050
|
|
|
|
107,740
|
|
|
|
52,182
|
|
|
|
65,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
62,434
|
|
|
|
65,531
|
|
|
|
95,888
|
|
|
|
143,969
|
|
|
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
161,634
|
|
|
|
205,469
|
|
|
|
99,020
|
|
|
|
116,242
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
|
|
4,781
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
8,462
|
|
|
|
10,393
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
11,892
|
|
|
|
20,415
|
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
|
|
13,108
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
5,412
|
|
|
|
4,387
|
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
|
|
7,849
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
8,710
|
|
|
|
12,575
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
7,022
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
8,621
|
|
|
|
8,003
|
|
|
|
16,444
|
|
|
|
37,799
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
42,210
|
|
|
|
57,810
|
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
36,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
20,989
|
|
|
|
20,426
|
|
|
|
33,770
|
|
|
|
59,004
|
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
|
66,631
|
|
|
|
100,016
|
|
|
|
47,801
|
|
|
|
61,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41,445
|
|
|
|
45,105
|
|
|
|
62,118
|
|
|
|
84,965
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
95,003
|
|
|
|
105,453
|
|
|
|
51,219
|
|
|
|
54,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
9,078
|
|
|
|
8,393
|
|
|
|
10,734
|
|
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
14,498
|
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
|
9,283
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,760
|
|
|
|
11,180
|
|
|
|
13,957
|
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
21,270
|
|
|
|
23,620
|
|
|
|
11,804
|
|
|
|
13,037
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
13,084
|
|
|
|
20,366
|
|
|
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
Write-off of purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
30,303
|
|
|
|
26,727
|
|
|
|
32,705
|
|
|
|
81,189
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
85,764
|
|
|
|
61,584
|
|
|
|
28,452
|
|
|
|
33,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,142
|
|
|
|
18,378
|
|
|
|
29,413
|
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
43,869
|
|
|
|
22,767
|
|
|
|
20,645
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
|
(7,012
|
)
|
|
|
(47,427
|
)
|
|
|
(23,502
|
)
|
|
|
(22,764
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
19,337
|
|
|
|
31,040
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
4,995
|
|
|
|
7,541
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,305
|
|
|
$
|
11,796
|
|
|
$
|
19,010
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,473
|
|
|
|
18,617
|
|
|
|
21,185
|
|
|
|
23,300
|
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
20,531
|
|
|
|
19,832
|
|
|
|
22,499
|
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of cash flows data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
15,495
|
|
|
$
|
23,711
|
|
|
$
|
28,524
|
|
|
$
|
32,116
|
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,709
|
|
|
$
|
16,801
|
|
|
$
|
22,748
|
|
Investment activities
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
(15,321
|
)
|
|
|
(89,220
|
)
|
|
|
(110,495
|
)
|
|
|
(877,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,626
|
)
|
|
|
(13,442
|
)
|
|
|
(8,770
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(23,290
|
)
|
|
|
(12,081
|
)
|
|
|
74,074
|
|
|
|
69,161
|
|
|
|
868,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,427
|
)
|
|
|
(4,699
|
)
|
|
|
(12,796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring revenue percentage(2)
|
|
|
64.8
|
%
|
|
|
68.0
|
%
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
76.0
|
%
|
|
|
79.3
|
%
|
|
|
79.3
|
%
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
Consolidated EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
40,979
|
|
|
$
|
44,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
41,719
|
|
|
$
|
52,381
|
|
|
$
|
130,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,210
|
|
Working capital (deficit)
|
|
|
36,699
|
|
|
|
42,009
|
|
|
|
116,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
75,480
|
|
|
|
82,585
|
|
|
|
185,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,177,600
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,077
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
57,270
|
|
|
|
61,588
|
|
|
|
156,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,722
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts for the Predecessor periods are computed based upon the
capital structure in existence prior to the Acquisition. Amounts
for the Successor periods are computed based upon the capital
structure in existence subsequent to the Acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
Recurring revenue percentage represents software-enabled
services revenues and maintenance revenues as a percentage of
total revenues. We do not believe that the recurring revenue
percentage for the Successor |
32
|
|
|
|
|
period of 2005 is meaningful because such period is only five
weeks in duration and not indicative of our overall trends. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used in key
financial covenants contained in our senior credit facilities,
which are material facilities supporting our capital structure
and providing liquidity to our business. Consolidated EBITDA is
defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA), further adjusted to exclude unusual items
and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant
compliance under our senior credit facilities. We believe that
the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in
presenting Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide
additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance
with the specified financial ratios and other financial
condition tests contained in our senior credit facilities.
Consolidated EBITDA is not presented for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 because we did not have
any senior credit facilities that required the calculation of
Consolidated EBITDA for those years. |
|
|
|
|
|
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA to gauge the costs of our
capital structure on a day-to-day basis when full financial
statements are unavailable. Management further believes that
providing this information allows our investors greater
transparency and a better understanding of our ability to meet
our debt service obligations and make capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
|
|
The breach of covenants in our senior credit facilities that are
tied to ratios based on Consolidated EBITDA could result in a
default under that agreement, in which case the lenders could
elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable and to
terminate any commitments they have to provide further
borrowings. Any such acceleration would also result in a default
under our indenture. Any default and subsequent acceleration of
payments under our debt agreements would have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash
flows. Additionally, under our debt agreements, our ability to
engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness,
making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios
based on Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not represent net income (loss) or cash
flow from operations as those terms are defined by GAAP and does
not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient
to fund cash needs. Further, our senior credit facilities
require that Consolidated EBITDA be calculated for the most
recent four fiscal quarters. As a result, the measure can be
disproportionately affected by a particularly strong or weak
quarter. Further, it may not be comparable to the measure for
any subsequent four-quarter period or any complete fiscal year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP,
and investors should not consider Consolidated EBITDA as a
substitute for measures of our financial performance and
liquidity as determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net
income, operating income or net cash provided by operating
activities. Because other companies may calculate Consolidated
EBITDA differently than we do, Consolidated EBITDA may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. Consolidated EBITDA has other limitations as an
analytical tool, when compared to the use of net income (loss),
which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the provision of income tax
expense in our various jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense we incur as a result of our debt leverage;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect any attribution of costs to
our operations related to our investments and capital
expenditures through depreciation and amortization charges;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the cost of compensation we
provide to our employees in the form of stock option awards; and
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA excludes expenses that we believe are
unusual or non-recurring, but which others may believe are
normal expenses for the operation of a business.
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of net income to Consolidated
EBITDA as defined in our senior credit facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007(a)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
47,039
|
|
|
|
46,320
|
|
|
|
23,273
|
|
|
|
22,555
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(2,647
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
11,876
|
|
|
|
27,128
|
|
|
|
30,969
|
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
|
|
22,028
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
72,924
|
|
|
|
36,966
|
|
|
|
38,438
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital-based taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges(c)
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings(d)
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
Other(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
87,395
|
|
|
$
|
40,979
|
|
|
$
|
44,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007 are
included because our senior credit facilities require the
calculation of our consolidated total leverage and consolidated
net interest coverage ratio for the prior four consecutive
quarters. With the exception of acquired EBITDA and cost
savings, our results for the twelve months ended June 30,
2007 are calculated based on our results for the year ended
December 31, 2006, in addition to our results for the six
months ended June 30, 2007, less our results for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. Acquired EBITDA and cost
savings for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007 reflects
the EBITDA impact of significant businesses that were acquired
during this period as if the acquisitions occurred as of
July 1, 2006 and cost savings to be realized from such
acquisitions. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments include (1) an adjustment
to increase revenues by the amount that would have been
recognized if deferred revenue were not adjusted to fair value
at the date of the Transaction and (2) an adjustment to
increase rent expense by the amount that would have been
recognized if lease obligations were not adjusted to fair value
at the date of the Transaction. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges include foreign currency gains
and losses, gains and losses on the sales of marketable
securities, proceeds from legal settlements, costs associated
with the closing of a regional office and other one-time
expenses. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings reflects the EBITDA impact of
significant businesses that were acquired during the period as
if the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period and
cost savings to be realized from such acquisitions. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Other includes management fees paid to Carlyle and the non-cash
portion of straight-line rent expense. |
34
Consolidated
EBITDA and Consolidated Leverage Ratios
Our senior credit facilities require us to maintain both a
maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(currently no more than 6.75) and a minimum Consolidated EBITDA
to consolidated net interest ratio (currently not less than
1.50) in each case calculated for the trailing four quarters.
The table below summarizes our Consolidated EBITDA, consolidated
total leverage ratio and consolidated net interest coverage
ratio for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)(5)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except ratio data)
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
87,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(current maximum covenant level: 6.75)(2)
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest coverage ratio
(current minimum covenant level: 1.50)(3)
|
|
|
10.87
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We reconcile our Consolidated EBITDA for the trailing four
quarters to net income for the same period using the same
methods set forth above. |
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated total leverage ratio is defined in our senior
credit facilities at the last day of any period of four
consecutive fiscal quarters, as the ratio of (a) the
principal amount of all debt at such date, minus the amount, up
to a maximum amount of $30,000,000 of cash and cash equivalents
to (b) Consolidated EBITDA. |
|
(3) |
|
Consolidated net interest coverage ratio is defined in our
senior credit facilities as for any period, the ratio of
(a) Consolidated EBITDA for such period to (b) total
cash interest expense for such period with respect to all
outstanding indebtedness minus total cash interest income for
such period. |
|
(4) |
|
This ratio is not comparable because we did not incur debt under
our existing senior credit facilities until November 2005 in
connection with the Transaction. |
|
(5) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to the use of substantially all of
our net proceeds of this offering to redeem $71.75 million
in original principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 111.75% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. |
35
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with the Selected Consolidated Financial Data
section of this prospectus and our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus. In addition to historical information, this
discussion contains forward-looking statements based on our
current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of
various factors, including those set forth in the Risk
Factors section and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are a leading provider of mission-critical, sophisticated
software products and software-enabled services that allow
financial services providers to automate complex business
processes and effectively manage their information processing
requirements. Our portfolio of software products and rapidly
deployable software-enabled services allows our clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. Our solutions enable our clients to
focus on core operations, better monitor and manage investment
performance and risk, improve operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs. We provide our solutions globally to more than
4,000 clients, principally within the institutional asset
management, alternative investment management and financial
institutions sectors.
In 2006 and the first half of 2007, we accomplished four primary
objectives: entered new markets and expanded our presence in
current markets, increased our recurring revenues, enhanced our
operating income and paid down debt and reduced our debt
leverage.
Through two acquisitions in 2006, we expanded our presence in
the alternative investment market and entered the financial
services training market. In March 2006, we acquired Cogent
Management Inc., a provider of services to the alternative
investment management market. We combined the Cogent business
with our SS&C Fund Services business and increased our
presence in this market. In August 2006, we acquired the assets
of Zoologic Inc., a provider of web-based courseware and
training for the financial services industry. We further
expanded our services in the alternative investment market in
March 2007 when we acquired the assets of Northport LLC. In
2005, we expanded our presence in the international market with
both the acquisition of FMC, which had operations in both London
and Australia and the acquisition of MarginMan, which had
operations in Ireland. In 2006, we expanded our alternative
asset market services into our European operations. Since the
beginning of 2005, our headcount outside North America has
increased by approximately 50 employees or 100%, and we
expect it will continue to increase in future periods. As a
result, our revenue outside of North America has increased from
$21.2 million in 2004 to $47.2 million in 2006.
As we have expanded our business, we have focused on increasing
our contractually recurring revenues, which include maintenance
revenues and software-enabled services revenues. We have seen
increased demand in the financial services industry for our
software-enabled services. This demand has been both from
existing customers increasing services they purchase from us and
from selling our services to new customers. To support that
demand, we have taken a number of steps, such as automating our
software-enabled services delivery methods, providing our
employees with sales incentives and acquiring businesses that
offer software-enabled services or that have a large base of
maintenance clients. We believe that increasing the portion of
our total revenues that are contractually recurring gives us the
ability to better plan and manage our business and helps us to
reduce the fluctuations in revenues and cash flows typically
associated with software license revenues. Our software-enabled
services revenues increased from $30.9 million, or 32% of
total revenues, in 2004 to $107.7 million, or 52% of total
revenues, in 2006. Our maintenance revenues increased from
$36.4 million in 2004 to $55.2 million in 2006.
Maintenance customer retention rates have continued to be in
excess of 90% and we have maintained both pricing levels for new
contracts and annual price increases for existing contracts. Our
software-enabled services revenue has grown from 32.2% of total
revenues in 2004 to
36
56.2% of total revenues in the six months ended June 30,
2007. To support that growth and maintain our level of customer
service, we have invested in increased personnel, facilities
expansion and information technology. As a result of these
investments and the fact that software-enabled services have
lower gross margins than license and maintenance revenues, our
overall gross margin percentage has been impacted. We expect our
contractually recurring revenues to continue to increase as a
percentage of our total revenues.
While increasing our contractually recurring revenues, we also
focus on increasing our profitability. Although operating
expenses increased in terms of dollars due to our acquisitions,
we reduced operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues
from 34% in 2004 to 30% in 2006. These efforts contributed to a
49% increase in our operating income from 2004 to 2006. We
believe that our success in managing operating expenses results
from a disciplined approach to cost controls, our focus on
operational efficiencies, identification of synergies related to
acquisitions and more cost-effective marketing programs.
In 2006, we generated $30.7 million of net cash from
operating activities. We used $17.1 million, net of
borrowings, to pay down debt. For the six months ended
June 30, 2007, we further paid down $12.9 million of
debt. Our operating results improvements and the reduction of
debt resulted in a reduction of our consolidated total leverage
ratio from 6.43x as of December 31, 2005 to 5.16x as of
June 30, 2007. Please see Selected Consolidated
Financial Data for additional information on our financial
ratios.
The
Going-Private Transaction
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, with and into SS&C,
with SS&C being the surviving company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings.
The accompanying financial information is presented for two
periods: Predecessor and Successor, which relate to the period
preceding the Transaction and the period succeeding the
Transaction, respectively. The results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2004 are the results of operations
of SS&C and its consolidated subsidiaries (Predecessor).
The results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 are
the results of operations of SS&C Holdings and its
consolidated subsidiaries, including SS&C (Successor). Our
results of operations for 2005 consist of SS&Cs
consolidated results of operations for the Predecessor period
from January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and
SS&C Holdings consolidated results of operations for
the Successor period from November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005. To facilitate comparison among the
annual periods, we have prepared our discussion of the results
of operations by comparing the mathematical combination of the
Successor and Predecessor periods in the year ended
December 31, 2005 to the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2006. Although this presentation does not comply with GAAP,
we believe that it provides a meaningful method of comparison.
The combined operating results have not been prepared as pro
forma results under applicable regulations and may not reflect
the actual results we would have achieved absent the Transaction
and may not be predictive of future results of operations.
Effect of
the Going-Private Transaction
As a result of the Transaction, our assets and liabilities,
including client relationships, completed technology and trade
names, were adjusted to their fair market values as of the
closing date. These adjusted valuations resulted in an increase
in our cost of revenue and operating expenses due to the
increase in expense related to amortization of intangible assets.
The value at which we carry our intangible assets and goodwill
increased significantly. As set forth in greater detail in the
table below, as a result of the application of purchase
accounting, our intangible assets with definite lives were
revalued from an aggregate of $80.7 million prior to the
consummation of the Transaction to $272.1 million after the
consummation of the Transaction, and were assigned new
amortization periods.
37
The valuation assigned to our intangible assets at the date of
the Transaction was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
197.1
|
|
|
|
11.5 years
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
$
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
8.5 years
|
|
Trade names
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
13.9 years
|
|
Exchange relationships
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
Other
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Goodwill was also revalued from $175.5 million prior to the
consummation of the Transaction to $809.5 million after the
consummation of the Transaction and is subject to annual
impairment testing.
Additionally, as discussed below in Liquidity
and Capital Resources, we incurred significant
indebtedness in connection with the consummation of the
Transaction, and our total indebtedness and related interest
expenses are significantly higher than prior to the Transaction.
We are obligated to make periodic principal and interest
payments on our senior and subordinated debt of approximately
$46 million annually.
Strategic
Acquisitions
To complement our organic growth, we evaluate and execute
acquisitions that expand our client base, increase our market
presence both in the United States and abroad, expand the
breadth of our proprietary software and software-enabled service
offerings and enhance our strategic assets. Since the beginning
of 2004, we have spent approximately $259 million in cash
to acquire 12 financial services businesses.
The following table lists the businesses we have acquired since
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Business
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Description
|
|
Northport
|
|
March 12, 2007
|
|
Alternative investment fund management services
|
Zoologic
|
|
August 31, 2006
|
|
Web-based training software
|
Cogent Management
|
|
March 3, 2006
|
|
Alternative investment fund management services
|
Open Information Systems
|
|
October 31, 2005
|
|
Money market processing software and services
|
MarginMan
|
|
August 24, 2005
|
|
Collateralized trading software and services
|
Financial Interactive
|
|
June 3, 2005
|
|
Investor relations software and services
|
Financial Models Company
|
|
April 19, 2005
|
|
Investment management software and services
|
EisnerFast
|
|
February 28, 2005
|
|
Alternative investment fund management services
|
Achievement Technologies
|
|
February 11, 2005
|
|
Facilities management software
|
OMR Systems Corporation
|
|
April 12, 2004
|
|
Treasury processing software and services
|
NeoVision Hypersystems
|
|
February 17, 2004
|
|
Visual analytic software
|
Investment Advisory Network
|
|
January 16, 2004
|
|
Wealth management software and services
|
Critical
Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
A number of our accounting policies require the application of
significant judgment by our management, and such judgments are
reflected in the amounts reported in our consolidated financial
statements. In applying these policies, our management uses its
judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in
the determination of estimates. Those estimates are based on our
historical experience, terms of existing contracts,
managements observation of trends in the industry,
information provided by our clients and information available
from other outside sources, as appropriate. On an ongoing basis,
we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related
to revenue recognition, doubtful accounts receivable, goodwill
and other intangible assets and other contingent liabilities.
Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates
contained in our consolidated financial statements. We believe
that the following are our critical accounting policies.
38
Revenue
Recognition
Our revenues consist primarily of software-enabled services and
maintenance revenues, and, to a lesser degree, software license
and professional services revenues.
Software-enabled services revenues, which are based on a monthly
fee or transaction-based, are recognized as the services are
performed. Software-enabled services are provided under
arrangements that generally have terms of two to five years and
contain monthly or quarterly fixed payments, with additional
billing for increases in market value of a clients assets,
pricing and trading activity under certain contracts.
We recognize software-enabled services revenues in accordance
with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104
Revenue Recognition, on a monthly basis as the
software-enabled services are provided and when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We do not
recognize any revenues before services are performed. Certain
contracts contain additional fees for increases in market value,
pricing and trading activity. Revenues related to these
additional fees are recognized in the month in which the
activity occurs based upon our summarization of account
information and trading volume.
We apply the provisions of Statement of Position
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2)
to all software transactions. We recognize revenues from the
sale of software licenses when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the fee is
fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable
is reasonably assured. Our products generally do not require
significant modification or customization of the underlying
software and, accordingly, the implementation services we
provide are not considered essential to the functionality of the
software.
We use a signed license agreement as evidence of an arrangement
for the majority of our transactions. Delivery generally occurs
when the product is delivered to a common carrier F.O.B.
shipping point, or if delivered electronically, when the client
has been provided with access codes that allow for immediate
possession via a download. Although our arrangements generally
do not have acceptance provisions, if such provisions are
included in the arrangement, then delivery occurs at acceptance.
At the time of the transaction, we assess whether the fee is
fixed or determinable based on the payment terms. Collection is
assessed based on several factors, including past transaction
history with the client and the creditworthiness of the client.
The arrangements for perpetual software licenses are generally
sold with maintenance and professional services. We allocate
revenue to the delivered components, normally the license
component, using the residual value method based on objective
evidence of the fair value of the undelivered elements. The
total contract value is attributed first to the maintenance and
support arrangement based on the fair value, which is derived
from renewal rates. Fair value of the professional services is
based upon stand-alone sales of those services. Professional
services are generally billed at an hourly rate plus
out-of-pocket expenses. Professional services revenues are
recognized as the services are performed. Maintenance revenues
are recognized ratably over the term of the contract.
We also sell term licenses with maintenance. These arrangements
range from one to seven years. Vendor-specific objective
evidence does not exist for the maintenance element in the term
licenses, and revenues are therefore recognized ratably over the
contractual term of the arrangement.
We occasionally enter into software license agreements requiring
significant customization or fixed-fee professional service
arrangements. We account for these arrangements in accordance
with the percentage-of-completion method based on the ratio of
hours incurred to expected total hours; accordingly we must
estimate the costs to complete the arrangement utilizing an
estimate of
man-hours
remaining. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation
process, it is at least reasonably possible that completion
costs may be revised. Such revisions are recognized in the
period in which the revisions are determined. Due to the
complexity of some software license agreements, we routinely
apply judgments to the application of software recognition
accounting principles to specific agreements and transactions.
Different judgments or different contract structures could have
led to different accounting conclusions, which could have a
material effect on our reported quarterly results of operations.
39
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The preparation of financial statements requires our management
to make estimates relating to the collectability of our accounts
receivable. Management establishes the allowance for doubtful
accounts based on historical bad debt experience. In addition,
management analyzes client accounts, client concentrations,
client creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in
our clients payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of
the allowance for doubtful accounts. Such estimates require
significant judgment on the part of our management. Therefore,
changes in the assumptions underlying our estimates or changes
in the financial condition of our clients could result in a
different required allowance, which could have a material effect
on our reported results of operations.
Long-lived
Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142), we must test goodwill annually for impairment
(and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that
the carrying value of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible
assets may be impaired) using reporting units identified for the
purpose of assessing potential future impairments of goodwill.
We apply the provisions of SFAS 142 and
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and assess the impairment
of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
important which could trigger an impairment review include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business; and
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles,
long-lived assets and goodwill may not be recoverable based upon
the existence of one or more of the above indicators of
potential impairment, we assess whether an impairment has
occurred based on whether net book value of the assets exceeds
related projected undiscounted cash flows from these assets. We
considered a number of factors, including past operating
results, budgets, economic projections, market trends and
product development cycles. Differing estimates and assumptions
as to any of the factors described above could result in a
materially different impairment charge and thus materially
different results of operations.
Acquisition
Accounting
In connection with our acquisitions, we apply the provisions of
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and
allocate the purchase price to the assets and liabilities we
acquire, such as net tangible assets, completed technology,
in-process research and development, client contracts, other
identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. We apply
significant judgments and estimates in determining the fair
market value of the assets acquired and their useful lives. For
example, we have determined the fair value of existing client
contracts based on the discounted estimated net future cash
flows from such client contracts existing at the date of
acquisition and the fair value of the completed technology based
on the discounted estimated future cash flows from the product
sales of such completed technology. While actual results during
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were
consistent with our estimated cash flows and we did not incur
any impairment charges during those years, different estimates
and assumptions in valuing acquired assets could yield
materially different results.
Stock-based
Compensation
As of the date of the Transaction, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R), using the modified prospective
method, which requires companies to record stock compensation
expense over the remaining service period for all unvested
awards as of the adoption date.
40
Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Using
the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R,
stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date
based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense
over the appropriate service period. Determining the fair value
of stock-based awards requires considerable judgment, including
estimating the expected term of stock options, expected
volatility of our stock price, and the number of awards expected
to be forfeited. In addition, for stock-based awards where
vesting is dependent upon achieving certain operating
performance goals, we estimate the likelihood of achieving the
performance goals. Differences between actual results and these
estimates could have a material effect on our financial results.
A deferred income tax asset is recorded over the vesting period
as stock compensation expense is recorded. The realizability of
the deferred tax asset is ultimately based on the actual value
of the stock-based award upon exercise. If the actual value is
lower than the fair value determined on the date of grant, then
there could be an income tax expense for the portion of the
deferred tax asset that is not realizable.
We grant stock options to our employees and directors under our
2006 equity incentive plan. Given the lack of a public market
for our common stock, our board of directors must determine the
fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, which
requires making complex and subjective judgments. Our board has
reviewed and considered a number of factors when determining the
fair value of our common stock, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the value of our business as determined at arms length in
connection with the Transaction;
|
|
|
|
significant business milestones that may have affected the value
of our business subsequent to the Transaction;
|
|
|
|
the continued risks associated with our business;
|
|
|
|
the economic outlook in general and the condition and outlook of
our industry;
|
|
|
|
our financial condition and expected operating results;
|
|
|
|
our level of outstanding indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
the market price of stocks of publicly traded corporations
engaged in the same or similar lines of business; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of July 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, analyses using
a weighted average of three generally accepted valuation
procedures: the income approach, the market approach - publicly
traded guideline company method and the market approach -
transaction method.
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
granted since August 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Options by Vesting Type(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Time
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
1,165,831
|
|
|
$
|
74.50
|
|
|
$
|
74.50
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
$
|
32.98
|
|
|
$
|
21.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
30.75
|
|
|
|
32.61
|
|
|
|
21.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
30.69
|
|
|
|
32.54
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
May 2007
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
40.85
|
|
|
|
43.32
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
41.37
|
|
|
|
43.89
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted-average fair value of options by vesting type
represents the value as determined under SFAS 123R at the
grant date. These fair values do not reflect the re-valuation of
certain options related to modifications effected in April 2007,
as more fully described in note 3 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. Based upon our current assessment of the
number of modified performance-based options that will
eventually vest, we expect to recognize additional stock-based
compensation expense of approximately $2.1 million ratably
over the remainder of 2007 related to these modified options. |
|
(2) |
|
We have not yet determined the fair value of options granted
during 2007 that vest only upon a
change-in-control. |
41
Between the closing date of the Transaction in November 2005 and
early August 2006, we did not award any options or other equity
awards to our employees or directors. In August 2006, our board
of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2006
equity incentive plan. On August 9, 2006, our board of
directors granted options to purchase an aggregate of
1,165,831 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$74.50 per share. Our board of directors determined that the
$74.50 price, which was the value of our common stock at the
time of the Transaction and which was arrived at in an
arms-length negotiation between representatives of the
independent committee of SS&Cs board of directors and
representatives of investment funds affiliated with The Carlyle
Group, continued to represent the fair value of our common stock
in August 2006. The board of directors believed that the
business had not fundamentally changed since November 2005 and
that the likelihood of a liquidity event, including a potential
sale of the company or a public offering of stock, was remote.
In October 2007, in connection with our proposed initial public
offering and in anticipation of receiving a recommended initial
public offering price range from our managing underwriters, our
board of directors undertook a reassessment of the fair value of
our common stock as of July 31, 2006. Our board of
directors reassessed the fair value of our common stock using
three generally accepted valuation procedures: the income
approach, the market approach publicly traded
guideline company method and the market approach
transaction method. The income approach is a method used to
value business interests that involves estimating the future
cash flows of the business, discounted to their present value.
The market approach publicly traded guideline
company method estimates fair value using revenue and EBITDA
multiples derived from the stock price of publicly traded
companies engaged in a similar line of business. The market
approach transaction method estimates fair value
using transactions involving the actual sale or purchase of
similar companies, and we reviewed eight transactions as part of
this analysis. We then compared the results of the various
valuation methods and other factors to calculate the enterprise
value attributable to common stockholders and the fair value of
each share, which we determined to be between $63 and $77 per
share. As the boards prior valuation of $74.50 not only
fell within the range of estimated values in the reassessment
but also reflected the arms-length price negotiated at the
time of the Transaction, the board determined that $74.50
continued to represent the fair value per share of our common
stock as of August 9, 2006.
In November 2006 and March 2007, we granted options to purchase
an aggregate of 33,500 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $74.50 per share. In November 2006, we also
sold an aggregate of 8,900 shares of common stock to our
employees under the 2006 equity incentive plan for a purchase
price of $74.50 per share. The board believed that $74.50
continued to represent the fair value of the common stock at
this time because the business had not changed fundamentally and
a liquidity event continued to be remote. The board did not
conduct contemporaneous or retrospective valuations of the
common stock in connection with the November and March grants
because of the immaterial size of the awards and the cost of
such valuations.
Between May 10, 2007 and June 19, 2007, we granted
options to purchase an aggregate of 20,500 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $98.91 per share, which our board
of directors determined was equal to the fair value of our
common stock. In setting the fair value of our common stock at
$98.91, our board used the three generally accepted valuation
procedures used in its October 2007 reassessment: the income
approach, the market approach -publicly traded guideline company
method and the market approach - transaction method. We
conducted the assessment as of March 31, 2007 and then
correlated the results of the various valuation methods and
other factors to calculate the enterprise value attributable to
common stockholders and the fair value of each share. Our board
believed that the fair value of our common stock had increased
to $98.91 per share as of March 31, 2007 because of
improvements in the performance of our business and the
near-term outlook of our business, as well as managements
expectations regarding the imminence of an initial public
offering. The fair value of our common stock had increased since
the July 2006 determinations under all three methodologies for
the following reasons:
Income Approach. Our board factored in timing
differences in the receipt of future cash flows, as well as the
reduction in net debt. In addition, while the expected timing of
a liquidity event was still believed to be remote as of
July 31, 2006, a public offering was imminent as of
March 31, 2007 and thus our board did not apply a liquidity
discount as of March 31, 2007.
42
Publicly Traded Guideline Company Method. Our
board determined that revenue and EBITDA multiples for guideline
companies generally increased or remained flat between
July 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007. Moreover, we
experienced improvements in the performance of our business
between July 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, which
resulted in higher trailing twelve-month and projected revenues
and EBITDA. Under this methodology, our board also factored in
the reduction in net debt and the imminence of an initial public
offering.
Transaction Method. Our board believed our
valuation was higher due to our improved revenue and EBITDA
metrics (against flat multiples of comparable transactions), our
reduction in net debt and the imminence of an initial public
offering.
We believe that several factors account for the difference in
the fair value of our common stock of $98.91 as of June 2007 and
$ per share, which is the midpoint
of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the increase in the fair value of our common stock as a result
of market considerations, as represented in the significant
number of public offerings in the months immediately prior to
this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the changes that will result in our capital structure as a
result of this offering, including the anticipated reduction in
outstanding debt resulting from the redemption of
$71.75 million in principal amount of our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013;
|
|
|
|
the added liquidity of our common stock attributable to our
listing on a public securities exchange; and
|
|
|
|
the growth of our software-enabled services business.
|
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the
application of SFAS 123R in future periods, the
compensation expense that we record under SFAS 123R may
differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current
period. In addition, there is a risk that our estimates of the
fair values of our share-based compensation awards on the grant
dates may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized
upon the exercise, expiration, early termination or forfeiture
of those share-based payments in the future. Certain share-based
payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless
or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the
fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported
in our financial statements.
We believe that we have used reasonable methodologies,
approaches and assumptions consistent with the AICPAs
Practice Aid Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity
Securities Issued as Compensation to determine the fair value of
our common stock.
The values of outstanding vested and unvested options as of
June 30, 2007 based on the difference between an assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share and the exercise price of the options outstanding are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
925,390
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
699,965
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
The carrying value of our deferred tax assets assumes that we
will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in
certain tax jurisdictions, based on estimates and assumptions.
If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future,
we may be required to record additional valuation allowances
against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income
tax expense in our consolidated statement of operations. On a
quarterly basis, we evaluate whether deferred tax assets are
realizable and assess whether there is a need for additional
valuation allowances. Such estimates require significant
judgment on the part of our management. In addition, we evaluate
the need to provide additional tax provisions for adjustments
proposed by taxing authorities.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial
Standards Accounting Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). At adoption, we had
43
$4.2 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits.
The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a reclassification of
certain tax liabilities from current to non-current and to
certain related deferred tax assets. We did not record a
cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as a result of
adopting FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, accrued
interest related to unrecognized tax benefits was less than
$0.1 million. We recognize accrued interest and penalties
relating to the unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the
income tax provision.
As of June 30, 2007, we had $5.4 million of
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. Of this amount,
$5.1 million relates to uncertain income tax positions that
either existed prior to or were created as a result of the
Transaction and would decrease goodwill if recognized. The
remainder of the unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would
decrease our effective tax rate and increase our net income.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth revenues (dollars in thousands)
and changes in revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
From Prior Year
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
22,925
|
|
|
$
|
23,734
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
20,147
|
|
|
$
|
17,250
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
55,222
|
|
|
|
47,765
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
44,064
|
|
|
|
36,433
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
15,085
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
12,565
|
|
|
|
11,320
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
107,740
|
|
|
|
75,050
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
67,193
|
|
|
|
30,885
|
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
143.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
205,469
|
|
|
$
|
161,634
|
|
|
$
|
17,665
|
|
|
$
|
143,969
|
|
|
$
|
95,888
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
68.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
11,494
|
|
|
$
|
10,362
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
30,233
|
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
|
|
10,128
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
65,472
|
|
|
|
52,182
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
116,242
|
|
|
$
|
99,020
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the percentage of our total
revenues represented by each of the following sources of
revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
44
Comparison
of Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Our revenues consist primarily of software-enabled services and
maintenance revenues, and, to a lesser degree, software license
and professional services revenues. As a general matter, our
software license and professional services revenues tend to
fluctuate based on the number of new licensing clients, while
fluctuations in our software-enabled services revenues are
attributable to the number of new software-enabled services
clients as well as the number of outsourced transactions
provided to our existing clients. Maintenance revenues vary
based on the rate by which we add or lose maintenance clients
over time and, to a lesser extent, on the annual increases in
maintenance fees, which are generally tied to the consumer price
index.
Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were
$116.2 million, increasing 17% from $99.0 million in
the same period in 2006. Revenues for businesses and products
that we have owned for at least 12 months, or organic
revenues, increased 11%, accounting for $10.9 million of
the increase, and came from increased demand of
$11.4 million for our software-enabled services and an
increase of $1.5 million in maintenance revenues, offset by
decreases of $1.1 million in license sales and
$0.9 million in professional services revenues. The
remaining $3.3 million increase was due to sales of
products and services that we acquired in our recent
acquisitions of Northport, Zoologic and Cogent, which we
acquired in March 2007, August 2006 and March 2006,
respectively. Additionally, revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 include a reduction of $3.0 million as a
result of adjusting deferred revenue to fair value in connection
with the Transaction.
Software
Licenses
Software license revenues were $11.5 million and
$10.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Acquisitions added $0.8 million in
revenues, partially offsetting a decrease of $1.1 million
in organic revenues. Additionally, software license revenues for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 included a reduction of
$1.4 million as a result of adjusting our deferred revenue
to fair value in connection with the Transaction. Software
license revenues will vary depending on the timing, size and
nature of our license transactions. For example, the average
size of our software license transactions and the number of
large transactions may fluctuate on a period-to-period basis.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we had a similar
number of perpetual license transactions as we did in the six
months ended June 30, 2006. However, the average size of
the transactions was smaller than that of the prior year.
Additionally, software license revenues will vary among the
various products that we offer, due to differences such as the
timing of new releases and variances in economic conditions
affecting opportunities in the vertical markets served by such
products.
Maintenance
Maintenance revenues were $30.2 million and
$26.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Maintenance revenue growth of
$3.9 million was due in part to organic revenue growth of
$1.5 million and acquisitions, which added
$0.2 million in revenues. Additionally, maintenance
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included a
reduction of $2.2 million as a result of adjusting our
deferred revenue to fair value in connection with the
Transaction. We typically provide maintenance services under
one-year renewable contracts that provide for an annual increase
in fees, generally tied to the percentage change in the consumer
price index. Future maintenance revenue growth is dependent on
our ability to retain existing clients, add new license clients,
and increase average maintenance fees.
Professional
Services
Professional services revenues were $9.0 million and
$10.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Organic professional services revenues
decreased $0.9 million, primarily related to four
significant professional services projects that were either
completed or substantially completed in late 2006. Additionally,
professional services revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 included an increase of $0.2 million as
a result of adjusting our deferred revenue to fair value in
connection with the Transaction.
45
Our overall software license revenue levels and market demand
for professional services will continue to have an effect on our
professional services revenues.
Software-enabled
Services
Software-enabled services revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $65.5 million and
$52.2 million, respectively. Organic revenue growth
accounted for $11.4 million of the increase and came from
increased demand and the addition of new clients for our
SS&C Fund Services and SS&C Direct
software-enabled services, as well as our Pacer application
service provider (ASP) services and Securities Valuation (SVC)
securities data services provided by SS&C Technologies
Canada Corp. Acquisitions added $2.3 million in revenues in
the aggregate. Additionally, software-enabled services revenues
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 include an increase
of $0.4 million as a result of adjusting our deferred
revenue to fair value in connection with the Transaction. Future
software-enabled services revenue growth is dependent on our
ability to retain existing clients, add new clients and increase
average fees.
Cost of
Revenues
The total cost of revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $61.8 million and
$47.8 million, respectively. The gross margin decreased to
47% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 52% for the
comparable period in 2006. The decrease in gross margin was
primarily attributable to additional amortization of
$2.6 million, stock-based compensation expense of
$1.2 million and a non-cash increase in rent expense of
$0.2 million. In addition, we have invested in increased
personnel, facilities expansion and information technology to
support our growth and maintain our level of customer service
for our software-enabled services. As a result, and due to the
fact that software-enabled services have lower gross margins
than license and maintenance revenues, our overall gross margin
percentage has been impacted. Accounting for the remainder of
the total cost of revenues increase was $2.2 million in
costs associated with the acquisitions of Northport, Zoologic
and Cogent, and cost increases of $7.8 million to support
our organic revenue growth, primarily in software-enabled
services revenues.
Cost
of Software Licenses
Cost of software license revenues consists primarily of
amortization expense of completed technology, royalties,
third-party software, and the costs of product media, packaging
and documentation. The cost of software license revenues for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was
$4.8 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The
increase in cost of software licenses was due in part to
additional amortization expense of $0.1 million based on
cash flows and $0.1 million of costs related to
acquisitions. Cost of software license revenues as a percentage
of such revenues was 42% and 44% for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cost
of Maintenance
Cost of maintenance revenues consists primarily of technical
client support, costs associated with the distribution of
products and regulatory updates and amortization of intangible
assets. The cost of maintenance revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $13.1 million and
$9.9 million, respectively. The increase in cost of
maintenance revenues was due principally to increased
amortization of intangible assets of $2.2 million,
acquisitions, which added $0.4 million in costs, and
organic cost increases of $0.6 million to support the
growth in organic revenues.
Cost
of Professional Services
Cost of professional services revenues consists primarily of the
cost related to personnel utilized to provide implementation,
conversion and training services to our software licensees, as
well as system integration, custom programming and actuarial
consulting services. The cost of professional services revenues
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was
$7.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The
increase
46
in cost of professional services revenues was primarily due to
stock-based compensation expense of $0.1 million and an
increase of $0.5 million in organic personnel costs.
Cost
of Software-enabled Services
Cost of software-enabled services revenues consists primarily of
the cost related to personnel utilized in servicing our
software-enabled services clients and amortization of intangible
assets. The cost of software-enabled services revenues for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was
$36.8 million and $27.1 million, respectively. The
increase in cost of software-enabled services revenues was
primarily due to an increase of $6.6 million in organic
costs to support the growth in organic revenues and
acquisitions, which added $1.7 million in the aggregate.
Additionally, stock-based compensation represented
$1.0 million of the increase and increases of
$0.3 million in amortization expense and $0.1 million
in non-cash rent expense contributed to the overall increase.
Operating
Expenses
Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 were $33.8 million and $28.5 million,
respectively. The $5.3 million increase in operating
expenses was primarily due to stock-based compensation expense
of $3.3 million and our acquisitions of Northport, Zoologic
and Cogent, which added $0.7 million in costs. These
increases were partially offset by a reduction of
$0.2 million in capital-based taxes. The remainder of the
increase was due to an increase in organic costs to support the
growth in organic revenues.
Selling
and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of the
personnel costs associated with the selling and marketing of our
products, including salaries, commissions and travel and
entertainment. Such expenses also include amortization of
intangible assets, the cost of branch sales offices, trade shows
and marketing and promotional materials. Selling and marketing
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
were $9.3 million and $7.9 million, respectively. The
increase in selling and marketing expenses was primarily
attributable to stock-based compensation expense of
$0.7 million, acquisitions, which added $0.4 million
in costs, and an increase of $0.2 million in organic costs.
Research
and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel
costs attributable to the enhancement of existing products and
the development of new software products. Research and
development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 were $13.0 million and $11.8 million,
respectively. The increase in research and development expenses
was primarily due to $0.5 million of stock-based
compensation expense, acquisitions, which added
$0.3 million in costs, and an increase of $0.4 million
in organic costs.
General
and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
personnel costs related to management, accounting and finance,
information management, human resources and administration and
associated overhead costs, as well as fees for professional
services. General and administrative expenses for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $11.5 million and
$8.8 million, respectively. The increase in general and
administrative expenses was primarily due to stock-based
compensation expense of $2.1 million and acquisitions,
which added $0.1 million. These increases were offset by a
decrease of $0.2 million in capital-based taxes. The
remainder of the increase was due to an increase in organic
costs to support the growth in organic revenues.
47
Interest
Expense, Net
Net interest expense was $22.6 million and
$23.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Interest expense was primarily related
to our debt outstanding under our senior credit facility and
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013.
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2007
consisted primarily of foreign currency gains and proceeds
received from insurance policies. Other income, net for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 consisted primarily of foreign
currency gains.
Benefit
for Income Taxes
We had an effective tax rate of 7% for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. While we currently estimate that the
effective tax rate for the balance of the year will be
approximately 12%, the effective tax rate may fluctuate
significantly based on the amount of our annual consolidated
pre-tax income (loss) and which tax jurisdictions generate the
majority of our annual consolidated pre-tax income (loss). Our
anticipated annual effective tax rate of 12% is lower than the
U.S. statutory tax rate of 35% because we have incurred
losses in tax jurisdictions with higher statutory tax rates and
generated income in tax jurisdictions with lower statutory tax
rates.
