424(b)3

Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)3
Registartion number 333-133500

PROSPECTUS

PURE BIOSCIENCE

9,177,596 SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK

This prospectus relates to the sale of up to 8,157,376 shares of common stock of PURE Bioscience and 1,020,220 shares of common stock of PURE Bioscience issuable upon exercise of options and warrants by the selling securities holders named herein. PURE Bioscience will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling securities holders; however, we will receive the proceeds from any exercise of outstanding options and warrants. All costs associated with this registration will be borne by PURE Bioscience. We usually refer to PURE Bioscience as "PURE" or "PURE Bioscience".

A public market currently exists for our shares on the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board Market with the symbol PURE. On June 22, 2006, the closing sale price of our common stock was $2.05 per share.

The selling securities holders may sell the shares of common stock described in this prospectus in public or private transactions, on or off the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board Market, at prevailing market prices, or at privately negotiated prices. The selling securities holders may sell shares directly to purchasers or through brokers or dealers. Brokers or dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling securities holders. More information is provided in the section titled “Plan of Distribution” on page 13.

Our common stock is deemed to be “penny stock” as that term is defined in Rule 3a51-1 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934. Brokers/Dealers dealing in penny stocks are required to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks. Moreover, brokers/dealers are required to determine whether an investment in a penny stock is suitable investment for a prospective investor.

THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ONLY BY PERSONS WHO CAN AFFORD THE LOSS OF THEIR ENTIRE INVESTMENT. SEE “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 4.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this Prospectus is July 7, 2006.




Prospectus Summary	3

Selected Financial Highlights	3

Risk Factors	4

Forward-Looking Statements	8

Use of Proceeds	8

Determination of Offering Price	8

Selling Securities Holders	9

Plan of Distribution	13

Legal Proceedings	15

Directors and Executive Officers	17

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	19

Description of Securities	19

Experts and Interest of Named Counsel	20

Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Liabilities	20

Organization within Last Five Years	20

Description of the Business	21

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operation for the Year Ended July 31, 2005 and Quarter Ended April 30, 2006	25

Description of Property	29

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	29

Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholders Matters	31

Executive Compensation	32

Financial Statements	F-	1

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following is only a summary of the information, financial statements, and notes included in this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including “Risk Factors” and our financial statements and notes to the financial statements before making an investment in PURE Bioscience.

OVERVIEW

PURE Bioscience, or “PURE,” develops and markets technology-based bioscience products that provide non-toxic solutions to numerous global health challenges. Our proprietary high efficacy/low toxicity bioscience technologies, including our silver dihydrogen citrate-based antimicrobials and boric acid-based pesticides, represent innovative advances in diverse markets and lead today’s global trend toward industry and consumer use of “green” products while providing competitive advantages in efficacy and safety. Our offices and manufacturing facility are located at 1725 Gillespie Way, El Cajon, California 92020. El Cajon is the in the San Diego metropolitan area. Our telephone number is (619) 596-8600.

Securities Offered: 8,157,376 shares of common stock of PURE Bioscience and 1,020,220 shares of common stock of PURE Bioscience issuable upon exercise of options and warrants offered by the selling securities holders.

We are not offering any of the selling securities holder securities. These shares may be sold by the holders from time to time at prevailing market prices. We will not receive any of the proceeds from any sale of the selling securities holder shares. See “Selling Securities Holders” on page 9 and “Plan of Distribution” on page 13.

SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

	Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2005			Nine Months Ended April 30, 2006

Net sales/operating revenues:	$	155,806		$	158,925

Income (loss) from continuing operations after taxes:	$	(1,847,130	)	$	(2,400,142	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations per common share
after taxes:	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)

Total assets:	$	3,314,037		$	8,813,729

Long-term obligations and redeemable preferred:	$	—		$	—

RISK FACTORS

Investment in the Shares involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should consider the discussion of risks and other information contained in this Prospectus.

Business Risks
We had a loss of $3,011,818 from continuing operations before taxes in the fiscal year ending July 31, 2005, a loss of $609,534 from continuing operations before taxes in the fiscal quarter ending October 31, 2005, a loss of $919,156 from continuing operations before taxes in the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2006 and a loss of $871,500 from continuing operations before taxes in the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2006.. We may continue to have losses in the future which may impair our ability to research, test, develop and market our bioscience products.

The losses discussed above resulted primarily from expenditures on new products developed and launched during the applicable fiscal year or fiscal quarter. Specifically, such losses include a significant increase in general and administrative expenses because of increased costs associated with developing and marketing our water treatment business and emerging silver ion and pesticide product lines. If our revenue growth is slower than anticipated or operating expenses exceed expectations, it may take an unforeseen period of time to achieve or sustain profitability and we may never achieve or sustain profitability. Slower than anticipated revenue growth from new products would force us to scale back research, testing, product development and marketing of new products, at which time we would reduce the size and scope of our operations.

By selling our Water Treatment Division, we lost the most significant contributor to our historical revenue stream and became less diversified. We are now a bioscience company focused on the marketing, selling and continued development of silver dihydrogen citrate antimicrobial technology and Triglycylboride™ pesticide technology. While the rewards in these fields are potentially great, the risks, the regulatory hurdles and the costs of doing business are also high. Our silver dihydrogen citrate is a platform technology rather than a single use applied technology. As such, products developed from the platform fall under the jurisdiction of multiple U.S. and international regulatory agencies. We currently have Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) registration for our 2400-parts per million (ppm) technical grade SDC concentrate (trade name Axenohl®), as well as for our Axen® and Axen®30 hard surface disinfectant products for commercial, industrial and consumer applications including restaurants, homes and medical facilities. We intend to fund and manage additional EPA regulated product development internally and in conjunction with current regulatory consultants; however the introduction of additional EPA regulated antimicrobial products could take several months.

Our technology also shows promise as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial for use in human and veterinary healthcare products. We have chosen to pursue development and product approvals through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) by partnering with Therapeutics, Incorporated, which has assumed responsibility for the testing and regulatory process for selected potential FDA regulated silver dihydrogen citrated-based products. We expect that Therapeutics’ experience with drug development and FDA processing, especially with regard to dermal pharmaceuticals, could lead to IND, NDA and/or 510-K filings for silver dihydrogen citrate-based healthcare products with the FDA. The FDA and comparable agencies in many foreign countries impose substantial limitations on the introduction of new products through costly and time consuming laboratory and clinical testing and other procedures. The process of obtaining FDA and other required regulatory approvals is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. There is no guarantee that either we or Therapeutics, Incorporated will be able to obtain the resources necessary to obtain such approvals, or that the products will meet the strict criteria imposed by the FDA. It may be several years before we are able to introduce any FDA regulated antimicrobial pharmaceutical products, if at all.

Even if we are successful in bringing additional EPA or FDA regulated products to market, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully manufacture or market the products or that potential customers will buy them. For example, a current or future competitive product may have, or be perceived as having, greater efficacy or cost effectiveness. In addition, the market in which we will sell any such products is dominated by a number of large, well-capitalized corporations, which may impact our ability to successfully market our products or maintain any technological advantage we might develop. We may also be subject to changes in regulations governing the manufacture and marketing of our products, which could increase costs, reduce any competitive advantages, or adversely affect marketing effectiveness.

Need for Additional Capital Formation
We believe that sales from our new product lines will not provide sufficient capital resources to sustain operations and fund product development through the end of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2006. In the short term, we have raised capital through the issuance of equity to fund future growth until we operate above the break-even point. We continually evaluate opportunities to sell additional equity or debt securities, or obtain credit facilities from lenders, to strengthen our financial position. Raising of additional capital may reduce the value, perhaps substantially, of the commercialization of our bioscience technology. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Interest on any additional debt taken on will increase our expenses. There is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Insufficient funds may require that we: (i) delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our research and product development programs; (ii) license to third parties the right to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise commercialize; or (iii) reduce or cease operations.

Acceptance of New Products and Technology
We have begun marketing our new antimicrobial silver ion technology to industrial markets, including healthcare, dental, veterinary and food processing, as well as to consumer products markets. We also have begun marketing our environmentally safe pesticides. These products have not yet been accepted into the marketplace. Risks involved in introducing these new products include liability for product effectiveness and competition from existing or emerging sources.

Approval by Government Agencies
Government regulation in the United States and in other countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacturing and marketing of many of our products and in our ongoing research and development activities. Complying with applicable government regulations and obtaining necessary clearances or approvals can be time consuming and expensive, and there can be no assurance that regulatory review will not involve delays or other actions adversely affecting the marketing and sale of our products. We also cannot predict the extent or impact of future legislation or regulation.

Some of our new bioscience applications for the healthcare markets and food preparation markets will require approval by government agencies prior to marketing or sale in the United States. We have not yet applied for Food and Drug Administration or Department of Agriculture approval. If these applications are not approved, we will not be able to market or sell such products, which would limit the revenues which may be realized from these products. Even after approval, we will remain subject to changing governmental policies regulating antimicrobial products. We also intend to take these technologies to the international marketplace, and international business carries a great deal of risk with regard to foreign governments, banking and markets.

Competition
Our silver ion, pesticide and other products will be competing in markets dominated by extremely large, well financed and internationally recognized chemical and pharmaceutical companies. Our ability to compete will depend upon developing brand recognition and distribution methods. Many of our competitors already have well established brands and distribution, as well as many times our financial ability. Focused competition by such chemical and pharmaceutical giants could substantial limit our potential market and ability to profit from these products.

Patents and Intellectual Property
We rely and may in the future rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect the proprietary aspects of our technology and business. These legal protections afford only limited protection for our intellectual property and trade secrets. Despite efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our proprietary technology or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.

We have filed for U.S. and foreign patent applications and trademark registrations for our patents and trademarks. It is possible that competitors or others will create and use products in violation of our patents and/or adopt service names similar to our service names. Such patent infringement could have a material, adverse effect on our business. Adopting similar names and trademarks by competitors could lead to customer confusion. Any claims or customer confusion related to our trademarks could negatively affect our business.

Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights and protect our trade secrets. If third parties prepare and file applications in the United States or other countries that claim trademarks used or registered by us, we may oppose those applications and may be required to participate in proceedings before the regulatory agencies who determine priority of rights to such trademarks. Any litigation or adverse priority proceeding could result in substantial costs and diversions of resources, and could seriously harm our business and operating results.

Finally, to the extent that we operate internationally, the laws of many countries may not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. Many countries have a “first-to-file” trademark registration system. As a result, we may be prevented from registering or using our trademarks in certain countries if third parties have previously filed applications to register or have registered the same or similar trademarks. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate, and our competitors could independently develop similar technology.

Product Liability
As a business which manufactures and markets products for use by consumers, we may become liable for any damage caused by our products when used in the manner intended. Any such claim of liability, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming and/or result in costly litigation. Although we maintain general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of the types described above and may not be adequate to indemnify for all liabilities that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage could harm our business and operating results.

Control by Management
As of June 22 2006, Michael L. Krall, President and Chief Executive officer of the Company, beneficially owned, including exercisable options, approximately 9% of the Common Stock. Further, as of June 22, 2006, the directors and officer of the Company, as a group, beneficially owned, including exercisable options and warrants, approximately 27% of the Common Stock. As a result, our management, and Mr. Krall in particular, are in a position to significantly influence the direction and policies of the Company, the election of the Board of Directors of the Company and the outcome of any other matters requiring stockholder approval.

Price and Trading Volume of Common Stock
Since going public in August 1996, the price and trading volume of our Common Stock has been highly volatile. The price has ranged from below $1 per share to over $7 per share. In addition, the monthly trading volume has varied from under 200,000 shares to over 3,000,000 shares. Over the past six (6) months, the daily closing price of the Common Stock has ranged from $0.73 to $2.95, and the monthly trading volume has varied from approximately 495,000 shares to approximately 3,500,000 shares. This volatility could adversely affect an Investor’s ability to sell the Shares and the available price for the Shares, including resulting in lower prices being available to an Investor if the Investor desires to sell his, her or its Shares at any given time.

Penny Stock
The Common Stock may be characterized as “penny stock” under SEC regulations. As such, broker-dealers dealing in the Common Stock may be subject to the disclosure rules for transactions involving penny stocks, which generally require that, prior to a purchase, the broker-dealer determine if purchasing the Common Stock is suitable for the applicable purchaser. The broker-dealer must also obtain the written consent of the applicable purchasers to purchase the Common Stock and disclose the best bid and offer prices available for the Common Stock and the price at which the broker-dealer last purchased or sold the Common Stock. These additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage them from effecting transactions in the Common Stock, which could make it difficult for an investor to sell his, her or its Shares at any given time.

Shares Reserved for Issuance
We have reserved approximately 11,669,220 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance which includes shares under equity compensation plans, vested and unvested options, and warrants. These shares have a weighted-average exercise price of approximately $1.16. Approximately 14,580,778 shares of Common Stock remain available for future issuance under equity compensation plans or otherwise. The exercise of options and common stock purchase warrants, and the sale of underlying shares, could have an adverse effect on the market for the Shares.

No Cash Dividends
We have never paid any cash dividends on the Common Stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on the Common Stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at such time as the Board of Directors of the Company may consider relevant.

Principal Reliance on Single Product
Our principal technology is an aqueous antimicrobial, silver dihydrogen citrate (“SDC”), a patented molecule which we sell as ready-to-use formulations and in concentrate form for incorporation into numerous third party products and applications. We expect that sales of SDC will constitute a substantial portion of net sales during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2006 and in future periods. Any material decrease in the overall level of sales of, or the prices for SDC, whether as a result of competition, change in consumer demand, or any other factor, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Dilution
Investors may experience dilution in the net tangible book value of their investment upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants granted under our stock option plans and other options, warrants and outstanding convertible securities (including the Placement Agent Warrants).

Anti-Takeover Provisions of Charter and By-Laws
Certain provisions of our charter and by-laws may delay or frustrate the removal of incumbent directors and may prevent or delay a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving the Company that is not approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, even if such events may be beneficial to the interests of stockholders. For example, our Board of Directors, without stockholder approval, has the authority and power to issue all authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock and preferred stock which have not otherwise been reserved for issuance. Thus, assuming the sale of the Maximum Amount of Common Stock, our Board of Directors could issue approximately 17,688,000 shares of Common Stock (assuming offer and sale of the Maximum Amount of Common Stock) on such terms as the Board of Directors determines. The Board of Directors could also issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and such preferred stock could have voting or conversion rights which could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of Common Stock. In addition, California law may contain provisions that have the effect of making it more difficult or delaying attempts by others to gain control of the Company.

Forward Looking Statements
Except for historical information, the information contained in this Prospectus and in the reports we have filed with the SEC contains “forward-looking” statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our industry, plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and assumptions and other statements contained in the Prospectus that are not historical facts. When used in this Prospectus, the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,”“believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section, our actual operating results and financial performance may prove to be very different from what might have predicted as of the date of this Prospectus or the dates of our reports filed with the SEC, as the case may be. The risks described herein address some of the factors that may affect our future operating results and financial performance.

Use of Proceeds

PURE Bioscience will not receive any of the proceeds from any sale of the selling securities holder shares; however, if all options and warrants are exercised, we will receive approximately $1,535,200. There are no commissions or expenses associated with the exercise of the options and warrants. We will apply these funds to working capital.

Determination of Offering Price

We are not offering any of the selling securities holders' securities. These shares may be sold by the holders from time to time at prevailing market prices. We will not receive any of the proceeds from any sale of the selling securities holders' shares; however, if all options and warrants are exercised, we will receive approximately $1,535,200. See "Selling Securities Holders" on page 9 and "Plan of Distribution" on page 13.

Selling Securities Holders

Except as noted in the footnotes below, the shares of common stock included in this Prospectus were issued in the following private placement transactions:

•

In May 2004, we issued an aggregate of 415,722 share of common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for $187,075

•

In June 2004, we issued 111,111 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $50,000.

•

In July 2004, we issued 55,556 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $25,000.

•

In August 2004, we issued 125,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $50,000.

•

In November 2004, we issued 60,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $30,000.

•

In December 2004, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $100,000.

•

Also in December 2004, we issued 166,667 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $100,000.

•

In March 2005, we issued an aggregate of 400,000 shares of common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for $200,000.

•

Also, in March 2005, we issued 1,330,000 shares of common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for $605,000.

•

In April 2005, we issued 458,329 shares of common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for $275,000.

•

In November 2005, we issued 39,999 shares of common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for $30,000.

•

In January 2006, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for $375,000.

•

In February 2006, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Michael Sitton, an accredited investor and a director of the Company for $450,000.

•

In March 2006, we issued 3,952,209 shares of common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for $6,521,145.

