form6-k20090228.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
6-K
Report
of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the
month of April 2009
EXFO
Electro-Optical Engineering Inc.
(Translation
of registrant’s name into English)
400
Godin Avenue, Quebec, Quebec, Canada G1M 2K2
(Address
of principal executive offices)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in
this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If “Yes”
is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-______.
On March
31, 2009, EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc., a Canadian corporation,
reported its results of operations for the second fiscal quarter ended February
28, 2009. This report on Form 6-K sets forth the news release
relating to EXFO’s announcement and certain information relating to EXFO’s
financial condition and results of operations for the second fiscal quarter of
the 2009 fiscal year. This press release and information relating to
EXFO’s financial condition and results of operations for the second fiscal
quarter of the 2009 fiscal year are hereby incorporated as a document by
reference to Form F-3 (Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933)
declared effective as of July 30, 2001 and to Form F-3 (Registration Statement
under the Securities Act of 1933) declared effective as of
March 11, 2002 and to amend certain material information as set forth
in these two Form F-3 documents.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
EXFO
ELECTRO-OPTICAL ENGINEERING INC.
|
|
By:
/s/ Germain
Lamonde
Name: Germain
Lamonde
Title: President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date:
April 6, 2009
EXFO Reports Strong Quarterly Results Amid Difficult Market
Environment
§
|
Increases
sales 7.1% year-over-year to US$46.4 million with book-to-bill ratio of
1.02
|
§
|
Record
protocol sales exceed 40% of Telecom Division
revenues
|
§
|
Recognizes
multi-million dollar contract from Tier-1 North American wireless
operator
|
§
|
Captures
No. 1 position in global fiber-optic test equipment market with 18.0%
market share and 33.3% for portable installation and maintenance
segment
|
QUEBEC
CITY, CANADA, March 31, 2009—EXFO Electro-Optical Engineering Inc. (NASDAQ:
EXFO; TSX: EXF) reported today strong financial results for the second quarter
ended February 28, 2009.
Sales
increased 7.1% to US$46.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 from
US$43.3 million in the second quarter of 2008, but were flat compared to US$46.4
million in the first quarter of 2009. Net bookings improved 6.3% to US$47.3
million for a book-to-bill ratio of 1.02 in the second quarter of fiscal 2009
from US$44.5 million in the same period last year, but dropped 9.6% from US$52.3
million in the first quarter of 2009. At the mid-point of fiscal 2009, bookings
and sales increased 12.9% and 10.1% year-over-year to US$99.6 million and
US$92.7 million, respectively, for a book-to-bill ratio of 1.07.
Gross
margin reached 60.4% of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to
58.3% in the second quarter of 2008 and 62.3% in the first quarter of 2009.
After six months into fiscal 2009, gross margin attained 61.4% compared to 57.0%
in the same period last year.
GAAP net
earnings in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 amounted to US$2.7 million, or
US$0.04 per diluted share, compared to US$4.0 million, or US$0.06 per diluted
share, in the same period last year and US$5.3 million, or US$0.08 per diluted
share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. GAAP net earnings in the second
quarter of 2009 included US$1.0 million in after-tax amortization of intangible
assets and US$0.3 million in stock-based compensation costs. It should be noted
that EXFO benefited from a net US$1.2 million income tax recovery in the second
quarter of 2008 and recorded a pre-tax, foreign exchange gain of US$4.6 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, EXFO closed the acquisition of Sweden-based
PicoSolve Inc., a supplier of ultra-high-speed optical sampling oscilloscopes
capable of characterizing transmission networks up to 500 Gbit/s. PicoSolve’s
industry-leading oscilloscopes have been integrated in EXFO’s optical product
offering for 40 Gbit/s and 100 Gbit/s R&D, manufacturing and deployment
applications.
Following
the quarter-end, EXFO was named recipient of the Growth Strategy Leadership
Award by Frost & Sullivan for the fifth consecutive time. The award is
presented to the company whose growth strategy generates the largest
market-share gains in the global fiber-optic test equipment (FOTE) market during
the previous research period. According to Frost & Sullivan, a leading
global growth consulting firm, EXFO captured first place overall in the FOTE
market with a market share of 18.0% in 2008 from third place with a market share
of 12.7% in 2006. (Frost & Sullivan did not grant an award for market-share
gains in 2007). Based on Frost & Sullivan’s market data, EXFO improved its
leadership position in the portable installation and maintenance test market
from 25.5% in 2006 to 33.3% in 2008.
“Given
the challenging market environment and typical seasonality, I’m rather pleased
with our revenue and earnings performance in the second quarter, as well as with
our confirmed global market leadership in Optical testing and continued progress
in our Protocol test and service assurance business that reached above 40% of
Telecom Division revenues for the first time,” said Germain Lamonde, EXFO’s
Chairman, President and CEO. “Our early success in service assurance and
wireless market reflects our alignment with key growth segments in the telecom
industry. Our strong earnings performance, meanwhile, can be attributed to
quality of execution and a favorable Canadian/US exchange rate.”
Unaudited
Selected Financial Information
(In
thousands of US dollars)
Segmented
results:
|
|
|
Q2
2009 |
|
Q2
2008 |
|
Q1
2009 |
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
$
|
41,367 |
$
|
37,435 |
$
|
41,159 |
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
5,005 |
|
5,846 |
|
5,204 |
Total
|
|
$
|
46,372 |
$
|
43,281 |
$
|
46,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
$
|
2,117 |
$
|
2,817 |
$
|
1,355 |
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
482 |
|
818 |
|
738 |
Total
|
|
$
|
2,599 |
$
|
3,635 |
$
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
selected information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP
net earnings
|
|
$
|
2,655 |
$
|
4,024 |
$
|
5,287 |
After-tax
amortization of intangible assets
|
|
$ |
1,034 |
$
|
490 |
$
|
1,098 |
Stock-based
compensation costs
|
|
$ |
325 |
$
|
269 |
$
|
322 |
Future
income tax recovery
|
|
$ |
– |
$
|
(2,715 |
$
|
– |
Effect
of changes in Canadian tax rate
|
|
$ |
– |
$
|
1,524 |
$
|
– |
Operating
Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses amounted to US$15.8 million, or 34.1% of sales, in
the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to US$13.7 million, or 31.6% of
sales, in the same period last year and US$17.1 million, or 36.9% of sales, in
the first quarter of 2009.
Gross
research and development expenses totaled US$8.8 million, or 19.0% of sales, in
the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to US$7.6 million, or 17.5% of
sales, in the second quarter of 2008 and US$8.6 million, or 18.6% of sales, in
the first quarter of 2009.
Net
R&D expenses totaled US$7.3 million, or 15.8% of sales, in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to US$6.2 million, or 14.3% of sales, in the
same period last year and US$7.2 million, or 15.6% of sales, in the first
quarter of 2009.
Second-Quarter
Business Highlights
Market expansion — EXFO
delivered sales growth of 7.1% year-over-year in the second quarter of 2009,
including a combined US$9.2 million revenue contribution from Brix Networks and
Navtel Communications. The company’s Protocol business, which includes Brix
Networks and Navtel Communications, generated record quarterly sales, accounting
for more than 40% of Telecom Division revenue. EXFO’s top customer accounted for
20.3% of sales in the second quarter largely due to a multi-million dollar IP
service assurance contract from a Tier-1 North American wireless operator.
Year-to-date in fiscal 2009, EXFO’s top customer represented 11.8% of sales and
its top three customers 18.6%.
Profitability — GAAP net
earnings amounted to US$2.7 million, or US$0.04 per diluted share, in the second
quarter based on higher-margin protocol sales, cost-control initiatives and a
favorable Canada/US exchange rate. At the mid-point of fiscal 2009, GAAP net
earnings amounted to US$7.9 million, or US$0.12 per diluted share. In
comparison, the company posted GAAP net earnings of US$3.9 million, or US$0.06
per diluted share, at the same period in 2008.
Innovation — EXFO launched
seven new products in the second quarter, including a patent-pending distributed
PMD analyzer that allows network operators to cost-effectively upgrade their
networks to 40G and 100G by measuring the level of potentially debilitating PMD
on each fiber section. The company also released a new software suite for
Packet-over-OTN (Optical Transport Network) test applications in
next-generation, IP networks; a new software suite for end-to-end testing of IMS
(Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem) networks; and a new passive optical
network (PON) power meter for fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) test applications.
Following the quarter-end, EXFO introduced a portable, multi-layer platform
(FTB-500) designed for high-end test applications in the field and central
office; a high-performance optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) purpose-built for
dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) network commissioning and network
upgrades to 40G; and an optical time domain reflectometer (OTDR) optimized for
FTTH applications and live fiber troubleshooting. Sales from products that have
been on the market two years or less accounted for 41.4% of total sales in the
second quarter of 2009 and 37.2% year-to-date in fiscal 2009.
Business
Outlook
EXFO
forecasted sales between US$45 million and US$50 million and GAAP net earnings
between US$0.01 per diluted share and US$0.05 per diluted share for the third
quarter of 2009. GAAP net earnings include US$0.02 per share in after-tax
amortization of intangible assets and stock-based compensation
costs.
This
guidance was established by management based on existing backlog as of the date
of this press release, seasonality, expected bookings for the remaining of the
quarter, as well as stability in exchange rates compared to the previous
quarter.
Conference
Call and Webcast
EXFO will
host a conference call today at 5 p.m. (Eastern time) to review its financial
results for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. To listen to the conference call
and participate in the question period via telephone, dial 1-416-641-6680. Germain Lamonde,
Chairman, President and CEO, and Pierre Plamondon, CA, Vice-President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer, will participate in the call. An audio replay of
the conference call will be available one hour after the event until 7 p.m. on
April 7, 2009. The replay number is 1-402-977-9141 and the reservation number is
21416112. The audio Webcast and replay of the conference call will also be
available on EXFO’s Website at www.EXFO.com, under the Investors
section.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S.
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we intend that such
forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby.
Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or
statements of current condition. Words such as may, will, expect, believe,
anticipate, intend, could, estimate, continue, or the negative or comparable
terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition,
any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other
characterizations of future events and circumstances are considered
forward-looking statements. They are not guarantees of future performance and
involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
in forward-looking statements due to various factors including consolidation in
the global telecommunications test, measurement and service assurance industry;
capital spending levels in the telecommunications, life sciences and
high-precision assembly sectors; concentration of sales; fluctuating exchange
rates and our ability to execute in these uncertain conditions; the effects of
the additional actions we have taken in response to such economic uncertainty
(including our ability to quickly adapt cost structures with anticipated levels
of business, ability to manage inventory levels with market demand); market
acceptance of our new products and other upcoming products; limited visibility
with regards to customer orders and the timing of such orders; our ability to
successfully integrate our acquired and to-be-acquired businesses; our ability
to successfully expand international operations; the retention of key technical
and management personnel; and future economic, competitive, financial and market
conditions, including slow-down or recession in the global economy. Assumptions
relating to the foregoing involve judgments and risks, all of which are
difficult or impossible to predict and many of which are beyond our control.
Other risk factors that may affect our future performance and operations are
detailed in our Annual Report, on Form 20-F, and our other filings with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities commissions. We
believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable based on information currently available to us, but we cannot assure
you that the expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly, you
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These
statements speak only as of the date of this document. Unless required by law
or applicable regulations, we undertake no obligation to revise or
update any of them to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the
date of this document.
About
EXFO
EXFO is a
leading provider of test and service assurance solutions for network service
providers and equipment manufacturers in the global telecommunications industry.
The Telecom Division offers a wide range of innovative solutions
extending across the full technology lifecycle ― from design to technology
deployment and onto service assurance ― and covering all layers on a network
infrastructure to enable triple-play services and next-generation, converged IP
networking. The Life Sciences and Industrial Division offers solutions in
medical device and opto-electronics assembly, fluorescence microscopy and other
life science sectors. For more information, visit www.EXFO.com.
For
more information
Vance
Oliver
Manager,
Investor Relations
(418)
683-0913, Ext. 3733
vance.oliver@exfo.com
EXFO Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Interim
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in thousands of US
dollars)
|
|
As
at
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
As
at
August
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
5,914 |
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
|
48,898 |
|
|
|
81,626 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
(note 4)
|
|
|
29,206 |
|
|
|
31,473 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
Income
taxes and tax credits recoverable
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
4,836 |
|
Inventories
(note 5)
|
|
|
28,869 |
|
|
|
34,880 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
Future
income taxes
|
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,374 |
|
|
|
174,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
credits recoverable
|
|
|
19,321 |
|
|
|
20,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
17,108 |
|
|
|
19,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
16,621 |
|
|
|
19,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
36,909 |
|
|
|
42,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
income taxes
|
|
|
12,988 |
|
|
|
15,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,321 |
|
|
$ |
293,066 |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities (note 6)
|
|
$ |
27,903 |
|
|
$ |
24,713 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,700 |
|
|
|
29,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts
(note 4)
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,955 |
|
|
|
33,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies (note
7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
capital (note 8)
|
|
|
105,934 |
|
|
|
142,786 |
|
Contributed
surplus
|
|
|
16,670 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
68,436 |
|
|
|
60,494 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
51,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,366 |
|
|
|
259,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,321 |
|
|
$ |
293,066 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(in thousands of US
dollars, except share and per share data)
|
|
Three
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
46,372 |
|
|
$ |
92,735 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
84,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (note
5) (1,2)
|
|
|
18,353 |
|
|
|
35,833 |
|
|
|
18,060 |
|
|
|
36,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
56,902 |
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
48,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
and administrative (1)
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
32,891 |
|
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
28,500 |
|
Net
research and development (1)
(note 9)
|
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
14,546 |
|
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
|
12,197 |
|
Amortization
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
25,420 |
|
|
|
52,210 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
44,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from operations
|
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
Foreign
exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
before income taxes
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (note
10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(8,373 |
) |
|
|
(7,192 |
) |
Future
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
9,368 |
|
|
|
9,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted net earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average number of shares outstanding (000’s)
|
|
|
60,875 |
|
|
|
64,108 |
|
|
|
68,984 |
|
|
|
68,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number
of shares outstanding (000’s) (note 11)
|
|
|
61,375 |
|
|
|
64,546 |
|
|
|
69,490 |
|
|
|
69,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Stock-based compensation costs
included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Selling
and administrative
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Net
research and development
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
(2)
|
The
cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown
separately.
