Blueprint
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark
one)
☒
Annual Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
☐
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for
the transition period from ____ to____.
Commission
file number 0-11104
NOBLE ROMAN’S, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana
|
35-1281154
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
One Virginia Avenue, Suite
300
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (317) 634-3377
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common
Stock
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐
No
☒
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate by check
mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.(Check
one):
Large
Accelerated Filer ☐
|
Accelerated
Filer
☐
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer ☐
(do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
Reporting Company ☒
|
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The
aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant as of
June
30, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing
price of the registrant’s common shares on such date was $10
million.
Indicate the number
of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 20,783,032 shares
of common stock as of March 20, 2017.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference:
Portions
of the definitive proxy statement for the registrant’s 2017
Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in
Part III.
NOBLE
ROMAN’S, INC.
FORM
10-K
Year
Ended December 31, 2016
Table
of Contents
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I |
|
1.
|
Business
|
3
|
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
13
|
2.
|
Properties
|
13
|
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
13
|
4.
|
Mine
Safety Disclosures
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
5.
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
14
|
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
16
|
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
27
|
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
28
|
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
48
|
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
48
|
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
49
|
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
49
|
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
49
|
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
49
|
14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
50
|
|
PART
IV
|
|
15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
50
|
PART 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General Information
Noble
Roman’s, Inc., an Indiana corporation incorporated in 1972
with three wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pizzaco, Inc., N.R. Realty,
Inc. and RH Roanoke, Inc., sells and services franchises and
licenses for non-traditional foodservice operations and stand-alone
locations under the trade names “Noble Roman’s
Pizza,” “Noble Roman’s Take-N-Bake,”
“Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub” and
“Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs.” The
concepts’ hallmarks include high quality pizza and sub
sandwiches, along with other related menu items, simple operating
systems, fast service times, labor-minimizing operations,
attractive food costs and overall affordability. Since 1997, the
Company has concentrated its efforts and resources primarily on
franchising and licensing for non-traditional locations and now has
awarded franchise and/or license agreements in 50 states plus
Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, the Bahamas, Italy, the Dominican
Republic and Canada. During 2016, the Company created a new
stand-alone concept called Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza &
Pub. In recent years the Company has focused its sales efforts on
(1) franchises/licenses for non-traditional locations primarily in
convenience stores and entertainment facilities and (2) license
agreements for grocery stores to sell the Noble Roman’s
Take-N-Bake Pizza. In 2017, the Company will maintain that same
focus and expects to begin to add franchising Noble Roman’s
Craft Pizza & Pub to its business as well. Pizzaco, Inc.
currently owns and operates two Company locations, RH Roanoke, Inc.
operates a Company location and Noble Roman’s, Inc. owns and
operates a Craft Pizza & Pub location which it intends to use
as a base to support the franchising of that concept. References in
this report to the “Company” are to Noble
Roman’s, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context
requires otherwise.
Noble Roman’s Pizza
The
hallmark of Noble Roman’s Pizza is “Superior quality
that our customers can taste.” Every ingredient and process
has been designed with a view to produce superior
results.
●
A fully-prepared
pizza crust that captures the made-from-scratch pizzeria flavor
which gets delivered to non-traditional locations in a shelf-stable
condition so that dough handling is no longer an impediment to a
consistent product in non-traditional locations.
●
In-store fresh made
crust with only specially milled flour with above average protein
and yeast for use in its Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
locations, the first of which opened in January 2017.
●
Fresh packed,
uncondensed and never cooked sauce made with secret spices,
parmesan cheese and vine-ripened tomatoes in all
venues.
●
100% real cheese
blended from mozzarella and Muenster, with no soy additives or
extenders.
●
100% real meat
toppings, with no additives or extenders, a distinction compared to
many pizza concepts.
●
Vegetable and
mushroom toppings that are sliced and delivered fresh, never canned
in non-traditional locations and vegetables will be sliced fresh on
premises in the Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
locations.
●
An extended product
line that includes breadsticks and cheesy stix with dip, pasta,
baked sandwiches, salads, wings and a line of breakfast products
for the non-traditional locations.
Noble Roman’s Take-N-Bake
The
Company developed a take-n-bake version of its pizza as an addition
to its menu offerings. The take-n-bake pizza is designed as an
add-on component for new and existing convenience stores and as an
offering for grocery store delis. The Company offers the
take-n-bake program in grocery stores under a license agreement
rather than a franchise agreement. In convenience stores,
take-n-bake is an available menu offering under the existing
franchise/license agreement. The Company uses the same high quality
pizza ingredients for its take-n-bake pizza as with its baked
pizza, with slight modifications to portioning for enhanced home
baking performance.
Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs
Tuscano’s
Italian Style Subs is a separate non-traditional location concept
that focuses on sub sandwich menu items but only in locations that
also have a Noble Roman’s franchise. Tuscano’s was
designed to be comfortably familiar from a customer’s
perspective but with many distinctive features that include an
Italian-themed menu. The ongoing royalty for a Tuscano’s
franchise is identical to that charged for a Noble Roman’s
Pizza franchise. The Company has a grab-n-go service system for a
selected portion of the Tuscano’s menu in an attempt to add
sales opportunities for non-traditional Noble Roman’s Pizza
locations.
Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
In
January 2017, the Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub opened
in Westfield, Indiana, a prosperous and growing community on the
northwest side of Indianapolis. Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza
& Pub is designed to harken back to the Company’s early
history when it was known simply as “Pizza Pub.” Like
then, and like the new full-service pizza concepts today, ordering
takes place at the counter and food runners deliver orders to the
dining room for dine-in guests. The Company believes that Noble
Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub features many enhancements over
the current competitive landscape. The restaurant features two
styles of hand-crafted, made-from-scratch pizzas with a selection
of 40 different toppings, cheeses and sauces from which to choose.
Beer and wine also are featured, with 16 different beers on tap
including both national and local craft selections. Wines include
16 high quality, affordably priced options by the bottle or glass
in a range of varietals. Beer and wine service is provided at the
bar and throughout the dining room.
The
pizza offerings feature Noble Roman’s traditional
hand-crafted thinner crust as well as its signature deep-dish
Sicilian crust. New technology and extensive research and
development enable fast cook times, with oven speeds running only
2.5 minutes for traditional pies and 5.75 minutes for Sicilian
pies. Traditional pizza favorites such as pepperoni are options on
the menu, but also offered is a selection of original creations
such as “Pig in the Apple Tree,” a pizza featuring
bacon, diced apples, candied walnuts and gorgonzola cheese. The
menu also features a selection of contemporary and fresh,
made-to-order salads such as “Avocado Chicken Caesar,”
and fresh-cooked pasta like “Chicken Fettuccine
Alfredo.” The menu includes baked subs, hand-sauced wings and
a selection of desserts, as well as Noble Roman’s famous
Breadsticks with Spicy Cheese Sauce.
Additional
enhancements include a glass enclosed “Dough Room”
where Noble Roman’s Dough Masters hand make all pizza and
breadstick dough from scratch in customer view. Also in the dining
room is a “Dusting & Drizzle Station” where guests
can customize their pizzas after they are baked with a variety of
toppings and drizzles, such as rosemary infused olive oil, honey
and Italian spices. Kids enjoy Noble Roman’s root beer tap,
which is part of a special menu for customers 12 and younger.
Throughout the dining room and the bar area are 13 large and giant
screen television monitors for sports and the nostalgic black and
white shorts featured in Noble Roman’s earlier
days.
Business Strategy
The
Company’s business strategy includes the following principal
elements:
1. Focus on revenue expansion through franchising/licensing
traditional and non-traditional locations:
Sales of Non-Traditional Franchises and Licenses. The
Company believes it has an opportunity for increasing unit and
revenue growth within its non-traditional venue, particularly with
grocery store delis, convenience stores including Circle K
franchise stores, travel plazas, Walmart stores and entertainment
facilities. The Company’s franchises/licenses in
non-traditional locations are foodservice providers within a host
business and usually require a substantially lower investment
compared to stand-alone traditional locations.
Sale of Traditional Franchises. The Company has developed the next
generation stand-alone prototype for its Noble Roman’s Craft
Pizza & Pub format. The Company has opened one location as a
Company-owned store and plans to open a second location, followed
by an aggressive plan to promote franchising in concentric circles
from those locations.
2. Leverage the results of research and development
advances.
The
Company has invested significant time and effort to create what it
considers to be competitive advantages in its products and systems
for both its non-traditional and traditional locations. The Company
will continue to make these advantages the focal point in its
marketing process. The Company believes that the quality and
freshness of its products, their cost-effectiveness, relatively
simple production and service systems, and its diverse, modularized
menu offerings will contribute to the Company’s strategic
attributes and growth potential. The menu items for the
non-traditional locations were developed to be delivered in a
ready-to-use format requiring only on-site assembly and baking
except for take-n-bake pizza, which is sold to bake at home. The
Company believes this process results in products that are great
tasting, quality consistent, easy to assemble, relatively low in
food cost, and require minimal labor, which allows for a
significant competitive advantage in the non-traditional locations
due to the speed and simplicity at which the products can be
prepared, baked and served to customers.
3. Aggressively communicate the Company’s competitive
advantages to its target market of potential franchisees and
licensees.
The
Company utilizes the following methods of reaching potential
franchisees and licensees and to communicate its product and system
advantages: (1) calling from both acquired and in-house prospect
lists; (2) frequent direct mail campaigns to targeted prospects;
(3) web-based lead capturing; and (4) live demonstrations at trade
and food shows. In particular, the Company has found that
conducting live demonstrations of its systems and products at
selected trade and food shows across the country allows it to
demonstrate advantages that can otherwise be difficult for a
potential prospect to visualize. There is no substitute for
actually tasting the difference in a product’s quality to
demonstrate the advantages of the Company’s products. The
Company carefully selects the national and regional trade and food
shows where it either has an existing relationship or considerable
previous experience to expect that such shows offer opportunities
for fruitful lead generation.
Business Operations
Distribution
The
Company’s proprietary ingredients are manufactured pursuant
to the Company’s recipes and formulas by third-party
manufacturers under contracts between the Company and its various
manufacturers. These contracts require the manufacturers to produce
ingredients meeting the Company’s specifications and to sell
them to Company-approved distributors at prices negotiated between
the Company and the manufacturer.
At
present, the Company has primary distributors strategically located
throughout the United States. The distributor agreements require
the primary distributors to maintain adequate inventories of all
ingredients necessary to meet the needs of the Company’s
franchisees and licensees in their distribution areas for weekly
deliveries to the franchisee/licensee locations and to its grocery
store distributors in their respective territories. Each of the
primary distributors purchases the ingredients from the
manufacturer at prices negotiated between the Company and the
manufacturers, but under payment terms agreed upon by the
manufacturer and the distributor, and distributes the ingredients
to the franchisee/licensee at a price determined by the distributor
agreement. Payment terms to the distributor are agreed upon between
each franchisee/licensee and the respective distributor. In
addition, the Company has agreements with numerous grocery store
distributors located in various parts of the country which agree to
buy the Company’s ingredients from one of the Company’s
primary distributors and to distribute those ingredients only to
their grocery store customers who have signed license agreements
with the Company.
Franchising
The
Company sells franchises for both non-traditional and traditional
locations.
The
initial franchise fees are as follows:
Franchise
Format
|
Non-Traditional,
Except Hospitals
|
|
|
Noble Roman’s
Pizza
|
$7,500
|
$10,000
|
$30,000(1)
|
Tuscano’s
Subs
|
$6,000
|
$10,000
|
-
|
Noble Roman’s
& Tuscano’s
|
$11,500
|
$18,000
|
-
|
(1)
With the sale of multiple traditional stand-alone franchises to a
single franchisee, the franchise fee for the first unit is $30,000,
the franchise fee for the second unit is $25,000 and the franchise
fee for the third unit and any additional unit is
$20,000.
The
franchise fees are paid upon signing the franchise agreement and,
when paid, are deemed fully earned and non-refundable in
consideration of the administration and other expenses incurred by
the Company in granting the franchises and for the lost and/or
deferred opportunities to grant such franchises to any other
party.
Licensing
Noble
Roman’s Take-n-Bake Pizza licenses for grocery stores are
governed by a supply agreement. The supply agreement generally
requires the licensee to: (1) purchase proprietary ingredients only
from a Noble Roman’s-approved distributor; (2) assemble the
products using only Noble Roman’s approved ingredients and
recipes; and (3) display products in a manner approved by Noble
Roman’s using Noble Roman’s point-of-sale marketing
materials. Pursuant to the distributor agreements, the primary
distributors place an additional mark-up, as determined by the
Company, above their normal selling price on the key ingredients as
a fee for the Company in lieu of royalty. The distributors agree to
segregate this additional mark-up upon invoicing the licensee, to
hold the fees in trust for the Company and to remit them to the
Company within ten days after the end of each month.
Competition
The
restaurant industry and the retail food industry in general are
very competitive with respect to convenience, price, product
quality and service. In addition, the Company competes for
franchise and license sales on the basis of product engineering and
quality, investment cost, cost of sales, distribution, simplicity
of operation and labor requirements. Actions by one or more of the
Company’s competitors could have an adverse effect on the
Company’s ability to sell additional franchises or licenses,
maintain and renew existing franchises or licenses, or sell its
products. Many of the Company’s competitors are very large,
internationally established companies.
Within
the competitive environment of the non-traditional franchise and
license segment of the restaurant industry, management has
identified what it believes to be certain competitive advantages
for the Company. First, some of the Company’s competitors in
the non-traditional venue are also large chains operating thousands
of franchised, traditional restaurants. Because of the contractual
relationships with many of their franchisees, some competitors may
be unable to offer wide-scale site availability for potential
non-traditional franchisees. The Company is not faced with any
significant geographic restrictions in this regard.
Many of
the Company’s competitors in the non-traditional venue were
established with little or no organizational history operating
traditional foodservice locations. This lack of operating
experience may limit their ability to attract and maintain
non-traditional franchisees or licensees who, by the nature of the
venue, often have little exposure to foodservice operations
themselves. The Company’s background in traditional
restaurant operations has provided it experience in structuring,
planning, marketing, and controlling costs of franchise or license
unit operations which may be of material benefit to franchisees or
licensees.
The
Company’s new Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
format competes with similar restaurants in its service area. Some
of the competitors are company-owned or franchised locations of
large chains and others are independently owned. Many of the
Company’s competitors are large and
well-established.
