UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB/A

ý  ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004

o  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-29478

PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

748 Miller Drive, S.E., Leesburg, Virginia 20175

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

703-777-9095

(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    ý Yes  o No

Check if no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  o

The issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year were: $11,773,853.

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by persons not “affiliated” with the issuer at August 12, 2004 was $11,708,816 based on the closing price of $0.60 per share.  As of August 12, 2004, 23,808,602 of Common Stock were issued and outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:             o Yes   ý No

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Certain portions of Registrant’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the close of the Corporation’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference under Part III.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-KSB/A to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 28, 2004 (the “Original Filing”) is being filed to reflect the restatement of our consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003.

The Company had originally reported the difference between the fair value of the equity exchanged and the carrying value of the Precision Funding debt and accrued interest as a gain on debt restructuring in the statement of operations for the year ending June 30, 2003.  Since Precision Funding was controlled by shareholders of the Company who were considered related parties, the Company has restated the consolidated financial statements to report such difference as a capital contribution.  The effect of the restatement reduced net income and increased additional paid in capital and accumulated deficit by $9.7 million and reduced net income applicable to common stock per common share- Basic and Diluted from $0.72 to $0.08 for the period ending June 30, 2003 and increased additional paid in capital and accumulated deficit by $9.7 million for the period ending June 30, 2004.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and “plan” as they relate to Precision Auto Care, Inc. or its management are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. All statements regarding Precision Auto Care, Inc. or Precision Auto Care, Inc.’s expected future financial position, business strategy, cost savings and operating synergies, projected costs and plans, and objectives of management for future operations are forward-looking statements. Although Precision Auto Care, Inc. believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements herein include, among others, the factors set forth under the caption “Business—Risk Factors,” general economic and business and market conditions, changes in federal and state laws, and increased competitive pressure in the automotive aftermarket services business.

4

PART I

Item 1.   Business

OVERVIEW

Precision Auto Care, Inc. (“PACI” or the “Company”) is a franchisor of automotive service centers located in the United States and in certain foreign countries.  At June 30, 2004, the Company had 31 total employees of which 30 are full time employees.  Through its franchised centers, services are provided to automobile owners and focus on those high-frequency items required on a periodic basis to maintain the vehicle properly.

The Company was incorporated as a Virginia corporation in April 1997, but its predecessors have been in the automotive maintenance services business since 1976.  The first Precision Tune was established in 1976 to provide quick, convenient and inexpensive engine tune-ups.  Franchising of Precision Tune centers began the next year.  As automotive technology changed, Precision Tune expanded its menu of offered automotive maintenance and repair services to include oil changes, fuel injection service, air conditioning service, cooling system service, brake service and more diagnostic services.  In September 1996, the Precision Tune brand name was changed to Precision Tune Auto Care to reflect the shift in emphasis.

The Company is the result of the November 1997 combination of WE JAC Corporation (the owner of Precision Tune Auto Care) and nine other automotive maintenance services companies in connection with its initial public offering.  In March 1998, the Company acquired the holder of the master franchise agreement for Precision Tune Auto Care in Mexico and Puerto Rico.  The Company’s Mexican assets were sold in January 2002.  In March and April 2003, the Company disposed of its manufacturing operations.  See Notes to Financial Statements for financial information regarding the disposal of the Company’s Manufacturing and Distribution business segment.

The Company has one remaining business segment, Automotive Care Franchising.  The Automotive Care Franchising business segment, which is comprised of Precision Tune Auto Care (“PTAC”) and Precision Lube Express, provides automotive services primarily through franchised operations located in the United States and in certain foreign countries.

•                  Through its franchisees, PTAC provides automotive maintenance and repair services, such as engine performance, oil change and lubrication and brake services, which require relatively short service times.  At June 30, 2004, these services were provided at 413 Precision Tune Auto Care centers owned and operated by franchisees.

•                  Precision Lube Express franchisees and licensees provide convenient fast oil change and lube services.  At June 30, 2004, there was 1 Precision Lube Express center owned and operated by a franchisee.  In the future, the Company will not be selling Precision Lube Express franchises.

OPERATIONS

Precision Tune Auto Care

Precision Tune Auto Care is a franchisor of automotive service centers that provide specialized quality maintenance and repair services that require relatively short service times.  The automotive care services provided by Precision Tune Auto Care centers include the diagnosis, maintenance and repair of ignition systems, fuel systems, computerized engine control systems, cooling systems, starting/charging systems, emissions control systems, engine drive train systems, electrical systems, air conditioning systems, oil and other fluid systems, and brake systems.

Prototype Center.  The current prototype Precision Tune Auto Care center is a free-standing building with six to eight service bays, of which two to four are drive-through and include pits to facilitate fast oil change and lubrication services.  Franchisees typically develop Precision Tune Auto Care centers either by entering into a build-to-suit lease, under which the landlord constructs the center and leases it to the franchisee, or by purchasing land and building the facility.  The Company typically seeks sites in commercial areas with a minimum population of 50,000 people within a five mile radius.   Exclusive of real estate, the estimated capital required to open a prototype Precision Tune Auto Care center ranges from $123,000 to $208,075.

Retail Marketing.  Precision Tune Auto Care’s marketing objectives at the retail level are to increase franchisee sales, enhance first-time customers’ experiences, and bolster each franchisee’s customer retention efforts.  To further these objectives, Precision Tune Auto Care has developed and implemented a marketing plan containing programs and materials for use by Precision Tune Auto Care centers.  The plan includes targeted marketing programs designed to reach key market segments, in-store merchandising materials designed to enhance retail sales and first time customer trials, and other local marketing materials (e.g., second car discounts, service reminder cards, and ATM receipt coupons) designed to generate customers and improve customer retention.

