UNITED STATES |
|||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|||
|
|||
SCHEDULE 14A |
|||
|
|||
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of |
|||
|
|||
Filed by the Registrant ý |
|||
|
|||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|||
|
|||
Check the appropriate box: |
|||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
||
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
||
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
||
|
|||
AVOCENT CORPORATION |
|||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
|||
|
|||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|||
ý |
No fee required. |
||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
||
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
||
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Avocent Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held at the Huntsville Marriott Hotel located at Five Tranquility Base, Huntsville, Alabama 35805, on Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect two Class III directors to serve until the annual meeting of our stockholders in 2009;
2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2006;
3. To amend the Avocent Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and approve the reservation of an additional two million two hundred fifty thousand (2,250,000) shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan; and
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on May 3, 2006, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment or postponement of this annual meeting. A list of these stockholders is kept at the office of our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. However, to assure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to mark, sign, and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose. You may also be able to submit your proxy over the Internet or by telephone. For specific instructions, please refer to the information provided with your proxy card.
Any stockholder attending the meeting may vote in person even if he or she has returned a proxy.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
Huntsville, Alabama |
|
April 28, 2006 |
|
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE
MEETING, PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AS
PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED, POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE.
4991 Corporate Drive
Huntsville, Alabama 35805
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be held on June 15, 2006
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
Date, Time, and Place
This Proxy Statement is furnished to the stockholders of Avocent Corporation, a Delaware corporation, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors for use at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Huntsville Marriott Hotel located at Five Tranquility Base, Huntsville, Alabama 35805, on Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time, and any and all postponements or adjournments of this annual meeting, for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These proxy solicitation materials were first mailed on or about May 12, 2006, to all stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Our principal executive offices are located at 4991 Corporate Drive, Huntsville, Alabama 35805.
Purposes of the Annual Meeting
The purposes of the annual meeting are to:
Elect two Class III directors to serve until the annual meeting of our stockholders in 2009;
Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2006;
Amend the Avocent Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and approve the reservation of an additional two million two hundred fifty thousand (2,250,000) shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan; and
Transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting.
Revocability of Proxies
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by delivering to our corporate secretary or our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, a written
1
notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.
Record Date and Share Ownership
Stockholders of record at the close of business on May 3, 2006, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. On April 14, 2006, 48,963,888 shares of our common stock, and no shares of our preferred stock, were issued and outstanding, held of record by approximately 300 stockholders. For information regarding security ownership by principal stockholders and management, see the section below entitled, Security Ownership by Principal Stockholders and Management.
Voting and Solicitation; Quorum
Each share held as of the record date is entitled to one vote. A quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting requires the presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by holders of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding on the record date.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. However, broker non-votes will not be counted for the purpose of determining the number of shares entitled to vote with respect to a proposal on which the broker has expressly not voted. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the voting on a proposal that requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote.
The solicitation of proxies will be conducted by mail, and we will bear all attendant costs. These costs will include the expense of preparing and mailing proxy solicitation materials for the annual meeting and reimbursements paid to brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials regarding the annual meeting to such beneficial owners. Certain of our directors, officers, and regular employees, without additional compensation, may also solicit proxies, personally or by telephone, email, or facsimile. We have retained Mellon Investor Services, LLC to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $10,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses, and we have agreed to indemnify Mellon against certain liabilities arising out of or in connection with our agreement.
Stockholder Proposals for the Next Annual Meeting
Any stockholder proposal to be presented at our next annual meeting of stockholders must be received at our offices no later than December 29, 2006, in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for such meeting. Any such proposals must be submitted in writing, addressed to the attention of our corporate secretary at 9911 Willows Road N.E., Redmond, Washington 98052, Attention: Corporate Secretary, and must otherwise comply with our Bylaws and the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Our Bylaws establish an advance notice procedure with regard to certain matters, including stockholder proposals not included in our Proxy Statement, to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders. In general, nominations for the election of directors or proposals for other business may be made by the Board of Directors or by any stockholder entitled to vote who has delivered written notice to our corporate secretary not less than 90 days in advance of the annual meeting, which notice must contain specified information concerning the nominees and concerning the stockholder proposing such nominations. In the event that less than 100 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholders must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. A copy of the full text of the Bylaw provisions discussed above may be obtained by writing to our corporate secretary. All notices of proposals by stockholders, whether or not included in our proxy materials, should be sent to our corporate secretary at 9911 Willows Road N.E., Redmond, Washington 98052, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
2
Householding of Proxy Materials
We have adopted a procedure approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) called householding. Under this procedure, stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one set of our proxy materials unless one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. We believe this will provide greater convenience for our stockholders, as well as cost savings for us, by reducing the number of duplicate documents that are sent to your home.
Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Householding will not in any way affect your rights as a stockholder.
If you are eligible for householding and currently receive multiple copies of our proxy materials with other stockholders of record with whom you share an address or if you hold stock in more than one account, and in either case you wish to receive only a single copy of these documents for your household, please contact our corporate secretary at 9911 Willows Road N.E., Redmond, Washington 98052, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by telephone at (425) 861-5858.
If you participate in householding and wish to receive a separate copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K or this Proxy Statement, or if you do not wish to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, please contact our corporate secretary at the address or telephone number indicated above and we will promptly deliver to you separate copies of these documents.
Beneficial stockholders can request information about householding from their banks, brokers, or other holders of record.
3
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF CLASS III DIRECTORS
Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors is to be divided into three classes of directors, designated as Class I, Class II, and Class III. Our Board of Directors currently consists of eight members, with three members in each of Classes I and II, and two members in Class III. Upon the expiration of the term of a class of directors, nominees for that class are elected to serve for a term of three years and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. The current terms of the two Class III directors, Francis A. (Fran) Dramis, Jr. and Stephen F. Thornton, expire upon the election and qualification of the directors to be elected at the annual meeting. Following the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee, our Board of Directors has nominated Messrs. Dramis and Thornton for reelection to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting, to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2009. The terms of the Class I and Class II directors expire at the annual meetings of stockholders to be held in 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote all proxies FOR the election of Messrs. Dramis and Thornton to the Board of Directors. The nominees have consented to serve as our directors if elected. If, at the time of the annual meeting, either of the nominees is unable or declines to serve as a director, the discretionary authority provided in the enclosed proxy will be exercised to vote for a substitute candidate designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that either of the nominees will be unable, or will decline, to serve as a director.
Set forth below is certain information furnished to us by the director nominees and by each of the incumbent directors whose terms will continue following the annual meeting.
Class I Directors
William H. McAleer, 55, has been one of our directors since July 2000. Mr. McAleer is currently Managing Director of Voyager Capital, a venture firm that provides funding to private information technology companies. From 1988 through 1994, he was Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of Aldus Corporation, a publicly-traded software company.
David P. Vieau, 56, has been one of our directors since April 2001. Since March 2002, Mr. Vieau has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of A123Systems, Inc., a privately-held company that develops advanced power technologies for portable communications and computer systems. From January 2001 to March 2002, he was a consultant and private investor.
Doyle C. Weeks, 60, has been one of our directors since July 2000. Mr. Weeks has been President and Chief Operating Officer since February 2005. Prior to that he was our Executive Vice President of Group Operations and Business Development from July 2000 to January 2005.
Class II Directors
John R. Cooper, 58, has been one of our directors since July 2000, and was elected as Chairman of our Board of Directors in April 2003. Mr. Cooper has been our Chief Executive Officer since March 2002 and also served as our President from March 2002 through January 2005. From April 2001 to November 2001, Mr. Cooper served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of ADTRAN, Inc., a publicly-traded company that designs, develops, manufacturers, markets and services a broad range of high-speed digital transmission products.
Harold D. Harry Copperman, 59, Mr. Copperman has been one of our directors since November 2002. Mr. Copperman is currently President and Chief Executive Officer of HDC Ventures, Inc., a management and
4
investment group focusing on enterprise systems, software, and services, a position he has held since March 2002. From January 2001 to March 2002, he was a consultant and private investor. Mr. Copperman is also a director of Epicor Software Corporation, a provider of enterprise software solutions for mid-market companies, and AXS-One Inc., a provider of records compliance management solutions.
Edwin L. Harper, 61, has been one of our directors since July 2000, and was elected as our Lead Independent Director in April 2003. Since February 2005, Mr. Harper has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of WhiteCell Software, Inc., a network security company. From March 2001 to January 2005, Mr. Harper has been a consultant and private investor. From September 1999 to March 2001, Mr. Harper served as President of Manufacturing Technology, Inc., a privately-held company that manufactured slicing and dicing equipment for the thin film head, semiconductor, and optics industries. Mr. Harper is also a director of Ditech Communication Corporation, a telecommunications equipment supplier.
Class III Directors
Francis A. Fran Dramis, Jr., 58, has been one of our directors since November 2002. Mr. Dramis is currently Chief Information - E-Commerce & Security Officer for BellSouth Corporation, a telecommunications company based in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Dramis has held a variety of positions at BellSouth, which he joined in December 1998.
Stephen F. Thornton, 66, has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2000, and was Chairman of our Board of Directors from July 2000 to April 2003. Mr. Thornton was our President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2000 to March 2002.
Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation
The two nominees receiving the greatest number of votes of the shares present and entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be elected as directors.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF MESSRS. DRAMIS AND THORNTON TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
5
PROPOSAL TWO
TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS
OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
Our Audit Committee has appointed the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to conduct an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards of our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. A representative of that firm is expected to be present at the annual meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will be given an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers its independence from us and our management, and this discussion included consideration of the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board and the potential impact that non-audit services provided to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers could have on its independence. This appointment is being submitted for ratification at the meeting. If not ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment, although the Audit Committee will not be required to appoint different independent auditors. PricewaterhouseCoopers has served as our independent auditors since July 2000.
Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented and voting at the annual meeting will be required to approve this proposal.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HAS APPROVED THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2006, AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THIS APPOINTMENT.
6
PROPOSAL THREE
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
AVOCENT CORPORATION 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE FOR AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN
Our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan) was adopted by our Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders in 2005. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to our directors, employees, and consultants, and to promote the success of our business.
As of April 14, 2006, a total of 3,657,105 shares of our Common Stock is presently available for Awards under the 2005 Plan. As of April 14, 2006, 52,400 option Awards had been exercised under the 2005 Plan, and there were option Awards outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 295,480 shares at a weighted average exercise price of $26.53 per share.
The Board of Directors believes that the number of shares remaining available for awards under the Plan is insufficient to satisfy the purposes of the 2005 Plan unless additional shares are authorized, and you are being asked to approve an amendment, which was unanimously approved by our Board of Directors, to the Avocent Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase by two million two hundred fifty thousand the number of shares that may be awarded under the 2005 Plan. In addition, this amendment to the 2005 Plan is being submitted to stockholders for approval in order to enable us to grant certain awards under the 2005 Plan that may qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
Amendment Approval
We strongly believe that the amendment to our 2005 Plan for the reservation of additional shares is essential to our continued success. The Board and management believe that equity awards motivate high levels of performance, align the interests of service providers and stockholders by giving employees the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the Company, and provide an effective means of recognizing service provider contributions to our success. Our recent acquisition of Cyclades Corporation added approximately 325 new employees, and the Board and management believe that equity awards are of great value in recruiting and retaining personnel who help us meet its goals, as well as rewarding and encouraging current service providers. The Board and management believe that the ability to grant equity awards will be important to our future success.
The terms of our 2005 Plan specify that the pool of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan are reduced at a two-for-one rate for every Award of restricted stock, performance shares, or restricted stock units with a per share price less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the Award. In the past, we have granted stock options that were not subject to this two-for-one rule, but after a comprehensive review of our incentive compensation programs with an independent compensation consultant, our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors have concluded that future Awards will likely consist of restricted stock (or restricted stock units) and performance shares rather than stock options, and recently made approximately 897,000 Awards of restricted stock units and performance shares, which as a result of this two-for-one rule, reduced the pool of shares available under our 2005 Plan by 1,794,000. As a result, we believe we need to increase the number of available shares to meet our future needs. If the amendment is approved, we will have approximately 4,113,105 shares of our common stock available for Awards, but effectively, we will only be able to make approximately 2,056,552 Awards of restricted stock, performance shares, or restricted stock units under the 2005 Plan.
Starting in 2006, we were required by new accounting regulations to record a charge to earnings for employee and director stock option grants, and the 2005 Plan allows us to grant a wide range of awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, dividend
7
equivalents, and deferred stock units, which will help us achieve our goal of attracting, retaining, and motivating talented personnel.
As of April 14, 2006, there were approximately 1,308 employees (including officers) and six non-employee members of our Board of Directors eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan.
Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented and voting at the annual meeting will be required to approve this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 PLAN.
Our executive officers and members of our Board have an interest in this proposal as they may receive awards under the 2005 Plan.
2005 Plan Summary
The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of the 2005 Plan and its operation. The 2005 Plan is set forth in its entirety as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2005 Plan.
Eligibility. Options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, deferred stock units, and dividend equivalents may be granted under the 2005 Plan. Options granted under the 2005 Plan may be either incentive stock options, as defined in Section 422 of the Code, or nonstatutory stock options. Nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units, and dividend equivalents may be granted under the 2005 Plan to our directors, employees, or consultants. Incentive stock options may be granted only to our employees. The Administrator of the 2005 Plan (as defined below), in its discretion, selects the person(s) to whom options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, deferred stock units, and dividend equivalents (collectively, Awards) may be granted, the time or times at which Awards are granted, and the number of shares subject to each such Award.
Code Section 162(m) Annual Limitations. The 2005 Plan provides that no person(s) may be granted, in any fiscal year, options or stock appreciation rights to purchase more than 400,000 shares of common stock; provided, however, the limit will be 1,200,000 shares for a persons first fiscal year of service with us. No more than 200,000 shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, or performance shares (which may include related dividend equivalent grants) may be granted to a person in any fiscal year; provided, however, the limit will be 600,000 shares for a persons first fiscal year of service with us. In addition, no person(s) may receive performance units, in any fiscal year, having an initial value greater than $1,000,000; provided, however, that the limit will be $3,000,000 for such persons first fiscal year of service with us.
Shares Available For Issuance. Upon approval of this amendment by stockholders, a total of 3,113,105 shares of common stock will be available for Awards under the 2005 Plan, plus any shares subject to any outstanding options under our current stock options plans that subsequently expire unexercised. As noted above, any shares subject to restricted stock, performance shares, or restricted stock units with a per share price less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the Award will be counted against the authorized share reserve as two shares for every one share subject to the Award, and if any such shares are returned to the 2005 Plan, such shares will be counted as two shares. If an Award expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full (or, with respect to restricted stock, performance shares, or restricted stock units, is forfeited
8
to or repurchased by us), the unpurchased shares (or, for Awards other than options and stock appreciation rights, the forfeited or repurchased shares) will become available for future Awards. With respect to stock appreciation rights, shares issued pursuant to a stock appreciation right, as well as the shares withheld to pay the exercise price, will not be available under the 2005 Plan for future Awards and from and after the effective date of the 2005 Plan, shares reserved for issuance upon grant of stock appreciation rights shall not become available for issuance under the 2005 Plan to the extent the number of reserved shares exceeds the number of shares actually issued upon exercise of the stock appreciation rights. Shares of restricted stock, performance shares, or restricted stock units that are repurchased by us at the fair market value on the date of the original Award, or are forfeited to us, will become available for future grant under the 2005 Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise price of an option will not become available for future Awards, and shares used to satisfy tax withholding obligations will also not become available for future Awards under the 2005 Plan. To the extent a 2005 Plan Award is paid out in cash rather than stock, such cash payment will not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan. Any payout of dividend equivalents or performance units, because they are payable only in cash, will not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan. Conversely, any forfeiture of dividend equivalents or performance units will not increase the number of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan.
Administration. The 2005 Plan may generally be administered by the Board or a committee appointed by the Board (as applicable, the Administrator). In the case of Awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the committee will consist of two or more outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m).
Terms and Conditions of Options. Each option will be evidenced by a stock option agreement between us and the optionee, and is subject to the following additional terms and conditions:
Exercise Price. The Administrator determines the exercise price of options at the time the options are granted. The exercise price of a stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date such option is granted; provided, however, the exercise price of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date such option is granted. The fair market value of our common stock is generally determined with reference to the closing sale price for our common stock (or the closing bid if no sales were reported) on the date the option is granted.
Exercise of Option; Form of Consideration. The Administrator determines when options become exercisable and may, in its discretion, accelerate the vesting of any outstanding option. The 2005 Plan permits payment to be made by cash, check, other shares of our common stock (with some restrictions), a broker-assisted same day sale, any other form of consideration permitted by applicable law, or any combination thereof.
Term of Option. The term of an option may be no more than ten (10) years from the date of grant; provided that in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, the term of the option may be no more than five (5) years from the date of grant. No option may be exercised after the expiration of its term.
Termination of Employment. If the optionees service with us terminates for any reason other than death or disability or unless the Administrator otherwise approves, the options may be exercised as provided in the applicable option agreement. In the absence of a specified time in the agreement, the options may be exercised for up to three months after such termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the option) and may be exercised only to the extent the option was exercisable on the termination date.
Death or Disability. If an optionee ceases to be a service provider for us as a result of his or her death or disability, then options held by such optionee may be exercised as provided in the applicable option agreement. In the absence of a specified time in the agreement, the options may be exercised for twelve months after such cessation of service (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the option) and only to the extent the option was exercisable on the date of death or disability.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation rights are Awards that grant the participant the right to receive
9
an amount equal to (i) the number of shares exercised, times (ii) the amount by which our stock price exceeds the exercise price. An individual will be able to profit from a stock appreciation right only if the fair market value of the stock increases above the exercise price. Our obligation arising upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right may be paid in shares or in cash, or any combination thereof, as the Administrator may determine and as set forth in the stock appreciation right agreement. The Administrator determines the terms of stock appreciation rights. However, a stock appreciation right may not be granted with an exercise price below 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant. Moreover, a stock appreciation right will expire no later than ten years after the date of grant.
