e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
Commission file number:
000-50499
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
01-0616769
|
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
4000 MacArthur Boulevard, East
Tower
Newport Beach, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
92660-3095
(Zip code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(949) 579-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock $0.01 par
value per share
(including associated Preferred Share Purchase Rights)
(Title of Each
Class)
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(Name of Each
Exchange on Which Registered)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer.
Large Accelerated
Filer o Accelerated
Filer þ Non-accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrants voting and
non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of
the end of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter was
approximately $427.4 million. Shares held by each officer
and director and each person owning more than 10% of the
outstanding voting and non-voting stock have been excluded from
this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be
affiliates of the Registrant. This determination of potential
affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination
for other purposes. Shares held include shares of which certain
of such persons disclaim beneficial ownership.
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrants Common
Stock as of October 27, 2006 was 110,792,184.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the
2006 fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this
Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains statements relating to Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
(including certain projections and business trends) that are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and are subject to
the safe harbor created by those sections. All
statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
other than those that are purely historical, are forward-looking
statements. Words such as expect,
believe, anticipate,
outlook, could, target,
project, intend, plan,
seek, estimate, should,
may, assume and continue, as
well as variations of such words and similar expressions, also
identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
include, without limitation, statements regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our competitive advantages;
|
|
|
|
the benefits of a fabless operation;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our relationships with network infrastructure
original equipment manufacturers to facilitate early adoption of
our products, enhance our ability to obtain design wins and
encourage adoption of our technology in the industry;
|
|
|
|
the importance of software drivers and application software;
|
|
|
|
the growth prospects for the network infrastructure equipment
and communications semiconductors markets, including increased
demand for network capacity, the upgrade and expansion of legacy
networks, the build-out of networks in developing countries, and
the increased outsourcing of component requirements;
|
|
|
|
our investment in research and development and participation in
the formulation of industry standards;
|
|
|
|
the growth rate for products in the enterprise, network access
and metro service areas and our position to increase market
share;
|
|
|
|
the focus of our research and development efforts on certain
products, including voice over Internet protocol and high
performance analog applications, and our expectation of the
growth prospects for those products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve design wins and convert wins into revenue;
|
|
|
|
the availability of raw materials, parts and supplies;
|
|
|
|
competition and the principal competitive factors for
semiconductor suppliers, including time to market, product
quality, reliability and performance, customer support, price
and total system cost, new product innovation and compliance
with industry standards;
|
|
|
|
the continuation of intense price and product competition, and
the resulting declining average selling prices for our products;
|
|
|
|
our investments in research and development;
|
|
|
|
the value of our intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
the impact of changes in customer purchasing activities,
inventory levels and inventory management practices;
|
|
|
|
the importance of attracting and retaining highly skilled,
dedicated personnel;
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve revenue growth and profitability, or to
achieve positive cash flows from operations, and the expected
period through which we will continue to incur significant
losses and negative cash flows;
|
|
|
|
our plans to reduce operating expenses, and the amount and
timing of any such expense reductions;
|
|
|
|
the importance of providing comprehensive product service and
support;
|
|
|
|
the dependence of our operating results on our ability to
introduce products on a timely basis;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our existing sources of liquidity and
expected sources of cash to fund our operations, research and
development efforts, anticipated capital expenditures, working
capital and other financing requirements for the next twelve
months;
|
|
|
|
our expectation of paying our obligations relating to our
restructuring plans and other obligations over their respective
terms, our intention to fund those payments from available cash
balances and funds from product sales, and the impact of such
payments on our liquidity;
|
|
|
|
the circumstances under which we may need to seek additional
financing, our ability to obtain any such financing and any
consideration of acquisition opportunities;
|
|
|
|
our expectation that our provision for income taxes for fiscal
2007 will principally consist of income taxes related to our
foreign operations;
|
|
|
|
our expectations with respect to our recognition of income tax
benefits in the future;
|
|
|
|
our restructuring plans, including expected workforce reductions
and facilities closures, the expected cost savings under our
restructuring plans and the uses of those savings, the timing
and amount of payments to complete the actions, the source of
funds for such payments, the impact on our liquidity and the
resulting decreases in our research and development and selling,
general and administrative expenses, and the amounts of future
charges to complete our restructuring plans;
|
|
|
|
our intentions with respect to inventories that were previously
written down;
|
|
|
|
our beliefs regarding the effect of the disposition of pending
or asserted legal matters;
|
|
|
|
our plans relating to our use of stock-based compensation, the
effectiveness of our incentive compensation programs and the
expected amounts of stock-based compensation expense in future
periods;
|
|
|
|
our belief that the financial stability of suppliers is an
important consideration in our customers purchasing
decisions;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of future payments under contractual
obligations; and
|
|
|
|
the impact of recent accounting pronouncements and the adoption
of new accounting standards.
|
Our expectations, beliefs, anticipations, objectives,
intentions, plans and strategies regarding the future are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results, and actual events
that occur, to differ materially from results contemplated by
the forward-looking statement. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
market demand for our new and existing products and our ability
to increase our revenues;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain operating expenses within anticipated
levels;
|
|
|
|
our ability to reduce our cash consumption;
|
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital needed for our business;
|
|
|
|
constraints in the supply of wafers and other product components
from our third-party manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully and cost effectively establish and
manage operations in jurisdictions with low cost structures;
|
|
|
|
the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
successful development and introduction of new products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain design wins and develop revenues from them;
|
|
|
|
pricing pressures and other competitive factors;
|
|
|
|
order and shipment uncertainty;
|
|
|
|
changes in our customers inventory levels and inventory
management practices;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields;
|
|
|
|
product defects; and
|
|
|
|
intellectual property infringement claims by others and the
ability to protect our intellectual property.
|
The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including
those set forth in Item 1A Risk
Factors and those detailed from time to time in our other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These
forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof
and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to
update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Mindspeed®
and Mindspeed
Technologies®
are registered trademarks of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Other
brands, names and trademarks contained in this report are the
property of their respective owners.
For presentation purposes of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
references made to the years ended September 30, 2006,
September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 relate to
the actual fiscal years ended September 29, 2006,
September 30, 2005, and October 1, 2004, respectively.
4
PART I
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (we or Mindspeed) designs, develops
and sells semiconductor networking solutions for communications
applications in enterprise, access, metropolitan and wide-area
networks. Our products, ranging from optical network transceiver
solutions to voice and Internet protocol (IP) processors, are
sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for use in a
variety of network infrastructure equipment, including mixed
media gateways, high-speed routers, switches, access
multiplexers, cross-connect systems, digital loop carrier
equipment, IP private branch exchanges (PBXs) and optical
modules. Service providers and enterprises use this equipment
for the processing, transmission and switching of high-speed
voice, data and video traffic, including advanced services such
as voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), within different
segments of the communications network. Our customers include
Alcatel Data Networks, S.A., Cisco Systems, Inc., Huawei
Technologies Co., McData Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric
Corporation, Siemens A.G. and Zhongxing Telecom Equipment Corp.
(ZTE).
We believe the breadth of our product portfolio, combined with
more than three decades of experience in semiconductor hardware,
software and communications systems engineering, provide us with
a competitive advantage. We have proven expertise in signal,
packet and transmission processing technologies, which are
critical core competencies for successfully defining, designing
and implementing advanced semiconductor products for
next-generation network infrastructure equipment. We seek to
cultivate close relationships with leading network
infrastructure OEMs to understand emerging markets, technologies
and standards. We focus our research and development efforts on
applications in the segments of the telecommunications network
which we believe offer the most attractive growth prospects. Our
business is fabless, which means we outsource all of our
manufacturing needs, and we do not own or operate any
semiconductor manufacturing facilities. We believe being fabless
allows us to minimize operating infrastructure and capital
expenditures, maintain operational flexibility and focus our
resources on the design, development and marketing of our
products the highest value-creation elements of our
business model.
Spin-off
from Conexant Systems, Inc.
Mindspeed was originally incorporated in Delaware in 2001 as a
wholly owned subsidiary of Conexant Systems, Inc.
(Conexant). On June 27, 2003, Conexant
completed the distribution to Conexant stockholders of all
outstanding shares of common stock of Mindspeed (the
distribution). In the distribution, each Conexant stockholder
received one share of our common stock (including an associated
preferred share purchase right) for every three shares of
Conexant common stock held and cash for any fractional share of
our common stock. Following the distribution, we began
operations as an independent, publicly held company. Our common
stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the ticker symbol
MSPD.
Prior to the distribution, Conexant transferred to us the assets
and liabilities of its Mindspeed business, including the stock
of certain subsidiaries, and certain other assets and
liabilities which were allocated to us under the Distribution
Agreement entered into between us and Conexant. Also prior to
the distribution, Conexant contributed to us cash in an amount
such that at the time of the distribution our cash balance was
$100 million. We issued to Conexant a warrant to purchase
30 million shares of our common stock at a price of
$3.408 per share, exercisable for a period of ten years
after the distribution. In connection with the Distribution, we
and Conexant also entered into a Credit Agreement (terminated
December 2004), an Employee Matters Agreement, a Tax Allocation
Agreement, a Transition Services Agreement and a Sublease.
Industry
Overview
Communications semiconductor products are a critical part of
network infrastructure equipment. Network infrastructure OEMs
require advanced communications semiconductor
products such as digital signal processors,
transceivers, framers, packet and cell processors and switching
solutions that are highly optimized for the
equipment employed by their customers. We seek to provide
semiconductor products that enable network
5
infrastructure OEMs to meet the needs of their service provider
and enterprise customers in terms of system performance,
functionality and
time-to-market.
Addressed
Markets
Our semiconductor products are primarily focused on network
infrastructure equipment applications in three segments of the
broadly defined communications network: enterprise networks;
network access service areas; and metropolitan area networks.
The type and complexity of network infrastructure equipment used
in these segments continues to expand, driven by the need for
the processing, transmission and switching of digital voice,
data and video traffic over multiple communication media, at
numerous transmission data rates and employing different
protocols. We also offer a limited number of products used in
wide-area or long-haul networks.
Enterprise networks include equipment that is deployed
primarily in the offices of commercial enterprises for voice and
data communications and access to outside networks. An
enterprise network may be comprised of many local area networks,
as well as client workstations, centralized database management
systems, storage area networks and other components. In
enterprise networks, communications semiconductors facilitate
the processing and transmission of voice, data and video traffic
in converged IP networks that are replacing the traditional
separate telephone, data and video conferencing networks.
Typical network infrastructure equipment found in enterprise
networks that use our products include voice gateways, IP PBXs,
storage area network (SAN) routers and director class switches.
In addition, a major trend in the broadcast video market is the
switch from analog to digital television transmission and the
conversion from standard-definition television services to
high-definition television (HDTV) services featuring more
detailed images and digital surround sound. We offer a family of
broadcast-video products optimized for high-speed HDTV routing
and production switcher applications.
Network Access service areas of the telecommunications
network refer to the last mile of a
telecommunications or cable service providers physical
network (including copper, fiber optic or wireless transmission)
and the network infrastructure equipment that connects
end-users, typically located at a business or residence, with
metropolitan area and wide-area networks. For this portion of
the network, infrastructure equipment requires semiconductors
that enable reliable, high-speed connectivity capable of
aggregating or disaggregating and transporting multiple forms of
voice, data and video traffic. In addition, communications
semiconductors must accommodate multiple transmission standards
and communications protocols to provide a bridge between
dissimilar access networks, for example, connecting wireless
base station equipment to a wireline network. Typical network
infrastructure equipment found at the edge of the network access
service area that use our products include remote access
concentrators, digital subscriber line (DSL) access
multiplexers, mixed-media gateways, wireless base stations,
digital loop carrier equipment and optical line termination and
media converters.
Metropolitan Area Networks, or metro, service areas of
the telecommunications network refer to the portion of a service
providers physical network that enables high-speed
communications within a city or a larger regional area. In
addition, it provides the communications link between network
access service areas and the fiber optic-based, wide-area
network. For metro equipment applications, communications
semiconductors provide transmission and processing capabilities,
as well as information segmentation and classification, and
routing and switching functionality, to support high-speed
traffic from multiple sources employing different transmission
standards and communications protocols. These functions require
signal conversion, signal processing and packet processing
expertise to support the design and development of highly
integrated mixed-signal devices combining analog and digital
functions with communications protocols and application
software. Typical network infrastructure equipment found in
metro service areas that use our products include add-drop
multiplexers, switches, high-speed routers, digital
cross-connect systems, optical edge devices and multiservice
provisioning platforms.
The telecommunications network, including the Internet, has
evolved into a complex, hybrid series of digital and optical
networks that connect individuals and businesses globally. These
new larger bandwidth, data-centric networks integrate voice,
data and video traffic, operate over both wired and wireless
media, link existing voice and data networks and cross
traditional enterprise, network access, metro and long haul
service area boundaries. Network infrastructure OEMs are
designing faster, more intelligent and more complex equipment to
satisfy the needs of the service providers as they continue to
expand their network coverage and service offerings while
upgrading and connecting or integrating existing networks of
disparate types. In this demanding environment, we
6
believe network infrastructure OEMs select as their strategic
partners communications semiconductor suppliers who can deliver
advanced products that provide increased functionality, lower
total system cost and support for a variety of communications
media, operating speeds and protocols.
The
Mindspeed Approach
We believe the breadth of our product portfolio, combined with
our expertise in semiconductor hardware, software and
communications systems engineering, provide us with a
competitive advantage in designing and selling our products to
leading network infrastructure OEMs.
We have proven expertise in signal, packet and transmission
processing technologies. Signal processing involves both signal
conversion and digital signal processing techniques that convert
and compress voice, data and video between analog and digital
representations. Packet processing involves bundling or
segmenting information traffic using standard protocols such as
IP or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) and enables sharing of
transmission bandwidth across a given communication medium.
Transmission processing involves the transport and receipt of
voice, data and video traffic across copper wire and optical
fiber communications media.
These core technology competencies are critical for developing
semiconductor networking solutions that enable the processing,
transmission and switching of high-speed voice, data and video
traffic, employing multiple communications protocols, across
disparate communications networks. Our core technology
competencies are the foundation for developing our:
|
|
|
|
|
semiconductor device architectures, including digital signal
processors, mixed signal devices and programmable protocol
engines, as well as analog signal processing capabilities;
|
|
|
|
highly optimized signal processing algorithms and communications
protocols, which we implement in semiconductor devices; and
|
|
|
|
critical software drivers and application software to perform
signal, packet and transmission processing tasks.
|
We believe the software drivers and application software are an
increasingly important part of the semiconductor networking
solutions we offer to OEMs.
Increasing
Demand for Communications Semiconductors
We believe the market for network infrastructure equipment in
general, and for communications semiconductors in particular,
offers attractive long-term growth prospects for several reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that demand for network capacity will continue to
increase, driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet user growth;
|
|
|
|
higher network utilization rates; and
|
|
|
|
the popularity of VoIP and other bandwidth-intensive
applications, such as wireless data transfer and
video/multimedia applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that incumbent telecommunications carriers,
integrated communication service providers and cable multiple
service operators worldwide will continue to upgrade and expand
legacy portions of their networks to accommodate new service
offerings and to reduce operating costs.
|
|
|
|
In developing countries, we expect that service providers will
continue the build-out of telecommunication networks, many of
which were previously government owned.
|
Moreover, we expect that network infrastructure OEMs will
outsource more of their semiconductor component requirements to
semiconductor suppliers, allowing the OEMs to reduce their
operating cost structure by shifting their focus and investment
from internal application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)
semiconductor design and development to more strategic systems
development.
7
Strategy
Our objective is to grow our business and to become the leading
supplier of semiconductor networking solutions to leading global
network infrastructure OEMs in key enterprise, network access
and metro service area market segments. To achieve this
objective, we are pursuing the following strategies:
Focus
on Increasing Share in High-Growth, High-Margin
Applications
We have established strong market positions for our products in
the enterprise, network access and metro service areas of the
telecommunications network. We believe the markets for
semiconductor products that address these applications will grow
at faster rates than the markets for network infrastructure
equipment in general. In addition, products which address
applications in the enterprise, network access and metro service
areas and perform packet processing, transmission processing
and/or
signal processing functions typically command higher average
selling prices and higher margins, primarily due to their
functional complexity and their software content. These two key
attributes are expected to make the enterprise, network access
and metro service areas the most attractive market segments for
the foreseeable future. We believe that our three core
technology competencies, coupled with focused investments in
product development, will position us to increase our share in
those target areas.
Expand
Strategic Relationships with Industry-Leading Global Network
Infrastructure OEMs and Maximize Design Win Share
We identify and selectively establish strategic relationships
with market leaders in the network infrastructure equipment
industry to develop next-generation products and, in some cases,
customized solutions for their specific needs. We have an
extensive history of working closely with our customers
research and development and marketing teams to understand
emerging markets, technologies and standards, and we invest our
product development resources in those areas. We believe our
close relationships with leading network infrastructure OEMs
facilitate early adoption of our semiconductor products during
development of their system-level products, enhance our ability
to obtain design wins from those customers and encourage
adoption of our technology throughout the industry.
In North America, we have cultivated close relationships with
leading network infrastructure OEMs, including Cisco Systems,
Inc., McData Corporation and Nortel Networks, Inc. Abroad, we
have established close relationships with market leaders such as
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation,
TrueLight Corporation and Zhongxing Telecom Equipment Corp. in
the Asia-Pacific region and Alcatel Data Networks, S.A., Siemens
A.G. and LM Ericsson Telephone Company in Europe.
Capitalize
on the Breadth of Our Product Portfolio
We build on the breadth of our product portfolio of
physical-layer devices, together with our signal and packet
processing devices and communications software expertise, to
increase our share of the silicon content in our customers
products. We offer a range of complementary products that are
optimized to work with each other and provide our customers with
complete information receipt, processing and transmission
functions. These complementary products allow infrastructure
OEMs to source components that provide proven interoperability
from a single semiconductor supplier, rather than requiring OEMs
to combine and coordinate individual components from multiple
vendors. In addition, we offer highly integrated products such
as our family of
Comcerto®
VoIP processor solutions that provide our customers with a
complete hardware and software solution in a single device.
These integrated products perform functions typically requiring
multiple discrete components and software. We believe that this
strategy of offering both complementary and integrated products
increases product performance, speeds
time-to-market
and lowers the total system cost for our customers.
The breadth of our product portfolio also provides a competitive
advantage for serving network convergence applications such as
multiprotocol
wireless-to-wireline
connectivity. These applications generally require a combination
of processing, transmission or switching functionality to move
high-speed voice and data traffic using multiple communications
protocols across disparate communications networks.
8
Provide
Outstanding Technical Support and Customer Service
We provide broad-based technical and product design support to
our customers through three dedicated teams: field application
engineers; product application engineers; and technical
marketing personnel. We believe that comprehensive service and
support are critical to shortening our customers design
cycles and maintaining a long-term competitive position within
the network infrastructure equipment market. Outstanding
customer service and support are important competitive factors
for semiconductor component suppliers like us seeking to be the
preferred suppliers to leading network infrastructure OEMs.
Products
We provide network infrastructure OEMs with a broad portfolio of
advanced semiconductor networking solutions, ranging from
physical-layer transceivers and framers to higher-layer network
processors. Our products can be classified into three focused
product families: high-performance analog products; multiservice
access digital signal processor (DSP) products; and wide-area
networking (WAN) communications products. These three product
families are found in a variety of networking equipment designed
to process, transmit and switch voice, data and video traffic
between, and within, the different segments of the
communications network.
High-Performance
Analog Products
Our high-performance analog transmission devices and switching
products support storage area networking,
fiber-to-the-premise
and broadcast video, as well as mainstream synchronous optical
networking (SONET)/synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) and
packet-over-SONET
applications, typically operating at data transmission rates
between 155 megabits per second (Mbps) and 10 gigabits per
second (Gbps). Our transmission products include laser drivers,
transimpedance amplifiers, post amplifiers, clock and data
recovery circuits, serializers/deserializers, video reclockers,
cable drivers and line equalizers. These products serve as the
connection between a fiber optic or coaxial cable component
interface and the remainder of the electrical subsystem in
various network equipment and perform a variety of functions,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
converting incoming optical signals from fiber optic cables to
electrical signals for processing and transport over a wireline
medium and vice-versa;
|
|
|
|
conditioning the signal to remove unwanted noise or errors;
|
|
|
|
combining lower speed signals from multiple parallel paths into
higher speed serial paths, and vice-versa, for bandwidth
economy; and
|
|
|
|
amplifying and equalizing weaker signals as they pass through a
particular systems equipment, media or network.
|
Our switching products include a family of high-speed crosspoint
switches capable of switching traffic up to 4.25 Gpbs within
various types of network switching equipment. These crosspoint
switches direct, or transfer, a large number of high-speed data
input streams, regardless of traffic type, to different
connection trunks for rerouting the information to new
destination points in the network. Crosspoint switches are often
used to provide redundant traffic paths in networking equipment
to protect against the loss of critical data from spurious
network outages or failures that may occur from
time-to-time.
Target equipment applications for our switching products include
add-drop multiplexers, high-density IP switches, storage-area
routers and optical cross-connect systems. In addition, we offer
crosspoint switches optimized for standard and high-definition
broadcast video routing and production switching applications at
rates up to 3 Gbps.
Multiservice
Access DSP Products
Our software-configurable multiservice access DSP products serve
as bridges for transporting voice, data and video between
circuit-switched networks and packet-based networks. Our
multiservice access DSP device architecture combines the
performance of a digital-signal processor core with the
flexibility of a microcontroller core to support our extensive
suite of modulation techniques, echo cancellers, speech coders
and communications protocols. These products process and
translate voice, data and video signals and perform various
management and
9
reporting functions that help determine the appropriate amount
of bandwidth required for transporting the signals to the next
destination. They compress the signals to minimize bandwidth
consumption and modify or add communications protocols to
accommodate transport of the signals across a variety of
different services and networks. Supported services include
VoIP,
voice-over-ATM
(VoATM) and
voice-over-DSL
services, as well as
wireline-to-wireless
connectivity.
Our
Comcerto®
family of
voice-over-packet
(VoP) communications processors includes a full range of pin-
and software-compatible enterprise and carrier-class voice
processing solutions that enable OEMs to provide scalable
systems with customized features. The high-density members of
this family, the Comcerto 600 and Comcerto 700 series processors
and related software, provide a complete
system-on-a-chip
solution for carrier-class VoIP and VoATM applications. The
Comcerto 600 is capable of handling more than 256 channels of
both VoIP and VoATM traffic, while the Comcerto 700 supports
more than 400 channels. Both are targeted for use in digital
loop carriers and voice and media gateways designed to bridge
wireless, wireline and enterprise networks.
The Comcerto 500 and 800 series solutions are designed for
enterprise voice and data processing applications. The Comcerto
500 series is a silicon
PBX-on-a-chip
which supports all required voice processing functionality for
up to 64 channels, including encryption. The Comcerto 800 series
enables a new class of
office-in-a-box
systems by combining a high-quality VoP subsystem with a
high-performance routing and virtual private network (VPN)
engine. The Comcerto 800 series integrates voice processing,
packet processing and encryption functionality into a single
device for the rapidly growing market for VoP enterprise
networks. This product is targeted for use in enterprise voice
gateways, IP PBXs and integrated access devices (IADs).
Wide-Area
Networking Communications Products
Our WAN communications products include transmission solutions
and high-performance ATM/multi-protocol label switching (MPLS)
network processors that facilitate the aggregation, processing
and transport of voice and data traffic over copper wire or
fiber optic cable to access metropolitan and long-haul networks.
Our T1/E1, T3/E3 and SONET carrier devices incorporate
high-speed analog, digital and mixed-signal circuit technologies
and include multi-port framers and line interface units (LIUs)
or transceivers for 1.5 Mbps to 155 Mbps data
transmission. Framers format data for transmission and extract
data at reception, while LIUs condition signals for transmission
and reception over multiple media. Our link-layer products
include multi-channel, high-level data link channel (HDLC)
communications controllers and multi-channel, inverse
multiplexing over ATM (IMA) traffic controllers. The IMA
protocol enables the aggregation of multiple T1 or DSL lines to
deliver higher data rates using existing ATM infrastructure
while the HDLC protocol is used for the packetization of data
and the transfer of messaging and signaling information across
the network. We also offer a family of symmetric DSL (SDSL)
transceivers which enable service providers to deliver Internet
access at data transmission rates of 1.5 Mbps to
5.7 Mbps in both directions over copper wire, supporting
telecommuting and branch office functions worldwide.
Our high-performance ATM/MPLS network processors are designed to
offer advanced protocol translation and traffic management
capabilities. Protocol translation occurs where different types
of networks and protocols interconnect. Traffic management
describes a collection of functions which are used to optimally
allocate network bandwidth and allow service providers to
provide differentiated services over their networks. Our
software-programmable devices operate at data transmission rates
from 1.5 Mbps to 2.5 Gbps. Our network processor devices
address internetworking applications, including ATM segmentation
and reassembly, and a variety of traffic management functions,
including traffic shaping, traffic policing and queue
management, required by these applications.
Our wide-area networking communications products are designed
for use in a variety of equipment including digital loop
carriers, DSL access multiplexers, add-drop multiplexers,
switches, high-speed routers, digital cross-connect systems,
optical edge devices, multiservice provisioning platforms, voice
gateways and wireless base station controllers.
10
Customers
We market and sell our semiconductor networking solutions
directly to leading network infrastructure OEMs. We also sell
our products indirectly through electronic component
distributors and third-party electronic manufacturing service
providers, which manufacture products incorporating our
semiconductor networking solutions for OEMs. Sales to
distributors accounted for approximately 49% of our revenues for
fiscal 2006. For fiscal 2006, distributors Avnet, Inc. and
Alltek Technology Corporation and manufacturing service provider
Jabil Circuit, Inc. accounted for 17%, 11%, and 11%,
respectively, of our net revenues.
Our top five direct OEM customers for fiscal year 2006 were
Alcatel Data Networks, S.A., Fujitsu Limited, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd., Sonus Networks, Inc. and Zhongxing
Telecom Equipment Corp. While our direct sales to these
customers accounted for a total of approximately 14% of our
fiscal 2006 net revenues, we believe indirect sales to
these same customers represent a significant additional portion
of our net revenues. Including indirect sales, we believe that
Cisco Systems, Inc. accounted for approximately 18% of our
fiscal 2006 net revenues and that no other OEM customer
accounted for 10% or more of our net revenues. We believe that
our significant indirect network infrastructure OEM customers
for fiscal year 2006 also included McData Corporation,
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Nortel Networks, Inc., Siemens
A.G. and TrueLight Corporation.
Our customer base is widely dispersed geographically. Revenues
derived from customers located in the Americas, Europe, and the
Asia-Pacific region were 34%, 12% and 54%, respectively, of our
total revenues for fiscal 2006. We believe a substantial portion
of the products we sell to OEMs and third-party manufacturing
service providers in the Asia-Pacific region is ultimately
shipped to end-markets in the Americas and Europe. See
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data, including Note 2 and Note 14 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on
customers and geographic areas.
Sales,
Marketing and Technical Support
We have a worldwide sales, marketing and technical support
organization comprised of 105 employees as of October 27,
2006, located in 6 domestic and 8 international sales locations.
Our marketing, sales and field applications engineering teams,
augmented by 17 electronic component distributors and 12 sales
representative organizations, focus on marketing and selling
semiconductor networking solutions to worldwide network
infrastructure OEMs.
We maintain close working relationships with our customers
throughout their lengthy product development cycle. Our
customers may need six months or longer to test and evaluate our
products and an additional six months or longer to begin volume
production of network infrastructure equipment that incorporates
our products. During this process, we provide broad-based
technical and product design support to our customers through
our field application engineers, product application engineers
and technical marketing personnel. We believe that providing
comprehensive product service and support is critical to
shortening our customers design cycles and maintaining a
competitive position in the network infrastructure equipment
market.
Operations
and Manufacturing
We are a fabless company, which means we do not own or operate
foundries for wafer fabrication or facilities for device
assembly and final test of our products. Instead, we outsource
wafer fabrication, assembly and testing of our semiconductor
products to independent, third-party contractors. We use
mainstream digital complementary metal-oxide semiconductor
(CMOS) process technology for the majority of our products; we
rely on specialty processes for the remainder of products.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC) is our
principal foundry supplier of CMOS wafers and die. Our primary
foundry supplier for specialty process requirements is Jazz
Semiconductor, Inc. We use several other suppliers for wafers
used in older products. We believe that the raw materials, parts
and supplies required by our foundry suppliers are generally
available at present and will be available in the foreseeable
future.
Semiconductor wafers are usually shipped to third-party
contractors for device assembly and packaging where the wafers
are cut into individual die, packaged and tested before final
shipment to customers. We use Amkor Technology, Inc. and other
third-party contractors, located in the Asia-Pacific region,
Europe and California, to
11
satisfy a variety of assembly and packaging technology and
product testing requirements associated with the back-end
portion of the manufacturing process.
We qualify each of our foundry and back-end process providers.
This qualification process consists of a detailed technical
review of process performance, design rules, process models,
tools and support, as well as analysis of the
subcontractors quality system and manufacturing
capability. We also participate in quality and reliability
monitoring through each stage of the production cycle by
reviewing electrical and parametric data from our wafer foundry
and back-end providers. We closely monitor wafer foundry
production for overall quality, reliability and yield levels.
Competition
The communications semiconductor industry in general, and the
markets in which we compete in particular, are intensely
competitive. We compete worldwide with a number of U.S. and
international suppliers that are both larger and smaller than us
in terms of resources and market share. We expect intense
competition to continue.
Our principal competitors are Agere Systems, Inc., Applied Micro
Circuits Corporation, Centillium Communications, Inc., Conexant
Systems, Inc., Exar Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
Gennum Corporation, Infineon Technologies A.G., Maxim Integrated
Products, Inc., PMC-Sierra, Inc., Texas Instruments
Incorporated, Transwitch Corporation and Vitesse Semiconductor
Corporation.
We believe that the principal competitive factors for
semiconductor suppliers in each of our served markets are:
|
|
|
|
|
time-to-market;
|
|
|
|
product quality, reliability and performance;
|
|
|
|
customer support;
|
|
|
|
price and total system cost;
|
|
|
|
new product innovation; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with industry standards.
|
While we believe that we compete favorably with respect to each
of these factors, many of our current and potential competitors
have certain advantages over us, including:
|
|
|
|
|
stronger financial position and liquidity;
|
|
|
|
longer presence in key markets;
|
|
|
|
greater name recognition;
|
|
|
|
access to larger customer bases; and
|
|
|
|
significantly greater sales and marketing, manufacturing,
distribution, technical and other resources.
|
As a result, these competitors may be able to devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we can. Our competitors may also be able to adapt
more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in
customer requirements or may be more able to respond to the
cyclical fluctuations or downturns that affect the semiconductor
industry from time to time. Moreover, we have incurred
substantial operating losses, and we anticipate future losses.
If we are not successful in assuring our customers of our
financial stability, our OEM customers may choose semiconductor
suppliers whom they believe have a stronger financial position
or liquidity, which may materially adversely affect our business.
Backlog
Our sales are made primarily pursuant to standard purchase
orders for delivery of products. Because industry practice
allows customers to cancel orders with limited advance notice to
us prior to shipment, we believe that backlog as of any
particular date is not a reliable indicator of our future
revenue levels.
12
Research
and Development
We have significant research, development, engineering and
product design capabilities. As of October 27, 2006, we had
282 employees engaged in research and development activities. We
perform research and product development activities at our
headquarters in Newport Beach, California and at 7 design
centers. In order to enhance the cost-effectiveness of our
operations, we have increasing sought to shift portions of our
research and development operations to jurisdictions with lower
cost structures than that available in the United States. Our
design centers are strategically located to take advantage of
key technical and engineering talent. Our success depends to a
substantial degree upon our ability to develop and introduce in
a timely fashion new products and enhancements to our existing
products that meet changing customer requirements and emerging
industry standards. We have made and plan to make substantial
investments in research and development and to participate in
the formulation of industry standards. In addition, we actively
collaborate with technology leaders to define and develop
next-generation technologies.
We spent approximately $64.1 million, $71.4 million,
and $79.6 million on research and development activities in
fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decreases in
our research and development expenses reflect the workforce
reductions and other cost reduction actions we implemented in
fiscal years 2002 through 2006.
Intellectual
Property
Our success and future revenue growth depend, in part, on the
intellectual property that we own and develop, including
patents, licenses, trade secrets, know-how, trademarks and
copyrights, and on our ability to protect our intellectual
property. We continuously review our patent portfolio to
maximize its value to us, abandoning inapplicable or less useful
patents and filing new patents important to our product roadmap.
Our patent portfolio may be used to avoid, defend or settle any
potential litigation with respect to various technologies
contained in our products. The portfolio may also provide
negotiating leverage in attempts to cross-license patents or
technologies with third parties and it may provide licensing
opportunities in the future. We rely primarily on patent,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as employee
and third-party nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and
other methods to protect our proprietary technologies and
processes. In connection with our participation in the
development of various industry standards, we may be required to
reasonably license certain of our patents to other parties,
including competitors that develop products based upon the
adopted industry standards. We have also entered into agreements
with certain of our customers and granted these customers the
right to use our proprietary technology in the event that we
file for bankruptcy protection or take other equivalent actions.
While in the aggregate our intellectual property is considered
important to our operations, no single patent, license, trade
secret, know-how, trademark or copyright is considered of such
importance that its loss or termination would materially affect
our business or financial condition.
Employees
As of October 27, 2006, we had 512 full-time
employees, of whom approximately 340 were engineers. Our
employees are not covered by any collective bargaining
agreements and we have not experienced a work stoppage in the
past five years. We believe our future success will depend in
large part on our ability to continue to attract, motivate,
develop and retain highly skilled and dedicated technical,
marketing and management personnel.
Cyclicality
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is
characterized by constant and rapid technological change, rapid
product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving technical
standards, short product life cycles and wide fluctuations in
product supply and demand. From time to time these and other
factors, together with changes in general economic conditions,
cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry, and in
our business in particular.
In addition, our operating results are subject to substantial
quarterly and annual fluctuations due to a number of factors,
such as demand for network infrastructure equipment, the timing
of receipt, reduction or cancellation of significant orders,
fluctuations in the levels of component inventories held by our
customers, the gain or loss of significant customers, market
acceptance of our products and our customers products, our
ability to develop,
13
introduce and market new products and technologies on a timely
basis, the availability and cost of products from our suppliers,
new product and technology introductions by competitors,
intellectual property disputes, and the timing and extent of
product development costs.
Available
Information
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.mindspeed.com. Our
Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and other
information related to our company, are available free of charge
on this site as soon as reasonably practicable after such
reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Our Standards of Business Conduct,
Guidelines on Corporate Governance and Board Committee Charters
are also available on our website. We will provide reasonable
quantities of paper copies of filings free of charge upon
request. In addition, we will provide a copy of the Board
Committee Charters to stockholders upon request. No portion of
our Internet website or the information contained in or
connected to the website is incorporated into this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
Our business, financial condition and operating results can be
affected by a number of factors, including those listed below,
any one of which could cause our actual results to vary
materially from recent results or from our anticipated future
results. Any of these risks could also materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition or the price of our
common stock or other securities.
We are
incurring substantial operating losses, and we anticipate
additional future losses.
We incurred a net loss of $24.5 million for fiscal 2006
compared to net losses of $62.6 million in fiscal 2005 and
$93.2 million in fiscal 2004. We expect that we will
continue to incur significant losses and negative cash flows at
least through the first half of fiscal 2007, and we may incur
additional significant losses and negative cash flows in
subsequent periods.
In order to become profitable, or to generate positive cash
flows from operations, we must reduce operating expenses or
achieve substantial revenue growth. Through fiscal 2006, we have
completed a series of cost reduction actions which have improved
our operating cost structure. We plan to continue with cost
reduction actions in the first half of fiscal 2007. These
expense reductions alone may not make us profitable or allow us
to sustain profitability if it is achieved. Our ability to
achieve the necessary revenue growth will depend on increased
demand for network infrastructure equipment that incorporates
our products, which in turn depends primarily on the level of
capital spending by communications service providers and
enterprises. We may not be successful in achieving the necessary
revenue growth or the expected expense reductions within the
anticipated time frame, or at all. Moreover, some of our
completed cost reduction measures taken in fiscal 2006 will not
have a recurring impact in future periods, and we may be unable
to sustain other past or expected future expense reductions in
subsequent periods. We may not achieve profitability or sustain
such profitability, if achieved.
We
have substantial cash requirements to fund our operations,
research and development efforts and capital expenditures. Our
capital resources are limited and capital needed for our
business may not be available when we need it.
For fiscal 2006, our net cash used in operating activities was
$15.9 million compared to net cash used in operating
activities of $30.2 million for fiscal 2005 and
$43.2 million for fiscal 2004. Our principal sources of
liquidity are our existing cash balances, marketable securities
and cash generated from product sales. As of September 30,
2006, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $30.0 million
and our marketable securities totaled $11.3 million. We
believe that our existing sources of liquidity will be
sufficient to fund our operations, research and development
efforts, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and
other financing requirements for at least the next twelve
months. However, we cannot assure you that this will be the
case, and if we continue to incur operating losses and negative
cash flows in the future, we may need to reduce further our
operating costs or obtain alternate sources of financing, or
both. We may not have access to additional sources of capital on
favorable terms or
14
at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of
equity, equity-based or debt securities, such securities may
have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our
common stock and our stockholders may experience dilution of
their ownership interests.
We
operate in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry, which is
subject to significant downturns.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is
characterized by constant and rapid technological change, rapid
product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving technical
standards, short product life cycles and wide fluctuations in
product supply and demand. From time to time these and other
factors, together with changes in general economic conditions,
cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry in
general, and in our business in particular. Periods of industry
downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand,
production overcapacity, high inventory levels and accelerated
erosion of average selling prices. These factors have caused
substantial fluctuations in our revenues and our results of
operations in the past and we may experience similar
fluctuations in our business in the future.
Our
operating results are subject to substantial quarterly and
annual fluctuations.
Our revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and may fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations are due to a
number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These
factors include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in end-user demand for the products manufactured and
sold by our customers;
|
|
|
|
the timing of receipt, reduction or cancellation of significant
orders by customers;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the levels of component inventories held by our
customers and changes in our customers inventory
management practices;
|
|
|
|
shifts in our product mix and the effect of maturing products;
|
|
|
|
availability and cost of products from our suppliers;
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers;
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products and our customers
products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop, introduce, market and support new
products and technologies on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
the timing and extent of product development costs;
|
|
|
|
new product and technology introductions by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields;
|
|
|
|
significant warranty claims, including those not covered by our
suppliers;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property disputes; and
|
|
|
|
the effects of competitive pricing pressures, including
decreases in average selling prices of our products.
|
The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast, and these, as
well as other factors, could materially adversely affect our
quarterly or annual operating results. If our operating results
fail to meet the expectations of analysts or investors, they
could materially and adversely affect the price of our common
stock.
The
increasing significance of our foreign operations exposes us to
risks that are beyond our control and could affect our ability
to operate successfully.
In order to enhance the cost-effectiveness of our operations, we
have increasingly sought to shift portions of our research and
development and customer support operations to jurisdictions
with lower cost structures than that available in the United
States. The transition of even a portion of our business
operations to new facilities in a foreign country involves a
number of logistical and technical challenges that could result
in product development delays and operational interruptions,
which could reduce our revenues and adversely affect our
business. We may
15
encounter complications associated with the
set-up,
migration and operation of business systems and equipment in a
new facility. This could result in delays in our research and
development efforts and otherwise disrupt our operations. If
such delays or disruptions occur, they could damage our
reputation and otherwise adversely affect our business and
results of operations.
To the extent that we shift any operations or labor offshore to
jurisdictions with lower cost structures, we may experience
challenges in effectively managing those operations as a result
of several factors, including time zone differences and
regulatory, legal, cultural and logistical issues. Additionally,
the relocation of labor resources may have a negative impact on
our existing employees, which could negatively impact our
operations. If we are unable to effectively manage our offshore
research and development staff and any other offshore
operations, our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
We cannot be certain that any shifts in our operations to
offshore jurisdictions will ultimately produce the expected cost
savings. We cannot predict the extent of government support,
availability of qualified workers, future labor rates, or
monetary and economic conditions in any offshore locations where
we may operate. Although some of these factors may influence our
decision to establish or increase our offshore operations, there
are inherent risks beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
political uncertainties;
|
|
|
|
wage inflation;
|
|
|
|
exposure to foreign currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers; and
|
|
|
|
foreign regulatory restrictions and unexpected changes in
regulatory environments.
|
We will likely be faced with competition in these offshore
markets for qualified personnel, including skilled design and
technical personnel, and we expect this competition to increase
as companies expand their operations offshore. If the supply of
such qualified personnel becomes limited due to increased
competition or otherwise, it could increase our costs and
employee turnover rates. One or more of these factors or other
factors relating to foreign operations could result in increased
operating expenses and make it more difficult for us to manage
our costs and operations, which could cause our operating
results to decline and result in reduced revenues.
We are
entirely dependent upon third parties for the manufacture of our
products and are vulnerable to their capacity constraints during
times of increasing demand for semiconductor
products.
We are entirely dependent upon outside wafer fabrication
facilities, known as foundries, for wafer fabrication services.
Our principal suppliers of wafer fabrication services are TSMC
and Jazz. We are also dependent upon third parties, including
Amkor, for the assembly and testing of all of our products.
Under our fabless business model, our long-term revenue growth
is dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient external
manufacturing capacity, including wafer production capacity.
Periods of upturns in the semiconductor industry may be
characterized by rapid increases in demand and a shortage of
capacity for wafer fabrication and assembly and test services.
The risks associated with our reliance on third parties for
manufacturing services include:
|
|
|
|
|
the lack of assured supply, potential shortages and higher
prices;
|
|
|
|
increased lead times;
|
|
|
|
limited control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields,
production costs and product quality; and
|
|
|
|
the unavailability of, or delays in obtaining, products or
access to key process technologies.
|
Our standard lead time, or the time required to manufacture our
products (including wafer fabrication, assembly and testing) is
typically 12 to 16 weeks. During periods of manufacturing
capacity shortages, the foundries and other suppliers on whom we
rely may devote their limited capacity to fulfill the production
requirements of other clients that are larger or better financed
than we are, or who have superior contractual rights to enforce
manufacture of their products, including to the exclusion of
producing our products.
16
Additionally, if we are required to seek alternative foundries
or assembly and test service providers, we would be subject to
longer lead times, indeterminate delivery schedules and
increased manufacturing costs, including costs to find and
qualify acceptable suppliers. For example, if we choose to use a
new foundry, the qualification process may take as long as six
months over the standard lead time before we can begin shipping
products from the new foundry.
Wafer fabrication processes are subject to obsolescence, and
foundries may discontinue a wafer fabrication process used for
certain of our products. In such event, we generally offer our
customers a last-time buy program to satisfy their
anticipated requirements for our products. The unanticipated
discontinuation of a wafer fabrication process on which we rely
may adversely affect our revenues and our customer relationships.
The foundries and other suppliers on whom we rely may experience
financial difficulties or suffer disruptions in their operations
due to causes beyond our control, including labor strikes, work
stoppages, electrical power outages, fire, earthquake, flooding
or other natural disasters. Certain of our suppliers
manufacturing facilities are located near major earthquake fault
lines in the Asia-Pacific region and California. In the event of
a disruption of the operations of one or more of our suppliers,
we may not have an alternate source immediately available. Such
an event could cause significant delays in shipments until we
could shift the products from an affected facility or supplier
to another facility or supplier. The manufacturing processes we
rely on are specialized and are available from a limited number
of suppliers. Alternate sources of manufacturing capacity,
particularly wafer production capacity, may not be available to
us on a timely basis. Even if alternate manufacturing capacity
is available, we may not be able to obtain it on favorable
terms, or at all. Difficulties or delays in securing an adequate
supply of our products on favorable terms, or at all, could
impair our ability to meet our customers requirements and
have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
In addition, the highly complex and technologically demanding
nature of semiconductor manufacturing has caused foundries to
experience, from time to time, lower than anticipated
manufacturing yields, particularly in connection with the
introduction of new products and the installation and
start-up of
new process technologies. Lower than anticipated manufacturing
yields may affect our ability to fulfill our customers
demands for our products on a timely basis. Moreover, lower than
anticipated manufacturing yields may adversely affect our cost
of goods sold and our results of operations.
We are
subject to intense competition.
The communications semiconductor industry in general, and the
markets in which we compete in particular, are intensely
competitive. We compete worldwide with a number of U.S. and
international semiconductor manufacturers that are both larger
and smaller than we are in terms of resources and market share.
We currently face significant competition in our markets and
expect that intense price and product competition will continue.
This competition has resulted, and is expected to continue to
result, in declining average selling prices for our products.
Many of our current and potential competitors have certain
advantages over us, including:
|
|
|
|
|
stronger financial position and liquidity;
|
|
|
|
longer presence in key markets;
|
|
|
|
greater name recognition;
|
|
|
|
more secure supply chain;
|
|
|
|
access to larger customer bases; and
|
|
|
|
significantly greater sales and marketing, manufacturing,
distribution, technical and other resources.
|
As a result, these competitors may be able to adapt more quickly
to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements or may be able to devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than we can.
Moreover, we have incurred substantial operating losses, and we
anticipate future losses. We believe that financial stability of
suppliers is an important consideration in our customers
purchasing decisions. If
17
our OEM customers perceive that we lack adequate financial
stability, they may choose semiconductor suppliers that they
believe have a stronger financial position or liquidity.
Current and potential competitors also have established or may
establish financial or strategic relationships among themselves
or with our existing or potential customers, resellers or other
third parties. These relationships may affect customers
purchasing decisions. Accordingly, it is possible that new
competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and
rapidly acquire significant market share. We may not be able to
compete successfully against current and potential competitors.
Our
success depends on our ability to develop competitive new
products in a timely manner.
Our operating results will depend largely on our ability to
continue to introduce new and enhanced semiconductor products on
a timely basis. Successful product development and introduction
depends on numerous factors, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to anticipate customer and market requirements and
changes in technology and industry standards;
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately define new products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete development of new products, and bring
our products to market, on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our ability to differentiate our products from offerings of our
competitors; and
|
|
|
|
overall market acceptance of our products.
|
We may not have sufficient resources to make the substantial
investment in research and development in order to develop and
bring to market new and enhanced products, particularly if we
are required to take further cost reduction actions.
Furthermore, we are required to evaluate expenditures for
planned product development continually and to choose among
alternative technologies based on our expectations of future
market growth. We may be unable to develop and introduce new or
enhanced products in a timely manner, our products may not
satisfy customer requirements or achieve market acceptance, or
we may be unable to anticipate new industry standards and
technological changes. We also may not be able to respond
successfully to new product announcements and introductions by
competitors.
Research and development projects may experience unanticipated
delays related to our internal design efforts. New product
development also requires the production of photomask sets and
the production and testing of sample devices. In the event we
experience delays in obtaining these services from the wafer
fabrication and assembly and test vendors on whom we rely, our
product introductions may be delayed and our revenues and
results of operations may be adversely affected.
If we
are not able to keep abreast of the rapid technological changes
in our markets, our products could become
obsolete.
The demand for our products can change quickly and in ways we
may not anticipate because our markets generally exhibit the
following characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
rapid technological developments;
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in customer requirements;
|
|
|
|
frequent new product introductions and enhancements;
|
|
|
|
declining prices over the life cycle of products; and
|
|
|
|
evolving industry standards.
|
Our products could become obsolete sooner than we expect because
of faster than anticipated, or unanticipated, changes in one or
more of the technologies related to our products. The
introduction of new technology representing a substantial
advance over current technology could adversely affect demand
for our existing products. Currently accepted industry standards
are also subject to change, which may also contribute to the
obsolescence of
18
our products. If we are unable to develop and introduce new or
enhanced products in a timely manner, our business may be
adversely affected.
Uncertainties
involving the ordering and shipment of our products could
adversely affect our business.
Our sales are typically made pursuant to individual purchase
orders and we generally do not have long-term supply
arrangements with our customers. Generally, our customers may
cancel orders until 30 days prior to shipment. In addition,
we sell a substantial portion of our products through
distributors, some of whom have a right to return unsold
products to us. Sales to distributors accounted for
approximately 49% of our net revenues for fiscal 2006.
Because of the significant lead times for wafer fabrication and
assembly and test services, we routinely purchase inventory
based on estimates of end-market demand for our customers
products, which may be subject to dramatic changes and is
difficult to predict. This difficulty may be compounded when we
sell to OEMs indirectly through distributors or contract
manufacturers, or both, as our forecasts of demand are then
based on estimates provided by multiple parties. In addition,
our customers may change their inventory practices on short
notice for any reason. The cancellation or deferral of product
orders, the return of previously sold products or overproduction
due to the failure of anticipated orders to materialize could
result in our holding excess or obsolete inventory, which could
result in write-downs of inventory. Conversely, if we fail to
anticipate inventory needs we may be unable to fulfill demand
for our products, resulting in a loss of potential revenue.
If
network infrastructure OEMs do not design our products into
their equipment, we will be unable to sell those products.
Moreover, a design win from a customer does not guarantee future
sales to that customer.
Our products are not sold directly to the end-user but are
components of other products. As a result, we rely on network
infrastructure OEMs to select our products from among
alternative offerings to be designed into their equipment. We
may be unable to achieve these design wins. Without
design wins from OEMs, we would be unable to sell our products.
Once an OEM designs another suppliers semiconductors into
one of its product platforms, it is more difficult for us to
achieve future design wins with that OEMs product platform
because changing suppliers involves significant cost, time,
effort and risk. Achieving a design win with a customer does not
ensure that we will receive significant revenues from that
customer and we may be unable to convert design wins into actual
sales. Even after a design win, the customer is not obligated to
purchase our products and can choose at any time to stop using
our products if, for example, its own products are not
commercially successful.
Because
of the lengthy sales cycles of many of our products, we may
incur significant expenses before we generate any revenues
related to those products.
Our customers generally need six months or longer to test and
evaluate our products and an additional six months or more to
begin volume production of equipment that incorporates our
products. These lengthy periods also increase the possibility
that a customer may decide to cancel or change product plans,
which could reduce or eliminate sales to that customer. As a
result of this lengthy sales cycle, we may incur significant
research and development and selling, general and administrative
expenses before we generate any revenues from new products. We
may never generate the anticipated revenues if our customers
cancel or change their product plans.
We may
be subject to claims, or we may be required to defend and
indemnify customers against claims, of infringement of
third-party intellectual property rights or demands that we, or
our customers, license third-party technology, which could
result in significant expense.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous
protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights. From
time to time, third parties have asserted and may in the future
assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual
property rights against technologies that are important to our
business. The resolution or compromise of any litigation or
other legal process to enforce such alleged third party rights,
including claims arising through our contractual indemnification
of our customers, or claims challenging the validity of our
patents, regardless of its merit or resolution, could be costly
and divert the efforts and attention of our management and
technical personnel. We may not prevail in any such litigation
or other legal process or we may compromise or settle such
claims because of the
19
complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in
intellectual property disputes and the significant expense in
defending such claims. If litigation or other legal process
results in adverse rulings we could be required to:
|
|
|
|
|
pay substantial damages for past, present and future use of the
infringing technology;
|
|
|
|
cease the manufacture, use or sale of infringing products;
|
|
|
|
discontinue the use of infringing technology;
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to develop non-infringing
technology;
|
|
|
|
pay substantial damages to our customers or end users to
discontinue use or replace infringing technology with
non-infringing technology;
|
|
|
|
license technology from the third party claiming infringement,
which license may not be available on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all; or
|
|
|
|
relinquish intellectual property rights associated with one or
more of our patent claims, if such claims are held invalid or
otherwise unenforceable.
|
In connection with the distribution, we generally assumed
responsibility for all contingent liabilities and litigation
against Conexant or its subsidiaries related to the Mindspeed
business.
If we
are not successful in protecting our intellectual property
rights, it may harm our ability to compete.
We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade
secret laws, as well as employee and third-party nondisclosure
and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our
proprietary technologies and processes. We may be required to
engage in litigation to enforce or protect our intellectual
property rights, which may require us to expend significant
resources and to divert the efforts and attention of our
management from our business operations. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
the steps we take to prevent misappropriation or infringement of
our intellectual property may not be successful;
|
|
|
|
any existing or future patents may be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented; or
|
|
|
|
the measures described above may not provide meaningful
protection.
|
Despite the preventive measures and precautions that we take, a
third party could copy or otherwise obtain and use our
technology without authorization, develop similar technology
independently or design around our patents. We generally enter
into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants
and strategic partners. We also try to control access to and
distribution of our technologies, documentation and other
proprietary information. Despite these efforts, internal or
external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use
our products, services or technology without our authorization.
Also, former employees may seek employment with our business
partners, customers or competitors, and we cannot assure you
that the confidential nature of our proprietary information will
be maintained in the course of such future employment. Further,
in some countries outside the United States, patent protection
is not available or not reliably enforced. Some countries that
do allow registration of patents do not provide meaningful
redress for patent violations. As a result, protecting
intellectual property in those countries is difficult and
competitors may sell products in those countries that have
functions and features that infringe on our intellectual
property.
The
complexity of our products may lead to errors, defects and bugs,
which could subject us to significant costs or damages and
adversely affect market acceptance of our
products.
Although we, our customers and our suppliers rigorously test our
products, our products are complex and may contain errors,
defects or bugs when first introduced or as new versions are
released. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future
experience, errors, defects and bugs. If any of our products
contain production defects or reliability, quality or
compatibility problems that are significant to our customers,
our reputation may be damaged and customers may be reluctant to
buy our products, which could adversely affect our ability to
retain
20
existing customers and attract new customers. In addition, these
defects or bugs could interrupt or delay sales of affected
products to our customers, which could adversely affect our
results of operations.
If defects or bugs are discovered after commencement of
commercial production of a new product, we may be required to
make significant expenditures of capital and other resources to
resolve the problems. This could result in significant
additional development costs and the diversion of technical and
other resources from our other development efforts. We could
also incur significant costs to repair or replace defective
products and we could be subject to claims for damages by our
customers or others against us. These costs or damages could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
We may
not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary
for the design, development, sale and support of our products.
Our success could be negatively affected if key personnel
leave.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract, retain and
motivate qualified personnel, including executive officers and
other key management, technical and support personnel. As the
source of our technological and product innovations, our key
technical personnel represent a significant asset. The
competition for such personnel can be intense in the
semiconductor industry. We may not be able to attract and retain
qualified management and other personnel necessary for the
design, development, sale and support of our products.
In periods of poor operating performance, we have experienced,
and may experience in the future, particular difficulty
attracting and retaining key personnel. If we are not successful
in assuring our employees of our financial stability and our
prospects for success, our employees may seek other employment,
which may materially adversely affect our business. Moreover,
our recent expense reduction and restructuring initiatives,
including a series of worldwide workforce reductions, have
significantly reduced the number of our technical employees. We
intend to continue to expand our international business
activities including expansion of design and operational centers
abroad and may have difficulty attracting and maintaining
international employees. The loss of the services of one or more
of our key employees, including Raouf Y. Halim, our chief
executive officer, or certain key design and technical
personnel, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate
qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to operate our business.
Approximately 10% of our engineers are foreign nationals working
in the United States under visas. The visas held by many of our
employees permit qualified foreign nationals working in
specialty occupations, such as certain categories of engineers,
to reside in the United States during their employment. The
number of new visas approved each year may be limited and may
restrict our ability to hire additional qualified technical
employees. In addition, immigration policies are subject to
change, and these policies have generally become more stringent
since the events of September 11, 2001. Any additional
significant changes in immigration laws, rules or regulations
may further restrict our ability to retain or hire technical
personnel.
We are
subject to the risks of doing business
internationally.
A significant part of our strategy involves our continued
pursuit of growth opportunities in a number of international
markets. We market, sell, design and service our products
internationally. For fiscal 2006, approximately 70% of our net
revenues were from customers located outside the United States,
primarily in the Asia-Pacific region and Europe. In addition, we
have design centers, customer support centers, and rely on
suppliers, located outside the United States, including
foundries and assembly and test service providers located in the
Asia-Pacific region. Our international sales and operations are
subject to a number of risks inherent in selling and operating
abroad which could adversely affect our ability to increase or
maintain our foreign sales. These include, but are not limited
to, risks regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
local economic and political conditions;
|
|
|
|
disruptions of capital and trading markets;
|
|
|
|
accounts receivable collection and longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
potential hostilities and changes in diplomatic and trade
relationships;
|
|
|
|
restrictive governmental actions (such as restrictions on the
transfer or repatriation of funds and trade protection measures,
including export duties and quotas and customs duties and
tariffs);
|
|
|
|
changes in legal or regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining distribution and support;
|
|
|
|
the laws and policies of the United States and other countries
affecting trade, foreign investment and loans, and import or
export licensing requirements;
|
|
|
|
tax laws;
|
|
|
|
limitations on our ability under local laws to protect our
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
cultural differences in the conduct of business; and
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, acts of terrorism and war.
|
Because most of our international sales, other than sales to
Japan (which are denominated principally in Japanese yen), are
currently denominated in U.S. dollars, our products could
become less competitive in international markets if the value of
the U.S. dollar increases relative to foreign currencies.
As we continue to shift a portion of our operations offshore,
more of our expenses are incurred in currencies other than those
in which we bill for the related services. An increase in the
value of certain currencies, such as the Ukrainian hryvnia and
Indian rupee, against the U.S. dollar could increase costs
of our offshore operations by increasing labor and other costs
that are denominated in local currencies.
From time to time we may enter into foreign currency forward
exchange contracts to mitigate the risk of loss from currency
exchange rate fluctuations for foreign currency commitments
entered into in the ordinary course of business. We have not
entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts for
other purposes. Our financial condition and results of
operations could be adversely affected by currency fluctuations.
We may
make business acquisitions or investments, which involve
significant risk.
We may from time to time make acquisitions, enter into alliances
or make investments in other businesses to complement our
existing product offerings, augment our market coverage or
enhance our technological capabilities. However, any such
transactions could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
issuances of equity securities dilutive to our existing
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial debt and assumption of unknown
liabilities;
|
|
|
|
large one-time write-offs;
|
|
|
|
amortization expenses related to intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business
concerns; and
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees from the acquired business.
|
Integrating acquired organizations and their products and
services may be expensive, time-consuming and a strain on our
resources and our relationships with employees and customers,
and ultimately may not be successful.
Additionally, in periods subsequent to an acquisition, we must
evaluate goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets for
impairment. When such assets are found to be impaired, they will
be written down to estimated fair value, with a charge against
earnings.
22
The
price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly.
The price of our common stock is volatile and may fluctuate
significantly. There can be no assurance as to the prices at
which our common stock will trade or that an active trading
market in our common stock will be sustained in the future. The
market price at which our common stock trades may be influenced
by many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our operating and financial performance and prospects, including
our ability to achieve or sustain profitability, if achieved,
within the forecasted time period;
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;
|
|
|
|
investor perception of us and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
the level of research coverage of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
general financial and other market conditions; and
|
|
|
|
domestic and international economic conditions.
|
In addition, public stock markets have experienced, and may in
the future experience, extreme price and trading volume
volatility, particularly in the technology sectors of the
market. This volatility has significantly affected the market
prices of securities of many technology companies for reasons
frequently unrelated to or disproportionately impacted by the
operating performance of these companies. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock. If our common stock trades below $1.00 for
30 consecutive trading days, or if we otherwise do not meet
the requirements for continued quotation on the Nasdaq Global
Market, our common stock could be delisted, which would
adversely affect the ability of investors to sell shares of our
common stock and could otherwise adversely affect our business.
Our
results of operations could vary as a result of the methods,
estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting
policies.
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our
accounting policies have a significant impact on our results of
operations. Such methods, estimates and judgments are, by their
nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, and factors may arise over time that lead us to
change our methods, estimates and judgments. Changes in those
methods, estimates and judgments could significantly affect our
results of operations. In particular, beginning in our first
quarter of fiscal 2006, the calculation of share-based
compensation expense under SFAS No. 123R required us
to use valuation methodologies (which were not developed for use
in valuing employee stock options) and a number of assumptions,
estimates and conclusions regarding matters such as expected
forfeitures, expected volatility of our share price, the
expected dividend rate with respect to our common stock and the
exercise behavior of our employees. There are no means, under
applicable accounting principles, to compare and adjust our
expense if and when we learn of additional information that may
affect the estimates that we previously made, with the exception
of changes in expected forfeitures of share-based awards.
Factors may arise over time that lead us to change our estimates
and assumptions with respect to future share-based compensation
arrangements, resulting in variability in our share-based
compensation expense over time. Changes in forecasted
share-based compensation expense could impact our gross margin
percentage; research and development expenses; and selling,
general and administrative expenses.
Substantial
sales of the shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion
of our convertible senior notes or exercise of the warrant
issued to Conexant could adversely affect our stock price or our
ability to raise additional financing in the public capital
markets.
Conexant holds a warrant to acquire 30 million shares of
our common stock at a price of $3.408 per share,
exercisable through June 27, 2013, representing
approximately 16% of our outstanding common stock on a fully
diluted basis. The warrant may be transferred or sold in whole
or part at any time. If Conexant sells the warrant or if
Conexant or a transferee of the warrant exercises the warrant
and sells a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the future, or if investors perceive that these sales may occur,
the market price of our common stock could
23
decline or market demand for our common stock could be sharply
reduced. As of September 30, 2006, we have
$46.0 million principal amount of convertible senior notes
outstanding. These notes are convertible at any time, at the
option of the holder, into approximately 432.9004 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes or an
aggregate of approximately 19.9 million shares of our
common stock. The conversion of the notes and subsequent sale of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock could also
adversely affect demand for, and the market price of, our common
stock. Each of these transactions could adversely affect our
ability to raise additional financing by issuing equity or
equity-based securities in the public capital markets.
Antidilution
and other provisions in the warrant issued to Conexant may also
adversely affect our stock price or our ability to raise
additional financing.
The warrant issued to Conexant contains antidilution provisions
that provide for adjustment of the warrants exercise
price, and the number of shares issuable under the warrant, upon
the occurrence of certain events. If we issue, or are deemed to
have issued, shares of our common stock, or securities
convertible into our common stock, at prices below the current
market price of our common stock (as defined in the warrant) at
the time of the issuance of such securities, the warrants
exercise price will be reduced and the number of shares issuable
under the warrant will be increased. The amount of such
adjustment, if any, will be determined pursuant to a formula
specified in the warrant and will depend on the number of shares
issued, the offering price and the current market price of our
common stock at the time of the issuance of such securities.
Adjustments to the warrant pursuant to these antidilution
provisions may result in significant dilution to the interests
of our existing stockholders and may adversely affect the market
price of our common stock. The antidilution provisions may also
limit our ability to obtain additional financing on terms
favorable to us.
Moreover, we may not realize any cash proceeds from the exercise
of the warrant held by Conexant. A holder of the warrant may opt
for a cashless exercise of all or part of the warrant. In a
cashless exercise, the holder of the warrant would make no cash
payment to us, and would receive a number of shares of our
common stock having an aggregate value equal to the excess of
the then-current market price of the shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrant over the exercise price of
the warrant. Such an issuance of common stock would be
immediately dilutive to the interests of other stockholders.
Some
of our directors and executive officers may have potential
conflicts of interest because of their positions with Conexant
or their ownership of Conexant common stock.
Some of our directors are Conexant directors, and our
non-executive chairman of the board is chairman of the board and
chief executive officer of Conexant. Several of our directors
and executive officers own Conexant common stock and hold
options to purchase Conexant common stock. Service on our board
of directors and as a director or officer of Conexant, or
ownership of Conexant common stock by our directors and
executive officers, could create, or appear to create, potential
conflicts of interest when directors and officers are faced with
decisions that could have different implications for us and
Conexant. For example, potential conflicts could arise in
connection with decisions involving the warrant to purchase our
common stock issued to Conexant, or other agreements entered
into between us and Conexant in connection with the distribution.
Our restated certificate of incorporation includes provisions
relating to the allocation of business opportunities that may be
suitable for both us and Conexant based on the relationship to
the companies of the individual to whom the opportunity is
presented and the method by which it was presented and also
includes provisions limiting challenges to the enforceability of
contracts between us and Conexant.
We may have difficulty resolving any potential conflicts of
interest with Conexant, and even if we do, the resolution may be
less favorable than if we were dealing with an entirely
unrelated third party.
Provisions
in our organizational documents and rights plan and Delaware law
will make it more difficult for someone to acquire control of
us.
Our restated certificate of incorporation, our amended and
restated bylaws, our amended rights agreement and the Delaware
General Corporation Law contain several provisions that would
make more difficult an acquisition of
24
control of us in a transaction not approved by our board of
directors. Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended
and restated bylaws include provisions such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the division of our board of directors into three classes to be
elected on a staggered basis, one class each year;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of our
preferred stock in one or more series without further
authorization of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that stockholders provide advance notice of any
stockholder nominations of directors or any proposal of new
business to be considered at any meeting of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that a supermajority vote be obtained to remove a
director for cause or to amend or repeal certain provisions of
our restated certificate of incorporation or amended bylaws;
|
|
|
|
elimination of the right of stockholders to call a special
meeting of stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
a fair price provision.
|
Our rights agreement gives our stockholders certain rights that
would substantially increase the cost of acquiring us in a
transaction not approved by our board of directors.
In addition to the rights agreement and the provisions in our
restated certificate of incorporation and amended bylaws,
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
generally provides that a corporation shall not engage in any
business combination with any interested stockholder during the
three-year period following the time that such stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder, unless a majority of the
directors then in office approves either the business
combination or the transaction that results in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder or specified stockholder
approval requirements are met.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
At October 27, 2006, we occupied our headquarters located
in Newport Beach, California (which includes design and sales
offices), 7 design centers and 13 sales locations. These
facilities had an aggregate floor space of approximately
268,000 square feet, all of which is leased, consisting of
approximately 193,000 square feet at our headquarters,
58,000 square feet at our design centers and
17,000 square feet at our sales locations. We believe our
properties are well maintained, are in sound operating condition
and contain all the equipment and facilities to operate at
present levels.
Through our design centers, we provide design engineering and
product application support and after-sales service to our OEM
customers. The design centers are strategically located to take
advantage of key technical and engineering talent worldwide.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are currently not engaged in legal proceedings that require
disclosure under this Item.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during
the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
25
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol MSPD. From June 30, 2003 to
December 12, 2003, our common stock was traded on the
American Stock Exchange. Prior to June 30, 2003, we were a
wholly owned subsidiary of Conexant. The following table lists
the high and low sales price of our common stock as reported by
the Nasdaq Global Market or the American Stock Exchange, as
applicable, for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31,
2004
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Quarter ended September 30,
2005
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31,
2005
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
Quarter ended September 30,
2006
|
|
$
|
2.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
Recent
Share Prices and Holders
The last reported sale price of our common stock on
November 27, 2006 was $1.70 and there were approximately
39,032 holders of record of our common stock. However, many
holders shares are listed under their brokerage
firms names. We estimate our actual number of beneficial
stockholders to be approximately 170,000.
Dividend
Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We
currently intend to retain any earnings for use in our business
and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
Value) of Shares (or
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Purchased as Part
|
|
|
Units) that May yet be
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
of Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(or Unit)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
July 1, 2006 to July 28,
2006
|
|
|
43,003
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 29, 2006 to
August 25, 2006
|
|
|
1,788
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26, 2006 to
September 29, 2006
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,791
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents shares of our common stock withheld from, or
delivered by, employees in order to satisfy applicable tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of
restricted stock. These repurchases were not made pursuant to
any publicly announced plan or program. |
26
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The selected consolidated financial data presented below should
be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our consolidated selected financial data have been derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected
financial data include our results of operations and financial
position while we were part of Conexant prior to June 27,
2003. The financial data for periods prior to June 27, 2003
do not reflect what our results of operations and financial
position would have been if we had operated as an independent
public company during those periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
135,919
|
|
|
$
|
111,777
|
|
|
$
|
119,435
|
|
|
$
|
81,906
|
|
|
$
|
80,036
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
43,592
|
|
|
|
33,704
|
|
|
|
35,149
|
|
|
|
25,127
|
|
|
|
29,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
92,327
|
|
|
|
78,073
|
|
|
|
84,286
|
|
|
|
56,779
|
|
|
|
50,626
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
64,104
|
|
|
|
71,355
|
|
|
|
79,582
|
|
|
|
106,289
|
|
|
|
167,148
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
46,970
|
|
|
|
41,871
|
|
|
|
46,845
|
|
|
|
49,656
|
|
|
|
69,500
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,481
|
|
|
|
50,318
|
|
|
|
51,223
|
|
|
|
312,388
|
|
Special charges(1)
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
5,999
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
27,170
|
|
|
|
168,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
113,624
|
|
|
|
139,706
|
|
|
|
177,132
|
|
|
|
234,338
|
|
|
|
717,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(21,297
|
)
|
|
|
(61,633
|
)
|
|
|
(92,846
|
)
|
|
|
(177,559
|
)
|
|
|
(667,276
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,231
|
)
|
|
|
(1,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(22,665
|
)
|
|
|
(62,259
|
)
|
|
|
(92,526
|
)
|
|
|
(176,481
|
)
|
|
|
(667,574
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
(24,514
|
)
|
|
|
(62,629
|
)
|
|
|
(93,247
|
)
|
|
|
(177,261
|
)
|
|
|
(668,273
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting for goodwill(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(573,184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(24,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,247
|
)
|
|
$
|
(750,445
|
)
|
|
$
|
(668,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.74
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting for goodwill(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
50,880
|
|
|
$
|
59,332
|
|
|
$
|
49,082
|
|
|
$
|
71,783
|
|
|
$
|
(35,430
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
96,542
|
|
|
|
105,504
|
|
|
|
126,300
|
|
|
|
203,889
|
|
|
|
787,111
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
44,618
|
|
|
|
44,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
23,476
|
|
|
|
33,826
|
|
|
|
90,927
|
|
|
|
167,134
|
|
|
|
720,323
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Special charges consist of asset impairments, restructuring
charges, separation costs and gains and losses on the sale of
certain assets. |
27
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Effective October 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, and recorded an impairment charge
of $573.2 million to write down the carrying value of
goodwill to estimated fair value. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Overview
We design, develop and sell semiconductor networking solutions
for communications applications in enterprise, access,
metropolitan and wide-area networks. Our products, ranging from
optical network transceiver solutions to voice and Internet
protocol (IP) processors, are classified into three focused
product families: high-performance analog products, multiservice
access digital signal processor (DSP) products and wide area
networking (WAN) communications products. Our products are sold
to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for use in a variety
of network infrastructure equipment, including mixed media
gateways, high-speed routers, switches, access multiplexers,
cross-connect systems, add-drop multiplexers, digital loop
carrier equipment, IP private branch exchanges (PBXs) and
optical modules. Service providers use this equipment for the
processing, transmission and switching of high-speed voice, data
and video traffic, including advanced services such as
voice-over-IP
(VoIP), within different segments of the communications network.
Our OEM customers include Alcatel Data Networks, S.A., Cisco
Systems, Inc., McData Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric
Corporation, Siemens A.G. and Zhongxing Telecom Equipment Corp.
Trends
and Factors Affecting Our Business
Our products are components of network infrastructure equipment.
As a result, we rely on network infrastructure OEMs to select
our products from among alternative offerings to be designed
into their equipment. These design wins are an
integral part of the long sales cycle for our products. Our
customers may need six months or longer to test and evaluate our
products and an additional six months or more to begin volume
production of equipment that incorporates our products. We
believe our close relationships with leading network
infrastructure OEMs facilitate early adoption of our products
during development of their products, enhance our ability to
obtain design wins and encourage adoption of our technology by
the industry.
We market and sell our semiconductor products directly to
network infrastructure OEMs. We also sell our products
indirectly through electronic component distributors and
third-party electronic manufacturing service providers, who
manufacture products incorporating our semiconductor networking
solutions for OEMs. Sales to distributors accounted for
approximately 49% of our revenues for fiscal 2006. Sales to
customers located outside the United States, primarily in the
Asia-Pacific region and Europe, were approximately 70% of our
net revenues for fiscal 2006. We believe a substantial portion
of the products we sell to OEMs and third-party manufacturing
service providers in the Asia-Pacific region is ultimately
shipped to end markets in the Americas and Europe.
We have significant research, development, engineering and
product design capabilities. Our success depends to a
substantial degree upon our ability to develop and introduce in
a timely fashion new products and enhancements to our existing
products that meet changing customer requirements and emerging
industry standards. We have made, and plan to make, substantial
investments in research and development and to participate in
the formulation of industry standards. We spent approximately
$64.1 million on research and development for fiscal 2006.
We seek to maximize our return on our research and development
spending by focusing our research and development investment in
what we believe are key high-growth markets, including VoIP and
high-performance analog applications.
We are dependent upon third parties for the manufacture,
assembly and testing of our products. Our ability to bring new
products to market, to fulfill orders and to achieve long-term
revenue growth is dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient
external manufacturing capacity, including wafer fabrication
capacity. Periods of upturn in the semiconductor industry may be
characterized by rapid increases in demand and a shortage of
capacity for wafer fabrication and assembly and test services.
In such periods, we may experience longer lead times or
indeterminate delivery schedules, which may adversely affect our
ability to fulfill orders for our products. During periods of
capacity shortages for manufacturing, assembly and testing
services, our primary foundries and other suppliers may devote
their limited capacity to fulfill the requirements of other
clients that are larger than we are, or who have
28
superior contractual rights to enforce manufacture of their
products, including to the exclusion of producing our products.
We may also incur increased manufacturing costs, including costs
of finding acceptable alternative foundries or assembly and test
service providers.
In order to achieve profitability, we must reduce operating
expenses or achieve substantial revenue growth. Through fiscal
2006, we have completed a series of cost reduction actions which
have improved our operating cost structure.
We plan to continue with cost reduction actions in the first
half of fiscal 2007. Our ability to achieve the necessary
revenue growth will depend on increased demand for network
infrastructure equipment that incorporates our products, which
in turn depends primarily on the level of capital spending by
communications service providers. We believe the market for
network infrastructure equipment in general, and for
communications semiconductors in particular, offers attractive
long-term growth prospects due to increasing demand for network
capacity, the continued upgrading and expansion of existing
networks and the build-out of telecommunication networks in
developing countries. However, the semiconductor industry is
highly cyclical and is characterized by constant and rapid
technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price
erosion, evolving technical standards, short product life cycles
and wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. These
factors have caused substantial fluctuations in our revenues and
our results of operations in the past, and we may experience
cyclical fluctuations in our business in the future.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we announced a
restructuring plan. We anticipate incurring special charges of
$4.2 million during the first and second quarters of fiscal
2007, primarily associated with severance costs for affected
employees and the impairment of certain excess space at the
Newport Beach headquarters. When we complete these restructuring
actions, we expect to achieve annualized savings of
approximately $14 million.
Stock-Based
Compensation Programs
We use stock-based compensation to attract and retain employees
and to provide long-term incentive compensation that aligns the
interests of our employees with those of our stockholders. Prior
to fiscal 2006, our stock-based compensation consisted
principally of stock options. Eligible employees received grants
of stock options at the time of hire; we also made broad-based
stock option grants covering substantially all of our employees
annually. Stock option awards have exercise prices not less than
the market price of our common stock at the grant date and a
contractual term of eight or ten years, and are subject to
time-based vesting (generally over four years). From time to
time we have also used restricted stock awards with time-based
vesting for incentive or retention purposes.
For fiscal 2006, we revised our stock-based compensation
arrangements to provide current and long-term incentive
compensation, principally through restricted stock awards.
During fiscal 2006, we granted an aggregate of 4.2 million
shares of restricted stock to our employees. These awards
principally consisted of broad-based grants, covering
substantially all of our employees. One broad-based grant was
intended to provide performance emphasis and incentive
compensation through vesting tied to each employees
performance against individual goals for fiscal year 2006.
Another broad-based grant of restricted stock was intended to
provide long-term incentive compensation; these awards vest
ratably over a period of four years, and require continued
service. Certain senior management personnel also received
additional restricted stock awards having vesting tied to our
achievement of an operating profit.
From time to time, we also grant stock options or other
stock-based awards for incentive or retention purposes. We
expect to formally review, and may further revise, our
compensation arrangements for fiscal 2007 and thereafter based
on regular assessment of the effectiveness of our compensation
arrangements and to keep our overall compensation package at
market levels.
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS 123R,
Share-Based Payment using the modified
prospective application. SFAS 123R requires that we
account for all stock-based compensation transactions using a
fair-value method and recognize the fair value of each award as
an expense over the service period. As required by
SFAS 123R, our stock-based compensation expense for fiscal
2006 includes the fair value of new awards, modified awards and
any unvested awards outstanding at October 1, 2005.
However, the consolidated financial statements for periods
29
prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R have not been restated
to reflect the fair value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based
upon the market price of our common stock at the grant date. We
estimate the fair value of stock option awards, as of the grant
date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair
value of each award is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the vesting or service period.
Stock-based compensation expense totaling $7.5 million and
$400,000 for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively, is included in
cost of goods sold, research and development expenses, selling,
general and administrative expenses and special charges. The
increase principally reflects the cost of restricted stock and
other awards made during fiscal 2006, as well as the cost of
awards outstanding at October 1, 2005 but vesting after
that date. As of September 30, 2006, there was unrecognized
compensation expense of $2.1 million related to unvested
stock options, which we expect to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 2.3 years and unrecognized
compensation expense of $3.8 million related to unvested
restricted stock awards, which we expect to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
Spin-off
from Conexant Systems, Inc.
On June 27, 2003, Conexant completed the distribution to
Conexant stockholders of all outstanding shares of common stock
of Mindspeed, then a wholly owned subsidiary of Conexant. In the
distribution, each Conexant stockholder received one share of
our common stock, par value $.01 per share (including an
associated preferred share purchase right), for every three
shares of Conexant common stock held and cash for any fractional
share of our common stock. Following the distribution, we began
operations as an independent, publicly held company. Our common
stock now trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the ticker
symbol MSPD.
Prior to the distribution, Conexant transferred to us the assets
and liabilities of its Mindspeed business, including the stock
of certain subsidiaries, and certain other assets and
liabilities which were allocated to us under the Distribution
Agreement entered into between us and Conexant. Also prior to
the distribution, Conexant contributed to us cash in an amount
such that at the time of the distribution our cash balance was
$100 million. We issued to Conexant a warrant to purchase
30 million shares of our common stock at a price of
$3.408 per share, exercisable for a period of ten years
after the distribution. We and Conexant also entered into a
Credit Agreement, an Employee Matters Agreement, a Tax
Allocation Agreement, a Transition Services Agreement and a
Sublease.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Among the significant estimates
affecting our consolidated financial statements are those
relating to inventories, revenue recognition, allowances for
doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation, income taxes and
impairment of long-lived assets. We regularly evaluate our
estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and
various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. To the extent
actual results differ from those estimates, our future results
of operations may be affected.
Inventories We write down our inventory for
estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal
to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based upon assumptions about future
demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are
less favorable than our estimates, additional inventory
write-downs may be required. In the event we experience
unanticipated demand and are able to sell a portion of the
inventories we have previously written down, our gross margins
will be favorably affected.
Revenue Recognition We recognize revenues
when the following fundamental criteria are met:
(i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
(ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) our price to the
customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection of
the sales price is reasonably assured. Delivery occurs when
goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the
customer, in accordance with the terms specified in the
arrangement with the customer. Revenue recognition is deferred
in all instances where the earnings process is incomplete. We
make
30
certain product sales to electronic component distributors under
agreements allowing for a right to return unsold products. We
defer the recognition of revenue on all sales to these
distributors until the products are sold by the distributors to
a third party. We record a reserve for estimated sales returns
and allowances in the same period as the related revenues are
recognized. We base these estimates on our historical experience
or the specific identification of an event necessitating a
reserve. To the extent actual sales returns differ from our
estimates, our future results of operations may be affected.
Development revenue is recognized when services are performed
and was not significant for any of the periods presented.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We maintain
allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting
from the inability of our customers to make required payments.
Our estimates of such losses are based on an assessment of the
aging of outstanding accounts receivable and a review of
specific customer accounts. If the financial condition of our
customers were to deteriorate, our actual losses may exceed our
estimates and additional allowances would be required.
Stock-Based Compensation We account for
stock-based compensation in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment.
SFAS 123R requires that we account for all stock-based
compensation transactions using a fair-value method and
recognize the fair value of each award as an expense over the
service period. The fair value of restricted stock awards is
based upon the market price of our common stock at the grant
date. We estimate the fair value of stock option awards, as of
the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The use of the Black-Scholes model requires that we make a
number of estimates, including the expected option term, the
expected volatility in the price of our common stock, the
risk-free rate of interest and the dividend yield on our common
stock. If our expected option term and stock-price volatility
assumptions were different, the resulting determination of the
fair value of stock option awards could be materially different.
In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the number
of share-based awards that we expect will ultimately vest upon
the fulfillment of service conditions (such as time-based
vesting) or the achievement of specific performance conditions.
If the actual number of awards that ultimately vest differs
significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation
expense and our results of operations could be materially
impacted.
Deferred Income Taxes We have provided a full
valuation allowance against our U.S federal and state deferred
tax assets. If sufficient evidence of our ability to generate
future U.S federal
and/or state
taxable income becomes apparent, we may be required to reduce
our valuation allowance, resulting in income tax benefits in our
statement of operations. We evaluate the realizability of our
deferred tax assets and assess the need for a valuation
allowance quarterly.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We
continually monitor and review long-lived assets, including
fixed assets, goodwill and intangible assets, for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The
determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of the
undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of an
asset and its eventual disposition. The estimate of cash flows
is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about
expected future operating performance, growth rates and other
factors. Our estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ
from actual cash flows due to, among other things, technological
changes, economic conditions, changes to our business model or
changes in our operating performance. If the sum of the
undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the
carrying value, we recognize an impairment loss, measured as the
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the
asset.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which
replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting
Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in
accounting principle and requires retrospective application (a
term defined by the statement) to prior periods financial
statements, unless it is impracticable to determine the effect
of a change. It also applies to changes required by an
accounting pronouncement that does not include specific
transition provisions. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005. We will adopt
SFAS No. 154 as of the
31
beginning of fiscal 2007, and we do not expect that the adoption
of SFAS 154 will have a material impact on our financial
condition or results of operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This pronouncement
recommends a recognition threshold and measurement process for
recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions
taken or expected to be taken in the Companys tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions.
The accounting provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for
our first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company is in the
process of evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of
FIN 48 will have on its financial statements.
In September 2006, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements, which addresses how uncorrected errors
in previous years should be considered when quantifying errors
in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 requires
registrants to consider the effect of all carry over and
reversing effects of prior-year misstatements when quantifying
errors in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 allows
registrants to record the effects of adopting the guidance as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. We will adopt
SAB 108 as of the beginning of fiscal 2007 and do not
expect that the adoption of SAB 108 will have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurement (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities
measured at fair value. We will be required to adopt
SFAS 157 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Management is
currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 157 and has
not yet determined the impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Results
of Operations
Fourth
Quarter Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fourth Quarter Fiscal
2005
In fiscal 2005, our fourth quarter net revenues grew 17% year
over year, reaching $31.1 million. Our quarterly operating
loss for the fiscal 2005 fourth quarter decreased to
$4.6 million. The improvement in our operating loss
reflects the revenue growth we achieved, a $4.8 million
decrease in combined quarterly research and development and
selling, general and administrative expenses and a
$12.6 million decrease in amortization of intangible assets.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, our net revenues grew 4%
year over year, reaching $32.2 million. Our fiscal 2006
fourth quarter net revenues decreased approximately 10% from
fiscal 2006 third quarter net revenues of $35.9 million.
Our operating loss for the fiscal 2006 fourth quarter was
$7.0 million compared to $4.6 million in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase in our operating loss
reflects a lower gross margin of $1.4 million and increased
operating expenses mainly due to an increase in stock based
compensation expense of $1.5 million.
Net
Revenues
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005; Fiscal 2005 Compared to Fiscal
2004
The following table summarizes our net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Multiservice access DSP products
|
|
$
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
$
|
26.5
|
|
High-performance analog products
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
WAN communications products
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
135.9
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
$
|
111.8
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
For fiscal 2006, the 22% increase in our net revenues compared
to fiscal 2005 reflects higher sales volumes across each of our
product families. Net revenues from our multiservice access DSP
products increased $4.3 million, or 13%, reflecting
increased sales volumes across the majority of our VoIP product
families. We believe we are benefiting from the increasing
deployment of
IP-based
networks both in new network buildouts (particularly in Asia)
and the replacement of circuit-switched networks. Net revenues
from our high-performance analog products increased by
$15.6 million, or 58%, benefiting from increased shipments
of our crosspoint switches, physical media dependent devices
serving fiber optic markets and video infrastructure products
serving standard and high definition broadcast video markets.
Sales of our WAN communications products increased by
$4.2 million, or 8%, reflecting increased shipments of our
T/E carrier transmission products serving metro access and
aggregation as well as wireless markets, partially offset by
lower demand for our ATM/MPLS network processor products serving
router markets.
The 6% decrease in our net revenues for fiscal 2005 compared to
fiscal 2004 reflects lower sales volumes in our WAN
communications products, partially offset by increased shipments
of our multiservice access DSP products and our high performance
analog products. Sales of our multiservice access DSP products
benefited from increased shipments of our Comcerto
series VoIP processors for use in VoIP applications. In our
high performance analog products, we saw increased demand for
our crosspoint switches, including video applications, and our
physical media dependent devices. Net revenues from our WAN
communications products reflect lower demand for our T1/E1 and
T3/E3 line interface units and DSL transceivers resulting from a
slowdown in consumption of our products in access and
metropolitan area network applications. Sales of WAN
communications products also reflect the lower demand we
experienced for our ATM/MPLS network processor products for use
in wireless, enterprise and broadband infrastructure
applications.
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
92.3
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
$
|
78.1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
84.3
|
|
Percent of net revenues
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
Gross margin represents net revenues less cost of goods sold. As
a fabless semiconductor company, we use third parties (including
TSMC, Jazz and Amkor) for wafer fabrication and assembly and
test services. Our cost of goods sold consists predominantly of:
purchased finished wafers; assembly and test services; royalty
and other intellectual property costs; labor and overhead costs
associated with product procurement; and sustaining engineering
expenses pertaining to products sold.
Our gross margin for fiscal 2006 increased $14.2 million
over fiscal 2005, principally reflecting the 22% increase in our
net revenues and the favorable effect of increased manufacturing
volumes, net favorable impact of higher than anticipated
manufacturing yields, a net decrease in the provision for excess
and obsolete inventories partially offset by a greater level of
depreciation on photomask production tooling and a higher level
of variable manufacturing overhead. Our gross margin as a
percent of net revenues for fiscal 2006 declined from fiscal
2005 primarily as a result of a reduction in the benefit related
to the sale of inventory previously written down to a zero cost
basis in 2001. The change in provision for excess and obsolete
inventories was a credit of $586,000 for fiscal 2006, compared
to an increase in the provision of $489,000 for fiscal 2005. Our
gross margin for fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 reflects
the 6% decrease in our annual net revenues and the adverse
impact of lower manufacturing volumes we experienced in fiscal
2005. These factors were partially offset by a lower provision
for excess and obsolete goods.
Our gross margins also benefited from the sale of inventories
with an original cost of $5.5 million (2006),
$8.7 million (2005), and $9.0 million (2004) that
we had written down to a zero cost basis during fiscal 2001.
These sales resulted from renewed demand for certain products
that was not anticipated at the time of the write-downs. The
previously written-down inventories were generally sold at
prices which exceeded their original cost.
In fiscal 2001, we recorded an aggregate of $83.5 million
of inventory write-downs, reducing the cost basis of the
affected inventories to zero. The fiscal 2001 inventory
write-downs resulted from the sharply reduced end-customer
demand for network infrastructure equipment during that period.
As a result of these market conditions,
33
we experienced a significant number of order cancellations and a
decline in the volume of new orders beginning in the fiscal 2001
first quarter. The inventories written down in fiscal 2001
principally consisted of multiservice access processors and DSL
transceivers.
We assess the recoverability of our inventories at least
quarterly through a review of inventory levels in relation to
foreseeable demand (generally over twelve months). Foreseeable
demand is based upon all available information, including sales
backlog and forecasts, product marketing plans and product life
cycles. When the inventory on hand exceeds the foreseeable
demand, we write down the value of those inventories which, at
the time of our review, we expect to be unable to sell. The
amount of the inventory write-down is the excess of historical
cost over estimated realizable value. Once established, these
write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost
basis of the excess inventory.
Our products are used by OEMs that have designed our products
into network infrastructure equipment. For many of our products,
we gain these design wins through a lengthy sales cycle, which
often includes providing technical support to the OEM customer.
In the event of the loss of business from existing OEM
customers, we may be unable to secure new customers for our
existing products without first achieving new design wins. When
the quantities of inventory on hand exceed foreseeable demand
from existing OEM customers into whose products our products
have been designed, we generally will be unable to sell our
excess inventories to others, and the estimated realizable value
of such inventories to us is generally zero.
From the time of the fiscal 2001 inventory write-downs through
September 30, 2006, we scrapped a portion of these
inventories having an original cost of $39.1 million and
sold a portion of these inventories with an original cost of
$32.0 million. The sales resulted from increased demand
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 which was not
anticipated at the time of the write-downs. As of
September 30, 2006, we continued to hold inventories with
an original cost of $12.4 million which were previously
written down to a zero cost basis. We currently intend to hold
these remaining inventories and will sell these inventories if
we continue to experience a renewed demand for these products.
While there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so,
if we are able to sell a portion of the inventories which are
carried at zero cost basis, our gross margins will be favorably
affected by an amount equal to the original cost of the
zero-cost basis inventory sold. To the extent that we do not
experience renewed demand for the remaining inventories, they
will be scrapped as they become obsolete.
We base our assessment of the recoverability of our inventories,
and the amounts of any write-downs, on currently available
information and assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. Demand for our products may fluctuate significantly
over time, and actual demand and market conditions may be more
or less favorable than those projected by management. In the
event that actual demand is lower than originally projected,
additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Research
and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
64.1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
79.6
|
|
Percent of net revenues
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
Our research and development (R&D) expenses consist
principally of direct personnel costs, photomasks, electronic
design automation tools and pre-production evaluation and test
costs. The decrease in R&D expenses fiscal 2006 compared to
fiscal 2005 includes a $4.3 million decrease in
compensation and personnel-related costs partly attributable to
a one-time vacation requirement, a $2.7 million decrease in
depreciation expense and a $2.2 million decrease in
materials, supplies and mask sets, principally resulting from
the expense reduction actions we completed in fiscal 2005.
During fiscal 2005, we reduced our workforce and closed design
centers in Herzlia, Israel and Lisle, Illinois. The affected
research and development programs were principally our
asynchronous transfer mode (ATM)/multi-protocol label switching
(MPLS) network processor products and, to a lesser extent, our
T/E carrier transmission products. These personnel-related cost
savings were partly offset by increased headcount and spending
directed toward VoIP products and our high-performance analog
products, and by a $2.5 million increase in stock based
compensation expense. The decrease in R&D expenses also
reflects lower costs for materials, photomasks and preproduction
devices resulting from the aforementioned expense reduction
actions
34
and the reduction in new product development activities in the
ATM/MPLS and T/E carrier transmission product lines.
The decrease in R&D expenses for fiscal 2005 compared to
fiscal 2004 primarily reflects lower headcount and
personnel-related costs resulting from our expense reduction
actions, including the closure of design centers in Herzlia,
Israel and Lisle, Illinois, as well as lower supplies costs.
Selling,
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
$
|
46.8
|
|
Percent of net revenues
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses
include personnel costs, independent sales representative
commissions and product marketing, applications engineering and
other marketing costs. Our SG&A expenses also include costs
of corporate functions including accounting, finance, legal,
human resources, information systems and communications. The
increase in our SG&A expenses for fiscal 2006 compared to
fiscal 2005 principally reflects a $3.9 million increase in
stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by the
benefit of a one-time vacation requirement. The increase also
reflects increased compensation and personnel-related costs and
higher sales commissions associated with the 22% increase in
sales for fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005.
The decrease in our SG&A expenses for fiscal 2005 compared
to fiscal 2004 primarily reflects the positive impact of lower
headcount and personnel-related costs resulting from our expense
reduction and restructuring actions as well as lower selling
costs resulting from lower sales volumes in fiscal 2005.
Amortization
of Intangible Assets and Change in Accounting for
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
|
$
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
$
|
50.3
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets decreased to zero for fiscal
2006 because the remainder of our intangible assets became fully
amortized during fiscal 2005, reducing their carrying value to
zero. Intangible assets were amortized over periods averaging
approximately five years for each major asset class and
extending to various dates through June 2005. We will not record
any additional amortization expense on our existing intangible
assets in future periods.
Special
Charges
Special charges consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Impairments
During fiscal 2005, we recorded asset impairment charges
totaling $810,000 related to property and equipment that we
determined to abandon or scrap, including assets associated with
the closure of our former design centers in Herzlia, Israel and
Lisle, Illinois.
We continually monitor and review long-lived assets, including
fixed assets and intangible assets, for possible impairment.
Future impairment tests may result in significant write-downs of
the value of our assets.
35
Restructuring
Charges
Mindspeed 2006 Restructuring Plan In March
2006, we implemented a restructuring plan under which we reduced
our workforce by approximately 21 employees. The affected
employees included approximately 9 persons in research and
development, 6 in sales and marketing and 6 in general and
administrative functions. In July 2006, we continued this
restructuring plan and reduced our workforce by an additional 19
employees. The affected employees included approximately 17
persons in research and development and 2 in sales and
marketing. In connection with the 2006 restructuring plan, we
recorded $2.4 million of restructuring charges for fiscal
2006. These restructuring charges included $2.1 million of
severance benefits payable to 40 employees and $294,000 for the
value of stock-based compensation awards that vest without
future service to us.
We expect that the workforce reductions relating to our 2006
restructuring plan will reduce our quarterly operating expenses
by approximately $1.7 million, including approximately
$1.4 million in research and development expenses and
approximately $300,000 in selling, general and administrative
expenses. We expect to realize the full benefit of these
reductions beginning in the fiscal 2007 first quarter. However,
we intend to reinvest substantially all of such cost savings
back into our research and development programs. Consequently,
we do not expect that the 2006 restructuring plan will result in
a long-term reduction in our operating expenses.
Activity and liability balances related to the Mindspeed 2006
restructuring plan through September 30, 2006 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
2,406
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance at
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mindspeed 2004 Restructuring Plan In October
2004, we announced a restructuring plan intended to reduce our
operating expenses while focusing our research and development
investment in key high-growth markets, including
voice-over-Internet
protocol (VoIP) and high-performance analog applications. The
expense reduction actions included workforce reductions and the
closure of design centers in Herzlia, Israel and Lisle,
Illinois. Approximately 80% of the expense reductions were
derived from the termination of research and development
programs which we believe had a longer
return-on-investment
timeframe or that addressed slower growth markets. The affected
research and development programs were principally our
asynchronous transfer mode (ATM)/multi-protocol label switching
(MPLS) network processor products and, to a lesser extent, our
T/E carrier transmission products. The remainder of the cost
savings came from the selling, general and administrative
functions. We completed substantially all of these actions
during fiscal 2005, reducing our workforce by approximately 90
employees.
36
In connection with these actions, we recorded fiscal 2005
restructuring charges of approximately $5.9 million. The
restructuring charges included an aggregate of $3.4 million
for the workforce reductions, based upon estimates of the cost
of severance benefits for the affected employees, and
approximately $2.5 million related to contractual
obligations for the purchase of design tools and other services
in excess of anticipated requirements. During fiscal 2006, we
recorded additional charges of $277,000 for severance and
related benefits payable to the affected employees. Activity and
liability balances related to the Mindspeed 2004 restructuring
plan through September 30, 2006 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
3,412
|
|
|
$
|
2,517
|
|
|
$
|
5,929
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,575
|
)
|
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
|
(4,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance at
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
(1,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance at
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Restructuring Plans In fiscal 2001,
2002 and 2003, we implemented a number of cost reduction
initiatives to improve our operating cost structure. The cost
reduction initiatives included workforce reductions, significant
reductions in capital spending, the consolidation of certain
facilities and salary reductions for the senior management team.
During the year ended September 30, 2006, we made cash
payments of $1.5 million under these restructuring plans
and reversed $134,000 of previously accrued costs and expenses
related to contractual obligations. As of September 30,
2006, our remaining liabilities under these restructuring plans
totaled $500,000, representing amounts payable under
non-cancelable leases, severance benefits to affected employees
and other contractual commitments.
As of September 30, 2006, we have a remaining accrued
restructuring balance for all restructuring plans totaling
$1.7 million (classified as a current liability),
principally representing obligations under non-cancelable leases
and other contractual commitments. We expect to pay these
obligations over their respective terms, which expire at various
dates through fiscal 2007. The payments will be funded from
available cash balances and funds from product sales and are not
expected to impact significantly our liquidity.
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest expense for fiscal 2006 and 2005 represents interest on
the $46 million convertible senior notes we issued in
December 2004. Interest expense increased for fiscal 2006, as
compared to fiscal 2005, because the notes were outstanding
during the entire fiscal 2006 year.
Other
Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Other income principally consists of interest income, foreign
exchange gains and losses, franchise taxes and other
non-operating gains and losses. The decrease in other income in
fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 principally reflects
lower interest income resulting from the lower cash, cash
equivalent and marketable security balances partially offset by
higher interest rates that prevailed during fiscal 2006. The
increase in other income for fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004
principally reflects higher interest income, partially offset by
the write-off of capitalized costs associated with the
terminated credit facility. The increase in interest income
resulted from higher invested cash balances and the higher
interest rates that prevailed during fiscal 2005.
37
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
Our provision for income taxes for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and
2004 principally consisted of income taxes incurred by our
foreign subsidiaries. As a result of our recent operating losses
and our expectation of future operating results, we determined
that it is more likely than not that the U.S. federal and
state income tax benefits (principally net operating losses we
can carry forward to future years) which arose during fiscal
2006, 2005, and 2004 will not be realized. Accordingly, we have
not recognized any income tax benefits relating to our
U.S. federal and state operating losses for those periods
and we do not expect to recognize any income tax benefits
relating to future operating losses until we believe that such
tax benefits are more likely than not to be realized. We expect
that our provision for income taxes for fiscal 2007 will
principally consist of income taxes related to our foreign
operations.
As of September 30, 2006, we had a valuation allowance of
$268 million against our U.S. federal and state
deferred tax assets (which reduces their carrying value to zero)
because we do not expect to realize these deferred tax assets
through the reduction of future income tax payments. As of
September 30, 2006, we had U.S. federal net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $603 million, including
the net operating loss carryforwards we retained in the
distribution.
38
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results for each of
the eight fiscal quarters in the period ended September 30,
2006. The information for each of these quarters is derived from
our unaudited interim financial statements which have been
prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
In our opinion, all necessary adjustments, which consist only of
normal and recurring accruals as well as the inventory
write-downs and special charges, have been included to fairly
present our unaudited quarterly results. This data should be
read together with our consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto included in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
26,316
|
|
|
$
|
26,644
|
|
|
$
|
27,738
|
|
|
$
|
31,079
|
|
|
$
|
33,203
|
|
|
$
|
34,610
|
|
|
$
|
35,894
|
|
|
$
|
32,212
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
7,982
|
|
|
|
8,316
|
|
|
|
8,207
|
|
|
|
9,199
|
|
|
|
10,482
|
|
|
|
10,221
|
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
11,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
18,334
|
|
|
|
18,328
|
|
|
|
19,531
|
|
|
|
21,880
|
|
|
|
22,721
|
|
|
|
24,389
|
|
|
|
24,699
|
|
|
|
20,518
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
19,604
|
|
|
|
18,613
|
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
|
|
16,390
|
|
|
|
16,512
|
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
15,049
|
|
|
|
15,508
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
10,662
|
|
|
|
10,430
|
|
|
|
10,797
|
|
|
|
9,982
|
|
|
|
11,036
|
|
|
|
12,462
|
|
|
|
11,807
|
|
|
|
11,665
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
12,676
|
|
|
|
6,981
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
48,415
|
|
|
|
36,532
|
|
|
|
28,244
|
|
|
|
26,515
|
|
|
|
27,573
|
|
|
|
30,653
|
|
|
|
27,909
|
|
|
|
27,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(30,081
|
)
|
|
|
(18,204
|
)
|
|
|
(8,713
|
)
|
|
|
(4,635
|
)
|
|
|
(4,852
|
)
|
|
|
(6,264
|
)
|
|
|
(3,210
|
)
|
|
|
(6,971
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(558
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(30,081
|
)
|
|
|
(18,458
|
)
|
|
|
(8,906
|
)
|
|
|
(4,814
|
)
|
|
|
(5,030
|
)
|
|
|
(6,462
|
)
|
|
|
(3,601
|
)
|
|
|
(7,572
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(30,479
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,395
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,504
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,544
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and
diluted loss per share
|
|
|
100,804
|
|
|
|
102,075
|
|
|
|
102,698
|
|
|
|
103,183
|
|
|
|
103,698
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
106,510
|
|
|
|
106,938
|
|
The growth in our quarterly net revenues for fiscal 2006
generally reflects increased shipments in all of our product
families; multiservice access DSP products, high performance
analog products and WAN communications products.
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS 123R
Share-Based Payment and began accounting for all
stock-based compensation transactions using a fair-value method
and recognizing the fair value of each award as an expense over
the service period. Therefore, stock-based compensation expense
is included in cost of goods sold, research and development
expenses, general and administrative expenses and special
charges for each of the four quarters of fiscal 2006. Quarterly
stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2006 ranged from
$1.4 million to $2.5 million and totaled
$7.5 million for fiscal 2006. Quarterly stock-based
compensation expense for fiscal 2005 averaged $100,000 per
quarter and totaled $400,000 for fiscal 2005.
Our quarterly R&D expenses generally decreased through
fiscal 2005 and 2006 as a result of the workforce reductions and
other cost reduction initiatives we implemented partially offset
by stock-based compensation expense. Our R&D expenses of
$15.5 million for the fiscal 2006 fourth quarter reflect
the effect of the cost savings from the restructuring plans we
initiated in fiscal 2004 through 2006.
39
Quarterly amortization of intangible assets ceased in fiscal
2006 as the remainder of our intangible assets became fully
amortized during fiscal 2005.
In fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006, we recorded special charges for
our restructuring plans. Special charges for fiscal 2005 also
include asset impairments totaling $0.8 million.
Interest expense for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 represents
interest on the $46 million convertible senior notes we
issued in December 2004. Other income decreased during fiscal
2006 as a result of lower invested cash balances partially
offset by increasing interest rates.
In the past, our quarterly operating results have fluctuated due
to a number of factors, many of which are outside our control.
These include changes in the overall demand for network
infrastructure equipment, the timing of new product
introductions, the timing of receipt, reduction or cancellation
of significant orders by customers, supply availability and
other factors that have had a significant impact on our revenues
and gross margins. Significant quarterly fluctuations in results
of operations have also caused significant fluctuations in our
liquidity and working capital, including our cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable and payable and inventories.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash used in operating activities was $15.9 million for
fiscal 2006 compared to $30.2 million for fiscal 2005 and
$43.2 million for fiscal 2004. Operating cash flows for
fiscal 2006 reflect our net loss of $24.5 million,
partially offset by non-cash charges (depreciation, stock
compensation and other) of $13.8 million, and net working
capital increases of approximately $5.2 million.
The net working capital increases for fiscal 2006 included a
$7.7 million increase in net inventories, principally
related to our high performance analog and multiservice access
VoIP products as we built inventories to support expected
increases in demand. These amounts were partially offset by a
$1.6 million decrease in accounts receivable resulting from
a decrease in our average collection period and a
$1.6 million increase in deferred revenue.
Cash provided by investing activities of $25.2 million for
fiscal 2006 principally consisted of net sales of marketable
securities (net of purchases) of $29.7 million, partially
offset by capital expenditures of $4.5 million. Cash used
in investing activities of $44.7 million for fiscal 2005
principally consisted of net purchases of marketable securities
of $40.9 million and capital expenditures of
$4.0 million, partly offset by proceeds from asset sales of
$151,000. Cash used in investing activities of $5.7 million
for fiscal 2004 consisted of payments for capital expenditures,
partially offset by proceeds from sales of assets of $54,000.
Cash provided by financing activities of $5.3 million for
fiscal 2006 consisted of proceeds of $5.3 million from the
exercise of stock options. Cash provided by financing activities
of $46.6 million for fiscal 2005 consisted of net proceeds
of $43.9 million from the sale of $46 million
principal amount of convertible senior notes and proceeds of
$3.1 million from the exercise of stock options and
warrants, partially offset by debt issuance costs of $433,000.
Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2004 consisted
of proceeds of $12.5 million from the exercise of stock
options and warrants, partially offset by deferred financing
costs paid of $64,000.
Convertible
Senior Notes Offering
In December 2004, we sold $46.0 million aggregate principal
amount of Convertible Senior Notes due 2009 for net proceeds
(after discounts and commissions) of approximately
$43.9 million. The notes are senior unsecured obligations,
ranking equal in right of payment with all future unsecured
indebtedness. The notes bear interest at a rate of 3.75%,
payable semiannually in arrears each May 18 and
November 18. We used approximately $3.3 million of the
proceeds to purchase U.S. government securities that were
pledged to the trustee for the payment of the first four
scheduled interest payments on the notes when due.
The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any
time prior to maturity into shares of our common stock. Upon
conversion, we may, at our option, elect to deliver cash in lieu
of shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and
shares of common stock. Effective May 13, 2005, the
conversion price of the notes was adjusted to $2.31 per
share of common stock, which is equal to a conversion rate of
approximately 432.9004 shares
40
of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes. Prior to
this adjustment, the conversion price applicable to the notes
was $2.81 per share of common stock, which was equal to
approximately 355.8719 shares of common stock per $1,000
principal amount of notes. The adjustment was made pursuant to
the terms of the indenture governing the notes. The conversion
price is subject to further adjustment under the terms of the
indenture to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, issuances of
rights to purchase shares of common stock and certain other
events.
If we undergo certain fundamental changes (as defined in the
indenture), holders of notes may require us to repurchase some
or all of their notes at 100% of the principal amount plus
accrued and unpaid interest. If, upon notice of certain events
constituting a fundamental change, holders of the notes elect to
convert the notes, we will be required to increase the number of
shares issuable upon conversion by up to 72.09 shares per
$1,000 principal amount of notes. The number of additional
shares, if any, will be determined by the table set forth in the
indenture governing the notes. In the event of a non-stock
change of control constituting a public acquirer change of
control (as defined in the indenture), we may, in lieu of
issuing additional shares or making an additional cash payment
upon conversion as required by the indenture, elect to adjust
the conversion price and the related conversion obligation such
that the noteholders will be entitled to convert their notes
into a number of shares of public acquirer common stock.
For financial accounting purposes, our contingent obligation to
issue additional shares or make an additional cash payment upon
conversion following a fundamental change is an embedded
derivative. As of September 30, 2006, the estimated
fair value of our liability under the fundamental change
adjustment was not significant.
Conexant
Warrant
In the distribution, we issued to Conexant a warrant to purchase
30 million shares of our common stock at a price of
$3.408 per share, exercisable for a period of ten years
after the distribution. The warrant contains antidilution
provisions that provide for adjustment of the exercise price,
and the number of shares issuable under the warrant, upon the
occurrence of certain events. If we issue, or are deemed to have
issued, shares of our common stock, or securities convertible
into our common stock, at prices below the current market price
of our common stock (as defined in the warrants) at the time of
the issuance of such securities, the warrants exercise
price will be reduced and the number of shares issuable under
the warrant will be increased. The amount of such adjustment, if
any, will be determined pursuant to a formula specified in the
warrant and will depend on the number of shares issued, the
offering price and the current market price of our common stock
at the time of the issuance of such securities. Adjustments to
the warrant pursuant to these antidilution provisions may result
in significant dilution to the interests of our existing
stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock. The antidilution provisions may also limit our
ability to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us.
Moreover, we may not realize any cash proceeds from the exercise
of the warrant held by Conexant. A holder of the warrant may opt
for a cashless exercise of all or part of the warrant. In a
cashless exercise, the holder of the warrant would make no cash
payment to us and would receive a number of shares of our common
stock having an aggregate value equal to the excess of the
then-current market price of the shares of our common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrant over the exercise price of
the warrant. Such an issuance of common stock would be
immediately dilutive to the interests of other stockholders.
Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash
balances, marketable securities and cash generated from product
sales. As of September 30, 2006, our cash and cash
equivalents totaled $30.0 million and our marketable
securities totaled $11.3 million. Our working capital at
September 30, 2006 was $50.9 million.
In order to become profitable, or to generate positive cash
flows from operations, we must reduce operating expenses or
achieve substantial revenue growth. Through fiscal 2006, we have
completed a series of cost reduction actions which have improved
our operating cost structure. We plan to continue with cost
reduction actions in the first half of fiscal 2007. These
expense reductions alone may not make us profitable or allow us
to sustain profitability if it is achieved. Our ability to
achieve the necessary revenue growth will depend on increased
demand for network infrastructure equipment that incorporates
our products, which in turn depends primarily on the level of
capital spending by communications service providers and
enterprises. We may not be successful in achieving the
41
necessary revenue growth or the expected expense reductions
within the anticipated time frame, or at all. Moreover, some of
our completed cost reduction measures taken in fiscal 2006 will
not have a recurring impact in future periods, and we may be
unable to sustain other past or expected future expense
reductions in subsequent periods. We may not achieve
profitability or sustain such profitability, if achieved.
We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, along with
cash expected to be generated from product sales, will be
sufficient to fund our operations, research and development
efforts, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and
other financing requirements for at least the next twelve
months. We will need to continue a focused program of capital
expenditures to meet our research and development and corporate
requirements. We may also consider acquisition opportunities to
extend our technology portfolio and design expertise and to
expand our product offerings. In order to fund capital
expenditures, increase our working capital or complete any
acquisitions, we may seek to obtain additional debt or equity
financing. We may also need to seek to obtain additional debt or
equity financing if we experience downturns or cyclical
fluctuations in our business that are more severe or longer than
anticipated or if we fail to achieve anticipated revenue and
expense levels. However, we cannot assure you that such
financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes the future payments we are
required to make under contractual obligations as of
September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
<1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
>5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
46.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest expense on long-term debt
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
78.0
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
$
|
47.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt consists of $46.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our Convertible Senior Notes. The notes bear
interest at a rate of 3.75%, payable semiannually in arrears
each May 18 and November 18, and mature on
November 18, 2009. U.S. Treasury securities having an
aggregate face amount of approximately $860,000 are pledged to
the trustee for the payment of the next scheduled interest
payment on the notes when due.
In March 2005, we amended and restated the Sublease with
Conexant pursuant to which we lease our headquarters in Newport
Beach, California. The Sublease has an initial term extending
through June 2008, and we may, at our option, extend the
Sublease for an additional two-year term. Rent payable under the
Sublease is approximately $3.9 million annually, subject to
annual increases of 3%, plus a prorated portion of operating
expenses associated with the leased property. We estimate our
minimum future obligation under the Sublease at approximately
$6.7 million annually (a total of $11.8 million over
the remainder of the initial lease term), but actual costs under
the Sublease will vary based upon Conexants actual costs.
In addition, each year we may elect to purchase certain services
from Conexant based on a prorated portion of Conexants
actual costs.
We lease our other facilities and certain equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases. The leases expire at various
dates through 2014 and contain various provisions for rental
adjustments, including, in certain cases, adjustments based on
increases in the Consumer Price Index. The leases generally
contain renewal provisions for varying periods of time.
Contractual obligations under operating leases have not been
reduced by anticipated rental income under noncancelable
subleases totaling $1.2 million and extending to various
dates through fiscal 2008.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have made guarantees and indemnities, under which we may be
required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party,
in relation to certain transactions. In connection with the
distribution, we generally assumed responsibility for all
contingent liabilities and then-current and future litigation
against Conexant or its subsidiaries
42
related to the Mindspeed business. We may also be responsible
for certain federal income tax liabilities under the Tax
Allocation Agreement between us and Conexant, which provides
that we will be responsible for certain taxes imposed on us,
Conexant or Conexant stockholders. In connection with certain
facility leases, we have indemnified our lessors for certain
claims arising from the facility or the lease. We indemnify our
directors, officers, employees and agents to the maximum extent
permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. The duration
of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and in many cases is
indefinite. The majority of our guarantees and indemnities do
not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future
payments we could be obligated to make. We have not recorded any
liability for these guarantees and indemnities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Our cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and
highly-liquid money market funds. Our marketable securities
consist of auction rate securities whose interest rates reset
periodically (generally every seven or twenty-eight days) and
U.S. Treasury securities having maturities of less than
eighteen months. Our main investment objectives are the
preservation of investment capital and the maximization of
after-tax returns on our investment portfolio. Consequently, we
invest in the securities that meet high credit quality standards
and we limit the amount of our credit exposure to any one
issuer. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative or
investment purposes.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are not
subject to significant interest rate risk due to the short
maturities or variable interest rate characteristics of these
instruments. As of September 30, 2006, the carrying value
of our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
approximates fair value.
Our long-term debt consists of convertible senior notes which
bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.75%. Consequently, our
results of operations and cash flows are not subject to any
significant interest rate risk relating to our long-term debt.
Foreign
Exchange Risk
We transact business in various foreign currencies and we face
foreign exchange risk on assets and liabilities that are
denominated in foreign currencies. The majority of our foreign
exchange risks are not hedged; however, from time to time, we
may utilize foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge
a portion of our exposure to foreign exchange risk. These
hedging transactions are intended to offset the gains and losses
we experience on foreign currency transactions with gains and
losses on the forward contracts, so as to mitigate our overall
risk of foreign exchange gains and losses. We do not enter into
forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. At
September 30, 2006, we held no foreign currency forward
exchange contracts. Based on our overall currency rate exposure
at September 30, 2006, a 10% change in currency rates would
not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
43
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
29,976
|
|
|
$
|
15,335
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
11,260
|
|
|
|
40,094
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances for
doubtful accounts of $447 (2006) and $462 (2005)
|
|
|
14,786
|
|
|
|
16,356
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
19,008
|
|
|
|
10,730
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
78,720
|
|
|
|
85,904
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,961
|
|
|
|
14,890
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
96,542
|
|
|
$
|
105,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,639
|
|
|
$
|
9,776
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
5,047
|
|
|
|
3,452
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
|
5,038
|
|
|
|
6,722
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
27,840
|
|
|
|
26,572
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
44,618
|
|
|
|
44,219
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
73,066
|
|
|
|
71,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Notes 6 and 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par
value: 25,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par
value, 500,000 shares authorized; 110,702 (2006) and
103,852 (2005) issued shares
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
250,602
|
|
|
|
237,003
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(212,566
|
)
|
|
|
(188,052
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(15,667
|
)
|
|
|
(16,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
23,476
|
|
|
|
33,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
96,542
|
|
|
$
|
105,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
135,919
|
|
|
$
|
111,777
|
|
|
$
|
119,435
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
43,592
|
|
|
|
33,704
|
|
|
|
35,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
92,327
|
|
|
|
78,073
|
|
|
|
84,286
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
64,104
|
|
|
|
71,355
|
|
|
|
79,582
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
46,970
|
|
|
|
41,871
|
|
|
|
46,845
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,481
|
|
|
|
50,318
|
|
Special charges
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
5,999
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
113,624
|
|
|
|
139,706
|
|
|
|
177,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(21,297
|
)
|
|
|
(61,633
|
)
|
|
|
(92,846
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,231
|
)
|
|
|
(1,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(22,665
|
)
|
|
|
(62,259
|
)
|
|
|
(92,526
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(24,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in per share
computation
|
|
|
105,537
|
|
|
|
102,190
|
|
|
|
98,140
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(24,514
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,247
|
)
|
Adjustments required to reconcile
net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
9,140
|
|
|
|
11,263
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,481
|
|
|
|
50,318
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Inventory provisions
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
4,697
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Other noncash items, net
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
(7,848
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(7,692
|
)
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
(12,648
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
(3,336
|
)
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
298
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(1,621
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(15,880
|
)
|
|
|
(30,209
|
)
|
|
|
(43,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(4,488
|
)
|
|
|
(3,980
|
)
|
|
|
(5,791
|
)
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
marketable securities
|
|
|
(37,597
|
)
|
|
|
(76,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of
available-for-sale
marketable securities
|
|
|
65,585
|
|
|
|
38,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
held-to-maturity
marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of
held-to-maturity
marketable securities
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
25,225
|
|
|
|
(44,700
|
)
|
|
|
(5,737
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and
warrants
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
12,534
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
46,606
|
|
|
|
12,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14,641
|
|
|
|
(28,303
|
)
|
|
|
(36,483
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
15,335
|
|
|
|
43,638
|
|
|
|
80,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
29,976
|
|
|
$
|
15,335
|
|
|
$
|
43,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2003
|
|
|
93,545
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
215,334
|
|
|
$
|
(32,176
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
167,134
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,247
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,312
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
7,074
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
15,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,972
|
|
Compensation expense related to
employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
100,619
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
231,368
|
|
|
|
(125,423
|
)
|
|
|
(16,024
|
)
|
|
|
90,927
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,629
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,769
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
Compensation expense related to
employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
237,003
|
|
|
|
(188,052
|
)
|
|
|
(16,164
|
)
|
|
|
33,826
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,514
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,017
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,410
|
|
Common stock repurchased and
retired
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Compensation expense related to
employee stock plans
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
110,702
|
|
|
$
|
1,107
|
|
|
$
|
250,602
|
|
|
$
|
(212,566
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (Mindspeed or the Company) designs,
develops and sells semiconductor networking solutions for
communications applications in enterprise, access, metropolitan
and wide-area networks. On June 27, 2003, Conexant Systems,
Inc. (Conexant) completed the distribution (the Distribution) to
Conexant stockholders of all 90,333,445 outstanding shares of
common stock of its wholly owned subsidiary, Mindspeed. In the
Distribution, each Conexant stockholder received one share of
Mindspeed common stock (including an associated preferred share
purchase right) for every three shares of Conexant common stock
held and cash for any fractional share of Mindspeed common
stock. Following the Distribution, Mindspeed began operations as
an independent, publicly held company.
Prior to the Distribution, Conexant transferred to Mindspeed the
assets and liabilities of the Mindspeed business, including the
stock of certain subsidiaries, and certain other assets and
liabilities which were allocated to Mindspeed under the
Distribution Agreement entered into between Conexant and
Mindspeed. Also prior to the Distribution, Conexant contributed
to Mindspeed cash in an amount such that at the time of the
Distribution Mindspeeds cash balance was
$100 million. Mindspeed issued to Conexant a warrant to
purchase 30 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at a
price of $3.408 per share, exercisable for a period
beginning one year and ending ten years after the Distribution.
In connection with the Distribution, Mindspeed and Conexant also
entered into a Credit Agreement (terminated December 2004), an
Employee Matters Agreement, a Tax Allocation Agreement, a
Transition Services Agreement and a Sublease.
Basis
of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, include the accounts of Mindspeed and each of
its subsidiaries. All accounts and transactions among Mindspeed
and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. In
the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated
condensed financial statements contain all adjustments,
consisting of adjustments of a normal recurring nature and the
special charges (Note 12), necessary to present fairly the
Companys financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Fiscal Periods The Company maintains a
fifty-two/fifty-three week fiscal year ending on the Friday
closest to September 30. Fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004
comprised 52 weeks and ended on September 29,
September 30, and October 1, respectively. For
convenience, the accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Among the significant
estimates affecting the financial statements are those related
to the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, long-lived
assets, stock compensation, income taxes, restructuring costs
and litigation. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its
estimates based upon currently available information. Actual
results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized
when the following fundamental criteria are met:
(i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
(ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the price to the
customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection of
the sales price is reasonably assured. Delivery occurs when
goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the
customer, in accordance with the terms specified in the
arrangement with the customer. Revenue recognition is deferred
in all instances where the earnings process is incomplete.
Certain product sales are made to electronic component
distributors under agreements allowing for a right to return
unsold products. Recognition of revenue on all sales to these
distributors is deferred until the products are sold by the
distributors to a third party. A provision for estimated sales
returns and allowances from other customers is made in the same
period
48
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
as the related revenues are recognized, based on historical
experience or the specific identification of an event
necessitating a reserve. Development revenue is recognized when
services are performed and was not significant for any of the
periods presented.
Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company
considers all highly liquid investments with insignificant
interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or
less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their
fair values.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using the average cost
method on a currently adjusted standard basis (which
approximates actual cost); market is based upon estimated net
realizable value. The valuation of inventories at the lower of
cost or market requires the use of estimates as to the amounts
of current inventories that will be sold. These estimates are
dependent on the Companys assessment of current and
expected orders from its customers, and orders generally are
subject to cancellation with limited advance notice prior to
shipment.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is based on
estimated useful lives (principally 10 to 27 years for
buildings and improvements; 3 to 5 years for machinery and
equipment; and the shorter of the remaining terms of the leases
or the estimated economic useful lives of the improvements for
land and leasehold improvements). Significant renewals and
betterments are capitalized and replaced units are written off.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.
Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist
mainly of patents and developed technology and are amortized on
a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 2 to
8 years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company
continually monitors events or changes in circumstances that
could indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets to
be held and used, including intangible assets, may not be
recoverable. The determination of recoverability is based on an
estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the
use of the asset and its eventual disposition. When impairment
is indicated for a long-lived asset, the amount of impairment
loss is the excess of net book value over fair value. Long-lived
assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value less costs to sell. During fiscal 2005, the
Company recorded impairment charges as discussed in
Note 12. As of September 30, 2006, the Company
identified no circumstances that indicated a potential
impairment of any of its long-lived assets.
Foreign Currency Translation and
Remeasurement The Companys foreign
operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign
currency transaction costs. The functional currency of the
Companys principal foreign subsidiaries is the local
currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
functional currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at
the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates and
income and expense items are translated at the average exchange
rates prevailing during the period. The resulting foreign
currency translation adjustments are accumulated as a component
of other comprehensive income. For the remainder of the
Companys foreign subsidiaries, the functional currency is
the U.S. dollar. Inventories, property, plant and
equipment, cost of goods sold and depreciation for those
operations are remeasured from foreign currencies into
U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates; other accounts
are translated at current exchange rates. Gains and losses
resulting from those remeasurements are included in earnings.
Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions
are recognized currently in earnings.
Research and Development Research and
development costs, other than software development costs, are
expensed as incurred. Development costs for software to be sold
or marketed are capitalized following attainment of
technological feasibility. No development costs that qualify for
capitalization were incurred during any of the periods presented.
Product Warranties The Companys
products typically carry a warranty for periods of up to five
years. The Company establishes reserves for estimated product
warranty costs in the period the related revenue is recognized,
based on historical experience and any known product warranty
issues.
49
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Recent Accounting Standards In May 2005, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and
Error Corrections, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all
voluntary changes in accounting principle and requires
retrospective application (a term defined by the statement) to
prior periods financial statements, unless it is
impracticable to determine the effect of a change. It also
applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement that
does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS 154
is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors
made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The
Company will adopt SFAS No. 154 as of the beginning of
fiscal 2007 and does not expect that the adoption of
SFAS 154 will have a material impact on its financial
condition or results of operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This pronouncement
recommends a recognition threshold and measurement process for
recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions
taken or expected to be taken in the Companys tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions.
The accounting provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for
our first fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007 of fiscal
2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect, if
any, the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial
statements.
In September 2006, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements, which addresses how uncorrected errors
in previous years should be considered when quantifying errors
in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 requires
registrants to consider the effect of all carry over and
reversing effects of prior-year misstatements when quantifying
errors in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 allows
registrants to record the effects of adopting the guidance as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The Company
will adopt SAB 108 as of the beginning of fiscal 2007 and
does not expect that the adoption of SAB 108 will have a
material impact on its financial condition or results of
operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurement (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities
measured at fair value. The Company will be required to adopt
SFAS 157 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Management is
currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 157 and has
not yet determined the impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Stock-Based Compensation Effective
October 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R)
to account for stock-based compensation. SFAS 123R requires
that the Company account for all stock-based compensation
transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the fair
value of each award as an expense over the service period. The
fair value of restricted stock awards is based upon the market
price of our common stock at the grant date. The Company
estimates the fair value of stock options granted using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes
model requires a number of estimates, including the expected
option term, the expected volatility in the price of our common
stock, the risk-free rate of interest and the dividend yield on
our common stock. Judgment is required in estimating the number
of share-based awards that we expect will ultimately vest upon
the fulfillment of service conditions (such as time-based
vesting) or the achievement of specific performance conditions.
The financial statements include amounts that are based on the
Companys best estimates and judgments. Prior to fiscal
2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using
the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Option No. 25 Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees (see Note 10).
Income Taxes The provision for income taxes
is determined in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting For Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences
between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities, applying enacted statutory tax rates in effect for
the
50
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A
valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Loss Per Share Basic loss per share is based
on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share also
includes the effect of stock options, warrants and other common
stock equivalents outstanding during the period if such
securities are dilutive. Because the Company incurred a net loss
in each of the periods presented, the potential dilutive effect
of the Companys outstanding stock options, stock warrants
and convertible senior notes was not included in the computation
of diluted loss per share because these securities were
antidilutive. For periods prior to the Distribution, the
weighted-average number of shares outstanding is based on
Conexants weighted-average shares outstanding.
Concentrations Financial instruments that
potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit
risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents,
marketable securities and trade accounts receivable. Cash and
cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and money market
funds maintained with several financial institutions. Deposits
held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on
such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon
demand and are maintained with high-credit quality financial
institutions and therefore have minimal credit risk. Marketable
securities consist of U.S. Treasury securities and auction
rate securities, all of which are high investment grade. The
Company, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure through
diversification and investment in highly rated securities. The
Companys trade accounts receivable primarily are derived
from sales to manufacturers of network infrastructure equipment
and electronic component distributors. Management believes that
credit risks on trade accounts receivable are moderated by the
diversity of its end customers and geographic sales areas. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers financial condition and requires collateral,
such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, whenever deemed
necessary.
The following individual customers accounted for 10% or more of
net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Customer C
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Customer D
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Customer E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
The following individual customers accounted for 10% or more of
total accounts receivable at fiscal year ends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Customer C
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Customer F
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Customer G
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information Interest
paid was $1.7 million and $0.8 million for fiscal 2006
and fiscal 2005, respectively; the Company paid no interest
during fiscal 2004. Income taxes paid, net of refunds received,
were ($36,000), $400,000 and $300,000 million during fiscal
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Comprehensive Loss Accumulated other
comprehensive loss at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consists
of foreign currency translation adjustments. Foreign currency
translation adjustments are not presented net of any tax effect
as the Company does not expect to incur any tax liability or
realize any benefit related thereto.
Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts
have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
51
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Supplemental
Financial Statement Data
|
Marketable
Securities
Marketable securities at fiscal year ends consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
$
|
10,400
|
|
|
$
|
10,400
|
|
|
$
|
38,385
|
|
|
$
|
38,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
860
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
2,546
|
|
|
$
|
2,546
|
|
Less amounts classified as
noncurrent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
|
|
(825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
860
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
1,709
|
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
marketable securities consist of auction rate securities with
interest at rates that are reset periodically (generally every
seven or twenty-eight days), each having contractual maturity
dates in excess of ten years. These securities are recorded at
fair value in the accompanying balance sheets; any unrealized
gains/losses are included in other comprehensive income, unless
a loss is determined to be other than temporary. As of
September 30, 2006, there are no unrealized holding gains
or losses. The Company classifies all
available-for-sale
securities as current assets in the accompanying balance sheets
because the Company has the ability and intent to sell these
securities as necessary to meet its liquidity requirements.
Held-to-maturity
marketable securities consist of U.S. Treasury securities
having an aggregate face amount of approximately $860,000
purchased in connection with the sale of $46.0 million
aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes. These
securities, which mature in November 2006, were pledged to the
trustee for the payment of the fourth scheduled interest payment
on the notes when due. Consequently, these securities are
classified as
held-to-maturity
securities and are recorded at their amortized cost.
Inventories
Inventories at fiscal year ends consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
$
|
9,120
|
|
|
$
|
5,422
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
9,888
|
|
|
|
5,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,008
|
|
|
$
|
10,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company assesses the recoverability of inventories through
an ongoing review of inventory levels in relation to sales
backlog and forecasts, product marketing plans and product life
cycles. When the inventory on hand exceeds the foreseeable
demand, the value of inventory that at the time of the review is
not expected to be sold is written down. The amount of the
write-down is the excess of historical cost over estimated
realizable value (generally zero). Once established, these
write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost
basis of the excess inventory.
The assessment of the recoverability of inventories, and the
amounts of any write-downs, are based on currently available
information and assumptions about future demand (generally over
twelve months) and market conditions. Demand for the
Companys products may fluctuate significantly over time,
and actual demand and market conditions may be more or less
favorable than those projected by management. In the event that
actual demand is lower than originally projected, additional
inventory write-downs may be required.
52
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company may retain and make available for sale some or all
of the inventories which have been written down. In the event
that actual demand is higher than originally projected, the
Company may be able to sell a portion of these inventories in
the future. The Company generally scraps inventories which have
been written down and are identified as obsolete.
Our gross margin included a benefit of $5.5 million (2006),
$8.7 million (2005) and $9.0 million
(2004) from the sale of inventories that we had written
down to a zero cost basis during fiscal 2001. As of
September 30, 2006, the Company continued to hold
inventories with an original cost of $12.4 million which
were previously written down to a zero cost basis.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at fiscal year ends consists of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
69,995
|
|
|
$
|
68,868
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,206
|
|
|
|
73,556
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(62,245
|
)
|
|
|
(58,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,961
|
|
|
$
|
14,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets consisting of developed technology
(approximately $228 million), customer base (approximately
$28 million) and other intangibles (approximately
$11 million) were amortized over periods averaging
approximately five years for each major asset class and
extending to various dates through June 2005. Amortization of
intangible assets was zero for fiscal 2006 because the remainder
of the intangible assets became fully amortized during fiscal
2005, reducing their carrying value to zero. Amortization of
intangible assets totaled $20.5 million (2005) and
$50.3 million (2004).
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the provision for
income taxes on continuing operations follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
U.S. federal statutory tax at
35%
|
|
$
|
(7,933
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,791
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,384
|
)
|
State taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
(3,612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,563
|
)
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
Foreign income taxes in excess of
U.S.
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
Research and development credits
|
|
|
(3,443
|
)
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
|
|
(1,864
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
17,187
|
|
|
|
26,836
|
|
|
|
32,783
|
|
Other
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes consists of the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(29,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84,946
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
(7,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22,665
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,259
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities at fiscal year-ends
consist of the tax effects of temporary differences related to
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
16,746
|
|
|
$
|
17,151
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
Product returns and allowances
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
|
221,294
|
|
|
|
207,804
|
|
Research and development and
investment credits
|
|
|
31,932
|
|
|
|
26,783
|
|
Foreign deferred taxes
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,517
|
|
|
|
6,013
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(268,144
|
)
|
|
|
(250,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
14,308
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
Deferred state taxes
|
|
|
11,875
|
|
|
|
9,926
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
13,158
|
|
|
|
10,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
1,150
|
|
|
$
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon the Companys operating losses and expected
future operating results, management determined that it is more
likely than not that the U.S. federal and state deferred
tax assets as of September 30, 2006 and 2005
54
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
will not be realized through the reduction of future income tax
payments. Consequently, the Company has established a valuation
allowance for its net U.S. federal and state deferred tax
assets as of those dates.
Through the Distribution date, Mindspeeds results of
operations were included in Conexants consolidated federal
and state income tax returns. The provision for income taxes and
the related deferred tax assets and liabilities for periods
prior to the Distribution were calculated as if Mindspeed had
filed separate tax returns as an independent company.
In connection with the Distribution, Mindspeed and Conexant
entered into a tax allocation agreement which provides, among
other things, for the allocation between Conexant and Mindspeed
of federal, state, local and foreign tax liabilities relating to
Mindspeed. The tax allocation agreement also allocates the
liability for any taxes that may arise in connection with the
Distribution. The tax allocation agreement generally provides
that Conexant will be responsible for any such taxes. However,
Mindspeed will be responsible for any taxes imposed on
Mindspeed, Conexant or Conexant stockholders if either the
Distribution fails to qualify as a reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes or the distribution of
Mindspeed Technologies common stock is disqualified as a
tax-free transaction to Conexant for U.S. federal income
tax purposes and such failure or disqualification is
attributable to post-Distribution transaction actions by
Mindspeed, its subsidiaries or its stockholders.
As of September 30, 2006, Mindspeed had U.S. federal
net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$603.2 million, which expire at various dates from 2010
through 2027, and aggregate state net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $117.8 million, which expire
at various dates from 2007 through 2027. Mindspeed also has
U.S. federal and state research and development tax credit
carryforwards of approximately $13.5 million and
$18.4 million, respectively. The U.S. federal credits
expire at various dates from 2010 through 2027, while the state
credits have no expiration date.
The deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2006 include a
deferred tax asset of $11.5 million representing net
operating losses arising from the exercise of stock options by
Mindspeed employees. To the extent the Company realizes any tax
benefit for the net operating losses attributable to the stock
option exercises, such amount would be credited directly to
stockholders equity.
The Company has not provided for U.S. taxes or foreign
withholding taxes on approximately $560,000 of undistributed
earnings from its foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are
to be reinvested indefinitely. If these earnings were
distributed, foreign tax credits may become available under
current law to reduce the resulting U.S. income tax
liability.
|
|
5.
|
Convertible
Senior Notes
|
In December 2004, the Company sold $46.0 million aggregate
principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due 2009 for net
proceeds (after discounts and commissions) of approximately
$43.9 million. The notes are senior unsecured obligations
of the Company, ranking equal in right of payment with all
future unsecured indebtedness. The notes bear interest at a rate
of 3.75%, payable semiannually in arrears each May 18 and
November 18. The Company used approximately
$3.3 million of the proceeds to purchase
U.S. government securities that were pledged to the trustee
for the payment of the first four scheduled interest payments on
the notes when due.
The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any
time prior to maturity into shares of the Companys common
stock. Upon conversion, the Company may, at its option, elect to
deliver cash in lieu of shares of its common stock or a
combination of cash and shares of common stock. Effective
May 13, 2005, the conversion price of the notes was
adjusted to $2.31 per share of common stock, which is equal
to a conversion rate of approximately 432.9004 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes. Prior to this
adjustment, the conversion price applicable to the notes was
$2.81 per share of common stock, which was equal to
approximately 355.8719 shares of common stock per $1,000
principal amount of notes. The adjustment was made pursuant to
the terms of the indenture governing the notes. The conversion
price is subject to further adjustment under the terms
55
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the indenture to reflect stock dividends, stock splits,
issuances of rights to purchase shares of common stock and
certain other events.
If the Company undergoes certain fundamental changes (as defined
in the indenture), holders of notes may require the Company to
repurchase some or all of their notes at 100% of the principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. If, upon notice of
certain events constituting a fundamental change, holders of the
notes elect to convert the notes, the Company will be required
to increase the number of shares issuable upon conversion by up
to 72.09 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The
number of additional shares, if any, will be determined by the
table set forth in the indenture governing the notes. In the
event of a non-stock change of control constituting a
public acquirer change of control (as defined in the
indenture), the Company may, in lieu of issuing additional
shares or making an additional cash payment upon conversion as
required by the indenture, elect to adjust the conversion price
and the related conversion obligation such that the noteholders
will be entitled to convert their notes into a number of shares
of public acquirer common stock.
For financial accounting purposes, the Companys contingent
obligation to issue additional shares or make an additional cash
payment upon conversion following a fundamental change is an
embedded derivative. As of September 30, 2006,
the estimated fair value of the Companys liability under
the fundamental change adjustment was not significant.
In connection with the sale of the notes, the Company granted
the purchasers certain registration rights. The Companys
Form S-3
registration statement covering the resale of the notes and the
sale of shares issuable upon conversion of the notes was
declared effective by the SEC on April 6, 2005.
Upon completion of the sale of the notes, the $50 million
Credit Agreement with Conexant was terminated. The Company had
made no borrowings under the credit facility, and no portion of
the related warrant is, or will become, exercisable.
As of September 30, 2006, the estimated fair value of the
convertible senior notes was approximately $49.0 million.
In March 2005, we amended and restated the Sublease with
Conexant pursuant to which we lease our headquarters in Newport
Beach, California. The Sublease has an initial term extending
through June 2008, and we may, at our option, extend the
Sublease for an additional two-year term. Rent payable under the
Sublease is approximately $3.9 million annually, subject to
annual increases of 3%, plus a prorated portion of operating
expenses associated with the leased property. We estimate our
minimum future obligation under the Sublease at approximately
$6.7 million annually (a total of $11.8 million over
the remainder of the initial lease term), but actual costs under
the Sublease will vary based upon Conexants actual costs.
In addition, each year we may elect to purchase certain services
from Conexant based on a prorated portion of Conexants
actual costs.
The Company leases its other facilities and certain equipment
under non-cancelable operating leases. The leases expire at
various dates through 2014 and contain various provisions for
rental adjustments including, in certain cases, adjustments
based on increases in the Consumer Price Index. The leases
generally contain renewal provisions for varying periods of time.
Rental expense was approximately $7.7 million (2006),
$7.3 million (2005), and $6.8 million (2004). Rental
expense includes $6.5 million (2006), $3.7 million
(2005), and $4.5 million (2004) paid to Conexant under
the
56
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Sublease. As of September 30, 2006, the Companys
minimum future obligations under operating leases (including the
estimated minimum future obligation under the Sublease) are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
9,217
|
|
2008
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
2009
|
|
|
912
|
|
2010
|
|
|
406
|
|
2011
|
|
|
205
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum future lease payments
|
|
$
|
17,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum future lease payments as of September 30, 2006
include an aggregate of $0.9 million relating to facilities
no longer occupied by the Company, which is included in the
restructuring liability in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be
instituted or asserted against Conexant or Mindspeed, including
those pertaining to product liability, intellectual property,
environmental, safety and health, and employment matters. In
connection with the Distribution, Mindspeed assumed
responsibility for all contingent liabilities and current and
future litigation against Conexant or its subsidiaries to the
extent such matters relate to Mindspeed.
The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and
some lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be disposed of
unfavorably to the Company. Many intellectual property disputes
have a risk of injunctive relief and there can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to license a third partys
intellectual property. Injunctive relief could have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company. Based on its evaluation of matters
which are pending or asserted, management of the Company
believes the disposition of such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company.
The Company has made guarantees and indemnities, under which it
may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified
party, in relation to certain transactions. In connection with
the Distribution, the Company generally assumed responsibility
for all contingent liabilities and then-current and future
litigation against Conexant or its subsidiaries related to
Mindspeed. The Company may also be responsible for certain
federal income tax liabilities under the tax allocation
agreement between Mindspeed and Conexant, which provides that
the Company will be responsible for certain taxes imposed on
Mindspeed, Conexant or Conexant stockholders. In connection with
the sales of its products, the Company provides intellectual
property indemnities to its customers. In connection with
certain facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors
for certain claims arising from the facility or the lease. The
Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and
agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the
State of Delaware. The duration of the guarantees and
indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite. The
guarantees and indemnities to customers in connection with
product sales generally are subject to limits based upon the
amount of the related product sales. Some customer guarantees
and indemnities, and the majority of other guarantees and
indemnities, do not provide for any limitation of the maximum
potential future payments the Company could be obligated to
make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these
guarantees and indemnities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
57
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys authorized capital consists of
500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which
2,500,000 shares are designated as Series A junior
participating preferred stock (Junior Preferred Stock).
The Company has a preferred share purchase rights plan to
protect stockholders rights in the event of a proposed
takeover of the Company. Pursuant to the preferred share
purchase right (a Right) attached to each share of common stock,
the holder may, in certain takeover-related circumstances,
become entitled to purchase from the Company 1/100th of a
share of Junior Preferred Stock at a price of $20, subject to
adjustment. Also, in certain takeover-related circumstances,
each Right (other than those held by an acquiring person) will
generally be exercisable for shares of the Companys common
stock or stock of the acquiring person having a then-current
market value of twice the exercise price. In certain events,
each Right may be exchanged by the Company for one share of
common stock or 1/100th of a share of Junior Preferred
Stock. The Rights expire on June 26, 2013, unless earlier
exchanged or redeemed at a redemption price of $0.01 per
Right, subject to adjustment.
Warrants
In the Distribution, Mindspeed issued to Conexant a warrant to
purchase 30 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at a
price of $3.408 per share, exercisable through
June 27, 2013. The $89 million fair value of the
warrant (estimated by management at the time of the Distribution
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) was recorded as a
return of capital to Conexant. As of September 30, 2006,
the entire warrant remains outstanding.
The warrant held by Conexant contains antidilution provisions
that provide for adjustment of the warrants exercise
price, and the number of shares issuable under the warrant, upon
the occurrence of certain events. In the event that the Company
issues, or is deemed to have issued, shares of its common stock,
or securities convertible into its common stock, at prices below
the current market price of its common stock (as defined in the
warrant) at the time of the issuance of such securities, the
warrants exercise price will be reduced and the number of
shares issuable under the warrant will be increased. The amount
of such adjustment, if any, will be determined pursuant to a
formula specified in the warrant and will depend on the number
of shares issued, the offering price and the current market
price of the common stock at the time of the issuance of such
securities.
Also in the Distribution, as a result of adjustments made to an
outstanding warrant to purchase shares of Conexant common stock,
Mindspeed issued to Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. (Jazz) a warrant to
purchase 1,036,806 shares of Mindspeed common stock, at a
price of $2.5746 per share. During fiscal 2005, the Company
issued 478,405 shares of its common stock upon the exercise
of all remaining warrants held by Jazz for aggregate proceeds of
$1.2 million.
|
|
10.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R requires that the
Company account for all stock-based compensation using a
fair-value method and recognize the fair value of each award as
an expense over the service period. For fiscal 2005 and earlier
years, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using
the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related
interpretations and followed the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148 Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure. Under the intrinsic value method required by
APB 25, the Company generally recognized no compensation
expense with respect to stock option awards or awards under the
employee stock purchase plan.
The Company elected to adopt SFAS 123R using modified
prospective application. Under that method, compensation
expense includes the fair value of new awards, modified awards
and any unvested awards outstanding at October 1, 2005.
However, the consolidated financial statements for periods prior
to the adoption of SFAS 123R
58
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based compensation. Stock-based
compensation expense for fiscal 2005 and earlier years
represents the cost of restricted stock awards determined in
accordance with APB 25. The Company elected the transition
method described in FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 123R-3
related to accounting for the tax effects of share-based payment
awards to employees.
Stock-based compensation awards generally vest over time and
require continued service to the Company and, in some cases,
require the achievement of specified performance conditions. The
amount of compensation expense recognized is based upon the
number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. The
Company estimates forfeiture rates of 8.5% to 10% depending on
the characteristics of the award.
As a result of the Companys recent operating losses and
its expectation of future operating results, no income tax
benefits have been recognized for any U.S. federal and
state operating losses including those related to
stock-based compensation expense. The Company does not expect to
recognize any income tax benefits relating to future operating
losses until it determines that such tax benefits are more
likely than not to be realized.
The fair value of stock options awarded was estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used
and the resulting fair value of options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
3.4 years
|
|
|
|
2.2 years
|
|
|
|
3.3 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
The expected option term was estimated based upon historical
experience and managements expectation of exercise
behavior. The expected volatility of the Companys stock
price is based upon the historical daily changes in the price of
the Companys common stock since our spin-off from
Conexant. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the current
yield on U.S. Treasury securities having a term similar to
the expected option term. Dividend yield is estimated at zero
because the Company does not anticipate paying dividends in the
foreseeable future.
Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock
options and restricted stock under SFAS 123R for fiscal
2006 was allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,757
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
Special charges
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
$
|
7,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Had the Company recorded compensation expense using the
accounting method recommended by SFAS No. 123 for
prior fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, net
income and net income per share would have been approximated in
the following (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(62,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(93,247
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in the determination of reported net loss
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under the fair value method
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
|
26,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(74,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
(119,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, basic and
diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
Stock
Compensation Plans
The Company has two principal stock incentive plans: the 2003
Long-Term Incentives Plan and the Directors Stock Plan. The 2003
Long-Term Incentives Plan provides for the grant of stock
options, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to
officers and employees of the Company. The Directors Stock Plan
provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock and
other stock-based awards to the Companys non-employee
directors. As of September 30, 2006, an aggregate of
5.6 million shares of the Companys common stock are
available for issuance under these plans. In addition, the
Directors Stock Plan provides that the number of shares
available for issuance is automatically increased on the first
day of each fiscal year by an amount equal to the greater of
160,000 shares or 0.18% of the shares of the Companys
common stock outstanding on that date, subject to the board
being authorized and empowered to select a smaller amount.