Selling Security Holder	Voting and Investment Control Person	Securities Owned	Securities Offered	Securities Owned After Offering	% After Offering
Eric A. Alden & Debra L. Alden		15,151	15,151	0	*
Robert W Allen & Susan M Allen JTWROS	Robert W Allen & Susan M Allen	60,606	60,606	0	*
E H Arnold		60,606	60,606	0	*
Gary Arnold and Patricia Arnold Ten Com	Gary Arnold and Patricia Arnold	60,606	60,606	0	*
Dennis Atchley (1)		558,301 (1)	50,000	508,301	2.10
Bart and Wendy Baker JTWROS	Bart and Wendy Baker	10,000	10,000	0	*
Greg Barnhill (2)		994,000 (2)	50,000	944,000	3.82
Thomas J Bean		30,303	30,303	0	*
Clyde Berg		30,000	30,000	0	*
Linda Berglas		10,000	10,000	0	*
Russell Bernier		80,000 (3)	80,000	0	*
John Bertsch Trust John Bertsch Trustee John Bertsch		30,303	30,303	0	*
Allison Bibicoff		116,666	116,666	0	*
Harvey Bibicoff (4)		751,522 (4)	751,522	0	*
Harvey Bibicoff and Jacqueline Bibicoff Trustees of the Bibicoff Family Trust Dtd 5/16/00 (4)	Harvey Bibicoff and Jacqueline Bibicoff	25,000	25,000	0	*
Hillary Bibicoff		16,666	16,666	0	*
Phillip Bibicoff		34,847	34,847	0	*
Steven Botwinick		22,726	22,726	0	*
Alfred F. Bracher, III		60,606	60,606	0	*
Robert Brooks		30,000	30,000	0	*
Dennis Brovarone (5)		1,121,067 (5)	50,000	1,071,067	4.32
Gary Brownell (6)		1,064,905 (6)	50,000	1,014,905	4.10
Dominick Brunone		4,242	4,242	0	*

Selling Security Holder	Voting and Investment Control Person	Securities Owned	Securities Offered	Securities Owned After Offering	% After Offering
Michael Brunone		35,000 (7)	35,000	0	*
Andrew Buckland (8)		400,000 (8)	50,000	350,000	1.45
Fabian Calvo		6,060	6,060	0	*
Kenneth W Cleveland		15,151	15,151	0	*
John W Crow		15,151	15,151	0	*
CSL Associates, LP	Charles Lipson	272,727	272,727	0	*
Ralph J Cuomo & Leslie L Cuomo JTWROS	Ralph J Cuomo & Leslie L Cuomo	5,000	5,000	0	*
Darich Associates c/o Jimmy Schneider	Jimmy Schneider	6,060	6,060	0	*
Stephen Davison		83,500	83,500	0	*
Paul G. Detkin		15,151	15,151	0	*
Richard Duke		12,500	12,500	0	*
Frank M Durrance		30,303	30,303	0	*
Jack Erlanger		100,000	100,000	0	*
R. Jerry Falkner (9)		30,000	30,000	0	*
Brigitte Ferrada		100,000	100,000	0	*
Brigitte Ferrada Sep IRA	Brigitte Ferrada	27,500	27,500	0	*
Raphael E Ferris		6,060	6,060	0	*
Art Finnel		25,000	25,000	0	*
Dennis Fortin		60,606	60,606	0	*
Harvey W. Freishtat		25,000	25,000	0	*
Stephen Friedland Linda Friedland		12,121	12,121	0	*
Francine Garofalo		16,666	16,666	0	*
Robert P Giesen		10,000	10,000	0	*
Frank Gimenez & Philomena Gimenez JTWROS	Frank Gimenez & Philomena Gimenez	6,060	6,060	0	*
John T Glancy & Lisa Glancy JTWROS	John T Glancy & Lisa Glancy	6,060	6,060	0	*
Neil Goldman		200,000	200,000	0	*
Gary L Gray		5,000	5,000	0	*
Gregory Family Trust dated 1989 Gordon Gregory, Trustee	Gordon Gregory	16,666	16,666	0	*
John C. Guttilla and Peggy Guttilla JTWROS	John C. Guttilla and Peggy Guttilla	6,060	6,060	0	*
Douglas E. Hailey		31,000 (10)	31,000	0	*
Hillson Partnership LP	Daniel Abramowitz	363,636	363,636	0	*
Jeffrey G Hipp & Mary Ann Hipp JTWROS	Jeffrey G Hipp & Mary Ann Hipp	6,000	6,000	0	*
Joel E Hipp & Patricia N Hipp JTWROS	Joel E Hipp & Patricia N Hipp	6,060	6,060	0	*
Tom Hirsch Maureen A Hirsch		6,060	6,060	0	*
Glenn R Hubbard		12,121	12,121	0	*
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.	Joshua Silverman	200,000	200,000	0	*
Howard Isaacs (11)		225,000 (11)	225,000	0	*
J. W. Focused Growth Fund LP	Jason Wild	31,818	31,818	0	*
J Wild Fund, LP	Jason Wild	13,636	13,636	0	*
Ralph and Joanne Jenney		50,000	50,000	0	*
Howard A Kalka		30,303	30,303	0	*
Larry S Kaplan & Maria B Kaplan JTWROS	Larry S Kaplan & Maria B Kaplan	6,060	6,060	0	*

Selling Security Holder	Voting and Investment Control Person	Securities Owned	Securities Offered	Securities Owned After Offering	% After Offering
Robert D Katchke		6,060	6,060	0	*
William Kehl		15,151	15,151	0	*
Charles E Klabunde Trust Charles E Klabunde TTEE U/A Dated 4/9/03 219	Charles E Klabunde	12,121	12,121	0	*
Randall S Knox		20,000	20,000	0	*
Robert Koski		19,393	19,393	0	*
Michael L. Krall (12)		2,362,122 (12)	50,000	2,312,122	8.87
Levi D Kuhn		85,000	85,000	0	*
Michael G Kulik		15,151	15,151	0	*
John & Christine Lauro JTWROS	John & Christine Lauro	6,060	6,060	0	*
Tom Y Lee		200,000	200,000	0	*
Lewis Opportunity Fund LP	W. Austin Lewis IV	100,000	100,000	0	*
Life Works Enterprises LLC	Donna Cash	500,000	500,000	0	*
Charles and Grace Lipson		30,303	30,303	0	*
Manuel Llerena		33,000	33,000	0	*
Peter Longo		15,151	15,151	0	*
Terri MacInnis (13)		73,000 (13)	73,000	0	*
Donald McCulloch & Jacquline McCulloch JTWROS	Donald McCulloch & Jacquline McCulloch	12,121	12,121	0	*
Robert W Main TTEE Under The Robert Main Trust Dtd 9/7/05 3607	Robert W Main	20,606	20,606	0	*
Scott Malin		55,006	55,006	0	*
Robert H Mapp		15,151	15,151	0	*
Meadow Ventures	Bruce Evans	200,000	200,000	0	*
Meadowbrook Opportunity Fund LLC	Evan Greenberg	480,000	480,000	0	*
Martin Michaels		41,667	41,667	0	*
Tom C Mina		2,424	2,424	0	*
Ashok Kumar Narang		30,303	30,303	0	*
Robert Nathan		50,000	50,000	0	*
Bruce Newell		23,061	23,061	0	*
Newport Capital Holdings Inc. (14)	John Vasquez	33,333	33,333
Marlan L. Nichols		55,000	55,000	0	*
Nite Capital LP	Chris Casey	303,030	303,030	0	*
Christine Nitz		12,121	12,121	0	*
Peter K. Nitz		90,303	90,303	0	*
Sandra P Nitz		70,303	70,303	0	*
Patrick Noto		16,666	16,666	0	*
Dr Richard V Nuttall & Annetta Mets Nuttall JTWROS	Dr Richard V Nuttall & Annetta Mets Nuttall	5,000	5,000	0	*
Richard Oh		25,000 (15)	25,000	0	*
Vincent M Palmieri		30,000 (16)	30,000	0	*
Patience Partners	Robert Van Roijen	10,000	10,000	0	*
Polaris Partners LP, Peter Melhado, General Partner	Peter Melhado	250,000	250,000	0	*
Powell Family Limited Partners c/o Ron Powell	Ron Powell	15,151	15,151	0	*
The Private Financing Group Inc.	Jay Bartelstone	5,000	5,000	0	*
Michael T Prousis		15,151	15,151	0	*
David A Random		30,303	30,303	0	*

Selling Security Holder	Voting and Investment Control Person	Securities Owned	Securities Offered	Securities Owned After Offering	% After Offering
Mark Ravich		30,303	30,303	0	*
John J Resich Jr TTEE John J Resich Jr Ret Trust	John J Resich Jr	6,060	6,060	0	*
RFJM Partners LLC	Jeff Markowitz	55,146	55,146	0	*
David Frank Rios & Margaret Jo Rios TTEE Dtd 6-22-99	David Frank Rios & Margaret Jo Rios	30,303	30,303	0	*
Michael Rivkind		20,000	20,000	0	*
IRA FBO Angel Rosario Pershing LLC as Custodian Rollover Account	Angel Rosario	9,994	9,994	0	*
Allan Rubinstein		6,060	6,060	0	*
Terry Schaeffer		6,060	6,060	0	*
Jerry Schmitz & Norma Schmitz JTWROS	Jerry Schmitz & Norma Schmitz	6,060	6,060	0	*
Schottenfeld Qualified Associates LP	Rick Schottenfeld	242,424	242,424	0	*
Robert C. Schroeder		75,000 (17)	75,000	0	*
Scot Holding Inc	Tom Pendergast	15,151	15,151	0	*
Shadow Capitol LLC Attn B Kent Garlinghouse	B Kent Garlinghouse	60,606	60,606	0	*
Patrick Sheedy		30,000	30,000	0	*
Paul Seid		25,000	25,000	0	*
Donna Singer (18)		1,272,758 (18)	50,000	1,222,758	4.90
D. Michael Sitton (19)		877,000 (19)	500,000	377,000	1.56
Valdemar Skov		12,121	12,121	0	*
Kenneth Solomon & Monnye Gross JTWROS	Kenneth Solomon & Monnye Gross	12,121	12,121	0	*
William Spielberger		12,121	12,121	0	*
John Stanley		50,000	50,000	0	*
Brigitte & David Stetson JTWROS	Brigitte & David Stetson	20,000	20,000	0	*
Gray Strang		13,333	13,333	0	*
Richard Strang Jr.		13,333	13,333	0	*
Richard W. Strang TTEE Strang Mechanical Inc. Employees Retirement Tr 001	Richard W. Strang	13,333	13,333	0	*
Swab Plus	Garry Tsaur	200,000	200,000	0	*
Michael N. Taglich (20)		170,455 (20)	170,455	0	*
Robert F. Taglich (21)		109,849 (21)	109,849	0	*
IRA FBO Robert F Taglich Pershing LLC as Custodian Rollover Account (39)	Robert F Taglich	60,606	60,606	0	*
Eugene Trager		20,000	20,000	0	*
Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd.	Rob Ellin	250,000	250,000	0	*
Natalie R Wensley		12,121	12,121	0	*
Edward H. Williams		22,000	22,000	0	*
Jacob Wizman		100,000	100,000	0	*
Gerald Zobel Trust U A/D 3/24/93 Gerald Zobel TTEE & SUCC	Gerald Zobel	10,000	10,000	0	*

Less than 1%

Except as noted in the footnotes below, the selling shareholders have had no material relationship with PURE Bioscience within the last three years.

(1)	Mr. Atchley is the Corporate Secretary of PURE Bioscience. The shares were received through an equity compensation plan exercise. His ownership includes 440,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(2)	Mr. Barnhill is a Director of PURE Bioscience. The shares were received through an equity compensation plan exercise. His ownership includes 789,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(3)	Includes 30,000 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(4)	Includes 337,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options granted in connection with investor relations services and 39,522 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(5)	Mr. Brovarone is a Director of PURE Bioscience. The shares were received through an equity compensation plan exercise. His ownership includes 985,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(6)	Mr. Brownell is a Director of PURE Bioscience. The shares were received through an equity compensation plan exercise. His ownership includes 950,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(7)	Includes 30,000 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(8)	Mr. Buckland is the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of PURE Bioscience. It is anticipated that the shares will be acquired though an equity compensation plan exercise. His ownership includes 400,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(9)	Shares issued in connection with investor relations services in 2003. We no longer have a relationship with Mr. Falkner

(10)	Includes 31,000 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(11)	Includes 225,000 shares issuable upon exercise of an option granted in connection with previously provided investor relations services. We no longer have a relationship with Mr. Isaacs

(12)	Mr. Krall is the Chairman, President and CEO of PURE Bioscience. The shares were received through an equity compensation plan exercise. His ownership includes 1,650,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(13)	Ownership includes 63,000 shares issuable upon exercise of an option granted in connection with investor relations services

(14)	Shares issued upon exercise of warrant issued in a private placement in January 2003. John Vasquez, voting and investment control

(15)	Includes 25,000 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(16)	Includes 20,000 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(17)	Includes 75,000 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(18)	Ms. Singer is the Executive Vice President and a Director of PURE Bioscience. The shares were received through an equity compensation plan exercise. Her ownership includes 1,200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options

(19)	Mr. Sitton is a Director of PURE Bioscience. The shares were acquired in a private placement of common stock in February 2006 at $0.90 per share. His ownership includes 377,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options.

(20)	Mr. Taglich is a principal of Taglich Brothers, Inc., a placement agent for PURE Bioscience. Mr. Taglich's ownership includes 72,349 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

(21)	Mr. Taglich is a principal of Taglich Brothers, Inc., a placement agent for PURE Bioscience. Mr. Taglich's ownership includes 72,349 shares issuable upon exercise of placement agent warrant

Plan of Distribution

We are not offering any of the selling securities holders’ securities. These shares may be sold by the holders from time to time at prevailing market prices. We will not receive any of the proceeds from any sale of the selling securities holders’ shares; however, if all options and warrants are exercised, we will receive approximately $1,535,200. The Selling securities holders may sell or distribute its shares in transactions through underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents from time to time or through privately negotiated transactions, including in distributions to shareholders or partners or other persons affiliated with the Selling securities holder. If a selling security holder enters into an agreement after the date of this prospectus to sell its shares to a broker-dealer as a principal and that broker-dealer is acting as an underwriter, we will file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement containing this prospectus identifying the broker-dealer and disclosing required information on the plan of distribution. Additionally, prior to any involvement of any broker-dealer in the offering, such broker-dealer must seek and obtain clearance of the underwriting compensation and arrangements from the NASD Corporate Finance Department.

The distribution of the Selling securities holders shares may be effected from time to time in one or more transactions (which may involve crosses or block transactions) in the following types of transactions:

Over-the-counter market sales, or on such public markets as the common stock may from time to time be trading;

Privately negotiated sales;

Settlement of short sales entered into after the date of this prospectus;

By writing of call options on the shares (whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise). A call option is a contract whereby the option holder has a right to purchase the shares from the writer of the option for a set period of time at a pre-defined price;

By purchasing put options (whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise) and delivering the shares to the writer of the option. A put option is a contract whereby the option holder has a right to sell the shares to the writer of the option for a set period of time at a pre-defined price; or

Any combination of these methods of distribution.

Any of such transactions may be effected at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, at negotiated prices or at fixed prices.

If the selling securities holders effect such transactions by selling the shares to or through underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents, such underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the Selling securities holders or commissions from purchasers of the shares for whom they may act as agent (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents might be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved).

A selling securities holder and any brokers, dealers or agents that participate in the distribution of the securities might be deemed to be underwriters, and any profit on the sale of the securities by them and any discounts, concessions or commissions received by any such underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents might be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.

A selling securities holder may pledge the shares from time to time in connection with such Selling securities holder’s financing arrangements. To the extent any such pledgees exercise their rights to foreclose on any such pledge, and sell the shares, such pledgees may be deemed underwriters with respect to such shares and sales by them may be effected under this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of any of the shares by the selling securities holder.

Under the Exchange Act and applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, any person engaged in a distribution of any of the shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the shares for a period, depending upon certain circumstances, of either two days or nine days prior to the commencement of such distribution. In addition, and without limiting the foregoing, the selling securities holders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, including without limitation Regulation M, which provisions may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares by the selling securities holder.

Under the securities laws of certain states, the shares may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in certain states the shares may not be sold unless the shares have been registered or qualify for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

Penny Stock Rules / Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act

Our shares are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 15g-1 through 15g-6 promulgated there under. They impose additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors who are generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses.

Rule 15g-1 exempts a number of specific transactions from the scope of the penny stock rules. Rule 15g-2 declares unlawful broker/dealer transactions in penny stocks unless the broker/dealer has first provided to the customer a standardized disclosure document.

Rule 15g-3 provides that it is unlawful for a broker/dealer to engage in a penny stock transaction unless the broker/dealer first discloses and subsequently confirms to the customer current quotation prices or similar market information concerning the penny stock in question.

Rule 15g-4 prohibits broker/dealers from completing penny stock transactions for a customer unless the broker/dealer first discloses to the customer the amount of compensation or other remuneration received as a result of the penny stock transaction.

Rule 15g-5 requires that a broker/dealer executing a penny stock transaction, other than one exempt under Rule 15g-1, disclose to its customer, at the time of or prior to the transaction, information about the sales persons compensation.

Rule 15g-6 requires broker/dealers selling penny stocks to provide their customers with monthly account statements.

