Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

CoBiz Financial Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

April 8, 2010

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

        This year's Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CoBiz Financial Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company), will be held at the Magnolia Ballroom, 817 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 on May 20, 2010 at 8:00 a.m., M.D.T. You are cordially invited to attend.

        This year, we are using the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rule that allows us to furnish our proxy materials to shareholders over the Internet. This means our shareholders will receive only a notice containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and vote online. If you receive this notice but would still like to request paper copies of the proxy materials, please follow the instructions on the notice or on the website referred to on the notice. By delivering proxy materials electronically to our shareholders, we can reduce the costs of printing and mailing our proxy materials. Please visit http:www.edocumentview.com/COBZ for more information about the electronic delivery of proxy materials.

        The Company's Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

        To be certain that your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting, whether or not you plan to attend in person, you should vote via telephone, via Internet, or by following the instructions on the enclosed notice as soon as possible. Your vote is important.

        At the Annual Meeting, I will review the Company's activities during the past year and its plans for the future. Shareholders will be given the opportunity to address questions to the Company's management. I hope you will be able to join us.


Table of Contents


COBIZ FINANCIAL INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Date and Time:

  Thursday, May 20, 2010, at 8:00 a.m., M.D.T.

Location:

 

Magnolia Ballroom
817 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202

Items of Business:

 
(i)
 

The election of ten nominees to serve as directors of the Company;

 
(ii)
 

The ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010;

 
(iii)
 

A nonbinding shareholder approval of executive compensation;

 
(iv)
 

The proposal to amend the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized under the Plan to 3,750,000 shares and increase the restricted stock award limit under the Plan to 2,000,000 shares; and

 
(v)
 

Any other business that may properly be considered at the meeting or any adjournment of the meeting.

Record Date:

 

You may vote at the meeting if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 31, 2010.

Voting by Proxy:

 

If you cannot attend the annual meeting in person, you may vote your shares by telephone or Internet by no later than 1:00 a.m. Central Time on May 20, 2010 (or as directed on the enclosed notice card). We encourage you to vote by telephone or Internet in order to reduce our mailing and handling expenses.

Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials:

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholders Meeting to be Held on May 20, 2010: CoBiz Financial's 2010 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 are available at: http:www.edocumentview.com/COBZ

Dated: April 8, 2010

        REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWN, YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE VOTE VIA TELEPHONE, INTERNET OR BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE NOTICE AND REQUESTING PAPER COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIALS AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL MEETING, AND IF YOU ARE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON.


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION OF PROXY, REVOCABILITY AND VOTING OF PROXIES

  1

General

  1

Voting

  1

Solicitation and Revocability of Proxies

  2

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

 
3

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 
3

Nominees for Election as Directors

  4

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 
9

PROPOSAL 3: NONBINDING SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 
9

PROPOSAL 4: AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY'S 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 
10

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES

 
19

Executive Committee

  19

Audit Committee

  20

Governance and Nominating Committee

  20

Compensation Committee

  21

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

  22

Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills of Directors and Nominees

  23

Board Structure and Lead Independent Director

  24

Board's Role in the Risk Oversight Process

  25

Director Training

  26

Compensation of Directors

  26

MANAGEMENT

 
28

Executive Officers

  28

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 
30

Executive Summary

  30

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  30

Compensation Committee Report

  42

Summary Compensation Table

  43

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

  44

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

  46

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

  47

Stock Option Plans

  47

Pension Benefits

  48

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

  49

RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 
52

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

  52

Pre-Approval of Services

  52

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 
54

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

 
55

Stock Ownership of Directors and Management

  55

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

  56

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

 
57

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 
58

Table of Contents

2009 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

  58

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

 
58

SHAREHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 
59

SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2011 ANNUAL MEETING

 
59

OTHER MATTERS

 
60

HOUSEHOLDING

 
60

APPENDIX A—AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 
A-i

Table of Contents


COBIZ FINANCIAL INC.
PROXY STATEMENT

SOLICITATION OF PROXY, REVOCABILITY AND VOTING OF PROXIES

GENERAL

        This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of CoBiz Financial Inc. (the "Board" or "Board of Directors"), a Colorado corporation (the "Company" or "CoBiz"), for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May 20, 2010, at 8:00 a.m., M.D.T., at the Magnolia Ballroom, 817 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, and at any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

        This Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy are first being transmitted or delivered to holders of the Company's common stock beginning on or about April 8, 2010, together with the Company's 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders.

        The Company's principal executive offices are located at 821 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.


VOTING

        Who Can Vote.    Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2010 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of that date, there were 36,738,994 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share is entitled to one vote. Cumulative voting is not permitted. Shares as to which the shareholder instructs the proxy to abstain from voting on any matter or withholds authority to vote for a director will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting but as not voted for purposes of determining the approval of any such matter or the election of directors. If a broker submits a proxy that indicates the broker does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on one or more matters (a "broker non-vote"), those shares will be treated in the same manner as abstentions.

        Quorum Requirement.    The Company's bylaws provide that the holders of not less than a majority of the shares entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum.

        Information about Votes Necessary for Action to be Taken.    Directors are elected by plurality vote, which means that the ten nominees who receive the most votes will be elected. The remaining matters to be considered at the meeting will be adopted if a majority of the votes cast "for" or "against" the matter vote in favor. Abstentions and broker non-votes (assuming a quorum is present) will have no effect on the election of Directors or on the remaining matters to be considered at the meeting.

        Internet availability of proxy materials.    This year, we are using the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) notice and access rule that allows us to furnish our proxy materials over the Internet to our shareholders instead of mailing paper copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, beginning on or about April 8, 2010, we sent our shareholders by mail a notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and vote online. This notice is not a proxy card and cannot be used to vote your shares. If you received only a notice this year, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless you request the materials by following the instructions on the notice or on the website referred to on the notice.

        If you own shares of common stock in more than one account—for example, in a joint account with your spouse and in your individual brokerage account—you may have received more than one notice. To vote all of your shares by proxy, please follow each of the separate proxy voting instructions that you received for your shares of common stock held in each of your different accounts.

1


Table of Contents

        Voting.    If your shares of our common stock are held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in "street name"), you should receive instructions from that person or entity that you must follow in order to have such shares voted. If you hold shares of our common stock in your own name and not through a broker or another nominee, you may vote such shares:

        Whichever of these methods you select to transmit your instructions, the proxy holders will vote your shares of our common stock in accordance with your instructions. Executed but unmarked proxies will be voted:

        Vote by Telephone.    If you hold shares of our common stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote such shares by telephone by dialing the toll-free telephone number printed on your notice card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 20, 2010. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares of our common stock and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

        Vote by Internet.    If you hold shares of our common stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can choose to vote via the Internet. The website for Internet voting is printed on your notice card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day until 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 20, 2010. As with telephone voting, you will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

        Vote by Mail.    You can vote by mail by following the instructions on the attached notice and requesting paper copies of the proxy materials. Then signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the postage paid envelope to be provided.


SOLICITATION AND REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES

        The Company will pay all expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, officers, directors and regular employees of the Company, who will receive no extra compensation for their services, may solicit proxies by telephone calls or facsimile transmissions.

        A shareholder submitting the enclosed proxy may revoke it at any time before his or her vote is cast at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of termination of the proxy's authority or of a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by voting in person at the meeting. Shares entitled to vote and represented by properly completed proxies received prior to the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be voted in the manner directed by the shareholder granting such proxy. If no direction is made in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.

2


Table of Contents


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

        

1.     Election of Directors

        The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of its Board of Directors. The Board has the authority under the Company's bylaws to set the number of directors, which may not be less than three. Effective May 21, 2009 the Board set the number of directors at ten.

        Candidates for nomination to the Board are selected by the Governance and Nominating Committee, and recommended to the Board of Directors for approval, in accordance with the guidelines established by such Committee, taking into consideration the overall composition and diversity of the Board and areas of expertise that new Board members might be able to offer. Directors are elected by the shareholders at each Annual Meeting, to serve for a one-year term, which expires on the date of the next Annual Meeting.

        Steven Bangert, Michael B. Burgamy, Morgan Gust, Evan Makovsky, Douglas L. Polson, Mary K. Rhinehart, Noel N. Rothman, Timothy J. Travis, Mary Beth Vitale and Mary M. White are incumbent directors whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting. All of them are being nominated for reelection at the Annual Meeting. As a result, there will not be any vacancies on the Board after our shareholders meeting on May 20, 2010 (assuming that all nominated directors are elected at the Annual Meeting).

        The Board has determined that directors Burgamy, Gust, Polson, Rhinehart, Rothman, Travis, Vitale and White qualify as independent directors under the NASDAQ listing standards as currently in effect. Directors are encouraged but are not required to attend the Annual Meeting. Last year, all incumbent directors attended the Annual Meeting, except for Timothy J. Travis.

        Each of the ten nominees standing for election has indicated a willingness to serve, but in case any of them is not a candidate at the Annual Meeting, which is not presently anticipated, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy may vote for a substitute nominee at their discretion.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE
ELECTION OF THESE DIRECTORS.

3


Table of Contents

Information regarding director nominees is set forth below:


Nominees for Election as Directors

Name:   Steven Bangert

Age:

 

53

Director since:

 

September 1994

CoBiz board committee:

 

Executive Committee

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Bangert has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Company since September 1994. From August 1992 to March 1999, Mr. Bangert served as President and a director of Western Capital Holdings, Inc. (Western Capital), formerly the bank holding company for River Valley Bank—Texas, located in McAllen, Texas. From March 1992 to July 1998, Mr. Bangert also served as Chairman of the Board of River Valley Bank—Texas, and, from April 1988 to July 1994, he served as Vice Chairman of the Board and CEO of River Valley Savings Bank—Illinois, a financial institution with locations in Chicago and Peoria, Illinois. From February 1994 to July 1998, Mr. Bangert served as a director and member of the Executive Committee of Lafayette American Bank. He holds a B.S. degree in business administration from the University of Nebraska—Lincoln.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Bangert also serves as Chairman of the Board of the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, CoBiz Bank (Bank), and as a director of: CoBiz GMB, Inc. (GMB); Financial Designs, Ltd. (FDL); CoBiz Insurance, Inc.; CoBiz ACMG, Inc. (ACMG); and Wagner Investment Management, Inc. (Wagner), which are direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Company.


Name:


 


Michael B. Burgamy

Age:

 

64

Director since:

 

May 1998

CoBiz board committees:

 

Executive Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance & Nominating Committee (Chair)

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

From 1999 to April 2001, Mr. Burgamy served as the Chief Financial Officer of Colibri Holding Corporation, a manufacturer of pet products and garden supplies. In April 2001, Mr. Burgamy became a director of Colibri Holding Corporation. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Burgamy served as the President of Perky-Pet Products Co., a manufacturer of pet products and supplies. From January 1976 to November 1994, he was President of CGS Distributing, Inc., a wholesale distributor of lawn and garden supplies. He holds a B.S. degree in engineering management from the United States Air Force Academy.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Burgamy has also served as a director of the Bank since March 1997.