5

Training and Operational Support.  A significant element of Precision Tune Auto Care’s commitment to service is its training program for franchisees.  New franchisees are required to successfully complete over 40 hours of initial training at its national training center in Leesburg, Virginia.  The Company also offers a full line of technical training, including courses on engine performance, fuel systems and emissions, automotive electronics, fuel injection, and brake certification.  These courses, which include both classroom and hands-on training, are designed to allow franchisees and service center technicians to maintain and update their technical capability to service today’s more complex vehicles.

Franchise Marketing.  The Company (through a predecessor company) has marketed franchises for Precision Tune Auto Care centers since 1977.  Its franchise sales process includes advertising in appropriate franchise and business publications, establishing relationships and working with sales brokers, conducting franchise sales seminars, maintaining a home page on the Internet through which interested parties may submit a franchise inquiry, and advertising on several franchise sales orientated web sites.  Prospective franchisees are asked to complete a Confidential Qualifications Report, which serves as the initial screening to determine whether a prospect is qualified.  The Company seeks individuals with management experience who will make a full-time commitment to the operation of their franchise and who have a minimum of $70,000 and $200,000 in liquid assets and net worth, respectively.

Precision Tune Auto Care’s area-development system has played a significant role in its franchise development efforts.  Under this system, Precision Tune Auto Care has entered into area-development agreements that grant area developers the right and obligation to develop franchises within specific geographic regions for stated periods of time.  Franchise agreements within the area are between the Company and the franchisee.  The area developer typically receives up to one-half of the initial franchise fee, one-half of the subsequent royalty revenues and one-half of franchise renewal and transfer fees.  After the creation of a franchise, the area developer performs many of Precision Tune Auto Care’s franchise support obligations. As of June 30, 2004, 19 area developers and their affiliates had an ownership interest in approximately 29% of the total number of Precision Tune Auto Care centers.

Open Area Development.  Precision Tune Auto Care’s current strategy is also to pursue new area developers to develop open areas in which current area developers have not been granted rights.  To attract new area developers, the company employs strategies similar to those used in marketing unit franchises.  However, the net worth requirements for prospective area developers are greater than those required for a unit franchisee.  These requirements range from $250,000 to $1,000,000 net worth, depending upon the size of the particular area.

FRANCHISING ACTIVITIES

Precision Tune Auto Care.  As of June 30, 2004, all of Precision Tune Auto Care domestic and international centers were owned and managed by franchisees.  Precision Tune Auto Care’s franchises have been sold during the preceding years under franchise agreements that vary in detail as the Precision Tune Auto Care’s franchise program has evolved.  Royalty rates in existing franchise agreements are 7.5%.  Currently, Precision Tune Auto Care’s standard franchise agreement requires payment to the Company of an initial franchise fee of $25,000 and a continuing royalty of 7.5% of weekly gross receipts.  In addition, the franchisee is required to contribute to or expend up to 9% of weekly gross receipts on advertising, of which 1.5% is currently paid into the national marketing fund and up to 7.5% of which is spent locally.  The current standard form franchise agreement has an initial term of ten years and provides for five-year renewal options.

The Company has implemented a program under which qualified franchisees are eligible to have their royalty rate reduced to as low as 6% if they satisfy certain criteria.  Under the program, franchisees are also provided with an incentive to purchase additional Precision Tune Auto Care franchises.  Any franchisee that has owned and operated a center for at least one year in accordance with this program will be charged an initial franchise fee of $15,000 for a second franchise and $10,000 for each additional franchise purchased, provided certain conditions are met.

Under its current form of franchise agreement, the Company has a continuing obligation to make technical and administrative support available, centralized marketing support, and training and related support available to its franchisees.  In areas where there are area developers, the Company has delegated most of these duties to area developers under its area developer system.

Upon non-renewal and transfer, the Company has the first right to purchase the operating assets and obtain an assignment of leased facilities in certain cases.  In certain situations, the Company will repurchase franchise rights.  The decision to repurchase is made solely at its discretion and is not a contractual obligation.  The Company also periodically obtains possession of some franchisees’ franchise rights by exchanging for such rights notes payable or other consideration, or by exercising rights outlined in the franchise agreements.

The Company also enters into master franchise agreements to develop international markets.  At the present time, the Company has master franchise agreements in Taiwan, Indonesia, United Arab Emirates, the Bahamas, the Dominican Republic, Peru, Brazil, El Salvador, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Saudi Arabia, and Portugal.  Generally, the master franchisee pays a license fee and is required to develop Precision Tune Auto Care centers in accordance with an agreed upon schedule within the defined area. Franchise agreements within the area are between the master franchisee and the unit franchisee.  The master franchisee is required to perform all

6

of the obligations of the franchisor including training, administrative and operational support, and the Company generally receives 20% of the initial franchise fee and up to one-third of ongoing royalty fees.

CO-BRANDING

On March 20, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Petro USA, Inc., a subsidiary of Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc., to provide Getty’s dealers with the opportunity to host a Precision Tune Auto Care franchise or Precision Lube Express franchise.  This co-branding program involves a planned association of two distinct brands, which are typically associated with different business concepts.   At June 30, 2004, there were seven Getty stores that were hosting Precision Tune Auto Care centers and one Getty store that was hosting a Precision Lube Express center.

The Company is seeking to enter into other similar alliance agreements or other related agreements, where its franchised businesses will be the secondary tenant at the primary tenant’s location.  The co-branding program may have separate agreements with the primary tenant’s organization or its affiliates to assist Precision Tune Auto Care in the offer of franchises to the primary tenants and the provision of services.  The Company expects that these co-branding opportunities will be with other providers of automotive services not similar to its own, like gasoline stations, detail, paint and body work stations, tire shops, glass shops, and muffler shops.  Due to the nature of these co-branding relationships, the Company expects to modify its standard form of franchise agreement to reflect the differences or similarities between its businesses.  Some of these primary tenants may be in direct competition with the Company and may choose not to franchise their particular location.  Additionally, the Company makes the final decision as to entering into a franchise agreement with a primary tenant.