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Unaudited Interim
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
and Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(in thousands of US
dollars)
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(4,646 |
) |
|
|
(41,579 |
) |
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
19,733 |
|
Changes
in unrealized losses on short-term investments
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Unrealized
gains (losses) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
(8,663 |
) |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
2,549 |
|
Reclassification
of realized gains (losses) on forward exchange contracts in net
earnings
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
Future
income taxes effect of the above items
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,241 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,741 |
) |
|
$ |
9,516 |
|
|
$ |
24,177 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of prior periods
|
|
$ |
51,129 |
|
|
$ |
53,418 |
|
Current
period
|
|
|
(41,579 |
) |
|
|
19,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,550 |
|
|
|
73,151 |
|
Unrealized
gains (losses) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of prior periods
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
1,948 |
|
Current
period, net of realized gains (losses) and future income
taxes
|
|
|
(5,126 |
) |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,222 |
) |
|
|
2,371 |
|
Unrealized
losses on short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of prior periods
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Current
period, net of future income taxes
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
4,326 |
|
|
$ |
75,557 |
|
Total
retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income amounted to
$121,779 and $72,762 as of February 29, 2008, and
February 28, 2009, respectively.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings
and
Contributed Surplus
(in thousands of US
dollars)
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– Beginning of the period
|
|
$ |
60,494 |
|
|
$ |
42,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add
(deduct)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
|
7,942 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
Premium
on redemption of share capital (note 8)
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– End of the period
|
|
$ |
68,436 |
|
|
$ |
46,222 |
|
Contributed
surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– Beginning of the period
|
|
$ |
5,226 |
|
|
$ |
4,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add
(deduct)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation costs
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
Reclassification
of stock-based compensation costs to share capital upon exercise of stock
awards (note 8)
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
Discount
on redemption of share capital (note 8)
|
|
|
11,257 |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– End of the period
|
|
$ |
16,670 |
|
|
$ |
4,827 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands of US
dollars)
|
|
Three
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
Six
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
Add
(deduct) items not affecting cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in discount on short-term investments
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
Stock-based
compensation costs
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
4,773 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
Future
income taxes
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
9,368 |
|
|
|
9,449 |
|
Change
in unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(601 |
) |
|
|
(4,057 |
) |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
8,791 |
|
|
|
16,132 |
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
19,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in non-cash operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
(2,817 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
Income
taxes and tax credits
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(9,190 |
) |
|
|
(9,648 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(396 |
) |
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
(2,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,296 |
|
|
|
13,620 |
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
7,193 |
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
to short-term investments
|
|
|
(133,364 |
) |
|
|
(255,464 |
) |
|
|
(197,607 |
) |
|
|
(409,060 |
) |
Proceeds
from disposal and maturity of short-term
investments
|
|
|
149,501 |
|
|
|
276,106 |
|
|
|
194,009 |
|
|
|
408,580 |
|
Additions
to capital assets (1)
|
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
|
(3,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,191 |
|
|
|
16,182 |
|
|
|
(5,711 |
) |
|
|
(4,166 |
) |
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in bank loan
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Exercise
of stock options (note 8)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Redemption
of share capital (note 8)
|
|
|
(25,631 |
) |
|
|
(26,078 |
) |
|
|
− |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,626 |
) |
|
|
(26,047 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of foreign exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in cash
|
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
– Beginning of period
|
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
5,914 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
– End of period
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
9,211 |
|
|
$ |
9,211 |
|
(1) As
at February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009, unpaid purchases of capital assets
amounted to $94 and $614, respectively.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
EXFO Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
1. Interim
Financial Information
The
financial information as at February 28, 2009, and for the three- and six-month
periods ended February 29, 2008, and February 28, 2009, is unaudited. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the
results of these periods in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada have been included. The adjustments
made were of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results may not necessarily
be indicative of results anticipated for the entire year.
These
interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in Canada and use the same
accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the company’s most
recent annual consolidated financial statements, except for changes described in
note 2. However, all disclosures required for annual financial statements have
not been included in these financial statements. Consequently, these interim
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
company’s most recent annual consolidated
financial statements.
2. New
Accounting Standards and Pronouncements
Adopted
in fiscal 2009
In
December 2006, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) issued
three new sections, which provide a complete set of disclosure and
presentation requirements for financial instruments: Section 3862, “Financial
Instruments − Disclosures”; Section 3863, “Financial
Instruments − Presentation”; and Section 1535, “Capital
Disclosures”.
Section
3862 replaces the disclosure portion of Section 3861, “Financial
Instruments − Disclosure and Presentation”. The new standard
places increased emphasis on disclosures regarding risks associated with both
recognized and unrecognized financial instruments and how these risks are
managed. It is also intended to remove any duplicate disclosures and simplify
the disclosures about concentrations of risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and
price risk previously found in Section 3861.
Section
3863 carries forward the presentation requirements from Section 3861,
unchanged.
Section
1535 applies to all entities, regardless of whether they have financial
instruments or are subject to external capital requirements. The new section
requires disclosure of information about an entity’s objectives, policies and
processes for managing capital, as well as quantitative data about capital and
whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements.
The
company adopted these new standards on September 1, 2008 (notes 3 and
4).
In June
2007, the CICA issued Section 3031, “Inventories”. This standard requires the
measurement of inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value and
includes guidance on the determination of cost, including allocation of
overheads and other costs to inventory. The standard also requires the
consistent use of either first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted average cost
formula to measure the cost of inventories and requires the reversal of previous
write-downs to net realizable value when there is a subsequent increase in the
value of inventories. The new standard applies to fiscal years beginning
on or after January 1, 2008. The company adopted this new standard on
September 1, 2008, and its adoption had no effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
In June
2007, the CICA amended Section 1400, “General Standards of Financial Statement
Presentation” to include new requirements regarding an entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern. These amendments apply to fiscal years beginning on
or after January 1, 2008. The company adopted these amendments on September 1,
2008, and their adoption had no effect on its consolidated financial
statements.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
To
be adopted after fiscal 2009
In
February 2008, the CICA issued Section 3064, “Goodwill and intangible assets”,
which supersedes Section 3062, “Goodwill and other intangible assets” and
Section 3450, “Research and development costs”. Various changes have been made
to other sections of the CICA Handbook for consistency purposes. Section 3064
establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and of intangible
assets by profit-oriented enterprises. Standards concerning goodwill remain
unchanged from the standards included in Section 3062. This new section
applies to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008. The company will
adopt this new standard on September 1, 2009, and has not yet determined the
effects its adoption will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
January 2009, the CICA issued Section 1582, “Business Combinations”, which
replaces Section 1581, “Business Combinations”. This new section establishes the
standards for the accounting of business combinations and states that all assets
and liabilities of an acquired business will be recorded at fair value.
Obligations for contingent consideration and contingencies will also be recorded
at fair value at the acquisition date. The standard also states that
acquisition-related costs will be expensed as incurred and that restructuring
charges will be expensed in the periods after the acquisition date. This
standard applies prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates
on or after January 1, 2011; earlier adoption is permitted.
In January 2009, the CICA issued
Section 1601, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, which replaces Section 1600,
“Consolidated Financial Statements”, and establishes the standards for preparing
consolidated financial statements. This new section applies to fiscal years
beginning on or after January 1, 2011; earlier adoption is permitted.
The company has not yet determined the impact, if any, that adopting this
standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2009, the CICA issued Section 1602, “Non-controlling Interests”, which
establishes standards for the accounting of non-controlling interests of a
subsidiary in the preparation of consolidated financial statements subsequent to
a business combination. This new section applies to fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2011; earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of
a fiscal year.
Should
the company decide to early adopt one of these three new sections, it must adopt
all three on the same date.
3. Capital
Disclosures
The
company is not subject to any external restrictions on its capital.
The
company’s objectives when managing capital are:
·
|
To
maintain a flexible capital structure, which optimizes the cost of capital
at acceptable risk;
|
·
|
To
sustain future development of the company, including research and
development activities, market development, and potential acquisitions of
complementary businesses or products;
and
|
·
|
To
provide the company’s shareholders with an appropriate return on their
investment.
|
The
company defines its capital as shareholders’ equity, excluding accumulated other
comprehensive income. Accumulated other comprehensive income’s main components
are the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, which is the result
of the translation of the company’s consolidated financial statements into
US dollars (the reporting currency) as well as after-tax unrealized gains
(loss) on forward exchange contracts.
The
capital of the company amounted to $208,506,000 and $191,040,000 as at August
31, 2008 and February 28, 2009, respectively.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Of this
capital, as at February 28, 2009, an amount of $58,128,000 represented cash and
short-term investments ($87,540,000 as at August 31, 2008),
a portion of which can be considered in excess of the company’s current and
expected needs (except for potential acquisitions of businesses).
The company has consequently been actively repurchasing shares from the
open market via a normal course issuer bid through the facilities of the Toronto
Stock Exchange and NASDAQ. Furthermore, on December 18, 2008, pursuant to a
substantial issuer bid (note 8), the company purchased for cancellation
7,692,307 subordinate voting shares for an aggregate purchase price of
CA$30,000,000 (US$24,879,000), plus related fees of $576,000.
4. Financial
Instruments
Market
risk
Currency
risk
The
principal measurement currency of the company is the Canadian dollar. The
company is exposed to currency risks as a result of its export sales
of products manufactured in Canada and China, the majority of which are
denominated in US dollars and euros. These risks are partially hedged
by forward exchange contracts (US dollars) and certain operating expenses (US
dollars and euros).
As at
February 28, 2009, the company held contracts to sell US dollars for Canadian
dollars at various forward rates, which are summarized as follows:
|
Expiry
dates
|
|
Contractual
amounts
|
|
|
Weighted
average contractual
forward
rates
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
March
2009 to August 2009
|
|
$ |
18,800 |
|
|
|
1.0567
|
|
|
September
2009 to August 2010
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
1.0760
|
|
|
September
2010 to August 2011
|
|
|
14,600 |
|
|
|
1.1221
|
|
|
September
2011
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1.1278
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
58,600 |
|
|
|
1.0822
|
|
These
contracts are designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges.
The fair
value of forward exchange contracts, which represents the amount that the
company would receive or pay to settle the contracts based on the forward
exchange rate at period end, amounted to net gains of $62,000 as at August 31,
2008 and net losses of $8,457,000 as at February 28, 2009, following
the significant decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar compared to the US
dollar since the beginning of fiscal 2009. As at February 28, 2009,
forward exchange contracts, in the amount of $4,997,000, are presented
in the accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 6) in the balance sheet,
and forward exchange contracts, in the amount of $2,329,000, are presented
in forward exchange contracts in the balance sheet.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
The
following table summarizes significant financial assets and liabilities that are
subject to currency risk
as at February 28, 2009:
|
|
Carrying/nominal
amount
(in
thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
Carrying/nominal
amount
(in
thousands
of
euros)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Financial
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
6,128 |
|
|
€ |
575 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
22,292 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
|
|
28,420 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
Financial
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7,452 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Forward
exchange contracts
|
|
|
58,600 |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
66,052 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Net
exposure
|
|
$ |
(37,632 |
) |
|
€ |
3,328 |
|
The
period-end value of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar was CA$1.2707
= US$1.00 as at February 28, 2009.
The
period-end value of the Canadian dollar compared to the euro was CA$1.6089 =
€1.00 as at February 28, 2009.
The
following sensitivity analysis summarizes the effect that a change in the value
of the Canadian dollar (compared to US dollar and euro) would have on
financial assets and liabilities denominated in US dollars and euros, as well as
on net earnings, net earnings per diluted share and comprehensive income, based
on the foreign exchange rates
as at February 28, 2009:
·
|
An
increase (decrease) of 10% in the period-end value of the Canadian dollar
compared to the US dollar would decrease (increase) net earnings by
$1,433,000, or $0.02 per diluted
share.
|
·
|
An
increase (decrease) of 10% in the period-end value of the Canadian dollar
compared to the euro would decrease (increase) net earnings by $434,000,
or $0.01 per diluted share.
|
·
|
An
increase (decrease) of 10% in the period-end value of the Canadian dollar
compared to the US dollar would increase (decrease) comprehensive income
by $3,600,000.
|
The
impact of the change in the value of the Canadian dollar compared to the US
dollar and the euro on these financial assets and liabilities is recorded in the
foreign exchange gain or loss line item in the consolidated statements of
earnings, except for outstanding forward contracts, which impact is recorded in
comprehensive income. The change in the value of the Canadian dollar
compared to the US dollar and the euro also impacts the company’s balances of
income tax and tax credits recoverable or payable and future income tax
assets and liabilities related to integrated foreign subsidiaries; this may
result in additional and significant foreign exchange gain or loss. However,
these assets and liabilities are not considered financial instruments and are
excluded from the sensitivity analysis above. The foreign exchange rate
fluctuations also flow through the statements of earnings line items, as a
significant portion of the company’s operating expenses is denominated
in Canadian dollars, and the company reports its results in US dollars;
that effect is not reflected in the sensitivity
analysis above.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Interest
rate risk
The
company is exposed to interest rate risks through its short-term investments. As
at February 28, 2009, the company’s short-term investments, in the
amount of $48,898,000, bear interest at rates ranging between 0.73% and 2.65%
and mature between March 2009 and June 2009.
·
|
An
increase (decrease) of 0.5% in the interest rate of the company’s
short-term investments would increase (decrease) net earnings by $42,000,
or $0.00 per diluted share on a quarterly
basis.
|
Due to
their short-term maturity of usually three months or less, the company’s
short-term investments are not subject to significant fair value interest
rate risk. Accordingly, change in fair value has been nominal to the degree that
amortized cost has historically approximated the fair value. Any change in fair
value of the company’s short-term investments, all of which are
classified as available for sale, is recorded in comprehensive
income.
Cash,
accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities are
non-interest-bearing financial assets and liabilities.