Rule 15g-9 requires broker/dealers to approved the transaction for the customer’s account; obtain a written agreement from the customer setting forth the identity and quantity of the stock being purchased; obtain from the customer information regarding his investment experience; make a determination that the investment is suitable for the investor; deliver to the customer a written statement for the basis for the suitability determination; notify the customer of his rights and remedies in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions; and, the NASD’s toll free telephone number and the central number of the North American Administrators Association, for information on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their associated persons.

The application of the penny stock rules may affect your ability to resell your shares due to broker-dealer reluctance to undertake the above-described regulatory burdens

Legal Proceedings

In November 2004, we received a $14.2 million award resulting from the bifurcated binding arbitration proceeding against NVID International, Inc. through the American Arbitration Association International Centre for Dispute Resolution. As a result, our royalty and other contractual obligations to NVID were legally terminated. Our October 2003 arbitration action against NVID International and Falken Industries, Ltd., sought damages and relief from continued and ongoing public dissemination of false, misleading and disparaging statements. In March 2006, our November 2004 arbitration award against NVID was confirmed by the US District Court, Southern District of California, as a federal judgment.

In October 2005, we received a further $3.64 million award, including costs, resulting from the binding arbitration proceeding against Falken Industries. The October 2005 arbitration award against Falken Industries, Ltd. was confirmed by Judge M James Lorenz of the US District Court, Southern District of California by an Order dated January 18, 2006. The Clerk of the Court entered judgment in accordance with the award of the arbitrator on January 20, 2006. The judgment was unopposed; however, Falken Industries, Ltd. has subsequently filed a motion to set aside the Court's Order and the resulting judgment. The matter has been briefed and is now before the Court. On April 7, 2006 we were issued a Writ Of Execution for Money Damages along with an Abstract of Judgment, by the US District Court, Southern District of California for $3.74 million with daily interest of $444.80.

In June 2004, we filed an arbitration action against Nickel Ltd. and Falken Industries Ltd., case number 50 T 133 00319 04, for breach of contract regarding a license for Axen30. Nickel resisted arbitration, however on September 30, 2005, the US District Court, Southern District of California ordered Nickel to arbitration. Nickel has appealed the US District Court order compelling Nickel to Arbitration. The arbitration is in progress, and the hearing on the merits has been moved to August 2006. Falken Industries was not part of the District Court matter to compel arbitration, and has now refused to be a part of this arbitration procedure. On December 16, 2005, we filed a separate lawsuit against Falken Industries, Ltd. in the US District Court, Southern District of California for breach of contract, injunctive relief, trade libel, and declaratory relief regarding a license for Axen30 originally issued to Nickel, Ltd. On December 22, 2005, Nickel, Ltd. filed for declaratory relief with the American Arbitration Association International Centre for Dispute Resolution to clarify the parties' obligations under the Umbrella Agreement.

Nickel Ltd. has recently filed two lawsuits under the jurisdiction of the Tribunal De Commerce De Paris. The first of these actions was filed on October 26, 2005 against us under an agreement (the “Super Distribution Agreement”) signed in January 2003, seeking an award in the amount of approximately $14.6 million, including damages. The second lawsuit was filed on November 21, 2005 against Carline America, a Nevada corporation, and us, also under the Super Distribution Agreement. Carline America was established by us solely for the Super Distribution Agreement but never commenced operations or issued shares due to Nickel’s breach of contract. This second lawsuit seeks an award in the amount of approximately $21.9 million including damages from Carline, and also seeks to hold us liable for the full amount. In January 2006, Emile Gouiran, Nickel, Ltd. and Falken Industries, Ltd. filed a defamation lawsuit under the jurisdiction of the Tribunal De Commerce De Paris against Michael L. Krall, Dennis Atchley, PURE Bioscience, PURE’s legal counsel, and other parties. We are currently, with our French counsel, evaluating the three lawsuits; however, we believe each suit is frivolous, maliciously false, and wholly without merit. These recent suits follow four previous suits brought by Nickel against us in France, all of which were dismissed by the respective French courts.

Directors and Executive Officers

The executive officers and directors of PURE Bioscience and their ages are as follows:

Name	Age	Position	Held Position Since
Michael L. Krall Andrew J. Buckland Donna Singer Gary Brownell, CPA Dennis Atchley, Esq. Greg Barnhill Dennis Brovarone D. Michael Sitton Tommy G. Thompson	54 43 36 54 56 51 50 56 64	President, CEO, Chairman, Director CFO, Principal Accounting Officer Executive Vice President, Director Director Secretary Director Director Director Director	1992 2005 1998 1996 1996 2001 1996 2006 2006

The Directors serve until their successors are elected by the shareholders. Vacancies on the Board of Directors may be filled by appointment of the majority of the continuing directors. The executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors except as subject to the employment agreement with Mr. Krall.

Business Experience
DENNIS B. ATCHLEY, ESQ. Mr. Atchley is the Secretary of PURE Bioscience and currently practices as a sole practitioner in Oceanside, California handling corporate and business related litigation matters. A 1973 graduate of Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles and a 1976 graduate of California Western School of Law in San Diego, California, Mr. Atchley is a member of the California Bar, the San Diego County Bar Association, and the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego. .

GREGORY H. BARNHILL Mr. Barnhill is a Partner and member of the Board of Brown Advisory Securities, LLC. Previously, Mr. Barnhill served as Managing Director of North American Equity Sales at Deutsche Banc Alex.Brown Inc., Baltimore, MD. He joined the firm in 1975, following his graduation from Brown University with an AB degree in economics.

DENNIS BROVARONE Mr. Brovarone has been practicing corporate and securities law since 1986 and as a sole practitioner since 1990. He was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors in April 1996. From January 2002 to the present, Mr. Brovarone serves on the Board of Directors of Shannon International, Inc., a publicly held Nevada corporation.

GARY W. BROWNELL Mr. Brownell served as the CFO for PURE Bioscience from 1996 through June 2005 and has been a Director of PURE Bioscience since 1996.

ANDREW J. BUCKLAND Mr. Buckland joined PURE Bioscience as its Chief Financial Officer in 2005. Prior to joining PURE, Mr. Buckland served as Vice President of Finance at Cardionet, Inc. Previous to that, Mr. Buckland served as Chief Financial Officer and as Chief Accounting Officer of Advanced Tissue Sciences, a public biotechnology company based in San Diego. He earned an MBA from the University of California, Irvine and a BA (with Honors) from the University of the West of England Business School.

MICHAEL L. KRALL Mr. Krall is the President, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors of PURE Bioscience, a position he has held since 1993.

DONNA SINGER Ms. Singer is the Executive Vice President of PURE Bioscience and has been a director since 1997. From 1996-1998, Ms. Singer served as Vice President of Operations for the Company.

D. MICHAEL SITTON Mr. Sitton owns Sitton Properties, a commercial real estate development corporation with current holdings in Missouri, Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas and Texas. Mr. Sitton also owns American Ramp Transit and is a controlling partner in Blue Sky Realty, Polo Outdoor Media, Power Plus Igniter, Silverhorn Holdings and Enviroguard Sciences LLC.

TOMMY G. THOMPSON Secretary Thompson is currently the Independent Chairman of the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, a partner at the law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &Feld, and President of Logistics Health Incorporated. Secretary Thompson served as HHS Secretary from 2001 to 2005 and as Governor of Wisconsin from 1987-2001. Secretary Thompson also serves as a director on the boards of Centene Corporation and CR Bard, Inc.

Family Relationships
There is no family relationship between any Director, executive or person nominated or chosen by PURE Bioscience to become a Director or executive officer.

Audit Committee
The Board of Directors does not have an audit committee. The functions of the audit committee are currently performed by the entire board of directors. PURE Bioscience is under no legal obligation to establish an audit committee and has elected not to do so at this time so as to avoid the time and expense of identifying independent directors willing to serve on the audit committee. PURE Bioscience may establish an audit committee in the future if the board determines it to be advisable or we are otherwise required to do so by applicable law, rule or regulation.

As the board of directors does not have an audit committee, it therefore has no “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B. In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual member of the audit committee who understands Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and financial statements; is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements comparable to the breadth and complexity to our financial statements; understands internal controls over financial reporting, and understands audit committee functions.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock beneficially owned as of June 22, 2006 by individual directors and executive officers and by all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Based upon a review of the Company's shareholders list as of June 22, 2006, there are no registered holders of five percent or more of the Company's Common Stock. As of June 22, 2006, there were 23,750,002 shares outstanding.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title	Common Stock Ownership	Percentage of Shares Outstanding (%)

Dennis Atchley	Secretary	558,301 (1)	2	.30
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Gregory Barnhill	Director	994,000 (2)	4	.02
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Dennis Brovarone	Director	1,121,067 (3)	4	.51
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Gary Brownell	Director	1,064,905 (4)	4	.29
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Andrew J. Buckland	Chief Financial Officer,	400,000 (5)	1	.66
1725 Gillespie Way	Principal Accounting Officer
El Cajon, CA 92020

Michael L. Krall	President, CEO/Chairman	2,362,122 (6)	9	.05
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Donna Singer	Executive VP, Director	1,272,758 (7)	5	.09
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

D. Michael Sitton	Director	877,000 (8)	3	.56
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Tommy G. Thompson	Director	196,000 (9)	0	.82
1725 Gillespie Way
El Cajon, CA 92020

Directors and Officers as a Group
(9 individuals)		8,846,153 (10)	27	.14

(1)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 440,000 shares.

(2)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 789,000 shares.

(3)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 985,000 shares.

(4)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 950,000 shares.

(5)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 400,000 shares.

(6)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 1,650,000 shares.

(7)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 1,200,000 shares.

(8)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 377,000 shares.

(9)

Includes presently exercisable options to acquire up to 196,000 shares.

(10)

Includes presently exercisable options held by all of the above officers and directors to acquire up to 6,987,000 shares.

Description of Securities

We are authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of its no par value common stock. Each share is entitled to one vote on matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders. There is no cumulative voting of the common stock. The common stock shares have no redemption provisions nor any preemptive rights. We are also authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, the rights and preferences of which may be set from time to time prior to issuance by the Board of Directors. 8,157,376 shares of common stock of PURE Bioscience and 1,020,220 shares of common stock of PURE Bioscience issuable upon exercise of options and warrants are being offered by the Selling Securities Holders. The options and warrants include the following issuances: (1) A total of 395,220 warrants were issued to the placement agents in connection with that firm’s placement of shares sold in March 2006. These warrants entitle the holders to acquire up to 395,220 shares of common stock at $ 2.556 per share on or before March 24, 2011; (2) an option on a total of 225,000 shares was issued in March 2005 in connection with investor relations services. This option entitles the holder to acquire up to 225,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share on or before March 18, 2007; (3) two options totaling 350,000 shares were issued in February 2005 in connection with investor relations services. This option entitles the holders to acquire up to 350,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share on or before February 14, 2008; and (4) an option totaling 50,000 shares was issued in December 2005 in connection with investor relations services. This option entitles the holder to acquire up to 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share on or before February 14, 2008.

Experts and Interest of Named Counsel

Miller and McCollom, Certified Public Accountants, Lakewood, Colorado our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our financial statements included in this prospectus and registration statement to the extent and for the periods set forth in its audit report. Miller and McCollom has presented its report with respect to our audited financial statements. We have included these financial statements in the prospectus in reliance on the report of Miller and McCollom, given on its authority as experts in account and auditing.

Dennis Brovarone, Esq., 1725 Gillespie Way, El Cajon, California, is a Director of PURE Bioscience. Mr. Brovarone served as our expert in connection with the registration statement, has passed on the legality of the common stock offered by this prospectus, and received a $15,000 fee in connection with the registration statement and this prospectus.

Disclosure of Commission Position of Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws include an indemnification provision under which we have agreed to indemnify our directors and officers from and against certain claims arising from or related to future acts or omissions as a director or officer. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Organization within Last Five Years

PURE Bioscience was incorporated in the State of California on August 24, 1992, to pursue the immediate business of manufacturing and marketing the Fillmaster® pharmaceutical water purification and dispensing equipment line.

In September 2003, shareholders approved a name change from Innovative Medical Services to PURE Bioscience. The name change reflected our increasing focus on the development and commercialization of our silver dihydrogen citrate antimicrobial technology.

In May 2005, we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division, which included the Fillmaster® line of products, to Maryland-based Innovative Medical Services, LLC for $2,375,000. At closing, we received $1,950,000 in cash and a promissory note in the amount of $425,000. In June, we received a cash payment of $225,000, and in August, subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, we received the balance of $200,000 plus interest on the promissory note. As a result of the sale, we are now primarily focused on further development and commercialization of our silver dihydrogen citrate antimicrobial technology.

Description of Business

PURE Bioscience was incorporated in the State of California in 1992 as a provider of pharmaceutical water purification products, however we are now developing into markets with broader potential with new, proprietary bioscience products based upon our patented silver ion antimicrobial technologies and patent pending boric acid based pesticide technologies. In May 2005, we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division to Maryland-based Innovative Medical Services, LLC for $2,375,000. We used a portion of the proceeds of the sale to retire substantially all debt, and the remainder to capitalize the continuing commercialization of our current and future bioscience products.

Bioscience Technology
Our flagship bioscience technology is an aqueous disinfectant, Silver Dihydrogen Citrate (“SDC”). A patented new molecule, SDC is an electrolytically generated source of stabilized ionic silver that can serve as the basis for a broad range of products in diverse markets. SDC liquid is colorless, odorless, tasteless, non-caustic and formulates well with other compounds. As a platform technology, our SDC-based antimicrobial is distinguished from competitors in the marketplace because of its superior efficacy combined with reduced toxicity. We produce and market pre-formulated, ready-to-use products, as well as varying strengths of SDC concentrate as an additive or raw material for inclusion in other companies’ products.

We currently have Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registration for our 2400-parts per million (ppm) technical grade SDC concentrate (trade name Axenohl®) as well as for our Axen® and Axen®30 hard surface disinfectant products for commercial, industrial and consumer applications including restaurants, homes and medical facilities. The Axen30 EPA registration includes a 30 second kill time on standard indicator bacteria, a 24 hour residual kill on standard indicator bacteria, a 2 minute kill time on some resistant strains of bacteria, 10 minute kill time on fungi, 30 second kill time on HIV Type I, and 10 minute kill time on other viruses. These claims distinguish the efficacy of Axen30 from many of the leading commercial and consumer products currently on the market, while maintaining lower toxicity ratings. Based on the EPA toxicity categorization of antimicrobial products that ranges from Category I (high toxicity) down to Category IV, Axen30 is an EPA Category IV antimicrobial for which precautionary labeling statements are normally not required. This compares with Category II warning statements for most leading brands of disinfectant products.

Our technology also shows promise as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial and anti-fungal for use in human and veterinary healthcare products. We have chosen to pursue approvals through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by partnering with Therapeutics, Incorporated, which has assumed responsibility for funding and managing the testing and regulatory process for selected potential FDA regulated SDC-based products. Therapeutics, Incorporated is focusing on development of SDC-based products for the treatment of bacterial, viral and fungal mediated diseases and conditions, beginning with women’s health products and acne treatment products. Therapeutics, Incorporated expects its development work will result in multiple Investigational New Drug (IND) filings with the US FDA.

We also market a patent-pending pesticide technology, Triglycylboride™ which, like SDC, provides effective results without human toxicity and is an alternative to traditional poisons. Triglycylboride has been formulated into EPA registered RoachX® and AntX™, the key products in our Innovex® line of pest control products. In addition, the Innovex® line features our EPA-exempt non-toxic TrapX® rodent lure, and our EPA registered CleanKill™, the SDC-based hard surface disinfectant for the pest control industry. The pest control products are being marketed to both commercial pest control and consumer products companies.

Manufacturing
We manufacture and blend the silver dihydrogen citrate products in our manufacturing facility at our corporate headquarters. As production quantities increase, we may choose to outsource blending and packaging operations; however, we plan to maintain the manufacturing operation for our silver dihydrogen citrate concentrate. Silver, the primary active ingredient, is a readily available commodity, and the other active and inactive ingredients of silver dihydrogen citrate are readily available from chemical supply companies.

We manufacture RoachX, AntX and TrapX in our manufacturing facility at our corporate offices and outsource some of the packaging functions. The active and inactive ingredients of these products are readily available through multiple manufacturers in the US and abroad.

Principal Reliance on Single Product
Our principal technology is an aqueous antimicrobial, silver dihydrogen citrate (“SDC”), a patented molecule which we sell as ready-to-use formulations and in concentrate form for incorporation into numerous third party products and applications. We expect that sales of SDC will constitute a substantial portion of net sales during the fiscal year ending July 31, 2006. Any material decrease in the overall level of sales of, or the prices for SDC, whether as a result of competition, change in consumer demand, or any other factor, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Patents and Trademarks
On November 30, 2001, we acquired the patent for our silver dihydrogen citrate and its method of making. We previously licensed the use of this patent. We purchased the patent for 700,000 shares of our common stock plus certain expenses.