Comparison
of Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Revenues
Revenues were $205.5 million, $161.6 million and
$95.9 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Revenue
growth in 2006 of $43.8 million, or 27%, was primarily a
result of our 2005 acquisitions of FMC, EisnerFast, Financial
Interactive, Inc., MarginMan and OIS, which increased revenues
by an aggregate of $24.5 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity. Our 2006 acquisitions of Cogent and
Zoologic added $5.1 million in the aggregate and revenues
for businesses and products that we have owned for at least
12 months, or organic revenues, increased
$17.1 million, or 10.5%, from 2005. Organic growth came
from increased demand for our software-enabled services totaling
$15.7 million and increases in sales of our maintenance and
professional services of $3.2 million and
$1.6 million, respectively. These increases were offset by
a decrease of $3.4 million in license sales. Revenues for
2006 also include a reduction of $3.6 million related to
the valuation of deferred revenue acquired in the Transaction,
while 2005 revenues were reduced by $0.7 million. The
increase in revenues from 2004 to 2005 of $65.7 million, or
69%, was primarily a result of our 2005 acquisitions, which
added an aggregate of $53.5 million, our 2004 acquisition
of OMR, which added $6.4 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity and organic revenue growth of
$6.6 million, or 6.9%. Revenues for 2005 also include a
reduction of $0.7 million related to the valuation of
deferred revenue acquired in the Transaction.
Software
Licenses
Software license revenues were $22.9 million,
$23.7 million and $17.3 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The decrease in software license revenues
from 2005 to 2006 of $0.8 million was due to a reduction of
$1.5 million related to the valuation of deferred revenue
acquired in the Transaction. Our acquisition of Zoologic in
August 2006 added $0.7 million, while organic revenues were
consistent with 2005. During 2006 and 2005, we had a similar
number of perpetual license transactions at a comparable average
size. The increase in software license revenues from 2004 to
2005 of $6.4 million, or 38%, was due to our 2005
acquisitions, which contributed $4.3 million in the
aggregate and organic revenue growth of $2.1 million, or
12.5%. During 2005, we had a greater number of perpetual license
transactions, at a slightly smaller average size than 2004.
Software license revenues will vary depending on the timing,
size and nature of our license transactions. For example, the
average size of our software license transactions and the number
of large transactions may fluctuate on a
period-to-period
basis. Additionally, software license revenues will vary among
48
the various products that we offer, due to differences such as
the timing of new releases and variances in economic conditions
affecting opportunities in the vertical markets served by such
products.
Maintenance
Maintenance revenues were $55.2 million, $47.8 million
and $36.4 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
increase in maintenance revenues from 2005 to 2006 of
$7.5 million, or 16%, was primarily due to our 2005
acquisitions, which increased revenues an aggregate of
$5.9 million, reflecting a full 12 months of activity,
organic growth of $3.2 million and our acquisition of
Zoologic, which added $0.2 million. These increases in
maintenance revenues were offset by a reduction of
$2.8 million related to the valuation of deferred revenue
acquired in the Transaction, and 2005 revenues were reduced by
$1.0 million due to the valuation of acquired deferred
revenues. The increase in maintenance revenues from 2004 to 2005
of $11.4 million, or 31%, was primarily attributable to our
2005 acquisitions, which added $9.3 million in the
aggregate, our 2004 acquisition of OMR, which increased
$1.5 million, reflecting a full 12 months of activity
and organic revenue growth of $1.5 million, or 4.0%. These
increases in maintenance revenues were offset by a reduction of
$1.0 million related to the valuation of deferred revenue
acquired in the Transaction. We typically provide maintenance
services under one-year renewable contracts that provide for an
annual increase in fees, generally tied to the percentage
changes in the consumer price index. Future maintenance revenue
growth is dependent on our ability to retain existing clients,
add new license clients and increase average maintenance fees.
Professional
Services
Professional services revenues were $19.6 million,
$15.1 million and $11.3 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The increase in professional services
revenues from 2005 to 2006 of $4.5 million, or 30%, was
primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which increased revenues
by an aggregate of $2.9 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity and organic growth of
$1.6 million. The increase in professional services
revenues from 2004 to 2005 of $3.8 million, or 33%, was
primarily attributable to our 2005 acquisitions, which added an
aggregate of $5.0 million in revenues. Organic revenues
decreased by $1.4 million, primarily the result of
significant implementation projects from 2004 that were
completed during the first quarter of 2005. Professional
services revenues for 2005 also include an increase of
$0.2 million related to the valuation of deferred revenue
acquired in the Transaction. Our overall software license
revenue levels and market demand for professional services will
continue to have an effect on our professional services revenues.
Software-Enabled
Services
Software-enabled services revenues were $107.7 million,
$75.1 million and $30.9 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The increase in software-enabled services
revenues from 2005 to 2006 of $32.7 million, or 44%, was
primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which increased revenues
by an aggregate of $12.5 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity, our 2006 acquisition of Cogent,
which added $4.2 million and organic growth of
$15.7 million, or 21%. Organic growth was driven by
SS&C Fund Services and Pacer ASP services provided by
SS&C Canada. Software-enabled services revenues for 2006
include an increase of $0.4 million related to the
valuation of deferred revenue acquired in the Transaction, while
2005 revenues were increased by $0.1 million. The increase
in software-enabled services revenues from 2004 to 2005 of
$44.2 million, or 143%, was primarily attributable to our
2005 acquisitions, which added an aggregate of
$34.9 million in revenues, our 2004 acquisition of OMR,
which increased $3.8 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity and organic revenue growth of
$5.4 million, or 17.6%. Software-enabled services revenues
for 2005 also include an increase of $0.1 million related
to the valuation of deferred revenue acquired in the
Transaction. Future software-enabled services revenue growth is
dependent on our ability to add new software-enabled services
clients, retain existing clients and increase average
software-enabled services fees.
Cost of
Revenues
The total cost of revenues was $100.0 million,
$66.6 million and $33.8 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The gross margin decreased from 65% in 2004
to 59% in 2005 and to 51% in 2006. The increase
49
in costs in 2006 was primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions,
which increased costs by an aggregate of $10.7 million,
reflecting a full 12 months of activity, our 2006
acquisitions of Cogent and Zoologic, which added
$2.9 million, incremental amortization of
$10.2 million related to the revaluation of intangible
assets in connection with the Transaction and cost increases of
$10.0 million to support our organic revenue growth. The
increased costs included $9.0 million for personnel,
infrastructure and other costs to support the growth in our
software-enabled services revenues and professional services
revenues, respectively, and $1.0 million of stock-based
compensation expense. The increase in cost of revenues in 2005
was primarily attributable to our 2005 acquisitions, which added
an aggregate of $25.6 million in costs. Our April 2005
acquisition of FMC initially increased our headcount by
approximately 300 employees, of which approximately
150 employees were performing operating functions that
affected cost of revenues. Additionally, costs for OMR increased
$3.2 million, reflecting a full twelve months of activity
for this April 2004 acquisition, and personnel costs and other
expenses increased $4.0 million to support our increased
organic revenues.
Cost
of Software License Revenues
The cost of software license revenues was $9.2 million,
$3.8 million and $2.3 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The increase in cost from 2005 to 2006 was
primarily attributable to $3.9 million in additional
amortization relating to the Transaction, reflecting a full
12 months, our 2005 acquisitions, which increased costs by
an aggregate of $0.8 million, reflecting a full
12 months, and our acquisition of Zoologic, which added
$0.1 million in costs. Organically, costs increased
$0.6 million, reflecting additional amortization under the
percent of cash flows method. The increase in cost from 2004 to
2005 was primarily attributable to amortization of completed
technology associated with our 2005 acquisitions, which added
$0.8 million in costs, and $0.2 million of costs for
OMR, reflecting a full 12 months of amortization for the
completed technology acquired in April 2004. Additionally, costs
increased $0.5 million reflecting the revaluation of
intangibles acquired in the Transaction.
Cost
of Maintenance Revenues
The cost of maintenance revenues was $20.4 million,
$11.9 million and $8.5 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The increase in costs from 2005 to 2006 was
primarily due to $7.0 million in additional amortization
relating to the Transaction, our 2005 acquisitions, which
increased costs by an aggregate of $1.4 million, reflecting
a full 12 months of activity, and our 2006 acquisition of
Zoologic, which added $0.3 million. These increases were
offset by a $0.2 million decrease in organic costs. The
increase in costs from 2004 to 2005 was primarily due to
$2.7 million in additional costs associated with our 2005
acquisitions and additional costs of $0.7 million related
to OMR, reflecting a full 12 months of activity.
Additionally, reductions in personnel and other expenses of
$0.7 million were fully offset by an increase in
amortization expense related to the revaluation of intangible
assets acquired in the Transaction.
Cost
of Professional Services Revenues
The cost of professional services revenue was
$12.6 million, $8.7 million and $6.6 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in costs from
2005 to 2006 was primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which
increased an aggregate of $2.3 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity, and an increase of $1.5 million
to support organic revenue growth. The increase in costs from
2004 to 2005 was attributable to our 2005 acquisitions, which
added $2.1 million in the aggregate, and increased costs of
$0.5 million related to OMR, reflecting a full
12 months of activity, partially offset by a reduction of
$0.5 million in personnel and other expenses.
Cost
of Software-Enabled Services Revenues
The cost of software-enabled services revenues was
$57.8 million, $42.2 million and $16.4 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in costs from
2005 to 2006 was primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which
increased costs by an aggregate of $6.2 million, reflecting
a full 12 months of activity, our 2006 acquisition of
Cogent, which added $2.5 million, and an increase of
$7.0 million in organic costs to support the growth in
software-enabled services revenues. Additionally, 2006 costs
include $0.8 million related
50
to stock-based compensation and a decrease of $0.8 million
in amortization expense. The increase in costs from 2004 to 2005
was primarily due to $20.0 million of costs associated with
our 2005 acquisitions and increased costs of $1.8 million
related to OMR, reflecting a full 12 months of activity.
Additionally, personnel and other expenses increased
$3.8 million to support growth in organic revenues, and
amortization expense increased $0.2 million due to the
revaluation of intangible assets acquired in the Transaction.
Operating
Expenses
Our total operating expenses were $61.6 million,
$85.8 million and $32.7 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, and represent 30%, 53% and 34%,
respectively, of total revenues in those years. The decrease in
total operating expenses from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to
one-time transaction costs of $36.9 million in 2005.
Additionally, our 2005 acquisitions increased costs by an
aggregate of $6.6 million, reflecting a full 12 months
of activity, our 2006 acquisitions added $0.6 million and
organic costs increased $5.5 million. The increase in
organic costs was primarily due to $2.9 million in
stock-based compensation, $1.8 million in capital-based
taxes, $1.1 million in increased amortization expense due
to the revaluation of intangible assets acquired in the
Transaction and $1.0 million in post-Transaction management
services provided by Carlyle. These increases were offset by a
decrease of $1.3 million in personnel and other expenses.
The increase in total operating expenses from 2004 to 2005 was
primarily due to transaction costs of $36.9 million related
to the sale of the Company and the 2005 acquisitions, which
added $14.1 million in expenses. Our April 2005 acquisition
of FMC initially increased our headcount by approximately
300 employees, of which approximately 150 employees
affect operating expenses. Shortly after the acquisition, we
consolidated functions and reduced the number of development
projects, thereby reducing the number of employees performing
development, sales and administrative functions to approximately
110. Additionally, expenses for OMR increased $1.1 million,
reflecting a full 12 months of activity and bad debt
expense increased $1.3 million, mainly due to a benefit of
$0.4 million recorded in 2004, partially offset by a
decrease in personnel and other costs of $0.3 million.
Selling
and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses were $17.6 million,
$14.5 million and $10.7 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, representing 9%, 9% and 11%, respectively,
of total revenues in those years. The increase in expenses from
2005 to 2006 was primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which
increased costs by an aggregate of $1.8 million, reflecting
a full 12 months of activity, our 2006 acquisitions, which
added $0.4 million, a $1.0 million in increased
amortization expense due to the revaluation of intangible assets
acquired in the Transaction and stock-based compensation expense
of $0.6 million. These increases were offset by a decrease
of $0.7 million in personnel and other costs. The increase
in expenses from 2004 to 2005 was due to the 2005 acquisitions,
which added $4.2 million in costs, and an increase of
$0.2 million, reflecting a full 12 months of activity
for OMR. Additionally, a reduction in personnel and other costs
of $0.7 million was partially offset by increased
amortization of $0.1 million related to the revaluation of
intangible assets acquired in the Transaction.
Research
and Development
Research and development expenses were $23.6 million,
$21.3 million and $14.0 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, representing 11%, 13% and 15%, respectively,
of total revenues in those years. The increase in expenses from
2005 to 2006 was primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which
increased costs by an aggregate of $3.4 million, reflecting
a full 12 months of activity, our 2006 acquisitions, which
added $0.2 million, and stock-based compensation expense of
$0.4 million. These increases were offset by a decrease of
$1.6 million in personnel and other costs. The increase in
expenses from 2004 to 2005 was primarily attributable to our
2005 acquisitions, which added $6.7 million in costs, and
increased expenses of $0.7 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity for OMR, partially offset by a
reduction in personnel costs of $0.1 million.
General
and Administrative
General and administrative expenses were $20.4 million,
$13.1 million and $8.0 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, representing 10%, 8% and 8%, respectively, of
total revenues in those years. The increase in expenses from
2005 to 2006 was primarily due to our 2005 acquisitions, which
increased costs by
51
an aggregate of $1.4 million, reflecting a full
12 months of activity, stock-based compensation expense of
$1.8 million, capital-based taxes of $1.8 million and
$1.0 million in post-Transaction management services
provided by Carlyle. Personnel and other costs increased an
additional $1.3 million. The increase in expenses from 2004
to 2005 was primarily attributable to our 2005 acquisitions,
which added $3.2 million in costs, and increased expenses
of $0.2 million, reflecting a full 12 months of activity
for OMR. Additionally, bad debt expense increased
$1.3 million, primarily due to a benefit of
$0.4 million recorded in 2004, and personnel costs
increased $0.4 million.
Merger
Costs Related to the Transaction
In connection with the Transaction, we incurred
$36.9 million in costs, including $31.7 million of
compensation expense related to the payment and settlement of
SS&Cs outstanding stock options.
Interest
Income, Interest Expense and Other Income, Net
We had interest expense of $47.4 million and interest
income of $0.4 million in 2006. In 2005, we had interest
expense of $7.0 million and interest income of
$1.1 million. In 2004, we had no interest expense and
interest income of $1.5 million. The increase in interest
expense from 2005 to 2006 reflects a full 12 months of
carrying the debt issued in connection with the Transaction. The
interest expense in 2005 was due to the issuance of
$205.0 million in
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and $285.0 million of
borrowings in November 2005 in connection with the Transaction.
Additionally, we used $84.0 million of cash on hand and
incurred $75.0 million of debt to effect our acquisition of
FMC in April 2005. Other income, net in 2006 primarily reflects
income recorded under the equity method from a private
investment. Included in other income, net in 2005 were net gains
of $0.6 million resulting from the sale of marketable
securities and net foreign currency translation gains of
$0.2 million. Included in other income, net in 2004 was
$0.1 million related to a favorable legal settlement.
Provision
for Income Taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a benefit
of $3.8 million. This was partially due to a change in
Canadian statutory tax rates enacted in June 2006, for which we
recorded a benefit of approximately $1.2 million on our
deferred tax assets, and foreign tax benefits of approximately
$1.9 million. For the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, we had effective income tax rates of approximately 63%
and 39%, respectively. The higher tax rate in 2005 was primarily
due to merger costs related to the sale of SS&C, which were
not deductible for tax purposes. We had $89.0 million of
deferred tax liabilities and $19.1 million of deferred tax
assets at December 31, 2006. In future years, we expect to
have sufficient levels of profitability to realize the deferred
tax assets at December 31, 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our principal cash requirements are to finance the costs of our
operations pending the billing and collection of client
receivables, to fund payments with respect to our indebtedness,
to invest in research and development and to acquire
complementary businesses or assets. We expect our cash on hand,
cash flows from operations, net proceeds from this offering and
availability under the revolving credit portion of our senior
credit facilities to provide sufficient liquidity to fund our
current obligations, projected working capital requirements and
capital spending for at least the next 12 months.
Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at
June 30, 2007 were $13.2 million, an increase of
$1.5 million from $11.7 million at December 31,
2006. Cash provided by operations was partially offset by net
repayments of debt and cash used for acquisitions and capital
expenditures. Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities at December 31, 2006 represents a decrease of
$3.9 million from $15.6 million at December 31,
2005. The decrease was primarily due to net repayment of debt
and cash paid for acquisitions and fixed assets, partially
offset by cash provided by operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $22.7 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Cash provided by
operating activities was primarily due to a net loss of
$1.2 million adjusted for non-cash items of
52
$18.9 million and changes in our working capital accounts
totaling $5.1 million. The changes in our working capital
accounts were driven by an increase in deferred revenues,
primarily due to the collection of annual maintenance fees,
offset in part by an increase in accounts receivable due to
additional revenues and the timing of collections.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $30.7 million
in 2006. Net cash provided by operating activities during 2006
was primarily due to net income of $1.1 million adjusted
for non-cash items of $23.6 million and changes in our
working capital accounts totaling $6.0 million. The changes
in our working capital accounts were primarily related to the
collection of taxes receivable and accounts receivable,
partially offset by a decrease in accrued expenses, due in part
to the payment of expenses related to the Transaction.
Investing activities used net cash of $8.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007. Cash used by investing
activities was due to $5.1 million cash paid for the
acquisition of Northport, $3.4 million in capital
expenditures and a $0.2 million additional private
investment. Net cash used in investing activities was
$18.6 million in 2006, including $14.0 million for the
acquisitions of Cogent and Zoologic and $4.2 million for
capital expenditures. Additionally, we capitalized
$0.4 million of development costs related to our
FundRunner Marathon product that was released in December
2006.
Financing activities used net cash of $12.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007, representing
$12.9 million of net repayments of debt under our senior
credit facilities, partially offset by income tax benefits of
$0.1 million related to option exercises. Net cash used in
financing activities was $16.4 million in 2006, primarily
related to $17.1 million net repayments of debt.
Additionally, we received $0.7 million from the sale of our
common stock to employees pursuant to our 2006 equity incentive
plan.
As a result of the Transaction, we are highly leveraged and our
debt service requirements are significant. At June 30,
2007, our total indebtedness was $463.8 million and we had
$75.0 million available for borrowing under our revolving
credit facility.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2006 that require us to make future cash
payments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
471,929
|
|
|
$
|
2,674
|
|
|
$
|
5,348
|
|
|
$
|
8,348
|
|
|
$
|
455,559
|
|
Interest payments(2)
|
|
|
280,788
|
|
|
|
43,594
|
|
|
|
86,744
|
|
|
|
85,834
|
|
|
|
64,616
|
|
Operating lease obligations(3)
|
|
|
48,758
|
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
|
|
13,964
|
|
|
|
11,955
|
|
|
|
14,741
|
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
805,415
|
|
|
$
|
56,120
|
|
|
$
|
107,224
|
|
|
$
|
106,646
|
|
|
$
|
535,425
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Short-term and long-term debt obligations do not reflect our
intention to redeem up to 35% of our senior subordinated notes.
If we redeem 35% of our senior subordinated notes with the net
proceeds from this offering, our payments due in more than
five years will be reduced by $71.8 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects interest payments on our term loan facility at an
assumed interest rate of three-month LIBOR of 5.36% plus 2.0%,
interest payments on our revolving credit facility at an assumed
interest rate of one-month LIBOR of 5.35% plus 2.75% and
required interest payment payments on our senior subordinated
notes of 11.75%. If we redeem 35% of our senior subordinated
notes with the net proceeds from this offering, our interest
payments will be reduced by $8.4 million per year. |
|
(3) |
|
We are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for office
space and office equipment. The lease for the corporate facility
in Windsor, Connecticut was extended in 2006 and now expires in
2016. We sublease office space under noncancelable leases. We
received rental income under these leases of |
53
|
|
|
|
|
$1.4 million, $352,000 and $456,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The effect
of the rental income to be received in the future has not been
included in the table above. |
|
(4) |
|
Purchase obligations include the minimum amounts committed under
contracts for goods and services. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that is material to investors.
The
Going-Private Transaction
On November 23, 2005, in connection with the Transaction,
SS&C (1) entered into a new $350 million credit
facility, consisting of a $200 million term loan facility
with SS&C as the borrower, a $75 million-equivalent
term loan facility with a Canadian subsidiary as the borrower
($17 million of which is denominated in US dollars and
$58 million of which is denominated in Canadian dollars)
and a $75 million revolving credit facility and
(2) issued $205 million aggregate principal amount of
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013.
Senior
Credit Facilities
SS&Cs borrowings under the senior credit facilities
bear interest at either a floating base rate or a Eurocurrency
rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin. In addition,
SS&C pays a commitment fee in respect of unused revolving
commitments at a rate that will be adjusted based on our
leverage ratio. SS&C is obligated to make quarterly
principal payments on the term loan of $2.6 million per
year. Subject to certain exceptions, thresholds and other
limitations, SS&C is required to prepay outstanding loans
under the senior credit facilities with the net proceeds of
certain asset dispositions and certain debt issuances and 50% of
its excess cash flow (as defined in the agreements governing our
senior credit facilities), which percentage will be reduced
based on our reaching certain leverage ratio thresholds.
The obligations under our senior credit facilities are
guaranteed by SS&C Holdings and all of SS&Cs
existing and future material wholly owned
U.S. subsidiaries, with certain exceptions as set forth in
our credit agreement. The obligations of the Canadian borrower
are guaranteed by SS&C Holdings, SS&C and each of
SS&Cs U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, with certain
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement. The obligations
under the senior credit facilities are secured by a perfected
first priority security interest in all of SS&Cs
capital stock and all of the capital stock or other equity
interests held by SS&C Holdings, SS&C and each of
SS&Cs existing and future U.S. subsidiary
guarantors (subject to certain limitations for equity interests
of foreign subsidiaries and other exceptions as set forth in our
credit agreement) and all of SS&C Holdings and
SS&Cs tangible and intangible assets and the tangible
and intangible assets of each of SS&Cs existing and
future U.S. subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions
as set forth in the credit agreement. The Canadian
borrowers borrowings under the senior credit facilities
and all guarantees thereof are secured by a perfected first
priority security interest in all of SS&Cs capital
stock and all of the capital stock or other equity interests
held by SS&C Holdings, SS&C and each of
SS&Cs existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in
the credit agreement, and all of SS&C Holdings and
SS&Cs tangible and intangible assets and the tangible
and intangible assets of each of SS&Cs existing and
future U.S. and Canadian subsidiary guarantors, with certain
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement.
The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions,
SS&Cs (and its restricted subsidiaries) ability
to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and
distributions on capital stock, create liens on assets, enter
into sale and lease-back transactions, repay subordinated
indebtedness, make capital expenditures, engage in certain
transactions with affiliates, dispose of assets and engage in
mergers or acquisitions. In addition, under the senior credit
facilities, SS&C is required to satisfy and maintain a
maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage
ratio. We were in compliance with all covenants at June 30,
2007.
54
In March 2007, SS&C amended the credit agreement to reduce
the margin on the U.S. Term Loan from 2.5% to 2.0%.
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013
The
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 are unsecured senior subordinated
obligations of SS&C that are subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior debt, including the
senior credit facilities. The senior subordinated notes will be
pari passu in right of payment to all future senior
subordinated debt of SS&C.
The senior subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in
part, at SS&Cs option, at any time at varying
redemption prices that generally include premiums, which are
defined in the indenture. In addition, upon a change of control,
SS&C is required to make an offer to redeem all of the
senior subordinated notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains a
number of covenants that restrict, subject to certain
exceptions, SS&Cs ability and the ability of its
restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay
dividends, make certain investments, create liens, dispose of
certain assets and engage in mergers or acquisitions.
We currently intend to use substantially all of our net proceeds
from this offering to redeem up to $71.75 million in
principal amount of the outstanding senior subordinated notes,
at a redemption price of 111.75% of the principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. If we redeem the maximum amount of
senior subordinated notes permitted by the indenture, we will
redeem $71.75 million in principal amount of notes for
$80.18 million in cash, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
This redemption will result in a loss on extinguishment of debt
of approximately $8.4 million in the period in which the
notes are redeemed. Additionally, we will incur a non-cash
charge of approximately $2.2 million relating to the
write-off of deferred financing fees attributable to the
redeemed notes. Our future annual interest payments will be
reduced by approximately $8.4 million. For each
$1.0 million decrease in the principal amount redeemed, we
will pay $1.12 million less in cash. See Use of
Proceeds for additional information.
Covenant
Compliance
Under the senior credit facilities, we are required to satisfy
and maintain specified financial ratios and other financial
condition tests. As of June 30, 2007, we were in compliance
with the financial and non-financial covenants. Our continued
ability to meet these financial ratios and tests can be affected
by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we
will meet these ratios and tests. A breach of any of these
covenants could result in a default under the senior credit
facilities. Upon the occurrence of any event of default under
the senior credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare
all amounts outstanding under the senior credit facilities to be
immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to
extend further credit.
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used in key
financial covenants contained in our senior credit facilities,
which are material facilities supporting our capital structure
and providing liquidity to our business. Consolidated EBITDA is
defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA), further adjusted to exclude unusual items
and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant
compliance under our senior credit facilities. We believe that
the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in
presenting Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide
additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance
with the specified financial ratios and other financial
condition tests contained in our senior credit facilities.
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA to gauge the costs of our
capital structure on a day-to-day basis when full financial
statements are unavailable. Management further believes that
providing this information allows our investors greater
transparency and a better understanding of our ability to meet
our debt service obligations and make capital expenditures.
The breach of covenants in our senior credit facilities that are
tied to ratios based on Consolidated EBITDA could result in a
default under that agreement, in which case the lenders could
elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable and to
terminate any commitments they have to provide further
55
borrowings. Any such acceleration would also result in a
default under our indenture. Any default and subsequent
acceleration of payments under our debt agreements would have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
position and cash flows. Additionally, under our debt
agreements, our ability to engage in activities such as
incurring additional indebtedness, making investments and paying
dividends is also tied to ratios based on Consolidated EBITDA.
Consolidated EBITDA does not represent net income (loss) or cash
flow from operations as those terms are defined by GAAP and does
not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient
to fund cash needs. Further, our senior credit facilities
require that Consolidated EBITDA be calculated for the most
recent four fiscal quarters. As a result, the measure can be
disproportionately affected by a particularly strong or weak
quarter. Further, it may not be comparable to the measure for
any subsequent four-quarter period or any complete fiscal year.
Consolidated EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP,
and investors should not consider Consolidated EBITDA as a
substitute for measures of our financial performance and
liquidity as determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net
income, operating income or net cash provided by operating
activities. Because other companies may calculate Consolidated
EBITDA differently than we do, Consolidated EBITDA may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. Consolidated EBITDA has other limitations as an
analytical tool, when compared to the use of net income (loss),
which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the provision of income tax
expense in our various jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense we incur as a result of our debt leverage;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect any attribution of costs to
our operations related to our investments and capital
expenditures through depreciation and amortization charges;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the cost of compensation we
provide to our employees in the form of stock option awards; and
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA excludes expenses that we believe are
unusual or non-recurring, but which others may believe are
normal expenses for the operation of a business.
|
56
The following is a reconciliation of net income to Consolidated
EBITDA as defined in our senior credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
22,555
|
|
|
|
23,273
|
|
|
|
47,039
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
|
|
27,128
|
|
|
|
11,876
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
38,438
|
|
|
|
36,966
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
22,028
|
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments(1)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
Capital-based taxes
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges(2)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings(3)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(4)
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
44,182
|
|
|
$
|
40,979
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments include (a) an adjustment
to increase revenues by the amount that would have been
recognized if deferred revenue were not adjusted to fair value
at the date of the Transaction and (b) an adjustment to
increase rent expense by the amount that would have been
recognized if lease obligations were not adjusted to fair value
at the date of the Transaction. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges include foreign currency gains
and losses, gains and losses on the sales of marketable
securities, proceeds from legal settlements, costs associated
with the closing of a regional office and other one-time
expenses. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings reflects the EBITDA impact of
significant businesses that were acquired during the period as
if the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period and
cost savings to be realized from such acquisitions. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Other includes management fees paid to Carlyle and the non-cash
portion of straight-line rent expense. |
Our covenant restricting capital expenditures for the year
ending December 31, 2007 limits expenditures to
$10 million. Actual capital expenditures through
June 30, 2007 were $3.4 million. Our covenant
requirements for total leverage ratio and minimum interest
coverage ratio and the actual ratios for the 12 months
ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirements
|
|
Ratios
|
|
Maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio
|
|
|
6.75
|
x
|
|
|
5.16
|
x
|
Minimum Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest
coverage ratio
|
|
|
1.50
|
x
|
|
|
2.00
|
x
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of
FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to create
a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in
57
tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income
taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and
transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. We adopted FIN 48 as of
January 1, 2007, as required.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This standard does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 157 will
have a significant impact on our financial position and results
of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 provides
entities with the option to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value, and also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between entities that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This
standard is intended to expand the use of fair value
measurement, but does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS 159 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
potential impact of this standard on our financial position and
results of operations.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. We have invested our available cash in
short-term, highly liquid financial instruments, having initial
maturities of three months or less. When necessary we have
borrowed to fund acquisitions.
At June 30, 2007, we had total debt of $463.8 million,
including $258.8 million of variable rate debt. We have
entered into three interest rate swap agreements which fixed the
interest rates for $205.3 million of our variable rate
debt. Two of our swap agreements are denominated in
U.S. dollars and have notional values of $100 million
and $50 million, effectively fix our interest rates at
6.78% and 6.71%, respectively, and expire in December 2010 and
December 2008, respectively. Our third swap agreement is
denominated in Canadian dollars and has a notional value
equivalent to approximately $55.3 million
U.S. dollars. The Canadian swap effectively fixes our
interest rate at 6.679% and expires in December 2008. During the
period when all three of our swap agreements are effective, a 1%
change in interest rates would result in a change in interest of
approximately $0.5 million per year. Upon the expiration of
the two interest rate swap agreements in December 2008 and the
third interest rate swap agreement in December 2010, a 1% change
in interest rates would result in a change in interest of
approximately $1.6 million and $2.6 million per year,
respectively.
At June 30, 2007, $56.5 million of our debt was
denominated in Canadian dollars. We expect that our foreign
denominated debt will be serviced through our local operations.
During 2006, approximately 40% of our revenues was from clients
located outside the United States. A portion of the revenues
from clients located outside the United States is denominated in
foreign currencies, the majority being the Canadian dollar.
Revenues and expenses of our foreign operations are denominated
in their respective local currencies. We continue to monitor our
exposure to foreign exchange rates as a result of our foreign
currency denominated debt, our acquisitions and changes in our
operations.
The foregoing risk management discussion and the effect thereof
are forward-looking statements. Actual results in the future may
differ materially from these projected results due to actual
developments in global financial markets. The analytical methods
used by us to assess and minimize risk discussed above should
not be considered projections of future events or losses.
58
Overview
We are a leading provider of mission-critical, sophisticated
software products and software-enabled services that allow
financial services providers to automate complex business
processes and effectively manage their information processing
requirements. Our portfolio of software products and rapidly
deployable software-enabled services allows our clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. Our solutions enable our clients to
focus on core operations, better monitor and manage investment
performance and risk, improve operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs. We provide our solutions globally to more than
4,000 clients, principally within the institutional asset
management, alternative investment management and financial
institutions sectors. In addition, our clients include
commercial lenders, corporate treasury groups, insurance and
pension funds, municipal finance groups and real estate property
managers.
We provide the global financial services industry with a broad
range of both specialized software products, which are deployed
at our clients facilities, and software-enabled services,
which consist of software-enabled outsourcing services and
subscription-based on-demand software that is hosted at our
facilities. Our software-enabled services, which combine the
strengths of our proprietary software with our domain expertise,
enable our clients to contract with us to provide many of their
mission-critical and complex business processes. For example, we
utilize our software to offer comprehensive fund administration
services for alternative investment managers, including fund
manager services, transfer agency services, fund of funds
services, tax processing and accounting and processing. We offer
clients the flexibility to choose from multiple software
delivery options, including on-premise applications and hosted,
multi-tenant or dedicated applications. Additionally, we provide
certain clients with targeted, blended solutions based on a
combination of our various software and software-enabled
services. We believe that our software-enabled services provide
superior client support and an attractive alternative to clients
that do not wish to install, manage and maintain complicated
financial software. The following table describes selected
functionality of our software products and software-enabled
services and the eight vertical markets that we serve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
Alternative
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
Leasing/
|
|
Selected
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Functionality
|
|
Managers
|
|
|
Groups
|
|
|
Institutions
|
|
|
Managers
|
|
|
Funds
|
|
|
Lenders
|
|
|
Groups
|
|
|
Managers
|
|
|
Portfolio Management/Accounting
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading/Treasury Operations
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Modeling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
SS&C Fund Services
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Management/Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
Our business model is characterized by substantial contractually
recurring revenues, high operating margins and significant cash
flow. We generate revenues primarily through our high-value
software-enabled services, which are typically sold on a
long-term subscription basis and integrated into our
clients business processes. Our software-enabled services
are generally provided under two- to five-year non-cancelable
contracts with required monthly or quarterly payments. We also
generate revenues by licensing our software to clients through
either perpetual or term licenses, both of which include
annually renewable maintenance contracts. As a consequence, a
significant portion of our revenues consists of subscription
payments and maintenance fees and is contractually recurring in
nature. Our pricing typically scales as a function of our
clients assets under management, the complexity of asset
classes managed and the volume of transactions.
Our contractually recurring revenue model helps us minimize the
fluctuations in revenues and cash flows typically associated
with up-front, perpetual software license revenues and enhances
our ability to manage costs. Our contractually recurring
revenues, which we define as our software-enabled services and
maintenance revenues, increased as a percentage of total
revenues from 52% in the year ended December 31, 2000 to
79%
59
in the year ended December 31, 2006. We have experienced
average revenue retention rates in each of the last five years
of greater than 90% on our software-enabled services and
maintenance contracts for our core enterprise products. We
believe that the high value-added nature of our products and
services has enabled us to maintain our high revenue retention
rates and significant operating margins.
Through a combination of consistent organic growth and
acquisitions, we generated revenues of $205.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to revenues of
$95.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. We
generated 77% of our revenues in 2006 from clients in North
America and 23% from clients outside North America. Our revenues
are highly diversified, with our largest client in 2006
accounting for 5.5% of our revenues.
Since 2005, our business has continued to grow, and we have made
significant operational improvements. We acquired EisnerFast,
Financial Interactive, Cogent Management and Northport, which
enabled us to expand our software-enabled services for
alternative investment managers, as well as MarginMan, Open
Information Systems and Zoologic, which added software solutions
to complement our product suite. We also acquired and integrated
the operations of Financial Models Company, which significantly
increased our client base and product capabilities. Moreover, we
have strengthened our product portfolio through internal
development and introduced new offerings for institutional asset
managers, alternative investment managers and mortgage and
commercial loan managers. On November 23, 2005, SS&C
was acquired by SS&C Holdings, which is currently owned
principally by funds affiliated with Carlyle and by Mr. Stone.
Our
Industry
The financial services industry is a large, dynamic market and
comprises a variety of enterprises and organizations, including
institutional asset managers, alternative investment managers,
financial institutions, commercial lenders, corporate treasury
groups, insurance and pension funds, municipal finance groups
and real estate property managers. We expect continued strong
growth within the financial services information technology, or
IT, market due to growing assets under management, increasing
transaction volumes, constantly evolving regulatory requirements
and the increasing number, and complexity, of asset classes.
According to a 2006 Gartner report, worldwide financial services
industry spending on IT services and software is forecasted to
grow from $163.5 billion in 2005 to $230.9 billion in
2010, representing a 7.2% compound annual growth rate.
Additionally, worldwide financial services spending on
outsourced process management is expected to grow from
$26.5 billion in 2005 to $40.7 billion in 2010,
representing an 8.9% compound annual growth rate. We expect our
growth to continue due to a number of factors related to the
financial services industry and evolving challenges faced by
industry participants, including:
Rapidly Growing Worldwide Financial Services
Industry. As both transaction volumes and
assets under management increase, financial services providers
require more advanced solutions to automate complex business
processes and manage their information processing requirements.
For example, according to a 2006 Boston Consulting Group report,
the value of professionally managed assets grew by approximately
15% globally to $49.1 trillion in 2005, with the United
States accounting for $22 trillion of that amount. The
average daily trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange
increased from 1.04 billion shares in 2000 to
2.00 billion shares in the first quarter of 2007.
Additionally, alternative investment vehicles such as hedge
funds and private equity funds have experienced rapid growth.
According to a 2007 report of Hedge Fund Research, Inc.,
the total assets under hedge fund management have increased from
$490.6 billion in 2000 to $1.5 trillion in 2006,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 20%. To keep pace
with the rapid growth in the industry and remain competitive
with other industry participants, financial services providers
increasingly need to implement advanced software applications or
utilize service offerings from third parties to manage their
most critical and complex IT processes.
Increasing Willingness to Implement Solutions from
Independent Software Vendors and Outsource IT
Operations. Historically, financial services
providers have relied in large part on their internal IT
departments to supply the systems required to manage, analyze
and control vast amounts of data. Rather than internally
developing applications that automate business processes, many
financial services providers are implementing advanced software
solutions from independent software vendors to replace their
current systems, which are
60
often cumbersome, time-consuming to operate and expensive to
implement, customize, update and support. Additionally,
financial services providers globally are outsourcing a growing
percentage of their business processes to benefit from
best-in-class
process execution, focus on core operations, quickly expand into
new markets, reduce costs, streamline organizations, handle
increased transaction volumes and ensure system redundancy. We
believe that one of the key challenges faced by investment
management industry participants is how to expand their use of
third-party service providers to address the increasing
complexity of new products and the growing investor and
regulatory information demands. For example, many alternative
investment firms lack the substantial in-house IT resources
necessary to establish and manage the complex IT infrastructures
their investment professionals require. These firms increasingly
seek end-to-end solutions that enable them to outsource their
operations from the front-office through the back-office.
Asset Classes and Securities Products Growing in Both
Number and Complexity. As the financial
services industry has evolved, investment professionals must
increasingly track and invest in numerous types of asset classes
and securities that are often far more complex than traditional
equity and debt instruments, including mortgage- and
asset-backed securities, derivatives, swaps, futures, repos and
options. These assets require more sophisticated systems to
automate functions such as trading and modeling, portfolio
management, accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation,
reporting, processing and clearing.
Increasing Regulatory
Requirements. Increasing domestic and foreign
regulation is forcing compliance with more complicated and
burdensome requirements for financial services providers. This
has escalated demand for software solutions that both meet
compliance requirements and reduce the burden of compliance
reporting and enforcement. For example, according to a May 2007
PricewaterhouseCoopers survey, the top two challenges for 2007
cited by investment management industry executives were
regulatory uncertainty and regulatory pressures to increase
transparency. Financial services providers continue to face
increasing regulatory oversight from domestic organizations such
as the National Association of Securities Dealers,
U.S. Treasury Department, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, New York Stock Exchange, National Association of
Insurance Commissioners and U.S. Department of Labor as
well as foreign regulatory bodies such as the Office of
Supervision of Financial Institutions in Ottawa, Canada,
Financial Services Association in London, England and Ministry
of Finance in Tokyo, Japan. As the financial services industry
continues to grow in complexity, we anticipate regulatory
oversight will continue to impose new demands on financial
services providers.
Intense Global Competition Among Financial Services
Providers. Competition within the financial
services industry has become intense as financial services
providers expand into new markets and offer new services to
their clients in an effort to maximize their profitability.
Additionally, a significant number of small- and medium-sized
organizations, such as hedge funds, have begun to compete with
large financial institutions as they seek to attract new clients
whose assets they can manage. As traditional equity and debt
instruments become more commoditized, financial services
providers are expanding into more complex product and service
offerings to drive profitability. In response to these
increasingly competitive conditions worldwide, financial
services organizations seek to rapidly expand into new markets,
increase front-office productivity by offering investment
professionals greater modeling functionality and better tools to
solve complex financial problems, and drive cost savings by
utilizing software to automate and integrate their
mission-critical and labor intensive business processes, provide
greater functionality to investment professionals and offer the
tools necessary to solve complex financial problems.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our position in the marketplace results from
several key competitive strengths, including:
Broad Portfolio of Products and Services Focused on
Financial Services Organizations. Our broad
portfolio of over 50 software products and software-enabled
services allows professionals in the financial services industry
to efficiently and rapidly analyze and manage information,
increase productivity, devote more time to critical business
decisions and reduce costs. Our products and services automate
our clients most mission-critical, complex business
processes, and improve their operational efficiency. We believe
our product and service offerings position us as a leader within
the specific sectors of financial services software and
61
services in which we compete. We provide highly flexible,
scalable and cost-effective solutions that enable our clients to
track complex securities, better employ sophisticated investment
strategies, scale efficiently and meet evolving regulatory
requirements. Our solutions allow our clients to automate and
integrate their front-office, middle-office and back-office
functions, thus enabling straight-through processing.
Enhanced Profitability Through Software
Ownership. We use our proprietary software
products and infrastructure to provide our software-enabled
services, strengthening our overall operating margins. Because
we use our own products in the execution of our software-enabled
services and own and control our products source code, we
can quickly identify and deploy product improvements and respond
to client feedback, enhancing the competitiveness of our
software and software-enabled service offerings. This continuous
feedback process provides us with a significant advantage over
many of our competitors, specifically those software competitors
that do not provide a comparable software-enabled services model
and therefore do not have the same level of hands-on experience
with their products.