COMPETITION

The Company’s franchisees and licensees encounter competition in all aspects of their business, including the sale by Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express centers of automotive maintenance and repair services and fast oil and lubrication services.  The Company believes that automobile dealerships, including recently emerging national and regional new and used auto dealerships, represent Precision Tune Auto Care’s principal competitors.  Other Precision Tune Auto Care competitors include tire companies and regional under-the-hood service specialists.  National competitors within Precision Tune Auto Care’s market include Sears Auto Center and the automotive maintenance centers operated by Goodyear and Firestone, among others.  Its regional competitors include All Tune and Lube (East Coast), Econo Lube N’ Tune (West Coast), Tunex International, Inc.  (Rocky Mountain region), Tune-Up Masters, and Speedee Oil Change and Tune-Up (Southern region).  The Company believes that the greater technical complexity of today’s vehicles provides a substantial barrier to entry for competitors in the “under-the-hood” segment of the automotive care services industry.

The Company believes that the Precision Tune Auto Care centers all compete on the basis of customer awareness through advertising, service, convenience and location and, to a lesser extent, on price.  The Company believes that the potential ability to offer all of the services provided by each of the operations at one center or in centers in close proximity to one another will be a significant competitive advantage.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Franchising Regulation.  The Company is subject to federal, international and state laws and regulations, including the regulations of the Federal Trade Commission as well as similar authorities in individual states, in connection with the offer, sale and termination of franchises and the regulation of the franchisor/franchisee relationship.  From time to time, the Company experiences periods during which sales are restricted while it registers updates of its disclosure material with various states.  Such delays may have an adverse effect on its ability to offer and sell franchises.  In addition, the Company may become subject to litigation with, or other claims filed with state, federal or international authorities by, franchisees or area developers based on alleged unfair trade practices, implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing or express violations of agreements.  The failure by the Company to comply with these laws could subject the Company to liability to franchisees and to fines or other penalties imposed by governmental authorities and could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental Regulation.  Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express centers store new oil and handle large quantities of used automotive oils and fluids.  As a result of these activities, the Company, its franchisees and area developers are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations dealing with the transportation, storage, presence, use, disposal and handling of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes, and underground fuel storage tanks.  If any such substances were improperly released or improperly stored on the property of any franchisee, including leased properties, or if the Company were found to be in violation of applicable environmental laws and regulations, the Company could be responsible for clean-up costs, property damage and fines or other penalties, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

7

TRADEMARKS

The Company has registered a number of trademarks and service marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including “Precision Tune Auto Care.”  Its failure to obtain and maintain trademark and service mark registration could have a material adverse effect on its operations.  The Company has also registered or made application to register trademarks in foreign countries where master franchise licenses have been granted.

SEASONALITY

Seasonal changes may impact various sectors of the Company’s businesses and, accordingly, its operations may be adversely affected by seasonal trends in certain periods.  In particular, severe weather in winter months may make it difficult for consumers in affected parts of the country to travel to Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express and obtain services.

RISK FACTORS

The Company’s business and investment in its Common Stock are subject to certain risks, including the following:

Stock Listing.  The Company’s common stock trades on the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.’s OTC Bulletin Board.  Like other stocks traded over this quotation system, its common stock is thinly traded, highly volatile and not followed by analysts.

Penny Stock Regulations.  The Company’s common stock is subject to the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to “penny stocks.”  These rules require brokers selling securities subject to these rules to persons other than established customers and institutional accredited investors to complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors and provide investors with certain information concerning the risks of trading in the security.  These rules may restrict the ability of brokers to sell the Company’s common stock and thus may have an adverse effect on the liquidity and market price of its common stock.

Resale Restrictions on Common Stock.  Because of large broker-dealer spreads, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the broker-dealer at the same price the broker-dealer sold the stock to the investor.  In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value.  The market among broker-dealers may not be active, making it more difficult for investors to sell this stock.  Investors in a penny stock often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock.  The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers may be greater than any profit a seller may make.

Penny Stock Market.  Shareholders should be aware that, according to Securities and Exchange Commission Release No.
34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse which could cause investors to lose their entire investment.  Such patterns include:

•                  control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;

•                  manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;

•                  “boiler room” practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;

•                  excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and mark-ups by selling broker-dealers; and

•                  the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

The Company’s management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market.  Although it does not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, it will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to its securities.

Competition.  The automotive services industry is highly competitive.  The Company believes that automobile dealerships, including recently emerging national and regional new and used auto dealerships, represent the principal competitors for Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express service centers; however, these service centers also compete with national and regional fast oil change and lube companies, major oil manufacturers, local service stations and local, regional and national automobile maintenance and repair service providers.

The Company believes the principal competitive factors in the markets serviced by each of its business units are location, name recognition and reputation, and quality of service and price.

The Company also competes with some of those noted above and with other parties in the sale of franchises.  Competitive factors include startup costs, royalty rates, franchisee support and the financial performance of existing centers.  With respect to the sales of supplies and equipment for franchisees, competition is based on availability, price, ability to provide prompt delivery and the quality of support services.

8

Certain competitors discussed above have greater financial resources than the Company does.  There can be no assurance that the Company or individual Precision centers will be able to compete effectively.  See “Business¾Competition.”

Reliance on Franchising.  Franchise royalties are a significant component of its revenue base.  Therefore, the Company depends upon the ability of its franchisees to promote and capitalize upon the “Precision” brand and the reputation the Company believes the Company enjoys for quality and value.  There can be no assurance that the Company or our area developers will be able to recruit and retain franchisees with the business abilities or financial resources necessary to open Precision Tune Auto Care centers on schedule or that the franchisees will conduct operations profitably.  In addition, to the extent that franchisees finance their operations with secured indebtedness, the Company’s rights to receive franchise royalties would be effectively subordinated to the rights of franchisees’ lenders.  See “Business¾Operations.”