The first United States patent for silver dihydrogen citrate was issued on March 6, 2001, and a supplemental patent has been filed to cover the substitution of 14 other organic acids for citric acid in the formulation. In June 2003, we received a second United States patent granted for silver dihydrogen citrate that covers the formulation of the aqueous disinfectant in combination with ethyl alcohol. In addition, PURE has received patents in Australia and New Zealand as well as in the EAPC (Eurasian Patent Community) and the OAPI (Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle). Patent applications are pending in Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Mexico, the EPO (European Patent Office) and the ARIPO (African Regional Industrial Property Organization). These foreign patent applications were filed through the Patent Cooperation Treaty and were published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (www.wipo.org) as Number WO 99/18790 on April 22, 1999.

In May 2004, we filed an additional United States patent covering multiple potential uses for our SDC technology including the treatment of specific types of bacteria, fungus and viruses, as well as medical treatment and the preservation of consumable and non-consumable products. The additional Disinfectant and Method of Use patent application was the seventh SDC related patent application filed in the United States covering inventive aspects of manufacturing, composition and formulations of our SDC technology. In addition, in August 2004, we filed a utility patent application to protect our proprietary silver dihydrogen citrate disinfectant in combination with other antimicrobial compounds, including quaternary ammonia, oxidizers or halogens such as chlorine, bromine or iodine.

In August 2004, we filed a utility patent application to protect our proprietary silver dihydrogen citrate disinfectant in combination with other antimicrobial compounds, including quaternary ammonia, oxidizers or halogens such as chlorine, bromine or iodine.

In November 2004, we filed a utility patent application to protect anhydrous, or crystalline, silver dihydrogen citrate antimicrobial compositions, processes of making and methods of use.

A patent application for RoachX and related products was filed in February 1998 to protect a nonaqueous form of insecticide consisting of a desiccant, preferably boric acid, with additional ingredients for binding, stability and target insect attraction.

We own the registered trademarks or trademark applications for PURE Bioscience™, Axenohl®, Axen®, Silvérion®, Kinderguard™, Innovex™, RoachX®, AntX®, TrapX® and Medifier®.

Government Regulation and Approval
We manufacture and sell pesticide and antimicrobial products that are regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) under Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). We have five products registered by the U.S. EPA; two pesticides, AntX and RoachX, and three antimicrobial pesticides, Axen, Axen30 and Axenohl. As we continue to develop new products, we will require a registration from the US EPA in order to market our products in the United States. There is no guarantee that the US EPA will grant a registration for the products we submit.

In addition, each of the 50 United States has its own government agency that regulates pesticide sales into their state. Prior to distributing a product into any of these states, a registration from the state is required. We market our pesticide and antimicrobial products to third party distributors who are responsible for obtaining these state registrations. Should we begin to directly market our own brands, we would first need to obtain a registration for each state to which we will distribute product.

We have chosen to pursue approvals through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by partnering with Therapeutics, Incorporated, which has assumed responsibility for funding and managing the testing and regulatory process for potential FDA regulated silver dihydrogen citrate-based products. Therapeutics, Incorporated is focusing on development of silver dihydrogen citrate-based products for the treatment of bacterial, viral and fungal mediated diseases and conditions. Therapeutics, Incorporated expects its development work will result in multiple Investigational New Drug (IND) filings with the US FDA. There is no guarantee that the US FDA will grant approvals for the products we or our partners may submit.

In addition, if we should be begin to sell our products internationally, we will have to gain all necessary regulatory approvals or registrations in each specific country in which our products would be sold. We are not currently selling product outside of the US and have not begun to undertake obtaining any international regulatory approvals or registrations.

We are unaware of any other existing or probable governmental regulation that would affect our business, but there is no guarantee that our business will not be impacted by additional federal or state regulations.

Research and Development
Research and Development costs that have no alternative future uses are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses. The total amounts we charged to Research and Development expense were $1,357,000 and $1,133,000 in the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Costs and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws
There is an annual fee of $3,600 per product to maintain the registration with the U.S. EPA. The maximum fee is $151,000 for 68 or more product registrations. The current annual fees for registering a pesticide or antimicrobial in all 50 states are approximately $10,200.

Employees
As of June 22, 2006, we employ thirteen people, twelve of whom are full-time employees.

Where You Can Get More Information

Our common stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “PURE.” We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.

You may read and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of our documents by writing to the SEC and paying a fee for the copying cost. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information about the operation of the public reference facilities. SEC filings are also available at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 30, 2006 versus Three Months Ended April 30, 2005
In May 2005, we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division and are now completely focused on the development of our bioscience technologies. In the financial statements included in this Report on Form 10Q-SB, the Water Treatment division is included as a Discontinued Operation in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows presented for comparative purposes relating to the periods ending April 30, 2005.

We are at an early stage in the development and marketing of our bioscience technologies in highly competitive markets, and we anticipate that market acceptance of our novel technology may be a long term achievement. Even when our SDC products have been approved by regulatory authorities and are available for commercial sale, there is often an extended period of time in which potential users formulate and test them before committing to significant purchases. Each formulation of our products requires regulatory approval for each respective jurisdiction in which it is sold, and in addition to competitive challenges, we believe that the investment necessary to pursue research, testing and regulatory approval for SDC-based products will continue to be significant. However, we believe we are in a position to accelerate additional regulatory approvals and negotiate distribution, development and marketing agreements for the inclusion of SDC into multiple global products. For example, during the quarter ended January 31, 2006, we announced that we had entered into a supply and distribution agreement with Enviroguard Sciences LLC, initially for the supply and distribution of our hard surface disinfectant. As a result of this and other agreements, we expect sales of our SDC-based products and, to a lesser extent, our pesticide products, to accelerate in future periods.

During the quarter ended April 30, 2006, revenues of $44,300 increased by 7% over the quarter ended April 30, 2005. Gross profit for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 was $21,700 versus $17,800 in the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. The gross margin percentage improved from 43% in the prior year to 49% in the current period. The improvement is due to a favorable product mix, offsetting the absorption of the overhead costs of our manufacturing facility over a smaller number of products during the period ended April 30, 2006 than in the prior period. During the quarter ended April 30, 2005, we absorbed such costs over the products of the Water Treatment Division in addition to our bioscience products.

Operating costs increased from $534,700 in the quarter ended April 30, 2005, to $912,900 in the quarter ended April 30, 2006. Within these operating cost totals, selling expenses increased by $99,900, to $168,700 in the current quarter compared with the same quarter in the prior fiscal year. The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to fees and prepaid option expense amortization and other costs associated with the introduction of silver dihydrogen citrate products to new partners, and to pending product launches. General and administrative expenses increased by $210,300, to $411,700 in the quarter ended April 30, 2006, compared with the quarter ended April 30, 2005. The increase in expense for the most recent quarter is primarily due to consulting fees and option expenses related to investments in corporate infrastructure. In addition and to a lesser extent, insurance and accounting fees increased year over year. Over the same period, research and development costs, including patent, license and product registration expenditures, increased by 30% to $332,500, primarily due to increased consulting fees and option expenses. Our research and development expense primarily includes costs associated with the continuing development of our silver dihydrogen citrate technology and related investments in patents, licenses, product registrations with regulatory agencies, and in formulation and method development.

Our net loss from operations before taxes, excluding earnings from the Water Treatment Division prior to its sale, increased by $342,700, from a net loss of $528,800 in the quarter ended April 30, 2005 to a net loss of $871,500 in the quarter ended April 30, 2006. Earnings from the Water Treatment Division in the quarter ended April 30, 2005, shown in the Statements of Operations as “Income from discontinued operations,” were $92,200, resulting in a consolidated net loss in the prior period of $436,500.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended April 30, 2006 versus Nine Months Ended April 30, 2005
In the financial statements included in this Report on Form 10Q-SB, the Water Treatment division, which was sold in May 2005, is included as a Discontinued Operation in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows presented for comparative purposes relating to the periods ending April 30, 2005.

During the nine months ended April 30, 2006, revenues of $158,900 increased by 35% over the nine months ended April 30, 2005. Gross profit for the nine months ended April 30, 2006 was $92,300 versus $72,400 in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The gross margin percentage declined from 61% to 58% over the same period, primarily as we are now absorbing the overhead costs of our manufacturing facility over a smaller number of products. In the prior fiscal year we absorbed such costs over the products of the Water Treatment Division in addition to our bioscience products.

Operating costs increased from $1,986,800 in the nine months ended April 30, 2005, to $2,504,800 in the nine months ended April 30, 2006. Included in these totals, selling expenses increased by $47,200, to $410,400 in the current period compared with the same nine months in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to costs associated with the introduction of silver dihydrogen citrate products to new partners and to pending product launches. General and administrative expenses increased by $580,500, to $1,278,400 in the nine months ended April 30, 2006, compared with the nine months ended April 30, 2005. The increase in expense is primarily due to expenses for investor relations and investment consulting services, investments in corporate infrastructure, and to a lesser extent, increases in insurance and accounting fees. Research and development costs declined by $109,600 or 12% over the same period, to $716,000 for the nine months ended April 30, 2006, primarily due to a reduction in patent related legal fees.

Our net loss from operations before taxes, excluding earnings from the Water Treatment Division prior to its sale, increased by $466,600, from a net loss of $1,933,500 in the nine months ended April 30, 2005 to a net loss of $2,400,100 in the same period of the current fiscal year. Earnings from the Water Treatment Division in the nine months ended April 30, 2005, shown in the Statements of Operations as “Income from discontinued operations”, were $483,400, resulting in a consolidated net loss in the prior period of $1,450,100.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
From inception through the present, we have financed our operations primarily through our initial public offering in August of 1996, by subsequent private placement stock sales, and in May 2005 by the sale of our Water Treatment Division.

In March 2005 we paid off a $300,000 convertible debenture and had $535,000 in loans forgiven in partial consideration for the return of a trust deed. In addition, in May 2005 we paid off a $600,000 line of credit and a $90,000 loan. As a result of these transactions, we currently have no long-term debt.

In May 2005, we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division to Maryland-based Innovative Medical Services, LLC (IMS LLC) for $2,375,000. IMS LLC also assumed all liabilities associated with the Division. At closing, we received $1,950,000 in cash and a promissory note in the amount of $425,000. In June 2005, we received a cash payment of $225,000, leaving a $200,000 promissory note (“Notes receivable”) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at July 31, 2005. During the first quarter of the current fiscal year, we received the balance of $200,000 plus interest of $3,900 on the promissory note.

We agreed to continue to fund the working capital of IMS LLC subsequent to the sale of the Water Treatment Division, until such time as IMS LLC had in place their appropriate legal and tax registrations, in order to enable the continuation of payroll and an uninterrupted supply of materials and components for the business. At July 31, 2005, we had funded $132,521 of working capital on IMS LLC’s behalf, as shown in “Other receivables” on the balance sheet as at July 31, 2005. During the first quarter of the current fiscal year, in addition to the payment of the promissory note, IMS LLC reimbursed us for the working capital we had provided subsequent to the sale. We are no longer providing any working capital for IMS LLC.

As at April 30, 2006 we had current assets of $6,057,400, an increase of $5,118,500 from July 31, 2005. The increase is primarily due to $5.9 million of cash received from our March 2006 private placement. Under the private placement, we issued 3,952,209 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share to accredited investors, for a total of $6,521,145. Net proceeds to us, after fees and expenses, were $5,911,608. The placement agent also received a warrant to purchase 355,698 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.556. On April 24 2006, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission as required under the placement agreement, for the resale of shares issued in the private placement. The registration statement included all shares of common stock issued in the private placement, as well as the shares to be issued upon the exercise of the warrants. Under the terms of the placement agreement, as amended on April 21, 2006, if the registration statement is not declared effective within 150 days of the filing date (April 24, 2006), we will be subject to liquidated damage penalties. We will be obligated to pay to each investor a cash penalty of two percent (2%) of their purchase price for each thirty (30) day period, or any part thereof, beyond the 150 day period, until the registration statement is declared effective; however the maximum cash payment to each investor is thirty-six percent (36%) of such investor’s purchase price. The maximum potential liquidated damage payment of 59.4 cents per share, or $2,347,612, is classified as temporary equity on the balance sheet. Under the terms of the placement agreement, as amended on April 21, 2006, there are no liquidated damage penalties associated with the warrants.

Within the increase of $5,118,500 in current assets from July 31, 2005, the $5.9 million of cash received from the March 2006 private placement is only partially offset by a reduction in Notes receivable and Other receivables as discussed above, and by cash used in our operations as outlined in the analysis later in this section. At April 30, 2006 we had current liabilities of $319,100, a decrease of $34,200 from July 31, 2005.

In the nine months ended April 30, 2006, property, plant and equipment increased by $44,200 to $196,100. Subsequent to our private placement in March 2006, we have commenced planned investments in our manufacturing and information technology infrastructure. Other assets increased by $337,000 over the nine months through April 30, 2006, primarily due to the recording of unvested options as a prepaid asset (“Prepaid consulting”) which will be amortized over the life of associated consulting agreements. See Note 7 to the financial statements included in this Report on Form 10Q-SB for further details of this transaction. The $473,700 of prepaid consulting on the balance sheet as at April 30, 2006 was partially offset by an excess of patent amortization over patent capitalization during the nine months through April 30, 2006, and approximately $30,000 of capitalized patents that were written off in the current fiscal year and which related to Water Treatment Division technology that was not acquired by IMS LLC. The capitalized value of patents and licenses at April 30, 2006, primarily related to our silver dihydrogen citrate technology, was $2,076,700.

Net cash flow for the nine months ended April 30, 2006, was $5,392,700, compared with net cash flow of $146,100 for the same period of the prior fiscal year. Net cash outlows from operating activities were $1,541,400 for the nine months ended April 30, 2006. Excluding the receivables associated with the sale of the Water Treatment Division as discussed above, net operating cash outflows were $1,873,900. Net operating cash outflows for the same nine months of the previous fiscal year were $1,799,600, or $1,316,200 when excluding cash generated from the operation of the Water Treatment Division as a discontinued operation. The increase in cash outflows in the current fiscal year is due to both increased cash expense and investment in inventory, infrastructure and research and development, and the use of working capital; in the nine months ended April 30, 2005, accounts payable and accrued liabilities grew by $515,100, whereas in the same period of the current fiscal year they declined by $31,400.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $7,041,600 in the nine months ended April 30, 2006, compared with $1,441,000 in the same period of the previous fiscal year, the most significant factor being proceeds from sale of common stock, which were $7,041,600, including temporary equity, in the current period and $1,681,000 during the period ended April 30, 2005.

In November 2005, we sold 39,999 shares of common stock in a private placement to an accredited investor, for $0.75 per share (a total value of $30,000). In January 2006, we sold 500,000 shares of unregistered common stock in a private placement to an unaffiliated, accredited investor at $0.75 per share (a total value of $375,000). In February 2006, we sold 500,000 shares of unregistered common stock in a private placement to a director of the Company, at $0.90 per share. In the same month, we received $10,000 from the exercise of a warrant to purchase 33,333 shares of unregistered common stock. In March 2006, we conducted a private placement in which we issued 3,952,209 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share to accredited investors, for a total of $6,521,145, resulting in net proceeds to us of $5,911,608 (See Note 4 for further details of this transaction). Also in March 2006, we received $12,500 from the exercise of an option on 25,000 shares of common stock, and $75,000 from the exercise of an option on 50,000 shares of common stock. Additionally, we received $41,040 from the exercise of an option on 72,000 shares of common stock issued under an employee option plan. In April 2006, we received $40,810 from the exercise of an option on 77,000 shares of common stock. In the same month, we received the following amounts from the exercise of options under employee option plans: $2,500 from an option on 5,000 shares of common stock, $15,960 from an option on 28,000 shares of common stock, and $8,250 from an option on 16,500 shares of common stock. Additionally in April 2006, we received $15,900 from the exercise of an option on 30,000 shares of common stock under the Directors and Officers Option Plan.

With respect to sales of our common stock made during the periods presented herein, we relied on Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The securities were offered solely to accredited or sophisticated investors, who were provided all of the current public information available on PURE Bioscience.

In the nine months ended April 30, 2005, the sale of common stock of $1,681,000 included a private placement which consisted of 125,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.39 per share and a one-year option to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock at $1.50 valued at $1,154, for a total of $50,000; the sale of 80,000 shares of common stock for $40,000 ($0.50 per share); two private placements valued at $200,000 (366,667 shares of common stock at an average price of $0.5455 per share); the receipt of $150,000 from the exercise of 300,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share; a private placement of 60,000 shares of common stock at $0.49 per share and a one-year warrant to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 valued at $674, for a total of $30,000; and the receipt of $10,500 from the exercise of an employee option. Additionally, during the three months ending April 30, 2005 we conducted private placements consisting of 1,330,000 shares of common stock issued between $0.30 and $0.50 per share for a total value of $605,000, a private placement in which we sold two units of Company securities, each unit consisting of 200,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.449 per share and a one-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $1.00, and a private placement which consisted of 458,329 shares of common stock issued a $.60 per share for the total value of $275,000. We also received $120,500 from the exercise of options.

At April 30, 2006 we had remaining cash and cash equivalents of $5,798,600. Future investments are expected to include development and expansion of our infrastructure and manufacturing capacity, product launches, research and development projects, and regulatory submissions.