Attractive Operating Model. We believe
we have an attractive operating model due to the contractually
recurring nature of our revenues, the scalability of our
software and software-enabled services, the significant
operating cash flow we generate and our highly effective sales
and marketing model.
Growing Contractually Recurring Revenues. We
continue to focus on growing our contractually recurring
revenues from our software-enabled services and our maintenance
contracts because they provide greater predictability in the
operation of our business and enable us to strengthen long-term
relationships with our clients. Contractually recurring revenues
represented 79% of total revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2006, up from 52% of total revenues in 2000.
Scalable Software and Software-enabled
Services. We have designed our software and
software-enabled services to accommodate significant additional
business volumes with limited incremental costs. The ability to
generate additional revenues from increased volumes without
incurring substantial incremental costs provides us with
opportunities to improve our operating margins.
Significant Operating Cash Flow. We are able
to generate significant operating cash flows due to our strong
operating margins and the relatively modest capital requirements
needed to grow our business.
Highly Effective Sales and Marketing Model. We
utilize a direct sales force model that benefits from
significant direct participation by senior management. We
achieve significant efficiency in our sales model by leveraging
the Internet as a direct marketing medium. Approximately every
two weeks, we deliver over 300,000 electronic newsletters to
industry participants worldwide. These eBriefings are
integrated with our corporate website, www.ssctech.com, and are
the source for a substantial number of our sales leads. Our deep
domain knowledge and extensive participation in day-to-day
investment, finance and fund administration activities enable us
to create informative and timely articles that are the basis of
our eBriefings.
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. As of June 30, 2007, we had
833 development and service professionals with significant
expertise across the eight vertical markets that we serve and a
deep working knowledge of our clients businesses. By
leveraging our domain expertise and knowledge, we have
developed, and continue to improve, our mission-critical
software products and services to enable our clients to overcome
the complexities inherent in their businesses. For example, our
Complete Asset Management, Reporting and Accounting, or CAMRA,
software, which supports the entire portfolio management
function across all typical securities transactions, was
originally released in 1989 and has been continually updated to
meet our clients new business requirements. We were
founded in 1986 by William C. Stone, who has served as our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since our inception. Our
senior management team has a track record of operational
excellence and an average of more than 15 years of
experience in the software and financial services industries.
Trusted Provider to Our Highly Diversified and Growing
Client Base. By providing mission-critical,
reliable software products and services for more than
20 years, we have become a trusted provider to the
financial services industry. We have developed a large and
growing installed base within multiple segments of the financial
services industry. Our clients include some of the largest and
most well-recognized firms in the
62
financial services industry. We believe that our high-quality
products and superior services have led to long-term client
relationships, some of which date from our earliest days of
operations in 1987. Our strong client relationships, coupled
with the fact that many of our current clients use our products
for a relatively small portion of their total funds and
investment vehicles under management, provide us with a
significant opportunity to sell additional solutions to our
existing clients and drive future revenue growth at lower cost.
Superior Client Support and Focus. Our
ability to rapidly deliver improvements and our reputation for
superior service have proven to be a strong competitive
advantage when developing client relationships. We provide our
larger clients with a dedicated client support team whose
primary responsibility is to resolve questions and provide
solutions to address ongoing needs. We also offer the Solution
Center, an interactive website that serves as an exclusive
online client community where clients can find answers to
product questions, exchange information, share best practices
and comment on business issues. We believe a close and active
service and support relationship significantly enhances client
satisfaction, strengthens client relationships and furnishes us
with information regarding evolving client issues.
Our
Growth Strategy
We intend to be the leading provider of superior technology
solutions to the financial services industry. The key elements
of our growth strategy include:
Continue to Develop Software-Enabled Services and New
Proprietary Software. Since our founding in
1986, we have focused on building substantial financial services
domain expertise through close working relationships with our
clients. We have developed a deep knowledge base that enables us
to respond to our clients most complex financial,
accounting, actuarial, tax and regulatory needs. We intend to
maintain and enhance our technological leadership by using our
domain expertise to build valuable new software-enabled services
and solutions, continuing to invest in internal development and
opportunistically acquiring products and services that address
the highly specialized needs of the financial services industry.
Our internal product development team works closely with
marketing and client service personnel to ensure that product
evolution reflects developments in the marketplace and trends in
client requirements. In addition, we intend to continue to
develop our products in a cost-effective manner by leveraging
common components across product families. We believe that we
enjoy a competitive advantage because we can address the
investment and financial management needs of high-end clients by
providing industry-tested products and services that meet global
market demands and enable our clients to automate and integrate
their front-, middle- and back-office functions for improved
productivity, reduced manual intervention and bottom-line
savings. Our software-enabled services revenues increased from
$30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 to
$107.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 87%.
Expand Our Client Base. Our client base
of more than 4,000 clients represents a fraction of the total
number of financial services providers globally. As a result, we
believe there is substantial opportunity to grow our client base
over time as our products become more widely adopted. We have a
substantial opportunity to capitalize on the increasing adoption
of mission-critical, sophisticated software and software-enabled
services by financial services providers as they continue to
replace inadequate legacy solutions and custom in-house
solutions that are inflexible and costly to maintain. Our direct
sales force principally targets financial services providers
that are not currently our clients.
Increase Revenues from Existing
Clients. We believe our established client
base presents a substantial opportunity for growth. Revenues
from our existing clients generally grow along with the amount
and complexity of assets that they manage and the volume of
transactions that they execute. While we expect to continue to
benefit from the financial services industrys growing
assets under management, expanding asset classes, and increasing
transaction volumes, we also intend to leverage our deep
understanding of the financial services industry to identify
other opportunities to increase our revenues from our existing
clients. Many of our current clients use our products for a
minority of their total assets under management and investment
funds, providing us with significant opportunities to expand our
business relationship and revenues. We have been successful in,
and expect to continue to focus our marketing efforts on,
providing additional modules or features to the products and
services our existing clients already use, as well as
cross-selling our other
63
products and services. Additionally, we intend to sell
additional software products and services to new divisions and
new funds of our existing client base. Our client services team
is primarily responsible for expanding our relationships with
current clients. Moreover, our high quality of service helps us
maintain significant client retention rates and longer lasting
client relationships.
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions of Complementary
Businesses and Technologies. We intend to
continue to employ a highly disciplined and focused acquisition
strategy to broaden and enhance our product and service
offerings, add new clients, supplement our internal development
efforts and accelerate our expected growth. We believe that our
acquisitions have been an extension of our research and
development effort that has enabled us to purchase proven
products and remove the uncertainties associated with software
development projects. We will seek to opportunistically acquire,
at attractive valuations, businesses, products and technologies
in our existing or complementary vertical markets that will
enable us to better satisfy our clients rigorous and
evolving needs. We have a proven ability to integrate
complementary businesses as demonstrated by the 23 businesses
that we have acquired since 1995. Our experienced senior
management team leads a rigorous evaluation of our acquisition
candidates to ensure that they satisfy our product or service
needs and will successfully integrate with our business while
meeting our targeted financial goals. As a result, our
acquisitions have contributed marketable products or services
that have added to our revenues. For example, the acquisitions
of EisnerFast, Cogent and Northport have expanded our
software-enabled services offerings to the alternative
investment management market, which is one of our fastest
growing businesses today. Through the broad reach of our direct
sales force and our large installed client base, we believe we
can market these acquired products and services to a large
number of prospective clients and scale revenues. Additionally,
we have been able to improve the operational performance and
profitability of our acquired businesses, creating significant
value for our stockholders.
Strengthen Our International
Presence. We believe that there is a
significant market opportunity to provide software and services
to financial services providers outside North America. In 2006,
we generated 23% of our revenues from clients outside North
America. We are building our international operations in order
to increase our sales outside North America. We believe that the
hiring of more sales personnel will lead to increased
international sales. For example, we believe that the rapidly
growing alternative investment management market in Europe
presents a compelling growth opportunity. We plan to expand our
international market presence by leveraging our existing
software products and software-enabled services for alternative
investment managers, which to date have primarily been
implemented by
U.S.-based
alternative investment management firms.
Our
Acquisitions
Since 1995, we have acquired over 20 businesses within our
industry. We generally seek to acquire companies that satisfy
our financial metrics, including expected return on investment,
and that:
|
|
|
|
|
provide complementary products or services in the financial
services industry;
|
|
|
|
address a highly specialized problem or a market niche in the
financial services industry;
|
|
|
|
expand our global reach into strategic geographic markets;
|
|
|
|
have solutions that lend themselves to being delivered as
software-enabled services; and
|
|
|
|
possess proven technology and an established client base that
will provide a source of ongoing revenues and to whom we may be
able to sell existing products and services.
|
Our senior management receives numerous acquisition proposals
for its consideration. We receive referrals from several
sources, including clients, investment banks and industry
contacts. We believe, based on our experience, that there are
numerous solution providers addressing highly particularized
financial services needs or providing specialized services that
would meet our acquisition criteria.
64
Below is a table summarizing our acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Products and
|
Date
|
|
Acquired Business
|
|
Contract Purchase Price*
|
|
Services Currently Offered
|
|
March 1995
|
|
Chalke
|
|
$10,000,000
|
|
PTS
|
November 1997
|
|
Mabel Systems
|
|
$850,000 and 109,224 shares
|
|
Mabel
|
December 1997
|
|
Shepro Braun Systems
|
|
1,500,000 shares
|
|
Total Return, Antares
|
March 1998
|
|
Quantra
|
|
$2,269,800 and 819,028 shares
|
|
SKYLINE
|
April 1998
|
|
The Savid Group
|
|
$821,500
|
|
Debt & Derivatives
|
March 1999
|
|
HedgeWare
|
|
1,028,524 shares
|
|
AdvisorWare
|
March 1999
|
|
Brookside
|
|
41,400 shares
|
|
Consulting services
|
November 2001
|
|
Digital Visions
|
|
$1,350,000
|
|
PortPro, The BANC Mall, PALMS
|
January 2002
|
|
Real-Time, USA
|
|
$4,000,000
|
|
Real-Time, Lightning
|
November 2002
|
|
DBC
|
|
$4,500,000
|
|
Municipal finance products
|
December 2003
|
|
Amicorp Fund Services
|
|
$1,800,000
|
|
Fund services
|
January 2004
|
|
Investment Advisory Network
|
|
$3,000,000
|
|
Compass, Portfolio Manager
|
February 2004
|
|
NeoVision Hypersystems
|
|
$1,600,000
|
|
Heatmaps
|
April 2004
|
|
OMR Systems
|
|
$19,671,000
|
|
TradeThru, Xacct
|
February 2005
|
|
Achievement Technologies
|
|
$470,000
|
|
SamTrak
|
February 2005
|
|
EisnerFast
|
|
$25,300,000
|
|
Fund services
|
April 2005
|
|
Financial Models Company
|
|
$159,000,000
|
|
FMC suite of products
|
June 2005
|
|
Financial Interactive
|
|
358,424 shares and warrants to purchase 50,000 shares
|
|
FundRunner
|
August 2005
|
|
MarginMan
|
|
$5,600,000
|
|
MarginMan
|
October 2005
|
|
Open Information Systems
|
|
$24,000,000
|
|
Money Market Manager, Information Manager
|
March 2006
|
|
Cogent Management
|
|
$12,250,000
|
|
Fund services
|
August 2006
|
|
Zoologic
|
|
$3,000,000
|
|
Education and training courseware
|
March 2007
|
|
Northport
|
|
$5,000,000
|
|
Fund services
|
* Share references are to shares of SS&C common stock
after giving effect to SS&Cs three-for-two common
stock split in the form of a stock dividend effective as of
March 2004.
Many of our acquisitions have enabled us to expand our product
and service offerings into new markets or client bases within
the financial services industry. For example, with our
acquisitions of Shepro Braun Systems and HedgeWare, we began
providing portfolio management and accounting software to the
hedge funds and family offices market. We began offering
property management products to the real estate property
management industry after we acquired Quantra and started
selling financial modeling products to the municipal finance
groups market after the DBC acquisition. Our acquisition of OMR
Systems Corporation and OMR Systems International Limited, which
we refer to collectively as OMR, allowed us to offer integrated,
global solutions to financial institutions and hedge funds
through our TradeThru software and Xacct services. The
acquisitions of EisnerFast, Cogent and Northport expanded our
software-enabled services to the hedge
65
fund and private equity markets. With our acquisition of FMC, we
complemented and expanded our product and service offerings to
meet the front-, middle- and back-office needs of the investment
management industry. The addition of new products and services
also enabled us to market other products and services to
acquired client bases. Some acquisitions have also provided us
with new technology, such as the Heatmaps data visualization
product developed by NeoVision Hypersystems, Inc.
To date, all of our acquisitions have resulted in a marketable
product or service that has added to our revenues. We also have
generally been able to improve the operating performance and
profitability of the acquired businesses. We seek to reduce the
costs of the acquired businesses by consolidating sales and
marketing efforts and by eliminating redundant administrative
tasks and research and development expenses. In some cases, we
have also been able to increase revenues generated by acquired
products and services by leveraging our larger sales
capabilities and client base.
Products
and Services
Our products and services allow professionals in the financial
services industry to automate complex business processes within
financial services providers and are instrumental in helping our
clients manage significant information processing requirements.
Our solutions enable our clients to focus on core operations,
better monitor and manage investment performance and risk,
improve operating efficiency and reduce operating costs. Our
portfolio of over 50 products and software-enabled services
allows our clients to automate and integrate front-office
functions such as trading and modeling, middle-office functions
such as portfolio management and reporting, and back-office
functions such as accounting, performance measurement,
reconciliation, reporting, processing and clearing.
The following chart summarizes our principal software products
and services, typical users and the vertical markets each
product serves. Most of these products are also used to deliver
our software-enabled services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Typical Users
|
|
|
Vertical Markets Served
|
Portfolio Management/Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AdvisorWare
Altair
CAMRA
CAMRA D Class
Debt & Derivatives
FundRunner
FundRunner Investorsite
FundRunner Marathon
Lightning
Pacer
Pages
PALMS
PortPro
Recon
SS&C Wealth Management
Suite Front Office
Sylvan
Total Return
|
|
|
Portfolio managers
Asset managers
Fund administrators
Investment advisors
Accountants
Auditors
Alternative investment managers Brokers/dealers
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
Corporate treasury groups
Financial institutions
Institutional asset managers
Insurance and pension funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading/Treasury Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antares
Heatmaps
MarginMan
Suite Front Office
TradeDesk
TradeThru
|
|
|
Securities traders
Financial institutions
Risk managers
Foreign exchange traders
Asset managers
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
Corporate treasury groups
Financial institutions
Institutional asset managers
Insurance and pension funds
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Typical Users
|
|
|
Vertical Markets Served
|
Financial Modeling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AnalyticsExpress
DBC (family of products)
Finesse HD
PTS
|
|
|
CEO/CFOs
Risk managers
Actuarial professionals
Bank asset/liability managers Investment bankers
State/local treasury staff
Financial advisors
|
|
|
Insurance and pension funds
Financial institutions
Municipal finance groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Management/Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LMS Loan Suite
LMS Originator
LMS Servicer
The BANC Mall
|
|
|
Mortgage originators
Commercial lenders
Mortgage loan servicers
Mortgage loan portfolio managers
Real estate investment managers
Bank/credit union loan officers
|
|
|
Commercial lenders
Financial institutions
Insurance and pension funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKYLINE (family of products)
SamTrak
|
|
|
Real estate investment managers
Real estate leasing agents
Real estate property managers
Facility managers
|
|
|
Real estate leasing/property managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Manager
Money Market Manager
|
|
|
Financial institutions
Custodians
Security lenders
Cash managers
|
|
|
Financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zoologic Learning Solutions
|
|
|
Financial institutions
Asset managers
Hedge fund managers
Investment bankers
|
|
|
All verticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Typical Users
|
|
|
Vertical Markets Served
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SS&C Direct
SS&C Fund Services
SSCNet
SVC
|
|
|
Portfolio managers
Asset managers
Fund administrators
Investment advisors
Alternative investment managers Securities traders
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
Financial institutions
Institutional asset managers
Insurance and pension funds
|
|
Portfolio
Management/Accounting
Our products and services for portfolio management span most of
our vertical markets and offer our clients a wide range of
investment management solutions.
AdvisorWare. AdvisorWare software supports
hedge funds, funds of funds and family offices with
sophisticated global investment, trading and management
concerns,
and/or
complex financial, tax (including German tax requirements),
partnership and allocation reporting requirements. It delivers
comprehensive multi-currency investment management, financial
reporting, performance fee calculations, net asset value
calculations, contact management and partnership accounting in a
straight-through processing environment.
Altair. Altair software is a portfolio
management system designed for companies that are looking for a
solution that meets Benelux market requirements and want
client/server architecture with SQL support. We sell Altair
primarily to European asset managers, stock brokers, custodians,
banks, pension funds and insurance
67
companies. Altair supports a full range of financial
instruments, including fixed income, equities, real estate
investments and alternative investment vehicles.
CAMRA. CAMRA (Complete Asset Management,
Reporting and Accounting) software supports the integrated
management of asset portfolios by investment professionals
operating across a wide range of institutional investment
entities. CAMRA is a 32-bit, multi-user, integrated solution
tailored to support the entire portfolio management function and
includes features to execute, account for and report on all
typical securities transactions.
We have designed CAMRA to account for all activities of the
investment operation and to continually update investment
information through the processing of day-to-day securities
transactions. CAMRA maintains transactions and holdings and
stores the results of most accounting calculations in its open,
relational database, providing user-friendly, flexible data
access and supporting data warehousing.
CAMRA offers a broad range of integrated modules that can
support specific client requirements, such as TBA dollar rolls,
trading, compliance monitoring, net asset value calculations,
performance measurement, fee calculations and reporting.
CAMRA D Class. CAMRA D Class software is for
smaller U.S. insurance companies that need to account for
their trades and holdings and comply with statutory reporting
requirements but do not require a software application as
sophisticated as CAMRA.
Debt & Derivatives. Debt &
Derivatives is a comprehensive financial application software
package designed to process and analyze all activities relating
to derivative and debt portfolios, including pricing, valuation
and risk analysis, derivative processing, accounting, management
reporting and regulatory reporting. Debt & Derivatives
delivers real-time transaction processing to treasury and
investment professionals, including traders, operations staff,
accountants and auditors.
FundRunner. FundRunner is a hedge fund
investor relationship management and fund profiling solution.
FundRunner solutions provide a comprehensive investor
relationship management and fund profiling infrastructure for
managing sophisticated investors by consolidating and automating
their communication needs. FundRunner solutions
streamline client servicing and marketing for fund managers and
integrates account management, correspondence tracking,
marketing, reporting, fund and investor performance analysis and
compliance.
FundRunner InvestorSite. FundRunner
InvestorSite is a robust, easy-to-use Internet
communications development and administration toolset for the
investment management industry. FundRunner InvestorSite
empowers investment managers to easily develop and maintain a
secure, personalized web presence in order to give their clients
valuable information.
FundRunner Marathon. FundRunner
Marathon HF gives hedge fund managers every tool necessary
for investor communication and reporting in a clear and simple
package any user can easily adopt out of the box.
Lightning. Lightning is a comprehensive
software-enabled service supporting the front-, middle- and
back-office processing needs of commercial banks and
broker-dealers of all sizes and complexity. Lightning automates
a number of processes, including trading, sales, funding,
accounting, risk analysis and asset/liability management.
Pacer. Pacer is a portfolio management and
accounting system designed to manage diversified global
portfolios and meet the unique management and accounting needs
of all business streams, from institutional and pension
management, to separately managed accounts, private client
portfolios, mutual funds and unit trusts.
Pages. Pages is a client communication system
that generates unique individual client statements and slide
presentations for print, electronic or face-to-face meetings.
Pages helps enhance customer services by producing client
statements that automatically assemble data from portfolio
management, customer relationship management, performance
measurement and other investment systems.
68
PALMS. PALMS (Portfolio Asset Liability
Management System) is an Internet-based service for community
banks and credit unions that enables them to manage and analyze
their balance sheet. PALMS gives financial institutions instant
access to their balance sheet by importing data directly from
general ledger, loan, deposit and investment systems and can
perform simulations for detailed analysis of the data.
PortPro. PortPro delivers Internet-based
portfolio accounting and is available as a software-enabled
service. PortPro helps financial institutions effectively
measure, analyze and manage balance sheets and investment
portfolios. PortPro is offered as a stand-alone product or as a
module of Lightning. PortPro includes bond accounting and
analytics.
Recon. Recon is a transaction, position and
cash reconciliation system that streamlines reconciliation by
identifying exceptions and providing effective workflow tools to
resolve issues faster, thereby reducing operational risk. Recon
automatically reconciles transactions, holdings and cash from
multiple sources.
SS&C Wealth Management. SS&C Wealth
Management is a web services platform that delivers core account
management services to wealth management professionals. Services
include investor prospecting, account aggregation and
reconciliation, account management, tax lot accounting,
performance measurement, fee processing and reporting. Services
can be customized to meet the specific needs of registered
investment advisors, broker-dealers or financial institutions.
Suite Front Office. A web-based service,
Suite Front Office combines our core asset management
product functionalities into an innovative, visually appealing,
and easy-to-use interface. Suite provides an integrated suite
with best-of-breed components modeling, trading,
portfolio accounting, client communications and other mission
critical workflows as an on-demand, software-enabled
service.
Sylvan. Sylvan is a performance measurement,
attribution and composite management platform designed to
streamline the calculation and reporting of performance
measurement requirements of clients. It provides an
enterprise-wide performance solution with data sourced from
multiple accounting engines and is highly scaleable, supporting
the high volumes of detailed analysis requirements of
institutional investment managers.
Total Return. Total Return is a portfolio
management and partnership accounting system directed toward the
hedge fund and family office markets. It is a multi-currency
system, designed to provide financial and tax accounting and
reporting for businesses with high transaction volumes.
Trading/Treasury
Operations
Our comprehensive real-time trading systems offer a wide range
of trade order management solutions that support both buy-side
and sell-side trading. Our full-service trade processing system
delivers comprehensive processing for global treasury and
derivative operations. Solutions are available to clients either
through a license or as a software-enabled service.
Antares. Antares is a comprehensive,
real-time, event-driven trading and profit and loss reporting
system designed to integrate trade modeling with trade order
management. Antares enables clients to trade and report
fixed-income, equities, foreign exchange, futures, options,
repos and many other instruments across different asset classes.
Antares also offers an add-on option of integrating
Heatmaps data visualization technology to browse and
navigate holdings information.
Heatmaps. Heatmaps is a data visualization
technology that uses color, sound, animation and pattern to
integrate vast amounts of financial data and analytics into
dynamic, visual color displays. Heatmaps provides professional
traders, analysts, asset managers and senior management with
consolidated and simplified views of their information, allowing
them to proactively monitor their business for opportunities,
trends and potential risks.
MarginMan. MarginMan delivers collateralized
trading software to the foreign exchange (FX) marketplace.
MarginMan supports collateralized FX trading, precious metals
trading and over-the-counter FX options trading.
TradeDesk. TradeDesk is a comprehensive
paperless trading system that automates front- and middle-office
aspects of fixed-income transaction processing. In particular,
TradeDesk enables clients to automate
69
ticket entry, confirmation and access to offerings and provides
clients with immediate, online access to complete client
information and holdings.
TradeThru. TradeThru is a web-based treasury
and derivatives operations service that supports multiple asset
classes and provides multi-bank, multi-entity and multi-currency
integration of front-, middle- and back-office trade functions
for financial institutions. TradeThru is available either
through a license or as a software-enabled service. The system
delivers automated front- to back-office functions throughout
the lifecycle of a trade, from deal capture to settlement, risk
management, accounting and reporting. TradeThru also provides
data to other external systems, such as middle-office analytic
and risk management systems and general ledgers. TradeThru
provides one common instrument database, counterparty database,
audit trail and end-of-day runs.
Financial
Modeling
We offer several powerful analytical software and financial
modeling applications for the insurance industry. We also
provide analytical software and services to the municipal
finance groups market.
AnalyticsExpress. AnalyticsExpress is a
reporting and data visualization tool that translates actuarial
analysis into meaningful management information.
AnalyticsExpress brings flexibility to the reporting process and
allows clients to analyze and present output at varying levels
of detail and create high-level reports and charts.
DBC Product Suite. We provide analytical
software and services to municipal finance groups. Our suite of
DBC products addresses a broad spectrum of municipal finance
concerns, including:
|
|
|
|
|
general bond structures,
|
|
|
|
revenue bonds,
|
|
|
|
housing bonds,
|
|
|
|
student loans, and
|
|
|
|
Federal Housing Administration insured revenue bonds
and securitizations.
|
Our DBC products also deliver solutions for debt structuring,
cash flow modeling and database management. Typical users of our
DBC products include investment banks, municipal issuers and
financial advisors for structuring new issues, securitizations,
strategic planning and asset/liability management.
Finesse HD. Finesse HD is a financial
simulation tool for the property/casualty insurance industry
that uses the principles of dynamic financial analysis. Finesse
HD measures multiple future risk scenarios to provide a more
accurate picture of financial risk and is designed to generate
iterative computer-simulated scenarios.
PTS. PTS is a pricing and financial modeling
tool for life insurance companies. PTS provides an economic
model of insurance assets and liabilities, generating
option-adjusted cash flows to reflect the complex set of options
and covenants frequently encountered in insurance contracts or
comparable agreements.
Loan
Management/Accounting
Our products that support loan administration activities are LMS
and The BANC Mall.
LMS Loan Suite. The LMS Loan Suite is a single
database application that provides comprehensive loan management
throughout the life cycle of a loan, from the initial request to
final disposition. We have structured the flexible design of the
LMS Loan Suite to meet the most complex needs of commercial
lenders and servicers worldwide. The LMS Loan Suite includes
both the LMS Originator and the LMS Servicer, facilitating
integrated loan portfolio processing.
LMS Originator. LMS Originator is a
comprehensive commercial loan origination system, designed to
bring efficiencies and controls to streamline the loan
origination process. LMS Originator tracks the origination
70
of a loan from the initial request through the initial funding.
It enables clients to set production goals, measure production
volumes against these goals and analyze the quality of loan
requests being submitted by third parties. LMS Originator is
integrated with LMS Servicer for seamless loan management
processing throughout the life cycle of a loan.
LMS Servicer. LMS Servicer is a comprehensive
commercial loan servicing system designed to support the
servicing of a wide variety of product types and complex loan
structures. LMS Servicer provides capabilities in implementing
complex investor structures, efficient payment processing,
escrow processing and analysis, commercial mortgage-backed
securities (CMBS) servicing and reporting and portfolio
analytics. LMS Servicer is integrated with LMS Originator for
seamless loan management processing throughout the life cycle of
a loan.
The BANC Mall. The BANC Mall is an
Internet-based lending and leasing tool designed for loan
officers and loan administrators. The BANC Mall provides, as a
software-enabled service, online lending, leasing and research
tools that deliver critical information for credit processing
and loan administration. Clients use The BANC Mall on a
fee-for-service basis to access more than a dozen data providers.
Property
Management
SKYLINE. SKYLINE is a comprehensive property
management system that integrates all aspects of real estate
property management, from prospect management to lease
administration, work order management, accounting and reporting.
By providing a single-source view of all real estate holdings,
SKYLINE functions as an integrated lease administration system,
a historical property/portfolio knowledge base and a robust
accounting and financial reporting system, enabling users to
track each property managed, including data on specific units
and tenants. Market segments served include:
|
|
|
|
|
commercial
|
|
retirement communities
|
|
|
residential
|
|
universities
|
|
|
retail
|
|
hospitals
|
|
|
SamTrak. SamTrak is a comprehensive facilities
maintenance and work processing system designed to seamlessly
integrate accounting functionality with building management.
Money
Market Processing
Information Manager. Information Manager is a
comprehensive web-enabled solution for financial institutions
that delivers core business application functionality to
internal and external clients desktops. Information
Manager provides reporting, transaction entry, scheduling,
entitlement and work flow management and interfaces to
third-party applications. Information Manager supports
back-office systems, including custody, trust accounting,
security lending, cash management, collateral management and
global clearing.
Money Market Manager. Money Market Manager
(M3) is a web-enabled solution that is used by banks and
broker-dealers for the money market issuance services. M3
provides the functionality required for issuing and acting as a
paying agent for money market debt instruments. M3 provides the
reports needed for clients to manage their business, including
deals, issues and payment accruals.
Training
Zoologic Learning Solutions. Zoologic Learning
Solutions is a suite of learning solutions that provides
in-depth, introductory and continuing education training at all
levels, offering
mix-and-match
courses easily configured into curriculums that meet our
clients needs. It includes instructor-led training,
web-based courseware and program design.
71
Software-Enabled
Services
SS&C Direct. We provide comprehensive
software-enabled services through our SS&C Direct operating
unit for portfolio accounting, reporting and analysis functions.
The SS&C Direct service includes:
|
|
|
|
|
hosting of a companys application software,
|
|
|
|
automated workflow integration,
|
|
|
|
automated quality control mechanisms, and
|
|
|
|
extensive interface and connectivity services to custodian
banks, data service providers, depositories and other external
entities.
|
SS&C Directs Outsourced Investment Accounting
Services option includes comprehensive investment accounting and
investment operations services for sophisticated, global
organizations.
SS&C Fund Services. We provide
comprehensive on- and offshore fund administration services to
hedge fund and other alternative investment managers using our
proprietary software products. SS&C Fund Services
offers fund manager services, transfer agency services, funds of
funds services, tax processing and accounting and processing.
SS&C Fund Services supports all fund types and
investment strategies. Market segments served include:
|
|
|
|
|
hedge fund managers
|
|
investment managers
|
|
|
funds of funds managers
|
|
commodity pool operators
|
|
|
commodity trading advisors
|
|
proprietary traders
|
|
|
family offices
|
|
private equity groups
|
|
|
private wealth groups
|
|
separate managed accounts
|
|
|
SSCNet. SSCNet is a global trade network
linking investment managers, broker-dealers, clearing agencies,
custodians and interested parties. SSCNets real-time trade
matching utility and delivery instruction database facilitate
integration of front-, middle- and back-office functions,
reducing operational risk and costs.
SVC. SVC is a single source for securities
data that consolidates data from leading global sources to
provide clients with the convenience of one customized data
feed. SVC provides clients with seamless, timely and accurate
data for pricing, corporate actions, dividends, interest
payments, foreign exchange rates and security master for global
financial instruments.
Software
and Service Delivery Options
Our delivery methods include software-enabled services, software
licenses with related maintenance agreements, and blended
solutions. All of our software-enabled services are built around
and leverage our proprietary software.
Software-Enabled Services. We provide a
broad range of software-enabled services for our clients. By
utilizing our proprietary software and avoiding the use of
third-party products to provide our software-enabled services,
we are able to greatly reduce potential operating risks,
efficiently tailor our products and services to meet specific
client needs, significantly improve overall service levels and
generate high overall operating margins and cash flow. Our
software-enabled services are generally provided under two- to
five-year non-cancelable contracts with required monthly and
quarterly payments. Pricing on our software-enabled services
varies depending upon the complexity of the services being
provided, the number of users, assets under management and
transaction volume. Importantly, our software-enabled services
allow us to leverage our proprietary software and existing
infrastructure, thereby increasing our aggregate profits and
cash flows. For the year ended December 31, 2006, revenues
from software-enabled services represented 52.4% of total
revenues.
Software License and Related Maintenance
Agreements. We license our software to
clients through either perpetual or term licenses, both of which
include annually renewable maintenance contracts. Maintenance
contracts on our core enterprise software products, which
typically incorporate annual pricing increases,
72
provide us with a stable and contractually recurring revenue
base due to average revenue retention rates of over 90% in each
of the last five years. We typically generate additional
revenues as our existing clients expand usage of our products.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, license and
maintenance revenues represented 11.2% and 26.9% of total
revenues, respectively.
Blended Solutions. We provide certain
clients with targeted, blended solutions based on a combination
of our various software and software-enabled services. We
believe that this capability further differentiates us from many
of our competitors that are unable to provide this level of
service.
Professional
Services
We offer a range of professional services to assist clients.
Professional services consist of consulting and implementation
services, including the initial installation of systems,
conversion of historical data and ongoing training and support.
Our in-house consulting teams work closely with the client to
ensure the smooth transition and operation of our systems. Our
consulting teams have a broad range of experience in the
financial services industry and include certified public
accountants, chartered financial analysts, mathematicians and IT
professionals from the asset management, real estate,
investment, insurance, hedge fund, municipal finance and banking
industries. We believe our commitment to professional services
facilitates the adoption of our software products across our
target markets. For the year ended December 31, 2006,
revenues from professional services represented 9.5% of total
revenues.
Product
Support
We believe a close and active service and support relationship
is important to enhancing client satisfaction and furnishes an
important source of information regarding evolving client
issues. We provide our larger clients with a dedicated client
support team whose primary responsibility is to resolve
questions and provide solutions to address ongoing needs. Direct
telephone support is provided during extended business hours,
and additional hours are available during peak periods. We also
offer the Solution Center, a website that serves as an exclusive
online community for clients, where clients can find answers to
product questions, exchange information, share best practices
and comment on business issues. Approximately every two weeks,
we distribute via the Internet our software and services
eBriefings, which are industry-specific articles in our
eight vertical markets and in geographic regions around the
world. We supplement our service and support activities with
comprehensive training. Training options include regularly
hosted classroom and online instruction, e.Training, and
online client seminars, or webinars, that address
current, often technical, issues in the financial services
industry.
We periodically make maintenance releases of licensed software
available to our clients, as well as regulatory updates
(generally during the fourth quarter, on a when and if available
basis), to meet industry reporting obligations and other
processing requirements.
Clients
We have over 4,000 clients globally in eight vertical markets in
the financial services industry that require a full range of
information management and analysis, accounting, actuarial,
reporting and compliance software on a timely and flexible
basis. Our clients include multinational banks, retail banks and
credit unions, hedge funds, funds of funds and family offices,
institutional asset managers, insurance companies and pension
funds, municipal finance groups, commercial lenders, real estate
lenders and property managers. Our clients include many of the
largest and most well-recognized firms in the financial services
industry. During the year ended December 31, 2006, our top
10 clients represented approximately 21% of revenues, with no
single client accounting for more than 5.5% of revenues.
Sales and
Marketing
We believe a direct sales organization is essential to the
successful implementation of our business strategy, given the
complexity and importance of the operations and information
managed by our products, the extensive regulatory and reporting
requirements of each industry, and the unique dynamics of each
vertical
73
market. Our dedicated direct sales and support personnel
continually undergo extensive product and sales training and are
located in our various sales offices worldwide. We also use
telemarketing to support sales of our real estate property
management products and work through alliance partners who sell
our software-enabled services to their correspondent banking
clients.
Our marketing personnel have extensive experience in high tech
marketing to the financial services industry and are responsible
for identifying market trends, evaluating and developing
marketing opportunities, generating client leads and providing
sales support. Our marketing activities, which focus on the use
of the Internet as a cost-effective means of reaching current
and potential clients, include:
|
|
|
|
|
content-rich, periodic software and services eBriefings
targeted at clients and prospects in each of our vertical
and geographic markets,
|
|
|
|
regular product-focused webinars,
|
|
|
|
seminars and symposiums,
|
|
|
|
trade shows and conferences, and
|
|
|
|
e-marketing campaigns.
|
Some of the benefits of our shift in focus to an Internet-based
marketing strategy include lower marketing costs, more direct
contacts with actual and potential clients, increased marketing
leads, distribution of more up-to-date marketing information and
an improved ability to measure marketing initiatives.
The marketing department also supports the sales force with
appropriate documentation or electronic materials for use during
the sales process.
Product
Development and Engineering
We believe we must introduce new products and offer product
innovation on a regular basis to maintain our competitive
advantage. To meet these goals, we use multidisciplinary teams
of highly trained personnel and leverage this expertise across
all product lines. We have invested heavily in developing a
comprehensive product analysis process to ensure a high degree
of product functionality and quality. Maintaining and improving
the integrity, quality and functionality of existing products is
the responsibility of individual product managers. Product
engineering management efforts focus on enterprise-wide
strategies, implementing best-practice technology regimens,
maximizing resources and mapping out an integration plan for our
entire umbrella of products as well as third-party products. Our
research and development expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 were $14.0 million,
$21.3 million and $23.6 million, respectively.
Our research and development engineers work closely with our
marketing and support personnel to ensure that product evolution
reflects developments in the marketplace and trends in client
requirements. We have generally issued a major release of our
core products during the second or third quarter of each fiscal
year, which includes both functional and technical enhancements.
We also provide an annual release in the fourth quarter to
reflect evolving regulatory changes in time to meet
clients year-end reporting requirements.
Competition
The market for financial services software and services is
competitive, rapidly evolving and highly sensitive to new
product introductions and marketing efforts by industry
participants, although high conversion costs can create barriers
to adoption of new products or technologies. The market is
fragmented and served by both large-scale players with broad
offerings as well as firms that target only local markets or
specific types of clients. We also face competition from
information systems developed and serviced internally by the IT
departments of large financial services firms. We believe that
we generally compete effectively as to the factors identified
for each market below, although some of our existing competitors
and potential competitors have substantially greater financial,
technological and marketing resources than we have and may offer
products with different functions or features that are more
attractive to potential customers than our offerings.
74
Alternative Investments: In our alternative
investments market, we compete with multiple vendors that may be
categorized into two groups, one group consisting of independent
specialized administration providers, which are generally
smaller than us, and the other including prime brokerage firms
offering fund administration services. Major competitors in this
market include CITCO Group, State Street Bank and BISYS. The key
competitive factors in marketing software and services to the
alternative investment industry are the need for independent
fund administration, features and adaptability of the software,
level and quality of customer support, level of software
development expertise and total cost of ownership. Our strengths
in this market are our expertise, our independence, our ability
to deliver functionality by multiple methods and our technology,
including the ownership of our own software. Although no company
is dominant in this market, we face many competitors, some of
which have greater financial resources and distribution
facilities than we do.
Asset Management: In the asset management
market, we compete with a variety of other vendors depending on
customer characteristics such as size, type, location, computing
environment and functionality requirements. Competitors in this
market range from larger providers of integrated portfolio
management systems and outsourcing services, such as SunGard,
Mellon Financial (Eagle Investment Systems) and Advent, to
smaller providers of specialized applications and technologies
such as StatPro, Charles River and others. We also compete with
internal processing and information technology departments of
our customers and prospective customers. The key competitive
factors in marketing asset management solutions are the
reliability, accuracy, timeliness and reporting of processed
information to internal and external customers, features and
adaptability of the software, level and quality of customer
support, level of software development expertise and return on
investment. Our strengths in this market are our technology, our
ability to deliver functionality by multiple delivery methods
and our ability to provide cost-effective solutions for clients.
Although no company is dominant in this market, we face many
competitors, some of which have greater financial resources and
distribution facilities than we do.
Insurance and Pension Funds: In our insurance
market, we compete with a variety of vendors depending on
customer characteristics such as size, type, location, computing
environment and functionality requirements. Competitors in this
market range from large providers of portfolio management
systems, such as State Street Bank (Princeton Financial Systems)
and SunGard, to smaller providers of specialized applications
and services.
We also compete with outsourcers, as well as the internal
processing and information technology departments of our
customers and prospective customers. The key competitive factors
in marketing insurance and pension plan systems are the
accuracy, timeliness and reporting of processed information
provided to internal and external customers, features and
adaptability of the software, level and quality of customer
support, economies of scale and return on investment. Our
strengths in this market are our years of experience, our
top-tier clients, our ability to provide solutions by multiple
delivery methods, our cost-effective and customizable solutions
and our expertise. We believe that we have a strong competitive
position in this market.
Real Estate Property Management: In the real
estate property management market, we compete with numerous
software vendors consisting of smaller specialized real estate
property management solution providers and larger property
management software vendors with more dedicated resources than
our real estate property management business, such as Yardi and
Intuit. The key competitive factors in marketing property
management systems are the features and adaptability of the
software, level of quality and customer support, degree of
responsiveness and overall net cost. Our strengths in this
market are the quality of our software and our reputation with
our clients. This is a very fragmented market with many
competitors.
Financial Institutions: In our financial
institutions market, there are multiple software and services
vendors that are either smaller providers of specialized
applications and technologies or larger providers of enterprise
systems, such as SunGard and Misys. We also compete with
outsourcers as well as the internal processing and information
technology departments of our customers and prospective
customers. The key competitive factors in marketing financial
institution software and services including accuracy and
timeliness of processed information provided to customers,
features and adaptability of the software, level and quality of
customer support, level of software development expertise, total
cost of ownership and return on investment.
75
Our strengths in this market are our flexible technology
platform and our ability to provide integrated solutions for our
clients. In this market we face many competitors, some of which
have greater financial resources and distribution facilities
than we do.
Commercial Lending: In the commercial lending
market, we compete with a variety of other vendors depending on
customer characteristics such as size, type, location and
functional requirements. Competitors in this market range from
large competitors whose principal businesses are not in the loan
management business, such as PNC Financial Services (Midland
Loan Services), to smaller providers of specialized applications
and technologies. The key competitive factors in marketing
commercial lending solutions are the accuracy, timeliness and
reporting of processed information provided to customers, level
of software development expertise, level and quality of customer
support and features and adaptability of the software. Our
strength in this market is our ability to provide both broadly
diversified and customizable solutions to our clients. In this
market we face many competitors, some of which have greater
financial resources and distribution facilities than we do.
Corporate Treasury: In the corporate treasury
market, we compete with larger competitors of end-to-end
corporate treasury solutions like SimCorp and SunGard. The key
competitive factors in marketing corporate treasury solutions
are the features and complexity of our software, level of
software development expertise, total cost of ownership and
return on investment. Our strengths in this market are our
broadly diversified portfolio of software solutions, our ability
to provide integrated solutions and our flexible delivery
mechanisms. We face the competitive challenge that we are a
relatively new entrant in this market.