Automotive Technology Advances.  The demand for the services offered by its Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express centers could be adversely affected by continuing developments in automotive technology.  Automotive manufacturers are producing cars that last longer and require service and maintenance at less frequent intervals.  For example, some manufacturers now recommend that consumers change oil at 10,000 mile intervals and replace spark plugs and other engine components at 100,000 miles, a significant increase from the mileage intervals recommended for earlier models and those currently recommended by most manufacturers.  The demand for its services also could be adversely affected by longer and more comprehensive warranty programs offered by automobile manufacturers and other third parties.  The Company believes that a majority of new automobile owners have their cars serviced by a dealer during the period the car is under warranty.  In addition, advances in automotive technology may require the Company to incur additional costs to update its technical training program and upgrade the diagnostic capabilities of its centers.

Labor Availability. The provision of high quality maintenance services by Precision Tune Auto Care centers requires an adequate supply of skilled labor.  In addition, the operating costs and operating revenues of such centers may be adversely affected by high turnover in skilled technicians.  Trained and experienced automotive technicians are in high demand.  Accordingly, a center’s ability to increase productivity and revenues could be affected by its inability to maintain the employment of skilled technicians necessary to provide the center’s services.  There can be no assurance that Precision Tune Auto Care or its franchisees will be able to attract and maintain an adequate skilled labor force necessary to operate these centers efficiently or that labor expenses will not increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of skilled technicians, thereby adversely impacting its financial performance.

Dependence on Management and Key Personnel.  The Company’s success depends to a significant extent on the performance and continued services of senior management and certain key personnel.  The Company believes these individuals possess the necessary experience in financing, operating and managing a company intent on improving its financial performance.  The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations.

Seasonal Nature of Portions of the Business.  Seasonal changes may impact various sectors of its businesses and, accordingly, its operations may be adversely affected by seasonal trends in certain periods.  In particular, severe weather in winter months may make it difficult for consumers in affected parts of the country to travel to Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express centers and obtain services.

Control by Management and Principal Shareholders.  As of August 12, 2004, its directors, executive officers and shareholders beneficially owning more than 5% of its outstanding common stock, in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 18% of its outstanding common stock.  Accordingly, these persons have substantial influence over its affairs, including the ability to influence the election of directors and appointment of management, the outcome of votes by its shareholders on major corporate transactions, including mergers and the sales of substantial assets and other matters requiring shareholder approval.

Franchising Regulations.  The Company is subject to federal, international and state laws and regulations, including the regulations of the Federal Trade Commission as well as similar authorities in individual states, in connection with the offer, sale and termination of franchises and the regulation of the franchisor/franchisee relationship.  See “Business¾Government Regulation.”  Its failure to comply with these laws could subject the Company to liability to franchisees and to fines or other penalties imposed by governmental authorities.  From time to time, the Company experiences periods during which sales are restricted while the Company registers updates of its disclosure material with various states.  Such delays may have an adverse effect on its ability to offer and sell franchises.  In addition, the Company may become subject to litigation with, or other claims filed with state, federal or international authorities by, franchisees or area developers based on alleged unfair trade practices, implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing or express violations of agreements.  Accordingly, its failure to comply with applicable franchise laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental Regulation.  Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express centers store new oil and handle large quantities of used automotive oils and fluids.  Precision Auto Wash centers (which were formerly franchise operations under the PACI umbrella) used chemicals in the washing process.  These chemicals, along with oils, fluids and other chemicals washed off of the vehicle were collected with the waste water from the car wash process.  As a result of these activities, the Company, its franchisees and area developers are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations dealing with the transportation,

9

storage, presence, use, disposal and handling of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes, discharge of storm water, and underground fuel storage tanks.  If any such substances were improperly released or improperly stored on its property or the property of any franchisee, including leased properties, or the Company were found to be in violation of applicable environmental laws and regulations, the Company could be responsible for clean-up costs, property damage and fines or other penalties, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.  See “Business¾Government Regulation.”

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC.

Louis M. Brown, Jr., age 61 became Chairman of the Board in October 2003.  He also remains Chief Executive Officer.  He is Vice Chairman of Micros Systems, Inc. since April 2003 and was Chairman of the Board from January 1987 to April 2003.

Robert R. Falconi, age 50, became President in October 2003. He also remains Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  From March 2002 to October 2003, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer. From September 2000 to February 2002, he was the Company’s Vice President – Finance, Administration and Chief Financial Officer.  From August 1998 until September 2000, he was Chief Financial Officer of Apptis, Inc.

Frederick F. Simmons, age 42, became Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in March 2001. From December 1995 to February 2001, he was Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Advantica Restaurant Group, Inc.

John T. Wiegand, age 42, became Senior Vice President – Operational Programs and Training in March 2002.  From August 2000 to March 2002, he was Senior Vice president of Franchise Operations and from June 1998 to August 2000, he was Vice President of North American Operations. Mr. Wiegand joined WE JAC Corporation, the Company’s predecessor, as Director of Field Operations in August 1996.

Kevin Bates, age 42, became Vice President - Marketing and Advertising in October 1999. From January 1998 until October 1999, he was our Director of Field Operations.

Joel Burrows, age 47, became Vice President - Training/Research and Development in September 1999. From December 1997 until September 1999, he was the PTAC Director of Training/Research and Development.

Glyn D. Massingill, age 58, became Vice President - Franchise Services in January 2000.  From September 1990 through December 1999, Mr. Massingill was Vice President and General Manager of Precision Automotive Components Manufacturing and Distribution (PAC), a division of the Company.

Douglas V. Krueger, age 33, became Controller in January 2003.  From September 2001 until January 2003, Mr. Krueger was the Assistant Controller of the Company.  From September 2000 until September 2001, Mr. Krueger was a financial analyst of the Company.  From September 1998 until September 2000, he was a financial analyst of Apptis, Inc.

Item 2.   Properties

The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in approximately 18,000 square feet of leased office space in Leesburg, Virginia pursuant to a lease that expires in 2009.