Valuation of Intangible Assets
SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and other intangible assets be tested for impairment on an annual basis, and in certain circumstances between annual tests. Recoverability of assets to be held for use is based on expectations of future discounted cash flows from the related operations, and when circumstances dictate, we adjust the asset to the extent the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. Our impairment review process is based on the discounted future cash flow approach that uses our estimates of revenue driven by assumed market segment share and estimated costs. Also included in our analysis is an estimate of revenues expected from our agreement with Therapeutics, Incorporated (“Therapeutics”). We entered into an agreement with Therapeutics in September 2003, which was amended and expanded in April 2006, for the development and commercialization of certain FDA regulated silver dihydrogen citrate based products, where Therapeutics is responsible for development activities and regulatory filings. In the agreement, Therapeutics has agreed to reimburse us for pre-contract acquisition and development costs of the silver dihydrogen citrate intellectual property as well as reimbursement for ongoing intellectual property costs associated with silver dihydrogen citrate. Following the reimbursement of both Therapeutics’ and our costs, depending on the type of product, we will receive a minimum of 40% of all sales proceeds, licensing fees, royalty payments and all other forms of cash and non-cash consideration received by the two parties. We will also realize revenues from the sale of silver dihydrogen citrate raw material as an active ingredient.

Judgments made by us related to the expected useful lives of long-lived assets and our ability to realize discounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amounts of such assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing maintenance and improvements of the assets and changes in economic and market conditions. As we assess the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, these factors could cause us to realize a material impairment charge, which would result in decreased results of operations and a decrease in the carrying value of these assets on our consolidated balance sheet

Description of Property

Our business operates in a 13,067 square foot facility located in a light industrial/office park in El Cajon, California. This location houses all administrative, executive, sales, manufacturing and shipping functions. The space is leased from an unaffiliated third party under a sixty-five month agreement commencing on July 1, 1996. On May 14, 1996, we entered into an operating lease agreement for our home office which expires (under extension) in October 2006. As part of the agreement to sell the assets of the Water Treatment Division to Innovative Medical Services, LLC, we entered into a sublease agreement with IMS LLC which terminates concurrently with our master lease. Under the sublease agreement, IMS LLC occupies approximately 28% of the square footage of the facility and pays us $3,760 per month in rent. However the obligation for making payments under the master lease remains with us until the end of the current lease term.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Effective January 2006, the Directors of PURE Bioscience elected D. Michael Sitton to the Board of Directors. In connection with his appointment to the Board and in accordance with Company policy, the Company granted Mr. Sitton a fully vested option to purchase 100,000 shares of Company stock at an exercise price of $0.85 per share. In late 2005, Sitton established Enviroguard Sciences LLC to market and sell PURE’s silver dihydrogen citrate-based products, beginning with the hard surface disinfectant. PURE has entered into a supply and distribution agreement with Enviroguard Sciences LLC, and has retained Sitton as a business development consultant. PURE has entered into a two-year consulting agreement with Sitton for domestic and international business development, the compensation for which is a fee of $12,500 per month and an option on one million seven hundred thousand shares of PURE Bioscience unregistered common stock which vests as follows:


Vesting Date Exercise Price Amount Vested	6/01/06 $1.00 277,000	12/01/06 $1.50 277,000	6/01/07 $1.75 296,000	12/01/07 $2.00 296,000	6/01/08 $2.50 277,000	12/01/08 $2.75 277,000

No family relationships exist between Mr. Sitton and PURE Bioscience, its directors or officers.

Effective February 23, 2006, the Directors of PURE Bioscience elected Tommy G. Thompson, former United States Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and former four-term Governor of Wisconsin, to its Board of Directors. In connection with his appointment to the Board and in accordance with Company policy, the Company granted Secretary Thompson a fully vested option to purchase 100,000 shares of Company stock at an exercise price of $0.85 per share, fair market value on the date of the offer.

PURE has entered into a two-year consulting agreement with Secretary Thompson for domestic and international business development, the compensation for which is a fee of $12,500 per month and an option on six hundred thousand shares of PURE Bioscience common stock which vests as follows:


Vesting Date Exercise Price Amount Vested	6/01/06 $1.00 96,000	12/01/06 $1.50 96,000	6/01/07 $1.75 108,000	12/01/07 $2.00 108,000	6/01/08 $2.50 96,000	12/01/08 $2.75 96,000

PURE has entered into a non-exclusive supply and distribution agreement with Enviroguard Sciences LLC under which Enviroguard will market and sell PURE’s silver dihydrogen citrate-based products, beginning with the hard surface disinfectant. Secretary Thompson has an ownership stake in Enviroguard Sciences LLC.

No family relationships exist between Secretary Thompson and PURE Bioscience, its directors or officers.

Market for PURE Bioscience’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

(1)

Market Information: PURE Bioscience's common stock is traded on the Bulletin Board under the symbol "PURE."

(2)

High and Low Bid Prices: The following table sets forth high and low bid prices for each fiscal quarter, for the last three fiscal years and the recent two quarters of the current fiscal year as reported on Yahoo! Finance. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

Fiscal 2006				Fiscal 2005				Fiscal 2004
Quarter Ended	High	Low		Quarter Ended	High	Low		Quarter Ended	High	Low
April 30, 2006 January 31, 2006 October 31, 2005	$3.09 $1.49 $1.05	$1.22 $0.70 $0.68		July 31, 2005 April 30, 2005 January 31, 2005 October 31, 2004	$1.05 $1.22 $1.04 $0.55	$0.52 $0.63 $0.36 $0.35		July 31, 2004 April 30, 2004 January 31, 2004 October 31, 2003	$1.00 $1.00 $1.07 $1.07	$0.25 $0.25 $0.68 $0.53

(3)

Security Holders: As of June 22, 2006, we had approximately 378 holders of record of our common stock. This does not include beneficial owners holding common stock in street name. The closing price per share on June 22, 2006 was $2.05.

(4)

Dividend Plans: We have paid no common stock cash dividends and have no current plans to do so.

(5)

Preferred Stock: There are no shares of preferred stock presently outstanding.

(6)

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Plan Category		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders	5,269,000	$	0	.58	2,292,912

Equity compensation
plans not approved by
security holders	4,078,000	$	1	.33	1,758,000

Total	9,347,000	$	0	.91	4,050,912

The following equity compensation plans were not approved by security holders:

2001 ETIH2O Stock Option Plan: Adopted by the Board in January 2001, there are 1,000,000 shares authorized under this Plan. The options have a five-year term with vesting ratably over a five-year period. Executive Officers and Directors are not eligible participants under this plan.

2001 Consultants and Advisors Stock Option Plan: Adopted by the Board in January 2001, there are 500,000 shares authorized under this Plan. The options have a five-year term with vesting ratably over a five-year period. Executive Officers and Directors are not eligible participants under this plan.

2004 Consultants and Advisors Stock Option Plan: Adopted by the Board in April 2004, there are 2,000,000 shares authorized under this plan. The options have a five-year term with vesting ratably over a five-year period. Executive Officers and Directors are not eligible participants under this plan.

Executive Compensation
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2005, the compensation awarded or paid by the Company to its Chief Executive Officer and any of the executive officers of the Company whose total salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 during such year (The “Named Executive Officers”):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
						Long Term Compensation
	Annual Compensation					Awards	Payouts
Name and Principle Position	Year	Salary ($)		Other Annual Compensation ($)		Securities Underlying Options (#)	All Other Compensation ($)
Michael L. Krall President/CEO	2005		172,308		0	480,000 Common		0

Michael L. Krall President/CEO	2004		168,000		0	0		0

Michael L. Krall President/CEO	2003		168,000		0	50,000 Common		0

No other executive officer earned more than $100,000 during the current fiscal year.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option/Values
The following table sets forth the number and value of the unexercised options held by each of the Named Executive Officers at July 31, 2005.

Aggregate Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option Values
Name	Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized at FY-End ($)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at FY-End (#) Exercisable/Unexercisable	Value of Unexercised In-the Money Options at FY-End ($) Exercisable/Unexercisable
Michael L. Krall President/CEO	0	0	1,211,250 Common Shares/Exercisable	$353,281/Exercisable (1)

(1) Option value based on the difference between the exercise price of unexercised options and the average closing price of $0.82 for the 30 trading days ending July 31, 2005.

Employment Agreements and Executive Compensation
In April 1996, the Board of Directors approved a five-year employment agreement for Michael Krall, its President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Krall received a salary of $168,000 per year plus an amount equal to 3% of PURE Bioscience’s net income before taxes, if any, plus other benefits. The Board of Directors has extended Mr. Krall’s employment agreement for an additional year. In May 2005, the Board of Directors approved a salary increase to $200,000 per year for Mr. Krall.

Compensation of Directors
Directors are entitled to receive $300 plus reimbursement for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred for attendance at Board of Directors meetings. Directors, upon joining the Board, each receive an option on 100,000 shares at fair market value. Upon each subsequent anniversary thereof, each such Director will receive an option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at fair market value. The Plans also give the Administrative Committee discretion to award additional options.

Other Arrangements: None

Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangement
There is no compensatory plan or arrangement with respect to any individual named above which results or will result from the resignation, retirement or any other termination of employment with the Company, or from a change in the control of the Company.

PURE Bioscience
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Audited Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-2

Balance Sheets for the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004			F-3

Statements of Operations for the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004			F-4

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004			F-5

Notes to Financial Statements			F-6



Interim Financial Statements:

Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2005 and April 30, 2006 (unaudited)			F-17

Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)			F-18

Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended April 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)			F-19

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)			F-20

F-1

The Board of Directors
PURE Bioscience

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PURE Bioscience as of July 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended July 30, 2005 and 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentations. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PURE Bioscience. and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

/s/ MILLER AND McCOLLOM
MILLER AND McCOLLOM
Certified Public Accountants
4350 Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 300
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
October 28, 2005

F-2

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	July 31
	2005			2004
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	405,888		$	17,366
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $ 59,000 at July 31, 2004
8,000 at July 31, 2005		73,261			238,487
Other receivables		132,521			—
Notes receivable		200,000			—
Inventories		52,059			172,933
Prepaid expenses		72,344			—
Interest receivable		2,817			191,849

Total current assets		938,890			620,635

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment		151,990			167,173

Total property, plant and equipment		151,990			167,173

Other Assets
Trust deed receivable		—			2,035,000
Deposits		9,744			9,744
Patents and licenses		2,213,413			2,343,235

Total other assets		2,223,157			4,387,979

Assets of the water division held for resale		—			306,258
Total assets	$	3,314,037		$	5,482,045

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	191,803		$	973,581
Accrued liabilities		158,698			591,933
Income taxes payable		2,800			2,700
Notes payable		—			300,000
Loans from shareholders		—			1,135,000

Total current liabilities		353,301			3,003,214

Liabilities of the water division held for resale		—			44,464

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock		—			—
Class A common stock, no par value:
50,000,000 shares authorized
15,457,310 issued and outstanding July 31, 2004, and
17,713,306 issued and outstanding July 31, 2005		19,317,001			17,834,139
Warrants:
1,385,223 issued and outstanding July 31, 2004, and
640,929 issued and outstanding July 31, 2005		198,471			837,894
Accumulated deficit		(16,554,736	)		(16,237,666	)

Total stockholders' equity		2,960,736			2,434,367

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	3,314,037		$	5,482,045

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Years Ended July 31
	2005			2004
Net revenues	$	155,806		$	263,499
Cost of sales		51,594			130,904

Gross profit		104,212			132,595

Selling expenses		427,452			306,243
General and administrative expenses		1,330,828			1,319,774
Research and development		1,357,112			1,133,007

Total operating costs		3,115,392			2,759,024

Loss from operations		(3,011,180	)		(2,626,429	)

Other income and (expense):
Interest income		146,174			191,861
Interest expense		(109,608	)		(315,724	)
Other		(37,204	)		(70,571	)

Total other income (expense)		(638	)		(194,434	)

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(3,011,818	)		(2,820,863	)
Income tax benefit		1,164,688			218,312

Loss from continuing operations		(1,847,130	)		(2,602,551	)
Discontinued operations:
Gain on sale of Water Treatment Division		2,187,136			—
Income from operation of Water Treatment Division		510,411			515,900
Income taxes on discontinued operations		(1,167,487	)		(221,012	)

Income from discontinued operations		1,530,060			294,888

Net loss after taxes	$	(317,070	)	$	(2,307,663	)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.19	)
Discontinued operations		0.09			0.02

Net loss	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.17	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Years Ended July 31
	2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(317,070	)	$	(2,307,663	)

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Amortization		158,184			177,045
Depreciation		110,146			98,402
Services and interest paid for with stock and warrants		808,139			462,770
Pre-tax income from discontinued operations		(510,411	)		(515,900	)
Pre-tax gain on sale of discontinued operations		(2,187,136	)		—

Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		32,705			(74,592	)
(Increase) decrease in due from officers and employees		—			61
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expense		(72,344	)		6,654
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable		189,032			(191,849	)
(Increase) decrease in inventory		120,874			(53,697	)
(Increase) decrease in deposits		—			(403	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(781,778	)		(105,547	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued cash liabilities		(447,770	)		486,372

Increase (decrease) in income tax payable		100			—


Net cash (used) in operating activities		(2,897,330	)		(2,018,347	)

Cash flows from investing activities

Investment in patents and licenses		(28,362	)		(45,000	)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(94,963	)		(16,551	)


Net cash (used) in investing activities		(123,325	)		(61,551	)

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from debt obligations		—			100,000
Payment of notes payable		(300,000	)		—
Proceeds from loans from shareholders		90,000			—
Payment of loans from shareholders		(690,000	)		—
Proceeds from sale of common stock		1,681,000			1,182,075


Net cash provided by financing activities		781,000			1,282,075

Cash flows from discontinued operations:

Proceeds from sale of Water Treatment Division		2,175,000			—
Cash flows from operation of Water Treatment Division		543,727			564,102


Net cash from discontinued operations		2,718,727			564,102


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	479,073		$	(233,721	)


Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		17,366			251,087

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	496,439		$	17,366


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	149,835		$	166,236
Cash paid for taxes	$	3,416		$	—
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issue / (reacquisition) of stock in exchange for trust deed	$	(1,735,700	)	$	1,600,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
See Independent Accountants’ Report

Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies of PURE Bioscience (formerly Innovative Medical Services) is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements. The financial statements are stated in United States of America dollars.

Organization and Business Activity

PURE Bioscience was incorporated as Innovative Medical Services in San Diego, California on August 24, 1992 as a provider of pharmaceutical water purification products. In September 2003, the Company effected a name change, as approved by shareholders, to PURE Bioscience.

In October of 1998, the Company formed a subsidiary, EXCOA Nevada to purchase the assets of Export Company of America, Inc. (EXCOA), a privately held Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based distributor of disposable medical, dental and veterinary supplies. The major asset of this company was its 45% interest in Ampromed Comercio Importacao E Exportacao Ltda (AMPROMED), a Rio de Janeiro-based import company that sells medical, dental and veterinary supplies and water filtration products to practitioners, retail outlets and government agencies. We acquired the remaining 55% interest in AMPROMED from a private individual and transferred it to EXCOA Nevada.

In November 2000, PURE Bioscience acquired 100% of the stock of ETIH2O, Inc., a privately held technology corporation that developed silver dihydrogen citrate and its associated brands, Axenohl and Axen.

Subsequent to the acquisition of ETIH2O, our business activity was divided into two basic business segments, the Bioscience Division and the Water Treatment Division. The Bioscience Division is our primary business and consists of the production, sale and licensing of silver ion bioscience technologies and boric acid based pesticides. In May 2005 we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division to Maryland-based Innovative Medical Services, LLC.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying financial statements include the consolidated accounts of PURE Bioscience and its subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition

Generally, we recognize income based upon concluded arrangements with customers and when all events have occurred by delivery or performance.

Revenue for Bioscience products is recognized as product is shipped to customers, free on board from either our facility or third party packagers.

Revenue was recognized for products and Customer Service Plans within the Water Treatment Division, prior to its divestiture in May 2005, as revenue from discontinued operations. Customer acceptance provisions and installation procedures accompanying delivery were minor in nature, and we did not experience any material expense in satisfying warranties and returns. Most of the Division’s chain customers had entered into multi-year contracts for the Customer Service Plan 2000. The Plan provided an extended warranty on Fillmaster pharmacy products; significant discounts on maintenance item costs; free software upgrades for the Fillmaster 1000e and Scanmaster; automatic replacement filter shipments; and simplified, annual invoicing. When the customer bought a dispenser on the Customer Service Plan 2000 it agreed to pay a fixed annual fee that covered replacement filters and parts. The filters were normally replaced once a year. In order to match income with related costs, and for simplicity in accounting and billing, we billed the customer the annual fee and recognized revenue in the same month that we shipped replacement filters to the store. This was done one year after the store was added to the Plan and each year thereafter. Subsequent to the sale of the Water Treatment Division in May 2005, we no longer recognize revenue for Fillmaster or Scanmaster products or Customer Service Plans.

Accounts Receivable

We sell on terms of cash or net 30 days. Invoices not paid within stated terms are considered delinquent. We analyze our accounts receivable periodically and recognize an allowance for doubtful accounts based on estimated collectibility. Individual accounts deemed uncollectible are charged to the allowance. At July 31, 2005, $8,000 was considered past due, determined at 90 days after invoice date.

Stock-Based Compensation

We follow FASB Statement No. 123, ‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation’ (‘FAS 123’). The provisions of FAS 123 allow companies to either expense the estimated fair value of stock options or to continue to follow the intrinsic value method set forth in APB Opinion 25, ‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’ (‘APB 25’) but disclose the pro forma effects on net income (loss) had the fair value of the options been expensed. We have elected to continue to apply the methods of APB 25 in accounting for our stock option plans. For awards that generate compensation expense as defined under APB 25, we calculate the amount of expenses and recognize the expense over the vesting period of the award.

F-6

Research and Development

Research and Development costs that have no alternative future uses are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses. The total amount charged to Research and Development expense was $1,357,112 and $1,133,007 in the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Depreciation Method

The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The useful lives of property, plant, and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are:


	Computers and equipment Furniture and fixtures Website Vehicles	7.0 years 10.0 years 3.0 years 5.0 years to 7.0 years

Leasehold improvements are being depreciated over the life of the lease, which is equal to 120 months.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

The cost of patents acquired is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lives of the patents. Licenses are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 15 to 20 years. The weighted average amortization period for all patents and licenses is 17.69 years. The estimated amortization expense over each of the next five years is $159,100. Amortization expense for the years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004 was $158,200 and $177,045, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 121, Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed, we periodically analyze our intangible assets and long-lived assets for potential impairment, assessing the appropriateness of lives and recoverability of unamortized balances through measurement of undiscounted operating cash flows on a basis consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the average cost method. Inventories at July 31, 2005 consisted of:

	2005		2004
Finished Goods	$	22,800	$	131,300
Work in Progress		6,800		17,700
Raw Materials		22,500		175,300

	$	52,100	$	324,300

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts for receivables and payables approximate fair value because of their short maturity, generally less than three months. The fair value of the note receivable as at July 31, 2005 cannot be estimated because of the unique nature of such instruments. Whenever shares are issued for assets, services or interest, we use market prices of our common stock to estimate the fair value of the shares issued. Whenever options or warrants are issued for assets, services or interest, we use the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the equity instrument, using market prices of our common stock and prevailing risk-free interest rates.

Advertising and Promotional Costs

Cost of advertising and promotion are expensed as incurred. Such costs were $427,452 and $306,243 for the years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

We have adopted FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share (“SFAS 128”), which is effective for periods ending after December 15, 1997. Entities that have both common stock and other equity instruments outstanding, such as options and warrants, are required to present both basic and diluted per share amounts. Diluted per share amounts assume the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential common stock instruments, including options and warrants, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase the income per common share from continuing operations. Both the basic and diluted loss per common share for the years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004 are based on the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the periods.

F-7

The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares actually outstanding with the number of shares used in the computations of loss per common share:

	For the Years Ended
	July 31, 2005			July 31, 2004
Shares outstanding		17,713,306			15,547,310
Weighted average number of shares actually outstanding		16,897,118			13,836,574
Stock Options		6,485,960			3,983,750
Warrants		640,929			1,385,223

Total weighted average shares		24,024,007			19,205,547

Loss from continuing operations	$	(1,847,430	)	$	(2,602,551	)
Income from discontinued operations		1,530,060			294,888

Net loss	$	(317,070	)	$	(2,307,663	)

Net income / (loss) per common share, basic and diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.19	)
Discontinued operations		0.09			0.02

Net loss	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.17	)

Income Taxes

We record deferred taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The Statement requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Other

•

Our fiscal year end is July 31st of each year.

•

We paid no cash dividends during the periods presented.

•

Shipping and handling costs payable by us are charged to cost of sales.

•

Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

•

All of our assets are located in the United States.

•

We have no elements of comprehensive income other than net income.

•

For purposes of the consolidated balance sheet and statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At July 31, 2005 and at July 31, 2004, we had no deposits in excess of FDIC insured limits.

Note 2. Sale of Water Treatment Division and Discontinued Operations

Effective May 25 2005, we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division to Maryland-based Innovative Medical Services, LLC (IMS LLC) for $2,375,000. IMS LLC also assumed all liabilities associated with the Division. At closing, we received $1,950,000 in cash and a promissory note in the amount of $425,000. In June, we received a cash payment of $225,000. The balance on the promissory note of $200,000 is shown as “Notes Receivable” on the balance sheet as at July 31, 2005. In August, subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, we received the balance of $200,000 plus interest on the promissory note. See Note 16.

We agreed to continue to fund the working capital of IMS LLC subsequent to the sale of the Water Treatment Division, until such time as IMS LLC had in place their appropriate legal and tax registrations, in order to enable the continuation of payroll and an uninterrupted supply of materials and components for the business. At July 31, 2005, we had funded $132,521 of working capital on IMS LLC’s behalf. This amount is shown as “Other receivables” on the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2005. In August, in addition to the payment of the promissory note and after the end of our fiscal year, IMS LLC reimbursed us for the working capital we had provided subsequent to the sale. We are no longer providing any working capital for IMS LLC. See Note 16.

The realized gain to us on the sale of the Water Treatment Division was $2,187,136 before the effect of taxes. The sale of the Water Treatment Division assets to Innovative Medical Services, LLC will be a transaction taxable for United States federal and California income tax purposes. The tax liability related to the sale is estimated to be approximately $937,000, however this will be offset by current year losses and available net operating loss carryforwards relating to our continuing operations. For a further discussion of the tax consequences of the sale, see Note 13.

The Water Treatment Division has been reported as a discontinued operation since October 2003 when we made the decision to dispose of the segment, however we continued to operate and retain the profits from that division until its sale on May 25, 2005. For details of the results of operations for the Water Treatment Division for the year ended July 31, 2004 and for the subsequent period through the sale of the Division on May 25, 2005, see Note 14.

F-8

In accordance with SFAS 144, the assets and liabilities of the Water Division were historically classified as held for sale and are presented separately on the balance sheet as at July 31, 2004. No assets or liabilities relating to the Water Division remained on the balance sheet as at July 31, 2005, with the exception of the “Note receivable” and “Other receivable” as discussed previously in this note.

Note 3. Trust Deed Receivable

In August 2003, we completed a financing arrangement which included the acquisition of a $2,000,000 Note and Trust Deed bearing a rate of interest of 10% with principal and all interest due and payable on or before June 12, 2004. The Trust Deed and accrued interest of $35,000 was shown in the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2004 as a “Trust deed receivable.” In addition to the Trust Deed, the arrangement included a $435,000 unsecured offsetting loan payable, included in “Loans from shareholders” in the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2004. See Note 6. The Trust Deed was acquired in exchange for 2,000,000 unregistered shares of our common stock issued to a party unrelated to the grantor, which was recorded at $1,600,000 or $0.80 per share based on fair market value at the date of the transaction.

In late 2003 we entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of the assets and certain related liabilities of the Water Treatment Division to Data Recovery Continuum, Inc. (DRCI) for $2.75 million in cash at closing to include the purchase of the Trust Deed at face value, and additional amounts one year after closing based on certain criteria relating to sales of water treatment systems. At this time, DRCI paid to us a deposit of $100,000 in cash, secured by a promissory note for that amount which was also included in “Loans from shareholders” in the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2004.

Prior to the due date on the Trust Deed, the debtors requested an extension to complete an in-process financing plan for the payment of the principal and interest, which we granted, however the debtor failed to perform during the term of the extension.

In March 2005, we reached a partial settlement with Lee Brukman of Next9, LLC and Data Recovery Continuum, Inc. in which we reacquired the 2,000,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for our conditional transfer to Brukman of the Trust Deed receivable. In addition, Brukman forgave $535,000 in loans to us, plus accrued interest of $61,377. The net result on the consolidated balance sheet was a reduction in assets of approximately $2,327,700, a reduction in liabilities of approximately $596,000, and an increase in common stock of $1,735,700, or $0.87 per share, based on an estimate of fair value.

Note 4. Property, Plant and Equipment

The following is a summary of property, plant, and equipment – at cost less accumulated depreciation:

	July 31, 2005			July 31, 2004
Computers and equipment	$	746,880	$	1,054,602
Furniture and fixtures		82,325		108,129
Vehicle		—		50,985
Leasehold improvements		309,830		309,830

		1,139,036		1,523,546
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		987,046		1,248,235

Total	$	151,990	$	275,311

Depreciation charged to general and administrative expense for the years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004 was $137,700 and $161,000, respectively.

Note 5. Notes Payable

There were no notes payable as at July 31, 2005.

The note payable as at July 31, 2004 consisted of a convertible debenture with interest payable quarterly at 10%. The debenture was originally due on July 24, 2004 and was contained in a Unit Purchase Agreement in which the holder of the note received 300,000 five-year warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.75. The recorded value of the note payable and the warrants were apportioned based on their respective fair values. This resulted in the note being recorded at its discounted value of $180,513. The discount of $119,487 was amortized over the one-year life of the note. The note contained provisions for convertibility to our common stock if held to maturity. This note was in technical default as of July 25, 2004, but was guaranteed by a third party and subsequently paid off in cash in March, 2005.

Note 6. Loans from Shareholders

There were no shareholder loans outstanding at July 31, 2005.

The shareholder loans of $1,135,000 as at July 31, 2004 included a $600,000 line of credit with interest at 18%, secured by the total assets of the Company excluding the Axenohl patent. During the year ended July 31, 2004, we became in default and in December 2003, two parties filed an action in District Court of Arizona against PURE Bioscience for our failure to perform under the terms of their loan agreements. In May 2005, the $600,000 line of credit plus $103,000 of accrued interest was paid off as part of a settlement of the outstanding litigation.

In August 2003, we completed a financing arrangement which included the acquisition of a Note and Trust Deed and a $435,000 unsecured offsetting loan payable. In late 2003, a related party paid to us a deposit of $100,000 in cash, secured by a promissory note for that amount which was also included in “Loans from shareholders” in the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2004. The $535,000 in loans payable was included in “Loans from shareholders” in the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2004. The loans were forgiven as part of a settlement in March, 2005. See Note 3.

F-9

In November 2004, we received a $90,000 loan from a director/shareholder, with an interest rate of 8% per annum and a warrant to purchase 18,000 shares of common stock. The note was originally due in 30 days but was extended to April 29, 2005 in exchange for an additional warrant to purchase 18,000 shares. The warrants were valued at $9,971 ($0.28 per share based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 137.78% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%). In April 2005, a $30,000 payment was made to reduce the $90,000 loan and in May 2005, the balance of the loan plus accrued interest was paid off.

Note 7. Warranty Liabilities

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” Subsequent to the sale of the Water Treatment Division in May 2005, we no longer have liability for warranties previously provided on Water Division systems, and do not provide replacement warranties on Bioscience products. The warranty liability as at July 31, 2004 is shown on the consolidated balance sheet as “Liabilities of the water division held for resale.” Prior to the sale of the Water Treatment Division, we provided a standard warranty of two years for replacement parts on all Fillmaster systems sold. Most of our chain customers entered into multi-year contracts for customer service plans with fixed annual fees that provided an extended warranty on systems, discounts on maintenance item costs, software upgrades, and replacement filters. We monitored the costs of providing products and services, other than filters, under the plans. This cost remained steady over time as a percentage of related revenues. The following is a summary of changes in our product warranty liability.

	Beginning Liability		Ending Liability
Year ended July 31, 2005	$	44,464	$	—

Year ended July 31, 2004	$	42,430	$	44,464

Note 8. Commitments

On May 14, 1996, we entered into an operating lease agreement for our home office which expires (under extension) in October 2006. The rental expense recorded in general and administrative expenses for the years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2004 was $152,295 and $181,370, respectively.

As part of the agreement to sell the assets of the Water Treatment Division to Innovative Medical Services, LLC, we entered into a sublease agreement with IMS LLC which terminates concurrently with our master lease. Under the sublease agreement, IMS LLC occupies approximately 28% of the square footage of the facility and pays us $3,760 per month in rent. However the obligation for making payments under the master lease remains with us until the end of the current lease term.

Future minimum rental payments required for each of the 5 succeeding years assuming exercise of the option, and assuming we rent 100% of the existing facility, are as follows:

	Year Ended July 31	Amount
	2006 2007 2008 2009 2010	$ 176,302 $ 183,354 $ 190,688 $ 198.316 $ 206,248

The Company has an employment contract with its Chief Executive Officer/President which includes a provision for him to be paid an amount equal to 3% of the Company’s net income before taxes, if any.

Note 9. Equity and Common Stock

Whenever shares are issued for assets, services or interest, we use market prices of our common stock to estimate the fair value of the shares issued. Whenever options or warrants are issued for assets, services or interest, we use the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the equity instrument, using market prices of our common stock and prevailing risk-free interest rates.

In August 2004 we issued 200,000 options to purchase common stock in exchange for consulting and legal services valued at $125,000. Also in August 2004 we conducted a private placement which consisted of 125,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.39 per share and a one-year warrant to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock at $1.50 valued at $1,154 ($0.01 per share based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 137.78% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%) for a total of $50,000, and issued 80,000 shares of common stock valued at $40,000 or $0.50 per share. In September 2004 we issued 7,000 shares valued at $2,275 ($0.33 per share) for payment of directors’ expenses. In addition, in the same month we issued 200,000 shares valued at $90,000 ($0.45 per share) in exchange for the assignment of two patent rights.

In November 2004 we issued 200,000 shares of common stock valued at $100,000 ($0.50 per share) in exchange for consulting and legal services. We also issued options on 250,000 shares in exchange for consulting services with exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $0.80 valued at $88,057 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 137.78% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%) In December 2004 we issued 300,000 shares of common stock ($0.50 per share) for consulting services valued at a fair value of $150,000. In the same month we also conducted two private placements which in aggregate were valued at $200,000 (366,667 shares of common stock at an average price of $0.5455 per share). We also received $10,500 from the exercise of employee options, and $150,000 from the exercise of 300,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share.

F-10

In January 2005 we issued 5,000 shares of common stock ($0.87 per share) valued at $4,350 (based on the market price of the stock at the time the services were rendered) in exchange for business services. We also conducted a private placement which consisted of 60,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.49 per share and a one-year warrant to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock at $1.00, valued at $674 ($0.01 per share based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 137.78% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%) for a total of $30,000. The value of the shares and warrants were apportioned based on their relative market values.

In February 2005 we issued 50,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.436 per share and a one year warrant to purchase an additional 100,000 shares of common stock, valued at $13,182 ($0.263 per share based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 112.30% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%) for a total value of $35,000, in exchange for business services. In addition, we issued a three-year option on 350,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.75 in exchange for consulting services valued at $160,982 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 112.3% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%)

In March 2005 we conducted two private placements which consisted of 1,330,000 shares of common stock issued between $0.30 and $0.50 per share, for a total value of $605,000 (average price of $.45 per share). We also conducted a private placement in which we sold two units of our securities, each unit consisted of 200,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.449 per share and a one-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at $1.00, valued at $10,196 ($0.051 per share based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 112.30% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%), for a total value of $100,000 per unit. Also in March 2005 we issued 30,000 shares of common stock valued at $33,000 ($1.10 per share based on the market price of the stock at the time the services were rendered) in exchange for consulting services. We also issued a one-year option on 25,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 for consulting services valued at $12,374, and two-year option on 225,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 for consulting services valued at $134,631 (each based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 112.3% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.25%). In the same month we received $40,500 from the exercise of options on 100,000 shares.

In April 2005 we conducted a private placement which consisted of 458,329 shares of common stock issued at $.60 per share, for the total value of $275,000. We also issued 30,000 shares of common stock valued at $30,000 ($1.00 per share based on the market price of the stock when the services were rendered) in exchange for consulting services. Additionally, we received $80,000 from the exercise of options on 200,000 shares.

In May 2005 we issued 74,000 shares of common stock valued at $74,000 ($1.00 per share based on the market price of the stock when the services were rendered) in exchange for consulting services.

During the year ended July 31, 2005, 347,794 warrants valued in prior years at $49,421 expired. In addition, in 2003 we recorded 651,000 warrants at a valuation of $635,376 based upon a contractual obligation, however the warrants were never issued. During the year ended July 31, 2005 our contractual obligation to issue the warrants was terminated. The adjustments related to these events are recorded in the equity schedule below on the line “Expired / Terminated Warrants.”