4


Table of Contents


Name:

 

Morgan Gust

Age:

 

62

Director since:

 

January 2006

CoBiz board committees:

 

Compensation Committee (Chair)

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Gust is the owner and operator of various entities engaged in agriculture and real estate. Prior to June, 2007, Mr. Gust served as the President of Giant Industries, Inc., a petroleum refining and marketing company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Gust joined Giant Industries in August 1990, and over the years served in various senior management positions, including Executive Vice President, Vice President Administration, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Gust holds a B.S. degree and a J.D. degree from the University of Arizona.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Gust serves on the Board of the following funds:
   

•       Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund Incorporated (NYSE: PFD)

•       Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Opportunity Fund Incorporated (NYSE: PFO)

•       Flaherty & Crumrine/Claymore Preferred Securities Income Fund Incorporated (NYSE: FFC)

•       Flaherty & Crumrine/Claymore Total Return Fund Incorporated (NYSE: FLC)



Name:


 


Evan Makovsky

Age:

 

65

Director since:

 

January 2003

CoBiz board committee:

 

None

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Makovsky is the co-founder of Shames-Makovsky Realty Company, which specializes in the sale and leasing of commercial, industrial and investment properties. In the mid-1980s, Shames-Makovsky Realty Company formed Shames-Makovsky Mortgage Company, which specializes in "gap" financing. He holds a B.S.B.A. degree in Business and an M.S.B.A. degree in Finance from the University of Denver.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Makovsky has also served as a director of the Bank since March 1997.

5


Table of Contents


Name:

 

Douglas L. Polson

Age:

 

68

Director since:

 

August 2008

CoBiz board committee:

 

Audit Committee

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Polson served as chairman of Pacific Energy Group LLC, a NYSE-registered company and an affiliate of the Anschutz Corporation, from 2001 until 2005. He previously served as vice president, CFO and director of the Anschutz Corporation and Anschutz Company. Mr. Polson formerly chaired the Audit and Finance Committee and served as a member of the Executive Committee of the University of Colorado Hospital. Mr. Polson received his bachelor's degree from Utah State University and master's in business administration from Michigan State University.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Polson previously served on the boards of directors of Southern Pacific Rail Corporation, Rio Grande Industries and Qwest Communications International, Inc.


Name:


 


Mary K. Rhinehart

Age:

 

51

Director since:

 

August 2008

CoBiz board committee:

 

Audit Committee

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Ms. Rhinehart is senior vice president and chief financial officer of Johns Manville. Ms. Rhinehart joined Johns Manville, a leading manufacturer and marketer of premium-quality building and specialty products and a Berkshire Hathaway company, in 1979. During her career with Johns Manville, she has served in numerous leadership roles including CFO, corporate treasurer, corporate controller, vice president of human resources and vice president and general manager of a business unit. She received her bachelor's degree cum laude from the University of Colorado at Boulder and her master's in business administration from the University of Denver.

Other directorships:

 

Ms. Rhinehart currently serves on the board of directors of the University of Colorado Hospital—Finance and Audit Committee and the University of Denver Daniels College of Business Executive Advisory Committee. Ms Rhinehart is a former board member of Craig Hospital (including Chairman), KEMPE Children's Foundation and the Denver Chamber of Commerce.

6


Table of Contents


Name:

 

Noel N. Rothman

Age:

 

80

Director since:

 

September 1994

CoBiz board committee:

 

Compensation Committee

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Rothman is a private investor and has served as President of Namtor, Inc., a closely held business and financial services company in which he is a principal shareholder, since September 1985. Mr. Rothman attended Wayne State University.

Other directorships:

 

None


Name:


 


Timothy J. Travis

Age:

 

65

Director since:

 

May 1998

CoBiz board committee:

 

Lead Director, Executive Committee, Governance & Nominating Committee

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Since November 1981, Mr. Travis has been the President and CEO of Eaton Metal Products Company, a fully integrated engineering fabricator, with which he has been employed since 1963.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Travis also serves as a director and chairman of the audit committee and also serves on the finance committee and on the executive committee of University of Colorado Hospital, and is a past Chairman of the Denver Area Council of Boy Scouts of America. In addition, he is also a director of the National Western Stock Show. Mr. Travis is also a member of the Board of Directors of Raffles Insurance Co. In September of 2008 he became a Trustee of the El Pomar Foundation.

7


Table of Contents


Name:

 

Mary Beth Vitale

Age:

 

56

Director since:

 

January 2005

CoBiz board committee:

 

Audit Committee (Chair)

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Ms. Vitale co-founded Pellera, a strategic communications and business development firm, in 2001. Previously, she had served as President, CEO and Chairman of the Board of WestwindMedia.com, President and COO of RMI.NET, and President-western states for AT&T. She received her bachelor's degree from Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, Michigan; a master's degree from the University of Colorado; and an advanced management degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. She was also a Commissioner on former Colorado Governor Bill Owens' Commission for Science and Technology. In addition, she is a member of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Corporate Directors local chapter and is their treasurer.

Other directorships:

 

Ms. Vitale previously served on the Board of Intrado, Inc., a publicly-traded technology company, from 1999 to 2004; on the Board of RMI.Net, a publicly traded national e-business and convergent communications company from 1997 to 2000; on the Board as lead director of Eye-ris, a privately held software company, since 2006; on the Board of Zynex, Inc., a publicly-traded medical technology company, since 2008; and has served as a director of the Bank since May 2009.


Name:


 


Mary M. White

Age:

 

58

Director since:

 

January 2005

CoBiz board committee:

 

Governance and Nominating Committee

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Ms. White has served as the CEO of Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, Colorado, since 1996; previously, she spent 15 years at Rose Medical Center in Denver where she went from an Administrative Resident to Senior Vice President. Ms. White is active in many community organizations, having served on the Boards of the Colorado Neurological Institute, Colorado Personalized Education for Physicians, the American Heart Association and Doctors' Care. She is a past President of the Board of the Colorado Health & Hospital Association and is a past chair of the American Hospital Association's Metropolitan Hospital Governing Council. Ms. White received her bachelor's degree from Juniata College in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, and a master's degree from the University of Pittsburgh. Ms. White also serves on the Juniata College Board of Trustees and on the Board of Directors of Mountain States Employer's Council.

Other directorships:

 

None

8


Table of Contents

2.     Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

        The Board of Directors has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2010. Deloitte & Touche LLP has no relationship with the Company other than that arising from its engagement as independent registered public accounting firm. See "Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" below. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS
THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010.

3.     Nonbinding shareholder approval of executive compensation

        The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that provides Company shareholders the opportunity to vote on an advisory (nonbinding) resolution at each annual meeting to approve the compensation of the Company's executives named in the annual proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related disclosure contained in such proxy statement.

        This proposal gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to vote for or against the following resolution:

        Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the Board. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

        Shareholders are encouraged to carefully review the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement for a detailed discussion of the Company's executive compensation program.

        Our overall executive compensation policies and procedures are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation (together with the accompanying narrative disclosure) in this proxy statement. Our compensation policies and procedures are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, oversees our executive compensation program and continually monitors our policies to ensure they continue to emphasize programs that reward executives for results that are consistent with shareholder interests.

        Our Board and our Compensation Committee believe that our commitment to these responsible compensation practices justifies a vote by shareholders FOR the resolution approving the compensation of our executives as disclosed in this proxy statement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVES.

9


Table of Contents

4.     The proposed amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized under the Plan to 3,750,000 shares and increase the restricted stock award limit under the Plan to 2,000,000 shares.

        On March 18, 2010, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the CoBiz Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, or the "Plan," and approved the submission of such amendment to our shareholders for approval. The amendment, or the "Plan Amendment," subject to shareholder approval, would increase the number of shares of common stock available for awards under the Plan from 2,750,000 to 3,750,000 and of the 3,750,000 shares that could be issued under the Plan, increase the number of shares of restricted stock that could be issued to 2,000,000 shares from 500,000 shares.

History of the 2005 Plan

        At the May 19, 2005 Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved the CoBiz Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan adopted by the Board of Directors on April 5, 2005. At the May 15, 2008 Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved an amendment to the Plan adopted by the Board of Directors on March 17, 2008 that increased both the number of shares available and the limit on restricted stock awards.

        Currently, a total of 2,750,000 shares of our common stock are reserved for issuance upon exercise of awards granted under the Plan. As of March 31, 2010, awards to purchase 1,874,297 shares were outstanding, and 863,467 shares remain available for future awards under the Plan, or approximately 31.4% of total shares reserved. The remaining shares available for future awards under the Plan are insufficient to meet our long-term incentive needs. The proposed Plan Amendment therefore provides for an additional 1,000,000 shares, for a total of 3,750,000 shares available for awards to be made under the Plan. In addition, the number of shares that can be awarded in restricted stock will increase from 500,000 to 2,000,000. The use of restricted stock, in conjunction with stock options, provides an equity incentive to an employee that retains some value even in a period when the Company's stock price is declining. The Company estimates that these additional shares will be sufficient to make awards under the Plan for the next 3 to 4 years.

        The Company believes that its future success depends heavily on its ability to attract, motivate and retain the highest caliber employees. Equity is a key component of CoBiz's total compensation package and closely aligns key employees' interests with those of the Company's shareholders. Our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors believe that adding 1,000,000 shares to the Plan and increasing the number of shares available for restricted stock grants is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders because it will permit us to attract and retain key employees by providing them with appropriate equity incentives.

Summary of the Plan

        The following summary of the Plan is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the Plan and the Plan Amendment, copies of which are attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A. The Plan provides for the grant, at the discretion of the Committee (defined below), of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, performance shares, and performance units.

        General.    The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Company by providing an incentive program that will enable the Company to attract and retain employees, consultants and directors upon whose judgment, interest and efforts the Company's success is dependent and to provide them with an equity interest in the success of the Company in order to motivate superior performance. These incentives are provided through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, performance shares, and performance units.

10


Table of Contents

        Authorized Shares.    If the Plan Amendment is approved by the shareholders, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan will be increased to 3,750,000 from 2,750,000 shares.

        Certain Award Limits.    In addition to the limitation described above with respect to the total number of shares of common stock that will be authorized for issuance under the Plan, the Plan limits the number of shares that may be issued under certain types of awards. If the Plan Amendment is approved by the shareholders, no more than 2,000,000 shares in the aggregate may be issued pursuant to all restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted under the Plan. To enable compensation in connection with certain types of awards to qualify as "performance-based" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Plan establishes a limit on the maximum aggregate number of shares or dollar limit for which any such award may be granted to an employee in any fiscal year, as follows:

        A participant may receive only one performance share or performance unit award with respect to any performance period.