Credit
risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the company to credit risk consist
primarily of cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable and forward
exchange contracts (with a positive fair value). As at
February 28, 2009, the company’s short-term investments consist of
debt instruments issued by 14 (10 as at August 31, 2008) high-credit quality
corporations and trusts. None of these debt instruments are expected
to be affected by a liquidity risk, and none of them represent
asset-backed commercial paper. The company’s cash and forward exchange contracts
are held with or issued by high-credit quality financial institutions;
therefore, the company considers the risk of non-performance on these
instruments to be limited.
Generally,
the company does not require collateral or other security from customers for
trade accounts receivable; however, credit is extended to customers following an
evaluation of creditworthiness. In addition, the company performs ongoing credit
reviews of all its customers and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable when accounts are determined to be uncollectible. Allowance for
doubtful accounts amounted to $305,000 and $599,000 as at August
31, 2008 and February 28, 2009, respectively and bad debt expense
amounted to $13,000 and $315,000 for the three months ended
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009, respectively, and
$53,000 and $355,000 for the six months ended February 29, 2008 and
February 28, 2009, respectively.
For the
three and the six months ended February 28, 2009, one customer
represented more than 10% of global sales with 20.3% ($9,407,000) and 11.9%
($11,042,000) respectively.
The
following table summarizes the age of trade accounts receivable as at
February 28, 2009:
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
21,044 |
|
Past
due since less than 30 days
|
|
|
4,346 |
|
Past
due, 31 to 60 days
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
Past
due, more than 61 days
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Total
accounts receivable
|
|
|
29,805 |
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
$ |
29,206 |
|
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Liquidity
risk
Liquidity
risk is defined as the potential that the company cannot meet its obligations as
they become due.
The
following table summarizes the contractual maturity of the company’s financial
liabilities as at February 28, 2009:
|
|
0-12
months
|
|
|
13-24
months
|
|
|
25-36
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
22,906 |
|
|
$ |
− |
|
|
$ |
− |
|
Forward
exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outflow
|
|
|
34,500 |
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
Inflow
|
|
|
(28,841 |
) |
|
|
(13,749 |
) |
|
|
(7,315 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
28,565 |
|
|
$ |
2,051 |
|
|
$ |
985 |
|
In
addition, the company has a share repurchase program that may require additional
cash outflows during fiscal 2009 and 2010 (note 8). Also, the company has
outstanding contingent considerations payable upon acquisitions of assets and
business, which are not yet recorded in the financial statements that may
require additional cash outflows during fiscal 2009 to 2011.
As at
February 28, 2009, the company had $58,128,000 in cash and short-term
investments. In addition to these financial assets, the company has unused
available lines of credit totalling $11,220,000 for working capital and other
general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions and its share
repurchase program as well as unused lines of credit of $14,968,000 for
foreign currency exposure related to its forward exchange
contracts.
5. Inventories
|
|
As
at
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
As
at
August
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$ |
14,434 |
|
|
$ |
17,651 |
|
Work
in progress
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
15,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,869 |
|
|
$ |
34,880 |
|
The cost
of sales comprised almost exclusively the amount of inventory recognized as an
expense during the reporting periods, except for the related amortization, that
is shown separately in operating expenses.
Inventory
write-down amounted to $523,000 and $1,010,000 for the three months ended
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009, respectively and
$268,000 and $1,804,000 for the six months ended February 29, 2008 and
February 28, 2009, respectively.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
6. Accounts
Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
|
As
at
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
As
at
August
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$ |
9,197 |
|
|
$ |
10,303 |
|
Salaries
and social benefits
|
|
|
8,223 |
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
Warranty
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
Commissions
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Tax
on capital
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
Restructuring
charges
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Forward
exchange contracts (note 4)
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Business
combination
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
− |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,903 |
|
|
$ |
24,713 |
|
Changes
in the warranty provision are as follows:
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– Beginning of period
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
– End of period
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
7. Contingencies
Class
Action
On
November 27, 2001, a class-action suit was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York against the company, four
of the underwriters of its Initial Public Offering and some of its executive
officers pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder and Sections 11, 12 and 16 of the Securities Act of 1933.
This class action alleges that the company’s registration statement and
prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2000,
contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions resulting from (i) the
underwriters allegedly soliciting and receiving additional, excessive and
undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they
allocated material portions of the shares issued in connection with the
company’s Initial Public Offering; and (ii) the underwriters allegedly
entering into agreements with customers whereby shares issued in connection with
the company’s Initial Public Offering would be allocated to those customers in
exchange for which customers agreed to purchase additional amounts of shares in
the after-market at predetermined prices.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
On April
19, 2002, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint containing master
allegations against all of the defendants in all of the 310 cases included
in this class action and also filed an amended complaint containing allegations
specific to four of the company’s underwriters, the company and two of its
executive officers. In addition to the allegations mentioned above, the amended
complaint alleges that the underwriters (i) used their analysts to manipulate
the stock market; and (ii) implemented schemes that allowed issuer insiders
to sell their shares rapidly after an initial public offering and benefit from
high market prices. As concerns the company and its two executive officers in
particular, the amended complaint alleges that (i) the company’s registration
statement was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose
the additional commissions and compensation to be received by underwriters; (ii)
the two named executive officers learned of or recklessly disregarded the
alleged misconduct of the underwriters; (iii) the two named executive officers
had motive and opportunity to engage in alleged wrongful conduct due to personal
holdings of the company’s stock and the fact that an alleged artificially
inflated stock price could be used as currency for acquisitions; and (iv) the
two named executive officers, by virtue of their positions with the company,
controlled the company and the contents of the registration statement and had
the ability to prevent its issuance or cause it to be corrected. The plaintiffs
in this suit seek an unspecified amount for damages suffered.
In July
2002, the issuers filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint
and a decision was rendered on February 19, 2003. Only one of the claims
against the company was dismissed. On October 8, 2002, the claims against
its officers were dismissed pursuant to the terms of Reservation of Rights and
Tolling Agreements entered into with the plaintiffs.
In June
2004, an agreement of partial settlement was submitted to the court for
preliminary approval. The proposed partial settlement was between the
plaintiffs, the issuer defendants in the consolidated actions, the issuer
officers and directors named as defendants, and the issuers’ insurance
companies. The court granted the preliminary approval motion
on February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications. On
August 31, 2005, the court issued a preliminary order further approving the
modifications to the settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The court
also appointed the notice administrator for the settlement and ordered that
notice of the settlement be distributed to all settlement class members by
January 15, 2006. The settlement fairness hearing occurred on
April 24, 2006, and the court reserved decision at that time.
While the
partial settlement was pending approval, the plaintiffs continued to litigate
against the underwriter defendants. The district court directed that the
litigation proceed within a number of “focus cases” rather than in all of the
310 cases that have been consolidated. The company's case is not one
of these focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the district court
certified the focus cases as class actions. The underwriter defendants
appealed that ruling, and on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit reversed the district court’s class certification
decision.
On April
6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing of
that decision and, on May 18, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the plaintiffs’
petition for rehearing en
banc. In light of the Second Circuit’s opinion, liaison counsel for all
issuer defendants, including the company, informed the court that this
settlement cannot be approved, because the defined settlement class, like the
litigation class, cannot be certified. On June 25, 2007, the district
court entered an order terminating the settlement agreement. On August 14, 2007,
the plaintiffs filed their second consolidated amended class-action complaints
against the focus cases and, on September 27, 2007, again moved for class
certification. On November 12, 2007, certain defendants in the
focus cases moved to dismiss the second consolidated amended class-action
complaints. On March 26, 2008, the district court denied the motions to dismiss,
except as to Section 11 claims raised by those plaintiffs who sold their
securities for a price in excess of the initial offering price and those who
purchased outside of the previously certified class period. Briefing on the
class certification motion was completed in May 2008. That motion was withdrawn
without prejudice on October 10, 2008. On February 25, 2009, liaison
counsel for the plaintiffs informed the district court that a settlement has
been agreed to in principle, subject to formal approval by the parties, and
preliminary and final approval by the court.
Due to
the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the final outcome of the case
including the approval of the settlement described above is uncertain and it is
not possible to determine the amount of any possible losses. The company will
continue to defend its position in this litigation that the claims against
it, and its officers, are without merit. Accordingly, no provision for this
case has been made in the interim consolidated financial statements as at
February 28, 2009.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Contingent
consideration
Following
the purchase of assets during the three months ended February 28, 2009, the
company has a contingent cash consideration of up to $1,000,000, payable based
upon the achievement of a booking volume in the next 24 months following the
purchase.
8. Share
Capital
On
November 6, 2008, the company announced that its Board of Directors had
authorized a renewal of its share repurchase program, by way of a normal course
issuer bid on the open market, of up to 10% of its public float (as defined by
the Toronto Stock Exchange), or 2,738,518 subordinate voting shares, at the
prevailing market price. The company expects to use cash, short-term
investments or future cash flows from operations to fund the repurchase of
shares. The period of the normal course issuer bid commenced on November 10,
2008, and will end on November 9, 2009, or on an earlier date if the
company repurchases the maximum number of shares permitted under the bid. The
program does not require the company to repurchase any specific number
of shares, and it may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time and
without prior notice. All shares repurchased under the bid will be
cancelled.
On
November 10, 2008, the company announced that its Board of Directors had
authorized a substantial issuer bid (the “Offer”) to purchase for
cancellation subordinate voting shares for an aggregate purchase price not
to exceed CA$30,000,000. On December 18, 2008, pursuant to the Offer, the
company purchased for cancellation 7,692,307 subordinate voting shares for
the aggregate purchase price of CA$30,000,000 (US$24,879,000), plus related fees
of $576,000. The company used cash and short-term investments to fund the
purchase of shares.
|
The
following tables summarize changes in share capital for the six months
ended February 29, 2008, and
February 28, 2009:
|
|
|
Six
months ended February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
Multiple
voting shares
|
|
|
Subordinate
voting shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as at August 31, 2007
|
|
|
36,643,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
32,361,561 |
|
|
$ |
150,018 |
|
|
$ |
150,019 |
|
Reclassification
of stock-based compensation costs to share capital upon exercise of stock
awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Redemption
of share capital
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(29,200 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as at November 30, 2007
|
|
|
36,643,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32,332,361 |
|
|
|
149,885 |
|
|
|
149,886 |
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Redemption
of restricted share units
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
38,031 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Reclassification
of stock-based compensation costs to share capital upon exercise of stock
awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as at February 29, 2008
|
|
|
36,643,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
32,374,392 |
|
|
$ |
150,104 |
|
|
$ |
150,105 |
|
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
|
|
Six
months ended February 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
Multiple
voting shares
|
|
|
Subordinate
voting shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as at August 31, 2008
|
|
|
36,643,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
30,783,705 |
|
|
$ |
142,785 |
|
|
$ |
142,786 |
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Redemption
of share capital
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(176,914 |
) |
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as at November 30, 2008
|
|
|
36,643,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
30,619,291 |
|
|
|
141,990 |
|
|
|
141,991 |
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Redemption
of restricted share units
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
92,682 |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
− |
|
Redemption
of share capital
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(7,745,379 |
) |
|
|
(36,514 |
) |
|
|
(36,514 |
) |
Reclassification
of stock-based compensation costs to share capital upon exercise of stock
awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as at February 28, 2009
|
|
|
36,643,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
22,969,094 |
|
|
$ |
105,933 |
|
|
$ |
105,934 |
|
9. Net
Research and Development Expenses
Net
research and development expenses comprise the following:
|
|
Three
months ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28, 2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
research and development expenses
|
|
$ |
8,791 |
|
|
$ |
17,403 |
|
|
$ |
7,575 |
|
|
$ |
15,061 |
|
Research
and development tax credits
|
|
|
(1,466 |
) |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
(2,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
14,546 |
|
|
$ |
6,185 |
|
|
$ |
12,197 |
|
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
For the
three and the six months ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009, the
reconciliation of the income tax provision calculated using the combined
Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rate with the income tax
provision in the financial statements is as follows:
|
|
Three
months ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Income
tax provision at combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory tax
rate (32% in 2008 and 31% in 2009)
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
3,399 |
|
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
income taxed at different rates
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
Non-taxable
income
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
Non-deductible
expenses
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Change
in tax rates (1)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
Change
in tax strategy (2)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(2,715 |
) |
|
|
(2,715 |
) |
Foreign
exchange effect of translation of foreign integrated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
Utilization
of previously unrecognized future income tax assets
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
Unrecognized
future income tax assets on temporary deductible differences and unused
tax losses and deductions
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
995 |
|
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
The
income tax provision consists of the following:
Current
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
(8,373 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
8,860 |
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
9,368 |
|
|
|
9,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
995 |
|
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
(1)
|
During
the three months ended February 29, 2008, reductions to the Canadian
federal statutory tax rate, previously announced by the Canadian federal
government, were enacted. Therefore, Canadian federal future income tax
assets decreased by $1,524,000, and generated a future income tax expense
for the same amount during the three and six months ended February 29,
2008.
|
(2)
|
During
the three months ended February 29, 2008, based on new Canadian federal
enacted tax rates, the company reviewed its tax strategy for the future
use of its Canadian federal operating losses, research and development
expenses, certain timing differences and research and development tax
credits to minimize income taxes payable on future years’ taxable income,
by amending its prior year’s income tax returns to generate a net
operating loss to be carried back to prior years, which released
previously used research and development tax credits. This resulted in an
increase of its tax related assets of $2,715,000 and in an income tax
recovery for the same amount in the statements of earnings for the three
and six months ended
February 29, 2008.
|
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
The
following table summarizes the reconciliation of the basic weighted average
number of shares outstanding and the diluted weighted average number of shares
outstanding:
|
|
Three
months ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average number of shares outstanding (000’s)
|
|
|
60,875 |
|
|
|
64,108 |
|
|
|
68,984 |
|
|
|
68,992 |
|
Plus
dilutive effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options (000’s)
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
Restricted
share units (000’s)
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Deferred
share units (000’s)
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
weighted average number of shares outstanding (000’s)
|
|
|
61,375 |
|
|
|
64,546 |
|
|
|
69,490 |
|
|
|
69,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
awards excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average number of
shares because their exercise price was greater than the average market
price of the common shares (000’s)
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
The
company is organized under two reportable segments: the Telecom Division and the
Life Sciences and Industrial Division. The Telecom Division offers integrated
test solutions and network monitoring systems to network service providers,
cable TV operators, system vendors and component manufacturers throughout the
global telecommunications industry. The Life Sciences and Industrial Division
offers solutions in medical-device and opto-electronics assembly, fluorescence
microscopy and other life sciences sectors.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
The
following tables present information by segment:
|
|
Three
months ended February 28, 2009
|
|
|
Six
months ended February 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
|
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
|
Life
Sciences
and
Industrial Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
41,367 |
|
|
$ |
5,005 |
|
|
$ |
46,372 |
|
|
$ |
82,526 |
|
|
$ |
10,209 |
|
|
$ |
92,735 |
|
Earnings
from operations
|
|
$ |
2,117 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
2,599 |
|
|
$ |
3,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
4,692 |
|
Unallocated
items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
641 |
|
Foreign
exchange gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,658 |
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
|
Three
months ended February 29, 2008
|
|
|
Six
months ended February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
|
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
|
Life
Sciences
and
Industrial Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
37,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,846 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
72,800 |
|
|
$ |
11,466 |
|
|
$ |
84,266 |
|
Earnings
from operations
|
|
$ |
2,817 |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
2,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
3,937 |
|
Unallocated
items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
Foreign
exchange loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Total
assets by reportable segment are detailed as follows:
|
|
As
at
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
As
at
August
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
$ |
125,170 |
|
|
$ |
145,168 |
|
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
9,571 |
|
Unallocated
assets
|
|
|
102,597 |
|
|
|
138,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,321 |
|
|
$ |
293,066 |
|
Unallocated
assets are comprised of cash, short-term investments, other receivable on
forward exchange contracts, income taxes and tax credits recoverable and future
income tax assets.
