Unassociated Document
  UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-QSB
 
x    QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

o   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
 
Commission File Number 0-32353

ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)
 
Delaware
 
84-1475642
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
 
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
1180 Avenue of the Americas, 19 th  Floor, New York, NY
 
10036
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)

(646) 214-0700
(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registration is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of November 13, 2006, there were 15,264,248 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $.001 par value per share, outstanding.

Traditional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o  No x
 

 
Index

 
 
 
 
Page
PART I
 
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance Sheets September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005
 
3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) and for the period from inception (September 9, 2003) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) and for the period from inception (September 9, 2003) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Changes in Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the period from inception (September 9, 2003) to December 31, 2003
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
 
17
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
Controls and Procedures
 
24
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II   
 
OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
Legal Proceedings
 
25
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
25
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
Defaults Under Senior Securities
 
25
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
25
 
 
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
Other Information
 
26
 
 
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
Exhibits
 
26
         
 
 
Signatures
 
27
         
 
 
Exhibit Index
 
28


  
ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Balance Sheets

   
September 30, 2006
 
December 31, 2005
 
   
(Unaudited)
     
ASSETS
             
Current assets:
             
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
32,962,230
 
$
8,880,717
 
Short-term investments
   
1,536,357
   
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
314,785
   
211,837
 
Total current assets
   
34,813,372
   
9,092,554
 
               
Property and equipment, net
   
294,982
   
269,702
 
               
Deposits
   
9,367
   
5,700
 
Other non current assets
   
177,219
   
124,343
 
Total assets
 
$
35,294,940
 
$
9,492,299
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
             
Current liabilities:
             
Accounts payable
 
$
1,143,777
 
$
835,997
 
Accrued expenses
   
2,136,961
   
1,418,819
 
Total current liabilities
   
3,280,738
   
2,254,816
 
Deferred rent
   
39,972
   
35,557
 
Commitments and contingencies
             
Stockholders' equity:
             
Common stock, $.001 par value; 280,000,000 shares authorized;
             
15,264,248 and 7,247,992 shares issued and outstanding
             
at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
   
15,264
   
7,248
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
59,361,574
   
22,559,034
 
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
   
(27,402,608
)
 
(15,364,356
)
Total stockholders' equity
   
31,974,230
   
7,201,926
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
35,294,940
 
$
9,492,299
 

3

 
ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Statements of Operation (unaudited)
 
 
 
For the three
months ended September 30,
2006
 
For the three
months ended September 30,
2005
 
For the nine
months ended September 30,
2006
 
For the nine
months ended September 30,
2005
 
From
Inception
(Sept. 9, 2003)
through
September 30,
2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research contract revenue
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
 
                     
Operating expenses and other income:
                     
Research and development
   
2,097,617
   
1,318,608
   
6,545,986
   
4,279,687
   
14,266,443
 
General and administrative
   
1,832,361
   
1,541,740
   
6,345,450
   
2,953,830
   
14,281,596
 
Total operating expenses
   
3,929,978
   
2,860,348
   
12,891,436
   
7,233,517
   
28,548,039
 
 
                     
Loss from operations
   
(3,929,978
)
 
(2,860,348
)
 
(12,891,436
)
 
(7,233,517
)
 
(28,548,039
)
 
                     
Interest income
   
475,476
   
94,231
   
853,184
   
177,710
   
1,145,431
 
Net loss
 
$
(3,454,502
)
$
(2,766,117
)
$
(12,038,252
)
$
(7,055,807
)
$
(27,402,608
)
 
                     
 
                     
Basic and diluted net loss per share
 
$
(0.23
)
$
(0.77
)
$
(1.03
)
$
(2.32
)
   
 
                     
Weighted average common shares
                     
outstanding used to compute basic
                     
and diluted net loss per share share
   
15,264,368
   
3,593,109
   
11,662,722
   
3,041,829
     

4


ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Statements of Cash Flows

 
 
For the nine months
ended
September 30, 2006
 
For the nine months
ended
September 30, 2005
 
For the Period
from
Inception
(Sept. 9, 2003)
through
September 30, 2006
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
             
Net loss
 
$
(12,038,252
)
$
(7,055,807
)
$
(27,402,608
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
             
Depreciation and amortization
   
117,155
   
72,519
   
252,340
 
Non-cash stock-based compensation
   
2,530,436
   
   
3,332,307
 
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
   
(1,165
)
 
   
(1,165
)
Change in operating assets and liabilites:
             
(Increase) decrease in:
             
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
(102,948
)
 
(92,245
)
 
(314,785
)
Other noncurrent assets
   
(52,876
)
 
(92,812
)
 
(177,219
)
Deposits
   
(3,667
)
 
24,014
   
(9,367
)
Increase (decrease) in:
             
Accounts payable
   
307,780
   
(232,558
)
 
1,143,777
 
Accrued expenses
   
718,142
   
391,248
   
2,136,961
 
Deferred rent
   
4,415
   
   
39,972
 
Net cash used in operating activities
   
(8,520,980
)
 
(6,985,641
)
 
(20,999,787
)
 
             
Cash flows from investing activities:
             
Purchases of property and equipment
   
(141,270
)
 
(64,648
)
 
(546,157
)
Increase in short-term investments
   
(1,536,357
)
 
   
(1,536,357
)
Net cash used in investing activities
   
(1,677,627
)
 
(64,648
)
 
(2,082,514
)
 
             
Cash flows from financing activities:
             
Stockholders' capital contribution
   
   
   
500,000
 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net
   
34,280,120
   
4,676
   
38,784,935
 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net
   
   
16,759,596
   
16,759,596
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
34,280,120
   
16,764,272
   
56,044,531
 
 
             
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
   
24,081,513
   
9,713,983
   
32,962,230
 
 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
   
8,880,717
   
1,026,656
   
 
 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
32,962,230
 
$
10,740,639
 
$
32,962,230
 
 
             
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:
             
Cash paid for interest
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
 
             
Cash paid for income taxes
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
 
             
Supplementary disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
             
Warrants issued to placement agents and investors, in connection with
             
with private placement
 
$
13,092,561
 
$
 
$
13,092,561
 
Warrants issued to placement agent, in connection
             
with preferred stock issuance
 
$
 
$
1,682,863
 
$
1,682,863
 
                     
Preferred stock conversion to common stock  
$
 
$
16,759,596
 
$
16,759,596
 

5


ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Statement of Changes in Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited), For the Year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and
For the Period from Inception (September 9, 2003) to December 31, 2003
 

   
Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants
 
Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)
 
   
Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock
 
Warrants to Purchase
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Warrants
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Additional Paid-
in Capital
 
Deficit Accumulated
During The
Development Stage
 
Total
Stockholders' Equity/(Deficit)
 