Restricted Stock. Restricted stock Awards are shares of our common stock that vest in accordance with terms and conditions established by the Administrator, and the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of any restricted stock Awards. The Administrator will determine the number of shares of restricted stock granted to any service provider. The Administrator may impose whatever conditions to vesting it determines to be appropriate, which will typically be based principally or solely on continued service but may include a performance-based component. Shares of restricted stock that do not vest are subject to our right of repurchase or forfeiture. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise, shares of restricted stock will be held by us as escrow agent until any restrictions on the shares have lapsed.
Restricted Stock Units. Each restricted stock unit represents one share of our common stock for purposes of determining the number of shares subject to a restricted stock unit Award. Restricted stock units will vest in accordance with terms and conditions established by the Administrator, and the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of any restricted stock unit Awards. The Administrator will determine the number of shares of restricted stock units awarded to any service provider. The Administrator may impose whatever conditions to vesting it determines to be appropriate which will typically be based principally or solely on continued service but may include a performance-based component. Earned restricted stock units are paid out in shares of our common stock.
Performance Units and Performance Shares. Performance units and performance shares may be granted under our 2005 Plan. Performance units and performance shares are Awards that will result in a payment to a participant only if performance goals established by the Administrator are achieved or the Awards otherwise vest. The Administrator will establish organizational or individual performance goals in its discretion, and depending on the extent to which they are met, these goals will determine the number and/or the value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out to participants. Performance units are settled in a cash equivalent equal to the fair market value of our common stock as determined on the vesting date. Each performance share will be the equivalent of one share of our common stock for the purposes of determining the number of shares subject to a performance share Award.
Performance Goals. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the annual compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to each of our other four most highly compensated executive officers may not be deductible for federal income tax purposes to the extent it exceeds $1 million. However, we are able to preserve the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million if the conditions of Section 162(m) are met. These conditions include stockholder approval of the 2005 Plan, setting limits on the number of Awards that any individual may receive, and for Awards other than options, establishing performance criteria that must be met before the Award actually will vest or be paid. We have designed the 2005 Plan so that it permits us to pay compensation that qualifies as performance-based under Section 162(m). Thus, the Administrator (in its discretion) may make performance goals applicable to a participant with respect to an Award. At the Administrators discretion, one or more of the following performance goals may apply (all of which are defined in the 2005 Plan): our annual revenues, cash position, earning per share, net income, operating cash flow, operating income, operational earnings per share, return on assets, return on equity, return on sales, the prices of our common stock, and total stockholder return. The Administrator will automatically adjust any evaluation of performance under a performance goal to exclude (i) any extraordinary non-recurring items, (ii) the effect of any changes in accounting principles affecting our business or the reported results of one of our business units, or (iii) the effect of any business acquisition that was not contemplated at the time the performance goals were established.
10
Deferred Stock Units. Our 2005 Plan permits the grant of deferred stock units, which may consist of restricted stock, performance shares, or performance unit Awards that are paid out in installments or on a deferred basis in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Administrator.
Nontransferability of Awards. Unless determined otherwise by the Administrator, Awards granted under the 2005 Plan are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and may be exercised during the participants lifetime only by the participant, or in the event of the participants death, by the optionees estate or by a person who acquires the right to exercise the Award. Notwithstanding any action by the Administrator to make an Award transferable, no transfer for value or consideration shall be made with the prior approval of our stockholders.
Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization. In the event that our common stock changes by reason of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination, reclassification, or other similar change in our capital structure effected without the receipt of consideration, appropriate adjustments will be made in the number and class of shares of stock subject to the 2005 Plan, the number and class of shares of stock subject to any Award outstanding under the 2005 Plan, the exercise or purchase price of any such outstanding Award, and the annual per-person limits applicable to different types of Awards. In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, the Administrator will notify each participant as soon as practicable prior to such liquidation or dissolution. The Administrator may, in its discretion, provide that each participant will have the right to exercise his or her options or stock appreciation rights as to all shares subject to the Awards. In addition, the Administrator may provide that any right we have to repurchase or forfeit other Awards will lapse and become fully vested.
Change in Control. In the event of a change in control of us, the successor corporation will either assume or provide a substitute Award for each outstanding Award. In the event the successor corporation refuses to assume or provide a substitute Award, the Award will immediately vest and become exercisable as to all of the shares subject to such Award, or if applicable, the Award vesting will be fully accelerated. When making Awards under the 2005 Plan, the Administrator may also, in its sole discretion, provide for the acceleration of vesting in the event of a change of control. In addition, if an option or stock appreciation right has become fully vested and exercisable in lieu of assumption or substitution, the Administrator will provide at least 15 days notice that the option or stock appreciation right will immediately vest and become exercisable as to all of the shares subject to such Award and all outstanding options and stock appreciation rights will terminate upon the expiration of such notice period. A change in control is defined as (i) the acquisition by any person of 25% or more of the combined voting power of the Companys outstanding securities, (ii) a change in the composition of our Board of Directors within any 24 month period as a result of which individuals who were directors at the beginning of any such period (together with any other directors first elected by at least two-thirds of the directors in office immediately prior to any such election) cease to constitute a majority of our Board of Directors, (iii) a consolidation or merger approved by stockholders in which we are not the continuing or surviving company or pursuant to which our shares are not converted into cash, securities, or other property, or (iv) stockholders approve any sale, exchange, liquidation, or transfer of substantially all of the assets of the Company approved by stockholders.
Amendment and Termination of the 2005 Plan. Our Board may amend, alter, suspend, or terminate the 2005 Plan, or any part thereof, at any time and for any reason, but it may not materially amend the 2005 Plan without obtaining stockholder approval. No such action by the Board or stockholders may impair any Award previously granted under the 2005 Plan without the written or electronic consent of the participant.
Stock Price. On April 14, 2006, the closing price of the common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market was $30.96.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following paragraphs are a summary of the general federal income tax consequences to U.S. taxpayers and to us of Awards granted under the 2005 Plan. It does not purport to be complete and does not discuss the tax
11
consequences of the participants death or the provisions of the income tax laws of any municipality, state, or foreign country in which the employee may reside. Tax consequences for any particular individual may be different.
Incentive Stock Options. An optionee who is granted an incentive stock option does not recognize taxable income at the time the option is granted or upon its exercise, although the exercise is an adjustment item for alternative minimum tax purposes and may subject the optionee to the alternative minimum tax. Upon a disposition of the shares more than two years after grant of the option and one year after exercise of the option, any gain or loss (that is, the difference between the sale price and the exercise price of the option) is treated as long-term capital gain or loss. If these holding periods are not satisfied, the optionee recognizes ordinary income at the time of disposition equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the date of the option exercise (or the sale price of the shares, if less). Any additional gain or loss recognized on such a disposition of the shares is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the optionee held the shares. A different rule for measuring ordinary income upon such a premature disposition may apply if the optionee is also one of our officers, directors, or ten percent stockholders. Unless limited by Section 162(m) of the Code, we are entitled to a deduction in the same amount as the ordinary income recognized by the optionee.
Nonstatutory Stock Options. An optionee does not recognize any taxable income at the time he or she is granted a nonstatutory stock option. Upon exercise, the optionee recognizes taxable income generally measured by the excess of the then fair market value of the shares (on the exercise date) over the exercise price. Any taxable income recognized in connection with an option exercise by an employee is subject to tax withholding by us. Upon a disposition of such shares by the optionee, any additional gain or loss is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the optionee held the shares. Unless limited by Section 162(m) of the Code, we are entitled to a deduction in the same amount as the ordinary income recognized by the optionee.
Restricted Stock. A participant will generally recognize ordinary income on receipt of an Award of restricted stock when his or her rights in that Award become substantially vested, in an amount equal to the amount by which the then fair market value of the common stock acquired exceeds the price he or she has paid for it, if any. Recipients of restricted stock may, however, within 30 days of receiving an Award of restricted stock, choose to have any applicable risk of forfeiture disregarded for tax purposes by making a 83(b) election under the Code. If the participant makes an 83(b) election, he or she will have to report ordinary income equal to the difference between the value of the shares and the price paid for the shares, if any, at the time of the receipt of the restricted stock Award. Any ordinary income recognized by the participant generally will be deductible by us.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant does not recognize taxable income upon grant of a stock appreciation right. Upon exercise, the participant recognizes ordinary income in an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any shares received. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be capital gain or loss. Stock appreciation rights that may be settled in cash may be subject to earlier taxation and an additional 20% tax under Section 409A of the Code.
Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, and Performance Shares. A participant does not recognize taxable income upon grant of restricted stock units, performance units, or performance shares. Instead, he or she recognizes ordinary income at the time of vesting equal to the fair market value (on the vesting date) of the shares or cash received minus any amount paid for the shares.
Deferred Stock Units. A participant will not have taxable income upon the grant of a deferred stock unit (except in the case of restricted stock acquired pursuant to a stock purchase right pursuant to which a participant elected to be taxed at the time of grant, as described under Restricted Stock above). Instead, a participant generally will recognize the income at the time of the receipt of the shares subject to the Award equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares at the time of receipt and any amount paid for the shares. However, a participant will be subject to employment taxes at the time a deferred stock unit vests, even if the participant has not yet received the shares subject to the Award. Depending on the structure of the Deferred Stock Award, it may result in earlier taxation and an additional 20% tax under Section 409A of the Code.