Proprietary
Rights
We rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark
and patent law, nondisclosure agreements and technical measures
to protect our proprietary technology. We have registered
trademarks for many of our products and will continue to
evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as
appropriate. We generally enter into confidentiality
and/or
license agreements with our employees, distributors, clients and
potential clients. We seek to protect our software,
documentation and other written materials under trade secret and
copyright laws, which afford limited protection. These efforts
may be insufficient to prevent third parties from asserting
intellectual property rights in our technology. Furthermore, it
may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy portions
of our products or to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and
use proprietary information, and third parties may assert
ownership rights in our proprietary technology. For additional
risks relating to our proprietary technology, please see
Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our
Business If we are unable to protect our proprietary
technology, our success and our ability to compete will be
subject to various risks, such as third-party infringement
claims, unauthorized use of our technology, disclosure of our
proprietary information or inability to license technology from
third parties.
Rapid technological change characterizes the software
development industry. We believe factors such as the
technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product
developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition
and reliable service and support are more important to
establishing and maintaining a leadership position than legal
protections of our technology.
Employees
As of June 30, 2007, we had 1,019 full-time employees,
consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
200 employees in research and development,
|
|
|
|
541 employees in consulting and services,
|
|
|
|
80 employees in sales and marketing,
|
|
|
|
92 employees in client support, and
|
|
|
|
106 employees in finance and administration.
|
As of June 30, 2007, 357 of our employees were in our
international operations. No employee is covered by any
collective bargaining agreement. We believe that we have a good
relationship with our employees.
76
Properties
We lease our corporate offices, which consist of
73,000 square feet of office space located in 80 Lamberton
Road, Windsor, CT 06095. In 2006, we extended the lease term
through October 2016. We utilize facilities and offices in
thirteen locations in the United States and have offices in
Toronto, Canada; Montreal, Canada; London, England; Amsterdam,
the Netherlands; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Tokyo, Japan; Curacao,
the Netherlands Antilles; Dublin, Ireland; and Sydney, Australia.
Legal
Proceedings
In connection with the Acquisition, two purported class action
lawsuits were filed against SS&C, each of its directors
and, with respect to the first matter described below, SS&C
Holdings, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in
and for New Castle County.
The first lawsuit is Paulena Partners, LLC v. SS&C
Technologies, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 1525-N
(filed July 28, 2005). The second lawsuit is Stephen
Landen v. SS&C Technologies, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 1541-N
(filed August 3, 2005). Each complaint purports to state
claims for breach of fiduciary duty against all of
SS&Cs directors at the time of filing of the
lawsuits. The complaints allege, among other things, that
(1) the merger will benefit SS&Cs management or
Carlyle at the expense of its public stockholders, (2) the
merger consideration to be paid to stockholders is inadequate or
unfair and does not represent the best price available in the
marketplace for SS&C, (3) the process by which the
merger was approved was unfair and (4) the directors
breached their fiduciary duties to SS&Cs stockholders
in negotiating and approving the merger. Each complaint seeks,
among other relief, class certification of the lawsuit, an
injunction preventing the consummation of the merger (or
rescinding the merger if it is completed prior to the receipt of
such relief), compensatory
and/or
rescissory damages to the class and attorneys fees and
expenses, along with such other relief as the court might find
just and proper. The plaintiffs have not sought a specific
amount of monetary damages.
The two lawsuits were consolidated by order dated
August 31, 2005. On October 18, 2005, the parties to
the consolidated lawsuit entered into a memorandum of
understanding, pursuant to which SS&C agreed to make
certain additional disclosures to its stockholders in connection
with their approval of the merger. The memorandum of
understanding also contemplated that the parties would enter
into a settlement agreement, which the parties executed on
July 6, 2006. Under the settlement agreement, SS&C
agreed to pay up to $350,000 of plaintiffs legal fees and
expenses. The settlement agreement was subject to customary
conditions, including court approval following notice to the
stockholders of SS&C. The court did not find that the
settlement agreement was fair, reasonable and adequate and
disapproved the proposed settlement on November 29, 2006.
The court criticized plaintiffs counsels handling of
the litigation, noting that the plaintiffs counsel
displayed a lack of understanding of basic terms of the merger,
did not appear to have adequately investigated the
plaintiffs potential claims and was unable to identify the
basic legal issues in the case. The court also raised questions
about the process leading up to the transaction, which process
included Mr. Stones discussions of potential
investments in, or acquisitions of, SS&C, without prior
formal authorization of SS&Cs board, but the court
did not make any findings of fact on the litigation other than
that there were not adequate facts in evidence to support the
settlement. The plaintiffs decided to continue the litigation
following rejection of the settlement, and the parties are
currently in discovery. The court has set a trial date for July
2008. We believe that the claims are without merit and are
defending them vigorously.
From time to time, we are subject to certain other legal
proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of
business. In the opinion of our management, we are not involved
in any such litigation or proceedings by third parties that our
management believes could have a material adverse effect on us
or our business.
77
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth information regarding our
executive officers, directors and director nominees, including
their ages as of July 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
William A. Etherington(1)(2)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Allan M. Holt(1)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Todd R. Newnam(2)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Director
|
Claudius (Bud) E. Watts IV(1)(2)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
Kenneth Daly(3)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director Nominee
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Member of our Compensation Committee. |
|
(2) |
|
Member of our Audit Committee. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Daly will become a director upon the closing of this
offering and join our Audit Committee. |
William C. Stone founded SS&C in 1986 and has served
as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer since our inception. He also has served as our President
from inception through April 1997 and again from March 1999
until October 2004. Prior to founding SS&C, Mr. Stone
directed the financial services consulting practice of KPMG LLP,
an accounting firm, in Hartford, Connecticut and was Vice
President of Administration and Special Investment Services at
Advest, Inc., a financial services company.
Normand A. Boulanger has served as our President and
Chief Operating Officer since October 2004. Prior to that,
Mr. Boulanger served as our Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer from October 2001 to October 2004,
Senior Vice President, SS&C Direct from March 2000 to
September 2001, Vice President, SS&C Direct from April 1999
to February 2000, Vice President of Professional Services for
the Americas, from July 1996 to April 1999, and Director of
Consulting from March 1994 to July 1996. Prior to joining
SS&C, Mr. Boulanger served as Manager of Investment
Accounting for The Travelers from September 1986 to March 1994.
Mr. Boulanger was elected as one of our directors in
February 2006.
Patrick J. Pedonti has served as our Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2002. Prior
to that, Mr. Pedonti served as our Vice President and
Treasurer from May 1999 to August 2002. Prior to joining
SS&C, Mr. Pedonti served as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer for Accent Color Sciences, Inc., a company
specializing in high-speed color printing, from January 1997 to
May 1999.
Stephen V.R. Whitman has served as our Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary since June 2002. Prior
to joining SS&C, Mr. Whitman served as an attorney for
PA Consulting Group, an international management consulting
company headquartered in the United Kingdom, from November 2000
to December 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Whitman served as
Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Hagler Bailly,
Inc., a publicly traded international consulting company to the
energy and network industries, from October 1998 to October 2000
and as Vice President and General Counsel from July 1997 to
October 1998.
William A. Etherington was elected as one of our
directors in May 2006. He currently serves as Chairman of the
Board of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC).
Mr. Etherington retired from IBM in September 2001 as
Senior Vice President and Group Executive, Sales and
Distribution. Mr. Etherington spent over 37 years with
IBM and was a member of IBMs Operations Committee and
Worldwide Management Council. He also serves on the boards of
directors of Celestica Inc. and MDS Inc.
78
Allan M. Holt was elected as one of our directors in
February 2006. He currently serves as a Managing Director and
Co-head of the U.S. Buyout Group of The Carlyle Group, which he
joined in 1991. He previously was head of Carlyles Global
Aerospace, Defense, Technology and Business/Government Services
group. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Holt spent three and a
half years with Avenir Group, Inc., an investment and advisory
group. From 1984 to 1987, Mr. Holt was Director of Planning
and Budgets at MCI Communications Corporation. He also serves on
the boards of directors of MedPointe, Inc., The Neilsen Company
and Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.
Todd R. Newnam was elected as one of our directors in
February 2006. He currently serves as a Managing Director of The
Carlyle Group, which he joined in 2000. Prior to joining Carlyle
in 2000, Mr. Newnam was a Vice President of the Defense,
Aerospace, and Technical Services Group in the First Union
Securities, Inc.s M&A Group (formerly Bowles
Hollowell Conner & Co.). He also serves on the board
of directors of CPU Technology.
Claudius (Bud) E. Watts IV was elected as one of our
directors in November 2005. He currently serves as a Managing
Director and Head of the Technology Buyout Group of The Carlyle
Group, which he joined in 2000. Prior to joining Carlyle in
2000, Mr. Watts was a Managing Director in the M&A
group of First Union Securities, Inc. He joined First Union
Securities when First Union acquired Bowles Hollowell
Conner & Co., where Mr. Watts was a principal. He
also serves on the boards of directors of CPU Technology, Firth
Rixson, Ltd., Freescale Semiconductor and Open Solutions Inc.
Kenneth Daly will be elected as one of our directors upon
consummation of this offering. Since May 2007, Mr. Daly has
served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director for
NACD, the National Association of Corporate Directors, a
non-profit organization that provides resources in the areas of
corporate governance policy and practice to its members. Prior
to joining NACD, Mr. Daly served as Director of the Audit
Committee Institute of KPMG LLP, an accounting firm, from
January 2005 until May 2007, and as a Partner at KPMG from 1978
to January 2005.
Board of
Directors
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
board of directors. We currently have six directors, all of whom
were elected as directors under the board composition provisions
of a stockholders agreement and our certificate of
incorporation. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions. The board of directors will be expanded to
seven in connection with this offering. Our board of directors
intends to fill the vacancy created by this increase in the
number of directors with the election of Kenneth Daly effective
as of the closing of this offering. Mr. Daly has indicated
his intent to serve on our board of directors. Our directors
hold office until their successors have been elected and
qualified or until the earlier of their resignation or removal.
Following the closing of this offering, the board of directors
will be divided into three classes with members of each class of
directors serving for staggered three-year terms. The board of
directors will consist of two Class I directors
(Messrs. Boulanger and Newnam), two Class II directors
(Messrs. Daly and Etherington) and three Class III
directors (Messrs. Holt, Stone and Watts), whose initial
terms will expire at the annual meetings of stockholders held in
2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Our classified board could
have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to
acquire control of us.
Our certificate of incorporation that will become effective upon
the closing of this offering provides that the authorized number
of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of
directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an
increase in the number of directors will be distributed between
the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class
will consist of one-third of the directors. This classification
of the board of directors may have the effect of delaying or
preventing changes in our control or management.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will become
effective upon the closing of this offering provide that our
directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our
stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors.
79
Upon the expiration of the term of a class of directors,
directors in that class will be eligible to be elected for a new
three-year term at the annual meeting of stockholders in the
year in which their term expires.
All of our board members, including Mr. Daly upon his
election, other than Messrs. Stone and Boulanger are
considered to be independent members of the board
under applicable rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Mr. Etherington is considered to be, and Mr. Daly is
expected to be, an independent member of the audit
committee, and Messrs. Newnam and Watts are not, under
applicable NASDAQ and Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors directs the management of our business
and affairs, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its
business through meetings of the board of directors and three
standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation
committee and the nominating committee. In addition, from time
to time, special committees may be established under the
direction of the board of directors when necessary to address
specific issues.
Audit Committee. Messrs. Etherington, Newnam
and Watts currently serve on the audit committee, and
Mr. Daly will join our audit committee following the
closing of this offering, and our board has determined that each
of these members is an audit committee financial
expert as that term is defined under the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The audit
committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm;
|
|
|
|
overseeing the work of our independent registered public
accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration
of reports from our independent registered public accounting
firm;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and our independent
registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly
financial statements and related disclosures;
|
|
|
|
coordinating our board of directors oversight of internal
control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and
procedures and our code of business conduct and ethics;
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt and retention of
accounting related complaints and concerns;
|
|
|
|
approving any related person transactions; and
|
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report required by the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
Compensation Committee. Messrs. Etherington,
Holt and Watts currently serve on our compensation committee.
Our compensation committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to our board
of directors with respect to, the compensation of our chief
executive officer and our other executive officers;
|
|
|
|
overseeing and administering our cash and equity incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to our board with respect
to director compensation; and
|
|
|
|
preparing the compensation committee report required by
Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
|
Nominating
Committee. Messrs.
currently serve on our nominating committee. Our nominating
committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board
of directors;
|
|
|
|
recommending to our board of directors the persons to be
nominated for election as directors and to each of the
boards committees; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to our board of directors
with respect to management succession planning.
|
80
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of ethics, referred to as the
SS&C Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is
applicable to all directors, officers and employees and includes
provisions relating to accounting and financial matters. The
SS&C Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on
our website at www.ssctech.com. If we make any substantive
amendments to, or grant any waivers from, the code of ethics for
any director or officer, we will disclose the nature of such
amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on
Form 8-K.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the compensation committee is or has been a former
or current officer or employee of SS&C Holdings or had any
related person transaction involving SS&C Holdings. None of
our executive officers served as a director or a member of a
compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent
function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers
served as a director or member of our compensation committee
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through a merger transaction. As discussed below, various
aspects of our executive officer compensation were negotiated
and determined in connection with the Acquisition.
Our executive compensation program is overseen and administered
by our compensation committee, which currently consists of
Messrs. Etherington, Holt and Watts. Our compensation committee
operates under a written charter adopted by our board of
directors and discharges the responsibilities of the board
relating to the compensation of our executive officers. Our
chief executive officer is actively involved in setting
executive compensation and typically presents salary, bonus and
equity compensation recommendations to the compensation
committee, which, in turn, considers the recommendations and has
ultimate approval authority.
Objectives
of Our Executive Compensation Program
The primary objectives of the compensation committee with
respect to executive compensation are to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent;
|
|
|
|
reward successful performance by the executive officers and the
company; and
|
|
|
|
align the interests of executive officers with those of our
stockholders by providing long-term equity compensation.
|
To achieve these objectives, the compensation committee
evaluates our executive compensation program with the goal of
setting compensation at levels the committee believes are
competitive with those of other companies in our industry and in
our region that compete with us for executive talent. We have
not, however, retained a compensation consultant to review our
policies and procedures relating to executive compensation, and
we have not formally benchmarked our compensation against that
of other companies. Our compensation program rewards our
executive officers based on a number of factors, including the
companys operating results, the companys performance
against budget, individual performance, prior-period
compensation and prospects for individual growth. Changes in
compensation are generally incremental in nature without wide
variations from year to year but with a general trend that has
matched increasing compensation with the growth of our business.
The factors that affect compensation are subjective in nature
and not tied to peer group analyses, surveys of compensation
consultants or other statistical criteria. Each year our chief
executive officer makes recommendations to the compensation
committee regarding compensation packages, including his own. In
making these recommendations, our chief executive officer
attempts to structure a compensation package based on years of
experience in the financial services and software industries and
knowledge of what keeps people motivated and committed to the
institution. He prepares a written description for the members
of the compensation committee of the performance during the year
of each executive officer, including himself,
81
discussing both positive and negative aspects of performance and
recommending salary and bonus amounts for each officer. As it
relates to the compensation of executives other than our chief
executive officer, our compensation committee relies heavily on
our chief executive officers recommendations and discusses
his reviews and recommendations with him as part of its
deliberations. As it relates to our chief executive
officers compensation, the compensation committee
considers our chief executive officers recommendations. In
this as in other compensation matters, the compensation
committee exercises its independent judgment. After due
consideration, the compensation committee accepted the chief
executive officers recommendations based on 2006 executive
officer performance.
Components
of Our Executive Compensation Program
The primary elements of our executive compensation program are:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
|
discretionary annual cash bonuses;
|
|
|
|
stock option awards;
|
|
|
|
perquisites; and
|
|
|
|
severance and change-of-control benefits.
|
We have no formal or informal policy or target for allocating
compensation between long-term and short-term compensation,
between cash and non-cash compensation or among the different
forms of non-cash compensation. Instead, the compensation
committee, in consultation with and upon the recommendation of
our chief executive officer, determines subjectively what it
believes to be the appropriate level and mix of the various
compensation components. While we identify below particular
compensation objectives that each element of executive
compensation serves, we believe that each element of
compensation, to a greater or lesser extent, serves each of the
objectives of our executive compensation program.
Base
Salary
Base salary is used to recognize the experience, skills,
knowledge and responsibilities required of all our employees,
including our executives. When establishing base salaries for
2006, the compensation committee, together with our chief
executive officer, considered a variety of factors, including
the seniority of the individual, the level of the
individuals responsibility, the ability to replace the
individual, the individuals tenure at the company,
relative pay among the executive officers and the dollar amount
that would be necessary to keep the executive in the Windsor,
Connecticut area. Generally, we believe that executive base
salaries should grow incrementally over time and that more of
the up side of compensation should rest with cash
bonuses and long-term equity incentive compensation. In the case
of Mr. Stone, the minimum base salary is mandated by his
employment agreement negotiated in connection with the
Transaction and cannot be less than $500,000 per year. Kevin
Milne, our former Senior Vice President
International whose employment with us terminated as of
October 31, 2006, was party to an employment agreement that
provided for a base salary of £200,000 per year.
Base salaries are reviewed at least annually by our compensation
committee, and are adjusted from time to time to realign
salaries with market levels after taking into account company
performance and individual responsibilities, performance and
experience. In March 2007, the compensation committee, upon
Mr. Stones recommendation, set the following base
salaries for our executive officers in 2007: Mr. Stone,
$600,000; Mr. Boulanger, $400,000; Mr. Pedonti,
$225,000; and Mr. Whitman, $205,000.
Discretionary
Annual Cash Bonus
Annual cash bonuses to executive officers and other employees
are discretionary. Annual cash bonuses are generally provided to
employees regardless of whether we meet, exceed or fail to meet
our budgeted results, but the amount available for bonuses to
all employees, including the executive officers, will depend
upon our financial results. The annual cash bonuses are intended
to compensate for strategic, operational and
82
financial successes of the company as a whole, as well as
individual performance and growth potential. The annual cash
bonuses are discretionary and not tied to the achievement of
specific results or pre-established financial metrics or
performance goals. No formula exists for determining the amount
of bonuses for employees or executive officers.
Our chief executive officer proposes executive bonus
allocations, including his own proposed bonus, to the
compensation committee, which has ultimate approval authority.
The compensation committee accepted and approved
Mr. Stones recommendations for 2006 bonuses. In
making recommendations to the compensation committee about
bonuses for executive officers, our chief executive officer,
after taking into account the positive or negative impact of
events outside the control of management or an individual
executive, makes a subjective judgment of an individuals
performance, in the context of a number of factors, including
our financial performance, revenues and financial position going
into the new fiscal year. In making his recommendations for 2006
bonuses, Mr. Stone considered, among other things, an
executives (including his own) work in integrating
acquisitions, in managing, recruiting and hiring staff, in
completing acquisitions, in strengthening areas of the business,
in redirecting resources to position the business for future
growth and in achieving financial results. Mr. Stone is
entitled to a minimum annual bonus of at least $450,000 pursuant
to his employment agreement. Mr. Stones $895,000
bonus for 2006 was recommended by Mr. Stone and approved,
after due consideration, by the compensation committee. The
compensation committee determined Mr. Stones bonus
amount based on Mr. Stones recommendation. The
committees approval of Mr. Stones bonus took
into account Mr. Stones role in the companys
actual revenue, revenue growth, Consolidated EBITDA and
Consolidated EBITDA growth, growth in recurring revenues,
successful and attractive acquisitions, the successful
integration of acquisitions and the improvement in our market
position during 2006.
Mr. Stone made his recommendations on 2006 bonuses to the
compensation committee in February 2007, and the compensation
committee approved such bonuses in March 2007.
The amount of money available for the employee bonus pool is
determined by our chief executive officer after actual
Consolidated EBITDA for the preceding fiscal year is determined.
In making this determination, the chief executive officer takes
into account a number of factors, including: actual Consolidated
EBITDA, growth in Consolidated EBITDA over the preceding year,
minimum Consolidated EBITDA required to ensure debt covenant
compliance, our short-term cash needs, the recent employee
turnover rate and any improvement or deterioration in our
strategic market position. Thereafter, the amount available for
the bonuses to executive officers is determined after
considering the amount that would be required from the bonus
pool for bonuses to non-executive officer employees. No actions
have been taken yet with respect to discretionary annual cash
bonuses for 2007.
Mr. Milnes employment agreement provided him with an
opportunity to earn an annual cash bonus of up to 50% of his
annual base salary, based on certain metrics relating to
Mr. Milnes performance and SS&Cs financial
performance and at the discretion of Mr. Stone. We awarded
no bonus to Mr. Milne for his 2006 services because we
provided him with a severance package.
Stock
Option Awards
In August 2006, our board of directors and stockholders adopted
the 2006 equity incentive plan, which provides for the grant of
options to purchase shares of our common stock to employees,
consultants and directors and provides for the sale of our
common stock to employees, consultants and directors. A maximum
of 1,314,567 shares of common stock are reserved for
issuance under the plan. Options may be incentive stock options
that qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, or nonqualified options. Options granted under the plan
may not be exercised more than ten years after the date of
grant. Shares acquired by any individuals will be subject to the
terms and conditions of a stockholders agreement that governs
the transferability of the shares.
83
During August 2006, we awarded our executive officers long-term
incentive compensation in the form of option grants to purchase
shares of our common stock. Our board of directors awarded the
following types of options to its executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
40% of the options are time-based options that vest
as to 25% of the number of shares underlying the option on
November 23, 2006 and as to 1/36 of the number of shares
underlying the option each month thereafter until fully vested
on November 23, 2009. The time-based options become fully
vested and exercisable immediately prior to the effective date
of a liquidity event, as defined;
|
|
|
|
40% of the options are performance-based options
that vest based on the determination by our board of directors
or compensation committee as to whether our EBITDA for each
fiscal year 2006 through 2010 equals, exceeds or falls short by
a certain percentage of the EBITDA target for such year. A
certain percentage of performance-based options will vest
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event if
proceeds from the liquidity event equal or exceed specified
returns on investments in SS&C Holdings made by
Mr. Stone and investment funds associated with Carlyle,
which we refer to collectively as our principal
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
20% of the options are superior options that vest
(in whole or in part) only upon a liquidity event if proceeds
from the liquidity event equal or exceed specified returns on
investments in SS&C Holdings made by our principal
stockholders.
|
The exercise price per share for the options awarded in August
2006 is $74.50, which is the split-adjusted value of our common
stock at the time of the consummation of the Transaction. As
there was no trading market for our common stock at the time of
grant, our board of directors determined in good faith that the
valuation of the consolidated enterprise at the time of the
Transaction continued to represent the fair market value of the
common stock as of August 2006. Our board of directors
determined the number of options to be awarded to the executive
officers based on projected ownership percentages of our common
stock that were disclosed in connection with the Transaction. At
that time, we disclosed that Mr. Stone was entitled to
options for 2% of our fully diluted shares, per his employment
agreement, and that we would award options representing an
aggregate of 2.9% of our fully diluted shares to our other
executive officers.
We believe that the combination of time-based, performance-based
and superior options provides incentives to our executive
officers not only to remain with the company but also to help
grow the company and improve profitability. The 2006 EBITDA
target contained in the performance-based options was not met,
and thus none of the performance-based options had vested as of
December 31, 2006. On April 18, 2007, our board of
directors approved (1) the vesting, as of April 18,
2007, of 50% of the performance-based options granted to our
employees that would have vested if SS&C had met its EBITDA
target for fiscal year 2006 set forth in the employees
stock option agreements; (2) the vesting, conditioned upon
SS&Cs meeting its EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007
set forth in the employees stock option agreements, of the
other 50% of the 2006 tranche of the performance-based options;
and (3) the reduction by approximately 10% of
SS&Cs EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007 set forth in
the employees stock option agreements. Our board of
directors decided that a partial acceleration of the 2006
performance-based options and a reduction in the 2007 EBITDA
target were appropriate because (1) we had improved
revenues, recurring revenues and EBITDA in 2006 as compared to
2005; (2) work done in 2006 had created significant
positive momentum in the business going into 2007; and
(3) given the competitive labor environment in financial
services and in software-enabled services, the board desired to
ensure high rates of employee retention as we pursued our plan
for growth. Although we believe it is unlikely we will meet the
2007 EBITDA target in full, we believe it is reasonably probable
that we will have sufficient 2007 EBITDA to trigger partial
vesting of the 2007 tranche of the performance-based options as
provided for in the 2006 equity incentive plan. We do not
believe that subsequent EBITDA targets are currently probable.
Perquisites
We offer a variety of benefit programs to all eligible
employees, including our executive officers. Our executive
officers generally are eligible for the same benefits on the
same basis as the rest of our employees, including medical,
dental and vision benefits, life insurance coverage and short-
and long-term disability
84
coverage. Our executive officers are also eligible to contribute
to our 401(k) plan and receive matching company contributions
under the plan. In addition, our executive officers are entitled
to reimbursement for all reasonable travel and other expenses
incurred during the performance of the executive officers
duties in accordance with our expense reimbursement policy.
We limit the use of perquisites as a method of compensation and
provide our executive officers with only those perquisites that
we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall
compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain
talented employees for key positions.
Severance
and Change-of-Control Benefits
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stone is entitled
to specified benefits in the event of the termination of his
employment under certain circumstances. Mr. Stones
severance benefits were negotiated with representatives of
Carlyle in connection with the Transaction. In the fourth
quarter of 2006, we negotiated a compromise agreement with
Mr. Milne that provided Mr. Milne with certain
severance benefits as part of the termination of his employment
with us. We provide more detailed information about the benefits
to Messrs. Stone and Milne, along with estimates of their
value under various circumstances, under the captions
Employment and Related Agreements and
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of
Control below.
As described above, the time-based options awarded to our
executive officers vest in full immediately prior to the
effective date of a liquidity event, and the performance-based
and superior options vest in whole or in part if proceeds from
the liquidity event equal or exceed specified returns on
investments in SS&C Holdings made by our principal
stockholders. The option agreements, the terms of which were
negotiated with representatives of Carlyle, define a
liquidity event as either:
(a) the consummation of the sale, transfer, conveyance or
other disposition in one or a series of related transactions, of
the equity securities of SS&C Holdings held, directly or
indirectly, by all of our principal stockholders in exchange for
currency, such that immediately following such transaction (or
series of related transactions), the total number of all equity
securities held, directly or indirectly, by all of the principal
stockholders and any affiliates is, in the aggregate, less than
50% of the total number of equity securities (as adjusted) held,
directly or indirectly, by all of the principal stockholders as
of November 23, 2005; or
(b) the consummation of the sale, lease, transfer,
conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger or
consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of
all or substantially all of the assets of SS&C Holdings to
any person other than to any of the principal stockholders or
their affiliates.
In addition, under the terms of the 2006 equity incentive plan,
either our board or compensation committee can accelerate in
whole or in part the vesting periods for outstanding options.
Please see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change
of Control below for estimates of the value our executive
officers would receive in the event of a liquidity event.
Accounting
and Tax Implications
The accounting and tax treatment of particular forms of
compensation do not materially affect our compensation
decisions. However, we evaluate the effect of such accounting
and tax treatment on an ongoing basis and will make appropriate
modifications to compensation policies where appropriate. For
instance, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for
certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid in any
taxable year to the companys chief executive officer and
the four other most highly compensated executive officers.
However, certain compensation, including qualified
performance-based compensation, will not be subject to the
deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The
compensation committee intends to review the potential effect of
Section 162(m) periodically and use its judgment to
authorize compensation payments that may be subject to the limit
when the compensation committee believes such payments are
appropriate and in our best interests after taking into
consideration changing business conditions and the performance
of our employees.
85
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table contains information with respect to the
compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of
our chief executive officer (principal executive officer), chief
financial officer (principal financial officer), two other
executive officers and one former executive officer, who were
the most highly compensated executive officers in 2006. We refer
to these five executive officers as our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary($)
|
|
Bonus($)
|
|
Awards($)
|
|
Awards($)(1)
|
|
Compensation($)
|
|
Total($)
|
|
William C. Stone,
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
895,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
597,582
|
|
|
$
|
3,224
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1,995,806
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger,
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
440,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,188
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,241,452
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,094
|
|
|
|
3,160
|
(4)
|
|
|
592,254
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman,
General Counsel
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,515
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
(5)
|
|
|
412,779
|
|
Kevin Milne,
Senior Vice President International(6)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
317,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,765
|
(7)
|
|
|
466,632
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount earned for
financial reporting purposes for 2006, in accordance with
SFAS 123R for options to purchase shares of SS&C
Holdings common stock granted under the 2006 equity incentive
plan. The amounts disregard the estimate of forfeitures related
to service-based vesting and are based on assumptions included
in Note 10 of the notes to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of our contribution of $3,000 to Mr. Stones
account under the SS&C 401(k) savings plan and our payment
of $224 of long-term disability premiums for the benefit of
Mr. Stone. |
|
(3) |
|
Consists of our contribution of $3,000 to
Mr. Boulangers account under the SS&C 401(k)
savings plan and our payment of $264 of long-term disability
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Boulanger. |
|
(4) |
|
Consists of our contribution of $3,000 to
Mr. Pedontis account under the SS&C 401(k)
savings plan and our payment of $160 of long-term disability
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Pedonti. |
|
(5) |
|
Consists of our contribution of $3,000 to
Mr. Whitmans account under the SS&C 401(k)
savings plan and our payment of $264 of long-term disability
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Whitman. |
|
(6) |
|
Amounts based on the pound-dollar exchange rate as of
October 31, 2006 of 1.9072. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Milnes employment was terminated effective
October 31, 2006. In connection with such termination,
Mr. Milne received an aggregate of $148,765, consisting of
$95,360 in lieu of three months notice of termination,
$411 in lieu of benefits Mr. Milne would have received
during the notice period, a severance payment of $29,341 and
accrued vacation pay of $23,653. |
Employment
and Related Agreements
Effective as of November 23, 2005, we entered into a
definitive employment agreement with Mr. Stone. The terms
of the agreement, which were negotiated between Mr. Stone
and representatives of Carlyle in connection with the
Transaction, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The employment of Mr. Stone as the chief executive officer
of SS&C Holdings and SS&C;
|
|
|
|
An initial term through November 23, 2008, with automatic
one-year renewals until terminated either by Mr. Stone or
us;
|
|
|
|
An annual base salary of at least $500,000;
|
|
|
|
An opportunity to receive an annual bonus in an amount to be
established by our board of directors based on achieving
individual and company performance goals mutually determined by
our board and
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Stone. If Mr. Stone is employed at the end of any
calendar year, his annual bonus will not be less than $450,000
for that year;
|
|
|
|
|
|
A grant of options to purchase shares of our common stock
representing 2% of our outstanding common stock on
November 23, 2005;
|
|
|
|
Certain severance payments and benefits. If we terminate
Mr. Stones employment without cause, if
Mr. Stone resigns for good reason (including, under certain
circumstances, within three months following a change of
control) prior to the end of the term of the employment
agreement, or if Mr. Stone receives a notice of non-renewal
of the employment term by us, Mr. Stone will be entitled to
receive (1) an amount equal to 200% of his base salary and
200% of his target annual bonus, (2) vesting acceleration
with respect to 50% of his then unvested options and shares of
restricted stock, and (3) three years of coverage under
SS&Cs medical, dental and vision benefit plans. In
the event of Mr. Stones death or a termination of
Mr. Stones employment due to any disability that
renders Mr. Stone unable to perform his duties under the
agreement for six consecutive months, Mr. Stone or his
representative or heirs, as applicable, will be entitled to
receive (1) vesting acceleration with respect to 50% of his
then unvested options and shares of restricted stock, and
(2) a pro-rated amount of his target annual bonus. In the
event payments to Mr. Stone under his employment agreement
(or the management agreement entered into in connection with the
Transaction) cause Mr. Stone to incur a 20% excise tax
under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code,
Mr. Stone will be entitled to an additional payment
sufficient to cover such excise tax and any taxes associated
with such payments; and
|
|
|
|
Certain restrictive covenants, including a non-competition
covenant pursuant to which Mr. Stone will be prohibited
from competing with SS&C and its affiliates during his
employment and for a period equal to the later of (1) four
years following the effective time of the merger, in the case of
a termination by us for cause or a resignation by Mr. Stone
without good reason, and (2) two years following
Mr. Stones termination of employment for any reason.
|
Cause means (a) Mr. Stones willful
and continuing failure (except where due to physical or mental
incapacity) to substantially perform his duties;
(b) Mr. Stones conviction of, or plea of guilty
or nolo contendere to, a felony; (c) the commission by
Mr. Stone of an act of fraud or embezzlement against us or
any of our subsidiaries as determined in good faith by a
two-thirds majority of the board; or
(d) Mr. Stones breach of any material provision
of his employment agreement.
Good reason means the occurrence of any of the
following events without Mr. Stones written consent:
(a) an adverse change in Mr. Stones title;
(b) a material diminution in Mr. Stones
employment duties, responsibilities or authority, or the
assignment to Mr. Stone of duties that are materially
inconsistent with his position; (c) any reduction in
Mr. Stones base salary or target annual bonus;
(d) a relocation of our principal executive offices to a
location more than 35 miles from its current location which
has the effect of increasing Mr. Stones commute;
(e) any breach by us of any material provision of
Mr. Stones employment agreement or the stockholders
agreement entered into by and among us, investment funds
affiliated with Carlyle and Mr. Stone; or (f) upon a
change in control where (1) Carlyle exercises its
bring-along rights in accordance with the stockholders
agreement, and (2) Mr. Stone votes against the
proposed transaction in his capacity as a stockholder.
Under Mr. Stones employment agreement, a change
of control means:
(a) the acquisition by any individual, entity or
group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of beneficial
ownership (within the meaning of
Rule 13d-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of either:
|
|
|
|
|
the then-outstanding shares of our common stock or the common
stock of SS&C, or
|
|
|
|
the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting
securities or the then-outstanding voting securities of
SS&C entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors (in each case, other than any acquisition by us,
Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. (an investment fund affiliated with
Carlyle), Mr. Stone, any employee or group of employees of
ours, or affiliates of any of the foregoing, or
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or
maintained by us or any of our affiliates); or
|
(b) individuals who, as of the effective date of
Mr. Stones employment agreement, constituted our
board of directors and any individuals subsequently elected to
our board of directors pursuant to the stockholders agreement
cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of our
board of directors, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
individuals whose election, or nomination for election by our
stockholders, was approved by at least a majority of the
directors comprising the board of directors on the effective
date of Mr. Stones employment agreement and any
individuals subsequently elected to our board of directors
pursuant to the stockholders agreement or
|
|
|
|
individuals nominated or designated for election by Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P.
|
Other than Mr. Stone, none of our current executive
officers is party to an employment agreement. Kevin Milne, our
former Senior Vice President International, was
party to an employment agreement that provided, among other
things, for an annual base salary of £200,000 and the
opportunity to earn an annual cash bonus of up to 50% of his
annual base salary based on certain metrics relating to
Mr. Milnes performance and SS&Cs financial
performance and at the discretion of Mr. Stone. In
connection with the termination of his employment,
Mr. Milne entered into a compromise agreement with our
subsidiary, SS&C Technologies Limited. Under the terms of
the agreement, Mr. Milnes employment terminated on
October 31, 2006. The agreement provided that, in addition
to payment of Mr. Milnes salary and benefits through
the termination date, Mr. Milne would be paid an aggregate
severance payment of £65,600. In addition, Mr. Milne
received £12,402 for accrued vacation time. Mr. Milne
executed a release in favor of SS&C Technologies Limited
and any subsidiary or holding company of SS&C Technologies
Limited, agreed to continue to satisfy his non-solicitation
obligations under his employment agreement, and agreed to
satisfy certain confidentiality obligations.
2006
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table contains information concerning grants of
plan-based awards to our named executive officers during 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts Under Equity
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
of Option
|
|
|
Value of Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
|
Target(#)
|
|
|
Options(#)
|
|
|
Awards ($/Sh)
|
|
|
Awards(5)
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,993
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
74.50
|
|
|
$
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
70,993
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
35,496
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
21.23
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,245
|
(2)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
53,245
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
26,622
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
21.23
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,623
|
(2)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
26,622
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
13,311
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
21.23
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,199
|
(2)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
14,198
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
7,099
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
21.23
|
|
Kevin Milne
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,874
|
(2)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
8,874
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
|
8/9/06
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
21.23
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Awarded under the 2006 equity incentive plan. |
88
|
|
|
(2) |
|
This option is a time-based option that vests as to 25% of the
number of shares underlying the option on November 23, 2006
and as to 1/36 of the number of shares underlying the option
each month thereafter until fully vested on November 23,
2009. The time-based options become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event, as
defined. |
|
(3) |
|
This option is a performance-based option that vests based on
the determination by our board of directors or compensation
committee as to whether our EBITDA for each fiscal year 2006
through 2010 equals, exceeds or falls short by a certain
percentage of the EBITDA target for such year. A certain
percentage of performance-based options will vest immediately
prior to the effective date of a liquidity event if proceeds
from the liquidity event equal or exceed specified returns on
investments in SS&C Holdings made by our principal
stockholders. |
|
(4) |
|
This option is a superior option that vests (in whole or in
part) only upon a liquidity event if proceeds from the liquidity
event equal or exceed specified returns on investments in
SS&C Holdings made by our principal stockholders. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value of each option award
computed in accordance with SFAS 123R. See Note 10 of
the notes to our audited annual consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
For more information regarding our option awards, please see
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Stock
Option Awards.
1998
Stock Incentive Plan
In 1998, the board of directors of SS&C adopted, and the
stockholders of SS&C approved, the 1998 stock incentive
plan, or 1998 plan, to provide equity compensation to
SS&Cs officers, directors, employees, consultants and
advisors. In connection with the Transaction, all outstanding
options to purchase SS&C common stock under the 1998 plan
became fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to the
effectiveness of the Acquisition. Each SS&C option that
remained outstanding under the 1998 plan at the time of the
Acquisition (other than options held by (1) non-employee
directors of SS&C, (2) certain individuals identified
by SS&C and SS&C Holdings and (3) individuals who
held options that were, in the aggregate, exercisable for fewer
than 100 shares of SS&C common stock) was assumed by
SS&C Holdings and was automatically converted into an
option to purchase shares of common stock of SS&C Holdings.
The options that were not assumed or otherwise exercised
immediately prior to the Acquisition were cashed out in
connection with the Acquisition. Since the Acquisition, we have
granted no further options or other awards under the 1998 plan.
On May 17, 2006, our board of directors adopted, and our
stockholders approved, the amendment and restatement of the 1998
plan, which reflects, among other things, the formal assumption
of the 1998 plan by SS&C Holdings. As of July 31,
2007, there were outstanding options under the 1998 plan to
purchase a total of 410,149 shares of our common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $13.49 per share.
1999
Non-Officer Employee Stock Incentive Plan
In 1999, the board of directors of SS&C adopted the 1999
non-officer employee stock incentive plan, or 1999 plan, to
provide equity compensation to SS&Cs employees,
consultants and advisors other than its executive officers and
directors. In connection with the Transaction, all outstanding
options to purchase SS&C common stock under the 1999 plan
became fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to the
effectiveness of the Acquisition. Each SS&C option that
remained outstanding under the 1999 plan at the time of the
Acquisition (other than options held by (1) certain
individuals identified by SS&C and SS&C Holdings and
(2) individuals who held options that were, in the
aggregate, exercisable for fewer than 100 shares of
SS&C common stock) was assumed by SS&C Holdings and
was automatically converted into an option to purchase shares of
common stock of SS&C Holdings. The options that were not
assumed or otherwise exercised immediately prior to the
Acquisition were cashed out in connection with the Acquisition.
Since the Acquisition, we have granted no further options or
other awards under the 1999 plan. On May 17, 2006, our
board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the
amendment and restatement of the 1999 plan, which reflects,
among other things, the formal assumption of the 1999 plan by
SS&C Holdings. As of July 31,
89
2007, there were outstanding options under the 1999 plan to
purchase a total of 68,875 shares of our common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $37.12 per share.
2006
Equity Incentive Plan
In August 2006, our board of directors adopted, and our
stockholders approved, our 2006 equity incentive plan. Our 2006
equity incentive plan provides for the granting of options,
restricted stock and other stock-based awards to our employees,
consultants and directors and our subsidiaries employees,
consultants and directors. A maximum of 1,314,567 shares of
our common stock are reserved for issuance under our 2006 equity
incentive plan, and the unexercised portion of any shares of
common stock subject to awards that is forfeited, repurchased,
expires or lapses under our 2006 equity incentive plan will
again become available for the grant of awards under our 2006
equity incentive plan except for vested shares of common stock
that are forfeited or repurchased after being issued from our
2006 equity incentive plan.
As of July 31, 2007, options to purchase a total of
1,143,926 shares of common stock were outstanding under our
2006 equity incentive plan at a weighted average exercise price
of $74.94 per share. As of July 31, 2007, we had issued
8,900 shares of common stock under the 2006 equity
incentive plan, and 170,641 shares remained available for
future awards under the plan. We may adjust the number of shares
reserved for issuance under our 2006 equity incentive plan in
the event of our reorganization, merger, consolidation,
recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split
or similar event.