        Share Accounting and Adjustments.    If any award granted under the Plan expires or otherwise terminates for any reason without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company at the participant's purchase price, any such shares reacquired or subject to a terminated award will again become available for issuance under the Plan. Shares will not be treated as having been issued under the Plan and will therefore not reduce the number of shares available for grant to the extent an award is settled in cash or such shares are withheld or reacquired by the Company in satisfaction of a tax withholding obligation. The number of shares available under the Plan will be reduced upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right only by the number of shares actually issued. If shares are tendered in payment of the exercise price of an option, the number of shares available under the Plan will be reduced only by the net number of shares issued. Appropriate adjustments will be made to the number of shares authorized under the Plan, to the numerical limits on certain types of awards described above, and to outstanding awards in the event of any change in the common stock through merger, consolidation, reorganization, reincorporation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, split-off, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares or similar change in our capital structure, or if the Company makes a distribution to shareholders in a form other than common stock (excluding normal cash dividends) that has a material effect on the fair market value of the common stock. In such circumstances, the Committee also has the discretion under the Plan to adjust the terms of outstanding awards as it deems appropriate.

        Administration.    The Plan generally will be administered by the Company's Compensation Committee or other committee of the Board of Directors or, in the absence of such committee, by the Board of Directors. In the case of awards intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m) of the Code, administration of the Plan must be by a compensation committee comprised solely of two or more "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m).

11


Table of Contents


(For purposes of this summary, the term "Committee" will refer to either such duly appointed committee or the Board of Directors.) Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee determines in its discretion the persons to whom and the times at which awards are granted, the types and sizes of such awards, and all of their terms and conditions. The Committee may, subject to certain limitations on the exercise of its discretion required by Section 162(m), amend, cancel or renew any award, waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any award, and accelerate, continue, extend or defer the vesting of any award. The Plan provides, subject to certain limitations, for indemnification by the Company of any director, officer or employee against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with any legal action arising from such person's action or failure to act in administering the Plan. All awards granted under the Plan will be evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and the participant specifying the terms and conditions of the award, consistent with the requirements of the Plan. The Committee will interpret the Plan and awards granted thereunder, and all determinations of the Committee will be final and binding on all persons having an interest in the Plan or any award.

        Prohibition of Option and SAR Repricing.    The Plan expressly provides that, without the approval of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at a meeting of our shareholders, the Committee may not provide for either the cancellation of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for the grant of new options or stock appreciation rights at a lower exercise price or the amendment of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights to reduce the exercise price.

        Eligibility.    Awards may be granted to employees, directors and consultants of the Company or any present or future subsidiary of the Company. In addition, awards may be granted to prospective service providers in connection with written employment offers, provided that no shares subject to any such award may vest, become exercisable or be issued prior to such person's commencement of service. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees who, as of the time of grant, are employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Committee has determined that all of the Company's 560 employees were eligible to receive awards under the Plan.

        Stock Options.    The Committee may grant nonstatutory stock options, incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, or any combination of these. The exercise price of each option may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. However, any incentive stock option granted to a person who at the time of grant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company (a "Ten Percent Shareholder") must have an exercise price equal to at least 110% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

        The Plan provides that the option exercise price may be paid in cash, by check, or in cash equivalent; by means of a broker-assisted cashless exercise; to the extent legally permitted, by tender to the Company of shares of common stock owned by the participant having a fair market value not less than the exercise price; by such other lawful consideration as approved by the Committee; or by any combination of these. Nevertheless, the Committee may restrict the forms of payment permitted in connection with any option grant. No option may be exercised unless the participant has made adequate provision for federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, relating to the exercise of the option, including, if permitted or required by the Company, through the participant's surrender of a portion of the option shares to the Company.

        Options will become vested and exercisable at such times or upon such events and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria or restrictions as specified by the Committee. The maximum term of any option granted under the Plan is ten years, provided that an incentive stock option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder must have a term not exceeding five years. Unless otherwise permitted by the Committee, an option generally will remain exercisable for three months following the participant's

12


Table of Contents


termination of service, provided that if service terminates as a result of the participant's death or disability, the option generally will remain exercisable for 12 months, but in any event the option must be exercised no later than its expiration date.

        Incentive stock options are nontransferable by the participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and are exercisable during the participant's lifetime only by the participant. However, a nonstatutory stock option may be assigned or transferred to the extent permitted by the Committee in its discretion.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    The Committee may grant stock appreciation rights. A stock appreciation right is exercisable at such times or upon such events and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria or restrictions as specified by the Committee. The exercise price of each stock appreciation right may not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

        Upon the exercise of any stock appreciation right, the participant is entitled to receive an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock as to which the right is exercised over the aggregate exercise price for such shares. At the Committee's discretion, it may make payment of this stock price appreciation in cash or in shares of common stock whose fair market value on the exercise date equals the payment amount. The payment will be made in a lump sum. The maximum term of any stock appreciation right granted under the Plan is ten years.

        Stock appreciation rights generally are nontransferable by the participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and generally are exercisable during the participant's lifetime only by the participant. Other terms of stock appreciation rights generally are similar to the terms of comparable stock options.

        Restricted Stock Awards.    The Committee may grant restricted stock awards under the Plan either in the form of a restricted stock purchase right, which gives a participant an immediate right to purchase common stock, or in the form of a restricted stock bonus, for which the participant furnishes consideration in the form of services to the Company. The Committee determines the purchase price payable under restricted stock purchase awards, which may be less than the then current fair market value of our common stock. Restricted stock awards may be subject to vesting conditions based on such service or performance criteria as the Committee specifies, including the attainment of one or more performance goals similar to those described below in connection with performance awards. Shares acquired pursuant to a restricted stock award may not be transferred by the participant until vested. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, a participant whose service with the Company terminates will forfeit any shares of restricted stock as to which the restrictions have not lapsed prior to the participant's termination of service. Participants holding restricted stock will have the right to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid, except that dividends or other distributions paid in shares will be subject to the same restrictions as the original award.

        Restricted Stock Units.    The Committee may grant restricted stock units under the Plan, which represent a right to receive shares of our common stock at a future date determined in accordance with the participant's award agreement. No monetary payment is required for receipt of restricted stock units or the shares issued in settlement of the award, the consideration for which is furnished in the form of the participant's services to the Company. The Committee may grant restricted stock unit awards subject to the attainment of one or more performance goals similar to those described below in connection with performance awards, or may make the awards subject to vesting conditions similar to those applicable to restricted stock awards. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, a participant whose service with the Company terminates will forfeit any restricted stock units which have not vested prior to the participant's termination of service. Participants have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends with respect to restricted stock unit awards until shares of common stock are issued in

13


Table of Contents


settlement of such awards. However, the Committee may grant restricted stock units that entitle their holders to receive dividend equivalents, which are rights to receive additional restricted stock units for a number of shares whose value is equal to any cash dividends the Company pays.

        Performance Awards.    The Committee may grant performance awards subject to such conditions and the attainment of such performance goals over such periods as the Committee determines in writing and sets forth in a written agreement between the Company and the participant. These awards may be designated as performance shares or performance units. Performance shares and performance units are unfunded bookkeeping entries generally having initial values, respectively, equal to the fair market value determined on the grant date of a share of common stock and $100 per unit. Performance awards will specify a predetermined amount of performance shares or performance units that may be earned by the participant to the extent that one or more predetermined performance goals are attained within a predetermined performance period. To the extent earned, performance awards may be settled in cash, shares of common stock (including shares of restricted stock) or any combination thereof.

        Prior to the beginning of the applicable performance period or such later date as permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee will establish one or more performance goals applicable to the award. Performance goals will be based on the attainment of specified target levels with respect to one or more measures of business or financial performance of the Company and each subsidiary consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes, or such division or business unit of the Company as may be selected by the Committee. The Committee, in its discretion, may base performance goals on one or more of the following such measures: gross margin, operating margin, operating income, pre-tax profit, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, net income, expenses, the market price of our common stock, earnings per share, return on shareholder equity, return on capital, return on net assets, economic value added, market share and other earnings or performance targets established by the Committee. The target levels with respect to these performance measures may be expressed on an absolute basis or relative to a standard specified by the Committee. The degree of attainment of performance measures will be calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but prior to the accrual or payment of any performance award for the same performance period, and, according to criteria established by the Committee, excluding the effect (whether positive or negative) of changes in accounting standards or any extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring item occurring after the establishment of the performance goals applicable to a performance award.

        Following completion of the applicable performance period, the Committee will certify in writing the extent to which the applicable performance goals have been attained and the resulting value to be paid to the participant. The Committee retains the discretion to eliminate or reduce, but not increase, the amount that otherwise would be payable on the basis of the performance goals attained to a participant who is a "covered employee" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. However, no such reduction may increase the amount paid to any other participant. The Committee may make positive or negative adjustments to performance award payments to participants other than covered employees to reflect the participant's individual job performance or other factors determined by the Committee. In its discretion, the Committee may provide for the payment to a participant awarded performance shares of dividend equivalents with respect to cash dividends paid on the Company's common stock. Payment will be made in a lump sum unless the Award Agreement provides for a deferred payment, a lump sum or installments. If any payment is to be made on a deferred basis, the Committee may provide for the payment of dividend equivalents or interest during the deferral period.

        Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, if a participant's service terminates due to the participant's death or disability prior to completion of the applicable performance period, the final award value will be determined at the end of the performance period on the basis of the performance goals attained during the entire performance period but will be prorated for the number of months of

14


Table of Contents


the participant's service during the performance period. If a participant's service terminates prior to completion of the applicable performance period for any other reason, the Plan provides that, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the performance award will be forfeited. No performance award may be sold or transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution prior to the end of the applicable performance period.

        Change in Control.    Unless otherwise defined in a participant's award agreement, the Plan provides that a "Change in Control" occurs upon (a) the acquisition by any person, entity or group (as defined in Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) (other than (1) the Company and its subsidiaries, (2) any employee benefit plan of the Company or its subsidiaries, or (3) any person who is an officer, director or beneficial owner of 5% or more of the outstanding stock on the effective date of the plan), through one transaction or a series of transactions, of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company; (b) the merger or consolidation of the Company as a result of which the persons who were shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the merged or consolidated company; provided, however, that, for purposes of this clause (b), any shares of stock of or other equity interest in the merged or consolidated entity that are issued to or retained by a person who was a shareholder of the Company immediately prior to the transaction in respect of such person's ownership interest in a party to the transaction other than the Company shall not be deemed to be owned by such person immediately after the transaction (but shall be deemed to be outstanding); (c) the liquidation or dissolution of the Company (other than (1) a dissolution occurring upon a merger or consolidation thereof, (2) a liquidation of the Company into its subsidiary, or (3) a liquidation or dissolution that is incident to a reorganization); and (d) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company through one transaction or a series of related transactions to one or more persons or entities.