12
Tax Effect for the Company. We will generally be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an Award in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a participant and at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option), unless limited by Section 162(m) of the Code. Our 2005 Plan permits the Administrator to grant Awards that qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m) of the Code, thereby permitting us to receive a federal income tax deduction in connection with such Awards.
Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code (Section 409A), enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, imposes certain new requirements applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation plans. If a nonqualified deferred compensation plan subject to Section 409A fails to meet, or is not operated in accordance with, these new requirements, then all compensation deferred under the plan may become immediately taxable. Stock appreciation rights and deferred stock unit Awards which may be granted under the 2005 Plan may constitute deferred compensation subject to the Section 409A requirements. If an Award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, the recipient of that Award may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the Award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an Award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409As provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% federal income tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation. The Internal Revenue Service has not issued final regulations under Section 409A and, accordingly, the requirements of Section 409A (and the application of those requirements to Awards issued under the 2005 Plan) are not entirely clear. It is our intention that any Award granted under the 2005 Plan will comply with Section 409A.
Accounting Treatment. Prior to 2006, employee Awards of stock options and Awards of stock options to members of our Board of Directors with purchase prices at or above fair market value on the grant date did not typically result in any direct charge to our reported earnings, and the fair market value of these Awards was required to be disclosed in the notes to our financial statements. We also disclosed, in the notes to our financial statements, the pro forma impact these Awards would have on our reported earnings and earnings per share if the fair value of the Awards at the time of grant was treated as compensation expense. Effective 2006, the SEC requires mandatory expensing for equity Awards. Accordingly, all 2005 Plan Awards granted after December 31, 2005, and all unvested stock options then outstanding will result in expense charges to our reported earnings. This expense will typically be recognized over the related vesting period.
New Plan Benefits. The 2005 Plan provides that the number of Awards that an employee, director, or consultant receives is in the discretion of the Administrator. The following table sets forth information with respect to Awards made under the 2005 Plan on April 25, 2006 to our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, other employees, and members of our Board of Directors. All Awards consisted of restricted stock (or restricted stock units) and performance shares. All Awards vest over two or three years, and in some cases, are further subject to the achievement of certain performance goals.
13
New Plan Benefits
Avocent Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
Name and Position |
|
Dollar Value(1) |
|
Number of Units |
|
|
John R. Cooper |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
69,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle C. Weeks |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
47,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. David Perry |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
32,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kieran MacSweeney |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
15,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
26,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Group |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
320,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive Director Group |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
40,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive Employee Group |
|
$ |
31.25 |
|
536,033 |
|
(1) These Awards consisted of restricted stock (or restricted stock units) and performance shares representing shares of our common stock, and the amount listed in this column is the closing price of our common stock on April 25, 2006, the date the Awards were made.
14
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Board of Directors and Committee Meetings
During 2005, our Board of Directors met thirteen times. There were four meetings of the Acquisition and Strategy Committee, twelve meetings of the Audit Committee, six meetings of the Compensation Committee, and three meetings of the Nominating and Governance Committee during 2005. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees, if any, on which such director served. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board of Directors at our annual meeting of stockholders, our directors are encouraged to attend. Three of our directors attended the last annual meeting of stockholders.
Determinations Regarding Director Independence and Other Matters
The Board of Directors has determined that each of Harry D. Copperman, Francis A. Dramis, Jr., Edwin L. Harper, William H. McAleer, and David P. Vieau is an independent director as that term is defined in Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealers (the NASD). In this Proxy Statement, these five directors are referred to individually as an Independent Director and collectively as Independent Directors. The Independent Directors generally meet in executive session at each quarterly Board meeting.
The Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence standards applicable to those committees prescribed by the NASD, the SEC, and the Internal Revenue Service.
Finally, the Board of Directors has determined that William H. McAleer, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an audit committee financial expert as that term is defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
Avocents Code of Conduct, as adopted by the Board of Directors on April 22, 2004, is available on our website at www.Avocent.com.
Lead Independent Director
In April 2003, the Independent Directors selected Edwin L. Harper as the Lead Independent Director. As such, Mr. Harper presides at meetings of the Independent Directors, and has the other responsibilities prescribed in the Lead Independent Director Responsibility Statement that was adopted by our Board and is available on our website at www.Avocent.com.
During 2005, our Board of Directors had four standing committees: the Acquisition and Strategy Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee. All of the committee charters, as adopted by our Board of Directors, are available on our website at www.Avocent.com. The functions performed by each committee and the members of each committee are described below.
Acquisition and Strategy Committee. The Acquisition and Strategy Committee oversees our strategic direction and our acquisitions strategy and reviews specific acquisition proposals. The current members of the Acquisition and Strategy Committee are Harold D. Copperman (Chairman), Francis A. Dramis, Jr., Edwin L. Harper, and William H. McAleer.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews with our independent registered public accounting firm the scope, results, and costs of the annual audit and our accounting policies and financial reporting. Our Audit Committee has (i) direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our
15
independent registered public accounting firm, (ii) established procedures for handling complaints regarding our accounting practices, (iii) authority to engage any independent advisors it deems necessary to carry out its duties, and (iv) appropriate funding to engage any necessary outside advisors. The current members of the Audit Committee are William H. McAleer (Chairman), Harold D. Copperman, and Edwin L. Harper. The Audit Committee report is set forth below. The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its Charter on an annual basis, and the Audit Committee Charter is set forth as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation and benefits practices and programs. The current members of the Compensation Committee are David P. Vieau (Chairman), Harold D. Copperman, and Edwin L. Harper.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews candidates and makes recommendations of nominees (in consultation with the Lead Independent Director) for the Board of Directors. The Committee also oversees our corporate governance and compliance activities. See the section above entitled Stockholder Proposals for the Next Annual Meeting and our Bylaws for the proper proposal procedures. The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Francis A. Dramis, Jr. (Chairman), Harold D. Copperman, and David P. Vieau.
Director Nomination Policy
The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a policy with respect to the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders. Pursuant to the policy, any stockholder may nominate a director candidate by following the procedures described in the section above entitled Stockholder Proposals for the Next Annual Meeting and as prescribed in our Bylaws. In addition, stockholders who have held at least 5% of our outstanding stock for at least one year may submit recommendations for candidates to be considered for nomination by our Nominating and Governance Committee. In order to make a recommendation to the Committee, a stockholder must deliver a written request to our corporate secretary which satisfies the notice, information, and consent requirements set forth in the Policies and Procedures for Director Candidates of the Nominating and Governance Committee, which can be found on our website at www.Avocent.com.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate the qualifications of all director recommendations that are properly submitted by stockholders, management, members of the Board of Directors, and to the extent deemed necessary, third-party search firms. We have in the past paid a third party to assist us in identifying, evaluating, and screening potential candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors, and we may do so in the future. In assessing potential candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers relevant factors, including, among other things, issues of character, judgment, independence, expertise, diversity of experience, length of service, and other commitments. In addition, the Committee considers the suitability of each candidate, taking into account the current members of the Board of Directors, in light of the current size and composition of the Board of Directors. After completion of its evaluation of candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee will recommend a slate of director-nominees to the Board of Directors.
Communications With the Board
Stockholders wishing to communicate with our Board of Directors should send their communications in writing to the attention of our General Counsel and Secretary at Avocent Corporation, 9911 Willows Road, N.E., Redmond, WA 98052. Our General Counsel and Secretary will review the communication, and if the communication is determined to be relevant to our operations, policies, or procedures (and not vulgar, threatening, or of an inappropriate nature not relating to our business), the communication will be forwarded to our Lead Independent Director. If the communication requires a response, our General Counsel and Secretary will assist our Lead Independent Director (or other Directors) in preparing the response.
16
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting process of Avocent Corporation (Avocent or the Company) on behalf of the Companys Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the annual report with management, including a discussion of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee reviewed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Companys independent registered public accounting firm that is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, an opinion on managements assessment of internal controls over financial reporting, and an opinion on the Companys internal controls over financial reporting, its judgments about Avocents accounting principles and the other matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards, including Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees). In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from the Company and from the Companys management, and this discussion included consideration of the matters in the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 that were received by the Audit Committee from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the potential impact the non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers could have on its independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers the overall scope and plans for its audits. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its audits and quarterly reviews, its observations regarding the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of the Companys financial reporting. There were twelve meetings of the Audit Committee during 2005.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has approved, that the 2005 audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|
William H. McAleer, Chairman |
|
Harold D. Copperman |
|
Edwin L. Harper |
Fees Billed to Us by PricewaterhouseCoopers during Fiscal 2005
Audit Fees:
Fees and related expenses for the 2005 and 2004 fiscal year audits by PricewaterhouseCoopers of our annual financial statements and its review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q totaled $965,771 and $1,456,235, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees:
For the years 2005 and 2004, PricewaterhouseCoopers billed us $512,686 and $214,328, respectively, for its services related to acquisitions and consultation on accounting issues and readiness procedures for Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
17
Tax Fees:
For the years 2005 and 2004, PricewaterhouseCoopers billed us $0 and $206,324, respectively, for professional services related to preparation of our tax returns and $4,737 and $398,484, respectively, for tax consulting.
All Other Fees:
For the years 2005 and 2004, PricewaterhouseCoopers billed us $0 and $0, respectively, for other services.