Seasonality of Sales
Direct
sales of non-traditional franchises or licenses may be affected by
seasonalities and holiday periods. Sales to certain non-traditional
venues may be slower around major holidays such as Thanksgiving and
Christmas, and during the first quarter of the year. The
Company’s sales of take-n-bake pizza in grocery stores are
typically slower during the summer months, especially when the
weather is hot. Additionally, extreme winter weather conditions,
compared to the norm for the various regions of the country,
adversely affect franchisee’s/licensee’s sales, which
in turn affects Company royalties.
Employees
As of
March 1, 2017, the Company employed approximately 26 persons
full-time and 53 persons on a part-time, hourly basis, of which 20
of the full-time employees are employed in sales and service of the
franchise/license units and six full-time employees and all 53
employed on a part-time basis manage and work the Company-owned
restaurant locations. No employees are covered under a collective
bargaining agreement. The Company believes that relations with its
employees are good.
Trademarks and Service Marks
The
Company owns and protects several trademarks and service marks.
Many of these, including NOBLE ROMAN’S ®, Noble
Roman’s Pizza®, THE BETTER PIZZA PEOPLE ®,
“Noble Roman’s Take-N-Bake Pizza,” “Noble
Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub” and Tuscano’s
Italian Style Subs®, are registered with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office as well as with the corresponding agencies of
certain other foreign governments. The Company believes that its
trademarks and service marks have significant value and are
important to its sales and marketing efforts.
Government Regulation
The
Company and its franchisees and licensees are subject to various
federal, state and local laws affecting the operation of our
respective businesses. Each location, including the Company’s
Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub location, is subject to
licensing and regulation by a number of governmental authorities,
which include health, safety, sanitation, building, employment,
alcohol and other agencies and ordinances in the state or
municipality in which the facility is located. The process of
obtaining and maintaining required licenses or approvals can delay
or prevent the opening of a location. Vendors, such as our
third-party production and distribution services, are also licensed
and subject to regulation by state and local health and fire codes,
and U. S. Department of Transportation regulations. The Company,
its franchisees, licensees and vendors are also subject to federal
and state environmental regulations, as well as laws and
regulations relating to minimum wage and other employment-related
matters. In certain circumstances, the Company is, or soon may be,
subject to various local, state and/or federal laws requiring
disclosure of nutritional and/or ingredient information concerning
the Company’s products, its packaging, menu boards and/or
other literature. Changes in the laws and rules applicable to the
Company or its franchisees or licensees, or their interpretation,
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business.
The
Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission
(“FTC”) and various state agencies pursuant to federal
and state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. Several
states also regulate aspects of the franchisor-franchisee
relationship. The FTC requires us to furnish to prospective
franchisees a disclosure document containing certain specified
information. Several states also regulate the sale of franchises
and require registration of a franchise disclosure document with
state authorities. Substantive state laws that regulate the
franchisor-franchisee relationship presently exist in a substantial
number of states and bills have been introduced in Congress from
time to time that would provide for additional federal regulation
of the franchisor-franchisee relationship in certain respects.
State laws often limit, among other things, the duration and scope
of non-competition provisions and the ability of a franchisor to
terminate or refuse to renew a franchise. Some foreign countries
also have disclosure requirements and other laws regulating
franchising and the franchisor-franchisee relationship, and the
Company is subject to applicable laws in each jurisdiction where it
seeks to market additional franchised units.
Officers of the Company
Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer - Paul
W. Mobley* was Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer from 1991 until 2014 when he
became Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Mobley
has been a Director and an Officer since 1974. Mr. Mobley has a
B.S. in Business Administration from Indiana University and is a
CPA. He is the father of A. Scott Mobley.
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and a Director - A.
Scott Mobley* has been President since 1997, a Director
since 1992, Secretary since 1993 and Chief Executive Officer since
2014. Mr. Mobley was Vice President from 1988 to 1997 and from 1987
until 1988 served as Director of Marketing for the Company. Prior
to joining the Company, Mr. Mobley was a strategic planning analyst
with a division of Lithonia Lighting Company. Mr. Mobley has a B.S.
in Business Administration magna cum laude from Georgetown
University and an MBA from Indiana University. He is the son of
Paul W. Mobley.
Executive Vice President of Franchising - Troy Branson* has
been Executive Vice President for the Company since 1997 and from
1992 to 1997, he was Director of Business Development. Before
joining the Company, Mr. Branson was an owner of Branson-Yoder
Marketing Group from 1987 to 1992, after graduating from Indiana
University where he received a B.S. in Business.
*Each of Messieurs Paul W. Mobley, A. Scott Mobley and Troy Branson
are “executive officers” of the Company for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Vice President of Development - James D. Bales has been Vice
President of Operations/Development since March 2008. Before
becoming Vice President of Operations/Development, Mr. Bales held
various positions with the Company beginning in 2004. Before
joining the Company, Mr. Bales had 15 years of management
experience in operations and marketing where he held various
positions with TCBY starting in 1989. Mr. Bales attended Northern
Kentucky University for Graphic Design, Inver Hills Community
College for Business Management and obtained his B.S. in Business
from the University of Phoenix.
Available Information
We make
available, free of charge through our Internet website
(http://www.nobleromans.com), our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
these reports with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The information on our website is not incorporated into
this annual report.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
All
phases of the Company’s operations are subject to a number of
uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are
outside of its control, and any one or a combination of which could
materially affect its results of operations. Important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the
Company’s expectations are discussed below. Prospective
investors should carefully consider these factors before investing
in our securities as well as the information set forth under
“Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 of this report.
These risks and uncertainties include:
Competition from larger companies.
The
Company competes for franchise and license sales with large
national companies and numerous regional and local companies. Many
of its competitors have greater financial and other resources than
the Company. The restaurant industry in general is intensely
competitive with respect to convenience, price, product quality and
service. In addition, the Company competes for franchise and
license sales on the basis of several factors, including product
engineering and quality, investment cost, cost of sales,
distribution, simplicity of operation and labor requirements.
Activities of the Company’s competitors could have an adverse
effect on the Company’s ability to sell additional franchises
or licenses or maintain and renew existing franchises and licenses
or the operating results of the Company’s system. Unlike the
other non-traditional agreements, most of the take-n-bake license
agreements with grocery stores are not for any specified period of
time and, therefore, grocery stores could discontinue offering the
take-n-bake pizza or other retail items at any time. As a result of
these factors, the Company may have difficulty competing
effectively from time to time or in certain markets.
Dependence on growth strategy.
The
Company’s primary growth strategy includes selling new
franchises or licenses for non-traditional locations, including
grocery stores and stand-alone pizza restaurants. The opening and
success of new locations will depend upon various factors, which
include: (1) the traffic generated by and viability of the
underlying activity or business in non-traditional locations; (2)
the ability of the franchisees and licensees to operate their
locations effectively; (3) their ability to comply with applicable
regulatory requirements; and (4) the effect of competition and
general economic and business conditions including food and labor
costs. Many of the foregoing factors are not within the
Company’s control. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to achieve its plans with respect to the opening or
operation of new non-traditional franchises/licenses or stand-alone
locations.
Success of the new Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
concept
The
Company plans to open and operate a minimum of two locations of the
Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub and, once open, the
Company plans to launch a major franchising effort based on Noble
Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub. The first Noble Roman’s
Craft Pizza & Pub opened on January 31, 2017. This plan
requires additional capital investment. The Company may not be able
to operate the Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub locations
successfully. The opening and operation of these locations may cost
more than we have budgeted. Further, we may not be able to
successfully franchise this concept. The success of the
Company’s plans will depend upon various factors, which
include the traffic generated by and viability of the new locations
and our ability to successfully market this concept to potential
franchisees. These factors may not be within the Company’s
control. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
achieve its plans with respect to the opening or operation of the
Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub locations or the
franchising of the concept.
Dependence on success of franchisees and licensees.
Most of
the Company’s earnings comes from royalties and other fees
generated by its franchisees and licensees which are independent
operators, and their employees are not the Company’s
employees. The Company is dependent on the franchisees to
accurately report their weekly sales and, consequently, the
calculation of royalties. If the franchisees do not accurately
report their sales, the Company’s revenue could decline. The
Company provides training and support to franchisees and licensees
but the quality of the store operations and collectability of the
receivables may be diminished by a number of factors beyond the
Company’s control. Consequently, franchisees and licensees
may not successfully operate locations in a manner consistent with
the Company’s standards and requirements, or may not hire and
train qualified managers and other store personnel. If they do not,
the Company’s image and reputation may suffer, and its
revenues and stock price could decline. While the Company attempts
to ensure that its franchisees and licensees maintain the quality
of its brand and branded products, franchisees and licensees may
take actions that adversely affect the value of the Company’s
intellectual property or reputation. Initiatives to increase the
Federal minimum wage could have an adverse financial effect on our
franchisees or licensees by increasing their labor
cost.
Dependence on distributors.
The
success of the Company’s license and franchise offerings
depends upon the Company’s ability to engage and retain
unrelated, third-party distributors. The Company’s
distributors collect and remit certain of the Company’s
royalties and must reliably stock and deliver products to our
licensees and franchisees. The Company’s inability to engage
and retain quality distributors, or a failure by distributors to
perform in accordance with the Company’s standards, could
have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Dependence on consumer preferences and perceptions.
The
restaurant industry and the retail food industry is often affected
by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional and local
economic conditions, demographic trends, traffic patterns and the
type, number and location of competing restaurants. The Company can
be substantially adversely affected by publicity resulting from
food quality, illness, injury, other health concerns or operating
issues stemming from one restaurant or retail outlet or a limited
number of restaurants and retail outlets.
Ability to service or refinance our outstanding indebtedness and
the dilutive effect of our outstanding convertible
debt
We have
substantial debt obligations. At December 31, 2016, our total debt
was approximately $5.8 million. Our outstanding debt includes
certain indebtedness evidenced by convertible promissory notes we
issued, along with certain warrants exercisable for the
Company’s common stock, in a private placement in 2016 and
2017.
We may
not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to
repay our indebtedness when it becomes due and to meet our other
cash needs. If we are not able to pay our debts as they become due,
we will be required to pursue one or more alternative strategies,
such as selling assets, refinancing or restructuring our
indebtedness or selling additional debt or equity securities. We
may not be able to refinance our debt or sell additional debt or
equity securities or our assets on favorable terms, if at all, and
if we have to sell our assets, that sale may negatively affect our
ability to generate revenue.
Additionally,
the issuance of shares of common stock upon the conversion of our
outstanding convertible promissory notes or the exercise of the
warrants issued in connection with the sale of the convertible
promissory notes would have a dilutive effect on our
stockholders.
Interruptions in supply or delivery of food products.
Dependence
on frequent deliveries of product from unrelated third-party
manufacturers through unrelated third-party distributors also
subjects the Company to the risk that shortages or interruptions in
supply caused by contractual interruptions, market conditions,
inclement weather or other conditions could adversely affect the
availability, quality and cost of ingredients. In addition, factors
such as inflation, market conditions for cheese, wheat, meats,
paper and labor may also adversely affect the franchisees and
licensees and, as a result, can adversely affect the
Company’s ability to add new franchised or licensed
locations.
Dependence on key executives.
The
Company’s business has been and will continue to be dependent
upon the efforts and abilities of its executive staff generally,
and particularly Paul W. Mobley, our Executive Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer, and A. Scott Mobley, our President and Chief
Executive Officer. The loss of either of their services could have
a material adverse effect on the Company.
Federal, state and local laws with regard to the operation of the
businesses.
The
Company is subject to regulation by the FTC and various state
agencies pursuant to federal and state laws regulating the offer
and sale of franchises. Several states also regulate aspects of the
franchisor-franchisee relationship. The FTC requires the Company to
furnish to prospective franchisees a disclosure document containing
certain specified information. Several states also regulate the
sale of franchises and require registration of a franchise
disclosure document with state authorities. Substantive state laws
that regulate the franchisor-franchisee relationship presently
exist in a substantial number of states, and bills have been
introduced in Congress from time to time that would provide for
federal regulation of the franchisor-franchisee relationship in
certain respects. The state laws often limit, among other things,
the duration and scope of non-competition provisions and the
ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a
franchise. Some foreign countries also have disclosure requirements
and other laws regulating franchising and the franchisor-franchisee
relationship, and the Company would be subject to applicable laws
in each jurisdiction where it seeks to market additional franchise
units.
Each
franchise and Company-owned location is subject to licensing and
regulation by a number of governmental authorities, which include
health, safety, sanitation, building, alcohol, employment and other
agencies and ordinances in the state or municipality in which the
facility is located. The process of obtaining and maintaining
required licenses or approvals can delay or prevent the opening of
a franchise location. Vendors, such as the Company’s
third-party production and distribution services, are also licensed
and subject to regulation by state and local health and fire codes,
and U. S. Department of Transportation regulations. The Company,
its franchisees and its vendors are also subject to federal and
state environmental regulations.
Indiana law with regard to purchases of our stock.
Certain
provisions of Indiana law applicable to the Company could have the
effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or
of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control
of the Company. Such provisions could also limit the price that
certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares
of its common stock. These provisions include prohibitions against
certain business combinations with persons or groups of persons
that become “interested shareholders” (persons or
groups of persons who are beneficial owners of shares with voting
power equal to 10% or more) unless the board of directors approves
either the business combination or the acquisition of stock before
the person becomes an “interested
shareholder.”
Inapplicability of corporate governance standards that apply to
companies listed on a national exchange.
Our
stock is quoted on the OTCQB, a Nasdaq-sponsored and operated
inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities not
included on the Nasdaq Stock Market. We are not subject to the same
corporate governance requirements that apply to exchange-listed
companies. These requirements include: (1) a majority of
independent directors; (2) an audit committee of independent
directors; and (3) shareholder approval of certain equity
compensation plans. As a result, quotation of our stock on the
OTCQB limits the liquidity and price of our stock more than if our
stock was quoted or listed on a national exchange. There is no
assurance that the Company’s stock will continue to be
authorized for quotation by the OTCQB or any other market in the
future.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The
Company’s headquarters are located in 7,600 square feet of
leased office space in Indianapolis, Indiana. The lease for this
property expires on March 31, 2018.