In the opinion of management, the Company’s current space is adequate for its operating needs.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business, including contract, franchisee and employment-related litigation. In the course of enforcing its rights under existing and former franchisee agreements, the Company is subject to complaints and letters threatening litigation concerning the interpretation and applicability of these agreements, particularly in cases involving defaults and terminations of franchises.  As of the date hereof, there are no such lawsuits pending against the Company.

Rebecca Abdallah v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., et al., District Court of Webb County, Texas, Case No. 2003-CVE-00798-D2

On September 8, 2003, Precision Franchising LLC (“PFL”) was served with Plaintiff’s First Amended Petition seeking damages in excess of $75,000 from the manufacturer of a vehicle purchased by her husband, the seller of the vehicle, a franchised Precision Tune Auto Care center which conducted a pre-purchase inspection of the vehicle, and against PFL.  With respect to PFL, Plaintiff alleges that she suffered personal injuries as a result of PFL’s inadequate policies and procedures regarding the pre-purchase inspection; failure to adequately hire, train and supervise employees; failure to investigate the vehicle’s history of fuel leaks and ongoing recall investigations; failure to investigate the vehicle’s fuel system; and negligent misrepresentations about the condition of the vehicle.  In

10

June 2004, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, and in July 2004, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit against the Company without prejudice.

Previously Reported Cases:

Lumnivision, S.A. de C.V. v. Praxis Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V., Third Civil Court, First Judicial District, Monterrey, Nuevo Laredo, Mexico.

Lumnivision filed suit against Praxis Afinaciones, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of PACI, seeking payment of 766,000 Mexican Pesos, plus interest at the rate of 5% per month, for services under a contract.  Praxis Afinaciones denies the allegations and is defending the allegations in the lawsuit.

United Bank, NA v. C. Eugene Deal, Miracle Partners, Inc., Star Auto Center, Inc., Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Case No. 01-CV0019, Filed January 11, 2001

Miracle Partners, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is party to a confessed judgment of approximately $1.3 million.  The subsidiary is currently inactive and has no assets.  As such, management believes this judgment will have no material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations.  Furthermore, the Company believes that it has a meritorious claim against Mr. Deal, former President of Miracle Partners, for misrepresentations made in connection with PACI’s acquisition of Miracle Partners, Inc. in 1997 for all amounts covered by the judgment.

Threatened Litigation:

Puyallup Auto Stop Associates, Inc. v. PTW, Inc.

By letter dated July 1, 2003, a former landlord has asserted a claim against PTW, Inc. for reimbursement of the costs of remediating environmental contamination to the leased premises during the term of the lease, which costs allegedly exceed $250,000.  Investigation into the Company’s liability is ongoing.

The Company does not believe that any of the above claims or proceedings will result in a material judgment against the Company.  There can be no assurance, however, that these suits will ultimately be decided in its favor.  Any one of these claims or proceedings may result in a material judgment against the Company, which could cause material adverse consequences to its operations.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

11

PART II

Item 5.   Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (“Common Stock”) is publicly traded on the National Association of Security Dealers Inc.’s OTC Bulletin Board and is quoted under the symbol “PACI.”

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices on NASD OTC Bulletin Board for the Common Stock during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, and June 30, 2003, respectively. To date, the Company has not paid any Common Stock dividends and does not anticipate paying any Common Stock dividends in the foreseeable future, however dividends are currently being paid on the Company’s Series A redeemable preferred stock (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation – Liquidity and Capital Resources”  and Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

These over the counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003

As of September 1, 2004, there were approximately 200 record holders of Common Stock and approximately 1,200 beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

12

Item 6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

Introduction

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of the Company and related notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

Overview

Precision Auto Care is a global franchisor of auto care and quick-lube centers. Company revenues are derived from three primary areas: franchise development, royalties, and distribution. Franchise development revenues include sales of franchises and master licenses. Royalty revenues are derived from royalty fees paid by individual franchisees to the Company based on qualified retail sales by the franchisee. Distribution revenues are derived from the sale of automotive related supplies to individual franchisees.

Direct costs consist of fees paid to area developers for the sale of new franchises and for supporting franchisees on an ongoing basis, other costs associated with directly supporting the franchise system, and the cost of automotive related supplies. General and administrative expenses include all legal, accounting, general overhead, information technology and corporate staff expenses. Other income and expense items include interest income and expense which are included within the non-operating income/expense category on the Statement of Operations.  Severances, abandoned acquisitions, early buyout of lease obligations, and sale of assets are included in the operating expenses on the Statement of Operations.

The Company has one remaining business segment, Automotive Care Franchising, due to the disposal of its manufacturing operations in March and April 2003.  See Notes to Financial Statements for financial information regarding the disposal of the Company’s Manufacturing and Distribution business segment.  This disposal was accounted for as a discontinued operation resulting in the reclassification of amounts associated with the manufacturing business in its historical financial statements.  The Automotive Care Franchising business segment, which is comprised of Precision Tune Auto Care (“PTAC”) and Precision Lube Express, provides automotive services primarily through franchised operations located in the United States and in certain foreign countries.

The Company’s core auto care and franchising business continues to benefit from an improved focus on unit economics, and in the field training programs. Additionally, the Company is seeking growth through co-branding. This strategy is designed to permit the Company to partner with other retailers and service providers who are also seeking to improve cash flows through complementary brands.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies.  For a full description of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  These critical accounting policies require estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the consolidated financial statements.  Due to their nature, estimates involve judgments based on available information.  Actual results or amounts could differ from estimates and the difference could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.  Therefore, understanding these policies is important in understanding the reported results of operations and the financial position of the Company.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s royalty revenue is recognized as earned in accordance with the specific terms of each agreement and to the extent no known issues involving collection exist.  In the case when revenues are not likely to be collected, the Company provides for estimated losses.  This estimate is based upon our historical experience as well as a detailed review of our receivable balances.

Revenue from the sale of a franchise is recognized upon the opening of the franchised center.