Our board of directors or a committee appointed by our board of
directors administers our 2006 equity incentive plan. The
administrator is authorized to take any action with respect to
our 2006 equity incentive plan, including:
|
|
|
|
|
to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating
to our 2006 equity incentive plan,
|
|
|
|
to determine the type or types of awards to be granted under our
2006 equity incentive plan,
|
|
|
|
to select the persons to whom awards may be granted under our
2006 equity incentive plan,
|
|
|
|
to grant awards and to determine the terms and conditions of
such awards,
|
|
|
|
to construe and interpret our 2006 equity incentive plan and
|
|
|
|
to amend, suspend or terminate our 2006 equity incentive plan.
|
We grant stock options under our 2006 equity incentive plan
pursuant to a stock grant notice and stock option agreement,
which we refer to as the option agreement. Options may be
incentive stock options that qualify under Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or nonqualified options.
Options granted under our 2006 equity incentive plan may not be
exercised more than ten years after the date of grant. The
option agreement provides, among other things, that:
|
|
|
|
|
each option will vest, depending on the classification of the
option as a time option, performance option or superior option,
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
°
|
time options will vest as to 25% of the number of shares
underlying the option on a date certain (November 23, 2006
for the first tranche of options awarded under the plan in
August 2006, but generally the first anniversary of either the
date of grant or the start date for a new employee) and will
continue to vest as to 1/36 of the number of shares underlying
the option each month thereafter until such options are fully
vested. Time options will become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event.
|
|
|
°
|
A certain percentage of the performance options will vest based
on the administrators determination as to whether our
EBIDTA for each fiscal year 2006 through 2010 (2007 through 2011
for options awarded in 2007) equals, exceeds or falls short
by a certain percentage of the EBITDA target for such year. A
certain percentage of performance options will vest immediately
prior to the effective date of a liquidity event if proceeds
from the liquidity event equal or exceed a certain target.
|
90
|
|
|
|
°
|
The vesting of superior options will be determined based on the
extent to which proceeds from a liquidity event equal or exceed
a certain target.
|
|
|
|
|
|
any portion of an option that is unvested at the time of a
participants termination of service with us will be
forfeited to us; and
|
|
|
|
any portion of an option that is vested but unexercised at the
time of a participants termination of service with us may
not be exercised after the first to occur of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
°
|
the expiration date of the option, which will be no later than
ten years from the date of grant,
|
|
|
°
|
30 days following the date of the termination of service
for any reason other than cause, death or disability,
|
|
|
°
|
the date of the termination of service for cause and
|
|
|
°
|
twelve months following the termination of service by reason of
the participants death or disability.
|
Restricted stock awards may also be granted under our 2006
equity incentive plan and are evidenced by a stock award
agreement. Upon termination of a participants employment
or service, shares of restricted stock that are not vested at
such time will be forfeited to us. Our 2006 equity incentive
plan also gives the administrator discretion to grant stock
awards free of restrictions on transfer or forfeiture.
If a change in control of our company occurs, the administrator
may, in its sole discretion, cause any and all awards
outstanding under our 2006 equity incentive plan to terminate on
or immediately prior to the date of such change in control and
will give each participant the right to exercise the vested
portion of such awards during a period of time prior to such
change in control. Our 2006 equity incentive plan will terminate
on August 8, 2016, unless the administrator terminates it
sooner. Please see Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Components of our Executive Compensation
Program Stock Option Awards for additional
information relating to our 2006 equity incentive plan and
awards thereunder.
91
2006
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning stock
options held by each of our named executive officers as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options(#)
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
(#)(3)
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
75,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.334
|
|
|
|
2/17/2010
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
5/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.986
|
|
|
|
4/8/2013
|
|
|
|
|
19,227
|
(2)
|
|
|
51,766
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,993
|
(3)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,496
|
(4)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
25,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.70
|
|
|
|
10/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.962
|
|
|
|
2/6/2013
|
|
|
|
|
14,420
|
(2)
|
|
|
38,825
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,245
|
(3)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,622
|
(4)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
15,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.56
|
|
|
|
8/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
7,210
|
(2)
|
|
|
19,413
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,622
|
(3)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,311
|
(4)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
7,461
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.962
|
|
|
|
2/6/2013
|
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
(2)
|
|
|
10,354
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,198
|
(3)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,099
|
(4)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
Kevin Milne(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These options were granted under our prior 1998 stock incentive
plan and are fully vested. |
|
(2) |
|
This option is a time-based option awarded under our 2006 equity
incentive plan that vests as to 25% of the number of shares
underlying the option on November 23, 2006 and as to 1/36
of the number of shares underlying the option each month
thereafter until fully vested on November 23, 2009. The
time-based options become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event, as
defined. |
|
(3) |
|
This option is a performance-based option awarded under our 2006
equity incentive plan that vests based on the determination by
our board of directors or compensation committee as to whether
our EBITDA for each fiscal year 2006 through 2010 equals,
exceeds or falls short by a certain percentage of the EBITDA
target for such year. A certain percentage of performance-based
options will vest immediately prior to the effective date of a
liquidity event if proceeds from the liquidity event equal or
exceed specified returns on investments in us made by our
principal stockholders. |
|
(4) |
|
This option is a superior option awarded under our 2006 equity
incentive plan that vests (in whole or in part) only upon a
liquidity event if proceeds from the liquidity event equal or
exceed specified returns on investments in us made by our
principal stockholders. |
|
(5) |
|
All options held by Mr. Milne were unvested at the date of
his termination and forfeited at that time. |
92
2006
Option Exercises
No stock options were exercised by our named executive officers
during 2006.
2006
Pension Benefits
None of our named executive officers participate in or have
account balances in qualified or non-qualified defined benefit
plans sponsored by us.
2006
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
None of our named executive officers participate in or have
account balances in non-qualified deferred contribution plans or
other deferred compensation plans maintained by us.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
William
C. Stone
Effective as of November 23, 2005, we entered into a
definitive employment agreement with Mr. Stone. The terms
of the agreement are described under the caption
Employment and Related Agreements above.
The table below reflects the amount of compensation payable to
Mr. Stone in the event of termination of his employment or
a liquidity event (as defined in our 2006 equity incentive
plan). The amounts shown assume that such termination was
effective as of December 31, 2006, and thus include amounts
earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts that
would be paid out to him upon his termination. The actual
amounts to be paid out, if any, can only be determined at the
time of his separation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to
|
|
Without Cause, For
|
|
|
For Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
Good Reason or
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon Termination
|
|
Upon Notice of
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Liquidity Event
|
|
Non-Renewal
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Event(2)
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Base salary
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Target annual bonus
|
|
|
900,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
450,000
|
(5)
|
Stock Options(6)
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Health and welfare benefits
|
|
|
33,986
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax gross up payment
|
|
|
2,363,761
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,297,747
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event that Mr. Stones employment is terminated
for cause or without good reason, he will be entitled to unpaid
base salary through the date of the termination, payment of any
annual bonus earned with respect to a completed fiscal year of
SS&C that is unpaid as of the date of termination and any
benefits due to him under any employee benefit plan, policy,
program, arrangement or agreement. |
|
(2) |
|
Liquidity event is defined in our 2006 equity incentive plan.
Time-based options will become fully vested and exercisable
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event.
Performance-based options will vest in whole or in part
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event if
proceeds from the liquidity event equal or exceed a certain
target. The vesting of superior options will be determined based
on the extent to which proceeds from a liquidity event equal or
exceed a certain target. Because the exercise price of all of
Mr. Stones unvested options is equal to the fair
market value of such options as of December 31, 2006,
Mr. Stone would not have recognized any value from the
acceleration of vesting and exercise of such options. |
|
(3) |
|
Consists of 200% of 2006 base salary payable promptly upon
termination. |
93
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Consists of 200% of 2006 target annual bonus payable promptly
upon termination. The compensation committee did not set a
formal 2006 target annual bonus for Mr. Stone. The figure
used for the 2006 target annual bonus is $450,000, the minimum
annual bonus specified for Mr. Stone in his employment
agreement. |
|
(5) |
|
Consists of a cash payment equal to the amount of
Mr. Stones target annual bonus for 2006, payable
within 30 business days of termination. The compensation
committee did not set a formal 2006 target annual bonus for
Mr. Stone. The figure used for the 2006 target annual bonus
is $450,000, the minimum annual bonus specified for
Mr. Stone in his employment agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
Based upon an exercise price of $74.50 per share and a fair
market value of $74.50 per share as of December 31, 2006,
as determined by our board of directors. |
|
(7) |
|
Vesting acceleration with respect to unvested options to
purchase an aggregate of 78,881 shares of our common stock,
which is equal to 50% of all unvested options held by
Mr. Stone on December 31, 2006. Because the exercise
price of such options is equal to the fair market value of such
options as of December 31, 2006, Mr. Stone would not
have recognized any value from the acceleration of vesting and
exercise of such options. |
|
(8) |
|
Represents three years of coverage under SS&Cs
medical, dental and vision benefit plans. |
|
(9) |
|
In the event that the severance and other benefits provided for
in Mr. Stones employment agreement or otherwise
payable to him in connection with a change in control constitute
parachute payments within the meaning of
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and will
be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the
Code, then Mr. Stone shall receive (a) a payment from
us sufficient to pay such excise tax, and (b) an additional
payment from us sufficient to pay the excise tax and federal and
state income taxes arising from the payments made by us to
Mr. Stone pursuant to this sentence. |
In accordance with Mr. Stones employment agreement,
none of the severance payments described above will be paid
during the six-month period following his termination of
employment unless we determine, in our good faith judgment, that
paying such amounts at the time or times indicated above would
not cause him to incur an additional tax under Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code (in which case such amounts shall
be paid at the time or times indicated above). If the payment of
any amounts are delayed as a result of the previous sentence, on
the first day following the end of the six-month period, we will
pay Mr. Stone a lump-sum amount equal to the cumulative
amounts that would have otherwise been previously paid to him
under his employment agreement. Thereafter, payments will resume
in accordance with the above table.
Kevin
Milne
As of October 31, 2006, in connection with his termination
of employment, Kevin Milne, our former Senior Vice
President International, entered into a compromise
agreement with our subsidiary, SS&C Technologies Limited,
providing for an aggregate severance payment to Mr. Milne
of £65,600. In addition, Mr. Milne received
£12,402 for accrued vacation time. The aggregate payments
to Mr. Milne equaled approximately $148,765, based on the
pound-dollar exchange rate as of October 31, 2006 of
1.9072. All unvested options held by Mr. Milne on
October 31, 2006 were forfeited.
Other
Named Executive Officers
Other than Mr. Stone, none of our current named executive
officers has any arrangement that provides for severance
payments. Our 2006 equity incentive plan provides for vesting of
stock options in connection with a liquidity event. Time-based
options become fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to
the effective date of a liquidity event, a certain percentage of
performance-based options vest immediately prior to the
effective date of a liquidity event if proceeds from the
liquidity event equal or exceed a certain target and superior
options vest based on the extent to which proceeds from a
liquidity event equal or exceed a certain target.
As of December 31, 2006, Messrs. Boulanger, Pedonti
and Whitman held the following unvested stock options that would
have become fully vested upon a liquidity event, assuming that
certain targets with respect to proceeds from the liquidity
event were met.
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Value of Unvested
|
Name
|
|
Unvested Options (#)
|
|
Options ($)(1)
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
118,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
59,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
31,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value of unvested options was calculated by multiplying the
number of shares underlying unvested options by $74.50, the fair
market value of our common stock on December 31, 2006, as
determined by our board of directors, and then deducting the
aggregate exercise price for these options. Because the exercise
price of such options is equal to the fair market value of such
options as of December 31, 2006, Messrs. Boulanger,
Pedonti and Whitman would not have recognized any value from the
acceleration of vesting and exercise of such options. |
Director
Compensation
None of our directors, except Mr. Etherington, receives
compensation for serving as a director. Mr. Etherington
receives, and Mr. Daly will receive upon his election as a
director, an annual retainer fee of $25,000 and $2,500 for each
board meeting attended in person. Effective upon the closing of
this offering, we will pay an annual retainer of $5,000 to
Messrs. Etherington and Daly for service on the audit
committee. All of the directors are reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses associated with their service on the
board. The following table contains for
Mr. Etheringtons compensation received during the
year ended December 31, 2006 for serving as a director.
2006
Director Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)
|
|
William Etherington
|
|
$
|
27,500
|
|
|
$
|
77,700
|
|
|
$
|
105,200
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For his service as a director, Mr. Etherington is paid an
annual retainer fee of $25,000 and $2,500 for each board meeting
attended in person. Mr. Etherington was paid an aggregate
of $27,500 for his service as a director in 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Upon his election to the board of directors,
Mr. Etherington was granted an option to purchase
2,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price per
share of $74.50. Such option was 100% vested on the date of
grant. This option, which was outstanding at December 31,
2006, had a calculated fair value of $31.08 per underlying
share, representing a total grant date fair value of $77,700.
The amount in this column reflects the dollar amount recognized
for financial statement reporting purposes for the year ended
December 31, 2006 in accordance with SFAS 123R. A
discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the amount in
this column may be found in Note 10 to our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Management
Agreement
TC Group, L.L.C. (an affiliate of Carlyle), Mr. Stone and
SS&C Holdings entered into a management agreement on
November 23, 2005, pursuant to which SS&C Holdings
paid (1) TC Group, L.L.C. a fee of $5,233,516 for certain
services provided by it to SS&C Holdings in connection with
the Transaction and the financing of the Transaction and
(2) Mr. Stone a fee of $2,266,484 in consideration of
his commitment to contribute SS&C equity to SS&C
Holdings pursuant to the contribution and subscription agreement
between Mr. Stone and SS&C Holdings and as
consideration for Mr. Stones agreement to enter into
a long-term
95
employment agreement with SS&C Holdings, including the
non-competition provisions therein. The aggregate amount of
these fees was allocated to Mr. Stone and TC Group, L.L.C.
pro rata based on their respective ownership of SS&C
Holdings following the consummation of the Transaction.
SS&C Holdings also agreed to pay to TC Group L.L.C.
(1) an annual fee of $1.0 million for certain
management services to be performed by it for SS&C Holdings
following consummation of the Transaction and to reimburse TC
Group L.L.C. for certain out-of pocket expenses incurred in
connection with the performance of such services and
(2) additional reasonable compensation for other services
provided by TC Group L.L.C. to SS&C Holdings from time to
time, including investment banking, financial advisory and other
services with respect to acquisitions and divestitures by
SS&C Holdings or sales of equity or debt interests of
SS&C Holdings or any of its affiliates. The management
agreement will terminate upon completion of this offering.
Contribution
and Subscription Agreement
On July 28, 2005, Mr. Stone and SS&C Holdings
entered into a contribution and subscription agreement, which
provided that, immediately prior to the closing date of the
Transaction, Mr. Stone would contribute to SS&C
Holdings 4,026,845 shares of SS&C common stock held by
him in exchange for the issuance by SS&C Holdings to
Mr. Stone of newly issued shares of common stock of
SS&C Holdings, representing approximately 28% of the
outstanding equity of SS&C Holdings. Mr. Stone and
SS&C Holdings subsequently reached an understanding to
allow Mr. Stone to reduce the number of shares of SS&C
common stock that he would contribute to SS&C Holdings
pursuant to the contribution and subscription agreement to
3,921,958 shares, with a value of approximately
$146.1 million based on a per-share value of $37.25.
Mr. Stone also agreed not to exercise any of his
outstanding options to purchase SS&C common stock.
Accordingly, pursuant to the merger agreement for the
Acquisition, these options became vested and immediately
exercisable on the closing date of the Transaction and were
assumed by SS&C Holdings and converted into options to
acquire common stock of SS&C Holdings. The value of these
assumed options was approximately $18.9 million (calculated
by multiplying the number of shares subject to each option by
the amount, if any, by which $37.25 exceeded the exercise price
of the options). The aggregate value of his contributed shares
and options was $165.0 million and represented
approximately 28% of the fully diluted outstanding equity of
SS&C Holdings, after giving effect to the anticipated
equity contributions by Carlyle.
Stockholders
Agreement
On November 23, 2005, Mr. Stone became a party to a
stockholders agreement with SS&C Holdings, Carlyle Partners
IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., which includes
restrictions on transfer as well as other provisions described
below.
Board of directors. The stockholders agreement
provides that our board of directors will initially consist of
six members, with Mr. Stone occupying one seat and having
the right to designate one of the remaining board members, and
with the stockholders affiliated with Carlyle having the right
to designate the remaining four board members. Accordingly,
Mr. Stone designated Normand A. Boulanger, and the
stockholders affiliated with Carlyle designated William A.
Etherington, Allan M. Holt, Todd R. Newnam and Claudius E.
Watts, IV as members of our board of directors. The number of
board members which Carlyle is entitled to designate will be
reduced (1) to three directors if the Carlyle holders hold
less than 40% of our common stock, (2) to two directors if
the Carlyle holders hold less than 30% of our common stock, and
(3) to one director if the Carlyle holders hold less than
15% of our common stock. The number of board members which
Mr. Stone is entitled to designate (including himself) will
be reduced to one director if Mr. Stone holds less than 15%
of our common stock. The Carlyle holders rights under the
board of directors designation provisions of the stockholders
agreement will terminate at such time as they hold less than 10%
of our common stock. Mr. Stones rights under the
board of directors designation provisions of the stockholders
agreement will terminate at such time as he holds less than 10%
of our common stock.
Bring-along rights. If, on or after
November 23, 2007 (or the date Mr. Stone ceases to be
our chief executive officer, if earlier), any party to the
stockholders agreement proposes to transfer 50% or more of all
common stock held by the parties to the agreement to a
third-party purchaser, then such transferring
96
stockholder can require the other stockholders who are parties
to the agreement to transfer their common stock on the same
terms and conditions as the transferring holder.
Tag-along rights. If any party to the
stockholders agreement proposes to transfer any of our capital
stock to a third-party purchaser, each other holder who is a
party to the agreement can request that such third-party
purchaser purchase a pro rata portion of common stock from such
holder.
Right of first negotiation. Under the
stockholders agreement, the Carlyle holders have granted
Mr. Stone a right of first negotiation in connection with
any transfer by a Carlyle holder of our common stock prior to
November 23, 2007 (or the closing of this offering, if
earlier).
Preemptive rights. Each stockholder who is a
party to the stockholders agreement has the right to purchase
its pro rata portion of any new securities which SS&C
Holdings may propose to issue and sell (not including the
issuance of shares of common stock in this offering).
Upon completion of this offering, the tag-along rights, right of
first negotiation and preemptive rights will terminate in
accordance with the terms of the stockholders agreement.
Service
Provider Stockholders Agreement
On November 23, 2005, all of our members of management
(other than Mr. Stone) and all employee option holders who
decided to convert their SS&C options into options to
acquire common stock of SS&C Holdings became parties to a
service provider stockholders agreement with Carlyle Partners
IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. and SS&C Holdings. In
addition, substantially all holders of options to purchase
common stock of SS&C Holdings have subsequently become
parties to the agreement. The agreement contains restrictions on
the transferability of such management and employee option
holders equity, and also gives SS&C Holdings the
right to repurchase shares of its common stock and options to
acquire its common stock from members of its management and
employee option holders who are parties to the agreement upon
termination of their service to SS&C Holdings in certain
circumstances.
Under the agreement, after November 23, 2007 (or the date
Mr. Stone ceases to be our chief executive officer, if
earlier), if the Carlyle holders propose to transfer 50% or more
of our outstanding common stock to a third-party purchaser, then
the Carlyle holders can require the members of our management
and employee option holders who are parties to the agreement to
transfer their common stock and options on the same terms and
conditions as the Carlyle holders (bring-along rights). If any
Carlyle holder proposes to transfer any of our capital stock to
a third-party purchaser, each member of our management and
employee option holder who is a party to the agreement can
request that such third-party purchaser purchase a pro rata
portion of common stock from such member of management or
employee option holder (tag-along rights).
Upon completion of this offering, the restrictions on transfers
of shares, tag-along rights and our repurchase rights will
terminate in accordance with the terms of the service provider
stockholders agreement.
Registration
Rights Agreement
On November 23, 2005, Mr. Stone became a party to a
registration rights agreement with SS&C Holdings, Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., which provides
for certain registration rights. Under the registration rights
agreement, either the Carlyle holders or Mr. Stone can
demand, at any time after six months after the closing of this
offering, that we file a registration statement for all or a
portion of their common stock. The Carlyle holders and
Mr. Stone are also entitled to request, at any time after
this offering, that their shares be covered by a registration
statement that we are otherwise filing with respect to common
stock. These registration rights are subject to conditions and
limitations, including the right of the underwriters of an
offering to limit the number of shares included in certain
registrations. For additional detail, see Description of
Capital Stock Registration Rights.
97
Management
Rights Agreement
Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., SS&C
Holdings and SS&C entered into a management rights
agreement on November 23, 2005, pursuant to which Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. was granted (1) the right to nominate one
director to serve as a member of the board of directors of
SS&C Holdings and to appoint one non-voting board observer
to the board of directors of SS&C, (2) reasonable
access to the books and records of SS&C Holdings and
SS&C and their subsidiaries and (3) the right to
consult from time to time with the management of SS&C
Holdings and SS&C and their subsidiaries at their
respective place of business regarding operating and financial
matters. The management rights agreement will terminate with
respect to SS&C when SS&C Holdings and its affiliates
no longer beneficially own any voting securities of SS&C.
The management rights agreement will terminate with respect to
SS&C Holdings when Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. and its
affiliates no longer beneficially own any voting securities of
SS&C Holdings.
RLI
Insurance Company
From January 1, 2004 through the second quarter of 2007,
RLI Insurance Company paid an aggregate of $256,902 to us for
maintenance of CAMRA and Finesse products. Michael J. Stone,
President of RLI Insurance, is the brother of William C. Stone.
Other
Transactions
John Stone, the brother of William C. Stone, is employed by
SS&C as Vice President of Sales Management. From
January 1, 2004 through the quarter ended June 30,
2007, John Stone was paid an aggregate of $596,594 as salary and
commissions related to his employment at SS&C.
Review,
Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related
Persons
Our board of directors intends to adopt written policies and
procedures for the review of any transaction, arrangement or
relationship in which we are a participant, the amount involved
exceeds $120,000, and one of our executive officers, directors,
director nominees or 5% stockholders (or their immediate family
members), each of whom we refer to as a related
person, has a direct or indirect material interest.
If a related person proposes to enter into such a transaction,
arrangement or relationship, which we refer to as a
related person transaction, the related person must
report the proposed related person transaction to our general
counsel. The policy calls for the proposed related person
transaction to be reviewed and, if deemed appropriate, approved
by our boards audit committee. Whenever practicable, the
reporting, review and approval will occur prior to entry into
the transaction. If advance review and approval is not
practicable, the committee will review, and, in its discretion,
may ratify the related person transaction. The policy also
permits the chairman of the committee to review and, if deemed
appropriate, approve proposed related person transactions that
arise between committee meetings, subject to ratification by the
committee at its next meeting. Any related person transactions
that are ongoing in nature will be reviewed annually.
A related person transaction reviewed under the policy will be
considered approved or ratified if it is authorized by the
committee after full disclosure of the related persons
interest in the transaction. As appropriate for the
circumstances, the committee will review and consider:
|
|
|
|
|
the related persons interest in the related person
transaction;
|
|
|
|
the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the
related person transaction;
|
|
|
|
the approximate dollar value of the amount of the related
persons interest in the transaction without regard to the
amount of any profit or loss;
|
|
|
|
whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of
our business;
|
|
|
|
whether the terms of the transaction are no less favorable to us
than terms that could have been reached with an unrelated third
party;
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
the purpose of, and the potential benefits to us of, the
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
any other information regarding the related person transaction
or the related person in the context of the proposed transaction
that would be material to investors in light of the
circumstances of the particular transaction.
|
The committee may approve or ratify the transaction only if the
committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the
transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, our best
interests. The committee may impose any conditions on the
related person transaction that it deems appropriate.
In addition to the transactions that are excluded by the
instructions to the Securities and Exchange Commissions
related person transaction disclosure rule, our board has
determined that the following transactions do not create a
material direct or indirect interest on behalf of related
persons and, therefore, are not related person transactions for
purposes of this policy:
|
|
|
|
|
interests arising solely from the related persons position
as an executive officer of another entity (whether or not the
person is also a director of such entity), that is a participant
in the transaction, where (a) the related person and all
other related persons own in the aggregate less than a 10%
equity interest in such entity and (b) the related person
and his or her immediate family members are not involved in the
negotiation of the terms of the transaction and do not receive
any special benefits as a result of the transaction, and
(c) the amount involved in the transaction equals less than
the greater of $200,000 or 5% of the annual gross revenues of
the company receiving payment under the transaction; and
|
|
|
|
a transaction that is specifically contemplated by provisions of
our charter or bylaws.
|
The policy provides that transactions involving compensation of
executive officers shall be reviewed and approved by the
compensation committee in the manner specified in its charter.
Executive
Compensation and Stock Option Awards
Please see Management for information on the
compensation of, and stock options granted to, our directors and
executive officers.
Employment
Agreements
We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Stone
as described in Management Employment and
Related Agreements.
PRINCIPAL
AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
This table presents information concerning the beneficial
ownership of the shares of our common stock as of July 31,
2007. The table also contains information about beneficial
ownership, as adjusted to reflect the sale of common stock in
this offering, assuming 7,087,658 shares of common stock
are outstanding as of July 31, 2007
and shares
are outstanding immediately following the completion of this
offering.
Specifically, the table reflects beneficial ownership
information about:
|
|
|
|
|
each of the selling stockholders;
|
|
|
|
each person we know to be the beneficial owner of more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors and director nominees; and
|
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
|
99
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting
or investment power over securities. Except in cases where
community property laws apply or as indicated in the footnotes
to this table, we believe that each stockholder identified in
the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all
shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by the
stockholder. Shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 31,
2007 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the
person holding the options for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person.
The information in the table below with respect to each selling
stockholder has been obtained from that selling stockholder.
When we refer to the selling stockholders in this
prospectus, we mean those persons listed in the table below as
offering shares, as well as the pledgees, donees, assignees,
transferees, successors and others who may hold any of the
selling stockholders interest.
See Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
for a discussion of the material relationships between the
Company and investment funds associated with Carlyle.
Unless otherwise noted below, the address of the persons and
entities listed on the table is
c/o SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc., 80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT
06095.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
|
Owned After the
|
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
|
Offering Assuming
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
|
Owned After the Offering
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
the Underwriters
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
Assuming the
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Underwriters Over-
|
|
|
|
Owned Prior
|
|
|
Option is
|
|
|
Option is Not
|
|
|
Option is
|
|
|
Allotment Option is
|
|
|
|
to the Offering
|
|
|
Not
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Exercised in
|
|
|
Exercised in Full(1)
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Full(1)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCG Holdings, L.L.C.(2)
|
|
|
5,114,095
|
|
|
|
72.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Etherington(3)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allan M. Holt(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claudius (Bud) E. Watts IV(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd Newnam(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone(5)
|
|
|
2,300,617
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger(6)
|
|
|
92,228
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti(7)
|
|
|
29,864
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman(8)
|
|
|
15,388
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Milne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Daly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(8 persons)(9)
|
|
|
2,440,597
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than one percent of the outstanding shares of
common stock. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters an option
to purchase up to an
additional shares. |
|
(2) |
|
TC Group IV, L.P. is the sole general partner of Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., the record
holders of 4,915,571 and 198,524 shares of our common
stock, respectively. TC Group IV, L.L.C. is the sole general
partner of TC Group IV, L.P. TC Group, L.L.C. is the sole
managing member of TC Group IV, L.L.C. TCG Holdings, L.L.C. is
the sole managing member of TC Group, L.L.C. Accordingly, TC
Group IV, L.P., TC Group IV, L.L.C., TC Group, L.L.C. and TCG
Holdings, L.L.C. each may be deemed owners of shares of our
common stock owned of record by each of Carlyle Partners IV,
L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. William E. Conway, Jr., Daniel
A. DAniello and David M. Rubenstein are managing members
of TCG Holdings, L.L.C. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to
share beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock
beneficially owned by TCG Holdings, L.L.C. Such individuals
expressly disclaim any such beneficial ownership. Each of
Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV |
100
|
|
|
|
|
Coinvestment, L.P. may be considered an affiliate or associated
person of a broker-dealer that is not participating in this
offering. Each represents that it acquired its shares in the
ordinary course of business and at the time of purchase had no
agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any
person to distribute the securities. The principal address and
principal offices of TCG Holdings, L.L.C. and certain affiliates
is
c/o The
Carlyle Group, 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 220
South, Washington, D.C.
20004-2505. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Consists of 2,500 shares subject to outstanding stock
options which are currently exercisable. |
|
(4) |
|
Does not include 5,114,095 shares of common stock held by
investment funds associated with or designated by The Carlyle
Group. Messrs. Holt, Watts and Newnam are executives of The
Carlyle Group. They disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares
held by investment funds associated with or designated by The
Carlyle Group. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 339,638 shares subject to outstanding stock
options exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following July 31, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Consists of 92,228 shares subject to outstanding stock
options exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following July 31, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Consists of 29,864 shares subject to outstanding stock
options exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following July 31, 2007. |
|
(8) |
|
Consists of 15,388 shares subject to outstanding stock
options exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following July 31, 2007. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 479,618 shares subject to outstanding stock
options exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following July 31, 2007. |
DESCRIPTION
OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
Senior
Credit Facilities
Overview
In connection with the Transaction, SS&C entered into its
senior credit facilities with J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as co-lead arrangers and joint
bookrunners, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent,
Wachovia Bank, National Association as syndication agent and
Bank of America, N.A. as documentation agent.
The senior credit facilities consist of a revolving credit
facility and term loan facility. The term loan facility has a
principal amount of $275.0 million, of which the equivalent
of $75.0 million ($17 million of which is denominated
in U.S. dollars and $58 million of which is
denominated in Canadian dollars) was drawn by SS&C
Technologies Canada Corp., one of our Canadian subsidiaries as
the Canadian borrower, on the closing date of the Transaction.
The revolving credit facility has a principal amount of
$75.0 million, of which $10.0 million was drawn on the
closing date of the Transaction to pay a portion of the costs
associated with the Transaction. The remainder is available for
general corporate purposes, subject to certain conditions. In
addition, the equivalent of up to $10.0 million of the
revolving credit facility may be drawn in Canadian dollars
either by us or the Canadian borrower. Our ability to draw under
the revolving credit facility is conditioned upon, among other
things, our continued compliance with covenants in the credit
agreement, our ability to bring down the representations and
warranties contained in the credit agreement and the absence of
any default or event of default under the senior credit
facilities.
Our revolving credit facility will mature on November 23,
2011, and the term loan facility will mature on
November 23, 2012.
The term loan facility amortizes in nominal quarterly
installments of 0.25% ($2.6 million per year) beginning on
March 31, 2006 until maturity, whereby the final
installment of the term loan facility will be paid on the
maturity date in an amount equal to the aggregate unpaid
principal amount.
101
In addition to the revolving credit facility and term loan
facility described above, our senior credit facilities permit
SS&C or the Canadian borrower to incur up to
$100.0 million in total principal amount of additional term
loan indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions.
Guarantees;
Security
The obligations under the senior credit facilities are secured
and fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally
by us and each of SS&Cs material wholly owned
U.S. subsidiaries currently existing or that we may create
or acquire, with certain exceptions as set forth in our credit
agreement, pursuant to the terms of a separate guarantee and
collateral agreement. The obligations of the Canadian borrower
are secured and fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and
severally by us and SS&C and each of its material wholly
owned U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries currently existing or
that we may create or acquire, with certain exceptions as set
forth in our credit agreement, pursuant to the terms of a
separate guarantee and collateral agreement.
Borrowings under the senior credit facilities, all guarantees
thereof and SS&Cs obligations under related hedging
agreements are secured by a perfected first priority security
interest in: (1) all of SS&Cs capital stock and
all of the capital stock or other equity interests held by
SS&C, us and each of our existing and future
U.S. subsidiary guarantors (subject to certain limitations
for equity interests of foreign subsidiaries and other
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement); and
(2) all of SS&Cs and our tangible and intangible
assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each of our
existing and future U.S. subsidiary guarantors, with
certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement.
The Canadian borrowers borrowings under the senior credit
facilities and all guarantees thereof are secured by a perfected
first priority security interest in: (1) all of
SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by SS&C, us and each of our
existing and future U.S. and Canadian subsidiary
guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit
agreement; and (2) all of SS&Cs and our tangible
and intangible assets and the tangible and intangible assets of
each of our existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in
the credit agreement.
Interest
Rates and Fees
Borrowings under the senior credit facilities that are
denominated in U.S. dollars bear interest at a rate equal
to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either: (1) a
base rate determined by reference to the higher of
(a) JPMorgan Chase Banks prime rate and (b) the
federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%; or (2) a Eurocurrency
rate on deposits in U.S. dollars for one-, two-, three- or
six-month periods (or nine- or twelve-month periods if, at the
time of the borrowing, all lenders agree to make such a duration
available). Borrowings under the revolving credit facility that
are denominated in Canadian dollars bear interest at the rate
equal to the applicable margin plus a Eurocurrency rate on
deposits in Canadian dollars for one-, two-, three- or six-month
periods (or nine- or twelve-month periods if, at the time of the
borrowing, all lenders agree to make such a duration available).
Borrowings by the Canadian borrower that are denominated in
Canadian dollars bear interest at a rate equal to the applicable
margin plus, at the Canadian borrowers option, either at
the Canadian dollar prime rate or the applicable bankers
acceptances discount rate. Borrowings by the Canadian borrower
that are denominated in U.S. dollars bear interest at the
rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at the Canadian
borrowers option, either (1) a base rate determined
by reference to the higher of (a) a reference rate for
determining interest rates on commercial loans denominated in
U.S. dollars and (b) the federal funds rate plus 1/2
of 1%; or (2) a Eurocurrency rate on deposits in
U.S. dollars for one-, two-, three- or six-month periods
(or nine-or twelve-month periods if, at the time of the
borrowing, all lenders agree to make such a duration available).
The applicable margin is subject to change depending on
SS&Cs leverage ratio. We will also pay the lenders a
commitment fee on the unused commitments under the revolving
credit facility, which is payable quarterly in arrears. The
commitment fee is subject to change depending on our leverage
ratio.
102
Mandatory
and Optional Repayment
Subject to exceptions for reinvestment of proceeds and other
exceptions and materiality thresholds, we are required to prepay
outstanding loans under the senior credit facilities with the
net proceeds of certain asset dispositions, near-term tax
refunds in certain circumstances and the incurrence of certain
debt, and 50% of SS&Cs excess cash flow, subject to
reduction to 25% and to 0% if certain leverage ratios are met.
We may voluntarily prepay loans or reduce commitments under the
senior credit facilities, in whole or in part, subject to
minimum amounts. If we prepay Eurocurrency rate loans other than
at the end of an applicable interest period, we are required to
reimburse lenders for their losses or expenses sustained as a
result of such prepayment.
Covenants
The senior credit facilities contain negative and affirmative
covenants affecting SS&C and its existing and future
restricted subsidiaries, with certain exceptions set forth in
the credit agreement. The senior credit facilities contain the
following negative covenants and restrictions on, among others,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
liens;
|
|
|
|
sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
debt;
|
|
|
|
dividends and other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
redemptions and stock repurchases;
|
|
|
|
consolidations, mergers and acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
asset dispositions;
|
|
|
|
investments, loans and advances;
|
|
|
|
changes in line of business;
|
|
|
|
changes in fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
restrictive agreements with subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
amendments or prepayments of subordinated indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
speculative hedging agreements.
|
The senior credit facilities also require SS&C, and require
its existing and future restricted subsidiaries, with certain
exceptions set forth in the credit agreement, to meet certain
financial covenants and ratios, particularly a leverage ratio
and an interest coverage ratio.
The senior credit facilities contain the following affirmative
covenants, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
delivery of financial and other information to the
administrative agent;
|
|
|
|
notice to the administrative agent upon the occurrence of
certain events of default, litigation and other material events;
|
|
|
|
conduct of business and maintenance of existence;
|
|
|
|
payment of material taxes and other governmental charges;
|
|
|
|
maintenance of properties, licenses and insurance;
|
|
|
|
access to books and records by the lenders;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
further assurances and maintenance of collateral.
|
Events
of Default
The senior credit facilities specify certain events of default,
including, among others: failure to pay principal, interest or
fees, violation of covenants, material inaccuracy of
representations and warranties, cross-defaults to material
indebtedness, certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, certain
material judgments, certain ERISA events, invalidity or
subordination provisions, change of control and invalidity of
guarantees or security documents.
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013
Overview
SS&C has issued $205.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013 pursuant to the terms of an
indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee.
Guarantees
and Ranking
The notes are general unsecured senior subordinated obligations
of SS&C that are subordinated in right of payment to all
existing and future senior debt of SS&C, including the
senior credit facilities. The notes are pari passu in
right of payment to all future senior subordinated debt of
SS&C. The notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a
senior subordinated basis by all existing and future direct and
indirect domestic subsidiaries of SS&C that guarantee the
obligations under the senior credit facilities or any of
SS&Cs other indebtedness or the indebtedness of the
guarantors.
Maturity
and Interest
The notes mature on December 1, 2013. Interest on the notes
accrues at the rate of 11.75% per annum and is payable
semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Optional
Redemption
The notes are redeemable, at SS&Cs option, in whole
or in part, at any time on or after December 1, 2009 and
prior to maturity at the applicable redemption prices set forth
below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus
accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to
the relevant redemption date. Such redemption prices are set
forth below, in each case if redeemed during the
12-month
period commencing on December 1 of the applicable year:
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption Period
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
105.8750
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
102.9375
|
%
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The notes also may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time
prior to December 1, 2009, at SS&Cs option, at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes redeemed plus the applicable premium as of, and accrued
and unpaid interest to, the redemption date. The applicable
premium, with respect to any note, is the greater of
(a) 1.0% of the then outstanding principal amount of the
note and (b) the excess of (i) the present value of
(A) the redemption price of the note at December 1,
2009 (as set forth in the table above) plus (B) all
required interest payments due on the note through
December 1, 2009, computed using a discount rate equal to
the yield to maturity of United States Treasury securities with
a constant maturity most nearly equal to the period from such
redemption date to December 1, 2009 plus 50 basis
points over (ii) the then outstanding principal amount of
the note.
In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to
December 1, 2008, SS&C may redeem up to 35% of the
original aggregate principal amount of the notes, with funds in
an equal aggregate amount up to the aggregate proceeds of
certain equity offerings of SS&C or any of its direct or
indirect parent entities, at a
104
redemption price of 111.75%, plus accrued and unpaid interest,
if any, to the redemption date. This redemption provision is
subject to a requirement that notes in an aggregate principal
amount equal to at least 65% of the original aggregate principal
amount of notes must remain outstanding after each such
redemption.
Change
of Control
Upon a change of control, we are required to make an offer to
redeem all of the notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest and liquidated damages, if any, to the date of
repurchase.
Covenants
The indenture governing the notes contains covenants limiting,
among other things, SS&Cs ability and the ability of
its restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
agree to payment restrictions affecting SS&Cs
restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of SS&Cs assets;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with SS&Cs affiliates;
|
|
|
|
incur liens; and
|
|
|
|
designate any of SS&Cs subsidiaries as unrestricted
subsidiaries.
|
The restrictive covenants in the indenture permit SS&C,
after our initial public offering, to pay dividends to us in an
amount not to exceed in any fiscal year 6% of the net proceeds
received by SS&C through a contribution to equity capital
from such offering to enable us to pay dividends to our
stockholders.
Events
of Default
The indenture governing the notes provides for customary events
of default, including, among others: failure to pay principal,
interest, fees or liquidated damages, violation of covenants,
cross-defaults to material indebtedness, certain material
judgments, invalidity of guarantees, and certain bankruptcy and
insolvency events.
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
Following the closing of this offering, our authorized capital
stock will consist
of shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
and shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, all of which
preferred stock will be undesignated. The following description
of our capital stock and provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws are summaries and are qualified by
reference to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws that
will become effective upon the closing of this offering. Copies
of these documents have been filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as exhibits to our registration statement,
of which this prospectus forms a part. The description of our
common stock reflects changes to our capital structure that will
occur upon the closing of this offering.
105
Common
Stock
As of July 31, 2007, there were 7,087,658 shares of
our common stock outstanding and held of record by approximately
17 stockholders.
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders
and do not have cumulative voting rights. An election of
directors by our stockholders shall be determined by a plurality
of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote on the
election. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive
proportionately any dividends as may be declared by our board of
directors, subject to any preferential dividend rights of any
series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the
future.
In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, the holders of
common stock are entitled to receive proportionately our net
assets available for distribution to stockholders after the
payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the
prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of
common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or
conversion rights. Our outstanding shares of common stock are,
and the shares offered by us in this offering will be, when
issued and paid for, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders
of common stock are subject to and may be adversely affected by
the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred
stock that we may designate and issue in the future.
Preferred
Stock
Under the terms of our certificate of incorporation that will
become effective upon the closing of this offering, our board of
directors is authorized to direct us to issue shares of
preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder
approval. Our board of directors has the discretion to determine
the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including
voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption
privileges and liquidation preferences, of each series of
preferred stock.
The purpose of authorizing our board of directors to issue
preferred stock and determine its rights and preferences is to
eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific
issuances. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing
flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions, future
financings and other corporate purposes, could have the effect
of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or
could discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, a
majority of our outstanding voting stock. Upon the closing of
this offering, there will be no shares of preferred stock
outstanding, and we have no present plans to issue any shares of
preferred stock.
Options
As of July 31, 2007, we had outstanding options to purchase
an aggregate of 1,622,950 shares of common stock with a
weighted-average exercise price of $57.80 per share.
Registration
Rights
We entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of
November 23, 2005, as amended, with Mr. Stone, Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. Under the
registration rights agreement, holders of shares having
registration rights can demand that we file a registration
statement or request that their shares be covered by a
registration statement that we are otherwise filing, as
described below. These registration rights are subject to
conditions and limitations, including the right of the
underwriters of an offering to limit the number of shares
included in certain registrations.
Demand Registration Rights. At any time after
six months after the closing of this offering, either the
holders of a majority of the common stock held by the Carlyle
holders or Mr. Stone may request that we register all or a
portion of their common stock for sale under the Securities Act.
We must use our reasonable best efforts to effect the
registration as requested, subject to our right to postpone such
registration if we determine that such registration would be
materially detrimental to us or our stockholders or if our board
of directors determines in its good faith judgment that the
registration would have an adverse effect on a then
106
contemplated public offering of our common stock. A
holders right to demand registration of shares is subject
to the right of the underwriters to limit the number of shares
included in the offering. We are required to effect four of
these registrations, in the case of the Carlyle holders, and
three of these registrations, in the case of Mr. Stone. We
are not obligated to effect more than three of these
registrations in any year. No registration will count towards
such numerical limitations, however, if any shares of common
stock requested to be registered are cut back by the
underwriters of an offering. Neither the Carlyle holders nor
Mr. Stone is entitled to make a registration request if
such holder owns less than 5% of our common stock held
collectively by the Carlyle holders and Mr. Stone.
Piggy-back Registration Rights. In addition,
if at any time after this offering we register any shares of
common stock, the holders of all shares having registration
rights are entitled to notice of the registration and to include
all or a portion of their common stock in the registration. We
must use our reasonable best efforts to effect the registration
as requested, unless we determine for any reason not to proceed
with the proposed registration of the securities to be sold by
us.
We will pay all registration expenses, other than underwriting
discounts and selling commissions, related to any demand or
piggyback registration, including the fees and expenses of one
counsel selected by the selling stockholders. The registration
rights agreement contains customary cross-indemnification
provisions, pursuant to which we are obligated to indemnify the
selling stockholders in the event of material misstatements or
omissions in the registration statement attributable to us, and
they are obligated to indemnify us for material misstatements or
omissions in the registration statement attributable to them.
Corporate
Opportunities
Our certificate of incorporation provides that Carlyle Partners
IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. and their respective
affiliates have no obligation to offer us an opportunity to
participate in business opportunities presented to such
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle or their respective
officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners,
affiliates and subsidiaries even if the opportunity is one that
we might reasonably have pursued, and that neither such
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle nor their respective
officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners,
affiliates or subsidiaries will be liable to us or our
stockholders for breach of any duty by reason of any such
activities unless, in the case of any person who is a director
or officer of our company, such business opportunity is offered
to such director or officer in writing solely in his or her
capacity as an officer or director of our company. Stockholders
will be deemed to have notice of and consented to this provision
of our certificate of incorporation.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions
Staggered Board. Our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws divide our board of directors into
three classes with staggered three-year terms. In addition, our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that directors
may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our
stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors. Under our certificate of incorporation and bylaws,
any vacancy on our board of directors, including a vacancy
resulting from an enlargement of our board of directors, may be
filled only by vote of a majority of our directors then in
office. The classification of our board of directors and the
limitations on the ability of our stockholders to remove
directors and fill vacancies could make it more difficult for a
third party to acquire, or discourage a third party from seeking
to acquire, control of our company.
Special Meeting of Stockholders; Advance Notice Requirements
for Stockholder Proposals and Director
Nominations. Our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws that will become effective upon the closing of this
offering provide that any action required or permitted to be
taken by our stockholders at an annual meeting or special
meeting of stockholders may only be taken if it is properly
brought before such meeting. Our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws also provide that, except as otherwise required by
law, special meetings of the stockholders can only be called by
our chairman of the board, our chief executive officer or our
board of directors. In addition, our bylaws establish an advance
notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before
an annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed
nominations of candidates for election
107
to the board of directors. Stockholders at an annual meeting may
only consider proposals or nominations specified in the notice
of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the direction
of the board of directors, or by a stockholder of record on the
record date for the meeting who is entitled to vote at the
meeting and who has delivered timely written notice in proper
form to our secretary of the stockholders intention to
bring such business before the meeting. These provisions could
have the effect of delaying until the next stockholder meeting
stockholder actions that are favored by the holders of a
majority of our outstanding voting securities.
Action by Written Consent. Our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws provide that action may be taken by
written consent of stockholders only for so long as William C.
Stone and investment funds affiliated with Carlyle collectively
hold a majority of our outstanding common stock. After such
time, any action taken by the stockholders must be effected at a
duly called annual or special meeting. These provisions make it
more procedurally difficult for a stockholder to place a
proposal or nomination on the meeting agenda or to take action
without a meeting, and therefore may reduce the likelihood that
a stockholder will seek to take independent action to replace
directors or seek a stockholder vote with respect to other
matters that are not supported by management.
Super-Majority Voting. The Delaware General
Corporation Law provides generally that the affirmative vote of
a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter is
required to amend a corporations certificate of
incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporations certificate
of incorporation or bylaws, as the case may be, requires a
greater percentage. Our bylaws may be amended or repealed by a
majority vote of our board of directors or the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our
stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of
at least two-thirds of the votes which all our stockholders
would be entitled to cast in an election of directors is
required to amend or repeal or to adopt any provisions
inconsistent with any of the provisions of our certificate of
incorporation described in the prior two paragraphs.
Authorized But Unissued Shares. The authorized
but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock are
available for future issuance without stockholder approval,
subject to any limitations imposed by the listing standards of
the NASDAQ Stock Market. These additional shares may be used for
a variety of corporate finance transactions, acquisitions and
employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued
and unreserved common stock and preferred stock could make more
difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by
means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Delaware Takeover Statute. We have opted out
of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
which would have otherwise imposed additional requirements
regarding mergers and other business combinations.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
Upon completion of this offering, the transfer agent and
registrar for our common stock will
be .
NASDAQ
Global Market Listing
We have applied to the NASDAQ Global Market for the listing of
our common stock under the trading symbol SSNC.
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Immediately prior to this offering, there was no public market
for our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of
common stock in the public market, or the perception that such
sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our
common stock. Although we have applied to have our common stock
approved for listing on the NASDAQ Global Market, we cannot
assure you that there will be an active public market for our
common stock.
108
Upon the closing of this offering, we will have outstanding an
aggregate
of shares
of common stock, assuming the issuance
of shares
of common stock offered by us in this offering and no exercise
of options after July 31, 2007. Of these shares, all shares
sold in this offering will be freely tradable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act,
except for any shares purchased by our affiliates,
as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities
Act, whose sales would be subject to certain limitations and
restrictions described below.
The
remaining shares
of common stock will be restricted securities, as
that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
These restricted securities are eligible for public sale only if
they are registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify
for an exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701
under the Securities Act, which are summarized below.
Subject to the
lock-up
agreements described below and the provisions of Rules 144
and 701 under the Securities Act, these restricted securities
will be available for sale in the public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Days After Date of
|
|
|
|
|
this Prospectus
|
|
Shares Eligible for Sale
|
|
Comment
|
|
Date of Prospectus
|
|
|
|
Shares sold in the offering
|
Date of Prospectus
|
|
|
|
Freely tradable shares saleable under Rule 144(k) that are not
subject to a lock-up
|
90 Days
|
|
|
|
Shares saleable under Rules 144 and 701 that are not subject to
a lock-up
|
180 Days
|
|
|
|
Lock-up released; shares saleable under Rules 144 and 701
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
Restricted securities held for one year or less
|
In addition, of the 1,622,950 shares of our common stock
that were subject to stock options outstanding as of
July 31, 2007, options to purchase 709,308 shares of
common stock were exercisable as of July 31, 2007 and, upon
exercise, these shares will be eligible for sale subject to the
lock-up
agreements described below.
Lock-up
Agreements
All of our directors and officers and certain other stockholders
and holders of options to purchase shares of our common stock,
who as of July 31, 2007 collectively
owned shares
of our common stock (including exercisable options), have agreed
that, without the prior written consent of the representatives
of the underwriters, they will not, subject to limited
exceptions, during the period ending 180 days after the
date of this prospectus, subject to extension in specified
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of our common stock,
|
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of our common stock or such other securities, in cash
or otherwise.
These agreements are subject to certain exceptions, and also
subject to extensions for up to an additional 34 days, as
described in the section of this prospectus entitled
Underwriting.
Upon the expiration of the applicable
lock-up
periods, substantially all of the shares subject to such
lock-up
restrictions will become eligible for sale, subject to the
limitations discussed above.
109
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after the effective date of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, a
person who has beneficially owned shares of our common stock for
at least one year, including an affiliate, would be entitled to
sell in brokers transactions or to market
makers, within any three-month period, a number of shares that
does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding,
which will equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume in our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such
sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are generally subject to the
availability of current public information about us.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not an affiliate of ours
at the time of sale and has not been an affiliate at any time
during the three months preceding a sale, and who has
beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least
two years, including the holding period of any prior owner other
than one of our affiliates, is entitled to sell such shares
without having to comply with the manner of sale, public
information, volume limitation or notice filing provisions of
Rule 144.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701, any of our employees,
directors, officers, consultants or advisors who purchases
shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option
plan or other written agreement before the effective date of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is
entitled to sell such shares 90 days after such effective
date in reliance on Rule 144. Our affiliate can resell
shares under Rule 701 without having to comply with the
holding period requirement of Rule 144, and our
non-affiliates can resell shares without having to comply with
the public information, holding period, volume limitation or
notice filing provisions of Rule 144.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated that
Rule 701 will apply to typical stock options granted by an
issuer before it becomes subject to the reporting requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, along with the shares
acquired upon exercise of such options, including exercises
after the date of this prospectus.
Stock
Options
We intend to file one or more registration statements on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act to register all shares of common stock
subject to outstanding stock options and common stock issued or
issuable under our stock plans. We expect to file the
registration statement covering shares offered pursuant to our
stock plans shortly after the date of this prospectus,
permitting the resale of such shares by nonaffiliates in the
public market without restriction under the Securities Act and
the sale by affiliates in the public market, subject to
compliance with the resale provisions of Rule 144.
Registration
Rights
Upon the closing of this offering, the holders
of shares
of common stock or their transferees will be entitled to various
rights with respect to the registration of these shares under
the Securities Act. Registration of these shares under the
Securities Act would result in these shares becoming fully
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act
immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration, except
for shares purchased by affiliates. See Description of
Capital Stock Registration Rights for
additional information. Shares covered by a registration
statement will be eligible for sale in the public market upon
the expiration or release from the terms of the
lock-up
agreement.
110
CERTAIN
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a general discussion of the material
U.S. federal income and estate tax considerations
applicable to
non-U.S. holders
with respect to their ownership and disposition of shares of our
common stock. This discussion is for general information only
and is not tax advice. Accordingly, all prospective
non-U.S. holders
of our common stock should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to the U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our
common stock. In general, a
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock who is not for
U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation or any other organization taxable as a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized
in the United States or under the laws of the United States or
of any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is included in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of
the trusts substantial decisions or (2) the trust has
a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury
Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
This discussion is based on current provisions of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as
the Code, existing and proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder, current administrative rulings and
judicial decisions, in effect as of the date of this prospectus,
all of which are subject to change or to differing
interpretation, possibly with retroactive effect. Any change
could alter the tax consequences to
non-U.S. holders
described in this prospectus. We assume in this discussion that
a
non-U.S. holder
holds shares of our common stock as a capital asset, generally
property held for investment.
This discussion does not address all aspects of
U.S. federal income and estate taxation that may be
relevant to a particular
non-U.S. holder
in light of that
non-U.S. holders
individual circumstances nor does it address any aspects of
U.S. state, local or
non-U.S. taxes.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or
circumstances that may apply to a
non-U.S. holder
and does not address the special tax rules applicable to
particular
non-U.S. holders,
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
brokers or dealers in securities;
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies;
|
|
|
|
pension plans;
|
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations;
|
|
|
|
passive foreign investment companies;
|
|
|
|
owners that hold our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; and
|
|
|
|
certain U.S. expatriates.
|
In addition, this discussion does not address the tax treatment
of partnerships or persons who hold their common stock through
partnerships or other pass-through entities for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. A partner in a
partnership or other pass-through entity that will hold our
common stock should consult his, her or its own tax advisor
regarding the tax consequences of the acquisition, holding and
disposing of our common stock through a partnership or other
pass-through entity, as applicable.
111
There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service,
which we refer to as the IRS, will not challenge one or more of
the tax consequences described herein, and we have not obtained,
nor do we intend to obtain, an opinion of counsel with respect
to the U.S. federal income or estate tax consequences to a
non-U.S. holder
of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common stock.
Distributions
on Our Common Stock
Distributions on our common stock generally will constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the
extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles. If a distribution exceeds our current and
accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated as
a tax-free return of the
non-U.S. holders
investment, up to such holders tax basis in the common
stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as capital gain,
subject to the tax treatment described below in Gain on
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Stock.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
generally will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal
income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty between the
United States and such holders country of residence.
If we determine, at a time reasonably close to the date of
payment of a distribution on our common stock, that the
distribution will not constitute a dividend because we do not
anticipate having current or accumulated earnings and profits,
we intend not to withhold any U.S. federal income tax on
the distribution as permitted by U.S. Treasury Regulations.
If we or another withholding agent withholds tax on such a
distribution, a
non-U.S. holder
may be entitled to a refund of the tax withheld which the
non-U.S. holder
may claim by timely filing a U.S. tax return with the IRS.
Dividends that are treated as effectively connected with a trade
or business conducted by a
non-U.S. holder
within the United States and, if an applicable income tax treaty
so provides, that are attributable to a permanent establishment
or a fixed base maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States, are generally exempt from the 30%
withholding tax if the
non-U.S. holder
satisfies applicable certification and disclosure requirements.
However, such U.S. effectively connected income, net of
specified deductions and credits, is taxed at the same graduated
U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to
U.S. persons (as defined in the Code). Any
U.S. effectively connected income received by a
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may also, under certain circumstances, be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30%
rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable
income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence.
A
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock who claims the benefit of an applicable
income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence generally will be required to
provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or successor form) and satisfy applicable certification and
other requirements.
Non-U.S. holders
are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their
entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax
under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund or credit of any
excess amounts withheld by timely filing a U.S. tax return
with the IRS.
Gain on
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common
Stock
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax or
withholding tax on any gain realized upon such holders
sale, exchange or other disposition of shares of our common
stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides, is
attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base
maintained by such
non-U.S. holder,
in which case the
non-U.S. holder
generally will be taxed at the graduated U.S. federal
income tax rates applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in
the Code) and, if the
non-U.S. holder
is a foreign corporation, the branch profits tax described above
in Distributions on Our Common Stock also may apply;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the
disposition and certain other conditions are met, in which case
the
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to a 30% tax (or such lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence) on the net gain derived from
the disposition, which may be offset by U.S. source capital
losses of the
non-U.S. holder,
if any; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
we are or have been, at any time during the five-year period
preceding such disposition (or the
non-U.S. holders
holding period, if shorter) a U.S. real property
holding corporation unless our common stock is regularly
traded on an established securities market and the
non-U.S. holder
holds no more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, directly
or indirectly during the shorter of the
5-year
period ending on the date of the disposition or the period that
the
non-U.S. holder
held our common stock. If we are determined to be a
U.S. real property holding corporation and the foregoing
exception does not apply, then a purchaser may withhold 10% of
the proceeds payable to a
non-U.S. holder
from a sale of our common stock and the
non-U.S. holder
generally will be taxed on its net gain derived from the
disposition at the graduated U.S. federal income tax rates
applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in the Code).
Generally, a corporation is a U.S. real property holding
corporation only if the fair market value of its U.S. real
property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair
market value of its worldwide real property interests plus its
other assets used or held for use in a trade or business.
Although there can be no assurance, we do not believe that we
are, or have been, a U.S. real property holding
corporation, or that we are likely to become one in the future.
No assurance can be provided that our common stock will be
regularly traded on an established securities market for
purposes of the rules described above.
|
U.S.
Federal Estate Tax
Shares of our common stock that are owned or treated as owned at
the time of death by an individual who is not a citizen or
resident of the United States, as specifically defined for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, are considered
U.S. situs assets and will be included in the
individuals gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax
purposes. Such shares, therefore, may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax or
other treaty provides otherwise.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
We must report annually to the IRS and to each
non-U.S. holder
the gross amount of the distributions on our common stock paid
to such holder and the tax withheld, if any, with respect to
such distributions.
Non-U.S. holders
may have to comply with specific certification procedures to
establish that the holder is not a U.S. person (as defined
in the Code) in order to avoid backup withholding at the
applicable rate, currently 28%, with respect to dividends on our
common stock. Dividends paid to
non-U.S. holders
subject to the U.S. withholding tax, as described above in
Distributions on Our Common Stock, generally will be
exempt from U.S. backup withholding.
Information reporting and backup withholding will generally
apply to the proceeds of a disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
effected by or through the U.S. office of any broker,
U.S. or foreign, unless the holder certifies its status as
a
non-U.S. holder
and satisfies certain other requirements, or otherwise
establishes an exemption. Generally, information reporting and
backup withholding will not apply to a payment of disposition
proceeds to a
non-U.S. holder
where the transaction is effected outside the United States
through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker. However, for information reporting purposes,
dispositions effected through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker with substantial U.S. ownership or operations
generally will be treated in a manner similar to dispositions
effected through a U.S. office of a broker.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application
of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to
them.
Copies of information returns may be made available to the tax
authorities of the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides or is incorporated under the provisions of a specific
treaty or agreement.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
non-U.S. holder
can be refunded or credited against the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that an
appropriate claim is timely filed with the IRS.
113
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the
underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Jefferies & Company,
Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC are acting as
representatives, have severally agreed to purchase, and we and
the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to them, severally,
the number of shares indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject
to their acceptance of the shares from us and the selling
stockholders and subject to prior sale. The underwriting
agreement provides that the obligations of the several
underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of
common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to the
approval of specified legal matters by their counsel and to
other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to take and pay
for all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus
if any such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not
required to take or pay for the shares covered by the
underwriters over-allotment option described below.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares
of common stock directly to the public at the public offering
price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to
certain dealers at a price that represents a concession not in
excess of $ a share under the
public offering price. No underwriter may allow, and no dealer
may reallow, any concession to other underwriters or to certain
dealers. After the initial offering of the shares of common
stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time
to time be varied by the representatives.
The selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters an
option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this
prospectus, to purchase up to an aggregate
of
additional shares of common stock at the public offering price
listed on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting
discounts and commissions. The underwriters may exercise this
option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if
any, made in connection with the offering of the shares of
common stock offered by this prospectus. To the extent the
option is exercised, each underwriter will become obligated,
subject to certain conditions, to purchase approximately the
same percentage of the additional shares of common stock as the
number listed next to the underwriters name in the
preceding table bears to the total number of shares of common
stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the
preceding table.
The following table shows the per share and total public
offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and
proceeds before expenses to us and the selling stockholders.
These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full
exercise of the underwriters option to purchase up to an
additional shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
114
The estimated offering expenses payable by us, exclusive of the
underwriting discounts and commissions, are approximately
$ .
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales
to discretionary accounts to exceed 5% of the total number of
shares of common stock offered by them.
We have applied for listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol SSNC.
We and all of our directors and officers and certain other
stockholders and holders of options to purchase shares of our
common stock, who as of July 31, 2007 collectively
owned shares
of our common stock (including exercisable options), have agreed
that, without the prior written consent of the representatives
of the underwriters, we and they will not, during the period
ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of our common stock,
|
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of our common stock or such other securities, in cash
or otherwise. In addition, we and each such person agrees that,
without the prior written consent of the representatives of the
underwriters, it will not, during the period ending
180 days after the date of this prospectus, make any demand
for, or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of
any shares of common stock or any security convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock.
The restrictions described in the immediately preceding
paragraph to do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares to the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
transactions by any person other than us relating to shares of
common stock or other securities acquired in open market
transactions after the completion of the offering of the shares;
|
|
|
|
transfers of shares of common stock or any security convertible
into our common stock as a bona fide gift;
|
|
|
|
transfers to family members or to trusts for the benefit of the
stockholder or family members of the stockholder, in each case,
for estate planning purposes;
|
|
|
|
distributions of shares of common stock or any security
convertible into or exercisable for common stock to partners,
members or equityholders of the stockholder;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a stockholders entry into a written trading plan designed
to comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, provided that no sales are made pursuant to such
trading plan during the restricted period; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the exercise of an option to purchase shares of common stock
granted under a stock incentive plan or stock purchase plan
described in this prospectus or the acceptance of restricted
stock awards from us and the disposition of shares of restricted
stock to us pursuant to the terms of such plan.
|
The 180-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the
180-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or material news
event relating to us occurs; or
|
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
period,
|
115
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the later of the
expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event and the last
day of the
180-day
restricted period.
In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the
underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain
or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically,
the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to
purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short
position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no
greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the
underwriters under the over-allotment option. The underwriters
can close out a covered short sale by exercising the
over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open market.
In determining the source of shares to close out a covered short
sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the
open market price of shares compared to the price available
under the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also sell
shares in excess of the over-allotment option, creating a naked
short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short
position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the common stock in the open market after pricing that could
adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering. As an
additional means of facilitating this offering, the underwriters
may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open
market to stabilize the price of the common stock. These
activities may raise or maintain the market price of the common
stock above independent market levels or prevent or retard a
decline in the market price of the common stock. The
underwriters are not required to engage in these activities and
may end any of these activities at any time.
We, the selling stockholders and the underwriters have agreed to
indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on
websites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling
group members, if any, participating in this offering. The
representative may agree to allocate a number of shares of
common stock to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage
account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the
representative to underwriters that may make Internet
distributions on the same basis as other allocations.
European
Economic Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, each Manager has
represented and agreed that with effect from and including the
date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that
Member State it has not made and will not make an offer of
shares to the public in that Member State, except that it may,
with effect from and including such date, make an offer of
shares to the public in that Member State:
(a) at any time to legal entities which are authorized or
regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so
authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to
invest in securities;
(b) at any time to any legal entity which has two or more
of (1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts; or
(c) at any time in any other circumstances which do not
require the publication by us of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of the above, the expression an offer of
shares to the public in relation to any shares in any
Member State means the communication in any form and by any
means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and
the shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide
to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the same may be varied
in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus
Directive in that Member State and the expression Prospectus
Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC
and includes any relevant implementing measure in that Member
State.
116
United
Kingdom
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that it has only
communicated or caused to be communicated and will only
communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or
inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning
of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000) in connection with the issue or sale of the shares in
circumstances in which Section 21(1) of such Act does not
apply to us and it has complied and will comply with all
applicable provisions of such Act with respect to anything done
by it in relation to any shares in, from or otherwise involving
the United Kingdom.
Pricing
of the Offering
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives.
Among the factors considered in determining the initial public
offering price will be our future prospects and those of our
industry in general, our sales, earnings and certain other
financial and operating information in recent periods, and the
price-earnings ratios, price-sales ratios, market prices of
securities, and certain financial and operating information of
companies engaged in activities similar to ours.
Directed
Share Program
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to
five percent of the shares of common stock to be issued by
us and offered by this prospectus for sale, at the initial
public offering price, to directors, officers, employees,
business associates and related persons associated with us. If
purchased by these persons, these shares will be subject to a
180-day
lock-up
restriction. The number of shares of common stock available for
sale to the general public will be reduced to the extent these
individuals purchase such reserved shares. Any reserved shares
that are not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to
the general public on the same basis as the other shares offered
by this prospectus.
Affiliates
of Certain of the Underwriters
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates
have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future
perform, various financial advisory and investment banking
services for us and our subsidiaries, for which they received or
will receive customary fees and expenses. JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., an affiliate of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., is a
lender and the administrative agent under our senior credit
facilities, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, an
affiliate of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, is a lender and the
syndication agent under such senior credit facilities. JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank, National Association
received customary compensation for their services in connection
with the senior credit facilities.
Notice to
Canadian Residents
Resale
Restrictions
The distribution of the shares in Canada is being made only on a
private placement basis exempt from the requirement that we and
the selling stockholders prepare and file a prospectus with the
securities regulatory authorities in each province where trades
of shares are made. Any resale of the shares in Canada must be
made under applicable securities laws which will vary depending
on the relevant jurisdiction, and which may require resales to
be made under available statutory exemptions or under a
discretionary exemption granted by the applicable Canadian
securities regulatory authority. Purchasers are advised to seek
legal advice prior to any resale of the shares.
117
Representations
of Purchasers
By purchasing shares in Canada and accepting a purchase
confirmation a purchaser is representing to us, the selling
stockholders and the dealer from whom the purchase confirmation
is received that:
|
|
|
|
|
the purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities
laws to purchase the shares without the benefit of a prospectus
qualified under those securities laws,
|
|
|
|
where required by law, that the purchaser is purchasing as
principal and not as agent,
|
|
|
|
the purchaser has reviewed the text above under Resale
Restrictions, and
|
|
|
|
the purchaser acknowledges and consents to the provision of
specified information concerning its purchase of the shares to
the regulatory authority that by law is entitled to collect the
information.
|
Further details concerning the legal authority for this
information is available on request.
Rights of
Action Ontario Purchasers Only
Under Ontario securities legislation, certain purchasers who
purchase a security offered by this prospectus circular during
the period of distribution will have a statutory right of action
for damages, or while still the owner of the shares, for
rescission against us and the selling stockholders in the event
that this prospectus contains a misrepresentation without regard
to whether the purchaser relied on the misrepresentation. The
right of action for damages is exercisable not later than the
earlier of 180 days from the date the purchaser first had
knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action and
three years from the date on which payment is made for the
shares. The right of action for rescission is exercisable not
later than 180 days from the date on which payment is made
for the shares. If a purchaser elects to exercise the right of
action for rescission, the purchaser will have no right of
action for damages against us or the selling stockholders. In no
case will the amount recoverable in any action exceed the price
at which the shares were offered to the purchaser and if the
purchaser is shown to have purchased the securities with
knowledge of the misrepresentation, we and the selling
stockholders will have no liability. In the case of an action
for damages, we and the selling stockholders will not be liable
for all or any portion of the damages that are proven to not
represent the depreciation in value of the shares as a result of
the misrepresentation relied upon. These rights are in addition
to, and without derogation from, any other rights or remedies
available at law to an Ontario purchaser. The foregoing is a
summary of the rights available to an Ontario purchaser. Ontario
purchasers should refer to the complete text of the relevant
statutory provisions.
Enforcement
of Legal Rights
All of our directors and officers as well as the experts named
herein and the selling stockholders may be located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian
purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon us or
those persons. All or a substantial portion of our assets and
the assets of those persons may be located outside of Canada
and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment
against us or those persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment
obtained in Canadian courts against us or those persons outside
of Canada.
Taxation
and Eligibility for Investment
Canadian purchasers of shares should consult their own legal and
tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of an
investment in the shares in their particular circumstances and
about the eligibility of the shares for investment by the
purchaser under relevant Canadian legislation.
118
We obtained the industry, market and competitive position data
in this prospectus from our own internal estimates and research
as well as from industry and general publications and research,
surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Industry
publications, studies and surveys generally state that they have
been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although
they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such
information. While we believe that each of these studies and
publications is reliable, we have not independently verified
market and industry data from third-party sources. While we
believe our internal company research is reliable and the market
definitions are appropriate, neither such research nor these
definitions have been verified by any independent source.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston,
Massachusetts, has passed upon the validity of the shares of
common stock offered hereby. Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston,
Massachusetts, has acted as counsel for the underwriters in
connection with certain legal matters related to this offering.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,
2005 and 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2004, for
the period from January 1, 2005 through November 22,
2005, for the period from November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005 and for the year ended December 31,
2006 included in this prospectus have been so included in
reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
registration statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-143719) under the Securities Act with
respect to the shares of common stock offered hereby. This
prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration
statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules filed
therewith. For further information about us and the common stock
offered hereby, we refer you to the registration statement and
the exhibits and schedules filed thereto. Statements contained
in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any
other document that is filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement
is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of
such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement. Upon completion of this offering, we
will be required to file periodic reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may read
and copy this information at the Public Reference Room of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the public reference
rooms by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains an
Internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and
other information about issuers, like us, that file
electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
address of that site is www.sec.gov.
119
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-13
|
|
|
F-14
|
|
|
F-15
|
|
|
F-16
|
|
|
F-17
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
|
F-47
|
F-1
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,210
|
|
|
$
|
11,718
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,602 and $1,670, respectively
|
|
|
36,941
|
|
|
|
31,695
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,185
|
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
58,619
|
|
|
|
51,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
15,774
|
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,358
|
|
|
|
15,018
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(7,098
|
)
|
|
|
(4,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
11,260
|
|
|
|
10,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
844,484
|
|
|
|
820,470
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$39,691 and $24,260, respectively
|
|
|
263,237
|
|
|
|
270,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,177,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,680
|
|
|
$
|
5,694
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
8,961
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
7,139
|
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue
|
|
|
33,421
|
|
|
|
25,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
55,359
|
|
|
|
52,548
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
461,077
|
|
|
|
466,235
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
6,114
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
68,328
|
|
|
|
69,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
590,878
|
|
|
|
589,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
564,064
|
|
|
|
559,524
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
21,989
|
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586,798
|
|
|
|
563,200
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
586,722
|
|
|
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,177,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-2
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
11,494
|
|
|
$
|
10,362
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
30,233
|
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
|
|
10,128
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
65,472
|
|
|
|
52,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
116,242
|
|
|
|
99,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
4,781
|
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
13,108
|
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
7,022
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
36,839
|
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
61,750
|
|
|
|
47,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
54,492
|
|
|
|
51,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
9,283
|
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13,037
|
|
|
|
11,804
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
|
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
33,847
|
|
|
|
28,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
20,645
|
|
|
|
22,767
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(22,555
|
)
|
|
|
(23,273
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
|
321
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
Foreign exchange gains on debt
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
Amortization of loan origination costs
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
Equity earnings on long-term investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|
|
(1,927
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects
from acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,394
|
)
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,149
|
)
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
(7,546
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenues
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
22,748
|
|
|
|
16,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,434
|
)
|
|
|
(1,944
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(5,136
|
)
|
|
|
(11,500
|
)
|
Cash paid for long-term investment
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(8,770
|
)
|
|
|
(13,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from borrowings
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
13,400
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(18,070
|
)
|
|
|
(18,171
|
)
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(12,796
|
)
|
|
|
(4,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
11,718
|
|
|
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
13,210
|
|
|
$
|
14,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These accounting principles were
applied on a basis consistent with those of the audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In the opinion of SS&C Technologies Holdings,
Inc. (the Company), the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, except as
noted elsewhere in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements) necessary to state fairly its financial position as
of June 30, 2007 and the results of its operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These statements
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial
statements. The financial statements contained herein should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and footnotes as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The December 31, 2006 consolidated balance
sheet data were derived from audited financial statements, but
do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted
accounting principles for annual financial statements. The
results of operations for the six months ended June 30,
2007 are not necessarily indicative of the expected results for
the full year.
The Company acquired SS&C Technologies, Inc.
(SS&C) on November 23, 2005 through a
merger transaction. The acquisition was accomplished through the
merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company, into SS&C, with SS&C being the
surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
(the Transaction). Although the Transaction occurred
on November 23, 2005, the Company adopted an effective date
of November 30, 2005 for accounting purposes. The activity
for the period November 23, 2005 through November 30,
2005 was not material to either the successor or predecessor
periods for 2005.
|
|
3.
|
Stock-based
Compensation
|
In August 2006, the Board of Directors adopted a new
equity-based incentive plan (the 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan), which authorizes equity awards to be granted for up
to 1,314,567 shares of common stock.
Under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company has granted
both time-based and performance-based options. Time-based
options vest 25% one year from the date of grant and
1/36th of
the remaining balance each month thereafter for 36 months
and can also vest upon a change in control, subject to certain
conditions. Certain performance-based options vest upon the
attainment of certain annual EBITDA targets for the Company
during the five-year period beginning January 1, 2006.
Additionally, EBITDA in excess of the EBITDA target in any given
year shall be applied to the EBITDA of any previous year for
which the EBITDA target was not met in full such that attainment
of a prior year EBITDA target can be achieved subsequently. In
the event all EBITDA targets of previous years were met in full,
the excess EBITDA shall be applied to the EBITDA of future
years. These performance-based options can also vest upon a
change in control, subject to certain conditions. Compensation
expense associated with these options is recorded beginning in
the period that management first estimates that the attainment
of the EBITDA targets, and therefore the vesting of the options,
is probable and is recorded over the remaining service period,
with a cumulative
catch-up
amount recorded for prior service. Changes in managements
assessment of the probability of attaining the EBITDA targets
could cause compensation expense to fluctuate from period to
period. The remaining performance-based options vest only upon a
change in control in which certain internal rate of return
targets are attained. Compensation expense will be recorded at
the time that a change in control becomes probable.
F-5
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
granted during the six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value at
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Underlying Stock
|
|
|
Time of Grant
|
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
$
|
74.50
|
|
|
$
|
74.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2007
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, the Board of Directors approved (i) the
vesting, as of April 18, 2007, of 50% of the
performance-based options granted to the Companys
employees through March 31, 2007 that would have vested if
the Company had met its EBITDA target for fiscal year 2006
(collectively, the 2006 Performance Options);
(ii) the vesting, conditioned upon the Companys
meeting its EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007, of the other 50%
of the 2006 Performance Options; and (iii) the reduction of
the Companys EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007. The
Company re-measured those awards using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and assumptions reflecting current facts
and circumstances as of the modification date. As of the
modification date, the Company estimated the fair value of its
performance-based options to be $45.45. In estimating the common
stock value, the Company valued the Company using several
methods, including the income approach, guideline company method
and comparable transaction method. The Company used the
following assumptions to estimate the option value: expected
term to exercise of 3.5 years; expected volatility of
41.0%; risk-free interest rate of 4.57%; and no dividend yield.
Expected volatility is based on a combination of the
Companys historical volatility adjusted for the
Transaction and historical volatility of the Companys peer
group. Expected term to exercise is based on the Companys
historical stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the
Transaction.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
recorded a one-time charge of $2.0 million related to the
50% of the 2006 Performance Options that were immediately vested
as of April 18, 2007. Additionally, the Company recorded
compensation expense of $0.8 million related to the
performance-based options based upon the Companys
probability assessment of attaining its EBITDA target for fiscal
year 2007. The remaining $0.9 million of stock-based
compensation expense related to time-based options. Based upon
its current assessment of the number of modified
performance-based
options that will eventually vest, the Company expects to
recognize additional stock-based compensation expense of
approximately $2.1 million ratably over the remainder of
the year related to these modified options. The Company does not
currently believe that the attainment of the annual EBITDA
targets for 2008 through 2010 is probable.
F-6
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Statements of operations classification:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Cost of professional services
|
|
|
146
|
|
Cost of software-enabled services
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
740
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
471
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income, requires that items defined as comprehensive
income, such as foreign currency translation adjustments and
unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps, be separately
classified in the financial statements and that the accumulated
balance of other comprehensive income be reported separately
from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the
equity section of the balance sheet.
The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive
income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,561
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains
|
|
|
19,242
|
|
|
|
8,040
|
|
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
19,058
|
|
|
$
|
12,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, debt consisted
of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Senior credit facility, revolving portion, weighted-average
interest rate of 8.10%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
Senior credit facility, term loan portion, weighted-average
interest rate of 7.36% and 7.73%, respectively
|
|
|
258,757
|
|
|
|
263,929
|
|
113/4%
senior subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,757
|
|
|
|
471,929
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,680
|
)
|
|
|
(5,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
461,077
|
|
|
$
|
466,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized financing costs of $1.1 million and
$1.3 million were amortized to interest expense during the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage the
floating rate portion of its debt portfolio. During the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized
unrealized gains of $1.0 million, net of tax, and
$2.7 million, net of tax, respectively, in other
comprehensive income related to the change in market value of
the swaps. The market value of the swaps recorded in other
comprehensive income may be recognized in the statement of
operations if certain terms of the senior credit facility
change, if the loan is extinguished or if the swaps agreements
are terminated prior to maturity.
On March 12, 2007, the Company purchased substantially all
the assets of Northport LLC (Northport), for
approximately $5.1 million in cash, plus the costs of
effecting the transaction, and the assumption of certain
liabilities. Northport provides accounting and management
services to private equity funds.
The net assets and results of operations of Northport have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from March 1, 2007. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of client relationships and client contracts, was
determined using the future cash flows method. The intangible
assets are amortized each year based on the ratio that current
cash flows for the intangible asset bear to the total of current
and expected future cash flows for the intangible asset. The
intangible assets are amortized over approximately seven years,
the estimated life of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill.
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price
for the acquisition of Northport (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
Acquired client relationships and contracts
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company reported revenues of $1.4 million from
Northport from the acquisition date through June 30, 2007.
Pro forma operating results for the 2007 acquisition are not
presented because the results would not be significantly
different from historical results.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to
U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple
state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is subject to
examination by tax authorities throughout the world, including
such major jurisdictions as the U.S., Canada, Connecticut and
New York. In these major jurisdictions, the Company is no longer
subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to
2002, 2003, 1999 and 2003, respectively.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of
Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). At adoption, the Company had
$4.2 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits.
The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a reclassification of
certain tax liabilities from current to non-current of
$3.8 million and to certain related deferred tax assets of
$0.4 million. The Company did not record a cumulative
effect adjustment to retained earnings as a result of adopting
FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, accrued interest
related to unrecognized tax benefits was less than
$0.1 million. The Company recognizes accrued interest and
penalties relating to the unrecognized tax benefits as a
component of the income tax provision.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company had $5.4 million of
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. Of this amount,
$5.1 million relates to uncertain income tax positions that
either existed prior to or were created as a result of the
Transaction and would decrease goodwill if recognized. The
remainder of the unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would
decrease the Companys effective tax rate and increase the
Companys net income.
|
|
8.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In connection with the Transaction, two purported class action
lawsuits were filed against SS&C, each of its directors
and, with respect to the first matter described below, the
Company, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in
and for New Castle County.
The first lawsuit is Paulena Partners, LLC v. SS&C
Technologies, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 1525-N
(filed July 28, 2005). The second lawsuit is Stephen
Landen v. SS&C Technologies, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 1541-N
(filed August 3, 2005). Each complaint purports to state
claims for breach of fiduciary duty against all of
SS&Cs directors at the time of filing of the
lawsuits. The complaints allege, among other things, that
(l) the merger will benefit SS&Cs management or
The Carlyle Group at the expense of its public stockholders,
(2) the merger consideration to be paid to stockholders is
inadequate or unfair and does not represent the best price
available in the marketplace for SS&C, (3) the process
by which the merger was approved was unfair and (4) the
directors breached their fiduciary duties to SS&Cs
stockholders in negotiating and approving the merger. Each
complaint seeks, among other relief, class certification of the
lawsuit, an injunction preventing the consummation of the merger
(or rescinding the merger if it is completed prior to the
receipt of such relief), compensatory
and/or
rescissory damages to the class and attorneys fees and
expenses, along with such other relief as the court might find
just and proper. The plaintiffs have not sought a specific
amount of monetary damages.
The two lawsuits were consolidated by order dated
August 31, 2005. On October 18, 2005, the parties to
the consolidated lawsuit entered into a memorandum of
understanding, pursuant to which SS&C agreed to make
certain additional disclosures to its stockholders in connection
with their approval of the merger. The memorandum of
understanding also contemplated that the parties would enter
into a settlement agreement, which the parties executed on
July 6, 2006. Under the settlement agreement, SS&C
agreed to pay up to
F-9
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
$350,000 of plaintiffs legal fees and expenses. The
settlement agreement was subject to customary conditions,
including court approval following notice to the stockholders of
SS&C. The court did not find that the settlement agreement
was fair, reasonable and adequate and disapproved the proposed
settlement on November 29, 2006. The court criticized
plaintiffs counsels handling of the litigation,
noting that the plaintiffs counsel displayed a lack of
understanding of basic terms of the merger, did not appear to
have adequately investigated the plaintiffs potential
claims and was unable to identify the basic legal issues in the
case. The court also raised questions about the process leading
up to the transaction, which process included
Mr. Stones discussions of potential investments in,
or acquisitions of, SS&C, without prior formal
authorization of SS&Cs board, but the court did not
make any findings of fact on the litigation other than that
there were not adequate facts in evidence to support the
settlement. The plaintiffs decided to continue the litigation
following rejection of the settlement, and the parties are
currently in discovery. The court has set a trial date for July
2008. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and
is defending them vigorously.
From time to time, the Company is subject to certain other legal
proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of its
business. In the opinion of management, the Company is not
involved in any such litigation or proceedings by third parties
that management believes could have a material adverse effect on
the Company or its business.
|
|
9.
|
Product
and Geographic Sales Information
|
The Company operates in one reportable segment, as defined by
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. The Company manages
its business primarily on a geographic basis. The Company
attributes net sales to an individual country based upon
location of the customer. The Companys geographic regions
consist of the United States, Americas, excluding the United
States, Europe and Asia Pacific and Japan. The European region
includes European countries as well as the Middle East and
Africa.
Revenues by geography were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
70,970
|
|
|
$
|
58,801
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
18,575
|
|
|
|
16,923
|
|
Americas excluding United States and Canada
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
22,584
|
|
|
|
19,465
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
116,242
|
|
|
$
|
99,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues by product group were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Portfolio management/accounting
|
|
$
|
90,974
|
|
|
$
|
73,012
|
|
Trading/treasury operations
|
|
|
13,069
|
|
|
|
14,383
|
|
Financial modeling
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
Loan management/accounting
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
Money market processing
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
Training
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
116,242
|
|
|
$
|
99,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements (FAS 157).
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This standard does not require any new fair value
measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does
not expect that the adoption of FAS 157 will have a
significant impact on its financial position and results of
operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (FAS 159). FAS 159
provides entities with the option to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value, and also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. This standard is intended to expand the use of fair
value measurement, but does not require any new fair value
measurements. FAS 159 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this
standard on its financial position and results of operations.
|
|
11.
|
Basic and
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic
earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by
dividing income available to the Companys common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is
computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the
period. Common equivalent shares consist of stock options using
the treasury stock method. Common equivalent shares are excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share if the effect
of including such common equivalent shares is antidilutive
because their exercise prices exceed the fair value of common
stock. In periods where a net loss is recorded, no effect is
given to potentially dilutive securities since the effect would
be antidilutive. Accordingly, no effect has been given to the
assumed exercise of 1,625,355 common stock options outstanding
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 since the effect
would be antidilutive for the reporting periods. There were no
antidilutive options outstanding for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Income available to stockholders is the same
for basic and diluted earnings per share.
F-11
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in
calculation of basic earnings per share
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
|
7,077
|
|
Weighted average common stock equivalents options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
outstanding used in calculation of diluted earnings
per share
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
Reports
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (Successor) at December 31, 2006 and
2005 and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period
from November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for share-based compensation effective November 23, 2005.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
June 8, 2007
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of SS&C
Technologies, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the results of operations and cash flows of SS&C
Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Predecessor) for the
period from January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005
and for the year ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
March 31, 2006, except for the last three paragraphs of
Note 2 as to which the date is June 8, 2007
F-13
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
11,718
|
|
|
$
|
15,584
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,670 and $2,092, respectively (Note 3)
|
|
|
31,695
|
|
|
|
32,862
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,176
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
51,236
|
|
|
|
62,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
8,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,018
|
|
|
|
10,720
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(4,999
|
)
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
10,019
|
|
|
|
10,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
820,470
|
|
|
|
818,180
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$24,260 and $1,870, respectively
|
|
|
270,796
|
|
|
|
285,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,152,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,176,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
5,694
|
|
|
$
|
10,438
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
8,961
|
|
|
|
9,048
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
8,769
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 5)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue
|
|
|
25,679
|
|
|
|
20,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
52,548
|
|
|
|
55,575
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 6)
|
|
|
466,235
|
|
|
|
478,143
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 5)
|
|
|
69,518
|
|
|
|
84,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
589,389
|
|
|
|
619,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Notes 4 and 10):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 10,000 shares
authorized; 7,088 and 7,075 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
559,524
|
|
|
|
554,894
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,200
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 1 share and
0 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,152,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,176,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-14
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
22,925
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,147
|
|
|
$
|
17,250
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
55,222
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
|
44,064
|
|
|
|
36,433
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
|
12,565
|
|
|
|
11,320
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
107,740
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
|
67,193
|
|
|
|
30,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
205,469
|
|
|
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
|
143,969
|
|
|
|
95,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
20,415
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
|
10,393
|
|
|
|
8,462
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
12,575
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
7,849
|
|
|
|
6,606
|
|
Software-enables services
|
|
|
57,810
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
|
37,799
|
|
|
|
16,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
100,016
|
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
|
|
59,004
|
|
|
|
33,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
105,453
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
|
84,965
|
|
|
|
62,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
|
10,734
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23,620
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
13,957
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
20,366
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
Merger costs related to the Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
61,584
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
|
81,189
|
|
|
|
32,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
43,869
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
|
29,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(47,427
|
)
|
|
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
31,040
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes (Note 5)
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
19,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
|
|
23,300
|
|
|
|
21,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
|
|
22,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-15
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
19,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
27,128
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains on debt
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of loan origination costs
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings in long-term investment
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (gains) losses on equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale or disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(10,112
|
)
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects
from acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,442
|
)
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(2,044
|
)
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
7,844
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
|
(8,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(3,088
|
)
|
|
|
4,178
|
|
|
|
|
34,891
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
521
|
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
|
(3,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
30,709
|
|
|
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
|
32,116
|
|
|
|
28,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,223
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(Note 11)
|
|
|
(13,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207,919
|
)
|
|
|
(23,541
|
)
|
Additions to capitalized software
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of SS&C Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(877,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of long-term investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,250
|
)
|
|
|
(165,556
|
)
|
Sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,159
|
|
|
|
101,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(18,626
|
)
|
|
|
(877,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
(110,495
|
)
|
|
|
(89,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from other borrowings
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt and acquired debt
|
|
|
(34,518
|
)
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
74,795
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from borrowings for the Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,718
|
)
|
|
|
(2,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(16,427
|
)
|
|
|
868,655
|
|
|
|
|
69,161
|
|
|
|
74,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,866
|
)
|
|
|
(3,665
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9,664
|
)
|
|
|
13,652
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
19,249
|
|
|
|
|
28,913
|
|
|
|
15,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
11,718
|
|
|
$
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,249
|
|
|
$
|
28,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
45,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,702
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Income tax refunds, net of payments
|
|
$
|
(635
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,441
|
|
|
$
|
7,713
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 11 for a discussion of acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared but not paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-16
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004, the Periods
January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005 and the Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
of Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
26,806
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
105,359
|
|
|
$
|
8,793
|
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
$
|
(53,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,010
|
|
|
$
|
19,010
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
74,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared $0.22 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
31,276
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
185,032
|
|
|
$
|
23,029
|
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
(53,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
156,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,584
|
)
|
|
|
(5,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared $0.08 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at November 22, 2005
|
|
|
32,072
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
|
$
|
201,665
|
|
|
$
|
21,873
|
|
|
$
|
7,701
|
|
|
$
|
(59,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
172,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial capital contributions
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
554,894
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
554,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
554,894
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
559,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,699
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-17
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is referred to herein as
Holdings. SS&C Technologies, Inc. is referred
to herein as SS&C. The term Company
refers to (i) prior to November 23, 2005, SS&C
and its consolidated subsidiaries and (ii) on and after
November 23, 2005, Holdings and its consolidated
subsidiaries (including SS&C). Holdings was incorporated in
July 2005 by investment funds associated with The Carlyle Group
to serve as the top-level holding company for SS&C, its
primary operating company. Financial information for the
Predecessor period is for SS&C Technologies, Inc.
Holdings was incorporated in Delaware on July 26, 2005 and
its principal activity is to hold its investment in SS&C.
SS&C was acquired on November 23, 2005 through a
merger transaction. The acquisition was accomplished through the
merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Holdings (previously known as Sunshine Acquisition
Corporation), into SS&C, with SS&C being the surviving
company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (the
Transaction). Although the Transaction occurred on
November 23, 2005, the Company adopted an effective date of
November 30, 2005 for accounting purposes. The activity for
the period November 23, 2005 through November 30, 2005
was not material. The accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, cash flows and stockholders equity are
presented for two periods: Predecessor and Successor, which
relate to the period preceding the Transaction and the period
succeeding the Transaction, respectively.
The Transaction was a non-taxable purchase and, as a result, the
net assets of the Company were not
stepped-up
to fair value for U.S. tax purposes.
The Transaction was financed by a combination of borrowings
under the Companys senior credit facility, the issuance of
senior subordinated notes due 2013 and the equity investment of
The Carlyle Group and management. See Note 6 for a
description of the Companys indebtedness. Additionally,
the Predecessor Company incurred costs of $36.9 million in
the period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005
related to the Transaction. These costs consisted primarily of
stock-based compensation expense (see Note 2) as well
as legal and other advisory fees. Costs related to the financing
facilities were capitalized (see Note 6).
The purchase price, including transaction costs that have been
recorded as debt issuance costs or included in the overall
purchase price, was approximately $1.05 billion. The
sources and uses of funds in connection with the Transaction are
summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
|
|
|
Uses
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facilities
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
Consideration paid to stockholders and optionholders
|
|
$
|
768,416
|
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
Repayment of existing debt and legal fees
|
|
|
75,153
|
|
Senior subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
Converted share and option consideration
|
|
|
173,965
|
|
Cash on hand
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
33,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution cash
|
|
|
381,000
|
|
|
Total uses
|
|
$
|
1,050,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution non-cash
|
|
|
173,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources
|
|
$
|
1,050,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The non-cash equity contribution was a combination of shares and
fully vested stock options of the Predecessor. The shares were
converted into shares of Holdings. The fully vested stock
options were converted into fully vested stock options of
Holdings.
F-18
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The total purchase price was allocated to the Companys
tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities
based on their estimated fair values on November 23, 2005,
the closing date of the Transaction, as set forth below. The
remainder of the purchase price was recorded as goodwill.
The final allocation of the purchase price is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
235,088
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
55,700
|
|
Acquired client contracts and relationships
|
|
|
197,100
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
17,200
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
806,587
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(79,817
|
)
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(107,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
1,050,965
|
|
Non-cash equity contribution
|
|
|
(173,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in acquisition of SS&C
|
|
$
|
877,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of intangible assets, including completed
technology, trade names and customer relationships, was based on
an independent appraisal and was determined using various
methods of the income approach. Intangible assets are amortized
each year based on the ratio that current cash flows for the
intangible asset bear to the total of current and expected
future cash flows for the intangible asset. Completed technology
is amortized over estimated lives ranging from approximately six
to nine years (weighted-average of 8.5 years). Acquired
client contracts and relationships are amortized over estimated
lives ranging from 11 to 13 years (weighted-average of
11.5 years). Trade names are amortized over estimated lives
ranging from nine to 15 years (weighted-average of
13.9 years). Other intangible assets are amortized over
estimated lives ranging from three to ten years
(weighted-average of 7.7 years).
In connection with the purchase price allocation, the Company
estimated the fair value of the maintenance and support
obligation assumed by the Successor company in connection with
the Transaction. The estimated fair value of the maintenance and
support obligation was determined using a cost
build-up
approach. The cost
build-up
approach determines fair value by estimating the costs relating
to fulfilling the obligation plus a normal profit margin.
The Company provides software products and software-enabled
services to the financial services industry, primarily in North
America. The Company also has operations in the U.K., the
Netherlands, Malaysia, Ireland, Australia, the Netherlands
Antilles and Japan. The Companys portfolio of over 50
products and software-enabled services allows its clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. The Company provides its products and
related services in eight vertical markets in the financial
services industry:
1. Insurance and pension funds;
2. Institutional asset managers;
3. Alternative investment managers;
4. Financial institutions, such as retail banks and credit
unions;
5. Commercial lenders;
F-19
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
6. Real estate leasing/property managers;
7. Municipal finance groups; and
8. Corporate treasury groups.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used
for, but not limited to, collectibility of accounts receivable,
costs to complete certain contracts, valuation of acquired
assets and liabilities, valuation of stock options, income tax
accruals and the value of deferred tax assets. Estimates are
also used to determine the remaining economic lives and carrying
value of fixed assets, goodwill and intangible assets. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant accounts,
transactions and profits between the consolidated companies have
been eliminated in consolidation. In the first quarter of 2005,
the Company made a $2.0 million investment in a company.
This unconsolidated investment is in a company over which we do
not have control, but have the ability to exercise influence
over operating and financial policies, and as a result is
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The
carrying value of this investment is $2.5 million at
December 31, 2006 and is included in intangible and other
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The earnings from the
investment are recorded on a pre-tax basis.
Revenue
Recognition
The Companys payment terms for software licenses typically
require that the total fee be paid upon signing of the contract.
Maintenance services are typically due in full at the beginning
of the maintenance period. Professional services and
software-enabled services are typically due and payable monthly
in arrears. Normally the Companys arrangements do not
provide for any refund rights, and payments are not contingent
on specific milestones or customer acceptance conditions. For
arrangements that do contain such provisions, the Company defers
revenue until the rights or conditions have expired or have been
met.
Unbilled accounts receivable primarily relates to professional
services and software-enabled services revenue that has been
earned as of month end but is not invoiced until the subsequent
month, and to software license revenue that has been earned and
is realizable but not invoiced to clients until future dates
specified in the client contract.
Deferred revenue consists of payments received related to
product delivery, maintenance and other services, which have
been paid by customers prior to the recognition of revenue.
Deferred revenue relates primarily to cash received for
maintenance contracts in advance of services performed.
License
Revenue
The Company follows the principles of Statement of Position
(SOP)
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
which provides guidance on applying generally accepted
accounting principles in recognizing revenue on software
transactions.
SOP 97-2
requires that revenue recognized from software transactions be
allocated to each element of the transaction based on the
relative fair values of the elements,
F-20
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
such as software products, specified upgrades, enhancements,
post-contract client support, installation or training. The
determination of fair value is based upon vendor-specific
objective evidence. Under
SOP 97-2,
the Company recognizes software license revenues allocated to
software products and enhancements generally upon delivery of
each of the related products or enhancements, assuming all other
revenue recognition criteria are met. In the rare occasion that
a software license agreement includes the right to a specified
upgrade or product, the Company defers all revenues under the
arrangement until the specified upgrade or product is delivered,
since typically vendor-specific objective evidence
(VSOE) does not exist to support the fair value of
the specified upgrade or product.
The Company generally recognizes revenue from sales of software
or products including proprietary software upon product shipment
and receipt of a signed contract, provided that collection is
probable and all other revenue recognition criteria of
SOP 97-2
are met. The Company sells perpetual software licenses in
conjunction with professional services for installation and
maintenance. For these arrangements, the total contract value is
attributed first to the maintenance arrangement based on its
fair value, which is derived from stated renewal rates. The
contract value is then attributed to professional services based
on estimated fair value, which is derived from the rates charged
for similar services provided on a stand-alone basis. The
Companys software license agreements generally do not
require significant modification or customization of the
underlying software, and, accordingly, implementation services
provided by the Company are not considered essential to the
functionality of the software. The remainder of the total
contract value is then attributed to the software license based
on the residual method described in
SOP 98-9,
Modification of
SOP 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions.
The Company also sells term licenses ranging from one to seven
years, some of which include bundled maintenance services. For
those arrangements with bundled maintenance services, VSOE does
not exist for the maintenance element and therefore the total
fee is recognized ratably over the contractual term of the
arrangement. The Company classifies revenues from bundled term
license arrangements as both software licenses and maintenance
revenues by allocating a portion of the revenues from the
arrangement to maintenance revenues and classifying the
remainder in software licenses revenues. The Company uses its
renewal rates for maintenance under perpetual license agreements
for the purpose of determining the portion of the arrangement
fee that is classified as maintenance revenues.
The Company occasionally enters into license agreements
requiring significant customization of the Companys
software. The Company accounts for the license fees under these
agreements on the percentage-of-completion basis. This method
requires estimates to be made for costs to complete the
agreement utilizing an estimate of development
man-hours
remaining. Revenue is recognized each period based on the hours
incurred to date compared to the total hours expected to
complete the project. Due to uncertainties inherent in the
estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that
completion costs may be revised. Such revisions are recognized
in the period in which the revisions are determined. Provisions
for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are determined on
a
contract-by-contract
basis, and are made in the period in which such losses are first
estimated or determined.
Maintenance
Agreements
Maintenance agreements generally require the Company to provide
technical support and software updates (on a
when-and-if-available
basis) to its clients. Such services are generally provided
under one-year renewable contracts. Maintenance revenues are
recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement.
Professional
Services
The Company provides consulting and training services to its
clients. Revenues for such services are generally recognized
over the period during which the services are performed. The
Company typically charges
F-21
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
for professional services on a time and materials basis.
However, some contracts are for a fixed fee. For the fixed-fee
arrangements, an estimate is made of the total hours expected to
be incurred to complete the project. Due to uncertainties
inherent in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably
possible that completion costs may be revised. Such revisions
are recognized in the period in which the revisions are
determined. Revenues are recognized each period based on the
hours incurred to date compared to the total hours expected to
complete the project.
Software-enabled
Services
The Companys software-enabled services arrangements make
its software application available to its clients for processing
of transactions. The software-enabled services arrangements
provide an alternative for clients who do not wish to install,
run and maintain complicated financial software. Under the
arrangements, the client does not have the right to take
possession of the software, rather, the Company agrees to
provide access to its applications, remote use of its equipment
to process transactions, access to clients data stored on
its equipment, and connectivity between its environment and the
clients computing systems. Software-enabled services
arrangements generally have terms of two to five years and
contain monthly or quarterly fixed payments, with additional
billing for increases in market value of a clients assets,
pricing and trading activity under certain contracts.
The Company recognizes software-enabled services revenues in
accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104
Revenue Recognition, on a monthly basis as the
software-enabled services are provided and when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
Company does not recognize any revenue before services are
performed. Certain contracts contain additional fees for
increases in market value, pricing and trading activity.
Revenues related to these additional fees are recognized in the
month in which the activity occurs based upon the Companys
summarization of account information and trading volume.
Research
and Development
Research and development costs associated with computer software
are charged to expense as incurred. In accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed, capitalization
of internally developed computer software costs begins upon the
establishment of technological feasibility based on a working
model. Net capitalized software costs of $425,000 and $0 are
included in the December 31, 2006 and 2005 balance sheets,
respectively, under Intangible and other assets.
The Companys policy is to amortize these costs upon a
products general release to the client. Amortization of
capitalized software costs is calculated by the greater of
(a) the ratio that current gross revenues for a product
bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross
revenues for that product or (b) the straight-line method
over the remaining estimated economic life of the product,
including the period being reported on, typically two to six
years. It is reasonably possible that those estimates of
anticipated future gross revenues, the remaining estimated
economic life of the product, or both could be reduced
significantly due to competitive pressures. Amortization expense
related to capitalized software development costs was $0 for the
year ended December 31, 2006 and the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, $52,000
for the period January 1, 2005 through November 22,
2005 and $57,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
F-22
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock-based
Compensation
Successor
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123(R) (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), as
of the date of the closing of the Transaction using the modified
prospective method, which requires companies to record stock
compensation expense for all unvested and new awards as of the
adoption date. Accordingly, prior period amounts presented
herein have not been restated. Under the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123R, stock-based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and
is recognized as expense over the requisite service period.
Predecessor
Prior to the closing of the Transaction, the Company applied APB
25 in accounting for its stock plans. The Company followed the
disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS 123), as amended by
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Had
compensation cost for the Companys stock option plans and
employee stock purchase plan been determined consistent with
SFAS 123, the Companys net income would have been
adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated in the table below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
19,010
|
|
Add back: compensation expense recorded in period
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation determined under
fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(3,473
|
)
|
|
|
(1,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, pro forma
|
|
$
|
28,939
|
|
|
$
|
17,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The add-back of compensation expense relates to
$31.7 million of compensation expense included in
Merger costs related to the Transaction during the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 in
connection with the Companys offer to settle outstanding
stock options in cash at the time of the Transaction. As a
result of this offer, the Company settled outstanding options to
purchase 1.1 million shares of SS&C having a fair
value of $37.25 per share and a weighted-average average
exercise price of $9.29 per share for $31.7 million, the
intrinsic value of the settled options. Outstanding options to
purchase 968,934 shares of SS&C not settled for cash
were converted into fully-vested options to purchase
484,467 shares of Holdings having the same intrinsic value.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
Under SFAS No. 109, an asset and liability approach is
used to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future tax consequences of items that are recognized in its
financial statements and tax returns in different years. A
valuation allowance is established against net deferred tax
assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
F-23
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid marketable securities
with original maturities of three months or less at the date of
acquisition to be cash equivalents.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of
property and equipment is calculated using a combination of
straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful
lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Equipment
|
|
3-5 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7-10 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Shorter of lease term or estimated useful life
|
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006,
the period November 23, 2005 through December 31,
2005, the period January 1, 2005 through November 22,
2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004 was $4,635,000,
$431,000, $3,286,000 and $2,192,000, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The costs of
sold or retired assets are removed from the related asset and
accumulated depreciation accounts and any gain or loss is
included in other income, net.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, requires that goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be
tested for impairment at least annually. The Company has
completed the required impairment tests for goodwill and has
determined that no impairment existed as of December 31,
2006 or 2005. There were no indefinite-lived intangible assets
as of December 31, 2006 or 2005.
The following table summarizes changes in goodwill (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
818,180
|
|
Adjustments related to the Transaction
|
|
|
(9,045
|
)
|
2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
11,891
|
|
Adjustments to previous acquisitions
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
820,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustments made to reduce deferred tax liabilities,
increase deferred revenues and increase deferred financing costs
related to the Transaction were made as final information became
available for these items.
Completed technology and other identifiable intangible assets
are amortized over lives ranging from three to 15 years
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. Amortization expense associated
with completed technology and other amortizable intangible
assets was $22,493,000, $1,870,000, $6,237,000 and $2,344,000
for the year ended December 31, 2006, the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and
the year ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
F-24
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of the components of other intangible assets is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
202,353
|
|
|
$
|
197,222
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
56,454
|
|
|
|
55,937
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
17,268
|
|
|
|
17,203
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,145
|
|
|
|
272,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(24,260
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
253,885
|
|
|
$
|
270,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated amortization expense, related to intangible
assets, for each of the next five years ending December 31 is
expected to approximate (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
28,873
|
|
2008
|
|
|
28,786
|
|
2009
|
|
|
28,158
|
|
2010
|
|
|
27,145
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,780
|
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived
assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets to be
Disposed of. The Company assesses potential impairments to
its long-lived assets when there is evidence that events or
changes in circumstances have made recovery of the assets
carrying value unlikely. An impairment loss would be recognized
when the sum of the expected future undiscounted net cash flows
is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The Company has
identified no such impairment losses. Substantially all of the
Companys long-lived assets are located in the United
States and Canada.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash, cash
equivalents, marketable securities, and trade receivables. The
Company has cash investment policies that limit investments to
investment grade securities. Concentrations of credit risk, with
respect to trade receivables, are limited due to the fact that
the Companys client base is highly diversified. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no significant
concentrations of credit risk and the carrying value of these
assets approximates fair value.
International
Operations and Foreign Currency
The functional currency of each foreign subsidiary is the local
currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of foreign
subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at period-end
exchange rates, and capital stock accounts are translated at
historical rates. Revenues and expenses are translated using the
average rates during the period. The resulting translation
adjustments are excluded from net earnings and accumulated as a
separate component of stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are included in the
results of operations in the periods in which they occur and are
immaterial for all periods presented.
F-25
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Derivative
Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments, consisting of interest
rates swaps, to manage interest rate risk associated with the
variable interest rate on its bank credit facility. The
Companys objective in managing interest rate risk is to
manage volatility in the effective cost of debt. The Company
accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133), which requires
that all derivative instruments be recorded at fair value.
In order for derivative instruments to qualify for hedge
accounting in accordance with SFAS 133, the underlying
hedged item must expose the Company to risks associated with
market fluctuations and the financial instrument used as a hedge
must reduce the Companys exposure to market fluctuation
throughout the hedge period. If these criteria are not met, a
change in the market value of the financial instrument is
recognized as a gain or loss and is recorded as a component of
interest expense in the period of change. The Company excludes
the change in the time value of money when assessing the
effectiveness of the hedging relationship. All derivatives are
evaluated quarterly.
Derivative instruments entered into by the Company qualify for
hedge accounting and are designated as cash flow hedges. Cash
flow hedges are hedges of forecasted transactions or the
variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a
recognized asset or liability. For cash flow hedge transactions,
changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are
reported in other comprehensive income. The gains and losses on
cash flow hedge transactions reported in other comprehensive
income are effectively reclassified to earnings in the periods
in which earnings are affected by the variability of the cash
flows of the hedged item.
Net interest paid or received pursuant to the derivative
instruments is included as a component of interest expense in
the period. Pending interest settlements earned on derivative
instruments held at the end of a period are also included as a
component of interest expense and in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. See Note 6 for further
disclosure related to the Companys derivative instruments.
Comprehensive
Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income, requires that items defined as comprehensive
income, such as foreign currency translation adjustments and
unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, be
separately classified in the financial statements and that the
accumulated balance of other comprehensive income be reported
separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital
in the equity section of the balance sheet. Total comprehensive
income consists of net income and other accumulated
comprehensive income disclosed in the equity section of the
balance sheet.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had a balance of $960,000
in foreign currency translation gains and a balance of $739,000
(net of taxes of $548,000) in unrealized gains on interest rate
swaps.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
(FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an interpretation of FAS 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, to create a single model to address
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48
also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosures and transition. FIN 48 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of
FIN 48. At adoption, the Company had $4.2 million of
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. The adoption of
FIN 48 resulted in a reclassification of certain tax
liabilities from current to non-current of $3.8 million and
to certain related deferred tax assets of $419,000. The Company
did not record a
F-26
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as a result of
adopting FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, accrued
interest related to unrecognized tax benefits was less than
$0.1 million.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements (FAS 157).
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This standard does not require any new fair value
measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does
not expect that the adoption of FAS 157 will have a
significant impact on its financial position and results of
operations.
Basic
and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic
earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by
dividing income available to the Companys common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is
computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the
period. Common equivalent shares consist of stock options using
the treasury stock method. Common equivalent shares are excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share if the effect
of including such common equivalent shares is antidilutive
because their exercise prices exceed the fair value of common
stock.
The following table sets forth the weighted average common
shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
|
|
23,300
|
|
|
|
21,185
|
|
Weighted average common stock equivalents options
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
|
|
22,499
|
|
Options to purchase 1,133,446, 0, 0 and 117,174 shares were
outstanding at December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005,
November 22, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively,
but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share because the effect of including the options would be
antidilutive.
F-27
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table represents the activity for the allowance
for doubtful accounts during the year ended December 31,
2006, the period November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005, the period January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,092
|
|
|
$
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
Charge (benefit) to costs and expenses
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
$
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,057
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management establishes the allowance for doubtful accounts based
on historical bad debt experience. In addition, management
analyzes client accounts, client concentrations, client
creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in the
clients payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts.
At December 31, 2006, 10,000,000 shares of common
stock were authorized and 7,088,442 and 7,087,529 shares of
common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively. At
December 31, 2005, 10,000,000 shares of common stock
were authorized and 7,075,074 shares of common stock were
issued and outstanding.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
repurchased 913 shares of common stock at $74.50 per share.
The sources of income (loss) before income taxes were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
(10,670
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
$
|
30,634
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
7,956
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,370
|
|
|
$
|
31,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,168
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,802
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,556
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
State
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(6,116
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(2,776
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates were 140%, 0%, 78.9% and 38.8% for the
year ended December 31, 2006, the period November 23,
2005 through December 31, 2005, the period January 1,
2005 through November 22, 2005 and the year ended
December 31, 2004, respectively. The reconciliation between
the expected tax expense and the actual tax provision (benefit)
is computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate income
tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Computed expected tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(949
|
)
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,180
|
|
|
$
|
10,864
|
|
Increase (decrease) in income tax expense resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes (net of federal income tax benefit)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
Tax-exempt interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
Foreign operations
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
Rate change impact on deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Deal costs (non-deductible)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded valuation allowances of $5,680,000 and
$2,228,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005 related to net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credits in certain foreign
jurisdictions.
F-29
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The components of deferred income taxes at December 31,
2006 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
$
|
1,635
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,244
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
8,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,391
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
24,751
|
|
|
|
88,973
|
|
|
|
13,167
|
|
|
|
96,507
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(5,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,071
|
|
|
$
|
88,973
|
|
|
$
|
10,939
|
|
|
$
|
96,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December, 31, 2006, the Company has not accrued deferred
income taxes on $5.6 million of unremitted earnings from
non-U.S. subsidiaries
as such earnings are expected to be reinvested overseas and used
to service Canadian debt.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had federal net operating
loss carryforwards of $5.2 million that begin to expire in
2017.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had state net operating
loss carryforwards in various states of $98.5 million that
expire between 2008 and 2026.
As defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code,
certain ownership changes limit the annual utilization of
federal net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. The
Company does not believe that the Section 382 limitation
from its previous ownership changes will result in the loss of
any net operating loss or credit carryforward.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had foreign net
operating loss carryforwards other than Japan of
$3.6 million, which are available to offset foreign income
on an infinite carryforward basis. Japans net operating
loss carryforward of $0.4 million begins to expire in 2007.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had federal tax credit
carryforwards of $0.4 million that begin to expire in 2011.
F-30
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Debt and
Derivative Instruments
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, debt consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Senior credit facility, revolving portion, weighted-average
interest rate of 8.10% and 6.57%, respectively(A)
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,734
|
|
Senior credit facility, term loan portion, weighted-average
interest rate of 7.73% and 6.90%, respectively(A)
|
|
|
263,929
|
|
|
|
275,833
|
|
113/4% Senior
subordinated notes due 2013(B)
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,929
|
|
|
|
488,581
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,694
|
)
|
|
|
(10,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
466,235
|
|
|
$
|
478,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 23, 2005, in connection with the Transaction,
the Company (i) entered into a new $350 million credit
facility, consisting of a $200 million term loan facility
with SS&C as the borrower, a $75 million-equivalent
term loan facility with a Canadian subsidiary as the borrower
($17 million of which is denominated in U.S. dollars
and $58 million of which is denominated in Canadian
dollars) and a $75 million revolving credit facility, of
which $10 million was immediately drawn ($5 million of
which is denominated in U.S. dollars and $5 million of
which is denominated in Canadian dollars) and (ii) issued
$205 million aggregate principal amount of senior
subordinated notes. The portion of the term loan facility
denominated in Canadian dollars was $51.9 million and
$58.8 million, respectively, at December 31, 2006 and
2005. The portion of the revolving credit facility denominated
in Canadian dollars was $0 and $4.7 million, respectively,
at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The Company capitalized
financing costs of approximately $17.2 million associated
with these facilities. Costs of $8.5 million associated
with the credit facility are being amortized over a period of
seven years. Costs of $8.7 million associated with the
senior subordinated notes are being amortized over a period of
eight years. Costs of $2.8 million and $0.2 million
were amortized to interest expense in the year ended
December 31, 2006 and the period November 23, 2005
through December 31, 2005, respectively. The amount due
under the revolving portion of the senior credit facility has
been classified as a current liability based on the
Companys intent to repay the obligation in 2007.
|
|
(A)
|
Senior
Credit Facilities
|
Borrowings under the senior credit facilities bear interest at
either a floating base rate or a Eurocurrency rate plus, in each
case, an applicable margin. In addition, the Company pays a
commitment fee in respect of unused revolving commitments at a
rate that will be adjusted based on its leverage ratio. The
initial commitment fee rate is 0.5% per annum. The Company is
obligated to make quarterly principal payments on the term loan
of approximately $2.7 million per year. Subject to certain
exceptions, thresholds and other limitations, the Company is
required to prepay outstanding loans under its senior credit
facilities with the net proceeds of certain asset dispositions
and certain debt issuances and 50% of its excess cash flow (as
defined in the agreements governing the senior credit
facilities), which percentage will be reduced based on the
Company reaching certain leverage ratio thresholds.
The obligations under the senior credit facilities are
guaranteed by all of SS&Cs existing and future wholly
owned U.S. subsidiaries and by Holdings, with certain
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement. The obligations
of the Canadian borrower are guaranteed by SS&C, each of
its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries and Holdings, with
certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement.
Obligations under the senior credit facilities are secured by a
perfected first priority security interest in all of the
SS&Cs capital stock and all of
F-31
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the capital stock or other equity interests held by Holdings,
SS&C and each of SS&Cs existing and future
U.S. subsidiary guarantors (subject to certain limitations
for equity interests of foreign subsidiaries and other
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement) and all of
Holdings and SS&Cs tangible and intangible
assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each of the
SS&Cs existing and future U.S. subsidiary
guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit
agreement. The Canadian borrowers borrowings under the
senior credit facilities and all guarantees thereof are secured
by a perfected first priority security interest in all of the
SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by Holdings, SS&C and each of
the SS&Cs existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in
the credit agreement, and all of the Holdings and
SS&Cs tangible and intangible assets and the tangible
and intangible assets of each of the SS&Cs existing
and future U.S. and Canadian subsidiary guarantors, with
certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement.
The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions,
Holdings, SS&Cs and most of SS&Cs
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay
dividends and distributions on capital stock, create liens on
assets, enter into sale and lease-back transactions, repay
subordinated indebtedness, make capital expenditures, engage in
certain transactions with affiliates, dispose of assets and
engage in mergers or acquisitions. In addition, under the senior
credit facilities, the Company is required to satisfy and
maintain a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest
coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2006, the Company was in
compliance with the financial and non-financial covenants.
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage the
floating rate portion of its debt portfolio. An interest rate
swap is a contractual agreement to exchange payments based on
underlying interest rates. In November 2005, the Company entered
into three interest rate swap agreements which fixed the
interest rates for $200.6 million of its variable rate
debt. Two of the Companys swap agreements are denominated
in U.S. dollars and have notional values of
$100 million and $50 million and expire in December
2010 and December 2008, respectively. Under these agreements,
the Company is required to pay the counterparty a stream of
fixed interest payments of 4.78% and 4.71%, respectively, and in
turn, receive variable interest payments based on LIBOR (5.36%
at December 31, 2006) from the counterparty. The
Companys third swap agreement is denominated in Canadian
dollars and has a notional value equivalent to approximately
$50.6 million U.S. dollars and expires in December
2008. Under this agreement, the Company is required to pay the
counterparty fixed interest payments of 3.93% and in turn,
receive variable interest payments based on the Canadian dollar
Bankers Acceptances rate (4.34% at December 31,
2006) from the counterparty. The net receipt or payment
from the interest rate swap agreements is recorded in interest
expense. The interest rate swaps are designated and qualify as
cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended. As such, the swaps are accounted for as assets and
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The
fair value of derivatives was approximately $1.3 million
and $0.1 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and was estimated based on past, present and
expected future market conditions and represents their carrying
values. For the year ended December 31, 2006 and the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the
Company recognized unrealized gains of $635,000 and $105,000,
net of tax, in Other Comprehensive Income related to the change
in fair value of the swaps. There is no income statement impact
from changes in the fair value of the swap agreements as the
hedges have been assessed with no ineffectiveness. The fair
value of the swaps recorded in Other Comprehensive Income may be
recognized in the statement of operations if certain terms of
the senior credit facility change, if the loan is extinguished
or if the swaps agreements are terminated prior to maturity. No
amounts are expected to be recognized in the statement of
operations during 2007.
|
|
(B)
|
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013
|
The
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 are unsecured senior subordinated
obligations of SS&C that are subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior debt of SS&C,
including the senior
F-32
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
credit facilities. The senior subordinated notes will be pari
passu in right of payment to all future senior subordinated
debt of SS&C. The senior subordinated notes are jointly and
severally fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured
senior subordinated basis by all existing and future direct and
indirect domestic subsidiaries of SS&C that guarantee the
obligations under the senior credit facilities or any of
SS&Cs other indebtedness or the indebtedness of the
guarantors.
The senior subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in
part, at SS&Cs option, at any time at varying
redemption prices that generally include premiums, which are
defined in the indenture. In addition, upon a change of control,
SS&C is required to make an offer to redeem all of the
senior subordinated notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains a
number of covenants that restrict, subject to certain
exceptions, SS&Cs ability and the ability of its
restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay
dividends, make certain investments, create liens, dispose of
certain assets and engage in mergers or acquisitions. Although
the indenture generally limits the ability of Holdings to obtain
funds from its subsidiaries, whether by dividend or loan, the
indenture permits SS&C, after an initial public offering of
Holdings, to pay dividends to Holdings in an amount not to
exceed in any fiscal year 6% of the net proceeds received by
SS&C through a contribution to equity capital from such
offering to enable Holdings to pay dividends to its
stockholders. As of December 31, 2006, SS&C was in
compliance with the financial covenants.
The estimated fair value of SS&Cs senior subordinated
notes due 2013 is $222.4 million at December 31, 2006.
The estimated fair value of SS&Cs senior subordinated
notes was based on quoted market prices on or about
December 31, 2006 and is presented to satisfy the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial
Instruments (SFAS 107), and is not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could
realize in a current market exchange.
At December 31, 2006, annual maturities of long-term debt
during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
2,674
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,674
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
455,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
471,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
Revolving Credit Facility
On April 13, 2005, the Company entered into a credit
agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement) with
Fleet National Bank regarding a two-year, $75,000,000 senior
revolving credit facility intended to finance a portion of the
Companys acquisition of Financial Models Company Inc.
(FMC) and related fees and expenses and to provide
ongoing working capital and cash for other general corporate
purposes. Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the
Company was permitted to borrow funds from Fleet, initially in
the principal amount of $75 million and including a
$5 million sublimit for the issuance of standby and
commercial letters of credit. Upon execution of the Credit
Agreement on April 13, 2005, the Company drew down the full
amount of the Loan, which consisted of (1) $65 million
as a Eurodollar Rate Loan with an interest period of thirty days
at a rate per annum equal to the British Bankers Association
LIBOR Rate plus 100 basis points, and
(2) $10 million as a Base Rate Loan bearing interest
at a fluctuating rate per annum
F-33
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or the
prime rate as publicly announced by Bank of America,
N.A. The obligations of the Company under the credit agreement
were guaranteed by OMR Systems Corporation and Financial Models
Company Ltd., both of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of the
Company. This facility was terminated in connection with the
Transaction.
The Company is obligated under noncancelable operating leases
for office space and office equipment. Total rental expense was
$8,976,000, $625,000, $6,373,000 and $3,155,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2006, the period November 23, 2005
through December 31, 2005, the period January 1, 2005
through November 22, 2005 and the year ended
December 31, 2004, respectively. The lease for the
corporate facility in Windsor, Connecticut expires in 2016.
Future minimum lease payments under the Companys operating
leases, excluding future sublease income, as of
December 31, 2006, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
8,098
|
|
2008
|
|
|
7,297
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6,540
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,415
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
14,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company subleases office space to other parties under
noncancelable leases. The Company received rental income under
these leases of $1.4 million, $19,000, $333,000 and
$456,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and
the year ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
Future minimum lease receipts under these leases as of
December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,460
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
License
and Royalty Agreements
|
The Company has non-exclusive rights to integrate certain
third-party software into certain of the Companys
products. Under the terms of an agreement, the licensor of the
software is paid royalties based on a percentage of the related
license fee revenues collected by the Company. Under another
agreement, the Company is obligated to pay at least $25,000 per
quarter. The total royalty expense under these agreements for
the year ended December 31, 2006, the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and
the year ended December 31, 2004 was $412,000, $34,000,
$384,000 and $448,000, respectively.
F-34
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
|
The Company has a 401(k) Retirement Plan (the Plan)
that covers substantially all domestic employees. Each employee
may elect to contribute to the Plan, through payroll deductions,
up to 20% of his or her salary, subject to certain limitations.
The Plan provides for a Company match of employees
contributions in an amount equal to 50% of an employees
contributions up to $3,000 per year. The Company offers
employees a selection of various public mutual funds but does
not include Company common stock as an investment option in its
Plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred
$998,000, $67,000, $765,000 and $710,000, respectively, of
matching contribution expenses related to this plan.
|
|
10.
|
Stock
Option and Purchase Plans
|
Successor
In connection with the Transaction, options to purchase
968,934 shares of the Predecessor held by certain employees
that were not exercised prior to the closing of the Transaction
were automatically converted into fully-vested options to
purchase 484,467 shares of Holdings (Rollover
Options), having the same intrinsic value of
$27.9 million. The Rollover Options had a weighted-average
exercise price of $16.96 per share and a weighted-average
remaining life of 6.4 years.
In August 2006, the Board of Directors adopted a new
equity-based incentive plan (the Plan), which
authorizes equity awards to be granted for up to
1,314,567 shares of the Companys common stock. During
the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company granted
time-based and performance-based options to purchase
approximately 472,032 and 704,299 shares of its common
stock, respectively. All options awarded during 2006 have an
exercise price of $74.50 and expire ten years from the date of
grant.
Time-based options granted upon adoption of the Plan vest 25% on
November 23, 2006 and 1/36th of the remaining balance
each month thereafter for 36 months. Time-based options
granted thereafter generally vest 25% on the first anniversary
of the grant date and 1/36th of the remaining balance each
month thereafter for 36 months. All time-based options can
vest upon a change in control, subject to certain conditions.
Time-based options granted during 2006 have a fair value of
$31.08 per share based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following assumptions: dividend yield of zero; expected
life of four years; expected volatility of 45.85% and risk-free
interest rate of 4.86%. Compensation expense is recorded on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, with the
exception of the options granted upon adoption of the Plan, for
which the first 25%, which is recorded between the grant date
and November 23, 2006, to mirror the vesting. The Company
recorded approximately $3.9 million of stock-based
compensation expense related to these options for the year ended
December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, there is
approximately $6.0 million of unearned non-cash stock-based
compensation that the Company expects to recognize as expense
over the next 2.9 years.
Performance-based options to purchase approximately
470,000 shares of common stock vest upon the attainment of
certain annual EBITDA targets for the Company during the
five-year period beginning January 1, 2006. Additionally,
EBITDA in excess of the EBITDA target in any given year shall be
applied to the EBITDA of any previous year for which the EBITDA
target was not met in full such that attainment of a prior year
EBITDA target can be achieved subsequently. In the event all
EBITDA targets of previous years were met in full, the excess
EBITDA shall be applied to the EBITDA of future years. These
performance-based options can also vest upon a change in
control, subject to certain conditions. These performance-based
options granted during 2006 have a fair value of $32.98 per
share based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions: dividend yield of zero; expected life of
4.5 years; expected volatility of 45.85% and risk-free
interest rate of 4.86%. Compensation expense is recorded at the
time that the attainment
F-35
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of the annual and cumulative EBITDA targets becomes probable.
The Company did not record stock-based compensation expense
related to these options during the year ended December 31,
2006. At December 31, 2006, there is approximately
$10.4 million of unearned non-cash stock-based compensation
that the Company could recognize as expense over approximately
the next four years when and if the attainment of the EBITDA
targets become probable.