In its pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee has authorized our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, or our Chief Accounting Officer to engage the services of PricewaterhouseCoopers with respect to the following services:
audit related services that are outside the scope of our annual audit and generally are (i) required on a project, recurring, or one-time basis, (ii) requested by one of our business partners (e.g., a review or audit of royalty payments), or (iii) needed by us to assess the impact of a proposed accounting standard;
audits of the annual statutory financial statements required by the non-US governmental agencies for our overseas subsidiaries;
accounting services related to potential or actual acquisitions or investment transactions that if consummated would be reflected in our financial results or tax returns (this does not include any due diligence engagements, which must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee separately); and
other accounting and tax services that are expected to result in fees of less than $25,000 per project, such as routine consultations on accounting and/or tax treatments for contemplated transactions.
Notwithstanding, the delegation of pre-approval authority, the Audit Committee will be informed of all audit and non-related services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers. The foregoing pre-approval authority relates only to engagements where the fees for services in connection with any such engagement are expected to be less than $25,000. The Audit Committee has also delegated to its chairman the authority to pre-approve or disapprove any of the engagements as well as any engagements not listed above up to $100,000 per project where the fees for services are expected to be between $25,000 and $100,000 per project, and any such decisions by the chairman must be presented to the full Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting. Any engagements where the fees for services are expected to exceed $100,000 per project must be pre-approved by a vote of the entire Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has considered the provision of non-audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers and has determined that the provision of such services is compatible with PricewaterhouseCooperss independence.
18
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the individuals who served as our executive officers as of Apri1 25, 2006:
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Cooper* |
|
58 |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Doyle C. Weeks* |
|
60 |
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
C. David Perry |
|
51 |
|
Executive Vice President
and General Manager of the Avocent |
Douglas E. Pritchett |
|
50 |
|
Executive Vice President of Marketing |
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
55 |
|
Executive Vice President of
Legal and Corporate Affairs, |
Edward H. Blankenship |
|
41 |
|
Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Assistant Secretary |
Stephen M. Daly |
|
41 |
|
Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy |
Mark Lee |
|
34 |
|
Senior Vice President and
General Manager of the Avocent Embedded |
Kieran MacSweeney |
|
49 |
|
Senior Vice President and
General Manager of the Avocent Desktop |
Eugene F. Mulligan |
|
41 |
|
Senior Vice President of Global Operations |
Christopher L. Thomas |
|
50 |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer |
* See Proposal One Election of Directors for biographies of the executive officers who are also on our Board of Directors.
C. David Perry has been our Executive Vice President and the General Manager or our Management Systems Division since January 2006, our Executive Vice President of Global OEM Markets from February 2005 to December 2005, our Senior Vice President of Global Marketing and OEM Sales from May 2003 to January 2005, our Senior Vice President of OEM Sales from April 2002 to May 2003, and our Vice President of OEM Sales from July 2000 to April 2002.
Douglas E. Pritchett has been our Executive Vice President of Marketing since July 2005, our Executive Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Assistant Secretary from February 2005 to July 2005, and our Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary from July 2000 to February 2005.
Samuel F. Saracino has been our Executive Vice President of Legal and Corporate Affairs, General Counsel, and Secretary since February 2005 and our Senior Vice President of Legal and Corporate Affairs, General Counsel, and Secretary from July 2000 to January 2005.
Edward H. Blankenship has been our Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Assistant Secretary since July 2005. From July 2002 to July 2005, he was our Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to that he was a Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1998 to July 2002.
Stephen M. Daly has been our Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy since February 2005 and our Vice President of Embedded Solutions from November 2003 to January 2005. From October 2002 to November 2003, he was Chairman and CEO of Soronti, Inc., a company that manufactured remote access hardware which we acquired in November 2003. Prior to that, he was Director of Marketing, Systems Management Division, of Intel Corporation, a hardware manufacturer, since 1992.
19
Mark Lee has been our Senior Vice President and the General Manager of the Avocent Embedded Solutions and Software Division since January 2006 and our Senior Vice President of IPMI Technology and the President and CEO of OSA Technologies, Inc. since our acquisition of OSA Technologies, Inc. in April 2004. Prior to the acquisition, he was President and CEO of OSA Technologies, Inc., an embedded manageability firmware and software provider, from April 2000 to April 2004. Mr. Lee is a member of the Board of Directors of Ninetowns Digital World Trade Holdings Limited, a Chinese software company.
Kieran MacSweeney has been our Senior Vice President and the General Manager of the Avocent Desktop Solutions Division and Managing Director of Avocent International since January 2006, our Senior Vice President of Global Corporate Quality and Managing Director of Avocent International since February 2005 and our Senior Vice President and Managing Director of International Operations from July 2000 to January 2005.
Eugene F. Mulligan has been our Senior Vice President of Global Operations since January 2006, our Senior Vice President of Operations, Redmond, from February 2005 to December 2005, our Vice President of West Coast Operations from November 2001 to January 2005, our Director of Redmond Operations from November 2000 to October 2001, and our Manufacturing Engineering Manager from July 2000 to October 2000. Prior to that, he held the same position at Apex since April 2000.
Christopher L. Thomas has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer since January 2006 and our Senior Vice President of Engineering from July 2000 to December 2005.
20
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table shows:
the compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer during the last completed fiscal year;
the compensation earned by our other four most highly compensated individuals who served as executive officers during the last completed fiscal year; and
the compensation received by each such individual for the two preceding fiscal years.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
|
Awards |
|
All Other |
|
|||||
Name & Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus(1) |
|
Options |
|
Compensation(2) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
John R. Cooper |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
450,000 |
|
$ |
90,200 |
|
28,000 |
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
416,000 |
|
$ |
335,659 |
(3) |
75,000 |
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
$ |
425,460 |
(4) |
150,000 |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Doyle C. Weeks |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
$ |
99,200 |
|
14,500 |
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
312,000 |
|
$ |
196,136 |
|
40,000 |
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
$ |
291,194 |
(5) |
100,000 |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
C. David Perry |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
$ |
82,700 |
|
11,500 |
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
Executive Vice President and General Manager |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
$ |
147,874 |
|
40,000 |
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
of Avocent Management Systems Division |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
$ |
186,950 |
|
55,000 |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Kieran MacSweeney(6) |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
293,496 |
|
$ |
58,699 |
|
3,700 |
|
$ |
29,293 |
|
Senior Vice President and General Manager of |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
291,632 |
|
$ |
179,758 |
|
25,000 |
|
$ |
29,060 |
|
Avocent Desktop
Solutions Division and |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
230,170 |
|
$ |
221,128 |
|
30,000 |
|
$ |
41,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
256,000 |
|
$ |
77,000 |
|
8,500 |
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
Executive Vice President of Legal and Corporate |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
$ |
154,158 |
|
40,000 |
|
$ |
9,404 |
|
Affairs, General Counsel, and Secretary |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
$ |
195,250 |
|
40,000 |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
(1) |
The amounts listed in this column include bonuses earned in the indicated year and paid in the subsequent year. The amounts exclude bonuses paid in the indicated year but earned in a prior year. |
|
|
(2) |
Employer contributions to Avocents 401(k) Retirement Plan for Messrs. Cooper, Weeks, Perry, and Saracino. In the case of Mr. MacSweeney, the amounts include pension contribution made by us for his benefit and, for 2003, a car allowance. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes a restricted, deferred cash bonus of $55,646 awarded to Mr. Cooper for 2004, which vested and was paid to him in February 2006, together with earnings of $3,506 on the deferred cash bonus based on appreciation in the S&P 500 Index. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes a restricted, deferred cash bonus of $50,000 awarded to Mr. Cooper for 2003, which vested and was paid to him in February 2006, together with earnings of $5,380 on the deferred cash bonus based on appreciation in the S&P 500 Index. |
21
(5) |
Includes a restricted, deferred cash bonus of $40,000 awarded to Mr. Weeks for 2003, which vested and was paid to him in February 2006, together with earnings of $4,304 on the deferred cash bonus based on appreciation in the S&P 500 Index. |
|
|
(6) |
Mr. MacSweeney is paid in euros, and all amounts listed for him were converted to dollars at the Allied Irish Banks average rate for the applicable year. All amounts reported for Mr. MacSweeney are therefore affected by the foreign exchange ratio in effect between euros and dollars. |
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table provides information with respect to stock options granted to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table in the last completed fiscal year. In addition, as required by SEC, the table sets forth the hypothetical gains that would exist for the options based on assumed rates of annual compound stock price appreciation during the option term.
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants(2) |
|
|
|
Potential Realizable |
|
|||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
Percent of |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Annual Rates of |
|
|||||
Name(1) |
|
Granted |
|
Fiscal Year(4) |
|
($/sh)(5) |
|
Date |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
John R. Cooper |
|
28,000 |
|
8.15 |
% |
$ |
26.14 |
|
6/30/2015 |
|
$ |
460,301 |
|
$ |
1,166,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Doyle C. Weeks |
|
14,500 |
|
4.22 |
% |
$ |
26.14 |
|
6/30/2015 |
|
$ |
238,370 |
|
$ |
604,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
C. David Perry |
|
11,500 |
|
3.35 |
% |
$ |
26.14 |
|
6/30/2015 |
|
$ |
189,052 |
|
$ |
479,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Kieran MacSweeney |
|
3,700 |
|
1.08 |
% |
$ |
26.14 |
|
6/30/2015 |
|
$ |
60,825 |
|
$ |
154,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
8,500 |
|
2.47 |
% |
$ |
26.14 |
|
6/30/2015 |
|
$ |
139,734 |
|
$ |
354,114 |
|
(1) |
The information provided in this table is based on information pertaining to options granted to them by Avocent during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. |
|
|
(2) |
No stock appreciation rights were granted to executive officers in our last completed fiscal year. |
|
|
(3) |
The potential realizable value illustrates value that might be realized upon exercise of the options immediately prior to the expiration of their terms, assuming the specified compounded rates of appreciation of the market price per share from the date of grant to the end of the option term. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercise are dependent upon a number of factors, including the future performance of our common stock and the timing of option exercises, as well as the optionees continued employment throughout the vesting period. There can be no assurance that the amounts reflected in this table will be achieved. |
|
|
(4) |
The percentages listed in this column are based on stock options to purchase 343,580 shares granted to our employees during the year 2005. |
|
|
(5) |
The exercise price may be paid in cash or in mature shares of common stock (held by the officer for more than six months) valued at fair market value on the exercise date. |
22
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table sets forth information with respect to stock options exercised by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table during the last completed fiscal year. In addition, the table sets forth the number of shares covered by stock options as of the last completed fiscal year, and the value of in-the-money stock options, which represents the positive spread between the exercise price of a stock option and the market price of the shares subject to such option at the end of the last completed fiscal year.
Name(1) |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
Number of Securities |
|
Value of Unexercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
365,500/20,000 |
|
$648,700/$112,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle C. Weeks |
|
50,000 |
|
$ |
721,000 |
|
394,500/0 |
|
$102,838/0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. David Perry |
|
|
|
|
|
204,600/0 |
|
$807,151/0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kieran MacSweeney |
|
27,500 |
|
$ |
395,588 |
|
308,700/0 |
|
$309,273/0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
36,000 |
|
$ |
743,887 |
|
268,576/0 |
|
$419,950/0 |
|
(1) |
The information provided in this table for the executive officers is based on any options exercised by them during 2005. |
|
|
(2) |
The amounts listed in this column are calculated by subtracting the aggregate exercise price of the options from the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock on the date of exercise, and do not necessarily indicate that the optionee sold such stock. |
|
|
(3) |
The amounts listed in this column are calculated based on the $27.19 closing price of the shares on December 30, 2005, the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as reported on The Nasdaq National Market, less the exercise price of the options. |
23
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005:
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1) |
|
5,073,996 |
|
$ |
33.35 |
|
3,641,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders(2) |
|
610,290 |
|
$ |
38.91 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(3) |
|
5,684,286 |
|
$ |
32.00 |
|
3,641,136 |
|
(1) Column (a) includes only securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or rights under the Avocent Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, the Avocent Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plans, and the Avocent Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which are described in the footnotes to our Financial Statements in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2006.
(2) Column (a) includes only securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or rights under the Avocent Corporation 2000 Transition Stock Option Plan and the Avocent Corporation 2003 Inducement Plan, which are described in the footnotes to our Financial Statements in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2006.
(3) Column (a) does not include securities to be issued under equity compensation plans assumed by us in connection with mergers and acquisitions and pursuant to which options remain outstanding, including the following: the Apex Employee Stock Plan, the Cybex 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Cybex 1998 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, the Cybex Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Equinox Systems Inc. 1988 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Equinox 1992 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Equinox 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Equinox Directors Stock Option Plan, the Equinox 2000 Directors Stock Option Plan, the 2C Computing, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan, and the OSA Technologies, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan. As of December 31, 2005, a total of 732,626 shares of Avocent Corporation common stock may be purchased pursuant to options outstanding under all such plans, at a weighted average exercise price of $16.87. No further grants may be made under any of these plans.
24
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Effective February 2005, we pay our non-executive directors an annual cash fee of $35,000 for their service on our Board of Directors and its committees. In addition, we pay our Lead Independent Director an additional annual fee of $35,000, the Chairman of our Audit Committee an additional annual fee of $10,000, and the Chairmen of our other Committees of the Board of Directors an additional annual fee of $5,000 each. We also paid $1,500 for attendance in person or by telephone at each Audit Committee meeting and $1,000 for attendance in person or by telephone at Board of Directors or other committee meetings during 2005. Messrs. Copperman, Dramis, Harper, McAleer, Thornton, and Vieau received compensation of $74,388, $61,833, $106,790, $81,139, $52,028, and $61,141, respectively, for their services as directors (including participation in committee meetings) during 2005. In June 2005,Messrs. Copperman, Dramis, Harper, McAleer, Thornton, and Vieau each received options to purchase 4,200 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $26.14, vesting on December 31, 2005.
In October 2003, we amended the option agreements we have with our Independent Directors to specify that, in the event of a change in control of Avocent, any outstanding options held by each such director shall become fully vested and immediately available for exercise. Future equity award agreements we have with our directors may contain comparable change in control provisions under which any outstanding equity awards become fully vested and immediately available.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
We have entered into employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, including each of those executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. Under each agreement, the employee receives an annual base salary, subject to annual increases at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors not less than the annual cost of living increase percentage, and is entitled to receive an annual bonus at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on our performance and the performance of the executive officer and to participate in stock option plans and all other benefit programs generally available to our executive officers.
Under the terms of the employment agreements, our executive officers have also agreed that during the term of their employment and for a term of twelve (12) months thereafter, they will not compete against us, without our prior written consent, by engaging in any capacity in any business activity in the United States, Canada, Europe, or Asia that is substantially similar to, or in direct competition with, our business.
Under the terms of the employment agreements, we may terminate an executive officers employment for cause, which includes termination by reason of acts of (i) willful dishonesty, fraud, or deliberate injury or attempted injury to us or (ii) the executive officers willful material breach of the employment agreement that has resulted in material injury to us, in which event, the executive shall receive accrued salary, earned bonus and other benefits through the date of termination but not including severance compensation. If a participating executive officer is terminated by us without cause (including a constructive termination of the executive officers employment by reason of a material breach by us of his employment agreement), he is entitled to receive his accrued salary, earned bonus, and other benefits through the date of termination, including severance compensation.
Severance compensation is generally equal to the executive officers base salary at the rate payable at the time of termination for a period of twelve (12) months following the date of termination and an amount equal to the executive officers average annual bonus during the two years immediately preceding his termination. However, John R. Cooper, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is entitled to his base salary for a period of up to twenty-four months after the date of his termination, and Doyle C. Weeks, our President and Chief Operating Officer, is entitled to his base salary for a period of eighteen months after the date of his termination. At the election of any executive officer, he may receive a lump sum severance amount equal to the present value of such severance payments (using a discount rate equal to the 90-day Treasury bill interest rate in effect on the date of delivery of such election notice). Under the severance compensation provisions of the employment agreements and equity award agreements with our executive officers, our executive officers are also entitled, upon termination without cause or a
25
change in control, to accelerate vesting of any award granted under our stock option or equity incentive plans and to a continuation of medical plan benefits for a period of twelve (12) months after the date of termination.
If a change-in-control of Avocent occurs and the executive officer terminates his employment within six (6) months or we terminate his employment within eighteen (18) months, the executive officer is immediately entitled to receive accrued salary, earned bonus, and other benefits through the date of termination, including the severance compensation described above. Except for a change-in-control, executive officers are not entitled to severance compensation for voluntary termination or termination by reason of the executive officers death or disability.
Under the terms of the employment and other agreements, we agree to indemnify each executive officer for certain liabilities arising from actions taken by the executive officer within the scope of his employment.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring the general compensation policies and compensation plans of Avocent Corporation, as well as the specific compensation levels for executive officers. It also approves grants of Awards under the Avocent Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. John R. Cooper, our current President and Chief Executive Officer, generally participates in all discussions and decisions regarding salaries and incentive compensation for employees, except that he is excluded from discussions of or voting on his own salary and incentive compensation.
General Compensation Policy. Under the supervision of the Lead Independent Director and the Compensation Committee, Avocents compensation policy is designed to attract and retain qualified key executives critical to the Companys growth and long-term success. It is the objective of the Board of Directors to have a portion of each executives compensation contingent upon Avocents performance as well as upon the individuals personal performance. Accordingly, each executive officers compensation package is comprised of three elements: (i) annual base salary, (ii) annual bonus based on the achievement of certain performance goals established for Avocent and for the executive officer, and (iii) equity-based benefit plans that are designed to strengthen the mutuality of interests between the executive officers and Avocents stockholders.
The summary below describes in more detail the factors that the Compensation Committee considers in establishing each of the three primary components of the compensation package provided to the executive officers.
Base Salary. The level of base salary is established primarily on the basis of the individuals qualifications and relevant experience, the strategic goals for which he or she has responsibility, the compensation levels at companies which compete with Avocent for business and executive talent, and the incentives necessary to attract and retain qualified management. Base salary is adjusted each year to take into account the individuals performance and to maintain a competitive salary structure. Avocents performance does not play a significant role in the determination of base salary.