The following schedule summarizes the change in equity for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004:

			Common Stock ($)					Warrant Valuation ($)			Accumulated Deficit			Total ($)
Balance, July 31, 2003	10,594,088		$	14,758,203		1,037,429		$	788,473		$	(13,930,003	)	$	1,616,673

Shares Issued for Trust Deed	2,000,000			1,600,000		—			—			—			1,600,000
Private Placement	2,438,222			1,132,653		347,794			49,421			—			1,182,074
Shares Issued for Services	515,000			343,283		—			—			—			343,283
Net Income / (Loss)	—			—		—			—			(2,307,663	)		(2,307,663	)


Balance, July 31, 2004	15,547,310		$	17,834,139		1,385,223		$	837,894		$	(16,237,666	)	$	2,434,367


Shares Returned re. Trust Deed	(2,000,000	)		(1,735,700	)	—			—			—			(1,735,700	)
Private Placement	2,739,996			1,337,779		112,500			21,547			—			1,359,326
Shares Issued for Patent Rights	200,000			90,000		—			—			—			90,000
Shares Issued for Services	896,000			936,486		142,000			23,827			—			960,313
Options Exercised	330,000			169,500		—			—			—			169,500
Expired / Terminated Warrants	—			684,797		(998,794	)		(684,797	)		—			—
Net Income / (Loss)	—			—		—			—			(317,070	)		(317,070	)


Balance, July 31, 2005	17,713,306			19,317,001		640,929			198,471			16,554,736			2,960,736

The Company also has 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized; no preferred stock has been issued.

F-11

The following schedule summarizes the outstanding warrants:

Issued For			Warrant Valuation ($)		Weighted Average Exercise Price

Services	6/14/02	15,000	$	8,610	$	1	.00	6/14/07
Private Placement	1/31/03	71,429		25,000		0	.30	1/31/08
Private Placement	7/24/03	300,000		119,487		0	.75	7/24/08
Private Placement	8/19/04	12,500		1,154		1	.50	8/19/05
Services	11/29/04	36,000		9,971		0	.53	11/29/05
Services	1/14/05	6,000		674		1	.00	1/14/06
Services	2/7/05	100,000		13,182		1	.12	2/7/06
Private Placement	3/16/05	50,000		10,196		1	.00	3/16/06
Private Placement	3/16/05	50,000		10,196		1	.00	3/16/06


Total		640,929	$	198,471

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

See Note 6.

Note 11. Stock Option Plans

The Company has the following stock option plans (the Plans) pursuant to which options to acquire common stock have been granted.

1996 Directors And Officers Stock Option Plan: On April 17, 1996, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Directors and Officers Stock Option Plan. The Plan is administered by the entire Board of Directors. The Plan became effective on April 17, 1996 by the Board of Directors, was not subject to Shareholder approval and shall terminate on April 17, 2006. Subject to anti-dilution provisions, the Plan may issue Options to acquire up to 1,000,000 shares to Directors and Officers. The Plan may be terminated, modified or amended by the Board of Directors.

1998 Directors And Officers Stock Option Plan: On December 19, 1998, the Company’s Shareholders approved the Amended PURE Bioscience 1998 Officers and Directors Stock Option Plan.

2001 Directors And Officers Stock Option Plan: On January 8, 2001, the Company’s Shareholders approved the PURE Bioscience 2001 Officers and Directors Stock Option Plan.

2001 ETIH2O Stock Option Plan: Adopted by the Board in January 2001, there are 1,000,000 shares authorized under this Plan. Executive Officers and Directors are not eligible participants under this plan.

2001 Consultants and Advisors Stock Option Plan: Adopted by the Board in January 2001, there are 500,000 shares authorized under this Plan. Executive Officers and Directors are not eligible participants under this plan.

2002 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan: On March 11, 2002, the Company’s Shareholders approved the PURE Bioscience 2002 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan. Eligible Plan Participants include the Directors and Officers of the Company, consultants, advisors and other individuals deemed by the Compensation Committee to provide valuable services to the Company but who are not otherwise eligible to participate in the Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan.

2002 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan: On March 11, 2002, the Company’s Shareholders approved the PURE Bioscience 2002 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan. Eligible Plan Participants include employees and non-employee Directors for the Company.

2004 Consultants and Advisors Stock Option Plan: Adopted by the Board in April 2004, there are 2,000,000 shares authorized under this plan. Executive Officers and Directors are not eligible participants under this plan.

Non-employee directors are eligible to receive stock option grants under the Company’s 1996, 1998 and 2001 Directors and Officers Stock Option Plans and the 2002 Non-Qualified and Employee/Incentive Stock Option Plans. Employee Directors are eligible to receive stock option grants under the Company’s 1996, 1999 and 2001 Directors and Officers Stock Option Plans and the 2002 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan. The Plans are administered by an Administrative Committee. The exercise price for Options shall be set by the Administrative Committee but shall not be for less than the fair market value of the shares on the date the Option is granted. Fair market value shall mean the average of the closing price for ten consecutive trading days ending on the day prior to the date the option is granted. The period in which Options can be exercised shall be set by the Administrative Committee not to exceed five years from the date of Grant. Options granted to new executive officers or directors shall vest one year from date of appointment or election. Shares issuable under options granted to continuing officers or directors are immediately exercisable and vest upon exercise. The Board may at any time terminate the Plans. The approval of the majority of shareholders is required to increase the total number of shares subject to the Plans, change the manner of determining the option price or to withdraw the administration of the Plans from the Administrative Committee.

F-12

We estimate a fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123). In accordance with SFAS 123, we have chosen to continue to account for employee stock-based compensation utilizing the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair market price of our common stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Also, in accordance with SFAS 123, we have provided footnote disclosure with respect to stock-based employee compensation. The cost of stock-based employee compensation is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period. The value of the stock based award is determined using a pricing model whereby compensation cost is the excess of the fair value of the stock as determined by the model at grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.

We account for non-employee stock based compensation by recording the fair value of the stock options granted over the anticipated service period.

The effect of applying FAS 123 on the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 pro forma net loss as stated below is not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net loss for future years due to, among other things, the vesting period of the stock options and the fair value of additional stock options in future years. Had compensation cost for our stock option plans been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under the plans consistent with the methodology prescribed under FAS 123, our net loss in the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 would have been approximately $1,631,359 and $3,552,985 or $(0.10) per share and $(0.26) per share, respectively, on a diluted basis. Compensation cost for non-employees of $396,043 was charged to income in the year ended July 31, 2005 and $125,000 in the year ended July 31, 2004. The weighted average fair value for all options granted during the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 are estimated at $0.50 per share and $1.24 per share, respectively, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average fair value non-employee options granted during the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004 are estimated at $0.49 per share and $0.75 per share, respectively using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following assumptions were used for grants in 2005; no dividend yield, volatility of between 112.3% and 137.78%, and a risk-free interest rate of between 2.25% and 3.75%. Assumptions for grants awarded in 2004 were: no dividend yield, volatility of 137.78%, and a risk-free interest rate of 1.75%.

A summary of stock option activity is as follows:


Balance at July 31, 2003	4,692,300		1	.61
Granted	500,000		0	.46
Exercised	(400,300	)	0	.48
Forfeited	(808,550	)	1	.85

Balance at July 31, 2004	3,983,750		1	.67

Granted	3,957,210		0	.57
Exercised	(930,000	)	1	.31
Forfeited	(525,000	)	0	.56

Balance at July 31, 2005	6,485,960		0	.64

			Outstanding						Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Life (in years)			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Price ($)
$0.35 to $0.57		5,370,960		3	.49	$	0	.53		5,127,210	$	0	.53
$0.75 to $1.25		790,000		2	.15	$	0	.86		790,000	$	0	.86
$1.50 to $2.00		325,000		0	.36	$	1	.92		325,000	$	1	.92

		6,485,960		3	.17	$	0	.64		6,424,210	$	0	.64

Note 12. Pension Plan

We participate in a Small SEP program under which we may make contributions to a SEP, which includes a salary reduction arrangement (SARSEP). Employees who participate in the SARSEP may elect to have us: (a) make contributions to the SEP on their behalf, or (b) pay them cash. A salary reduction arrangement may be used only in years in which the SEP meets requirements that the IRS may impose to ensure distribution of excess contributions. Annual contributions of an employer under a SEP are excluded from the participant’s gross income. No employer contributions were made during the years ending July 31, 2005 or July 31, 2004.

Note 13. Income Taxes

We file federal and California consolidated tax returns with our subsidiaries. Taxable income is different to the income reported in our financial statements due to temporary tax differences and certain other differences between tax laws and generally accepted accounting principles.

The sale of the Water Treatment Division to Innovative Medical Services, LLC (IMS LLC) is a transaction taxable for United States federal and California income tax purposes. We recognized taxable income equal to the amount realized on the sale, consisting of the cash received plus the amount of related liabilities assumed by IMS LLC, in excess of the tax basis in the assets sold. The realized gain to us on the sale was $2,187,136, giving rise to an estimated tax liability of $937,000. In addition, income tax related to the operation of the Division through May 25, 2005 is estimated to be $230,500. The total taxes relating to the discontinued operation are therefore approximately $1,167,500. This amount is offset by the realization of a tax benefit of approximately $1,164,700 from current year losses and available net operating loss carryforwards relating to our continuing operations.

F-13

The net tax effect of these amounts gives rise to the current provision for income taxes of $2,800 for the year ended July 31, 2005 and $2,700 for the year ended July 31, 2004, which is the minimum franchise tax paid to the State of California regardless of income or loss.

At July 31, 2005, we had federal and California tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $14,460,600 and $3,683,800 respectively. At July 31, 2004, we had federal and California tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13,939,500 and $5,995,900 respectively. The difference between federal and California tax loss carryforwards is primarily due to limitations on California loss carryforwards. The federal tax loss carryforwards will begin expiring in the year ending July 31, 2016 unless previously utilized, and will completely expire in the year ending July 31, 2024. The California tax loss carryforwards began to expire in the year ended July 31, 2005 and will completely expire in the year ending July 31, 2016.

Significant components of our deferred tax assets are as follows:

	July 31, 2005			July 31, 2004
Net operating loss carryforward	$	5,242,300		$	5,269,500
Stock options and warrants		532,400			583,600
Other timing differences and allowances		(83,000	)		(191,900	)

Total deferred tax assets		5,691,700			5,661,200
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets		(5,691,700	)		(5,661,200	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

Realization of our deferred tax assets, which relate to operating loss carryforwards and timing differences, is dependant on future earnings. The timing and amount of future earnings are uncertain and therefore a valuation allowance has been established. The increase in the valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset during the year ended July 31, 2005 was $30,500.

A reconciliation of income taxes computed using the statutory income tax, compared to the effective tax rate is as follows:


Federal tax benefit at the expected statutory rate	34	%	34	%
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit	9		9
Valuation allowance	(43	)	(43	)

Income tax benefit - effective rate	0	%	0	%

Note 14. Business Segment and Sales Concentrations

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131, certain information is disclosed based on the way management organizes financial information for making operating decisions and assessing performance. In determining operating segments, we reviewed the current management structure reporting to the chief operating decision-maker (‘CODM’) and analyzed the reporting the CODM receives to allocate resources and measure performance.

Our business activity was historically divided into two distinct business segments, the Water Treatment segment and the Bioscience segment. These two segments were determined by management based upon the inherent differences in the end use of the products, the inherent differences in the value added processes made by the Company, the differences in the regulatory requirements and the inherent differences in the strategies required to successfully market finished products. The Water Treatment segment included Commercial Water and Residential Retail products and the Nutripure Water Dealer program. Bioscience includes the silver dihydrogen citrate antimicrobial and the Innovex line of pest control products. As we have planned for a considerable period of time to sell the Water Treatment segment, it has been reported as Discontinued Operations in the financial statements. For the year ended July 31, 2005, earnings for the discontinued Water Treatment Division relate to the period from August 1, 2004 to May 25, 2005, the date on which the Division assets were sold. Subsequent to the sale, we retained no interest in the assets, liabilities or earnings of Innovative Medical Services LLC, the acquiring entity.

Segment information is presented in accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based on a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon our internal organization and disclosure of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods. Our financial reporting systems present various data for management to run the business, including internal profit and loss statements prepared on a basis not consistent with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Reconciling amounts consist of unallocated general and administrative expenses.

F-14

2004	Water Treatment (Discontinued)		Biosciences			Reconciling Amounts			Consolidated
Revenues	Full Year		Full Year			Full Year			Full Year
Commercial Water Treatment
Fillmaster Products	$	1,035,300	$	—		$	—		$	1,035,300
Replacement Filters (Includes CSP 2000)		640,600		—			—			640,600
Residential Water Treatment		49,900		—			—			49,900
Water Dealer Program		36,000		—			—			36,000
Silver Dihydrogen Citrate		—		83,800			—			83,800
Pesticide		—		179,700			—			179,700

Total Revenues	$	1,800,600	$	263,500		$	—		$	2,064,100

Operating Income/(Loss) before taxes	$	515,900	$	(248,600	)	$	(2,377,829	)	$	(2,110,529	)

Segment Assets	$	108,136	$	2,510,408

2005
Revenues	Thru May 25			Full Year			Full Year			Full Year
Commercial Water Treatment
Fillmaster Products	$	985,187		$	—		$	—		$	985,187
Replacement Filters (Includes CSP 2000)		717,257			—			—			717,257
Residential Water Treatment		(2,489	)		—			—			(2,489	)
Water Dealer Program		—			—			—			—
Silver Dihydrogen Citrate		—			91,333			—			91,333
Pesticide		—			64,473			—			64,473

Total Revenues	$	1,699,955		$	155,806		$	—		$	1,855,761

Operating Income/(Loss) before taxes	$	510,411		$	(2,819,664	)	$	(191,516	)	$	(2,500,759	)

Segment Assets (post-sale)	$	—		$	2,508,012

Significant customers for each fiscal year primarily consisted of domestic retail chain pharmacies. Sales concentrations to major chain stores were approximately $703,990 and export sales were $231,569 for the year ended July 31, 2005. Sales concentrations to major chain stores were approximately $1,449,000 and export sales were $76,800 for the year ended July 31, 2004. Three major retail chain pharmacies accounted for 41% of consolidated sales.

Sales of silver dihydrogen citrate and pesticide products are made to a small number of partners who formulate products for sale to multiple diversified third parties. The number of partners and third party end-users and retailers is expected to increase as Axenohl (silver dihydrogen citrate) is introduced into new markets.

Note 15. Patents

On November 30, 2001, we acquired the patent (the “Axenohl patent”) for silver dihydrogen citrate, a silver ion based technology which is the basis for our silver ion products. We previously licensed the use of this patent. We purchased the patent for 700,000 shares of common stock plus certain expenses, and valued the patent at $1,540,600 based on the market price of the stock exchanged.

As a condition of the purchase agreement of the Axenohl patent, we originally agreed to make certain royalty payments to NVID. In October 2003, we filed an arbitration action against NVID International and Falken Industries to demand a cease and desist from continued and ongoing public dissemination of false, misleading and disparaging statements and complete cooperation in enforcing and defending the silver dihydrogen citrate patent and related technology, pursuant to the Core Settlement Agreement between PURE Bioscience and NVID International. In November 2004, we won a $14.2 million award resulting from the action against NVID. In addition to the $14.2 million award against NVID, the arbitrator also clarified that PURE’s royalty obligations to NVID were legally terminated by NVID’s material breach of the Core Settlement Agreement, resulting in the elimination of approximately $17 million in potential future royalty payments from PURE to NVID over the life of the Axenohl patent. In October 2005, we received a further $3.4 million award plus costs of $241,000 resulting from a related binding arbitration proceeding against Falken Industries. The award, from the American Arbitration Association International Center for Dispute Resolution, is a binding ruling. We are evaluating the issues of collectibility of the awards, however due to the uncertainty of our ability to collect we have not recorded the awards or any part of them as assets on the balance sheet as at July 31, 2005.

Note 16. Subsequent Events

In August 2005 we received the balance of $200,000 plus interest on the promissory note from IMS LLC that constitutes all of the “Notes receivable” on the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2005. At the same time, we were also reimbursed by IMS LLC for the working capital we had provided subsequent to the sale of the Water Treatment Division in May. The amount reimbursed in August offset the entire amount recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as at July 31, 2005 under “Other receivables.” See Note 2 for a more detailed discussion of each of these transactions.

In October we received a $3.4 million award plus costs of $241,000 resulting from a binding arbitration proceeding against Falken Industries. See Note 15. The award, from the American Arbitration Association International Center for Dispute Resolution, is a binding ruling. We are currently evaluating the issue of collectibility of the award.

F-15

Note 17. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123(R) (revised 2004) (“FAS 123(R)”). In addition, in March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14, “Share-Based Payment” (SAB 107) which provides interpretations regarding the interaction between FAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provided the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. FAS 123(R) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions, including stock option awards. FAS 123(R) revises FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. FAS 123(R) will require us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock option awards based on the grant-date fair value of such awards. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. We will report such costs as part of our general and administrative expenses. FAS 123(R) will be effective for us as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005, which will be our fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. We will recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying this statement as of the effective date. Currently, the cumulative effect of initially applying FAS 123(R) has not been determined and is subject to change depending on future events.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (“FAS 153”). FAS 153 eliminates the exception to recognize non-monetary transactions at fair value for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets previously allowed by APB Opinion No. 29, and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. FAS 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (“FAS 154”), which changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle, requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle and carries forward without change the guidance contained in Opinion 20 for reporting the correction of an error in previously issued financial statements and a change in accounting estimate. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 154 to affect future reporting or disclosures.