13.
|
Differences
between Canadian and U.S. GAAP
|
These
interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
Canadian GAAP; significant differences in measurement and disclosure from U.S.
GAAP are set out in note 19 to the company’s most recent annual consolidated
financial statements. This note describes significant changes occurring since
the most recent annual consolidated financial statements and provides a
quantitative analysis of all significant differences. All disclosures required
in annual financial statements under U.S. GAAP and Regulation S-X of the
Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States have not been provided
in these interim consolidated financial statements.
Statements
of earnings
For the
three and six months ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009, there were
no significant differences between the net earnings under Canadian GAAP as
compared to U.S. GAAP.
Reconciliation
of shareholders’ equity to conform to U.S. GAAP
The
following summary sets out the significant differences between the company’s
reported shareholders’ equity under Canadian GAAP as compared to U.S.
GAAP:
|
|
As
at
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
As
at
August
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity in accordance with Canadian GAAP
|
|
$ |
195,366 |
|
|
$ |
259,515 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(10,570 |
) |
|
|
(12,640 |
) |
Stock
appreciation rights
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
$ |
184,723 |
|
|
$ |
246,802 |
|
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
Research
and development tax credits
Under
Canadian GAAP, all research and development tax credits are recorded as a
reduction of gross research and development expenses. Under U.S. GAAP, tax
credits that are utilizable against income taxes payable are recorded in the
income taxes. These tax credits amounted to $808,000, $1,788,000 for the three
and six months ended February 29, 2008, respectively, and $732,000 and
$1,628,000 for the three and six-months ended February 28, 2009, respectively.
This difference has no impact on the net earnings and the net earnings per share
for the reporting periods.
Statements
of cash flows
For the
three and six months ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2009, there were
no significant differences between the statements of cash flows under
Canadian GAAP as compared to U.S. GAAP, except for the subtotal before change
in non-cash operating items, whose presentation is not permitted under U.S.
GAAP.
New
accounting standards and pronouncements
Adopted
in fiscal 2009
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued SFAS 157,
“Fair Value Measurements”, which establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in GAAP and is applicable to other accounting pronouncements,
in which fair value is considered to be the relevant measurement attribute.
SFAS 157 also expands disclosures about fair value measurement. In February
2008, the FASB amended SFAS 157 to exclude leasing transactions and to delay the
effective date by one year for non-financial assets and liabilities that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements
on a non-recurring basis. This statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The company adopted this statement
on September 1, 2008, and its adoption had no effect on its
consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No.
115”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions of this statement
apply only to entities that elect the fair value option. However, the amendment
to SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”,
applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. This
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
company adopted this statement on September 1, 2008, and it did
not elect to use the fair value option as of the date of adoption.
To
be adopted after fiscal 2009
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), “Business Combinations”,
and SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51”. These new standards will
significantly change the accounting and reporting for business combination
transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated
financial statements. SFAS 141(R) and SFAS160 are required to be adopted
simultaneously and are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The
company will adopt this statement on September 1, 2009, and is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
EXFO
Electro-Optical
Engineering Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in
thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data and as otherwise
noted)
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”, which
will require entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations,
and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s
financial position, financial performance and cash flow. SFAS 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The company
will adopt this statement on September 1, 2009, and is currently
evaluating the impact its adoption will have on its note disclosures related to
derivative instruments and hedging activities.
In April
2008, the FASB issued the FASB staff position (FSP) FAS 142-3, “Determination of
the Useful Lives of Intangible Assets”. This FSP amends
the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS
142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets”. The intent of
this FSP is to improve
the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS 142 and
the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset
under SFAS
141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations”, and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). This
FSP shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
prohibited. The guidance for
determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset in paragraphs 7–11
of this FSP shall be
applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date.
The disclosure requirements
in paragraphs 13–15 shall be applied prospectively to all intangible assets
recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. The company
will adopt this FSP on September 1, 2009, and is currently evaluating
the impact its adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The new standard is intended to improve
financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy,
for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are
presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP
for non-governmental entities. For
non-governmental entities, the guidance in SFAS 162 replaces that prescribed
in Statement on
Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles” and will become effective 60 days following the
SEC's approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles”. The
company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 162 will have on
its consolidated financial statements.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition
and
Results of Operations
This
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we intend that
such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby.
Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or
statements of current condition. Words such as may, will, expect, believe,
anticipate, intend, could, estimate, continue, or the negative or comparable
terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition,
any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other
characterizations of future events and circumstances are considered
forward-looking statements. They are not guarantees of future performance and
involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
in forward-looking statements due to various factors including consolidation in
the global telecommunications test, measurement and service
assurance industry; capital spending levels in the
telecommunications, life sciences and high-precision assembly sectors;
concentration of sales; fluctuating exchange rates and our ability to execute in
these uncertain conditions; the effects of the additional actions we have taken
in response to such economic uncertainty (including our ability to quickly adapt
cost structures with anticipated levels of business, ability to manage inventory
levels with market demand); market acceptance of our new products and other
upcoming products; limited visibility with regards to customer orders and the
timing of such orders; our ability to successfully integrate our acquired and
to-be-acquired businesses; our ability to successfully expand international
operations; the retention of key technical and management personnel; and future
economic, competitive, financial and market conditions, including slow-down or
recession in the global economy. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve
judgments and risks, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and
many of which are beyond our control. Other risk factors that may affect our
future performance and operations are detailed in our Annual Report, on Form
20-F, and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and
the Canadian securities commissions. We believe that the expectations reflected
in the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information currently
available to us, but we cannot assure you that the expectations will prove to
have been correct. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this
document. Unless required by law or applicable regulations,
we undertake no obligation to revise or update any of them to reflect
events or circumstances that occur after the date of this
document.
The
following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations is dated March 27, 2009.
All
dollar amounts are expressed in US dollars, except as otherwise
noted.
INDUSTRY
OVERVIEW
The
fundamental drivers for increased bandwidth and converged, IP networks in the
global telecommunications industry remain the same, but they are now
combined with more constraints for capital expenditures and a more pressing need
to reduce operating expenses, as operators are typically seeing a reduction in
the number of wireline connections, as some consumers are transferring to
wireless only. In addition, as the global economic turbulence continues, it has
negatively affected a number of network operators and network equipment
manufacturers (NEMs), especially in the United States and Western Europe. In
fact, several of these players have announced significant reductions in capital
expenditures and staffing levels for calendar year 2009 in anticipation of lower
revenue streams.
Despite
this challenging macro-economic environment, it should be noted that telecom
market dynamics in 2009 are completely different from those permeating the
industry downturn in 2001. First of all, there is currently a myriad
of bandwidth-intensive applications generating a strong growth in bandwidth
demand both in wireless and wireline networks. As an example, monthly traffic is
now at the exabyte level (1 exabyte equals 1 quintillion bytes) in 2009, while
in 2001, there were few applications outside of regular e-mail delivery.
Secondly, the ongoing demand for bandwidth has placed an obvious strain on
access, metro rings and long-haul routes, whereas in 2001, there was
an overabundance of bandwidth capacity in the optical backbone networks.
Finally, most network operators are in a better financial position
today than in 2001, when many of them were financially overextended, with some
declaring outright bankruptcy.
Notwithstanding
these market discrepancies, the intense competition between telecom network
operators and cable companies and the benefits of converged IP networks (new
services attracting higher-margin revenues while reducing operating costs) are
further reasons operators will likely continue investing in broadband
deployments and IP convergence.
According
to Cisco’s Visual Networking Index, global IP traffic will nearly double every
two years (compound annual growth rate of 46%) from 2007-2012, reaching just
under 44 exabytes per month in 2012. Global bandwidth demand is driven by a wide
range of applications including peer-to-peer file sharing, Internet gaming as
well as various forms of IP video. For example, YouTube consumed more
bandwidth in 2008 than traffic crossing the entire US network backbone in 2000,
according to Cisco. Social Networking applications like Facebook and others are
also huge drivers for the increasing bandwidth needed in modern
networks.
This
trend will likely remain strong for years to come with upcoming deployments of
Internet protocol television (IPTV), high-definition Internet protocol
television (HD-IPTV) and increased online video streaming, since these
applications consume colossal amounts of bandwidth. As a result,
telecom operators and cable companies will likely maintain significant
investments in their access networks in order to remain competitive and provide
differentiated, revenue-generating services so as to attract and retain
consumers, who are increasingly relying on broadband network services for their
work, entertainment and everyday activities.
As the
volume of IP traffic, number of applications and quantity of consumers are
increasing, so is the need for a 24/7, real-time service assurance solution
that monitors IP traffic at the application level, from the access to the core
network, as this is the best method for wireline and wireless operators to
minimize the cost to operate their networks and provide a superior customer
experience.
As well,
it is now clear that fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) is becoming the access network
architecture of choice for network operators. This architecture allows them to
meet heightened bandwidth requirements and future-proof their access networks,
as residential bandwidth requirements are growing from the 1 to 5 Mbit/s
(megabits per second) of the past to the 30 to 100 Mbit/s required in the
long term. Some projects, however, might be delayed based on the ability to fund
such projects. Hybrid architectures, combining copper and fiber
(fiber-to-the-curb, or FTTC, and fiber-to-the-node, or FTTN), will also
keep expanding in the short term, since they are less-expensive methods
to increase bandwidth and can be mass-deployed faster.
These
investment decisions are applicable not only to green-field deployments and
high-rise buildings, but also to larger-scale rollouts as long-term
operating costs are less than FTTC and FTTN. It is noteworthy to mention that
the cost of deploying FTTH has largely fallen over the last four years as volume
increased and deployment tools, like those we offer, are making the task
increasingly simple and efficient. We are only at the early stages of fiber
deployments in access networks, both in the Americas and around the world.
It is also worth noting that Western Europe and even China have become
increasingly committed to deploying FTTH networks, given their high population
density.
As
bandwidth growth in access networks continues to increase, it has begun placing
a strain on metro rings and core networks. It is also driving the need for
higher-speed technologies; for example, 43 Gbit/s (gigabits per
second) SONET/SDH
is now seeing early deployments and becoming mainstream, while the upcoming 100
Gbit/s Ethernet is being developed aggressively despite the difficult economic
environment, The early stages of 100 Gbit/s Ethernet field trials should start
later this calendar year, conducted by a select few operators. In the
long run, the deployment of these solutions is expected
to be significantly more economical, especially if trenches need to be
dug in order to deploy new fiber in metro or long-distance
routes.
As
telecommunication networks are being transformed to provide IP-based voice,
video and data capabilities, legacy SONET/SDH standards, which were first
established in the mid-1980s and implemented until 2005, did not have the
payload flexibility to seamlessly and efficiently mix and transport video with
voice and data. These networks will not be capable of efficiently carrying these
emerging IP-based services as they are designed for public switched telephone
network (PSTN), point-to-point voice transmission only. As a result,
new-generation OTN standards have been defined and are at the very foundation of
what the industry is calling next-gen networks Telco
operators are increasingly turning to next-generation, IP-based networks to
allow for more flexible and efficient transport of applications and
services, and to offer customers higher-margin triple-play services ― and even
quadruple-play services ― as wireline and
wireless technologies become increasingly interconnected. Finally, as
subscribers of these new services reach a critical mass, telcos are relying
on service assurance solutions to ensure that the quality of service (QoS) and
quality of experience (QoE) demanded by users are optimal in the post-deployment
phase.
These
market dynamics affected telecom test and service assurance suppliers in the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. On the other hand, the global recession mainly
afflicting customers in the United States and Western Europe could potentially
delay network investments and necessarily reduce demand for our test and
service assurance solutions.
COMPANY
OVERVIEW
We
reported sales of $46.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, which
represented an increase of 7.1% year-over-year. We also reported net
accepted orders of $47.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 for
a book-to-bill ratio of 1.02. Total sales for the second quarter of fiscal
2009 included $9.2 million from newly acquired Brix Networks Inc. and Navtel
Communications Inc.
Looking
at the bottom line, we generated GAAP net earnings of $2.7 million, or $0.04 per
diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to $4.0
million, or $0.06 per share, for the same period last year. Net earnings
for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were positively and significantly affected
by the weaker value of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US dollar.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we reported a foreign exchange gain of
$1.1 million, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $232,000 for the same
period last year. Net earnings in the second quarter of 2009 included charges of
$1.4 million for stock-based compensation costs and the after-tax amortization
expense for intangible assets. EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization) reached $6.0 million, or 12.9% of sales
in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to $5.1 million,
or 11.8% of sales for the same period last year (see further in this document
for a complete reconciliation of EBITDA to GAAP net
earnings).
During
the first half of fiscal 2009, we recorded a significant foreign exchange gain
of $5.7 million, which mostly comes from the first quarter of 2009, when we
recorded a foreign exchange gain of $4.6 million. Indeed, during the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, we faced a substantial and sudden decrease in the value
of the Canadian dollar versus the US dollar; this had a two-fold positive impact
on our financial results. First, in the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
the $4.6 million foreign exchange gain represented the effect of the 14.1%
decrease (compared to August 31, 2008) in the period-end value of the
Canadian dollar versus the US dollar on our balance sheet items. During the
second quarter of 2009, we witnessed more stability in the period-end value of
the Canadian dollar, compared to the previous quarter (decrease of 2.6%), which
resulted in a foreign exchange gain of $1.1 million. Secondly, the average value
of the Canadian dollar decreased 13.9% in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and
18.4% in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the corresponding periods
last year. Given that most of our sales are denominated in US dollars but a
significant portion of our expenses are denominated in Canadian dollars, our
financial results were positively affected as these expenses (measured
in Canadian dollars) were reduced when translated in US dollars for
reporting purposes. In comparison, we reported a foreign exchange loss of
$232,000 and $848,000 for the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2008.
During these periods, the value of the Canadian dollar increased 2.1% and 7.8%,
respectively, compared to the US, which resulted in foreign exchange losses
during these periods.
On
November 6, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a
renewal of our share repurchase program, by way of a normal course
issuer bid on the open market, of up to 10% of our public float (as defined
by the Toronto Stock Exchange), or 2.7 million subordinate voting shares,
at the prevailing market price. We expect to use cash, short-term investments or
future cash flows from operations to fund the repurchase of shares. The period
of the normal course issuer bid started on November 10, 2008, and will end on
November 9, 2009, or on an earlier date if we repurchase the
maximum number of shares permitted under the bid. The program does not require
that we repurchase any specific number of shares, and it may be modified,
suspended or terminated at any time and without prior notice. All shares
repurchased under the bid will be cancelled.
On
November 10, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a
substantial issuer bid (the “Offer”) to purchase for cancellation subordinate
voting shares for an aggregate purchase price not to exceed
CA$30 million. On December 18, 2008, pursuant to the Offer, we purchased
for cancellation 7,7 million subordinate voting shares for the aggregate
purchase price of CA$30 million (US$24.9 million), plus related fees of
$576,000. We used cash and short-term investments to fund the purchase of
shares.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, EXFO closed the acquisition of Swedish-based
PicoSolve Inc., a supplier of ultra-high-speed optical sampling oscilloscopes
for 40G and 100G R&D, manufacturing and deployment
applications.
During
the second quarter of 2009, we launched seven new products, namely a
ground-breaking distributed PMD analyzer that allows network operators to
quantify the level of potentially debilitating PMD on each fiber section
of a network instead of an entire link. As a result, network operators can
cost-effectively upgrade their networks to 40 Gbit/s or even 100
Gbit/s by identifying and repairing only the affected sections of their
networks, rather than overhauling their entire systems. Other notable product
launches included a new software suite for packet-over-optical transport network
(OTN) test applications in next-generation, IP networks; a new software suite
for end-to-end testing of Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) networks;
and a new passive optical network (PON) power meter for fiber-to-the-home (FTTH)
test applications. Following the quarter-end, we released three additional
products including a portable, multilayer platform (FTB-500) designed for
high-end test applications in the field and central office. Sales from products
that have been on the market two years or less represented 41% of total sales
in the second quarter of 2009 and 37% after six months.
Following
the quarter-end, we were named recipient of the Growth Strategy Leadership Award
by Frost & Sullivan for the fifth consecutive time. The award is presented
to the company whose growth strategy generates the largest market-share gains in
the global fiber-optic test equipment (FOTE) market during the previous research
period. According to Frost & Sullivan, a leading global growth consulting
firm, we captured first place overall in the FOTE market with a market share of
18.0% in 2008, up from third place in 2006 with a market share of 12.7%. (Frost
& Sullivan did not grant an award in 2008 for market-share gains in 2007).
Frost & Sullivan estimated the FOTE market to be $567.4 million in 2008,
including $247.9 million for the portable installation and maintenance
(I&M) test market. Based on Frost & Sullivan’s market data, we improved
our leadership position in the portable I&M test market from 25.5% in 2006
to 33.3% in 2008.
OUR
STRATEGY, KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND CAPABILITY TO DELIVER
RESULTS
For a
complete description of our strategy and the related key performance indicators,
as well as our capability to deliver results in fiscal 2009, please refer
to the corresponding sections in our most recent Annual Report, filed with the
securities commissions.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
For a
complete description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, please
refer to the corresponding section in our most recent Annual Report, filed with
the securities commissions. The following details the changes in critical
accounting policies that were adopted in fiscal 2009 and those to be adopted
after 2009.
In
December 2006, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) issued
three new sections, which provide a complete set of disclosure and
presentation requirements for financial instruments: Section 3862, “Financial
Instruments − Disclosures”; Section 3863, “Financial
Instruments − Presentation”; and Section 1535, “Capital
Disclosures”.
Section
3862 replaces the disclosure portion of Section 3861, “Financial
Instruments − Disclosure and Presentation”. The new standard
places increased emphasis on disclosures regarding risks associated with both
recognized and unrecognized financial instruments and how these risks are
managed. It is also intended to remove any duplicate disclosures and simplify
the disclosures about concentrations of risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and
price risk previously found in Section 3861.
Section
3863 carries forward the presentation requirements from Section 3861,
unchanged.
Section
1535 applies to all entities, regardless of whether they have financial
instruments and are subject to external capital requirements. The new section
requires disclosure of information about an entity’s objectives, policies and
processes for managing capital, as well as quantitative data about capital and
whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements.
We
adopted these new standards on September 1, 2008 and provided the required
disclosure in our interim consolidated financial statements.
In June
2007, the CICA issued Section 3031, “Inventories”. This standard requires the
measurement of inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value and
includes guidance on the determination of cost, including allocation of
overheads and other costs to inventory. The standard also requires the
consistent use of either first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted average cost
formula to measure the cost of inventories and requires the reversal of previous
write-downs to net realizable value when there is a subsequent increase in the
value of inventories. The new standard applies to fiscal years beginning
on or after January 1, 2008. We adopted this new standard
on September 1, 2008, and its adoption had no effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In June
2007, the CICA amended Section 1400, “General Standards of Financial Statement
Presentation” to include new requirements regarding an entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern. These amendments apply to fiscal years beginning on
or after January 1, 2008. We adopted these amendments on September 1, 2008, and
their adoption had no effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
To
be adopted after fiscal 2009
In
February 2008, the CICA issued Section 3064, “Goodwill and intangible assets”,
which supersedes Section 3062, “Goodwill and other intangible assets” and
Section 3450, “Research and development costs”. Various changes have been made
to other sections of the CICA Handbook for consistency purposes. Section 3064
establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and
of intangible assets by profit-oriented enterprises. Standards concerning
goodwill remain unchanged from the standards included in Section 3062. This new
section applies to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008. We will
adopt this new standard on September 1, 2009, and have not yet
determined the effects its adoption will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
January 2009, the CICA issued Section 1582, “Business Combinations”, which
replaces Section 1581, “Business Combinations”. This new section establishes the
standards for the accounting of business combinations and states that all assets
and liabilities of an acquired business will be recorded at fair value.
Obligations for contingent considerations and contingencies will also be
recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The standard also states that
acquisition-related costs will be expensed as incurred and that restructuring
charges will be expensed in the periods after the acquisition date. This
standard applies prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates
on or after January 1, 2011; earlier adoption is permitted.
In January 2009, the CICA issued
Section 1601, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, which replaces Section 1600,
“Consolidated Financial Statements”, and establishes the standards for preparing
consolidated financial statements. This new section applies to fiscal years
beginning on or after January 1, 2011; earlier adoption is permitted. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that adopting this standard will have
on our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2009, the CICA issued Section 1602, “Non-controlling Interests”, which
establishes standards for the accounting of non-controlling interests of a
subsidiary in the preparation of consolidated financial statements subsequent to
a business combination. This new section applies to fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2011; earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a
fiscal year.
Should we
decide to early adopt one of these three new sections, we must adopt all three
on the same date.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and
results of operations for the periods ended February 29, 2008 and February 28,
2009, should be read in conjunction with our interim consolidated financial
statements and the related notes thereto. Our interim consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles (Canadian GAAP) and significant differences in
measurement and disclosure from United States generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP) are set out in note 13 to our interim consolidated
financial statements. Our measurement currency is the Canadian dollar,
although we report our financial statements in US dollars. The following
table sets forth interim consolidated statements of earnings data in thousands
of US dollars, except per share data, and as a percentage of sales for
the periods indicated:
|
|
Three
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Three
months
ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
46,372 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
92,735 |
|
|
$ |
84,266 |
|
Cost
of sales (1)
|
|
|
18,353 |
|
|
|
18,060 |
|
|
|
35,833 |
|
|
|
36,204 |
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
56,902 |
|
|
|
48,062 |
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
and administrative
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
32,891 |
|
|
|
28,500 |
|
Net
research and development
|
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
|
14,546 |
|
|
|
12,197 |
|
Amortization
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
25,420 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
52,210 |
|
|
|
44,125 |
|
Earnings
from operations
|
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
3,937 |
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
Foreign
exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
Earnings
before income taxes
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
Income
taxes (2)
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted net earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmented
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
$ |
41,367 |
|
|
$ |
37,435 |
|
|
$ |
82,526 |
|
|
$ |
72,800 |
|
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
5,846 |
|
|
|
10,209 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
|
|
$ |
46,372 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
92,735 |
|
|
$ |
84,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
$ |
2,117 |
|
|
$ |
2,817 |
|
|
$ |
3,472 |
|
|
$ |
2,838 |
|
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,599 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
4,692 |
|
|
$ |
3,937 |
|
Research
and development data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
research and development
|
|
$ |
8,791 |
|
|
$ |
7,575 |
|
|
$ |
17,403 |
|
|
$ |
15,061 |
|
Net
research and development
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
6,185 |
|
|
$ |
14,546 |
|
|
$ |
12,197 |
|
(1)
|
The
cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown
separately.
|
(2)
|
Include
a one-time income tax expense of $1.5 million as a result of changes in
Canadian federal enacted tax rates and an income tax recovery of $2.7
million as a result of changes of our tax strategy, for the three and the
six months ended February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
Three
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Three
months
ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost
of sales (1)
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
and administrative
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Net
research and development
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Amortization
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
Earnings
from operations
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Foreign
exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Earnings
before income taxes
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Income
taxes (2)
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Net
earnings for the period
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segmented
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
|
89.2 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
|
|
89.0 |
% |
|
|
86.4 |
|
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom
Division
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
research and development
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
Net
research and development
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
cost of sales is exclusive of amortization, shown
separately.
|
(2)
|
Include
a one-time income tax expense of $1.5 million as a result of changes in
Canadian federal enacted tax rates and an income tax recovery of $2.7
million as a result of changes of our tax strategy, for the three and the
six months ended February 29, 2008.
|
SALES
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, our global sales increased 7.1% to $46.4
million from $43.3 million for the same period last year, with an 89%-11% split
in favor of our Telecom Division.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, our global sales increased 10.1% to
$92.7 million from $84.3 million for the same period last year, with
an 89%-11% split in favor of our Telecom Division.
Telecom
Division
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, sales of our Telecom Division increased
10.5% to $41.4 million from $37.4 million for the same period last
year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, sales of our Telecom Division increased
13.4% to $82.5 million from $72.8 million for the same period last
year.
In the
second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, we posted year-over-year sales
growth mainly due to the market acceptance as well as market share gain of
our next-generation IP test solutions, and due to the inclusion of the
sales of newly acquired Brix Networks and Navtel Communications’ products. In
fact, sales of Brix Network and Navtel Communications amounted to $9.2 million
and $13.8 million together for the second quarter and the first half of 2009,
respectively. Sales of Brix Networks recognized in the second quarter of fiscal
2009 included a significant order shipped to a Tier-1 wireless North
American operator, this order was for our converged service assurance solution,
which provides real-time monitoring of the quality of voice-over-IP (VoIP) and
IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) services over converged networks. Excluding sales
of Brix Networks and Navtel Communications, our telecom sales would have
decreased 14.1% and 5.5% organically year-over-year during these two periods,
reflecting the impact of the global economic recession so far in fiscal 2009.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we posted record-high sales of
protocol test solutions and, unsurprisingly, our protocol test solutions (which
include Brix Network and Navtel Communications’ sales) represented our
fastest-growing product line. Also, they represented more than 40% of our
telecom sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, for the first time in our
history, which compares to more than 20% for the same period last
year.
On the
other hand, sales of optical test solutions and copper-access decreased during
the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the same
periods last year. This mainly results from lower sales in the Americas, due to
the global economic recession and its repercussions on our
customers.
In
addition, in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, foreign
exchange losses on our forward exchange contracts, which are included in our
telecom sales, amounted to $1.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively,
compared to foreign exchange gains of $1.2 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, for the same periods last year, significantly reducing our sales
year-over-year. In fact, if we exclude the impact of the foreign exchange gains
or losses on our foreign exchange contracts recorded in our sales, telecom
sales would have increased 17.6% and 19.6% year-over-year in the second quarter
and the first half of fiscal 2009, respectively, compared to the same periods
last year. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2009, the
average value of the Canadian dollar versus the US dollar decreased 18.4%
and 16.2%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods last year, which
resulted in significant foreign exchange losses on our forward exchange
contracts in fiscal 2009.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, our top customer represented 22.7% ($9.4
million) of our telecom sales, compared to 6.5% ($2.4 million) for the same
period last year. They represented 13.4% ($11.0 million) of our telecom sales in
the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to 9.7% ($7.0 million) for the same
period last year. Excluding sales to this customer, our telecom sales would have
decreased 8.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 but increased 8.7% in
the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the corresponding periods
last year. This shows that after six months into fiscal 2009, we were able to
diversify our customer base.