The Company also has a 2003 Stock Option Plan, under which stock
options were issued in connection with the Distribution. In the
Distribution, each holder of a Conexant stock option (other than
options held by persons in certain foreign locations) received
an option to purchase a number of shares of Mindspeed common
stock. The number of shares subject to, and the exercise prices
of, the outstanding Conexant options and the Mindspeed options
were adjusted so that the aggregate intrinsic value of the
options was equal to the intrinsic value of the Conexant option
immediately prior to the Distribution and the ratio of the
exercise price per share to the market value per share of each
option was the same immediately before and after the
Distribution. As a result of such option adjustments, Mindspeed
issued options to purchase an aggregate of approximately
29.9 million shares of its common stock to holders of
Conexant stock options (including Mindspeed employees) under the
2003 Stock Option Plan. There are no shares available for new
stock option awards under the 2003 Stock Option Plan. However,
any shares subject to the unexercised portion of any terminated,
forfeited or cancelled option are available for future option
grants only in connection with an offer to exchange outstanding
options for new options.
The Company also maintains employee stock purchase plans for its
domestic and foreign employees, under which 1.3 million
shares are available for issuance. The employee stock purchase
plans provide that the maximum number of shares under the plans
is automatically increased on the first day of each fiscal year
by an aggregate of 750,000 shares.
60
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Option Awards
Prior to fiscal 2006, stock-based compensation consisted
principally of stock options. Eligible employees received grants
of stock options at the time of hire; the Company also made
broad-based stock option grants covering substantially all
employees annually. Stock option awards have exercise prices not
less than the market price of the common stock at the grant date
and a contractual term of eight or ten years, and are subject to
time-based vesting (generally over four years). The following
table summarizes stock option activity under all plans (shares
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2003
|
|
|
30,466
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,516
|
)
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,500,000
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(930
|
)
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2004
|
|
|
26,859
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excercisable at September 30,
2004
|
|
|
17,722
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(2,734
|
)
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2005
|
|
|
26,080
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excercisable at September 30,
2005
|
|
|
19,104
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,009
|
)
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,400,000
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
22,196
|
|
|
$
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
4.3 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
3.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006, there was unrecognized
compensation expense of $2.1 million related to unvested
stock options, which the Company expects to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
The following table summarizes all options to purchase Mindspeed
common stock outstanding at September 30, 2006 (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$0.25 - $1.58
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
1.61 - 2.27
|
|
|
7,119
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
6,716
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
2.28 - 2.73
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
2.79 - 4.41
|
|
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
3.65
|
|
4.46 - 23.29
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 - 23.29
|
|
|
22,196
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The outstanding stock options include options held by Mindspeed
employees to purchase an aggregate of 14.7 million shares
of Mindspeed common stock, which are summarized in the following
table (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$0.25 - $1.51
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
1.61 - 2.27
|
|
|
4,177
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
2.28 - 2.73
|
|
|
6,620
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
2.82 - 4.41
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
4.46 - 16.98
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
7.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 - 16.98
|
|
|
14,738
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
11,633
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
The Companys stock incentive plans also provide for awards
of restricted shares of common stock and other stock-based
incentive awards and from time to time the Company has used
restricted stock awards for incentive or retention purposes.
Restricted stock awards have time-based vesting
and/or
performance conditions and are generally subject to forfeiture
if employment terminates prior to the end of the service period
or if the prescribed performance criteria are not met.
Restricted stock awards are valued at the grant date based upon
the market price of the Companys common stock and the fair
value of each award is charged to expense over the service
period.
Restricted stock grants totaled 4.2 million shares (2006),
421,000 shares (2005) and 51,000 shares (2004).
In fiscal 2006, new awards of stock-based compensation have
principally consisted of restricted stock awards. These awards
principally consisted of broad-based grants covering
substantially all employees. One broad-based grant was intended
to provide performance emphasis and incentive compensation
through vesting tied to each employees performance against
individual goals for fiscal year 2006. Certain senior management
personnel also received additional restricted stock awards
having vesting tied to the Companys achievement of an
operating profit. For purposes of the restricted stock awards,
operating profit or loss excludes stock-based compensation
expenses and special charges. The Company achieved an operating
profit (as defined) in the fiscal 2006 third quarter. These
awards also contain a requirement for continued service through
November 8, 2006. Another broad-based grant of restricted
stock was intended to provide long-term incentive compensation;
these awards vest ratably over a period of four years, and
require continued service.
The fair value of each award is charged to expense over the
service period. The actual amounts of expense will depend on the
number of awards that ultimately vest upon the satisfaction of
the related performance and service conditions. The following
table summarizes restricted stock award activity (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended
September 30, 2006 was $1.5 million. As of
September 30, 2006 there was unrecognized compensation
expense of $3.8 million related to unvested restricted
stock awards, which the Company expects to recognize over a
weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has an employee stock purchase plan under which
eligible employees may authorize the Company to withhold up to
10% of their compensation for each pay period to purchase shares
of the Companys common stock, subject to certain
limitations. Through July 2005, purchases were made at specified
intervals during a
24-month
offering period at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on
the first day of the
24-month
offering period or on the purchase date. Beginning in August
2005, offering periods generally commence on the first trading
day of March and September of each year and are generally six
months in duration, but may be terminated earlier under certain
circumstances. Purchases are made at the end of each offering
period, at a discount of 5% from the fair market value on the
purchase date. Under SFAS 123R, the plan is
non-compensatory and the Company has recorded no compensation
expense in connection therewith. During the years ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company issued 108,000 and
666,000 shares of its common stock under the employee stock
purchase plan for net proceeds of $298,000 and
$1.1 million, respectively.
|
|
11.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Company sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan for its
eligible employees. Prior to the Distribution, Mindspeed
employees were eligible to participate in similar plans
sponsored by Conexant. The Company matches a portion of employee
contributions and funds the matching contribution in shares of
its common stock. The Company issued 331,000 shares (2006),
483,000 shares (2005), and 220,000 shares
(2004) of its common stock to fund the matching
contributions. The Company recognized expenses under the
retirement savings plans, including amounts allocated from
Conexant, of $0.8 million (2006), $0.9 million (2005),
and $1.2 million (2004).
Special charges consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Impairments
During fiscal 2005, the Company recorded asset impairment
charges totaling $810,000 related to property and equipment that
the Company determined to abandon or scrap, including assets
associated with the closure of our former design centers in
Herzlia, Israel and Lisle, Illinois.
The Company continually monitors and review long-lived assets,
including fixed assets and intangible assets, for possible
impairment. Future impairment tests may result in significant
write-downs of the value of our assets
Restructuring
Charges
Mindspeed 2006 Restructuring Plan In March
2006, the Company implemented a restructuring plan under which
the Company reduced our workforce by approximately 21 employees.
The affected employees included approximately 9 persons in
research and development, 6 in sales and marketing and 6 in
general and administrative functions. In July 2006, the Company
continued this restructuring plan and reduced our workforce by
an additional
63
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
19 employees. The affected employees included approximately 17
persons in research and development and 2 in sales and
marketing. In connection with the 2006 restructuring plan, the
Company recorded $2.4 million of restructuring charges for
fiscal 2006. These restructuring charges included
$2.1 million of severance benefits payable to 40 employees
and $294,000 for the value of stock-based compensation awards
that vest without future service to us.
The Company expects that the workforce reductions will reduce
our quarterly operating expenses by approximately
$1.7 million, including approximately $1.4 million in
research and development expenses and approximately $300,000 in
selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company
expects to realize the full benefit of these reductions
beginning in the fiscal 2007 first quarter. However, the Company
intends to reinvest substantially all of such cost savings back
into our research and development programs. Consequently, we do
not expect that the 2006 restructuring plan will result in a
long-term reduction in our operating expenses.
Activity and liability balances related to the Mindspeed 2006
restructuring plan through September 30, 2006 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
2,406
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance,
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mindspeed 2004 Restructuring Plan In October
2004, the Company announced a restructuring plan intended to
reduce our operating expenses while focusing our research and
development investment in key high-growth markets, including
voice-over-Internet
protocol (VoIP) and high-performance analog applications. The
expense reduction actions included workforce reductions and the
closure of design centers in Herzlia, Israel and Lisle,
Illinois. Approximately 80% of the expense reductions were
derived from the termination of research and development
programs which the Company believed had a longer
return-on-investment
timeframe or that addressed slower growth markets. The affected
research and development programs were principally our
asynchronous transfer mode (ATM)/multi-protocol label switching
(MPLS) network processor products and, to a lesser extent, our
T/E carrier transmission products. The remainder of the cost
savings came from the selling, general and administrative
functions. The Company completed substantially all of these
actions during fiscal 2005, reducing our workforce by
approximately 90 employees.
64
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with these actions, the Company recorded fiscal
2005 restructuring charges of approximately $5.9 million.
The restructuring charges included an aggregate of
$3.4 million for the workforce reductions, based upon
estimates of the cost of severance benefits for the affected
employees, and approximately $2.5 million related to
contractual obligations for the purchase of design tools and
other services in excess of anticipated requirements. During
fiscal 2006, the Company recorded additional charges of $277,000
for severance and related benefits payable to the affected
employees. Activity and liability balances related to the
Mindspeed 2004 restructuring plan through September 30,
2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
3,412
|
|
|
$
|
2,517
|
|
|
$
|
5,929
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,575
|
)
|
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
|
(4,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance,
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
(1,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance,
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Restructuring Plans In fiscal 2001,
2002 and 2003, the Company implemented a number of cost
reduction initiatives to improve our operating cost structure.
The cost reduction initiatives included workforce reductions,
significant reductions in capital spending, the consolidation of
certain facilities and salary reductions for the senior
management team. During the year ended September 30, 2006,
the Company made cash payments of $1.5 million under these
restructuring plans and reversed $134,000 of previously accrued
costs and expenses related to contractual obligations. As of
September 30, 2006, our remaining liabilities under these
restructuring plans totaled $500,000, representing amounts
payable under non-cancelable leases, severance benefits to
affected employees and other contractual commitments.
As of September 30, 2006, the Company has a remaining
accrued restructuring balance for all restructuring plans
totaling $1.7 million (classified as a current liability),
principally representing obligations under non-cancelable leases
and other contractual commitments. The Company expects to pay
these obligations over their respective terms, which expire at
various dates through fiscal 2007. The payments will be funded
from available cash balances and funds from product sales and
are not expected to impact significantly our liquidity.
|
|
13.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
The Company leases its headquarters and principal design center
in Newport Beach, California from Conexant. For the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, rent and operating
expenses paid to Conexant were $6.5 million,
$3.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively.
The Company made no sales to Conexant during the year ended
September 30, 2006 and has no liability in accounts payable
to Conexant at September 30, 2006. Sales to Conexant were
$1.2 million (2005), and $1.2 million (2004). As of
September 30, 2005 a liability to Conexant of
$0.1 million is included in accounts payable in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
65
MINDSPEED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Segment
and Other Information
|
The Company operates a single business segment which designs,
develops and sells semiconductor networking solutions for
communications applications in enterprise, access, metropolitan
and wide-area networks. Revenues by product line are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Multiservice access DSP products
|
|
$
|
37,404
|
|
|
$
|
33,048
|
|
|
$
|
26,524
|
|
High-performance analog products
|
|
|
42,742
|
|
|
|
27,087
|
|
|
|
24,636
|
|
WAN communications products
|
|
|
55,773
|
|
|
|
51,642
|
|
|
|
67,968
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,919
|
|
|
$
|
111,777
|
|
|
$
|
119,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by geographic area are presented based upon the country
of destination. Revenues by geographic area are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
41,151
|
|
|
$
|
32,764
|
|
|
$
|
38,151
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
|
|
9,602
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
45,661
|
|
|
|
42,366
|
|
|
|
48,201
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
16,999
|
|
|
|
16,894
|
|
|
|
14,077
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
7,088
|
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
|
|
10,135
|
|
China
|
|
|
35,501
|
|
|
|
20,412
|
|
|
|
20,252
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
7,376
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
4,082
|
|
Other Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
6,754
|
|
|
|
4,509
|
|
|
|
4,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
73,718
|
|
|
|
54,531
|
|
|
|
53,538
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
16,540
|
|
|
|
14,880
|
|
|
|
17,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135,919
|
|
|
$
|
111,777
|
|
|
$
|
119,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other foreign country represented 10% or more of net revenues
for any of the periods presented. The Company believes a
substantial portion of the products sold to original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) and third-party manufacturing service
providers in the Asia-Pacific region are ultimately shipped to
end-markets in the Americas and Europe.
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment and
other long-term assets. Long-lived assets by geographic area at
fiscal year-ends are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
14,553
|
|
|
$
|
15,946
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,815
|
|
|
$
|
17,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Subsequent Events
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company announced a
restructuring plan. The Company anticipates incurring special
charges of $4.2 million during the first and second
quarters of fiscal 2007, primarily associated with severance
costs for affected employees and the impairment of certain
excess space at the Newport Beach headquarters.
66
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows,
and stockholders equity and comprehensive loss for each of
the three years in the period ended September 30, 2006. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and the financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and the financial statement schedule based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company at September 30, 2006 and 2005, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended September 30, 2006, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
November 29, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
November 29, 2006
67
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of September 30, 2006. Disclosure controls and
procedures are defined under SEC rules as controls and other
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within required time periods. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2006,
these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is a process to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial
reporting for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial
reporting includes policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to maintaining records that in reasonable
detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial
statements and that receipts and expenditures of company assets
are made in accordance with management authorization; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance that unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could
have a material effect on our financial statements would be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not
intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of
our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based upon that evaluation, management
concluded that the companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2006.
Deloitte & Touche LLP has audited our assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting and their report is
included in herein.
68
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting, that Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2006, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2006, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended September 30, 2006,
of the Company and our report dated November 29, 2006,
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements
and the financial statement schedule.
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
November 29, 2006
69
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
The following disclosure would otherwise be filed on
Form 8-K
under the heading Item 1.01. Entry Into a Material
Definitive Agreement.:
On August 27, 2006, we entered into an agreement with Dave
Carroll in connection with his resignation as Senior Vice
President, Worldwide Sales effective as of July 28, 2006.
The agreement provides that Mr. Carroll would be placed on
unpaid leave through January 31, 2007, at which time all
unvested stock options and restricted stock awards shall expire.
Any vested stock options as of January 31, 2007, will be
exercisable for a period of three months thereafter. The
agreement also contains Mr. Carrolls release of
claims against us and our affiliates, including
employment-related claims. Under the agreement, Mr. Carroll
agreed not to solicit or hire our employees for a period ending
on July 31, 2007.
The foregoing summary is not intended to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the agreement, which
is filed as Exhibit 10.32 to this Report.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference to
the Companys definitive Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy Statement) to be filed
with the SEC.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from the sections entitled Election of
Directors, Executive Officers, Board
Committees and Meetings and Other
Matters Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance in the Proxy Statement.
We have adopted a code of ethics entitled Standards of
Business Conduct, that applies to all employees, including
our executive officers and directors. A copy of the standards of
business conduct is posted on our website
(www.mindspeed.com). In addition, we will provide
to any person without charge a copy of the standards upon
written request to our secretary at the address above. In the
event that we make any amendment to, or grant any waiver from, a
provision of the standards of business conduct that requires
disclosure under applicable results, we will disclose such
amendment or waiver and the reasons therefore as required by the
SEC and Nasdaq.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Executive
Compensation, Option Grants in Last Fiscal
Year, Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal
Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values,
Directors Compensation and Change of
Control Agreements in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Equity Compensation
Plan Information and Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated by
reference to the section entitled Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section entitled Principal Accountant
Fees and Services in the Proxy Statement.
70
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company
for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are
included herewith:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of
Operations, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss,
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(2) Supplemental Schedules
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted because the required
information is not present in amounts sufficient to require
submission of the schedule, or because the required information
is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration Statement
No. 333-106146),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen certificate for the
Registrants Common Stock, par value $.01 per share,
filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form 10 (File
No. 1-31650),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of
June 26, 2003, by and between the Registrant and Mellon
Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent, filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 1, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
First Amendment to Rights
Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2004, by and between the
Registrant and Mellon Investor Services LLC, filed as
Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant
dated June 27, 2003, filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration Statement
No. 333-109523),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated as of June 27, 2003, by and between the Registrant
and Conexant Systems, Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration Statement
No. 333-109523),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
December 8, 2004, between the Registrant and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of 3.75% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2009, attached as Exhibit A to the
Indenture (Exhibit 4.6 hereto), is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of December 8, 2004, by and between the Registrant
and Lehman Brothers Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Distribution Agreement dated as of
June 27, 2003, by and between Conexant Systems, Inc. and
the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 1, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Employee Matters Agreement dated
as of June 27, 2003, by and between Conexant Systems, Inc.
and the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 1, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employee
Matters Agreement dated as of June 27, 2003, by and between
Conexant Systems, Inc. and the Registrant, dated
January 13, 2005, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employee
Matters Agreement dated as of June 27, 2003, by and between
Conexant Systems, Inc. and the Registrant, dated July 1,
2005, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Employee
Matters Agreement dated as of June 27, 2003, by and between
Conexant Systems, Inc. and the Registrant, dated January 9,
2006, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Tax Allocation Agreement dated as
of June 27, 2003, by and between Conexant Systems, Inc. and
the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 2.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 1, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Sublease,
dated March 24, 2005, by and between Conexant Systems, Inc.
and the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
December 2, 2004, between the Registrant and Lehman
Brothers Inc., filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Pledge Agreement, dated as of
December 8, 2004, by the Registrant in favor of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. , filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Control Agreement, dated as of
December 8, 2004, by and among the Registrant and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee, and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., in its capacity as securities intermediary and
depositary bank, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement
between the Registrant and certain executives of the Registrant,
filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form 10 (File
No. 1-31650),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.12
|
|
Schedule identifying parties to
and terms of agreements with the Registrant substantially
identical to the Employment Agreement constituting
Exhibit 10.11 hereto, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
entered into between the Registrant and the Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of the directors of
the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.14
|
|
Schedule identifying parties to
agreements with the Registrant substantially identical to the
Form of Indemnification Agreement constituting
Exhibit 10.13 hereto, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.15
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.16
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003
Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.17
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003
Stock Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration Statement
No. 333-106146),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.18
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003
Long-Term Incentives Plan, as amended, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 24, 2005, is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
*10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Stock Option Award under
the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan,
filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.20
|
|
Stock Option Terms and Conditions
under the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives
Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.21
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award
under the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives
Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.22
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Terms and
Conditions under the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term
Incentives Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2004, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.23
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration Statement
No. 333-106479),
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Stock Option Award under
the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Directors Stock Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.25
|
|
Stock Option Terms and Conditions
under the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Directors Stock Plan,
filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.26
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.27
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.28
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Mindspeed
Technologies, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.29
|
|
Form of Restricted
Shares Award under the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.30
|
|
Restricted Shares Award Terms
and Conditions under the Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Directors
Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*+10
|
.31
|
|
Confidential Severance Agreement
and General Release, dated June 26, 2006, by and between
Danny Shamlou and the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.32
|
|
Agreement and General Release,
dated August 27, 2006, by and between Dave Carroll and the
Registrant.
|
|
*10
|
.33
|
|
Summary of Director Compensation
Arrangements, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Statement re: Computation of
Ratios.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of subsidiaries of the
Registrant.
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of attorney, authorizing
certain persons to sign this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
on behalf of certain directors and officers of the Registrant.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
+ |
|
Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Omitted
portions have been filed separately with the SEC. |
(b) Exhibits
See subsection (a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
The financial statement schedule for Mindspeed Technologies,
Inc. is set forth in (a)(2) of Item 15 above.
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Newport Beach, State of California,
on this 29th day of November, 2006.
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Raouf Y. Halim
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this report has been signed on the
29th day of November, 2006, by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
/s/ Raouf
Y. Halim
Raouf
Y. Halim
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Simon
Biddiscombe
Simon
Biddiscombe
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
Dwight
W. Decker*
Dwight
W. Decker
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
Donald
R. Beall*
Donald
R. Beall
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Donald
H. Gips*
Donald
H. Gips
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Michael
T. Hayashi*
Michael
T. Hayashi*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Thomas
A. Madden*
Thomas
A. Madden
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Jerre
L. Stead*
Jerre
L. Stead*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Raouf
Y. Halim
Raouf
Y. Halim,
Attorney-in-Fact**
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
By authority of the power of attorney filed as Exhibit 24
hereto. |
74
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
to Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions(1)
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
Reserve for sales returns and
allowances
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
Reserve for sales returns and
allowances
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
Year ended September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
932
|
|
|
$
|
(118
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187
|
)
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
Reserve for sales returns and
allowances
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deductions in the allowance for doubtful accounts reflect
amounts written off. |
75
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Agreement and General Release,
dated August 27, 2006, by and between Dave Carroll and the
Registrant.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Statement re: Computation of
Ratios.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of subsidiaries of the
Registrant.
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of attorney, authorizing
certain persons to sign this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
on behalf of certain directors and officers of the Registrant.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
76