FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): August 28, 2003
Exact name of registrant as specified | I.R.S. | |
in its charter, state of incorporation, | Employer | |
Commission | address of principal executive offices, | Identification |
File Number | Telephone | Number |
1-16305 | PUGET ENERGY, INC. | 91-1969407 |
A Washington Corporation. | ||
10885 - N.E. 4th Street | ||
Bellevue, Washington 98004-5515 | ||
(425) 454-6363 |
1-4393 | PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. | 91-0374630 |
A Washington Corporation | ||
10885 - N.E. 4th Street | ||
Bellevue, Washington 98004-5515. | ||
(425) 454-6363 |
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS
On
August 28, 2003, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) trial staff and Puget
Sound Energy (PSE), the utility subsidiary of Puget Energy, filed an agreement that would
end all accusations by FERC of PSEs participation in market manipulation during the
2000-2001 Western energy crisis.1 The agreement states there is no basis to
proceed with show cause proceedings against PSE arising from trading activities in the
California market during the period January 1, 2000 through June 20, 2001.
PSE
was among a group of 43 energy companies that were directed by FERC on June 25, 2003 to
show cause or to prove they did not engage in illegal market manipulation
during the California energy crisis. The show cause order was previously described in PSE
and Puget Energys form 10-Q filed for the second quarter of 2003 (see paragraph 4
of the section entitled Proceedings Relating to the Western Power Market).
Under
the terms of the agreement, FERC trial staff cleared PSE of all allegations relating to
false import (described in the 10-Q as ricochet) and paper
trading activities. PSE agreed to pay $17,092 in connection with two missed
deliveries of power contracted for by the California ISO to avoid the costs and burdens of
further litigating. PSE and FERC trial staff acknowledge in the agreement that PSE denies
any wrongdoing in connection with the missed deliveries, and the FERC trial staff took no
position on the merits of the allegation. PSE produced evidence to show the missed
deliveries occurred due to system reliability issues.
The
agreement must be approved by a FERC administrative law judge and the FERC Commission
before becoming effective. A copy of the agreement without exhibits is attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1; a copy of the full agreement with exhibits can be found at www.ferc.gov.
_________________
1 FERC is still investigating the propriety of bids made into California markets of over $250/Mwh during 2000. PSE made only a small number of such bids during times when the market was trading at that level and has no reason to believe it is a target of that investigation.
ITEM 7. EXHIBITS
Exhibit 99.1 - Settlement agreement related to FERC's June 25, 2003 Show Cause Order.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
PUGET ENERGY, INC. |
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. |
/s/ Jennifer L. O'Connor |
Jennifer L. O'Connor |
Vice President and General Counsel |