Bonuses. Bonuses are awarded by the Compensation Committee based on objective and subjective standards. In awarding executive bonuses, the Compensation Committee considers Avocents success in achieving specific financial goals and objectives, including revenue growth and earnings growth, and each executives success in achieving certain individual goals and objectives.
Equity Incentive Plan. In the past, Avocent utilized stock option plans to provide executives and other key employees with incentives to maximize long-term stockholder values. Awards by the Compensation Committee took the form of stock options designed to give the recipient a significant equity stake and thereby closely align his or her interests with those of Avocents stockholders. Factors considered in making such awards included the individuals position in the Company, his or her performance and responsibilities, and internal comparability considerations. In addition, the Compensation Committee established certain general guidelines in making option grants to executive officers in an attempt to target a fixed number of unvested option shares based upon each individuals position in the Company and his existing holdings of unvested options.
26
In the past, each option grant allows the executive officer to acquire shares of common stock at a fixed price per share (the fair market value on the date of grant) over a specified period of time (up to 10 years). The options typically vested in periodic installments over a three-year or four-year period, contingent upon the executive officers continued employment with the Company. Accordingly, the option provided a return to the executive officer only if he or she remains employed by the Company, and then only if the market price of the common stock appreciates over the option term.
In 2006, however, we were required by new accounting regulations to record a charge to earnings for employee and director stock option grants, and last year the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors, and our shareholders approved the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to allow us more equity incentive alternatives and a wider range of awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, dividend equivalents, and deferred stock units. In making individual awards, the Compensation Committee, working with Radford Surveys and Consulting, established general guidelines for making restricted share or performance share awards, and the Committee will continue to consider the other factors described above for each executive. However, the Compensation Committee is not required to adhere strictly to these guidelines and may vary the size of the equity award to each executive officer as it determines the circumstances warrant.
The restricted stock awards will usually vest in annual installments over a period (typically three years) and will allow an executive officer to acquire unrestricted shares of common stock contingent on the executive officers continued employment with the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee may make awards of performance shares that will be earned if certain performance metrics (such as operation earnings, operational earnings growth, operational earnings, or operational earnings per share) are met. Once a particular performance metric is met, the shares would then vest over a two or three year period.
Equity Ownership Guidelines. In April 2006,our Board of Directors approved stock ownership guidelines for our directors and senior corporate officers. Under these ownership guidelines, our Board members are expected to own Avocent stock with a value equal to at least the annual Board retainer, the Companys Chief Executive Officer is expected to own Avocent stock with a value equal to at least three times his base salary, the Companys President and Chief Operating Officer is expected to own Avocent stock with a value equal to at least one and one-half times his base salary, and our other executive officers are expected to own Avocent stock with a value equal to at least the officers base salary. These ownership levels would be achieved over a period of time by requiring the director or officer to retain a significant portion of any restricted stock award until such time as the required minimum ownership level is reached.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. John R. Cooper was selected as our President and Chief Executive Officer in March 2002. In establishing Mr. Coopers compensation package for 2005, the Compensation Committee engaged Mellon Human Resources & Investor Solutions as a compensation consultant to review and assess our executive compensation policies and philosophies and equity compensation (particularly in light of SFAS 123R which requires mandatory expensing for equity awards for fiscal years commencing after June 15, 2005). Upon completion of that study, meetings and discussions with Mellon representatives, and following deliberations by both the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors (upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) set Mr. Coopers base salary for 2005 at $450,000 effective January 1, 2005. Based on the Compensation Committees evaluation of Mr. Coopers performance during 2005, and in recognition of progress made by the Company during the fiscal year and for retention purposes, Mr. Cooper was awarded an incentive cash bonus of $90,000 for 2005.
In establishing Mr. Coopers compensation package for 2006, the Compensation Committee engaged Radford Surveys and Consulting to again review and assess our executive compensation policies and philosophies and equity compensation. Upon completion of that study, meetings and discussions with Radford representatives, and following deliberations by both the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors (upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) set Mr. Coopers base salary for 2005 at
27
$500,000 effective January 1, 2006.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation. The Compensation Committee has considered the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which section disallows a federal income tax deduction for any publicly held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1 million in any taxable year for the chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers, respectively, unless such compensation meets the requirements for the performance-based exception to Section 162(m). As the cash compensation paid by Avocent to each of these executive officers is expected to be below $1 million and the Compensation Committee believes that Awards to be made under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to such officers will meet the requirements for qualifying as performance-based, the Compensation Committee believes that Section 162(m) will not affect the tax deductions available to the Company with respect to the compensation of executive officers. It is the Compensation Committees policy to qualify, to the extent reasonable, its executive officers compensation for deductibility under applicable tax law. However, Avocent may, from time to time, pay compensation to executive officers that may not be deductible.
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|
David P. Vieau, Chairman |
|
Harold D. Copperman |
|
Edwin L. Harper |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No member of our Compensation Committee or executive officer of Avocent has a relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with executive officers or directors of another entity.
28
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return data for our common stock to the cumulative return of (i) the NASDAQ US Index and (ii) the NASDAQ Computer Index for the period beginning January 1, 2001, and ending on December 30, 2005. The graph assumes that $100 was invested at a per share price of $27.00 on January 1, 2001, the closing price on December 31, 2000, and the reinvestment of any dividends. The stock price performance on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG AVOCENT CORPORATION, THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S.) INDEX
AND THE NASDAQ COMPUTER MANUFACTURERS INDEX
|
|
12/00 |
|
12/01 |
|
12/02 |
|
12/03 |
|
12/04 |
|
12/05 |
|
||||||
AVOCENT CORPORATION |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
150 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S.) |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
91 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
NASDAQ COMPUTER MFGS |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
$ |
36 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
58 |
|
The information contained above under the captions Audit Committee Report for the year Ended December 31, 2005, Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation, and Stock Performance Graph shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.
29
SECURITY OWNERSHIP BY PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table indicates the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of April 14, 2006 by (i) each person or entity known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding stock, (ii) each of the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table, (iii) each of our directors, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting powers with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. Ownership information is based upon information furnished by the respective individuals.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Percentage of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs Asset
Management LP(2) |
|
4,597,180 |
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Resources,
Inc, and its affiliates(3) |
|
3,174,423 |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen F. Thornton(4) |
|
665,935 |
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Cooper(5) |
|
421,431 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doyle C. Weeks(6) |
|
395,880 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. David Perry(7) |
|
173,176 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kieran MacSweeney(8) |
|
288,812 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel F. Saracino(9) |
|
236,033 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harold D. Copperman(10) |
|
44,200 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francis A. Dramis, Jr.(11) |
|
14,200 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edwin L. Harper(12) |
|
70,181 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. McAleer(13) |
|
59,200 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
David P. Vieau(14) |
|
44,200 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons)(15) |
|
3,113,341 |
|
6.32 |
% |
* Less than one percent.
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity named below has an address in care of our principal executive offices located at 4991 Corporate Drive, Huntsville, Alabama 35805. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person or entity holding
30
the options but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity. The numbers reflected in the percentage ownership columns are based on 48,963,888 shares of our common stock outstanding.
(2) Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Goldman Sachs Asset Management LP. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2006.
(3) Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Franklin Resources, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2006.
(4) Includes (i) 157,065 shares owned directly by Mr. Thornton, (ii) 49,248 shares owned by his spouse, (iii) 70,422 shares held by the Thornton Family Limited Partnership, of which Mr. Thornton is a general partner and as to which he may be deemed to share voting and investment power, and (iv) 389,200 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(5) Includes (i) 31,931 shares owned directly by Mr. Cooper, (ii) 4,000 shares held by Mr. Cooper in his Individual Retirement Account, and (iii) 385,500 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(6) Includes (i) 1,380 shares owned directly by Mr. Weeks, and (ii) 394,500 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(7) Includes (i) 6,676 shares owned directly by Mr. Perry, and (ii) 166,500 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(8) Includes (i) 112 shares owned directly by Mr. MacSweeney, and (ii) 288,700 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(9) Includes (i) 7,457 shares owned directly by Mr. Saracino, and (ii) 228,576 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(10) Includes 44,200 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(11) Includes 14,200 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(12) Includes (i) 981 shares owned directly by Mr. Harper, and (ii) 69,200 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(13) Includes 59,200 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(14) Includes 44,200 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006.
(15) Includes (i) 2,769,448 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2006, (ii) 650 shares held by a family member of one of our other executive officers, and (iii) 600 shares in the Individual Retirement Account of one of our other executive officers.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and The Nasdaq Stock Market. Such directors, executive officers, and ten-percent stockholders are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal 2005, our directors, executive officers, and ten-percent stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them except that the Thornton Family Limited Partnership, of which Mr. Thornton is a general partner and as to which he may be deemed to share
31
voting and investment power, failed to timely report a sale of 70,000 shares in February 2006.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
During fiscal 2005, there was not, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount involved exceeds $60,000 and in which any of our directors, executive officers, or holders of more than 5% of our common stock, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest other than compensation agreements and other arrangements described in Employment Contracts and Severance Agreements.
OTHER INFORMATION
Our 2006 Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 will be mailed to the stockholders of record as of May 12, 2006 together with the mailing of this Proxy Statement. Stockholders who do not receive a copy of the 2006 Annual Report with their Proxy Statement may obtain a copy by writing to or calling Samuel F. Saracino, Secretary, Avocent Corporation, 9911 Willows Road N.E., Redmond, Washington 98052. His telephone number is (425) 861-5858.