        The Committee may provide (either at the time of a Change of Control or at the time that options or stock appreciation rights are granted) for the acceleration of vesting of any or all outstanding options and stock appreciation rights upon a Change of Control, upon such terms and to such extent as it determines.

        If a Change in Control occurs, the Plan authorizes the Committee, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, to settle each or any outstanding option or stock appreciation right for a payment to the participant with respect to each vested share subject to the award of an amount equal to the excess of the consideration to be paid per share of common stock in the Change in Control transaction over the exercise price per share under the award. Upon such payment, the related option or stock appreciation right is cancelled. Alternatively, if a Change in Control occurs, the Committee may direct, without the consent of any participant, that the surviving, continuing, successor or purchasing entity or its parent either will assume all outstanding options and stock appreciation rights or substitute substantially equivalent options or rights for its stock. If any option or stock appreciation right is not to be settled, assumed or substituted for as described above, in connection with a Change of Control, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may give written notice to the participant establishing a date by which such option or stock appreciation right must be exercised (to the extent vested) prior to the consummation of the Change in Control. Any such option or stock appreciation right that is not exercised by the date specified in such notice shall terminate upon the consummation of the Change in Control.

        Finally, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the event of a Change in Control for the acceleration of vesting of any restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award, performance share and performance unit award held by a participant whose service with the Company has not terminated prior to the Change in Control to such extent as determined by the Committee.

15


Table of Contents

        Termination or Amendment.    The Plan will continue in effect until the first to occur of (i) its termination by the Committee, (ii) the date on which all shares available for issuance under the Plan have been issued and all restrictions on such shares under the terms of the Plan and the agreements evidencing awards granted under the Plan have lapsed, or (iii) the tenth anniversary of the Plan's effective date. The Committee may terminate or amend the Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may be made without shareholder approval that would increase the maximum aggregate number of shares of stock authorized for issuance under the Plan, change the class of persons eligible to receive incentive stock options or would require shareholder approval under any applicable law, regulation or rule. No termination or amendment may affect any outstanding award unless expressly provided by the Committee, and, in any event, may not adversely affect an outstanding award without the consent of the participant unless necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule. See "Impact of Section 409A of the Code" below for a discussion of the right of the Board to amend the Plan without shareholder approval to comply with recent legislation.

        Fair Market Value.    For purposes of the Plan, the fair market value of a share of Company common stock for any particular date is the closing price of a share as reported by NASDAQ (or any other exchange on which the stock is then traded) or if the stock is not traded on NASDAQ or another exchange or if the closing price is not reported by NASDAQ, the average of the high bid and low asked prices for the stock, as reported by NASDAQ or any other accepted source selected by the Committee or, if bid and asked prices are not reported by any source acceptable to the Committee, the fair market value will be determined by the Committee in good faith by any reasonable means. On March 29, 2010, the fair market value per share determined on this basis was $6.03, based on the closing price of a share as reported by NASDAQ.

Summary of U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following summary is intended only as a general guide to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of participation in the Plan and does not attempt to describe all possible federal or other tax consequences of such participation or tax consequences based on particular circumstances.

        Incentive Stock Options.    A participant recognizes no taxable income for regular income tax purposes as a result of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option qualifying under Section 422 of the Code. Participants who neither dispose of their shares within two years following the date the option was granted nor within one year following the exercise of the option normally will recognize a capital gain or loss upon the sale of the shares equal to the difference, if any, between the sale price and the purchase price of the shares. If a participant satisfies such holding periods upon a sale of the shares, the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. If a participant disposes of shares within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the date of exercise (a "disqualifying disposition"), the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the option exercise date and the exercise price (not to exceed the gain realized on the sale if the disposition is a transaction with respect to which a loss, if sustained, would be recognized) will be taxed as ordinary income at the time of disposition. Any gain in excess of that amount will be a capital gain. If a loss is recognized, there will be no ordinary income, and such loss will be a capital loss. Any ordinary income recognized by the participant upon the disqualifying disposition of the shares generally should be deductible by us for federal income tax purposes, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

        The difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date of an incentive stock option is treated as an adjustment in computing the participant's alternative minimum taxable income and may be subject to an alternative minimum tax which is paid if such tax exceeds the regular tax for the year. Special rules may apply with respect to certain subsequent sales of the shares in a disqualifying disposition, certain basis adjustments for purposes of computing

16


Table of Contents


the alternative minimum taxable income on a subsequent sale of the shares and certain tax credits which may arise with respect to participants subject to the alternative minimum tax.

        Nonstatutory Stock Options.    Options not designated or qualifying as incentive stock options will be nonstatutory stock options having no special tax status. A participant generally recognizes no taxable income as the result of the grant of such an option. Upon the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, the participant normally recognizes ordinary income in the amount of the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of stock acquired by the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the exercise date, will be taxed as a capital gain or loss. No tax deduction is available to the Company with respect to the grant of a nonstatutory stock option or the sale of the stock acquired pursuant to such grant. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant as a result of the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    A Participant recognizes no taxable income upon the receipt of a stock appreciation right. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to the withholding of income and employment taxes. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant in connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation right, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

        Restricted Stock.    A participant acquiring restricted stock generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares on the "determination date." The "determination date" is the date on which the participant acquires the shares unless the shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and are not transferable, in which case the determination date is the earlier of (i) the date on which the shares become transferable or (ii) the date on which the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. If the determination date is after the date on which the participant acquires the shares, the participant may elect, pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code, to have the date of acquisition be the determination date by filing an election with the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") no later than 30 days after the date on which the shares are acquired. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of shares acquired pursuant to a restricted stock award, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the determination date, will be taxed as a capital gain or loss. The Company generally should be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant on the determination date, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

        Performance and Restricted Stock Unit Awards.    A participant generally will recognize no income upon the receipt of a performance share, performance unit or restricted stock unit award. Upon the settlement of such awards, participants normally will recognize ordinary income in the year of receipt in an amount equal to the cash received and the fair market value of any substantially vested shares received. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. If the participant receives shares of restricted stock, the participant generally will be taxed in the same manner as described above (see discussion under "Restricted Stock"). Upon the sale of any shares received, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the "determination date" (as defined above under "Restricted Stock"), will be taxed as a capital gain or loss. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction

17


Table of Contents


equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant on the determination date, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

        Company's Deduction.    The Plan is designed to preserve the Company's ability to deduct in full for federal income tax purposes the compensation recognized by its executive officers in connection with certain awards granted under the Plan. Section 162(m) of the Code generally denies a corporate tax deduction for annual compensation exceeding $1 million paid to the CEO or to any of the four other most highly compensated officers of a publicly held company. Furthermore, the Company's participation in the Treasury's Capital Purchase Program limits the tax deductibility of compensation to $500,000 for Senior Executive Officers. However, certain types of compensation, including performance-based compensation, are generally excluded from this deductibility limit.

        Impact of Section 409A of the Code.    Section 409A of the Code provides that amounts deferred under a "nonqualified deferred compensation plan" are included in income when deferred, or when the amount is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, if later, unless the plan complies with certain requirements imposed under Code Section 409A, including requirements related to the timing of elections and distributions. If a plan fails to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A, then all deferred amounts are included in the individual's taxable income, and the individual is subject to an additional tax equal to 20% plus interest at the IRS underpayment rate plus 1% from the time the amount first was deferred or no longer was subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, if later, to the time the amount is included in income. Final regulations issued by the IRS provide exceptions from the application of Code Section 409A for certain equity-based arrangements, although other types of equity-based arrangements are considered nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A. Exceptions from the application of Code Section 409A include transfers of restricted stock, stock options granted at not less than fair market value (including nonstatutory stock options and incentive stock options), and stock appreciation rights granted at not less than fair market value. Other equity-based awards under the Plan will be subject to the requirements of Code Section 409A.

Summary

        We believe strongly that the approval of the Plan Amendment, which includes the increase in the number of authorized shares for issuance, including an increase in the number of restricted stock awards permitted, is essential to our continued success. Awards such as those provided under the Plan constitute an important incentive for participants and will help us to attract, retain and motivate qualified individuals to serve on behalf of our company.

Vote Required

        Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares casting votes in person or by proxy on this proposal at the annual meeting. The number of such affirmative votes must be at least a majority of the required quorum for the meeting.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDMENT TO THE COBIZ INC. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

18


Table of Contents


MEETINGS OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES

        The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of the Board and the following standing committees: Executive, Audit, Governance and Nominating and Compensation. The standing committees regularly report on their activities and actions to the full Board. Each of the standing committees has the authority to engage outside experts, advisors and counsel to the extent it considers appropriate to assist the committee in its work. With the exception of the Executive Committee, each of the standing committees has adopted and operates under a written charter.

        The Company maintains an Internet website located at www.cobizfinancial.com on which, among other things, the Company makes available, free of charge, various reports that it files with or furnishes to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K. These reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Additional information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The Company has also made available on its website its Corporate Governance Guidelines, its Excessive or Luxury Expenditures Policy and its Code of Conduct and Ethics, as well as the charters for its Audit Committee, Governance and Nominating Committee and Compensation Committee. To access these materials, visit the Company's website at www.cobizfinancial.com and select "Investor Relations," then select "Corporate Governance," and then select the name of the document you wish to view. The content on any website referred to in this filing is not incorporated by reference into this filing unless expressly noted otherwise.

        The Board of Directors held seven meetings during fiscal year 2009. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board and Board committees on which the director served during the fiscal year.

        The following table reflects the current membership of each Board committee:

 
  Committee Membership
Name
  Executive   Audit   Governance &
Nominating
  Compensation

Steven Bangert

  X            

Michael B. Burgamy

  X       Chair   X

Morgan Gust

  X           Chair

Evan Makovsky

               

Douglas L. Polson

      X        

Mary K. Rhinehart

      X        

Noel N. Rothman

              X

Timothy J. Travis

  X       X    

Mary Beth Vitale

      Chair        

Mary M. White

          X    


Executive Committee

        The Executive Committee is authorized to exercise certain of the powers of the Board of Directors, subject to ratification by the full Board of Directors, and meets as needed, usually in situations where it is not feasible to take action by the full Board of Directors. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2009.

