S-1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 13, 2006
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
3443 |
|
34-1712937 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One Infinity Corporate Centre Drive
Suite 300
Garfield Heights, Ohio 44125-5370
Tel.:
(440) 753-1490
Fax:
(440) 753-1491
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Matthew J. Klaben, Esq.
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
One Infinity Corporate Centre Drive
Suite 300
Garfield Heights, Ohio 44125-5370
Tel.:
(440) 753-1490
Fax:
(440) 753-1491
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
Edward P. Tolley III, Esq.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017-3954
Tel.: (212) 455-2000
Fax: (212) 455-2502 |
|
James S. Scott Sr., Esq.
Michael Benjamin, Esq.
Shearman & Sterling LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10022-6069
Tel: (212) 848-4000
Fax: (212) 848-7179 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement is declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, check the following
box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of |
|
|
Aggregate Offering |
|
|
Amount of |
|
Securities to be Registered |
|
|
Price(1) |
|
|
Registration Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
$250,000,000 |
|
|
$26,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee under Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act). |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is
not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not
soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the
offer or sale is not permitted.
|
PROSPECTUS (Subject to
Completion)
Issued ,
2006
Shares
Chart Industries, Inc.
Common Stock
Chart Industries, Inc. is offering shares of its common stock.
All of the shares of common stock are being sold by us. We
intend to use approximately
$ million
of the net proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold in
this offering to repay certain of our indebtedness and
approximately
$ million
of the net proceeds to pay a dividend to our stockholders
existing immediately prior to this offering, consisting of
affiliates of First Reserve and certain members of our
management.
This is our initial public offering and no public market
currently exists for our common stock. We anticipate that the
initial public offering price will be between
$ and
$ per
share. We intend to apply to list the common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol GTL.
The underwriters have the option to purchase up to an
additional shares
of our common stock from us at the initial public offering
price, less the underwriting discount to cover over-allotments.
We intend to use the proceeds we receive from any shares sold
pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment option to pay
an additional dividend to our existing stockholders.
Investing in the common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Public | |
|
Underwriting | |
|
Proceeds, before | |
|
|
Offering Price | |
|
Discount | |
|
expenses, to us | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Per Share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on
or
about ,
2006.
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley |
Lehman Brothers |
UBS Investment Bank |
,
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information different from that contained in this prospectus. We
are offering to sell shares of common stock and seeking offers
to buy shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers
and sales are permitted. The information contained in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus,
regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any
sale of the shares of common stock.
Through and
including ,
2006 (the
25th day
after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell
or trade shares, whether or not participating in this offering,
may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to
the dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting
as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus, but it may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. We urge you to read this entire
prospectus including the section entitled Risk
Factors and the financial statements and related notes,
before investing in our common stock.
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this
prospectus, (i) the terms we, our,
us, the Company, Chart
Industries and similar terms refer to Chart Industries,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and (ii) the term
issuer refers to Chart Industries, Inc. and not any
of its subsidiaries.
Chart Industries, Inc.
Our Company
We are a leading independent global manufacturer of highly
engineered equipment used in the production, storage and end-use
of hydrocarbon and industrial gases. We believe we are a
preferred global supplier of engineered equipment used
throughout the liquid gas supply chain. The largest portion of
end-use applications for our products is energy-related,
accounting for 51% of sales in 2005, and 58% of orders and 77%
of backlog at December 31, 2005. We are a leading
manufacturer of standard and engineered equipment primarily used
for low-temperature and cryogenic applications. We have
developed an expertise in cryogenic systems and equipment, which
operate at low temperatures sometimes approaching absolute zero
(0° Kelvin; -273° Centigrade; -459° Fahrenheit).
The majority of our products, including vacuum-insulated
containment vessels, heat exchangers, cold boxes and other
cryogenic components, are used throughout the liquid gas supply
chain for the purification, liquefaction, distribution, storage
and use of hydrocarbon and industrial gases.
We have attained this position by capitalizing on our low-cost
global manufacturing footprint, technical expertise and
know-how, broad product offering, reputation for quality, and by
focusing on attractive, growing markets. We have an established
sales and customer support presence across the globe and
low-cost manufacturing operations in the United States, Central
Europe and China. We believe we are the number one or two
equipment supplier in all of our primary end-use markets. For
the combined year ended December 31, 2005, we generated
revenues of $403.1 million compared to revenues of
$305.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Our backlog at December 31, 2005 was $233.6 million
compared to $129.3 at December 31, 2004.
We believe that we are well-positioned to benefit from a variety
of long-term trends driving demand in our industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing demand for natural gas and the geographic dislocation
of supply and consumption, which is resulting in the need for a
global network for liquefied natural gas (LNG); |
|
|
|
increasing demand for natural gas processing, particularly in
the Middle East, as crude oil producers look to utilize the gas
portions of their reserves; and |
|
|
|
increased demand for natural and industrial gases resulting from
rapid economic growth in developing areas, particularly Central
and Eastern Europe and China. |
We operate in three segments: (i) Energy and Chemicals
(E&C), (ii) Distribution and Storage
(D&S) and (iii) BioMedical. While each
segment manufactures and markets different cryogenic equipment
and systems to distinct end-users, they share a reliance on our
heat transfer and low temperature storage know-how and
expertise. The E&C and D&S segments manufacture products
used in energy-related applications. Through our E&C
segment, we are a leading global provider of cryogenic equipment
used in the separation, liquefaction and purification of
hydrocarbon and industrial gases. Our primary products include
heat exchangers, cold boxes and vacuum-insulated pipe
(VIP). Through our D&S segment, we are a leading
global provider of cryogenic equipment used in the distribution
and storage of hydrocarbon and industrial gases. Our primary
products include bulk storage systems for LNG and industrial
gases, packaged gas systems, VIP systems, LNG vehicle fueling
systems and beverage liquid
CO2
systems. Through our BioMedical segment, we are a leading
independent supplier of cryogenic equipment used in the storage
and
1
distribution of biological materials and oxygen used primarily
in the medical and animal breeding industries. Our primary
products include respiratory liquid oxygen therapy systems,
biological storage systems and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) cryostat components.
The following charts show the proportion of our revenues
generated by each operating segment as well as our estimate of
the proportion of revenue generated by end-user for the combined
year ended December 31, 2005.
Sales By Segment
Sales By End-User
Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths position us
to enhance our growth and profitability:
|
|
|
Focus on Attractive Growing End Markets. We
anticipate growing demand in the end markets we serve, with
particularly strong growth in LNG, natural gas processing,
specific international markets across all segments and
biomedical equipment. Energy Ventures Analysis projects global
LNG liquefaction capacity to increase 15.2% per annum from
2005 through 2011 and the International Energy Agency expects
the natural gas industry to invest approximately
$250 billion in LNG facilities from 2001 to 2030. In
addition, international demand for our products is being driven
by growing manufacturing capacity and industrial activity in
developing areas, particularly Central and Eastern Europe and
China. Rapid economic development in these areas has caused a
significant increase in the demand for natural and industrial
gases. According to Spiritus Consulting, the global market for
industrial gas is projected to grow 7.0% per annum through
2009. |
|
|
Substantial Revenue Visibility. We have a large
and growing backlog, which provides us with a high degree of
visibility in our forecasted revenue. Our backlog is comprised
of the portion of signed purchase orders or other written
contractual commitments received from customers that we have not
recognized as revenue under the percentage of completion method
or based upon shipment. Our backlog as of December 31, 2005
was $233.6 million compared to $129.3 million and
$49.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Projects for energy-related applications totaled
approximately $180.0 million in backlog as of
December 31, 2005. Substantially all of our backlog as of
December 31, 2005 is scheduled to be recognized as sales
during the next twelve months. |
|
|
Leading Market Positions. We believe we are
the #1 or #2 equipment supplier in each of our primary
end markets both domestically and internationally. Based on our
relationships with key customers, we believe that our strong
industry positioning makes us the preferred supplier and
typically one of only two or three suppliers qualified to
provide certain products to key customers. As our customers
continue to rationalize their vendors, we expect to gain
additional market share and that the benefit of our leading
position will become more pronounced. |
|
|
Diverse, Long-Standing Customer Base. We currently
serve over 2,000 customers worldwide. Our primary customers are
large, multinational producers and distributors of hydrocarbon
and industrial gases that provide us with revenue stability.
Customers and end-users also include high growth LNG processors,
petrochemical processors and biomedical companies. We have
developed strong, long- |
2
|
|
|
standing relationships with these customers, many of whom have
been purchasing products from us or one of our predecessors for
over 20 years. Our primary customers and end-users include
Air Products, Praxair, Airgas, Air Liquide, JGC Corporation
(JGC), Bechtel Corporation, General Electric
(GE), ExxonMobil, British Petroleum (BP)
and ConocoPhillips. |
|
|
Highly Flexible and Low-Cost Manufacturing Base.
Given our long-term investment in global manufacturing
facilities and specialized equipment, we have developed a
substantial comparative scale and geographic advantage within
the markets for the cryogenic products that we manufacture. The
scale enables cost efficiencies and the geographic reach
provides access to customers that we believe would be difficult
for a potential competitor to replicate. With more than
1.5 million square feet of manufacturing space across 11
primary facilities and three continents, we have substantial
operational flexibility. We are a low-cost producer for our
products across all segments. In addition, the high cost of
capital and economies of scale required for this type of
manufacturing create significant barriers for new entrants. |
|
|
Product Expertise, Quality, Reliability and
Know-How. Within our end markets, we have established a
reputation for quality, reliability and technical innovation. We
believe that the main drivers of our target customers
purchasing decisions are a suppliers product expertise,
quality, reliability and know-how rather than pricing and terms,
giving us an advantage based on our reputation and consequent
brand recognition. The value of this brand recognition is
significantly enhanced by the extended life cycle of our
products and the high cost to our target customers of product
failure. As a focused provider of highly engineered cryogenic
equipment, we believe it would be difficult for a new entrant to
duplicate our capabilities. |
|
|
Experienced Management Team. We have assembled a
strong senior management team with over 250 combined years of
related experience. We have a balance of entrepreneurs,
internally developed leaders and experienced managers from
analogous industries. The team has grown into a cohesive unit
with complementary management and operational skills. The
current management team is directly responsible for the strong
sales growth and the significant margin improvements experienced
since 2003. |
Business Strategy
We believe that we are well-positioned to maintain our
leadership in providing highly engineered equipment for use in
low-temperature and cryogenic applications and meet the
worlds growing demand for hydrocarbon and industrial gases
with more economical, reliable and environmentally friendly
systems. The principal elements of our strategy are as follows:
|
|
|
Continue to develop innovative, high-growth,
energy-specific products. We plan to continue to focus
on extending our cryogenic technological leadership, both to
capitalize on increasing demand for energy and to create new
applications. We believe that we are well positioned to benefit
from increased demand for LNG, natural gas processing and gas to
liquid (GTL) solutions. Our engineering, technical
and marketing employees actively assist customers in specifying
their needs and in determining appropriate products to meet
those needs. Current product development includes subsea VIP,
synthetic gas, hydrogen recovery, small-scale bulk gas
distribution solutions and LNG/ GTL production systems. |
|
|
Leverage our global platform to capitalize on growing
international demand. We expect growth in hydrocarbon
and industrial gas demand and investment over the next five
years in the Middle East, Central and Eastern Europe, Russia and
China. We believe that our historic and planned investment in
our manufacturing facilities in the Czech Republic and China and
the investment in sales and marketing capabilities in these
markets, supplemented by our continuing investment in our
U.S. facilities, has positioned us to increase our market
share in growing international markets. We believe we are
well-positioned to make acquisitions of complementary businesses
to expand our global infrastructure. |
|
|
Capitalize on our position as a market leader. We
plan to continue to grow our long-standing relationships with
the leading users of cryogenic equipment. Our engineering and
development teams partner with our customers to better
understand and meet their cryogenic equipment needs,
particularly in the growing LNG and international markets. We
intend to grow our customer base as industrial gas producers
increasingly outsource bulk tank storage and other non-core
parts of their business. |
3
|
|
|
Maintain our position as a low-cost producer while
continuing to improve operating performance. We believe
we are the lowest cost manufacturer for most of our products and
we intend to continue to leverage our scale, scope, technical
expertise and know-how to deliver to our customers higher
quality and more reliable products and services at lower cost.
Our largest manufacturing facility is in the Czech Republic,
which allows us to achieve considerable cost savings versus our
competitors. In addition, we believe China, where we are
experiencing significant growth, will be a sustainable low-cost
labor environment. We maintain a disciplined approach to capital
expenditures. We intend to make capacity investments in
energy-related markets where we expect to realize significant
and timely returns, and to also leverage our existing operating
capacity in other markets. |
Recent Developments
On February 9, 2006, we entered into a letter of intent to
purchase the common stock of a company that designs and
manufactures custom air cooled heat exchangers utilizing
advanced technology in thermal and mechanical design. The
aggregate purchase price for the acquisition is expected to be
approximately $16.5 million, which will be paid in cash.
The closing of this acquisition is subject to customary
conditions. We intend to finance this acquisition with our
available cash and/or borrowings under our senior secured credit
facility and expect the acquisition to close during the second
quarter of 2006.
Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risk. You
should carefully consider all the information in this prospectus
prior to investing in our common stock. Our ability to execute
our strategy is subject to the risks that are generally
associated with the production, storage and end-use of
hydrocarbon and industrial gases. We are also subject to a
number of risks related to our competitive position and business
strategies. For example, our acquisitive business strategy
exposes us to the risks involved in consummating and integrating
acquisitions, including the risk that in a future acquisition we
could incur additional debt and contingent liabilities which
could adversely affect our operating results. For additional
risks relating to our business and the offering, see Risk
Factors beginning on page 11 of this prospectus.
The Acquisition
On August 2, 2005, Chart Industries entered into an
agreement and plan of merger with certain of its stockholders,
First Reserve Fund X, L.P. (First Reserve), a
Delaware limited partnership, and CI Acquisition, Inc. (CI
Acquisition), a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of First Reserve, which provided for (i) the
sale of shares of common stock of Chart Industries, Inc. by
certain of its stockholders to CI Acquisition and (ii) the
merger of CI Acquisition with and into Chart Industries, with
Chart Industries surviving the merger as an indirect,
wholly-owned subsidiary of First Reserve. We refer to the stock
purchase, the merger and the related financing thereof
collectively as the Acquisition. The Acquisition
closed on October 17, 2005. In connection with the
Acquisition, entities affiliated with First Reserve contributed
$111.3 million in cash to fund a portion of the purchase
price of the equity interests in Chart Industries, and
management contributed $6.4 million in the form of rollover
options. The remainder of the cash needed to finance the
Acquisition, including related fees and expenses, was provided
by funds raised by the offering of our $170.0 million
senior subordinated notes due 2015 (the notes) and
borrowings under our $240.0 million senior secured credit
facility. The senior secured credit facility consists of a
$180.0 million term loan facility and a $60.0 million
revolving credit facility. See The Transactions.
Company Information
Chart Industries, Inc. is a Delaware corporation incorporated in
1992. Our principal executive offices are located at One
Infinity Corporate Centre Drive, Suite 300, Garfield
Heights, Ohio, 44125 and our telephone number is
(440) 753-1490.
The financial statements and other financial data presented in
this prospectus are of Chart Industries, Inc. and its direct and
indirect subsidiaries.
4
The Offering
|
|
|
Shares of common stock offered by Chart Industries, Inc. |
|
shares. |
|
Shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares
(including shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, that will
be dividended to our stockholders existing immediately prior to
this offering, consisting of affiliates of First Reserve and
certain members of our management, assuming the underwriters do
not exercise their option to purchase additional shares and
giving effect to
the -for-one
stock split we expect to effect prior to the consummation of
this offering). |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
shares. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering,
after deducting underwriting discounts, will be approximately
$ million.
We intend to use approximately
$ million
of the net proceeds to repay certain indebtedness. We intend to
use the remaining net proceeds of approximately
$ million
to pay a dividend to our stockholders existing immediately prior
to the offering, consisting of affiliates of First Reserve and
certain members of our management. See Use of
Proceeds. We also intend to use the proceeds we receive
from any shares sold pursuant to the underwriters
over-allotment option to pay an additional dividend to our
existing stockholders. |
|
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
GTL |
Unless we specifically state otherwise, all information in this
prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to
purchase additional shares; |
|
|
|
gives effect to
the -for
one stock split effected prior to the consummation of the
offering; |
|
|
|
assumes that we issue an
additional shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, of our
common stock to our existing stockholders pursuant to a stock
dividend that we will declare prior to the consummation of this
offering, the terms of which will require that shortly after the
expiration of the underwriters over-allotment option
(assuming the option is not exercised in full), we issue to our
existing stockholders the number of shares equal to (x) the
number of additional shares the underwriters have an option to
purchase minus (y) the actual number of shares the
underwriters purchase from us pursuant to that option; |
|
|
|
excludes 573,027 shares issuable to FR X Chart
Holdings LLC upon exercise of its warrant to purchase our
shares; and |
|
|
|
excludes shares
of our common stock reserved for issuance under our existing
stock option plans. |
The size of
the -for-one
stock split referenced herein is intended to achieve an
estimated share price between
$ and
$ per
share and has been calculated based on the mid-point of the
estimated price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus.
5
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Information
The financial statements referred to as the Predecessor Company
financial statements include the consolidated audited financial
statements of Chart Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries prior
to our Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Our emergence
from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in September 2003
resulted in a new reporting entity and the adoption of fresh
start accounting (Fresh-Start accounting) in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Statement of
Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code. The financial statements referred to
as the Reorganized Company financial statements include the
consolidated audited financial statements of Chart Industries,
Inc. and its subsidiaries after our emergence from
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and prior to the
Acquisition and related financing thereof. The financial
statements referred to as the Successor Company financial
statements include the consolidated audited financial statements
of Chart Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries after the
Acquisition and the related financing thereof.
The following table sets forth our summary historical
consolidated financial and other data as of the dates and for
the periods indicated. The Predecessor Company summary
historical financial statements and other data for the nine
months ended September 30, 2003 are derived from our
audited financial statements for such period included elsewhere
in this prospectus, which have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The
Reorganized Company summary historical financial statements and
other data for the year ended December 31, 2004, the three
months ended December 31, 2003 and the period from
January 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005 (the 2005
Reorganized Period) are derived from our audited financial
statements for such periods included elsewhere in this
prospectus, which have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP. The Successor Company summary historical financial
statements and other data as of December 31, 2005 and for
the period from October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005
(the 2005 Successor Period) are derived from our
audited financial statements for such periods included elsewhere
in this prospectus, which have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP. The data should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements, related notes and other
financial information included herein.
The following summary unaudited pro forma balance sheet
information as of December 31, 2005 has been prepared to
give pro forma effect to this offering and the application of
the proceeds therefrom as if they had occurred on
December 31, 2005. The following summary unaudited pro
forma statements of operations information for the year ended
December 31, 2005 has been prepared to give pro forma
effect to this offering, the application of the proceeds
therefrom and the Acquisition as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2005. The pro forma adjustments used in
preparing the pro forma financial information reflect estimates,
which we believe are reasonable but may change upon finalization
of our analysis. The assumptions used in the preparation of
unaudited financial information may not prove to be correct. The
pro forma financial information is for informational purposes
only and should not be considered indicative of actual results
that would have been achieved had the Acquisition and this
offering actually been consummated on the dates indicated and do
not purport to indicate balance sheet information or results of
operations as of any future date or any future period.
6
The historical consolidated financial data presented below is
not necessarily indicative of our future performance. This
information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction
with Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
Data, Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Information, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
October 17, | |
|
Year | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
$ |
403,149 |
|
|
Cost of sales(1)
|
|
|
141,240 |
|
|
|
52,509 |
|
|
|
211,770 |
|
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
|
75,733 |
|
|
|
293,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
55,777 |
|
|
|
16,061 |
|
|
|
93,806 |
|
|
|
88,213 |
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
|
110,132 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
44,211 |
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
53,374 |
|
|
|
59,826 |
|
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
|
84,764 |
|
|
Restructuring and other operating expenses, net(2)(3)
|
|
|
14,564 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,775 |
|
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
56,594 |
|
|
|
67,485 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
|
92,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,998 |
) |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
37,212 |
|
|
|
20,728 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
17,570 |
|
|
|
Interest expense, net(4)
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
27,401 |
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(8,490 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
29,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
(4,808 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
32,832 |
|
|
|
16,036 |
|
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
(12,017 |
) |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(3,602 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before minority interest
|
|
|
(7,855 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(8,415 |
) |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes and other
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7,918 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(8,486 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued operations(5)
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(7,085 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share data(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share(7):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
19,466 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
35,059 |
|
|
$ |
15,641 |
|
|
$ |
18,742 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
(20,799 |
) |
|
|
(362,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(15,907 |
) |
|
|
(13,976 |
) |
|
|
(35,744 |
) |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
348,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(8)
|
|
$ |
9,260 |
|
|
$ |
2,225 |
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
$ |
6,808 |
|
|
$ |
4,396 |
|
|
$ |
20,987 |
|
|
EBITDA(9)
|
|
|
15,522 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
45,936 |
|
|
|
26,989 |
|
|
|
9,005 |
|
|
|
36,337 |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
11,038 |
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
51,781 |
|
|
|
49,635 |
|
|
|
129,278 |
|
|
|
206,215 |
|
|
|
233,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
15,433 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Working capital (deficit)(10)
|
|
|
55,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
641,806 |
(11) |
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
347,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
116,330 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The three months ended December 31, 2003 and the 2005
Successor Period include non-cash inventory valuation charges of
$5.4 million and $8.9 million, respectively, related
to Fresh-Start and purchase accounting. |
|
|
(2) |
In March 2003, we completed the closure of our Wolverhampton,
United Kingdom manufacturing facility, operated by Chart Heat
Exchangers Limited (CHEL). On March 28, 2003,
CHEL filed for voluntary administration under the U.K.
Insolvency Act of 1986. CHELs application for voluntary
administration was approved on April 1, 2003 and an
administrator was appointed. In accordance with
SFAS No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries, we are not consolidating the accounts or
financial results of CHEL subsequent to March 28, 2003 due
to the assumption of control of CHEL by the insolvency
administrator. Effective March 28, 2003, we recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $13.7 million to write off
our net investment in CHEL. |
|
|
(3) |
In September 2003, in accordance with Fresh-Start accounting
related to our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, all
assets and liabilities were adjusted to their fair values. The
adjustment to record the assets and liabilities at fair value
resulted in net other income of $5.7 million. Further
information about the adjustment is included in the notes to our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes derivative contract valuation income or expense for
interest rate collars to manage interest exposure relative to
term debt. |
|
|
(5) |
This relates to the sale of our Greenville Tube, LLC business in
July 2003. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
additional information. |
|
|
(6) |
Unaudited pro forma basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
have been calculated in accordance with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) rules for initial public
offerings. These rules require that the weighted average share
calculation give retroactive effect to any changes in our
capital structure as well as the number of shares whose sale
proceeds would be necessary to repay any debt or to pay any
dividend as reflected in the pro forma adjustments. Therefore,
pro forma weighted average shares for purposes of the unaudited
pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share calculation, has
been adjusted to reflect
(i) the -for-one
stock split we expect to effect immediately prior to
consummation of this offering and (ii) the stock dividend
of shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, to our
existing stockholders that will be made shortly after the
expiration of the underwriters over-allotment option
assuming no exercise of that option
and shares
of our common stock being offered hereby. |
|
|
(7) |
Earnings per share data on a diluted basis is not shown because
it is anti-dilutive as a result of our loss during the 2005
Successor Period. |
|
|
(8) |
The nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the 2005
Successor Period include financing costs amortization of
$1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. |
|
|
(9) |
EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) before
income tax expense and interest expense plus depreciation and
amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted as
indicated below. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to
represent cash flow from operations as defined by |
8
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP and should not be used as an alternative to net income as
an indicator of operating performance or to cash flow as a
measure of liquidity. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are included in
this prospectus because they are a basis upon which our
management assesses financial performance. The senior secured
credit facility also includes the definition of pro forma EBITDA
which is used in the calculation of certain covenants. Pro forma
EBITDA is calculated based on EBITDA and is adjusted in a manner
similar to that described herein. While EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA are frequently used as a measure of operations and the
ability to meet debt service requirements, they are not
necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of
other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method
of calculation. The following table reconciles EBITDA to net
income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
October 17, | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(7,085 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,486 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(3,602 |
) |
Interest expense net(a)
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
27,401 |
|
Depreciation and amortization(b)
|
|
|
9,260 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
20,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
15,522 |
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
45,936 |
|
|
$ |
26,989 |
|
|
$ |
9,005 |
|
|
$ |
36,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes derivative contract valuation income or expense for
interest rate collars to manage interest exposure relative to
term debt. |
|
(b) |
The nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the 2005
Successor Period include financing costs amortization of
$1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
The following table reconciles EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA as such
terms are defined in our senior secured credit facility and the
indenture governing the notes. Certain covenants under the
senior secured credit facility are also tied to ratios based on
Adjusted EBITDA and our ability to engage in activities such as
incurring additional debt, making investments and paying
dividends under both our indenture and senior secured credit
facility is also tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
October 17, | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
15,522 |
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
45,936 |
|
|
$ |
26,989 |
|
|
$ |
9,005 |
|
|
$ |
36,300 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
9,508 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
Inventory valuation charge(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
Acquisition expenses(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
In-process research and development charge(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
Hurricane losses(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs(f)
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
Reorganization expenses(g)
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
Appraisal rights settlement(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Management fees(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(j)
|
|
|
8,929 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations(k)
|
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
25,325 |
|
|
$ |
10,153 |
|
|
$ |
52,934 |
|
|
$ |
50,269 |
|
|
$ |
19,672 |
|
|
$ |
69,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents stock-based compensation charges for stock and stock
options issued to key employees and directors, and an additional
charge for the cash-out of stock options in the 2005 Reorganized
Period as a result of the Acquisition. Although it may be of
limited relevance to holders of our debt instruments, it may be
of more relevance to our equity holders, since such equity
holders ultimately bear such expenses. |
|
|
(b) |
Represents a non-cash inventory valuation charge recorded in
cost of sales for the adjustment of inventory to fair value as a
result of Fresh-Start accounting as of September 30, 2003
and purchase accounting as of October 17, 2005, the closing
date of the Acquisition. Under Fresh-Start and purchase
accounting, inventory was adjusted to the fair value as of the
dates indicated above, and a corresponding charge was taken in
the subsequent three months ended December 31, 2003 and the
2005 Successor Period cost of sales as the inventory was sold. |
|
|
(c) |
Represents acquisition expenses, primarily professional fees,
incurred by us as a result of the Acquisition. |
|
|
(d) |
Represents a non-cash charge for purchased in-process research
and development in conjunction with the acquisition of Changzhou
CEM Cryo Equipment Co., Ltd (CEM) in 2005. |
|
|
(e) |
Represents losses and costs incurred related to the damaged
caused by Hurricane Rita at our New Iberia, Louisiana facilities. |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Includes inventory valuation charges recorded in cost of sales,
and severance expenses, facility exit costs and non-operating
expenses related to the execution of our operational
restructuring plan, which primarily included moving the
Burnsville, Minnesota manufacturing operations to Canton,
Georgia, closing the Plaistow, New Hampshire and Wolverhampton,
United Kingdom manufacturing facilities and closing the
Westborough, Massachusetts engineering office. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for additional
information. |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Includes pre-bankruptcy debt restructuring-related fees,
Fresh-Start accounting adjustments and expenses, and a claim
settlement related to our 2003 bankruptcy reorganization. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for additional
information. |
|
|
(h) |
Represents a charge for the settlement of former Reorganized
Company shareholders appraisal rights claims as a result
of the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
(i) |
Represents non-recurring management fees charged by our
Reorganized Company majority shareholders, which are not charged
by First Reserve. |
|
|
(j) |
Includes non-recurring gains and losses and charges on the sale,
disposal or impairment of assets. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
(k) |
Represents income from our former Greenville Tube, LLC stainless
steel tubing business, which was sold in July 2003. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for additional
information. |
|
|
(10) |
Working capital is defined as current assets excluding cash
minus current liabilities excluding short-term debt. |
|
(11) |
Includes $236.7 million of goodwill and $154.1 million
of finite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of
December 31, 2005. |
10
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risk. You
should carefully consider the risks described below, together
with the other information in this prospectus, prior to
investing in our common stock.
Risks Related to our Business
|
|
|
The markets we serve are subject to cyclical demand, which
could harm our business and make it difficult to project
long-term performance. |
Demand for our products depends in large part upon the level of
capital and maintenance expenditures by many of our customers
and end users, in particular those customers in the global
hydrocarbon and industrial gas markets. These customers
expenditures historically have been cyclical in nature and
vulnerable to economic downturns. Decreased capital and
maintenance spending by these customers could have a material
adverse effect on the demand for our products and our business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, this
historically cyclical demand limits our ability to make accurate
long-term predictions about the performance of our company.
For example, certain of our core businesses underperformed in
the years prior to 2004 due to a general downturn in capital
spending in the global and domestic industrial gas markets.
While we have experienced demand growth since late 2003 in the
global hydrocarbon and industrial gas markets, this growth may
not continue and our businesses performance may not be
markedly better or may be worse in the future. In addition,
changing world economic and political conditions may reduce the
willingness of our customers and prospective customers to commit
funds to purchase our products and services. Further, in 2005,
the U.S. government announced the reduction of the amount of
dollars it offered as reimbursement to our customers for
purchasing our medical oxygen therapy products, which has
adversely affected demand for these products.
|
|
|
The loss of, or significant reduction in, purchases by our
largest customers could adversely affect our revenues. |
Although no single customer accounted for more than 9% of our
total sales for the year ended December 31, 2005, a small
number of customers has accounted for a substantial portion of
our historical net sales, and we expect that a limited number of
customers will continue to represent a substantial portion of
our sales for the foreseeable future. Approximately 33%, 39%,
36% and 26% of our sales for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, were made to Praxair,
Air Liquide, Air Products, Bechtel, Airgas, BOC, JGC and Linde,
which management believes are the largest producers and
distributors of hydrocarbon and industrial gases, and their
suppliers. The loss of any of our major customers or a decrease
in orders or anticipated spending by such customers could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. Our largest customers, such as Linde and
BOC, could also engage in business combinations which could
increase their size and increase or decrease the portion of our
total sales concentration to any single customer. Additionally,
we currently sell all of our MRI components to GE, a leading
worldwide manufacturer of MRI equipment, which accounted for
$7.5 million in sales for the year ended December 31,
2005. The loss of, or significant reduction in, purchases of our
MRI components by GE could adversely effect our BioMedical
business.
|
|
|
We may be unable to compete successfully in the highly
competitive markets in which we operate. |
Although many of our products serve niche markets, a number of
our direct and indirect competitors in these markets are major
corporations, some of which have substantially greater
technical, financial and marketing resources than we, and other
competitors may enter these markets. Any increase in competition
may cause us to lose market share or compel us to reduce prices
to remain competitive, which could result in reduced sales and
earnings. Companies that operate in our industry are Air
Products, Kobe, Linde, Nordon, Puritan-Bennett, a division of
Tyco International, Ltd., Sumitomo and Taylor-Wharton, a Harsco
Company. Additionally, we compete with several suppliers owned
by global industrial gas producers and many smaller
fabrication-only facilities around the world. Increased
competition with these companies could prevent the institution
of price increases or could require price reductions or
increased spending on research and
11
development and marketing and sales, any of which could
adversely affect our results of operation. In the event of an
industry downturn, customers who typically outsource their need
for cryogenic systems to us may use their excess capacity to
produce such systems themselves. We also compete in the sale of
a limited number of products with certain of our major customers.
|
|
|
We will soon be required to evaluate our internal controls
under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any
adverse results from such evaluation could result in a loss of
investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse
effect on our stock. |
As a result of this offering, we become subject to reporting and
other obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Beginning with the year
ending December 31, 2007, pursuant to Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will be required to furnish a
report by our management on our internal control over financial
reporting, and our auditors will be required to deliver an
attestation report on managements assessment of and
operating effectiveness of internal controls. The report by our
management must contain, among other matters, an assessment of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting and audited consolidated financial statements as of
the end of our fiscal year. This assessment must include
disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting identified by management.
In June 2004, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or
PCAOB, adopted rules for purposes of implementing
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which
included revised definitions of material weaknesses and
significant deficiencies in internal control over financial
reporting. The PCAOB defines a material weakness as a
significant deficiency, or a combination of significant
deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that
a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected. The rules
describe certain circumstances as being both significant
deficiencies and strong indicators that a material weakness in
internal control over financial reporting exists.
We have substantial effort ahead of us to complete documentation
of our internal control system and financial processes,
information systems, assessment of their design, remediation of
control deficiencies identified in these efforts and management
testing of the designs and operation of internal controls. We
may not be able to complete the required management assessment
by our reporting deadline. An inability to complete and document
this assessment could result in us receiving less than an
unqualified report from our auditors with respect to our
internal controls.
Each year, starting with 2007, we must perform the system and
process documentation and evaluation needed to comply with
Section 404, which is both costly and challenging. During
this process, if our management identifies one or more material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we
will be unable to assert that such internal control is
effective. If material weaknesses are identified and not
remediated with respect to our internal control over financial
reporting, we would not be able to conclude that our internal
controls over financial reporting were effective, which could
result in the inability of our external auditors to deliver an
unqualified report, or any report, on our internal controls. If
we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial
reporting is effective, investors could lose confidence in the
accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could
have an adverse effect on our stock price.
|
|
|
As a global business, we are exposed to economic,
political and other risks in different countries which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations. |
Since we manufacture and sell our products worldwide, our
business is subject to risks associated with doing business
internationally. In 2005, 51% of our sales were made in
international markets. Our future results could be harmed by a
variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
exchange controls and currency restrictions; |
12
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political,
social or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets; |
|
|
|
civil unrest, turmoil or outbreak of disease in any of the
countries in which we operate; |
|
|
|
tariffs, other trade protection measures and import or export
licensing requirements; |
|
|
|
potentially negative consequences from changes in U.S. and
international tax laws; |
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing and managing geographically widespread
operations; |
|
|
|
differing labor regulations; |
|
|
|
requirements relating to withholding taxes on remittances and
other payments by subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
different regulatory regimes controlling the protection of our
intellectual property; |
|
|
|
restrictions on our ability to own or operate subsidiaries, make
investments or acquire new businesses in these jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
restrictions on our ability to repatriate dividends from our
foreign subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
difficulty in collecting international accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
difficulty in enforcement of contractual obligations under
non-U.S. law; |
|
|
|
transportation delays or interruptions; |
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements; and |
|
|
|
the burden of complying with multiple and potentially
conflicting laws. |
Our international operations also expose us to different local
political and business risks and challenges. For example, we are
faced with potential difficulties in staffing and managing local
operations and we have to design local solutions to manage
credit and legal risks of local customers and distributors. In
addition, because some of our international sales are to
suppliers that perform work for foreign governments, we are
subject to the political risks associated with foreign
government projects. For example, certain foreign governments
may require suppliers for a project to obtain products solely
from local manufacturers or may prohibit the use of products
manufactured in certain countries.
International growth and expansion into emerging markets, such
as China, Central and Eastern Europe, and the Middle East, may
cause us difficulty due to greater regulatory barriers than in
the United States, the necessity of adapting to new regulatory
systems, problems related to entering new markets with different
economic, social and political systems, and significant
competition from the primary participants in these markets, some
of which may have substantially greater resources than us.
Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon
our ability to succeed in differing economic, social and
political conditions. We may not succeed in developing and
implementing policies and strategies to counter the foregoing
factors effectively in each location where we do business and
the foregoing factors may have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
|
If we are unable to successfully manage our growth, our
business could be adversely affected. |
We expect to continue to expand our operations in the United
States and abroad, particularly in China and the Czech Republic.
Our ability to operate our business successfully and implement
our strategies depends, in part, on our ability to allocate our
resources optimally in each of our facilities in order to
maintain efficient operations as we expand. Ineffective
management of our growth could cause manufacturing
inefficiencies, increase our operating costs, place significant
strain on our management and administrative resources and could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
For example, we plan to invest over $20 million in new
capital expenditures in the United States in 2006 and 2007
related to the expected growth of our Energy &
Chemicals business. If we fail to implement this
13
capital project in a timely and effective manner, we may lose
the opportunity to obtain some customer orders. Even if we
effectively implement this project, the orders needed to support
the capital expenditure may not be obtained or may be less than
expected, which may result in sales or profitability at lower
levels than anticipated. In addition, potential cost overruns,
delays or unanticipated problems in any capital expansion could
make the expansion more costly than originally predicted.
In addition, we are in the process of establishing our internal
audit function, and adverse developments in the implementation
of this function may adversely affect our ability to manage our
growth.
|
|
|
If we lose our senior management or other key employees,
our business may be adversely affected. |
Our ability to successfully operate and grow our business and
implement our strategies is largely dependent on the efforts,
abilities and services of our senior management and other key
employees. Our future success will also depend on, among other
factors, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel,
such as engineers and other skilled labor, either through direct
hiring or the acquisition of other businesses employing such
professionals. The loss of the services of any of our senior
management or other key employees or the failure to attract or
retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse
effect on our business or business prospects.
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the prices and availability of raw
materials and our exposure to fixed-price contracts could
negatively impact our financial results. |
The pricing and availability of raw materials for use in our
businesses can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our
control, including general, domestic and international economic
conditions, labor costs, production levels, competition,
consumer demand, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange
rates. This volatility can significantly affect the availability
and cost of raw materials for us, and may, therefore, have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The commodity metals we use, including aluminum and stainless
steel, have experienced significant upward fluctuations in
price. On average, approximately half of our cost of sales is
represented by the cost of commodities metals. We have generally
been able to recover the cost increases through price increases
to our customers; however, during periods of rising prices of
raw materials, such as in 2004 and 2005, we may be unable to
pass a portion of such increases on to our customers.
Conversely, when raw material prices decline, customer demands
for lower prices could result in lower sale prices and, to the
extent we have existing inventory, lower margins. As a result,
fluctuations in raw material prices could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
In addition, a substantial portion of our revenues is derived
from fixed-price contracts for large system projects. To the
extent that original cost estimates prove to be inaccurate or
the contracts do not permit us to pass increased costs on to our
customers, profitability from a particular contract may be
adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
|
|
|
We may fail to successfully acquire or integrate companies
that provide complementary products or technologies. |
A component of our growth strategy is the acquisition of
businesses that complement our existing products and services.
Our acquisition strategy involves the potential risks inherent
in assessing the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent or
other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition
candidates and in integrating the operations of acquired
companies. In addition, any acquisition of a foreign business
may increase our exposure to certain risks inherent in doing
business outside the United States, including currency exchange
rate fluctuations, restrictions on the repatriation of profits,
compliance with foreign laws and standards and political risks.
From time to time, we may have acquisition discussions with
potential target companies. We are unable to predict the
likelihood of a material acquisition being completed as a result
of any of these discussions. If an
14
opportunity arises and we proceed with a relatively large
acquisition for cash consideration, a substantial portion of our
surplus borrowing capacity could be used in order to consummate
any such acquisition. We may further seek to finance a potential
acquisition through a debt or equity financing. For large
potential acquisition opportunities, should any arise, one or
more of the potential risks described above may be particularly
acute.
Except as discussed under Prospectus SummaryRecent
Developments, we are not presently engaged in any
negotiations concerning any acquisition which may be material in
size and scope to our business. We anticipate, however, that one
or more potential acquisition opportunities could become
available in the future. If and when appropriate acquisition
opportunities become available, we may pursue them actively. No
assurance can be given that any acquisition will or will not
occur, that if an acquisition does occur that it will not
materially and adversely affect us or that any such acquisition
will be successful in enhancing our business for one or more of
the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Any business acquired may not be integrated successfully and may
not prove profitable; |
|
|
|
The price we pay for any business acquired may overstate the
value of that business or otherwise be too high; |
|
|
|
We may fail to achieve acquisition synergies; or |
|
|
|
The focus on the integration of operations of acquired entities
may divert managements attention from the
day-to-day operation of
our businesses. |
Inherent in any future acquisition is the risk of transitioning
company cultures and facilities. The failure to efficiently and
effectively achieve such transitions could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations, particularly during the period immediately following
any acquisition. In addition to the risks inherent in completing
an acquisition, we are further subject to the risk that
acquisition opportunities may not continue to be available and
we may not have access to the capital required to finance
potential acquisitions that are available.
|
|
|
If we are unable to continue our technological innovation
in our business and successful introduction of new commercial
products, our profitability could be adversely affected. |
The industries we serve, including the energy and biomedical
industries, experience periodic technological change and product
improvement. Manufacturers periodically introduce new
generations of products or require new technological capacity to
develop customized products or respond to industry developments
or needs. Our future growth will depend on our ability to gauge
the direction of the commercial and technological progress in
our markets, as well as our ability to acquire new product
technology or fund and successfully develop, manufacture and
market products in this constantly changing environment. We must
continue to identify, develop, manufacture and market innovative
products on a timely basis to replace existing products in order
to maintain our profit margins and competitive position. We may
not be successful in acquiring and developing new products or
technology and any of our new products may not be accepted by
our customers. If we fail to keep pace with evolving
technological innovations in the markets we serve, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
|
|
|
We carry significant goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets on our balance sheet, which are subject to
impairment testing and could subject us to significant charges
to earnings in the future if impairment occurs. |
As of December 31, 2005, we had goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets of approximately
$272 million, which represented 42% of our total assets.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not
amortized but are tested for impairment annually or more often
if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential
impairment may exist. Factors that could indicate that our
goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired
include a decline in stock price and market capitalization,
lower than projected operating results and cash flows, and
slower growth rates in our industry. To test for impairment, we
develop a model to estimate the fair market value of our
reporting segments. This fair market value model incorporates our
15
estimates of future operating results and cash flows, estimates
of allocations of certain assets and cash flows among reporting
segments, estimates of future growth rates and our judgment
regarding the applicable discount rates to use to discount those
estimated operating results and cash flows. If an impairment is
determined to exist, we are required to record a charge to
earnings in our financial statements, which may be significant,
as in 2002 when we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$92.4 million to write off non-deductible goodwill of the
D&S segment. While we do not presently anticipate that any
of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets will be
impaired in the foreseeable future, if an impairment is
determined to exist and we are required to record a charge to
earnings, it may result in a material adverse impact on our
results of operations and shareholders equity.
|
|
|
We may be required to make material expenditures in order
to comply with environmental, health and safety laws, or incur
additional liabilities under these laws. |
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws
and regulations that impose various environmental controls on us
or otherwise relate to environmental protection and various
health and safety matters, including the discharge of pollutants
in the air and water, the handling, use, treatment, storage and
clean-up of solid and
hazardous materials and wastes, and the investigation and
remediation of soil and groundwater affected by hazardous
substances. These laws and regulations often impose strict,
retroactive and joint and several liability for the costs of,
and damages resulting from, cleaning up our, or our
predecessors, past or present facilities and third party
disposal sites. Compliance with these laws generally increases
the costs of transportation and storage of raw materials and
finished products, as well as the costs of storing and disposing
waste, and could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and financial condition. If we are found to have
violated any of these laws, we may become subject to corrective
action orders and fines or penalties, and incur substantial
costs, including substantial remediation costs. Further, we also
could be subject to future liability resulting from conditions
that are currently unknown to us that could be discovered in the
future.
We are currently remediating or developing work plans for
remediation of environmental conditions involving certain
current or former facilities. For example, the discovery of
contamination arising from historical industrial operations at
our Clarksville, Arkansas property has exposed us, and in the
future may continue to expose us, to remediation obligations. To
date, our environmental remediation expenditures and costs for
otherwise complying with environmental laws and regulations have
not been material, but the uncertainties associated with the
investigation and remediation of contamination and the fact that
such laws or regulations change frequently makes predicting the
cost or impact of such laws and regulations on our future
operations uncertain. Stricter environmental, safety and health
laws, regulations or enforcement policies could result in
substantial costs and liabilities to us and could subject us to
more rigorous scrutiny. Consequently, compliance with these laws
could result in significant expenditures as well as other costs
and liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
|
|
|
The insolvency of our formerly consolidated subsidiary,
Chart Heat Exchangers Limited, could have a material adverse
impact on our liquidity and financial position. |
On March 28, 2003, our U.K. subsidiary, Chart Heat
Exchangers Limited, or CHEL, which previously operated the
closed Wolverhampton, United Kingdom manufacturing facility,
filed for a voluntary administration under the U.K. Insolvency
Act 1986. CHELs application for voluntary administration
was approved on April 1, 2003 and an administrator was
appointed. Additionally, we received information that indicated
that CHELs net pension plan obligations had increased
significantly, primarily due to a decline in plan asset values
and interest rates, as well as increased plan liabilities,
resulting in an estimated plan deficit of approximately
$12 million as of March 2003. Based on our financial
condition, in March 2003 we determined not to advance funds to
CHEL in amounts necessary to fund CHELs obligations. Since
CHEL was unable to fund its net pension deficit, the trustees of
the CHEL pension plan requested a decision to
wind-up the plan from a
U.K. pension regulatory board. That board approved the
wind-up as of
March 28, 2003. While no claims related to the CHEL
insolvency presently are pending against us, persons impacted by
the insolvency or others could bring pension and/or benefit
related claims against us. Claims may be asserted against us for
pension or other
16
obligations of CHEL related to these matters. To the extent we
are found to have significant liability with respect to
CHELs obligations, such liability could have a material
adverse impact on our liquidity, results of operations and
financial position as a result of CHELs insolvency.
|
|
|
Due to the nature of our business and products, we may be
liable for damages based on product liability and warranty
claims. |
Due to the high pressures and low temperatures at which many of
our products are used and the fact that some of our products are
manufactured for relatively broad consumer use, we face an
inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event that the
failure, use or misuse of our products results, or is alleged to
result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. We believe that
we meet or exceed existing professional specification standards
recognized or required in the industries in which we operate. We
have been subject to claims in the past, none of which have had
a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results
of operations, and we may be subject to claims in the future.
Although we currently maintain product liability coverage, which
we believe is adequate for the continued operation of our
business, such insurance may become difficult to obtain or
unobtainable in the future on terms acceptable to us. A
successful product liability claim or series of claims against
us, including one or more consumer claims purporting to
constitute class actions, in excess of our insurance coverage
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or results of operations.
|
|
|
Increases in labor costs, potential labor disputes and
work stoppages at our facilities could materially adversely
affect our financial performance. |
Our financial performance is affected by the availability of
qualified personnel and the cost of labor. As of
December 31, 2005, we had 2,271 employees, including 1,402
domestic employees and 869 international employees. These
employees consisted of 766 salaried, 283 union hourly and 1,222
non-union hourly employees as of December 31, 2005. During
2005, the union that formerly represented our employees at one
facility was decertified. Employees represented by a union
presently are subject to one collective bargaining agreement
with a local union in the United States that expires in February
2007. If we are unable to enter into new, satisfactory labor
agreements with our unionized employees upon expiration of their
collective bargaining agreement, we could experience a
significant disruption to our operations, which could cause us
to be unable to deliver products to customers on a timely basis.
Other labor controversies may likewise impede our operations.