Life
Sciences and Industrial Division
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, sales of our Life Sciences and Industrial
Division decreased $841,000, or 14.4% year-over-year at $5.0 million, compared
to $5.8 million for the same period last year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, sales of our Life Sciences and Industrial
Division decreased $1.3 million, or 11.0% year-over-year to $10.2 million,
from $11.5 million for the same period last year.
A
significant portion of sales of that division are conducted through original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) agreements. Consequently, we are dependent, to some
extent, on the buying pattern of our customers. Moreover, a significant
part of our product offering is related to manufacturing applications of
consumer goods, which have been affected by the current state of the global
economy.
Net
bookings
Overall,
for the two divisions, net accepted orders increased 6.3% year-over-year to
$47.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 from
$44.5 million for the same period last year, for a book-to-bill ratio of
1.02.
This
increase in bookings year-over-year is due to significant order acceleration in
our Protocol test segment, which includes newly acquired Brix Networks and
Navtel Communications’ product lines. However, the strong performance of our
Protocol test segment in terms of bookings in the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
compared to the same period last year, was offset in part by the impact of the
current worldwide recession on our optical and copper-access
business.
Geographic
distribution
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, sales to the Americas, Europe, Middle East
and Africa (EMEA) and Asia-Pacific (APAC) accounted for 60%, 25% and 15% of
global sales, respectively. For the corresponding period last year, sales to the
Americas, EMEA and APAC accounted for 51%, 34% and 15% of global sales,
respectively. For the six months ended February 28, 2009, sales to the Americas,
EMEA and APAC accounted for 58%, 26% and 16% of global sales, respectively. For
the corresponding period last year, sales to the Americas, EMEA and APAC
accounted for 54%, 29% and 16% of global sales, respectively.
In the
second quarter of fiscal 2009, we reported year-over-year sales increases (in
dollars) in the Americas and APAC. In fact, sales to these regions
increased (in dollars) 25.7% and 5.1%, respectively. Sales to EMEA decreased (in
dollars) 20.1% year-over-year. During the first half of fiscal 2009, we reported
year-over-year sales increases (in dollars) in Americas and APAC. In fact
sales to these regions increased (in dollars) 18.2% and 4.3%, respectively.
Sales to EMEA decreased (in dollars) 1.8% year-over-year.
In the
Americas, the increase in sales in the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2009, compared to the same period last year, comes from Canada and
the United States. In fact, we posted year-over-year sales growth of 69.6% and
24.2% in Canada and the United States, respectively during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009 and 57.8% and 14.8%, respectively during the first half of fiscal
2009. The significant increase in sales in Canada in the second quarter and the
first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the same periods last year, mainly comes
from our optical and protocol test solutions, especially with Tier-1 NSPs. In
the United States, the growth in sales in the second quarter and the first half
of fiscal 2009, compared to the same periods last year, is mainly due to the
contribution of newly acquired Brix Networks and Navtel Communications, as a
large order from a Tier-1 North American wireless operator for Brix Networks
solutions was recognized in the sales for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. The contribution of Brix Networks and Navtel
Communications in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009 mitigated
the effect of the recession on our sales in the United States, mainly those of
our optical and copper-access test solutions. Finally, sales to Latin America
decreased (in dollars) 24.6% and 6.8% year-over-year in the second quarter and
the first half of fiscal 2009, respectively, as sales to this region depend on
the timing and scope of our customers’ projects.
The
decrease in sales in the EMEA market, in dollars, in the second quarter and the
first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the same periods last year, is due to the
impact of the global recession as we are seeing some caution from many of our
customers with their new fiscal year budgets (calendar 2009). While we see
this as a delay and a change in spending patterns, we expect
that investments in next-generation access and transport networks will not be
affected in the long term and we are positioning ourselves to capitalize on
that, with recent additions to our product portfolio and sales strategy. In
fact, many Tier-1 carriers in EMEA are migrating their traditional
circuit-switched core networks to higher-speed, dense wavelength-division
multiplexing (DWDM) and next-generation packet-based architectures, which is
creating a market demand for our protocol test solutions as well as our
DWDM, ROADM and fiber characterization test kits. Furthermore, we are leveraging
our FTTx leadership gained in the United States to provide consultancy with
many of the early adopters in this field in EMEA. Also, as a portion
of these orders in this region are denominated in Euros or British Pounds,
the weakness of the US dollar against these currencies in the second quarter and
for the first half of fiscal 2009, also had a negative impact on our sales
expressed in US dollars for this region, which contributed to the decrease in
sales compared to the corresponding periods last year.
In the
APAC market, we are seeing the continued return on investment of some specific
optical, protocol as well as life sciences and industrial products
developed and targeted for this important market. This increasingly competitive
range, coupled with our steadily expanding market presence, is responsible for
the higher sales in this region in the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2009, compared to the same periods last year.
Through
our two divisions, we sell our products to a broad range of customers, including
network service providers, network equipment manufacturers, wireless operators,
cable TV operators, optical system and component manufacturers, as well as
customers in the life sciences and high-precision assembly sectors. In the
second quarter of fiscal 2009, our top customer accounted for 20.3% ($9.4
million) of our global sales, and our top three customers accounted for 29.2%
of our global sales. In the corresponding period last year, no customer
accounted for more than 10% of our global sales, and our top three customers
accounted for 14.6% of our global sales. For the six months ended
February 28, 2009, our top customer accounted for 11.9% ($11.0
million) of our global sales, and our top three customers accounted for 18.8% of
our global sales. For the corresponding period last year, no customer accounted
for more than 10% of our global sales, and our top three customers accounted for
14.8% of our global sales. In the second quarter and the first half of fiscal
2009, our top customer placed a significant order to purchase a
converged service assurance solution. Excluding this major sale, this
customer would have represented less than 10% of our global sales for both
periods.
GROSS
MARGIN
Gross
margin increased to 60.4% of sales for the three months ended February 28, 2009,
from 58.3% for the same period last year.
Gross
margin increased to 61.4% of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2009,
compared to 57.0% for the same period last year.
The increase
in our gross margin in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009,
compared to the same periods last year, can be explained by the following
factors.
First,
the impact of the fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar, compared to
the US dollar, was two-fold in the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2009. In fact, over the last several quarters, our procurement costs
decreased as the Canadian dollar strengthened, compared to the US dollar, and as
a significant portion of our raw material purchases are denominated in US
dollars. This allowed us to improve our gross margin continually over the last
few quarters, as our raw material costs of parts purchased in US dollar are
measured in Canadian dollars in our financial statements. In addition, the
sudden decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar, versus the US dollar, since
the beginning of fiscal 2009 resulted in a lower cost of goods sold
expressed in US dollars in the statements of earnings. However, the
increase in the procurement costs of our raw materials purchased in US dollars,
as a result of the sudden and recent decrease in the value of the Canadian
dollar compared to the US dollar, have begun to materialize and will
continue to materialize over time, in line with the inventory turnover rate, as
these raw materials are included in the cost of goods sold of products
manufactured with these parts.
Secondly,
in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, our gross margin was
positively affected by the significant increase in sales of our protocol
test solutions year-over-year, including those of newly acquired Brix Networks
and Navtel Communications, as these products have better margins than our
other test solutions. Sales of protocol test solutions reached their
highest level in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
In
addition, the operation of our manufacturing facility in China resulted in a
larger portion of our sales coming from products manufactured in China; those
products have a lower cost of goods than those manufactured in our facilities in
Canada, thus resulting in an improvement in gross margin
year-over-year.
Also, the
shift in the geographic distribution of our sales resulted in more sales to the
Americas compared to Europe, Middle-East and Africa (EMEA) as well as
Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009,
versus the corresponding periods last year. This resulted in an improvement of
the gross margin year-over-year since sales to the Americas tend to generate
better margins than those in the EMEA and APAC regions.
Finally, foreign
exchange losses on our forward exchange contracts, which are included in our
telecom sales, had a negative impact on our margin in the second quarter
and in the first half of fiscal 2009, while this impact was positive in the
corresponding periods last year.
Considering
the expected sales growth in fiscal 2009, the expected increase in sales of
protocol products and the full contribution of Brix Networks and Navtel
Communications (which tend to generate higher margins), the cost-effective
design of our products, our manufacturing activities in China and our tight
control on operating costs, we expect our gross margin to improve in the
future. However, our gross margin may fluctuate quarter-over-quarter as our
sales may fluctuate. Furthermore, our gross margin can be negatively affected by
the effects of the actual worldwide recession, increased competitive pricing
pressure, customer concentration and/or consolidation, increased obsolescence
costs, shifts in customer and product mix, under-absorption of fixed
manufacturing costs, challenges encountered in the operation of our
manufacturing facility in China and increases in product offerings by other
suppliers in our industry. Finally, any increase in the strength of the Canadian
dollar, compared to the US dollar, would have a negative impact on our gross
margin in fiscal 2009 and beyond.
SELLING
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, selling and administrative expenses were
$15.8 million, or 34.1% of sales, compared to $13.7 million, or 31.6%
of sales for the same period last year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, selling and administrative expenses were
$32.9 million, or 35.5% of sales, compared to $28.5 million, or 33.8%
of sales for the same period last year.
Brix
Networks and Navtel Communications, which were acquired in the third quarter of
fiscal 2008, contributed for the whole periods to our selling and administrative
expenses in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, which caused
these expenses to increase compared to the same periods last year. In addition,
selling expenses for Brix Networks and Navtel Communications tend to be higher
in percentage of sales than the rest of our business, as their sales cycle
is much longer and complex than our other product lines.
In
addition, during the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, we
maintained our sales and marketing activities to develop our markets and
leverage our significant research and development investments; this resulted
in higher sales and marketing expenditures (including additional employees
and expenses to support the launch of several new products and to increase
brand name recognition), compared to the corresponding periods last
year.
However,
during the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, the substantial and
sudden decrease in the average value of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US
dollar, had a significant positive impact on our selling and administrative
expenses, since a significant portion of these expenses is denominated in
Canadian dollars and since these expenses increased year-over-year as our sales
grew.
Also,
during the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we discontinued certain product
lines, which led to the lay-off of some of our sales and marketing personnel,
resulting in severance expenses during the first half of fiscal
2008.
For
fiscal 2009, considering the expected increase in sales and the significant
impact of the acquisitions of Brix Networks and Navtel Communications on our
selling and administrative expenses—whose selling expenses tend to be
higher, as their products deliver better margins compared to the rest
of our product lines—we expect our selling and administrative expenses to
increase in dollars and range between 32% and 34%. In particular, in fiscal
2009, we expect our commission expenses to increase as sales volume increases.
Furthermore, considering our goal of becoming the leading player in the telecom
test, measurement and monitoring space, we plan to maintain our sales and
marketing efforts, both domestic and international. Finally, any increase in the
strength of the Canadian dollar would also cause our selling and administrative
expenses to increase, as a significant portion of these expenses are incurred
in Canadian dollars.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Gross
research and development expenses
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, gross research and development expenses
totalled $8.8 million, or 19.0% of sales, compared to
$7.6 million, or 17.5% of sales for the same period last year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, gross research and development expenses
totalled $17.4 million, or 18.8% of sales, compared to
$15.1 million, or 17.9% of sales for the same period last
year.
Brix
Networks and Navtel Communications, which were acquired in the third quarter of
fiscal 2008, contributed to our gross research and development expenses
during the entire second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009,
which caused these expenses to increase, compared to the same periods last year.
In addition, Brix Networks and Navtel Communications tend to incur a higher
percentage of sales for research and development expenses compared to our
other product lines as their products are more software-intensive, although they
deliver higher margins than most of our other product
lines.
In
addition, we intensified our research and development activities by hiring
additional employees, namely in our software development center in Pune,
India, which resulted in increased gross research and development expenses
in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, compared
to the same periods last year.
However,
during the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, the significant and
rapid decrease in the average value of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US
dollar, also had a substantial positive effect on our gross research and
development expenses as an important portion of these expenses are denominated
in Canadian dollars and also because these expenses increased
year-over-year.
Also, in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we closed down our R&D operations in
Budapest, Hungary, and certain R&D projects, which resulted in severance
expenses during the first half of fiscal 2009.
Tax
credits
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, tax credits from the Canadian federal and
provincial governments for research and development activities were
$1.5 million, or 16.7% of gross research and development expenses, compared
to $1.4 million, or 18.3% of gross research and development expenses for the
same period last year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, these tax credits were $2.9 million,
or 16.4% of gross research and development expenses, compared to $2.9
million, or 19.0% of gross research and development expenses for the same period
last year.
All our
research and development tax credits are denominated in Canadian dollars. The
significant and sudden decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar, compared to
the US dollar, during the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009 had
a negative impact on these tax credits expressed in US
dollars.
However,
that decrease in tax credits was offset in part by increased research and
development activities in Canada, where we are eligible for tax
credits.
The
decrease in research and development tax credits as a percentage of gross
research and development expenses for the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2009, compared to the corresponding periods last year, is mainly due
to the fact that the portion of gross research and development incurred in
Canada, where we are entitled to tax credits, was lower than last year following
the establishment of our new software development center in India as well
as the acquisition of Brix Networks, which is located in the United States. Our
research and development activities conducted outside Canada do not entitle us
to tax credits.
For
fiscal 2009, we expect that our net research and development expenses will
increase in dollars, and range between 14% and 16% of sales, given our focus on
innovation, the addition of Brix Networks and Navtel Communications (whose
products are software-intensive), the addition of software features in our
products, our desire to gain market share and our goal to exceed customer
expectations. Also, we are increasingly taking advantage of talent pools around
the world with the establishment of a research and development center focused
on software development in Pune, India. Finally, any increase in the
strength of the Canadian dollar in the upcoming quarters would cause our
net research and development expenses to increase, as a significant portion of
these are incurred in Canadian dollars.