19


Table of Contents


Audit Committee

        The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has the responsibility to:

        The Audit Committee consists of three members, Mr. Polson, Ms. Rhinehart and Ms. Vitale, all of whom are "independent" under the NASDAQ listing standards currently in effect. The Board of Directors has designated Mr. Polson, Ms. Rhinehart and Ms. Vitale each as an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules. The Board of Directors has determined that the Audit Committee members do not have any relationship to the Company that may interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities. None of the Audit Committee members are current officers or employees of the Company or its affiliates. The Audit Committee held seventeen meetings in 2009. At least quarterly, the Audit Committee met in private session with our independent registered public accounting firm and alone in executive session without members of management present. Annually, the Audit Committee will meet privately with the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the Director of Internal Audit of the Company.


Governance and Nominating Committee

        The Governance and Nominating Committee (G&N Committee) operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. The G&N Committee has the responsibility to:

20


Table of Contents

        When evaluating whether an incumbent director should be nominated for reelection, the G&N Committee reviews the director's overall service to the Company during his or her term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation and quality of performance. When searching for new director candidates, the G&N Committee canvasses its network of professional contacts to compile a list of potential candidates and may also engage a professional search firm if it deems appropriate. The G&N Committee then meets to discuss and consider each candidate's qualifications and selects by majority vote a nominee to recommend to the full Board. The G&N Committee will consider individuals recommended by a shareholder of the Company to serve on the Board. For a description of the procedures for nominating a candidate to the Board and the minimum qualifications for Board membership, please see "Shareholder Recommendations of Director Nominees" below.

        At any meeting of the shareholders at which nominees for director are subject to an uncontested election (that is, the number of nominees is equal to the number of seats), any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes "withheld" from his or her election than votes "for" such election (with "abstentions" and "broker non-votes" not counted as a vote "for" or "against" such nominee's election) (a "Majority Withheld Vote"), promptly shall offer to submit his or her resignation from the Board following certification of the shareholder vote. The G&N Committee shall consider the director's offer and recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to same, which can range from accepting the director's offer; to maintaining the director but addressing what the G&N Committee believes to the underlying causes of the "withheld" votes; to resolving that the director will not be renominated in the future for election; or to rejecting the director's offer.

        Each member of the G&N Committee must meet the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards and any other applicable laws, rules and regulations governing independence, as determined by the Board. The G&N Committee currently consists of Messrs. Burgamy and Travis, and Ms. White, each of whom is "independent" under the NASDAQ listing standards currently in effect.

        The G&N Committee held five meetings in 2009. During the meetings, the Committee held an executive session without members of management present.


Compensation Committee

        The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in the discharge of its responsibilities relating to compensation of the executives and other key employees of the Company, and in connection with administering the Company's employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee has responsibility to:

21


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Burgamy, Gust and Rothman, each of whom is not an employee of the Company, is independent under the NASDAQ listing standards currently in effect and is an "outside director" within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Service Code (Code).

        The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2009. During several meetings, the Compensation Committee held an executive session without members of management present.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2009, or at any other time, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Furthermore, no executive officer of the Company served on the compensation committee (or other Board committee performing equivalent functions) or as a director of any other entity that had an executive officer who served as a director or on the Compensation Committee of the Company.

        The Bank has invested or committed to invest in several licensed Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs) in which certain directors (including Messrs. Burgamy and Rothman, who are members of the Compensation Committee) and executive officers of the Company also own interests. These investments and the interests of the directors and executive officers in the SBICs are described below.

        In July 1997, the Bank committed to purchase up to $500,000 of limited partnership interests in Prairie Capital Mezzanine Fund, L.P. (Prairie Capital), an investment fund that makes subordinated debt and preferred stock investments in a wide variety of small businesses throughout the United States. Prairie Capital is licensed as a SBIC. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank's aggregate investment in Prairie Capital was $450,000, and the Bank was subject to additional capital calls of up to $50,000. Mr. Bangert and Namtor Denver Property LLC (Namtor), an entity controlled by Mr. Rothman, have made individual capital commitments to Prairie Capital in amounts of $2,000,000 and $1,500,000, respectively, and own interests in Prairie Capital proportionate to their capital commitments. Mr. Bangert is a member of the Advisory Board of Prairie Capital. The general partner of Prairie Capital has agreed to make certain payments to the Bank, Mr. Bangert and Namtor (pro rata, in proportion to their respective investments in Prairie Capital) following the liquidation of Prairie Capital in the event that they do not realize an internal rate of return of at least 25% on their respective investments.

        In addition, the Bank has committed $1,000,000 to a second fund, Prairie Capital Mezzanine Fund II, L.P. (Prairie Capital II). As of December 31, 2009, the Bank's aggregate investment in Prairie Capital II was $900,000, and the Bank was subject to additional capital calls of up to $100,000. Messrs. Bangert, Rothman and Burgamy have capital commitments to Prairie Capital II in amounts of $2,000,000, $285,000 and $500,000, respectively, and own interests in Prairie Capital II proportionate to their capital commitments. The general partner of Prairie Capital II has not made any guarantees regarding the financial returns of this fund. Mr. Bangert is a member of the Advisory Board of Prairie Capital II.

22


Table of Contents

        The Bank has also committed $1,000,000 to a third fund, Prairie Capital Mezzanine Fund III, L.P. (Prairie Capital III). As of December 31, 2009, the Bank's aggregate investment in Prairie Capital III was $850,000, and the Bank was subject to additional capital calls of up to $150,000 in Prairie Capital III. Messrs. Bangert, Rothman and Burgamy have capital commitments to Prairie Capital III in amounts of $2,000,000, $1,500,000 and $500,000, respectively, and own interests in Prairie Capital III proportionate to their capital commitments. The general partner of Prairie Capital III has not made any guarantees regarding the financial returns of this fund. Mr. Bangert is a member of the Advisory Board of Prairie Capital III.

        The Bank has committed $7,500,000 to GMB Mezzanine Capital, L.P. (GMB Mezz Fund). As of December 31, 2009, the Bank's aggregate investment in the GMB Mezz Fund was $5,620,000, and the Bank was subject to additional capital calls of up to $1,880,000 in the fund. The GMB Mezz Fund Partnership Agreement stipulates that unused capital calls returned to partners can be subject to recall at a later date which would increase the amount of additional capital calls the Bank is subject to. The GMB Mezz Fund's general partner is Lakeside Capital Partners, LLC (Lakeside Capital). The Company advanced start-up funding to Lakeside Capital while it was forming and marketing the GMB Mezz Fund. In return, Lakeside Capital granted naming rights of the fund to CoBiz and agreed to allocate a portion of their carried-interest in the GMB Mezz Fund to the Company. The following directors have also made capital commitments to the GMB Mezz Fund, as indicated, and own interests proportionate to their capital commitments: Mr. Bangert—$2,500,000; Mr. Burgamy—$500,000; Mr. Rothman—$2,000,000; and Mr. Travis—$500,000. Mr. Bangert is also a member of the Advisory Board of GMB Mezz Fund.


Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills of Directors and Nominees

        In considering each director and director nominee and the composition of the Board as a whole, the G&N Committee searches for candidates that promote diversity of views, experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills, including diversity in gender and ethnic background, that the G&N Committee believes enables a director to make a significant contribution to the Board and its oversight of the Company. These experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills, include management experience, independence, financial expertise, education, community involvement and diversity in gender and ethnic background. The Committee may also consider other experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills, as it deems appropriate, given the needs of the Board and the Company.

        The Committee believes that directors who possess these experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills are better able to provide oversight of management and our long-term and strategic objectives. The following table sets forth the experience, characteristics, attributes and skills of each director nominee that led the Board to conclude that such persons should serve as directors. The Board also

23


Table of Contents


considered the specific experience described in each nominee's biographical information, as disclosed above.

Attribute   Directors with Attribute
Management Experience        
Experience as a CEO, COO, President or Senior Vice President of a company or a significant subsidiary, operating division or business unit.   Steven Bangert
Michael B. Burgamy
Morgan Gust
Evan Makovsky
Douglas L. Polson
  Mary K. Rhinehart
Noel N. Rothman
Timothy J. Travis
Mary Beth Vitale
Mary M. White

Independence

 

 

 

 
Satisfy the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards and SEC regulations.   Michael B. Burgamy
Morgan Gust
Douglas L. Polson
Mary K. Rhinehart
  Noel N. Rothman
Timothy J. Travis
Mary Beth Vitale
Mary M. White

Financial Expertise

 

 

 

 
Possess the knowledge and experience to be qualified as an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined by SEC regulations.   Morgan Gust
Douglas L. Polson
  Mary K. Rhinehart
Mary Beth Vitale

Education

 

 

 

 
Possesses an advanced educational degree.   Morgan Gust
Evan Makovsky
Douglas L. Polson
  Mary K. Rhinehart
Mary Beth Vitale
Mary M. White

Community Involvement

 

 

 

 
Is actively involved in the communities in which we operate and will promote a positive image of the Company.   Steven Bangert
Michael B. Burgamy
Morgan Gust
Evan Makovsky
Douglas L. Polson
  Mary K. Rhinehart
Noel N. Rothman
Timothy J. Travis
Mary Beth Vitale
Mary M. White

Diversity

 

 

 

 
Contribute to the board in a way that enhances perspectives through diversity in gender, ethnic background, etc.   Mary K. Rhinehart
Mary Beth Vitale
Mary M. White
   


Board Structure and Lead Independent Director

        Mr. Bangert serves as the Chairman of the Board, in addition to his duties as CEO of the Company. He is currently the only director who is also an employee of the Company. The Board has determined that the current structure of the combined Chairmanship and CEO position is in the best interest of the Company. The Board believes that the experience of Mr. Bangert is invaluable to the leadership and the direction of the Company as provided by the Board. The combined position promotes both guidance and clarity of the Company's mission statement. The Board believes that the potential appearance of a conflict of interest that may arise when the positions are combined has been mitigated by steps taken by the Board. Specifically, the Board has elected a lead independent director as discussed below, conducts executive sessions without the presence of management, utilizes the services of independent consultants to review executive compensation and has aligned incentive compensation with corporate-wide performance goals that do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risks.

24


Table of Contents

        Mr. Travis currently serves as the lead independent director of the Board of Directors. He was initially elected to such position by the independent members of the Board of Directors at the May 2009 meeting of the Board of Directors to serve in such position by the independent members of the Board. The lead independent director position will continue to be reviewed annually at the May meeting of the Board of Directors. The responsibilities of the lead independent director are as follows:


Board's Role in the Risk Oversight Process

        The Board's role in risk oversight is to oversee and monitor the Company's risk management processes and to ensure that management has the skills and resources in place to address areas of risk within the organization. To facilitate that goal, the Company has implemented an enterprise wide risk analysis and oversight program. This program is designed to: (a) identify the various risks faced by the organization, including credit risk, market risk (including liquidity risk) and operating risk (including technology, operational, compliance and fiduciary risk); (b) identify appropriate mitigation measures for such risks, including assigning responsibility for managing those risks to individual executives within the management team; and (c) align these management assignments with appropriate Board-level oversight.