F-16

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited) April 30 2006			July 31 2005
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,798,618		$	405,888
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $ 8,000 at July 31, 2005 and
$8,000 at April 30, 2006		70,826			73,261
Other receivables		—			132,521
Notes receivable		—			200,000
Inventories		128,172			52,059
Prepaid expenses		59,776			72,344
Interest receivable		—			2,817

Total current assets		6,057,392			938,890

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment		196,146			151,990

Total property, plant and equipment		196,146			151,990

Other Assets
Prepaid consulting		473,711			—
Deposits		9,744			9,744
Patents and licenses		2,076,736			2,213,413

Total other assets		2,560,191			2,223,157

Total assets	$	8,813,729		$	3,314,037

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	125,905		$	191,803
Accrued liabilities		193,173			158,698
Income taxes payable		—			2,800

Total current liabilities		319,078			353,301

Commitments and Contingencies
Temporary equity (See Note 4)		2,347,612			—

Total commitments and contingencies		2,347,612			353,301

Total liabilities		2,666,690			—

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock		—			—
Class A common stock, no par value:
50,000,000 shares authorized
23,615,502 issued and outstanding at April 30, 2006, and
17,713,306 issued and outstanding at July 31, 2005		24,669,419			19,317,001
Warrants:
978,127 issued and outstanding at April 30, 2006, and
640,929 issued and outstanding at July 31, 2005		432,498			198,471
Accumulated deficit		(18,954,878	)		(16,554,736	)

Total stockholders' equity		6,147,039			2,960,736

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	8,813,729		$	3,314,037

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-17

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Nine Months Ended April 30						For the Three Months Ended April 30
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Net revenues	$	158,925		$	117,818		$	44,314		$	41,407
Cost of sales		66,585			45,394			22,592			23,609

Gross profit		92,340			72,424			21,722			17,798

Selling expenses		410,418			363,215			168,747			68,828
General and administrative expenses		1,278,435			697,976			411,712			210,269
Research and development		815,958			925,579			332,450			255,562

Total operating costs		2,504,811			1,986,770			912,909			534,659

Loss from operations		(2,412,471	)		(1,914,346	)		(891,187	)		(516,861	)

Other income and (expense):
Interest income		24,904			100,835			23,710			13
Interest expense		(460	)		(106,110	)		(186	)		(5,000	)
Other		(12,115	)		(13,882	)		(3,789	)		(6,906	)

Total other income (expense)		12,329			(19,157	)		19,735			(11,893	)

Loss from continuing operations		(2,400,142	)		(1,933,503	)		(871,452	)		(528,754	)
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations		—			483,432			—			92,237

Net loss before taxes		(2,400,142	)		(1,450,071	)		(871,452	)		(436,517	)
Income tax provision		—			—			—			—

Net loss after taxes	$	(2,400,142	)	$	(1,450,071	)	$	(871,452	)	$	(436,517	)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)
Discontinued operations		—			0.03			—			0.01
Income tax provision		—			—			—			—

Net loss	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ACCUMULATED DEFICITS

	(Unaudited) Year-to-Date Ended April 30 2006			Year Ended July 31 2005
Balance, beginning of period	$	(16,554,736	)	$	(16,237,666	)

Net income (loss)		(2,400,142	)		(317,070	)

Balance, end of period	$;	(18,954,878	)	$	(16,554,736	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-18

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Nine Months Ended April 30
	2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss	$	(2,400,142	)	$	(1,450,071	)

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Amortization		148,411			118,408
Depreciation		51,534			56,617
Services and interest paid for with stock and options		418,777			432,587
Pre-tax income from discontinued operations		—			(483,432	)

Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		2,435			49,560
Other receivables		132,521			—
Notes receivable		200,000			—
Prepaid expense		12,568			(65,133	)
Interest receivable		2,817			—
Inventory		(76,112	)		56,932
Accounts payable		(65,899	)		(347,402	)
Accrued cash liabilities		34,475			(167,650	)
Income tax payable		(2,800	)		—

Net cash (used) in operating activities		(1,541,415	)		(1,799,584	)

Cash flows from investing activities

Investment in capitalized patents and licenses		(11,734	)		(21,317	)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(95,689	)		(13,794	)

Net cash (used) in investing activities		(107,423	)		(35,111	)

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from short-term loans		80,000			90,000
Payment of short-term loans		(80,000	)		(330,000	)
Proceeds from sale of common stock (including temporary equity)		7,041,568			1,681,000

Net cash provided by financing activities		7,041,568			1,441,000

Cash flows from discontinued operations:

Cash flows from operation of Water Treatment Division		—			539,825

Net cash from discontinued operations		—			539,825

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	5,392,730		$	146,130

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		405,888			17,366

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5,798,618		$	163,496

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest		460		$	—
Cash paid for taxes		6,189		$	3,416

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Value of options issued in exchange for services - prepaid		473,711			—
Temporary equity classified as a liability on the balance sheet (See Note 4)		2,347,612			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-19

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Financial Statements

The financial statements included herein have been prepared by PURE Bioscience (“we”, “us”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted as allowed by such rules and regulations, and we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the period ending July 31, 2005 and their accompanying notes, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in our 10K-SB on October 31, 2005. While management believes the procedures followed in preparing the financial statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB are reasonable, the accuracy of the amounts are at least partially dependent upon facts that will exist and results that will be accomplished by us later in the fiscal year. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year.

We believe that the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Note 2. Business Segment and Sales Concentrations

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, certain information may be disclosed based on the way we organize financial information for making operating decisions and assessing performance. SFAS 131 requires that we apply standards based on a management approach, and requires segmentation based upon our internal organization and disclosure of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods. In determining operating segments, we have reviewed the current management structure reporting to the chief operating decision-maker (‘CODM’) and analyzed the reporting the CODM receives to allocate resources and measure performance.

Our business activity was historically divided, managed and conducted in two basic business segments; the Water Treatment division, including Commercial Water and Residential Retail products and the Nutripure Water Dealer program; and the Bioscience division, consisting of our silver dihydrogen citrate antimicrobial and the Innovex line of pest control products. However, in May 2005 we sold the assets of our Water Treatment Division to Maryland-based Innovative Medical Services, LLC. In the financial statements included in this report, the Water Treatment division is included as a Discontinued Operation in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows presented for comparative purposes relating to the periods ending April 30, 2005.

Subsequent to the sale of the Water Treatment division, we have determined that based upon the end use of our products, the value added processes made by us, the regulatory requirements, the customers and partners, and the strategy required to successfully market finished products, we are operating in a single segment.

During the nine months ended April 30, 2006, 88% of sales were made to three strategic partners that are also developing markets for our products. 42% of sales during the first nine months of the current fiscal year were made to U.S. domestic customers, and 58% were made to international customers.

Note 3. Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported statements to conform to our current financial statement format.

Note 4. Financing Events

On March 27, 2006, we conducted a private placement in which we issued 3,952,209 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share to accredited investors, for a total of $6,521,145. Net proceeds to us, after fees and expenses, were $5,911,608. Taglich Brothers, Inc. acted as placement agent and in accordance with the placement agent agreement, Taglich Brothers, Inc. received a cash fee of $469,522 and a five year warrant to purchase 355,698 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.556. The fair value of the warrants at the time of the private placement was $351,459 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 72.35% and a risk-free interest rate of 5.00%). Other cash fees paid to third parties, for legal and other fees associated with the private placement, were $140,014.

On April 24 2006, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission as required under the placement agreement, for the resale of shares issued in the private placement. The registration statement included all shares of common stock issued in the private placement, as well as the shares to be issued upon the exercise of the warrants. Under the terms of the placement agreement, as amended on April 21, 2006, if the registration statement is not declared effective within 150 days of the filing date (April 24, 2006), we will be subject to liquidated damage penalties. We will be obligated to pay to each investor a cash penalty of two percent (2%) of their purchase price for each thirty (30) day period, or any part thereof, beyond the 150 day period, until the registration statement is declared effective; however the maximum cash payment to each investor is thirty-six percent (36%) of such investor’s purchase price.

Following the guidance set forth in EITF D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities, we have determined that the maximum potential liquidated damage payment of 59.4 cents per share, or $2,347,612, should be classified as temporary equity on the balance sheet. EITF D-98 requires the classification outside of permanent equity because the registration of the common shares is not solely within our control. When the registration process is complete and the common shares issued in the private placement are no longer subject to liquidated damages, the remaining balance of temporary equity will be reclassified to permanent equity.

Under the terms of the placement agreement, as amended on April 21, 2006, there are no liquidated damage penalties associated with the warrants, and the fair value of the warrants is therefore accounted for as stockholders’ equity on the Balance Sheet as at April 30, 2006.

F-20

Note 5. Common Stock

In November 2005, we sold 39,999 shares of common stock in a private placement to an accredited investor, for $0.75 per share (a total value of $30,000). In December 2005, we issued 25,000 shares of common stock valued at $19,250 ($0.77 per share, based on the market price of the stock at the time services were rendered) in exchange for regulatory and consulting services. In the same month we issued options on 50,000 shares in exchange for investor relations and investment banking consulting services, at an exercise price of $0.75, valued at $17,229 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 82.23% and a risk-free interest rate of 4.25%). Additionally, in December 2005 we issued options on 50,000 shares in exchange for business development consulting services, at an exercise price of $0.80, valued at $15,426 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 82.23% and a risk-free interest rate of 4.25%).

In January 2006, we sold 500,000 shares of unregistered common stock in a private placement to an unaffiliated, accredited investor at $0.75 per share (a total value of $375,000). In the same month, we issued options on 300,000 shares in exchange for investor relations and investment banking consulting services, at an exercise price of $1.00, valued at $154,390 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 82.23% and a risk-free interest rate of 4.25%).

Also during the quarter ended January 31, 2006, we agreed to issue an aggregate of 2,300,000 options to two newly elected directors of the Company, related to two-year consulting agreements for domestic and international business development, with vesting of all options in future periods subject to performance under the consulting agreements. See Note 7 for more detail on the accounting treatment of these option agreements.

In February 2006, we sold 500,000 shares of unregistered common stock in a private placement to a director of the Company, at $0.90 per share. In the same month, there was a net exercise of an option on 15,000 shares of common stock that resulted in the issuance of 5,196 shares of common stock, and we received $10,000 from the exercise of a warrant to purchase 33,333 shares of unregistered common stock. Additionally, we issued options on 100,000 shares in exchange for formulation, blending and packaging services, at an exercise price of $1.18, valued at $64,060 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 72.35% and a risk-free interest rate of 5.00%), and we issued options on 25,000 shares in exchange for chemistry and formulation consulting services, at an exercise price of $0.80, valued at $20,881 (based on the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 72.35% and a risk-free interest rate of 5.00%). Also in February 2006, we agreed to issue 2,000 shares of common stock in exchange for retail marketing consulting services valued at $2,900.

In March 2006, we conducted a private placement in which we issued 3,952,209 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share to accredited investors, for a total of $6,521,145, resulting in net proceeds to us of $5,911,608. In addition, the placement agent received a five year warrant to purchase 355,698 shares at an exercise price of $2.556. See Note 4 for further details of this transaction.

Also in March 2006, we received $12,500 from the exercise of an option on 25,000 shares of common stock, and $75,000 from the exercise of an option on 50,000 shares of common stock. Additionally, we received $41,040 from the exercise of an option on 72,000 shares of common stock issued under an employee option plan.

In April 2006, there was a net exercise of an option on 100,000 shares that resulted in the issuance of 63,640 shares of common stock. We also received $40,810 from the exercise of an option on 77,000 shares of common stock. In the same month, there was a net exercise of an option on 47,500 shares under an employee stock option plan that resulted in the issuance of 41,496 shares of common stock, and we received the following amounts from the exercise of options under employee option plans: $2,500 from an option on 5,000 shares of common stock, $15,960 from an option on 28,000 shares of common stock, and $8,250 from an option on 16,500 shares of common stock. Additionally in April 2006, there were net exercises of options issued under our Directors and Officers Option Plan on 418,460 shares which resulted in the issuance of 337,823 shares of common stock, and we also received $15,900 from the exercise by a director of the Company of an option on 30,000 shares of common stock under the same plan.

Note 6. Stock Option Plans

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123), we have chosen to continue to account for employee stock-based compensation utilizing the intrinsic value method. As permitted by SFAS 123, we have applied the methods of APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for stock options issued to employees. The value of the stock-based award is determined using a pricing model whereby compensation cost is the excess of the fair value of the stock as determined by the model at grant date, or other measurement date, over the amount an optionee must pay to acquire the stock. We account for stock-based compensation to third parties for services by recording the fair value of the stock options granted over the anticipated service period.

Had compensation cost for employee stock options been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards, consistent with the methodology prescribed under FAS 123, our net loss in the nine months ended April 30, 2006 would have been approximately $5,780,009 or $(0.20) per share on a fully-diluted basis. The effect of applying FAS 123 on the nine months ended April 30, 2006 pro forma net loss is not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net loss for the year ended July 31, 2006 or for future years due, among other things, to the vesting period of the stock options and the fair value of additional stock options in future periods.

Compensation cost of $418,777 for stock-based compensation to third parties for services was charged to income in the nine months ended April 30, 2006, including the amortization of prepaid options as discussed in Note 7. The weighted average fair value of options and warrants issued to third parties for services during the nine months ended April 30, 2006 is estimated at $0.31 per share, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The weighted average fair value for all options and warrants granted during the nine months ended April 30, 2006 is estimated at $0.69 per share on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Assumptions used in calculating the fair value for options and warrants using the Black-Scholes model during the nine months ended April 30, 2006 were: no dividend yield, volatility of between 72.35% and 82.23%, and a risk-free interest rate of between 4.25% and 5.00%.

A summary of stock option activity during the period ended April 30, 2006 is as follows:

F-21


Balance at July 31, 2005	6,485,960		0	.64
Granted	6,125,000		1	.56
Exercised	(856,459	)	0	.62
Forfeited	(398,001	)	1	.59

Balance at April 30, 2006	11,356,500		1	.10

			Outstanding							Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Life (in years)			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Price ($)
$0.50 to $0.75		6,485,960		3	.04	$	0	.54		4,956,500	$	0	.54
$0.80 to $1.20		1,800,000		3	.33	$	0	.89		1,800,000	$	0	.89
$1.50 to $2.75		4,600,000		3	.30	$	1	.78		2,300,000	$	1	.65

		11,356,500		3	.19	$	1	.10		9,056,500	$	0	.89

Note 7. Prepaid Consulting

During the quarter ended January 31, 2006, we entered into a two-year consulting agreement with Mr. Michael Sitton for domestic and international business development, the compensation for which is a fee of $12,500 per month and an option on two million shares of unregistered common stock, which vest over three years. We also entered into a two-year consulting agreement with Secretary Tommy Thompson, for domestic and international business development, the compensation for which is a fee of $12,500 per month and an option on three hundred thousand shares of unregistered common stock, which vest over three years. During the quarter ended April 30, 2006, Mr. Sitton transferred the rights to 300,000 options to Secretary Thompson. Mr. Sitton is now therefore the beneficial owner of 1,700,000, and Secretary Thompson is the beneficial owner of 600,000 of these options.

Under the option agreements, unvested options will not be issued if the associated consulting agreements are terminated prior to their two year term, and we do not have an obligation to register the underlying shares within a specified period. Mr. Sitton and Secretary Thompson were each elected to our Board of Directors during the quarter ended January 31, 2006.

During the quarter ended January 31, 2006, we recorded the value of the unvested options as a prepaid asset which will be amortized over the life of the consulting agreements. Mr. Sitton’s and Secretary Thompson’s options were valued at an aggregate of $598,372 based on their weighted average exercise prices of between $1.00 to $2.75, and the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model assuming no dividend yield, volatility of 82.23% and a risk-free interest rate of 4.25%. This amount is being amortized over the two year life of the consulting agreements at $24,932 per month. During the quarter ended April 30, 2006 we amortized $74,797. Since December 2005 we have amortized five months of expense, or $124,661, and as a result, we reported a prepaid asset of $473,711 as “Prepaid consulting” on the face of the balance sheet as at April 30, 2006.

Note 8. Subsequent Events

Subsequent to the end of the quarter ended April 30, 2006, we received $16,250 from the exercise of an option on 32,500 shares of common stock issued under an employee option plan, and issued 250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a net exercise of 377,586 warrants granted to a third party for financial services.

F-22

PROSPECTUS

PURE BIOSCIENCE

9,177,596 SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

OVERVIEW

SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

RISK FACTORS

Use of Proceeds

Determination of Offering Price

Selling Securities Holders

Plan of Distribution

Legal Proceedings

Directors and Executive Officers

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Description of Securities

Disclosure of Commission Position of Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

Organization within Last Five Years

Description of Business

Where You Can Get More Information

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Description of Property

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Market for PURE Bioscience’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

PURE Bioscience INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Financial Statements

Note 2. Business Segment and Sales Concentrations

Note 3. Reclassifications

Note 4. Financing Events

Note 5. Common Stock

Note 6. Stock Option Plans

Note 7. Prepaid Consulting

Note 8. Subsequent Events

PURE Bioscience
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS