e6vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington , D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006
Commission File Number: 000-25383
INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
Bangalore , Karnataka, India
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 560 100. 80-2852-0261
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g 3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to registrant in connection with Rule 12g 3-2(b).
Not Applicable
Currency of Presentation and Certain Defined Terms
In this Report, references to U.S. or United States are to the United States of America, its
territories and its possessions. References to India are to the Republic of India. References to
$ or dollars or U.S. dollars are to the legal currency of the United States and references to
Rs. or rupees or Indian rupees are to the legal currency of India. Our financial statements
are presented in Indian rupees and translated into U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with
United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or U.S. GAAP. References to Indian GAAP
are to Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. References to a particular fiscal year
are to our fiscal year ended March 31 of such year.
All references to we, us, our, Infosys or the Company shall mean Infosys Technologies
Limited, and, unless specifically indicated otherwise or the context indicates otherwise, our
consolidated subsidiaries. Infosys is a registered trademark of Infosys Technologies Limited in
the United States and India. All other trademarks or tradenames used in this Report are the
property of their respective owners.
Except as otherwise stated in this Report, all translations from Indian Rupees to U.S. dollars are
based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York on
September 29, 2006, for cable transfers in
Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which was
Rs. 45.95 per $1.00. September 29, 2006 was the last day of the quarter ended September 30, 2006
for which the noon buying rate is available. No representation is made that the Indian rupee
amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at such a rate or any
other rate. Any discrepancies in any table between totals and sums of the amounts listed are due to
rounding. Information contained in our website, www.infosys.com, is not part of this Report.
Cautionary
Note regarding Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Report contains certain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The forward-looking statements contained herein are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences
include but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this Report, as well as the sections entitled Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and our Report on Form 6-K for the three months
ended June 30, 2006. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which reflect managements analysis only as of the date of this Report. In addition,
readers should carefully review the other information in this Report and in the Companys periodic
reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from time to
time.
2
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Infosys Technologies Limited and subsidiaries
Unaudited
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
Investments in liquid mutual fund units |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Advance income taxes |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
2,220 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Client deposits |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.16 par value
600,000,000 equity shares authorized,
Issued and outstanding 551,109,960 and 555,785,001 as of
March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities And Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
2,220 |
|
|
|
|
(1) March 31, 2006 balances were obtained from audited financial statements
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
4
Infosys Technologies Limited and subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Gain on sale of long term investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per equity share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Weighted average equity shares used
in computing earnings per equity
share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
541,375,238 |
|
|
|
551,938,696 |
|
|
|
540,269,462 |
|
|
|
550,964,911 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
556,608,116 |
|
|
|
564,858,570 |
|
|
|
555,390,222 |
|
|
|
563,832,673 |
|
(2) Six
months ended September 30, 2005 figures were obtained from
audited financial statements.
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
5
Infosys Technologies Limited and subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par value |
|
|
capital |
|
|
income |
|
|
income |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005 |
|
|
541,141,098 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
923 |
|
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
|
Common stock
issued |
|
|
4,177,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Change in proportionate share of
subsidiary resulting from issuance
of stock by subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on mutual fund
investments, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as of September 30, 2005(3) |
|
|
545,319,024 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2006 |
|
|
551,109,960 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
4,675,041 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(265 |
) |
Stock
compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Income tax benefit arising on
exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Stock split effected in the form of
a stock dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2006 |
|
|
555,785,001 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
1,465 |
|
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
|
(3) Activity
for the six months period ended September 30, 2005 has been
obtained from the audited financial statements.
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
6
Infosys Technologies Limited and subsidiaries
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Stock
compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Client deposits |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
Acquisition of minority interest in subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Investment in liquid mutual fund units |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(651 |
) |
Redemption of liquid mutual fund units |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Non-current deposits placed with corporations |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Withdrawal of non-current deposits placed with corporations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Loans to employees |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock on exercise of
employee stock options |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(265 |
) |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the period |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
|
|
Supplementary information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid towards taxes |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
(4) Six
months ended September 30, 2005 cash flows were obtained from
audited financial statements
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
7
Infosys Technologies Limited and subsidiaries
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1 Company overview and significant accounting policies
1.1 Company overview
Infosys Technologies Limited (Infosys), along with its majority owned and controlled subsidiary,
Infosys BPO Limited (Infosys BPO), formerly Progeon Limited and wholly-owned subsidiaries Infosys
Technologies (Australia) Pty. Limited (Infosys Australia), Infosys Technologies (China) Co. Limited
(Infosys China), formerly Infosys Technologies (Shanghai) Co. Limited and Infosys Consulting Inc.
(Infosys Consulting) is a leading global technology services firm. The company provides end-to-end
business solutions that leverage technology. The company provides solutions that span the entire
software life cycle encompassing consulting, design, development, software re-engineering,
maintenance, systems integration, package evaluation and implementation and infrastructure
management services. In addition, the company offers software products for the banking industry and
business process management services.
1.2 Basis of preparation of financial statements and consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include Infosys and its subsidiaries (the company) and are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP). Infosys consolidates entities in which it owns or controls more than 50% of the
voting shares. The results of acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial
statements from the date of acquisition. Inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated on
consolidation.
Unaudited interim information presented in the consolidated financial statements has been prepared
by management and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments of a normal recurring
nature that are necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods shown, and is in accordance with GAAP. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in the companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006.
1.3 Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, accounting for costs and
efforts expected to be incurred to complete performance under software development arrangements,
allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, future obligations under employee benefit plans,
provisions for post-sales customer support, the useful lives of property, plant, equipment and
intangible assets and income tax valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Appropriate changes in estimates are made as management becomes aware of changes in
circumstances surrounding the estimates. Changes in estimates are reflected in the financials
statements in the period in which changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in
the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
8
1.4 Revenue recognition
The company derives revenues primarily from software development and related services, licensing of
software products and from business process management services. Arrangements with customers for
software development and related services are either on a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe or on a time
and material basis.
Revenue on time-and-material contracts is recognized as the related services are performed and
revenue from the end of the last billing to the balance sheet date is recognized as unbilled
revenues. Revenue from fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts is recognized as per the
percentage-of-completion method. Guidance has been drawn from paragraph 95 of Statement of Position
(SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, to account for revenue from fixed price arrangements for
software development and related services in conformity with SOP 81-1. The input (efforts expended)
method has been used to measure progress towards completion as there is a direct relationship
between input and productivity. Provisions for estimated losses, if any, on uncompleted contracts
are recorded in the period in which such losses become probable based on the current contract
estimates. Costs and earnings in excess of billings are classified as unbilled revenue while
billings in excess of costs and earnings are classified as unearned revenue. Maintenance revenue is
recognized ratably over the term of the underlying maintenance agreement.
The company provides its clients with a fixed-period warranty for corrections of errors and
telephone support on all its fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts. Costs associated with such
support services are accrued at the time related revenues are recorded and included in cost of
revenues. The company estimates such costs based on historical experience and estimates are
reviewed on a periodic basis for any material changes in assumptions and likelihood of occurrence.
In accordance with SOP 97-2, license fee revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the license fee is fixed and determinable, and the
collection of the fee is probable. Arrangements to deliver software products generally have three
elements: license, implementation and Annual Technical Services (ATS). The company has applied the
principles in SOP 97-2 to account for revenue from these multiple element arrangements. Vendor
specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE) has been established for ATS. VSOE is the price
charged when the element is sold separately. When other services are provided in conjunction with
the licensing arrangement, the revenue from such contracts are allocated to each component of the
contract using the residual method, whereby revenue is deferred for the undelivered services and
the residual amounts are recognized as revenue for delivered elements. In the absence of an
established VSOE for implementation, the entire arrangement fee for license and implementation is
recognized as the implementation is performed. Revenue from client training, support and other
services arising due to the sale of software products is recognized as the services are performed.
ATS revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which the services are rendered.
Revenues from business process management and other services are recognized on both, the
time-and-material and fixed-price, fixed-timeframe basis. Revenue on time-and-material contracts is
recognized as the related services are rendered. Revenue from fixed-price, fixed-timeframe
contracts is recognized as per the proportional performance method using an output measure of
performance.
When the company receives advances for services and products, such amounts are reported as client
deposits until all conditions for revenue recognition are met.
The company accounts for volume discounts and pricing incentives to customers using the guidance in
EITF Issue 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a
Reseller of the Vendors Products). The discount terms in the companys arrangements with customers
generally entitle the customer to discounts if the customer completes a specified cumulative level
of revenue transactions. In some arrangements, the level of discount varies with increases in the
levels of revenue transactions. The discounts are passed on to the customer either as check
payments or as a reduction of payments due from the customer. The company recognizes discount
obligations as a reduction of revenue based on the ratable
9
allocation of the discount to each of the underlying revenue transactions that result in progress
by the customer toward earning the discount. The company recognizes the liability based on its
estimate of the customers future purchases. Also, when the level of discount varies with increase
in levels of revenue transactions, the company recognizes the liability based on its estimate of
the customers future purchases. If the company cannot reasonably estimate the customers future
purchases, then the liability is recorded based on the maximum potential level of discount. The
company recognizes changes in the estimated amount of obligations for discounts using a cumulative
catch-up adjustment. Furthermore, the company does not recognize any revenue up front for breakages
immediately on the inception of an arrangement.
1.5 Cash and cash equivalents
The company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity at the date of
purchase / investment of three months or less and that are readily convertible to known amounts of
cash to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash and cash on deposit with
banks, and corporations.
1.6 Investments
Investments in non-readily marketable equity securities of other entities where the company is
unable to exercise significant influence and for which there are no readily determinable fair
values are recorded at cost. Declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included in
earnings.
Investment securities designated as available for sale are carried at their fair value. Fair
value is based on quoted market prices. Temporary unrealized gains and losses, net of the related
tax effect are reported as a separate component of stockholders equity until realized. Realized
gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary on available for sale
securities are included in earnings.
The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividend
income are recognized when earned.
1.7 Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The company
depreciates property, plant and equipment over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line
method. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
15 years
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
5 years |
Plant and equipment
|
|
5 years
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
2-5 years |
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
The cost of software purchased for internal use is accounted for under SOP 98-1, Accounting for the
Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Deposits paid towards the
acquisition of long lived assets that are outstanding at each balance sheet date and the cost of
assets not put to use before such date are disclosed under Capital work-in-progress. Costs of
improvements that substantially extend the useful life of particular assets are capitalized.
Repairs and maintenance cost are charged to earnings when incurred. The cost and related
accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated financial statements upon sale or
disposition of the asset.
The company evaluates the recoverability of these assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets
to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to
be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair
value of
10
the assets. Assets to be disposed are reported at the lower of the carrying value or the
fair value less the cost to sell.
1.8 Business combinations
Business combinations have been accounted using the purchase method under the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.
141, Business Combinations. Cash and amounts of consideration that are determinable at the date of
acquisition are included in determining the cost of the acquired business.
1.9 Goodwill
Goodwill represents the cost of the acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of identifiable
tangible and intangible net assets purchased. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis,
relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans and future cash flows.
Recoverability of goodwill is evaluated using a two-step process. The first step involves a
comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value. If the carrying amount of
the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the process involves a comparison of
the fair value and carrying value of the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of
the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is
recognized in an amount equal to the excess. Goodwill of a reporting unit is tested for impairment
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount.
1.10 Intangible assets
Intangible assets are amortized over their respective individual estimated useful lives on a
straight-line basis. The estimated useful life of an identifiable intangible asset is based on a
number of factors including the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic
factors (such as the stability of the industry, and known technological advances), and the level of
maintenance expenditures required to obtain the expected future cash flows from the asset.
Intangible assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held
and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets
exceeds the fair value of the assets.
1.11 Research and development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Software product development costs are
expensed as incurred until technological feasibility is achieved. Research and development costs
and software development costs incurred under contractual arrangements with customers are accounted
for as cost of revenues.
1.12 Foreign currency
The functional currency of the company and Infosys BPO is the Indian rupee (Rs.). The functional
currency for Infosys Australia, Infosys China and Infosys Consulting is the respective local
currency. The consolidated financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars. The translation of
Rs. to U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rate in effect at
the balance sheet date and for revenue, expense and cash-flow items using a monthly average
exchange rate for the respective periods. The gains or losses resulting from such translation are
included in Other comprehensive income, a separate
11
component of stockholders equity. The translation of the financial statements of foreign
subsidiaries from the local currency to the functional currency of the company is also performed on
the same basis.