        Responsibility for the oversight of the program itself has been delegated to the G&N Committee. Under the program, a risk matrix has been developed and the organization's most prominent risks have been identified, responsibility for such risks has been assigned to appropriate executives, and assignments have been aligned for appropriate Board oversight. Responsibility for managing these risks includes strategies related to both mitigation (acceptance and management) and transfer (insurance). The G&N Committee reviews and updates the matrix annually or as necessary if there are significant changes to products, services or risks. Such reviews are performed with input from individuals tasked with risk oversight, including our Chief Operations Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Internal Audit Director and Compliance Manager.

        The Board also regularly reviews the organizational structure of the Board, its committees and the management structure of the Company to ensure that risk oversight is appropriately addressed. The Board also meets in executive sessions without management, including executive sessions with our independent registered public accountants, to discuss items that include risk. The Board meets regularly with our Chief Operations Officer and other members of management to review the risk profile of the Company and risks related to the introduction of new and/or changed products.

        As part of its oversight of the Company's executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee, and the Company's management team, are responsible for evaluating the risks presented by the Company's compensation programs and confirming that such programs: (i) do not encourage risk taking to a degree that is reasonably likely to have a materially adverse impact on the Company; (ii) do not encourage the management team to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company; and (iii) do not encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company. At a minimum, the Compensation Committee reviews such risks every six months.

25


Table of Contents


Director Training

        Ms. Vitale, Chair of the Audit Committee, completed the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) accredited director education program "Board Leadership in Historic Times" in June 2009. Ms. Rhinehart attended the director education program "Bank Director Audit Committee Conference" in June 2009.


Compensation of Directors

        Each director who is not an employee, but serves in the roles described below, receives the following:

        In addition, during 2009 each incumbent director who was not an officer of the Company received options to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock for $6.02 per share, the closing market price of the stock on the date of grant. Furthermore, any director who is not an employee of the Company who also served on the Bank's Board of Directors received an option to purchase an additional 500 shares of common stock for $6.02 per share, the closing market price of the stock on the date of grant and was paid a fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Bank's Board they attended. Any director who is on the Bank's Board of Directors also received an annual retainer fee of $6,000. Directors of the Company who are employees do not receive additional compensation for their services as directors or committee members.

        No director received perquisites or personal benefits in 2009 in excess of $10,000.

26


Table of Contents

        The following table shows the compensation of the members of our Board of Directors during fiscal year 2009.

Name(1)
  Fees earned
or paid in
cash
($)
  Option
awards
($)(2)
  All other
compensation
($)(3)
  Total
($)
 

Michael B. Burgamy

  $ 42,250   $ 2,737   $ 19,368   $ 64,355  

Morgan Gust

  $ 30,250   $ 2,737   $   $ 32,987  

Thomas M. Longust(4)

  $ 6,000   $   $   $ 6,000  

Evan Makovsky

  $ 18,250   $ 2,737   $ 19,368   $ 40,355  

Harold Mosanko(4)

  $ 3,000   $   $ 4,000   $ 7,000  

Douglas L. Polson

  $ 40,000   $ 2,737   $   $ 42,737  

Mary K. Rhinehart

  $ 48,500   $ 2,737   $   $ 51,237  

Noel N. Rothman

  $ 23,250   $ 2,737   $   $ 25,987  

Timothy J. Travis

  $ 31,750   $ 2,737   $   $ 34,487  

Mary Beth Vitale

  $ 48,750   $ 2,737   $ 15,368   $ 66,855  

Mary M. White

  $ 23,250   $ 2,737   $   $ 25,987  

(1)
Steven Bangert, our CEO, is not included in this table because he is an employee of CoBiz and thus received no additional compensation for his service as director. The compensation he received as an employee of CoBiz is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)
The amounts in this column are calculated based on Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC 718), and represent the grant date fair value of the award. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to arrive at the Black-Scholes value are disclosed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report and Form 10-K. The grant date fair value per each director option award granted in 2009 was $2.74 per option based on the closing price per share of CoBiz Common Stock of $6.02 on May 20, 2009.

The directors held options at December 31, 2009, as follows:

Name
  Aggregate
number of
option awards
outstanding at
December 31, 2009
 

Michael B. Burgamy

    7,500  

Morgan Gust

    4,000  

Thomas M. Longust(4)

    8,665  

Evan Makovsky

    13,823  

Harold Mosanko(4)

    1,582  

Douglas L. Polson

    1,734  

Mary K. Rhinehart

    1,734  

Noel N. Rothman

    9,665  

Timothy J. Travis

    15,527  

Mary Beth Vitale

    5,500  

Mary M. White

    5,000  
(3)
All other compensation represents fees paid for service on the Bank's Board of Directors and includes the grant date fair value of $1,368 for the 500 additional options granted in 2009 based on the closing price per share of CoBiz Common Stock of $6.02 on May 20, 2009. The assumptions used to arrive at the Black-Scholes value are disclosed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report and Form 10-K.

(4)
Outgoing board member effective May 20, 2009.

27


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers

        Information regarding executive officers of the Company is set forth below. Biographical information for Mr. Bangert is set forth above under "Election of Directors."

Name:   Jonathan C. Lorenz

Age:

 

58

Officer since:

 

March 1995

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Lorenz has served as CEO of the Company's banking franchise composed of Colorado Business Bank and Arizona Business Bank since 1995. From June 1993 to March 1995, Mr. Lorenz pursued various business investment opportunities, including the formation of First Western Growth Fund, a small business investment company. Mr. Lorenz was employed by Colorado National Bank (CNB) in various capacities from September 1976 to June 1993. His last position with CNB was Senior Vice President and Manager of Corporate Banking. He holds a B.A. degree in political science and an M.B.A. from the University of Colorado.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Lorenz serves as Vice Chairman and CEO of the Bank. In addition, he is a director of GMB which is a direct subsidiary of the Company.

Name:

 

N. Bruce Callow

Age:

 

64

Officer since:

 

January 2009

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Callow has served as the Executive Vice President and Director of Wealth Management of the Company since January 2009. Previously he served as Executive Vice President, Private Bank and Institutional Trust Services at Fifth Third Bank, Chicago. In addition, he previously served in senior management positions at LaSalle/ABN AMRO Bank and Northern Trust Co. Mr. Callow has a J.D. degree from DePaul University College of Law; and a B.S. from Loyola University, Chicago, IL.

Other directorships:

 

None

28


Table of Contents

Name:   Richard J. Dalton

Age:

 

53

Officer since:

 

January 1997

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Mr. Dalton has served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of the Company since May 2009. From May 2003 to May 2009, Mr. Dalton served as the President of the Company. From January 1997 to May 2003, Mr. Dalton served as Executive Vice President and CFO of the Company. From August 1992 to January 1998, Mr. Dalton was the Vice President of Western Capital. From August 1992 to June 1996, Mr. Dalton served as the President and CEO of River Valley Bank—Texas. He holds a B.S. degree in business administration from the University of Southern Colorado and an M.B.A. from the University of Colorado.

Other directorships:

 

Mr. Dalton is also a director of CoBiz ACMG, a direct subsidiary of the Company.

Name:

 

Lyne B. Andrich

Age:

 

43

Officer since:

 

May 1997

Principal occupation and recent business experience:

 

Ms. Andrich has served as Executive Vice President and CFO of the Company since May 2003. Ms. Andrich served as Controller of the Company from May 1997 until May 2003. From November 1995 to May 1997, Ms. Andrich was a regional reporting manager for Key Bank of the Rocky Mountains. From June 1989 to November 1995, Ms. Andrich held several positions with Bank One, Colorado, including Assistant Controller, Financial Reporting Manager and internal auditor. She holds a B.S. degree in accounting from the University of Florida and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Other directorships:

 

Ms. Andrich is also a director of Wagner, FDL and CoBiz Insurance, Inc., which are direct subsidiaries of the Company.

29


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        This section describes the Company's compensation philosophy, policies and programs and the compensation paid during 2009 to the Company's principal executive officer (i.e., our CEO) and principal financial officer (i.e., our CFO) and the three other officers of the Company having the highest total compensation for executive officers. We refer to these five individuals throughout the proxy statement as the "Named Executive Officers" or "NEOs."


Executive Summary

        The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for establishing and overseeing our executive compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee approves programs that seek to align Company and individual goals. Our primary compensation goal is to attract the best employees to the business, retain our key performing talent, and to encourage longevity. Some of the aspects of our compensation policies and practices that address these key areas include:

        The Compensation Committee's determination of appropriate levels of compensation for the NEOs was influenced primarily by the economic conditions and recession that severely impacted the Company's financial results, as well as peer group benchmark data. At the end of 2008 and beginning of 2009, the company expected a significant decline in company performance and instituted aggressive cost reduction measures. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not make any base salary adjustments during 2009 for the NEOs and the targets for annual and long-term incentive compensation were established consistent with the company's earnings expectations at that time. In addition, in 2009 the Compensation Committee reviewed its annual incentive compensation program and instituted changes to better align the program with the Company's guiding principles. One of the primary changes is to increase the amount of equity compensation awarded to our NEOs that will vest in future periods, while decreasing the cash component of incentive compensation. The changes are effective for incentive compensation in 2010. When making changes or contemplating new ideas on broad-based compensation plans, the Company will often seek input from our shareholders through discussion with institutional shareholders.

        The section titled "Components of our 2009 Compensation Program" noted below describes how the Company's executive officers were compensated for their performance in 2009. The section titled "2010 Incentive Compensation Plan" noted below provides further information on the changes that will be implemented in 2010. Pay for performance is an essential element of the Company's guiding principles. Additional information on the Company's business results can be found in the Company's 2009 Annual Report under the Management's Discussion and Analysis section.

        Set out below is the CD&A, which is a discussion of the Company's executive compensation programs and an analysis of the compensation of the NEOs for 2009.


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

TARP Compensation Standards

        On December 19, 2008, CoBiz became a participant in the U.S. Treasury's (Treasury) Troubled Asset Relief Program / Capital Purchase Program (CPP) when the Treasury purchased preferred stock issued by the Company. As a result, we are required to comply with a number of executive

30


Table of Contents


compensation standards set forth in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) during the period of time in which the Treasury holds an equity position in the Company.