Such disruptions could result in a loss of business and an
increase in our operating expenses, which could reduce our
profit margins. In addition, our non-unionized labor force may
become subject to labor union organizing efforts, which could
cause us to incur additional labor costs and increase the
related risks that we now face.
|
|
|
We may have to make significant cash payments to our
defined benefit pension plans, reducing the cash available for
our business. |
We have four defined benefit pension plans covering certain
U.S. hourly and salaried employees. All of these plans have
been frozen. Our current funding policy is to contribute at
least the minimum funding amounts required by law. Based on
current actuarial estimates, we expect to contribute
approximately $1.3 million to our U.S. defined benefit
pension plans during 2006. If the performance of our assets in
our pension plans does not meet our expectations or if other
actuarial assumptions are modified, our contributions for these
years could be higher than we expect, thus reducing the
available cash for our business.
|
|
|
Fluctuations in exchange and interest rates may affect our
operating results. |
Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may adversely
affect our results of operations. Because our consolidated
financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, if we
generate sales or earnings in other currencies, the translation
of those results into U.S. dollars can result in a
significant increase or decrease in the amount of those sales or
earnings. We also bid for certain foreign projects in
U.S. dollars. If the U.S. dollar strengthens relative
to the value of the local currency, we may be less competitive
on those projects. In addition, our debt service requirements
are primarily in U.S. dollars and a portion of our cash
flow is generated in euros or other foreign currencies.
Significant changes in the value of the foreign currencies
relative to the U.S. dollar could
17
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
our ability to meet interest and principal payments on our debt.
In addition, fluctuations in currencies relative to the
U.S. dollar may make it more difficult to perform
period-to-period
comparisons of our reported results of operations. For purposes
of accounting, the assets and liabilities of our foreign
operations, where the local currency is the functional currency,
are translated using period-end exchange rates, and the revenues
and expenses of our foreign operations are translated using
average exchange rates during each period.
In addition to currency translation risks, we incur currency
transaction risk whenever we or one of our subsidiaries enters
into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a currency
other than the local currency of the transacting entity. Given
the volatility of exchange rates, we may not be able to
effectively manage our currency and/or translation risks.
Volatility in currency exchange rates may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations. We have purchased and may continue to purchase
foreign currency forward purchase and sales contracts to manage
the risk of adverse currency fluctuations.
|
|
|
Our operations could be impacted by the effects of
hurricanes, which could be more severe than the damage and
impact that our New Iberia, Louisiana operations encountered
from hurricanes in 2005. |
Some of our operations, including our operations in New Iberia,
Louisiana and Houston, Texas, are located in geographic regions
and physical locations that are susceptible to physical damage
and longer-term economic disruption from hurricanes. We also
expect to make significant capital expenditures in
hurricane-susceptible locations in the near future. These
weather events can disrupt our operations, result in damage to
our properties and negatively affect the local economy in which
these facilities operate. In 2005, for example, our New Iberia,
Louisiana operations encountered some damage from the storm
surge and flooding caused by Hurricane Rita. Future hurricanes
may cause production or delivery delays as a result of the
physical damage to the facilities, the unavailability of
employees and temporary workers, the shortage of or delay in
receiving certain raw materials or manufacturing supplies and
the diminished availability or delay of transportation for
customer shipments, any of which may have an adverse affect on
our financial position and results of operations. Although we
maintain insurance subject to certain deductibles, which may
cover some of our losses, that insurance may become unavailable
or prove to be inadequate.
|
|
|
Failure to protect our intellectual property and know-how
could adversely affect our business. |
We rely on a combination of internal procedures, nondisclosure
agreements, intellectual property rights assignment agreements,
licenses, patents, trademarks and copyright law to protect our
intellectual property and know-how. Our intellectual property
rights may not be successfully asserted in the future or may be
invalidated, circumvented or challenged. In addition, the laws
of certain foreign countries in which our products may be sold
do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same
extent as the laws of the United States. Our failure or
inability to protect our proprietary information could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We have obtained and applied for some U.S. and foreign trademark
and patent registrations and will continue to evaluate the
registration of additional trademarks and patents, as
appropriate. We cannot guarantee that any of our pending
applications will be approved by the applicable governmental
authorities. Moreover, even if the applications are approved,
third parties may seek to oppose or otherwise challenge these
registrations. A failure to obtain trademark or patent
registrations in the United States or elsewhere could limit our
ability to protect our trademarks and technologies and could
impede our business in those jurisdictions.
In addition, we may be unable to prevent third parties from
using our intellectual property rights and know-how without our
authorization or from independently developing intellectual
property that is the same as or similar to ours, particularly in
those countries where the laws do not protect our intellectual
property rights as fully as in the United States. The
unauthorized use of our know-how by third parties could reduce
or eliminate any competitive advantage we have developed, cause
us to lose sales or otherwise harm our business. If we must sue
to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, any
suits or proceedings could be burdensome and costly, and we may
not prevail.
18
|
|
|
We may be subject to claims that our products or processes
infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may
cause us to pay unexpected litigation costs or damages, modify
our products or processes or prevent us from selling our
products. |
Although it is our intention to avoid infringing or otherwise
violating the intellectual property rights of others, third
parties may nevertheless claim that our processes and products
infringe their intellectual property rights. Whether or not
these claims have merit, we may be subject to costly and
time-consuming legal proceedings, and this could divert our
managements attention from operating our businesses. In
order to resolve such proceedings, we may need to obtain
licenses from these third parties or substantially reengineer or
rename our products in order to avoid infringement. In addition,
we might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on
acceptable terms, or at all, or be able to reengineer or rename
our products successfully.
|
|
|
The continued threat of terrorism, the occurrence of
terrorist acts and ongoing military actions could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations. |
The continued threat of terrorism and ongoing military actions,
as well as heightened security measures in response to these
threats and actions, may cause significant volatility in global
financial markets, reduced economic activity, reduced
availability of essential raw materials or supplies and
disruptions to commerce, our company, our employees and our
customers, thereby adversely affecting our business. The
continued threat of terrorism also could lead to changes in the
amount and scope of available insurance coverage as well as
higher premiums. Terrorist actions also could disrupt our
operations in the United States or abroad.
|
|
|
We are subject to regulations governing the export of our
products. |
Due to our significant foreign sales, our export activities are
subject to regulation, including the U.S. Treasury
Departments Office of Foreign Assets Controls
regulations. While we believe we are in compliance with these
regulations, there can be no assurance that we are not
currently, or may in the future be, in violation of these
regulations. Any violations may subject us to government
scrutiny, investigation and civil and criminal penalties and may
have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
|
As a provider of products to the U.S. government, we
are subject to federal rules, regulations, audits and
investigations, the violation or failure of which could
adversely affect our business. |
We sell certain of our products to the U.S. government and,
therefore, we must comply with and are affected by laws and
regulations governing purchases by the U.S. government.
Government contract laws and regulations affect how we do
business with our government customers and, in some instances,
impose added costs on our business. For example, a violation of
specific laws and regulations could result in the imposition of
fines and penalties or the termination of our contracts or
debarment from bidding on contracts. In some instances, these
laws and regulations impose terms or rights that are more
favorable to the government than those typically available to
commercial parties in negotiated transactions.
|
|
|
We are controlled by First Reserve, whose interest may not
be aligned with yours or ours. |
Upon completion of this offering, First Reserve may continue to
control a majority of our capital stock. As a result, First
Reserve has the ability to control our policies and operations,
including the election of directors, the appointment of
management, the entering into of mergers, sales of substantially
all of our assets and other extraordinary transactions, future
issuances of our common stock or other securities, the
implementation of stock repurchase programs, the payments of
dividends, if any, on our common stock, the incurrence of debt
by us and amendments to our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws. Additionally, First Reserve is in the business of making
investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and
hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly
with us. First Reserve may also pursue acquisition opportunities
that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result,
those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. So
long as First Reserve continues to own a significant amount of
our equity, even if
19
such amount is less than 50%, it will continue to be able to
strongly influence or effectively control our decisions.
|
|
|
As a controlled company within the meaning of
the New York Stock Exchange rules, we will qualify for, and
intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance
requirements. |
Upon completion of this offering, First Reserve may continue to
control a majority of our outstanding common stock. As a result,
we would be a controlled company within the meaning
of the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards.
Under the New York Stock Exchange rules, a company of which more
than 50% of the voting power is held by another company is a
controlled company and may elect not to comply with
certain New York Stock Exchange corporate governance
requirements, including (1) the requirement that a majority
of the board of directors consist of independent directors,
(2) the requirement that we have a nominating/corporate
governance committee that is composed entirely of independent
directors with a written charter addressing the committees
purpose and responsibilities and (3) the requirement that
we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of
independent directors with a written charter addressing the
committees purpose and responsibilities. If available, we
intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, we would not
have a majority of independent directors nor would our
nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees
consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you
would not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of
companies that are subject to all of the New York Stock Exchange
corporate governance requirements.
Risks Related To Our Leverage
|
|
|
Our substantial leverage and significant debt service
obligations could adversely affect our financial condition and
prevent us from fulfilling our debt service obligations. |
We are highly leveraged and have significant debt service
obligations. Our financial performance could be affected by our
substantial leverage. As of December 31, 2005, our total
indebtedness was $347.3 million. In addition, at that date,
we had $22.4 million of letters of credit and bank
guarantees outstanding and borrowing capacity of approximately
$37.6 million under the revolving portion of our senior
secured credit facility, after giving effect to the letters of
credit and bank guarantees outstanding. We may also incur
additional indebtedness in the future. This high level of
indebtedness could have important negative consequences to us
and you, including:
|
|
|
|
|
we may have difficulty generating sufficient cash flows to pay
interest and satisfy our debt obligations; |
|
|
|
we may have difficulty obtaining financing in the future for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes; |
|
|
|
we need to use a substantial portion of our available cash flow
to pay interest and principal on our debt, which will reduce the
amount of money available to finance our operations and other
business activities; |
|
|
|
some of our debt, including our borrowings under our senior
secured credit facility, has variable rates of interest, which
exposes us to the risk of increased interest rates; |
|
|
|
our debt level increases our vulnerability to general economic
downturns and adverse industry conditions; |
|
|
|
our debt level could limit our flexibility in planning for, or
reacting to, changes in our business and in our industry in
general; |
|
|
|
our substantial amount of debt and the amount we must pay to
service our debt obligations could place us at a competitive
disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; |
|
|
|
our customers may react adversely to our significant debt level
and seek or develop alternative suppliers; |
20
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with the financial and other restrictive
covenants in our debt instruments which, among other things,
require us to maintain specified financial ratios and limit our
ability to incur debt and sell assets, could result in an event
of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material
adverse effect on our business or prospects. |
Our net cash flow generated from operating activities was
$37.8 million (on a combined basis), $35.1 million and
$24.5 million (on a combined basis) for fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Our high level of indebtedness
requires that we use a substantial portion of our cash flow from
operations to pay principal of, and interest on, our
indebtedness, which will reduce the availability of cash to fund
working capital requirements, capital expenditures, research and
development or other general corporate or business activities,
including future acquisitions.
In addition, a substantial portion of our indebtedness bears
interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase,
debt service on our variable-rate debt will rise, which would
adversely affect our cash flow. Although our senior secured
credit facility requires us to employ hedging strategies such
that not less than 50% of our total debt carries a fixed rate of
interest for a period of three years following consummation of
the Acquisition, any hedging arrangement put in place may not
offer complete protection from this risk. Additionally, the
remaining portion of the senior secured credit facility may not
be hedged and, accordingly, the portion that is not hedged will
be subject to changes in interest rates.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund
our debt service obligations, we may be forced to sell assets,
seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our
indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful
and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service
obligations.
|
|
|
Despite our current leverage, we may still be able to
incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the
risks that we face. |
We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in
the future. The terms of our debt instruments do not fully
prohibit us from doing so. The revolving credit portion of our
senior secured credit facility provides commitments of up to
$60.0 million, approximately $37.6 million of which
would have been available for future borrowings (after giving
effect to letters of credit and bank guarantees outstanding) as
of December 31, 2005 on a pro forma basis after giving
effect to this offering and the application of the proceeds
therefrom. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the
related risks that we now face could intensify.
|
|
|
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash to service
all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions
to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may be
unsuccessful. |
Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt
obligations depends on our financial and operating performance,
which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive
conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors
beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient
cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be
available to us under our senior secured credit facility or
otherwise in an amount sufficient to permit us to pay the
principal and interest on our indebtedness or fund our other
liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of
our debt on or before maturity. We may be unable to refinance
any of our debt, including our senior secured credit facility or
the notes, on commercially reasonable terms. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund
our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or
delay capital expenditures, seek additional capital or seek to
restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative
measures may be unsuccessful and may not permit us to meet our
scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of such
operating results and resources, we could face substantial
liquidity problems and might be required to sell material assets
or operations to attempt to meet our debt service and other
obligations. The senior secured credit facility and the
indenture under which the notes were issued restrict our ability
to use the proceeds from asset sales. We may be unable to
consummate those asset sales to raise capital or sell assets at
prices that we believe are fair and proceeds that we do receive
may be
21
inadequate to meet any debt service obligations then due. See
Description of Other IndebtednessSenior Secured
Credit Facility.
|
|
|
The senior secured credit facility and the indenture
governing the notes contain a number of restrictive covenants
which limit our ability to finance future operations or capital
needs and engage in other business activities that may be in our
interest. |
The senior secured credit facility and the indenture governing
the notes impose, and the terms of any future indebtedness may
impose, operating and other restrictions on us and our
subsidiaries. Such restrictions affect or will affect, and in
many respects limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability
and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
create liens; |
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other distributions in respect of our
capital stock; |
|
|
|
redeem our capital stock; |
|
|
|
make certain investments or certain other restricted payments; |
|
|
|
sell certain kinds of assets; |
|
|
|
enter into certain types of transactions with
affiliates; and |
|
|
|
effect mergers or consolidations. |
The senior secured credit facility also requires us to achieve
certain financial and operating results and maintain compliance
with specified financial ratios. Our ability to comply with
these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control.
The restrictions contained in our senior secured credit facility
and the indenture governing the notes could:
|
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to plan for or react to market or economic
conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our
activities or business plans; and |
|
|
|
adversely affect our ability to finance our operations,
acquisitions, investments or strategic alliances or other
capital needs or to engage in other business activities that
would be in our interest. |
A breach of any of these covenants or our inability to comply
with the required financial ratios could result in a default
under our senior secured credit facility and/or the indenture
governing the notes. If an event of default occurs under our
senior secured credit facility, which includes an event of
default under the indenture governing the notes, the lenders
could elect to:
|
|
|
|
|
declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and
unpaid interest, to be immediately due and payable; |
|
|
|
require us to apply all of our available cash to repay the
borrowings; or |
|
|
|
prevent us from making debt service payments on the notes; |
any of which would result in an event of default under the
notes. The lenders will also have the right in these
circumstances to terminate any commitments they have to provide
further financing.
If we were unable to repay or otherwise refinance these
borrowings when due, our lenders could sell the collateral
securing our senior secured credit facility, which constitutes
substantially all of our and our domestic wholly-owned
subsidiaries assets.
22
|
|
|
We are a holding company and we depend upon cash from our
subsidiaries. If we do not receive cash distributions, dividends
or other payments from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to
meet our obligations. |
We are a holding company and all of our operations are conducted
through our subsidiaries. Accordingly, we are dependent upon the
earnings and cash flows of, and cash distributions, dividends
and other payments from, our subsidiaries to provide the funds
necessary to meet our obligations. If we do not receive such
cash distributions, dividends or other payments from our
subsidiaries, we may be unable to meet our obligations,
including the payment of principal or interest on our debt. In
addition, certain of our subsidiaries are holding companies that
rely on subsidiaries of their own as a source of funds to meet
any obligations that might arise.
Generally, the ability of a subsidiary to make cash available to
its parent is affected by its own operating results and is
subject to applicable laws and contractual restrictions
contained in its debt instruments and other agreements.
Moreover, there may be restrictions on payments by our
subsidiaries to us under applicable laws, including laws that
require companies to maintain minimum amounts of capital and to
make payments to shareholders only from profits. As a result,
although our subsidiaries may have cash, we may be unable to
obtain that cash to satisfy our obligations and make payments to
our stockholders, if any.
|
|
|
Because most of the proceeds from this offering will be
used to pay a dividend to our current stockholders, only a
portion of the proceeds will be used to repay our existing debt
and none of such proceeds will be used to further invest in our
business. |
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale by us of the
shares of common stock being offered hereby, after deducting
underwriting discounts, will be approximately
$ million.
We intend to use approximately
$ million
of the net proceeds to repay certain indebtedness. We intend to
use the net proceeds of approximately
$ million
to pay a dividend to our stockholders existing immediately prior
to this offering. This leaves no proceeds to further invest in
and grow our business. See Use of Proceeds.
Risks Related to this Offering
|
|
|
There is no existing market for our common stock, and we
do not know if one will develop to provide you with adequate
liquidity. |
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. We intend to apply to list our common stock on
the New York Stock Exchange. However, we cannot predict the
extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to
the development of a trading market on the New York Stock
Exchange or otherwise or how liquid that market might become. If
an active trading market does not develop, you may have
difficulty selling any of our common stock that you buy. The
initial public offering price for the shares was determined by
negotiations between us and the representatives of the
underwriters based on numerous factors that we discuss in the
Underwriting section of this prospectus and may not
be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market
following this offering.
Consequently, you may not be able to sell our common stock at
prices equal to or greater than the price you paid in this
offering.
|
|
|
Future sales of our shares could depress the market price
of our common stock. |
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result
of sales of a large number of shares of common stock in the
market after the offering or the perception that such sales
could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales
may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell
equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we
deem appropriate.
We, our executive officers and directors and affiliates of First
Reserve have agreed with the underwriters not to sell, dispose
of or hedge any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock,
subject to specified exceptions, during the period from the date
of this prospectus continuing through the date that is
180 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the
prior
23
written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated,
Lehman Brothers Inc. and UBS Securities LLC on behalf of the
underwriters. See Underwriting.
After this offering, we will
have shares
of common stock outstanding. Of those shares,
the shares
we are offering will be freely tradable.
The shares
that were outstanding immediately prior to this offering, plus
up to an
additional shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, that will
be dividended to our existing stockholders in the event the
over-allotment option is not exercised in full, will be eligible
for resale from time to time after the expiration of the
180-day lock-up,
subject to contractual and Securities Act restrictions,
including those relating to volume, manner of sale and other
conditions of Rule 144. None of those shares may currently
be resold under Rule 144(k) without regard to volume
limitations and no shares may currently be sold subject to
volume, manner of sale and other conditions of Rule 144.
After the expiration of the
180-day
lock-up period, First
Reserve and its affiliates, which collectively beneficially own
approximately million
shares
(approximately million
shares in the event the over-allotment option is not exercised),
will have the ability to cause us to register the resale of
their shares and certain other holders of our unregistered
common stock will be able to participate in such registration.
|
|
|
The market price of our common stock may be volatile,
which could cause the value of your investment to
decline. |
Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and
volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general
economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the
market price of our common stock in spite of our operating
performance. In addition, our operating results could be below
the expectations of securities analysts and investors, and in
response, the market price of our common stock could decrease
significantly. As a result, the market price of our common stock
could decline below the initial public offering price. You may
be unable to resell your shares of our common stock at or above
the initial public offering price. Among other factors that
could affect our stock price are:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in operating results; |
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by research analysts; |
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in economic, political or market
conditions, such as recessions or international currency
fluctuations; |
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in the regulatory environment
affecting our industry; |
|
|
|
changes in the market valuations of our industry peers; and |
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, divestitures, joint
ventures or other strategic initiatives. |
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price
of a companys securities, stockholders have often
instituted class action securities litigation against those
companies. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of management attention and
resources, which could significantly harm our profitability and
reputation.
|
|
|
The book value of shares of common stock purchased in the
offering will be immediately diluted and may be subject to
additional dilution in the future. |
The initial public offering price per share of our common stock
is substantially higher than our pro forma net tangible book
value per common share immediately after the offering. As a
result, you may pay a price per share that substantially exceeds
the book value of our assets after subtracting our liabilities.
Investors who purchase common stock in the offering will be
diluted by
$ per
share after giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock
in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share, the mid-point of the estimated price range on the cover
of this prospectus, assuming the dividend of shares, adjusted
for the elimination of any fractional shares, to the existing
stockholders in the event the over-allotment option
24
is not exercised. If we grant options in the future to our
employees, and those options are exercised or other issuances of
common stock are made, there will be further dilution.
|
|
|
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law
may discourage a takeover attempt. |
Provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law
could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law
impose various procedural and other requirements, which could
make it more difficult for stockholders to effect certain
corporate actions. For example, our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors
to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions of unissued series of preferred stock, without any
vote or action by our stockholders. Therefore, our board of
directors can authorize and issue shares of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting or other rights of holders of our common stock. These
rights may have the effect of delaying or deterring a change of
control of our company. These provisions could limit the price
that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for
shares of our common stock. See Description of Capital
Stock.
25
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements include statements relating to
our business. In some cases, forward-looking statements may be
identified by terminology such as may,
will, should, expects,
anticipates, believes,
projects, forecasts,
continue or the negative of such terms or comparable
terminology. Forward-looking statements contained herein
(including future cash contractual obligations) or in other
statements made by us are made based on managements
expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting us
and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our
operations and business environment, all of which are difficult
to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could
cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters
expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. We believe
that the following factors, among others (including those
described in Risk Factors), could affect our future
performance and the liquidity and value of our securities and
cause our actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by forward-looking statements made by us or
on our behalf:
|
|
|
|
|
the cyclicality of the markets which we serve; |
|
|
|
the loss of, or a significant reduction in purchases by, our
largest customers; |
|
|
|
competition in our markets; |
|
|
|
our compliance obligations with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
|
|
|
general economic, political, business and market risks
associated with our
non-U.S. operations; |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage our growth; |
|
|
|
the loss of key employees; |
|
|
|
the pricing and availability of raw materials and our ability to
manage our fixed-price contract exposure; |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully acquire or integrate companies that
provide complementary products or technologies; |
|
|
|
our ability to continue our technical innovation in our product
lines; |
|
|
|
the impairment of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets; |
|
|
|
the costs of compliance with environmental, health and safety
laws and responding to potential liabilities under these laws; |
|
|
|
the insolvency of our formerly consolidated subsidiary, Chart
Heat Exchangers Limited, or CHEL, and CHELs administration
proceedings in the United Kingdom, including claims that may be
asserted against us with respect to CHELs obligations; |
|
|
|
litigation and disputes involving us, including the extent of
product liability, warranty, pension and severance claims
asserted against us; |
|
|
|
labor costs and disputes; |
|
|
|
our relations with our employees; |
|
|
|
our funding requirements in connection with our defined benefit
pension plans; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates; |
|
|
|
disruptions in our operations due to hurricanes; |
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and know-how; |
|
|
|
the threat of terrorism and the impact of responses to that
threat; |
|
|
|
regulations governing the export of our products; |
26
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that our existing stockholders interests
will conflict with ours or yours; |
|
|
|
our status as a controlled company under NYSE
corporate governance rules; |
|
|
|
risks associated with our substantial indebtedness, leverage,
debt service and liquidity; |
|
|
|
risks related to this offering; and |
|
|
|
other factors described in this prospectus. |
There may be other factors that may cause our actual results to
differ materially from the forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this
prospectus and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
cautionary statements included in this prospectus. We undertake
no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements
which may be made to reflect events or circumstances that arise
after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
27
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA
This prospectus includes industry data and forecasts that we
have prepared based, in part, upon industry data and forecasts
obtained from industry publications and surveys. These sources
include publications by Energy Ventures Analysis, the Energy
Information Administration, the International Energy Agency and
Spiritus Consulting. Third-party industry publications, surveys
and forecasts generally state that the information contained
therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable,
but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness
of included information. We have not independently verified any
of the data from third-party sources nor have we ascertained the
underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Forecasts
are particularly likely to be inaccurate, especially over long
periods of time. As an example of the unpredictable nature of
these forecasts, in 1983, the U.S. Department of Energy
forecast that oil would cost $74 per barrel in 1995;
however, the price of oil was actually $17 per barrel. In
addition, we do not know what assumptions regarding general
economic growth were used in preparing the forecasts we cite.
28
THE TRANSACTIONS
The following contains summaries of the terms of the material
agreements that were entered into in connection with the
Acquisition. The descriptions of such agreements do not purport
to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference
to such agreements. Such agreements have been filed as exhibits
to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part.
The Acquisition
On August 2, 2005, Chart Industries entered into an
agreement and plan of merger (the merger agreement)
with certain of its then-existing stockholders (the
Principal Stockholders), First Reserve Fund X,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (First
Reserve), and CI Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (CI Acquisition) and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of First Reserve. The merger agreement provided for:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares of common stock of Chart Industries, par
value $0.01 per share, owned by the Principal Stockholders
(the Principal Stockholder Shares) to
CI Acquisition, which we refer to as the stock
purchase; and |
|
|
|
the merger of CI Acquisition with and into Chart
Industries, with Chart Industries surviving the merger as an
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of First Reserve, which we
refer to as the merger. |
We refer to the stock purchase and the merger, collectively as
the Acquisition. The Acquisition closed on
October 17, 2005.
Upon satisfaction of the conditions to the stock purchase,
CI Acquisition purchased the Principal Stockholder Shares
from the Principal Stockholders for a purchase price (the
Per Share Purchase Price) equal to $64.75 per
share in cash.
Chart Industries, First Reserve and CI Acquisition caused
the merger to occur immediately after the closing of the stock
purchase. At the effective time of the merger, each share of
common stock of Chart Industries outstanding (other than
treasury stock, shares held by First Reserve or
CI Acquisition, and shares with respect to which appraisal
rights were exercised under Delaware law) were converted into
the right to receive the Per Share Purchase Price in cash,
without interest, which we refer to as the merger consideration.
At the effective time of the merger, all those shares of common
stock of Chart Industries were cancelled and ceased to be
outstanding and each holder of a certificate representing that
common stock ceased to have any rights with respect to the
common stock of Chart Industries, except the right to receive
the merger consideration.
In addition, in general the holders of outstanding Chart
Industries warrants and stock options received, without the need
to exercise those warrants and stock options, the same per share
cash purchase price less the exercise price of the Chart
Industries warrants and stock options. Notwithstanding this
general treatment, the compensation committee of Chart
Industries board of directors, in accordance with the
terms of the merger agreement and Chart Industries stock
option plans, adjusted some Chart Industries stock options (or
portions of Chart Industries stock options) held by certain
employees, following the merger, to represent options to acquire
shares of common stock of Chart Industries after the merger.
After the merger, FR X Chart Holdings LLC became the
direct owner of all of the outstanding capital stock of Chart
Industries.
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger |
The merger agreement contains customary representations and
warranties of the Principal Stockholders, Chart Industries,
First Reserve and CI Acquisition and customary covenants
and other agreements among the parties. None of the
representations and warranties in the merger agreement survived
the completion of the merger and the merger agreement did not
provide for any post-closing indemnification obligations. The
29
representations and warranties of each party set forth in the
merger agreement were made solely for the benefit of specified
parties to the merger agreement (on the terms set forth in the
merger agreement) and such representations and warranties may
not be relied on by any other person.
The Financing
In connection with the Acquisition, First Reserve contributed
$111.3 million to FR X Chart Holdings LLC, the
direct parent of CI Acquisition in exchange for all of
FR X Chart Holdings LLCs equity.
FR X Chart Holdings LLC then contributed
$111.3 million to CI Acquisition in exchange for all
of CI Acquisitions capital stock. After the merger,
FR X Chart Holdings LLC became the direct owner of all
of the outstanding capital stock of Chart Industries. The
remainder of the cash needed to finance the acquisition,
including related fees and expenses, was provided by the
offering of the notes and the borrowings under the senior
secured credit facility provided by affiliates of the
underwriters, as joint bookrunners, lead arrangers or lenders,
and a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions.
The following table illustrates the approximate sources and uses
for the Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources |
|
|
|
Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
Senior secured credit facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(1)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Purchase of equity(2) |
|
$ |
378.8 |
|
|
Term loan B facility
|
|
|
180.0 |
|
|
Repayment of then-existing debt(3) |
|
|
66.8 |
|
Senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
170.0 |
|
|
Funded cash(2) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Equity contribution(4)
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
|
Fees and expenses |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sources of Funds
|
|
$ |
467.7 |
|
|
Total Uses of Funds |
|
$ |
467.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As of October 17, 2005, we had approximately
$40.9 million available for borrowing under the revolving
credit portion of the senior secured credit facility, subject to
certain conditions, after giving effect to approximately
$19.1 million outstanding letters of credit and bank
guarantees. |
|
(2) |
Represents a purchase price of $378.8 million in respect of
the equity, resulting in a gross cash purchase price of
$449.0 million for the Acquisition. We had approximately
$3.4 million of cash on hand upon consummation of the
Acquisition, resulting in the net purchase price reflected above. |
|
(3) |
We used an estimated $14.3 million of cash on our balance
sheet to repay existing debt immediately prior to the closing of
the Acquisition. |
|
(4) |
Prior to the consummation of the Acquisition, management held
options valued at $6.4 million, together with other options
that were cashed out in the Acquisition. In connection with the
Acquisition, our compensation committee elected to adjust these
options to represent options to acquire shares of our common
stock after consummation of the Acquisition. This amount
includes $6.4 million representing the value of these
options. |
Equity Sponsor
First Reserve Corporation is the leading private equity firm
specializing in the energy industry with $4.7 billion under
management in four active funds. Founded in 1980, First Reserve
Corporation was the first private equity firm to actively pursue
building a broadly diversified investment portfolio within the
energy and energy-related sectors. Since raising its initial
pure buyout fund in 1992 First Reserve Corporation has made 50
principal transactions investing over $3.0 billion in
equity. In addition, First Reserve Corporation portfolio
companies have completed more than 200 add-on transactions. Past
and present public First Reserve Corporation portfolio companies
include Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Cal Dive
International, Inc., Chicago Bridge and Iron N.V., Dresser Inc.,
Dresser-Rand Group Inc., Foundation Coal Corporation, Maverick
Tube Corporation, National Oilwell, Inc., Natural Resource
Partners, Pride International, Inc., Superior Energy Services
Inc. and Weatherford International Ltd.
30
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale by us of the
shares of common stock being offered hereby, after deducting
underwriting discounts and other fees and expenses payable by
us, will be approximately
$ million.
We intend to use approximately
$ million
of the net proceeds to repay a portion of the term loan under
our senior secured credit facility. We intend to use
approximately
$ million
of the net proceeds to pay a dividend to our stockholders
existing immediately prior to the offering, consisting of
affiliates of First Reserve and certain members of our
management. Of such amount, approximately
$ million
will be received by affiliates of First Reserve. In addition,
approximately
$ million
will be received by certain of our executive officers and other
key employees. We will pay the estimated offering expenses of
$ million
out of cash on hand.
We also intend to use the net proceeds we receive from any
shares sold pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment
option, after deducting underwriting discounts, to pay an
additional dividend to our existing stockholders. In the event
the underwriters fully exercise their over-allotment option, the
amount of this dividend will be approximately
$ million.
Of such amount, approximately
$ million
will be received by affiliates of First Reserve. In addition,
approximately
$ million
will be received by certain of our executive officers and other
key employees.
Any increase or decrease in the amount of net proceeds raised in
this offering from the amount stated above will increase or
decrease the cash dividend to be paid to our existing
stockholders, respectively, but will not materially affect the
amount of debt we intend to repay as described above. A $0.25
increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price per
share of the common stock (the mid-point of the range on the
cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the net
proceeds that we receive in this offering (and, accordingly,
that we dividend to our stockholders) by approximately
$ million,
after deducting underwriting discounts and other fees and
expenses payable by us, assuming the number of shares being
offered, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus does
not change.
31
DIVIDEND POLICY
Immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, we
intend to declare three dividends, which will be payable to our
stockholders existing prior to the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
The first dividend will be a cash dividend of
$ million,
assuming an initial public offering price per share of
$ ,
which we will pay to our existing stockholders out of a portion
of the net proceeds from this offering. |
|
|
|
The second dividend will be a cash dividend of up to
$ million,
assuming an initial public offering price per share of
$ ,
which we will pay to our existing stockholders with all of the
proceeds we receive from the shares sold pursuant to the
underwriters over-allotment option, if exercised. |
|
|
|
The third dividend will be a stock dividend of up
to shares
of our common stock, which we will pay to our existing
stockholders, the terms of which will require that shortly after
the expiration of the underwriters over-allotment option
(assuming the option is not exercised in full), we issue to our
existing stockholders the number of shares equal to (x) the
number of additional shares the underwriters have an option to
purchase minus (y) the actual number of shares the
underwriters purchase from us pursuant to that option. |
The purpose of the cash dividend described in the first bullet
above is to distribute a portion of the proceeds from this
offering to our existing stockholders. As the intended use of
proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment option by the
underwriters is a dividend to our existing stockholders, we have
assumed that investors will factor into their analysis the
dilutive effect of those shares being issued and the proceeds
being dividended out of our company by reducing their valuation
of our company. Accordingly, in the event the option is not
exercised, we have contemplated that the shares subject to the
option will be dividended to our existing stockholders as
described in the third bullet above. Such stock dividend would
have the same dilutive effect as selling those shares upon the
exercise of the over-allotment option and dividending the
proceeds to our existing owners.
Other than the dividends described above, we do not currently
intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock, and
instead intend to retain earnings, if any, for future operations
and debt reduction. The amounts available to us to pay cash
dividends will be restricted by our senior secured credit
facility. The indenture governing the notes also limits our
ability to pay dividends. In connection with this offering, we
intend to amend our senior secured credit facility to remove
certain restrictions on our ability to consummate the offering
and use the proceeds as described in Use of
Proceeds. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the
future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend on, among other things, our results of
operations, financial condition, cash requirements, contractual
restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may
deem relevant.
32
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and
capitalization as of December 31, 2005 (1) on an
actual basis and (2) on an as adjusted basis to reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale by us of
approximately shares
of our common stock in this offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses; |
|
|
|
the application of the estimated net proceeds as described in
Use of Proceeds; |
|
|
|
the -for-one
stock split we expect to effect immediately prior to the
consummation of this offering; and |
|
|
|
the stock dividend
of shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, to our
existing stockholders shortly after the expiration of the
underwriters over-allotment option, assuming no exercise
of that option. |
The information in this table should be read in conjunction with
The Transactions, Use of Proceeds,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions, | |
|
|
except share and per | |
|
|
share data) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured credit facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
175.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91/8
% senior subordinated notes due 2015
|
|
|
170.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt(2)
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
347.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
9,500,000 shares authorized and 1,718,896 shares
issued and outstanding(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained (deficit)
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
116.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately
$37.6 million available for borrowing under the revolving
portion of the senior secured credit facility, subject to
certain conditions, after giving effect to approximately
$22.4 million of letters of credit and bank guarantees
outstanding thereunder. See The Transactions and
Description of Indebtedness. |
|
(2) |
This relates to the indebtedness of Chart Ferox, a.s. and CEM,
our subsidiaries located in the Czech Republic and China,
respectively. See Description of IndebtednessChart
Ferox Credit Facility. |
|
(3) |
To the extent we change the number of shares of common stock we
sell in this offering from
the shares
we expect to sell or we change the initial public offering price
from the
$ per
share assumed initial offering price, or any combination of
these events occurs, our net proceeds from this offering and as
adjusted additional paid-in capital may increase of decrease. A
$0.25 increase (decrease) |
33
|
|
|
in the assumed initial public offering price per share of the
common stock, assuming no change in the number of shares of
common stock to be sold, would increase (decrease) the net
proceeds that we receive in this offering (and accordingly that
we dividend to our stockholders) and our as adjusted additional
paid-in capital by
$ million
and an increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 shares from the
expected number of shares to be sold in the offering, assuming
no change in the assumed initial public offering price per
share, would increase (decrease) our net proceeds from this
offering and our as adjusted additional paid-in capital by
approximately
$ million. |
34
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the initial public
offering price per share and the net tangible book value per
share after this offering. The net tangible book value per share
presented below is equal to the amount of our total tangible
assets (total assets less intangible assets) less total
liabilities as of December 31, 2005, divided by the number
of shares of our common stock that would have been held by our
existing stockholders had the stock dividend
of additional
shares, adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares,
to our existing stockholders shortly after the expiration of the
underwriters over-allotment option, assuming no exercise
of that option, been made as
of ,
2005. As of December 31, 2005, we had a net tangible book
deficit of
$ million,
or
$ per
share. On a pro forma basis, after giving effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares of common stock in this offering at an
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share, the mid-point of the price range on the cover of this
prospectus; |
|
|
|
the payment of the
$ million
dividend that we intend to declare prior to the consummation of
the offering to the existing stockholders; |
|
|
|
the application of the estimated net proceeds as described under
Use of Proceeds; and |
|
|
|
the effect of any other pro forma adjustments |
our pro forma net tangible book value as of December 31,
2005 would have been
$ million,
or
$ per
share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in
net tangible book value (or a decrease in net tangible book
deficit) of
$ per
share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net
tangible book value of
$ per
share to new investors.
The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Net tangible book deficit per share at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
new investors
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book deficit per share after the offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $0.25 increase (decrease) in the initial public offering price
from the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share would decrease (increase) our net tangible book deficit
after giving effect to this offering by approximately
$ million,
our pro forma net tangible book deficit per share after giving
effect to the offering by
$ per
share and the dilution in net tangible book deficit per share to
new investors in this offering by
$ per
share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated aggregate offering expenses payable by
us and assuming no other change to the number of shares offered
by us as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. An
increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 shares from the expected
number of shares to be sold in the offering, assuming no change
in the initial public offering price from the price assumed
above, would decrease (increase) our net tangible book deficit
after giving effect to this offering by approximately
$ million,
decrease (increase) our pro forma net tangible book deficit per
share after giving effect to this offering by
$ per
share, and increase (decrease) the dilution in net tangible book
deficit per share to new investors in this offering by
$ per
share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated aggregate offering expenses payable by
us. We will reduce the number of shares that we will issue to
our existing stockholders in the stock dividend described in the
first paragraph above by the number of shares sold to the
underwriters pursuant to their over-allotment option. We will
also pay to our existing stockholders a cash dividend equal to
all proceeds we receive from any such sale to the underwriters.
As a result, our pro forma net tangible book value will not be
affected by the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option.
35
The following table summarizes, on the same pro forma basis as
of December 31, 2005, the total number of shares of common
stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and
the average price per share paid by the existing stockholders
and by new investors purchasing shares in this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Average Price | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration and average price per share paid by the
existing stockholders in the table above give effect to the
$ million
dividend and the stock dividend
of shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, we intend
to pay to the existing stockholders in connection with this
offering. As the table indicates, the total consideration for
the existing stockholders shares is
$ million,
with an average share price of
$ ,
which means that the existing stockholders in the aggregate will
have received
$ million
more than they originally invested.
The number of shares held by existing stockholders will be
reduced to the extent the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option. If the underwriters fully exercise their
option, the existing stockholders will own a total
of shares
or approximately % of our total
outstanding shares which will decrease the average price paid by
the existing stockholders per share to
$ .
To the extent that we grant options to our employees in the
future, and those options are exercised or other issuances of
common stock are made, there will be further dilution to new
investors.
36
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been
derived by the application of pro forma adjustments to the
historical combined financial statements for the period from
January 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005 and for the period
from October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005. The
unaudited pro forma statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005 give effect to (i) the Acquisition,
(ii) the notes offering of October 17, 2005 and the
borrowings under our senior secured credit facility and
(iii) this offering of common stock and the estimated use
of proceeds from this offering, as if they had been consummated
on January 1, 2005. The unaudited pro forma balance sheet
as of December 31, 2005 gives effect to this offering and
the estimated use of proceeds from this offering, as if they had
occurred on December 31, 2005. The adjustments necessary to
fairly present this pro forma financial information have been
made based on available information and in the opinion of
management are reasonable and are described in the accompanying
notes. The unaudited pro forma financial information should not
be considered indicative of actual results that would have been
achieved had these transactions been consummated on the
respective dates indicated and do not purport to indicate
results of operations as of any future date or for any future
period. The assumptions used in the preparation of the unaudited
pro forma financial information may not prove to be correct. You
should read the unaudited pro forma financial information
together with Risk Factors, Use of
Proceeds, Capitalization and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our historical
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
37
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Offering Adjustments | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Assets |
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
15,433 |
|
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
62,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
53,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled contract revenue
|
|
|
23,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
12,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
173,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
64,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
236,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net
|
|
|
154,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
13,672 |
|
|
|
(b |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
641,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
34,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer advances and billings in excess of contract revenue
|
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
17,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
(b |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
104,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
(b |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
56,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
19,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder equity
|
|
|
116,330 |
|
|
|
(a |
)(b)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholder equity
|
|
$ |
641,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Reflects payment, using cash on-hand, of
$ million
of expenses in connection with this offering. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the use of a portion of the proceeds from the offering,
net of fees and expenses, to repay
$ million
of term loans under our senior secured credit facility and the
write-off of deferred financing costs of
$ million.
See Use of Proceeds. |
|
(c) |
Reflects the assumed gross proceeds of
$ million
from the offering, net of fees and expenses of
$ million.
On a pro forma basis as of December 31, 2005,
$ million
of the net proceeds from the offering is assumed to be used to
pay a dividend to our existing stockholders. See Use of
Proceeds. |
38
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized | |
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
October 17, | |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Offering |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005(1) | |
|
2005(2) | |
|
Adjustments(3) | |
|
Adjustments(4) |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
403,149 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
|
75,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
88,213 |
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,132 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
59,826 |
|
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
|
8,306 |
(a)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,764 |
|
Transaction expense
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,485 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
|
8,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
20,728 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
(8,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,570 |
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
17,681 |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
|
Financing costs amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
Derivative contracts valuation expense (income)
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
Foreign currency loss (gain)
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations before income taxes and minority
interest
|
|
|
16,036 |
|
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
(27,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,017 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(10,320 |
)(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations before minority interest
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(16,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,415 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,838 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Data(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
)(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Our capital structure changed as a result of the Acquisition.
Due to required purchase accounting adjustments relating to such
transaction, the consolidated financial and other information
for the period subsequent to the Acquisition (the 2005
Successor Period) is not comparable to such information
for the periods prior to the Acquisition (the 2005
Reorganized Period). The pro forma information, including
the allocation of the purchase price, is based on
managements estimates and valuations of the tangible and
intangible that were acquired.
|
|
(1) |
The amounts in this column represent the reported results of
Chart Industries, Inc. prior to the Acquisition, from
January 1, 2005 through October 16, 2005. |
(2) |
The amounts in this column represent the reported results of
Chart Industries, Inc. subsequent to the Acquisition, for the
period from October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005. |
(3) |
The amounts in this column represent the adjustments to reflect
the pro forma impact of the Acquisition as follows: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Reflects the adjustment to historical expense for management
fees of $306 charged by our Reorganized Company majority
shareholders, which are not charged by First Reserve. |
|
(b) |
Reflects the adjustment to historical expense for the change in
amortization expense due to the revaluation of our identifiable
finite-lived intangible assets in purchase accounting. Annual
amortization expense under the new basis of accounting is
estimated to be $14,271, of which $2,973 was recognized during
the 2005 Successor Period, and $2,686 of amortization expense
relating to finite-lived intangibles assets was recorded during
the 2005 Reorganized Period, resulting in a pro forma adjustment
of $8,612. |
|
(c) |
Reflects the adjustment to historical interest expense for
interest on the senior secured credit facility entered into in
conjunction with the Acquisition of $11,925 assuming an
outstanding balance of $180,000 and an interest rate of 6.625%
per annum. Also, reflects the adjustment to historical interest
expense for interest on the notes issued in conjunction with the
Acquisition of $15,513, assuming an outstanding balance of
$170,000 and an interest rate of 9.125% per annum. During the
2005 Successor Period, $5,565 of interest expense was recorded
for the senior secured credit facility and the notes and $4,192
of interest expense was recorded in the 2005 Reorganized Period
for our then existing senior credit facility. This results in a
pro forma adjustment of $17,681. |
|
(d) |
Reflects the adjustment to historical expense for the change in
amortization expense for deferred financing costs that were paid
in conjunction with the Acquisition. The annual amortization
expense is estimated to be $1,479, of which $308 was recorded in
the 2005 Successor Period, and no amortization expense was
recorded in the 2005 Reorganized Period, resulting in a pro
forma adjustment of $1,171. |
|
(e) |
Reflects the income tax of our pro forma adjustments to the
income statement at an estimated statutory tax rate of 38%. |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
For the 2005 Successor Period, basic earnings per share is
calculated by dividing net loss available to common shareholders
by the weighted average shares outstanding during this period. |
|
|
(4) |
The amounts in this column represent the adjustments to reflect
the pro forma impact of this offering and the estimated use of
proceeds therefrom. |
(5) |
Unaudited pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share have
been calculated in accordance with the SEC rules for initial
public offerings. These rules require that the weighted average
share calculation give retroactive effect to any changes in our
capital structure as well as the number of shares whose sale
proceeds would be necessary to repay any debt or to pay any
dividend as reflected in the pro forma adjustments. Therefore,
pro forma weighted average shares for purposes of the unaudited
pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share calculation, has
been adjusted to reflect
(i) the
-for-one stock split we expect to effect immediately prior to
the consummation of this offering and (ii) the stock
dividend
of shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, to our
existing stockholders that will be made shortly after the
expiration of the underwriters over-allotment option
assuming no exercise of that option, and
includes shares
of our common stock being offered hereby and the stock dividend
of shares. |
(6) |
Earnings per share data on a diluted basis for the 2005
Successor Period is not shown because it is anti-dilutive as a
result of our loss during this period. |
40
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The financial statements referred to as the Predecessor Company
financial statements include the consolidated audited financial
statements of Chart Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries prior
to our Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Our emergence
from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings resulted in a new
reporting entity and the adoption of Fresh-Start accounting in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Statement of
Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code. The financial statements referred to
as the Reorganized Company financial statements include the
consolidated audited financial statements of Chart Industries,
Inc. and its subsidiaries after our emergence from
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and prior to the
Acquisition and related financing thereof. The financial
statements referred to as the Successor Company financial
statements include the consolidated audited financial statements
of Chart Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries after the
Acquisition and the related financing thereof.
The following table sets forth the selected historical
consolidated financial information as of the dates and for each
of the periods indicated. The Predecessor Company selected
historical consolidated financial data as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 is derived from our
audited financial statements for such periods which have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, and which are not included in this
prospectus. The Predecessor Company selected historical
consolidated financial data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 is derived from our audited financial
statements for such period included elsewhere in this
prospectus, which have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP. The Reorganized Company selected historical consolidated
financial data as of September 30, 2003, December 31,
2003 and October 16, 2005 is derived from our audited
financial statements for such periods which have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, and which are not included in this
prospectus. The Reorganized Company selected historical
consolidated financial data for the three months ended
December 31, 2003, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the period from January 1,
2005 to October 16, 2005 (the 2005 Reorganized
Period) is derived from our audited financial statements
for such periods included elsewhere in this prospectus, which
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP. The Successor
Company selected historical consolidated financial statements
and other data as of December 31, 2005 and for the period
from October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005 (the
2005 Successor Period) is derived from our audited
financial statements for such period included elsewhere in this
prospectus, which have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP.
You should read the following table together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and related notes, included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
October 17, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
305,288 |
|
|
$ |
276,353 |
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
Cost of sales(1)
|
|
|
226,266 |
|
|
|
205,595 |
|
|
|
141,240 |
|
|
|
52,509 |
|
|
|
211,770 |
|
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
|
75,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
79,022 |
|
|
|
70,758 |
|
|
|
55,777 |
|
|
|
16,061 |
|
|
|
93,806 |
|
|
|
88,213 |
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
55,128 |
|
|
|
65,679 |
|
|
|
44,211 |
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
53,374 |
|
|
|
59,826 |
|
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
Restructuring and other operating expenses, net(2)(3)
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
105,897 |
|
|
|
14,564 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,995 |
|
|
|
171,576 |
|
|
|
58,775 |
|
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
56,594 |
|
|
|
67,485 |
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
17,027 |
|
|
|
(100,818 |
) |
|
|
(2,998 |
) |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
37,212 |
|
|
|
20,728 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
Interest expense, net(4)
|
|
|
21,589 |
|
|
|
17,612 |
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
(8,490 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,494 |
|
|
|
21,996 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
(8,467 |
) |
|
|
(122,814 |
) |
|
|
(4,808 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
32,832 |
|
|
|
16,036 |
|
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
11,136 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before minority interest
|
|
|
(8,865 |
) |
|
|
(133,950 |
) |
|
|
(7,855 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
Minority interest, net of taxes and other
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(9,064 |
) |
|
|
(134,002 |
) |
|
|
(7,918 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued operations(5)
|
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(5,158 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,785 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,085 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share data(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
Weighted average shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
7,458 |
|
|
$ |
5,249 |
|
|
$ |
19,466 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
35,059 |
|
|
$ |
15,641 |
|
|
$ |
18,742 |
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(6,261 |
) |
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
(20,799 |
) |
|
|
(362,250 |
) |
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
(17,614 |
) |
|
|
(15,907 |
) |
|
|
(13,976 |
) |
|
|
(35,744 |
) |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
348,489 |
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(7)
|
|
$ |
17,783 |
|
|
$ |
14,531 |
|
|
$ |
9,260 |
|
|
$ |
2,225 |
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
$ |
6,808 |
|
|
$ |
4,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
2Predecessor Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
11,801 |
|
|
$ |
7,225 |
|
|
$ |
27,815 |
|
|
$ |
18,600 |
|
|
$ |
14,814 |
|
|
$ |
11,470 |
|
|
$ |
15,433 |
|
|
Working capital(8)(9)
|
|
|
57,438 |
|
|
|
8,853 |
|
|
|
35,826 |
|
|
|
47,161 |
|
|
|
51,292 |
|
|
|
43,486 |
|
|
|
55,454 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
408,980 |
|
|
|
279,294 |
|
|
|
299,745 |
|
|
|
299,637 |
|
|
|
307,080 |
|
|
|
343,107 |
|
|
|
641,806 |
(10) |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
259,120 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
122,537 |
|
|
|
109,081 |
|
|
|
76,406 |
|
|
|
74,480 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
272,083 |
|
|
|
263,900 |
|
|
|
126,012 |
|
|
|
112,561 |
|
|
|
79,411 |
|
|
|
80,943 |
|
|
|
347,304 |
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
49,340 |
|
|
|
(81,617 |
) |
|
|
89,865 |
|
|
|
90,807 |
|
|
|
115,640 |
|
|
|
121,321 |
|
|
|
116,330 |
|
(footnotes on next page)
42
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In March 2003, we completed the closure of our Wolverhampton,
United Kingdom manufacturing facility, operated by CHEL. On
March 28, 2003, CHEL filed for voluntary administration
under the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986. CHELs application
for voluntary administration was approved on April 1, 2003
and an administrator was appointed. In accordance with
SFAS No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries, we are not consolidating the accounts or
financial results of CHEL subsequent to March 28, 2003 due
to the assumption of control of CHEL by the insolvency
administrator. Effective March 28, 2003, we recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $13.7 million to write off
our net investment in CHEL. |
|
|
(2) |
In 2002, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$92.4 million to write off non-deductible goodwill of the
D&S segment. Further information about this charge is found
in Note A to our audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
|
(3) |
In September 2003, in accordance with Fresh-Start accounting,
all assets and liabilities were adjusted to their fair values.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for further
discussion. The adjustment to record the assets and liabilities
at fair value resulted in net other income of $5.7 million.
Further information about the adjustment is located in
Note A to our audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes derivative contracts valuation income or expense for
interest rate collars to manage interest exposure relative to
term debt. |
|
|
(5) |
This relates to the sale of our Greenville Tube, LLC business in
July 2003. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
additional information. |
|
|
(6) |
Earnings per share data on a diluted basis is not shown for the
2005 Successor Period because it is anti-dilutive as a result of
our loss during this period. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes financing costs amortization for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2002, the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and the 2005 Successor Period of
$1.5 million, $3.2 million, $1.7 million and
$0.3 million, respectively. |
|
|
(8) |
As of December 31, 2002, we were in default on our senior
debt due to violation of financial covenants. In April 2003, the
lenders under our then-existing credit facility waived all
defaults existing at December 31, 2002 and through
April 30, 2003. Since the waiver of defaults did not extend
until January 1, 2004, this debt was classified as a
current liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2002. |
|
|
(9) |
Working capital is defined as current assets excluding cash
minus current liabilities excluding short-term debt. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes $236.7 million of goodwill and $154.1 million
of finite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of
December 31, 2005. |
43
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our results of
operations includes periods prior to the consummation of the
Acquisition and periods after the consummation of the
Acquisition. Accordingly, the discussion and analysis of
historical periods does not reflect fully the significant impact
that the Acquisition will have on us, including significantly
increased leverage and liquidity requirements. You should read
the following discussion of our results of operations and
financial condition in conjunction with the Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data and Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information sections and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. Actual results may differ
materially from those discussed below. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements. See Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors
for a discussion of certain of the uncertainties, risks and
assumptions associated with these statements.
Overview
We are a leading independent global manufacturer of highly
engineered equipment used in the production, storage and end-use
of hydrocarbon and industrial gases. We believe we are a
preferred global supplier of engineered equipment used
throughout the liquid gas supply chain. The largest portion of
end-use applications for our products is energy-related. We are
a leading manufacturer of standard and engineered equipment
primarily used for low-temperature and cryogenic applications.
We have developed an expertise in cryogenic systems and
equipment, which operate at low temperatures sometimes
approaching absolute zero (0° Kelvin; -273°
Centigrade; -459° Fahrenheit). The majority of our
products, including vacuum-insulated containment vessels, heat
exchangers, cold boxes and other cryogenic components, are used
throughout the liquid gas supply chain for the purification,
liquefaction, distribution, storage and use of hydrocarbon and
industrial gases.
In 2005, we experienced increased orders, backlog, sales and
gross profit compared to 2004, which was primarily driven by
continued growth in the global industrial and hydrocarbon
processing markets served by our D&S and E&C segments.
Combined orders for 2005 were $511.2 million, which
represented an increase of $118.4 million, or 30.1%,
compared to 2004 orders of $392.8 million, while backlog
was $233.6 million at December 31, 2005 compared to
$129.3 million at December 31, 2004, and represented
growth of 80.7%. In 2005, combined sales were
$403.1 million compared to sales in 2004 of
$305.6 million, reflecting an increase of
$97.5 million, or 31.9%. Our combined gross profit in 2005
was $110.1 million, or 27.3% of sales, and gross profit in
2004 was $93.8 million, or 30.7% of sales. While we
benefited from higher volumes in 2005, our combined gross profit
was negatively impacted by an $8.9 million, or 2.2% of
sales, non-cash charge for adjusting inventory to fair value as
a result of the Acquisition and higher manufacturing costs due
to the move of our medical respiratory product line production
from Burnsville, Minnesota to Canton, Georgia.
The continued growth in many of the markets we serve, our
present customer order trends, our 2005 year end backlog
level, our focus on the energy-related industry, and the
completion of our operational restructuring initiatives provide
a good opportunity for continued improvement in our operating
results in 2006. We believe that our cash flow from operations,
available cash and available borrowings under the senior secured
credit facility will be adequate to meet our working capital,
capital expenditure, debt service and other funding requirements
for the next twelve months and our long-term future contractual
obligations. However, a significant decline in orders and sales
in the U.S. medical respiratory product line, as a result
of announced reductions in U.S. government reimbursement
programs, could have a negative impact on our 2006 operating
results and cash flows.
On August 2, 2005, Chart Industries, Inc. entered into an
agreement and plan of merger with certain of its then-existing
stockholders (the Principal Stockholders), First
Reserve and CI Acquisition to purchase shares of common stock
owned by the Principal Stockholders. The Acquisition closed on
October 17, 2005. First Reserve contributed
$111.3 million, which was used to fund a portion of the
Acquisition. The remainder of the cash needed to finance the
Acquisition, including related fees and expenses, was provided
by proceeds of $170.0 million from the issuance of senior
subordinated notes due 2015 and borrowings under the senior
44
secured credit facility. See The Transactions. We
refer to our company after the Acquisition as the
Successor Company.
Chapter 11 Filing and Emergence
On July 8, 2003, we and all of our then majority-owned
U.S. subsidiaries (the Predecessor Company)
filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to implement an
agreed upon senior debt restructuring plan through a
pre-packaged plan of reorganization. On September 15, 2003,
we (as reorganized, the Reorganized Company) and all
of our then majority-owned U.S. subsidiaries emerged from
Chapter 11 proceedings pursuant to the Amended Joint
Prepackaged Reorganization Plan of Chart Industries, Inc. and
Certain Subsidiaries, dated September 3, 2003.
Our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings
resulted in a new reporting entity and the adoption of
fresh-start accounting in accordance with the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of
Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7)
(Fresh-Start accounting). We used September 30,
2003 as the date for adopting Fresh-Start accounting in order to
coincide with our normal financial closing for the month of
September 2003. Upon adoption of Fresh-Start accounting, a new
reporting entity was deemed to be created and the recorded
amounts of assets and liabilities were adjusted to reflect their
estimated fair values. Accordingly, the reported historical
financial statements of the Predecessor Company prior to the
adoption of Fresh-Start accounting for periods ended prior to
September 30, 2003 are not necessarily comparable to those
of the Reorganized Company. In this prospectus, references to
our nine-month period ended September 30, 2003 and all
periods ended prior to September 30, 2003 refer to the
Predecessor Company.
SOP 90-7 requires
that financial statements for the period following the
Chapter 11 filing through the bankruptcy confirmation date
distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated
with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the
business. Accordingly, revenues, expenses, realized gains and
losses and provisions for losses directly associated with the
reorganization and restructuring of the business, including
adjustments to fair value assets and liabilities and the gain on
the discharge of
pre-petition debt, were
reported separately as reorganization items, net, in the other
income (expense) section of the Predecessor Companys
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003. In accordance with Fresh-Start
accounting, all assets and liabilities were recorded at their
respective fair values as of September 30, 2003. Such fair
values represented our best estimates based on independent
appraisals and valuations. In applying Fresh-Start accounting,
adjustments to reflect the fair value of assets and liabilities,
on a net basis, and the restructuring of our capital structure
and resulting discharge of the senior lenders pre-petition
debt, resulted in net other income of $5.7 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2003. The reorganization
value exceeded the fair value of the Reorganized Companys
assets and liabilities, and this excess is reported as
reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets in the Reorganized Companys
consolidated balance sheet.
45
Operating Results
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship that
each line item in our consolidated statements of operations
represents to sales for the nine months ended September 30,
2003, the three months ended December 31, 2003, the year
ended December 31, 2004, the period from January 1,
2005 to October 16, 2005 (the 2005 Reorganized
Period) and the period from October 17, 2005 to
December 31, 2005 (the 2005 Successor Period).
The Predecessor, Reorganized and Successor Company are further
described in our audited financial statements and related notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
October 17, | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales(1)
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Acquisition expenses(7)
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Loss on insolvent subsidiary
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Equity expense in joint venture
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Financing costs amortization
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Derivative contracts valuation income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Foreign currency income (loss)
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Reorganization items, net
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Income from discontinued operation, net of tax
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Includes non-cash inventory valuation charges of
$9.0 million, $0.6 million, $0.2 million,
$5.4 million, and $0.5 million, representing 9.2%,
0.2%, 0.1%, 7.9%, and 0.2%, of sales, for the 2005 Successor
Period, the 2005 Reorganized Period, the year ended
December 31, 2004, the three months ended December 31,
2003, and the nine months ended September 30, 2003,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
Includes $1.5 million, $0.7 million, and
$6.4 million, representing 0.5%, 0.2%, and 3.2% of sales,
for claim settlements, professional fees incurred by us related
to our debt restructuring and bankruptcy reorganization
activities for the 2005 Reorganized Period, the year ended
December 31, 2004, and the nine months ended
September 30, 2003, respectively. |
|
(3) |
Includes stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million,
$9.5 million and $2.4 million, representing 0.4%, 3.1%
and 0.8% of sales, for the 2005 Successor Period, the 2005
Reorganized Period and the year ended December 31, 2004,
respectively. |
46
|
|
(4) |
Includes charges and losses related to damages caused by
Hurricane Rita of $0.4 million and $1.1 million,
representing 0.4% and 0.4% of sales, for the 2005 Successor
Period and the 2005 Reorganized Period, respectively. |
|
(5) |
Includes a charge for the settlement of former
shareholders appraisal rights claims related to the
Acquisition of $0.5 million, or 0.5% of sales, and a charge
for the write-off of purchased in-process research and
development of $2.8 million, or 0.1% of sales, for the 2005
Successor Period and the 2005 Reorganized Period, respectively. |
|
(6) |
Includes amortization expense for intangible assets of
$3.0 million, $2.7 million, $2.8 million,
$0.7 million, and $1.2 million, representing 3.0%,
0.9%, 0.9%, 1.0%, and 0.6%, of sales, for the 2005 Successor
Period, the 2005 Reorganized Period, the year ended
December 31, 2004, the three months ended December 31,
2003, and the nine months ended September 30, 2003,
respectively. |
|
(7) |
Represents expenses incurred by us related to the Acquisition. |
Segment Information
The following table sets forth sales, gross profit and gross
profit margin for our three operating segments for the periods
indicated during the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy & Chemicals
|
|
$ |
42,910 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,699 |
|
|
$ |
69,609 |
|
|
$ |
86,920 |
|
|
|
$ |
34,135 |
|
|
Distribution and Storage
|
|
|
102,469 |
|
|
|
|
37,863 |
|
|
|
162,508 |
|
|
|
161,329 |
|
|
|
|
47,832 |
|
|
Biomedical
|
|
|
51,638 |
|
|
|
|
15,008 |
|
|
|
73,459 |
|
|
|
57,248 |
|
|
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy & Chemicals
|
|
$ |
12,683 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,405 |
|
|
$ |
21,475 |
|
|
$ |
23,391 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,494 |
|
|
Distribution and Storage
|
|
|
25,515 |
|
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
46,588 |
|
|
|
47,120 |
|
|
|
|
8,861 |
|
|
Biomedical
|
|
|
17,579 |
|
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
25,743 |
|
|
|
17,702 |
|
|
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
55,777 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,061 |
|
|
$ |
93,806 |
|
|
$ |
88,213 |
|
|
|
$ |
21,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy & Chemicals
|
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
Distribution and Storage
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
Biomedical
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
22.4 |
% |
We moved the management and reporting of the LNG alternative
fuel systems product line from the E&C segment to the
D&S segment effective December 31, 2004. All segment
information for all previous periods has been restated to
conform to this presentation.
2005 Successor Period
Sales for the 2005 Successor Period were $97.7 million.
E&C segment sales were $34.1 million and benefited from
volume increases in both heat exchangers and LNG Systems,
primarily due to continued demand growth in the hydrocarbon
processing market. D&S segment sales were $47.8 million
as bulk storage
47
systems and packaged gas systems volume remained strong due to
stable demand in the global industrial gas market and higher
product pricing. BioMedical segment sales for this two month
period were $15.7 million. Sales of medical respiratory
products were unfavorably affected by lower volume in the United
States, and in particular to one of our major customers, due to
announced reductions in government reimbursement programs for
liquid oxygen therapy systems. This unfavorable volume trend in
domestic medical respiratory product sales was partially offset
by continued volume growth in medical respiratory product sales
in Europe and Asia and biological storage systems in the United
States as we further penetrated these markets.
|
|
|
Gross Profit and Gross Margin |
For the 2005 Successor Period, gross profit was
$21.9 million, or 22.4% of sales. Overall, the gross profit
was favorably affected by higher volumes in the D&S and
E&C segments. The E&C gross profit of
$10.5 million, or 30.7% of sales, benefited from the
completion of a high margin ethylene heat exchanger and LNG
system emergency order. The D&S segment gross profit of
$8.9 million, or 18.5% of sales, was also favorably
impacted by improved product pricing. The BioMedical gross
profit of $2.6 million, or 16.4% of sales, benefited from
productivity improvements at the Canton, Georgia facility
related to the manufacturing of medical respiratory products.
The BioMedical segment margins in the 2005 Reorganized Period
were negatively impacted by higher costs related to
inefficiencies from
ramping-up production
of the medical respiratory product line after completing the
move from the Burnsville, Minnesota facility to the Canton,
Georgia facility. In addition, overall company gross profit
included a $8.9 million, or 9.1% of sales, charge for the
fair value adjustment of finished goods and
work-in-process
inventory recorded under purchase accounting as a result of the
Acquisition. This fair value inventory adjustment was charged to
cost of sales as the inventory was sold. The D&S and
BioMedical segments gross profit charges were
$6.4 million, or 13.4% of sales, and $2.5 million, or
15.9% of sales, respectively, for this fair value inventory
adjustment. The E&C segment was not required to record an
inventory fair value adjustment due to the use of the percentage
of completion method for revenue recognition in this segment.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
(SG&A) |
SG&A expense for the 2005 Successor Period was
$16.6 million, or 17.0% of sales. SG&A expense was
affected by higher employee-related and marketing costs in the
D&S and E&C segments to support their continued sales
growth. SG&A expense included $3.0 million, or 3.1% of
sales, of amortization expense for finite-lived intangible
assets. In addition, SG&A expense included a
$0.5 million, or 0.5% of sales, charge for the settlement
of former shareholders appraisal rights claims as a result
of the Acquisition and $0.4 million, or 0.4% of sales, of
losses and charges related to damage caused by Hurricane Rita,
at our New Iberia, Louisiana facilities.
|
|
|
Employee Separation and Plant Closure Costs |
For the 2005 Successor Period, we recorded $0.1 million of
employee separation and plant closure costs, primarily related
to the closure of the Plaistow, New Hampshire and Burnsville,
Minnesota facilities.
|
|
|
Other Expenses and Income |
Net interest expense and financing costs amortization for the
2005 Successor Period, was $5.6 million and
$0.3 million, respectively, and related to the senior
secured credit facility that was entered into, and the senior
subordinated notes that were issued, on October 17, 2005 in
connection with the Acquisition.
We recorded $0.1 million of foreign currency losses due to
certain of our subsidiaries entering into transactions in
currencies other than their functional currencies.
48
Income tax benefit of $0.4 million for the 2005 Successor
Period represents taxes on both domestic and foreign earnings at
an annual effective income tax rate of 49.3%. Our taxes were
affected by tax benefits from foreign sales and research and
development and foreign tax credits.
As a result of the foregoing, we reported a net loss for the
2005 Successor Period of $0.5 million.
2005 Reorganized Period
Sales for the 2005 Reorganized Period were $305.5 million.
E&C segment sales were $86.9 million and benefited from
volume increases in both heat exchangers and LNG systems as a
result of strong order levels over the past seven quarters,
which has included three large orders each of approximately
$20.0 million, driven by continued growth in the LNG and
natural gas segments of the hydrocarbon processing market.
D&S segment sales were $161.3 million as bulk storage
systems and packaged gas systems volume remained strong due to
continued demand growth in the global industrial gas market.
Other factors contributing favorably to D&S segment sales
for this period were higher product pricing, and favorable
foreign currency translation of approximately $3.5 million
as a result of the weaker U.S. dollar compared to the Euro
and Czech Koruna. BioMedical segment sales were
$57.2 million. Sales of medical respiratory products were
unfavorably affected by lower volume in the United States, and
in particular to one of our major customers, primarily resulting
from announced U.S. government reimbursement reductions for
liquid oxygen therapy systems. This unfavorable volume trend in
U.S. medical respiratory product sales was partially offset
by continued sales volume growth in medical respiratory product
sales in Europe and Asia and biological storage systems in the
United States, Europe and Asia as we further penetrated these
markets.
|
|
|
Gross Profit and Gross Margin |
For the 2005 Reorganized Period gross profit was
$88.2 million, or 28.9% of sales. Overall, gross profit was
favorably affected by higher volumes in the D&S and E&C
segments, while gross profit margin was unfavorably affected by
higher manufacturing costs in the BioMedical segment and a shift
in product mix in the E&C segment. The gross profit margins
in the E&C segment of $23.4 million, or 26.9% of sales,
during the period saw overall mix shifts in sales from higher
margin heat exchanger projects to lower margin LNG systems
projects and also a shift within heat exchangers to lower margin
projects. In addition, the D&S segment gross profit of
$47.1 million, or 29.2% of sales, benefited from price
increases that were implemented during the year to offset higher
raw material steel costs that had been incurred in previous
years. Gross profit in the BioMedical segment of
$17.7 million, or 30.9% of sales, deteriorated primarily
due to lower U.S. medical respiratory product volume and
lower productivity and inventory valuation adjustments of
$0.6 million primarily in the first half of 2005, as a
result of the transition of the medical respiratory product line
manufacturing from Burnsville, Minnesota to Canton, Georgia.
SG&A expense for the 2005 Reorganized Period was
$59.8 million or 19.6% of sales. SG&A expense was
affected by an increase in employee-related and marketing costs
in the D&S and E&C segments to support their continued
sales growth. SG&A expense during this period included
stock-based compensation expense of $9.5 million. A
significant portion of this charge was incurred as a result of
stock options that were exercised in conjunction with the
Acquisition further described above. SG&A expense included a
charge of $2.8 million, or 0.9% of sales, for the
write-off of purchased
in-process research and
development. In addition, SG&A expense included
$1.1 million of costs and losses related to damage caused
by Hurricane Rita at the New Iberia, Louisiana facilities and a
$1.1 million charge for the settlement of a finders
fee claim asserted by a former shareholder in connection with
our 2003 bankruptcy reorganization.
49
During the 2005 Reorganized Period, we incurred
$6.6 million in expenses related to the Acquisition.
|
|
|
Employee Separation and Plant Closure Costs |
For the 2005 Reorganized Period, we recorded $1.1 million
of employee separation and plant closure costs, primarily
related to the closure of the Plaistow, New Hampshire and
Burnsville, Minnesota facilities.
|
|
|
Other Expenses and Income |
We recorded a net gain on the sale of assets of
$0.1 million, which included a gain of $1.7 million on
the settlement of a promissory note receivable related to the
2003 sale of our former Greenville Tube, LLC stainless tubing
business, a $1.2 million loss for the write-off of several
assets that were deemed to be impaired, and a loss of
$0.5 million for the write down of the Plaistow facility
held for sale to its estimated fair value.
Net interest expense for the 2005 Reorganized Period was
$4.2 million. We experienced higher interest expense during
this period as a result of higher interest rates and the
increase in the outstanding balance under the revolving credit
line of our then existing credit facility.
We recorded $0.7 million of foreign currency losses due to
certain of our subsidiaries entering into transactions in
currencies other than their functional currencies.
Income tax expense of $7.2 million for the 2005 Reorganized
Period represents taxes on both domestic and foreign earnings at
an annual effective income tax rate of 44.6%. Our income tax
expense was unfavorably impacted by approximately
$1.4 million due to the non-deductible charge for purchased
in-process research and development of $2.8 million and
Acquisition costs of $1.2 million.
As a result of the foregoing, we reported net income of
$8.9 million for the 2005 Reorganized Period.
Year Ended December 31, 2004
Sales for 2004 of $305.6 million were positively affected
by volume and price increases, a recovery of the global
industrial gas market and favorable foreign currency translation
as a result of the weakening of the U.S dollar compared to the
Euro and Czech Koruna. Sales in the E&C segment for 2004
were $69.6 million and both the heat exchanger and LNG
system product lines benefited from higher volume primarily in
the Asian, African and Middle Eastern markets. D&S segment
sales were $162.5 million in 2004 and benefited favorably
from volume increases in cryogenic bulk storage systems,
cryogenic packaged gas systems and beverage liquid
CO2
systems driven primarily by a recovery in the global industrial
gas market. Price increases and surcharges driven by higher raw
material costs and favorable foreign currency translation as a
result of the weakening of the U.S. Dollar compared to the
Euro and Czech Koruna also had a positive impact on D&S
segment sales. Sales in the BioMedical segment were
$73.4 million. Sales of our biological storage systems and
medical products experienced volume increases in both the U.S.
and European markets. Sales of MRI and other products
deteriorated in 2004 as this product lines primary
customer continued to transfer volume to lower cost
manufacturing regions.
50
|
|
|
Gross Profit and Gross Margin |
Gross profit for 2004 was $93.8 million or 30.7% of sales.
The gross profit was positively affected by volume increases
across all operating segments, and product price increases and
favorable foreign currency translation in the D&S segment.
The E&C segment gross profit and related margin were
$21.5 million and 30.9% of sales, respectively, in 2004.
The E&C segment benefited from higher volumes and the
delivery of a premium-priced, expedited order that was needed to
put a natural gas producers ethane recovery plant back in
service. A shift to lower margin industrial heat exchangers and
LNG VIP had an unfavorable impact on the E&C segment gross
profit margin. D&S segment gross profit and related margin
were $46.6 million and 28.7% of sales, respectively. The
D&S segment gross profit margin was positively affected by
product price increases and surcharges to offset higher raw
material costs that had been incurred, higher sales volume and
the realization of savings from our restructuring efforts. The
D&S segment gross profit margin was unfavorably affected by
a shift to lower margin bulk products. Gross profit and related
margin for the BioMedical segment were $25.7 million and
35.0% of sales, respectively. Gross profit margins for medical
and biological storage systems products were positively impacted
by higher volume and cost reductions, and MRI and other products
margins were unfavorably affected by higher material costs and
unabsorbed overhead costs due to lower sales volume.
SG&A expense for 2004 was $53.4 million, or 17.5% of
sales. In 2004, we benefited from cost savings realized as a
result of our continued restructuring efforts, including the
lower professional expenses that had been incurred previously to
restructure our senior debt in 2003 and $0.9 million of
life insurance proceeds from our voluntary deferred income plan.
In 2004, we incurred $5.3 million, or 1.7% of sales, of
incentive compensation expense for achieving our operating
targets, $2.4 million, or 0.8% of sales, of compensation
expense resulting from the sale of 28,797 shares of our
common stock to our chief executive officer at a price below the
closing market price on the date of sale and the issuance of new
stock options to certain key employees in 2004,
$2.8 million of expense, or 0.9% of sales, in 2004 related
to the amortization of certain intangible assets recorded in
September 2003 under Fresh-Start accounting, and
$0.9 million of selling expense, or 0.3% of sales related
to the settlement of two specific customer product claims that
were outside of our normal warranty period.
|
|
|
Employee Separation and Plant Closure Costs |
In 2004, we continued our manufacturing facility restructuring
plan, which commenced with the 2003 closure of our E&C
segment sales and engineering office in Westborough,
Massachusetts. We announced in December 2003 and January 2004
the closure of our D&S segment manufacturing facility in
Plaistow, New Hampshire and the BioMedical segment manufacturing
and office facility in Burnsville, Minnesota, respectively. In
each of these facility closures, we did not exit the product
lines manufactured at those sites, but moved manufacturing to
other facilities with available capacity, most notably New
Prague, Minnesota for engineered tank production and Canton,
Georgia for medical tank production. The Plaistow facility
closure was completed in the third quarter of 2004. We incurred
capital expenditures in 2004 of $2.5 million for
improvements and additions to the Canton, Georgia facility, and
completed the closure of the Burnsville, Minnesota facility in
the first quarter of 2005.
During 2004, we recorded employee separation and plant closure
costs of $3.2 million related to the manufacturing facility
reduction efforts and overall headcount reduction programs
described above. The total charges for 2004 included
$0.4 million of expense for contract termination costs,
$1.3 million severance and other benefits related to
terminating certain employees at these and other sites, and
$1.5 million for other associated costs. In addition, we
recorded a non-cash inventory valuation charge of
$0.2 million, included in cost of sales, for the write-off
of inventory at these sites. At December 31, 2004, we had a
reserve of $2.8 million remaining for the closure of these
facilities, primarily for lease termination and severance costs.
51
We recorded $0.1 million of equity loss related to our
Coastal Fabrication joint venture in 2004. In February 2004, our
Coastal Fabrication joint venture executed an agreement to
redeem the joint venture partners 50% equity interest. As
a result of the elimination of the joint venture partner and the
assumption of 100% of control by us, the assets, liabilities and
operating results of Coastal Fabrication are included in the
consolidated financial statements subsequent to February 2004.
In conjunction with the closure of the Burnsville, Minnesota
facility, we sold this facility in October 2004 for gross
proceeds of $4.5 million and recorded a loss on the sale of
$0.4 million. The proceeds of this sale were used to pay
down $0.9 million of debt outstanding under an industrial
revenue bond and the balance was used for working capital
purposes. In April 2004, we sold for $0.6 million of cash
proceeds a vacant building and a parcel of land at our New
Prague, Minnesota facility that was classified as an asset held
for sale in our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2003. In August 2004, we sold for
$1.1 million in cash proceeds, equipment at our Plaistow,
New Hampshire facility, resulting in a $0.6 million gain on
the sale of assets. We recorded a $0.4 million loss on the
sale of assets related to adjusting the Plaistow land and
building to fair value less cost to sell based upon an agreement
executed in September 2004 to sell the Plaistow land and
building. The land and building related to the Plaistow facility
are included in assets held for sale on our
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004.
Net interest expense for 2004 was $4.8 million. This lower
expense is attributable primarily to our debt restructuring in
September 2003 in conjunction with the Reorganization Plan and
the reduction in the debt balance as a result of
$40.0 million of aggregate voluntary prepayments on our
then existing term loan at the end of 2003 and during 2004.
|
|
|
Derivative Contracts Valuation Income and Expense |
We entered into an interest rate derivative contract in the form
of a collar in March 1999 to manage interest rate risk exposure
relative to our debt. This collar had a notional value of
$19.1 million at December 31, 2004 and expired in
March 2006. The fair value of the contract related to the collar
outstanding at December 31, 2004 is a liability of
$0.3 million and is recorded in accrued interest. The
change in fair value of the contracts related to the collars
during 2004 of $0.1 million is recorded in derivative
contracts valuation income.
We recorded a $0.5 million of foreign currency
remeasurement gain in 2004 as result of certain of our
subsidiaries entering into transactions in currencies other than
their functional currency.
In 2004, we recorded income tax expense of $10.1 million,
which primarily reflects the income tax expense associated with
U.S. and foreign earnings and a reduction in tax accruals for
prior tax periods at an annual effective tax rate of 30.9%.
52
As a result of the foregoing, we recorded net income of
$22.6 million in 2004.
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003
Sales for the three months ended December 31, 2003 were
$68.6 million and continued to be negatively impacted by
our prolonged debt restructuring initiatives and the resultant
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code, but not as significantly as during the first nine months
of 2003. Sales in the E&C segment were $15.7 million.
Heat exchanger and process system sales were favorably impacted
by volume and price increases in the hydrocarbon processing
market and began to recover from the prolonged impact of the
debt restructuring and bankruptcy reorganization. D&S
segment sales were $37.9 million during this period as
continued weakness in the global industrial gas market had an
unfavorable impact on bulk storage systems sales. In addition,
LNG fueling systems were affected by lower volume primarily as a
result of a decline in the economies of West Coast and South
Central states of the United States and our financial
difficulties. However, packaged gas and beverage liquid
CO2
systems benefited from higher sales volumes. Sales in the
BioMedical segment for the three months ended December 31,
2003 were $15.0 million. Sales of biological storage
systems and medical products benefited from higher volume, while
the MRI components sales declined due to lower volume as this
product lines primary customer transferred volume to lower
cost manufacturing regions.
|
|
|
Gross Profit and Gross Margin |
For the three months ended December 31, 2003, gross profit
was $16.1 million or 23.4% of sales. During this three
month period, we included as a component of cost of sales a
charge for the fair value
write-up in inventory
value as required under Fresh-Start accounting at
September 30, 2003. The charge was included as a component
of cost of sales as the inventory was sold during the three
months ended December 31, 2003. The dollar value of this
adjustment and its percentage reduction on gross profit margin
by operating segment for the three months ended
December 31, 2003 was as follows: $2.2 million and
5.8% of sales for the D&S segment, and $3.2 million and
21.3% of sales for the BioMedical segment. A similar valuation
adjustment for inventory in the E&C segment was not required
due to our use of the percentage of completion method for
revenue recognition in this segment.
In addition, the gross profit margin in the E&C segment
benefited from improved pricing in the hydrocarbon processing
market, cost savings recognized due to the closures of our
Wolverhampton, U.K. heat exchanger manufacturing facility and
Westborough, Massachusetts engineering facility. The D&S
segment gross profit margin was positively impacted by the
overhead cost savings from the closure of our Costa Mesa,
California and Columbus, Ohio manufacturing facilities. Gross
profit margin in the BioMedical segment was negatively impacted
further by lower margins for MRI cryostat components due to
lower pricing and unabsorbed overhead costs due to reduced
volume.
SG&A expense for the three months ended December 31,
2003 was $14.1 million, or 20.6% of sales. During this
three month period, we realized cost savings from the
elimination of a significant number of salaried employees from
its operational restructuring efforts described further below.
|
|
|
Employee Separation and Plant Closure Costs |
During the three months ended December 31, 2003, we
recorded employee separation and plant closure costs of
$1.0 million related to the manufacturing facility
reduction efforts and overall employee reduction programs
described further below. These charges included
$0.8 million for severance and other benefits related to
terminating certain employees and $0.2 million of plant
closure costs. At December 31, 2003, we
53
had a reserve of $3.4 million remaining for the closure of
these facilities, primarily for lease termination and severance
costs.
We recorded $0.04 million of equity loss from our Coastal
Fabrication joint venture for the three months ended
December 31, 2003.
Net interest expense for the three months ended
December 31, 2003 was $1.4 million and reflects
interest expense recorded under the credit facility entered into
on September 15, 2003 under the Reorganization Plan.
|
|
|
Derivative Contracts Valuation Expense |
For the three months ended December 31, 2003, we recorded
$0.05 million of derivative contracts valuation income for
our interest rate collar that expired in March 2006 and had a
notional value of $25.5 million at September 30, 2003.
We recorded $0.4 million foreign currency remeasurement
gain for the three months ended December 31, 2003 as result
of certain of our subsidiaries entering into transactions in
currencies other than their functional currency.
We recorded an income tax benefit of $0.1 million for the
three months ended December 31, 2003 for losses incurred
primarily as a result of the inventory valuation adjustment
under Fresh-Start accounting explained above and a reduction in
tax accruals for prior tax periods.
As a result of the foregoing, we had net income of
$0.03 million for the three months ended December 31,
2003.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were
negatively impacted by our prolonged debt restructuring
initiatives and the resultant reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, as certain
customers reduced order quantities, delayed signing significant
new orders, did not automatically renew supply contracts that
expired in 2003, and contracted with other competitors, due to
the uncertainty created by our leverage situation and bankruptcy
filing. We believe our E&C segment experienced the most
significant negative impact of the Chapter 11 filing, since
products in this segment frequently have extended production
times and significant dollar values.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, sales were
$197.0 million. E&C segment sales were
$42.9 million in the first nine months of 2003. The E&C
segment was unfavorably impacted by lower sales volume in the
process system market, and benefited from higher sales volume
for heat exchangers in the hydrocarbon processing market.
D&S segment sales were $102.5 million for the first
nine months of 2003 and were negatively affected by the
continued weak global market for industrial bulk storage
systems. BioMedical segment sales were $51.6 million in the
first nine months of 2003. Medical products and biological
storage systems sales were positively affected by increased
international volume, while MRI product sales were unfavorably
impacted by lower volume.
54
|
|
|
Gross Profit and Gross Margin |
Gross profit and the related margin for the first nine months of
2003 were $55.8 million and 28.3% of sales. The gross
profit and related margin were favorably affected in the E&C
and D&S segments primarily by the realization of operational
cost savings from our manufacturing facility rationalization
plan that commenced in early 2002. Gross profit margin in the
BioMedical segment was negatively impacted by a temporary
shut-down of our Denver, Colorado manufacturing plant in the
last half of March 2003 due to an unanticipated deferral until
the second quarter of 2003 of MRI product orders at the request
of the product lines only customer, and by a temporary
shut-down of this same facility in June 2003 due to a
weather-related extended power outage.
SG&A expense for the first nine months of 2003 was
$44.2 million, or 22.4% of sales. We recorded
$6.0 million, or 3.1% of sales, of SG&A expense in the
first nine months of 2003 for fees paid to professional advisors
related to our efforts to restructure our senior debt.
|
|
|
Employee Separation and Plan Closure Costs |
We recorded $0.9 million of employee separation and plant
closure costs in the first nine months of 2003. This expense
relates substantially to the closure of the E&C
segments Wolverhampton, U.K. manufacturing facility and
the engineering office in Westborough, Massachusetts and the
closure of the D&S segments manufacturing facilities
in Costa Mesa, California and Columbus, Ohio and consisted
primarily of lease termination costs and severance.
|
|
|
Loss on Insolvent Subsidiary |
In March 2003, we completed the closure of our Wolverhampton,
U.K. manufacturing facility, operated by Chart Heat Exchangers
Limited (CHEL). We have continued to manufacture
heat exchangers at our La Crosse, Wisconsin facility. On
March 28, 2003, CHEL filed for a voluntary administration
under the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986. CHELs application
for voluntary administration was approved on April 1, 2003
and an administrator was appointed. In accordance with
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries, we are not consolidating the accounts or
financial results of CHEL subsequent to March 28, 2003 due
to the assumption of control of CHEL by the insolvency
administrator. Effective March 28, 2003, we recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $13.7 million to write off
our net investment in CHEL.
On July 3, 2003, we sold certain assets and liabilities of
our former Greenville Tube, LLC stainless steel tubing business,
which we previously reported as a component of our E&C
segment. We received gross proceeds of $15.5 million,
consisting of $13.5 million in cash and $2.0 million
in a long-term subordinated note, and recorded a gain of
$3.7 million in the third quarter of 2003. In accordance
with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we classified the
operating results of this business as a discontinued operation
on our consolidated statement of operations for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2003. We reported income from
discontinued operation, net of taxes of $0.8 million in the
first nine months of 2003.
As part of closing our Columbus, Ohio manufacturing facility, we
sold our cryopump and valves product lines in the second quarter
of 2003 for net proceeds of $2.3 million and recorded a
$0.9 million gain in other income, and sold various fixed
assets of the Columbus, Ohio facility in the first quarter of
2003 for net proceeds of $0.2 million and recorded a
$0.2 million gain in other income.
55
Net interest expense was $9.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2003. We recorded interest expense on
amounts outstanding under the term loan portion and revolving
credit loan portion of our credit facility negotiated by the
Predecessor Company in March 1999 and under the Series 1
Incremental Revolving Credit Facility and the Series 2
Incremental Revolving Credit Facility entered into by the
Predecessor Company in November 2000 and in April 2001,
respectively until July 8, 2003, the date we filed our
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions, but not thereafter. As a
result, interest expense for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2003 does not include approximately
$3.8 million that would have been payable under the terms
of these facilities had we not filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection.
|
|
|
Financing Costs Amortization |
Financing costs amortization expense was $1.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2003. We recorded
financing costs amortization expense related to the credit
facility negoatiated by the Predecessor Company in March 1999
until July 8, 2003, the date we filed our Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions, but not thereafter. We did not record any
financing costs amortization expense subsequent to the third
quarter of 2003 related to our post-bankruptcy credit facilities.
|
|
|
Derivative Contracts Valuation Expense |
We recorded $0.4 million of derivative contracts valuation
expense in the nine month period ended September 30, 2003
for our interest rate collar that expired in March 2006 and has
a notional value of $26.7 million at September 30,
2003.
We recorded a $0.3 million of foreign currency
remeasurement loss for the nine months ended September 30,
2003 as result of certain of our subsidiaries entering into
transactions in currencies other than their functional currency.
|
|
|
Reorganization Items, Net |
The Predecessor Company recorded a net gain of $5.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as a result of
adopting Fresh-Start accounting. This net gain was comprised of
certain adjustments to the fair value of assets and liabilites
resulting in a net charge of $38.6 million, restructuring
of the Predecessor Companys capital structure, including a
discharge of the senior lenders pre-petition debt, resulting in
a net gain of $52.2 million, and charges of
$7.9 million for advisory fees and severance directly
related to the reorganization. In accordance with Fresh-Start
accounting, all assets and liabilities were recorded at their
estimated fair values as of September 30, 2003. Such fair
values represented our best estimates based on independent
appraisals and valuations.
Income tax expense of $3.0 million in the first nine months
of 2003 consisted of tax benefit from reversals of domestic
income tax reserves associated with resolved tax contingencies,
partially offset by taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
At September 30, 2003, we had a net deferred tax liability
of $6.7 million, which represents foreign deferred tax
liabilities. At September 30, 2003, we had a full valuation
allowance against our domestic net deferred tax assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, based upon managements assessment that
it was more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets
would not be realized. Pursuant to Section 108 of the
Internal Revenue Code, we materially reduced certain tax
attributes on January 1, 2004 due to the recognition of
cancellation of indebtedness income in the three-month period
ended September 30, 2003.
56
As a result of the foregoing, we reported a net loss of
$7.1 million for the first nine months of 2003.
Orders and Backlog
We consider orders to be those for which we have received a firm
signed purchase order or other written contractual commitment
from the customer. Backlog is comprised of the portion of firm
signed purchase orders or other written contractual commitments
received from customers that we have not recognized as revenue
upon shipment or under the percentage of completion method.
Backlog can be significantly affected by the timing of orders
for large projects, particularly in the E&C segment, and is
not necessarily indicative of future backlog levels or the rate
at which backlog will be recognized as sales. Our backlog at
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $233.6 million,
$129.3 million and $49.6 million, respectively. This
significant increase in backlog is primarily attributable to the
growth in the global industrial gas and the LNG and natural gas
segments of the hydrocarbon processing markets served by the
E&C and D&S segments. Substantially all of our
December 31, 2005 backlog is scheduled to be recognized as
sales during 2006.
The table below sets forth orders and backlog by segment for the
last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Orders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy & Chemicals
|
|
$ |
28,621 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
|
$ |
121,793 |
|
|
$ |
130,786 |
|
|
|
$ |
67,232 |
|
|
Distribution & Storage
|
|
|
105,233 |
|
|
|
|
37,696 |
|
|
|
193,156 |
|
|
|
191,188 |
|
|
|
|
45,859 |
|
|
Biomedical
|
|
|
52,751 |
|
|
|
|
14,492 |
|
|
|
77,893 |
|
|
|
62,396 |
|
|
|
|
13,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
186,605 |
|
|
|
$ |
67,450 |
|
|
$ |
392,842 |
|
|
$ |
384,370 |
|
|
|
$ |
126,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy & Chemicals
|
|
$ |
20,673 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,834 |
|
|
$ |
70,766 |
|
|
$ |
114,633 |
|
|
|
$ |
147,732 |
|
|
Distribution & Storage
|
|
|
28,591 |
|
|
|
|
27,993 |
|
|
|
53,900 |
|
|
|
83,194 |
|
|
|
|
79,524 |
|
|
Biomedical
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
8,388 |
|
|
|
|
6,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
51,781 |
|
|
|
$ |
49,635 |
|
|
$ |
129,279 |
|
|
$ |
206,215 |
|
|
|
$ |
233,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over the last two years, orders have increased significantly,
particularly in the E&C and D&S segments, as a result of
continued demand growth in the global industrial and the LNG and
natural gas segments of the hydrocarbon processing markets. In
addition, the E&C segment has benefited from several large
heat exchanger and LNG systems, and emergency orders during this
period.
For the 2005 Successor Period, orders were $126.9 million.
E&C segment orders of $67.2 million remained strong
during this period and included several large heat exchanger and
LNG systems orders, including an air separation heat exchanger
order of $16.0 million. D&C segment orders of
$45.9 million were driven by continued strong packaged gas
system orders. Bulk storage systems and packaged gas systems
orders were $26.9 million and $18.9 million,
respectively for this period. Biomedical segment orders were
$13.8 during this period as orders in the European and Asian
market medical respiratory and U.S. biological storage
system products order levels remained strong, while
U.S. medical respiratory product orders continued to
decline. This decline is explained further below.
Orders for the 2005 Reorganized Period were $384.4 million.
E&C segment orders of $130.8 million remained strong
during this period and included a $21.0 million LNG VIP
order and a $10.7 million hydrocarbon processing heat
exchanger order. D&C segment orders of $191.2 million
were driven by continued strong bulk storage systems orders and
strong packaged gas system orders, which were $118.5 mil-
57
lion and $72.7 million, respectively. This strong order
level in the D&S segment is driven by continued demand in
the global industrial gas markets served by us. Biomedical
segment orders were $62.4 million, as orders for European
and Asian medical respiratory products and U.S. biological
storage system products continued favorable growth trends due to
both continued market penetration and market growth.
U.S. medical respiratory product orders during this period
were unfavorably impacted by lower orders from a significant
customer and announced government reimbursement reductions for
liquid oxygen therapy systems.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, orders of
$392.8 million were positively affected by improvements in
the markets served by all three segments. During 2004, the
E&C segment showed a significant increase in orders to
$121.8 million, due to increased orders for both the heat
exchangers and LNG systems product lines, including orders of
$20.4 million and $19.3 million. The demand increase
was mainly due to the recovery of the global industrial gas
markets and the continuing development of a worldwide natural
gas market. The D&S segment orders significantly increased
in 2004 to $193.2 million as bulk storage and packaged gas
products experienced increased demand as a result of a recovery
in the global industrial gas market. During 2004, the BioMedical
segment continued its previous trend of increasing order
performance with orders of $77.9 million, driven by strong
demand for medical respiratory products and biological storage
systems both in the U.S. and international markets. Orders for
MRI components continued to decline during 2004 as the product
lines single customer continued to move business to lower
cost manufacturing countries.
For the three months ended December 31, 2003, orders were
$67.5 million and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 were $186.6 million. Although order
levels began to improve during the last three months of 2003,
orders during the first nine months of 2003 were negatively
affected by customer concerns of uncertainty relating to the
prolonged debt restructuring initiative and Chapter 11
bankruptcy reorganization, particularly within the E&C
segment. BioMedical segment orders during both periods of 2003
were fueled by strong demand for medical respiratory products,
but were unfavorably impacted by a reduction in orders for MRI
components from its sole customer as they continue to source the
product from suppliers in low cost manufacturing countries.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
Debt Instruments and Related Covenants |
In connection with the Acquisition, we entered into a
$240.0 million senior secured credit facility and completed
the $170.0 million offering of
91/8% senior
subordinated notes due 2015. We repaid the term loan portion of
our then existing credit facility (the term loan portion and
revolving credit portion of the facility are referred to
collectively as the 2003 Credit Facility) and
certain other debt on or before October 17, 2005, the
closing date of the Acquisition. The senior secured credit
facility consists of a $180.0 million term loan credit
facility and a $60.0 million revolving credit facility, of
which $35.0 million may be used for the issuance of letters
of credit. The term loan was fully funded on the closing date.