The
Company also leases space for its Company-owned restaurants in
Indianapolis, Indiana which expires December 31, 2020, in
Westfield, Indiana which expires in January 2027, in Roanoke,
Virginia which expires in August 2018 and in Jacksonville, North
Carolina which expires in December 2017.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The
Company, from time to time, is or may become involved in various
litigation or regulatory proceedings arising out of its normal
business operations.
Currently,
there are no such pending proceedings which the Company considers
to be material.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED
STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
Market
Information
The
Company’s common stock is included on the Nasdaq OTCQB and
trades under the symbol “NROM.”
The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the high and
low bid prices per share of common stock as reported by Nasdaq. The
quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commissions and may not represent actual
transactions.
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
March
31
|
$2.47
|
$1.97
|
$1.10
|
$.80
|
June
30
|
$2.38
|
$1.85
|
$.88
|
$.47
|
September
30
|
$2.00
|
$1.34
|
$.69
|
$.49
|
December
31
|
$1.55
|
$.94
|
$.50
|
$.37
|
Holders of Record
As of
March 15, 2017, there were approximately 262 holders of record of
the Company’s common stock. This excludes persons whose
shares are held of record by a bank, brokerage house or clearing
agency.
Dividends
The
Company has never declared or paid dividends on its common stock.
The Company’s current loan agreement, as described in Note 3
of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 of this report, prohibits the payment
of dividends on common stock.
Sale of Unregistered Securities
In the
fourth quarter of 2016, the Company issued certain convertible,
subordinated, unsecured promissory notes (the “Notes”)
in the aggregate principal amount of $1.6 million and warrants (the
“Warrants”) to purchase up to 1.6 million shares of the
Company’s common stock.
Each
holder of the Notes may convert them at any time into shares of the
Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.50 per
share (subject to anti-dilution adjustment). Subject to certain
limitations, upon 30 days’ notice the Company may require the
Notes to be converted into common stock if the daily average
weighted trading price of the common stock equals or exceeds $2.00
per share for a period of 30 consecutive trading days. The Warrants expire
three years from the date of issuance and provide for an exercise
price of $1.00 per share of common stock (subject to anti-dilution
adjustment). Subject to certain limitations, the Company may redeem
the Warrants at a price of $0.001 per share of common stock subject
to the Warrant upon 30 days’ notice if the daily average
weighted trading price of the common stock equals or exceeds $1.50
per share for a period of 30 consecutive trading days.
The
Company offered and issued the Notes and Warrants in reliance on
Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. The Notes and Warrants were issued to
accredited investors in privately negotiated transactions and not
pursuant to any public solicitation.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
None.
Equity Compensation Plan
Information
The
following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 with
respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under
our existing equity compensation plan.
Plan
Category
|
Number of
Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and
rights
(b)
|
Number of
securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
(c)
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by stockholders
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved by stockholders
|
2,957,667
|
$.69
|
(1)
|
Total
|
2,957,667
|
$.69
|
(1)
|
(1) The
Company may grant additional options under the employee stock
option plan. There is no maximum number of shares
available
for
issuance under the employee stock option plan.
The
Company maintains an employee stock option plan for its employees,
officers and directors. Any employee, officer and director of the
Company is eligible to be awarded options under the plan. The
employee stock option plan provides that any options issued
pursuant to the plan will generally have a three-year vesting
period and will expire ten years after the date of grant. Awards
under the plan are periodically made at the recommendation of the
Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer
and authorized by the Board of Directors. The employee stock option
plan does not limit the number of shares that may be issued under
the plan.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (In
thousands except per share data)
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties and
fees
|
$6,824
|
$7,083
|
$7,479
|
$7,465
|
$7,351
|
Administrative fees
and other
|
20
|
24
|
73
|
56
|
42
|
Restaurant
revenue
|
456
|
421
|
363
|
208
|
443
|
Total
revenue
|
7,300
|
7,528
|
7,915
|
7,729
|
7,836
|
Operating
expenses
|
2,348
|
2,527
|
2,716
|
2,774
|
2,549
|
Restaurant
operating expenses
|
427
|
391
|
402
|
248
|
443
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
116
|
114
|
112
|
106
|
125
|
General and
administrative
|
1,594
|
1,647
|
1,646
|
1,660
|
1,642
|
Operating
income
|
2,815
|
2,849
|
3,039
|
2,941
|
3,077
|
Interest
|
413
|
201
|
190
|
187
|
615
|
Loss on restaurant
discontinued
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
191
|
37
|
Change in fair
value of derivative
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
44
|
Adjust valuation of
receivables - including the Heyser
case
|
500
|
1,208
|
-
|
1,230
|
1,104
|
Income before
income taxes from continuing operations
|
1,902
|
1,440
|
2,849
|
1,333
|
1,277
|
Income
taxes
|
753
|
569
|
1,105
|
512
|
488
|
Net
income from continuing operations
|
1,149
|
871
|
1,744
|
821
|
789
|
Loss from
discontinued operations
|
(525)
|
(780)
|
(154)
|
(35)
|
(1,660)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$624
|
$91
|
$1,590
|
$786
|
$(871)
|
Cumulative
preferred dividends
|
99
|
99
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Net
income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$525
|
$(8)
|
$1,590
|
$786
|
$(871)
|
Weighted average
number of common shares
|
19,498
|
19,533
|
19,871
|
20,518
|
20,782
|
Net
income per share from continuing operations
|
$.06
|
$.05
|
$.09
|
$.04
|
$.04
|
Net
income (loss) per share
|
.03
|
.01
|
.08
|
.04
|
(.04)
|
Net
income (loss) per share available to common
stockholders
|
$.03
|
$-
|
$.08
|
$.04
|
$(.04)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
Working
capital
|
$1,964
|
$1,451
|
$2,267
|
$2,805
|
$2,429
|
Total
assets
|
17,161
|
16,374
|
17,758
|
18,465
|
19,899
|
Long-term
obligations, net of current portion
|
3,021
|
2,635
|
1,847
|
2,141
|
3,755
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
$12,379
|
$11,703
|
$13,766
|
$14,875
|
$14,018
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
The
Company sells and services franchises and licenses for
non-traditional foodservice operations and stand-alone locations
under the trade names “Noble Roman’s Pizza,”
“Noble Roman’s Take-N-Bake,” “Noble
Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub” and
“Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs.” The
concepts’ hallmarks include high quality pizza and sub
sandwiches, along with other related menu items, simple operating
systems, fast service times, labor-minimizing operations,
attractive food costs and overall affordability. Since 1997, the
Company has concentrated its efforts and resources primarily on
franchising and licensing for non-traditional locations and now has
awarded franchise and/or license agreements in 50 states plus
Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, the Bahamas, Italy, Dominican
Republic and Canada and, in January 2017, launched a new
stand-alone concept called Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza &
Pub.
There were 2,562 franchised or licensed outlets in operation on
December 31, 2015 and 2,768 on December 31, 2016. During the
12-month period ended December 31, 2016, 242 new franchised or
licensed outlets opened and 36 franchised outlets left the system.
Grocery stores are accustomed to adding products for a period of
time, removing them for a period of time and possibly re-offering
them. Therefore, it is unknown how many grocery store licenses, out
of the total count of 2,768, have left the system.
As
discussed in Note 1 of the notes to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements, the Company uses significant
estimates in evaluating such items as notes and accounts receivable
to reflect the actual amount expected to be collected for total
receivables. At December 31, 2015 and 2016, the Company reported
net accounts receivable of $7.0 million and $6.8 million,
respectively, each of which were net of allowances. The allowance
at December 31, 2015 was $1.2 million and at December 31, 2016 was
$2.7 million, including $1.5 million related to discontinued
operations, to reflect the amount the Company expects to realize
for the receivables. The Company has reviewed each of its accounts
and only included receivables in the amount expected to be
collected. The Company, at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016,
had a deferred tax asset on its balance sheet totaling $9.1 million
and $9.6 million, respectively. After reviewing expected results
from the Company’s current business plan, the Company
believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
will be utilized prior to their expiration, between 2019 and
2036.
Financial Summary
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity
with United States generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
The Company evaluates the carrying values of its assets, including
property, equipment and related costs, accounts receivable and
deferred tax assets, periodically to assess whether any impairment
indications are present due to (among other factors) recurring
operating losses, significant adverse legal developments,
competition, changes in demand for the Company’s products or
changes in the business climate that affect the recovery of
recorded values. If any impairment of an individual asset is
evident, a charge will be provided to reduce the carrying value to
its estimated fair value.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Noble
Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties and
fees
|
$7,479,334
|
94.5%
|
$7,464,963
|
96.6%
|
$7,350,692
|
93.8%
|
Administrative fees
and other
|
72,541
|
0.9
|
56,520
|
0.7
|
42,402
|
0.5
|
Restaurant
revenue
|
363,340
|
4.6
|
207,803
|
2.7
|
443,391
|
5.7
|
Total
revenue
|
7,915,215
|
100.0
|
7,729,286
|
100.0
|
7,836,485
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise-related
operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and wages
|
1,063,076
|
13.4
|
1,141,562
|
14.8
|
996,303
|
12.7
|
Trade
show expense
|
541,385
|
6.8
|
543,354
|
7.0
|
520,691
|
6.6
|
Travel
expense
|
235,127
|
3.0
|
255,125
|
3.3
|
230,091
|
2.9
|
Broker
commissions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
32,241
|
0.4
|
Other
operating expense
|
876,162
|
11.1
|
834,320
|
10.8
|
769,791
|
9.8
|
Restaurant
expenses
|
402,281
|
5.1
|
248,139
|
3.2
|
443,389
|
5.7
|
Depreciation
|
111,750
|
1.4
|
105,843
|
1.4
|
124,773
|
1.6
|
General and
administrative
|
1,646,502
|
20.8
|
1,659,966
|
21.5
|
1,641,853
|
21.0
|
Total
Expenses
|
4,876,283
|
61.6
|
4,788,309
|
62.0
|
4,759,132
|
60.7
|
Operating
income
|
3,038,932
|
38.4
|
2,940,977
|
38.0
|
3,077,353
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
190,382
|
2.4
|
186,414
|
2.4
|
615,687
|
7.9
|
Loss on restaurant
discontinued
|
-
|
-
|
191,390
|
2.5
|
36,776
|
0.5
|
Change in fair
value of derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
44,464
|
0.5
|
Adjust valuation of
receivables – including the
Heyser case
|
-
|
-
|
1,230,000
|
15.9
|
1,103,521
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
2,848,550
|
36.0
|
1,333,173
|
17.2
|
1,276,907
|
16.3
|
Income
taxes
|
1,104,809
|
14.0
|
512,671
|
6.6
|
487,880
|
6.2
|
Net
income from continuing operations
|
$1,743,741
|
22.0%
|
$820,502
|
10.6%
|
$789,027
|
10.1%
|
|
Quarters Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Royalties and
fees
|
$1,817,673
|
96.3%
|
$1,806,303
|
86.2%
|
Administrative fees
and other
|
11,342
|
0.6
|
8,234
|
0.4
|
Restaurant
revenue
|
59,040
|
3.1
|
280,654
|
13.4
|
Total
revenue
|
1,888,055
|
100.0
|
2,095,191
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise-related
operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and wages
|
281,716
|
14.9
|
236,699
|
11.3
|
Trade
show expense
|
137,753
|
7.3
|
137,604
|
6.6
|
Travel
expense
|
83,427
|
4.4
|
77,407
|
3.7
|
Other
operating expense
|
230,105
|
12.2
|
194,141
|
9.3
|
Restaurant
expenses
|
62,833
|
3.4
|
302,214
|
14.4
|
Depreciation
|
26,780
|
1.4
|
32,010
|
1.5
|
General and
administrative
|
431,355
|
22.9
|
435,892
|
20.8
|
Total
Expenses
|
1,253,969
|
66.5
|
1,415,967
|
67.6
|
Operating
income
|
634,086
|
33.5
|
679,224
|
32.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
47,774
|
2.5
|
323,863
|
15.5
|
Loss on restaurant
discontinued
|
191,390
|
10.1
|
-
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
44,464
|
2.1
|
Adjust valuation of
receivables – including the
Heyser case
|
380,000
|
20.1
|
352,862
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
before income taxes
(benefit)
|
14,922
|
0.8
|
(41,965)
|
(2.0)
|
Income
taxes
|
5,738
|
0.3
|
(16,027)
|
(0.8)
|
Net
income(loss) from continuing operations
|
$9,184
|
0.5%
|
$(25,938)
|
(1.2)%
|
2016 Compared to 2015
Total
revenue for the year 2016 was $7.8 million compared to $7.7 million
in 2015. The primary reason for the increase was the result of
adding two additional Company-owned restaurants in the fourth
quarter. For the three months ended December 31, 2016, total
revenue was $2.1 million compared to $1.9 million for the
comparable period in 2015. For the year 2016, franchise fees and
equipment commissions (“Upfront Fees”) increased to
$299,000 from $228,000 for 2015. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2016, Upfront Fees increased to $78,000 from $16,000
for the comparable period in 2015. Royalties and fees, less Upfront
Fees, decreased to $7.1 million for 2016 from $7.2 million in 2015.
The increase in Upfront Fees was primarily the result of selling
more non-traditional franchises. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2016, royalties and fees less Upfront Fees decreased
to $1.7 million from $1.8 million from the comparable period in
2015. The breakdown of royalties and fees less Upfront Fees for the
year 2016 and for the three months ended December 31, 2016 compared
to the comparable periods in 2015, respectively, were: royalties
and fees from non-traditional franchises other than grocery stores
were $4.4 million and $1.1 million and $4.4 million and $1.1
million; royalties and fees from the grocery store take-n-bake were
$2.1 million and $551,000 and $1.9 million and $532,000; royalties
and fees from stand-alone take-n-bake franchises were $318,000 and
$42,000 and $707,000 and $151,000; royalties and fees from
traditional locations were $238,000 and $58,000 and $265,000 and
$64,000.
Restaurant
revenue for 2016 increased to $443,000 from $208,000 in 2015. For
the three-month period ended December 31, 2016, restaurant revenue
increased to $281,000 from $59,000 for the comparable period in
2015. The increase in both annual and quarterly restaurant revenue
was a result of adding two additional company-owned restaurants
during the fourth quarter 2016 which had previously been franchised
restaurants.