Foreign-currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into the functional currency at
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The gains or losses resulting from such
translation are included in earnings. Transaction gains or losses realized upon settlement of
foreign currency transactions are included in determining net income for the period in which the
transaction is settled. Revenue, expense and cash-flow items denominated in foreign currencies are
translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate in effect on the date of the
transaction.
1.13 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average
number of equity shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by
dividing net income by the diluted weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution from equity shares issuable
through employee stock options. The dilutive effect of employee
stock options is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock
method. The dilutive effect of convertible securities is reflected in diluted earnings per share by
application of the if-converted method. If securities have been issued by a subsidiary that enable
their holders to obtain the subsidiarys common stock, the earnings of the subsidiary shall be
included in the consolidated diluted earnings per share computations based on the consolidated
groups holding of the subsidiarys securities.
If the number of common shares outstanding increases as a result of a stock dividend or stock split
or decreases as a result of a reverse stock split, the computations of basic and diluted earnings
per share are adjusted retroactively for all periods presented to reflect that change in capital
structure. If such changes occur after the close of the reporting period but before issuance of the
financial statements, the per-share computations for that period and any prior-period financial
statements presented are based on the new number of shares.
1.14 Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized as
income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. The measurement of deferred tax
assets is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits of which future
realization is not more likely than not. Changes in valuation allowance from period to period are
reflected in the income statement of the period of change. Deferred taxes are not provided on the
undistributed earnings of subsidiaries outside India where it is expected that the earnings of the
foreign subsidiary will be permanently reinvested. Tax benefits of deductions earned on exercise of
employee stock options in excess of compensation charged to earnings are credited to additional
paid in capital. The income tax provision for the interim period is based on the best estimate of
the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year.
1.15 Fair value of financial instruments
In determining the fair value of its financial instruments, the company uses a variety of methods
and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date.
The methods used to determine fair value include discounted cash flow analysis and dealer quotes.
All methods of assessing fair value result in general approximation of value, and such value may
never actually be realized.
12
1.16 Concentration of risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, investment securities and hedging
instruments. By nature, all such financial instruments involve risk, including the credit risk of
non-performance by counterparties. In managements opinion, as of March 31, 2006 and September 30,
2006 there was no significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance of the counterparties to
these financial instruments, other than the amounts already provided for in the financial
statements, if any. Exposure to credit risk is managed through credit approvals, establishing
credit limits and monitoring procedures. The factors which affect the fluctuations in the companys
provisions for bad debts and write offs for uncollectible accounts include the financial health and
economic environment of the clients. The company specifically identifies the potential credit loss
and then makes the provision. The companys cash resources are invested with corporations,
financial institutions and banks with high investment grade credit ratings. Limits are established
by the company as to the maximum amount of cash that may be invested with any such single entity.
1.17 Derivative financial instruments
The company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward and option
contracts to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivable and
forecasted cash flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. The counterparty for these
contracts is generally a bank. Although the company believes that these financial instruments
constitute hedges from an economic perspective, they do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS
133, as amended. Any derivative that is either not designated a hedge, or is so designated but is
ineffective per SFAS 133, is marked to market and recognized in earnings immediately and included
in other income, net.
1.18 Retirement benefits to employees
1.18.1 Gratuity
In accordance with the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Infosys provides for gratuity, a defined
benefit retirement plan (the Gratuity Plan) covering eligible employees. The Gratuity Plan provides
a lump-sum payment to vested employees at retirement, death, incapacitation or termination of
employment, of an amount based on the respective employees salary and the tenure of employment.
Liabilities with regard to the Gratuity Plan are determined by actuarial valuation. The company
fully contributes all ascertained liabilities to the Infosys Technologies Limited Employees
Gratuity Fund Trust (the Trust). In case of Infosys BPO, contributions are made to the Infosys
BPOs Employees Gratuity Fund Trust. Trustees administer contributions made to the Trusts and
contributions are invested in specific designated instruments as permitted by law and investments
are also made in mutual funds that invest in the specific designated instruments.
13
1.18.2 Superannuation
Certain employees of Infosys are also participants in a defined contribution plan. Until March
2005, the company made monthly contributions under the superannuation plan (the Plan) to the
Infosys Technologies Limited Employees Superannuation Fund Trust based on a specified percentage
of each covered employees salary. The company has no further obligations to the Plan beyond its
monthly contributions. Certain employees of Infosys BPO Ltd are also eligible for superannuation
benefit. Infosys BPO makes monthly provisions under the superannuation plan based on a specified
percentage of each covered employees salary. Infosys BPO has no further obligations to the
superannuation plan beyond its monthly provisions which are periodically contributed to a trust
fund, the corpus of which is invested with the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
Effective April
1, 2005, a portion of the monthly contribution amount was paid directly to the employees as an
allowance and the balance amount was contributed to the trusts.
1.18.3 Provident fund
Eligible employees of Infosys receive benefits from a provident fund, which is a defined
contribution plan. Both the employee and the company make monthly contributions to the provident
fund plan equal to a specified percentage of the covered employees salary. The company contributes
a part of the contributions to the Infosys Technologies Limited Employees Provident Fund Trust.
The remaining portion is contributed to the government administered pension fund. The rate at which
the annual interest is payable to the beneficiaries by the trust is being administered by the
government. The company has an obligation to fund any shortfall on the yield of the trusts
investments over the administered interest rates.
In respect of Infosys BPO, eligible employees receive benefits from a provident fund, which is a
defined contribution plan. Both the employee and Infosys BPO make monthly contributions to this
provident fund plan equal to a specified percentage of the covered employees salary. Amounts
collected under the provident fund plan are deposited in a government administered provident fund.
1.19 Stock-based compensation
Until March 31, 2006, the company applied the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed
by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions
involving Stock Compensation an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25, issued in March 2000, to
account for its fixed stock option plans. Under this method, compensation expense was recorded on
the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise
price. SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, established accounting and disclosure
requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
plans. As allowed by SFAS 123, the Company elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based
method of accounting described above, and adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 123 until March 2006.
14
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for the three
months ended and six months ended September 30, 2005 and if the company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to
stock-based employee compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based
employee compensation expense
determined under fair value
based method for all awards,
net of related tax effects |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
From April 1, 2006, the company adopted
FASB Statement No.123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
using the modified prospective approach. The company recorded stock compensation
expense of $1 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and $2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2006, using the fair value
recognition provisions.
The impact on the companys financial
statements for the three months ended and six months
ended September 30, 2006 due to the adoption of FASB Statement No.123 (revised 2004), Share Based
Payment using the modified prospective approach is given below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Details |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Earnings per equity share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There have been no grants of stock options by Infosys during the six months ended September 30,
2006. As of September 30, 2006, the unamortized stock
compensation expenses under the companys 1998 and
1999 option plans was $1 million and the same is expected to be amortized over a weighted average
period of approximately one year.
The unamortized stock compensation expense under the Infosys
BPOs 2002 Plans was $4 million and the same is expected to be amortized over a weighted average
period of approximately two years.
The fair value of each option granted by Infosys BPO is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Dividend yield % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term |
|
1-6 years |
|
|
|
|
|
1-6 years |
|
|
1-6 years |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
15
1.20 Dividends
Final dividends on common stock are recorded as a liability on the date of declaration by the
stockholders and interim dividends are recorded as a liability on the date of declaration by the
board of directors.
1.21 Equity issued by subsidiaries
Changes in the proportionate share of Infosys in the equity of subsidiaries resulting from
additional equity issued by the subsidiaries are accounted for as an equity transaction in
consolidation.
1.22 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 provides guidance on determination of fair value,
and lays down the fair value hierarchy to classify the source of information used in fair value
measurements. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement and will adopt
the guidelines stated in SFAS 157 from fiscal year beginning April 1, 2007.
In 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 158 Employers accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. New Statement 158 requires the company to
recognize on balance sheets the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans-as
of March 31, 2007. The company is required to recognize actuarial gains and losses, prior service
cost, and any remaining transition amounts from the initial application of Statements 87 and 106
when recognizing a plans funded status, with the offset to accumulated other comprehensive income.
Statement 158 will also require fiscal-year-end measurements of plan assets and benefit
obligations. The new Statement amends Statements 87, 88, 106, and 132R, but retains most of their
measurement and disclosure guidance and will not change the amounts recognized in the income
statement as net periodic benefit cost. The company does not believe that adoption of SFAS 158
will have a material impact on the financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48
applies to all tax positions within the scope of Statement 109 and clarifies when and how to
recognize tax benefits in the financial statements with a two-step approach of recognition and
measurement. Fin No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN No. 48
also requires the enterprise to make explicit disclosures about uncertainties in their income tax
positions, including a detailed roll forward of tax benefits taken that do not qualify for
financial statement recognition. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this
pronouncement and will adopt the guidelines stated FIN No. 48 from fiscal year beginning April 1,
2007.
2 Notes to the Unaudited consolidated financial statements
2.1 Cash and cash equivalents
The cost and fair values for cash and cash equivalents are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of, |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Cost and fair values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and bank deposits |
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
Deposits with corporations |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006 include restricted cash
balances in the amount of $1 million. The restrictions are primarily on account of unclaimed
dividends.
2.2 Trade accounts receivable
Trade accounts receivable as of March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $2 million and $5 million, amounted to $361 million and $454 million. The age
profile of trade accounts receivable, net of allowances, is given below.
In %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Period (in days) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 30 |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
31 60 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
61 90 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
More than 90 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
16
2.3 Business combination
On January 2, 2004 the company acquired, for cash, 100% of the equity in Expert Information
Services Pty. Limited, Australia for approximately $14 million. The acquired company was renamed as Infosys Technologies (Australia) Pty. Limited.
There is a further contingent consideration payable to the sellers subject to continued employment
and meeting of defined operating and financial performance parameters. The contingent consideration
is accounted as compensation.
2.4 Acquisition of minority interest in Infosys BPO
On June 30, 2006, Infosys acquired 8,750,000 equity shares of Infosys BPO from Citicorp
International Finance Corporation (CIFC) for a consideration of $116 million. As of September 30,
2006, Infosys holds 96.70% of the outstanding equity shares of Infosys BPO.
The purchase price has been allocated based on managements estimates and independent
appraisals of fair value as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Component |
|
Purchase price allocated |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Net current assets |
|
|
13 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Customer contracts |
|
|
19 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
The identified customer contracts intangible is being amortized over a period of four years, being
managements estimate of the useful life of the asset.
17
Gross intangible asset as of September 30, 2006 was $19 million and the accumulated amortization
cost of intangible asset was $1 million as of September 30,
2006. The aggregate amortization cost of
intangible asset for the six months ended September 30, 2006 was $1 million. The estimated
aggregate amortization expense of intangible asset for each of the five succeeding annual fiscal
periods (or portion thereof, as indicated below) as of September 30, 2006 are as detailed below.
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
Year ending March 31, |
|
cost |
Remainder of 2007 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
The company believes that the acquisition resulted in recognition of goodwill primarily because of
the acquired entitys market position, skilled employees, management strength and potential to
serve as a platform for enhancing business opportunities in the business process management area.
2.5 Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Rent deposits |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Security deposits with service providers |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Loans to employees |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
Other current assets as of September 30, 2006 include $4 million advanced to the Infosys
Technologies Limited Employees Gratuity Fund Trust. Other
current assets include marked to market gains on
foreign exchange forward and option contracts. Deposits with service providers relate principally
to leased telephone lines and electricity supplies.
2.6 Property, plant and equipment net
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Plant and equipment |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Capital work-in-progress |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
491 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
18
Depreciation expense amounted to $40 million and $50 million for the six months ended September 30,
2005 and 2006 respectively. The amount of third party software amortized during the six months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 was $15 million and $19 million respectively.
2.7 Other assets
Other assets consist of the following:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion of loans to employees |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Non-current deposits with corporations |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Others |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
2.8 Loans to employees
The company provides loans to eligible employees in accordance with policy. No loans have been made
to employees in connection with purchase of the companys equity securities by all employees. The
employee loans are repayable over fixed periods ranging from 1 to 100 months. The annual rates of
interest at which the loans have been made to employees vary between 0% through 4%. Loans
aggregating $28 million and $25 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2006 and September 30,
2006.
The required repayments of employee loans outstanding as of September 30, 2006 are as detailed
below.