The Company enters into domestic Area Development agreements and international Master License agreements (Agreements) which grant the area developer and master licensor, respectively, the right to sell, on the Company’s behalf, Precision Tune Auto Care franchises and Precision Lube Express franchises within a specific geographic region.  Revenue from the sale of Area Development agreements is recognized as all material services or conditions related to the sale are satisfied.  Revenue from the sale of master licenses is recognized upon signing the Agreement since the Company is not required to support the international franchises as there is no contractual agreement between the Company and the international franchisees.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually.  Historically, management has performed its impairment analysis

13

in the first quarter of each fiscal year.  Goodwill impairment testing for the period ending June 30, 2004, did not result in the impairment of recorded goodwill of approximately $8.7 million.  Subsequent to year-end, the Company obtained a current business enterprise valuation for purposes of supporting its impairment analysis for fiscal year 2005.  Such analysis further affirmed management’s conclusion that goodwill was not impaired at June 30, 2004.

Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance

The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Deferred tax liabilities and assets reflect the effects of tax losses and the future income tax effects of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and are measured using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The Company recognizes deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the asset will be realized in future years.

The Company regularly reviews the recoverability of its tax deferred assets and establishes a valuation allowance as deemed appropriate.  As of June 30, 2004, the Company had a valuation allowance of $6.4 million against deferred tax assets.  Given the Company’s current operating performance, management released approximately $629,000 of the valuation allowance during 2004.  This adjustment was based upon management’s assessment of the recoverability of deferred taxes which included projections of future pretax earnings.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended June 30, 2004 to the year ended June 30, 2003

Summary (in thousands)

Revenue. Total revenue for the year ended June 30, 2004 was $11.8 million, a decrease of approximately $100,000, or 1%, compared with total revenue of $11.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.

Automotive care franchising revenue for the year ended June 30, 2004 was $11.1 million, a decrease of approximately $204,000, or 2%, compared with automotive care revenues of $11.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.  This decrease was the result of a decrease in royalty revenues of $470,000. This decrease was offset by an increase in franchise development revenues of $112,000, and an increase in printing revenue related to franchise operations of $154,000.  The decrease in royalty revenues was driven by the result of system wide store sales being lower than last year and due to the fact that there were no revenues received from the discontinued operation in Mexico.  The increase in franchise development is due to the Company’s improved financial condition and increased sales efforts.  Subsequent to fiscal year end, in August 2004, the Company signed an area development agreement with North Pacific Precision, Inc. for the area rights for the Seattle market.  Under the agreement, North Pacific Precision, Inc. paid $500,000 for the area developer rights for the Seattle market, and the Company will receive fifty percent of the income from the sale of franchises and from

14

royalties from franchisees in the area (see Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).  The increase in printing revenue is due to new programs offered to franchisees that enable them to purchase more products from the company’s printing subsidiary.

Other revenue for the year ended June 30, 2004 was $658,000, an increase of approximately $41,000, or 7%, compared to $617,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003.   This increase was driven by an increase in revenues derived from training and rebate programs.

Direct Cost. Total direct costs for the year ended June 30, 2004 totaled $7.2 million, an increase of approximately $157,000 or 2%, compared with $7.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.

Automotive care franchising direct costs for the year ended June 30, 2004 totaled $6.6 million, an increase of $159,000 or 2%, compared with $6.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.  This increase is directly attributable to the fact that printing revenue comprised a greater percentage of the total revenue mix than it did in fiscal year 2003.  The increased printing revenues have a lower margin compared to the revenues associated with royalties, which decreased during the current year.

Other direct costs for the year ended June 30, 2004 totaled $611,000, a decrease of $2,000, compared with $613,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $3.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $177,000 or 5%, compared with $3.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2003.  This decrease was primarily the result of management’s cost reduction initiatives in general and administrative costs.  Specifically, legal and personnel costs were reduced.  The general and administrative expenses also include a charge of $127,000 and $40,000, respectively, due to variable accounting for certain employee stock options in 2004 and 2003 (see Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Operating Income From Continuing Operations.  The Company recorded operating income for the year ended June 30, 2004 of approximately $939,000, a decrease of $40,000, or 4%, compared with an operating income of $979,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003.

Gain on Debt Restructuring.  The Company recognized a gain from debt restructuring in the amount of $193,000 for the year ended June 30, 2004, as a result of restructuring the Board LLC debt.  During January 2003, the Company recognized a gain of approximately $660,000 due to a reduction in accrued expenses associated with its Mexican subsidiary based on management’s determination, upon consultation with legal counsel, that the Company would not be obligated to pay such expenses on behalf of the Mexican subsidiary as a result of such entity’s insolvency.

Other Income (Expense). The Company recorded Other Income of $47,000 for the year ended June 30, 2004, compared with Other Expense of $664,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003.  The Other Income in 2004 represents interest income derived from notes receivable with franchisees.  The Other Expense from 2003 was primarily interest expense on the Precision Funding and Board LLC debt.

Gain From Discontinued Operations.  The Company recorded a gain from discontinued operations for the year ended June 30, 2004 of $18,000 compared with a gain from discontinued operations of $254,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003 relating to the disposal of its manufacturing and distribution operations (see Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Net Income Applicable to Common Shareholders and Earnings Per Share. The Company recorded Net Income Applicable to Common Shareholders of $1.6 million, or $0.08 per share, for the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to $10.9 million, or $0.72 per share, for the year ended June 30, 2003. The decrease in net income is primarily attributable to the gain that was recognized on the debt restructuring in 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash at June 30, 2004 was $1.6 million.  During the period, cash provided by operations was $837,000.  The Company generated operating profit in fiscal year 2004 and expects to do so in fiscal year 2005.

Cash used in investing activities for the twelve months ended June 30, 2004 was $100,000 resulting primarily from the purchase of property and equipment.

Cash used in financing activities for the twelve months ended June 30, 2004 was $727,000. Cash used in financing activities during the period consisted of repayments of the subordinated debt and other notes payable.