As a
percentage of total revenue, salaries and wages for 2016 decreased
to 12.7% from 14.8% in 2015. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2016, salaries and wages decreased to 11.3% from 14.9%
for the comparable period in 2015. Salaries and wages decreased to
$996,000 and $237,000 from $1.1 million and $282,000 for the year
and the three-month period ended December 31, 2016, respectively,
compared to the comparable periods in 2015.
As a
percentage of total revenue, trade show expenses for 2016 decreased
to 6.6% from 7.0% in 2015. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2016, trade show expenses decreased to 6.6% from 7.3%
for the comparable period in 2015. Trade show expenses were
$521,000 and $138,000, respectively, for the year and three-month
period ended December 31, 2016 compared to $543,000 and $138,000,
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2015.
As a
percentage of total revenue, travel expenses for 2016 decreased to
2.9% from 3.3% in 2015. For the three-month period ended December
31, 2016, travel expense decreased to 3.7% from 4.4% for the
comparable period in 2015. Travel expenses were $230,000 and
$77,000, respectively, for the year and three-month period ended
December 31, 2016 and $255,000 and $83,000, respectively, for the
comparable periods in 2015.
As a
percentage of total revenue, other operating expenses for 2016
decreased to 9.8% compared to 10.8% in 2015. For the three-month
period ended December 31, 2016, other operating expenses decreased
to 9.3% from 12.2% for the comparable period in 2015. Other
operating expenses were $770,000 and $194,000 for the year and
three-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and $834,000 and
$230,000, respectively, for the comparable periods in
2015.
As a
percentage of total revenue, restaurant expenses in 2016 increased
to 5.7% from 3.2% in 2015. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2016, restaurant expenses increased to 14.4% from 3.4%
for the comparable period in 2015. The increase was a result of
adding two additional company-owned restaurants during the fourth
quarter 2016 which had previously been franchised
restaurants.
As a
percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses
for 2016 decreased to 21.0% from 21.5% in 2015. For the three-month
period ended December 31, 2016, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 20.8% from 22.9% for the comparable period in 2015.
General and administrative expenses were $1.6 million and $436,000
for the year and three-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and
$1.7 million and $431,000, respectively, for the comparable periods
in 2015.
As a
percentage of total revenue, total expenses for 2016 decreased to
60.7% from 62.0% in 2015. For the three-month period ended December
31, 2016, total expenses increased to 67.6% from 66.5% for the
comparable period in 2015. Total expenses were $4.8 million and
$1.4 million for the year and three-month periods ended December
31, 2016 and $4.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the
comparable periods in 2015.
As a
percentage of total revenue, operating income for 2016 increased to
39.3% from 38.0% in 2015.
For the
three-month period ended December 31, 2016, operating income
decreased to 32.4% from 33.5% for the comparable period in 2015.
Operating income was $3.1 million and $679,000 for the year and
three-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and $2.9 million and
$634,000, respectively, for the comparable periods in
2015.
Interest
expense, as a percentage of total revenue, increased to 7.9% from
2.4% for the year 2016 compared to 2015. For the three-month period
ended December 31, 2016, interest expense increased to 15.5% from
2.5% for the comparable period in 2015. Actual interest expense
increased to $616,000 and $324,000, respectively, for the year and
three-month period ended December 31, 2016 compared to $186,000 and
$48,000, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2015. The
primary reasons for the increase in interest expense were
additional borrowings and a higher effective interest
rate.
Change
in fair value of derivatives was a net expense of $44,000 compared
to none in 2015 due to the issuance of Notes and Warrants in
2016.
Loss on
restaurant discontinued was $37,000 in 2016 and $191,390 in 2015.
This restaurant was part of the discontinued operations in 2008 but
the decision was made at that time to continue to operate this
location until the lease (renewed in 2010) expired. The Company
does not expect this expense to recur.
Net
income before income taxes from continuing operations for 2016
remained the same at $1.3 million compared to the comparable period
in 2015; however, in 2016, the Company recognized a valuation
allowance of $1.1 million related to receivables including the
Heyser case compared to $1.2 million in 2015 and a loss on
restaurant discontinued of $37,000 in 2016 and $191,000 in 2015.
For the three-month period ended December 31, 2016, net loss before
income taxes from continuing operations was $42,000 compared to a
net income of $15,000 for the comparable period in 2015, however,
included in the three-month period ended December 31, 2016 was a
valuation allowance of $353,000 compared to $380,000 in the
comparable period in 2015. Although income tax expense is reflected
on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, the Company
will not pay any income tax on approximately the next $23 million
in net income before income taxes due to its net operating loss
carry-forwards.
Loss on
discontinued operations was approximately $1.7 million in 2016 and
$35,000 in 2015. This loss on discontinued operations for 2016 was
primarily the result of discontinuing the stand-alone take-n-bake
venue in the third quarter of 2016. See Note 11 of the notes to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Net
loss for 2016 was $871,000 compared to net income of $786,000 in
2015. The net loss was primarily a result of the loss on
discontinued operations of $1.7 million, adjustment in the
valuation of receivables including the Heyser case of $1.1 million
and change in fair value of derivatives of $44,000 in
2016.
2015 Compared to 2014
Total
revenue for the year 2015 was $7.7 million compared to $7.9 million
in 2014. The reason for the decrease was the result of the
restaurant discontinued, which was a part of the discontinued
operations from 2008 but continued to operate until the lease
(renewed in 2010) expired. For the three months ended December 31,
2015, total revenue increased to $1.9 million from $1.8 million for
the comparable period in 2014. For the year 2015, Upfront Fees
decreased to $228,000 from $392,000 for 2014. For the three-month
period ended December 31, 2015, Upfront Fees decreased to $16,000
from $74,000 for the comparable period in 2014. Royalties and fees,
less Upfront Fees, increased to $7.2 million for 2015 from $7.1
million in 2014. For the three-month period ended December 31,
2015, royalties and fees less Upfront Fees increased to $1.8
million from $1.6 million for the comparable period in 2014. The
breakdown of royalties and fees less Upfront Fees for the year 2015
and for the three months ended December 31, 2015 compared to the
comparable periods in 2014, respectively, were: royalties and fees
from non-traditional franchises other than grocery stores were $4.4
million and $1.1 million and $4.5 million and $993,000; royalties
and fees from the grocery store take-n-bake were $1.9 million and
$530,000 and $1.5 million and $340,000; royalties and fees from
stand-alone take-n-bake franchises were $707,000 and $151,000 and
$849,000 and $234,000; royalties and fees from traditional
locations were $265,000 and $64,000 and $283,000 and $67,000. The
decline in Upfront Fees was primarily the result of selling fewer
franchises for the Company’s stand-alone franchises. Most of
the growth came from licensing grocery store take-n-bake locations
where there are no Upfront Fees. The growth in the royalties and
fees from grocery store take-n-bake locations primarily was the
result of adding new locations to the system.
During
2014, the Company began auditing sales used to compute royalties
reported by non-traditional franchisees and plans to continue to do
so on an ongoing basis, the effect of which is unknown. The Company
estimates franchise sales based on product purchases as reflected
on distributor reports. Where under-reporting is identified, the
Company invoiced the franchisees for royalties on the unreported
amount.
Restaurant
revenue for 2015 decreased to $208,000 from $363,000 in 2014. The
reason for the decrease was the result of the restaurant
discontinued, which was a part of the discontinued operations from
2008 but continued to operate until the lease (renewed in 2010)
expired. For the three-month period ended December 31, 2015,
restaurant revenue decreased to $59,000 from $84,000 for the
comparable period in 2014. The Company had been operating two
locations used primarily for testing and demonstration purposes,
however one of those locations was a quick service restaurant
(“QSR”) concept, which was part of the discontinued
operations from 2008 but continued to operate until the lease
(renewed in 2010) expired in March 2016.
As a
percentage of total revenue, salaries and wages for 2015 increased
to 14.8% from 13.4% in 2014. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2015, salaries and wages decreased to 14.9% from 15.1%
for the comparable period in 2014. Salaries and wages remained
approximately the same at $1.1 million for both 2015 and 2014. For
the three-month period ended December 31, 2015, salaries and wages
increased to $282,000 from $274,000 for the comparable period in
2014.
As a
percentage of total revenue, trade show expenses for 2015 increased
to 7.0% in 2015 from 6.8% in 2014. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2015, trade show expenses decreased to 7.3% from 7.8%
for the comparable period in 2014. Trade show expenses were
$543,000 and $138,000, respectively, for the year and three-month
period ended December 31, 2015 compared to $541,000 and $141,000,
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2014.
As a
percentage of total revenue, travel expenses for 2015 increased to
3.3% from 3.0% in 2014. For the three-month period ended December
31, 2015, travel expense increased to 4.4% from 3.6% for the
comparable period in 2014. Travel expenses were $255,000 and
$83,000, respectively, for the year and three-month period ended
December 31, 2015 and $235,000 and $64,000, respectively, for the
comparable periods in 2014.
As a
percentage of total revenue, other operating expenses for 2015
decreased to 10.8% compared to 11.1% in 2014. For the three-month
period ended December 31, 2015, other operating expenses decreased
to 12.2% from 12.8% for the comparable period in 2014. Other
operating expenses were $834,000 and $230,000 for the year and
three-month periods ended December 31, 2015 and $876,000 and
$232,000, respectively, for the comparable periods in
2014.
As a
percentage of total revenue, restaurant expenses in 2015 decreased
to 3.2% from 5.1% in 2014. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2015, restaurant expenses decreased to 3.4% from 5.6%
for the comparable period in 2014. The Company had been operating
two locations used primarily for testing and demonstration
purposes, however one of those locations was a QSR concept, which
was part of the discontinued operations from 2008 but continued to
operate until the lease (renewed in 2010) expired in March
2016.
As a
percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses
for 2015 increased to 21.5% from 20.8% in 2014. For the three-month
period ended December 31, 2015, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 22.9% from 23.1% for the comparable period in 2014.
Other general and administrative expenses were $1.7 million and
$431,000 for the year and three-month periods ended December 31,
2015 and $1.65 million and $418,000, respectively, for the
comparable periods in 2014.
As a
percentage of total revenue, total expenses for 2015 increased to
62.0% from 61.6% in 2014. For the three-month period ended December
31, 2015, total expenses decreased to 66.5% from 69.6% for the
comparable period in 2014. Total expenses were $4.8 million and
$1.3 million for the year and three-month periods ended December
31, 2015 and $4.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the
comparable periods in 2014.
As a
percentage of total revenue, operating income for 2015 decreased to
38.0% from 38.4% in 2014.
For the
three-month period ended December 31, 2015, operating income
increased to 33.5% from 30.4% for the comparable period in 2014.
Operating income was $2.9 million and $634,000 for the year and
three-month periods ended December 31, 2015 and $3.0 million and
$550,000, respectively, for the comparable periods in
2014.
Interest
expense, as a percentage of total revenue, remained the same at
2.4% for both 2015 and 2014. For the three-month period ended
December 31, 2015, interest expense decreased to 2.5% from 2.7% for
the comparable period in 2014. Actual interest expense decreased to
$186,000 and $48,000, respectively, for the year and three-month
period ended December 31, 2015 compared to $190,000 and $50,000,
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2014. The primary
reason for the decrease in interest expense was the continued
amortization of the principal balance of notes payable partially
offset by a slightly higher effective rate of
interest.
Loss on
restaurant discontinued was $191,390 in 2015 and none in 2014. This
restaurant was part of the discontinued operations in 2008 but the
decision was made at that time to continue to operate this location
until the lease (renewed in 2010) expired. This is a non-recurring
expense.
Net
income before income taxes from continuing operations for 2015
decreased to $1.3 million from $2.8 million in 2014; however, in
2015, the Company recognized a valuation allowance of $1.2 million
related to receivables including the Heyser case and a loss on
restaurant discontinued of $191,000. For the three-month period
ended December 31, 2015, net income before income taxes from
continuing operations was $15,000 compared to $501,000 for the
comparable period in 2014, however, included in the three-month
period ended December 31, 2015 was a valuation allowance of
$380,000 related to receivables including the Heyser case and a
loss on restaurant discontinued of $191,000. Although income tax
expense is reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations, the Company did not pay any income tax due to its net
operating loss carry-forwards.
Loss on
discontinued operations was approximately $35,000 in 2015 and
$154,000 in 2014. This loss on discontinued operations was the
result of the issues related to the discontinued operations in 1999
and 2008, most of which have been resolved. The loss in 2015
consisted of $4,800 as a final payment on a property that was
closed in conjunction with the 1999 discontinued operations. In
addition, the Company incurred a loss of $30,000 for rent and legal
fees related to the operations discontinued in 2008.
Net
income for 2015 decreased to $786,000 from $1.6 million in 2014.
The decrease in net income was primarily a result of recognizing a
valuation allowance of $1.2 million for receivables including the
Heyser case in 2015.
Impact of Inflation
The
primary inflation factors affecting the Company’s operations
are food and labor costs to the franchisee. Cheese makes up the
single largest topping cost on a pizza. Cheese prices reached an
all-time record high in April 2014 and maintained at historically
high prices until mid-September 2014. They have since decreased.
The average cheese price in 2015 was approximately 3% below the
ten-year average for cheese prices; the average cheese price in
2016 was 7% below the ten-year average. The Company’s
business was affected by the increased cost of meats during 2014,
but these prices have also moderated somewhat. Labor costs across
the country have generally seen some upward pressure in hourly
rates as the unemployment rate has decreased and competition for
hourly employees has increased. However, the Company believes any
labor cost increases in the future for our non-traditional
franchisees and licensees will be somewhat mitigated due to the
relatively low labor requirements of the Company’s franchise
concepts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s strategy in recent years has been to grow its
business by concentrating on franchising/licensing non-traditional
locations including grocery store delis to sell take-n-bake pizza
and franchising stand-alone locations. This strategy was intended
to not require significant increase in expenses. The focus on
franchising/licensing non-traditional locations will continue to be
the Company’s strategy but, in addition, over the past two
years the Company has been developing a major business initiative
by re-designing and re-positioning its stand-alone franchise for
the next generation stand-alone prototype called “Noble
Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub.” As a result, the
Company plans to open and operate at least three locations of the
Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub and, once open, the
Company plans to launch a major franchising effort based on Noble
Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub. The first Noble Roman’s
Craft Pizza & Pub opened on January 31, 2017. The Company
currently operates three restaurant locations in addition to the
new Craft Pizza &Pub location. Two of the three restaurant
locations were previously operated by franchisees but acquired by
the Company in the fourth quarter of 2016. The Company does not
intend to take over any additional restaurant locations from
franchisees and is in the process of attempting to re-franchise one
of those two locations.