AMORTIZATION
OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, amortization of property, plant and
equipment was $1.0 million, compared to $998,000 for the same period last year.
For the six months ended February 28, 2009, amortization expenses amounted to
$2.2 million, compared to $2.0 million for the same period last
year.
The
recent startup of our own manufacturing and research and development
facilities in China and India, the upgrade of our IT systems, and the impact of
the acquisition of Brix Networks and Navtel Communications in the third quarter
of fiscal 2008 resulted in an increase in our amortization expenses in
the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the
corresponding periods last year. However, the significant decrease in the
average value of the Canadian dollar versus the US dollar in the second quarter
and the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the same periods last year,
limited the increase in our amortization expenses year-over-year
as a significant portion of these expenses are denominated
in Canadian dollars.
AMORTIZATION
OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, amortization of intangible assets was $1.2
million, compared to $720,000 for the same period last year. For the six
months ended February 28, 2009, amortization of intangible assets was
$2.6 million compared to $1.5 million for the same period last
year.
The
increase in amortization expenses in the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2009, compared to the same periods last year, is mainly due to the
acquisition of Brix Networks core technology in the third quarter of
2008.
INTEREST
INCOME
Our
interest income mainly resulted from our short-term investments, less interests
and bank charges. For the three months ended February 28, 2009,
interest income amounted to $175,000, compared to $1.6 million for the
same period last year. For the six months ended February 28, 2009,
interest income amounted to $641,000, compared to $3.1 million for the same
period last year.
The
decrease in interest income in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal
2009, compared to the corresponding periods last year, is mainly due to the
decrease in our cash and short-term investments following the cash payment of
$41.0 million for the acquisitions of Brix Networks and Navtel Communications in
the third quarter of fiscal 2008, the redemption of share
capital amounting to $34.0 million over the last 12 months, in
accordance with our share buy-back programs as well as the general
reduction in interest rates year-over-year. In addition, the significant
decrease in the average value of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US
dollar year-over-year, contributed to the decrease in our interest income in the
second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009, compared to the same period
last year, as it is denominated in Canadian dollars.
FOREIGN
EXCHANGE GAIN (LOSS)
Foreign
exchange gains and losses are mainly the result of the translation of operating
activities denominated in currencies other than the Canadian
dollar.
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, the foreign exchange gain amounted to $1.1
million, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $232,000 for the same
period last year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, the foreign exchange gain amounted to $5.7
million compared to a foreign exchange loss of $848,000 for the same
period last year.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the value of the Canadian dollar decreased
versus the US dollar compared to the previous quarter, which resulted in a
foreign exchange gain of $1.1 million during that period. In fact, the
period-end value of the Canadian dollar decreased 2.6% to CA$1.2707 = US$1.00 in
the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to CA$1.2372 = US$1.00 at the end of
the previous quarter. We also have to consider that the volume of operations
denominated in foreign currency (including balance sheet items) increased
year-over-year further increasing the foreign exchange gain, compared to the
same period last year.
During
the first half of fiscal 2009, the value of the Canadian dollar significantly
and rapidly decreased versus the US dollar, compared to August 31, 2008,
which resulted in a foreign exchange gain of $5.7 million in the first half
of fiscal 2009. In fact, the period-end value of the Canadian dollar
decreased 16.4% to CA$1.2707 = US$1.00 in the first half of fiscal 2009,
compared to CA$1.0626 = US$1.00 at the end of fiscal 2008. We also have to
consider that the volume of operations denominated in foreign currency
(including balance sheet items) increased year-over-year, further increasing the
exchange gain compared to the same period last year.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the value of the Canadian dollar increased
quarter-over-quarter, compared to the US dollar, which resulted in a foreign
exchange loss of $232,000 during that period. In fact, the period-end value
of the Canadian dollar increased 2.1% versus the US dollar in the second quarter
of fiscal 2008, compared to the previous
quarter.
During
the first half of fiscal 2008, the value of the Canadian dollar increased
significantly, compared to the US dollar, which resulted in a significant
foreign exchange loss of $848,000 during that period. In fact, the period-end value
of the Canadian dollar for the first half of fiscal 2008 increased 7.8%
versus the US dollar, compared to August 31,
2007.
It should
be noted that foreign exchange rate fluctuations also flow through the P&L
line items as a significant portion of our operating items are
denominated in Canadian dollars, and we report our results
in US dollars. Consequently, the decrease in the average value of the
Canadian dollar in the second quarter and the first half of fiscal 2009,
compared to the same periods last year, resulted in a significant and positive
impact on our financial results for these periods. This was amplified by the
fact that our operating activities incurred in Canadian dollars increased
year-over-year. In fact, the average value of the Canadian dollar in the
second quarter of fiscal 2009 was CA$1.2334 = US$1.00 versus CA$1.0066 = US$1.00
for the same period last year, representing a decrease of 18.4% in the
average value of the Canadian dollar year-over-year. For the first half of
fiscal 2009, the average value of the Canadian dollar was CA$1.1918 =
US$1.00 versus CA$0.9984 = US$1.00 for the same period last year, representing
a decrease of 16.2% in the average value of the Canadian dollar
year-over-year.
We manage
our exposure to currency risks with forward exchange contracts. In addition,
some of our Canadian entities’ operating activities are denominated in US
dollars or other currencies, which further hedges these risks. However, any
increase in the value of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US dollar, would
have a negative impact on our operating results.
INCOME
TAXES
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, our income tax expense was $1.2 million,
compared to $995,000 for the same period last year.
For the
six months ended February 28, 2009, our income tax expense was $3.0 million
compared to $2.3 million for the same period last year.
For the
three months ended February 28, 2009, we reported income tax expenses of $1.2
million on earnings
before income taxes of $3.9 million, for an effective income tax rate of 31.3%.
For the six months ended February 28, 2009, we reported income tax
expenses of $3.0 million on earnings before income
taxes of $11.0 million, for an effective income tax rate of 27.7%. Our
combined Canadian and provincial statutory tax rate is 31%. A significant
portion of our foreign exchange gain is created by the translation of financial
statements of our foreign integrated subsidiaries, and is therefore non-taxable.
On the other hand, we continue to maintain a valuation allowance for some
of our subsidiaries at loss and we have some non-deductible expenses, such as
stock-based compensation costs. Otherwise, the actual tax rate would have been
closer to the statutory tax rate for all periods.
For the
three months ended February 29, 2008, we reported an income tax expense of
$995,000 on earnings
before income taxes of $5.0 million, for an effective income tax rate of 19.8%.
For the six months ended February 29, 2008, we reported an income tax
expense of $2.3 million on earnings before income taxes
of $6.2 million, for an effective income tax rate of 36.5%. The
distortion between the income tax expense and pre-tax income for these periods
can be explained by the following factors. First, on December 14, 2007,
reductions to the Canadian federal statutory tax rate, previously announced
by the Canadian federal Government, were enacted. Therefore, our Canadian
federal future income tax assets decreased by $1.5 million and generate a
one-time future income tax expense for the same amount during the second quarter
and the first half of fiscal 2008. However, during the second quarter of fiscal
2008, based on these new enacted tax rates, we reviewed our tax strategy for the
future use of our Canadian federal operating losses, tax deductions, timing
differences and R&D tax credits to minimize income taxes payable on future
years’ taxable income, by amending our prior year’s income tax returns to create
a net operating loss to be carried back to prior years, which released
previously used research and development tax credits. This resulted in an
increase in our tax-related assets of $2.7 million and a one-time income
tax recovery for the same amount during the second quarter and the first half of
fiscal 2008. These two offsetting elements represented a net income tax recovery
of $1.2 million in the statements of earnings for the three- and six-month
periods ended February 29, 2008. Also, during these periods, some
expenses were non-deductible for tax purposes (mainly stock-based compensation
expenses and foreign exchange losses created by the translation of financial
statements of our foreign integrated subsidiaries) and some revenues were
non-taxable (namely certain R&D tax credits). In addition, we continued
to maintain a valuation allowance for some of our subsidiaries at loss, and
we utilize previously unrecognized future income tax assets. Finally, we
recorded income tax expenses for minimum taxes payable in certain tax
jurisdictions, where taxes are not related to pre-tax earnings. Otherwise,
actual tax rate would have been closer to the statutory tax rate for both
periods.
Please
refer to note 10 to our interim consolidated financial statements for details on
income taxes and a full reconciliation of the income tax
provision.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash requirements
and capital resources
As at
February 28, 2009, our cash and short-term investments totalled $58.1 million,
while our working capital was at $97.7 million. Our cash and short-term
investments decreased $13.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
compared to the previous quarter, mainly due to the cash payments of $25.6
million for the redemption of share capital under our substantial issuer bid
program and $2.9 million for the purchase of capital assets. In addition, our
cash position decreased quarter-over-quarter due to the decrease in the value of
the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar. Indeed, we recorded
an unrealized foreign exchange loss on our cash and short-term investments
of $1.0 million. This unrealized foreign exchange loss resulted from
the translation, in US dollars, of our Canadian-dollar-denominated
cash and short-term investments and was included in the accumulated other
comprehensive income in the balance sheet. On the other hand, operating
activities generated cash flows of $16.3 million during the second quarter of
fiscal 2009.
Our
short-term investments consist of commercial paper issued by 14 (13 as at
November 30, 2008) high-credit quality corporations and trusts; therefore, we
consider the risk of non-performance of these financial instruments
to be limited. None of these debt instruments are expected to be
affected by a liquidity risk, and none of them represent asset-backed commercial
paper. For the
purposes of managing our cash position, we have established a cash
management policy, which we follow and monitor on a regular basis. These
short-term investments will be used for working capital and other general
corporate purposes, including other potential acquisitions, payments
of contingent considerations and our share repurchase program.
We
believe that our cash balances and short-term investments will be sufficient to
meet our liquidity and capital requirements for the foreseeable future,
including the cash contingent considerations payable for the acquisition
of Brix Networks and capital assets as well as the effect of our normal
course issuer bid. In addition to these assets, we have unused available lines
of credit totaling $11.2 million for working capital and other general corporate
purposes and unused lines of credit of $15.0 million for foreign
currency exposure related to forward exchange contracts. However, possible
operating losses and/or possible investments in or acquisitions of complementary
businesses, products or technologies may require additional financing.
There can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be
available when required or, if available, that it can be secured on
satisfactory terms.
Sources
and uses of cash
We
finance our operations and meet our capital expenditure requirements mainly
through cash flows from operating activities, the use of our cash and short-term
investments as well as the issuance of subordinate voting shares.
Operating
activities
Cash
flows provided by operating activities were $16.3 million for the three months
ended February 28, 2009, compared to $9.4 million for the same period last
year.
Cash
flows provided by operating activities in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were
mainly attributable to the net earnings after items not affecting cash of $8.8
million, and to the net change in non-cash operating items
of $7.5 million mainly due to the effect on cash of the $4.5 million
decrease in our accounts receivable (due to timing of sales), the $352,000
decrease in our income taxes and tax credits recoverable (tax credits received
during the quarter less tax credits earned during the quarter and not yet
recovered), the $308,000 decrease in our prepaid expenses (fees initially paid
for the substantial issuer bid), the $488,000 decrease in our inventories and
the $1.8 million increase in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
mainly due to timing of purchases and payments.
Cash
flows provided by operating activities in the first half of fiscal 2009 were
mainly attributable to the net earnings after items not affecting cash of $16.1
million, offset by the negative net change in non-cash operating items
of $2.5 million mainly due to the negative effect on cash of the
$2.8 million increase in our accounts receivable (due to timing of sales),
the $344,000 increase in our income taxes and tax credits recoverable (mainly
tax credits earned during the period and not yet recovered), the $234,000
increase in our prepaid expenses. However, the increase in our
accounts payable and accrued liabilities generated cash flows of $762,000,
mainly due to timing of purchases and payments.
Cash
flows provided by operating activities were $9.4 million for the three months
ended February 29, 2008. Cash flows provided by operating activities
in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 were mainly attributable to the net
earnings after items not affecting cash of $15.8 million offset in part by the
negative net change in non-cash operating items of $6.4 million.
The negative net change in non-cash operating items was mainly due to the
negative effect on cash of the increase of $9.2 million of our income tax
and tax credits recoverable as well as the $985,000 increase in our
accounts receivable. The increase in our income taxes and tax credits is mainly
due to the increase in our tax credits recoverable following the change in
our tax strategy explained elsewhere in this document. This increase was for the
most part offset by the positive effect on cash of the decrease of our future
income tax assets, which also resulted from the change in the tax strategy. The
increase in our accounts receivable is due to the increase in sales during the
quarter. These negative effects on cash were offset by the positive
effect on cash of the $794,000 decrease in our inventories and the $2.7 million
increase in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The decrease in
our inventories resulted from increased sales activities during the quarter. The
increase in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities resulted from the
timing of certain purchases and payments as well as increased activities
during the quarter.
Cash
flows provided by operating activities were $7.2 million for the six months
ended February 29, 2008. Cash flows provided by operating activities in the
first half of fiscal 2008 were mainly attributable to the net earnings after
items not affecting cash of $19.3 million, offset in part by the negative net
change in non-cash operating items of $12.1 million; this negative net
change in non-cash operating items was mainly due to the negative effect on cash
of the $9.6 million increase in our income tax and tax credits recoverable, as
well as the $3.0 million decrease in our accounts payable and accrued
liabilities. The increase in our income taxes and tax credits recoverable
comes from the increase in our tax credits as explained above. The decrease in
our accounts payable and accrued liabilities is due to timing of purchases and
payments during the period. These negative effects on cash flows were offset in
part by the positive effect on cash of the $707,000 decrease in our
inventories, which resulted from increased sales activities during the
period.
Investing
activities
Cash
flows provided by investing activities were $13.2 million for the three months
ended February 28, 2009, compared to cash flows used by investing
activities of $5.7 million for the same period last year. In the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, we disposed (net of acquisitions) of
$16.1 million worth of short-term investments but paid $2.9 million for the
purchase of capital assets. For the corresponding period last year, we
acquired (net of disposal and maturity) $3.6 million worth of short-term
investments and paid $2.1 million for the purchase of capital
assets.
Cash
flows provided by investing activities were $16.2 million for the six months
ended February 28, 2009, compared to cash flows used by investing
activities of $4.2 million for the same period last year. In the first half
of fiscal 2009, we disposed (net of acquisitions) of $20.6
million worth of short-term investments but paid $4.5 million for the
purchase of capital assets. For the corresponding period last year, we
acquired (net of disposal and maturity) $480,000 worth of short-term investments
and paid $3.7 million for the purchase of capital assets.
Financing
activities
Cash
flows used by financing activities were $25.6 million for the three months ended
February 28, 2009, compared to cash flows of $10,000 provided by financing
activities for the same period last year. During the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, we paid $25.6 million for the redemption of share
capital under our share repurchase programs. However, we received $5,000 from
the exercise of stock options.
Cash
flows used by financing activities were $26.0 million for the six months ended
February 28, 2009, compared to cash flows provided by financing activities
of $535,000 for the same period last year. During the first half of fiscal
2009, we paid $26.1 million for the redemption of share capital under our
share repurchase programs. However, we received $31,000 from the exercise of
stock options. For the corresponding period last year, cash flows provided
by financing activities were due to changes in bank loan of $699,000,
offset by the cash payment of $174,000 for the redemption of share capital
under our normal course issuer bid program.
FORWARD
EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
We
utilize forward exchange contracts to manage our foreign currency exposure. Our
policy is not to utilize those derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes.
Our
forward exchange contracts, which are used to hedge anticipated
US-dollar-denominated sales, qualify for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange
translation gains and losses on these contracts are recognized
as an adjustment of the revenues when the corresponding sales are
recorded.
As at
February 28, 2009, we held forward exchange contracts to sell US dollars at
various forward rates, which are summarized as follows:
Expiry
dates
|
|
Contractual
amounts
|
|
|
Weighted average
contractual
forward
rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
2009 to August 2009
|
|
$ |
18,800,000 |
|
|
|
1.0567 |
|
September
2009 to August 2010
|
|
|
24,200,000 |
|
|
|
1.0760 |
|
September
2010 to August 2011
|
|
|
14,600,000 |
|
|
|
1.1221 |
|
September
2011
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1.1278 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
58,600,000 |
|
|
|
1.0822 |
|
The fair
value of forward exchange contracts, which represents the amount that the
company would receive or pay to settle the contracts based on the forward
exchange rate at period end, amounted to net gains of $62,000
as at August 31, 2008, and net losses of $8.5 million
as at February 29, 2009, following the significant decrease
in the value of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US dollar, during the
first six months of fiscal 2009.
CONTINGENCIES
Class
action
On
November 27, 2001, a class-action suit was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York against EXFO, four of the
underwriters of our Initial Public Offering and some of our executive officers
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder and Sections 11, 12 and 16 of the Securities Act of 1933. This class
action alleges that EXFO’s registration statement and prospectus filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2000, contained material
misrepresentations and/or omissions resulting from (i) the underwriters
allegedly soliciting and receiving additional, excessive and undisclosed
commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated material
portions of the shares issued in connection with EXFO’s Initial Public
Offering; and (ii) the underwriters allegedly entering into agreements with
customers whereby shares issued in connection with EXFO’s Initial Public
Offering would be allocated to those customers in exchange for which customers
agreed to purchase additional amounts of shares in the after-market
at predetermined prices.
On April
19, 2002, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint containing master
allegations against all of the defendants in all of the 310 cases included in
this class action and also filed an amended complaint containing allegations
specific to four of EXFO’s underwriters, EXFO and two of our executive officers.
In addition to the allegations mentioned above, the amended complaint alleges
that the underwriters (i) used their analysts to manipulate the stock
market; and (ii) implemented schemes that allowed issuer insiders to sell
their shares rapidly after an initial public offering and benefit from high
market prices. As concerns EXFO and our two executive officers in particular,
the amended complaint alleges that (i) EXFO’s registration statement was
materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose the additional
commissions and compensation to be received by underwriters; (ii) the two
named executive officers learned of or recklessly disregarded the alleged
misconduct of the underwriters; (iii) the two named executive officers had
motive and opportunity to engage in alleged wrongful conduct due to personal
holdings of EXFO’s stock and the fact that an alleged artificially inflated
stock price could be used as currency for acquisitions; and (iv) the two named
executive officers, by virtue of their positions with EXFO, controlled it and
the contents of the registration statement and had the ability to prevent its
issuance or cause it to be corrected. The plaintiffs in this suit seek an
unspecified amount for damages suffered.
In July
2002, the issuers filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint
and a decision was rendered on February 19, 2003. Only one of the claims
against EXFO was dismissed. On October 8, 2002, the claims against its
officers were dismissed pursuant to the terms of Reservation of Rights and
Tolling Agreements entered into with the plaintiffs.
In June
2004, an agreement of partial settlement was submitted to the court for
preliminary approval. The proposed partial settlement was between the
plaintiffs, the issuer defendants in the consolidated actions, the issuer
officers and directors named as defendants, and the issuers’ insurance
companies. The court granted the preliminary approval motion on
February 15, 2005, subject to certain modifications. On
August 31, 2005, the court issued a preliminary order further approving the
modifications to the settlement and certifying the settlement classes. The court
also appointed the notice administrator for the settlement and ordered that
notice of the settlement be distributed to all settlement class members by
January 15, 2006. The settlement fairness hearing occurred on
April 24, 2006, and the court reserved decision at that time.
While the
partial settlement was pending approval, the plaintiffs continued to litigate
against the underwriter defendants. The district court directed that the
litigation proceed within a number of “focus cases” rather than in all of the
310 cases that have been consolidated. EXFO's case is not one of
these focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the district court certified
the focus cases as class actions. The underwriter defendants appealed
that ruling, and on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit reversed the district court’s class
certification decision.
On April
6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing of
that decision and, on May 18, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the
plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing en banc. In light
of the Second Circuit’s opinion, liaison counsel for all issuer defendants,
including EXFO, informed the court that this settlement could not be approved,
because the defined settlement class, like the litigation class, could not be
certified. On June 25, 2007, the district court
entered an order terminating the settlement agreement. On August 14,
2007, the plaintiffs filed their second consolidated amended class action
complaints against the focus cases and, on September 27, 2007, again moved
for class certification. On November 12, 2007, certain defendants
in the focus cases moved to dismiss the second consolidated amended class action
complaints. On March 26, 2008, the district court denied the motions to dismiss,
except as to Section 11 claims raised by those plaintiffs who sold their
securities for a price in excess of the initial offering price and those
who purchased outside of the previously certified class period. Briefing on the
class certification motion was completed in May 2008. That motion was withdrawn
without prejudice on October 10, 2008. On February 25, 2009, liaison counsel for
the plaintiffs informed the district court that a settlement has been agreed to
in principle, subject to formal approval by the parties, and preliminary and
final approval by the court.
Due to
the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the final outcome of the case
including the approval of the settlement described above is uncertain and it is
not possible to determine the amount of any possible losses. We will
continue to defend our position in this litigation that the claims against EXFO,
and our officers, are without merit. Accordingly, no provision for this case has
been made in the interim consolidated financial statements as at February
28, 2009.
Contingent
consideration
Following
the purchase of assets during the three months ended February 28, 2009, we had a
contingent cash consideration of up to $1,000,000, payable based upon the
achievement of a booking volume in the next 24 months following the
purchase.
SHARE
CAPITAL AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Share
capital
As at
March 27, 2009, EXFO had 36,643,000 multiple voting shares outstanding,
entitling to ten votes each and 22,969,344 subordinate voting shares
outstanding. The multiple voting shares and the subordinate voting shares are
unlimited as to number and without par value. On December 18, 2008, we redeemed
7.7 million subordinated voting shares for a total consideration of CA$30
million (US$24.9 million), plus related fees of $576,000, in accordance with our
substantial issuer bid program.
Long-Term
Incentive Plan and Deferred Share Unit Plan
The
aggregate number of subordinate voting shares covered by stock options,
restricted share units (RSUs) and deferred share units (DSUs) granted under the
Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Deferred Share Unit Plan was 3,203,521 as at
February 28, 2009. The maximum number of subordinate voting shares issuable
under these two plans cannot exceed 6,306,153 shares. The following tables
summarize information about stock options, RSUs and DSUs granted to the members
of our Board of Directors and to our Management and Corporate Officers
as at February 28, 2009:
Stock Options
|
|
Number
|
|
%
of issued and outstanding
|
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, President and CEO (one individual)
|
179,642
|
|
10%
|
|
$9.05
|
Board
of Directors (four individuals)
|
|
148,807
|
|
9%
|
|
$6.19
|
Management
and Corporate Officers (eight individuals)
|
|
212,139
|
|
12%
|
|
$14.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,588
|
|
31%
|
|
$10.40
|
Restricted Share
Units
|
|
Number
|
|
%
of issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, President and CEO (one individual)
|
140,459
|
|
10%
|
|
|
Management
and Corporate Officers (eleven individuals)
|
|
481,554
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622,013
|
|
46%
|
|
|
Deferred Share
Units
|
|
Number
|
|
%
of issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
of Directors (five individuals)
|
|
98,926
|
|
100%
|
|
|
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As at
February 28, 2009, our off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of letters of
guarantee. As at February 28, 2009, our letters of guarantee
amounted to $5.4 million; these letters of guarantee expire at various
dates through fiscal 2011. From this amount, we had $1.2 million worth of
letters of guarantee for our own selling and purchase requirements, which were
reserved from one of our lines of credit. The remainder in the amount of $4.2
million was used to secure our line of credit in Chinese currency. This line of
credit was unused as at February 28, 2009. This
$4.2 million letter of guarantee is secured by short-term
investments.
VARIABLE
INTEREST ENTITY
As of
February 28, 2009, we did not have interests in any variable interest
entities.
RISKS
AND UNCERTAINTIES
Over the
past several years, we have managed our business in a difficult environment;
focused on research and development programs for new and innovative products
aimed at expected growth pockets in our sector; continued the development of our
domestic and international markets; and made strategic acquisitions. However, we
operate in a highly competitive sector that is in constant evolution and,
as a result, we encounter various risks and uncertainties that must be given
appropriate consideration in our strategic management policies.
We are
exposed to currency risks due to the export of our Canadian-manufactured
products, the large majority of which are denominated in US dollars. These
risks are partially hedged by operating expenses denominated
in US dollars and forward exchange contracts. The increased strength
of the Canadian dollar, compared to the US dollar, over the last few years,
has caused our operating expenses to increase significantly. Any further
increase in the value of the Canadian dollar in the coming months would
negatively affect our results of operations.
In
addition, our business is subject to the effects of general economic conditions
in North America and throughout the world and, more particularly, market
conditions in the telecommunications industry. In the past, our operating
results were adversely affected by reduced telecom capital spending in North
America, Europe and Asia and by general unfavorable economic conditions. In
particular, sales to network service providers in North America were
significantly and adversely affected by a downturn in 2001 in the
telecommunications industry. With the recession in key geographic
regions or markets, we may experience a material adverse impact on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
Also,
risks and uncertainties related to the telecommunications test, measurement and
monitoring industry involve the rapid development of new products that may have
short life cycles and require extensive research and development; the difficulty
of adequately predicting market size and trends; the difficulty of retaining
highly skilled employees; and the ability to quickly adapt our cost structure to
changing market conditions in order to achieve profitability.
Furthermore,
given our strategic goals for growth and competitive positioning in our
industry, we are continuously expanding into international markets, including
our manufacturing facilities in China and our software development center
in India. This exposes us to certain risks and uncertainties, namely changes in
local laws and regulations, multiple technological standards, protective
legislation, pricing pressure, cultural differences and the management
of operations in China and India.
Also,
while strategic acquisitions, like those we have made in the past, those closed
in fiscal 2008 and possibly others in the future, are essential to our long-term
growth, they also expose us to certain risks and uncertainties related to the
rapid and effective integration of these businesses as well as their products,
technologies and personnel. Finally, integration requires the dedication of
management resources, which may detract their attention from our day-to-day
business and operations.
The
current economic environment of our industry could also result in some of our
customers experiencing difficulties and, consequently, this could have a
negative effect on our results, especially in terms of future sales and
recoverability of accounts receivable. However, the sectorial and
geographic diversity of our customer base provides us with a reasonable
level of protection in this area. Finally, other financial instruments, which
potentially subject us to credit risks, consist mainly of cash,
short-term investments and forward exchange contracts. Our short-term
investments consist of debt instruments issued by high-credit quality
corporations and trusts. Our cash and forward exchange contracts are held with
or issued by high-credit quality financial institutions; therefore,
we consider the risk of non-performance on these instruments to be
limited.
For a
more complete understanding of risk factors that may affect us, please refer to
the risk factors set forth in our disclosure documents published with securities
commissions at www.EXFO.com or www.sedar.com in Canada
or www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml in the U.S.
Non-GAAP
financial measure
We
provide a non-GAAP financial measure (EBITDA*) as supplemental information
regarding our operational performance. We use EBITDA for the purposes of
evaluating our historical and prospective financial performance, as well as our
performance relative to our competitors. This measure also helps us to plan and
forecast future periods as well as to make operational and strategic decisions.
We believe that providing this information to our investors, in addition to
the GAAP measures, allows them to see the company’s results through the eyes of
management, and to better understand our historical and future financial
performance.
The
presentation of this additional information is not prepared in accordance with
GAAP. Therefore, the information may not necessarily be comparable to that of
other companies and should be considered as a supplement to,
not a substitute for, the corresponding measures calculated in
accordance with GAAP.
The
following table summarizes the reconciliation of EBITDA to GAAP net
earnings:
|
|
Three
months
ended
February 28,
2009
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
28,
2009
|
|
|
Three
months
ended
February 29,
2008
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
February
29,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP
net earnings for the period
|
|
$ |
2,655 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add
(deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(3,099 |
) |
Income
taxes
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
for the period
|
|
$ |
5,984 |
|
|
$ |
15,123 |
|
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
$ |
6,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDITDA
in percentage of sales
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
*
|
EBITDA
is defined as net earnings before interest, income taxes, amortization of
property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible
assets.
|