        Initially, there were four standards, which applied to our CEO, CFO and the three next highest paid executive officers, collectively our NEOs. These standards were in effect as of the end of 2008 and consisted of limits on severance; clawback provisions for bonuses, retention awards and incentive compensation; a requirement for the Compensation Committee to review compensation programs for unnecessary and excessive risks; and a limit on tax deductible compensation. The NEOs at the time we began participation in the CPP agreed that their separation entitlements and bonuses, retention awards and other incentive compensation would comply with these standards.

        On February 17, 2009, the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA) required the Treasury to enact additional compensation standards. These standards extend beyond our NEOs and apply to up to the twenty next most highly-compensated employees so long as the preferred stock issued to the Treasury remains outstanding. On June 15, 2009, the Treasury issued an interim final rule to provide guidance on the executive compensation provisions of the ARRA. Under ARRA, the compensation standards are required to include the following:

31


Table of Contents

In 2009, the Compensation Committee appointed Mr. Dalton to serve as the Company's TARP compliance officer. In this capacity, Mr. Dalton oversees the Company's TARP compliance efforts and prepares a planning agenda for the Compensation Committee to review such compliance.

Compensation Philosophy

        The general compensation philosophy of the Company is to provide executive compensation that allows the Company to recruit, retain and motivate a highly qualified management team that formulates and implements the Company's business strategies that ultimately lead to enhancing long-term shareholder value. To achieve this objective, the Company's compensation plan includes a combination of base salary and annual incentive compensation to reward short-term performance, and supplemental executive retirement benefits and the grant of stock options and restricted stock (both of which generally vest over time) to encourage retention and long-term performance.

Independent Consultant and Peer Group Analysis

        Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews the total compensation structure for the CEO and other NEOs. The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain outside consultants or advisors to assist in their analysis of competitive market data for comparable executive positions. In the past, the Compensation Committee has used the services of a local management consulting firm for independent advice on executive compensation matters. In 2009, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Ehrhardt, Keefe, Steiner & Hottman PC (EKS&H), a Denver-based accounting and business advisory firm. EKS&H was engaged to perform a management compensation study and an analysis of the Company's compliance with TARP. In its report, presented partly in writing and partly orally, EKS&H compared the compensation data of the NEOs to the top executive positions of twenty-nine, publicly traded, regional banks with assets primarily between $1-5 billion. The report also provided a distribution of compensation for the executive vice-presidents and senior vice-presidents of the Company, and identified individuals who fell above and below the mean salary. Based partially on the report of EKS&H, the Compensation Committee established 2010 incentive compensation guidelines for the NEOs as further discussed in the section titled "2010 Incentive Compensation Plan."

        In its annual competitive market analysis, the Compensation Committee also uses market data from two survey sources to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices. The first survey contained general compensation levels paid by a broad-based group of banking and financial services organizations with assets of $1 billion to $5 billion, as reported by SNL Securities. The second survey included SNL-compiled data on executive compensation of other similar sized banks and thrifts by geographic region. This peer group included: Guaranty Bancorp, United Western Bancorp, Inc., First State Bancorporation, Western Alliance Bancorporation and Cascade Bancorp. The Compensation Committee considered the differences, as well as similarities in business models of these specific peers in its evaluation of the appropriateness and adequacy of the Company's compensation structure for its top executive officers.

        The surveys reviewed by the Compensation Committee report average, median and percentile compensation levels for various executive positions. The Compensation Committee does not benchmark executive compensation at a certain level or percentile based on the survey data. The survey data is only one of the components considered when setting executive compensation. Other factors include, but are not necessarily limited to, level of responsibility, results of regulatory examinations, individual performance, operating unit performance and budget constraints.

32


Table of Contents

Components of our 2009 Compensation Program

        The following discussion should be read with the understanding that during the period in which any obligation arising from TARP financial assistance remains outstanding, the Company will not be required to make any award under its Annual Incentive Compensation Plan or Equity Award Programs to the extent such award would be in violation of the ARRA restrictions. See TARP Compensation Standards above.

        Base Salary.    The Company believes that competitive base salaries are necessary to attract and retain high performing executive officers. Generally, base salary is revised and adjusted once each year near the beginning of the year. The CEO conducts annual performance reviews for all NEOs, excluding himself. The performance reviews take into account individual performance, experience, unique contributions to the Company and the Company's need for certain types of expertise. The Compensation Committee considers its members' and the CEO's evaluation of both company and individual performance, the CEO's salary recommendations and competitive market data in determining appropriate base salary.

        With respect to the base salary of the Company's CEO, all of the members of the Compensation Committee discuss the CEO's and the Company's performance at one or more Compensation Committee meetings and then advise the CEO of the results of this review. As with all the NEO's, this performance review of the CEO is generally based on both objective and subjective criteria, with a subjective analysis of all matters considered relevant by the Compensation Committee being the determining factor in ultimately fixing compensation. Objectively, the Compensation Committee looks at the performance of the Company with particular emphasis on performance compared to budget for earnings. The Compensation Committee also considers, among other things, loan performance, loan and deposit growth, efficiency ratio, and earnings from the fee based businesses (i.e., all of our businesses other than the Bank). Of these criteria, none has a specific performance objective for which a set bonus payout amount or base salary increase has been mandated. None of these criteria are binding on the Compensation Committee in reaching its determination on either the base salary or the bonus to be awarded to the CEO. In its subjective analysis the Compensation Committee considers the accomplishment of strategic objectives such as growth and loan performance, reputation of the Company and the CEO, integrity and honesty, interaction of the CEO with employees and the Board, development of management, the availability of funds and all other matters which any member of the Compensation Committee wants to consider or discuss regarding their perception of the performance of the CEO.

        The NEOs' base salaries for 2009 were reviewed by the Compensation Committee near the beginning of the calendar year 2009. As previously disclosed in the 2009 proxy statement, the Compensation Committee determined that no increase in the base salary for NEOs would be awarded in 2009. This decision was made based on the downturn in the financial services industry and the decline in the financial results of the Company. The Company's operating results are more fully discussed in the section titled "2009 Results".

        The Compensation Committee has conducted its annual review of NEOs base salaries for 2010 and again determined that no increase in the base salary will be awarded for 2010 as will be more fully discussed in the 2011 proxy statement.

        Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.    The Company's philosophy is that incentive pay should generally constitute a meaningful component of total direct compensation. Annual cash bonus is intended to reward short-term performance and to be competitive with comparable executive positions in other companies.

        In 2009 and prior, the Company had an informal incentive compensation plan that represented, in most cases, the short-term component of our compensation package. Incentive compensation was

33


Table of Contents


determined based on (1) a target cash incentive which was a percentage of an individual employee's salary and (2) how actual results compare to target performance measures. For the NEOs, the Compensation Committee initially targeted potential cash incentive bonus at 60% of base salary based on meeting or exceeding budgeted diluted earnings per share growth. However, as discussed above for base-salary, this target or stretch goal was not determinative of the bonus paid and was only one component of the totality of the circumstances which the Compensation Committee considered. In addition, the Compensation Committee subjectively considered such things as shareholder returns, asset quality, level of executive responsibility, other compensation received by the executive, individual operating units' income contributions, non-interest income growth, control of non-interest expenses, growth objectives for total loans, total deposits and total assets, honesty, integrity, teamwork and the amount available by the Company for the payment of bonuses. Discretion was utilized by the Compensation Committee to adjust bonus amounts upward or downward as it deems appropriate in the circumstances. The Compensation Committee had the authority under the annual incentive plan to adjust any goal with respect to any participant in the incentive compensation plan. These decisions are subjective and based generally on a review of the circumstances affecting results to determine if any events were unusual or unforeseen.

        The Compensation Committee may also elect to grant bonuses based on the accomplishment of a particular goal or objective that requires additional commitments of time and effort by an executive officer. The Compensation Committee may also elect to award part of such incentive compensation in the form of stock options or restricted stock rather than cash. The CEO recommends the bonus amounts to be paid to each executive officer other than himself, but the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to modify or reject his recommendations.

        The short-term performance incentive of our NEOs for 2009 reflects the recession and negative economic conditions that significantly impacted the Company's financial performance and share price for the year. In early 2009, the Compensation Committee determined that none of the NEOs would receive a bonus for 2009 for these reasons. The Compensation Committee believes that the CEO and the other NEOs performed well in managing the Company in the face of the nation's financial and economic climate and worked hard and diligently for the Company's and Shareholders' best interests. Nevertheless, the Compensation Committee could not recommend that an annual incentive bonus be paid considering the Company's financial results and the decline in the value of our common stock. Our 2009 financial results and other matters are set forth below under the heading "2009 Results".

        Equity Incentives.    The long-term component of compensation has historically been provided in the form of stock options that vest ratably over three- to four-years. The Company's stock incentive plans are an important component of the Company's total compensation program for executive officers and other employees. The plans are intended as a retention tool and also to advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders by encouraging and enabling executive officers and other employees to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company. Through stock option grants, the long-range interests of management and employees are aligned with those of shareholders, as the optionees accumulate meaningful stakes in the Company. Although the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the CEO, the Compensation Committee makes all decisions concerning the granting of stock options to executive officers. Except for the Annual Retention Equity Program set forth below, these decisions are made on a subjective basis and generally do not bear a specific relationship to any particular measure of the Company's performance. The Compensation Committee believes that the stock option program is a valuable tool in recruiting, retaining and motivating employees, including executive officers.

        In 2008, the Compensation Committee introduced the use of restricted stock awards as equity incentives. Consistent with the industry, the Company has seen a sharp decline in the Company's stock price over the last few years. As a result, a significant portion of our officers, including the NEOs, have options with grant prices significantly higher than the current market value of our stock. As such, the

34


Table of Contents


Company is concerned that currently outstanding options may not be serving as an effective retention tool. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important for executive compensation, including long-term equity incentives, to be aligned with shareholder returns. Utilizing in part the input from its independent consultant, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock awards to provide "retention value" for key officers of the company, including the NEOs (the "Restricted Shares"). The Restricted Shares vest over a three-year period (five-years for the NEOs), in equal increments, and the officer must be employed by the company at the end of three (or five) years in order to receive the awards. Dividends will be paid on the shares awarded, whether or not vested. Vesting is contingent on meeting certain performance requirements. For the NEOs, the performance measurement metrics include company performance versus a peer group in the following categories:

        In order for any Restricted Shares to vest, the Company must satisfy certain annual performance targets, as measured by comparing the performance metrics of the Company against the performance metrics of each company of the Peer Group during the initial twelve-month period following the grant date and for each consecutive twelve-month period thereafter during the measurement periods. If the Company's performance meets or exceeds the performance of fifty percent (50%) of the peer group only with respect to one performance metric during at least three measurement periods of the restriction period, then fifty percent (50%) of the Restricted Shares shall be vested on the last day of the restriction period. If the Company's performance meets or exceeds the performance of fifty percent (50%) of the peer group with respect to at least two of the performance metrics during at least three measurement periods of the restriction period, then one hundred percent (100%) of the Restricted Shares shall be vested on the last day of the restriction period. If the Company fails to meet either of these performance targets, no Restricted Shares shall vest. Any shares that have not vested as of the last day of the restriction period shall be forfeited to the Company and the participant shall promptly surrender such shares to the Company.