Stockholders' contribution,
                                                 
September 9, 2003
   
 
$
 
$
   
250,487
 
$
250.00
 
$
499,750.00
 
$
 
$
500,000.00
 
Net loss
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
(160,136
)
 
(160,136
)
Balance at December 31, 2003 (audited)
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
250,487
   
250
   
499,750
   
(160,136
)
 
339,864
 
Issuance of common stock
   
   
   
   
2,254,389
   
2,254
   
4,497,746
   
   
4,500,000
 
Issuance of common stock for services
                     
256,749
   
257
   
438,582
   
   
438,839
 
Fair value of options/warrants
                                                 
issued for nonemployee services
   
   
   
   
   
   
264,277
   
   
264,277
 
Net loss
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
(5,687,297
)
 
(5,687,297
)
                                                   
Balance at December 31, 2004 (audited)
   
   
   
   
2,761,625
   
2,761
   
5,700,355
   
(5,847,433
)
 
(144,317
)
                                                 
Issuance of Series A convertible preferred
                                                 
stock (net of expenses of $1,340,263 and
                                                 
warrant cost of $1,682,863)
   
4,197,946
   
15,076,733
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
                                                   
Fair value of warrants to purchase Series
                                                 
A convertible preferred stock
   
   
   
1,682,863
   
   
   
   
   
 
Issuance of Common stock to EasyWeb
                                                 
Shareholders
   
   
   
   
189,922
   
190
   
(190
)
 
   
 
Conversion of Series A convertible
                                                 
preferred stock @ $0.001 into $0.001
                                                 
common stock on September 13, 2005
                                                 
at an exchange ratio of .500974
   
(4,197,946
)
 
(15,076,733
)
 
(1,682,863
)
 
4,197,823
   
4,198
   
16,755,398
   
   
16,759,596
 
Issuance of common stock for options
   
   
   
   
98,622
   
99
   
4,716
   
   
4,815
 
Fair value of options/warrants issued for
                                                 
nonemployee services
   
   
   
   
   
   
98,755
   
   
98,755
 
Net loss
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
(9,516,923
)
 
(9,516,923
)
                                                   
Balance at December 31, 2005 (audited)
   
   
   
   
7,247,992
   
7,248
   
22,559,034
   
(15,364,356
)
 
7,201,926
 
                                                   
Issuance of common stock in private
                                                 
placement, net of expenses $2,719,395
   
   
   
   
7,991,256
   
7,991
   
21,179,568
   
   
21,187,559
 
Issuance of warrants
   
   
   
   
   
   
13,092,561
   
   
13,092,561
 
Issuance of common stock for
                                                 
services rendered
   
   
   
   
25,000
   
25
   
106,225
   
   
106,250
 
Stock based compensation for
                                                 
employees
   
   
   
   
   
   
2,424,186
   
   
2,424,186
 
Net loss
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
(12,038,252
)
 
(12,038,252
)
                                                   
Balance at September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
   
 
$
 
$
   
15,264,248
 
$
15,264
 
$
59,361,574
 
$
(27,402,608
)
$
31,974,230
 

6

 
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS….  CONTINUED

ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
 
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPERATIONS
 
The financial statements included herein have been prepared by ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. (“ZIOPHARM” or the “Company”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. The unaudited financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.’s Form 10-KSB filed on March 20, 2006 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

ZIOPHARM is a development stage biopharmaceutical company that seeks to acquire, develop and commercialize, on its own or with other commercial partners, products for the treatment of important unmet medical needs in cancer.

The Company has operated at a loss since its inception in 2003 and has no revenues. The Company anticipates that losses will continue for the foreseeable future. At September 30, 2006, the Company’s accumulated deficit was approximately $27.4 million. The Company’s ability to continue operations after its current cash resources are exhausted depends on its ability to obtain additional financing and achieve profitable operations, as to which no assurances can be given. Cash requirements may vary materially from those now planned because of changes in the focus and direction of our research and development programs, competitive and technical advances, patent developments or other developments. Additional financing will be required to continue operations after we exhaust our current cash resources and to continue our long-term plans for clinical trials and new product development.

On May 3, 2006, pursuant to Subscription Agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) between the Company and certain institutional and other accredited investors, the Company completed the sale of an aggregate of 7,991,256 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock at a price of $4.63 per Share in a private placement (the “2006 Offering”). In addition to the Shares, the Company also issued to each investor a five-year warrant (each a “Warrant”) to purchase, at an exercise price of $5.56 per share, an additional number of shares of common stock equal to 30 percent of the Shares purchased by such investor in the 2006 Offering. In the aggregate, these Warrants entitle investors to purchase an additional 2,397,392 shares of common stock. The Company estimated the fair value of these warrants at $9,575,958 using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 5.01% and an expected life of 5 years, volatility of 100% and a dividend yield of 0%. The total gross proceeds resulting from the 2006 Offering was approximately $37 million, before deducting selling commissions and expenses. Following the completion of 2006 Offering, the Company has 15,264,248 shares of common stock outstanding.

The Company engaged Paramount BioCapital, Inc. (“Paramount”) and Griffin Securities, Inc. (together,  the “Placement Agents”) as co-placement agents in connection with the 2006 Offering. In consideration for their services, the Company paid the Placement Agents and certain selected dealers engaged by the Placement Agents and their designees aggregate cash commissions of $2,589,966 (of which $1,726,644 was paid to Paramount; see Note 4 - Related Party Transactions) and issued 7-year warrants to the Placement Agents and their designees to purchase an aggregate of 799,126 shares of the Company’s common stock (10 percent of the Shares sold in the 2006 Offering) at an exercise price of $5.09 per share (the “Placement Agent Warrants”). The Company estimated the fair value of these warrants at $3,516,603 using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 5.01% and an expected life of 7 years, volatility of 100% and a dividend yield of 0%. The Company made reimbursements of $100,000 to the Placement Agents for their accountable expenses incurred in connection with the 2006 Offering.

Pursuant to the Offering, the Company agreed to use its best efforts to (i) file a registration statement covering the resale of the Shares and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and Placement Agent Warrants within 30 days following the closing date of the 2006 Offering, and (ii) use its reasonable commercial efforts to cause the registration statement to be effective within 120 days after such final closing date.

7

 
With respect to each investor in the 2006 Offering, the Company also agreed to use its reasonable commercial efforts to cause the registration statement to remain effective until the earliest of (i) the date on which the investor may sell all of the Shares and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants then held by the investor pursuant to Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act of 1933 without regard to volume restrictions; and (ii) such time as all of the securities held by the investor and registered under the Registration Statement have been sold pursuant to a registration statement, or in a transaction exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 under Section 4(1) thereof so that all transfer restrictions and restrictive legends are removed upon the consummation of such sale. The Placement Agents have been afforded equivalent registration rights as the investors in the 2006 Offering with respect to the shares issuable upon exercise of the Placement Agent Warrants. On May 19, 2006, the Company filed a registration statement on form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The registration statement was declared effective on May 30, 2006, rendering the resale of the shares issued in the May 3, 2006 Offering registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933.

On August 3, 2005 the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 3, 2005 (the “Merger Agreement”) with EasyWeb, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“EasyWeb”), and ZIO Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of EasyWeb (“ZIO Acquisition”). EasyWeb was a company that was incorporated in September 1998 and had been in the business of designing, marketing, selling and maintaining customized and template turnkey sites on the Internet that are hosted by third parties. At the time of the Merger (as defined below), however, EasyWeb had no operating business and had limited assets and liabilities. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, ZIO Acquisition merged with and into ZIOPHARM, with ZIOPHARM remaining as the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EasyWeb (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, which was effective as of September 13, 2005, ZIO Acquisition ceased to exist and the surviving company changed its corporate name to ZIOPHARM, Inc. Based upon an Exchange Ratio, as defined in the Merger Agreement, in exchange for all of their shares of capital stock in ZIOPHARM, the ZIOPHARM Stockholders received a number of shares of Common Stock of EasyWeb such that, upon completion of the Merger, the then-current ZIOPHARM Stockholders held approximately 96.8% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of EasyWeb on a fully-diluted basis. Upon completion of the Merger, EasyWeb ceased all of its remaining operations and adopted and continued implementing the business plan of ZIOPHARM. Further, effective upon the Merger, the then current officers and directors of EasyWeb resigned, and the then current officers and directors of ZIOPHARM were appointed officers and directors of EasyWeb and EasyWeb changed its name to ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. In conjunction with the Merger, ZIOPHARM made payments of approximately $425,000 in September 2005 to certain affiliates of EasyWeb. Subsequently, on September 14, 2005 ZIOPHARM merged with and into EasyWeb and EasyWeb changed its name to ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.

8


Although EasyWeb was the legal acquirer in the transaction, ZIOPHARM became the registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, whereby ZIOPHARM was considered the acquirer of EasyWeb for financial reporting purposes because ZIOPHARM’s stockholders controlled more than 50% of the post-transaction combined entity, the management and the board were that of ZIOPHARM after the transaction, EasyWeb had no operating activity and limited assets and liabilities as of the transaction date, and the continuing operations of the entity are those of ZIOPHARM.

Accordingly, the equity of EasyWeb has been adjusted to reflect a recapitalization of the stock and the equity of ZIOPHARM has been adjusted to reflect a financing transaction with the proceeds equal to the net asset value of EasyWeb immediately prior to the Merger. The historical financial statements of ZIOPHARM have become the historical financial statements of the Company. The historical stockholders’ equity has been retroactively restated to adjust for the exchange of shares pursuant to the Merger Agreement. All share and per share information included in the accompanying financial statements and notes give effect to the exchange, except as otherwise stated.

    On June 6, 2005, the Company completed an offering (the “2005 Offering”) of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”). The Company issued 4,197,944 shares at $4.31 for gross proceeds of approximately $18.1 million. In connection with the 2005 Offering, the Company compensated Paramount, which served as placement agent for the 2005 Offering, or its affiliates for its services through the payment of (a) cash commissions equal to 7% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and (b) placement warrants to acquire 419,794 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Stock Warrants”), exercisable for a period of 7 years from the Closing Date at a per share exercise price equal to 110% of the price per Share sold in the 2005 Offering. These commissions are also payable on additional sales by the Company of securities (other than in a public offering) to investors introduced to the Company by Paramount during the twelve (12) month period subsequent to the final closing of the 2005 Offering. The Company also paid Paramount an expense allowance of $50,000 to reimburse Paramount for its out-of-pocket expenses. Also, for a period of 36 months from the final closing of the Offering, Paramount has the right of first refusal to act as the placement agent for any private sale of the Company’s securities. Lastly, the Company has agreed to indemnify Paramount against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

9

 
The Company has valued the Series A Stock Warrants using the Black-Scholes model recording a cost of $1,682,863. The Company has estimated the fair value of such warrants using the Black-Scholes model, using and assumed risk-free rate of 3.93% and expected life of 7 years, volatility of 134% and dividend yield of 0%.

The results disclosed in the Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
 
2.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
             
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (“SFAS 123R”) Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method, which results in the provision of SFAS 123R only being applied to the consolidated financial statements on a going-forward basis (that is, the prior period results have not been restated). Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award using the Black Scholes Model and is recognized as expense over the service period. Previously, the Company had followed Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations which resulted in account for employee share options at their intrinsic value in the financial statements.

The Company recognized the full impact of its share-based payment plans in the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 under SFAS 123R and did not capitalize any such costs on the balance sheets. The following table presents share-based compensation expense included in the Company’s statement of operations:

 
 
Three months
ended September 30, 2006
 
Nine months
ended September 30, 2006
 
           
Research and development, including costs of research contracts
 
$
101,928
 
$
266,174
 
General and administrative
   
228,535
   
2,158,012
 
Share based compensation expense before tax
   
330,463
   
2,424,186
 
Income tax benefit
   
   
 
Net compensation expense
 
$
330,463
 
$
2,424,186
 

10

 
Stock Based Compensation… continued
 
The adoption of SFAS 123R resulted in incremental stock-based compensation expense of $330,463 and $2,424,186 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 respectively, which caused the Company’s net loss to increase by $330,463 and $2,424,186 and its net loss per share to increase by $0.03 and $0.21 per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The adoption had no impact on cash used in operating activities or cash provided by financing activities.

The Company had previously adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), as amended by  SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, through disclosure only. SFAS 123 required the measurement of the fair value of stock option or warrants granted to employees to be included in the statement of operations or alternatively, disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. The Company previously accounted for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related interpretations, and had elected the disclosure only alternative under SFAS 123. All stock-based awards to nonemployees were accounted for at their fair value in accordance with SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services . The Company had recorded the fair value of each stock option issued to non-employees as determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
 
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock based awards for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005:

 
 
Three months
ended September 30, 2005
 
Nine months
ended September 30, 2005
 
Net loss:
 
$
(2,766,117
)
$
(7,055,807
)
As reported
             
Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss
   
   
 
Stock-based compensation expense under the fair value-based method
   
(176,297
)
 
(340,197
)
Pro forma net loss
 
$
(2,942,414
)
$
(7,396,004
)
               
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
             
As reported
 
$
(0.77
)
$
(2.32
)
Pro forma
 
$
(0.82
)
$
(2.43
)


11

 
3.
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
On December 31, 2005 the Company has authorized capital of 280,000,000 shares which has been designated as Common Stock. On April 26, 2006, the date of the Company’s annual stockholders meeting, the shareholders approved the adoption of an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation pursuant to which the Company has 280,000,000 shares of authorized capital stock, of which 250,000,000 shares are designated as common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), and 30,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, par value $.001 per share ( the “ Preferred Stock”).

Common Stock of ZIOPHARM, Inc.

In September 2003, the Company issued 2,000,000 (before the split discussed below and pre-Merger) shares of Common Stock at $0.25 per share for gross proceeds of $500,000.

In January 2004, the Company issued 18,000,000 (before the split discussed below and pre-Merger) shares of Common Stock at $0.25 per share for gross proceeds of $4,500,000.

In February 2004, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to provide for the combination of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share on a 1-for-4 basis (all other share amounts presented reflect the reverse split).

On June 6, 2005, the Company completed the 2005 Offering (see Note 1). As a result of the Merger, all shares of the Series A Preferred Stock were automatically converted into the number of shares of Common Stock that the holders of Series A Preferred Stock would have received if their shares of Series A Preferred Stock had been converted into Common Stock immediately prior to the Merger.

As discussed in Note 1, on May 3, 2006, pursuant to Subscription Agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) between the Company and certain institutional and other accredited investors, the Company completed the sale of an aggregate of 7,991,256 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock at a price of $4.63 per Share in a private placement (the “2006 Offering”). The total gross proceeds resulting from the 2006 Offering was approximately $37 million, before deducting selling commissions and expenses. Following the completion of the 2006 Offering, the Company has 15,264,248 shares of common stock outstanding.

Convertible Preferred Stock of ZIOPHARM, Inc.

Voting Rights

The holders of Series A Preferred Stock would have been entitled to vote together with all other holders of the Company’s voting stock on an “as-converted” basis on all matters submitted to a vote of holders generally. The holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting as a separate class, would also have had the right to approve by a 66% supermajority certain actions proposed to be taken by the Company.

Dividend Rights

The holders of Series A Preferred Stock had been entitled to receive dividends on an equal basis with the holders of Common Stock when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors.
 
12

 
Convertible Preferred Stock of  Stockholders' Equity... continued
 
Liquidation Preferences

The Series A Preferred Stock would have rank senior to the Common Stock and any future class of junior securities, and would have been entitled to a liquidation preference equal to the Stated Value, subject to adjustment (as defined in the Certificate of Designations for the Series A Preferred Stock), upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company or upon a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy of the Company.  

Conversion Rights

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock would have been convertible into Common Stock at any time at the option of the holder thereof (the Series A Preferred Stock and the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock are sometimes herein collectively referred to as the “Securities”). All of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock would have automatically convert into Common Stock upon the first date (the “Trading Date”) on which the Common Stock (or securities received in exchange for Common Stock) trades on a national securities exchange or on NASDAQ, including the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (a “Trading Event”). The rate at which shares of Series A Preferred Stock will convert into Common Stock will initially be one-for-one, subject to adjustment in connection with certain anti-dilution protections and other adjustments.
 
4.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
The Company had engaged Paramount to assist in placing shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the 2005 Offering on a “best efforts” basis. Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D. is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Paramount. Dr. Rosenwald is also the managing member of Horizon BioMedical Ventures, LLC (“Horizon”). On December 30, 2004, Horizon authorized the distribution of 2,428,910 shares of Common Stock (such shares, the “Horizon Distributed Shares”), in equal installments of 1,214,455 shares of Common Stock, to Mibars, LLC (“Mibars”) and to Dr. Rosenwald and his designees (the “Designated Shares”). The disposition of the Designated Shares will be subject to certain restrictions as agreed to among Dr. Rosenwald and Dr. Rosenwald’s designees. Among other things, under certain circumstances set forth in pledge agreements between Dr. Rosenwald and his designees, Dr. Rosenwald has the right to re-acquire the Designated Shares from his designees. As a result of those rights, Dr. Rosenwald may be deemed to be an affiliate of the Company.


13

 
Related Party Transactions... continued
 
In connection with the December 22, 2004 Option Agreement with Southern Research Institute (“SRI”), the Company entered into a Finders Agreement, dated December 23, 2004, with Paramount pursuant to which the Company had agreed to compensate Paramount, for services in connection with the Company’s introduction to SRI through the payment of (a) a cash fee of $60,000 and (b) warrants to purchase 62,621 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price equal to $4.75 per share. The Company has estimated the fair value of such warrants using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 3.93%, and expected life of 7 years, volatility of 134% and dividend yield of 0%. In December 2004, the Company expensed the $60,000 that was payable to Paramount and recognized compensation expense in the amount of $251,037 for the issuance of the warrants.

In connection with the 2005 Offering, the Company and Paramount entered into an Introduction Agreement in January 2005 (the “Introduction Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to compensate Paramount for its services in connection with the 2005 Offering through the payment of (a) cash commissions equal to 7% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and (b) placement warrants to acquire a number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock equal to 10% of the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued in the 2005 Offering, exercisable for a period of 7 years from the Closing Date at a per Share exercise price equal to 110% of the price per Share sold in the 2005 Offering. These commissions are also payable on additional sales by the Company of securities (other than in a public offering) to investors introduced to the Company by Paramount during the twelve (12) month period subsequent to the final closing of the 2005 Offering. The Company also agreed to pay to Paramount a non-accountable expense allowance of $50,000 to reimburse the Paramount for its out-of-pocket expenses. Also, for a period of 36 months from the final closing of the 2005 Offering, Paramount has the right of first refusal to act as the placement agent for the private sale of the Company’s securities. Lastly, the Company has agreed to indemnify Paramount against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

In connection with the 2006 Offering, on May 3, 2006, the Company paid Paramount a cash commissions equal to 7% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the Shares sold by Paramount in the 2006 Offering, resulting in a cash payment of approximately $1,726,644. In addition, the Company issued 7-year warrants to the Placement Agents and their designees to purchase an aggregate of 799,126 shares (10 percent of the Shares sold in the Offering) of the Company’s common stock, of which 532,750 at an exercise price of $5.09 per share (the “Placement Agent Warrants”).

Dr. Michael Weiser and Mr. Timothy McInerney, who are both members of the Board of Directors of the Company, are also full-time employees of Paramount .
 
5.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
 
The Company has adopted the 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), under which the Company had reserved for the issuance of 1,252,436 shares of its Common Stock as of September 30, 2006. The Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders on December 21, 2004. On April 26, 2006, the date of the Company’s annual stockholders meeting, the shareholders approved an amendment to the Plan increasing the total shares reserved by 750,000 shares, for a total of 2,002,436 shares.

As of September 30, 2006, there were 1,656,630 shares that are issuable under its 2003 Stock Option Plan upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase Common Stock. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had issued to our employees outstanding options to purchase up to 1,476,206 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In addition, the Company has issued to our directors options to purchase up to 180,174 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, as well as options to a consultant in connection with services rendered to purchase up to 250 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company had estimated the fair value of the options issued to the consultant using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 4.23%, and expected life of 10 years, volatility of 134% and dividend yield of 0%. The options issued to the consultant were valued at $1,050, and recorded as a charge to compensation expense in December 2004.
 
14

 
Stock Option Plan... continued
 
Currently, stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the day before the date of grant. Stock options to employees generally vest ratably over three years and have contractual terms of ten years. Stock options to directors generally vest ratably over two years and have contractual terms of ten years. Stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation method and compensation is recognized based on such fair value over the period of vesting on a straight-line basis. The Company has also reserved an aggregate of 70,934 additional shares for issuance under options granted outside of the 2003 Stock Option Plan.

During three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company granted 68,750 and 705,930 options, respectively. Also during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 the Company cancelled 22,939 and no options, respectively while no options were exercised, under the 2003 Stock Option plan, in this period. In addition, 91.718 shares were exercised in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Proceeds from the 2005 exercises amounted to $4,676 and the intrinsic value of these options amounted to $286,119. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Assumptions regarding volatility, expected term, dividend yield and risk-free interest rate are required for the Black-Scholes model. Volatility and expected term assumptions are based on comparable Company’s historical experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on a U.S. treasury note with a maturity similar to the option award’s expected life. The assumptions are as follows, for volatility is 101%, expected life of approximately 5 years, a dividend yield of 0% and a risk-free interest rate of 5.01%.
 
Stock option activity under the Company’s stock plan for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 was as follows:

 
 
Number of Shares
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Term (Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
Outstanding, January 1, 2006
   
973,639
  $
2.56
         
Granted
   
705,930
   
5.02
         
Exercised
   
   
         
Canceled
   
22,939
   
4.19
         
Outstanding, September 30, 2006
   
1,656,630
  $
3.56
   
8.76
  $
2,679,983
 
Options exercisable, September 30, 2006
   
942,097
  $
3.43
   
8.68
  $
1,622,360
 
 
Stock options granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, had weighted average grant date fair values of $3.89 and $1.98, respectively. At September 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock options outstanding amounted to $1,445,000. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.26 years.
 
15

 
6.
WARRANTS
 
The Company issued warrants to purchase 62,621 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to Paramount as compensation for services rendered in connection with our entering into an option agreement with Southern Research Institute. In connection with the warrants issued, the Company recorded a charge of $251,037 to general and administrative expense. The Company has estimated the fair value of such warrants using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 3.93%, and expected life of 7 years, volatility of 134% and dividend yield of 0%.

In 2005, the Company also issued performance warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for services to be rendered to its investor relations consultant as compensation. In connection with the warrant issuance, 12,500 shares are exercisable immediately and the Company recorded a charge of $44,640 to general and administrative expense in the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company had estimated the fair value of such warrants using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 4.39%, and expected life of 5 years, volatility of 109% and dividend yield of 0%. The remaining warrants vest in increments of 12,500, 12,500 and 12,500 based on certain performance objectives.

As discussed in Note 1, in connection with the 2005 Offering, the Company compensated Paramount, the placement agent for the 2005 Offering, or its affiliates for its services through the payment of placement warrants to acquire 419,794 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Stock Warrants”), exercisable for a period of 7 years from the closing date of the 2005 Offering at a per share exercise price equal to 110% of the price per share sold in the 2005 Offering. The Company valued the Series A Stock Warrants using the Black-Scholes model and recorded a charge of $1,682,863 against additional paid-in capital. The Company had estimated the fair value of the Series A Stock Warrants using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 3.93% and expected life of 7 years, volatility of 134% and dividend yield of 0%. 
 
As discussed in Note 1, on May 3, 2006, as part of the 2006 Offering, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,397,392 shares of common stock to investors and 799,126 warrants to purchase common stock to the Placement Agents and their designees. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants at $9,575,958 and $3,516,603, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model, using an assumed risk-free rate of 5.01% and an expected life of 5 and 7 years, volatility of 100% and a dividend yield of 0%. The fair value of the warrants was recorded as a permanent component of shareholder’s equity.

7.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On November 3, 2006, the Company signed a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement and License Agreement to acquire indibulin from affiliates of Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Indibulin, referred to by the Company as ZIO-301, is a novel anti-cancer agent that binds to tubulin, one of the essential proteins for chromosomal segregation, and targets mitosis like the taxanes and Vinca alkaloids. It is available as both an oral and a proprietary nanosuspension intravenous form. Molecules that target mitosis and inhibit cell division (antimitotic agents) are a major focus of cancer research and they are amoung the most widely used anti-cancer drugs in oncology today. Among the more well known antimitotic drugs are the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) and the Vinca alkaloids (vincristine, vinblastine). The terms of the agreement include an upfront cash payment of approximately $1.25 million with follow-on milestone cash payments that could amount to just over $7 million in the aggregate and royalties on net sales typical of a product at this stage of development. The purchase price includes the entire indibulin intellectual property portfolio as well as existing drug substance and capsule inventories.
 
16


Item 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
       
         This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB contains statements that are not historical, but are forward-looking in nature, including statements regarding the expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In particular, the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” section in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. We use words such as we “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” and “intend” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. A number of important factors could, individually or in the aggregate, cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, our ability to successfully develop or commercialize our product candidates, our ability to obtain additional financing, our ability to develop and maintain customer relationships, regulatory developments relating to and the general success of our customers’ products, and our ability to protect our proprietary technology. Other risks are described under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Current Report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 20, 2006.

Overview:

ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that is seeking to develop and commercialize a diverse, risk-sensitive portfolio of in-licensed cancer drugs that address unmet medical needs. Our principal focus is on the licensing and development of proprietary drug candidate families that are related to cancer therapeutics that are already on the market or in development. We believe this strategy will result in lower risk and expedited drug development programs. We expect to commercialize our products on our own in North America but recognize that promising clinical trial results in cancers with a high incidence and prevalence might also be addressed in a commercial partnership with another company with the requisite financial resources. Currently, we are in U.S. phase I and I/II studies for two product candidates known as ZIO-101 and ZIO-201:
 
 
·
ZIO-101 is an organic arsenic compound covered by issued U.S. patents and applications internationally. A form of commercially available inorganic arsenic (arsenic trioxide (Trisenox®) or ATO) has been approved for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a precancerous condition, and is on the compendia listing for the therapy of multiple myeloma as well as having been studied for the treatment of various other cancers. Nevertheless, ATO has been shown to be toxic to the heart, liver, and brain, limiting its use as an anti-cancer agent. Inorganic arsenic has also been shown to cause cancer of the skin and lung in humans. The toxicity of arsenic generally is correlated to its accumulation in organs and tissues. Our preclinical and phase I clinical studies to date have demonstrated that ZIO-101 (and organic arsenic in general) is considerably less toxic than inorganic arsenic, particularly with regard to heart toxicity. In vitro testing of ZIO-101 using the National Cancer Institute’s human cancer cell panel detected activity against lung, colon, brain, melanoma, ovarian and kidney cancer. Moderate activity was detected against breast and prostate cancer. In addition to solid tumors, in vitro testing in both the National Cancer Institute’s cancer cell panel and in vivo testing in a leukemia animal model demonstrated substantial activity against hematological cancers (cancers of the blood and blood-forming tissues) such as leukemia, lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndromes and multiple myeloma.
 
17

 
 
 
Phase I testing of the intravenous (IV) form of ZIO-101 is ongoing with two safety and dose finding studies. The Company has seen encouraging signs of clinical activity in both of these studies.. The Company has progressed an ongoing phase I/II study in advanced multiple myeloma designed to determine maximum tolerated dose and to assess clinical activity in this specific indication. The Company expects to pursue registration in the U.S. for the treatment of advanced multiple myeloma with a potentially pivotal trial to begin in late 2007. The Company also expects to initiate additional phase II studies in other hematological and solid tumor cancers while also exploring different dosing schedules and to file a U.S. Investigational New Drug Application for the clinical study of an oral form of ZIO-101.
 
 
·
ZIO-201, or isophosphoramide mustard (IPM), is a proprietary stabilized metabolite of ifosfamide that is also related to cyclophosphamide. A patent application for pharmaceutical composition has been filed. Cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are alkylating agents. The Company believes cyclophosphamide is the most widely used alkylating agent in cancer therapy and is used to treat breast cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ifosfamide has been shown to be effective in high dose by itself, or in combination in treating sarcoma and lymphoma. Although ifosfamide-based treatment generally represents the standard of care for sarcoma, it is not licensed for this indication by the Food and Drug Administration. Our preclinical studies have shown that, in animal and laboratory models, IPM evidences activity against leukemia and solid tumors. These studies also indicate that ZIO-201 has a better pharmacokinetic and safety profile than ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, offering the possibility of safer and more efficacious therapy with ZIO-201. Ifosfamide is metabolized to IPM. In addition to IPM, another metabolite of ifosfamide is acrolein, which is toxic to the kidneys and bladder. The presence of acrolein can mandate the administration of a protective agent called mesna, which is inconvenient and expensive. Chloroacetaldehyde is another metabolite of ifosfamide and is toxic to the central nervous system, causing “fuzzy brain” syndrome for which there is currently no protective measure. Similar toxicity concerns pertain to high-dose cyclophosphamide, which is widely used in bone marrow and blood cell transplantation. Because ZIO-201 is independently active without acrolein or chloroacetaldehyde metabolites, the Company believes that the administration of ZIO-201 may avoid many of the toxicities of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide without compromising efficacy. In addition to anticipated lower toxicity, ZIO-201 (and without the co-administration of mesna) may have other advantages over ifosfamide. In preclinical studies ZIO-201 likely cross-links DNA differently than ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide metabolites, resulting in a different activity profile. Moreover, in some instances ZIO-201 appears to show activity in ifosfamide- and/or cyclophosphamide-resistant cancer cells.
 
 
 
 
 
Phase I testing of the IV form of ZIO-201 is ongoing at two sites in the U.S. IPM has been administered without the “uroprotectant” mesna and the toxicities associated with acrolein and chloroacetaldehyde have not been observed. Electrolyte inbalances seen with ifosfamide have occurred in the higher dose cohorts. The Company has seen encouraging signs of clinical activity in the phase I study. The Company initiated a phase I/II trial in advanced sarcoma designed to determine maximum tolerated dose and to assess clinical activity in this specific indication. The Company expects to pursue registration in the U.S. for the treatment of advanced sarcoma with a potentialy pivotal trial to begin in late 2007. The Company also expects to initiate additional phase II studies in other cancers and using different dosing schedules and routes of administration and to file a U.S. Investigational New Drug Application for an oral form of ZIO-201.
 
18

 
Although we intend to continue with clinical development of ZIO-101 for advanced myeloma and ZIO-201 for advanced sarcoma, the successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. Product development costs and timelines can vary significantly for each product candidate and are difficult to accurately predict. Various statutes and regulations also govern or influence the manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping and marketing of each product. The lengthy process of seeking these approvals, and the subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial resources. Any failure by us to obtain, or any delay in obtaining, regulatory approvals could materially adversely affect our business. To date, we have not received approval for the sale of any drug candidates in any market and, therefore, have not generated any revenues from our drug candidates.
 
On November 3, 2006, the Company signed a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement and License Agreement to acquire indibulin from affiliates of Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Indibulin, referred to by the Company as ZIO-301, is a novel anti-cancer agent that binds to tubulin, one of the essential proteins for chromosomal segregation, and targets mitosis like the taxanes and Vinca alkaloids. It is available as both an oral and a proprietary nanosuspension intravenous form. Molecules that target mitosis and inhibit cell division (antimitotic agents) are a major focus of cancer research and they are amoung the most widely used anti-cancer drugs in oncology today. Among the more well known antimitotic drugs are the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) and the Vinca alkaloids (vincristine, vinblastine). The terms of the agreement include an upfront cash payment of approximately $1.25 million with follow-on milestone cash payments that could amount to just over $7 million in the aggregate and royalties on net sales typical of a product at this stage of development. The purchase price includes the entire indibulin intellectual property portfolio as well as existing drug substance and capsule inventories.
 
We were originally incorporated in Colorado in September 1998 (under the name Net Escapes, Inc.) and later changed our name to “EasyWeb, Inc.” in February 1999. We were re-incorporated in Delaware on May 16, 2005 under the same name. On September 13, 2005, we completed a “reverse” acquisition of privately held ZIOPHARM, Inc., a Delaware corporation. To effect this transaction, we caused ZIO Acquisition Corp., our wholly-owned subsidiary, to merge with and into ZIOPHARM, Inc., with ZIOPHARM, Inc. surviving as our wholly owned subsidiary. In accordance with the terms of the merger, the outstanding common stock of ZIOPHARM, Inc. automatically converted into the right to receive an aggregate of approximately 97.3% of our outstanding common stock (after giving effect to the transaction). Following the merger, we caused ZIOPHARM, Inc. to merge with and into us and we changed our name to “ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.”
 
19

 
Plan of Operation
 
Our plan of operation for the next twelve months, is to continue implementing our business strategy, including the clinical development of our two lead product candidates, ZIO-101, ZIO-201 and the newly acquired ZIO-301. We also intend to expand our drug candidate portfolio by seeking additional drug candidates through in-licensing arrangements. We expect our principal expenditures during those 12 months to include:

·
Fees and milestone payments required under the license agreements relating to our existing product candidates and additional in-licensed candidates;
·
Clinical trial expenses, including the costs incurred with respect to the conduct of clinical trials for ZIO-101 and ZIO-201, ZIO-301, and preclinical costs associated with back-up candidates ZIO-102 and ZIO-202;
·
Costs related to the scale-up and manufacture of ZIO-101, ZIO-201, and ZIO-301;
·
Rent for our facilities; and
·
General corporate and working capital, including general and administrative expenses.

As part of our plan for additional employees, we anticipate hiring several additional full-time employees in the medical, regulatory, clinical and finance functions. In addition, we intend to use senior advisors, consultants, clinical research organizations and third parties to perform certain aspects of product development, manufacturing, clinical and preclinical development, and regulatory and quality assurance functions.

At our current and desired pace of clinical development of ZIO-101, ZIO-201, newly acquired ZIO-301, and other back-up candidates and ongoing in-licensing efforts over the next 12 months we expect to spend approximately $3.1 million on preclinical and regulatory expenses, $16.8 million on clinical expenses (including clinical trials and milestone payments that we expect to be triggered under the license agreements relating to our product candidates), approximately $3.2 million on manufacturing costs, approximately $475,000 on facilities, rent (including additional space not presently contracted) and other facilities related costs, and approximately $3.4 million on general corporate and working capital. We believe that we currently have sufficient capital to fund development and commercialization activities of ZIO-101 and ZIO-201, as well as newly acquired ZIO-301, into the early part of the fourth quarter of 2007 with the proceeds, and interest earned herin, from the common stock offering received on May 3, 2006.

Product Candidate Development and Clinical Trials

ZIO-101. ZIO-101, organic arsenic, is being developed presently to treat advanced myeloma. As a follow-on to the ongoing phase I trials, a phase I/II trial in advanced multiple myeloma was initiated in January 2006. We will continue to explore the use of ZIO-101 in hematological and solid tumors as well as exploring different dosing schedules and forms. Preclinical development will continue with a back-up compound designated as ZIO-102. Additional compounds are being synthesized under our agreement with The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and the Texas A&M University System. Technology transfer and scale-up for the commercial manufacture of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, its lyophilization, and final product specification will continue through the period leading to the expected registration trial in late 2007. Preclinical development will continue with additional compounds.

ZIO-201. ZIO-201, stabilized isophosphoramide mustard, is being developed presently to treat advanced sarcoma. As a follow-on to the ongoing phase I trial, a phase I/II trial in advanced sarcoma was initiated and other trials, dosing schedules and forms are in the advanced planning stage. We expect to initiate a registration trial in advanced sarcoma in late 2007. Technology transfer and scale-up for the commercial manufacture of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, its lyophilization, and final product specification will continue. Preclinical development will continue with back-up analogues.
 
ZIO-301. ZIO-301, a novel anti-cancer agent that targets mitosis like the taxanes, is available as both an oral and a proprietary nanosuspension intravenous form. The oral form is currently in a Phase I trial, with Phase II expected to initiate in the first half of 2007 under an Investigational New Drug Application filed in the United States. The nanosuspension intravenous form is currently in late preclinical development with a Phase I trial anticipated in 2007.
 
20

 
Results of Operations
 
  Revenues.  We had no revenues for either of the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

  Research and development expenses.  For the three-month period ended September 30, 2006, research and development expenses increased by $779,009, or 59.1%, to $2,097,617 from $1,318,608 in the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. Increased research and development expenses in the current year period is attributable to an increase of approximately $70,000 in the cost of clinical trials and an increase of approximately $156,000 in manufacturing related costs. The increase in expenses is also attributable to an increase of approximately $102,000 in stock compensation expense related to stock options and approximately $434,000 in employee related costs. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, research and development expenses increased by $2,266,299, or 53.0%, to $6,545,986 from $4,279,687 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. Increased research and development expenses in the current year period is attributable to an increase of approximately $626,000 in the cost of clinical trials and an increase of approximately $427,000 in manufacturing related costs The increase in expenses is also attributable to an increase of approximately $266,000 in stock compensation expense related to stock options and approximately $787,000 in employee related costs.
 
General and administrative expenses. For the three month period ended September 30, 2006, general and administrative expenses increased by $290,621, or 18.9%, to $1,832,361 from $1,541,740 in the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. The increase is attributable to an increase of approximately $229,000 in stock compensation expense related to stock options, approximately $225,000 for investors relations services, approximately $118,000 in legal, accounting, and filing fee costs, approximately $40,000 in travel expenses and approximately $60,000 in employee related costs as we have built infrastructure to support the research and development efforts. These costs were offset by a decrease of $425,000 in merger related costs that were incurred in the three months ending September 30, 2005. For nine month period ended September 30, 2006, general and administrative expenses increased by $3,391,620, or 114.8%, to $6,345,450 from $2,953,830 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. The increase is attributable to an increase of approximately $2,158,000 in stock compensation expense related to stock options, approximately $106,000 as compensation expense for common stock issued to an investor relations consultant, approximately $366,000 for investors relations services, approximately $202,000 in legal, accounting and filing fees, and approximately $347,000 in employee related costs as we have built infrastructure to support the research and development efforts.

Other income (expense) . Other income increased by $381,245, or 404.6%, to $475,476 in the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 from $94,231 recorded in the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. Other income during the three month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was comprised of interest income. Other income increased by $675,474, or 380.1% to $853,184 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 from $177,710 recorded in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. Other income during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was comprised of interest income. The increase is due to higher cash balances, which was derived from the May 3, 2006 private placement, that was made available for investing purposes.

Net income (loss). For the reasons described above, the net loss increased by $688,385, or 24.9%, to $(3,454,502) in the three month period ended September 30, 2006 from $(2,766,117) for the same period of 2005. The net loss increased $(4,982,445), or 70.6%, to $(12,038,252) in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 from $(7,055,807) for the same period of 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2006, we had approximately $34.5 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. With the proceeds from our 2006 common stock offering, which was completed on May 3, 2006, we believe we currently have sufficient capital to fund development and commercialization activities of ZIO-101, ZIO-201, and ZIO-301 early into the fourth quarter of 2007. Because our business does not generate any cash flow, however, we will need to raise additional capital to continue development of the product candidates beyond that time or to fund development efforts related to new product candidates. We anticipate raising such additional capital by either borrowing money or by selling shares of our capital stock. To the extent additional capital is not available when we need it, we may be forced to abandon some or all of our development and commercialization efforts, which would have a material adverse effect on the prospects of our business. Further, our assumptions relating to the expected costs of development and commercialization and timeframe for completion are dependent on numerous factors other than available financing, including significant unforeseen delays in the clinical trial and regulatory approval process, which could be extremely costly. In addition, our estimates assume that we will be able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in each clinical trial.
 
21

 
The Company anticipates that losses will continue for the foreseeable future. At September 30, 2006, the Company’s accumulated deficit was approximately $27.4 million. The Company has incurred significant losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit that raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations after its current cash resources are exhausted depends on its ability to obtain additional financing and achieve profitable operations, as to which no assurances can be given.

Our actual cash requirements may vary materially from those now planned because of a number of factors including:

·
Changes in the focus and direction of our research and development programs, including the acquisition and pursuit of development of new product candidates;
·
Competitive and technical advances;
·
Costs of commercializing any of the product candidates;
·
Costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and any other intellectual property rights;
 
or other developments.
 
In order to continue our long-term plans for clinical trials and new product development, we will need to raise additional capital to continue to fund our research and development as well as operations after we exhaust our current cash resources. We expect to finance our cash needs through the sale of equity securities and possibly strategic collaborations or debt financings or through other sources that may be dilutive to existing stockholders. There can be no assurance that any such financing can be realized by the Company, or if realized, what the terms thereof may be, or that any amount that the Company is able to raise will be adequate to support the Company’s working capital requirements until it achieves profitable operations. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may not be able to market our products as planned or continue development and regulatory approval of our products, or we could be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all our research and development programs.
 
22

 
Since inception, our primary source of funding for our operations has been the private sale of our securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we received gross proceeds of approximately $37 million ($34,280,121 net of cash issuance costs) as a result of the sale of an aggregate of 7,991,256 shares (the “Shares”) of common stock, at a price of $4.63 per Share, in a private offering (the “2006 Offering”) that was completed on May 3, 2006. In addition to the Shares, the Company also issued to each investor a five-year warrant (each a “Warrant”) to purchase, at an exercise price of $5.56 per share, an additional number of shares of common stock equal to 30 percent of the Shares purchased by such investor in the Offering. In the aggregate, these Warrants entitle investors to purchase an additional 2,397,392 shares of common stock. The Company engaged Paramount BioCapital, Inc. and Griffin Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agents”) as co-placement agents in connection with the Offering. In consideration for their services, the Company paid the Placement Agents and certain selected dealers engaged by the Placement Agents aggregate cash commissions of $2,589,966 and issued 7-year warrants to the Placement Agents and their designees to purchase an aggregate of 799,126 shares at an exercise price of $5.09 per share. The Company also agreed to reimburse the Placement Agents for their accountable expenses incurred in connection with the Offering. Following the completion of Offering, the Company has 15,264,248 shares of common stock outstanding.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, we received $4,815 proceeds from the exercise of stock options and gross proceeds of approximately $18.1 million ($16.8 net of issuance costs) as a result of the sale by ZIOPHARM, Inc. of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement transaction. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, we received proceeds of approximately $4.5 million as a result of the sale by ZIOPHARM, Inc. of common stock in a private placement transaction.

At September 30, 2006, working capital was approximately $34.5 million, compared to working capital of approximately $7.2 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in working capital reflects the proceeds from the May 2006 offset by the use of funds for operations.
 
Capital expenditures were approximately $140,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. We anticipate additional capital expenditures of approximately $100,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
 
The Company’s significant lease obligation payable is as follows:

 
Payments due by Period
 
   
Total
 
Less than 1 Year
 
1 - 3 Years
 
4 - 5 Years
 
After 5 Years
 
Operating lease
 
$
855,343
 
$
275,091
 
$
504,220
 
$
76,032
   
-
 
 
Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounting for stock-based compensation and research and development activities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under difference assumptions or conditions.
 
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, fees paid to consultants and outside service providers for development, legal expenses resulting from intellectual property prosecution and organizational affairs and other expenses relating to the design, development, testing, and enhancement of our product candidates. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and other administrative personnel, recruitment expenses, professional fees and other corporate expenses, including business development and general legal activities.
 
Our results include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the issuance of stock option and warrants grants. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (“SFAS 123R”) Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method, which results in the provision of SFAS 123R only being applied to the consolidated financial statements on a going-forward basis (that is, the prior period results have not been restated). Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award using the Black Scholes Model and is recognized as expense over the service period. Previously, the Company had followed Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related interpretations which resulted in account for employee share options at their intrinsic value in the financial statements. The Company’s most critical estimates consist of accounting for stock-based compensation.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any “off-balance sheet agreements,” as that term is defined by SEC regulation.

23

 
Item 3.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES   
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
 
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 promulgated under the Exchange Act that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
24

 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings

No response required.
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

No response required.
 
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

No response required.
 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No response required.
 
Item 5. Other Information
 
Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
 
The information in this Item 5 is furnished to, but not filed with, the Securities and Exchange commission in lieu of furnishing such information pursuant to a separate Form 8-K, Item 2.02 “Results of Operations and Financial Condition.”
 
On November 13, 2006, ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. issued a press release reporting the financial results for its first quarter ended September 30, 2006. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
25

 
Item 6. EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
10.1 
  Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 3, 2006 by and among Baxter Healthcare S.A., Baxter International, Inc., Baxter Oncology GmbH and ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
10.2 
  License Agreement dated November 3, 2006 by and among Baxter Healthcare S.A., Baxter International, Inc. and ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.† 
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1
 
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
 
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1
  Press Release dated November 13, 2006.
 
Confidential treatment has been requested as to certain portions of this exhibit purusant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
26


SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
ZIOPHARM ONCOLOGY, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: November 13, 2006
By:  
/s/ Jonathan Lewis
 
 
Jonathan Lewis
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: November 13, 2006
By:  
/s/ Richard Bagley
 
 
Richard Bagley
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
27

 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
10.1 
  Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 3, 2006 by and among Baxter Healthcare S.A., Baxter International, Inc., Baxter Oncology GmbH and ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.
10.2 
  License Agreement dated November 3, 2006 by and among Baxter Healthcare S.A., Baxter International, Inc. and ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc.† 
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1
 
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
 
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1
  Press Release dated November 13, 2006.
 
Confidential treatment has been requested as to certain portions of this exhibit purusant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

28