The term loan matures on October 17, 2012 and the revolving
credit portion of the senior secured credit facility matures on
October 17, 2010. As a result of a $5.0 million
voluntary principal prepayment in December 2005, the term loan
requires quarterly principal payments that equal 0.8% per
annum of the funded balance commencing in September 2008 and a
remaining balloon payment on the maturity date. Future principal
payments will be adjusted for any voluntary prepayments. The
interest rate under the senior secured credit facility is, at
our option, the Alternative Base Rate (ABR) plus
1.0% or LIBOR plus 2.0% on the term loan, and ABR plus 1.5% or
LIBOR plus 2.5% on the revolving credit portion of the senior
secured credit facility. In addition, we are required to pay an
annual administrative fee of $0.1 million, a commitment fee
of 0.5% on the unused revolving credit balance, a letter of
credit participation fee of 2.5% per annum on the letter of
credit exposure and letter of credit issuance fee of 0.25%. The
obligations under the senior secured credit facility are secured
by substantially all of the assets of our domestic subsidiaries
and 65% of the capital stock of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
See Description of IndebtednessSenior Secured Credit
Facility.
The notes are due in 2015 with interest payable semi-annually on
April 15th and October 15th. Any of the notes may be
redeemed beginning on October 15, 2010. The initial
redemption price is 104.563% of the principal amount, plus
accrued interest. Also, any of the notes may be redeemed solely
at our option at any
58
time prior to October 15, 2010, plus accrued interest and a
make-whole premium. In addition, before
October 15, 2008, up to 35% of the notes may be redeemed
solely at our option at a price of 109.125% of the principal
amount, plus accrued interest, using the proceeds from sales of
certain kinds of capital stock. The notes are our general
unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment
to all of our existing and future senior debt, including the
senior secured credit facility, pari passu in right of
payment with all of our future senior subordinated indebtedness,
senior in right of payment with any of our future indebtedness
that expressly provides for its subordination to the notes, and
unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally by
substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries.
The senior secured credit facility and provisions of the
indenture governing the notes contain a number of customary
covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our
ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens or other
encumbrances, sell assets, enter into sale and lease-back
transactions, make certain payments, investments, loans,
advances and guarantees, make acquisitions and engage in mergers
and consolidations, pay dividends and distributions, and make
capital expenditures. Our senior secured credit facility also
includes covenants relating to leverage and interest coverage
ratios. See Description of Indebtedness. At
December 31, 2005, we had $175.0 million outstanding
under the term loan and $170.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of notes outstanding, and letters of credit and
bank guarantees totaling $22.4 million supported by the
revolving credit portion of the senior secured credit facility.
Chart Ferox, a.s. (Ferox), our majority-owned
subsidiary that operates in the Czech Republic, maintains
secured revolving credit facilities with borrowing capacity,
including overdraft protection, of up to $9.6 million, of
which $4.4 million is available only for letters of credit
and bank guarantees. Under the revolving credit facilities,
Ferox may make borrowings in Czech Koruna, Euros and
U.S. dollars. Borrowings in Koruna are at PRIBOR,
borrowings in Euros are at EUROBOR and borrowings in
U.S. dollars are at LIBOR, each with a fixed margin of
0.6%. Ferox is not required to pay a commitment fee to the
lenders under the revolving credit facilities with respect to
the unutilized commitments thereunder. Ferox must pay letter of
credit and guarantee fees equal to 0.75% on the face amount of
each guarantee. Feroxs land and buildings, and accounts
receivable secure $4.6 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, of the revolving credit facilities. At
December 31, 2005, there was $0.8 million of
borrowings outstanding under, and $1.5 million of bank
guarantees, supported by the Ferox revolving credit facilities.
Our debt and related covenants are further described in the
notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Cash provided by operating activities for the 2005 Successor
Period was $18.7 million, which included cash provided by
changes in working capital components of $7.6 million.
During the 2005 Successor Period, we used $362.3 million of
cash for investing activities. Cash of $356.6 million was
used to pay proceeds to our former shareholders as a result of
the Acquisition and $5.6 million was used for capital
expenditures. The significant capital expenditures were for the
construction of the new manufacturing facility in China, the
expansion of the biological storage product line manufacturing
facility in New Prague, Minnesota and reinvestment to upgrade
existing facilities to support business growth.
Cash provided by financing activities for the 2005 Successor
Period, was $348.5 million. In connection with the
Acquisition, we received proceeds of $350.0 million from
the senior secured credit facility and senior subordinated notes
and proceeds of $111.3 million from the sale of stock to
affiliates of First Reserve. These proceeds were used to pay our
former shareholders, repay $76.5 million of long-term debt
under the 2003 Credit Facility, pay former stock option holders
$15.8 million and pay financing and transaction costs of
$11.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In
addition, we made a voluntary principal prepayment of
$5.0 million on the term loan.
59
Cash provided by operating activities for the 2005 Reorganized
Period was $15.6 million and included cash used in working
capital components of $10.6 million to support the growth
in business, particularly in the E&C and D&S segments.
During the 2005 Reorganized Period, we used $20.8 million
of cash for investing activities. Cash of $12.0 million,
net of cash acquired, was used to acquire 100% of the equity
interest in Changzhou CEM Cryo Equipment Co., Ltd
(CEM). The CEM acquisition is further described in
the notes to our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Cash used for capital expenditures
for the period was $11.0 million. The significant capital
expenditures were for the construction of the new manufacturing
facility in China, the expansion of the biological storage
product line manufacturing facility in New Prague, Minnesota and
reinvestments to upgrade existing facilities to support growth
in our businesses. In addition, we received proceeds of
$1.7 million from the settlement of a promissory note
related to the 2003 sale of our former Greenville Tube, LLC
stainless steel tubing business.
For the 2005 Reorganized Period, $1.7 million of cash was
provided by financing activities. We borrowed $18.9 million
under our revolving credit facilities, including
$10.0 million in the second quarter of 2005 under the
revolving credit portion of the 2003 Credit Facility to finance
our acquisition of CEM. In addition, we made net payments under
the revolving credit portion of our 2003 Credit Facility and
other revolving credit facilities of $15.9 million and
$1.9 million of scheduled principal payments under the term
loan portion of the 2003 Credit Facility, and $1.1 million
of payments on other long-term debt. Proceeds from the sale of
stock during this period were $1.7 million.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
Cash provided by operations was $35.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004, which was primarily a result of
improved operating performance of all of our business segments,
including increased sales, realized savings due to continued
restructuring efforts and our successful reorganization under
the Bankruptcy Code enabling us to return to normal payment
terms with most of our vendors. This positive cash flow was
partially offset by increased inventory levels, particularly at
the BioMedical segment to ensure uninterrupted service to
customers during the transfer of manufacturing operations from
the Burnsville, Minnesota facility to the Canton, Georgia
facility.
In 2004, net cash used for investing activities was
$3.3 million. Capital expenditures were $9.4 million
and included the expansion of the Canton, Georgia facility to
accommodate the transfer of medical product line manufacturing
to that facility from the Burnsville, Minnesota facility, the
expansion of our operations in China and reinvestment into other
facilities. In addition, we received cash proceeds on the sale
of assets of $6.1 million in 2004, which included
$4.3 million from the sale of the Burnsville, Minnesota
facility, $0.6 million from the sale of a vacant building
and parcel of land at the New Prague, Minnesota facility, and
$1.1 million from the sale of equipment at the Plaistow,
New Hampshire facility.
We used $35.7 million of cash for financing activities in
2004. We paid $33.1 million to reduce our long-term debt.
This amount included voluntary prepayments made in April,
September and December 31, 2004, of $10.0 million,
$12.0 million and $8.0 million respectively, on the
term loan portion of our 2003 Credit Facility. The prepayments
were made due to the significant amount of cash provided by the
operating activities in 2004. Each prepayment reduced all future
scheduled quarterly amortization payments on a pro-rata basis.
Also, we used $1.9 million of cash for our debt
restructuring initiatives including costs associated with the
reorganization. We were required to delay until January 2004,
when our fee applications were approved by the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, payments of approximately
$0.9 million in bankruptcy related fees to various
professional service providers.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
Our cash provided by operating activities was $5.0 million
for the three months ended December 31, 2003. This cash
flow was primarily generated from working capital improvements
as we continued to benefit
60
from our successful Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization by
improved timeliness of customer cash collections on trade
receivables, reduced inventory levels and improved vendor
payment terms.
Cash provided by investing activities was $0.2 million,
while cash used in financing activities was $14.0 million
for this three month period. We made term loan principal
payments of $10.9 million, including a voluntary
$10.0 million prepayment in December 2003 under the term
loan portion of our 2003 Credit Facility that reduced all future
scheduled quarterly principal payments on a pro-rata basis. In
addition, we had net payments under the revolving credit portion
of our 2003 Credit Facility and other revolving credit
facilities of $2.6 million.
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 |
Cash provided by operating activites for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 was $19.5 million. The cash
provided from operations and working capital improvements was
$16.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively. The
working capital improvements were primarily attributable to the
successful Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization as we
strengthened our credit and collection policies and improved our
cash collections of trade receivables, reduced cash requirements
for inventory purchases due to the closure of several
manufacturing facilities and the return to normal payments terms
with a significant number of our vendors.
During this nine-month period, $15.1 million of cash was
provided by investing activities. $16.1 million was
provided by the proceeds from the sale of assets, including
$13.5 from the sale of certain assets and liabilities from our
Greenville Tube, LLC stainless steel tubing business, and
$2.5 million from the sale of certain fixed assets of the
cyropump and valves product line from our closed Columbus, Ohio
manufacturing facility. The proceeds from these sales were
primarily used to fund certain senior debt interest payments,
pay certain professional fees, and provide increased liquidity
for working capital and other corporate needs.
Our cash used in financing activities was $15.9 million. We
used $12.6 million to pay fees for our debt restructuring
initiatives, $1.3 million for net payments under our
then-existing credit facilities and $1.2 million for
long-term debt payments. The remaining cash of $0.8 million
was used for interest rate collar payments and purchases of
treasury stock.
We do not expect any unusual cash requirements for working
capital needs in 2006. We estimate that we will use
approximately $15 to $20 million of cash for capital
expenditures subject to restrictions under the senior secured
credit facility. A significant portion of capital expenditures
will be used for facility expansions and related equipment in
the E&C segment to increase capacity. Management believes
this expansion is necessary to support our significant growth in
sales, order and backlog levels and our expected growth in
business due to demand in the industrial gas and LNG and GTL
segments of the hydrocarbon gas markets. In addition, we expect
to pursue strategic business acquisitions in 2006 to complement
our existing product offerings and to alleviate some capacity
constraints at certain of our E&C and D&S facilities and
expect to fund these acquisitions through working capital,
borrowings under our senior secured credit facility or as
otherwise appropriate, subject to market conditions.
In 2006, cash requirements for debt service are forecasted to be
approximately $28 million for scheduled interest payments
under the senior secured credit facility and the senior
subordinated notes. We are not required to make any principal
payments under the term loan portion of the senior secured
credit facility due to the $5.0 million voluntary principal
prepayment made in December 2005. In addition, we made an
additional $5.0 million voluntary prepayment in March 2006
and will consider making additional voluntary principal payments
in 2006 based on cash levels and requirements. Finally, in 2006,
we expect to use approximately $16.0 million of cash for
both U.S. and foreign taxes and, based on current actuarial
estimates, to contribute approximately $1.3 million to our
four defined benefit pension plans to meet ERISA minimum funding
requirements. As of February 28, 2006, all four of these
defined benefit plans have been frozen and benefits will no
longer be accruing to the participants.
61
Our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005
and cash requirements resulting from those obligations are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2011 and | |
|
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007-2008 | |
|
2009-2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$ |
345,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
2,880 |
|
|
$ |
341,400 |
|
Interest on long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
236,531 |
|
|
|
27,729 |
|
|
|
54,957 |
|
|
|
54,689 |
|
|
|
99,156 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
9,255 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
Pension obligations
|
|
|
16,596 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
9,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
607,382 |
|
|
$ |
30,945 |
|
|
$ |
61,834 |
|
|
$ |
63,518 |
|
|
$ |
451,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We intend to repay indebtedness using the net proceeds of this
offering. This will reduce our long-term debt and interest
obligations. See Use of Proceeds and Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information. |
The interest payments in the above table were estimated based
upon our existing debt structure at December 31, 2005,
which included the senior secured credit facility and senior
subordinated notes, less scheduled debt payments each year, and
the interest rates in effect at December 31, 2005. The
planned funding of the pension and other post-employment
obligations were based upon actuarial and management estimates
taking into consideration the current status of the plans.
Our commercial commitments as of December 31, 2005, which
include standby letters of credit and bank guarantees, represent
potential cash requirements resulting from contingent events
that require performance by us or our subsidiaries pursuant to
funding commitments, and are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007-2008 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Standby letters of credit
|
|
$ |
12,325 |
|
|
$ |
10,585 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
Bank guarantees
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$ |
23,948 |
|
|
$ |
19,864 |
|
|
$ |
4,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Acquisition, we had 1,718,896 shares of
common stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005.
Also, in connection with the Acquisition, 573,027 warrants
to purchase our common stock were granted in November 2005 to FR
X Chart Holdings LLC and 218,408 stock options (New
Options) under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan were granted
to management to purchase shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $64.75 per share. In addition, certain
members of management rolled over 131,823 stock options
(Rollover Options) in the Acquisition from our 2004
Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the exercise price of which was
adjusted to $16.19 per share.
The warrants may be exercised anytime, including on a cashless
basis, and expire in March 2014. The New Options are exercisable
for a period of ten years and have two different vesting
schedules. 77,094 of the New Options are time-based
(Time-based Options) and vest 20% per year over
a five-year period, and 141,314 of the New Options are
performance-based (Performance-based Options) and
vest based upon specified returns on First Reserves
investment in the company. In addition, 122,470 of the Rollover
Options were vested on the closing date of the Acquisition and
9,353 of the Rollover Options vest based upon the attainment of
certain performance criteria. As of March 22, 2006, 128,543
of the Rollover Options were vested. On October 17, 2005,
we adopted SFAS 123(R) Share-Based Payments to
account for our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. See
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards below
for further information regarding the adoption of
SFAS 123(R).
62
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in
the Securities Act.
Contingencies
In conjunction with the Acquisition and the Notice of Merger,
dated October 25, 2005 provided to our former shareholders,
certain of the former shareholders, representing
244,180 shares of common stock, gave notice of their right
under Delaware General Corporation Law to exercise appraisal
rights. In February 2006, before the former shareholders filed
suit in court under Delaware law, we settled this appraisal
rights matter. This resulted in us paying additional proceeds to
these former shareholders of $0.5 million. This settlement
amount was accrued at December 31, 2005.
We are involved with environmental compliance, investigation,
monitoring and remediation activities at certain of our
operating facilities, and accrue for these activities when
commitments or remediation plans have been developed and when
costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Historical
annual cash expenditures for these activities have been charged
against the related environmental reserves. Future expenditures
relating to these environmental remediation efforts are expected
to be made over the next 8 to 14 years as ongoing costs of
remediation programs. Management believes that any additional
liability in excess of amounts accrued, which may result from
the resolution of such matters should not have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity, cash flows
or results of operations.
In March 2003, CHEL filed for a voluntary administration under
the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986. It is uncertain whether we will
be subject to any significant liability resulting from
CHELs insolvency administration. See
BusinessLegal Proceedings.
In 2004, as part of the Plaistow, New Hampshire manufacturing
facility closure, we withdrew from the multi-employer pension
plan related to the Plaistow employees. We continue to carry a
related estimated withdrawal liability of $0.2 million at
December 31, 2005. Any additional liability in excess of
the amount accrued is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on our financial position, liquidity, cash flow or
results of operations.
We are occasionally subject to various other legal actions
related to performance under contracts, product liability and
other matters, several of which actions claim substantial
damages, in the ordinary course of our business. Based on our
historical experience in litigating these actions, as well as
our current assessment of the underlying merits of the actions
and applicable insurance, we believe the resolution of these
other legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, liquidity, cash flows or results of
operations.
Foreign Operations
During 2005, we had operations in Australia, China, the Czech
Republic, Germany and the United Kingdom, which accounted for
23.3% of consolidated revenues and 13.5% of total assets at
December 31, 2005. Functional currencies used by these
operations include the Australian Dollar, the Chinese Renminbi
Yuan, the Czech Koruna, the Euro and the British Pound. We are
exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as a result of
transactions by these subsidiaries in currencies other than
their functional currencies, and from transactions by our
domestic operations in currencies other than the
U.S. Dollar. The majority of these functional currencies
and the other currencies in which we record transactions are
fairly stable. The use of these currencies, combined with the
use of foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts, has
enabled us to be sheltered from significant gains or losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions. This situation
could change if these currencies experience significant
fluctuations in their value as compared to the U.S. Dollar.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles and are based on the selection and application of
significant accounting policies, which require management to
make estimates and assumptions. Although Fresh-Start accounting
required the
63
selection of appropriate accounting policies for the Reorganized
Company, the significant accounting policies previously used by
the Predecessor Company have generally continued to be used by
the Reorganized Company and Successor Company. Management
believes the following are some of the more critical judgmental
areas in the application of its accounting policies that affect
its financial position and results of operations.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We evaluate the
collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of
factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific
customers inability to meet its financial obligations
(e.g., bankruptcy filings, substantial downgrading of credit
scores), a specific reserve is recorded to reduce the receivable
to the amount we believe will be collected. We also record
allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the
receivables are past due and historical experience. If
circumstances change (e.g., higher-than-expected defaults or an
unexpected material adverse change in a customers ability
to meet its financial obligations), our estimates of the
collectibility of amounts due could be changed by a material
amount.
Inventory Valuation Reserves. We determine inventory
valuation reserves based on a combination of factors. In
circumstances where we are aware of a specific problem in the
valuation of a certain item, a specific reserve is recorded to
reduce the item to its net realizable value. We also recognize
reserves based on the actual usage in recent history and
projected usage in the near-term. If circumstances change (e.g.,
lower-than-expected or higher-than-expected usage), estimates of
the net realizable value could be changed by a material amount.
Long-Lived Assets. We monitor our long-lived assets for
impairment indicators on an ongoing basis in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. If impairment indicators
exist, we perform the required analysis and record impairment
charges in accordance with SFAS No. 144. In conducting
our analysis, we compare the undiscounted cash flows expected to
be generated from the long-lived assets to the related net book
values. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the net book
value, the long-lived assets are considered not to be impaired.
If the net book value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment loss is measured and recognized. An impairment loss
is measured as the difference between the net book value and the
fair value of the long-lived assets. Fair value is estimated
based upon either discounted cash flow analyses or estimated
salvage values. Cash flows are estimated using internal
forecasts as well as assumptions related to discount rates.
Changes in economic or operating conditions impacting these
estimates and assumptions could result in the impairment of
long-lived assets. In 2006, we expect to record approximately
$4.3 million of amortization expense related to backlog.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets.
Under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, we evaluate goodwill and indefinite
lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis. To
test for impairment, we are required to estimate the fair market
value of each of our reporting units. We developed a model to
estimate the fair market value of our reporting units. This fair
market value model incorporates our estimates of future cash
flows, estimates of allocations of certain assets and cash flows
among reporting units, estimates of future growth rates and
managements judgment regarding the applicable discount
rates to use to discount those estimated cash flows. Changes to
these judgments and estimates could result in a significantly
different estimate of the fair market value of the reporting
units, which could result in a different assessment of the
recoverability of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible
assets.
Pensions. We account for our defined benefit pension
plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, which
requires that amounts recognized in financial statements be
determined on an actuarial basis. Our funding policy is to
contribute at least the minimum funding amounts required by law.
SFAS No. 87 and the policies used by us, notably the
use of a calculated value of plan assets (which is further
described below), generally reduce the volatility of pension
expense from changes in pension liability discount rates and the
performance of the pension plans assets.
A significant element in determining our pension expense in
accordance with SFAS No. 87 is the expected return on
plan assets. We have assumed that the expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets as of December 31, 2005 will be
8.25%. These expected return assumptions were developed using a
simple averaging formula based upon the plans investment
guidelines and the historical returns of equities and bonds.
64
While over the long term, the investment strategy employed with
our pension plan assets has earned in excess of such rates, we
believe our assumptions for expected future returns are
reasonable. However, we cannot guarantee that we will achieve
these returns in the future. The assumed long-term rate of
return on assets is applied to the market value of plan assets.
This produces the expected return on plan assets that reduces
pension expense. The difference between this expected return and
the actual return on plan assets is deferred. The net deferral
of past asset gains or losses affects the calculated value of
plan assets and, ultimately, future pension expense.
At the end of each year, we determine the rate to be used to
discount plan liabilities. The discount rate reflects the
current rate at which the pension liabilities could be
effectively settled at the end of the year. In estimating this
rate, we look to rates of return on high quality, fixed-income
investments that receive one of the two highest ratings given by
a recognized rating agency and the expected timing of benefit
payments under the plan. At December 31, 2005, we
determined this rate to be 5.50%. Changes in discount rates over
the past three years have not materially affected pension
expense, and the net effect of changes in the discount rate, as
well as the net effect of other changes in actuarial assumptions
and experience, has been deferred as allowed by
SFAS No. 87.
At December 31, 2005, our consolidated net pension
liability recognized was $6.9 million, a decrease of
$2.3 million from December 31, 2004. The decrease is
primarily due to an increase in the fair value of plan assets
during 2005, and the recognition of the previously determined
net unamortized gain at the closing date of the Acquisition in
accordance with SFAS 141, Business
Combinations. For the 2005 Successor Period and the 2005
Reorganized Period, we recognized approximately
$0.01 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of
pension income. The consolidated pension expense for the year
ended December 31, 2004 was $0.8 million. The pension
expense has decreased in the 2005 periods primarily due to the
freezing of a third defined benefit pension plan at
December 31, 2004 and the elimination of amortization of
prior service costs at October 17, 2005 in accordance with
SFAS 141. We currently expect that the pension income in
2006 will be approximately $0.5 million, an improvement
from the 2005 and 2004 pension income and expense, respectively,
due to the freezing of all four defined benefit pension plans.
Environmental Remediation Obligations. Our obligation for
known environmental problems at our current and former
manufacturing facilities have been recognized on an undiscounted
basis based on estimates of the cost of investigation and
remediation at each site. Management reviews our environmental
remediation sites quarterly to determine if additional cost
adjustments or disclosures are required. The characteristics of
environmental remediation obligations, where information
concerning the nature and extent of
clean-up activities is
not immediately available and changes in regulatory requirements
frequently occur, result in a significant risk of increase to
the obligations as they mature. Expected future expenditures are
not discounted to present value and potential insurance
recoveries are not recognized until realized.
Product Warranty Costs. We estimate product warranty
costs and accrue for these costs as products are sold. Estimates
are principally based upon historical product warranty claims
experience over the warranty period for each product line. Due
to the uncertainty and potential volatility of these warranty
estimates, changes in assumptions could materially affect net
income.
Revenue Recognition Long-Term Contracts. We
recognize revenue and gross profit as work on long-term
contracts progresses using the percentage of completion method
of accounting, which relies on estimates of total expected
contract revenues and costs. We follow this method since
reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs
applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. Since
the financial reporting of these contracts depends on estimates,
which are assessed continually during the term of the contract,
recognized revenues and profit are subject to revisions as the
contract progresses toward completion. Revisions in profit
estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts that
give rise to the revision become known. Accordingly, favorable
changes in estimates result in additional profit recognition,
and unfavorable changes will result in the reversal of
previously recognized revenue and profits. When estimates
indicate a loss is expected to be incurred under a contract,
cost of sales is charged with a provision for such loss. As work
progresses under a loss contract, revenue and cost of sales
continue to be recognized in equal amounts, and the
65
excess of costs over revenues is charged to the contract loss
reserve. We use the percentage of completion method of
accounting primarily in the E&C segment, with the balance
made up by the D&S segment.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment.
SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation and supersedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and amends
SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair values and
eliminates the pro forma disclosure option allowed under
SFAS 123. SFAS 123(R) is effective for nonpublic
entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005. We adopted SFAS 123(R) on October 17, 2005 in
conjunction with the Acquisition.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) FSP No. 109-1, Application for FASB
Statement No 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP 109-1 is intended
to clarify that the domestic manufacturing deduction should be
accounted for as a special deduction (rather than a rate
reduction) under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. A special deduction is recognized under
SFAS 109 as it is earned. The adoption of this statement
did not have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004. FSP 109-2 provides guidance under
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
with respect to recording the potential impact of the
repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (the Jobs Act) on enterprises income tax
expense and deferred tax liability. The Jobs Act was enacted on
October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise
is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of
enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for
reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of
applying SFAS No. 109. We completed evaluating the
impact of the repatriation provisions, and the adjustment as
provided for in FSP 109-2, did not have a material impact
on our tax expense or deferred tax liability.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations. This interpretation requires companies to
recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation
to perform asset retirement activities that are conditional on a
future event if the amount can be reasonably estimated. This
statement is effective for the year ending December 31,
2005. The adoption of this statement did not have a material
affect on our financial position, results of operations,
liquidity or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
recently issued the following Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards that we have not adopted as of December 31, 2005:
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. SFAS No 151 requires
abnormal amounts of inventory costs related to idle facility,
freight handling and wasted material expenses to be recognized
as current period charges. Additionally, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. The standard is effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently
evaluating the effect the adoption of SFAS No. 151
will have on our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
SFAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting
Changes and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting
Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154
requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be
applied retrospectively with all prior period financial
statements presented on the new accounting principle.
SFAS 154 also requires that a change in method of
depreciating and amortizing a long-lived asset be accounted for
prospectively as a change in estimate, and the correction of
errors in previously issued financial
66
statements should be termed a restatement. SFAS 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made
in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The
implementation of SFAS 154 does not have an impact our
present consolidated financial statements and will only affect
financial statements to the extent there are future accounting
changes or errors.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to
continuing fluctuations in foreign currency values and interest
rates that can affect the cost of operating and financing.
Accordingly, we address a portion of these risks through a
program of risk management.
Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from the current
senior secured credit facilitys various floating rate
pricing mechanisms. We entered into an interest rate derivative
contract, or collar, in March 1999 to manage interest rate risk
exposure relative to our debt. This collar had a notional amount
of $4.4 million at December 31, 2005 and expired in
March 2006. The fair value of the contract related to the collar
outstanding December 31, 2005 is a liability of less than
$0.1 million and is recorded in accrued interest. If
interest rates were to increase 100 basis points (1%) from
December 31, 2005 rates, and assuming no changes in debt
from the December 31, 2005 levels, our additional annual
expense would be approximately $1.8 million on a pre-tax
basis.
We have assets, liabilities and cash flows in foreign currencies
creating foreign exchange risk, the primary foreign currencies
being the British Pound, the Czech Koruna and the Euro. Monthly
measurement, evaluation and forward exchange contracts are
employed as methods to reduce this risk. We enter into foreign
exchange forward contracts to hedge anticipated and firmly
committed foreign currency transactions. We do not hedge foreign
currency translation or foreign currency net assets or
liabilities. The terms of the derivatives are one year or less.
Covenant Compliance
We believe that our senior secured credit facility and the
indenture governing our outstanding notes are material
agreements, that the covenants are material terms of these
agreements and that information about the covenants is material
to an investors understanding of our financial condition
and liquidity. The breach of covenants in the senior secured
credit facility that are tied to ratios based on Adjusted
EBITDA, as defined below, could result in a default under the
senior secured credit facility and the lenders could elect to
declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Any such
acceleration would also result in a default under our indenture.
Additionally, under the senior secured credit facilities and
indenture, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring
additional indebtedness, making investments and paying dividends
is also tied to ratios based on Adjusted EBITDA.
Covenant levels and pro forma ratios for the four quarters ended
December 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Quarters Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
Covenant Level | |
|
Ratio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Senior Secured Credit Facility(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio
|
|
|
1.75x |
|
|
|
2.62x |
|
Maximum total debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio
|
|
|
6.75x |
|
|
|
4.85x |
|
Indenture(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pro forma Adjusted EBITDA to pro forma fixed charge
coverage ratio required to incur additional debt pursuant to
ratio provisions(3)
|
|
|
2.0x |
|
|
|
2.33x |
|
|
|
(1) |
The senior secured credit facility requires us to maintain an
Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest ratio starting at a minimum of
1.75x and a total net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio starting at
a maximum of 6.75x. Failure to satisfy these ratio requirements
would constitute a default under the senior secured credit
facility. If lenders under the senior secured credit facility
failed to waive any such default, |
67
|
|
|
repayment obligations under the senior secured credit facility
could be accelerated, which would also constitute a default
under the indenture. |
|
(2) |
Our ability to incur additional debt and make certain restricted
payments under our indenture, subject to specified exceptions,
is tied to an Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio of at least
2.0 to 1.0. |
|
(3) |
The ratio is calculated giving pro forma effect to the
Acquisition and the incurrence of debt under the indenture and
the senior secured credit facility. |
Adjusted EBITDA as used herein is defined as net income before
interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and
amortization and further adjusted to exclude non-recurring
items, non-cash items and other adjustments permitted in
calculating covenants contained in the related senior secured
credit facility and indenture governing the notes, as shown in
the table below. We believe that the inclusion of supplementary
adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA are
appropriate to provide additional information to investors to
demonstrate compliance with financing covenants and our ability
to pay dividends. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, a
non-GAAP financial measure, and ratios based thereon, do not
comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(7,085 |
) |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
Interest expense net
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
Depreciation and amortization(a)
|
|
|
9,260 |
|
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
15,522 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
45,936 |
|
|
$ |
26,989 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
15,522 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
45,936 |
|
|
$ |
26,989 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,005 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
9,508 |
|
|
|
|
437 |
|
Inventory valuation charge(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
Acquisition expenses(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development charge(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurricane losses(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
|
406 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs(g)
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
Reorganization expenses(h)
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
Appraisal rights settlement(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Management fees(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(k)
|
|
|
8,929 |
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Income from discontinued operations(l)
|
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
25,325 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,153 |
|
|
$ |
52,934 |
|
|
$ |
50,269 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the 2005
Successor Period include financing costs amortization of
$1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. |
|
|
(b) |
Represents stock-based compensation charges for stock and stock
options issued to key employees and directors, and an additional
charge for the cash-out of stock options in the 2005 Reorganized
Period as a result of the Acquisition. Although it may be of
limited relevance to holders of our debt instruments, it may be
of more relevance to our equity holders, since such equity
holders ultimately bear such expenses. |
|
|
(c) |
Represents a non-cash inventory valuation charge recorded in
cost of sales for the adjustment of inventory to fair value as a
result of Fresh-Start accounting as of September 30, 2003
and purchase accounting as of |
68
|
|
|
October 17, 2005, the closing date of the Acquisition.
Under Fresh-Start and purchase accounting, inventory was
adjusted to the fair value as of the dates indicated above, and
a corresponding charge was taken in the subsequent three months
ended December 31, 2003 and the 2005 Successor Period cost
of sales as the inventory was sold. |
|
|
(d) |
Represents acquisition expenses, primarily professional fees,
incurred by us as a result of the Acquisition. |
|
|
(e) |
Represents a non-cash charge for purchased in-process research
and development in conjunction with the acquisition of CEM in
2005. |
|
|
(f) |
Represents losses and costs incurred related to the damaged
caused by Hurricane Rita at our New Iberia, Louisiana facilities. |
|
|
(g) |
Includes inventory valuation charges recorded in cost of sales,
and severance expenses, facility exit costs and non-operating
expenses related to the execution of our operational
restructuring plan, which primarily included moving the
Burnsville, Minnesota manufacturing operations to Canton,
Georgia, closing the Plaistow, New Hampshire and Wolverhampton,
United Kingdom manufacturing facilities and closing the
Westborough, Massachusetts engineering office. |
|
(h) |
Includes pre-bankruptcy debt restructuring-related fees,
Fresh-Start accounting adjustments and expenses, and a claim
settlement related to our 2003 bankruptcy reorganization. |
|
(i) |
Represents a charge for the settlement of former Reorganized
Company shareholders appraisal rights claims as a result
of the Acquisition. |
|
(j) |
Represents non-recurring management fees charged by our
Reorganized Company majority shareholders, which are not charged
by First Reserve. |
|
(k) |
Includes non-recurring gains and losses and charges on the sale,
disposal or impairment of assets. |
|
(l) |
Represents income from our former Greenville Tube, LLC stainless
steel tubing business, which was sold in July 2003. |
69
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Our products and services are important components to the liquid
gas supply chain. They are employed in cryogenic liquid
production, purification, transportation, distribution, storage
and other processes in which cryogenic liquids are converted
into the desired gases. These processes are important to the use
of hydrocarbon and industrial gases. Important applications
include LNG liquefaction and regasification, gas to liquids,
natural gas and petrochemical processing, industrial gas
production, transportation and storage, home healthcare
applications and biomedical research. Accordingly, global demand
for natural gas and industrial gases are fundamental drivers of
our business.
Natural gas usage is increasing rapidly due to its advantageous
environmental characteristics, superior heat efficiency, and
growth in other applications such as petrochemical feedstock.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA),
the consumption of natural gas will exceed that of coal by 2015.
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects
that global natural gas usage will grow 2.4% annually from 2002
to 2020 compared to 2.0% for oil and 2.3% for coal.
Growing Natural Gas Consumption
Source: LNG World Energy Outlook May 19-20, 2005
International Energy Agency presentation
LNG is expected to be the fastest growing segment of the natural
gas value chain. New supplies of natural gas are largely found
in areas that are long distances from the consumers of natural
gas. In circumstances where pipeline transport is not feasible,
natural gas must be converted into a more compact, liquid form,
in order to effectively transport it to the required location.
Products that enable the liquefaction of natural gas and
re-gasification of LNG for transportation and storage are
critical to the LNG industry.
The LNG liquefaction process is currently the largest LNG market
for our products. Our heat exchangers, cold boxes, VIP and other
products are used by customers in the LNG market to liquefy,
transport, distribute and store natural gas. According to the
IEA, investments in global LNG facilities are expected to total
approximately $250 billion from 2001 to 2030.
70
Energy Ventures Analysis projects LNG liquefaction capacity to
increase 15.2% per annum from 2005 through 2011.
Source: Energy Ventures Analysis, 2005
Commensurate with the increased LNG liquefaction investment and
capacity, transportation of LNG is expected to outpace pipeline
transport of natural gas over the next couple decades. The IEA
expects the transportation of LNG in 2030 to be more than six
times the level in 2001. Once this LNG reaches its end market it
will either be re-gasified for pipeline distribution or
distributed or stored in LNG format using cryogenic tanks where
there is no pipeline infrastructure.
Source: LNG World Energy Outlook May 19-20,
2005 International Energy Agency presentation
Hydrocarbon processing is another substantial market for our
products. In natural gas processing, customers employ cryogenic
equipment to separate and purify natural gas and then to further
separate natural gas into its component elements such as ethane,
propane, butane, other natural gas to liquids (NGL)
and by-products such as helium. In petrochemical processing,
customers use cryogenic separation and purification processes to
convert natural gas elements into ethylene (the basic building
block of plastics), propylene and numerous other industrial
chemicals. The hydrocarbon processing market uses many of the
products from our cryogenic categories in the gas separation and
purification processes and the subsequent storage and
distribution of liquid gases. Major customers for our products
in the hydrocarbon processing markets are large multinational
firms in the oil and gas industry, and large engineering and
construction firms.
Industrial gas demand is another fundamental driver of our
business. Growth in the industrial gas market is driven by the
underlying demand for products that require oxygen, nitrogen,
argon and other air gases. Producers of industrial gases
separate atmospheric air into its component gases using
cryogenic processes. The resultant liquid gases are then stored
and transported for ultimate use by a wide variety of customers
in the petrochemical, electronics, glass, paper, metals, food,
fertilizer, welding, enhanced oil recovery and medical
industries. The industrial gas market uses our products
throughout this process, for the separation, purification,
storage and distribution of gases. Notably, the oil and
chemicals sector is a substantial user of industrial gases, for
stimulating well pressure, refining oil, producing
petrochemicals and other applications.
71
According to Spiritus Consulting (Spiritus), revenue
in the industrial gas market grew at 6.6% per annum from
1999 to 2004. Spiritus projects the global industrial gas market
to grow at 7.0% per annum through 2009, fueled by growth of
9.0% per annum in Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The
following graph was prepared by us using data from the Spiritus
Consulting Report, 2004.
Industrial Gas Sales Growth by Region
Source: Spiritus Consulting Report, 2004
Our BioMedical segment is primarily driven by growth in home
healthcare and biomedical research. Growth in the home
healthcare market is being driven by the trend of decreased
hospital inpatient stays in favor of lower cost outpatient
treatments as well as by the aging U.S. population.
According to U.S. Census data, the U.S. population
aged 65 and over will grow from 36.7 million in 2005 to
46.8 million by 2015.
Growth in U.S. Elderly Population
Aged 65+
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000
Growth in an aging population as well as increases in the number
of respiratory disease cases is expected to increase demand for
respiratory therapy and home-based oxygen devices. Respiratory
therapy, which includes liquid oxygen systems, oxygen
compression systems and oxygen concentrators, is a primary
product service of our BioMedical segment.
Similarly, the global expansion of bio-tech and stem cell
research, and cord blood storage is expected to increase demand
for our biological storage products for storing biological
material. Additionally, U.S. Homeland Security initiatives
in response to acts of bio-terrorism should drive greater demand
for our biological storage products. Global artificial
insemination is expected to grow as countries are moving toward
independence in their dairy and beef production.
We believe that equipment suppliers that are diversified in
terms of product offerings that span the entire supply chain for
users of hydrocarbon and industrial gases will continue to be
industry leaders.
72
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a leading independent global manufacturer of highly
engineered equipment used in the production, storage and end-use
of hydrocarbon and industrial gases. We believe we are a
preferred global supplier of engineered equipment used
throughout the liquid gas supply chain. The largest portion of
end-use applications for our products is energy-related,
accounting for 51% of sales in 2005, and 58% of orders and 77%
of backlog at December 31, 2005. We are a leading
manufacturer of standard and engineered equipment primarily used
for low-temperature and cryogenic applications. We have
developed an expertise in cryogenic systems and equipment, which
operate at low temperatures sometimes approaching absolute zero
(0° Kelvin; -273° Centigrade; -459° Fahrenheit).
The majority of our products, including vacuum-insulated
containment vessels, heat exchangers, cold boxes and other
cryogenic components, are used throughout the liquid gas supply
chain for the purification, liquefaction, distribution, storage
and use of hydrocarbon and industrial gases.
Our primary customers are large, multinational producers and
distributors of hydrocarbon and industrial gases and their
suppliers. We sell our products and services to more than 2,000
customers worldwide. We have developed long-standing
relationships with leading companies in the gas production, gas
distribution, gas processing, LNG, chemical and industrial gas
industries, including Air Products, Praxair, Airgas, Air
Liquide, JGC Corporation (JGC), Bechtel Corporation,
General Electric (GE), ExxonMobil, British Petroleum
(BP) and ConocoPhillips, many of whom have been
purchasing our products for over 20 years.
We have attained this position by capitalizing on our low-cost
global manufacturing footprint, technical expertise and
know-how, broad product offering, reputation for quality, and by
focusing on attractive, growing markets. We have an established
sales and customer support presence across the globe and
low-cost manufacturing operations in the United States, Central
Europe and China. We believe we are the number one or two
equipment supplier in all of our primary end-use markets. For
the combined year ended December 31, 2005, we generated
revenues of $403.1 million compared to revenues of $305.6
for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our backlog at
December 31, 2005 was $233.6 million, compared to $129.3 at
December 31, 2004.
We believe that we are well-positioned to benefit from a variety
of long-term trends driving demand in our industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing demand for natural gas and the geographic dislocation
of supply and consumption, which is resulting in the need for a
global network for LNG; |
|
|
|
increasing demand for natural gas processing, particularly in
the Middle East, as crude oil producers look to utilize the gas
portions of their reserves; and |
|
|
|
increased demand for natural and industrial gases resulting from
rapid economic growth in developing areas, particularly Central
and Eastern Europe and China. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths position us
to enhance our growth and profitability:
|
|
|
Focus on Attractive Growing End Markets. We
anticipate growing demand in the end markets we serve, with
particularly strong growth in LNG, natural gas processing,
specific international markets across all segments and
biomedical equipment. Energy Ventures Analysis projects global
LNG liquefaction capacity to increase 15.2% per annum from
2005 through 2011 and the International Energy Agency expects
the natural gas industry to invest approximately
$250 billion in LNG facilities from 2001 to 2030. In
addition, international demand for our products is being driven
by growing manufacturing capacity and industrial activity in
developing areas, particularly Central and Eastern Europe and
China. Rapid economic development in these areas has caused a
significant increase in the demand for natural and |
73
|
|
|
industrial gases. According to Spiritus Consulting, the global
market for industrial gas is projected to grow 7.0% per
annum from 2009. |
|
|
Substantial Revenue Visibility. We have a large
and growing backlog, which provides us with a high degree of
visibility in our forecasted revenue. Our backlog is comprised
of the portion of signed purchase orders or other written
contractual commitments received from customers that we have not
recognized as revenue under the percentage of completion method
or based upon shipment. Our backlog as of December 31, 2005
was $233.6 million compared to $129.3 million and
$49.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Projects for energy-related applications totaled
approximately $180.0 million in backlog as of
December 31, 2005. Substantially all of our backlog as of
December 31, 2005 is scheduled to be recognized as sales
during the next twelve months. |
|
|
Leading Market Positions. We believe we are
the #1 or #2 equipment supplier in each of our primary
end markets both domestically and internationally. Based on our
relationships with key customers, we believe that our strong
industry positioning makes us the preferred supplier and
typically one of only two or three suppliers qualified to
provide certain products to key customers. As our customers
continue to rationalize their vendors, we expect to gain
additional market share and that the benefit of our leading
position will become more pronounced. |
|
|
Diverse, Long-Standing Customer Base. We currently
serve over 2,000 customers worldwide. Our primary customers are
large, multinational producers and distributors of hydrocarbon
and industrial gases that provide us with revenue stability.
Customers and end-users also include high growth LNG processors,
petrochemical processors and biomedical companies. We have
developed strong, long-standing relationships with these
customers, many of whom have been purchasing products from us or
one of our predecessors for over 20 years. Our primary
customers and end-users include Air Products, Praxair, Airgas,
Air Liquide, JGC, Bechtel Corporation, GE, ExxonMobil, BP and
ConocoPhillips. |
|
|
Highly Flexible and Low-Cost Manufacturing Base.
Given our long-term investment in global manufacturing
facilities and specialized equipment, we have developed a
substantial comparative scale and geographic advantage within
the markets for the cryogenic products that we manufacture. The
scale enables cost efficiencies and the geographic reach
provides access to customers that we believe would be difficult
for a potential competitor to replicate. With more than
1.5 million square feet of manufacturing space across 11
primary facilities and three continents, we have substantial
operational flexibility. We are a low-cost producer for our
products across all segments. In addition, the high cost of
capital and economies of scale required for this type of
manufacturing create significant barriers for new entrants. |
|
|
Product Expertise, Quality, Reliability and
Know-How. Within our end markets, we have established a
reputation for quality, reliability and technical innovation. We
believe that the main drivers of our target customers
purchasing decisions are a suppliers product expertise,
quality, reliability and know-how rather than pricing and terms,
giving us an advantage based on our reputation and consequent
brand recognition. The value of this brand recognition is
significantly enhanced by the extended life cycle of our
products and the high cost to our target customers of product
failure. As a focused provider of highly engineered cryogenic
equipment, we believe it would be difficult for a new entrant to
duplicate our capabilities. |
|
|
Experienced Management Team. We have assembled a
strong senior management team with over 250 combined years of
related experience. We have a balance of entrepreneurs,
internally developed leaders and experienced managers from
analogous industries. The team has grown into a cohesive unit
with complementary management and operational skills. The
current management team is directly responsible for the strong
sales growth and the significant margin improvements experienced
since 2003. |
Business Strategy
We believe that we are well-positioned to maintain our
leadership in providing highly engineered equipment for use in
low-temperature and cryogenic applications and meet the
worlds growing demand for
74
hydrocarbon and industrial gases with more economical, reliable
and environmentally friendly systems. The principal elements of
our strategy are as follows:
|
|
|
Continue to develop innovative, high-growth,
energy-specific products. We plan to continue to focus
on extending our cryogenic technological leadership, both to
capitalize on increasing demand for energy and to create new
applications. We believe that we are well positioned to benefit
from increased demand for LNG, natural gas processing and gas to
liquid (GTL) solutions. Our engineering, technical
and marketing employees actively assist customers in specifying
their needs and in determining appropriate products to meet
those needs. Current product development includes subsea VIP,
synthetic gas, hydrogen recovery, small-scale bulk gas
distribution solutions and LNG/ GTL production systems. |
|
|
Leverage our global platform to capitalize on growing
international demand. We expect growth in hydrocarbon
and industrial gas demand and investment over the next five
years in the Middle East, Central and Eastern Europe, Russia and
China. We believe that our historic and planned investment in
our manufacturing facilities in the Czech Republic and China and
the investment in sales and marketing capabilities in these
markets, supplemented by our continuing investment in our
U.S. facilities, has positioned us to increase our market
share in growing international markets. We believe we are
well-positioned to make acquisitions of complementary businesses
to expand our global infrastructure. |
|
|
Capitalize on our position as a market leader. We
plan to continue to grow our long-standing relationships with
the leading users of cryogenic equipment. Our engineering and
development teams partner with our customers to better
understand and meet their cryogenic equipment needs,
particularly in the growing LNG and international markets. We
intend to grow our customer base as industrial gas producers
increasingly outsource bulk tank storage and other non-core
parts of their business. |
|
|
Maintain our position as a low-cost producer while
continuing to improve operating performance. We believe
we are the lowest cost manufacturer for most of our products and
we intend to continue to leverage our scale, scope, technical
expertise and know-how to deliver to our customers higher
quality and more reliable products and services at lower cost.
Our largest manufacturing facility is in the Czech Republic,
which allows us to achieve considerable cost savings versus our
competitors. In addition, we believe China, where we are
experiencing significant growth, will be a sustainable low-cost
labor environment. We maintain a disciplined approach to capital
expenditures. We intend to make capacity investments in
energy-related markets where we expect to realize significant
and timely returns, and to also leverage our existing operating
capacity in other markets. |
Segments and Products
We operate in three segments: (i) Energy and Chemicals
(E&C), (ii) Distribution and Storage
(D&S) and (iii) BioMedical. While each
segment manufactures and markets different cryogenic equipment
and systems to distinct end-users, they share a reliance on our
heat transfer and low temperature storage know-how and
expertise. The E&C and D&S segments manufacture products
used in energy-related applications.
|
|
|
Energy and Chemicals Segment |
Our principal products within the E&C segment, which
accounted for 30% of sales for the year ended December 31,
2005, are focused on process equipment, primarily heat
exchangers and LNG systems, which include cold boxes and LNG
vacuum-insulated pipe, used by major natural gas, petrochemical
processing and industrial gas companies in the production of
their products. Our products in the E&C segment include the
following:
We are a leading designer and manufacturer of cryogenic heat
exchangers. Using technology pioneered by us, heat exchangers
are incorporated into systems such as cold boxes to facilitate
the progressive cooling and liquefaction of air or hydrocarbon
mixtures for the subsequent recovery or purification of component
75
gases. In hydrocarbon processing industries, heat exchangers
allow producers to obtain purified hydrocarbon by-products, such
as methane, ethane, propane and ethylene, which are commercially
marketable for various industrial or residential uses. In the
industrial gas market, heat exchangers are used to obtain high
purity atmospheric gases, such as oxygen, nitrogen and argon,
which have numerous diverse industrial applications. Heat
exchangers are customized to the customers requirements
and range in price from approximately $30,000 for a relatively
simple unit to as high as $10 million for a major project.
The heat exchangers market has seen significant demand
improvement over the last two years, resulting primarily from
increased activity in the LNG and natural gas segments of the
hydrocarbon processing market as well as the Asian industrial
gas market. In the future, management believes that continuing
efforts by petroleum producing countries to better utilize
stranded natural gas and previously flared gases, as well as
efforts to broaden their industrial base, present a promising
source of demand for our heat exchangers and cold box systems.
Demand for heat exchangers in developed countries is expected to
continue as firms upgrade their facilities for greater
efficiency and regulatory compliance.
Our principal competitors for heat exchangers are Linde,
Sumitomo, Kobe and Nordon. Management believes that we are the
only producer of large brazed aluminum heat exchangers in the
United States and that we are the leader in the global heat
exchanger market. Major customers for our heat exchangers in the
industrial gas market include Air Liquide, Air Products and
Praxair. In the hydrocarbon processing market, major customers
and end-users include Air Liquide, Air Products and Praxair. In
the hydrocarbon processing market, major customers include BP,
ExxonMobil, Saudi Aramco, ConocoPhillips and contractors such as
JGC, Bechtel and KBR.
We are a leading designer and fabricator of cold boxes. Cold
boxes are highly engineered systems used to significantly reduce
the temperature of gas mixtures to the point where component
gases liquefy and can be separated and purified for further use
in multiple industrial, scientific and commercial applications.
In the hydrocarbon processing market, our cold box systems are
used in natural gas processing and in the petrochemical
industry. In the industrial gas market, cold boxes are used to
separate air into its major atmospheric components, including
nitrogen, oxygen and argon, where the gases are used in a
diverse range of applications such as the quick-freezing of
food, wastewater treatment and industrial welding. The
construction of a cold box generally consists of one or more
heat exchangers and other equipment packaged in a
box consisting of metal framing and a complex system
of piping and valves. Cold boxes, which are designed and
fabricated to order, sell in the price range of $500,000 to
$10 million, with the majority of cold boxes priced between
$1 million and $2 million.
We have a number of competitors for fabrication of cold boxes,
including Linde, Air Products and many smaller fabrication-only
facilities around the world. Principal customers for our cold
boxes include Air Liquide, ABB Lummus, BP, Bechtel, Saudi
Aramco, Stone and Webster, and KBR.
|
|
|
LNG Vacuum Insulated Pipe |
This product line consists of vacuum-insulated pipe
(VIP) used for LNG transportation (LNG
VIP) within both export and import terminals. This is a
new and growing market as new LNG infrastructure is added around
the world. LNG VIP is fabricated to order with projects varying
in size from $500,000 to $25 million. Our competitors in
the LNG VIP market include Technip and ITP. In general, our
customers are the major contractors such as Technip and Bechtel.
LNG VIP competes directly with mechanically insulated pipe which
takes longer to install and requires higher maintenance over its
life.
|
|
|
Distribution and Storage Segment |
Through our D&S segment, which accounted for 52% of our
sales for the year ended December 31, 2005, we are a
leading supplier of cryogenic equipment to the global bulk and
packaged industrial gas markets. Demand for the products
supplied by this segment is driven primarily by the significant
installed base of users of cryogenic liquids as well as new
applications and distribution technologies for cryogenic
liquids. Our
76
products span the entire spectrum of the industrial gas market
from small customers requiring cryogenic packaged gases to large
users requiring custom engineered cryogenic storage systems. Our
products in the D&S segment include the following:
|
|
|
Cryogenic Bulk Storage Systems |
We are a leading supplier of cryogenic bulk storage systems of
various sizes ranging from 500 gallons to
150,000 gallons. Using sophisticated vacuum insulation
systems placed between inner and outer vessels, these bulk
storage systems are able to store and transport liquefied
industrial gases and hydrocarbon gases at temperatures from
-100° Fahrenheit to temperatures nearing absolute zero. End
use customers for our cryogenic storage tanks include industrial
gas producers and distributors, chemical producers,
manufacturers of electrical components, health care
organizations, food processors and businesses in the oil and
natural gas industries. Prices for our cryogenic bulk storage
systems range from $10,000 to $1,000,000. Global industrial gas
producers, including Praxair, Air Liquide, Air Products, Linde,
Messer and The BOC Group, are significant customers for our
cryogenic bulk storage systems. In addition, Airgas is a
significant customer in the North American industrial gas
market. On a worldwide basis, we compete primarily with
Taylor-Wharton, a Harsco Company in this product area. In the
European and Asian markets, we compete with several suppliers
owned by the global industrial gas producers as well as
independent regional suppliers.
|
|
|
Cryogenic Packaged Gas Systems |
We are a leading supplier of cryogenic packaged gas systems of
various sizes ranging from 160 liters to 2,000 liters.
Cryogenic liquid cylinders are used extensively in the packaged
gas industry to allow smaller quantities of liquid to be easily
delivered to the customers of the industrial gas distributors on
a full-for-empty or fill on site basis. Principal customers for
our liquid cylinders are the same global industrial gas
producers as the North American industrial gas distributors who
purchase our cryogenic bulk storage systems. We compete on a
worldwide basis primarily with Harsco in this product area. We
have developed two technologies in the packaged gas product
area: ORCA Micro-Bulk systems and
Tri-fecta®
Laser Gas assist systems. ORCA Micro-Bulk systems bring the ease
of use and distribution economics of bulk gas supply to
customers formerly supplied by high pressure or cryogenic liquid
cylinders. The ORCA Micro-Bulk system is the substantial market
leader in this growing product line. The
Tri-fecta®
Laser Gas assist system was developed to meet the assist
gas performance requirements for new high powered lasers
being used in the metal fabrication industry.
|
|
|
Cryogenic Systems and Components |
Our line of cryogenic components, including VIP, engineered bulk
gas installations and specialty liquid nitrogen end-use
equipment are recognized in the market for their reliability,
quality and performance. These products are sold to industrial
gas producers, as well as to a diverse group of distributors,
resellers and end users. We compete with a number of suppliers
of cryogenic systems and components, including Acme Cryogenics,
Vacuum Barrier Corporation and others.
This product line consists of LNG and liquid/compressed natural
gas refueling systems for centrally fueled fleets of vehicles
powered by natural gas, such as fleets operated by metropolitan
transportation authorities, refuse haulers and heavy-duty truck
fleets. Competition for LNG fueling and storage systems is based
primarily on product design, customer support and service,
dependability and price.
|
|
|
Beverage Liquid
CO2
Systems |
This product line consists primarily of vacuum-insulated, bulk
liquid
CO2
containers used for beverage carbonation in restaurants,
convenience stores and cinemas, in sizes ranging from 100 pounds
to 750 pounds of liquid
CO2
storage. We also manufacture and market non-insulated, bulk
fountain syrup containers for side-by-side installation with our
CO2
systems. Our beverage systems are sold to national restaurant
chains, soft
77
drink companies and
CO2
distributors. Our primary competitors for our bulk liquid
CO2
beverage delivery systems are Taylor-Wharton and other producers
of high-pressure gaseous
CO2
cylinders.
We operate three locations in the United States providing
installation, service and maintenance of cryogenic products
including storage tanks, liquid cylinders, cryogenic trailers,
cryogenic pumps and VIP.
The BioMedical segment, which accounted for 18% of our sales for
the year ended December 31, 2005, consists of various
product lines built around our core competencies in cryogenics,
but with a focus on the medical and biological users of the
liquids and gases instead of the large producers and
distributors of cryogenic liquids. Our products in the
BioMedical segment include the following:
Our medical oxygen product line is comprised of a limited range
of medical respiratory products, including liquid oxygen systems
and ambulatory oxygen systems, both of which are used for the
in-home supplemental oxygen treatment of patients with chronic
obstructive pulmonary diseases, such as bronchitis, emphysema
and asthma.
Individuals for whom supplemental oxygen is prescribed generally
receive an oxygen system from a home healthcare provider,
medical equipment dealer, or gas supplier. The provider or
physician usually selects which type of oxygen system to
recommend to its customers: liquid oxygen systems, oxygen
concentrators or high-pressure oxygen cylinders. Of these
modalities, physicians generally believe that liquid oxygen
offers greater long-term therapeutic benefits by providing the
option of increased patient ambulation.
Our primary competitor in the medical products line is
Puritan-Bennett, a division of Tyco International, Ltd. We
believe that competition for liquid oxygen systems is based
primarily upon product quality, performance, reliability,
ease-of-service and
price and focus our marketing strategies on these considerations.
|
|
|
Biological Storage Systems |
This product line consists of vacuum-insulated containment
vessels for the storage of biological materials. The primary
markets for this product line include medical laboratories,
biotech/pharmaceutical, research facilities, blood and tissue
banks, veterinary laboratories, large-scale repositories and
artificial insemination, particularly in the beef and dairy
industry.
The significant competitors for biological storage systems
include a few large companies worldwide, such as Taylor-Wharton,
Air Liquide and IBP. These products are sold through multiple
channels of distribution specifically applicable to each market
sector. The distribution channels range from highly specialized
cryogenic storage systems providers to general supply and
catalogue distribution operations to breeding service providers.
Historically, competition in this field has been focused on
design, reliability and price. Additionally, we believe our
understanding of the end-users applications and concerns
enables us to sell a total value package.
Alternatives to vacuum insulated containment vessels include
mechanical, electrically powered refrigeration.
The basis of the MRI technique is that the magnetic properties
of certain nuclei of the human body can be detected, measured
and converted into images for analysis. MRI equipment uses
high-strength magnetic fields, applied radio waves and
high-speed computers to obtain cross-sectional images of the
body. The major components of the MRI assembly are a series of
concentric thermal shields and a supercooled electromagnet
immersed in a liquid helium vessel (a cryostat) that
maintains a constant, extremely low temperature (4°Kelvin;
-452° Fahrenheit) to achieve superconductivity. We
manufacture large cryostats, various cryo-
78
genic interfaces, electrical feed-throughs and various other MRI
components that are used to transfer power and/or cryogenic
fluids from the exterior of the MRI unit to the various layers
of the cryostat and superconducting magnet. We currently sell
all of our MRI components to GE, a leading worldwide
manufacturer of MRI equipment.
Engineering and Product Development
Our engineering and product development activities are focused
on developing new and improved solutions and equipment for the
users of cryogenic liquids. Our engineering, technical and
marketing employees actively assist customers in specifying
their needs and in determining appropriate products to meet
those needs. Portions of our engineering expenditures typically
are charged to customers, either as separate items or as
components of product cost.
Competition
We believe we can compete effectively around the world and that
we are a leading competitor in our markets. Competition is based
primarily on performance and the ability to provide the design,
engineering and manufacturing capabilities required in a timely
and cost-efficient manner. Contracts are usually awarded on a
competitive bid basis. Quality, technical expertise and
timeliness of delivery are the principal competitive factors
within the industry. Price and terms of sale are also important
competitive factors. Because reliable market share data is not
available, it is difficult to estimate our exact position in our
markets, although we believe we rank among the leaders in each
of the markets we serve.
Marketing
We market our products and services throughout the world
primarily through direct sales personnel and through independent
sales representatives and distributors. The technical and custom
design nature of our products requires a professional, highly
trained sales force. While each salesperson and sales
representative is expected to develop a highly specialized
knowledge of one product or group of products within one of our
segments, each salesperson and certain sales representatives are
able to sell many products from different segments to a single
customer. We use independent sales representatives and
distributors to market our products and services in certain
foreign countries that we serve and in certain North American
markets. These independent sales representatives supplement our
direct sales force in dealing with language and cultural
matters. Our domestic and foreign independent sales
representatives earn commissions on sales, which vary by product
type.
Backlog
The dollar amount of our backlog at December 31, 2005 and
2004 was $233.6 million and $129.3 million,
respectively. Backlog is comprised of the portion of firm signed
purchase orders or other written contractual commitments
received from customers that we have not recognized as revenue
under the percentage of completion method or based upon
shipment. It is expected that substantially all of our
December 31, 2005 backlog will be recognized as sales
during the next twelve months. Backlog can be significantly
affected by the timing of orders for large products,
particularly in the E&C segment, and the amount of backlog
at December 31, 2005 described above is not necessarily
indicative of future backlog levels or the rate at which backlog
will be recognized as sales. For further information about our
backlog, including backlog by segment, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Customers
We sell our products to gas producers, distributors and
end-users across the industrial gas, hydrocarbon and chemical
processing industries in countries throughout the world. While
no single customer exceeded 10% of consolidated sales in 2005,
2004 or 2003, sales to our top ten customers accounted for 39%,
45% and 43% of consolidated sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Our sales to particular customers fluctuate from
period to period, but the global gas producer and distributor
customers tend to be a consistently large source of
79
revenue for us. Our supply contracts are generally contracts for
requirements only. While our customers are obligated
to purchase a certain percentage of their supplies from us,
there are no minimum requirements. Also, many of our contracts
may be cancelled on as little as one months notice. To
minimize credit risk from trade receivables, we review the
financial condition of potential customers in relation to
established credit requirements before sales credit is extended
and monitors the financial condition of customers to help ensure
timely collections and to minimize losses. In addition, for
certain domestic and foreign customers, particularly in the
E&C segment, we require advance payments, letters of credit
and other such guarantees of payment. Certain customers also
require us to issue letters of credit or performance bonds,
particularly in instances where advance payments are involved,
as a condition of placing the order. We believe our
relationships with our customers generally have been good since
our reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 2003.
Intellectual Property
Although we have a number of patents, trademarks and licenses
related to our business, no one of them or related group of them
is considered by us to be of such importance that its expiration
or termination would have a material adverse effect on our
business. In general, we depend upon technological capabilities,
manufacturing quality control and application of know-how,
rather than patents or other proprietary rights, in the conduct
of our business.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
We manufacture most of the products we sell. The raw materials
used in manufacturing include aluminum products (including
sheets, bars, plate and piping), stainless steel products
(including sheets, plates, heads and piping), palladium oxide,
carbon steel products (including sheets, plates and heads), 9%
nickel steel products (including heads and plates), valves and
gauges and fabricated metal components. Most raw materials are
available from multiple sources of supply. We believe our
relationships with our raw material suppliers and other vendors
are generally good. The commodity metals we use have experienced
significant upward fluctuations in price. We have generally been
able to recover the costs of price increases through our
contracts with customers. We foresee no acute shortages of any
raw materials that would have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, we had 2,271 employees, including
1,402 domestic employees and 869 international employees. These
employees consisted of 766 salaried, 283 bargaining unit hourly
and 1,222 non-bargaining unit hourly.
We are a party to one collective bargaining agreement through
one of our operating subsidiaries. The agreement with the
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
covering 283 employees at our La Crosse, Wisconsin heat
exchanger facility expires in February 2007. In 2005, through
another one of our operating subsidiaries, we were also a party
to the agreement with the United Steel Workers of America, which
covered 244 employees at our New Prague, Minnesota facility. On
November 16, 2005, pursuant to an approved stipulation
election agreement, the bargaining unit employees voted to
decertify the United Steel Workers of America as its bargaining
representative. The election results were certified on
November 23, 2005. Over the past several years, we have not
had any work stoppages or strikes and we believe our
relationships with our employees are generally good.
Environmental Matters
Our operations have historically included and currently include
the handling and use of hazardous and other regulated
substances, such as various cleaning fluids used to remove
grease from metal, that are subject to federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations. These regulations impose
limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the soil, air
and water, and establish standards for their handling,
management, use, storage and disposal. We monitor and review our
procedures and policies for compliance with
80
environmental laws and regulations. Our management is familiar
with these regulations, and supports an ongoing program to
maintain our adherence to required standards.
We are involved with environmental compliance, investigation,
monitoring and remediation activities at certain of our owned
manufacturing facilities and at one owned facility that is
leased to a third party. We believe that we are currently in
substantial compliance with all known environmental regulations.
We accrue for certain environmental remediation-related
activities for which commitments or remediation plans have been
developed and for which costs can be reasonably estimated. These
estimates are determined based upon currently available facts
regarding each facility. Actual costs incurred may vary from
these estimates due to the inherent uncertainties involved.
Future expenditures relating to these environmental remediation
efforts are expected to be made over the next 8 to 14 years
as ongoing costs of remediation programs. Although we believe we
have adequately provided for the cost of all known environmental
conditions, additional contamination or changes in regulatory
posture concerning our on-going remedial efforts could result in
more costly remediation measures than budgeted, or those we
believe are adequate or required by existing law. We believe
that any additional liability in excess of amounts accrued which
may result from the resolution of such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity,
cash flows or results of operations.
Properties
We occupy 24 principal facilities totaling approximately
1.9 million square feet, with the majority devoted to
manufacturing, assembly and storage. Of these manufacturing
facilities, approximately 1.6 million square feet are owned
and 300,000 square feet are occupied under operating
leases. We consider our manufacturing facilities sufficient to
meet our current and planned operational needs in the D&S
and Biomedical segments. However, we have commenced the
expansion of our E&C segment facilities over the next few
years to meet significant current order backlog levels and
expected growth in business as both we and our competitors reach
capacity. We lease approximately 10,300 square feet for our
corporate office in Garfield Heights, Ohio. Our major owned
facilities in the United States are subject to mortgages
securing our senior secured credit facility.
As a result of our operational restructuring activities, we
closed our D&S manufacturing facility in Plaistow, New
Hampshire in the third quarter of 2004 and we are currently
pursuing the sale of this property. The Plaistow, New Hampshire
facility is classified as an asset held for sale in
our audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2005 and 2004. In the first quarter of 2005, we completed the
move of the medical respiratory product line from the
Burnsville, Minnesota facility to the Canton, Georgia
manufacturing facility. The Burnsville, Minnesota facility was
sold in the fourth quarter of 2004 and leased until the move of
the medical respiratory product line was completed. Our
operational restructuring activities are further described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the related notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
81
The following table sets forth certain information about
facilities occupied by us as of March 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Segment |
|
Square Feet | |
|
Ownership | |
|
Use |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
LaCrosse, Wisconsin
|
|
Energy & Chemicals |
|
|
149,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
New Iberia, Louisiana
|
|
Energy & Chemicals |
|
|
62,400 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Manufacturing |
New Iberia, Louisiana
|
|
Energy & Chemicals |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Manufacturing |
The Woodlands, Texas
|
|
Energy & Chemicals |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office |
Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
|
|
Energy & Chemicals |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office |
Changzhou, China(1)
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Changzhou, China
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Changzhou, China
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Changzhou, China
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Manufacturing |
Decin, Czech Republic
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
564,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Houston, Texas
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Service |
Plaistow, New Hampshire(2)
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
164,400 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Solingen, Germany
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office |
Zhangiajang, China
|
|
Distribution & Storage |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Canton, Georgia
|
|
Distribution & Storage/ BioMedical |
|
|
154,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
Jasper, Georgia
|
|
Distribution & Storage/ BioMedical |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Warehouse/Service |
New Prague, Minnesota
|
|
Distribution & Storage/ BioMedical |
|
|
254,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Service/ Office |
Denver, Colorado
|
|
BioMedical |
|
|
109,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing |
Marietta, Georgia
|
|
BioMedical |
|
|
11,100 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office/Lab |
Brackell, United Kingdom
|
|
BioMedical |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office/Warehouse |
Lidcombe, Australia
|
|
BioMedical |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office/Warehouse |
New Prague, Minnesota
|
|
BioMedical |
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Warehouse |
Burnsville, Minnesota(3)
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office |
Garfield Heights, Ohio
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Office |
Clarksville, Arkansas(4)
|
|
Discontinued operation |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Manufacturing/Office |
|
|
(1) |
This facility has been vacated and we expect to sublease until
the lease expires. |
|
(2) |
This facility is being held for sale. |
|
(3) |
This facility is in the process of being closed and we expect to
buy-out the lease or sublease until the lease expires in January
2007. |
|
(4) |
This facility is leased from us, with a purchase option, by the
company that purchased certain assets of the former Greenville
Tube LLC stainless steel tubing business. |
Regulatory Environment
We are subject to federal, state and local regulations relating
to the discharge of materials into the environment, production
and handling of our hazardous and regulated materials and our
products and the conduct and condition of our production
facilities. We do not believe that these regulatory requirements
have had a material effect upon our capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position. We are not anticipating any
material capital expenditures in 2006 that are directly related
to regulatory compliance matters. We are also not aware of any
pending or potential regulatory changes that would have a
material adverse impact on our business.
82
Legal Proceedings
In March 2003, we completed the closure of our Wolverhampton,
United Kingdom manufacturing facility, operated by CHEL, and all
current heat exchanger manufacturing is being conducted at our
LaCrosse, Wisconsin facility. On March 28, 2003, CHEL filed
for a voluntary administration under the U.K. Insolvency Act of
1986. CHELs application for voluntary administration was
approved on April 1, 2003 and an administrator was
appointed. Additionally, we received information that indicated
that CHELs net pension plan obligations had increased
significantly primarily due to a decline in plan asset values
and interest rates as well as an increase in plan liabilities,
resulting in an estimated plan deficit of approximately
$12.0 million. Based on our financial condition, in March
2003 we determined not to advance funds to CHEL in amounts
necessary to fund CHELs obligations. Since CHEL was unable
to fund its net pension plan deficit, pay remaining severance
due to former employees or pay other creditors, the trustees of
the CHEL pension plan requested a decision to
wind-up the plan from a
U.K. pension regulatory board. That board approved the
wind-up as of
March 28, 2003.
We do not believe that we are legally obligated to fund the net
pension deficit of the CHEL pension plan because CHEL, which is
no longer one of our consolidated subsidiaries, was the sponsor
of the pension plan and the entity with primary responsibility
for the plan. In addition, we considered ourselves and our
consolidated subsidiaries legally released from being the
primary obligor of any CHEL liabilities. Further, at the time
the insolvency administrator assumed control of CHEL, we no
longer had control of the assets or liabilities of CHEL. As a
result, in March 2003, we wrote-off our net investment in CHEL.
In addition, any claims of CHEL against us were discharged in
bankruptcy as part of our Reorganization Plan.
While no claims presently are pending against us related to
CHELs insolvency, persons impacted by the insolvency or
others could bring a claim against us asserting that we are
directly responsible for pension and benefit related liabilities
of CHEL. Although we would contest any claim of this kind, we
can provide no assurance that claims will not be asserted
against us in the future. To the extent we have a significant
liability related to CHELs insolvency and pension wind-up,
satisfaction of that liability could have a material adverse
impact on our liquidity, results of operations and financial
position.
On July 8, 2003, we and all of our then majority-owned
U.S. subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to implement an agreed upon senior
debt restructuring plan through a prepackaged plan of
reorganization. None of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries
were included in the filing in the Bankruptcy Court. On
September 15, 2003, we (as reorganized, the
Reorganized Company) and all of our majority-owned
U.S. subsidiaries emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy
proceedings pursuant to the Amended Joint Prepackaged
Reorganization Plan of Chart Industries, Inc. and Certain
Subsidiaries, dated September 3, 2003. We have resolved all
proofs of claim asserted in the bankruptcy proceedings,
including the settlement in July 2005 of a finders fee
claim in the amount of $1.1 million asserted by one of our
former shareholders, against which we had filed an objection in
the Bankruptcy Court. We expect to move forward to close these
proceedings in the first half of 2006.
We are a party to other legal proceedings incidental to the
normal course of our business. Based on our historical
experience in litigating these actions, as well as our current
assessment of the underlying merits of the actions and
applicable insurance, management believes that the final
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial position, liquidity, cash flows or
results of operations.
83
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the name, age as of April 1,
2006 and position of each person that serves as an executive
officer or director of our company and certain other key members
of management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Samuel F. Thomas
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
Michael F. Biehl
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Matthew J. Klaben
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
James H. Hoppel, Jr.
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Assistant Treasurer |
John T. Romain
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
PresidentEnergy & Chemicals Group |
Thomas M. Carey
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
PresidentDistribution & Storage Group |
Steven T. Shaw
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
PresidentBioMedical Group |
Ben A. Guill
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Kenneth W. Moore
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Director |
Timothy H. Day
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Director |
Samuel F. Thomas is our Chief Executive Officer
and President and has served as a member of our board of
directors since October 2003. Prior to joining our company,
Mr. Thomas was Executive Vice President of Global
Consumables at ESAB Holdings Ltd. In addition to his most recent
position at ESAB, Mr. Thomas was responsible for ESAB N.
America during his employment at ESAB Holdings Ltd. Prior to
joining ESAB in February 1999, Mr. Thomas was Vice
President of Friction Products for Federal Mogul, Inc. Prior to
its acquisition by Federal Mogul in 1998, Mr. Thomas was
employed by T&N plc from 1976 to 1998, where he served from
1991 as chief executive of several global operating divisions,
including industrial sealing, camshafts and friction products.
Michael F. Biehl has been our Executive Vice
President since April 2006, served as our Chief Accounting
Officer from October 2002 until March 2006, and has been our
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since July 2001. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Biehl served as Vice President, Finance and
Treasurer at Oglebay Norton Company. Prior to joining Oglebay
Norton in 1992, Mr. Biehl worked in the audit practice of
Ernst & Young LLP in Cleveland, Ohio from 1978 to 1992.
Matthew J. Klaben is our Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining us in March 2006,
Mr. Klaben was a partner at the law firm of Calfee,
Halter & Griswold LLP in Cleveland, Ohio from January
2005 until March 2006, and an associate from April 1998 until
December 2004. Before that, Mr. Klaben was an associate at
the law firm of Jones Day in Cleveland, Ohio from September 1995
until April 1998.
James H. Hoppel, Jr. is our Chief Accounting
Officer, Controller and Assistant Treasurer and has served as
Controller since November 2004. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Hoppel served as Vice President, Finance for W.W.
Holdings, LLC, a manufacturer and distributor of doors and
hardware. Prior to joining W.W. Holdings in 2001,
Mr. Hoppel held various finance and accounting positions
with different organizations, including the Transaction Services
and Audit practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Cleveland,
Ohio.
John T. Romain has been the President of our
Energy & Chemicals Group since October 2002.
Mr. Romain has been with our company for twelve years, and
prior to becoming the President of the Energy &
Chemicals Group served as our Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Romain worked in the
audit practice of Ernst & Young LLP from 1985 to 1993,
where he gained extensive experience providing services to oil
and gas companies.
Thomas M. Carey has been the President of our
Distribution & Storage Group since September 2004.
Mr. Carey has been with us and our predecessors since 1987
and prior to becoming the President of the
Distribution & Storage Group, Mr. Carey worked in
various engineering and business management positions.
84
Prior to joining Chart, Mr. Carey was employed by Airco as
a field engineer in support of bulk industrial gas sales.
Steven T. Shaw has been the President of our
BioMedical Group since October 2002. Mr. Shaw has been
employed by us and our predecessors for eleven years in various
management positions. Before joining our company in 1993,
Mr. Shaw was employed for eleven years in the automotive
manufacturing and distribution business of TRW Inc. in
Cleveland, Ohio. Before that, he held positions in sales and
management with APS Incorporated in Houston, Texas.
Ben A. Guill has been the Chairman of our board of
directors since the Acquisition in October 2005. Mr. Guill
is the President and a Managing Director of First Reserve
Corporation, which he joined in September 1998. Prior to joining
First Reserve Corporation, Mr. Guill was the Managing
Director and Co-head of Investment Banking of Simmons &
Company International, an investment banking firm specializing
in the oil service industry. Mr. Guill also serves as a
director of Dresser, Inc., T-3 Energy Services, Inc. and
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
Kenneth W. Moore has been a member of our board of
directors since the Acquisition in October 2005. Mr. Moore
is a Managing Director of First Reserve Corporation and joined
that firm in January 2004. Prior to joining First Reserve
Corporation, Mr. Moore was a Vice President at Morgan
Stanley, an investment bank, from 2000 until 2004. Prior to
joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Moore was an Associate at Chase
Securities from 1998 until 2000. Mr. Moore also serves as a
director of Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.
Timothy H. Day has been a member of our board of
directors since the Acquisition in October 2005. Mr. Day is
a Director of First Reserve Corporation, which he joined in
November 2000. Before joining First Reserve Corporation,
Mr. Day was employed at WorldOil.com where he was a Vice
President in charge of Operations. Prior to that time,
Mr. Day spent three years with SCF Partners, a private
equity investment group and three years with CS First
Boston and Salomon Brothers. Mr. Day also serves as a
director of Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
Composition of the Board of Directors after this Offering
Our board of directors currently consists of four directors. We
expect to add an independent director prior to the effectiveness
of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part, another independent director within three months after the
first date the registration statement is declared effective and
one additional independent director to our board within twelve
months after the registration statement is declared effective.
Depending on the size of this offering, we will be a
controlled company under the New York Stock Exchange
corporate governance rules if First Reserve and its affiliates
continue to own more than 50% of our common stock after the
completion of this offering. As a result, we would be eligible
for exemptions from provisions of these rules requiring a
majority of independent directors, nominating and corporate
governance and compensation committees composed entirely of
independent directors and written charters addressing specified
matters. If available, we intend to take advantage of these
exemptions. In the event that we are not, or cease to be, a
controlled company within the meaning of these rules, we will be
required to comply with these provisions within the transition
periods specified in the New York Stock Exchange corporate
governance rules.
Board Committees
Our board of directors currently has an audit committee and a
compensation committee. In connection with this offering, we
intend to establish a nominating and corporate governance
committee.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Ben A. Guill, Kenneth W. Moore
and Timothy H. Day, who is currently the chairman. We expect
that our current audit committee will be comprised of three
independent directors within the transition periods specified in
Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Following this offering,
the
85
audit committee will be required to have at least one member who
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as
such term is defined in Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K.
The audit committee is governed by a written charter which will
be reviewed, and amended if necessary, on an annual basis. The
audit committees responsibilities include
(1) appointing, retaining, evaluating and terminating our
independent auditors and approving in advance any audit or
non-audit engagement or relationship between us and such
auditor, (2) approving the overall scope of the audit,
(3) assisting the board in monitoring the integrity of our
financial statements, the independent accountants
qualifications and independence, the performance of the
independent accountants and our internal audit function and our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
(4) annually reviewing an independent auditors report
describing the auditing firms internal quality-control
procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent
internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the auditing
firm, (5) discussing the annual audited financial and
quarterly statements with management and the independent
auditors, (6) discussing earnings press releases, as well
as financial information and earnings guidance provided to
analysts and rating agencies, (7) discussing policies with
respect to risk assessment and risk management, (8) meeting
separately, periodically, with management, internal auditors and
the independent auditor, (9) reviewing with the independent
auditor any audit problems or difficulties and managements
response, (10) setting clear hiring policies for employees
or former employees of the independent auditors,
(11) annually reviewing the adequacy of the audit
committees written charter, (12) reviewing with
management any legal matters that may have a material impact on
us and our financial statements and (13) reporting
regularly to the full board of directors.
Prior to consummation of this offering, the audit committee will
approve and adopt a Code of Ethical Business Conduct for all
employees and an additional Officer Code of Ethics for all of
our executives and financial officers, copies of which will be
available at no cost upon written request by our stockholders.
Compensation Committee
Our current compensation committee consists of Ben A. Guill,
Kenneth W. Moore and Timothy H. Day. The compensation committee
is responsible for (1) reviewing key employee compensation
policies, plans and programs, (2) reviewing and approving
the compensation of our chief executive officer and other
executive officers, (3) developing and recommending to the
board of directors compensation for board members,
(4) reviewing and approving employment contracts and other
similar arrangements between us and our executive officers,
(5) reviewing and consulting with the chief executive
officer on the selection of officers and evaluation of executive
performance and other related matters, (6) administration
of stock plans and other incentive compensation plans,
(7) overseeing compliance with any applicable compensation
reporting requirements of the SEC, (8) approving the
appointment and removal of trustees and investment managers for
pension fund assets, (9) retaining consultants to advise
the committee on executive compensation practices and policies
and (10) handling such other matters that are specifically
delegated to the compensation committee by the board of
directors from time to time.
Director Compensation
None of our directors currently receives any additional
compensation for serving as a director or as a member or chair
of a committee of the board of directors. We expect to pay our
independent directors an annual retainer of $32,000, payable in
equal quarterly installments, and to grant each independent
director 2,000 stock options annually, which options will be
granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of
a share of our common stock on the grant date. The options will
vest at 20% per year over five years. We expect to pay also to
the chairperson of our audit committee an additional $8,000
annual retainer and to the chairpersons of our other board
committees an additional $4,000 annual retainer, in each case in
equal quarterly installments. Additionally, we expect to pay our
independent directors a fee of $2,000 for board meetings
attended in person (up to six meetings and $1,000 per meeting
thereafter) and a fee of $1,000 for board meetings attended
telephonically. In connection with meetings of the committees of
our board of directors, we expect to pay our independent
directors who attend committee meetings in person a fee of
$1,000 per meeting and a fee of $500 per meeting for committee
meetings attended telephonically. In addition, directors must
accumulate at least $50,000 in our common stock during their
first 24 months on our board.
86
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table |
The following summary compensation table sets forth information
concerning compensation earned during the last three fiscal
years by our chief executive officer and all other persons who
served as executive officers during the last fiscal year. As of
April 1, 2006, our executive officers included
Messrs. Thomas and Biehl, in addition to Matthew J. Klaben,
our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and James H.
Hoppel, our Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Assistant
Treasurer, and Mr. Lovett was no longer an executive
officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Samuel F. Thomas(2)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,766,483 |
(3) |
|
|
67,547 |
(4) |
|
$ |
18,726 |
(5) |
|
Chief Executive Officer and |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
435,123 |
(6) |
|
|
203,701 |
(7) |
|
$ |
19,595 |
(5) |
|
President |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
92,307 |
|
|
$ |
94,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Biehl
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
213,200 |
|
|
$ |
319,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,830 |
(3) |
|
|
20,264 |
(4) |
|
$ |
18,726 |
(5) |
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
374,167 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000 |
(7) |
|
$ |
14,536 |
(5) |
|
Chief Financial Officer and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,077 |
(5) |
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles R. Lovett
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
173,349 |
|
|
$ |
260,024 |
|
|
$ |
916,205 |
(3) |
|
|
6,755 |
(4) |
|
$ |
15,471 |
(5) |
|
Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
168,300 |
|
|
$ |
307,450 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
(7) |
|
$ |
5,100 |
(5) |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,950 |
(5) |
|
|
(1) |
No person listed in the table received personal benefits or
perquisites in excess of the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of his
aggregate salary and bonus. Messrs. Thomas and Biehl
received automobile allowances of $1,846 and $6,923 in 2005,
respectively, and Mr. Biehl received the use of a company
car in 2003, 2004 and part of 2005. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Thomas became Chief Executive Officer on
October 6, 2003. |
|
(3) |
These amounts reflect the payments made by us in connection with
the Acquisition related to the cancellation of stock options (or
portions of stock options) held by the named individuals before
the Acquisition. |
|
(4) |
These options were granted on November 23, 2005 pursuant to
the terms of our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The following
portions of these options vest annually in equal installments
over five years based on continued service: Mr. Thomas
23,840; Mr. Biehl, 7,152; and Mr. Lovett, 2,384. The
following portions of these options vest based on performance,
measured by reference to First Reserves net return on its
investment in us: Mr. Thomas, 43,707; Mr. Biehl,
13,112; and Mr. Lovett, 4,371. |
|
(5) |
Represents amounts contributed by us to the listed persons
personal account under the Chart Industries, Inc. 401(k)
Investment and Savings Plan. |
|
(6) |
On February 26, 2004, Mr. Thomas purchased from us
28,797 shares of common stock at a price of $13.89 per
share. The amount listed as Other Annual
Compensation for Mr. Thomas for 2004 is equal to the
product of the total number of shares purchased and the
difference between the price paid to us and the closing price of
$29.00 per share of Reorganized Company common stock in the
over-the-counter-market
on February 26, 2004. |
|
(7) |
These options were granted on March 19, 2004 pursuant to
the terms of our 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. A portion
of these options were cancelled in the Acquisition in exchange
for the payments describe in footnote (3) above. The
balance of these options remain outstanding and were adjusted in
connection with the Acquisition to represent rollover options to
acquire our common stock after the Acquisition at an exercise
price of $16.19 per share, as follows: Mr. Thomas,
94,599; Mr. Biehl, 5,297; |
87
|
|
|
and Mr. Lovett, 5,221. All of these rollover options held
by Messrs. Thomas, Biehl and Lovett are currently
exercisable. |
|
|
(8) |
Of the amounts listed for 2004, $307,500 and $252,450 represent
year-end cash bonuses paid to Mr. Biehl and
Mr. Lovett, respectively, for our 2004 fiscal year. The
balance of the amounts listed for 2004, $66,667 for
Mr. Biehl and $55,000 for Mr. Lovett, represent
retention incentives that were paid in March 2004 in lieu of any
other cash bonuses for 2003. These retention incentives were
paid under retention agreements entered into in 2003 with
Mr. Biehl and Mr. Lovett, which required these
officers to remain employed with the company through
February 29, 2004 as a condition to payment. |
The following table sets forth information concerning the grant
of stock options to our chief executive officer and all other
executive officers during the last fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
at Assumed Annual Rates | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
of Stock Price | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Appreciation for Option | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees | |
|
or Base | |
|
|
|
Term | |
|
|
Granted | |
|
in Fiscal | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
Year | |
|
($/Sh) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% ($) | |
|
10% ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Samuel F. Thomas
|
|
|
67,547 |
(1) |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
$ |
64.75 |
|
|
|
11/23/15 |
(2) |
|
$ |
2,750,514 |
(3) |
|
$ |
6,970,175 |
(3) |
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Biehl
|
|
|
20,264 |
(1) |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
$ |
64.75 |
|
|
|
11/23/15 |
(2) |
|
$ |
825,150 |
(3) |
|
$ |
2,091,042 |
(3) |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles R. Lovett
|
|
|
6,755 |
(1) |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$ |
64.75 |
|
|
|
11/23/15 |
(2) |
|
$ |
275,064 |
(3) |
|
$ |
697,048 |
(3) |
|
Vice President Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
These options were granted on November 23, 2005 at an
exercise price of $64.75 pursuant to the terms of our 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan. The following portions of these options vest
annually in equal installments over five years based on
continued service: Mr. Thomas, 23,840; Mr. Biehl,
7,152; and Mr. Lovett, 2,384. The following portions of
these options vest based on performance, measured by reference
to First Reserves net return on its investment in us:
Mr. Thomas, 43,707; Mr. Biehl, 13,112; and
Mr. Lovett, 4,371. See 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan. |
|
(2) |
The portion of these options that vests based on performance, as
described in footnote (1), may terminate earlier than this date
to the extent the performance measure is not satisfied at such
time that First Reserve may cease to have any ownership interest
in us. |
|
(3) |
The potential realized values are net of exercise price but do
not take into account the payment of taxes associated with
exercise. The amounts represent hypothetical gains that could be
achieved for the respective options if exercised at the end of
the option term based on assumed annual rates of compound share
price appreciation from the date of this prospectus of 5% and
10% based on $64.75 per share, the fair market value on the date
of grant. The 5% and 10% assumed annual rates of compounded
share price appreciation are mandated by rules of the SEC and do
not represent our estimate or projection of our future common
share prices. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises
are dependent on the future performance of our common shares and
overall stock market conditions and the option holders
continued service with us. |
88
The following table sets forth information concerning the
exercise of stock options during 2005 by each of our chief
executive officer and all other executive officers and the
2005 year-end value of unexercised options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
Fiscal Year-End (#) | |
|
Fiscal Year-End ($)(1) | |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
Realized($) | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Samuel F. Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,599/67,547 |
|
|
|
$ /$ |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Biehl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,297/20,264 |
|
|
|
$ /$ |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles R. Lovett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,350/7,626 |
|
|
|
$ /$ |
|
|
Vice President Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
There was no public trading market for our common stock as of
December 31, 2005. The value of unexercised
in-the-money options is
based on the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per
share. |
Pension Plan Information
The Chart Retirement Income Plan was frozen as of
December 31, 2004. Therefore, no future service or earnings
will be considered in the calculation of the normal
retirement benefit (as defined therein) payable from the
plan. Mr. Lovetts annual benefit payable at his
normal retirement date (as defined therein) is
$4,850.88. This amount was calculated using his final average
earnings and credited service at December 31, 2004.
2005 Stock Incentive Plan
The following description of the Chart Industries, Inc. 2005
Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the Plan, is not
complete and is qualified by reference to the full text of the
Plan, which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part. We adopted the
stock incentive plan effective November 23, 2005 and it was
approved by our stockholders on November 23, 2005.
The Plan provides for the grant of options that are not
incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights
(SARs) or various other stock-based grants,
including the shares of our common stock sold to, and options
granted to, our executive officers and other key employees.
In connection with this offering, we intend to amend the Plan to
increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under the Plan and to make other changes to the terms
of the Plan that will be effective when we complete this
offering. As of April 1, 2006, there were
245,157 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
the Plan. The number or kind of shares issued or reserved for
issuance pursuant to the Plan or pursuant to outstanding awards,
maximum number of shares for which options or SARs may be
granted during a calendar year to any participant, the exercise
price of any award or any other affected term of an award may be
adjusted by our board of directors on account of mergers,
consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, extraordinary
dividends or other dilutive changes in the shares of common
stock. Shares of common stock covered by awards that terminate
or lapse without the issuance of shares will again be available
for grant under the Plan.
The Plan is administered by our board of directors, which may
delegate its duties and powers in whole or in part to any
committee thereof. The board has the full power and authority to
establish the terms and conditions of any award consistent with
the provisions of the Plan and to waive any such terms and
conditions at any time. The board also has the authority to
grant awards under the Plan. The board is authorized to
interpret the Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules
and regulations relating to the Plan and to make any other
determinations that it deems necessary or desirable for the
administration of the Plan. The board is
89
authorized to correct any defect or supply any omission or
reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan in the manner and to the
extent the board deems necessary or desirable.
The exercise price per share for options is equal to the fair
market value on the applicable date of grant. An option holder
may exercise an option by written notice and payment of the
exercise price (i) in cash, (ii) to the extent
permitted by the board, by the surrender of a number of shares
of common stock already owned by the option holder for at least
six months (or such other period as established from time to
time by the board to avoid adverse accounting treatment applying
generally accepted accounting principles), (iii) in a
combination of cash and shares of common stock (as qualified by
clause (ii)), (iv) through the delivery of irrevocable
instructions to a broker to sell share obtained upon the
exercise of the option and deliver to us an amount equal to the
exercise price for the shares of common stock being purchased or
(v) through such cashless exercise procedures as the board
may permit. Option holders who are subject to the withholding of
federal and state income tax as a result of exercising an option
may satisfy the income tax withholding obligation through the
withholding of a portion of the shares of common stock to be
received upon exercise of the option.
As of the date of this prospectus, we have granted under the
Plan certain options as non-qualified stock options, which have
been granted as follows: approximately 35% vest and become
exercisable over the passage of time, which we refer to as
time options, assuming the holder thereof continues
to be employed by us, and the remaining portion vests and
becomes exercisable based upon the achievement of certain
performance targets, which we refer to as performance
options. Time options generally become exercisable by the
holder of the option in installments of 20% on each of the first
five anniversaries of the grant date. Performance options
generally become exercisable based upon the Fund X
Net Return, which is the amount received by First Reserve
in cash (and/or in kind based upon the fair market value of
securities or other property received by First Reserve) in
respect of its investment in us divided by the aggregate amount
of the investment by First Reserve in us (the Fund X
Investment).
Immediately prior to a change in control of us (as defined in
the Plan), the exercisability of the time options will
automatically accelerate with respect to 100% of the shares of
our common stock subject to the time options. In addition,
subject to the holder of the options continued employment,
in the event First Reserve sells 100% of its interest in us to a
third party prior to October 17, 2008 and, as a result of
such sale, the Fund X Net Return is less than 2.50 times
the Fund X Investment, but an internal rate of return of
greater than 30% is realized, the performance option will
accelerate with respect to 45% of the shares of our common stock
subject to the performance option.
The board may grant SARs independent of or in connection with an
option. The exercise price per share of a SAR shall be an amount
determined by the board, but in no event shall such amount be
less than the greater of (i) the fair market value of a
share on the date the SAR is granted or, in the case of a SAR
granted in conjunction with an option, or a portion thereof, the
exercise price of the related option and (ii) the minimum
amount permitted by applicable laws, rules, by-laws or policies
of regulatory authorities or stock exchanges. Each SAR granted
independent of an option shall entitle a participant upon
exercise to an amount equal to (i) the excess of
(A) the fair market value on the exercise date of one share
over (B) the exercise price per share, times (ii) the
number of shares covered by the SAR. Each SAR granted in
conjunction with an option, or a portion thereof, shall entitle
a participant to surrender to us the unexercised option, or any
portion thereof, and to receive from us in exchange therefor an
amount equal to (i) the excess of (A) the fair market
value on the exercise date of one share over (B) the
exercise price per share, times (ii) the number of shares
covered by the option, or portion thereof, which is surrendered.
Payment shall be made in shares of common stock or in cash, or
partly in shares of common stock and partly in cash, all as
shall be determined by the board.
The board may grant awards of shares of common stock, restricted
stock and awards that are valued in whole or in part by
reference to, or are otherwise based on the fair market value
of, shares. Such awards will be subject to the terms and
conditions established by the board.
Unless otherwise determined by the board, awards granted under
the Plan are not transferable other than by will or by the laws
of descent and distribution.
90
The board of directors may amend, alter or discontinue the Plan
in any respect at any time, but no amendment, alteration or
discontinuance may diminish any of the rights of a participant
under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.
2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
The following description of the Chart Industries, Inc. 2004
Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our 2004
Plan, is not complete and is qualified by reference to the full
text of the 2004 Plan, which has been filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. We
adopted the stock incentive plan effective February 12,
2004. We anticipate that the 2004 Plan will be approved by our
stockholders prior to the completion of this offering.
The 2004 Plan permits the grant of nonqualified stock options to
our and our affiliates employees. A maximum of
494,703 shares of common stock may be subject to awards
under the 2004 Plan. The number of shares of common stock issued
or reserved pursuant to the 2004 Plan, or pursuant to
outstanding awards, is subject to adjustment on account of
mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, stock splits, stock
dividends, extraordinary dividends and other dilutive changes in
the shares of common stock. Shares of common stock covered by
awards that expire, terminate or lapse will again be available
for grant under the 2004 Plan.
The stock incentive plan is administered by our board of
directors, which may delegate its duties and powers in whole or
in part to any committee thereof. The board has the sole
discretion to determine the employees to whom awards may be
granted under the 2004 Plan and the manner in which such awards
will vest. Options will be granted by the board to employees in
such numbers and at such times during the term of the 2004 Plan
as the board shall determine. The board is authorized to
interpret the 2004 Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any
rules and regulations relating to the 2004 Plan.
The board shall determine the exercise price for each option. An
option holder may exercise an option by written notice and
payment of the exercise price (1) in cash, (2) by the
surrender of a number of shares of common stock already owned by
the option holder, (3) by surrender of all or part of an
award or (4) in a combination of the foregoing methods. The
board may also prescribe any other method of paying the exercise
price that it determines is consistent with applicable law and
the purpose of the 2004 Plan. The board in its discretion may
permit option holders who are subject to the withholding of
federal and state income tax as a result of exercising an option
to satisfy the income tax withholding obligation through the
withholding of a portion of the shares of common stock to be
received upon exercise of the option.
Unless otherwise determined by the board, awards granted under
the 2004 Plan are not transferable other than by will, by the
laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified
domestic relations order as defined in the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we expect the
outstanding options under the 2004 Plan to be fully vested and
exercised.
Our board of directors may amend, alter or discontinue the 2004
Plan in any respect at any time, but no amendment, alteration or
discontinuance may impair any of the rights of a participant
under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.
2006 Chart Executive Incentive Compensation Plan
The following description of the 2006 Chart Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our 2006 Bonus Plan, is
not complete and is qualified by reference to the full text of
the annual incentive plan, which has been filed as an exhibit to
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
The 2006 Bonus Plan is a bonus plan in which our executive
officers participate, which is designed to provide our executive
officers with incentive compensation based upon the achievement
of pre-established performance goals. The purpose of the annual
incentive plan is to attract, retain, motivate and reward
participants by providing them with the opportunity to earn
competitive compensation directly linked to our performance.
91
The 2006 Bonus Plan is administered by the compensation
committee of our board of directors. The 2006 Bonus Plan
provides for the payment of incentive bonuses, in the form of
cash. If our performance relative to the 2006 Bonus Plans
targets exceeds threshold amounts, participants may earn a bonus
of up to a pre-determined percentage of the participants
base salary, ranging from 90% to 165% of the participants
base salary at maximum performance levels.
The compensation committee of the board has established the
performance targets under the 2006 Bonus Plan. The material
targets under the 2006 Bonus Plan include working capital and
EBITDA targets. The performance period under the plan is our
fiscal year.
Following the end of the fiscal year, the compensation committee
of the board will determine (i) whether and to what extent
any of the performance objectives established have been
satisfied, and (ii) for each participant employed as of the
last day of the fiscal year, the actual bonus to which such
participant shall be entitled, taking into consideration the
extent to which the performance objectives have been met.
Employees on a leave of absence as of the last day of the fiscal
year are not eligible for payment under the plan unless and
until they return to active status.
Payment of any bonus amount will be made to participants before
March 15, 2007.
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we expect to adopt
an annual cash bonus plan that will apply to fiscal year 2007
and beyond. Such plan will be designed to comply with
performance-based compensation exemption from
section 162(m) of the Code during any period which
section 162(m) of the Code is applicable.
Employment Agreements
On November 23, 2005, we entered into an employment
agreement with Samuel F. Thomas, pursuant to which
Mr. Thomas serves as our Chief Executive Officer and
President for a rolling term of three years. Under the
agreement, Mr. Thomas is entitled to an annual base salary
of $400,000 payable in regular installments in accordance with
our usual payroll practices. Mr. Thomas is also eligible to
earn an annual bonus award, for each full year during the term
of his employment agreement, of up to 150% of his annual bonus
target, which target for calendar year 2006 is $440,000 and may
be increased in the sole discretion of our board of directors,
based upon the achievement of annual performance targets
established by our board. Mr. Thomas is also generally
entitled to participate in our employee benefit plans on the
same basis as those benefits are generally made available to our
other senior executives.
If Mr. Thomass employment is terminated by us without
cause or he resigns for good reason (as
such terms are defined in his employment agreement),
Mr. Thomas will be entitled to receive compensation and
benefits that are earned but unpaid as of the date of
termination and, subject to the execution and delivery of a
release of claims against us, (i) base salary for three
years, payable in installments and (ii) continued coverage
under our group health plans for three years or, to the extent
such coverage is not permissible under the terms of such plans,
an amount equal to the premium subsidy we would have otherwise
paid on Mr. Thomas behalf for such coverage.
Mr. Thomas is also subject to a covenant not to disclose
confidential information during the employment term and at all
times thereafter and covenants not to compete and not to solicit
employees or customers during the employment term and for three
years following termination of employment for any reason.
On December 1, 2005, we entered into an employment
agreement with Michael F. Biehl, pursuant to which
Mr. Biehl serves as our Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer for a rolling term of two years. Under the agreement,
Mr. Biehl is entitled to an annual base salary of $235,000
payable in regular installments in
92
accordance with our usual payroll practices. Mr. Biehl is
also eligible to earn an annual bonus award, for each full year
during the term of his employment agreement, of up to 150% of
his annual base salary, based upon the achievement of annual
performance targets established by our board. Mr. Biehl is
also generally entitled to participate in our employee benefit
plans on the same basis as those benefits are generally made
available to our other senior executives.
If Mr. Biehls employment is terminated by us without
cause or he resigns for good reason (as
such terms are defined in his employment agreement),
Mr. Biehl will be entitled to receive the compensation and
benefits that are earned but unpaid as of the date of
termination and, subject to the execution and delivery of a
release of claims against us, (i) base salary for two
years, payable in installments and (ii) continued coverage
under our group health plans for two years and, to the extent
such coverage is not permissible under the terms of such plans,
an amount equal to the premium subsidy we would have otherwise
paid on Mr. Biehls behalf for such coverage.
Mr. Biehl is also subject to a covenant not to disclose
confidential information during the employment term and at all
times thereafter and covenants not to compete and not to solicit
employees or customers during the term of his employment and for
two years following termination of employment for any reason.
On March 29, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement
with Matthew J. Klaben, pursuant to which Mr. Klaben serves
as our Vice President and General Counsel for a rolling term of
one year. Under the agreement, Mr. Klaben is entitled to an
annual base salary of $193,000, payable in regular installments
in accordance with our usual payroll practices. Mr. Klaben
is also entitled to receive a one-time $25,000 signing bonus,
which will be forfeited and repaid to the company if
Mr. Klaben resigns without good reason (as such
term is defined in his employment agreement) before
March 29, 2007. In addition, Mr. Klaben is also
eligible to earn an annual bonus award, for each full year
during the term of his employment agreement, of up to 105% of
his annual base salary, based upon the achievement of annual
performance targets established by our board. Mr. Klaben is
also generally entitled to participate in our employee benefit
plans on the same basis as those benefits are generally made
available to our other senior executives.
If Mr. Klabens employment is terminated by us without
cause or he resigns for good reason (as
such terms are defined in his employment agreement), he will be
entitled to receive the compensation and benefits that are
earned but unpaid as of the date of termination and, subject to
the execution and delivery of a release of claims against us,
(i) base salary for one year, payable in installments and
(ii) continued coverage under our group health plans for
one year and, to the extent such coverage is not permissible
under the terms of such plans, an amount equal to the premium
subsidy we would have otherwise paid on Mr. Klabens
behalf for such coverage.
Mr. Klaben is also subject to a covenant not to disclose
confidential information during his term of employment and at
all times thereafter and covenants not to compete and not to
solicit employees or customers during the term of his employment
and for one year following termination of employment for any
reason.
On December 1, 2005, we entered into an employment
agreement with Charles R. Lovett pursuant to which
Mr. Lovett serves as our Vice President Manufacturing
for a rolling term of one year. Under the agreement,
Mr. Lovett is entitled to an annual base salary of
$179,416, payable in regular installments in accordance with our
usual payroll practices. Mr. Lovett is also eligible to
earn an annual bonus award, for each full year during the term
of his employment agreement, of up to 150% of his annual base
salary, based upon the achievement of annual performance targets
established by our board. Mr. Lovett is also generally
entitled to participate in our employee benefit plans on the
same basis as those benefits are generally made available to our
other senior executives.
93
If Mr. Lovetts employment is terminated by us without
cause or he resigns for good reason (as
such terms are defined in the employment agreement), he will be
entitled to receive the compensation and benefits that are
earned but unpaid as of the date of termination and, subject to
the execution and delivery of a release of claims against us,
(i) base salary for one year, payable in installments and
(ii) continued coverage under our group health plans for
one year and, to the extent such coverage is not permissible
under the terms of such plans, an amount equal to the premium
subsidy we would have otherwise paid on Mr. Lovetts
behalf for such coverage.
Mr. Lovett is also subject to a covenant not to disclose
confidential information during his term of employment and at
all times thereafter and covenants not to compete and not to
solicit employees or customers during the term of his employment
and for one year following termination of employment for any
reason.
Management Equity
In connection with the Acquisition, the compensation committee
elected to adjust, in accordance with the terms of our 2004
Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the merger agreement, a
portion of certain then-outstanding stock options held by
certain executive officers or members of senior management to
represent options to acquire shares of our common stock after
the Acquisition. All other then-outstanding stock options were
cashed out pursuant to the merger agreement. All such rollover
options are subject to the same terms and conditions as set
forth in our 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and related
option agreements (including post-termination exercise periods)
and are fully vested, unless otherwise agreed in writing prior
to the closing of the Acquisition. In addition, any rollover
option that was granted with an exercise price per share less
than the per share fair market value of the shares underlying
the option on the grant date thereof was modified by increasing
the aggregate exercise price of such option by an amount equal
to the excess of (i) the aggregate fair market value of the
shares underlying such option on the grant date thereof over
(ii) the aggregate exercise price of such options on the
grant date thereof (the Aggregate Option Spread). At
the closing of the Acquisition, the holders of the rollover
options received an amount in cash equal to the Aggregate Option
Spread (less any required withholding). All shares of common
stock acquired upon exercise of a rollover option are subject to
the terms of the management stockholders agreements. See
Certain Related Party Transactions.
94
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table and accompanying footnotes show information
regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock before
and after this offering by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5%
of our common stock; |
|
|
|
each member of our board of directors and each of our named
executive officers; and |
|
|
|
all members of our board of directors and our executive officers
as a group. |
The number of shares and percentages of beneficial ownership
before the offering set forth below are based on
1,718,896 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding
as of March 31, 2006 and after giving effect to
the -for-one
stock split we expect to effect immediately prior to the
consummation of this offering. The number of shares and
percentages of beneficial ownership after the offering are based
on shares
of our common stock that will be issued and outstanding
immediately after this offering,
including shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, that will
be dividended to our existing stockholders assuming no exercise
of the underwriters over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned Immediately | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After this Offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
Assuming the | |
|
Assuming the | |
|
|
Owned Immediately | |
|
Underwriters Option | |
|
Underwriters Option | |
|
|
Prior to this Offering | |
|
is Not Exercised(1) | |
|
is Exercised in Full | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Percent of | |
Name of Beneficial Holder |
|
Number | |
|
Common | |
|
Number | |
|
Common | |
|
Number | |
|
Common | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Reserve Fund X, L.P(2)
|
|
|
2,291,923 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel F. Thomas(3)
|
|
|
94,599 |
|
|
|
5.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Biehl(4)
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. Klaben
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Hoppel, Jr.
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles R. Lovett(5)
|
|
|
5,221 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ben A. Guill(6)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth W. Moore(6)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy H. Day(6)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and officers as a group (8 persons)(7)
|
|
|
105,117 |
|
|
|
5.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We will grant the underwriters an option to purchase up to an
additional shares in this offering. Immediately prior to the
consummation of this offering, we will declare a stock dividend,
the terms of which will require that shortly after the
expiration of the underwriters over-allotment option
(assuming the option is not exercised in full) we issue to our
existing stockholders the number of shares equal to (x) the
number of additional shares the underwriters have an option to
purchase minus (y) the actual number of shares the
underwriters purchase from us pursuant to that option. |
|
(2) |
100% of our common stock is owned by FR X Chart Holdings
LLC, which in turn is 100% owned and managed by First Reserve
Fund X, L.P. (Fund X). First Reserve
GP X, L.P. (GP X) is the general partner
of Fund X. First Reserve GP X, Inc. (GP X,
Inc.) is the general partner of GP X. First Reserve
Corporation is the advisor to Fund X. The address of
FR X Chart Holdings LLC, Fund X, GP X, GP X,
Inc. and First Reserve Corporation is c/o First Reserve
Corporation, One Lafayette Place, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830.
First Reserves beneficial ownership consists of
1,718,896 shares of our common stock and a warrant
exercisable to acquire 573,027 shares of our common stock. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Thomas beneficial ownership consists of
94,599 shares subject to exercisable stock options. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Biehls beneficial ownership consists of
5,297 shares subject to exercisable stock options. |
95
|
|
(5) |
Mr. Lovetts beneficial ownership consists of
5,221 shares subject to exercisable stock options. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Guill is the President, a Managing Director and a
member of the board of directors of First Reserve Corporation
and GP X, Inc. Mr. Moore is a Managing Director of
First Reserve Corporation and GP X, Inc. Mr. Day is a
Director of First Reserve Corporation and GP X, Inc.
Mr. Guill, Mr. Moore and Mr. Day all disclaim
beneficial ownership of any shares of the issuers equity
securities owned by such entities or their affiliates (including
First Reserve Fund X, L.P.). |
|
(7) |
Consists of 105,117 shares subject to exercisable stock options. |
|
* |
Less than 1%. |
96
CERTAIN RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Management Stockholders Agreements
We have entered into management stockholders agreements,
dated as of November 23, 2005 and March 29, 2006, with
certain members of our management, including
Messrs. Thomas, Biehl, Klaben, Hoppel and Lovett (the
management stockholders) and FR X Chart Holdings LLC.
Restrictions on Transfers. The management
stockholders agreements impose significant restrictions on
transfers of shares of common stock. Except for transfers in
accordance with the management stockholders agreements,
transfers approved in advance by our board, transfers to Chart,
FR X Chart Holdings LLC or any affiliate of FR X Chart Holdings
LLC, transfers by a management stockholder to a family member or
family trust for bona fide estate planning purposes with the
consent of our board (which will not be unreasonably withheld),
transfers by a management stockholder by will or by intestate
succession, or any transfer made pursuant to the registration
rights granted by the management stockholders agreements
(Permitted Transfers), no management stockholder
will be permitted to transfer any shares of our common stock
without the consent of our board until the earliest to occur of
(i) an initial public offering of at least 25% of the
outstanding shares of our common stock or that results in gross
proceeds to us equal to $55,649,258.75, (ii) the occurrence
of a change of control (as defined in the management
stockholders agreements) of the company and
(iii) October 17, 2008 (the earliest of such dates
being the Lapse Date). The consummation of this
offering is expected to result in the occurrence of the Lapse
Date.
Right of First Offer. If at any time after the Lapse Date
but prior to the consummation of an initial public offering of
our common stock, the management stockholder proposes to
transfer his or her shares of common stock, other than in a
Permitted Transfer, or as a result of the exercise of tag-along
or drag-along rights (as described below), the management
stockholder will notify us of such proposed sale and allow us
the opportunity to, or to arrange for a third party to, purchase
such shares at the same price and on substantially the same
terms of the proposed transfer. If we do not elect to, or
arrange for a third party to, purchase such shares at such price
and on such terms, the management stockholder may then sell such
shares at such price and on such terms to a third party. This
right of first offer is expected to expire upon the consummation
of this offering.
Tag-Along Rights. If FR X Chart Holdings LLC wishes to
transfer shares of common stock other than pursuant to a
registered offering, a transfer pursuant to Rule 144 of the
Securities Act, a transfer with the approval of the members of
the board not affiliated with FR X Chart Holdings LLC, a
transfer by FR X Chart Holdings LLC to any of its affiliates or
partners or our employees or a transfer resulting in an exercise
by FR X Chart Holdings LLC of its drag-along rights, each
management stockholder shall have the right to tag-along and
participate, on a pro rata basis, in such transfer of common
stock.
Charts Right to Repurchase Shares of Common Stock of a
Management Stockholder. If, prior to the Lapse Date, a
management stockholders employment is terminated by us for
cause (as defined in the management
stockholders agreements), then we shall have the right to
repurchase all or part of the shares of common stock held by
such management stockholder at a per share price equal to the
lower of the purchase price per share paid by such management
stockholder and the fair market value (as defined in
the management stockholders agreements) per share on the
date of exercise of our repurchase right. If, prior to the Lapse
Date, a management stockholders employment is terminated
due to death or disability, by us without
cause, by such management stockholder for good
reason or upon retirement (as such terms are defined in
the management stockholders agreements), then we shall
have the right to repurchase all or part of the shares of common
stock held by such management stockholder at a per share price
equal to the fair market value per share on the date
of exercise of our repurchase right. If, prior to the Lapse
Date, a management stockholders employment is terminated
by such management stockholder without good reason,
then we shall have the right to repurchase all or part of the
shares of common stock held by such management stockholder at a
per share price equal to (i) the fair market
value per share on the date of exercise of our repurchase
right with respect to purchased shares and
rollover shares (as such terms are defined in the
management stockholders agreements) held by such
management stockholder and (ii) the
97
lower of the purchase price per share paid by such management
stockholder and the fair market value per share on
the date of exercise of our repurchase right with respect to all
other shares held by such management stockholder. Our right to
repurchase shares as described in this paragraph is expected to
expire upon consummation of this offering.
Obligation to Repurchase Shares of Common Stock of a
Management Stockholder. If a management stockholders
employment is terminated as a result of death or
disability, by us without cause or by
the management stockholder for good reason or upon
retirement, such management stockholder shall, for a
period of 90 days following the later of (x) the date
of such termination and (y) the date that is six months and
one day after the date on which such management stockholder
purchased the shares under stock options that were rolled over
in connection with the Acquisition from us, have the right to
sell to us, and we shall be required to purchase all of such
shares at a per share price equal to the fair market
value per share on the date of exercise of such right.
Piggyback Registration Rights. Pursuant to
and subject to the terms of the management stockholders
agreements, each management stockholder will have the
opportunity to include in registered sales of our common stock
(other than an initial public offering or relating to any
employee benefit plan or corporate merger, acquisition or
reorganization), all or any part of the registrable
securities (as such term is defined in the management
stockholders agreements) then held by such management
stockholder.
Voting Agreement. Until the occurrence of the Lapse Date,
each management stockholder shall vote his or her shares of
common stock with respect to all matters in the same proportion
as the shares of common stock held by FR X Chart Holdings LLC
and its affiliates are voted. This provision is expected to
expire upon the consummation of this offering.
Preemptive Rights. In the event we issue shares of our
common stock (other than upon or in connection with (i) any
exercise or conversion of options, warrants or convertible
securities outstanding as of the date of the management
stockholders agreements, or the issuance or exercise of
any options or warrants issued after the date of the management
stockholders agreements pursuant to any stock option plan
or stock option agreement approved by the board, (ii) any
issuance of common stock in exchange for consideration other
than cash or (iii) any acquisition (by sale, merger in
which we are the surviving corporation, or otherwise) by us of
equity in, or assets of, a business), each management
stockholder shall have the right to purchase, on a pro-rata
basis, shares of the common stock proposed to be issued. This
right terminates upon an initial public offering of our common
stock.
Stockholders Agreement
In connection with this offering, we and First Reserve or one of
its affiliates intend to enter into a stockholders agreement
pursuant to which First Reserve or its affiliates has the right
to request us to register the sale of shares held by First
Reserve, including shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant
held by FR X Chart Holdings LLC, on their behalf and may
require us to make available shelf registration statements
permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time
over an extended period. In addition, First Reserve has the
ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in
connection with registered offerings initiated by us. After the
consummation of this offering, First Reserve will own shares
entitled to these registration rights. There are also
573,027 shares under FR X Chart Holdings LLCs
warrant which are entitled to these registration rights. See
Warrant to Purchase our Shares.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the stockholders
agreement, after this offering, for so long as First Reserve
continues to hold (1) less than 50% but at least 25% of our
outstanding common stock, it shall have the right to designate
three director nominees, (2) less than 25% but more than
10% of our outstanding common stock, it will have the right to
designate two director nominees; and (3) 10% of our
outstanding common stock, it will have the right to designate
one director nominee. Once First Reserve holds less than 10% of
our outstanding common stock, it will have no right to designate
directors pursuant to the stockholders agreement.
98
Warrant to Purchase our Shares
On November 23, 2005, we issued a warrant to FR X Chart
Holdings LLC to purchase up to 573,027 shares of our common
stock at a per share purchase price of $64.75 (subject to
adjustment per the terms of the warrant). FR X Chart Holdings
LLC may exercise the warrant at any time prior to March 19,
2014, including through cashless exercise. The warrant may not
be transferred except to a successor of FR X Chart Holdings LLC
without the prior consent of a majority of our board of
directors who are not affiliated with FR X Chart Holdings LLC,
such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The
terms, conditions and securities subject to the warrant shall be
adjusted in a manner commensurate with and proportionate to
changes applying generally to the outstanding management
rollover options. See Management Management
Equity.
Legal Fees
On April 1, 2006, Matthew J. Klaben became our Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining us in
March 2006, Mr. Klaben was a partner with the law firm of
Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP. During 2005 and
year-to-date in 2006,
we paid $959,264 and $41,765, respectively, in legal fees and
expenses to the law firm of Calfee, Halter & Griswold
LLP for legal services rendered.
99
DESCRIPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS
Senior Secured Credit Facility
In connection with the Acquisition, we entered into a senior
secured credit facility with Citicorp North America, Inc., as
administrative agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as joint
lead arranger and joint book manager, Morgan Stanley Senior
Funding, Inc., as joint lead arranger, joint book manager and
syndication agent and each lender party thereto.
The senior secured credit facility provides senior secured
financing of $240.0 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $180.0 million term loan facility; and |
|
|
|
a $60.0 million revolving credit facility. |
The term loan portion of our senior secured credit facility was
fully funded on October 17, 2005 and had approximately
$37.6 million of borrowing capacity under the revolving
portion of our senior secured credit facility at
December 31, 2005, after giving effect to approximately
$22.4 million of letters of credit and bank guarantees
outstanding at that date.
Upon the occurrence of certain events, we may request an
increase to the existing term loan facility and/or the existing
revolving credit facility in an amount not to exceed
$50.0 million, subject to receipt of commitments by
existing lenders or other financial institutions reasonably
acceptable to the administrative agent.
We are the borrower for the term loan facility and the revolving
credit facility. The revolving credit facility includes
borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for
borrowings on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans.
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility bear
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at our
option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to
the highest of (1) the rate that the administrative agent
announces from time to time as its base commercial lending rate,
(2) the three month certificate of deposit rate plus 0.5%
and (3) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or (b) a
LIBOR rate determined by the applicable screen rate or by
reference to the costs of funds for deposits in
U.S. dollars for the interest period relevant to such
borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs.
The initial applicable margin for borrowings under the revolving
credit facility is 1.50% with respect to base rate borrowings
and 2.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings. After we deliver our
financial statements for the first fiscal quarter ending at
least six months after the closing date, such applicable margin
will be reduced to 1.25% and 2.25%, respectively if our leverage
ratio is less than 5.0 to 1.0 but greater than or equal to 4.0
to 1.0, and to 1.00% and 2.00%, respectively if our leverage
ratio is less than 4.0 to 1.0. The applicable margin for
borrowings under the term loan facility is 1.00% with respect to
base rate borrowings and 2.00% with respect to LIBOR borrowings.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under
the senior secured credit facility, we are required to pay a
commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit
facility in respect of the unutilized commitments thereunder.
The initial commitment fee rate is 0.50% per annum (which
fee will be reduced to 0.375% per annum if our leverage
ratio is less than 4.0 to 1.0). We also have to pay letter of
credit fees equal to the applicable margin then in effect with
respect to LIBOR loans under the revolving credit facility on
the aggregate undrawn amount of all letters of credit
outstanding. We also have to pay to each bank issuing a letter
of credit fees equal to 0.25% on the face amount of each letter
of credit and other customary documentary and processing charges.
100
The senior secured credit facility requires us to prepay
outstanding term loans, subject to certain exceptions, with:
|
|
|
|
|
beginning in the year ending December 31, 2006, 75% (which
percentage will be reduced to 50% if our leverage ratio is equal
to or less than 4.75 and greater than 3.75 to 1.00, and to 25%
if our leverage ratio is equal to or less than 3.75 to 1.00 and
greater than 2.75 to 1.00, and to 0% if our leverage ratio is
equal to or less than 2.75 to 1.00) of our annual excess cash
flow; |
|
|
|
100% of the net cash proceeds in excess of an amount to be
determined from non-ordinary course asset sales and casualty and
condemnation events, if we do not reinvest or contract to
reinvest those proceeds within 12 months and use such
proceeds within 18 months of receipt, subject to certain
limitations; |
|
|
|
100% of the net cash proceeds of any incurrence of debt, other
than certain debt permitted under the senior secured credit
facility; and |
|
|
|
100% of amounts in excess of an aggregate amount of
$5.0 million in respect of certain claims arising out of
the Acquisition, subject to certain exceptions. |
The foregoing mandatory prepayments other than from excess cash
flow will be applied first, to the next eight installments of
the term loan facility and second, to the remaining installments
of the term loan facility on a pro rata basis. Mandatory
prepayments from excess cash flow and optional prepayments will
be applied to the remaining installments of the term loan
facility at our direction. Each lender has the right to decline
any mandatory prepayment of its term loans in which case the
amount of such prepayment will be retained by us.
We may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the senior
secured credit facility at any time without premium or penalty,
other than customary breakage costs with respect to
LIBOR loans.
We are required to repay installments on the loans under the
term loan facility in quarterly principal amounts equal to 0.25%
of their funded total principal amount for the first six years
and nine months, with the remaining amount payable on the date
that is seven years from the date of the closing of the senior
secured credit facility.
Principal amounts outstanding under the revolving credit
facility will be due and payable in full at maturity, five years
from the date of the closing of the senior secured credit
facility.
All our obligations under the senior secured credit facility are
unconditionally guaranteed by each of our existing and future
domestic wholly-owned subsidiaries (subject to exceptions with
respect to immaterial subsidiaries and with respect to any
guaranty that could create materially adverse tax consequences),
and our direct parent, FR X Chart Holdings LLC, referred to,
collectively, as Domestic Guarantors.
All our obligations under the senior secured credit facility and
the guarantees of our obligations under the senior secured
credit facility by the Domestic Guarantors are secured by
substantially all our assets and the assets of each Domestic
Guarantor, including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, a pledge of 100% of our capital
stock and the capital stock of each direct and indirect domestic
subsidiary owned by us or a Domestic Guarantor (other than
subsidiaries substantially all of whose assets consist of stock
in controlled foreign corporations) and 65% of the capital stock
of each first tier foreign subsidiary owned by us or a Domestic
Guarantor and of each first tier domestic subsidiary owned by us
or a Domestic Guarantor substantially all of whose assets
consist of stock in controlled foreign corporations; and |
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, a security interest in
substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets owned by
us and each Domestic Guarantor. |
101
|
|
|
Certain Covenants and Events of Default |
The senior secured credit facility contains a number of
covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain
exceptions, our ability and the ability of each of our
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
prepay, redeem or repurchase other indebtedness (including the
notes); |
|
|
|
pay dividends and distributions or repurchase capital stock; |
|
|
|
create liens on assets; |
|
|
|
make investments, loans or advances; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
make certain acquisitions; |
|
|
|
engage in mergers or consolidations; |
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
amend certain material agreements governing indebtedness
(including the notes); |
|
|
|
change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
enter into sale and lease-back transactions; and |
|
|
|
enter into swap agreements. |
In addition, the senior secured credit facility requires us to
maintain the following financial covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio; and |
|
|
|
a minimum interest coverage ratio. |
The senior secured credit facility also contains certain
customary affirmative covenants and events of default.
As of February 28, 2006 we were in compliance in all
material respects with all covenants and provisions contained
under our senior secured credit facility.
In connection with this offering, we intend to enter into an
amendment to our senior secured facility to remove certain
restrictions on our ability to consummate the offering and the
use of proceeds as described in Use of Proceeds as
well as to make certain other amendments.
Senior Subordinated Notes
In October 2005, we issued
91/8
% senior subordinated notes that mature on
October 15, 2015 in an aggregate principal amount of
$170.0 million in a private transaction not subject to the
registration requirements under the Securities Act. The net
proceeds from that financing were used to finance the
Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses.
The notes are guaranteed, on a senior subordinated, unsecured
basis, by each of our direct and indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries that were domestic subsidiaries on the issue date.
102
The notes are our general unsecured senior subordinated
obligations that rank junior to our existing and future senior
indebtedness, including obligations under the senior secured
credit facility, equally in right of payment with all of our
future senior subordinated debt and senior in right of payment
to all of our future subordinated debt. They are effectively
subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and
future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets
securing such debt, and are structurally subordinated to all
obligations of our subsidiaries that are not guarantors.
At any time prior to October 15, 2008, we may on any one or
more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal
amount of notes issued under the indenture (including any
additional notes issued after the issue date) at a redemption
price of 109.125% of the principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to, but not
including, the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of
one or more equity offerings (such as this offering); provided
that:
|
|
|
(1) at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of notes
issued under the indenture (excluding notes held by us and our
subsidiaries) remains outstanding immediately after the
occurrence of such redemption; and |
|
|
(2) the redemption occurs within 180 days of the date
of the closing of such equity offering. |
Except pursuant to the preceding paragraph or as otherwise set
forth below, the notes will not be redeemable at our option
prior to October 15, 2010. We are not, however, prohibited
from acquiring the notes by means other than a redemption,
whether pursuant to a tender offer, open market purchase or
otherwise, so long as the acquisition does not violate the terms
of the indenture.
On or after October 15, 2010, we may redeem all or a part
of the notes at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages
of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid
interest and additional interest, if any, on the notes to be
redeemed, to, but not including, the applicable redemption date,
if redeemed during the twelve month period beginning on October
15 of the years indicated below, subject to the rights of
holders on the relevant record date to receive interest on the
relevant interest payment date.
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
2010
|
|
|
104.563% |
|
2011
|
|
|
103.042% |
|
2012
|
|
|
101.521% |
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000% |
|
In addition, at any time prior to October 15, 2010, we may
also redeem all or a part of the notes at a redemption price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of notes to be redeemed,
plus the applicable premium (an amount intended to approximate a
make-whole price based on the price of a
U.S. treasury security plus 50 basis points) as of,
and accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any,
to, but not including, the redemption date, subject to the
rights of holders on the relevant record date to receive
interest due on the relevant interest payment date. Though the
notes may be redeemed prior to October 15, 2010 in this
way, because any make-whole premium would be
prohibitively expensive, we do not expect to make a redemption
pursuant to this provision of the indenture.
In the event of a change of control, which is defined in the
indenture governing the notes, each holder of the notes will
have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part of
such holders notes at a purchase price in cash equal to
101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of purchase.
103
The indenture governing the notes contains certain covenants
that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of
some of our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue certain preferred shares; |
|
|
|
pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of our or any
of our restricted subsidiaries capital stock or make other
restricted payments; |
|
|
|
make certain investments; |
|
|
|
sell certain assets; |
|
|
|
create liens on certain debt without securing the notes; |
|
|
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of our assets; |
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with our affiliates; and |
|
|
|
designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries. |
The indenture governing the notes also provides for events of
default which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require
the principal of and accrued interest on such notes to become or
to be declared to be due and payable.
As of February 28, 2006 we were in compliance in all
material respects with all covenants and provisions contained
under the indenture governing the notes.
We are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to
register the notes under the Securities Act and consummate an
exchange offer no later than August 14, 2006. If this
requirement is not met, then the annual interest on the notes
will increase by (1) 0.25 percentage points for the
first 90 days following the end of such period and
(2) 0.25 percentage points at the beginning of each
subsequent 90 day period, up to a maximum of
1.0 percentage point until all such registration defaults
are cured.
Chart Ferox Credit Facility
Chart Ferox, a.s., our majority-owned subsidiary located in the
Czech Republic, currently maintains a secured revolving credit
facility with borrowing capacity of up to $9.6 million, of
which $4.4 million is available only for letters of credit
and bank guarantees. At December 31, 2005, there was
$0.8 million outstanding under the Ferox revolving credit
facility. Ferox is the only borrower for this revolving credit
facility.
Under the revolving credit facility, Ferox may make borrowings
in Czech Koruna, Euros and U.S. dollars. Borrowings in
Koruna are at PRIBOR, borrowings in Euros are at EURIBOR and
borrowings in U.S. dollars are at LIBOR, each with a fixed
margin of 0.6%. Ferox is not required to pay a commitment fee to
the lenders under the revolving credit facility in respect of
the unutilized commitments thereunder. Ferox must pay letter of
credit and guarantee fees equal to 0.75% on the face amount of
each guarantee.
Feroxs land and buildings secure $4.6 million, and
Feroxs account receivables secure $2.5 million of
this revolving credit facility.
104
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a description of the material terms of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended
and restated bylaws that will be in effect immediately prior to
this offering. We refer you to the form of our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated
bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Authorized Capitalization
Our authorized capital stock consists
of shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
which shares
were issued and outstanding immediately prior to this offering,
and shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which no
shares are currently issued and outstanding. Immediately
following the completion of this offering, we will
have shares
of common stock outstanding. Immediately following completion of
the offering, there will be no shares of preferred stock
outstanding.
Voting Rights. Holders of common stock are entitled to
one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the
stockholders. The holders of common stock do not have cumulative
voting rights in the election of directors.
Dividend Rights. Subject to the rights of the holders of
any preferred stock that may be outstanding, holders of our
common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be
declared by our board of directors out of funds legally
available to pay dividends. Dividends upon our common stock may
be declared by the board of directors at any regular or special
meeting, and may be paid in cash, in property, or in shares of
capital stock. Before payment of any dividend, there may be set
aside out of any of our funds available for dividends, such sums
as the board of directors deems proper as reserves to meet
contingencies, or for equalizing dividends, or for repairing or
maintaining any of our property, or for any proper purpose, and
the board of directors may modify or abolish any such reserve.
The senior secured credit facility and the indenture governing
the notes impose restrictions on our ability to declare
dividends with respect to our common stock.
Liquidation Rights. Upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding up, any business combination or a sale or disposition of
all or substantially all of the assets, the holders of common
stock are entitled to receive ratably the assets available for
distribution to the stockholders after payment of liabilities
and the liquidation preference of any of our outstanding
preferred stock.
Other Matters. The common stock has no preemptive or
conversion rights and is not subject to further calls or
assessment by us. There are no redemption or sinking fund
provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding
shares of our common stock, including the common stock offered
in this offering, are fully paid and non-assessable.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes
our board of directors to establish one or more series of
preferred stock and to determine, with respect to any series of
preferred stock, the terms and rights of that series, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation of the series; |
|
|
|
the number of shares of the series, which our board may, except
where otherwise provided in the preferred stock designation,
increase or decrease, but not below the number of shares then
outstanding; |
|
|
|
whether dividends, if any, will be cumulative or non-cumulative
and the dividend rate of the series; |
|
|
|
the dates at which dividends, if any, will be payable; |
|
|
|
the redemption rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of
the series; |
105
|
|
|
|
|
the terms and amounts of any sinking fund provided for the
purchase or redemption of shares of the series; |
|
|
|
the amounts payable on shares of the series in the event of any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the
affairs of our company, or upon any distribution of assets of
our company; |
|
|
|
whether the shares of the series will be convertible into shares
of any other class or series, or any other security, of our
company or any other corporation, and, if so, the specification
of the other class or series or other security, the conversion
price or prices or rate or rates, any rate adjustments, the date
or dates as of which the shares will be convertible and all
other terms and conditions upon which the conversion may be made; |
|
|
|
restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of
any other class or series; |
|
|
|
the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series; and |
|
|
|
such other rights, powers and preferences with respect to the
series as our board of directors may deem advisable. |
Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Delaware Law
and our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and
Amended and Restated Bylaws
Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, which are
summarized in the following paragraphs, may have an
anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender
offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in
its best interest, including those attempts that might result in
a premium over the market price for the shares held by
stockholders.
|
|
|
Removal of Directors; Vacancies |
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws provide that unless otherwise stated
in the stockholders agreement as more fully described in
Certain Related Party TransactionsStockholders
Agreement, (i) prior to the date on which First
Reserve ceases to own at least 40% of all outstanding shares of
stock, directors may be removed for any reason upon the
affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the voting
power of all then outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, voting together as a
single class and (ii) on and after the date on which First
Reserve ceases to own at least 40% of all the then outstanding
shares of common stock, directors may be removed with or without
cause, at any time by the affirmative vote of holders of at
least 75% of the voting power of all the then outstanding shares
of stock entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, voting together as a single class. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended
and restated bylaws also provide that any vacancies on our board
of directors will be filled by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the remaining directors, although less than a quorum
or by the sole remaining director.
The Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) provides
that stockholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate
votes in the election of directors unless our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not
expressly provide for cumulative voting.
|
|
|
Calling of Special Meetings of Stockholders |
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that special meetings of
our stockholders may be called at any time by the board of
directors or a committee of the board which has been designated
by the board of directors.
106
|
|
|
Stockholder Action by Written Consent |
The DGCL permits stockholder action by written consent unless
otherwise provided by our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation. Our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation precludes stockholder action by written consent
after the date on which First Reserve ceases to hold at least
40% of the then outstanding stock.
|
|
|
Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and
Director Nominations |
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that stockholders
seeking to nominate candidates for election as directors or to
bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders must
provide timely notice of their proposal in writing to the
corporate secretary.
Generally, to be timely, a stockholders notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than 90
calendar days nor more than 120 calendar days prior to the first
anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our proxy
materials for the preceding years annual meeting or at
such other time as specified in our amended and restated bylaws.
Our amended and restated bylaws also specify requirements as to
the form and content of a stockholders notice. These
provisions may impede stockholders ability to bring
matters before an annual meeting of stockholders or make
nominations for directors at an annual meeting of stockholders.
The DGCL provides generally that the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote is required
to amend a corporations certificate of incorporation or
bylaws, unless the certificate of incorporation requires a
greater percentage. Our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that the following provisions in our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended
and restated bylaws may only be amended, altered, repealed or
rescinded by a vote of at least 75% of the voting power of all
of the outstanding shares of our stock entitled to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
the removal of directors; |
|
|
|
the limitation of stockholder action by written consent; |
|
|
|
the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders being
vested solely in our board of directors and any committee of the
board of directors which has been designated by our board of
directors; |
|
|
|
the advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
director nominations; and |
|
|
|
the amendment provision requiring that the above provisions be
amended only with a 75% supermajority vote. |
In addition, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation grants our board of directors the authority to
amend or repeal our amended and restated bylaws without a
stockholder vote in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of
the State of Delaware or our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation.
|
|
|
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Officers
and Directors |
The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the
personal liability of directors to corporations and their
stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of
directors fiduciary duties. Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation includes a provision that
eliminates the personal liability of directors for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except:
|
|
|
|
|
for breach of duty of loyalty; |
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional
misconduct or knowing violation of law; |
|
|
|
under Section 174 of the DGCL (unlawful dividends); or |
|
|
|
for transactions from which the director derived improper
personal benefit. |
107
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws provide that we must indemnify our
directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the
DGCL. We are also expressly authorized to, and do, carry
directors and officers insurance providing coverage
for our directors, officers and certain employees for some
liabilities. We believe that these indemnification provisions
and insurance are useful to attract and retain qualified
directors and executive officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from
bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their
fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of
reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against
directors and officers, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. In
addition, your investment may be adversely affected to the
extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against
directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification
provisions.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors and officers providing for additional indemnification
protection beyond that provided by the directors and
officers liability insurance policy. In the
indemnification agreements, we have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions, to indemnify and hold harmless the director or
officer to the maximum extent then authorized or permitted by
the provisions of the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, the DGCL, or by any amendment(s) thereto.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which
indemnification is sought.
|
|
|
Delaware Anti-takeover Statute |
We have opted out of Section 203 of the DGCL. Subject to
specified exceptions, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business
combination with an interested stockholder for
a period of three years after the date of the transaction in
which the person became an interested stockholder.
Business combinations include mergers, asset sales
and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the
interested stockholder. Subject to various
exceptions, an interested stockholder is a person
who together with his or her affiliates and associates, owns, or
within three years did own, 15% or more of the
corporations outstanding voting stock. These restrictions
generally prohibit or delay the accomplishment of mergers or
other takeover or
change-in-control
attempts.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
National City Bank is the transfer agent and registrar for our
common stock.
Listing
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol GTL.
Authorized but Unissued Capital Stock
The DGCL does not require stockholder approval for any issuance
of authorized shares. However, the listing requirements of the
New York Stock Exchange, which would apply so long as our common
stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, require
stockholder approval of certain issuances equal to or exceeding
20% of the then outstanding voting power or then outstanding
number of shares of common stock, as well as for certain
issuances of stock in compensatory transactions. These
additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate
purposes, including future public offerings, to raise additional
capital or to facilitate acquisitions. One of the effects of the
existence of unissued and unreserved common stock may be to
enable our board of directors to issue shares to persons
friendly to current management, which issuance could render more
difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of our
company by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or
otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of our management
and possibly deprive the stockholders of opportunities to sell
their shares of common stock at prices higher than prevailing
market prices.
108
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has not been any public market for
our common stock, and we cannot predict what effect, if any,
market sales of shares of common stock or the availability of
shares of common stock for sale will have on the market price of
our common stock. Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts of
common stock in the public market, or the perception that such
sales could occur, could materially and adversely affect the
market price of our common stock and could impair our future
ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity or
equity-related securities at a time and price that we deem
appropriate.
Upon the closing of this offering, we will have outstanding an
aggregate of
approximately million
shares of common stock, including an
additional shares,
adjusted for the elimination of any fractional shares, that will
be issued upon the exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option or otherwise dividended to our existing
stockholders. Of the outstanding shares, the shares sold in this
offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act, except that any shares
held by our affiliates, as that term is defined
under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, may be sold only in
compliance with the limitations described below. The remaining
outstanding shares of common stock will be deemed
restricted securities as that term is defined under
Rule 144. Restricted securities may be sold in the public
market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption
from registration under Rule 144 or 144(k) under the
Securities Act, which are summarized below.
Under our stockholders agreement and management
stockholders agreements, we may be required to register
the sale of our shares held by First Reserve and certain
management stockholders. First Reserve and certain management
stockholders will have the ability to exercise certain
registration rights in connection with registered offerings
initiated by us or requested by First Reserve. Immediately after
this offering, First Reserve and management will
own shares
and shares,
respectively, entitled to these registration rights. See
Certain Related Party Transactions.
Rule 144
Subject to the lock-up
agreements described below and the volume limitations and other
conditions under Rule 144, additional shares of our common
stock will be available for sale in the public market pursuant
to exemptions from registration requirements as follows:
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
After days from the date of this
prospectus (subject to volume limitations and other conditions
under Rule 144 and to the lock-up agreements described
below) |
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
(or persons whose shares are required to be aggregated),
including an affiliate, who has beneficially owned shares of our
common stock for at least one year is entitled to sell in any
three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the
greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock; and |
|
|
|
the average weekly reported volume of trading in the common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange during the four calendar
weeks preceding the date on which notice of sale is filed,
subject to restrictions. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale
provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of
current public information about us.
Rule 144(k)
In addition, a person who is not deemed to have been an
affiliate of ours at any time during the 90 days preceding
a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be
sold for at least two years, would be entitled to sell those
shares under Rule 144(k) without regard to the manner of
sale, public information, volume limitation or notice
requirements of Rule 144. To the extent that our affiliates
sell their shares, other
109
than pursuant to Rule 144 or a registration statement, the
purchasers holding period for the purpose of effecting a
sale under Rule 144 commences on the date of transfer from
the affiliate.
Lock-Up Agreements
In connection with this offering, we, our executive offices,
directors and existing stockholders have agreed with the
underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell,
dispose of or hedge any of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock,
during the period ending 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, except with the prior written consent of Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Inc. and UBS
Securities LLC. See Underwriting.
110
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME AND
ESTATE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
NON-U.S. HOLDERS
The following is a summary of certain United States federal
income and estate tax consequences of the purchase, ownership
and disposition of our common stock as of the date hereof.
Except where noted, this summary deals only with common stock
that is held as a capital asset by a
non-U.S. holder.
A
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock (other than an
entity that is treated as a partnership for United States
federal income tax purposes) that is not for United States
federal income tax purposes any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation (or any other entity treated as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or
the District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a
United States person. |
This summary is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and
regulations, rulings and judicial decisions as of the date
hereof. Those authorities may be changed, perhaps retroactively,
so as to result in United States federal income and estate tax
consequences different from those summarized below. This summary
does not address all aspects of United States federal income and
estate taxes and does not deal with foreign, state, local or
other tax considerations that may be relevant to
non-U.S. holders
in light of their personal circumstances. In addition, it does
not represent a detailed description of the United States
federal income and estate tax consequences applicable to you if
you are subject to special treatment under the United States
federal income tax laws (including if you are a United States
expatriate, controlled foreign corporation,
passive foreign investment company or a partnership
or other pass-through entity for United States federal income
tax purposes). We cannot assure you that a change in law will
not alter significantly the tax considerations that we describe
in this summary.
If a partnership holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a
partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your
tax advisors.
If you are considering the purchase of our common stock, you
should consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular
United States federal income and estate tax consequences to you
of the ownership of the common stock, as well as the
consequences to you arising under the laws of any other taxing
jurisdiction.
Dividends
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder of
our common stock generally will be subject to withholding of
United States federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower
rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
However, dividends that are effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and, where a tax treaty applies, are
attributable to a United States permanent establishment (or, for
an individual, a fixed base) of the non-U.S. holder) are
not subject to the withholding tax, provided certain
certification and disclosure requirements are satisfied.
Instead, such dividends are generally subject to United States
federal income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as
if the
non-U.S. holder
were a United States person as defined under the Code, unless an
applicable income tax treaty provides otherwise. Any such
effectively connected dividends received by a foreign
corporation may be subject to an additional branch profits
tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty.
111
A non-U.S. holder
of our common stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an
applicable treaty rate and avoid backup withholding, as
discussed below, for dividends will be required (a) to
complete Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN (or other
applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury that such
holder is not a United States person as defined under the Code
and is eligible for treaty benefits or (b) if our common
stock is held through certain foreign intermediaries, to satisfy
the relevant certification requirements of applicable United
States Treasury regulations. Special certification and other
requirements apply to certain
non-U.S. holders
that are pass-through entities rather than corporations or
individuals.
A non-U.S. holder
of our common stock eligible for a reduced rate of United States
withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a
refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate
claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock
Any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock
generally will not be subject to United States federal income or
withholding tax unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of
the non-U.S.
holder in the United States (and, if required by an applicable
income tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent
establishment (or, for an individual, a fixed base) of the
non-U.S. holder); |
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder is
an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition,
and certain other conditions are met; or |
|
|
|
we are or have been a United States real property holding
corporation for United States federal income tax purposes
at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on
the date of disposition and the
non-U.S. holders
holding period for our common stock. |
An individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the first bullet point immediately above will be
subject to tax on the net gain derived from the sale under
regular graduated United States federal income tax rates. An
individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet point immediately above will be
subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale,
which may be offset by United States source capital losses, even
though the individual is not considered a resident of the United
States. If a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point
immediately above, it will be subject to tax on its net gain in
the same manner as if it were a United States person as defined
under the Code and, in addition, may be subject to the branch
profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings
and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty.
We believe we are not and do not anticipate becoming a
United States real property holding corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes.
Federal Estate Tax
Common stock held by an individual
non-U.S. holder at
the time of death will be included in such holders gross
estate for United States federal estate tax purposes, unless an
applicable estate tax or other treaty provides otherwise.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to
each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld
with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether
withholding was required. Copies of the information returns
reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.
A non-U.S. holder
will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to such
holder unless such holder certifies under penalty of perjury
that it is a
non-U.S. holder
(and the payor does not have actual
112
knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a United States
person as defined under the Code), or such holder otherwise
establishes an exemption.
Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances,
backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of our
common stock within the United States or conducted through
certain United States-related financial intermediaries, unless
the beneficial owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it
is a
non-U.S. holder
(and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that the beneficial owner is a United States person as defined
under the Code), or such owner otherwise establishes an
exemption.
113
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, each
of the underwriters named below have severally agreed to
purchase, and we have agreed to sell to them, severally, the
number of shares indicated in the table below. Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Inc. and
UBS Securities LLC are acting as book-running managers and as
representatives of the underwriters named below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are offering the common stock subject to their
acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior sale. The
underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the
common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to the
approval of certain legal matters by their counsel and to
certain other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to take
and pay for all of the common stock offered by this prospectus
if any such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not
required to take or pay for the shares covered by the
underwriters over-allotment option described below.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares
of common stock directly to the public at the public offering
price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to
certain dealers at a price that represents a concession not in
excess of
$ a
share under the public offering price. Any underwriter may
allow, and such dealer may reallow, a concession not in excess
of
$ a
share to other underwriters or to certain dealers. After the
initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering
price and other selling terms may from time to time be varied by
the representatives.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
an aggregate
of additional
shares of common stock at the public offering price listed on
the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts
and commissions. The underwriters may exercise this option
solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made
in connection with the offering of the shares of common stock
offered by this prospectus. To the extent the option is
exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to
specified conditions, to purchase approximately the same
percentage of additional shares of common stock as the number
listed next to the underwriters name in the preceding
table bears to the total number of shares of common stock listed
next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table. If
the underwriters option is exercised in full, the total
price to the public would be
$ ,
the total underwriters discounts and commissions would be
$ ,
and total proceeds to us would be
$ .
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by us.
Such amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full
exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by Chart Industries, Inc. |
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expenses of this offering payable by us, not including the
underwriting discounts and commissions, are estimated at
$ million.
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales
to accounts over which any such underwriter exercises
discretionary authority to exceed five percent of the total
number of shares of common stock offered by them.
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol GTL.
114
We, our executive officers, directors and existing stockholders
have agreed that, without the prior written consent of Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Inc. and
UBS Securities LLC on behalf of the underwriters, none of us
will, during the period ending 180 days after the date of
this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend, or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock or file any
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (other
than a registration statement on
Form S-8) with
respect to the foregoing; or |
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of the common stock; |
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or
otherwise.
The restrictions described in the previous paragraph do not
apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares to the underwriters pursuant to the
underwriting agreement; |
|
|
|
the issuance by us of shares of common stock upon the exercise
of an option or a warrant or the conversion of a security
outstanding on the date of this prospectus of which the
underwriters have been advised in writing; |
|
|
|
grants, issuances, or exercises under our existing employee
benefits plans; |
|
|
|
the issuance of common stock in connection with the acquisition
of, or joint venture with, another company, provided that the
recipient agrees to be bound by the restrictions described in
the previous paragraph; |
|
|
|
transactions by any person other than us relating to shares of
common stock or other securities acquired in open market
transactions after the completion of the offering of the shares; |
|
|
|
transfers by any person other than us of shares of common stock
or any security convertible, exchangeable for or exercisable
into common stock as a bona fide gift or gifts as a result of
operation of law or testate or in testate succession, provided
that such transferee agrees to be bound by the restrictions
described in the previous paragraph; |
|
|
|
transfers by any person other than us to a trust, partnership,
limited liability company or other entity, all of the beneficial
interests of which are held, directly, or indirectly by such
person, provided that such transferee agrees to be bound by the
restrictions described in the previous paragraph; or |
|
|
|
distributions by any person other than us of shares of common
stock or any security convertible, exchangeable for or
exercisable into common stock to limited partners or
stockholders of such person, provided that such distributee
agrees to be bound by the restrictions described in the previous
paragraph. |
At our request, the underwriters will reserve for sale, at the
initial public offering price, up
to shares
offered in this prospectus for our directors, officers,
employees, business associates and related persons. The number
of shares of common stock available for sale to the general
public will be reduced to the extent such persons purchase such
reserved shares. Any reserved shares which are not so purchased
will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the
same basis as the other shares offered in this prospectus.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
common stock. The initial public offering price was negotiated
between us and the representatives of the underwriters. The
factors considered in determining the initial public offering
price of the shares, in addition to prevailing market
conditions, will be our historical performance, our business
prospects, an assessment of our management and the consideration
of the above factors in relation to market valuation of
companies in related businesses, and the price-earnings ratios,
market prices of securities and other quantitative and
qualitative data relating to such businesses. The
115
estimated initial public offering price range set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus is subject to change as a result
of market conditions and other factors.
In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the
underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain
or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically,
the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to
purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short
position. A short sale is covered if the short
position is no greater than the number of shares available for
purchase by the underwriters under the over-allotment option.
The underwriters can close out a covered short sale by
exercising the over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the
open market. In determining the source of shares to close out a
covered short sale, the underwriters will consider, among other
things, the open market price of shares compared to the price
available under the over-allotment option. The underwriters may
also sell shares in excess of the over-allotment option,
creating a naked short position. The underwriters
must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in
the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be
created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be
downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering. As an additional means of facilitating
the offering, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, common
stock in the open market to stabilize the price of the common
stock. The underwriting syndicate may also reclaim selling
concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for
distributing common stock in the offering, if the syndicate
repurchases previously distributed common stock to cover
syndicate short positions, or to stabilize the price of the
common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market
price of the common stock above independent market levels or
prevent or retard a decline in the market price of our common
stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these
activities and may end any of these activities at any time.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased shares of common stock sold by
or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short
covering transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing transactions
may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the
market price of our stock, and together with the imposition of
the penalty bid, may stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
market price of the common stock. As a result, the price of the
common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might
exist in the open market. If these activities are commenced,
they may be discontinued at any time. These transactions may be
effected on the New York Stock Exchange, in the
over-the-counter market
or otherwise.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available by one
or more of the underwriters. The representatives may agree to
allocate a number of shares to underwriters for sale to their
online brokerage account holders. The representatives will
allocate shares to underwriters that may make Internet
distributions on the same basis as other allocations. In
addition, shares may be sold by the underwriters to securities
dealers who resell shares to online brokerage account holders.
From time to time, some of the underwriters and their affiliates
have provided, and may continue to provide, investment banking,
commercial banking and capital raising services to us and our
affiliates for fees and commissions that we believe are
customary. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. acts as joint
lead arranger, joint book manager and syndication agent and is a
lender under our senior secured credit facility. UBS Securities
LLC acted as our financial advisor in connection with the
Acquisition.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
116
VALIDITY OF THE SHARES
The validity of the issuance of the shares of common stock to be
sold in this offering will be passed upon for us by Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, New York.
Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, New York will act as
counsel to the underwriters. Shearman &
Sterling LLP represents First Reserve on other matters.
EXPERTS
The accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Chart
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005
and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows for the period from
October 17, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the period
from January 1, 2005 through October 16, 2005, the
year ended December 31, 2004, the three months ended
December 31, 2003, and the nine months ended
September 30, 2003, appearing in this prospectus have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon,
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) a registration statement on
Form S-1 under the
Securities Act with respect to the issuance of shares of our
common stock being offered hereby. This prospectus, which forms
a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of
the information set forth in the registration statement and
exhibits and schedules. For further information with respect to
us and the shares of our common stock, reference is made to the
registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus
as to the contents of any contract or other document are not
necessarily complete. We are not currently subject to the
informational requirements of the Exchange Act. After the
offering of the shares of our common stock, we will be subject
to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in
accordance therewith, will file reports and other information
with the SEC. The registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement, such reports and other
information can be inspected and copied at the Public Reference
Room of the SEC located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C.
20549. Copies of such materials, including copies of all or any
portion of the registration statement, can be obtained from the
Public Reference Room of the SEC at prescribed rates. You can
call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 to
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room. Such materials may also be accessed electronically by
means of the SECs home page on the Internet
(http://www.sec.gov).
117
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-2 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
F-3 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Period from
October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005, the Period from
January 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005, the Year Ended
December 31, 2004, the Three Months Ended December 31,
2003 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
|
|
F-4 |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
F-5 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Period from
October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005, the Period from
January 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005, the Year Ended
December 31, 2004, the Three Months Ended December 31,
2003 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
|
|
F-8 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-9 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholder and Board of Directors of Chart Industries,
Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Chart Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the
period from October 17, 2005 through December 31,
2005, the period from January 1, 2005 through
October 16, 2005, the year ended December 31, 2004,
the three months ended December 31, 2003, and the nine
months ended September 30, 2003. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Chart Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for the period from October 17, 2005 through
December 31, 2005, the period from January 1, 2005
through October 16, 2005, the year ended December 31,
2004, the three months ended December 31, 2003, and the
nine months ended September 30, 2003, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As more fully described in Note A to the consolidated
financial statements, effective September 15, 2003, the
Company emerged from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. In accordance
with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position No. 90-7, Financial Reporting by
Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code, the
Company has adopted Fresh Start reporting whereby
its assets, liabilities and new capital structure have been
adjusted to reflect estimated fair values as of
September 30, 2003. As a result, the consolidated financial
statements for periods from September 30, 2003 through
October 16, 2005 reflect this basis of reporting and are
not comparable to the Companys pre-reorganization
consolidated financial statements.
As more fully described in Note J to the consolidated
financial statements, on October 17, 2005, the Company
changed its method of accounting for stock based compensation by
adopting the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share
Based Payments.
Cleveland, Ohio
April 11, 2006
F-2
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
15,433 |
|
|
$ |
14,814 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
62,463 |
|
|
|
45,744 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
53,132 |
|
|
|
47,777 |
|
|
Unbilled contract revenue
|
|
|
23,813 |
|
|
|
10,528 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
12,102 |
|
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
173,064 |
|
|
|
139,389 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
64,265 |
|
|
|
41,993 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
236,742 |
|
|
|
75,110 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net
|
|
|
154,063 |
|
|
|
48,472 |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
13,672 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
641,806 |
|
|
$ |
307,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
34,435 |
|
|
$ |
26,789 |
|
|
Customer advances and billings in excess of contract revenue
|
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
|
15,181 |
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
16,148 |
|
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
17,606 |
|
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
3,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
104,481 |
|
|
|
76,288 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
76,406 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
56,038 |
|
|
|
12,939 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
19,957 |
|
|
|
25,807 |
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of Successor and Reorganized Company, par value
$.01 per share 9,500,000 shares
authorized, 1,718,896 and 5,358,183 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
117,367 |
|
|
|
90,652 |
|
|
|
Retained (deficit) earnings
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
22,631 |
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,330 |
|
|
|
115,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
641,806 |
|
|
$ |
307,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial
statements, including Note A Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
describing the Successor Company, Reorganized Company and
Predecessor Company. The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
Year | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Sales
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
75,733 |
|
|
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
|
211,770 |
|
|
|
52,509 |
|
|
|
|
141,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
|
|
88,213 |
|
|
|
93,806 |
|
|
|
16,061 |
|
|
|
|
55,777 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
16,632 |
|
|
|
|
59,826 |
|
|
|
53,374 |
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
|
44,211 |
|
Transaction expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
|
882 |
|
Loss on insolvent subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
Equity expense in joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,771 |
|
|
|
|
67,485 |
|
|
|
56,594 |
|
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
|
58,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
20,728 |
|
|
|
37,212 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
(2,998 |
) |
Other income (expense)
(Loss) gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(5,565 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,192 |
) |
|
|
(4,760 |
) |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
|
(9,911 |
) |
|
Financing costs amortization
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
Derivative contracts valuation income (expense)
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
Reorganization items, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,043 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,692 |
) |
|
|
(4,380 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
|
16,036 |
|
|
|
32,832 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,808 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
|
9,420 |
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before minority interest
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
(7,855 |
) |
Minority interest, net of taxes
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
(7,918 |
) |
Income from discontinued operation, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial
statements, including Note A Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
describing the Successor Company, Reorganized Company and
Predecessor Company. The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
(Dollars and shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Retained | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Paid-In | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
(Loss) Income | |
|
Stock | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2003, Predecessor Company
|
|
|
25,554 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
45,792 |
|
|
$ |
(116,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,799 |
) |
|
$ |
(781 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,617 |
) |
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,085 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
Contribution of stock to employee benefit plans
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
Issuance of warrants to lenders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
Treasury stock acquisitions
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2003, Predecessor Company
|
|
|
26,266 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
46,550 |
|
|
$ |
(123,180 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,267 |
) |
|
$ |
(886 |
) |
|
$ |
(80,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial
statements, including Note A Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
describing the Successor Company, Reorganized Company and
Predecessor Company. The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
(Dollars and shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Retained | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Paid-In | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Treasury |
|
Equity | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
(Loss) Income | |
|
Stock |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Balance at September 30, 2003, (Date of
Reorganization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Issuance of new common shares
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
89,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,865 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003, Reorganized Company
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
89,812 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,807 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,992 |
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004, Reorganized Company
|
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
90,652 |
|
|
|
22,631 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,640 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
Stock option pay-out adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,628 |
) |
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 16, 2005, Reorganized Company
|
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
89,715 |
|
|
$ |
31,489 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
121,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial
statements, including Note A Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
describing the Successor Company, Reorganized Company and
Predecessor Company. The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER EQUITY
(Dollars and shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Shareholder | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
(Deficit) | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at October 17, 2005 (Date of Acquisition)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Equity contributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash investment
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
111,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,298 |
|
|
|
Rollover of Reorganized Company vested stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
Compensation expense recognized for employee stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005, Successor Company
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
117,367 |
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
$ |
(548 |
) |
|
$ |
116,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial
statements, including Note A Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
describing the Successor Company, Reorganized Company and
Predecessor Company. The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
October 17, | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(506 |
) |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
22,600 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,085 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
Inventory purchase accounting charge
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,677 |
) |
|
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on insolvent subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
Financing costs amortization
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
Employee stock and stock option related compensation expense
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
9,509 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt restructuring-related fees expensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,753 |
) |
|
Purchased in-process research and development charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
|
7,607 |
|
|
Equity loss (income) from joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Contribution of stock to employee benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(8,267 |
) |
|
|
|
(8,611 |
) |
|
|
(4,661 |
) |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
(6,463 |
) |
|
|
(11,566 |
) |
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
Unbilled contract revenues and other current assets
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
|
(11,039 |
) |
|
|
2,903 |
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
|
|
6,424 |
|
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer advances and billings in excess of contract revenue
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
|
8,150 |
|
|
|
6,631 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
(3,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
18,742 |
|
|
|
|
15,641 |
|
|
|
35,059 |
|
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
|
19,466 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5,601 |
) |
|
|
|
(11,038 |
) |
|
|
(9,379 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,907 |
) |
|
Dividends received from joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,075 |
|
|
Acquisition of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to Reorganized Company shareholders for Transaction
|
|
|
(356,649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Investing Activities
|
|
|
(362,250 |
) |
|
|
|
(20,799 |
) |
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
|
20,359 |
|
|
Payments on revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
|
(15,916 |
) |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
(6,775 |
) |
|
|
|
(21,614 |
) |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(81,457 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,968 |
) |
|
|
(33,148 |
) |
|
|
(10,840 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
Proceeds from equity contribution
|
|
|
111,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of financing costs
|
|
|
(11,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of exercised stock options
|
|
|
(15,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Acquisition costs
|
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt restructuring-related fees paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,583 |
) |
|
Payments on interest rate collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities
|
|
|
348,489 |
|
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
(35,744 |
) |
|
|
(13,976 |
) |
|
|
|
(15,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow provided by (used in) continuing operations
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
(4,002 |
) |
|
|
(8,834 |
) |
|
|
|
18,660 |
|
Cash flow provided by discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
(4,002 |
) |
|
|
(8,834 |
) |
|
|
|
20,252 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
11,470 |
|
|
|
|
14,814 |
|
|
|
18,600 |
|
|
|
27,815 |
|
|
|
|
7,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
15,433 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,470 |
|
|
$ |
14,814 |
|
|
$ |
18,600 |
|
|
|
$ |
27,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial
statements, including Note A Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
describing the Successor Company, Reorganized Company and
Predecessor Company. The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE A Nature of Operations and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations: Chart Industries, Inc. (the
Company), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
First Reserve Fund X, L.P. (First Reserve), is
a leading global supplier of standard and custom-engineered
products and systems serving a wide variety of low-temperature
and cryogenic applications. The Company has developed an
expertise in cryogenic systems and equipment, which operate at
low temperatures sometimes approaching absolute zero. The
majority of the Companys products, including
vacuum-insulated containment vessels, heat exchangers, cold
boxes and other cryogenic components, are used throughout the
liquid-gas supply chain for the purification, liquefaction,
distribution, storage and use of industrial gases and
hydrocarbons. The Company has domestic operations located in
seven states, including the Corporate Office in Garfield
Heights, Ohio, and an international presence in Australia,
China, the Czech Republic, Germany and the United Kingdom.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in affiliates where the
Companys ownership is between 20 percent and
50 percent, or where the Company does not have control but
has the ability to exercise significant influence over
operations or financial policy, are accounted for under the
equity method. The Companys Chart Heat Exchangers Limited
(CHEL) subsidiary, the equity of which was
100 percent owned by the Company, filed for a voluntary
administration under the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986 on
March 28, 2003, as more fully described in Note F to
the consolidated financial statements. Since CHEL is not under
the control of the Company subsequent to March 28, 2003,
the consolidated financial statements do not include the
accounts or results of CHEL subsequent to this date.
Basis of Presentation: On August 2, 2005, the
Company, certain stockholders of the Company (the
Principal Stockholders), First Reserve Fund X,
L.P. (Buyer) and CI Acquisition, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Buyer (CI Acquisition), entered
into an agreement and plan of merger (Merger
Agreement). The Merger Agreement provided for the sale of
shares of common stock of the Company owned by the Principal
Stockholders (Principal Stockholders Shares) to CI
Acquisition, which is referred to as the Stock
Purchase, and the merger of CI Acquisition with and into
the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a
wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Buyer, which is referred to
as the Merger. The Stock Purchase and Merger are
collectively referred to as the Acquisition.
Upon satisfaction of the conditions to the Stock Purchase, CI
Acquisition agreed to purchase the Principal Stockholders Shares
for a purchase price (the Per Share Purchase Price)
equal to $65.74 per share in cash, minus the result of
(i) the expenses of the Company related to the Acquisition
(as provided in the Merger Agreement) divided by (ii) the
number of fully-diluted shares of Company common stock
outstanding immediately before the closing (assuming full
exercise of all Company stock options and warrants). The Merger
Agreement provided for the occurrence of the Merger after the
closing of the Stock Purchase, and provided that at the
effective time of the Merger each share of Company common stock
outstanding (other than treasury stock, shares held by Buyer or
CI Acquisition, and shares with respect to which appraisal
rights have been exercised under Delaware law) will be converted
into the right to receive the Per Share Purchase Price (or the
price paid in the Stock Purchase, if greater) in cash, without
interest (the Merger Consideration). Furthermore,
the Merger Agreement provided that the holders of outstanding
warrants and stock options to acquire shares of common stock of
the Company (other than any stock options adjusted to represent
options to acquire stock of the surviving corporation in the
Merger) will be entitled to receive an amount in cash equal to
the product of (i) the number of shares of common stock of
the Company issuable upon the exercise of the surrendered
warrant or option, as applicable, as of immediately prior to the
effective time of the Merger multiplied by (ii) the excess
of the Merger consideration over the per share exercise price of
the warrant or option, subject to applicable withholding taxes.
The Merger Agreement further
F-9
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
provided that after the Merger, no holders of common stock,
warrants or options (other than any stock options adjusted to
represent options to acquire stock of the surviving corporation
in the Merger) outstanding before the Merger will have any
rights in respect of such common stock, warrants or options,
other than the right to receive the cash referred to above. A
more complete description of the Acquisition and the terms of
the Merger Agreement are set forth above in this Prospectus
under the caption Transaction.
On October 17, 2005, the closing of the Acquisition (the
Closing Date) took place under the terms of the
Merger Agreement as described above in this Prospectus under the
caption Transaction. The Stock Purchase was made by
CI Acquisition for a Per Share Purchase Price of $64.75 per
share of common stock ($65.74 per share, less the
Companys transaction expenses of $0.99 per share) and
immediately following the Stock Purchase, the Merger occurred.
At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of
the Companys common stock (other than treasury stock,
shares held by Buyer or CI Acquisition, and shares as to which
appraisal rights were exercised under Delaware law) was
converted into the right to receive $64.75 per share and CI
Acquisition merged with and into Chart Industries, Inc. (which
is referred to after the merger as the Successor
Company). In the Merger, outstanding warrants and stock
options to acquire common stock of the Company (other than any
stock options adjusted to represent options to acquire the stock
of the surviving corporation in the Merger) were likewise
cancelled and treated in accordance with the terms of the Merger
Agreement. Certain stock options outstanding immediately before
the Merger were not cancelled and were adjusted under the terms
of the Merger Agreement to represent options to acquire the
Companys common stock after the Merger. The purchase price
related to the Acquisition was $456,662 and included $356,649 of
cash paid for common stock and warrants outstanding, $15,756 of
cash paid for Reorganized Company stock options, repayment of
$76,458 of existing pre-Transaction credit facility and certain
other debt, $1,852 of First Reserves acquisition expenses
and vested Rollover Reorganized Company stock options valued at
$5,947 to acquire stock of the Successor Company.
The table below summarizes the preliminary fair value assigned
to the Successor Companys assets and liabilities within
the balance sheet as of October 17, 2005 as a result of the
Acquisition, in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
20,861 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
54,594 |
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
65,005 |
|
Unbilled contract revenue
|
|
|
22,667 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,396 |
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
180,051 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
61,189 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
236,823 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
157,162 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
648,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
31,469 |
|
Customer advances and billings in excess of contract revenue
|
|
|
23,546 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
|
|
|
16,069 |
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
25,620 |
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
104,629 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
56,978 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
18,392 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Shareholder equity
|
|
$ |
117,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholder Equity
|
|
$ |
648,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
for the period from January 1 to October 16, 2005 for the
Reorganized Company are presented as the 2005 Reorganized
Period and for the period from October 17 to
December 31, 2005 for the Successor Company are presented
as the 2005 Successor Period.
On July 8, 2003, the Company and all of its then
majority-owned U.S. subsidiaries (the Predecessor
Company) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization
relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to
implement an agreed upon senior debt restructuring plan through
a pre-packaged plan of reorganization. On September 15,
2003, the Company (as reorganized, the Reorganized
Company) and all of its then majority-owned
U.S. subsidiaries emerged from Chapter 11 proceedings
pursuant to the Amended Joint Prepackaged Reorganization Plan of
Chart Industries, Inc. and Certain Subsidiaries, dated
September 3, 2003 (the Reorganization Plan).
The Companys emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy
proceedings resulted in a new reporting entity and the adoption
of fresh-start accounting in accordance with the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
Statement of
Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7)
(Fresh-Start accounting). The Company used
September 30, 2003 as the date for adopting Fresh-Start
accounting in order to coincide with the Companys normal
financial closing for the month of September 2003. Upon adoption
of Fresh-Start accounting, a new reporting entity was deemed to
be created and the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities
were adjusted to reflect their estimated fair values.
Accordingly, the reported historical financial statements of the
Company prior to the adoption of Fresh-Start accounting for
periods ended prior to September 30, 2003 are not
necessarily comparable to those of the Reorganized Company.
In this prospectus, references to the Companys nine month
period ended September 30, 2003 and all periods ended prior
to September 30, 2003 refer to the Predecessor Company.
SOP 90-7 requires
that financial statements for the period following the
Chapter 11 filing through the bankruptcy confirmation date
distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated
with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the
business. Accordingly, revenues, expenses, realized gains and
losses and provisions for losses directly associated with the
reorganization and restructuring of the business, including
adjustments to fair value assets and liabilities and the gain on
the discharge of pre-petition debt, are reported separately as
reorganization items, net, in the other income (expense) section
of the Predecessor Companys consolidated statement of
operations. In accordance with Fresh-Start accounting, all
assets and liabilities were recorded at their respective fair
values as of September 30, 2003. Such fair values
F-11
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
represented the Companys best estimates based on
independent appraisals and valuations. In applying Fresh-Start
accounting, adjustments to reflect the fair value of assets and
liabilities, on a net basis, and the restructuring of the
Companys capital structure and resulting discharge of the
senior lenders pre-petition debt, resulted in net other
income of $5,677 in the nine months ended September 30,
2003. The reorganization value exceeded the fair value of the
Reorganized Companys assets and liabilities, and this
excess is reported as goodwill in the Reorganized Companys
consolidated balance sheet.
Changes to Significant Accounting Policies: As part of
the provisions of
SOP 90-7, the
Reorganized Company was required to adopt on September 30,
2003 all accounting guidance that was going to be effective
within the twelve-month period following September 30,
2003. Additionally, Fresh-Start accounting required the
selection of appropriate accounting policies for the Reorganized
Company. The significant accounting policies previously used by
the Predecessor Company were generally continued to be used by
the Reorganized Company. As of September 30, 2003, the
Company changed its method of accounting for inventories at
sites of the Companys former Chart Heat Exchangers Limited
Partnership legal entity and former Process Systems, Inc. legal
entity from the
last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method to the
first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method since the value of inventory on the
LIFO method was approximately equal to the value on a FIFO basis.
All accounting policies of the Successor Company have generally
remained the same as the Reorganized Company, except for the
early adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) Share-Based
Payment on October 17, 2005 in conjunction with the
Acquisition. SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation and supersedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123(R) requires
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial
statements based on their fair values and eliminates the pro
forma disclosure option allowed under SFAS 123.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all
investments with an initial maturity of three months or less
when purchased to be cash equivalents. The December 31,
2005 and 2004 balances include money market investments and cash.
Concentrations of Credit Risks: The Company sells its
products to gas producers, distributors and end-users across the
industrial gas, hydrocarbon and chemical processing industries
in countries all over the world. Approximately 51 percent,
52 percent and 49 percent of sales were to foreign
countries in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. While no single
customer exceeded ten percent of consolidated sales in 2005,
2004 or 2003, sales to the Companys top ten customers
accounted for 39 percent, 45 percent and
43 percent of consolidated sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Companys sales to particular customers
fluctuate from period to period, but the gas producer and
distributor customers of the Company tend to be a consistently
large source of revenue for the Company. To minimize credit risk
from trade receivables, the Company reviews the financial
condition of potential customers in relation to established
credit requirements before sales credit is extended and monitors
the financial condition of customers to help ensure timely
collections and to minimize losses. Additionally, for certain
domestic and foreign customers, particularly in the Energy and
Chemicals segment, the Company requires advance payments,
letters of credit and other such guarantees of payment. Certain
customers also require the Company to issue letters of credit or
performance bonds, particularly in instances where advance
payments are involved, as a condition of placing the order.
The Company is also subject to concentrations of credit risk
with respect to its cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities, interest rate collar agreements and forward foreign
currency exchange contracts. To minimize credit risk from these
financial instruments, the Company enters into these
arrangements with major banks and other high credit quality
financial institutions and invests only in high-quality
instruments. The Company does not expect any counterparties to
fail to meet their obligations in this area.
F-12
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: The Company evaluates
the collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination
of factors. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a
specific customers inability to meet its financial
obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filings, or substantial
downgrading of credit scores), a specific reserve is recorded to
reduce the receivable to the amount the Company believes will be
collected. The Company also records allowances for doubtful
accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past
due and historical experience. The allowance for doubtful
accounts balance at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $1,304
and $1,520, respectfully.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
or market with cost being determined by the
first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
The components of inventory are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$ |
26,385 |
|
|
$ |
22,896 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
13,003 |
|
|
|
16,918 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
13,744 |
|
|
|
7,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,132 |
|
|
$ |
47,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Valuation Reserves: The Company determines
inventory valuation reserves based on a combination of factors.
In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific
problem in the valuation of a certain item, a specific reserve
is recorded to reduce the item to its net realizable value. The
Company also recognizes reserves based on the actual usage in
recent history and projected usage in the near-term. If
circumstances change (e.g., lower-than-expected or
higher-than-expected usage), estimates of the net realizable
value could be changed by a material amount.
Property, Plant and Equipment: At October 17, 2005,
property, plant and equipment was recorded at fair value under
SFAS 141 Business Combinations. The depreciable
lives were adjusted to reflect the estimated remaining useful
life of each asset and all existing accumulated depreciation of
the Reorganized Company was eliminated. Subsequent to
October 17, 2005, all capital expenditures for property,
plant and equipment are stated on the basis of cost.
Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals are charged
to expense as incurred, whereas major improvements are
capitalized. The cost of applicable assets is depreciated over
their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and
accelerated methods for income tax purposes. Depreciation
expense was $1,115 for the 2005 Successor Period, $4,122 for the
2005 Reorganized Period, $5,681 for the year ended
December 31,
F-13
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2004, $1,523 for the three-months ended December 31, 2003,
and $6,441 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
The following table summarizes the components of property, plant
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
Classification |
|
Estimated Useful Life |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land and buildings
|
|
20-35 years (buildings) |
|
$ |
34,450 |
|
|
$ |
24,264 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3-12 years |
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
21,917 |
|
Computer equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
3-7 years |
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,827 |
|
|
|
51,480 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(9,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,265 |
|
|
$ |
41,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company monitors its property, plant and equipment, and
finite-lived intangible assets for impairment indicators on an
ongoing basis in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. If impairment indicators exist, the Company
performs the required analysis and records impairment charges in
accordance with SFAS No. 144. In conducting its analysis,
the Company compares the undiscounted cash flows expected to be
generated from the long-lived assets to the related net book
values. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the net book
value, the long-lived assets are considered not to be impaired.
If the net book value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an
impairment loss is measured and recognized. An impairment loss
is measured as the difference between the net book value and the
fair value of the long-lived assets. Fair value is estimated
based upon either discounted cash flow analyses or estimated
salvage values. Cash flows are estimated using internal
forecasts as well as assumptions related to discount rates.
Changes in economic or operating conditions impacting these
estimates and assumptions could result in the impairment of
long-lived assets.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: In conjunction with
the Acquisition as previously explained above, the Company
recorded $236,742 of goodwill. In accordance with SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
the Company does not amortize goodwill or other indefinite-lived
intangible assets, but reviews them at least annually for
impairment using a measurement date of October 1st. The
Company amortizes intangible assets that have finite useful
lives over their useful lives.
SFAS No. 142 requires that indefinite-lived intangible
assets be tested for impairment and that goodwill be tested for
impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis. Under
SFAS No. 142, a company determines the fair value of any
indefinite-lived intangible assets, compares the fair value to
its carrying value and records an impairment loss if the
carrying value exceeds its fair value. Goodwill is tested
utilizing a two-step approach. After recording any impairment
losses for indefinite-lived intangible assets, a company is
required to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and
compare the fair value to its carrying value, including
goodwill, of such reporting unit (step one). If the fair value
exceeds the carrying value, no impairment loss would be
recognized. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds
its fair value, the Goodwill of the reporting unit may be
impaired. The amount of the impairment, if any, would then be
measured in step two, which compares the implied fair value of
the reporting units Goodwill with the carrying
F-14
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
amount of that Goodwill. The following table displays the gross
carrying amount and accumulated amortization for finite-lived
intangible assets and indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company | |
|
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
Weighted | |
|
| |
|
Weighted | |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Estimated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Useful Life | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Useful Life | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Finite-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpatented technology
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
9,400 |
|
|
$ |
(235 |
) |
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
Patents
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
8,138 |
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
11 years |
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
Product names
|
|
|
20 years |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
14 months |
|
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses and certificates
|
|
|
18 months |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relations
|
|
|
13 years |
|
|
|
96,906 |
|
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
13 years |
|
|
|
23,960 |
|
|
|
(2,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,216 |
|
|
$ |
(3,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,534 |
|
|
$ |
(3,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
272,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to
amortization was $2,973, for the 2005 Successor Period, $2,686
for the 2005 Reorganized Period, $2,809 for the year ended
December 31, 2004, $702 for the three months ended
December 31, 2003, and $1,166 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003, and is estimated to range from
approximately $15,500 to $10,300 annually for fiscal years 2006
through 2010, respectively.
Financial Instruments: The fair values of cash
equivalents, accounts receivable and short-term bank debt
approximate their carrying amount because of the short maturity
of these instruments. The fair value of long-term debt is
estimated based on the present value of the underlying cash
flows discounted at the Companys estimated borrowing rate.
Under such method the Companys long-term debt approximated
its carrying value at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Derivative Instruments: The Company utilizes certain
derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to
manage risk, including interest rate risk and foreign currency
risk that exists as part of ongoing business operations.
Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent
with related underlying exposures and do not constitute
positions independent of those exposures. The Company does not
enter into contracts for speculative purposes, nor is it a party
to any leveraged derivative instrument.
The Companys primary interest rate risk exposure results
from various floating rate pricing mechanisms in the
consolidated term loan and revolving credit facility. This
interest rate risk has been partially managed by the use of an
interest rate derivative contract relating to a portion of the
term debt. The interest rate derivative contract is generally
described as a collar and results in putting a cap on the base
LIBOR interest rate at approximately 7.0 percent and a
floor at approximately 5.0 percent on certain portions of
the Companys floating rate term debt. The Predecessor
Company entered into an interest rate collar in March 1999 to
manage interest rate risk exposure relative to its term debt.
This collar, in the amount of $4,430 at December 31, 2005,
expired in March 2006. The Companys interest rate collar
does not qualify as a hedge
F-15
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which
requires such a collar to be recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value. Changes in their fair value must be
recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. The fair
value of the contract related to the collar outstanding at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 is a liability of $5 and $312,
respectively and is recorded in accrued interest.
The change in fair value for the 2005 Successor Period, 2005
Reorganized Period, year ended December 31, 2004, three
months ended December 31, 2003, and the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 of $9, $28, $48, $46, and ($389)
respectively, is recorded in derivative contracts valuation
income (expense).
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as a
result of transactions in currencies other than the functional
currency of certain subsidiaries. The Company utilizes foreign
currency forward purchase and sale contracts to manage the
volatility associated with foreign currency purchases and
certain intercompany transactions in the normal course of
business. Contracts typically have maturities of less than one
year. Principal currencies include the Euro, British Pound and
Czech Koruna. The Companys foreign currency forward
contracts do not qualify as hedges under the provisions of
SFAS No. 133. Gains and losses recorded by the Company
related to foreign currency forward contracts during 2005, 2004
and 2003 were not material.
The Company held foreign exchange forward sale contracts for
notional amounts as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
USD
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
Euros
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Warranties: The Company provides product
warranties with varying terms and durations for the majority of
its products. The Company records warranty expense in cost of
sales. The changes in the Companys consolidated warranty
reserve are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
Nine | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
3,439 |
|
|
$ |
2,812 |
|
|
$ |
3,208 |
|
|
$ |
3,803 |
|
|
$ |
4,032 |
|
|
Warranty expense
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
Warranty usage
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
3,598 |
|
|
$ |
3,439 |
|
|
$ |
2,812 |
|
|
$ |
3,208 |
|
|
$ |
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: As a result of the
Acquisition, the Company had 1,718,896 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005. Also, in
connection with Acquisition, 573,027 warrants were granted
in November 2005 to FRX Chart Holdings LLC, then sole
shareholder and affiliate of First Reserve, at an exercise price
of $64.75 per share and expire in March 2014. The warrants
may be exercised at
F-16
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
anytime. The Company reports comprehensive income in its
consolidated statement of shareholders equity. The
components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
(286 |
) |
|
$ |
3,549 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustments net of taxes of $162 and
$671 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(548 |
) |
|
$ |
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, the Company finalized the liquidation of the Biomedical
operation in Solingen, Germany and recognized $403 of foreign
currency gain, $258 net of tax, related to the elimination
of the foreign currency translation adjustments previously
recorded as part of this entity.
Revenue Recognition: For the majority of the
Companys products, revenue is recognized when products are
shipped, title has transferred and collection is reasonably
assured. For these products, there is also persuasive evidence
of an arrangement and the selling price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable. For heat exchangers, cold boxes, liquefied natural
gas fueling stations and engineered tanks, the Company uses the
percentage of completion method of accounting. Earned revenue is
based on the percentage that incurred costs to date bear to
total estimated costs at completion after giving effect to the
most current estimates. Earned revenue on contracts in process
at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, totaled $126,122,
$47,978 and $73,360, respectively. Timing of amounts billed on
contracts varies from contract to contract and could cause
significant variation in working capital needs. Amounts billed
on percentage of completion contracts in process at
December 31 totaled $125,971, $43,343 and $65,309, in 2005,
2004, and 2003, respectively. The cumulative impact of revisions
in total cost estimates during the progress of work is reflected
in the period in which these changes become known. Earned
revenue reflects the original contract price adjusted for agreed
upon claims and change orders, if any. Losses expected to be
incurred on contracts in process, after consideration of
estimated minimum recoveries from claims and change orders, are
charged to operations as soon as such losses are known.
Distribution Costs: The Company records distribution
costs, including warehousing and freight related to product
shipping, in cost of sales.
Advertising Costs: The Company incurred advertising costs
of $556 for the 2005 Successor Period, $2,151 for the 2005
Reorganized Period, $2,833 for the year ended December 31,
2004, $465 for the three months ended December 2003, $1,538 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Such costs are
expensed as incurred.
Research and Development Costs: The Company incurred
research and development costs of $805 for the 2005 Successor
Period, $2,198 for the 2005 Reorganized Period, $3,279 for the
year ended December 31, 2004, $1,280 for the three months
ended December 31, 2003, and $2,551 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2003. Such costs are expensed as
incurred.
Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency for
the majority of the Companys foreign operations is the
applicable local currency. The translation from the applicable
foreign currencies to U.S. dollars is performed for balance
sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted
average exchange rate during the period. The resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a component of
shareholders equity. Gains or losses resulting from
foreign currency transactions are charged to operations as
incurred.
F-17
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Deferred Income Taxes: The Company and its
U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax
return. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary
differences between financial reporting and the consolidated tax
return in accordance with the liability method. A valuation
allowance is provided against net deferred tax assets when
conditions indicate that it is more likely than not that the
benefit related to such assets will not be realized.
Employee Stock Options: In November 2005, the Successor
Company granted stock options (New Options), under
the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (Stock Incentive Plan)
to certain management employees. In addition, under the
Companys 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (2004
Plan) certain management employees rolled over stock
options (Rollover Options). The Company adopted
SFAS 123(R) Share-Based Payments, on
October 17, 2005 using the modified prospective method, to
account for these New Options. The New Options are exercisable
for a period of ten years and have two different vesting
schedules. The time-based (Time-based Options) vest
equally over a five-year period and the performance-based
(Performance-based Options) vest based upon
specified actual returns on First Reserves investment in
the Company. Furthermore, certain of the Rollover Options were
vested on the Closing Date of the Acquisition and the remaining
unvested Rollover Options vest upon the performance criteria as
outlined in the 2004 Plan and related option agreements. The New
Options and Rollover Options generally may not be transferred,
and any shares of stock that are required upon exercise of the
New Options or Rollover Options generally may not be sold,
transferred, assigned or disposed of except under certain
predefined liquidity events or in the event of a change in
control. The Companys policy is to issue authorized shares
upon the exercise of any stock options. In addition, all of the
2004 stock options (2004 Options) of the Reorganized
Company, except for the Rollover Options described above, were
deemed to be exercised in conjunction with the Transaction on
October 17, 2005. These 2004 Options were accounted for
under the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related
interpretations in accounting for employee stock options. See
Note J for further discussions regarding the stock options.
Reclassifications: Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards: The Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently
issued the following Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards that the Company has adopted as of December 31,
2005:
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment.
SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation and supersedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123(R) requires
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial
statements based on their fair values and eliminates the pro
forma disclosure option allowed under SFAS 123.
SFAS 123(R) is effective for nonpublic entities for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company
adopted SFAS 123(R) early on October 17, 2005 in
conjunction with the Acquisition.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) FSP
No. 109-1,
Application for FASB Statement No 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004.
FSP 109-1 is
intended to clarify that the domestic manufacturing deduction
should be accounted for as a special deduction (rather than a
rate
F-18
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
reduction) under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. A special deduction is recognized under
SFAS 109 as it is earned. The adoption of this statement
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FSP
No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004.
FSP 109-2 provides
guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on
enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability.
The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004.
FSP 109-2 states
that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial
reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs
Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign
earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. The
Company completed evaluating the impact of the repatriation
provisions. The adjustment as provided for in
FSP 109-2 did not
have a material impact on the Companys tax expense or
deferred tax liability.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations. This interpretation requires companies to
recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation
to perform asset retirement activities that are conditional on a
future event if the amount can be reasonably estimated. This
statement is effective for the year ending December 31,
2005. The adoption of this statement did not have a material
affect on the Companys financial position, results of
operations, liquidity or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards: The Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently
issued the following Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards that the Company has not adopted as of
December 31, 2005:
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 requires
abnormal amounts of inventory costs related to idle facility,
freight handling and wasted material expenses to be recognized
as current period charges. Additionally SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. The standard is effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect the adoption of
SFAS No. 151 will have on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
SFAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting
Changes and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting
Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154
requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be
applied retrospectively with all prior period financial
statements presented on the new accounting principle.
SFAS 154 also requires that a change in method of
depreciating and amortizing a long-lived asset be accounted for
prospectively as a change in estimate, and the correction of
errors in previously issued financial statements should be
termed a restatement. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005. SFAS 154 will only affect the
Companys consolidated financial statements to the extent
there are future accounting changes or errors.
F-19
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE B Balance Sheet Components
The following table summarizes the components of other current
assets, other assets, net, other current liabilities and other
long-term liabilities on the Companys consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
Investment in leases
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,429 |
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
7,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,102 |
|
|
$ |
14,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
$ |
11,749 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Investment in leases
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
Cash value life insurance
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,672 |
|
|
$ |
2,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
$ |
4,599 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,636 |
|
|
Accrued other taxes
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
Accrued rebates
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
Accrued employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,606 |
|
|
$ |
12,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued environmental
|
|
$ |
6,608 |
|
|
$ |
6,460 |
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
|
7,233 |
|
|
|
11,106 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
Accrued contingencies and other
|
|
|
5,013 |
|
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,957 |
|
|
$ |
25,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE C Debt and Credit Arrangements
The following table shows the components of the Companys
borrowings at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Senior term loan, due October 2012 and September 2009,
respectively, average interest rate of 6.62% and 5.62% at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
78,395 |
|
Subordinated notes, due 2015, interest accrued at 9.125%
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue bonds, due August 2006, average
interest rate of 6.33% at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Revolving foreign credit facility and other short-term debt
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
347,304 |
|
|
|
79,411 |
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
3,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
345,000 |
|
|
$ |
76,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company entered into a
$240,000 senior secured credit facility (the Senior Credit
Facility) and completed a $170,000 offering of
91/8
percent senior subordinated notes (the Subordinated
Notes). The Company repaid the then existing credit
facility of the Reorganized Company, as described further below,
and certain other debt on or before October 17, 2005, the
Closing Date of the Acquisition. The Senior Credit Facility
consists of a $180,000 term loan facility (the Term
Loan) and a $60,000 revolving credit facility (the
Revolver), of which $35,000 may be used for the
issuance of letters of credit. The Term Loan and Subordinated
Notes were fully funded on the Closing Date. The Term Loan
matures on October 17, 2012 and the Revolver matures on
October 17, 2010. As a result of a $5,000 voluntary
principal prepayment in December 2005, the Term Loan requires
quarterly principal payments that equal 0.8 percent per
annum of the funded balance commencing in September 2008 and a
remaining balloon payment on the maturity date. Future principal
payments will be adjusted for any voluntary prepayments. The
interest rate under the Senior Credit Facility is, at the
Companys option, the Alternative Base Rate
(ABR) plus 1.0 percent or LIBOR plus
2.0 percent on the Term loan and ABR plus 1.5 percent
or LIBOR plus 2.5 percent on the Revolver. In addition, the
Company is required to pay an annual administrative fee of $100,
a commitment fee of 0.5 percent on the unused Revolver
balance, a letter of credit participation fee of
2.5 percent per annum on the letter of credit exposure and
a letter of credit issuance fee of 0.25 percent. The
obligations under the Secured Credit Facility are secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Companys
U.S. Subsidiaries and 65 percent of the capital stock
of the Companys
non-U.S. Subsidiaries.
The Subordinated Notes are due in 2015 with interest payable
semi-annually on
April 15th and
October 15th.
Any of the Subordinated Notes may be redeemed solely at the
Companys option beginning on October 15, 2010. The
initial redemption price is 104.563 percent of the
principal amount, plus accrued interest. Also, any of the notes
may be redeemed solely at the Companys option at any time
prior to October 15, 2010, plus accrued interest and a
make-whole premium. In addition, before
October 15, 2008, up to 35 percent of the Subordinated
Notes may be redeemed solely at the Companys option at a
price of 109.125 percent of the principal amount, plus
accrued interest, using the proceeds from sales of certain kinds
of capital stock. The Subordinated Notes are general unsecured
obligations of the Company and are subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior debt of the Company,
including the Senior Credit Facility, pari passu in right of
payment with all future senior subordinated indebtedness of the
F-21
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Company, senior in right of payment with any future indebtedness
of the Company that expressly provided for its subordination to
the Subordinated Notes, and unconditionally guaranteed jointly
and severally by substantially all of the Companys
U.S. Subsidiaries.
The Senior Credit Facility agreement and provisions of the
indenture governing the Subordinated Notes contain a number of
customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions
on the Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness,
create liens or other encumbrances, sell assets, enter into sale
and lease-back transactions, make certain payments, investments,
loans, advances or guarantees, make acquisitions and engage in
mergers or consolidations, pay dividends and distributions, and
make capital expenditures. The Senior Credit Facility also
includes covenants relating to leverage and interest coverage.
At December 31, 2005, there was $175,000 and $170,000
outstanding under the Term Loan and Subordinated Notes,
respectively, and letters of credit and bank guarantees totaling
$22,442 supported by the Revolver.
Chart Ferox, a.s. (Ferox), a majority-owned
subsidiary of the Company, maintains secured revolving credit
facilities with borrowing capacity, including overdraft
protection, of up to $9,600, of which $4,400 is available only
for letters of credit and bank guarantees. Under the revolving
credit facilities, Ferox may make borrowings in Czech Koruna,
Euros and U.S. dollars. Borrowings in Koruna are at PRIBOR,
borrowings in Euros are at EUROBOR and borrowings in
U.S. dollars are at LIBOR, each with a fixed margin of
0.6%. Ferox is not required to pay a commitment fee to the
lenders under the revolving credit facilities in respect to the
unutilized commitments thereunder. Ferox must pay letter of
credit and guarantee fees equal to 0.75% on the face amount of
each guarantee. Feroxs land and buildings, and accounts
receivable secure $4,600 and $2,500, respectively, of the
revolving credit facilities. At December 31, 2005, there
was $800 of borrowings outstanding under, and $1,506 of bank
guarantees supported by the Ferox revolving credit facilities.
The scheduled annual maturities of long-term debt and credit
arrangements at December 31, 2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
720 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
342,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
345,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective September 15, 2003, upon emergence from its
Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, the Reorganized
Company entered into a term loan agreement and revolving credit
facility (collectively, the 2003 Credit Facility).
The 2003 Credit Facility provided a term loan of $120,000 with
final maturity in 2009 and revolving credit line of $55,000, of
which $15,000 would have expired on January 31, 2006 and
$40,000 on September 15, 2008, and of which $40,000 was
available for the issuance of letters of credit and bank
guarantees. Under the terms of the credit facility, the term
loan bore interest at rates, at the Companys option, equal
to the prime rate plus 2.50 percent or LIBOR plus
3.50 percent and the revolving credit line bore interest,
at the Companys option, at rates equal to the prime rate
plus 1.50 percent or LIBOR plus 2.50 percent.
The 2003 Credit Facility contained certain covenants and
conditions, which imposed limitations on the Company and its
operating units, including restriction on the payment of cash
dividends and a requirement to meet certain financial tests and
to maintain on a quarterly basis certain consolidated financial
ratios, including leverage, interest coverage, minimum fixed
coverage, minimum operating cash flow and capital expenditures.
F-22
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The 2003 Credit Facility also contained a feature whereby if the
Company generated cash from operations above a pre-defined
calculated amount, the Company was required to use a portion of
that cash to make principal prepayments on the term loan portion
of the 2003 Credit Facility.
In 2004, the Company made prepayments on the term loan portion
of the Credit Facility totaling $30 million, which was in
addition to a $10 million prepayment made in December 2003.
The prepayments reduced all future scheduled term loan payments
on a pro-rata basis. As a result, the Company had borrowings
outstanding of $78,395 under the term loan portion of the 2003
Credit facility and letters of credit outstanding and bank
guarantees totaling $19,040 supported by the revolving credit
line portion of the 2003 Credit Facility.
The Company paid interest of $1,085 for the 2005 Successor
Period, $4,397 in the 2005 Reorganized Period, $5,615 in the
year ended December 31, 2004, $2,268 in the three months
ended December 31, 2003, and $10,021 in the nine months
ended September 30, 2003.
NOTE D Employee Separation and Plant Closure
Costs
In 2004, the Company continued its manufacturing facility
reduction plan which commenced in 2002. These actions resulted
in the closure of the Companys Energy and Chemicals
segment manufacturing facility in Wolverhampton, U.K. in March
2003, the closure in September 2003 of the Companys Energy
and Chemicals segment sales and engineering office in
Westborough, MA and the announcements in December 2003 and
January 2004 of the closure of the Companys Distribution
and Storage segment manufacturing facility in Plaistow, NH and
the Biomedical segment manufacturing and office facility in
Burnsville, MN, respectively. In 2004, the Company completed the
shutdown of the Plaistow, NH manufacturing facility and
continued the shutdown of the Burnsville, MN manufacturing
facility, which was completed in the first quarter of 2005. In
each of these facility closures, the Company did not exit the
product lines manufactured at those sites, but moved the
manufacturing to other facilities with available capacity, most
notably New Prague, MN for engineered tank production and
Canton, GA for medical respiratory production. During 2005 and
2004, the Company recorded employee separation and plant closure
costs related to the closures of these various facilities and
also recorded non-cash inventory valuation charges included in
cost of sales at certain of these sites.
The following tables summarize the Companys employee
separation and plant closure costs activity for 2005, 2004 and
2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005 Successor Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Energy & | |
|
|
|
|
Biomedical | |
|
& Storage | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
One-time employee termination costs
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Inventory valuation in cost of sales
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Reserve usage
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reserve
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
Reserves as of October 16, 2005
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005 Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Energy & | |
|
|
|
|
Biomedical | |
|
& Storage | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
One-time employee termination costs
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
(118 |
) |
Other associated costs
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
1,057 |
|
Inventory valuation in cost of sales
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
1,700 |
|
Reserve usage
|
|
|
(1,451 |
) |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(2,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reserve
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
Reserves as of January 1, 2005
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve as of October 16, 2005
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Energy & | |
|
|
|
|
Biomedical | |
|
& Storage | |
|
Chemical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
One-time employee termination costs
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
Inventory valuation in costs of sales
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
Reserve usage
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(3,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reserve
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(627 |
) |
Reserves as of January 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
2,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Energy & | |
|
|
|
|
Biomedical | |
|
& Storage | |
|
Chemical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
One-time employee termination costs
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
Reserve usage
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reserve
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
Reserves as of October 1, 2003
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve as of December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
2,182 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 Predecessor Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Energy & | |
|
|
|
|
Biomedical | |
|
& Storage | |
|
Chemicals | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
One-time employee termination costs
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(1,604 |
) |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(704 |
) |
Other associated costs
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
Inventory valuation in cost of sales
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Write-off due to CHEL insolvency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,976 |
) |
Reserve usage
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
|
|
(1,182 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reserve
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(2,471 |
) |
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(5,290 |
) |
Reserves as of January 1, 2003
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
8,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve as of September 30, 2003
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE E Acquisitions
On May 16, 2005, the Company acquired 100 percent of
the equity interest in Changzhou CEM Cryo Equipment Co., Ltd.
(CEM), a foreign owned enterprise established under
the laws of the Peoples Republic of China. The purchase
price was $13,664, consisting of cash of $12,198 and the
issuance of a promissory note of $1,466 payable to the seller.
The estimated fair value of the net assets acquired and goodwill
at the date of acquisition was $8,894 and $4,770, respectively.
For the 2005 Reorganized Period, the Company recorded a charge
of $2,768 for the write-off of purchased in-process research and
development that was included in the fair value of net assets
acquired. CEM has been included in the Companys
Distribution and Storage operating segment and includes
approximately $4,100 of revenue since the Acquisition.
On February 27, 2004, the Companys Coastal
Fabrication joint venture (Coastal Fabrication)
executed an agreement to redeem the joint venture partners
50 percent equity interest of $289 for cash consideration
of $250 and the possibility of additional consideration being
paid based upon the number of direct labor manufacturing hours
performed at the Companys New Iberia, LA facility during
2004 and 2005. The $39 difference between the cash consideration
paid and the value of the 50 percent equity interest was
recorded by Coastal Fabrication as a reduction of certain fixed
assets. As a result of the elimination of the joint venture
partner and the assumption of 100 percent of control by the
Company, the assets, liabilities and operating results of
Coastal Fabrication are included in these consolidated financial
statements subsequent to February 27, 2004.
NOTE F Loss on Insolvent Subsidiary
In March 2003, the Company completed the closure of its
Wolverhampton, United Kingdom manufacturing facility, operated
by CHEL, and all current heat exchanger manufacturing is now
being conducted at its LaCrosse, WI facility.
On March 28, 2003, CHEL filed for a voluntary
administration under the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986.
CHELs application for voluntary administration was
approved on April 1, 2003 and an administrator was
appointed. In accordance with SFAS No. 94,
Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries,
the Company is not consolidating the accounts or financial
results of CHEL subsequent to March 28, 2003 due to the
assumption of control of CHEL by the insolvency administrator.
F-25
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Effective March 28, 2003, the Company recorded a non-cash
impairment charge of $13,682 to write off its net investment in
CHEL. The components of this impairment charge includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
2,413 |
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,323 |
) |
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE G Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
$ |
7,665 |
|
|
$ |
7,872 |
|
|
Pensions
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
3,787 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
15,022 |
|
|
$ |
18,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
5,795 |
|
|
$ |
6,218 |
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
58,836 |
|
|
|
16,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$ |
64,631 |
|
|
$ |
22,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liabilities) asset
|
|
$ |
(49,609 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not provided for income taxes on approximately
$15,226 of foreign subsidiaries undistributed earnings as
of December 31, 2005, since the earnings retained have been
reinvested indefinitely by the subsidiaries. It is not
practicable to estimate the additional income taxes and
applicable foreign withholding taxes that would be payable on
the remittance of such undistributed earnings.
Congress passed the American Jobs Creation Act in October 2004.
The Act provided for a special one-time tax deduction of 85% of
certain foreign earnings that are repatriated (as defined in the
Act) in 2005. During the 2005 Reorganized Period, the Company
recorded income tax expense of $156 for the repatriation of
$2,970 of foreign earnings under the Act.
F-26
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
| |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States
|
|
$ |
(1,425 |
) |
|
$ |
10,718 |
|
|
$ |
25,566 |
|
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
|
$ |
(9,997 |
) |
Foreign
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
5,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(895 |
) |
|
$ |
16,037 |
|
|
$ |
32,832 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
| |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
6,601 |
|
|
$ |
5,224 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,016 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
9,420 |
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
6,639 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(441 |
) |
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
10,134 |
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
$ |
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The reconciliation of income taxes computed at the
U.S. federal statutory tax rates to income tax expense is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
| |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax (benefit) expense at U.S. statutory rates
|
|
$ |
(313 |
) |
|
$ |
5,691 |
|
|
$ |
11,491 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,391 |
) |
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Debt forgiveness income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,283 |
) |
Credit on foreign taxes paid
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate differential of earnings outside of U.S.
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
Federal tax benefit of foreign sales
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
Non-deductible (taxable) items goodwill and other
items
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
4,535 |
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Start accounting adjustments and valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,274 |
|
Repatriation of foreign earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolved tax contingency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(441 |
) |
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
10,134 |
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
$ |
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the 2005 Reorganized Period, the Company received a tax
benefit of $5,818 from the exercise of stock options as a result
of the Acquisition. The Company had net income tax payments
(refunds) of $3,113 in the 2005 Successor Period, $11,160
in the 2005 Reorganized Period, $8,035 in 2004, $362 in the
three months ended December 31, 2003, and $(1,262) in the
nine months ended September 30, 2003.
NOTE H Discontinued Operation and Assets Held for
Sale
On July 3, 2003, the Company sold certain assets and
liabilities of its former Greenville Tube, LLC stainless steel
tubing business, which the Company previously reported as a
component of its Energy and Chemicals operating segment. The
Company received gross proceeds of $15,500, consisting of
$13,550 in cash and $1,950 in a long-term subordinated note,
which resulted in a gain of $3,692 recorded in the nine months
ended September 30, 2003. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company classified the
operating results of this business as a discontinued operation
on its consolidated statements of operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2003. The amount of revenue reported in
discontinued operations was $8,807 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003. The amount of pre-tax profit reported
in discontinued operations is equal to the income from
discontinued operation, net of income taxes, since the Company
did not allocate income tax expense to this business.
In September 2003, the Company decided to sell a vacant building
and a parcel of land at its New Prague, MN Distribution and
Storage manufacturing facility. These assets were sold in April
2004 for $550 and the Company recorded a loss of $11 due to
selling expenses. The net proceeds from this sale were used for
working capital purposes.
F-28
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
In January 2004, the Company decided to sell a building and
parcel of land at its Burnsville, MN Biomedical manufacturing
and office facility. In June 2004, the Company executed an
agreement to sell the Burnsville facility for $4,500. Because
the net sales price, estimated to be $4,175 after selling costs,
was lower than the carrying value, the assets were written down
to the net sales price by recording a $404 loss on sale of
assets in 2004. The net proceeds from this sale were used to pay
down $880 of debt outstanding under an industrial revenue bond
and the remainder was used for working capital purposes.
In June 2004, the Company decided to sell a building, parcel of
land and manufacturing equipment at its Plaistow, NH
Distribution and Storage manufacturing and office facility. The
manufacturing equipment was sold in August 2004 for $1,082
resulting in a gain on sale of assets of $549. In September
2004, the Company entered into an agreement, which expired in
July 2005, to sell the Plaistow land and building for $3,567,
net of selling costs. It was determined the net sales price per
the agreement was lower than the carrying value and the Company
recorded a fair value impairment loss of $386 in 2004. During
the 2005 Reorganization Period, an additional $483 fair value
impairment loss was recognized by the Reorganized Company. At
December 31, 2005 the carrying value of this property
equaled $3,084. The Plaistow facility is classified as held for
sale on its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2005 and 2004. The Company continues to pursue the completion of
the sale and the net proceeds from such sale are expected to be
available for working capital purposes.
NOTE I Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has four defined benefit pension plans (the
Plans) covering certain U.S. hourly and salary
employees. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, three of the
Plans were frozen. Effective February 28, 2006, the fourth
Plan was frozen. The Plans provided benefits primarily based on
the participants years of service and compensation.
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic
pension (benefit) cost for the 2005 Successor Period, the 2005
Reorganized Period, the year ended December 31, 2004, the
three months ended December 31, 2003 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2003 based on a December 31
measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
| |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
|
|
(2,135 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
Amortization of net (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
431 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension (benefit) cost
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(190 |
) |
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table sets forth changes in the projected benefit
obligation and plan assets, the funded status of the plans and
the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
36,104 |
|
|
$ |
35,354 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
Interest coat
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(990 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
Plan Amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
Actuarial losses and plan changes
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
37,404 |
|
|
$ |
36,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1
|
|
$ |
27,789 |
|
|
$ |
25,244 |
|
|
Actual return
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(990 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31
|
|
$ |
30,104 |
|
|
$ |
27,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of the plans
|
|
$ |
(7,300 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,315 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension liability recognized
|
|
$ |
(6,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(7,300 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,106 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension liability recognized
|
|
$ |
(6,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation is equal to the projected
benefit obligation at December 31, 2005 and 2004 because
three of the Plans were frozen at these dates and the remaining
plan was service related. A minimum pension liability adjustment
was required as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 as the
actuarial present value of a projected benefit obligations
exceeded plan assets and accrued pension liabilities.
At December 31, 2005, the Companys consolidated net
pension liability recognized was $6.9 million, a decrease
of $2.3 million from December 31, 2004. The decrease
is primarily due to an increase in the fair value of plan assets
during 2005 and the recognition of the net unamortized gain at
the Closing Date of the Acquisition in accordance with
SFAS 141 Business Combinations.
F-30
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The actuarial assumptions used in determining the funded status
information and subsequent net periodic pension cost are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
Nine | |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
2005 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
Weighted average rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
Expected long-term weighted average rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
* |
No longer applicable as Plans were frozen and participants are
no longer accruing benefits. |
The expected long-term weighted average rate of return on plan
assets was established using the Companys target asset
allocation for equity and debt securities and the historical
average rates of return for equity and debt securities. The
Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix
of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize
the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk.
Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of
short- and long-term plan liabilities, plan funded status and
corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio contains
a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments.
Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and
non-U.S. stocks,
as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalizations.
Additionally, the Plans held 2,540 shares of the
Reorganized Companys common stock with fair values of $124
and $67 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and
did not receive any dividends on these shares during 2004 or
2003. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing
basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual
liability measurements and periodic asset/liability studies. The
Companys pension plan weighted-average actual and target
asset allocations by asset category at December 31 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
Target | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stocks
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Fixed income funds
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Companys funding policy is to contribute at least the
minimum funding amounts required by law. Based upon current
actuarial estimates, the Company expects to contribute $1,263 to
its defined benefit pension plans in 2006 and expects the
following benefit payments to be paid by the plans:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
2010
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company presently makes contributions to one bargaining unit
supported multi-employer pension plans resulting in expense of
$78 for the 2005 Successor Period, $282 for the 2005 Reorganized
Period, $313 for the year ended December 31, 2004, $110 for
the three months ended December 31, 2003 and $199 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2003. As part of the
closure of Plaistow, NH facility in 2004, the Company withdrew
from the multi-employer plan upon final termination of all
employees at such facility. The Company has recorded a related
estimated withdrawal liability of $170 at December 31, 2005
and 2004. Any additional liability over this accrued amount is
not expected to have a material adverse impact on the
Companys financial position, liquidity, cash flows or
results of operations.
The Company has a defined contribution savings plan that covers
most of its U.S. employees. Company contributions to the
plan are based on employee contributions, and a Company match
and discretionary contributions. Expenses under the plan totaled
$517 for the 2005 Successor Period, $2,188 for the 2005
Reorganized Period, $1,483 for the year ended December 31,
2004, $313 for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and
$1,118 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
NOTE J Stock Option Plans
In November 2005, 218,408 New Options were granted to certain
management employees of the Company, under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan, to purchase shares of the Successor
Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$64.75 per share. In addition, certain members of
management rolled over 131,823 options from the Reorganized
Companys 2004 Plan at an exercise price of $16.19 per
share.
The New Options are exercisable for a period of ten years and
have two different vesting schedules. 77,094 of the New Options
are time-based (Time-based Options) and vest equally
over a five year period, and 141,314 of the New Options are
performance-based (Performance-based Options) and
vest based upon specified actual returns on First Reserves
investment in the Company. In addition, 122,470 of the Rollover
Options were vested on the Closing Date of the Acquisition and
9,353 unvested Rollover Options vest upon the performance
criteria of the Companys 2004 Plan. As of March 22,
2006, 128,543 of the Rollover Options were vested. The New
Options generally may not be transferred, and any shares of
stock that are acquired upon exercise of the New Options
generally may not be sold, transferred, assigned or disposed of
except under certain predefined liquidity events or in the event
of a change in control. As of December 31, 2005, there were
350,231 vested and unvested options outstanding. For the 2005
Successor Period, $437 of stock-based compensation expense was
recognized for the New Options and the Rollover Options. At
December 31, 2005, the unrecognized total share-based
compensation expense to be recorded over the next five years
related to non-vested awards is $2,716.
The fair value of the New Options was estimated at the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate
of 4.8%; dividend yields of 0.0%; volatility factors of the
expected market price of the Companys common shares of
47.0%; and a
F-32
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
weighted-average expected life of 7.5 years for the
options. Volatility was calculated using an average of the
Reorganized Companys historical closing stock price on the
OTCBB from October 2, 2003 to October 14, 2005.
Stock-based compensation expense for the Time-based Options is
recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
On October 17, 2005, in conjunction with the Acquisition,
all of the unvested 2004 Options under the Reorganized
Companys 2004 Plan were vested upon the change of control,
except for 9,353 Rollover Options. The Reorganized
Companys 2004 Options are described further below. As a
result of normal vesting and the change in control, $9,508 of
share-based compensation expense was recognized for the 2005
Reorganized Period.
On March 19, 2004, the Reorganized Company granted 435,701
of 2004 Options to purchase shares of the Companys common
stock with an exercise price of $13.89 per share when the
closing market price of the Companys common stock was
$28.00 per share. These 2004 Options were accounted for
under the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). These non-qualified stock options
were exercisable for a period of 10 years and have two
different vesting schedules: 319,701 options were scheduled to
vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period and
116,000 options were scheduled to vest over a
45-month period, which
commenced April 1, 2004, based upon the achievement of
specific operating performance goals during that
45-month period as
determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. The 319,701 2004 Options on the time-based vesting
schedule were accounted for as a fixed compensatory plan under
APB 25. For these options, the Company expected to record
$4,313 as compensation expense over the vesting period based on
the $14.11 difference between the closing market price and the
exercise price on the date of grant. The 116,000 2004 Options on
the performance-based vesting schedule were accounted for as a
variable compensatory plan under APB 25. For these options,
the Company recorded compensation expense over the vesting
period based upon the difference between the closing market
price of the Companys stock and the exercise price at each
balance sheet measurement date, and the Companys estimate
of the number of options that will ultimately vest based upon
actual and estimated performance in comparison to the
performance targets.
During 2004, 14,000 options on the time-based vesting schedule
and 14,000 options on the performance-based vesting schedule
were cancelled due to the resignation of eligible employees, and
42,000 additional 2004 Options on the time-based vesting
schedule and 30,000 additional 2004 Options on the
performance-based vesting schedule were issued at the closing
market price on the date of grant to then new eligible employees
and non-employee members of the Companys Board of
Directors. The 42,000 2004 Options with the time-based vesting
schedule were accounted for as a fixed plan under APB 25.
For these options, the Company recorded no compensation expense,
since the exercise price was equal to the market price at the
date of grant. The 30,000 Options with the performance-based
vesting schedule were accounted for as a variable compensatory
plan under APB 25 and the Company recorded compensation
expense using the same method as the initial 116,000
performance-based options. As of December 31, 2004, there
were 479,701 options outstanding. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company recognized $1,998 of
stock-based compensation expense.
F-33
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Certain information for the 2005 Successor Company and the year
ended December 31, 2004, relative to the Successor
Companys and Reorganized Companys stock option plans
is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Rollover
|
|
|
131,823 |
|
|
|
16.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
218,408 |
|
|
|
64.75 |
|
|
|
507,701 |
|
|
|
18.04 |
|
Expired or canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
|
13.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
350,231 |
|
|
$ |
46.47 |
|
|
|
479,701 |
|
|
$ |
18.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year *
|
|
|
128,543 |
|
|
$ |
16.19 |
|
|
|
104,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year
|
|
$ |
37.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants at end of year
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for future grant at end of year
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Remaining contractual term of 8 years and 3 months. |
NOTE K Lease Commitments
The Company incurred $717, $2,665, $3,478, $974 and $3,756 of
rental expense under operating leases for the 2005 Successor
Period, the 2005 Reorganized Period, the year ended
December 31, 2004, the three months ended December 31,
2003 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003. At
December 31, 2005, future minimum lease payments for
non-cancelable operating leases for the next five years total
$8,547 and are payable as follows: 2006 $2,040;
2007 $1,855; 2008 $1,713;
2009 $1,600; and 2010 $1,339.
NOTE L Contingencies
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental
laws and regulations concerning, among other matters, waste
water effluents, air emissions and handling and disposal of
hazardous materials such as cleaning fluids. The Company is
involved with environmental compliance, investigation,
monitoring and remediation activities at certain of its owned
manufacturing facilities and at one owned facility that is
leased to a third party, and, except for these continuing
remediation efforts, believes it is currently in substantial
compliance with all known environmental regulations. At
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had undiscounted
accrued environmental reserves of $6,608 and $6,460,
respectively, recorded in other long-term liabilities. The
Company accrues for certain environmental remediation-related
activities for which commitments or remediation plans have been
developed and for which costs can be reasonably estimated. These
estimates are determined based upon currently available facts
and circumstances regarding each facility. Actual costs incurred
may vary from these estimates due to the inherent uncertainties
involved. Future expenditures relating to these environmental
remediation efforts are expected to be made over the next 8 to
14 years as ongoing costs of remediation programs.
F-34
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Although the Company believes it has adequately provided for the
cost of all known environmental conditions, the applicable
regulatory agencies could insist upon different and more costly
remediation than those the Company believes are adequate or
required by existing law. The Company believes that any
additional liability in excess of amounts accrued which may
result from the resolution of such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial
position, liquidity, cash flows or results of operations.
In conjunction with the Acquisition and the Notice of Merger
dated October 25, 2005, certain of the former shareholders
of the Reorganized Company representing 244,180 shares of
common stock, gave notice of their right under Delaware General
Corporation Law to exercise appraisal rights. In February 2006,
before the former shareholders filed suit in court under
Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company settled this
appraisal rights matter by paying additional proceeds to these
former shareholders of $0.5 million. This settlement amount
was accrued at December 31, 2005.
In March 2003, the Company completed the closure of its
Wolverhampton, United Kingdom manufacturing facility, operated
by CHEL, and all current heat exchanger manufacturing is being
conducted at the Companys La Crosse, WI facility. On
March 28, 2003, CHEL filed for a voluntary administration
under the United Kingdom (U.K.) Insolvency Act of
1986. CHELs application for voluntary administration was
approved on April 1, 2003 and an administrator was
appointed. Additionally, the Company received information that
indicated that CHELs net pension plan obligations had
increased significantly primarily due to a decline in plan asset
values and interest rates as well as increased plan liabilities,
resulting in an estimated plan deficit of approximately
$12.0 million as of March 2003. Based on the Companys
financial condition in March 2003, it determined not to advance
funds to CHEL in amounts necessary to fund CHELs
obligations. Since CHEL was unable to fund its net pension
deficit, pay remaining severance due to former employees, or pay
other creditors, the trustees of the CHEL pension plan requested
a decision to wind-up
the plan from a U.K. pension regulatory board. That board
approved the wind-up as
of March 28, 2003.
The Company does not believe that it is legally obligated to
fund the net pension deficit of the CHEL pension plan because
CHEL, which is no longer one of the Companys consolidated
subsidiaries, was the sponsor of the pension plan and the entity
with primary responsibility for the plan. In addition, the
Company considered itself and its consolidated subsidiaries
legally released from being the primary obligor of any CHEL
liabilities. Further, at the time the insolvency administrator
assumed control of CHEL, the Company no longer had control of
the assets or liabilities of CHEL. As a result, in March 2003,
the Company wrote-off its net investment in CHEL. In addition,
any claims of CHEL against the Company were discharged in
bankruptcy as part of the Companys Reorganization Plan.
While no claims presently are pending against the Company
related to CHELs insolvency, persons impacted by the
insolvency or others could bring a claim against the Company
asserting that the Company is directly responsible for pension
and benefit related liabilities of CHEL. Although the Company
would contest any claim of this kind, it can provide no
assurance that claims will not be asserted against it in the
future. To the extent the Company has a significant liability
related to CHELs insolvency and pension wind-up,
satisfaction of that liability could have a material adverse
impact on the Companys liquidity, results of operations
and financial position.
F-35
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Chapter 11 Reorganization |
On July 8, 2003, the Company and all of its then
majority-owned U.S. subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions
for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to implement an agreed upon
senior debt restructuring plan through a pre-packaged plan of
reorganization. None of the Companys
non-U.S. subsidiaries
were included in the filing in the Bankruptcy Court. On
September 15, 2003, the Reorganized Company and all of its
majority-owned U.S. subsidiaries emerged from
Chapter 11 proceedings pursuant to the Amended Joint
Prepackaged Reorganization Plan of Chart Industries, Inc. and
Certain Subsidiaries, dated September 3, 2003. The Company
has resolved all proofs of claim asserted in the bankruptcy
proceedings, including the settlement in July 2005 of a
finders fee claim in the amount of $1.1 million
asserted by a former shareholder of the Company, against which
the Company had filed an objection in the Bankruptcy Court. The
Company expects to move forward to close these proceedings in
2006.
|
|
|
Performance Under Contracts |
The Company is occasionally subject to various other legal
actions related to performance under contracts, product
liability and other matters, several of which actions claim
substantial damages, in the ordinary course of its business.
Based on the Companys historical experience in litigating
these actions, as well as the Companys current assessment
of the underlying merits of the actions and applicable
insurance, the Company believes the resolution of these other
legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, liquidity, cash flows or
results of operations.
The Company is a party to other legal proceedings incidental to
the normal course of its business. Based on the Companys
historical experience in litigating these actions, as well as
the Companys current assessment of the underlying merits
of the actions and applicable insurance, management believes
that the final resolution of these matters will not have a
material adverse affect on the Companys financial
position, liquidity, cash flows or results of operations.
NOTE M Operating Segments
The Companys structure of its internal organization is
divided into the following three reportable segments: Energy and
Chemicals, Distribution and Storage, and Biomedical. The
Companys reportable segments are business units that offer
different products. The reportable segments are each managed
separately because they manufacture and distribute distinct
products with different production processes and sales and
marketing approaches. The Biomedical segment sells medical
respiratory products, biological storage systems and magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) cryostat components. The
Distribution and Storage segment sells cryogenic bulk storage
systems, cryogenic packaged gas systems, cryogenic systems and
components, beverage liquid
CO2
systems and cryogenic services to various companies for the
storage and transportation of both industrial and natural gases.
The Energy and Chemicals segment sells heat exchangers, cold
boxes and liquefied natural gas (LNG) vacuum
insulated pipe (VIP) to natural gas, petrochemical
processing and industrial gas companies who use them for the
liquefaction and separation of natural and industrial gases. Due
to the nature of the products that each operating segment sells,
there are no inter-segment sales. The Company moved the
management and reporting of the LNG alternative fuel systems
product line from the Energy and Chemicals segment to the
Distribution and Storage segment effective December 31,
2004. All segment information for all periods presented has been
restated to conform to this presentation.
F-36
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based
on operating income or loss from continuing operations before
gain on sale of assets, net interest expense, financing costs
amortization expense, derivative contracts valuation expense,
foreign currency loss, income taxes, minority interest and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies.
Information for the Companys three reportable segments and
its corporate headquarters, and product revenue and geographic
information for the Company, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reportable Segments | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Energy and | |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Storage | |
|
Biomedical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
34,135 |
|
|
$ |
47,832 |
|
|
$ |
15,685 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs (benefit)
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
(4,683 |
) |
|
|
5,148 |
|
Total assets(B)(C)
|
|
|
177,915 |
|
|
|
341,644 |
|
|
|
93,929 |
|
|
|
28,318 |
|
|
|
641,806 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reportable Segments | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Energy and | |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Storage | |
|
Biomedical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
86,920 |
|
|
$ |
161,329 |
|
|
$ |
57,248 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs (benefit)
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
1,057 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
13,818 |
|
|
|
27,020 |
|
|
|
9,093 |
|
|
|
(29,203 |
) |
|
|
20,728 |
|
Total assets(B)(D)
|
|
|
85,203 |
|
|
|
151,404 |
|
|
|
99,001 |
|
|
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
343,107 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
11,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reportable Segments | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Energy and | |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Storage | |
|
Biomedical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
69,609 |
|
|
$ |
162,508 |
|
|
$ |
73,459 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
Equity expense in joint venture
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
11,545 |
|
|
|
27,799 |
|
|
|
14,493 |
|
|
|
(16,625 |
) |
|
|
37,212 |
|
Total assets(B)(D)
|
|
|
65,212 |
|
|
|
118,555 |
|
|
|
100,768 |
|
|
|
22,545 |
|
|
|
307,080 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
F-37
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reportable Segments | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Energy and | |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Storage | |
|
Biomedical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
15,699 |
|
|
$ |
37,863 |
|
|
$ |
15,008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
Equity expense in joint venture
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Operating income (loss)(A)
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
(8,926 |
) |
|
|
863 |
|
Total assets(B)(D)
|
|
|
62,558 |
|
|
|
105,508 |
|
|
|
105,127 |
|
|
|
26,444 |
|
|
|
299,637 |
|
Equity investment in joint venture
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reportable Segments | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Energy and | |
|
Distribution | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals | |
|
and Storage | |
|
Biomedical | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
42,910 |
|
|
$ |
102,469 |
|
|
$ |
51,638 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs (benefit)
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
7,607 |
|
Loss on insolvent subsidiary
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
Operating income (loss)(A)
|
|
|
(8,694 |
) |
|
|
8,005 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
|
|
(14,690 |
) |
|
|
(2,998 |
) |
Total assets(B)(D)
|
|
|
59,307 |
|
|
|
105,147 |
|
|
|
109,196 |
|
|
|
39,272 |
|
|
|
312,922 |
|
Equity investment in joint venture
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Corporate operating loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 includes $6,046 of professional fees
incurred by the Company related to its debt restructuring
activities. |
|
(B) |
|
Corporate assets at December 31, 2005, October 16,
2005, December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and
September 30, 2003 consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents and deferred income taxes. |
|
(C) |
|
Total assets at December 31, 2005 includes goodwill of
$72,833, $128,653 and $35,256 for the Energy and Chemicals,
Distribution and Storage, and Biomedical segments, respectively. |
|
(D) |
|
Total assets at October 16, 2005, December 31, 2004,
December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003 includes
goodwill of $31,648, $2,787 and $40,675 for the Energy and
Chemicals, Distribution and Storage, and Biomedical segments,
respectively. |
F-38
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
A reconciliation of the total of the reportable segments
operating income (loss) from continuing operations to
consolidated (loss) income from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
Nine | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
5,148 |
|
|
$ |
20,728 |
|
|
$ |
37,212 |
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
(2,998 |
) |
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(5,565 |
) |
|
|
(4,192 |
) |
|
|
(4,760 |
) |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
(9,911 |
) |
|
Financing costs amortization
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
Derivative contracts valuation income (expense)
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
Reorganization items, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
$ |
(895 |
) |
|
$ |
16,036 |
|
|
$ |
32,832 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
Nine | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Product Revenue Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Chemicals Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heat exchangers
|
|
$ |
22,218 |
|
|
$ |
52,702 |
|
|
$ |
48,091 |
|
|
$ |
10,975 |
|
|
$ |
31,430 |
|
|
Cold boxes and LNG VIP
|
|
|
11,917 |
|
|
|
34,218 |
|
|
|
21,518 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
11,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,135 |
|
|
|
86,920 |
|
|
|
69,609 |
|
|
|
15,699 |
|
|
|
42,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution and Storage Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryogenic bulk storage systems
|
|
|
22,626 |
|
|
|
70,180 |
|
|
|
73,118 |
|
|
|
17,950 |
|
|
|
43,248 |
|
|
Cryogenic packaged gas systems and beverage liquid CO
2
systems
|
|
|
18,150 |
|
|
|
65,713 |
|
|
|
59,706 |
|
|
|
13,447 |
|
|
|
41,677 |
|
|
Cryogenic systems and components
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
11,571 |
|
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
|
Cryogenic services
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
13,865 |
|
|
|
14,917 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
9,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,832 |
|
|
|
161,329 |
|
|
|
162,508 |
|
|
|
37,863 |
|
|
|
102,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biomedical Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical products and biological storage systems
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
48,488 |
|
|
|
62,873 |
|
|
|
12,337 |
|
|
|
41,355 |
|
|
MRI components and other
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
$ |
8,760 |
|
|
|
10,586 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
57,248 |
|
|
|
73,459 |
|
|
|
15,008 |
|
|
|
51,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sales
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Company | |
|
|
|
Reorganized | |
|
|
| |
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
October 17, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
Three | |
|
Nine | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Year | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
to | |
|
to | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
October 16, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived | |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived | |
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information: |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States
|
|
$ |
75,692 |
|
|
$ |
398,576 |
|
|
$ |
233,669 |
|
|
$ |
233,466 |
|
|
$ |
156,181 |
|
|
$ |
52,828 |
|
|
$ |
155,451 |
|
Czech Republic
|
|
|
12,829 |
|
|
|
27,944 |
|
|
|
42,645 |
|
|
|
43,163 |
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
10,205 |
|
|
|
20,406 |
|
Other Non-U.S. Countries
|
|
|
9,131 |
|
|
|
42,222 |
|
|
|
29,183 |
|
|
|
28,947 |
|
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
|
5,537 |
|
|
|
21,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
|
$ |
468,742 |
|
|
$ |
305,497 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
|
$ |
167,691 |
|
|
$ |
68,570 |
|
|
$ |
197,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Note N Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
Selected quarterly data for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Successor | |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter(a) | |
|
Quarter(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sales
|
|
$ |
85,170 |
|
|
$ |
99,721 |
|
|
$ |
105,787 |
|
|
$ |
14,819 |
|
|
$ |
97,652 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
24,898 |
|
|
|
29,932 |
|
|
|
30,101 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
|
|
14,092 |
|
|
|
12,398 |
|
|
|
(15,654 |
) |
|
|
5,148 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
8,658 |
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
(12,823 |
) |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fourth quarter for the Reorganized Company is the period
October 1, 2005 to October 16, 2005 and the fourth
quarter for the Successor Company is the period October 17,
2005 to December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reorganized Company | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sales
|
|
$ |
68,782 |
|
|
$ |
74,665 |
|
|
$ |
76,380 |
|
|
$ |
85,749 |
|
|
$ |
305,576 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
21,831 |
|
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
23,687 |
|
|
|
26,152 |
|
|
|
93,806 |
|
Employee separation and plant closure costs
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
(3,169 |
) |
Operating Income
|
|
|
7,804 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
11,642 |
|
|
|
37,212 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
NOTE O Subsequent Events
In February 2006, the Company paid $1,498, including fees to
acquire the remaining 4.3% of minority interest in Chart Ferox,
a.s. The Company expects to own a 100% interest in Chart Ferox,
a.s. during 2006 upon customary Czech Republic regulatory
approval.
F-41
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution. |
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses payable in
connection with the distribution of the securities being
registered. All amounts are estimated except the Securities and
Exchange Commission registration fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee
|
|
$ |
26,750 |
|
NYSE Listing Fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses
|
|
$ |
|
|
Printing and Engraving Expenses
|
|
$ |
|
|
Legal Fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounting Fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Registrar and Transfer Agent Fees
|
|
$ |
|
|
Agent and Trustee Fees and Expenses
|
|
$ |
|
|
NASD Filing Fee
|
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 14. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers. |
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the
DGCL) grants each corporation organized thereunder
the power to indemnify any person who is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of a corporation or enterprise,
against expenses, including attorneys fees, judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by him in connection with any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, other than an action by or in
the right of the corporation, by reason of being or having been
in any such capacity, if he acted in good faith in a manner
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
action, or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL enables a corporation in its
certificate of incorporation or an amendment thereto or
eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to the
corporation or its stockholders of monetary damages for
violations of the directors fiduciary duty of care, except
(i) for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty
to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or
omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) pursuant to
Section 174 of the DGCL (providing for liability of
directors for unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock
purchases or redemptions) or (iv) for any transaction from
which a director derived an improper personal benefit. The
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended
and Restated By-Laws for Chart Industries, Inc. provide for such
limitations on liability.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors and officers providing for additional indemnification
protection beyond that provided by the Directors and Officers
Liability Insurance Policy. In the indemnification agreements,
we have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify and
hold harmless the director or officer to the maximum extent then
authorized or permitted by the provisions of the Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the DGCL, or by any
amendment(s) thereto.
|
|
Item 15. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. |
We have issued unregistered securities in the transactions
described below. These securities were offered and sold in
reliance upon the exemptions provided for in
Section 1145(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, relating
to issuance of securities pursuant to our bankruptcy
reorganization plan, Section 4(2) of the Securities Act,
relating to sales not involving any public offering,
Rule 506 of the Securities Act relating to sales to
accredited investors and Rule 701 of the Securities Act
relating to a compensatory benefit plan. The
II-1
sales were made without the use of an underwriter and any
certificates representing the securities sold (other than
securities issued pursuant to the exemption provided by
Section 1145(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code) contain a
restrictive legend that prohibits transfer without registration
or an applicable exemption.
Pursuant to the terms of our bankruptcy reorganization plan, on
September 15, 2003 we issued an aggregate of
5,325,331 shares of common stock to our then senior lenders
and our pre-bankruptcy stockholders and we issued warrants to
acquire an aggregate of 280,281 shares of our common stock
to our pre-bankruptcy stockholders. These shares of common stock
and warrants were issued in accordance with the terms of our
reorganization plan, which was confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware by an order entered on
September 4, 2003, in reliance on the exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by
Section 1145(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The common
Stock issued to our then senior lenders was issued in exchange
for claims under our pre-bankruptcy senior credit facilities,
and the common stock and warrants issued to our pre-bankruptcy
stockholders was issued in exchange for their cancelled
pre-bankruptcy stock.
The following table shows the shares of our common stock that we
have issued upon the exercise of warrants for the prices
indicated therein for the past three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of Common | |
Date of Exercise |
|
Warrants Exercised | |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Stock Issued | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
July 15, 2004
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
2 |
|
August 12, 2004
|
|
|
26,390 |
|
|
$32.97 per share; cashless |
|
|
5,323 |
|
September 29, 2004
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
53 |
|
October 19, 2004
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
5 |
|
October 22, 2004
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
19 |
|
November 11, 2004
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1 |
|
November 19, 2004
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
53 |
|
December 8, 2004
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
6 |
|
December 10, 2004
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
24 |
|
January 4, 2005
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
9 |
|
February 11, 2005
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1 |
|
February 25, 2005
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1 |
|
March 9, 2005
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
819 |
|
April 12, 2005
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
987 |
|
April 12, 2005
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
107 |
|
April 27, 2005
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1 |
|
May 10, 2005
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
77 |
|
May 16, 2005
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
53 |
|
May 23, 2005
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
9 |
|
June 3, 2005
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
124 |
|
June 20, 2005
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
2 |
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
2 |
|
July 7, 2005
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
14 |
|
July 12, 2005
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
20 |
|
July 25, 2005
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
6 |
|
July 27, 2005
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1,157 |
|
August 5, 2005
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
7 |
|
August 5, 1005
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1,043 |
|
August 10, 2005
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
2,000 |
|
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of Common | |
Date of Exercise |
|
Warrants Exercised | |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Stock Issued | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
August 11, 2005
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1,780 |
|
August 11, 2005
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1,458 |
|
August 12, 2005
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
820 |
|
August 15, 2005
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1 |
|
August 15, 2005
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
5,148 |
|
August 18, 2005
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
32 |
|
August 24, 2005
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
4,279 |
|
August 31, 2005
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1 |
|
September 6, 2005
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
7,116 |
|
September 13, 2005
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
2 |
|
September 14, 2005
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
2,100 |
|
September 16, 2005
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
7 |
|
September 19, 2005
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
53 |
|
September 21, 2005
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
551 |
|
September 28, 2005
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
15,000 |
|
September 29, 2005
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
300 |
|
October 3, 2005
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
3,200 |
|
October 4, 2005
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
1,900 |
|
October 5, 2005
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
434 |
|
October 6, 2005
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
200 |
|
October 7, 2005
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
357 |
|
October 12, 2005
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
134 |
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
77,865 |
|
|
$32.97 per share |
|
|
56,798 |
|
With respect to each of the issuances above, the issuance of the
shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the warrants was
made in reliance on the exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided
by Section 1145(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, on the
basis that the common stock was offered and sold upon the
exercise of warrants that were offered and sold under a plan of
a debtor in exchange for an interest in the debtor. The warrants
were governed by a Warrant Agreement, dated September 15,
2003, between the Company and National City Bank, as warrant
agent. The Warrant Agreement terminated upon consummation of the
Acquisition.
On February 26, 2004, we issued an aggregate of
28,797 shares to Samuel F. Thomas, our Chief Executive
Officer, for an aggregate purchase price of $399,990 in reliance
on the exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506
thereunder on the basis that the transaction did not involve a
public offering.
On October 17, 2005, in connection with the Acquisition, we
issued an aggregate of 1,718,896 shares of our common stock
to FR X Chart Holdings LLC pursuant to the terms of
the agreement and plan of merger, dated August 2, 2005, by
and among certain of our then-existing stockholders, First
Reserve Fund X, L.P. and CI Acquisition, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of First Reserve Fund X, L.P. in reliance on the
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act provided by Section 4(2) thereunder.
On November 23, 2005, we issued 218,408 options under the
2005 Stock Option Plan in reliance on the exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by
Rule 701 promulgated thereunder.
On March 29, 2006, we issued 10,000 options under the 2005
Stock Option Plan to one of our executive officers in reliance
upon the exemption under Section 701 of the Securities Act.
II-3
|
|
Item 16. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
(a) Exhibits
Reference is made to the information contained in the
Exhibit Index filed as part of this Registration Statement,
which information is incorporated herein by reference pursuant
to Rule 411 of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Rules and Regulations under the Securities Act.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
All applicable financial statement schedule disclosure
requirements are included in the prospectus which forms a part
of this registration statement, which information is
incorporated herein by reference pursuant to Rule 411 of
the Securities and Exchange Commissions Rules and
Regulations under the Securities Act.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
|
|
|
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(2) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offering therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreements, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused the registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the city of Garfield Heights, State of Ohio, on
April 13, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Samuel F. Thomas |
|
Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer |
SIGNATURES AND POWERS OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below authorizes Michael F.
Biehl and Matthew J. Klaben and each of them, as his
attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to
execute, in his name and on his behalf, in any and all
capacities, this Registration Statement on
Form S-1 and any
and all amendments thereto (and any additional registration
statement related thereto permitted by Rule 462(b)
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (and all further
amendments including post-effective amendments thereto))
necessary or advisable to enable the registrant to comply with
the Securities Act of 1933, and any rules, regulations and
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
respect thereof, in connection with the registration of the
securities which are the subject of such registration statement,
which amendments may make such changes in such registration
statement as such
attorney-in-fact may
deem appropriate, and with full power and authority to perform
and do any and all acts and things, whatsoever which any such
attorney-in-fact or
substitute may deem necessary or advisable to be performed or
done in connection with any or all of the above-described
matters, as fully as each of the undersigned could do if
personally present and acting, hereby ratifying and approving
all acts of any such
attorney-in-fact or
substitute.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities indicated on April 13, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Samuel F. Thomas
Samuel F. Thomas |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ Michael F. Biehl
Michael F. Biehl |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
/s/ Ben A. Guill
Ben A. Guill |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
/s/ Kenneth W. Moore
Kenneth W. Moore |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Timothy H. Day
Timothy H. Day |
|
Director |
|
/s/ James H. Hoppel,
Jr.
James H. Hoppel, Jr. |
|
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1* |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 2, 2005 by
and among Chart Industries, Inc., certain of its stockholders,
First Reserve Fund X, L.P. and CI Acquisition, Inc. |
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement among GT Acquisition Company and
Greenville Tube, LLC, dated July 1, 2003 |
|
3 |
.1* |
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|
3 |
.2* |
|
Form of Amended and Restated By-Laws |
|
4 |
.1* |
|
Form of certificate of Chart Industries, Inc. common stock |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Indenture, dated as of October 17, 2005, between Chart
Industries, Inc. and The Bank of New York as trustee |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 17, 2005 among
Chart Industries, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto
and Morgan Stanley & Co., as representative of the
initial purchasers |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Form of Senior Subordinated Note (included in Exhibit 4.2) |
|
5 |
.1* |
|
Opinion of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2005 among FR X
Chart Holdings LLC, CI Acquisition, Inc., as Borrower, the
lenders party thereto, Citicorp North America, Inc., as
administrative agent, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as
syndication agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Morgan
Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint
book managers and Natexis Banques Populaires and Sovereign Bank,
as co-documentation agents |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of October 17,
2005 among FR X Chart Holdings LLC, as guarantor and pledgor, CI
Acquisition, Inc., as borrower, each subsidiary loan party named
therein and Citicorp North America, Inc., as collateral agent |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated November 23, 2005 between Chart
Industries, Inc. and Samuel F. Thomas |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2005 between Chart
Industries, Inc. and Michael F. Biehl |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2005 between Chart
Industries, Inc. and Charles R. Lovett |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated March 29, 2006 between Chart
Industries, Inc. and Matthew J. Klaben |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
IAM Agreement 2004-2007, effective February 8, 2004, by and
between Chart Heat Exchangers, L.P. and Local Lodge 2191 of
District Lodge 66 of the International Association of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO |
|
10 |
.8* |
|
Trust Agreement by and between Chart Industries, Inc. and
Security Trust Company relating to the Amended and Restated
Chart Industries, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Income Plan |
|
10 |
.9* |
|
Form of Management Stockholders Agreement |
|
10 |
.10* |
|
Form of Stockholders Agreement |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Chart Industries, Inc. 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.12* |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2004 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan (for Samuel F. Thomas) |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2004 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan (for those other than Samuel F. Thomas) |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Chart Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Chart Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.18* |
|
2006 Chart Executive Incentive Compensation Plan |
|
10 |
.19* |
|
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan |
|
10 |
.20 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement |
|
10 |
.21* |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries |
|
23 |
.1* |
|
Consent of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (included as
part of its opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 hereto) |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature page of this
Registration Statement) |
|
|
* |
To be filed by amendment. |