The Company’s current ratio was 2.14-to-1 as of December 31,
2016, compared to 2.94-to-1 as of December 31, 2015.
In 2012, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with BMO
Harris Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) for a term loan in the
amount of $5.0 million which was repayable in 48 equal monthly
principal installments of approximately $104,000 plus interest with
a final payment due in May 2016. In October 2013, the Company
entered into a First Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the
“First Amendment”). The First Amendment maintained the
terms of the term loan except for reducing the monthly principal
payments from $104,000 to approximately $80,700 and extending the
loan’s maturity to February 2017. All other terms and
conditions of the term loan remained the same including interest on
the unpaid principal at a rate per annum of LIBOR plus 4%. The
First Amendment also provided for a new term loan in the original
amount of $825,000 requiring monthly principal payments of
approximately $20,600 per month commencing in November 2013 and
continuing thereafter until the final payment in February 2017. The
term loan provided for interest on the unpaid principal balance to
be paid monthly at a rate per annum of LIBOR plus 6.08% per annum.
Proceeds from the new term loan were used to redeem the
Company’s Series B Preferred Stock which were earning a
return to the holders of 12% per annum.
In October 2014, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to its
Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). Pursuant to
the Second Amendment, the Company borrowed $700,000 in the form of
a term loan repayable in 36 equal monthly installments of principal
in the amount of $19,444 plus interest on the unpaid balance of
LIBOR plus 6% per annum. The terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement were otherwise unchanged. The Company used the proceeds
from the loan for additional working capital and open air display
coolers for grocery stores, as a result of the then recent growth
in the grocery store take-n-bake venue.
In July 2015, the Company borrowed $600,000 from a third-party
lender, evidenced by a promissory note which was to mature in July
2017. Interest on the note was payable at the rate of 8% per annum
quarterly in arrears and this loan was subordinate to borrowings
under the Company’s bank loan. In connection with the loan,
the Company issued, to the holder of the promissory note, a warrant
entitling the holder to purchase up to 300,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price per share of
$2.00. The warrant expires in July 2020. Proceeds were used to
increase working capital in anticipation of expected growth due to
the Company hiring two new sales people, a Vice President of
Supermarket Development, and entering into an agreement with a
franchise broker. The Company repaid this loan in January 2017 with
the proceeds of a $600,000 loan from Paul W. Mobley at an interest
rate of 7% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The loan matures
in March 2018. Per the anti-dilution provisions of the warrant, as
of January 2017, the warrant entitles the holder to purchase 1.2
million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of
$.50 per share.
In December 2015, the Company borrowed $100,000 from Paul W. Mobley
and $75,000 from A. Scott Mobley, two officers of the Company,
which are evidenced by promissory notes that were originally to
mature in January 2017. In January 2016, $25,000 of the previous
borrowing from A. Scott Mobley was repaid. In February 2016, A.
Scott Mobley loaned the Company another $10,000, evidenced by a
promissory note. In April 2016, the Company borrowed an additional
$150,000 from Paul W. Mobley, evidenced by a promissory note.
Proceeds were used for working capital. In conjunction with the
loan from Super G Funding, LLC (“Super G”), as
described below, Paul W. Mobley subordinated his $250,000 note and
A. Scott Mobley subordinated his $60,000 note to the Super G loan
and agreed to extend the maturity of those notes to June 10, 2018.
Interest on the notes are payable at the rate of 10% per annum paid
quarterly in arrears and the loans are unsecured.
In January 2016, the Company entered into a Third Amendment to its
Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”). Pursuant to
the Third Amendment, the Company consolidated its three term loans
with the Bank into a new term loan of $1,967,000 repayable in
monthly payments of principal in the amount of $54,654 plus
interest on the unpaid balance of LIBOR plus 6% per annum. The new
term loan was to mature March 31, 2017 when the remaining principal
balance would have become due. In addition, the Third Amendment
provided for a revolving loan in the maximum amount of $500,000
with a maturity of March 31, 2017.
In June 2016, the Company borrowed $2.0 million from Super G and
used those funds: (1) to repay the $500,000 revolving Bank loan and
(2) for working capital purposes. This loan is to be repaid in the
total amount of $2.7 million in regular semi-monthly payments over
a two year period.
In October 2016, the Company began a private placement of the Notes
and the Warrants (the “Offering”) and engaged Divine
Capital Markets, LLC to serve as placement agent for the Offering
(the “Placement Agent”). As of December 31, 2016, the
Company had issued Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1.6
million and Warrants to purchase up to 1.6 million shares of the
Company’s common stock. In January 2017, the Company
completed the Offering as a result of which it issued a total of
$2.4 million principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase up
to 2.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock. These
Notes, which are convertible, into the company’s common stock
and Warrants are described in greater detail in Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements herein.
The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Notes to fund
the opening of a Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
restaurants and for general corporate purposes.
In January 2017, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to its
Credit Agreement (the “Fourth Amendment”). Pursuant to
the Fourth Amendment, the Bank extended the maturity of the term
loan to March 31, 2018. All other terms and conditions of the loan
remain the same including the monthly principal payments and the
interest rate.
As a result of the financial arrangements described above and the
Company’s cash flow projections, the Company believes it will
have sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations and to carry out
its current business plan during 2017. Now that the Offering, as
described above, is complete the Company has begun efforts to
refinance all of its loans except the Notes, into one loan with an
extended amortization schedule. The Company’s cash flow
projections for the next two years are primarily based on the
Company’s strategy of growing the non-traditional
franchising/licensing venues including growth in the number of
grocery store locations licensed to sell the take-n-bake pizza and
operating two Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub locations,
as described above, plus launching an aggressive franchising
program of Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub
restaurants.
The Company does not anticipate that any of the recently issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards will have a material
impact on its Consolidated Statement of Operations or its
Consolidated Balance Sheet except:
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”)
recently issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2015-17 as part of its Simplification Initiative. The amendments
eliminate the guidance in Topic 740, Income Taxes, that required an
entity to separate deferred tax liabilities and assets between
current and noncurrent amounts in a classified balance sheet.
Rather, deferred taxes will be presented as noncurrent under the
new standard. It takes effect in 2017 for public
companies.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, its leasing standard
for both lessees and lessors. Under its core principle, a lessee
will recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet
for all arrangements with terms longer than 12 months. The new
standard takes effect in 2019 for public business
entities.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, regarding revenue on
contracts with customers. These new standards become effective in
January 2018. The company is currently evaluating the impact, if
any, of this Accounting Standards Update.
The Company does not believe these accounting pronouncements will
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth the future contractual obligations
of the Company as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
(1)
|
$5,797,477
|
$1,786,490
|
$4,010,987
|
$-
|
Operating
leases
|
1,414,526
|
286,426
|
431,920
|
696,180
|
Total
|
$7,212,003
|
$2,072,916
|
$4,442,907
|
$696,180
|
(1) The amounts do not include interest.
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements contained above in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis concerning the Company’s future revenues,
profitability, financial resources, market demand and product
development are forward-looking statements (as such term is defined
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) relating
to the Company that are based on the beliefs of the management of
the Company, as well as assumptions and estimates made by and
information currently available to the Company’s management.
The Company’s actual results in the future may differ
materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements
due to risks and uncertainties that exist in the Company’s
operations and business environment, including, but not limited to
competitive factors and pricing pressures, non-renewal of franchise
agreements, shifts in market demand, the success of new franchise
programs, including the new Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza &
Pub format, the company’s ability to successfully operate an
increased number of company-owned restaurants, general economic
conditions, changes in demand for the Company’s products or
franchises, the Company’s ability to service and refinance
its loans, the impact of franchise regulation, the success or
failure of individual franchisees and changes in prices or supplies
of food ingredients and labor as well as the factors discussed
under “Risk Factors” above in this annual report.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions or estimates prove incorrect, actual
results may vary materially from those described herein as
anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or
intended.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
The
Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to
its variable-rate debt. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had
outstanding variable interest-bearing debt in the aggregate
principal amount of $1.4 million. The Company’s current
borrowings are at a variable rate tied to LIBOR plus 6% per annum
adjusted on a monthly basis. Based on its current debt structure,
for each 1% increase in LIBOR the Company would incur increased
interest expense of approximately $10,803 over the succeeding
12-month period.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Noble Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$194,021
|
$477,928
|
Accounts
receivable - net
|
2,007,751
|
1,828,534
|
Inventories
|
492,222
|
754,418
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
634,016
|
568,386
|
Deferred
tax asset - current portion
|
925,000
|
925,000
|
Total
current assets
|
4,253,010
|
4,554,266
|
|
|
|
Property and
equipment:
|
|
|
Equipment
|
1,376,190
|
1,963,957
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
88,718
|
88,718
|
Construction
and equipment in progress
|
-
|
351,533
|
|
1,464,908
|
2,404,208
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,092,785
|
1,194,888
|
Net
property and equipment
|
372,123
|
1,209,320
|
Deferred tax asset
(net of current portion)
|
8,158,523
|
8,696,870
|
Goodwill
|
-
|
278,466
|
Other assets
including long-term portion of accounts receivable -
net
|
5,681,272
|
5,159,937
|
Total
assets
|
$18,464,928
|
$19,898,859
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
Current
portion of long-term notes payable to bank
|
$601,081
|
$655,725
|
Current
portion of loan payable to Super G
|
-
|
1,130,765
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
847,418
|
339,125
|
Total
current liabilities
|
1,448,499
|
2,125,615
|
|
|
|
Long-term
obligations:
|
|
|
Notes
payable to bank (net of current portion)
|
1,366,454
|
710,729
|
Loan
payable to Super G (net of current portion)
|
-
|
718,175
|
Notes
payable to officers
|
175,000
|
310,000
|
Note
payable to Kingsway America
|
600,000
|
600,000
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
-
|
769,835
|
Derivative
warrant liability
|
-
|
210,404
|
Derivative
conversion liability
|
-
|
435,671
|
Total
long-term liabilities
|
2,141,454
|
3,754,814
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
Common
stock – no par value (25,000,000 shares authorized,
20,775,921
issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 20,783,032
issued
and
outstanding as of December 31, 2016)
|
24,294,002
|
24,308,297
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(9,419,027)
|
(10,289,867)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
14,874,975
|
14,018,430
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$18,464,928
|
$19,898,859
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Noble Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties and
fees
|
$7,479,334
|
$7,464,963
|
$7,350,692
|
Administrative fees
and other
|
72,541
|
56,520
|
42,402
|
Restaurant
revenue
|
363,340
|
207,803
|
443,391
|
Total
revenue
|
7,915,215
|
7,729,286
|
7,836,485
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and wages
|
1,063,076
|
1,141,562
|
996,303
|
Trade
show expense
|
541,385
|
543,354
|
520,691
|
Travel
expense
|
235,127
|
255,125
|
230,091
|
Broker
commissions
|
-
|
-
|
32,241
|
Other
operating expenses
|
876,162
|
834,320
|
769,791
|
Restaurant
expenses
|
402,281
|
248,139
|
443,389
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
111,750
|
105,843
|
124,773
|
General and
administrative
|
1,646,502
|
1,659,966
|
1,641,853
|
Total
expenses
|
4,876,283
|
4,788,309
|
4,759,132
|
Operating
income
|
3,038,932
|
2,940,977
|
3,077,353
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
190,382
|
186,414
|
615,685
|
Loss on restaurant
discontinued
|
-
|
191,390
|
36,776
|
Change in fair
value of derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
44,464
|
Adjust valuation of
receivables - including Heyser case
|
-
|
1,230,000
|
1,103,521
|
Income
before income taxes from continuing
operations
|
2,848,550
|
1,333,173
|
1,276,907
|
Income tax
expense
|
1,104,809
|
512,671
|
487,880
|
Net
income from continuing operations
|
1,743,741
|
820,502
|
789,027
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued operations net of tax benefit
of
$97,284 for 2014, $21,697 for 2015 and
$1,026,277
for 2016
|
(153,545)
|
(34,724)
|
(1,659,867)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$1,590,196
|
$785,778
|
$(870,840)
|
Earnings per share
- basic:
|
|
|
|
Net
income from continuing operations
|
$.09
|
$.04
|
$.04
|
Net
loss from discontinued operations net of tax benefit
|
$(.01)
|
$(.00)
|
$(.08)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$.08
|
$.04
|
$(.04)
|
Weighted average
number of common shares outstanding
|
19,870,904
|
20,517,846
|
20,781,886
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
Net
income from continuing operations
|
$.08
|
$.04
|
$.04
|
Net
loss from discontinued operations net of tax benefit
|
$(.01)
|
$(.00)
|
$( .08)
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$.07
|
$.04
|
$( .04)
|
Weighted average
number of common shares outstanding
|
21,204,439
|
21,439,242
|
21,208,173
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity
Noble Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2013
|
19,585,089
|
$23,498,401
|
$(11,795,001)
|
$11,703,400
|
2014 net
income
|
|
|
1,590,196
|
1,590,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashless exercise
of employee stock
option
|
214,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
value of stock
options
|
|
48,815
|
|
48,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in
exchange for payables
|
180,000
|
318,208
|
|
318,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
employee stock options
|
115,000
|
105,230
|
|
105,230
|
Balance
at December 31, 2014
|
20,095,087
|
$23,970,654
|
$(10,204,805)
|
$13,765,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 net
income
|
|
|
785,778
|
785,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashless exercise
of employee stock
option
|
360,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
value of stock
options
|
|
26,962
|
|
26,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in
exchange for payables
|
50,000
|
95,000
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
employee stock options
|
270,667
|
201,386
|
|
201,386
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
20,775,921
|
$24,294,002
|
$(9,419,027)
|
$14,874,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 net
loss
|
|
|
(870,840)
|
(870,840)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashless exercise
of employee stock
option
|
7,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
value of stock
options
|
|
14,295
|
|
14,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
20,783,032
|
$24,308,297
|
$(10,289,867)
|
$14,018,430
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements..
