SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed
by the Registrant :
|
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant 9
|
Check
the
appropriate box:
9
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
9
|
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
:
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
9
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
9
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section
240.14a-12
|
RELIV’
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Name
of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment
of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
RELIV’
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
136
Chesterfield Industrial Boulevard
Chesterfield,
Missouri 63005
NOTICE
OF
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO
BE
HELD
ON MAY 25, 2006
To: Stockholders
of Reliv’ International, Inc.
The
Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Reliv’ International, Inc. will be held at
Reliv’ International, Inc., Corporate Headquarters, 136 Chesterfield Industrial
Boulevard, Chesterfield, Missouri 63005, on Thursday, May 25, 2006, at 10:00
a.m., Central Daylight Savings Time, for the following purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect 7 directors to hold office during the year following the Annual
Meeting or until their successors are elected (Item No. 1 on proxy
card);
|
|
2.
|
To
ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2006 (Item No.
2 on
proxy card); and
|
|
3.
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
|
The
close
of business on March 23, 2006, has been fixed as the record date for determining
the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual
Meeting.
BY
ORDER
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
April
21, 2006
|
/s/
Stephen M. Merrick
|
|
Stephen
M. Merrick, Secretary
|
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT
It
is important that as many shares as possible be
represented
at
the Annual Meeting. Please date, sign and promptly return
the
proxy in the enclosed envelope. Your proxy may be revoked
by
you at any time before it has been voted.
RELIV’
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
136
Chesterfield Industrial Boulevard
Chesterfield,
Missouri 63005
PROXY
STATEMENT
Information
Concerning the Solicitation
This
statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be
used
at the annual stockholders meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) of Reliv’
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be held on
Thursday, May 25, 2006. The proxy materials are being mailed on or about April
21, 2006 to stockholders of record.
The
solicitation of proxies in the enclosed form is made on behalf of the Board
of
Directors of the Company.
The
cost
of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy material and of reimbursing
brokers, nominees and fiduciaries for the out-of-pocket and clerical expenses
of
transmitting copies of the proxy material to the beneficial owners of shares
held of record by such persons will be borne by the Company. The Company does
not intend to solicit proxies otherwise than by use of the mail, but certain
officers and regular employees of the Company or its subsidiaries, without
additional compensation, may use their personal efforts, by telephone or
otherwise, to obtain proxies.
Quorum
and Voting
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on March 23, 2006 are entitled
to vote at the Annual Meeting. On that day, there were 15,613,857 shares of
common stock outstanding. Each share has one vote. A simple majority of the
outstanding shares is required to be present in person or by proxy at the
meeting for there to be a quorum for purposes of proceeding with the Annual
Meeting. A simple majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the
Annual Meeting, at which a quorum is present, is required to elect directors
and
approve the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm. Abstentions and withheld votes have the effect of votes against
these matters. Broker non-votes (shares held of record by a broker for which
a
proxy is not given) will be counted for purposes of determining shares
outstanding for purposes of a quorum, but will not be counted as present for
purposes of determining the vote on any matter considered at the
meeting.
A
stockholder signing and returning a proxy on the enclosed form has the power
to
revoke it at any time before the shares subject to it are voted by notifying
the
Secretary of the Company in writing. If a stockholder specifies how the proxy
is
to be voted with respect to any of the proposals for which a choice is provided,
the proxy will be voted in accordance with such specifications. If a stockholder
fails to so specify with respect to such proposals, the proxy will be voted
“FOR” the nominees for directors contained in these proxy materials and “FOR”
the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm.
Stock
Ownership by Management and Others
The
following table provides information concerning the beneficial ownership of
the
Company’s common stock by each director and nominee for director, certain
executive officers, and by all of the Company’s directors and officers as a
group as of March 23, 2006. In addition, the table provides information
concerning the beneficial owners known to the Company to hold more than five
percent of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of March 23, 2006.
The
amounts and percentage of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the
basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) governing
the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of
the
SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person
has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the
voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to
dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also
deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has
a
right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after March 23, 2006.
Under
these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same
securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to
which he has no economic interest. Percentage of class is based on 15,613,857
shares of common stock outstanding as of March 23, 2006.
Name
of beneficial owner(1)
|
|
Amount
and nature of
beneficial
ownership
|
|
Percent
of class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
L. Montgomery(2)
|
|
4,048,186
|
|
25.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl
W. Hastings(3)
|
|
931,453
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen
M. Merrick(4)
|
|
868,969
|
|
5.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.
Scott Montgomery(5)
|
|
125,243
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
D. Albright(6)
|
|
88,536
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
G. Hastings(7)
|
|
62,965
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan
A. Montgomery(8)
|
|
30,171
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
L. McCain(9)
|
|
470,545
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
B. Akin(10)
|
|
22,647
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
M. Henry(11)
|
|
12,000
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denis
St. John(12)
|
|
12,500
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (11 persons)(13)
|
|
6,673,215
|
|
41.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
______________________
*
less
than
one percent
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated below, the person named in the table has sole
voting
and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned,
subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address for each person is c/o Reliv International,
Inc.,
136 Chesterfield Industrial Boulevard, Chesterfield, Missouri
63005.
|
(2)
|
Includes
288,720 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006, 1,154,970 shares held through the Montgomery Family Limited
Partnership, 470,114 shares held through Montgomery Enterprises,
Ltd., for
which Mr. Montgomery has sole voting and investment power, and
125,920
shares held by Mr. Montgomery’s spouse.
|
(3)
|
Includes
20,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(4)
|
Includes
50,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(5)
|
Includes
50,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(6)
|
Includes
54,970 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(7)
|
Includes
20,743 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(8)
|
Includes
25,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(9)
|
Includes
50,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(10)
|
Includes
21,321 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(11)
|
Includes
10,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(12)
|
Includes
10,000 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
(13)
|
Includes
600,754 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after
March
23, 2006.