For the time-based and performance-based options valued using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the Company used the
following assumptions: expected term to exercise of
4.0 years and 4.5 years, respectively; expected
volatility of 45.85%; risk-free interest rate of 4.86%; and no
dividend yield. Expected volatility is based on a combination of
the Companys historical volatility adjusted for the
Transaction and historical volatility of the Companys peer
group. Expected term to exercise is based on the Companys
historical stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the
Transaction.
The remaining performance-based options to purchase
approximately 234,000 shares of common stock vest only upon
a change in control in which certain internal rate of return
targets are attained. These performance-based options granted
during 2006 have a fair value of $21.23 per share. Compensation
expense will be recorded at the time that a change in control
becomes probable. The Company did not record stock-based
compensation expense related to these options during the year
ended December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, there
is approximately $4.8 million of unearned non-cash
stock-based compensation that the Company expects to recognize
when and if a change in control becomes probable. There were no
unvested stock options at December 31, 2005 that carry over
into future periods. The Company generally settles stock option
exercises with newly issued common shares.
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations classification
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Maintenance
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Cost of Professional services
|
|
|
124
|
|
Cost of Software-enabled services
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
647
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
425
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes stock option transactions for the
year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 (Rollover options)
|
|
|
484,467
|
|
|
|
16.97
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,176,331
|
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(42,885
|
)
|
|
|
74.50
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,467
|
)
|
|
|
21.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,613,446
|
|
|
|
57.37
|
|
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended
December 31, 2006 was $0.2 million
F-36
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding that are expected to vest and stock options
outstanding that are exercisable at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, Vested Options Currently Exercisable
|
|
|
Outstanding Options Expected to Vest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Term (years)
|
|
|
|
602,058
|
|
|
$
|
28.60
|
|
|
$
|
27,636
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
220,406
|
|
|
$
|
74.50
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Predecessor
Prior to the Transaction, the Company offered an employee stock
purchase plan whereby employees could purchase Company stock at
a price equal to 85% of the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on either the first or last day of
the purchase period, whichever is lower. The semi-annual
purchase periods were October through March and April through
September. This plan was discontinued in connection with the
Transaction.
During 1994, the Board of Directors approved a plan (1994
Plan), effective January 1, 1995, for which
1,500,000 shares of common stock were reserved. The 1994
Plan was amended in October 1995 and April 1996 to reserve
additional shares of common stock for issuance under the 1994
Plan, bringing the total shares of common stock reserved for
issuance to 4,500,000. Options under the 1994 Plan generally
vested ratably over four years and expired ten years after the
date of grant. The Board of Directors, as of April 30,
1998, decided that no further options would be granted under the
1994 Plan. Under the 1994 Plan, there were options to purchase 0
and 111,401 shares of common stock outstanding as of
November 22, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively,
of which options to purchase 111,401 shares of common stock
were exercisable as of December 31, 2004.
The Companys 1996 Director Stock Option Plan
(1996 Plan) provided for non-employee directors to
receive options to purchase common stock of the Company at an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common
stock at the date of grant. Each option granted under the 1996
Plan was fully vested immediately upon the option grant date and
expired ten years from the grant date. On May 23, 2000, the
1996 Plan was amended to increase the number of shares of common
stock reserved for issuance to 450,000. The 1996 Plan was
further amended on May 20, 2004 to increase the number of
shares of common stock reserved for issuance to 675,000. At
November 22, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were 0
and 262,500 shares, respectively, available for director
option grants. There were options to purchase 0 and
360,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of
November 22, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
All options outstanding were exercisable as of December 31,
2004.
During 1998, the Board of Directors approved the 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan (1998 Plan), for which
2,250,000 shares of common stock were reserved for
issuance. The number of reserved shares was increased by 750,000
in both May 2000 and 2001. In May 2003, the number of reserved
shares was further increased by 1,500,000 for a total of
5,250,000 shares. Generally, options under the 1998 Plan
vested ratably over four years and expired ten years subsequent
to the grant. Shares available for option grants under the 1998
Plan were 0 and 2,784,048 at November 22, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. There were options to
purchase 0 and 1,504,913 shares of common stock outstanding
at November 22, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively, of which options to purchase 0 and
905,694 shares were exercisable.
In 1999, the Board of Directors approved the Companys 1999
Non-Officer Employee Stock Incentive Plan (1999
Plan) and reserved 1,875,000 shares of common stock
for issuance under the 1999 Plan. All of the Companys
employees, consultants, and advisors other than the
Companys executive officers and directors were eligible to
participate in the 1999 Plan. Only non-statutory stock options,
restricted stock awards, and other stock-based awards may be
granted under the 1999 Plan. Generally, options under the 1999
Plan vested
F-37
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
ratably over four years and expired ten years after the date of
grant. Shares available for option grants under the 1999 Plan
were 0 and 700,985 at November 22, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. There were options to
purchase 0 and 403,148 shares of common stock outstanding
at November 22, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively, of which options to purchase 0 and
291,767 shares were exercisable.
The following table summarizes stock option transactions for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and the period
January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
2,570,966
|
|
|
$
|
5.92
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
284,798
|
|
|
|
22.81
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(85,291
|
)
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(391,011
|
)
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,379,462
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
137,200
|
|
|
|
26.99
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(25,213
|
)
|
|
|
16.92
|
|
Exercised(1)
|
|
|
(1,522,515
|
)
|
|
|
8.59
|
|
Rollover options
|
|
|
(968,934
|
)
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at November 22, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 1,132,676 options with a weighted-average exercise
price of $9.29 that were cashed out in connection with the
Transaction, with the same economic effect as an exercise and
sale for the Transaction consideration.
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period
January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 was $11.50
and $13.69, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the year ended December 31, 2004 and the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 was
$6.8 million and $38.4 million, respectively. The fair
value of options vested during the year ended December 31,
2004 and the period January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 was $1.3 million and
$3.5 million, respectively.
11. Acquisitions
On August 31, 2006, the Company purchased substantially all
the assets of Zoologic, Inc. (Zoologic) for
approximately $3.0 million in cash, plus the costs of
effecting the transaction. Zoologic provides web-based
courseware and instructor-led training for the securities, asset
management and wealth management markets.
The net assets and results of operations of Zoologic have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from September 1, 2006. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of completed technology, trade name, client
relationships and client contracts, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The completed technology and
trade name are amortized over approximately six years, and the
contractual relationships are amortized over approximately three
years, the estimated lives of the assets. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
On March 3, 2006, the Company purchased all of the
outstanding stock of Cogent Management Inc.
(Cogent), for $12.25 million in cash, plus the
costs of effecting the transaction. The Company used
F-38
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
$6.25 million of cash on hand and borrowed
$6.0 million under the revolving portion of its senior
credit facility to fund the acquisition. Cogent provides hedge
fund management services primarily to
U.S.-based
hedge funds.
The net assets and results of operations of Cogent have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from March 1, 2006. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of client relationships and client contracts, was
determined using the future cash flows method. The intangible
assets are amortized each year based on the ratio that current
cash flows for the intangible asset bear to the total of current
and expected future cash flows for the intangible asset. The
intangible assets are amortized over approximately seven years,
the estimated life of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill.
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price
for the acquisitions of Zoologic and Cogent (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zoologic
|
|
|
Cogent
|
|
|
Tangible assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
1,074
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired client relationships and contracts
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
9,367
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,755
|
)
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
2,712
|
|
|
$
|
11,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
by the Predecessor Company 2005
On October 31, 2005, the Company purchased all the
outstanding stock of Open Information Systems, Inc.
(OIS) for $24.0 million in cash. Potential
earn-out payments may be made by the Company based on revenue
growth, if certain 2006 revenue targets, or, under certain
circumstances, 2007 revenue targets are met. OIS Money
Market Manager is used by banks and broker/dealers for money
market issuance services. Information Manager, another OIS
product, is a comprehensive tool for financial institutions,
allowing banks to web-enable core business applications for
Internet transaction entry, scheduling, reporting, work flow
management and third-party interfaces.
The net assets and results of operations of OIS have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from November 1, 2005. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed based on
their fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
the intangible assets, consisting of completed technology, trade
name and contractual relationships, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The intangible assets are
amortized over lives ranging from approximately six to ten
years, the estimated life of the assets. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
F-39
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On August 24, 2005, the Company acquired substantially all
the assets of MarginMan, a business within Integral Development
Corporation, for $5.6 million, plus the costs of effecting
the acquisition, and the assumption of certain liabilities.
MarginMan provides collateralized trading software to the
foreign exchange marketplace.
The net assets and results of operations of MarginMan have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from August 24, 2005. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed based on
their fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
the intangible assets, consisting of completed technology, trade
name and contractual relationships, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The intangible assets are
amortized over a life of approximately seven years, the
estimated life of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill.
On June 3, 2005, the Company purchased all the outstanding
stock of Financial Interactive, Inc. (FI) in
exchange for 358,424 shares of the Companys common
stock and warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of the
Companys stock with an exercise price of $37.69 per share,
expiring on June 3, 2010. FIs product, FundRunner,
provides a comprehensive investor relationship management and
fund profiling infrastructure to alternative fund managers,
funds of funds managers and fund administrators.
The shares of common stock issued as consideration were valued
at $9.3 million using the average closing market price for
several days prior to closing of the transaction, less a
discount for lack of registration. The warrants issued were
valued at $0.7 million using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model.
The net assets and results of operations of FI have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from June 1, 2005. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed based on
their fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
the intangible assets, consisting of completed technology, trade
name and contractual relationships, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The intangible assets are
amortized over lives ranging from seven to ten years, the
estimated lives of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill.
On April 19, 2005, the Company purchased substantially all
the outstanding stock of the Financial Models Company Inc.
(FMC) for approximately $159.0 million in cash,
plus approximately $13.8 million of costs to effect the
acquisition. The Company financed the FMC acquisition with
$75 million of borrowings under the credit facility
(Note 6) and approximately $84 million from cash
on hand. FMC provides comprehensive investment management
systems and services to the international investment management
industry.
The net assets and results of operations of FMC have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from April 19, 2005. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed based on
their fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
the intangible assets, including technology, trade names,
contractual relationships and exchange relationships, was based
on an independent appraisal and was determined using the income
approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method was
utilized for completed technology and trade names, the
discounted cash flow method for contractual relationships, and
the avoided-cost method for the exchange relationships. The
intangible assets are amortized each year based on the ratio
that current cash flows for the intangible asset bear to the
total of
F-40
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
current and expected future cash flows for the intangible asset.
The intangible assets are amortized over lives ranging from
seven to 15 years, the estimated lives of the assets. The
remainder of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company committed to a
plan to reduce headcount at FMC. Under the plan, the Company
terminated approximately 75 employees and accrued severance
costs of $3.3 million, of which substantially all has been
paid as of December 31, 2006. The severance costs were
included in the allocation of the purchase price and recorded as
an assumed liability.
On February 28, 2005, the Company purchased all of the
membership interests in EisnerFast LLC (EisnerFast),
for $25.3 million in cash. EisnerFast provides fund
accounting and administration services to on-and off-shore hedge
and private equity funds, funds of funds, and investment
advisors.
The net assets and results of operations of EisnerFast have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from March 1, 2005. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed based on
their fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of
the intangible assets, consisting of client contracts and client
relationships, was determined using the future cash flows
method. The intangible assets are amortized each year based on
the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible asset bear
to the total of current and expected future cash flows for the
intangible asset. The intangible assets are amortized over nine
years, the estimated life of the assets. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
On February 11, 2005, the Company acquired substantially
all the assets of Achievement Technologies, Inc.
(Achievement) for $470,000, plus the costs of
effecting the acquisition, and the assumption of certain
liabilities. Achievement provides a software solution for
facilities maintenance and management to real estate property
managers.
The net assets and results of operations of Achievement have
been included in the Companys consolidated financial
statements from February 1, 2005. The purchase price was
allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities
assumed based on their fair value at the date of acquisition.
The fair value of the completed technology was determined using
the future cash flows method. The acquired technology is
amortized on a straight-line basis over five years, the
estimated life of the product. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill.
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price
for the acquisitions of OIS, MarginMan, FI, FMC, EisnerFast and
Achievement (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OIS
|
|
|
MarginMan
|
|
|
FI
|
|
|
FMC
|
|
|
EisnerFast
|
|
|
Achievement
|
|
|
Assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
2,474
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
$
|
16,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
9,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Acquired client contracts and relationships
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
2,078
|
|
|
|
37,103
|
|
|
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
12,328
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
9,829
|
|
|
|
113,560
|
|
|
|
17,106
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(13,835
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
|
|
(11,633
|
)
|
|
|
(1,449
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,681
|
|
|
$
|
10,579
|
|
|
$
|
151,915
|
|
|
$
|
25,333
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Acquisitions
by the Predecessor Company 2004
On April 12, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding shares of OMR Systems Corporation and OMR Systems
International, Ltd. (together OMR) for
$19.7 million, plus the costs of effecting the transaction.
OMR provides treasury processing software and software-enabled
services to banks in Europe and the United States and offers
comprehensive hedge fund administration.
The net assets and results of operations of OMR have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from April 12, 2004. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of intangible assets,
including trade names and customer relationships, was based on
an independent appraisal and was determined using the income
approach. The completed technology is amortized on a
straight-line basis over seven years, the estimated life of the
product. Other acquired intangibles are amortized over lives
ranging from seven to nine years, the estimated lives of the
assets. The remainder of the purchase price was allocated to
goodwill.
On February 17, 2004, the Company acquired substantially
all the assets of NeoVision Hypersystems, Inc.
(NeoVision) for $1.6 million and the assumption
of certain liabilities. The Company paid $0.8 million
during the first quarter of 2004 and made the remaining payment
in the second quarter of 2004. NeoVision is a provider of
tactical visual analytical solutions for the financial industry.
NeoVisions products complement the Companys existing
product offerings and provide traders, brokers and portfolio
managers with the ability to quickly track, analyze and assess
market positions and performance.
The net assets and results of operations of NeoVision have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from February 15, 2004. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the completed technology
was determined using the future cash flows method. The acquired
technology is amortized on a straight-line basis over five
years, the estimated life of the product. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
On January 16, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all
the assets of Investment Advisory Network, LLC (IAN)
for $3 million and the assumption of certain liabilities.
IAN provides web-based wealth management services to financial
institutions, broker-dealers and financial advisors who offer
managed accounts to the private wealth market.
The net assets and results of operations of IAN have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from January 1, 2004. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the completed technology
was determined using the future cash flows method. The acquired
technology is amortized on a straight-line basis over five
years, the estimated life of the product. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price
for the OMR, NeoVision and IAN (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMR
|
|
|
NeoVision
|
|
|
IAN
|
|
|
Assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
8,134
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
Acquired client contracts, customer relationships and trade names
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(6,618
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
18,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,607
|
|
|
$
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results
of operations is provided for illustrative purposes only and
assumes that the Transaction and the acquisitions of Zoologic,
Cogent, OIS, MarginMan, FI, FMC, EisnerFast, OMR and IAN
occurred on January 1, 2005. This unaudited pro forma
information (in thousands) should not be relied upon as being
indicative of the historical results that would have been
obtained if these acquisitions had actually occurred on that
date, nor of the results that may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
208,231
|
|
|
$
|
18,274
|
|
|
$
|
179,210
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
The pro forma results of operations presented above include a
reduction in revenues of $3.6 million and $0.7 million
for 2006 and the period from November 23 through
December 31, 2005, respectively, related to the deferred
revenue adjustment recorded in connection with the Transaction.
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for the
acquisition of Achievement and NeoVision, as results of
operations of these acquisition are not significant to the
Company.
|
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In connection with the Transaction, TC Group, L.L.C. (an
affiliate of Carlyle), the Company and the Companys Chief
Executive Officer entered into an agreement pursuant to which
the Company paid (i) TC Group, L.L.C. a fee for
certain services provided by it to the Company in connection
with the Transaction, and (ii) the Companys Chief
Executive Officer a fee in consideration of his commitment to
contribute equity to the Company pursuant to a contribution and
subscription agreement and as consideration for the Chief
Executive Officers agreement to enter into a long-term
employment agreement with the Company, including non-competition
provisions therein. The aggregate amount of these fees was
$7.5 million, which was allocated to the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and TC Group, L.L.C. pro rata based
on their respective ownership of the Company following the
Transaction, and was recorded as part of the overall purchase
price of the Transaction.
The Company has agreed to pay TC Group, L.L.C. an annual
fee of $1.0 million for certain management services to be
performed by TC Group, L.L.C. following the Transaction,
and will also pay Carlyle additional reasonable compensation for
other services provided by TC Group, L.L.C. to the Company
from time to time, including investment banking, financial
advisory and other services.
|
|
13.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In connection with the Acquisition, two purported class action
lawsuits were filed against SS&C, each of its directors
and, with respect to the first matter described below, Holdings,
in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for
New Castle County.
The first lawsuit is Paulena Partners, LLC v. SS&C
Technologies, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 1525-N
(filed July 28, 2005). The second lawsuit is Stephen
Landen v. SS&C Technologies, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 1541-N
(filed August 3, 2005). Each complaint purports to state
claims for breach of fiduciary duty against all of
SS&Cs directors at the time of filing of the
lawsuits. The complaints allege, among other things, that
(1) the merger will benefit SS&Cs management or
The Carlyle Group at the expense of its public stockholders,
(2) the merger consideration to be paid to stockholders is
inadequate or unfair and does not represent the best price
available in the marketplace for SS&C, (3) the process
by which the merger was approved was unfair and (4) the
directors breached their fiduciary duties to SS&Cs
stockholders in negotiating and approving the
F-43
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
merger. Each complaint seeks, among other relief, class
certification of the lawsuit, an injunction preventing the
consummation of the merger (or rescinding the merger if it is
completed prior to the receipt of such relief), compensatory
and/or
rescissory damages to the class and attorneys fees and
expenses, along with such other relief as the court might find
just and proper. The plantiffs have not sought a specific amount
of monetary damages.
The two lawsuits were consolidated by order dated
August 31, 2005. On October 18, 2005, the parties to
the consolidated lawsuit entered into a memorandum of
understanding, pursuant to which SS&C agreed to make
certain additional disclosures to its stockholders in connection
with their approval of the merger. The memorandum of
understanding also contemplated that the parties would enter
into a settlement agreement, which the parties executed on
July 6, 2006. Under the settlement agreement, SS&C
agreed to pay up to $350,000 of plaintiffs legal fees and
expenses. The settlement agreement was subject to customary
conditions, including court approval following notice to the
stockholders of SS&C. The court did not find that the
settlement agreement was fair, reasonable and adequate and
disapproved the proposed settlement on November 29, 2006.
The court criticized plaintiffs counsels handling of
the litigation, noting that the plaintiffs counsel
displayed a lack of understanding of basic terms of the merger,
did not appear to have adequately investigated the
plaintiffs potential claims and was unable to identify the
basic legal issues in the case. The court also raised questions
about the process leading up to the transaction, which process
included Mr. Stones discussions of potential
investments in, or acquisitions of, SS&C, without prior
formal authorization of SS&Cs board, but the court
did not make any findings of fact on the litigation other than
that there were not adequate facts in evidence to support the
settlement. The plaintiffs decided to continue the litigation
following rejection of the settlement, and the parties are
currently in discovery. The court has set a trial date for July
2008. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and
are defending them vigorously.
From time to time, the Company is subject to certain other legal
proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of its
business. In the opinion of management, the Company is not
involved in any such litigation or proceedings by third parties
that management believes could have a material adverse effect on
the Company or its business.
|
|
14.
|
Product
and Geographic Sales Information
|
The Company operates in one reportable segment, as defined by
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. There were no sales to
any individual clients during the periods in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2006 that represented 10% or more
of net sales. The Company attributes net sales to an individual
country based upon location of the client.
The Company manages its business primarily on a geographic
basis. The Companys reportable regions consist of the
United States, Americas excluding the United States, Europe and
Asia Pacific and Japan. The European region includes European
countries as well as the Middle East and Africa.
The Company relies exclusively on its operations in the
Netherlands for sales of its Altair product. Total revenue
derived from this product was $2.0 million,
$0.6 million, $1.7 million and $2.0 million in
the year ended December 31, 2006, the period
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the
period January 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005 and
the year ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
F-44
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues by geography were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
122,341
|
|
|
$
|
10,261
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,542
|
|
|
$
|
74,724
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
35,924
|
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
|
18,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas excluding United States and Canada
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
3,163
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
40,150
|
|
|
|
4,151
|
|
|
|
|
27,737
|
|
|
|
14,965
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
|
2,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,469
|
|
|
$
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,969
|
|
|
$
|
95,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets as of December 31, were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
20,814
|
|
|
$
|
17,518
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
5,057
|
|
|
|
6,733
|
|
Americas excluding United States and Canada
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,506
|
|
|
$
|
24,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by product group were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Portfolio management/accounting
|
|
$
|
152,094
|
|
|
$
|
12,883
|
|
|
$
|
105,081
|
|
|
$
|
60,568
|
|
Trading/treasury operations
|
|
|
27,686
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
21,143
|
|
|
|
17,785
|
|
Financial modeling
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
8,521
|
|
|
|
9,257
|
|
Loan management/accounting
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
5,983
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
|
|
5,177
|
|
Money market processing
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,469
|
|
|
$
|
17,665
|
|
|
$
|
143,969
|
|
|
$
|
95,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 12, 2007, the Company acquired substantially all
the assets of Northport LLC for $5.0 million, plus the
costs of effecting the acquisition, and the assumption of
certain liabilities. Northport provides private equity fund
management and accounting services. The net assets and results
of operations of Northport will be included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements as of
March 1, 2007.
F-45
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In March 2007, the Company amended its Credit Agreement to
reduce the interest rate on the U.S. term loan facility.
On April 18, 2007, the Board of Directors approved
(i) the vesting, as of April 18, 2007, of 50% of the
Performance Options granted to the employees of SS&C
through March 31, 2007 under the Companys 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan that would have vested if the Company had met its
EBITDA target for fiscal year 2006 set forth in the
employees stock option agreements (collectively, the
2006 Performance Options); (ii) the vesting,
conditioned upon the Companys meeting its EBITDA target
for fiscal year 2007, of the other 50% of the 2006 Performance
Options; and (iii) the reduction of the Companys
EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007 set forth in the
employees stock option agreements. These modifications
will result in a compensation charge in the second quarter of
2007 related to the 2006 Performance Options that vested. The
probability of attaining the 2007 EBITDA target will be assessed
at the end of the second quarter of 2007 based upon the revised
target.
|
|
16.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
48,365
|
|
|
$
|
50,655
|
|
|
$
|
52,449
|
|
|
$
|
54,000
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
25,069
|
|
|
|
26,150
|
|
|
|
26,641
|
|
|
|
27,593
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,427
|
|
|
|
11,340
|
|
|
|
10,579
|
|
|
|
10,523
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
27,416
|
|
|
$
|
40,713
|
|
|
$
|
46,110
|
|
|
$
|
29,730
|
|
|
$
|
17,665
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
17,608
|
|
|
|
24,086
|
|
|
|
26,869
|
|
|
|
16,402
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
9,163
|
|
|
|
10,741
|
|
|
|
11,939
|
|
|
|
(28,067
|
)
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
5,969
|
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
6,995
|
|
|
|
(18,841
|
)
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes merger costs associated with the Transaction of $1,171
and $35,741 during the third quarter and the period from
October 1, 2005 through November 22, 2005,
respectively. |
F-46
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF
THE REGISTRANT
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
PARENT COMPANY BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
563,132
|
|
|
$
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 10,000 shares
authorized; 7,088 and 7,075 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Additionally paid-in capital
|
|
|
559,524
|
|
|
|
554,894
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,200
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 1 share and 0 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
563,132
|
|
|
$
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-47
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-48
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
Equity in net income of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,075
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in SS&C Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(381,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(381,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income tax refunds, net of payments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-49
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
For the Period November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005 and the Year Ended December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
of Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of common stock
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
554,894
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
554,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
7,075
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
554,894
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
559,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,699
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-50
SS&C
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to
Parent Company Financial Statements
|
|
1.
|
Background
and Basis of Presentation
|
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) is
the top-level holding company that conducts substantially all of
its business operations through its direct and indirect
subsidiaries Holdings was incorporated in Delaware on
July 26, 2005 in anticipation of the November 23, 2005
acquisition by its subsidiary, Sunshine Merger Corporation, of
SS&C Technologies, Inc. Holdings had no operations prior to
November 23, 2005, and accordingly, its results of
operations and cash flows have only been presented for the
post-acquisition period.
There are significant restrictions over Holdings ability
to obtain funds from its direct and indirect subsidiaries
through dividends, loans or advances. Accordingly, these
condensed financial statements have been presented on a
parent-only basis. Under a parent-only presentation,
Holdings investments in its consolidated subsidiaries are
presented under the equity method of accounting. These
parent-only financial statements should be read in conjunction
with Holdings audited annual consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Since its inception, no cash dividends have been paid to
Holdings by any if its direct or indirect subsidiaries.
Holdings has no direct outstanding debt obligations, but its
direct and indirect subsidiaries do. For a discussion of the
debt obligations of Holdings direct and indirect
subsidiaries, see Note 6 of the notes to the audited annual
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
3.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Holdings has no direct commitments or contingencies, but its
direct and indirect subsidiaries do. For a discussion of the
commitments and contingencies of Holdings direct and
indirect subsidiaries, see Note 13, of the notes to the
audited annual consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
F-51
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table indicates the expenses to be incurred in
connection with the offering described in this registration
statement, other than underwriting discounts and commissions,
all of which will be paid by us. All amounts are estimated
except the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee,
the National Association of Securities Dealers Inc. filing fee
and the NASDAQ Global Market listing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
NASD, Inc. filing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Accountants fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Blue Sky fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Transfer Agents fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits
a corporation to eliminate the personal liability of its
directors or its stockholders for monetary damages for a breach
of fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director
breached his or her duty of loyalty, failed to act in good
faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a
law, authorized the payment of a dividend or approved a stock
repurchase in violation of Delaware corporate law or obtained an
improper personal benefit. Our certificate of incorporation
provides that no director shall be personally liable to us or
our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of
fiduciary duty as director, notwithstanding any provision of law
imposing such liability, except to the extent that the Delaware
General Corporation Law prohibits the elimination or limitation
of liability of directors for breaches of fiduciary duty.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
provides that a corporation has the power to indemnify a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation and
certain other persons serving at the request of the corporation
in related capacities against expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlements actually and reasonably incurred by the person in
connection with an action, suit or proceeding to which he or she
is or is threatened to be made a party by reason of such
position, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he
or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her
conduct was unlawful, except that, in the case of actions
brought by or in the right of the corporation, no
indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue
or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the
Court of Chancery or other adjudicating court determines that,
despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of
Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify
each person who was or is a party or threatened to be made a
party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, other than an action by or in the right of us, by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was, or has agreed to
become, a director or officer, or is or was serving, or has
agreed to serve, at our request as a director, officer, partner,
II-1
employee or trustee of, or in a similar capacity with, another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, all such persons being referred to as an indemnitee,
or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted
in such capacity, against all expenses, including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with
such action, suit or proceeding and any appeal therefrom, if
such indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner he or she
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best
interests, and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, he or she had no reasonable cause to believe his or
her conduct was unlawful.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify
any indemnitee who was or is a party to or threatened to be made
a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit
by or in the right of us to procure a judgment in our favor by
reason of the fact that the indemnitee is or was, or has agreed
to become, our director or officer, or is or was serving, or has
agreed to serve, at our request as a director, officer, partner,
employee or trustee of, or in a similar capacity with, another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, or by reason of any action alleged to have been
taken or omitted in such capacity, against all expenses,
including attorneys fees, and, to the extent permitted by
law, amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred
by or on behalf of the indemnitee in connection with such
action, suit or proceeding, and any appeal therefrom, if the
indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner he or she
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best
interests, except that no indemnification shall be made with
respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which such person
shall have been adjudged to be liable to us, unless a court
determines that, despite such adjudication but in view of all of
the circumstances, he or she is entitled to indemnification of
such expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that
any indemnitee has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
we will indemnify him or her against all expenses, including
attorneys fees, actually and reasonably incurred in
connection therewith. Expenses must be advanced to an indemnitee
under certain circumstances.
We maintain a general liability insurance policy that covers
certain liabilities of directors and officers of our corporation
arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their
capacities as directors or officers.
In any underwriting agreement we enter into in connection with
the sale of common stock being registered hereby, the
underwriters will agree to indemnify, under certain conditions,
us, our directors, our officers and persons who control us with
the meaning of the Securities Act, as amended, against certain
liabilities.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
|
Since inception, we have issued the following securities that
were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933:
|
|
(a)
|
Issuances
of Capital Stock.
|
(1) On November 23, 2005, in connection with the
Transaction, we issued (A) 4,915,571 shares of our
common stock to Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. (an investment fund
affiliated with Carlyle) and 198,524 shares of our common
stock to CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. (an investment fund affiliated
with Carlyle) for consideration of $381,000,000 and
(B) 1,960,979 shares of our common stock to William C.
Stone, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, in
exchange for 3,921,958 shares of common stock of SS&C
held by Mr. Stone.
(2) Between August and November, 2006, we sold an aggregate
of 8,900 shares of restricted common stock at a price per
share of $74.50 to certain of our employees pursuant to our 2006
equity incentive plan.
No underwriters were involved in the foregoing issuances of
securities. The securities described in paragraph (a)(1) of
Item 15 were issued to accredited investors in reliance
upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act, as set forth in Section 4(2) under the
Securities Act, relative to transactions by an issuer not
involving any public offering, to the extent an exemption from
such registration was required. The securities described in
paragraph (a)(2) of Item 15 were issued pursuant to written
compensatory plans or arrangements with our employees, in
reliance on the exemption provided by Section 3(b) of the
Securities Act and Rule 701 promulgated thereunder.
II-2
(1) Between August 9, 2006 and July 31, 2007, we
granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of
1,219,831 shares of our common stock with exercise prices
ranging from $74.50 to $98.91 per share, to employees, directors
and consultants pursuant to our 2006 equity incentive plan.
(2) In connection with the Transaction, we assumed stock
options granted to SS&Cs employees, directors and
consultants pursuant to SS&Cs 1998 stock incentive
plan and 1999 non-officer employee stock incentive plan that
were automatically converted at the time of the Transaction into
options to purchase an aggregate of 484,467 shares of our
common stock with exercise prices ranging from $5.25 to $63.71
per share. An aggregate of 3,684 shares of our common stock
have been issued upon the exercise of stock options for an
aggregate consideration of $73,713 as of July 31, 2007.
The issuances of stock options and the shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of the options described in this
paragraph (b) of Item 15 were issued pursuant to
written compensatory plans or arrangements with our employees,
directors and consultants, in reliance on the exemption provided
by Section 3(b) of the Securities Act and Rule 701
promulgated thereunder, or pursuant to Section 4(2) under
the Securities Act, relative to transactions to transactions by
an issuer not involving any public offering, to the extent an
exemption from such registration was required.
All of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities
for purposes of the Securities Act. All certificates
representing the issued shares of capital stock described in
this Item 15 included appropriate legends setting forth
that the securities had not been registered and the applicable
restrictions on transfer.
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Acquisition Agreement, dated February 25, 2005, by and between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and Financial Models Company Inc.
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
March 2, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated February 28, 2005, by and among
SS&C Technologies, Inc., EisnerFast LLC and EHS, LLC is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
March 3, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 28, 2005, by and
among the Registrant, Sunshine Merger Corporation and SS&C
Technologies, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
August 25, 2005, by among the Registrant, Sunshine Merger
Corporation and SS&C Technologies, Inc. is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C Technologies,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 30, 2005
(File No. 000-28430)
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.3*
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(to be effective upon the closing of this offering)
|
|
3
|
.4*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (to be
effective upon the closing of this offering)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 23, 2005, among Sunshine
Acquisition II, Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc., the
Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013, including the form of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Note due 2013, is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to SS&C Technologies, Incs
Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended (File No.
333-135139) (the Form S-4)
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2006, among
Cogent Management Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013, is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Guarantee of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013 by Financial Models Company Ltd.,
Financial Models Holdings Inc., SS&C Fund Administration
Services LLC, OMR Systems Corporation and Open Information
Systems, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Guarantee of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013 by Cogent Management Inc. is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005,
among Sunshine Acquisition II, Inc., SS&C Technologies,
Inc. and the Guarantors named therein, as Issuers, and Wachovia
Capital Markets, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc
of America Securities LLC, as Initial Purchasers, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2005, between
Sunshine Acquisition II, Inc. and the Initial Purchasers named
in Schedule I thereto is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, executed by
SS&C Technologies, Inc., Financial Models Company Ltd.,
Financial Models Holdings Inc., SS&C Fund Administration
Services LLC, OMR Systems Corporation and Open Information
Systems, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7
to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, executed by
Cogent Management Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.8 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.9**
|
|
Specimen certificate evidencing shares of common stock
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, among Sunshine
Acquisition II, Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc., SS&C
Technologies Canada Corp., the several lenders from time to time
parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian
Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation
Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 23,
2005, made by the Registrant, Sunshine Acquisition II, Inc.,
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries in
favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
CDN Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 23,
2005, made by SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. and 3105198
Nova Scotia Company in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Toronto Branch, as Canadian Administrative Agent, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, made by Cogent
Management Inc., in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, by and
among the Registrant, Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV
Coinvestment, L.P., William C. Stone and Other Executive
Stockholders (as defined therein) is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, by
and among the Registrant, Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV
Coinvestment, L.P., William C. Stone and Other Executive
Investors (as defined therein) is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Service Provider Stockholders Agreement by and among the
Registrant, Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment, L.P.
and the Service Provider Stockholders (as defined therein) is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form S-4
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, between the
Registrant, William C. Stone and TC Group, L.L.C. is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
SS&C Technologies, Inc. Management Rights Agreement, dated
as of November 23, 2005, by and among Carlyle Partners IV, L.P.,
CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., the Registrant and SS&C
Technologies, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
1998 Stock Incentive Plan, including form of stock option
agreement, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
1999 Non-Officer Employee Stock Incentive Plan, including form
of stock option agreement, is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.11 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Option Assumption Notice for 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
and 1999 Non-Officer Employee Stock Incentive Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Dividend Equivalent Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 15, 2006 (File No.
000-28430) (the August 15, 2006 8-K)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Stock Award Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the August 15, 2006 8-K
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, by and
between William C. Stone and the Registrant is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Contract of Employment between Kevin Milne and SS&C
Technologies, Inc., effective as of June 9, 2004, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Compromise Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, between
Kevin Milne and SS&C Technologies Limited is incorporated
herein by reference to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006
(File No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Description of Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements is
incorporated herein by reference to Item 5.02 of SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
March 16, 2007 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated September 23, 1997, by and between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and Monarch Life Insurance Company,
as amended by First Amendment to Lease dated as of November 18,
1997, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 1999, between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton Limited
Partnership is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12
to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 000-28430)
(the 2004 10-K)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, effective as of July 1, 1999, between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton
Limited Partnership is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to the 2004 10-K
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease, effective as of June 7, 2005, between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton Limited
Partnership, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (File No.
000-28430) (the Q2 2005 10-Q)
|
|
10
|
.25**
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated as of November 1, 2006, by and
between SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton
Limited Partnership
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated January 6, 1998, by and between Financial
Models Company Inc. and Polaris Realty (Canada) Limited, as
amended by First Amendment of Lease, dated as of June 24,
1998, and as amended by Second Lease Amending Agreement, dated
as of November 13, 1998, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Q2 2005 10-Q
|
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of March 6, 2007, to the Credit
Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, among SS&C
Technologies, Inc., SS&C Technologies Canada Corp., as CDN
Borrower, the several banks and other financial institutions or
entities from time to time parties to the Credit Agreement as
lenders, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian
Administrative Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 9, 2007 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
21
|
**
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (included
in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consents of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
24
|
**
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included in the signature pages to this
registration statement)
|
|
99
|
.1**
|
|
Consent of Kenneth Daly
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
** |
|
Previously filed |
|
|
|
The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of
any omitted schedules to this agreement to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon its request. |
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 4 to
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Town of Windsor,
State of Connecticut on October 12, 2007.
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
William C. Stone
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement has been signed
by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ William
C. Stone
William
C. Stone
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
J. Pedonti
Patrick
J. Pedonti
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Normand
A. Boulanger
|
|
Director
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
William
A. Etherington
|
|
Director
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Allan
M. Holt
|
|
Director
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Todd
R. Newnam
|
|
Director
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Claudius
E. Watts IV
|
|
Director
|
|
October 12, 2007
|
|
|
* By: |
/s/ Patrick J. Pedonti
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
Attorney-in-fact
II-7
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Acquisition Agreement, dated February 25, 2005, by and between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and Financial Models Company Inc.
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
March 2, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated February 28, 2005, by and among
SS&C Technologies, Inc., EisnerFast LLC and EHS, LLC is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
March 3, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 28, 2005, by and
among the Registrant, Sunshine Merger Corporation and SS&C
Technologies, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 28, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
August 25, 2005, by among the Registrant, Sunshine Merger
Corporation and SS&C Technologies, Inc. is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to SS&C Technologies,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 30, 2005
(File No. 000-28430)
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.3*
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(to be effective upon the closing of this offering)
|
|
3
|
.4*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (to be
effective upon the closing of this offering)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 23, 2005, among Sunshine
Acquisition II, Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc., the
Guarantors named on the signature pages thereto, and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013, including the form of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Note due 2013, is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to SS&C Technologies, Incs
Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended (File No.
333-135139) (the Form S-4)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2006, among
Cogent Management Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013, is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Guarantee of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013 by Financial Models Company Ltd.,
Financial Models Holdings Inc., SS&C Fund Administration
Services LLC, OMR Systems Corporation and Open Information
Systems, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Guarantee of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013 by Cogent Management Inc. is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005,
among Sunshine Acquisition II, Inc., SS&C Technologies,
Inc. and the Guarantors named therein, as Issuers, and Wachovia
Capital Markets, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc
of America Securities LLC, as Initial Purchasers, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2005, between
Sunshine Acquisition II, Inc. and the Initial Purchasers named
in Schedule I thereto is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, executed by
SS&C Technologies, Inc., Financial Models Company Ltd.,
Financial Models Holdings Inc., SS&C Fund Administration
Services LLC, OMR Systems Corporation and Open Information
Systems, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7
to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, executed by
Cogent Management Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.8 to the Form S-4
|
|
4
|
.9**
|
|
Specimen certificate evidencing shares of common stock
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, among Sunshine
Acquisition II, Inc., SS&C Technologies, Inc., SS&C
Technologies Canada Corp., the several lenders from time to time
parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian
Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation
Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 23,
2005, made by the Registrant, Sunshine Acquisition II, Inc.,
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries in
favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
CDN Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 23,
2005, made by SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. and 3105198
Nova Scotia Company in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Toronto Branch, as Canadian Administrative Agent, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, made by Cogent
Management Inc., in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, by and
among the Registrant, Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV
Coinvestment, L.P., William C. Stone and Other Executive
Stockholders (as defined therein) is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, by
and among the Registrant, Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV
Coinvestment, L.P., William C. Stone and Other Executive
Investors (as defined therein) is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Service Provider Stockholders Agreement by and among the
Registrant, Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment,
L.P. and the Service Provider Stockholders (as defined therein)
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form
S-4
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Management Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, between the
Registrant, William C. Stone and TC Group, L.L.C. is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
SS&C Technologies, Inc. Management Rights Agreement, dated
as of November 23, 2005, by and among Carlyle Partners IV, L.P.,
CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., the Registrant and SS&C
Technologies, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
1998 Stock Incentive Plan, including form of stock option
agreement, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
1999 Non-Officer Employee Stock Incentive Plan, including form
of stock option agreement, is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.11 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Option Assumption Notice for 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
and 1999 Non-Officer Employee Stock Incentive Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Dividend Equivalent Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 15, 2006
(File No. 000-28430)
(the August 15, 2006 8-K)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Stock Award Agreement is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the August 15, 2006 8-K
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, by and
between William C. Stone and the Registrant is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Form S-4
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Contract of Employment between Kevin Milne and SS&C
Technologies, Inc., effective as of June 9, 2004, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Compromise Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, between
Kevin Milne and SS&C Technologies Limited is incorporated
herein by reference to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006
(File No. 000-28430)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Description of Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements is
incorporated herein by reference to Item 5.02 of SS&C
Technologies, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
March 16, 2007 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated September 23, 1997, by and between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and Monarch Life Insurance Company,
as amended by First Amendment to Lease dated as of
November 18, 1997, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (File
No. 000-28430)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 1999, between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton
Limited Partnership is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No. 000-28430) (the 2004 10-K)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, effective as of July 1, 1999, between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton Limited
Partnership is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13
to the 2004 10-K
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease, effective as of June 7, 2005, between
SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton Limited
Partnership, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (File No.
000-28430) (the Q2 2005 10-Q)
|
|
10
|
.25**
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated as of November 1, 2006, by and
between SS&C Technologies, Inc. and New Boston Lamberton
Limited Partnership
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated January 6, 1998, by and between Financial
Models Company Inc. and Polaris Realty (Canada) Limited, as
amended by First Amendment of Lease, dated as of June 24, 1998,
and as amended by Second Lease Amending Agreement, dated as of
November 13, 1998, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Q2 2005 10-Q
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of March 6, 2007, to the Credit
Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2005, among SS&C
Technologies, Inc., SS&C Technologies Canada Corp., as CDN
Borrower, the several banks and other financial institutions or
entities from time to time parties to the Credit Agreement as
lenders, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication
Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian
Administrative Agent, is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to SS&C Technologies, Inc.s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 9, 2007 (File No. 000-28430)
|
|
21
|
**
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (included
in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consents of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
24
|
**
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included in the signature pages to this
registration statement)
|
|
99
|
.1**
|
|
Consent of Kenneth Daly
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
** |
|
Previously filed |
|
|
|
The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of
any omitted schedules to this agreement to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon its request. |