OTHER MATTERS
We know of no other matters to be submitted for consideration by the stockholders at the annual meeting. If any other matters properly come before the annual meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to vote the shares they represent as the Board of Directors may recommend.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting, regardless of the number of shares which you hold. You are therefore urged to execute and return, at your earliest convenience, the accompanying proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed. You may also submit your proxy over the Internet or by telephone. For specific instructions, please refer to the information provided with your proxy card.
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, |
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel F. Saracino |
|
Secretary |
|
|
Huntsville, Alabama |
|
April 28, 2006 |
|
32
APPENDIX A
AVOCENT CORPORATION
2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility,
to provide additional incentive to Service Providers, and
to promote the success of the Companys business.
Awards granted under the Plan may be Incentive Stock Options, Nonstatutory Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Deferred Stock Units or Dividend Equivalents, as determined by the Administrator at the time of grant.
A-1
Notwithstanding subparagraphs (i)(iii)(1) and (b)(iii)(2) above, the term Change in Control shall not include a consolidation, merger, or other reorganization if upon consummation of such transaction all of the outstanding voting stock of the Company is owned, directly or indirectly, by a holding company, and the holders of the Companys common stock immediately prior to the transaction have substantially the same proportionate ownership and voting control of such holding company after such transaction.
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share.
A-9
An Option shall be deemed exercised when the Company receives: (i) written or electronic notice of exercise (in accordance with the Option Agreement) from the person entitled to exercise the Option, and (ii) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised. Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Administrator and permitted by the Option Agreement and the Plan. Shares issued upon exercise of an Option shall be issued in the name of the Participant. Until the stock certificate evidencing such Shares is issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder shall exist with respect to the optioned stock, notwithstanding the exercise of the Option. The Company shall issue (or cause to be issued) such stock certificate promptly after the Option is exercised. No adjustment will be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the stock certificate is issued, except as provided in Section 19 of the Plan.
Exercising an Option in any manner shall decrease the number of Shares thereafter available for sale under the Option, by the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised.
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
APPENDIX B
CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
AVOCENT CORPORATION
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Board) of Avocent Corporation (the Company) shall be to:
Oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the financial statements of the Company;
Assist the Board in oversight and monitoring of (i) the integrity of the Companys financial statements, (ii) the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the independent auditors qualifications, independence, and performance, and (iv) the Companys internal accounting, financial, and disclosure controls;
Prepare the Audit Committee report that the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) require be included in the Companys annual Proxy Statement;
Provide the Companys Board with the results of its monitoring and its recommendations; and
Provide to the Board such additional information and materials as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant financial matters that require the attention of the Board.
In addition, the Audit Committee will undertake those specific duties and responsibilities listed below and such other duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe to the Audit Committee.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP:
The Audit Committee members will be appointed by, and will serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee will consist of at least three members of the Board of Directors. Members of the Audit Committee must meet the following criteria (as well as any criteria required by the SEC):
Each member will be an independent director, as defined under applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules;
Each member will be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, in accordance with the NASDAQ National Market Audit Committee requirements; and
At least one member will have past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background, such as a current or past position as a principal financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities.
COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES:
The responsibilities of the Audit Committee shall include:
B-1
Reviewing on a continuing basis the adequacy of the Companys system of internal controls, including meeting periodically with the Companys management and the independent auditors to review the adequacy of such controls and to review before release any disclosure regarding such system of internal controls required under SEC rules to be contained in the Companys periodic filings and the attestations or reports by the independent auditors relating to such disclosure;
Recommending the appointment of, approving the compensation of, and overseeing the work of the independent auditors (including resolving disagreements between management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work;
Pre-approving audit and non-audit services to be provided to the Company by the independent auditors (or subsequently approving non-audit services in those circumstances where a subsequent approval is necessary and permissible); in this regard, the Audit Committee shall have the sole authority to approve the hiring and firing of the independent auditors, all audit engagement fees and terms and all non-audit engagements (as may be permissible) with the independent auditors;
Reviewing and providing guidance with respect to the external audit and the Companys relationship with its independent auditors by (i) reviewing the independent auditors proposed audit scope, approach, and independence; (ii) obtaining on a periodic basis a statement from the independent auditors regarding relationships and services with the Company that may affect or interfere with their independence and presenting this statement to the Board of Directors, and to the extent there are relationships, monitoring, and investigating them; (iii) discussing with the Companys independent auditors the financial statements and audit findings, including any significant adjustments, management judgments and accounting estimates, significant new accounting policies, and disagreements with management and any other matters described in SAS No. 61, as may be modified or supplemented; and (iv) reviewing reports submitted to the Audit Committee by the independent auditors in accordance with the applicable SEC requirements;
Reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditors the annual audited financial statements and quarterly unaudited financial statements, including the Companys disclosures under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other disclosures, prior to filing with the SEC the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, respectively;
Directing the Companys independent auditors to review before filing with the SEC the Companys interim financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, using professional standards and procedures for conducting such reviews;
Conducting a post-audit review of the financial statements and audit findings, including any significant suggestions for improvements provided to management by the independent auditors;
Reviewing before release the unaudited quarterly operating results in the Companys quarterly earnings release;
Overseeing compliance with the requirements of the SEC for disclosure of auditors services and Audit Committee members, member qualifications and activities;
Reviewing, approving and monitoring the Companys Code of Ethics for its senior financial officers;
B-2
Reviewing managements monitoring of compliance with the Companys standards of business conduct and with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
Reviewing, in conjunction with counsel, any legal matters that could have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements;
Reviewing and providing oversight of the internal audit function, including approval of the annual work plans and reports of findings prepared by internal audit
Providing oversight and review at least annually of the Companys risk management policies, including its investment policies;
Reviewing the Companys compliance with employee benefit plans;
Overseeing and reviewing the Companys policies regarding information technology and management information systems;
If necessary, instituting special investigations with full access to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the Company;
As appropriate, obtaining advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting, or other advisors;
Reviewing and approving in advance any proposed related party transactions;
Reviewing its own Charter, structure, processes, and membership requirements;
Providing a report in the Companys Proxy Statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC; and
Establishing procedures for receiving, retaining, and treating comments received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and procedures for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
MEETINGS:
The Audit Committee will meet at least four times each year. The Audit Committee may establish its own schedule, which it will provide to the Board of Directors in advance.
The Audit Committee will meet separately with the Chief Executive Officer and separately with the Chief Financial Officer of the Company at such times as are appropriate to review the financial affairs of the Company. The Audit Committee will meet separately with the independent auditors and the internal auditor of the Company, at such times as it deems appropriate, but not less than annually, to fulfill the responsibilities of the Audit Committee under this Charter.
MINUTES:
The Audit Committee will maintain written minutes of its meetings, which minutes will be filed with the minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors.
B-3
REPORTS:
In addition to preparing the report in the Companys Proxy Statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee will summarize its examinations and recommendations to the Board of Directors as may be appropriate, consistent with the Audit Committees Charter.
COMPENSATION:
Members of the Audit Committee shall receive such fees, if any, for their service as Audit Committee members as may be determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion. Such fees may include retainers or per meeting fees. Fees may be paid in such form of consideration as is determined by the Board of Directors.
Members of the Audit Committee may not receive any compensation from the Company except the fees that they receive for service as a member of the Board of Directors or any Committee of the Board.
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY:
The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more designated members of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors, provided such pre-approval decision is presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
B-4
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS VOTING FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING PROPOSALS. |
Please |
o |
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
1. |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Francis A.(Fran) Dramis, Jr. (Class III Director) |
|
|
2. |
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP as the Companys independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. |
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
||||
|
|
|
|
o |
o |
o |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
FOR all nominees |
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
listed (except as marked |
to vote for all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
to the contrary) |
nominees listed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN to reserve an additional 2,250,000 shares. |
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
o |
o |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
and, in their discretion, upon such other matter or matters which may properly come before |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
I PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING
|
o |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
IF YOU WISH TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL |
|
|
|
|||||||||
NOMINEE, WRITE THE NOMINEES NAME ON THE LINE BELOW. |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL LISTED, AND AS SAID PROXIES DEEM |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADVISABLE ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY COME |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE THE MEETING. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE PROXY |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
|||||
Signature |
|
Signature |
|
Date |
|
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears above. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
Ù FOLD AND DETACH HERE Ù
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
THANK YOU FOR VOTING.
PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AVOCENT CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
JUNE 15, 2006
The undersigned stockholder(s) of AVOCENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated April 28, 2006, and hereby appoints John R. Cooper, Doyle C. Weeks, Samuel F. Saracino, and Edward H. Blankenship, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AVOCENT CORPORATION to be held on Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., at the Huntsville Marriott Hotel, Five Tranquility Base, Huntsville, Alabama 35805, and at any adjournment or adjournments of the Annual Meeting, and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth on the reverse side:
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ù FOLD AND DETACH HERE Ù
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
JUNE 15, 2006
10:00 a.m.
Huntsville Marriott Hotel
Five Tranquility Base
Huntsville, Alabama 35805
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!