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Noble Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$1,590,196
|
$785,778
|
$(870,840)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
128,265
|
98,826
|
166,681
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,007,526
|
490,974
|
(538,348)
|
Change
in fair value of derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
44,464
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in:
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(419,166)
|
(319,797)
|
131,217
|
Inventories
|
(43,578)
|
(110,822)
|
(244,898)
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
4,344
|
(166,295)
|
104,802
|
Other
assets including long-term portion of accounts
receivable
|
(1,861,460)
|
(665,341)
|
150,885
|
Increase
(decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
263,622
|
322,453
|
(473,916)
|
NET
CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
669,749
|
435,776
|
(1,529,953)
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(22,176)
|
(13,840)
|
(364,035)
|
NET
CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(22,176)
|
(13,840)
|
(364,035)
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
Payment
of principal outstanding on bank loan
|
(1,235,694)
|
(1,348,229)
|
(601,081)
|
Payment
of principal on Super G
|
-
|
-
|
(78,976)
|
Proceeds
from new financings net of closing costs
|
697,704
|
600,000
|
3,210,509
|
Proceeds
from officers loans
|
-
|
175,000
|
135,000
|
Proceeds
from the exercise of stock options
|
105,230
|
201,386
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
NET
CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
(432,760)
|
(371,843)
|
2,665,452
|
|
|
|
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
Payment
of obligations from discontinued operations
|
(172,251)
|
(56,421)
|
(487,556)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
in cash
|
42,562
|
(6,328)
|
283,907
|
Cash at beginning
of year
|
157,787
|
200,349
|
194,021
|
Cash at end of
year
|
$200,349
|
$194,021
|
$477,928
|
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities:
In
2015, options to purchase 90,000 shares at $.36 per share, 100,000
shares at $.95 per share, 300,000 shares at $1.05 per share, 66,666
shares at $.58 per share and 30,000 shares at $.90 per share were
exercised pursuant to the cashless exercise provisions of the
options and the holders received 360,167 shares of common stock.
Also in 2015, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock in
exchange for $95,000 in payables.
In
2016, option to purchase 20,000 shares at $.58 per share was
exercised and the holder received 7,111 shares of common stock
pursuant to the cashless exercise provision of the
option.
The
Company acquired two restaurants from franchisees during the fourth
quarter of 2016, in exchange for $131,417 of equipment,$17,298 of
inventory and $427,181 in accounts payable and accrued
expenses.
See acconmpanying notes to consolidate financial
statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Noble Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Note l: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization:
The Company sells and services franchises and/or licenses for
non-traditional foodservice operations and stand-alone retail
outlets under the trade names “Noble Roman’s
Pizza,” “Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs” and
“Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub.” Unless the
context otherwise indicates, reference to the “Company”
are to Noble Roman’s, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
Principles
of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Noble Roman’s, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Pizzaco, Inc., N.R. Realty, Inc. and RH Roanoke, Inc.
Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Inventories:
Inventories consist of food, beverage, restaurant supplies,
restaurant equipment and marketing materials and are stated at the
lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.
Property
and Equipment: Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at
cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives ranging from
five years to 12 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the shorter of estimated useful life or the term of the lease.
Construction and equipment in progress are stated at cost for
leasehold improvements and equipment for a new restaurant being
constructed and was not completed until January 2017.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents: Includes actual cash balance. The cash is not
pledged nor are there any withdrawal restrictions.
Advertising
Costs: The Company records advertising costs consistent with the
Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the
“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Other Expense topic and Advertising Costs
subtopic. This statement requires the Company to expense
advertising production costs the first time the production material
is used.
Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures: The Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures topic of the FASB’s ASC requires companies to
determine fair value based on the price that would be received to
sell the assets or paid to transfer to liability to a market
participant. The fair value measurements and disclosure topic
emphasis that fair value is a market based measurement, not an
entity specific measurement. The guidance requires that assets and
liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in
one of the following categories:
Level
One: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level
Two: Observable market –based inputs or unobservable inputs
that are corroborated by
market
data.
Level
Three: Unsobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market
data.
Use of
Estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. The Company records a valuation allowance in a
sufficient amount to adjust the accounts receivables value, in its
best judgment, to reflect the amount that the Company estimates
will be collected from its total receivables. As any accounts are
determined to be permanently impaired (bankruptcy, lack of contact,
age of account balance, etc.), they are charged off against the
valuation allowance. The Company evaluates its property and
equipment and related costs periodically to assess whether any
impairment indications are present, including recurring operating
losses and significant adverse changes in legal factors or business
climate that affect the recovery of recorded value. If any
impairment of an individual asset is evident, a loss would be
provided to reduce the carrying value to its estimated fair
value.
Debt
Issuance Costs: Debt issuance cost is presented on the balance
sheet as a direct reducton from the carrying amount of the
associated liability. The debt issuance cost was reclassified from
other assets to long-term debt on its balance sheet but had no
effect on its statement of operations. Debt issuance costs are
amortized to interest expense ratably over the term of the
applicable debt. The debt issuance cost being amortized is $278,408
with an accumulated amortization at December 31, 2016 of
$45,727
Intangible
Assets: The Company recorded goodwill of $278,000 as a result of
the acquisition of RH Roanoke, Inc., in Virginia and a second
restaurant in North Carolina, both former franchisees of the
Company. The acquisitions were in exchange for $132,000 of
equipment, $17,000 of inventory and $427,000 of accounts payable
and accrued expenses. Goodwill has an indeterminable life and is
assessed for impairment at least annually and more frequently as
triggering events may occur. In making this assessment, management
relies on a number of factors including operating results, business
plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, and
transactions and marketplace data. Any impairment losses determined
to exist are recorded in the period the determination is made.
There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and
management's judgment is involved in performing goodwill and other
intangible assets valuation analyses, thus there is risk that the
carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets may be
overstated or understated. The Company has elected to perform the
annual impairment assessment of recorded goodwill as of the end of
the Company’s fiscal year. The results of this annual
impairment assessment indicated that the fair value of the
reporting unit as of December 31, 2016, exceeded the carrying, or
book value, including goodwill, and therefore recorded goodwill was
not subject to impairment.
Royalties,
Administrative and Franchise Fees: Royalties are generally
recognized as income monthly based on a percentage of monthly sales
of franchised or licensed restaurants and from audits including
interest per the franchise agreement and other inspections as they
come due and payable by the franchisee. Fees from the retail
products in grocery stores are recognized monthly based on the
distributors’ sale of those retail products to the grocery
stores or grocery store distributors. Administrative fees are
recognized as income monthly as earned. Initial franchise fees are
recognized as income when the services for the franchised location
are substantially completed.
Exit or
Disposal Activities Related to Discontinued Operations: The Company
records exit or disposal activity for discontinued operations when
management commits to an exit or disposal plan and includes those
charges under results of discontinued operations, as required by
the ASC “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations”
topic.
Income
Taxes: The Company provides for current and deferred income tax
liabilities and assets utilizing an asset and liability approach
along with a valuation allowance as appropriate. The Company
concluded that no valuation allowance was necessary because it is
more likely than not that the Company will earn sufficient income
before the expiration of its net operating loss carry-forwards to
fully realize the value of the recorded deferred tax asset. As of
December 31, 2016, the net operating loss carry-forward was
approximately $23 million which expires between the years 2019 and
2036. Management made the determination that no valuation allowance
was necessary after reviewing the Company’s business plans,
relevant known facts to date, recent trends, current performance
and analysis of the backlog of franchises sold but not yet
open.
U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles require the Company to
examine its tax positions for uncertain positions. Management is
not aware of any tax positions that are more likely than not to
change in the next 12 months, or that would not sustain an
examination by applicable taxing authorities. The Company’s
policy is to recognize penalties and interest as incurred in its
Consolidated Statements of Operations. None were included for the
years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The Company’s
federal and various state income tax returns for 2013 through 2016
are subject to examination by the applicable tax authorities,
generally for three years after the later of the original or
extended due date.
Basic
and Diluted Net Income Per Share: Net income per share is based on
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
respective year. When dilutive, stock options and warrants are
included as share equivalents using the treasury stock
method.
The
following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share for the year ended
December
31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share – basic
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
1,590,196
|
19,870,904
|
$.08
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
Options
|
-
|
1,333,535
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$1,590,196
|
21,204,439
|
$.07
|
The
following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share for the year ended December 31,
2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share – basic
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
785,778
|
20,517,846
|
$0.04
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
Options
|
-
|
921,296
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
785,778
|
21,439,242
|
$0.04
|
The
following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted
loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share – basic
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
(870,840)
|
20,781,886
|
$(0.04)
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
Options
|
-
|
32,845
|
|
Convertible
notes
|
-
|
393,442
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
(870,840)
|
212,008,173
|
$(0.04)
|
Subsequent
Events: The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date
the consolidated statements were issued and filed with the annual
report. In January 2017, the Company repaid a promissory note to
Kingsway America with an interest rate of 8% per annum due July
2017 by borrowing the $600,000 from an officer of the Company at an
interest rate of 7% per annum due March 2018. With the initial
Kingsway loan, they received a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares
of common stock at $2.00 per share containing certain anti-dilutive
provisions. In January 2017, as a result of those dilutive
provisions, the warrant changed to 1,200,000 shares at $.50 per
share. In January 2017, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment
to its Credit Agreement with BMO Harris Bank (the
“Bank”) to extend the maturity of that note from March
2017 to March 2018 with all other terms and conditions remaining
the same including the monthly principal payments and the interest
rate. In January 2017, the Company completed the Offering (as
described in Note 3), began in 2016, of Notes and Warrants under
which it issued a total of $2.4 million principal amount of the
Notes and Warrant to purchase 2.4 million shares of the
Company’s common stock. In January 2017, the Company opened
its first Noble Roman’s Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza &
Pub location. In January 2017, at a special meeting of the
shareholders, they approved the authorized shares being increased
from 25,000,000 to 40,000,000.
No
subsequent event required recognition or disclosure except as
discussed above.
Note 2: Accounts Receivable
At
December 31, 2015 and 2016, the carrying value of the
Company’s accounts receivable has been reduced to anticipated
realizable value. As a result of this reduction of carrying value,
the Company anticipates that substantially all of its net
receivables reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2015 and 2016 will be collected. The allowance to
reduce the receivables to anticipated net realizable value at
December 31, 2015 was $1.2 million and at December 31, 2016 was
$2.7 million, including $1.5 million related to discontinued
operations.
In
2012, the Company dismissed its counterclaims against certain
plaintiffs in the lawsuit related to the operations discontinued in
2008 and reduced the net realizable value by $500,000 related to
the Company’s counterclaims against the plaintiffs in the
lawsuit referenced above. In 2013, based on a judgment that was
entered in February 2014 in the lawsuit, the Company reduced the
carrying value of the receivables subject to the counterclaims by
$1.1 million. Since the right to receive passive income in the form
of royalties is not a part of the discontinued operations, the
adjustments to reflect these two charges were made to continuing
operations. In 2015, the Company made an adjustment for valuation
of receivables, including the Heyser case above, of $1.2 million.
In 2016, the Company made an adjustment for valuation of
receivables, including the Heyser case above, of $1.1
million.
Note 3: Notes Payable
In 2012, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with the Bank
for a term loan in the amount of $5.0 million which was repayable
in 48 equal monthly principal installments of approximately
$104,000 plus interest with a final payment due in May 2016. In
October 2013, the Company entered into a First Amendment to the
Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”). The First
Amendment maintained the terms of the term loan except for reducing
the monthly principal payments from $104,000 to approximately
$80,700 and extending the loan’s maturity to February 2017.
All other terms and conditions of the term loan remained the same
including interest on the unpaid principal at a rate per annum of
LIBOR plus 4%. The First Amendment also provided for a new term
loan in the original amount of $825,000 requiring monthly principal
payments of approximately $20,600 per month commencing in November
2013 and continuing thereafter until the final payment in February
2017. The term loan provided for interest on the unpaid principal
balance to be paid monthly at a rate per annum of LIBOR plus 6.08%
per annum. Proceeds from the new term loan were used to redeem the
Company’s Series B Preferred Stock which were earning a
return to the holders of 12% per annum.
In October 2014, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to its
Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). Pursuant to
the Second Amendment, the Company borrowed $700,000 in the form of
a term loan repayable in 36 equal monthly installments of principal
in the amount of $19,444 plus interest on the unpaid balance of
LIBOR plus 6% per annum. The terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement were otherwise unchanged. The Company used the proceeds
from the loan for additional working capital and open air display
coolers for grocery stores, as a result of the then recent growth
in the grocery store take-n-bake venue.
In July 2015, the Company borrowed $600,000 from a third-party
lender, evidenced by a promissory note which was to mature in July
2017. Interest on the note was payable at the rate of 8% per annum
quarterly in arrears and this loan was subordinate to borrowings
under the Company’s bank loan. In connection with the loan,
the Company issued, to the holder of the promissory note, a warrant
entitling the holder to purchase up to 300,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price per share of
$2.00. The warrant expires in July 2020. The Kingsway warrant
included anti-dilution features similar to those discussed in Note
3. As such, the Kingsway warrant is considered a derivative
liability at December 31, 2016 due to the additional borrowing from
Super G and the conversion feature of the private placement Notes,
the number of shares of common stock underlying the Kingsway
warrants increased from 300,000 to 480,000 and the exercise price
per warrant decreased from $2.00 per share to $.50 per share. In
2017, the number of shares underlying the warrant increased to 1.2
million and the exercise price remained at $.50 per share. Proceeds
were used to increase working capital in anticipation of expected
growth due to the Company hiring two new sales people, a Vice
President of Supermarket Development, and entering into an
agreement with a franchise broker. The Company repaid this loan in
January 2017 with the proceeds of a $600,000 loan from Paul W.
Mobley at an interest rate of 7% per annum payable quarterly in
arrears. The loan matures in March 2018.
In December 2015, the Company borrowed $100,000 from Paul W. Mobley
and $75,000 from A. Scott Mobley, two officers of the Company,
which are evidenced by promissory notes that were originally to
mature in January 2017. In January 2016, $25,000 of the previous
borrowing from A. Scott Mobley was repaid. In February 2016, A.
Scott Mobley loaned the Company another $10,000, evidenced by a
promissory note. In April 2016, the Company borrowed an additional
$150,000 from Paul W. Mobley, evidenced by a promissory note.
Proceeds were used for working capital. In conjunction with the
loan from Super G Funding, LLC (“Super G”), as
described below, Paul W. Mobley subordinated his $250,000 note and
A. Scott Mobley subordinated his $60,000 note to the Super G loan
and agreed to extend the maturity of those notes to June 10, 2018.
Interest on the notes are payable at the rate of 10% per annum paid
quarterly in arrears and the loans are unsecured.
In January 2016, the Company entered into a Third Amendment to its
Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”). Pursuant to
the Third Amendment, the Company consolidated its three term loans
with the Bank into a new term loan of $1,967,000 repayable in
monthly payments of principal in the amount of $54,654 plus
interest on the unpaid balance of LIBOR plus 6% per annum. The new
term loan was to mature March 31, 2017 when the remaining principal
balance would have become due. In addition, the Third Amendment
provided for a revolving loan in the maximum amount of $500,000
with a maturity of March 31, 2017.
In June 2016, the Company borrowed $2.0 million from Super G and
used those funds: (i) to repay the $500,000 revolving Bank loan and
(ii) for working capital purposes. This loan is to be repaid in the
total amount of $2.7 million in regular semi-monthly payments over
a two year period.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company issued 32 Units, for a
purchase price of $50,000 per Unit, or $1,600,000 in the aggregate.
Each $50,000 Unit consists of a convertible, subordinated,
unsecured promissory note (a “Note”) in an aggregate
principal amount of $50,000 and warrants (the
“Warrants”) to purchase up to 50,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock, no par value per share (the
“Common Stock”). The Company issued Units to investors
including the following related parties: Paul W. Mobley, the
Company’s Executive Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and a
director of the Company ($150,000); and Herbst Capital Management,
LLC, the principal of which is Marcel Herbst, a director of the
Company ($200,000).
Interest on the Notes accrues at the annual rate of 10% and is
payable quarterly in arrears. Principal of the Notes matures three
years after issuance. Each holder of the Notes may convert them at
any time into Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of
$0.50 per share (subject to anti-dilution adjustments). Subject to
certain limitations, upon 30 days’ notice the Company may
require the Notes to be converted into Common Stock if the daily
average weighted trading price of the Common Stock equals or
exceeds $2.00 per share for a period of 30 consecutive trading
days. The Notes provide for customary events of default. The Notes
are unsecured and subordinate to senior debt of the
Company.
The Warrants expire three years from the date of issuance and
provide for an exercise price of $1.00 per share of Common Stock
(subject to anti-dilution adjustments). Subject to certain
limitations, the Company may redeem the Warrants at a price of
$0.001 per share of Common Stock subject to the Warrant upon 30
days’ notice if the daily average weighted trading price of
the Common Stock equals or exceeds $1.50 per share for a period of
30 consecutive trading days.
In connection with the issuance of the Units, the Company granted
the Investors certain registration rights with respect to the
shares of Common Stock into which the Notes are convertible and for
which the Warrants are exercisable.
Divine Capital Markets LLC served as the placement agent for the
offering of the Units (the “Placement Agent”). In
consideration of the Placement Agent’s services, the
Placement Agent earns a cash fee and expense allowance equal to 10%
and 3%, respectively, of the gross proceeds of the offering, as
well as warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) for
10% of Units sold. Each Placement Agent Warrant allow the Placement
Agent to purchase a Unit for $60,000.
The Company evaluated the Notes, Warrants and Placement Agent
Warrants to determine if those contracts or embedded components of
those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted
for in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Due to the
anti-dilution features in the contracts, commonly referred to as
“down-round protection”, the contracts do not meet the
scope exception for treatment as a derivative under ASC 815. As
such, the embedded conversion feature in the Notes (the
“Conversion Feature”), the Warrants and the Placement
Agent warrants are considered derivative financial
instruments.
The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments
requires that the Company record these instruments at their fair
values as of the inception date of the agreement and at fair value
as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value
is recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense for each
reporting period at each balance sheet date. The Company reassesses
the classification of its derivative instruments at each balance
sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events
during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of
the event that caused the reclassification.
The fair value of the derivative instruments, along with the cash
Placement Agent fees, are deducted from the carrying value of the
Notes, as original issue discount (“OID”). The OID is
amortized over the term of the Notes using the effective interest
rate method.
Activity related to the Units during the fourth quarter of 2016 is
as follows:
Gross
Proceeds
|
$1,600,000
|
Placement
Agent Fees
|
208,000
|
Fair
Value of Warrants
|
96,380
|
Fair
Value of Conversion Features
|
458,875
|
Fair
Value of Placement Agent Warrants
|
46,358
|
Legal
and Other Costs of Issuance
|
42,918
|
Net
Amount Allocable to Notes
|
$747,469
|
At December 31, 2016, the balance of the Notes is comprised
of:
Face
Value
|
$1,600,000
|
Unamortized
OID
|
(830,165)
|
Carrying
Value
|
$769,835
|
Interest expense related to the Notes, including amortization of
OID, amounted to $22,365 for the year ended December 31,
2016.
The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Notes to fund
the opening of a Noble Roman’s Noble Roman’s Craft
Pizza & Pub restaurants and for general corporate
purposes.
In January 2017, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to its
Credit Agreement (the “Fourth Amendment”). Pursuant to
the Fourth Amendment, the Bank extended the maturity of the term
loan to March 31, 2018. All other terms and conditions of the loan
remain the same including the monthly principal payments and the
interest rate.
Interest paid on the Company’s loans in 2016 was $401,034 and
in 2015 was $139,328.
Note 4: Fair Value Measurement
To
measure the fair value of derivative instruments, the Company
utilizes Monte Carlo models that value the Kingsway Warrant,
Conversion Feature, Warrants and Placement Agent Warrants. The
Monte Carlo models are based on future projections of the various
potential outcomes of each instrument, giving consideration to the
terms of each instrument. A discounted average cash flow over the
various scenarios is completed to determine the value of the
instrument.
The
table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, of all
financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
during the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1,
2016
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Issuance
|
-
|
458,875
|
96,380
|
46,358
|
601,613
|
Change in Fair
Value of Derivative Liabilities
|
68,335
|
(23,203)
|
(2,993)
|
2,326
|
44,465
|
Balance –
December 31, 2016
|
68,335
|
435,672
|
93,387
|
48,684
|
646,078
|
The
fair value of the derivative instruments as of December 31, 2016
were calculated using Monte Carlo models with the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
Yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
Expected
Volatility
|
58%
|
58%
|
58%
|
58%
|
Risk Free Interest
Rate
|
1.6%
|
1.4%
|
1.4%
|
1.4%
|
Remaining
Contractual Term (Years)
|
3.5
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
Note 5: Royalties and Fees
Approximately
$313,000, $163,000 and $245,000 are included in 2014, 2015 and
2016, respectively, royalties and fees in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for initial franchise fees. Also included
in royalties and fees were approximately $80,000, $65,000 and
$54,000 in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, for equipment
commissions. Most of the cost for the services required to be
performed by the Company are incurred prior to the franchise fee
income being recorded which is based on contractual liability for
the franchisee. A substantial portion of the Company’s
ongoing royalty income is paid electronically by the Company
initiating a draft on the franchisee’s account by electronic
withdrawal.
In
conjunction with the development of Noble Roman’s Pizza and
Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs, the Company has devised its own
recipes for many of the ingredients that go into the making of its
products (“Proprietary Products”). The Company
contracts with various manufacturers to manufacture its Proprietary
Products in accordance with the Company’s recipes and
formulas and to sell those products to authorized distributors at a
contract price which includes an allowance for use of the
Company’s recipes. The manufacturing contracts also require
the manufacturers to remit those allowances to the Company on a
periodic basis, usually monthly. The Company recognizes those
allowances in revenue as earned based on sales reports from the
distributors.
There were 2,562 franchised or licensed outlets in operation on
December 31, 2015 and 2,768 on December 31, 2016. During the
12-month period ended December 31, 2016, there were 242 new
franchised or licensed outlets opened and 36 franchised or licensed
outlets left the system. Grocery stores are accustomed to adding
products for a period of time, removing them for a period of time
and possibly reoffering them. Therefore, it is unknown of the 2,017
included in the December 31, 2016 count, how many grocery store
licenses were actually operating at any given time.
Note 6: Contingent Liabilities for Leased Facilities
The
Company is no longer contingently liable on any leased
facilities.
The
Company has future obligations of $1,414,526 under current
operating leases as follows: due in less than one year $286,426,
due in one to three years $431,920 and due in three to five years
$696,180.
Note 7: Income Taxes
The
Company had a deferred tax asset, as a result of prior operating
losses, of $9.1 million at December 31, 2015 and $9.6 million at
December 31, 2016, which expires between the years 2019 and 2036.
In 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Company used deferred benefits to
offset its tax expense of $1.1 million, $513,000 and $488,000,
respectively, and tax benefits from loss on discontinued operations
of $97,000 in 2014, $22,000 in 2015 and $1.0 million in 2016. As a
result of the loss carry-forwards, the Company did not pay any
income taxes in 2014, 2015 and 2016. There are no material
differences between reported income tax expense or benefit and the
income tax expense or benefit that would result from applying the
Federal and state statutory tax rates.
Note 8: Common Stock
On
February 28, 2016, a former director exercised a stock option for
20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.58 per
share in a cashless exercise and was issued 7,111 shares of common
stock.
In connection with a loan in 2015, the Company issued a
warrant entitling the holder to purchase up to 300,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $2.00. The
warrant expires July 1, 2020, per the anti-dilution provisions of
the warrant, the warrant, since January 2017, entitles the holder
to purchase 1.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock
at a price of $.50 per share.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had issued Notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $1.6 million convertible to common
stock within three years at the rate of $.50 per share and Warrants
to purchase up to 1.6 million shares of the Company’s common
stock at $1.00 per share. In January 2017, the Offering as a result
of which the Company issued a total of $2.4 million principal
amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase up to 2.4 million shares
of the Company’s common stock.
The Company has an incentive stock option plan for key employees,
officers and directors. The options are generally exercisable three
years after the date of grant and expire ten years after the date
of grant. The option prices are the fair market value of the stock
at the date of grant. At December 31, 2016, the Company had the
following employee stock options outstanding:
|
|
47,500
|
$.58
|
155,000
|
.58
|
1,400,000
|
.58
|
31,000143,667
|
.58.58
|
|
|
230,500
|
1.00
|
265,000
|
1.00
|
325,000
|
1.00
|
325,000
|
.53
|
35,000
|
.50
|
As of
December 31, 2016, options for 2,165,999 shares were
exercisable
The
Company adopted the modified prospective method to account for
stock option grants, which does not require restatement of prior
periods. Under the modified prospective method, the Company is
required to record compensation expense for all awards granted
after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of
previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of
adoption, net of an estimate of expected forfeitures. Compensation
expense is based on the estimated fair values of stock options
determined on the date of grant and is recognized over the related
vesting period, net of an estimate of expected
forfeitures.
The
Company estimates the fair value of its option awards on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
risk-free interest rate is based on external data while all other
assumptions are determined based on the Company’s historical
experience with stock options. The following assumptions were used
for grants in 2014, 2015 and 2016:
Expected
volatility20% to 30%
Expected
dividend yield None
Expected
term (in years) 3
Risk-free
interest rate 1.4% to 2.64%
The
following table sets forth the number of options outstanding as of
December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 and the number of options
granted, exercised or forfeited during the years ended December 31,
2014, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016:
Balance of employee
stock options outstanding as of 12/31/13
|
3,457,500
|
Stock
options granted during the year ended 12/31/14
|
370,000
|
Stock
options exercised during the year ended 12/31/14
|
(390,000)
|
Stock
options forfeited during the year ended 12/31/14
|
(2,500)
|
Balance of employee
stock options outstanding as of 12/31/14
|
3,435,000
|
Stock
options granted during the year ended 12/31/15
|
410,000
|
Stock
options exercised during the year ended 12/31/15
|
(877,333)
|
Stock
options forfeited during the year ended 12/31/15
|
(310,000)
|
Balance of employee
stock options outstanding as of 12/31/15
|
2,657,667
|
Stock
options granted during the year ended 12/31/16
|
395,000
|
Stock
options exercised during the year ended 12/31/16
|
(20,000)
|
Stock
options forfeited during the year ended 12/31/16
|
(75,000)
|
Balance of employee
stock options outstanding as of 12/31/16
|
2,957,667
|
The
following table sets forth the number of non-vested options
outstanding as of December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, and the
number of stock options granted, vested and forfeited during the
years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Balance of employee
non-vested stock options outstanding as of 12/31/13
|
1,416,500
|
Stock
options granted during the year ended 12/31/14
|
370,000
|
Stock
options vested during the year ended 12/31/14
|
(755,000)
|
Stock
options forfeited during the year ended 12/31/14
|
-
|
Balance of employee
non-vested stock options outstanding as of 12/31/14
|
1,031,500
|
Stock
options granted during the year ended 12/31/15
|
410,000
|
Stock
options vested during the year ended 12/31/15
|
(380,999)
|
Stock
options forfeited during the year ended 12/31/15
|
(330,000)
|
Balance of employee
non-vested stock options outstanding as of 12/31/15
|
730,501
|
Stock
options granted during the year ended 12/31/16
|
395,000
|
Stock
options vested during the year ended 12/31/16
|
(258,833)
|
Stock
options forfeited during the year ended 12/31/16
|
(75,000)
|
Balance of employee
non-vested stock options outstanding as of 12/31/16
|
791,668
|
During
2016, employee stock options were granted for 395,000 shares,
options for 20,000 shares were exercised and options for 75,000
shares were forfeited. At December 31, 2016, the weighted average
grant date fair value of non-vested options was $.79 per share and
the weighted average grant date fair value of vested options was
$.66 per share. The weighted average grant date fair value of
employee stock options granted during 2014 was $1.00, during 2015
was $1.00 and during 2016 was $.53. Total compensation cost
recognized for share-based payment arrangements was $48,815 with a
tax benefit of $18,935 in 2014, $26,962 with a tax benefit of
$10,369 in 2015 and $14,295 with a tax benefit of $5,497 in 2016.
As of December 31, 2016, total compensation cost related to
non-vested options was $32,297, which will be recognized as
compensation cost over the next six to 33 months. No cash was used
to settle equity instruments under share-based payment
arrangements.
Note 9: Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
The Company does not believe that the recently issued Statements of
Financial Accounting Standards will have any material impact on the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or its
Consolidated Balance Sheets except:
The FASB recently issued ASU 2015-17 as part of its Simplification
Initiative. The amendments eliminate the guidance in Topic 740,
Income Taxes, that required an entity to separate deferred tax
liabilities and assets between current and noncurrent amounts in a
classified balance sheet. Rather, deferred taxes will be presented
as noncurrent under the new standard. It takes effect in 2017 for
public companies.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, its leasing
standard for both lessees and lessors. Under its core principle, a
lessee will recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance
sheet for all arrangements with terms longer than 12 months. The
new standard takes effect in 2019 for public business
entities.
In May 2014, the FASB issused ASU 2014-09 regarding Revenue From
Contract With Customers. The new standard to become effective in
January 2018. The company does not believe there will be a material
impact.
Note 10: Loss on Restaurant Discontinued
This
restaurant was a part of the discontinued operations in 2008 but
the decision was made to continue to operate this location until
the lease (renewed in 2010) expired. The Company does not expect
this expense to recur.
Note 11: Loss from Discontinued Operations
The
Company made the decision in late 2008 to discontinue the business
of operating traditional quick service restaurants. As a result,
the Company charged off or dramatically lowered the carrying value
of all receivables related to the traditional restaurants and
accrued future estimated expenses related to the estimated cost to
prosecute a lawsuit related to those discontinued operations. The
ongoing right to receive passive income in the form of royalties is
not a part of the discontinued segment.
The
Company reported a net loss on discontinued operations of $154,000
in 2014. This consisted of $9,600 in legal and settlement costs
through the expiration of the lease relating to the restaurant that
was closed in conjunction with the business activity discontinued
in 1999 discussed above. In addition, the Company incurred $139,600
for legal and other costs related to the operations discontinued in
2008, and wrote off $4,300 in receivables related to the operations
discontinued in 2008.
The
Company reported a net loss on discontinued operations of $35,000
in 2015. This consisted of $4,800 as a final payment on a property
that was closed in conjunction with the 1999 discontinued
operations. In addition, the Company incurred a loss of $30,000 for
rent and legal fees related to the operations discontinued in
2008.
The
Company report a net loss on discontinued operations of $1.7
million in 2016. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the
Company made the decision to discontinue the stand-alone
take-n-bake concept and devote its efforts to its next generation
stand-alone prototype, Noble Roman’s Craft Pizza & Pub.
As a result of that decision, the Company is charging off all
assets related to those discontinued operations, including $505,000
after-tax benefit invested in three franchised locations, partially
owned by certain officers of the Company which were not involved in
the management of the operations, which had been used primarily to
support research and development by the Company in those three
franchised locations. The Company was using those franchised
locations for testing and development in an attempt to improve the
stand-alone take-n-bake concept for future franchising before the
Company made the decision in the third quarter to discontinue that
concept. In addition, $1.07 million of the after-tax benefit
reflected the charge-off of various receivables due from unrelated
former franchisees of the stand-alone take-n-bake concept. In
addition, $48,000 of the after-tax benefit reflected the charge-off
of various other expenses related to the discontinuation of the
stand-alone take-n-bake concept. This resulted in the net loss
after-tax benefit resulting from the discontinuation of the
stand-alone take-n-bake concept in the aggregate amount of $1.7
million. The loss on discontinued operations also included a loss
of $39,000, after the tax benefit, for settlement of rent on a
former location that was part of the discontinued operations in
2008.
Note 12: Contingencies
The
Company, from time to time, is or may become involved in various
litigation or regulatory proceedings arising out of its normal
business operations.
Currently, there are no such pending proceedings which the Company
considers to be material.
Note 13: Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions
The
following is a summary of transactions to which the Company and
certain officers and directors of the Company are a party or have a
financial interest. The Board of Directors of the Company has
adopted a policy that all transactions between the Company and its
officers, directors, principal shareholders and other affiliates
must be approved by a majority of the Company’s disinterested
directors, and be conducted on terms no less favorable to the
Company than could be obtained from unaffiliated third
parties.
In
December 2015, the Company borrowed $100,000 from Paul W. Mobley
and $75,000 from A. Scott Mobley, two officers of the Company,
which are evidenced by promissory notes that were originally to
mature in January 2017. In January 2016, $25,000 of the previous
borrowing from A. Scott Mobley was repaid. In February 2016, A.
Scott Mobley loaned the Company another $10,000, evidenced by a
promissory note. In April 2016, the Company borrowed an additional
$150,000 from Paul W. Mobley, evidenced by a promissory note.
Proceeds were used for working capital. In conjunction with the
loan from Super G, as described below, Paul W. Mobley subordinated
his $250,000 note and A. Scott Mobley subordinated his $60,000 note
to the Super G loan and agreed to extend the maturity of those
notes to June 10, 2018. Interest on the notes are payable at the
rate of 10% per annum paid quarterly in arrears and the loans are
unsecured. In January 2017, the Company borrowed $600,000 from Paul
W. Mobley at an interest
rate of 7% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The loan matures
in March 2018.
Of the
32 units sold in the private placement which began in October 2016,
three units were purchased by Paul W. Mobley, Executive Chairman,
and four units were purchased by Marcel Herbst, Director. Each unit
consists of a Note in the principal amount of $50,000 and a Warrant
to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
These transactions were all done on the same terms and conditions
as all of the independent investors who purchased the other 25
units.
The
Company executed a franchise agreement for three stand-alone
take-n-bake retail outlets during 2012 in which the franchisee was
partially owned by certain officers of the Company, however, these
individuals were not involved in the management of the
franchisee’s operations, which had been used primarily to
support research and development by the Company in those three
franchised locations. The Company was supporting that franchise
because it was using those franchised locations for testing and
development in an attempt to improve the stand-alone take-n-bake
concept for future franchising before the Company made the decision
in the third quarter to discontinue that concept, resulting in a
loss after-tax benefit related to that entity of $505,000. The
Company has no exposure to loss related to this entity in the
future. Neither the Company, nor any officers of the Company, have
guaranteed any obligations of the franchisee. While the franchisee
was determined to be a variable interest entity, as defined by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
management determined that the Company had a significant variable
interest but did not have the power to direct the activities of the
variable interest entity that most significantly impact its
economic performance. Therefore, the Company was not the primary
beneficiary of the franchisee, and as such, was not required to
present consolidated financial statements with the
franchisee.
Note 14: Unaudited
Quarterly Financial Information
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
Total
revenue
|
$2,095
|
$2,022
|
$1,940
|
$1,779
|
Operating
income
|
679
|
856
|
881
|
662
|
Loss on restaurant
discontinued
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
Valuation allowance
for receivables - including Heyser
case
|
(353)
|
-
|
(751)
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of derivatives
|
(44)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Net income (loss)
before income taxes from continuing
operations
|
(42)
|
702
|
47
|
570
|
Net income (loss)
from continuing operations
|
(26)
|
434
|
31
|
350
|
Loss from
discontinued operations
|
(234)
|
(1,426)
|
-
|
-
|
Net income
(loss)
|
(260)
|
(993)
|
31
|
350
|
Net income from
continuing operations per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
.00
|
.02
|
.00
|
.02
|
Diluted
|
.00
|
.02
|
.00
|
.02
|
Net income (loss)
per common share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
(.01)
|
(.05)
|
.00
|
.02
|
Diluted
|
(.01)
|
(.05)
|
.00
|
.02
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
Total
revenue
|
$1,888
|
$1,918
|
$2,096
|
$1,827
|
Operating
income
|
634
|
725
|
918
|
664
|
Loss on restaurant
discontinued
|
191
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Valuation allowance
for receivables - including Heyser
case
|
380
|
250
|
600
|
-
|
Net income before
income taxes from continuing
operations
|
15
|
425
|
276
|
618
|
Net income from
continuing operations
|
10
|
261
|
170
|
380
|
Loss from
discontinued operations
|
(35)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Net income
(loss)
|
(25)
|
261
|
170
|
380
|
Net income from
continuing operations per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
-
|
.01
|
.01
|
.02
|
Diluted
|
-
|
.01
|
.01
|
.02
|
Net income per
common share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
-
|
.01
|
.01
|
.02
|
Diluted
|
-
|
.01
|
.01
|
.02
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
NOBLE ROMAN’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Indianapolis, Indiana
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
NOBLE ROMAN’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, as of December 31, 2016
and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of NOBLE ROMAN’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Somerset CPA’s, P.C.
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 27, 2017
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under
the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors,
management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and
procedures that:
(1)
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the Company;
(2)
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and
(3)
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of applicable limitations, there is a risk that material
misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by
internal control over financial reporting. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
The
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard
No. 5 defines a material weakness as a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely
basis. A deficiency in internal control over reporting exists when
the design or operation of a control does not allow management or
employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely
basis.
Our
management, including Paul W. Mobley, the Company’s Executive
Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer, and A. Scott
Mobley, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. Our
management has concluded that the Company’s internal controls
over financial reporting are effective.
There
have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting
during the period covered by this report that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the
Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding
internal control over financial reporting. Management’s
report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s
registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to
provide only management’s report in this annual
report.
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Based
on their evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, Paul W. Mobley, the Company’s Executive Chairman of
the Board and Chief Financial Officer, and A. Scott Mobley, the
company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, have
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) are effective.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Information
concerning this item is included under captions “Election of
Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance,” and “Corporate Governance”
in our Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
(the “2017 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information concerning this item is included under the captions
“Executive Compensation,” “Director
Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation” in the 2017 Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information
concerning this item is included in Item 5 of this report under the
caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and
under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management” in the 2017 Proxy Statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Information
concerning this item is included under the caption “Corporate
Governance” in the 2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information
concerning this item is included under the caption
“Independent Auditors’ Fees” in the 2017 Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM
15.
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following consolidated financial statements of Noble
Roman’s, Inc. and Subsidiaries are included in Item 8:
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2015 and
2016
|
28
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations - years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016
|
29
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity -
years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016
|
30
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - years ended December 31,
2014, 2015 and 2016
|
31
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
32
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm. – Somerset
CPAs, P.C.
|
47
|
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
3.1
|
Amended
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed as an exhibit to
the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to the Post Effective
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed July 1,
1985 (SEC File No.2-84150), is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant, as currently in effect,
filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed
December 23, 2009, is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
3.3
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
effective February 18, 1992 filed as an exhibit to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (SEC File
No. 33-66850), ordered effective on October 26, 1993, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
3.4
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
effective May 11, 2000, filed as Annex A and Annex B to the
Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 28,
2000, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
3.5
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
effective April 16, 2001 filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Registrant’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
3.6
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
effective August 23, 2005, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed August 29,
2005, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificates filed as an exhibit to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-18 filed
October 22, 1982 and ordered effective on December 14, 1982 (SEC
File No. 2-79963C), is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
4.2
|
Warrant to purchase
common stock, dated July 1, 2015, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August 11, 2015, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
Form of
warrant to purchase common stock, dated November 2, 2016 filed
herewith.
|
|
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement with Paul W. Mobley dated January 2, 1999 filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005, is incorporated herein by
reference.*
|
|
|
10.2
|
Employment
Agreement with A. Scott Mobley dated January 2, 1999 filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005, is incorporated herein by
reference.*
|
|
|
10.3
|
Credit
Agreement with BMO Harris Bank, N.A., dated May 25, 2012, filed as
Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form
10-Q filed on August 13, 2012, is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
10.4
|
First
Amendment to Credit Agreement with BMO Harris Bank, N.A. dated
October 31, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
10.5
|
Promissory
Note (Term Loan) with BMO Harris Bank, N.A. dated October 31, 2013,
filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
10.6
|
Promissory
Note (Term Loan II) with BMO Harris Bank, N.A. dated October 31,
2013, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
10.7
|
Second
Amendment to Credit Agreement with BMO Harris Bank, N.A. dated
October 15, 2014, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2015, is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
|
10.8
|
Promissory
Note with BMO Harris Bank, N.A. dated October 15, 2014, filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on March 12, 2015, is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10.9
|
Agreement
dated April 8, 2015, by and among Noble Roman’s, Inc. and the
shareholder parties, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s
Form 8-K filed on April 8, 2015, is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
10.10
|
Promissory Note
payable to Kingsway America, Inc., dated July 1, 2015, filed as
Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on August
11, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
10.11
|
Third Amendment to
Credit Agreement with BMO Harris Bank, N.A. dated January 22, 2016,
filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on
March 14, 2015. |
|
|
10.12
|
Promissory Note
payable to BMO Harris Bank, N.A., dated January 22, 2016, filed as
Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March
14, 2015. |
|
|
10.13
|
Promissory Note
payable to BMO Harris Bank, N.A., dated January 22, 2016, filed as
Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March
14, 2015. |
|
|
|
Promissory Note
payable to Paul W. Mobley, dated June 2016, filed
herewith. |
|
|
|
Promissory Note
payable to A. Scott Mobley, dated June 2016, filed
herewith. |
|
|
|
Form of convertible
promissory note dated November 2, 2016, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant, filed herewith. [NTD: Revise to include RH Roanoke,
Inc.]
|
|
|
|
C.E.O.
Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
|
|
|
C.F.O.
Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
C.E.O.
Certification under Section 1350 |
|
|
|
C.F.O.
Certification under Section 1350
|
|
|
101
|
Interactive
Financial Data
|
*
Identifies
an Exhibit that consists of or includes a management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
NOBLE
ROMAN’S, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 27,
2017
|
By:
|
/s/
A.
Scott Mobley
|
|
|
|
A. Scott
Mobley
|
|
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 27,
2017
|
By:
|
/s/
Paul W.
Mobley
|
|
|
|
Paul W.
Mobley
|
|
|
|
Executive
Chairman,
Chief
Financial Officer
and
Principal
Accounting Officer
|
|
In
accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
Date: March 27,
2017
|
|
/s/
Paul W.
Mobley
|
|
|
|
Paul W.
Mobley
|
|
|
|
Executive Chairman
of the Board,
Chief Financial
Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 27,
2017
|
|
/s/
A.
Scott Mobley
|
|
|
|
A. Scott
Mobley
|
|
|
|
President, Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 27,
2017
|
|
/s/
Douglas
H. Coape-Arnold
|
|
|
|
Douglas H.
Coape-Arnold
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 27,
2017
|
|
/s/
Marcel
Herbst
|
|
|
|
Marcel
Herbst
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
52