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
ONE - ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Seven
directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve for terms of one year
expiring on the date of the Annual Meeting in 2007. Each director elected will
continue in office until a successor has been elected. If a nominee is unable
to
serve, which the Board of Directors has no reason to expect, the persons named
in the accompanying proxy intend to vote for the balance of those named and,
if
they deem it advisable, for a substitute nominee.
THE
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES.
Information
Concerning Nominees
The
following is information concerning nominees for election to the Board of
Directors. Each of the following nominees is presently a member of the Board
of
Directors.
Robert
L. Montgomery,
age
64, is
the
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Montgomery became Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer on February 15, 1985, and President on July 1, 1985.
Mr. Montgomery has been a director of Reliv’ International since 1985.
Mr. Montgomery is also the President and a director of Reliv’, Inc. and
President and a director of Reliv’ World Corporation, both wholly owned
subsidiaries of Reliv’ International. Mr. Montgomery received a B.A. degree
in Economics from the University of Missouri in Kansas City, Missouri in 1965.
Mr. Montgomery is the father of R. Scott Montgomery, the Company’s Senior
Vice President, Worldwide Operations, and Ryan A. Montgomery, the Company’s Vice
President, Sales.
Stephen
M. Merrick,
age
64, has
been
the Senior Vice President, International and Corporate Development, Secretary,
General Counsel and a member of the Board of Directors since July 20, 1989.
Mr. Merrick is Of Counsel to Vanasco Genelly & Miller, which has
served as counsel to the Company with respect to certain matters, and has been
engaged in the practice of law for over 40 years. Previously, Mr. Merrick
was a principal of the law firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C., which served
as counsel to the Company with respect to certain matters. Mr. Merrick has
represented the Company since the Company’s founding. Mr. Merrick received
a Juris Doctor degree from Northwestern University School of Law in 1966.
Mr. Merrick is also Executive Vice President and a director of CTI
Industries Corporation, a manufacturer of packaging and novelty items.
Carl
W. Hastings,
age
64, has
been
Vice President since July 1, 1992. Dr. Hastings has been employed by
the Company since April 1991. Dr. Hastings was re-elected to the Board of
Directors in May 2005 and formerly served as a member of the Board of Directors
from February 1990 until May 2004. Dr. Hastings holds B.S. and M.S. degrees
and a Ph.D. degree in Food Science from the University of Illinois. For more
than the past 30 years, Dr. Hastings has been engaged in a variety of
employment and consulting capacities as a food scientist. Dr. Hastings is
the father of Steven G. Hastings, the Company’s Vice President, Sales.
Donald
L. McCain,
age
62, has
been
a member of the Board of Directors since July 20, 1989. Mr. McCain is
the Corporate Secretary and co-owner of The Baughan Group Inc., formerly
Robertson International Inc., a supplier and manufacturer of mining equipment
and supplies. He is also co-owner of Coal Age Incorporated, a mining
equipment manufacturer and rebuilding company. Mr. McCain co-founded
G&T Resources, Inc., an owner and operator of nursing homes, in 1980 and was
engaged in the management of that company until he sold his interest in
September 1994. Prior to that time, Mr. McCain was employed in the food
processing industry for fifteen years, most of that time was with Archer Daniels
Midland Company as a manager of plant operations. Mr. McCain is the father
of Ronald McCain, the Director of Customer Service and the son-in-law of Robert
L. Montgomery, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.
John
B. Akin,
age
77, has
been
a member of the Board of Directors since June 1986. Mr. Akin retired as
Vice President, A.G. Edwards & Sons and resident manager of the
Decatur, Illinois branch office in 1995. Mr. Akin had been associated with
A.G. Edwards & Sons as a stock broker, manager and officer since April
1973. Mr. Akin holds a B.A. degree from the University of Northern Iowa,
Cedar Falls, Iowa.
Robert
M. Henry,
age
59, has
been
a member of the Board of Directors since May 2004. On December 4, 2004,
Mr. Henry became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Arbonne
International, Inc., a skin care products company. From 2000 to 2003, he served
as Chief Executive Officer and board member for Mannatech, Incorporated, a
public multi-level marketing company that sells dietary supplements, wellness
and weight-management products to independent distributors. From 1998 to 2000,
Mr. Henry acted as an Operating Consultant for Gryphon Investors where he
gave advice on the investment opportunities in the network marketing industry.
From 1986 to 1998, Mr. Henry served in various executive positions in the
advertising, communications, investment and women’s apparel industries. From
1982 to 1986, he served as Corporate Controller Worldwide for Amway Corporation,
a multi-level marketer of various products. From 1971 to 1982, Mr. Henry
served various management roles for Avon Products Inc., including Regional
Controller, Manufacturing/Sales/Distribution, Chief Financial Officer for Avon
Fashions, and Manager A/P & Intercompany Accounting. He received a B.S.
degree in Accounting from Hunter College in New York and a J.D. from
Brooklyn Law School. Mr. Henry has been a member of the New York State
Bar since 1975 and also served on the Network Marketing Association Board of
Directors during 2002.
Denis
St. John,
age
62, has
been
a member of the Board of Directors since May 2004. Mr. St. John is a
CPA and principal with the Larson Allen Health Care Group, focusing on
physicians and institutions involved in clinics, nursing homes, medical office
buildings, and other real estate intensive projects. For 15 years,
Mr. St. John was associated with various accounting firms working
primarily in the tax area, serving mid-size, closely held companies.
Mr. St. John graduated from the University of Missouri with a Bachelor
of Science in Business Administration with a major in Accounting and a minor
in
Economics. He is a former NASD registered representative, holding Series 6
and 63 securities licenses. Mr. St. John is a member of the Missouri
Society of CPAs and the American Institute of CPAs.
Executive
Officers Other Than Nominees
R. Scott
Montgomery,
age
36, has
been
the Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations since August 2004.
Mr. Montgomery joined the Company in 1993 and previously served as the Vice
President of International Operations from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Montgomery
graduated from Southwest Missouri State University with a B.S. degree in Finance
and Investments. Mr. Montgomery is the son of Robert L. Montgomery, the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and the brother of Ryan A.
Montgomery, the Vice President, Sales.
Steven
D. Albright,
age
44, has
been
the Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer since March 2005.
Mr. Albright was the Vice President, Finance/Controller from 2002 to 2005
and was the Controller since 1992. Prior to his employment with the Company,
Mr. Albright was employed from 1987 to 1992 as Assistant Controller for
Kangaroos USA, Inc., an athletic shoe importer and distributor. For the period
from 1983 to 1987, he was employed by the public accounting firm of
Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Albright received a B.S. degree in
Accountancy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in May 1983
and
is a CPA.
Steven
G. Hastings,
age
40, was
appointed the Vice President, Sales in February 2004. Mr. Hastings was the
Vice President of International Marketing from 2002 to 2004 and the Director
of
International Marketing from 1996 to 2002. Mr. Hastings started with the
Company in January 1993 as Director of Marketing. Mr. Hastings graduated
from the University of Illinois in 1987 with a Marketing degree and obtained
his
Masters in Business from Butler University in Indianapolis in 1995.
Mr. Hastings is the son of Dr. Carl Hastings, the Vice President.
Ryan
A. Montgomery,
age
32, was
appointed the Vice President, Sales in November 2004. Mr. Montgomery served
as corporate counsel from September 1999 to October 2004. Mr. Montgomery
received his B.A. degree in Economics from Vanderbilt University in 1995 and
graduated from Saint Louis University Law School in 1999. Mr. Montgomery is
the son of Robert L. Montgomery, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and the brother of R. Scott Montgomery, the Senior Vice President
of
Worldwide Operations.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
The
Board
of Directors has standing Executive, Management, Compensation, Nominating and
Audit Committees. The Board of Directors met four times during 2005. No director
attended less than 75% of the combined Board of Directors and Committee
meetings.
The
Executive Committee acts on various matters between meetings of the Board of
Directors. The Executive Committee consists of Messrs. Montgomery, Merrick,
Hastings and McCain. The Executive Committee met two times during 2005.
The
Compensation Committee is composed of Messrs. McCain, Akin and St. John. The
Compensation Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of
Directors concerning the compensation of the Company’s officers and key
employees. The Compensation Committee met four times during 2005.
The
Management Committee reviews the Company’s operations and policies on a regular
basis. The Management Committee is composed of three members of the Board of
Directors, including Messrs. Montgomery, Hastings and Merrick, as well as
several other members of top management. The Management Committee met eleven
times during 2005.
The
Nominating Committee identifies and reviews potential candidates for the Board
of Directors and makes recommendations concerning potential candidates for
the
Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee is composed of Messrs. McCain,
Akin
and St. John. The Nominating Committee met one time in 2005.
The
Company has a Sales and Marketing Committee that meets on a regular basis to
discuss sales and marketing ideas and strategies as well as plan upcoming
distributor events. The Sales and Marketing Committee met five times during
2005
and is made up of two members of the Board of Directors, including Messrs.
Montgomery and Merrick, as well as several other members of management that
are
involved with sales and marketing.
All
of
the independent directors of the Board of Directors participated in the
nominating process and voted in favor of the nomination of the directors
nominated for election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May
25, 2006.
Audit
Committee
Since
2000, the Company has had a standing Audit Committee, which is presently
composed of Messrs. McCain, St. John and Henry. Mr. St. John has been designated
and is the Company’s “Audit Committee Financial Expert” pursuant to Item 401 of
Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Audit Committee
held
eight meetings during fiscal year 2005, including quarterly meetings with
management and the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss
the
Company’s financial statements. Mr. St. John and each appointed member of the
Committee satisfies the definition of “independent” as that term is defined in
the rules governing companies whose stock is traded on the Nasdaq National
Market. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit
Committee, a copy of which was included as Exhibit A to the 2004 Proxy
Statement. In addition, the Audit Committee has adopted a complaint monitoring
procedure to enable confidential and anonymous reporting to the Audit Committee
of concerns regarding, among other things, questionable accounting or auditing
matters.
Report
of the Audit Committee
The
Audit
Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the
Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial
statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed
the
audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management and the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP,
including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the clarity
of disclosures in the financial statements and internal controls.
The
Audit
Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm,
which
is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited
financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, their
judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s
application of accounting principles and such other matters as are required
to
be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing
standards, including but not limited to those matters required to be discussed
by SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU §380). In
addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered
public accounting firm their independence from management and the Company
including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence
Standards Board.
The
Audit
Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm the overall scope and plans for their audit of the Company’s financial
statements, management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit
Committee meets with the internal auditor and independent registered public
accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results
of
their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the
overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
In
reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the
audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for
the year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors have also
recommended, subject to stockholder approval, the selection of Ernst & Young
LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Donald
L.
McCain, Audit Committee Chair
Robert
M.
Henry, Member
Denis
St.
John, Member
Nominating
Committee
In
May
2004, the Company established a Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee
consists of three directors, Messrs. McCain, Akin and St. John. The Nominating
Committee does not have a charter. The Board of Directors has determined that
each of the members of the Nominating Committee is independent as defined in
the
listing standards for the Nasdaq National Market.
The
Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal policy with regard to
consideration of director candidates recommended by security holders. The
Company believes that continuing service of qualified incumbent members of
the
Board of Directors promotes stability and continuity at the Board level,
contributes to the Board’s ability to work as a collective body and provides the
benefit of familiarity and insight into the Company’s affairs. Accordingly, the
process of the Nominating Committee for identifying nominees reflects the
Company’s practice of re-nominating incumbent directors who continue to satisfy
the criteria for membership on the Board. For vacancies which are anticipated
on
the Board of Directors, the Nominating Committee intends to seek out and
evaluate potential candidates from a variety of sources that may include
recommendations by security holders, members of management and the Board of
Directors, consultants and others. The minimum qualifications for potential
candidates for the Board of Directors include demonstrated business experience,
decision-making abilities, personal integrity and a good reputation. In light
of
the foregoing, and the fact that two new independent directors were elected
to
the Board in 2004, it is believed that a formal policy and procedure with regard
to consideration of director candidates recommended by security holders is
not
necessary in order for the Nominating Committee to perform its duties.
The
Nominating Committee met one time. All of the independent directors of the
Board
of Directors participated in the nominating process and voted in favor of the
nomination of the persons nominated for election as directors at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 25, 2006.
Executive
Compensation
The
following table sets forth a summary of the compensation paid during the last
three fiscal years to the Chief Executive Officer and to each of the other
four
most highly compensated executive officers who were officers at December 31,
2005, and any executive officer who left during the last fiscal year who would
have been included in this group, the Named Executives.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
compensation
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Name
and principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Bonus(1)
($)
|
|
Securities
underlying options/SARs
|
|
All
other
compensation
($)
|
Robert
L. Montgomery
Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
2005
2004
2003
|
|
$642,625
$642,625
$642,625
|
|
$616,168
$442,400
$366,660
|
|
160,000
--
--
|
|
$17,765(2)
$23,368(3)
$17,464(4)
|
Stephen
M. Merrick
Senior
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
|
|
2005
2004
2003
|
|
$225,000
$124,800
$124,800
|
|
$154,042
$94,800
$78,570
|
|
50,000
--
--
|
|
--
--
--
|
Carl
W. Hastings
Vice
President
|
|
2005
2004
2003
|
|
$277,500
$270,000
$270,000
|
|
--
--
--
|
|
20,000
--
--
|
|
$17,398(2)
$23,752(3)
$12,792(4)
|
R.
Scott Montgomery
Senior
Vice President of Worldwide Operations
|
|
2005
2004
2003
|
|
$160,000
$136,500
$120,000
|
|
$176,048
$79,000
$65,475
|
|
50,000
--
--
|
|
$9,231(2)
$6,498(3)
$3,347(4)
|
Steven
D. Albright
Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2005
2004
2003
|
|
$150,000
$136,500
$130,000
|
|
$154,042
$79,000
$65,475
|
|
20,000
--
--
|
|
$10,810(2)
$10,008(3)
$9,240(4)
|
______________________
(1)
|
Reflects
bonus payments under the Company’s 2001 Incentive Compensation
Plan.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
the value of cash contributions by the Company to the Reliv’
International, Inc. 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan, of
$13,500
for each of Messrs. Robert L. Montgomery and Hastings, $9,000 for
Mr. R.
Scott Montgomery and $10,500 for Mr. Albright. Also includes the
portion
of premiums paid by the Company on life insurance policies on each
executive’s life attributable to the death benefit, to which each
executive’s estate is entitled. The allocated portion of premium paid was
$4,265 for Mr. Robert L. Montgomery, $3,898 for Dr. Hastings, $231
for Mr.
R. Scott Montgomery and $310 for Mr. Albright.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
the value of cash contributions by the Company to the Reliv’
International, Inc. 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan, of
$11,750
for each of Messrs. Robert L. Montgomery and Hastings, $6,300 for
Mr. R.
Scott Montgomery and $9,750 for Mr. Albright. Also includes the
portion of
premiums paid by the Company on life insurance policies on each
executive’s life attributable to the death benefit, to which each
executive’s estate is entitled. The allocated portion of premium paid was
$7,338 for Mr. Robert L. Montgomery, $2,402 for Dr. Hastings, $198
for Mr.
R. S. Montgomery and $258 for Mr. Albright.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
the value of cash contributions by the Company to the Reliv’
International, Inc. 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan, of
$10,500
for each of Messrs. Robert L. Montgomery and Hastings, $3,157 for
Mr. R.
Scott Montgomery and $9,000 for Mr. Albright. Also includes the
portion of
premiums paid by the Company on life insurance policies on each
executive’s life attributable to the death benefit, to which each
executive’s estate is entitled. The allocated portion of premium paid was
$6,964 for Mr. Robert L. Montgomery, $2,292 for Dr. Hastings, $190
for Mr.
R. Scott Montgomery and $240 for Mr. Albright.
|
The
Company has never granted any stock appreciation rights. During the period
from
January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2005, there have been no awards or payments
made
for long-term incentive compensation (other than stock option grants) and there
have been no restricted stock awards to any of the Named Executives.
The
following table provides information related to options to purchase the
Company’s common stock granted to the Named Executives during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005:
OPTION/SAR
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
Individual
grants(1)
|
|
Potential
realizable value at assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation
for
option term(2)
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Number
of
securities
underlying
options/SARs
granted
(#)
|
|
|
Percent
of total options/SARs
granted
to
employees
in fiscal year
|
|
|
Exercise
or base price ($/Sh)
|
|
|
Expiration
date
|
|
|
5%
($)
|
|
|
10%
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
L. Montgomery
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
29.47
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
1/5/2015
|
|
|
796,935
|
|
|
2,019,590
|
|
Stephen
M. Merrick
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
9.21
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
1/5/2015
|
|
|
249,042
|
|
|
631,122
|
|
Carl
W. Hastings
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
1/5/2015
|
|
|
99,617
|
|
|
252,449
|
|
R.
Scott Montgomery
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
9.21
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
1/5/2015
|
|
|
249,042
|
|
|
631,122
|
|
Steven
D. Albright
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
1/5/2015
|
|
|
99,617
|
|
|
252,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
______________________
(1)
|
The
options were granted at 100% of the market price on the date
of grant and
were vested immediately.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The
potential realizable values shown illustrate the values that
might be
realized upon exercise immediately prior to the expiration of
the option’s
term using 5% and 10% appreciation rates set by the SEC, compounded
annually and, therefore, are not intended to forecast possible
future
appreciation, if any, of the Company’s stock price.
|
|
|
The
following table provides information related to options to purchase the
Company’s common stock exercised by the Named Executives during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005, and the number and value of such options held as
of the
end of such fiscal year:
AGGREGATED
OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND
FY-END OPTION VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of securities
underlying
unexercised
options
at year end (#)
|
|
Value
of unexercised in-
the-money
options
at
fiscal year end ($)
|
Name
|
|
Shares
acquired
on
exercise
(#)
|
|
Value
realized
($)
|
|
Exercisable/unexercisable
|
|
Exercisable/unexercisable(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
L. Montgomery
|
|
243,302
|
|
$1,835,165
|
|
160,000/128,720
|
|
$841,600/$1,596,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen
M. Merrick
|
|
180,058
|
|
$1,408,846
|
|
50,000/0
|
|
263,000/0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl
W. Hastings
|
|
22,321
|
|
$176,881
|
|
20,000/0
|
|
105,200/0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.
Scott Montgomery
|
|
34,970
|
|
$311,387
|
|
50,000/0
|
|
263,000/0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
D. Albright
|
|
0
|
|
$0
|
|
54,970/0
|
|
541,430/0
|
______________________
(1) |
|
The
value of unexercised in-the-money options is based on the difference
between the exercise price and the fair market value of the Company’s
common stock on December 31, 2005.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table provides information regarding the Company’s equity compensation
plans as of December 31, 2005.
Plan
Category
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
813,074
|
|
$5.57
|
|
457,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
|
|
66,719
|
|
$9.47
|
|
706,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
879,793
|
|
$5.87
|
|
1,163,856
|
(footnote
on following
page)
______________________
(1) |
|
In
November 1998, the Company established a Distributor Stock Purchase
Plan.
The plan allows distributors who have reached the “Ambassador” status the
opportunity to allocate up to 10% of their monthly compensation into
the
plan to be used to purchase the Company’s common stock at the current
market value. The plan also states that at the end of each year,
the
Company will grant warrants to purchase additional shares of the
Company’s
common stock based on the number of shares purchased by the distributors
under the plan during the year. The warrant exercise price will equal
the
market price for the Company’s common stock at the date of issuance. The
warrants issued shall be in the amount of 25% of the total shares
purchased under the plan during the
year.
|
Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The
Compensation Committee is composed of three members of the Board of Directors.
All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors. None of
the
members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is an officer
or
employee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company serves as a member
of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any entity that has
one
or more executive officers serving on the Compensation Committee.
The
Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the standards and
philosophy of the Board of Directors regarding executive compensation, for
reviewing and evaluating executive compensation and compensation programs,
and
for recommending levels of salary and other forms of compensation for executives
to the Board of Directors. The full Board of Directors is responsible for
setting and administering salaries, bonus payments and other compensation awards
to executives.
Compensation
Philosophy
The
philosophy of the Compensation Committee, and of the Board of Directors,
regarding executive compensation includes the following principal
components:
To
attract and retain quality executive talent, which is regarded as critical
to
the Company’s long-term and short-term success, in substantial part by offering
compensation programs which provide attractive rewards for successful
effort.
To
provide a reasonable level of base compensation to senior executives and to
provide annual incentive compensation based on the Company’s success and
profitability.
To
create
a mutuality of interest between executive officers and stockholders through
long-term compensation structures, particularly stock option programs, so that
executive officers share the risks and rewards of strategic decision making
and
its effect on stockholder value.
The
Compensation Committee has and will continue to consider the impact of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (relating to the
deductibility of compensation to executive officers in excess of $1 million),
when establishing incentive compensation plans. However, the Compensation
Committee considers its primary goal to design compensation strategies that
further the Company’s interests and those of the stockholders. Accordingly, the
Compensation Committee retains the ability to recommend appropriate executive
compensation that it deems in the Company’s best interests and the best
interests of the stockholders even when some compensation payments may not
be
tax deductible.
The
Company’s executive compensation program consists of two key elements: (1) an
annual component consisting of base salary and incentive compensation and (2)
a
long-term component, principally stock options. Certain other benefits are
also
included in executive compensation.
Annual
Base Compensation
The
Compensation Committee recommends annual salary levels for each of the Named
Executives, and for the other senior executives, to the Board of Directors.
The
recommendations of the Compensation Committee for base salary levels for senior
executives are determined annually, in part, by evaluating the responsibilities
of the position and examining market compensation levels and trends for similar
positions in the marketplace.
Additional
factors which the Compensation Committee considers in recommending annual
adjustments to base salaries include: results of the Company’s operations,
sales, stockholder returns, and the experience, work-performance, leadership
and
team building skills of each executive. The Company receives information from
the Chief Executive Officer with regard to these matters. While each of these
factors is considered in relatively equal weight, the Compensation Committee
does not utilize performance matrices or measured weightings in its review.
Each
year, the Compensation Committee conducts a structured review of base
compensation of senior executives with input from the Chief Executive
Officer.
Annual
Incentive Compensation
During
2001, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved
an annual incentive compensation plan for members of management. Under the
terms
of the plan, a percentage of after tax net income is allocated to be paid to
senior executives and managers. The amount of profit and incentive compensation
for each participant is determined on a quarterly basis. During 2005, the
Company paid incentive compensation under the plan to Robert L. Montgomery,
Stephen M. Merrick, Steven D. Albright, R. Scott Montgomery, Steve Hastings,
Ryan Montgomery and 29 other executives and managers.
Long-Term
Component - Stock Options
The
long-term component of compensation provided to the Company’s executives has
been in the form of stock options. The Compensation Committee has recommended
to
the Board of Directors that a portion of the total compensation to executives
be
in the form of stock options. Stock options are granted with an exercise price
equal to or greater than the closing market price of the Company’s common stock
on the date of the grant. Stock options are exercisable within ten years from
the date granted. These stock options provide incentive for the creation of
stockholder value over the long-term since the full benefit of the compensation
package for an executive cannot be realized unless an appreciation in the price
of the Company’s common stock occurs over time.
The
magnitude of the stock option awards are determined annually by the Compensation
Committee and the Board of Directors. Generally, the number of options granted
to an executive has been based on the relative salary level of the
executive.
In
2005,
the Company granted incentive stock options to purchase up to 12,500 shares
of
the Company’s common stock to each of Messrs. R. Scott Montgomery, Carl W.
Hastings and Steven D. Albright, respectively, and the Company granted
non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 160,000, 50,000, 37,500, 7,500
and
7,500 to Messrs. Robert L. Montgomery, Stephen M. Merrick, R. Scott Montgomery,
Carl W. Hastings and Steven D. Albright, respectively. The
Company granted no stock options to any of the Named Executives in 2003 and
2004.
CEO
Compensation
The
Compensation Committee utilizes the same standards and methods for recommending
annual base compensation for the Chief Executive Officer as it does for other
senior executive officers.
In
1997,
the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Robert L. Montgomery,
Chief Executive Officer, providing that Mr. Montgomery’s base annual
compensation would not be less than $485,000 and that he would participate
in
executive bonus and incentive plans. During 2003, 2004 and 2005, upon the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the base salary of Mr. Montgomery
was $642,625, $642,625 and $642,625, respectively. In 2003, 2004 and 2005,
annual incentive compensation was paid to Mr. Montgomery in the amounts of
$366,660, $442,400 and $616,168, respectively, under the Company’s annual
incentive compensation plan based on profits of the Company.
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed the base compensation and incentive
compensation of Mr. Montgomery in relation to compensation levels of executives
at other comparable companies and in light of the Company’s performance. Over
the past three years, the base compensation of Mr. Montgomery has not been
increased, at his request, despite the fact that, over that period, the
Company’s net sales have increased by more than 80% and the Company’s net income
has increased from $2,492,807 to $7,521,416. Increases during that period in
the
short-term component of Mr. Montgomery’s compensation have been made only by
reason of his participation in the incentive portion of annual compensation
which is based on the Company’s profitability.
The
Compensation Committee recommended that Mr. Montgomery (and other senior
executives) receive incentive and non-qualified stock options, consistent with
observed market practices, so that a significant portion of his total
compensation will be based upon, and consistent with, returns to stockholders.
In 2005, Mr. Montgomery was granted non-qualified stock options to purchase
up
to 160,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In 2003 and 2004, no stock
options were granted to Mr. Montgomery.
Robert
L.
Montgomery participated in the Company’s 401K plan, enrolled in health, life,
automobile and disability insurance, was provided with a Company vehicle and
was
reimbursed for business expenses.
The
Compensation Committee believes that the compensation paid to executives and
senior management is reasonable in view of the Company’s performance and the
contribution of the executives and senior management to that
performance.
Compensation
Committee:
Denis
St.
John, Donald L. McCain, John B. Akin
Comparative
Stock Price Performance Graph
The
following graph compares, for the period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005,
the cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on the
Company’s common stock with (i) Nasdaq National Market Index (U.S.) and (ii) a
peer group including the following companies: Mannatech, Inc., Nature’s Sunshine
Products, Inc., Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. and USANA Health Sciences, Inc.
The peer group consists of other companies marketing nutritional products
through direct sales. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on January 1,
2001, in the Company’s common stock and each of the other investment
categories.
The
historical stock prices of the Company’s common stock shown on the graph below
are not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Per share value
as
of December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 is based on the common stock’s
closing price as of such date. All prices reflect a 5-for-4 stock split issued
to holders of record on November 14, 2003 and a 1-for-5.25 stock dividend issued
to holders of record on October 11, 2002.
The
information under this heading and under the headings “Report of the Audit
Committee” and “Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation” shall
not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating
by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act
of
1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and shall not otherwise be
deemed filed under such Acts.
|
|
|
INDEXED
RETURNS
|
|
|
Base
|
|
Years
Ending
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
Name / Index
|
Dec00
|
Dec01
|
Dec02
|
Dec03
|
Dec04
|
Dec05
|
RELIV
INTERNATIONAL INC
|
100
|
100.00
|
443.81
|
609.52
|
1071.30
|
1592.02
|
NASDAQ
STOCK MARKET (U.S)
|
100
|
79.32
|
54.84
|
81.99
|
89.22
|
91.12
|
PEER
GROUP
|
100
|
172.30
|
199.42
|
636.75
|
942.81
|
887.28
|
Employment
Agreements
In
June
1997, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Robert L. Montgomery
replacing a prior agreement. The agreement was originally for a term of six
years commencing on January 1, 1997 with a provision for automatic one year
renewal terms, and provides for Mr. Montgomery to receive base annual
compensation during the term of not less than $485,000. Mr. Montgomery is also
to participate in the Company’s annual incentive compensation and the Company’s
long-term incentive compensation plans, the Company’s stock option plan and such
other compensation plans as the Company may from time to time have for
executives. In the event of Mr. Montgomery’s death during the term of the
agreement, payments equal to his total compensation under the agreement will
be
made to his heirs for a period of six months. The agreement also allows Mr.
Montgomery the option, upon reaching age 60, to reduce his level of service
to
the Company by approximately one-half with a corresponding decrease in position
and compensation. Mr. Montgomery also has the option upon reaching age 60 to
terminate his active service and continue in a consulting capacity. The term
of
the consulting period will be 10 years and Mr. Montgomery will receive
approximately 20% of his prior annual compensation as a consulting fee. The
agreement includes the obligation of Mr. Montgomery to maintain the
confidentiality of the Company’s confidential information and contains a
covenant of Mr. Montgomery not to compete with the Company.
In
June
2002, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Dr. Hastings replacing
a prior employment agreement. The services agreement is for a period of twenty
years with a provision for automatic one year renewal terms. The employment
of
Dr. Hastings will be for a term commencing on July 1, 2001 and expiring on
June
30, 2006. During the initial term of employment, the Company is obligated to
pay
Dr. Hastings a basic salary at the rate of $22,500 per month. Effective December
15, 2005, the Compensation Committee increased Dr. Hastings’ basic salary to
$30,000 per month. Upon expiration of the term of employment, Dr. Hastings
will
be retained to provide consulting services to the Company for the remainder
of
the term of the services agreement. During the consulting term, the Company
will
pay Dr. Hastings the sum of $10,000 per month. In the event of Dr. Hastings’
death during the term of the agreement, payments equal to his total compensation
under the agreement will be made to his heirs for a period of six months. During
the term of the services agreement, the Company will be entitled to use the
name
and likeness of Dr. Hastings in connection with the Company’s promotional
materials and activities. The services agreement also includes the obligation
of
Dr. Hastings to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s confidential
information and to hold any and all inventions made or conceived by him during
the term of the agreement as the Company’s fiduciary and a covenant of Dr.
Hastings not to compete with the Company.
In
April
2002, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with R. Scott Montgomery
under which he was employed as Vice President of International Operations.
The
agreement was originally for a term of one year commencing on April 3, 2002
with
a provision for automatic one year renewal terms, and provides for Mr.
Montgomery to receive base annual compensation of not less than $105,000. Mr.
Montgomery is also to participate in the Company’s annual incentive compensation
plan and such other compensation plans as the Company may from time to time
have
for executives. In the event of Mr. Montgomery’s termination for reasons other
than an event of default or permanent mental or physical disability, Mr.
Montgomery will receive a severance payment equal to six months salary. The
agreement includes the obligations of Mr. Montgomery to maintain the
confidentiality of the Company’s confidential information and hold certain
inventions for the Company in his fiduciary capacity, and contains a covenant
not to solicit the Company’s distributors for a period of 24 months after the
date of termination of this agreement.
In
April
2002, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Ryan A. Montgomery
under which he was employed as Corporate Counsel. The agreement was originally
for a term of one year commencing on April 18, 2002 with a provision for
automatic one year renewal terms, and provides for Mr. Montgomery to receive
base annual compensation of not less than $85,000. Mr. Montgomery is also to
participate in the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan and such other
compensation plans as the Company may from time to time have for executives.
In
the event of Mr. Montgomery’s termination for reasons other than an event of
default or permanent mental or physical disability, Mr. Montgomery will receive
a severance payment equal to six months salary. The agreement includes the
obligations of Mr. Montgomery to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s
confidential information and hold certain inventions for the Company in his
fiduciary capacity, and contains a covenant not to solicit the Company’s
distributors for a period of 24 months after the date of termination of this
agreement.
In
May
2002, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Steven G. Hastings
under which he was employed as Vice President of International Marketing. The
agreement was originally for a term of one year commencing on May 6, 2002 with
a
provision for automatic one year renewal terms, and provides for Mr. Hastings
to
receive base annual compensation of not less than $103,500. Mr. Hastings is
also
to participate in the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan and such
other compensation plans as the Company may from time to time have for
executives. In the event of Mr. Hastings’ termination for reasons other than an
event of default or permanent mental or physical disability, Mr. Hastings will
receive a severance payment equal to six months salary. The agreement includes
the obligations of Mr. Hastings to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s
confidential information and hold certain inventions for the Company in his
fiduciary capacity, and contains a covenant not to solicit the Company’s
distributors for a period of 24 months after the date of termination of this
agreement.
In
March
1997, the Company entered into Split-Dollar Agreements with each of Messrs.
Robert L. Montgomery, R. Scott Montgomery, Carl W. Hastings, Steven G. Hastings
and Steven D. Albright. In August 2002, the Company entered into a Split-Dollar
Agreement with Mr. Ryan A. Montgomery. Under these agreements, the Company
pays
the premiums on life insurance policies covering each above-named officer’s
life. Upon the death of any of Messrs. Robert L. Montgomery, R. Scott
Montgomery, Ryan A. Montgomery, Carl W. Hastings, Steven G. Hastings or Steven
D. Albright, the Company is entitled to receive the greater of (1) one-third
of
the insurance proceeds, (2) the cash surrender value of the policy or (3) the
total premiums paid under the policy, with the insured’s beneficiary receiving
the balance of the insurance proceeds. On termination of the agreement prior
to
the death of the insured, he shall have the right to purchase the policy for
the
greater of (a) the cash surrender value of the policy or (b) the total premiums
paid under the policy.
In
March
1997, the Company entered into a Salary Continuation Plan Agreement with each
of
Messrs. R. Scott Montgomery, Steven G. Hastings and Steven D. Albright. The
agreement provides for continuation of each executive’s compensation at a rate
provided in the agreement for a period of 10 years upon termination of
employment, retirement or death, after he has reached the age of 55 and has
been
employed by the Company for 15 years. Salary continuation payments are also
made
in the event the executive is terminated prior to reaching these thresholds
for
reasons other than cause as defined in the agreement.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
Stephen
M. Merrick is Senior Vice President and a director. Mr. Merrick previously
was a
principal of the law firm of Merrick & Associates, P.C. and has served as
General Counsel since the Company’s inception. During the year ended December
31, 2005, the aggregate amounts paid or incurred by the Company to Merrick
&
Associates, P.C. for services provided to the Company was $40,000.
During
2005, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 535,008 shares of the Company’s
common stock held by certain executive officers and directors for an aggregate
purchase price of $5,082,576. The purchase price for each repurchase transaction
was determined using a 7% discount to the closing market price per share on
each
respective repurchase date in order to approximate the dilutive impact of any
corresponding sale on the open market. The terms and conditions of each
repurchase transaction were approved by the Board of Directors, excluding the
vote of any interested director.
The
following table provides information regarding the aggregate repurchase
transactions between the Company and each director or executive officer that
occurred during 2005.
Name
|
|
Aggregate
Number of Shares Repurchased (#)
|
|
Aggregate
Purchase Price ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
L. Montgomery
|
|
245,533
|
|
2,332,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen
M. Merrick
|
|
110,527
|
|
1,050,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl
W. Hastings
|
|
178,948
|
|
1,700,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
535,008
|
|
5,082,576
|
______________________
(1) |
|
The
total aggregate purchase price has been adjusted due to
rounding.
|
In
2005,
the Company also purchased 489,193 shares of the Company’s common stock from
Donald Gibbons, Jr., a former officer, and David Kreher, a former officer and
director, and his wife for an aggregate purchase price of $4,402,737. In
connection with these repurchases from Mr. and Mrs. Kreher, the Company issued
notes in the amount of $4,050,000.
The
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, Robert L. Montgomery,
is
the father of R. Scott Montgomery and Ryan A. Montgomery. R. Scott Montgomery
is
Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations and as a result of serving in
such
capacity, the Company paid him cash compensation of $336,048 for 2005. Ryan
A.
Montgomery is Vice President, Sales and as a result of serving in such capacity,
the Company paid him cash compensation of $304,042 for 2005. Ronald McCain
is
the son of Donald L. McCain, a director, and Ronald McCain is the son-in-law
of
the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, Robert L.
Montgomery. Ronald McCain is Director of Customer Service and as a result of
serving in such capacity, the Company paid him cash compensation of $208,024
for
2005.
Vice
President and director, Dr. Carl W. Hastings, is the father of Steven G.
Hastings and Brett M. Hastings. Steven G. Hastings is Vice President, Sales
and
as a result of serving in such capacity, the Company paid him cash compensation
of $304,042 for 2005. Brett M. Hastings is Associate General Counsel and as
a
result of serving in such capacity, the Company paid him cash compensation
of
$163,823 for 2005.
Compensation
of Directors
Members
of the Board of Directors who are not employees receive a monthly fee of $2,500
and $1,500 per attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or any
committees of the Board of Directors. On January 5, 2005, the Company issued
to
each of the non-employee members of the Board of Directors non-qualified stock
options to purchase the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $7.92 per
share, the closing price on January 5, 2005. Under these options, Mr. McCain
was
granted the right to purchase up to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
and Messrs. Henry, Akin and St. John were each granted the right to purchase
up
to 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class
of
the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with the Nasdaq
National Market. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders
are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section
16(a) forms they file.
Based
solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, or
written representations that no Form 5’s were required, the Company believes
that during calendar year 2005, all of the officers, directors and ten percent
beneficial owners of the Company complied with all applicable Section 16(a)
filing requirements,
except that the Company discovered an inadvertent error on a Form 4 previously
filed by Mr. Robert L. Montgomery, and Messrs. Donald L. McCain and John B.
Akin
each inadvertently failed to report a transaction relating to the Company’s
common stock. Form 4’s reporting these items were promptly filed after the
oversights were discovered.
Code
of Ethics
The
Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to senior executive and
financial officers. The Company’s Code of Ethics seeks to promote (1) honest and
ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts
of interest between personal and professional relationships, (2) full, fair,
accurate, timely and understandable disclosure of information to the Commission,
(3) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations, (4)
prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to predesignated
persons, and (5) accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics. A copy
of
the Company’s Code of Ethics has been attached to and can be viewed on the
Company’s Internet website at http://www.reliv.com under the section entitled
“Investor Relations.”
PROPOSAL
TWO - SELECTION
OF AUDITORS
Ratification
of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The
Board
of Directors has selected and approved Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements
for 2006, subject to ratification by the stockholders. It is expected that
a
representative of the firm of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the
Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she
so
desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees
Billed By Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
following table sets forth the amount of fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP
for services rendered for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004:
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees (1)
|
|
$
|
548,800
|
|
$
|
558,597
|
|
Audit-Related
Fees (2)
|
|
|
17,400
|
|
|
15,400
|
|
Tax
Fees (3)
|
|
|
307,700
|
|
|
169,309
|
|
Total
Fees
|
|
$
|
873,900
|
|
$
|
743,306
|
|
______________________
(1)
|
Includes
the annual consolidated financial statement audit, limited quarterly
reviews, statutory audits required internationally and the audit
of
internal controls.
|
(2)
|
Represents
fees paid for the annual audit of the Company’s 401(k)
Plan.
|
(3)
|
Primarily
represents the preparation of tax returns and other tax compliance
and
consulting services.
|
All
audit, tax, and other services to be performed by Ernst & Young LLP for the
Company must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews
the description of the services and an estimate of the anticipated costs of
performing those services. Services not previously approved cannot commence
until such approval has been granted. Pre-approval is granted usually at
regularly scheduled meetings. If unanticipated items arise between meetings
of
the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee has delegated approval authority to
the
chairman of the Audit Committee, in which case the chairman communicates such
pre-approvals to the full committee at its next meeting. During 2005, all
services performed by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by the Audit
Committee in accordance with this policy.
The
Audit
Committee reviews all relationships with Ernst & Young LLP, including the
provision of non-audit services, which may relate to the independent registered
public accounting firm’s independence. The Audit Committee considered the effect
of Ernst & Young LLP’s non-audit services in assessing the independence of
the independent registered public accounting firm and concluded that the
provision of such services by Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with the
maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing
functions.
THE
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” SUCH RATIFICATION.
Stockholder
Proposals for 2006 Proxy Statement
Proposals
by stockholders for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of Proxy
relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is scheduled to
be
held on May 24, 2007, should be addressed to the Secretary, Reliv’
International, Inc., P.O. Box 405, Chesterfield, Missouri 63006, and must be
received at such address no later than December 31, 2006. Upon receipt of any
such proposal, the Company will determine whether or not to include such
proposal in the Proxy Statement and Proxy in accordance with applicable law.
It
is suggested that such proposal be forwarded by certified mail, return receipt
requested.
Stockholder
Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders
of the Company may communicate with the Board of Directors in writing addressed
to:
Board
of Directors
c/o
Corporate Secretary
Reliv
International, Inc.
P.O.
Box 405
Chesterfield,
Missouri 63006
The
Secretary will review each communication from a stockholder. The Secretary
will
forward to the members of the Board of Directors each communication that (1)
concerns the Company’s business or governance, (2) is not offensive and is
legible in form and reasonably understandable in content, and (3) does not
relate to a personal grievance against the Company or a team member or further
a
personal interest not shared by the other stockholders generally.
The
Company strongly encourages each of its directors to attend each Annual Meeting
of the Company’s stockholders where attendance does not unreasonably conflict
with the director’s other business and personal commitments. All of the members
of the Board of Directors attended the 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Other
Matters to Be Acted Upon at the Meeting
The
management of the Company knows of no other matters to be presented at the
meeting. Should any other matter requiring a vote of the stockholders arise
at
the meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the proxies in accordance
with their best judgment.
|
BY
ORDER OF THE
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
|
|
Dated:
April 21, 2006
|
/s/
Stephen M. Merrick
|
|
|
Stephen
M. Merrick, Secretary
|