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment in the 12 months ending September 30, |
|
Repayment |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
2008 |
|
|
3 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
The estimated fair values of the receivables for loan to employees amounted to $24 million as of
March 31, 2006 and $22 million as of September 30, 2006. These amounts have been determined using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is
required to develop these estimates of fair value. Consequently, these estimates are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that the company could realize in the market.
19
2.9 Other accrued liabilities
Other accrued liabilities comprise the following:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation to staff |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
Provision for post sales client support |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Withholding taxes payable |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Provision for expenses |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Retainage |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Others |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
Provision for expenses primarily consists of accrued expenses relating to overseas travel expenses,
cost of technical sub-contractors, telecommunication charges, rental charges, professional charges,
brand building charges and office maintenance.
2.10 Non-current liabilities
Non-current liability of $5 million as of 31 March 2006 and 30 September 2006 consists of a
committed consideration for transfer of intellectual property rights in a commercial software
application product. The agreement was entered in fiscal 2003 and the amount was payable within ten
years of contract date. The company has subsequently settled the liability by paying cash
consideration.
2.11 Employee post-retirement benefits
2.11.1 Gratuity
Net gratuity cost was $2 million and $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and
2006 respectively. The significant component of net gratuity cost was service cost of approximately
$2 million and $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Interest cost was nil during the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively and
expected return on plan assets was nil and $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005
and 2006, respectively.
Net gratuity cost was $4 million and $4 million for the six months ended September 30, 2005 and
2006 respectively. The significant component of net gratuity cost is service cost of approximately
$4 million and $5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Interest cost and expected return on plan assets was $ 1 million and $1 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2005 and $1 million and $2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively.
The
company has contributed $9 million in the six months ended September 30, 2006 and expects to
contribute approximately $2 million to the gratuity trust during the remainder of fiscal 2007.
2.11.2 Superannuation
From April 1, 2005, a portion of the monthly contribution amount has been paid directly
to the employees as an allowance and the balance has been contributed to the trusts. $3 million was
contributed to the trusts during the six months ended September 30, 2006.
20
2.11.3 Provident fund
The
company contributed to the provident fund $4 million and
$5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2005
and 2006, respectively and $7 million and $9 million during
the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
2.12 Stockholders equity
Infosys has only one class of capital stock referred to as equity shares. On June 10, 2006, the
members of the company approved a 1:1 bonus issue on the equity shares of the company. The bonus
issue has the nature of a stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend with 1 additional
share being issued for every share held. The computations of basic and diluted EPS have also been
adjusted retroactively for all periods presented to reflect the change in capital structure. All
references in these financial statements to number of shares, per share amounts and exercise price
of stock option grants are retroactively restated to reflect stock splits made.
The rights of equity shareholders are set out below.
2.12.1 Voting
Each holder of equity shares is entitled to one vote per share. The equity shares represented by
American Depositary Shares (ADS) carry similar rights to voting and dividends as the other equity
shares. Each ADS represents one underlying equity share.
2.12.2 Dividends
Should the company declare and pay dividends, such dividends will be paid in Indian rupees. Indian
law mandates that any dividend be declared out of distributable profits only after the transfer of
a specified percentage of net income computed in accordance with current regulations to a general
reserve. Moreover, the remittance of dividends outside India is governed by Indian law on foreign
exchange and is subject to applicable taxes.
2.12.3 Liquidation
In the event of liquidation of the company, the holders of common stock shall be entitled to
receive any of the remaining assets of the company, after distribution of all preferential amounts.
The amounts will be in proportion to the number of equity shares held by the stockholders.
2.12.4 Stock options
There are no voting, dividend or liquidation rights to the holders of options issued under the
companys stock option plans.
2.13 Preferred stock of subsidiary
Infosys holds a majority of the equity share capital of Infosys BPO. The equity shares have been
issued to Infosys as per the terms of the stock subscription agreement signed in April 2002,
between Infosys, Citicorp International Finance Corporation (CIFC) and Infosys BPO. 12,250,000
equity shares have been issued to Infosys in each of April 2002 and March 2004 for an aggregate
consideration approximating $5 million. Pursuant to the agreement, CIFC was issued 4,375,000
(0.0005%) cumulative convertible preference shares in each of June 2002 and March 2004 for an
aggregate consideration approximating $20 million.
21
On June 30, 2005,
the preference shares were converted to equity shares of Infosys BPO as per the terms of the stock
subscription agreement.
As of March 31, 2006, CIFC held 8,750,000 equity shares of Infosys BPO.
Infosys percentage ownership in Infosys BPO immediately before and immediately after the
conversion of preference shares was 99.5% and 73.4% respectively. The transaction resulted in a
change of $12 million in the proportionate share of Infosys in the equity of Infosys BPO and the
change has been accounted for as an equity transaction in consolidation.
On June 30, 2006, Infosys acquired 8,750,000 equity shares of Infosys BPO from CIFC for a
consideration of $116 million. As of September 30, 2006, Infosys holds 96.70% of the outstanding
equity shares of Infosys BPO.
2.14 Non-Operating income
In fiscal 2005, the Company sold its investment in Yantra Corporation. The carrying value of the
investment in Yantra Corporation was completely written down in fiscal 1999. Consideration received
from the sale resulted in a gain of $11 million during fiscal 2005. Further consideration of $1
million was received during the six months ended September 30, 2006 resulting in a gain of $1
million for the period.
Other income, net, for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 consists
of the following:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Income from mutual fund investments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Foreign exchange gains/(losses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Income from mutual fund investments |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Foreign exchange gains/(losses), net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
2.15 Research and development
Research and development expenses were
$6 million and $9 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively and $12 million and $16 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
2.16 Employees Stock Offer Plans (ESOP)
In September 1994, the company established the 1994 plan, which provided for the issue of
48,000,000 warrants, as adjusted, to eligible employees. The warrants were issued to an employee
welfare trust (the Trust). In 1997, in anticipation of a share dividend to be declared by the
company, the Trust exercised all warrants held by it and converted them into equity shares. As and
when the Trust issued options / stock to eligible employees, the difference between the market
price and the exercise price was accounted as deferred stock compensation expense and amortized
over the vesting period. The 1994 plan lapsed in fiscal 2000, and consequently no further shares
will be issued to employees under this plan.
1998 Employees Stock Offer Plan (the 1998 Plan): The companys 1998 Plan provides for the grant of
non-statutory stock options and incentive stock options to employees of the company. The
establishment of the 1998 Plan was approved by the Board of Directors in December 1997 and by the
stockholders in January 1998. The Government of India has approved the 1998 Plan, subject to a
limit of 11,760,000 equity shares representing 11,760,000 ADS to be issued under the 1998 Plan.
Unless terminated sooner, the 1998 Plan
22
will terminate automatically in January 2008. All options under the 1998 Plan will be exercisable
for equity shares represented by ADSs. The 1998 Plan is administered by a Compensation Committee
comprising four members, all of who are independent directors on the Board of Directors. All
options under the 1998 Plan are exercisable for equity shares represented by ADSs.
1999 Stock Offer Plan (the 1999 Plan): In fiscal 2000, the company instituted the 1999 Plan. The
stockholders and the Board of Directors approved the 1999 Plan in June 1999. The 1999 Plan provides
for the issue of 52,800,000 equity shares to employees. The 1999 Plan is administered by a
Compensation Committee comprising four members, all of who are independent directors on the Board
of Directors. Under the 1999 Plan, options will be issued to employees at an exercise price, which
shall not be less than the fair market value (FMV). Under the 1999 Plan, options may also be issued
to employees at exercise prices that are less than FMV only if specifically approved by the members
of the company in a general meeting. All options under the 1999 plan are exercisable for equity
shares.
The options under the 1998 Plan and 1999 Plan vest over a period of one through four years and
expire five years from the date of completion of vesting.
The activity in the options of the 1998 and 1999 ESOP during the six months ended September 30,
2005 and 2006 are set out below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
|
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
arising |
|
|
average |
|
|
arising |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
out of |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
out of |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
options |
|
|
price |
|
|
options |
|
|
price |
|
|
1998 Option plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the Period |
|
|
6,108,580 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
4,546,480 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(67,656 |
) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
(137,360 |
) |
|
$ |
41 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(547,460 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
(675,571 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the period |
|
|
5,493,464 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
3,733,549 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period |
|
|
4,205,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,353,433 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
1999 Option plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the Period |
|
|
28,109,874 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
19,179,074 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(231,032 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
(53,265 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(3,630,466 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
(3,999,470 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the period |
|
|
24,248,376 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
15,126,339 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period |
|
|
19,960,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,991,897 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended September 30, 2006,
under the 1998 option plan and 1999 option plan was $14 million and $92 million respectively. The
aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended September 30, 2005 under
1998 option plan and 1999 option plan was $9 million and $46 million respectively.
As of September 30, 2006, options outstanding under the 1998 option plan and 1999 option plan had
an aggregate intrinsic value of $104 million and $419 million respectively and a weighted-average
remaining contractual term of 2.89 years and 2.65 years respectively. As of September 30, 2006,
options exercisable under the 1998 option plan and 1999 option plan had an aggregate intrinsic
value of $91 million and $ 385 million respectively and a weighted-average remaining contractual
term of 2.59 years and 2.44 years respectively.
Infosys BPOs 2002 Plan provides for the grant of stock options to its employees and was approved
by its Board of Directors and stockholders in June 2002. All options under the 2002 Plan are
exercisable for
23
equity shares. The 2002 Plan is administered by a Compensation Committee whose members are
directors of Infosys BPO. The 2002 Plan provides for the issue of 5,250,000 equity shares to
employees, at an exercise price, which shall not be less than the FMV. Options may also be issued
to employees at exercise prices that are less than FMV only if specifically approved by the members
of Infosys BPO in a general meeting. The options issued under the 2002 Plan vest in periods ranging
between one through six years, although accelerated vesting based on performance conditions is
provided in certain instances.
The activity in Infosys BPOs 2002 Plan during the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 are
set out below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
arising |
|
|
average |
|
|
arising |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
out of |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
Out of |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
options |
|
|
price |
|
|
options |
|
|
price |
|
|
|
|
Infosys BPOs 2002 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the
beginning of the
period |
|
|
3,116,518 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
|
2,452,330 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
Granted |
|
|
808,300 |
|
|
$ |
4.53 |
|
|
|
593,300 |
|
|
$ |
13.16 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(291,206 |
) |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
|
(241,862 |
) |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(365,512 |
) |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
(234,029 |
) |
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
|
Outstanding at the end
of the period |
|
|
3,268,100 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
|
2,569,739 |
|
|
$ |
5.44 |
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period |
|
|
906,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,626 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted by Infosys BPO during the six months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 was $1.73 and $6.65 respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of
options exercised under the Infosys BPOs 2002 plan was $5 million and $3 million during the six
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006.
As of September 30, 2006, options outstanding and exercisable under the Infosys BPOs 2002 plan had
an aggregate intrinsic value of $20 million and $5 million respectively and a weighted average
remaining contractual term of 3.97 years and 2.77 years respectively.
2.17 Income taxes
The provision for income taxes for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2005 and
2006 in the income statement comprises:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic taxes |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Foreign taxes |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign taxes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate taxes |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic taxes |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Foreign taxes |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic taxes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Foreign taxes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate taxes |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
All components of the aggregate taxes of $16 million and $26 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 respectively and $34 million and $49 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 respectively are allocated to the continuing operations of the company.
The tax effects of significant temporary differences that resulted in deferred tax assets and
liabilities, and a description of the financial statement items that created these differences are
as follows:
24
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of, |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Investments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Compensated absences and other accruals |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realisability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the level of historical taxable income
and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are
deductible, management believes that it is more likely than not the company will realize the
benefits of those deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance at September 30,
2006. The valuation allowance relates to investments. The amount of deferred tax assets considered
realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during
the carry forward period are reduced.
The provision for foreign taxes is due to income taxes payable overseas, principally in the United
States of America. The company benefits from certain significant tax incentives provided to
software firms under Indian tax laws. These incentives presently include those for facilities set
up under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and an exemption from payment of Indian corporate
income taxes for a period of ten consecutive years of operation of software development facilities
designated as Software Technology Parks (the STP Tax Holiday). The Government of India has
amended the tax incentives available to companies set up in designated STPs. The period of the STP
Tax Holiday available to such companies is restricted to ten consecutive years, beginning from the
financial year when the unit started producing computer software or April 1, 1999, whichever is
earlier. The tax holidays on all facilities under STPs expire in stages by 2009. Under the Special
Economic Zones Act, 2005 scheme, units in designated special economic zones which begin providing
services on or after April 1, 2005 will be eligible for a deduction of 100 percent of profits or
gains derived from the export of services for the first five years from commencement of provision
of services and 50 percent of such profits or gains for a further five years. Certain tax benefits
are also available for a further five years subject to the unit meeting defined conditions.
Infosys is subject to a 15% Branch Profit Tax (BPT) in the U.S. to the extent its U.S. branchs net
profit during the year is greater than the increase in the net assets of the U.S. branch during the
fiscal year, computed in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. At March 31, 2006, Infosys US
branch net assets amounted to approximately $261 million. As of September 30, 2006, the company has
not triggered the
BPT and intends to maintain the current level of its net assets in the US, as it is consistent with
its business plan. Accordingly, a BPT provision has not been recorded.
25
2.18 Earnings per share
The following is a reconciliation of the equity shares used in the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per equity share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per equity share weighted average
number of common shares outstanding excluding
unallocated shares of ESOP |
|
|
541,375,238 |
|
|
|
551,938,696 |
|
Effect of dilutive common equivalent shares stock
options outstanding |
|
|
15,232,878 |
|
|
|
12,919,874 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per equity share weighted average
number of common shares and common equivalent
shares outstanding |
|
|
556,608,116 |
|
|
|
564,858,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per equity share weighted average
number of common shares outstanding excluding
unallocated shares of ESOP |
|
|
540,269,462 |
|
|
|
550,964,911 |
|
Effect of dilutive common equivalent shares stock
options outstanding |
|
|
15,120,760 |
|
|
|
12,867,762 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per equity share weighted average
number of common shares and common equivalent
shares outstanding |
|
|
555,390,222 |
|
|
|
563,832,673 |
|
Options to purchase 273,508 shares under the 1998 Plan were not considered for calculating diluted
earnings per share for the six months ended September 30, 2006 as their effect was anti-dilutive.
All references in these financial statements to number of shares, per share amounts and exercise
price of stock option grants are retroactively restated to reflect stock splits made.
2.19 Derivative financial instruments
The company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward and option
contracts to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivable and
forecasted cash flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. The counterparty for these
contracts is generally a bank. Infosys held foreign exchange forward contracts of $119 million as
of March 31, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, Infosys held foreign exchange forward contracts of
$98 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 1 million. The foreign exchange forward contracts mature between 1 to 12 months. As of March 31,
2006, the company held put options of $4 million, call options of $8 million and range barrier
options of $210 million, Euro 3 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 3 million. As of
September 30, 2006, the company held range barrier options of $240 million, Euro 10 million and
United Kingdom Pound Sterling 11 million.
2.20 Segment reporting
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments
and related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The
companys operations predominantly relate to providing IT solutions, delivered to customers located
globally, across various industry segments. The Chief Operating Decision Maker evaluates the
companys performance and allocates resources based on an analysis of various performance
indicators by industry classes and geographic segmentation of customers. Accordingly, revenues
represented along industry classes comprise the principal basis of segmental information set out in
these financial statements. Secondary segmental reporting is performed on the basis of the
geographical location of customers. The accounting principles used in the preparation of the
financial statements are consistently applied to record revenue and expenditure in individual
segments, and are as set out in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Industry segments for the company are primarily financial services comprising enterprises providing
banking, finance and insurance services, manufacturing enterprises, enterprises in the
telecommunications (telecom) and retail industries, and others such as utilities, transportation
and logistics companies. Geographic segmentation is based on business sourced from that geographic
region and delivered from
26
both on-site and off-shore. North America comprises the United States of
America, Canada and Mexico; Europe includes continental Europe (both the east and the west),
Ireland and the United Kingdom; and the Rest of the World comprising all other places except those
mentioned above and India.
Revenue in relation to segments is categorized based on items that are individually identifiable to
that segment, while expenditure is categorized in relation to the associated turnover of the
segment. Allocated expenses of the geographic segments include expenses incurred for rendering
services from the companys offshore software development centers and on-site expenses. Certain
expenses such as depreciation, which form a significant component of total expenses, are not
specifically allocable to specific segments as the underlying assets are used interchangeably.
Management believes that it is not practical to provide segment disclosures relating to those costs
and expenses, and accordingly these expenses are separately disclosed as unallocated and adjusted
only against the total income of the company.
Fixed assets used in the companys business are not identified to any of the reportable segments,
as these are used interchangeably between segments. Management believes that it is currently not
practicable to provide segment disclosures relating to total assets and liabilities since a
meaningful segregation of the available data is onerous.
Geographical information on revenue and industry revenue information is collated based on
individual customers invoiced or in relation to which the revenue is otherwise recognized.
27
2.20.1 Industry segments
(Dollars in millions)
Three months ended
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
Identifiable operating
expenses |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
Gain on sale of long term
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
Identifiable operating
expenses |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
Gain on sale of long term
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
Six months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Identifiable operating expenses |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
Identifiable operating
expenses |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
Gain on sale of long term
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
2.20.2 Geographic segments
(Dollars in millions)
Three months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
India |
|
|
Rest of the |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
Identifiable operating expenses |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
Gain on sale of long term
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
India |
|
|
Rest of the |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
Identifiable operating
expenses |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
Gain on sale of long term
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
Six months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
India |
|
|
Rest of the |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Identifiable operating
expenses |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
India |
|
|
Rest of the |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
Identifiable operating
expenses |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Allocated expenses |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
Segmental operating income |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Unallocable expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
Gain on sale of long term
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
2.20.3 Significant clients
No client individually accounted for more than 10% of the revenues in the six months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006.
2.21 Litigation
The company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of
its business. Legal actions, when ultimately concluded and determined, will not, in the opinion of
management, have a material effect on the results of operations or the financial position of the
company.
2.22 Commitments and contingencies
As of
September 30, 2006 the company had contractual commitments for
capital expenditure of $116 million.
The company has outstanding performance guarantees for various statutory purposes totaling $6
million and $7 million as of March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006. These guarantees are generally
provided to governmental agencies.
2.23 Tax contingencies
During fiscal 2006, the company received a demand from the Indian tax authorities for payment of
additional tax of $30 million, including interest of $7 million, upon completion of their tax
review for fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003. The tax demand is mainly on account of disallowance of a
portion of the deduction to its taxable income under Indian law claimed by the company under
Section 10A of the Income-tax Act. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act is determined
by the ratio of Export Turnover to Total Turnover. The disallowance arose from certain expenses
incurred in foreign currency being reduced from Export Turnover but not reduced from Total Turnover
also.
The company is contesting the demand and management, including its tax advisers, believes that its
position will likely be upheld in the appellate process. No tax expense has been accrued in the
financial statements for the tax demand raised. Management believes that the ultimate outcome of
this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the companys financial position and
results of operations. For the demand pertaining to fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003, the position of
the Company has been substantially upheld by the appellate authority.
30
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
In addition to historical information, this discussion contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. When used in this discussion, the words
anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, project, seek, should, will and
other similar expressions as they relate to us or our business are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to certain
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include but are not
limited to, those discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report, as well as the section entitled Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and our Quarterly Report on Form 6-K for the quarter ended June
30, 2006. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which reflect managements analysis only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. The following
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements included herein
and the notes thereto. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are a leading global technology services company founded in 1981, and headquartered in
Bangalore, India. We provide comprehensive end-to-end business solutions that leverage technology
for our clients, including consulting, design, development, software re-engineering, maintenance,
systems integration, package evaluation and implementation and infrastructure management services.
We also provide software products to the banking industry. Through Infosys BPO (formerly Progeon),
we provide business process management services such as offsite customer relationship management,
finance and accounting, and administration and sales order processing. Our clients rely on our
solutions to enhance their business performance. Progeon Limited, our business process outsourcing
subsidiary, was renamed Infosys BPO Limited effective August 29, 2006. Infosys
Technologies (Shanghai) Co. Limited was renamed Infosys Technologies (China) Co. Limited during the
quarter ended September 30, 2006.
We completed our initial public offering of equity shares in India in 1993 and our initial public
offering of ADSs in the United States in 1999. In August 2003, we completed a sponsored secondary
offering of ADSs in the United States on behalf of our shareholders. In June 2005, we completed a
second sponsored secondary offering of ADSs in the United States on behalf of our shareholders, the
largest international equity offering out of India at the time. This offering included a public
offering without listing in Japan. We did not receive any of the proceeds from our sponsored
secondary offerings. On October 11, 2006, our Board of Directors approved the sponsoring of a
secondary offering of ADSs of up to 30 million ADSs against equity shares to be sold by our
shareholders in India. The Board has convened an extraordinary general meeting of the members of
the Company on November 7, 2006 to seek approval for the Offering.
The following table sets forth our growth in revenue, net income and number of employees from
fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2006:
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compound |
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Growth Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
545 |
|
|
$ |
2,152 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
Approximate number of employees at the end of the fiscal year |
|
|
10,700 |
|
|
|
52,700 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
% |
As of September 30, 2006, we had approximately 66,100 employees.
The following table sets forth our growth in revenue and net income for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 over the comparable period in 2005:
31
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
Our
revenue growth is attributed to a number of factors including an increase in the size and
number of projects executed for existing and new clients, as well as an expansion in the solutions
suites that we provide to our clients. For fiscal 2005, fiscal 2006, and the six months ended September
30, 2006, 95.4%, 95.0% and 96.4% of our revenue came from repeat business, which we define as
revenue from a client who also contributed to our revenue during the prior fiscal year.
We are
able to seamlessly deliver our onsite and offshore capabilities using
a distributed project management methodology that we refer to as our Global Delivery Model.
We divide projects into components that we execute simultaneously at client sites and at our
geographically dispersed development centers in India and around the world. Our Global Delivery
Model allows us to provide clients with high quality solutions in
reduced time-frames enabling them to achieve operational efficiencies.
The following table sets forth our revenues by geographic segments for fiscal 2006 and the six
months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Geographic Segments |
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
|
September 30,2006 |
|
|
North America |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
|
|
63.8 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
India |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Rest of the World |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
On June 30, 2006, we acquired 8,750,000 equity shares of Infosys BPO Limited from Citicorp
International Finance Corporation (CIFC) for a consideration of $116 million. As of September 30,
2006, Infosys holds 96.70% of the outstanding equity shares of Infosys BPO Limited.
Furthermore, at our Annual General Meeting held on June 10, 2006, our shareholders approved a final
dividend of approximately $0.09 per equity share and a Silver Jubilee special dividend of
approximately $0.33 per equity share, which has resulted in a cash outflow of approximately $265
million, including corporate dividend tax. Our Board of Directors, in its meeting on October 11,
2006 has approved payment of an interim dividend of approximately $0.11 per equity share for fiscal
2007. The dividend payment is expected to result in a cash outflow of approximately $69 million
including corporate dividend taxes.
Revenues
Our revenues are generated principally from technology services provided on either a
time-and-materials or a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe basis. Revenues from services provided on a
time-and-materials basis are recognized as the
related services are performed. Revenues from services provided on a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe
basis are recognized pursuant to the percentage of completion method. Most of our client contracts,
including those that are on a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe basis can be terminated by clients with
or without cause, without penalties and with short notice periods between zero and 90 days. Since
we collect revenues on contracts as portions of the contracts are completed, terminated contracts
are only subject to collection for portions of the contract completed through the time of
termination. Our contracts do not contain specific termination-related penalty provisions. In order
to manage and anticipate the risk of early or abrupt contract terminations, we monitor the progress
on all contracts and change orders according to their characteristics and the circumstances in
which they occur. This includes a focused review of our
32
ability and our clients ability to perform
on the contract, a review of extraordinary conditions that may lead to a contract termination, as
well as historical client performance considerations. Since we also bear the risk of cost overruns
and inflation with respect to fixed-price, fixed-timeframe projects, our operating results could be
adversely affected by inaccurate estimates of contract completion costs and dates, including wage
inflation rates and currency exchange rates that may affect cost projections. Losses on contracts,
if any, are provided for in full in the period when determined. Although we revise our project
completion estimates from time to time, such revisions have not, to date, had a material adverse
effect on our operating results or financial condition. We also generate revenue from software
application products, including banking software. Such software products represented 3.7% of our
total revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and 3.8% of our total revenues for
fiscal 2006.
We experience from time to time pricing
pressure from our clients, especially during the economic downturn in
the recent past, which has adversely affected our revenues, margins and gross profits. For
example, clients often expect that as we do more business with them, they will receive volume
discounts. Additionally, clients may ask for fixed-price arrangements or reduced rates. We attempt
to use fixed-price arrangements for work where the specifications are complete, so individual rates
are not negotiated for phases. We are also adding new services at higher price points and where
more value is added for our clients. In the past, some of our clients have delayed purchase
decisions as they seek to comply, as applicable, with increased regulations, such as the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or undergo corporate reorganizations.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues represented 57.8% of total revenues for the six months ended September 30,
2006 and for fiscal 2006. Our cost of revenues primarily consists of salary and other compensation
expenses, depreciation, overseas travel expenses including visa expenses, cost of software
purchased for internal use, cost of technical subcontractors, data communication expenses and
computer maintenance. We depreciate our personal computers and servers over two years and mainframe
computers over periods of up to three years. Third party software is written off over the estimated
useful life. Cost of revenues also includes stock compensation expenses. From April
1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment using the modified prospective
approach. We recorded stock compensation expense of $2 million during the six
months ended September 30, 2006 using the fair value recognition provisions.
We typically assume full project management responsibility for each project that we undertake.
Approximately 71.1% and 72.3% of the total billed person-months for our services for the six months
ended September 30, 2006 and during fiscal 2006 were performed at our global development centers in
India, and the balance of the work was performed at client sites and global development centers
located outside India. The proportion of work performed at our facilities and at client sites
varies from quarter to quarter. We charge higher rates and incur higher compensation and other
expenses for work performed at client sites and global development centers located outside India.
Services performed at a client site or global development centers located outside India typically
generate higher revenues per-capita at a lower gross margin than the same services performed at our
facilities in India. As a result, our total revenues, cost of revenues and gross profit in absolute
terms and as a percentage of revenues fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the proportion of
work performed outside India. Additionally, any increase in work performed at client sites or
global development centers located outside India can decrease our gross profits. We hire
subcontractors on a limited basis from time to time for our own technology development needs, and
we generally do not perform subcontracted work for other technology service providers. For the six
months ended September 30, 2006 and fiscal 2006, approximately 3.4% and 3.0% of our cost of
revenues was attributable to cost of technical subcontractors. We do not anticipate that our
subcontracting needs will increase significantly as we expand our business.
Revenues and gross profits are also affected by employee utilization rates. We define employee
utilization as the proportion of total billed person months to total available person months
excluding support personnel. We manage utilization by monitoring project requirements and
timetables. The number of consultants assigned to a project will vary according to size,
complexity, duration, and demands of the project. An unanticipated termination of a significant
project could also cause us to experience lower utilization of technology professionals, resulting
in a higher than
expected number of unassigned technology professionals. In addition, we do not fully utilize our
technology professionals when they are enrolled in training programs, particularly during our
14-week training course for new employees.
33
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses represented 6.6% and 6.3% of total revenues for the six months
ended September 30, 2006 and for fiscal 2006 respectively. Our selling and marketing expenses
primarily consist of expenses relating to salaries and other compensation expenses of sales and
marketing personnel, professional charges, travel, brand building, commission and earnout charges,
rental for sales and marketing offices and telecommunications. We may increase our
selling and marketing expenses as we seek to increase brand awareness among target clients and
promote client loyalty and repeat business among existing clients.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses represented 8.5% and 8.0% of total revenues for the six
months ended September 30, 2006 and for fiscal 2006 respectively. Our general and administrative
expenses is comprised of expenses relating to salaries and other compensation expenses of senior
management and other support personnel, travel expenses, legal and other professional fees,
telecommunications, utilities, other miscellaneous administrative costs and provisions for doubtful
accounts receivable. The factors which affect the fluctuations in our provisions for bad debts and
write offs of uncollectible accounts include the financial health of our clients and of the
economic environment in which they operate.
Gain on Sale of Long Term Investment
In fiscal 2005, we sold our investment in Yantra Corporation and the consideration received
from the sale resulted in a gain of $11 million during fiscal 2005. The carrying value of the
investment in Yantra Corporation was completely written down in fiscal 1999. Further consideration
of $1 million was received during the six months ended September 30, 2006 resulting in a gain of $1
million for the period.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Our amortization of intangible assets relates to identified intangibles arising from purchase
price allocations for business combinations. We amortize intangible assets over their estimated
useful lives. The amortization of intangible asset was $1 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and nil for the fiscal 2006.
Other Income, net
Other income / (expense), net includes interest income, income from liquid mutual fund
investments, foreign currency exchange gains/losses including marked to market gains / losses on
foreign exchange forward and option contracts, and provisions for losses on investments.
Functional Currency and Foreign Exchange
The functional currency of Infosys and Infosys BPO is the Indian rupee. The functional currency
for Infosys Australia, Infosys China and Infosys Consulting is the respective local currency. The
financial statements included in this Quarterly Report are reported in U.S. dollars. The
translation of rupees to dollars is performed for the balance sheet accounts using the exchange
rate in effect at the balance sheet date, and for revenue and expense accounts using a monthly
average exchange rate for the respective periods. The gains or losses resulting from such
translation are reported as other comprehensive income / loss.
Generally, Indian law requires residents of India to repatriate any foreign currency earnings to
India to control the exchange of foreign currency. More specifically, Section 8 of the Foreign
Exchange Management Act, or FEMA, requires an Indian company to take all reasonable steps to
realize and repatriate into India all foreign exchange earned by the company outside India, within
such time periods and in the manner as specified by the Reserve Bank of India, or RBI. The RBI has
promulgated guidelines that require the company to repatriate any realized foreign exchange back to
India, and either:
|
|
|
sell it to an authorized dealer for rupees within seven days from the date of
receipt of the foreign exchange; |
34
|
|
|
retain it in a foreign currency account such as an Exchange Earners Foreign
Currency, or EEFC, account with an authorized dealer; or |
|
|
|
|
use it for discharge of debt or liabilities denominated in foreign exchange. |
We typically collect our earnings and pay expenses denominated in foreign currencies using a
dedicated foreign currency account located in the local country of operation. In order to do this,
we are required to, and have obtained, special approval from the RBI to maintain a foreign currency
account in overseas countries like the United States. However, the RBI approval is subject to
limitations, including a requirement that we repatriate all foreign currency in the account back to
India within a reasonable time, except an amount equal to our local monthly operational cost of our
overseas branch and personnel. We currently pay such expenses and repatriate the remainder of the
foreign currency to India on a regular basis. We have the option to retain those in an EEFC account
(foreign currency denominated) or an Indian-rupee-denominated account. We convert substantially all
of our foreign currency to rupees to fund operations and expansion activities in India.
Our failure to comply with these regulations could result in RBI
enforcement action against us.
Income Taxes
Our net income earned from providing software development and other services outside India is
subject to tax in the country where we perform the work. Most of our tax paid in countries other
than India can be applied as a credit against our Indian tax liability to the extent that the same
income is subject to tax in India.
Currently, we benefit from the tax holidays the Government of India gives to the export of software
from specially designated software technology parks in India and for facilities set up under the
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005. As a result of these incentives, our operations have been subject
to relatively low tax liabilities. These tax incentives include a 10-year tax holiday from Indian
corporate income taxes for the operation of most of our Indian facilities. As a result of these tax
exemptions, a substantial portion of our pre-tax income has not been subject to significant tax in
recent years. These tax incentives resulted in a decrease in our income tax expense of $106 million
for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and $160 million for fiscal 2006 compared to the
effective tax amounts that we estimate would have applied if these incentives had not been
available.
The Finance Act, 2000 phases out the ten-year tax holiday over a ten-year period from fiscal 2000
through fiscal 2009. Accordingly, facilities set up in India on or before March 31, 2000 have a
ten-year tax holiday, new facilities set up on or before March 31, 2001 have a nine-year tax
holiday and so forth until March 31, 2009. After March 31, 2009, the tax holiday will no longer be
available to new facilities. Our current tax holidays expire in stages by 2009. Some of our new
facilities are being set up under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005. Under this scheme, units in
designated special economic zones which begin providing services on or after April 1, 2005 will be
eligible for a deduction of 100 percent of profits or gains derived from the export of services for
the first five years from commencement of provision of services and 50 percent of such profits or
gains for a further five years. Certain tax benefits are also available for a further five years
subject to the unit meeting defined conditions. When our tax holidays expire or terminate, our tax
expense will materially increase, reducing our profitability. As a result of such tax incentives,
our effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 was 11.1% and our Indian statutory tax rate for the same
period was 33.66%. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended September 30, 2006 was 11.6% and
our Indian statutory tax rate for the same period was 33.66%.
Minority interest
Minority interest represents the share of minority shareholders in the profits of Infosys BPO
Limited, our majority owned and consolidated subsidiary.
35
Results for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the three months ended September
30, 2005
Revenues
The following table sets forth the growth in our revenues for the three months ended September 30,
2006 over the corresponding period in 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September |
|
|
ended September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
Revenues increased in most segments of our services except for software re-engineering
services. The increase in revenues was attributable to an increase in business from existing
clients and the addition of new clients, particularly in industries such as financial services, manufacturing and
telecommunication services.
The following table sets forth our revenues by industry segments for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Industry Segments |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Financial services |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
Manufacturing |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Telecommunication |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
Others including
utilities, logistics
and services |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
Revenues from services represented 96.3% of total revenues for the three months ended September
30, 2006 as compared to 96.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Sale of our software
products represented 3.7% of our total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as
compared to 3.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2005.
|
The following table sets forth the revenues from fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts and
time-and-materials contracts as a percentage of total services revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
Percentage of total services revenues |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
Time-and-materials contracts |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
|
|
73.8 |
% |
|
36
The following table sets forth our revenues by geographic segments for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Geographic Segments |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
North America |
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
India |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Rest of the World |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2006 the total billed person-months for our
services other than business process management grew by 35.9% compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2005. The onsite and offshore volume growth for
our services other than business process management were 42.2% and 33.1% during the three
months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. We have
recently seen a slight increase in pricing on engagements with some of our customers. During the
three months ended September 30, 2006 there was 3.1% increase in onsite rates and a 1.8% increase
in offshore rates compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2005 for our services other than business process
management.
Cost of revenues
The following table sets forth our cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006
and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our cost of revenues is mainly attributable to increases of approximately $106
million in personnel costs due to new hires and a compensation review affected from April 2006, $7
million in cost of technical subcontractors, $4 million each in depreciation expenses and
amortization of software purchased for our own use and $3 million in provisions for post sales
client support, partially offset by a reduction of $2 million in amortization of software purchased
for service delivery to clients.
Gross profit
The following table sets forth our gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 43.3% for the three months ended September 30,
2005 and September 30, 2006.
37
Selling and marketing expenses
The following table sets forth our selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Selling and
marketing expenses |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of our sales and marketing personnel increased from 406 as of September 30, 2005 to
506 as of September 30, 2006. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is mainly attributable
to increases of approximately $10 million in personnel costs of selling and marketing employees on
account of new hires and the compensation review effected in April 2006, $2 million in commission
charges paid and $1 million in travel expenses. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of
revenue decreased from 6.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to 6.4% for the three
months ended September 30, 2006.
General and administrative expenses
The following table sets forth our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
General and
administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to increase of
approximately $6 million for personnel costs on account of new hires and the compensation review
effected from April 2006, $2 million each in professional charges, office maintenance charges and
power and fuel charges and $1 million each in foreign travel expenses, traveling and conveyance,
research grants, rent and telephone charges. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenue decreased from 8.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to 8.4% for the three
months ended September 2006.
Amortization of Intangible assets
The amortization of intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2006 represents $1
million of amortization of the identified customer contract intangibles arising on the allocation
of purchase price of Infosys BPO. There was no amortization of intangible assets for the three
months ended September 30, 2005.
38
Operating income
The following table sets forth our operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2006
and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
The following table sets forth our other income, net for the three months ended September 30, 2006
and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
% |
|
Other income, net, consists mainly of interest and dividend income, foreign exchange gains /
(losses), net and provision for investments. Interest income and income from mutual fund
investments was approximately $9 million and $12 million during the three months ended September
30, 2005 and 2006.
We recorded a gain on foreign exchange of $2 million during the three months ended September 30,
2006 as against losses of nil during the three months ended September 30, 2005. Foreign exchange
gains and losses arise from the depreciation and appreciation of the rupee against other currencies
in which we transact business.
The following table sets forth the currency in which our revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 are denominated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Currency |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
79.0 |
% |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Others |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
The following tables sets forth information on the foreign exchange rates in rupees per U.S.
dollar, United Kingdom Pound Sterling and Euro for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Appreciation / |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 (Rs.) |
|
|
September 30, 2006 (Rs.) |
|
|
(Depreciation) in percentage |
|
Average exchange
rate during the
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
43.78 |
|
|
|
46.29 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
United Kingdom
Pound Sterling |
|
|
77.79 |
|
|
|
87.07 |
|
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
Euro |
|
|
53.29 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September |
|
|
Three months ended September |
|
|
|
30, 2005 (Rs.) |
|
|
30, 2006 (Rs.) |
|
|
Exchange rate at the
beginning of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
43.51 |
|
|
|
45.87 |
|
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
77.98 |
|
|
|
84.82 |
|
Euro |
|
|
52.69 |
|
|
|
58.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate at the end of
the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
43.94 |
|
|
|
45.95 |
|
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
77.76 |
|
|
|
86.00 |
|
Euro |
|
|
52.98 |
|
|
|
58.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation /
(Depreciation) during the
period in percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
Euro |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
We used derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward and option contracts
to attempt to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivable and
forecasted cash flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. The counterparty for these
contracts is generally a bank. We held foreign exchange forward contracts of $119 million as of
March 31, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we held foreign exchange forward contracts of $98 million
and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 1 million. The foreign exchange forward contracts mature between
one to 12 months. As of March 31, 2006, we held put options of $4 million, call options of $8
million and range barrier options of $210 million, Euro 3 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling
3 million. As of September 30, 2006, we held range barrier options of $240 million, Euro 10 million
and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 11 million.
We have
recorded gain of $4 million on account of foreign exchange forward and option contracts for
the three months ended September 30, 2006 while we had recorded losses of $2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2005, which are included in total foreign currency exchange gains /
losses. Our accounting policy requires us to mark to market and recognize the effect in earnings
immediately of any derivative that is either not designated a hedge, or is so designated but is
ineffective as per SFAS 133.
Provision for income taxes
The following table sets forth our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the three
months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September |
|
|
ended September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for tax for the three months ended September 30, 2005 included a credit of $5
million being the effect of the change in estimate of taxes payable in a foreign jurisdiction on
completion of assessment proceedings by taxation authorities. Due to the tax credit the effective
tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2005 had decreased to 10.3% instead of 13.5%. The
decrease in the effective tax rate from 13.5% after considering the tax credit for the three months
ended September 30, 2005 to 11.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 is
mainly due to higher
offshore profitability, reduction in investible cash surplus due to
payment of silver jubilee dividend of $206 million and a greater
allocation of cash surplus in investments in mutual funds where the
returns are non-taxable.
40
Income from mutual fund investments increased
from $4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $7 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2006.
Minority Interest
During the
six months ended September 30, 2006, we acquired 8,750,000
equity shares of Infosys BPO from Citicorp International Finance
Corporation (CIFC) for a consideration of $116 million. As of
September 30, 2006, we hold 96.70% of the outstanding equity
shares of Infosys BPO as against 73.40% as of September 30,
2005.
Minority interest was $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as against nil for
the three months ended September 30, 2006.
Net income
The following table sets forth our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September |
|
|
ended September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results for the six months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended September
30, 2005
Revenues
The following table sets forth the growth in our revenues for the six months ended September 30,
2006 over the corresponding period in 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Six months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
Revenues increased in most segments of our services, except for re-engineering services. The
increase in revenues was attributable to an increase in business from both existing clients and
the addition of new clients, particularly in industries such as financial services, manufacturing and
telecommunication services.
The following table sets forth our revenues by industry segments for the six months ended September
30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
Industry Segments |
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
Financial services |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Manufacturing |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
Telecommunication |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Others including
utilities, logistics
and services |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
Revenues from services represented 96.3% of total revenues for the six months ended September
30, 2006 as compared to 95.9% for the six months ended September 30, 2005. Sale of our software
products represented 3.7% of our total
41
revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 4.1% for the six months ended
September 30, 2005.
The following table sets forth the revenues from fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts and
time-and-materials contracts as a percentage of total services revenues for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total services revenues |
|
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
|
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
Fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
Time-and-materials contracts |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
|
|
73.5 |
% |
|
The following table sets forth our revenues by geographic segments for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
|
Six months ended September |
|
Geographic Segments |
|
30, 2005 |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
North America |
|
|
64.6 |
% |
|
|
63.8 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
India |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Rest of the World |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
During the six months ended September 30, 2006 the total billed person-months for our services
other than business process management grew by 35.4% compared to the six months ended September 30,
2005. The onsite and offshore volume growth for our services other
than business process management were 42.2% and 32.3% during the six months ended
September 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended September 30, 2005. We have recently seen a
slight increase in pricing on engagements with some of our customers. During the six months ended
September 30, 2006 there was 2.9% increase in onsite rates and a 1.4% increase in offshore rates
compared to the six months ended September 30, 2005 for our
services other than business process management.
Cost of revenues
The following table sets forth our cost of revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our cost of revenues is
mainly attributable to increases of approximately $200
million in personnel costs due to new hires and a compensation review effected from April 2006, $11
million in cost of technical subcontractors, $8 million in
overseas travel expenses, $9 million in depreciation expenses, $4 million in amortization of
software purchased for own use and $3 million each in provision for post sales client support and
in traveling and conveyance, $2 million in visa costs and $1 million in stock compensation expenses.
42
Gross profit
The following table sets forth our gross profit for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenues from six months ended September 30,
2005 to six months ended September 30, 2006 is attributable to a 40.6% increase in revenues for the
six months ended September 30, 2006 offset by a 42.2% increase in cost of revenues in the same
period compared to the six months ended September 30, 2005.
Selling and marketing expenses
The following table sets forth our selling and marketing expenses for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Selling and
marketing expenses |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of our sales and marketing personnel increased from 406 as of September 30, 2005 to
506 as of September 30, 2006. The increase in selling and marketing expenses is mainly attributable
to increases of approximately $20 million in personnel costs of selling and marketing employees on
account of new hires and the compensation review effected from April 2006, $3 million in overseas
travel expenses, $2 million in commission charges and $1 million in brand building expenses.
General and administrative expenses
The following table sets forth our general and administrative expenses for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
General and
administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to increase of
approximately $10 million for personnel costs on account of new hires and the compensation review
effected from April 2006, $5 million in professional charges , $4 million each in office
maintenance charges and telecommunication charges, $3 million each in traveling and conveyance cost
and power and fuel charges, $2 million in provision for bad and doubtful accounts receivable and $1
million in research grants. The factors which affect the fluctuations in our provisions for bad
debts
43
and write offs of uncollectible accounts include the financial health of our clients and the
economic environment in which they operate. We specifically identify the credit loss and then make
the provision. No one client has contributed significantly to a loss, and we have had no
significant changes in our collection policies or payment terms.
Amortization of intangible assets
The amortization of intangible assets was $1 million for the six months ended September 30, 2006.
This relates to amortization of identified customer contracts intangible arising from the purchase
price allocation of a minority interest in Infosys BPO. The identified customer contract intangible
is being amortized over a period of four years, being managements estimate of the useful life of
the asset. There was no amortization of intangible assets for the six months ended September 30,
2005.
Operating income
The following table sets forth our operating income for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of long term investment
We had no gains on sales of long term investments in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005, we sold our
investment in Yantra Corporation and the consideration received from the sale resulted in a gain of
$11 million. The carrying value of the investment in Yantra Corporation was completely written down
in fiscal 1999. Further consideration of $1 million was received during the six months ended
September 30, 2006 resulting in a gain of $1 million for the period.
Other income, net
The following table sets forth our other income, net for the six months ended September 30, 2006
and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
162.5 |
% |
|
Other income, net, consists mainly of interest and dividend income, foreign exchange gains /
(losses), net and provision for investments. Interest income and income from mutual fund
investments was approximately $18 million and $27 million during the six months ended September 30,
2005 and 2006.
We recorded foreign exchange losses of $2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2005
compared to gain of approximately $14 million during the six months ended September 30, 2006.
Foreign exchange gains and losses arise from the appreciation and depreciation of the rupee against
other currencies in which we transact business.
44
The following table sets forth the currency in which our revenues for the six months ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 are denominated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Currency |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
78.6 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Others |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
The following tables sets forth information on the foreign exchange rates in rupees per U.S.
dollar, United Kingdom Pound Sterling and Euro for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation / |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
(Depreciation) in |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 (Rs.) |
|
|
September 30, 2006 (Rs.) |
|
|
percentage |
|
|
Average exchange
rate during the
period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
43.66 |
|
|
|
45.97 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
United Kingdom
Pound Sterling |
|
|
78.98 |
|
|
|
85.72 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
)% |
Euro |
|
|
53.84 |
|
|
|
58.60 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 (Rs.) |
|
|
2006 (Rs.) |
|
|
Exchange rate at the
beginning of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
43.62 |
|
|
|
44.48 |
|
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
82.18 |
|
|
|
77.36 |
|
Euro |
|
|
56.52 |
|
|
|
53.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate at the end of
the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
43.94 |
|
|
|
45.95 |
|
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
77.76 |
|
|
|
86.00 |
|
Euro |
|
|
52.98 |
|
|
|
58.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation /
(Depreciation) during the
period in percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
United Kingdom Pound Sterling |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
(11.2 |
)% |
Euro |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
(8.0 |
)% |
|
We used derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward and option contracts
to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivable and forecasted
cash flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. The counterparty for these contracts is
generally a bank. We held foreign exchange forward contracts of $119 million as of March 31, 2006.
As of September 30, 2006, we held foreign exchange forward contracts of $98 million and United
Kingdom Pound Sterling 1 million. The foreign exchange forward contracts mature between one to 12
months. As of March 31, 2006, we held put options of $4 million, call options of $8 million and
range barrier options of $210 million, Euro 3 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 3 million.
As of September 30, 2006, we
45
held range barrier options of $240 million, Euro 10 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 11
million. We have recorded losses of $3 million on account of foreign exchange forward and option
contracts for the six months ended September 30, 2006 while we had recorded gains of less than $1
million for the six months ended September 30, 2005, which are included in total foreign currency
exchange gains / losses. Our accounting policy requires us to mark to market and recognize the
effect in earnings immediately of any derivative that is either not designated a hedge, or is so
designated but is ineffective as per SFAS 133.
Provision for income taxes
The following table sets forth our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the six
months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for tax for the six months ended September 30, 2005 included a credit of $5
million being the effect of the change in estimate of taxes payable in a foreign jurisdiction on
completion of assessment proceedings by taxation authorities. Due to the tax credit the effective
tax rate for the six months ended September 30, 2005 had decreased to 11.5% from 13.2%. The
decrease in the effective tax rate from 13.2% after considering the tax credit for the six months
ended September 30, 2005 to 11.6% for the six months ended September 30, 2006 is mainly due to
higher offshore profitability, reduction in investible cash surplus
due to payment of silver jubilee dividend of $206 million and a
greater allocation of cash surplus in investments in mutual funds
where the returns are non-taxable. Income from mutual fund investments increased from $7 million in the six months ended
September 30, 2005 to $11 million in the six months ended September 30, 2006.
Minority Interest
During the
six months ended September 30, 2006, we acquired 8,750,000
equity shares of Infosys BPO from Citicorp International Finance
Corporation (CIFC) for a consideration of $116 million. As of
September 30, 2006 we hold 96.70% of the outstanding equity
shares of Infosys BPO as against 73.40% as of September 30,
2005. Minority interest was $1 million for the
six months ended September 30, 2005 as against $2 million for the six months ended September 30,
2006.
Net income
The following table sets forth our net income for the six months ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
As a percentage of
revenues |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our growth has been financed largely by cash generated from operations and, to a lesser extent,
from the proceeds from the sale of equity. In 1993, we raised approximately $4.4 million in gross
aggregate proceeds from our initial public offering of equity shares in India. In 1994, we raised
an additional $7.7 million through private placements of our equity shares with foreign
institutional investors, mutual funds, Indian domestic financial institutions and corporations. On
March 11, 1999, we raised $70.4 million in gross aggregate proceeds from our initial public
offering of ADSs in the United States.
46
As of September 30, 2006, we had $1.26 billion in working capital, including $328 million in cash
and cash equivalents and $615 million invested in liquid mutual fund units, and no outstanding bank
borrowings. We believe that a sustained reduction in IT spending, a longer sales cycle, and a
continued economic downturn in any of the various industry segments in which we operate, could
result in a decline in our revenue and negatively impact our liquidity and cash resources.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $304 million and $349 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2006. Net cash provided by operations consisted
primarily of net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization, minority interests, stock compensation expenses
and increases in unearned revenue, offset in part by an increase in accounts receivable, prepaid
expenses and other current assets, unbilled revenue and other accrued liabilities.
Trade accounts receivable increased by $3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2005,
compared to an increase of $104 million during the six months ended September 30, 2006. Accounts
receivable as of March 31, 2005 included $54 million receivable from a large customer. The payment
was received in the first week of April 2005. Accounts receivable as a percentage of last 12 months
revenues represented 16.2% and 17.7% as of September 30, 2005 and 2006. Prepaid expenses and other
current assets increased by $1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2005 and $10
million during the six months ended September 30, 2006. Other accrued liabilities increased by $5
million during the six months ended September 30, 2005, compared to an increase of $27 million
during the six months ended September 30, 2006. There has been an increase in unbilled revenues of
$9 million during the six months ended September 30, 2005, compared to an increase of $27 million
during the six months ended September 30, 2006. Unbilled revenues represent revenues that are
recognized but not yet invoiced. Client deposits decreased by $4 million during the six months
ending September 30, 2005. Unearned revenues increased by $20 million during the six months ending
September 30, 2005, compared to an increase of $24 million during the six months ending September
30, 2006. Unearned revenue resulted primarily from advance client billings on fixed-price,
fixed-timeframe contracts for which related efforts have not been expended. Revenues from
fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts and from time-and-materials contracts represented 28.7% and
71.3% of total services revenues for the six months ending September 30, 2005, as compared to 26.5%
and 73.5% for the six months ending September 30, 2006.
Net cash used in investing activities was $392 million and $686 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2006. Net cash used in investing activities, relating to our
acquisition of additional property, plant and equipment for the six months ended September 30, 2005
and September 30, 2006 was $127 million and $114 million. During the six months ended September 30,
2005, we invested $371 million in liquid mutual fund units, $9 million in non-current deposits with
corporations and redeemed mutual fund investments of $115 million. During the six months ended
September 30, 2006, we invested $651 million in liquid mutual fund units, $11 million in
non-current deposits with corporations, and redeemed mutual fund investments of $201 million.
On June 30, 2006, we acquired 8,750,000 equity shares of Infosys BPO Limited from Citicorp
International Finance Corporation (CIFC) for a consideration of $116 million. As of September 30,
2006, we held 96.70% of the outstanding equity shares of Infosys BPO Limited.
We used to provide various loans to employees including car loans, home loans, personal computer
loans, telephone loans, medical loans, marriage loans, personal loans, salary advances, education
loans and loans for rental deposits. These loans were provided primarily to employees in India who
were not executive officers or directors. Housing and car loans were available only to middle level
managers, senior managers and non-executive officers. These loans were generally collateralized
against the assets of the loan and the terms of the loans ranged from 1 to 100 months. we have
discontinued fresh disbursements under all of these loan schemes except for personal loans and
salary advances which we continue to provide primarily to employees in India who are not executive
officers or directors. We also provide allowances for purchase of cars and houses for our middle
level managers. The annual rates of interest for these loans vary between 0% and 4%. Loans
aggregating $28 million and $25 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2006 and September 30,
2006.
Net cash used in financing activities was $200 million for the six months ending September 30,
2006. This primarily comprised of $63 million of cash raised by issuance of equity shares on
exercise of stock options by employees, offset by dividend payments of $265 million. Our
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on June 10, 2006 approved a final dividend of
approximately $0.09 per equity share and a Silver Jubilee special dividend of approximately $0.33
per equity share, which has resulted in a cash outflow of approximately $265 million including
corporate dividend tax. Net cash provided by financing activities was $11 million for the six
months ending September 30, 2005. This primarily comprises $57 million of cash raised by issuance
of common stock on exercise of stock
47
options by employees offset by dividend payments of $46
million. Our Board of Directors, in its meeting on October 11, 2006 has approved payment of an
interim dividend of approximately $0.11 per equity share. The dividend payment is expected to
result in a cash outflow of approximately $69 million including corporate dividend tax. As of
September 30, 2006 we had contractual commitments for capital expenditure
of $116 million. These commitments include approximately $102 million in domestic purchases and $14
million in imports and overseas commitments for hardware, supplies and services to support our
operations generally, which we expect to be significantly completed by March 2007.
We have provided information to the public regarding forward-looking guidance on our business
operations.
Reconciliation between Indian and U.S. GAAP
All financial information in this quarterly report is presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
although we also report for Indian statutory purposes under Indian GAAP. There are material
differences between financial statements prepared in Indian and U.S. GAAP. The differences that
affect us are primarily attributable to U.S. GAAP requirements for the accounting for stock-based
compensation under SFAS 123R and amortization of intangible assets.
Reconciliation of Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in million) |
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Net profit as per Indian GAAP |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
Stock compensation expense (SFAS 123 R) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net income as per U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
General
Market risk is attributable to all market sensitive financial instruments including foreign
currency receivables and payables. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of
changes in the interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and
other market changes that affect market risk sensitive instruments.
Our exposure to market risk is a function of our revenue generating activities and any future
borrowing activities in foreign currency. The objective of market risk management is to avoid
excessive exposure of our earnings and equity to loss. Most of our exposure to market risk arises
out of our foreign currency accounts receivable.
Risk Management Procedures
We manage market risk through treasury operations. Our treasury operations objectives and policies
are approved by senior management and our audit committee. The activities of treasury operations
include management of cash resources, implementing hedging strategies for foreign currency
exposures, borrowing strategies, if any, and ensuring compliance with market risk limits and
policies.
Components of Market Risk
Exchange rate risk: Our exposure to market risk arises principally from exchange rate
risk. Even though our functional currency is the Indian rupee, we transact a major portion of our
business in foreign currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, the United Kingdom Pound Sterling and the
Euro. The exchange rate between the rupee and these currencies has changed substantially in recent
years and may fluctuate substantially in the future. Consequently, the results of our operations
are adversely affected as the rupee appreciates against dollar and other foreign currencies. For
the six months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, U.S. dollar denominated revenues
represented 75.2% and 78.6% of total revenues. For the same periods, revenues denominated in United
Kingdom Pound Sterling
48
represented 11.9% and 7.7% of total revenues while revenues denominated in
the Euro represented 4.8% and 4.3% of total revenues. Our exchange rate risk primarily arises from
our foreign currency revenues, receivables and payables. We use derivative financial instruments
such as foreign exchange forward and option contracts to attempt to mitigate
the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivable and forecasted cash flows
denominated in certain foreign currencies. We held foreign exchange forward contracts of $119
million as of March 31, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we held foreign exchange forward contracts
of $98 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 1 million. The foreign exchange forward contracts
mature between 1 to 12 months. As of March 31, 2006, we held put options of $4 million, call
options of $8 million and range barrier options of $210 million, Euro 3 million and United Kingdom
Pound Sterling 3 million. As of September 30, 2006, we held common range barrier options of $240
million, Euro 10 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 11 million. The forward contracts
typically mature within one to twelve months, must be settled on the day of maturity and may be
cancelled subject to the payment of any gains or losses in the difference between the contract
exchange rate and the market exchange rate on the date of cancellation. We use these derivative
instruments only as a hedging mechanism and not for speculative purposes. We may not purchase
adequate instruments to insulate ourselves from foreign exchange currency risks. The policies of
the Reserve Bank of India may change from time to time which may limit our ability to hedge our
foreign currency exposures adequately. In addition, any such instruments may not perform adequately
as a hedging mechanism. We may, in the future, adopt more active hedging policies, and have done so
in the past.
Fair value: The fair value of our market rate risk sensitive instruments approximates
their carrying value.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment requiring companies to change their accounting policies to record the fair
value of stock options issued to employees as an expense. Until March 2006, we did not deduct the
expense of employee stock option grants from our income based on the fair value method as we had
adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-8568, we have
adopted SFAS 123R from April 1, 2006. The change in the standard will adversely affect our
operating results in the event we make any future grants.
Impact on the financial statements due to the adoption of FASB Statement No.123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment using the modified prospective approach are given below.
|
|
|
|
|
Details |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
2 |
|
Earnings per equity share |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006, the unamortized stock compensation expenses under the 1998 and 1999
option plans was $1 million and the same is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period
of approximately one year and the unamortized stock compensation expenses under the Infosys BPOs
2002 Plan was $4 million and the same is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period of
approximately two years.
49
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. SFAS 157 provides guidance on determination of fair value, and lays down the
fair value hierarchy to classify the source of information used in fair value measurements. We are
currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement and will adopt the guidelines stated in SFAS
157 from fiscal year beginning April 1, 2007
In 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 158 Employers accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. New Statement 158 requires us to recognize
on balance sheets the funded status of pension and other
postretirement benefit plans as of March
31, 2007. We are required to recognize actuarial gains and losses, prior service cost, and any
remaining transition amounts from the initial application of Statements 87 and 106 when recognizing
a plans funded status, with the offset to accumulated other comprehensive income. Statement 158
will also require fiscal-year-end measurements of plan assets and benefit obligations. The new
Statement amends Statements 87, 88, 106, and 132R, but retains most of their measurement and
disclosure guidance and will not change the amounts recognized in the income statement as net
periodic benefit cost. We do not believe that adoption of SFAS 158 will have a material impact on
the financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48
applies to all tax positions within the scope of Statement 109 and clarifies when and how to
recognize tax benefits in the financial statements with a two-step approach of recognition and
measurement. Fin No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN No. 48
also requires the enterprise to make explicit disclosures about uncertainties in their income tax
positions, including a detailed rollforward of tax benefits taken that do not qualify for financial
statement recognition. We are currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement and will adopt
the guidelines stated FIN No. 48 from fiscal year beginning April 1, 2007
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our financial
statements as their application places the most significant demands on managements judgment, with
financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the following
paragraphs. For all of these policies, future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the
best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Estimates
We prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities on the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the financial reporting period. We primarily make estimates related
to contract costs expected to be incurred to complete development of software, allowances for
doubtful accounts receivable, our future obligations under employee retirement and benefit plans,
useful lives of property, plant and equipment, future income tax liabilities and contingencies and
litigation.
We continually evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on the most recently available
information, our own historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenues primarily from software development and related services, licensing of
software products and from business process management services. We make and use significant
management judgments and estimates in connection with the revenue that we recognize in any
accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any
period, if we made different judgments or utilized different estimates.
Arrangements with customers for software development and related services are either on a
fixed-price, fixed-timeframe or on a time-and-material basis. Revenue on time-and-material
contracts is recognized as the related services are rendered. Revenue from the end of the last
billing to the balance sheet date is recognized as unbilled revenues.
50
Maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the underlying maintenance
arrangement. When the company receives advances for services and products, such amounts are
reported as client deposits until all conditions for revenue recognition are met.
Revenue from our fixed-price arrangements for software development and related services that
involves significant production, modification or customization of the software, is accounted for in
conformity with ARB No. 45, using the guidance in Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1, and the
Accounting Standards Executive Committees conclusion in paragraph 95 of SOP 97-2. Fixed-price
arrangements, which are similar to contracts to design, develop, manufacture, or modify complex
aerospace or electronic equipment to a buyers specification or to provide services related to the
performance of such contracts and contracts for services performed by architects, engineers, or
architectural or engineering design firms, as laid out in Paragraph 13 of SOP 81-1, are also
accounted for in conformity with SOP 81-1.
In the above mentioned fixed price arrangements, revenue has been recognized using the
percentage-of-completion method. Costs and earnings in excess of billings are classified as
unbilled revenue while billings in excess of costs and earnings are classified as unearned revenue.
In measuring progress towards completion, we have selected a method that we believe is reliable and
best approximates the progress to completion. The input (efforts expended) method has been used to
measure progress towards completion as there is a direct relationship between hourly labor input
and productivity and the method indicates the most reliable measure of progress. However, we
evaluate each contract and apply judgment to ensure the existence of a relationship between hourly
labor input and productivity.
At the end of every reporting period, we evaluate each project for estimated revenue and estimated
efforts. Any revisions or updates to existing estimates are made wherever required by obtaining
approvals from officers having the requisite authority. Management regularly reviews and evaluates
the status of each contract in progress to estimate the profit or loss. As part of the review,
detailed actual efforts and a realistic estimate of efforts to complete all phases of the project
is compared with the details of the original estimate and the total contract price. To date, we
have not had any fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts that resulted in a material loss. However,
our policy is to establish a provision for losses on a contract as soon as losses become evident.
We evaluate change orders according to their characteristics and the circumstances in which they
occur. If such change orders are considered by the parties to be a normal element within the
original scope of the contract, no change in the contract price is made. Otherwise, the adjustment
to the contract price may be routinely negotiated. Contract revenue and costs are adjusted to
reflect change orders approved by the client and us, regarding both scope and price. Changes are
reflected in revenue recognition only after the change order has been approved by both parties. The
same principle is also followed for escalation clauses. Costs that are incurred for a specific
anticipated contract that will result in no future benefits unless the contract is obtained are not
included in contract costs or deferred costs before the signing of the contract. Such costs are
deferred only if the costs can be directly associated with a specific anticipated contract and if
their recoverability from that contract is determined to be probable.
We provide our clients with a fixed-period warranty for corrections of errors and telephone support
on all fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts. Costs associated with such support services are
accrued at the time related revenues are recorded and included in cost of revenues. We estimate
such costs based on historical experience, and review estimates on a periodic basis for any
material changes in assumptions and likelihood of occurrence.
In arrangements with software development and related services and maintenance services, we have
specifically applied the guidance in paragraph 9 of EITF Issue 00-21 to determine whether the
software development and related services can be considered a separate unit of accounting. Our
arrangements generally meet the criteria for software development and related services to be
considered a separate unit of accounting. We use the relative fair value method to allocate revenue
to maintenance services and the software development and related services. In cases where we are
unable to establish objective and reliable evidence of fair value for the software development and
related services, we have used the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration.
Maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the underlying maintenance arrangement
while software development and related services revenues are recognized using the
percentage-of-completion method.
In accordance with SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, license fee revenues are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the license fee is fixed and
determinable, and the collection of the fee is probable. Arrangements to deliver our software
product generally have three elements: license, implementation and Annual Technical Services, or
ATS. We have applied the principles in SOP 97-2 to account for revenue from these multiple element
arrangements. Vendor Specific Objective Evidence of fair value or VSOE has been established for
ATS. VSOE is the price charged when the element is sold separately. When other services are
provided in conjunction with the licensing arrangement, the revenue from such contracts are
allocated to each
51
component of the contract using the residual method, whereby revenue is deferred for the
undelivered services and the residual amounts are recognized as revenue for delivered elements. In
the absence of an established VSOE for implementation, the entire arrangement fee for license and
implementation is recognized as the implementation is performed. Revenue from client training,
support and other services arising due to the sale of software products is recognized as the
services are performed. ATS revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which the services are
rendered.
Revenues from business process management and other services are recognized on both the
time-and-material and fixed-price, fixed-timeframe bases. Revenue on time-and-material contracts is
recognized as the related services are rendered. Revenue from fixed-price, fixed-timeframe
contracts is recognized as per the proportional performance method using an output measure of
performance.
We recognize revenue only on collectibility being probable and hence credit losses do not have an
impact on our revenue recognition policy. Fluctuations in our provisions for bad debts and write
offs of uncollectible accounts depend on the financial health and economic environment governing
our clients. Our provisions are based on specific identification of the credit loss. No one client
has contributed significantly to credit losses. We have had no significant changes in our
collection policies or payment terms.
The company accounts for volume discounts and pricing incentives to customers using the guidance in
EITF Issue 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a
Reseller of the Vendors Products). The discount terms in the companys arrangements with customers
generally entitle the customer to discounts if the customer completes a specified cumulative level
of revenue transactions. In some arrangements, the level of discount varies with increases in the
levels of revenue transactions. The discounts are passed on to the customer either as check
payments or as a reduction of payments due from the customer. The company recognizes discount
obligations as a reduction of revenue based on the ratable allocation of the discount to each of
the underlying revenue transactions that result in progress by the customer toward earning the
discount. The company recognizes the liability based on its estimate of the customers future
purchases. Also, when the level of discount varies with increases in levels of revenue
transactions, the company recognizes the liability based on its estimate of the customers future
purchases. If the company cannot reasonably estimate the customers future purchases, then the
liability is recorded based on the maximum potential level of discount. The company recognizes
changes in the estimated amount of obligations for discounts using a cumulative catch-up
adjustment. Furthermore, the company does not recognize any revenue up front for breakages
immediately on the inception of an arrangement.
Income Tax
As part of our financial reporting process, we are required to estimate our liability for
income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires us to
estimate our actual current tax exposure together with an assessment of temporary differences
resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation on property, plant and equipment,
for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities,
which are included within our balance sheet.
We face challenges from domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of current taxes
due. These challenges include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the
allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. Based on our evaluation of our tax position
and the information presently available to us, we believe we have adequately accrued for probable
exposures as of September 30, 2006. To the extent we are able to prevail in matters for which
accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of our reserves, our
effective tax rate in a given financial statement period may be materially impacted.
Our deferred tax liabilities mainly arise from taxable basis differences in intangible assets and
investments in liquid mutual funds. Our deferred tax assets comprise assets arising from basis
differences in depreciation on property, plant and equipment, investments for which the ultimate
realization of the tax asset may be dependent on the availability of future capital gains, and
provisions for doubtful accounts receivable. We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets
will be recovered from future taxable income. This assessment takes into consideration tax planning
strategies, including levels of historical taxable income and assumptions regarding the
availability and character of future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax
assets are deductible. We believe it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of
those deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance at September 30, 2006. The
ultimate amount of defer red tax assets realized may be materially different from those recorded,
as influenced by potential changes in income tax laws in the tax jurisdictions where we operate.
51
To the extent we believe that realization of a deferred tax asset is not likely, we establish a
valuation allowance or increase this allowance in an accounting period and include an expense
within the tax provision in our statements of income. As of September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006,
we recorded valuation allowance of $1 million due to uncertainties related to our ability to
utilize some of our deferred tax assets comprising provisions for doubtful accounts receivable and
investments. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates of valuation allowance or
if we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish an additional valuation
allowance, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We account for business combinations in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.
Cash and amounts of consideration that are determinable at the date of acquisition are included in
determining the cost of the acquired business. The accounting for contingent consideration based on
earnings or other performance measures is a matter of judgment that depends on the relevant facts
and circumstances. If the substance of the contingent consideration is to provide compensation for
services, use of property, or profit sharing, we account for the additional consideration as an
expense of the appropriate period. Otherwise, the additional consideration paid is recorded as an
additional cost of the acquired business.
Goodwill represents the cost of the acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of identifiable
tangible and intangible net assets purchased. We generally seek the assistance of independent
valuation experts in determining the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net
assets of the acquired business. We assign all the assets and liabilities of the acquired business,
including goodwill, to reporting units in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.
We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. In this process, we rely on a number of factors
including operating results, business plans and future cash flows. Recoverability of goodwill is
evaluated using a two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the fair value of a
reporting unit with its carrying value. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, the second step of the process involves a comparison of the fair value and carrying
value of the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of the goodwill of a reporting
unit exceeds the fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal
to the excess. Goodwill of a reporting unit will be tested for impairment between annual tests if
an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
the reporting unit below its carrying amount.
We amortize intangible assets over their respective individual estimated useful lives on a
straight-line basis. Our estimates of the useful lives of identified intangible assets are based on
a number of factors including the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic
factors (such as the stability of the industry, and known technological advances), and the level of
maintenance expenditures required to obtain the expected future cash flows from the asset.
We evaluate intangible assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held
and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets
exceeds the fair value of the assets.
In evaluating goodwill and intangible assets for impairment, we may seek the assistance of
independent valuation experts, perform internal valuation analyses and consider other information
that is publicly available. The results of our evaluation may be dependent on a number of factors
including estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs, discount
rates and other variables. While we use assumptions which we believe are fair and reasonable,
actual future results may differ from the estimates arrived at using the assumptions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
53
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe, based on an evaluation
performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) are effective as of September 30, 2006 to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by Infosys in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to
Infosys management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by the Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims, which have arisen in the ordinary
course of its business. These legal actions, when ultimately concluded and determined, will not, in
the opinion of management, have a material effect on the results of operations or the financial
position of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk factors
This Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the section entitled Risk Factors
and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and in our
Report on Form 6-K for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The information presented below
updates and should be read in conjunction with the Risk Factors section and other information
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and our Report
on Form 6-K for the three months ended June 30, 2006, which Risk Factors are incorporated herein by
reference. The Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006, as updated by the Risk Factors included in our Report on Form 6-K for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, have not materially changed other than as set forth below.
Currency fluctuations may affect the results or our operations or the value of our ADSs.
Our functional currency is the Indian rupee although we transact a major portion of our business in
several currencies and accordingly face foreign currency exposure through our sales in the United
States and elsewhere and purchases from overseas suppliers in various
foreign currencies. Historically, we have held a
substantial majority of our cash funds in rupees. Accordingly, changes in exchange rates may have a
material adverse effect on our revenues, other income, cost of services sold, gross margin and net
income and may have a negative impact on our business, operating results and financial
condition. The exchange rate between the rupee and foreign currencies, including the dollar, the
United Kingdom Pound Sterling and the Euro, has changed substantially in recent years and may
fluctuate substantially in the future. We expect that a majority of our revenues will continue to
be generated in foreign currencies, including the dollar, the United Kingdom Pound Sterling and the
Euro, for the foreseeable future and that a significant portion of our expenses, including
personnel costs, as well as capital and operating expenditures, will continue to be denominated in
Indian rupees. Consequently, the results of our operations are adversely affected as the rupee
appreciates against the dollar and other foreign currencies.
Over the past six months the dollar has appreciated substantially against the rupee. The exchange
rate for one dollar based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York for cable transfers in
Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was Rs.
45.95 as of the last day of the three months and half year ended September 30, 2006 for which noon
buying rates were available against Rs. 43.94 as of the last day of the three months and half year
ended September 30, 2005.
54
The appreciation of the dollar against the rupee has positively
impacted our revenues and operating results over the past six months
when compared to the corresponding six
months in the previous fiscal year. In the event that the dollar does not continue to appreciate
against the rupee, or in the event that the dollar depreciates against the rupee, the results of
our operations may be adversely affected.
We use derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange forward and option contracts to
mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivable and forecasted cash
flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. We held foreign exchange forward contracts of $119
million as of March 31, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we held foreign exchange forward contracts
of $98 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 1 million. The foreign exchange forward contracts
mature between one to 12 months. As of March 31, 2006, we held put options of $4 million, call
options of $8 million and range barrier options of $210 million, Euro 3 million and United Kingdom
Pound Sterling 3 million. As of September 30, 2006, we held range barrier options of $240 million,
Euro 10 million and United Kingdom Pound Sterling 11 million. The increase in our use of derivative
instruments is primarily attributable to our decision to actively hedge our foreign currency
exposure given the recent volatility of the Indian rupee against foreign currencies, including the
U.S. dollar, the United Kingdom Pound Sterling and the Euro. We may not purchase derivative instruments adequate to insulate ourselves from foreign currency exchange risks.
Additionally, the policies of the Reserve Bank of India may change from time to time which may
limit our ability to hedge our foreign currency exposures adequately.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the rupee and the dollar will also affect the dollar
conversion by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the Depositary, of any cash dividends paid in
rupees on the equity shares represented by the ADSs. In addition, these fluctuations will affect
the dollar equivalent of the rupee price of equity shares on the Indian stock exchanges and, as a
result, the prices of our ADSs in the United States, as well as the dollar value of the proceeds a
holder would receive upon the sale in India of any equity shares withdrawn from the Depositary
under the Depositary Agreement. Holders may not be able to convert rupee proceeds into dollars or
any other currency, and there is no guarantee of the rate at which any such conversion will occur,
if at all.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders
On October 11, 2006, our Board of Directors approved the sponsoring of a secondary offering of ADSs
of up to 30 million ADSs against equity shares to be sold by our shareholders in India. The Board
has convened an extraordinary general meeting of the members of the Company on November 7, 2006 to
seek approval for the Offering.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports
The Exhibit Index attached hereto is incorporated by reference to this Item
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly organized.
Dated: 24 October, 2006
INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
/s/ NANDAN M. NILEKANI
Nandan M. Nilekani
Chief Executive Officer
56
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number Description of Document
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.