15

Management believes that the Company’s current cash balance, cash generated from operations, and available credit line will be sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital needs, capital expenditures, and contractual obligations for fiscal year 2005.

Debt Transactions

On October 30, 2002, the Company reached an agreement with Precision Funding, L.L.C. and a former board member to convert approximately $17.6 million of outstanding debt and accrued interest due to them to equity.  In exchange for the extinguishment of the approximately $17.6 million in outstanding debt and accrued interest due, the Company issued Precision Funding, L.L.C. and the former board member the following:

•                  2.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $500,000.

•                  500,000 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock of the Company with a stated value of $5,180,000 or $10.36 per share.  These shares are redeemable by the shareholder at any time after the 3rd anniversary of the Issue Date, October 30, 2002 on 30 days prior written notice for an aggregate value of $5,180,000 plus any unpaid dividends.  The holders of these shares are also entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 2% of the liquidation preference of the Series A preferred stock, $10.36 per share, per annum payable quarterly in arrears in cash on the last day, or the next succeeding business day, of January, April, July, and October in each year, beginning January 31, 2003.  Accrued dividends were approximately $4,000 and $9,000 at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

•                  Warrants to purchase 11,472,039 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.44 per share and a fair value of approximately $2.3 million.

Issuance of the warrants was subject to shareholder approval as part of a proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the Company’s authorized shares of common stock.  Such approval was granted at the annual shareholder meeting held on January 15, 2003 and as a result, the Company exchanged common stock, preferred stock and warrants with an aggregate fair value of $7.9 million in satisfaction of debt and accrued interest of approximately $17.6 million.  The difference in the carrying value of debt and accrued interest and the fair value of the common stock, preferred stock and warrants of $9.7 million was recorded as a capital contribution.

In October 1998, a subordinated debenture in the amount of $2.0 million was executed with an LLC composed of certain members of the Company’s board of directors (Board LLC).  On July 17, 2003, the Company reached an agreement to restructure the remaining $633,000 due to the Board LLC.  The terms of the agreement called for the following:

•                  Payment of $200,000 within 3 days of receipt of approval by the Company’s Board of Directors.

•                  Issuance of a non-interest bearing note payable in the amount of $50,000, payable in ten monthly installments of $5,000 each, commencing one month after the date of approval by the Company’s Board of Directors.

•                  Issuance of warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.44 per share having a fair value of approximately $222,000.

The Company recognized a gain of approximately $160,000 from this debt restructuring in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004.

In December 2003, the Company paid approximately $169,000 in full satisfaction of the $201,000 of debt owed to Radiant Systems, Inc.  The Company recognized a gain of approximately $32,000 from this transaction in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004.

In January 2004, 2,469,600 warrants were exercised pursuant to an agreement the Company reached with Precision Funding, L.L.C. and a former board member in October 2002.  Upon the exercise of these warrants at the previously agreed to exercise price of $0.44 per share, the holder purchased 2,469,600 restricted shares of common stock in exchange for surrendering 104,885 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Company, therefore, there were no cash proceeds received by the Company from this transaction.

In February 2004, 4,530,169 warrants were exercised pursuant to an agreement the Company reached with Precision Funding, L.L.C. and a former board member in October 2002.  Upon the exercise of these warrants at the previously agreed to exercise price of $0.44 per share, the holder purchased 4,530,169 restricted shares of common stock in exchange for surrendering 192,401 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Company, therefore, there were no cash proceeds received by the Company from this transaction.

Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations

Seasonal changes may impact various sectors of the Company’s business differently and, accordingly, the Company’s operations may be affected by seasonal trends in certain periods. In particular, severe weather in winter months can adversely affect the Company because such weather makes it difficult for consumers in affected parts of the country to travel to Precision Auto Care and Precision Lube Express centers.

16

Item 7.  Financial Statements

17

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Precision Auto Care, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Precision Auto Care, Inc. (the Company) and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s equity and cash flows for the years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Precision Auto Care, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 7, the accompanying 2004 consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and 2003 consolidated financial statements have been restated.

18

PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes.

19

PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes.

20

PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(1) – (As restated see Note 7)

See accompanying notes.

21

PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes.

22

Precision Auto Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Business Description and Financial Statement Presentation

Precision Auto Care, Inc. (the “Company”) is a franchisor of automotive maintenance service centers which provide specialized automotive care services, and fast oil change and lube services.  These franchisee owned centers operate primarily under the Precision Tune Auto Care and Precision Lube Express brand names. The Company disposed of its manufacturing and distribution business in March and April 2003 (see Note 4).

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s royalty revenue is recognized as earned in accordance with the specific terms of each agreement and to the extent no issues involving collection exist.  In the case when revenues are not likely to be collected, the Company provides for an estimate of bad debt expense.  This estimate is based upon our historical experience as well as a detailed review of our receivable balances.

Revenue from the sale of a franchise is recognized upon the opening of the franchised center.

The Company enters into domestic Area Development agreements and international Master License agreements (Agreements) which grant the area developer and master licensor, respectively, the right to sell, on the Company’s behalf, Precision Tune Auto Care franchises and Precision Lube Express franchises within a specific geographic region.  Revenue from the sale of Area Development agreements is recognized as all material services or conditions related to the sales are satisfied, which is typically upon signing as there are very minimal services provided.  Revenue from the sale of master licenses is recognized upon signing the Agreement since the Company is not required to support the international franchises as there is no contractual agreement between the Company and the international franchisees.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.  Cash balances may exceed insured amounts.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis for book purposes and accelerated methods for tax purposes over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Deferred tax liabilities and assets reflect the effects of tax losses and the future income tax effects of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and are measured using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  A valuation allowance is established when management is not able to conclude more likely than not that the assets will be realized in future years.

23

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying amount of long-lived assets to be held and used, including goodwill and other intangible assets, when events and circumstances warrant such a review. The carrying amount of a long lived asset is considered impaired when the estimated undiscounted cash flow from each asset is less than its carrying amount. In that event, the Company would record a loss equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset.  Assets to be disposed of are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, trade accounts receivable and notes receivable. The Company’s cash is held at FDIC insured financial institutions. The trade receivable balances are dispersed among a wide customer and franchisee base. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its franchises.  The Company maintains reserves for credit losses, and such losses have been within management’s expectations.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. The Company incurred $85,000 and $136,000 in advertising costs for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually.  Historically, management has performed its impairment analysis in the first quarter of each fiscal year.  Goodwill impairment testing for the period ending June 30, 2004, did not result in the impairment of recorded goodwill of approximately $8.7 million.  Subsequent to year-end, the Company obtained a current business enterprise valuation for purposes of supporting its impairment analysis for fiscal year 2005.  Such analysis further affirmed management’s conclusion that goodwill was not impaired at June 30, 2004.

Segment Reporting

The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, in the quarter ended September 30, 2001.  As a result, the Company evaluated its operations along two business lines: Automotive Care Franchising and Manufacturing and Distribution. In March and April 2003, the Manufacturing and Distribution segment was disposed of as a result of management’s decision to discontinue this business line (see Note 4).

Stock Options

The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations in accounting for stock based compensation and presents pro forma net income and earnings per share data as if the accounting prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” had been applied.  The Company also applies the provisions of FIN 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation”, as required when modifications and other provisions cause the application of variable accounting which calls for the periodic measurement of compensation expense based on the difference in the exercise price and the underlying value of the related stock.

Historically, no stock-based compensation was reflected in net income, as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.  However, the Company issued 65,000 options in the during fiscal year 2004 which had an exercise price below the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.  As a result, approximately $15,000 of compensation expense will be recognized over the vesting period of these options.  The Company granted stock to an officer with a fair value of $212,500 during fiscal year 2003, and recognized compensation expense of $132,500 and $80,000 as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.  The Company also repurchased certain options from employees and issued new options exercisable at an exercise price of $0.44 in fiscal year 2003, resulting in the newly issued options being treated as a repricing under FIN 44, which triggered variable accounting.  As a result, the Company recorded compensation expense of approximately $127,000 and $40,000 associated with these options as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

24

Had compensation expense for all options been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates during the years ending June 30, 2004 and 2003 consistent with the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, the pro forma net income and income per share would have been as follows:

*  All awards refers to awards granted, modified, or settled in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 1994 – awards for which the fair value was required to be measured under Statement 123.

Earnings Per Share

The Company reports earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings per Share” which specifies the methods of computation, presentation, and disclosure. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.  The weighted average number of shares outstanding related to stock options and warrants at June 30, 2004 and 2003 was 6,811,470 and 13,346,239, respectively.  Only stock options and warrants with exercise prices lower than the average market price of the common shares were included in the diluted EPS calculation for fiscal year 2004 and 2003.  For the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, 182,950 and 1,734,200 shares attributable to outstanding stock options, and 0 and 11,472,039 shares attributable to outstanding warrants were not included in the computation of diluted income per share as they were anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share.

25

Reclassifications

Certain amounts on the prior period financial statements have been reclassed to be in conformity with the current period financial statements.  Due to the disposal of its manufacturing and distribution operations in April 2003, the Company has one remaining business segment, Automotive Care Franchising.  Accordingly, the printing revenue and direct costs associated with the Company’s franchising activities have been reclassified to its Automotive Care Franchising segment for fiscal years 2004 and 2003.

Note 3 - New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46), which was amended by FIN 46R issued in December 2003. This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (VIEs) that either: (1) do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (2) for which the equity investors lack an essential characteristic of a controlling financial interest. This Interpretation applies immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003. It also applies in the first fiscal year or interim period ending after March 15, 2004, to VIEs created before February 1, 2003 in which an enterprise holds a variable interest. FIN 46 requires disclosure of VIEs in financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, if it is reasonably possible that as of the transition date: (1) the company will be the primary beneficiary of an existing VIE that will require consolidation or, (2) the company will hold a significant variable interest in, or have significant involvement with, an existing VIE.  The adoption of FIN 46R did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 is effective for derivative instruments and hedging activities entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except for certain forward purchase and sale securities. For these forward purchase and sale securities, SFAS No. 149 is effective for both new and existing securities after June 30, 2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. The provisions of SFAS No. 150 are effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003.  The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.  The Company’s redeemable preferred stock will continue to be presented in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet since it falls outside the scope of this standard.

Note 4 – Discontinued Operations

The Company disposed of its manufacturing and distribution operating segment as a result of the sale of substantially all of the assets of Worldwide Drying Systems (Worldwide) and Hydro Spray Car Wash Equipment Co. (Hydro Spray) in March 2003 and April 2003, respectively.  The sale of Worldwide for $300,000 in cash included inventory and manufacturing equipment with a carrying value of $93,000.  The resulting gain of $144,000, which included $63,000 in selling expenses associated with this sale, was recognized in March 2003.  Substantially all of the assets of Hydro Spray were sold in April 2003 for $900,000 to a group led by Ernest Malas, a former director and consultant of the Company’s manufacturing division.  The Company received $450,000 in cash and a note for $450,000, payable to the Company in 75 monthly payments of $6,000. On June 17, 2003, the purchaser of Hydro Spray purchased the note from the Company for $204,000.  The Company recorded a gain of $758,000 from the sale of Hydro Spray in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003.

As a result of the sale of Hydro Spray and Worldwide, the Company retained the following assets and liabilities.  These assets and liabilities are included in the assets and liabilities from discontinued operations at June 30, 2004 and 2003:

26

The following amounts related to the Company’s manufacturing and distribution operations have been segregated from continuing operations and reflected as discontinued operations for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:

Note 5 - Property, Plant and Equipment

The components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

Note 6 - Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following items: