UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q/A
(Amendment
No. 1)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-32375
Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-1164345 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
11465 Sunset Hills Road
5th Floor
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 883-1700
(Address including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
As of May 10, 2006, 11,263,151 shares of the Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, and
2,733,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01, of the Registrant were outstanding.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
Comstock
Homebuilding Companies, Inc. (the Company) is filing this
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to our Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2006, to
incorporate additional disclosure in Item 4. Controls and
Procedures and to correct certain errors and omissions in the
Exhibit 31 certification required by Exchange Act Rule 3a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a).
Except
as specifically indicated herein, no other information included in
the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q is amended by this Amendment No. 1
of Form 10-Q/A.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act)
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer have each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to ensure that we record, process, summarize, and report information required to be disclosed by us
in our quarterly reports filed under the Exchange Act within the time periods specified by the Securities
and Exchange Commissions
rules and forms and were effective as of March 31, 2006 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to the Companys
management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the
quarterly period covered by this report, there have not been any
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
or internal controls over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
We do not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error
or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion
of two or more people or by management override of the controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.