Annual Retention Awards

        The Board of Directors has approved an Annual Retention Equity Program for the grant of options to officers at the vice president level and above, including the NEOs. Awards are approved and granted as of the date of the Compensation Committee meeting held in May of each year. The Compensation Committee has determined that option awards issued pursuant to the Annual Retention Equity Program will have the following terms:

        In addition, the Compensation Committee has delegated to executive management the authority to grant certain recruitment options within pre-defined parameters. The grant date and option price for recruitment options is the closing market price as of the employee's date of hire. Furthermore, recruitment options which may be in the form of incentive stock options, have a term of 7 years, and a graduated vesting schedule of 3 years.

35


Table of Contents

        All other options are approved by the Compensation Committee prior to issuance. The grant date, option price and other material terms are determined by the Compensation Committee.

Retirement and Other Benefits

        Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP).    In 2004, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of an independent compensation consultant, determined that SERP benefits are customary and appropriate for the NEO positions and are necessary to retain top talent in the Company. At this time, all of the NEOs, with the exception of Mr. Callow, participate in the SERP. The Compensation Committee has the authority to add participants as deemed appropriate. In addition to being market competitive, another objective of these benefits is to restore and supplement the level of retirement benefits provided in the Company's defined contribution 401(k) plan due to limitations in the Code. The present value of accumulated benefits under the SERP for each of the NEOs is set forth in the section titled "Pension Benefits" below.

        Given the economic environment in late 2008 and early 2009, the Compensation Committee took the unusual step of suspending participation in the ongoing plan, making the suspension effective for the 2009 plan year. This suspension reduced the annual service cost contribution to the SERP program. After reviewing the overall compensation package of the NEOs, including the fact that base salaries were not increased in 2009 or 2010 and bonuses were not paid in 2008 or 2009, the Committee approved reinstating participation in the plan for 2010. The reinstatement was effective for the 2010 plan year and did not have any impact on the suspension for the 2009 plan year.

        Split-Dollar Endorsed Life Insurance.    Associated with the SERP benefit is a death benefit for participating NEO's designated beneficiaries. Beneficiaries designated by an executive are entitled to a split dollar share of the death proceeds from life insurance policies on each executive, which vary depending on the executive's employment status with the Company at the time of death, and eligibility to receive SERP payments.

        Defined Contribution Plan.    The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement savings plan available to all eligible employees, including the NEOs. Under the plan, the Company typically matches a portion of employee contributions. For 2009, employee contributions were matched up to a maximum of 3.5% of compensation subject in the case of the named executives to certain limitations in the Code. At December 31, 2009, all employer contributions made on behalf of executive officers were vested in accordance with the vesting schedule of the plan, generally five years from commencement of employment, on the basis of the officers' past service with the Company.

        As part of the Company's ongoing cost containment initiative, the Compensation Committee decreased the company's 401(k) match from 6% to 3% effective March 1, 2009. The 3.5% matching contribution in 2009 represents the weighted-average contribution rate for the year. The Compensation Committee will consider an additional discretionary match of 0-3% at the end of each fiscal year based upon the financial performance of the company. The Committee did not elect to contribute an additional discretionary match in 2009.

        Employment Agreements.    An additional component of the executive relationship with the Company intended to attract and retain key executive officers is an employment agreement. In addition to being market competitive, a comprehensive employment agreement supports a long-term commitment to each other between the Company and the executive, as well as a long-term perspective in the executive's leadership of the Company. It also provides the Company with valuable non-solicitation restrictions on the executive should his or her employment terminate. For the CEO, as well as other NEOs, a change in control benefit supports retention of key executives during potential merger and acquisition discussions and permits such discussions to take place with limited distraction arising from personal concerns.

36


Table of Contents

        Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).    The ESPP is a form of equity-based compensation that is available to all employees of the Company who own less than 5% of the Company's outstanding common stock. Under the ESPP, employees may elect, prior to the beginning of each calendar quarter, to purchase shares of the Company's common stock through payroll deduction at a price equal to 90% of the market price of the stock at the end of the calendar quarter. The ESPP provides an attractive vehicle for employees to acquire the Company's stock, which further aligns their financial interests with those of other shareholders.

        Perquisites and Other Benefits.    Perquisites and other benefits represent a small part of our overall compensation package, and are offered only after consideration of business need. The Company believes that perquisites are generally a part of executive officers' market-competitive total compensation packages. We annually review the perquisites and other personal benefits that we provide to executive management. The primary perquisites are the use of a Company auto or auto allowance, club memberships, parking, and reimbursement for certain spousal travel. In conjunction with the Company's participation in the CPP, any perquisite in excess of $25,000 paid to the five most highly compensated employees will be reported to the Treasury and no tax gross-ups will be paid to any NEO or the next twenty most highly compensated employees while we are subject to the TARP rules.

2009 Results

        The past two years have proved to be extremely challenging for financial service companies and CoBiz has not been immune to the issues plaguing the industry. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the full year of 2009 were $(2.98), compared to $0.05 in the year-earlier period. Net income (loss) was $(83.0) million in 2009 versus $1.3 million for the prior-year period. Driving the decrease in earnings was a higher level of provision for loan losses and a goodwill impairment charge. The provision for loan losses was $105.8 million in 2009, as compared to $39.8 million in 2008. During 2009, the Company conducted a detailed impairment analysis on goodwill. The result of the review indicated impairment of goodwill and at March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, impairment charges totaling $46.2 million were recorded eliminating all goodwill from the consolidated balance sheet of the Company.

        In spite of the challenges, the Company successfully raised additional common equity, increased core-deposits, and increased its net interest margin (NIM) during 2009. In addition, the Company made continued progress in 2009 with its cost containment initiative launched in mid-year 2008.

        Total nonperforming loans (NPLs) increased to $79.2 million at December 31, 2009, from $41.1 million in the prior-year period. Including OREO and repossessed assets of $25.3 million at December 2009, total nonperforming assets (NPAs) were $104.5 million at year end. Total NPAs were

37


Table of Contents


$47.0 million at December 31, 2008. The Company increased its allowance for loan and credit losses to total loans to 4.23% as of December 31, 2009, from 2.12% at December 31, 2008.

        To address the increase in NPLs and NPAs, the Company created a Special Assets Group in 2009 to focus on resolving problem assets. This group is led by a senior banking officer who has been with the bank for 13 years and previously served as the Bank's Chief Operations Officer. Most loans in a default or workout status are assigned to the Special Assets Group. In addition, to further strengthen our procedures over asset quality, we separated our loan review function into two separate departments during 2009: a loan review department and a credit administration department. We believe these actions will facilitate recovery strategies and reduce credit losses.

        In addition to the Company's financial goals, the Compensation Committee also considers management's relative success in achieving non-financial, strategic objectives. As discussed above, however, based on the overall financial results for 2009, the NEOs did not receive any cash incentive for 2009. The NEOs did receive, with the exception of Mr. Bangert, option awards under our Annual Retention Equity program as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.

        As of the date of this report, 2009 compensation for the NEOs was allocated as follows:

 
  Short-term
performance awards:
  Long-term
performance
awards:
   
 
Name
  Base
salary(1)
  Annual
incentive(1)
  Equity-
based(2)
  SERP(3)   Total  

Steven Bangert

    85 %   0 %   0 %   15 %   100 %

Jonathan C. Lorenz

    81 %   0 %   3 %   16 %   100 %

Richard J. Dalton

    83 %   0 %   4 %   13 %   100 %

Lyne B. Andrich

    82 %   0 %   4 %   14 %   100 %

N. Bruce Callow

    60 %   0 %   40 %   0 %   100 %

(1)
Base salary and annual incentive percentages are based on the amounts disclosed in the "Summary Compensation Table" for NEOs.

(2)
The long-term equity-based percentages are calculated utilizing amounts disclosed in the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table under the "Grant date fair value of option awards" column.

(3)
SERP benefits are based on the amounts disclosed in the "Summary Compensation Table" under the "Change in pension value" column. While the Compensation committee suspended additional benefits under the plan in 2009, the actuarial present value increased due to changes in the discount rate, average salary and payment distribution assumptions.

2010 Incentive Compensation Plan

        In conjunction with the report of EKS&H, the Compensation Committee approved in January 2010 the guidelines that will be used to determine the amount of incentive compensation that may be paid with respect to the 2010 fiscal year to the NEOs as well as certain other employees who are viewed as having an opportunity to directly and substantially contribute to the achievement of the Company's short-term and long-term objectives. Under these guidelines, incentive compensation is determined based on (1) a target cash incentive which is a percentage of an individual employee's salary and (2) a target restricted stock incentive which is a percentage of an individual employee's salary and is subject to a future vesting schedule. Incentive compensation paid to participants is calculated based on both individual and Company performance. No portion of the Company performance component will be payable unless the Company achieves profitability for the year, as measured by Return on Assets.

38


Table of Contents

        The annual range of incentive awards and the weighting of individual versus Company performance in calculating those awards for the NEOs, are as set forth below:

Name
  Range of
Cash Award
(% of Base Salary)(1)
  Range of Long-Term
Stock Award
(% of Base Salary)(2)
  % of Overall
Award Based
on Individual
Performance(3)
  % of Overall
Award Based
on Company
Performance(4)
 

Steven Bangert

    0 - 60%     0 - 100%     50%     50%  

Jonathan C. Lorenz

    0 - 60%     0 - 100%     50%     50%  

Lyne B. Andrich

    0 - 60%     0 - 100%     50%     50%  

Richard J. Dalton

    0 - 60%     0 - 100%     40%     60%  

N. Bruce Callow

    0 - 40%     0 - 60%     20 - 25%     75 - 80%  

(1)
The Company shall not make any cash awards to the extent such awards would be prohibited by ARRA restrictions. See TARP Compensation Standards above.

(2)
Any stock granted will be subject to a three year vesting schedule. In addition, no stock awards will be made to the extent such awards would be prohibited by ARRA restrictions. See TARP Compensation Standards above.

(3)
Individual performance is discretionary based on individual and team accomplishments, recent and expected financial trends, market trends and other qualitative considerations determined by the Compensation Committee.

(4)
Company performance is determined based on how actual results compare to the following performance measures of the Company:

a.
Core Earnings per Share Growth;

b.
Noninterest Income/Operating Revenue;

c.
Return on Average Tangible Equity; and

d.
Stock Price Growth.

Quartile Achieved   Bonus % Earned
1st   25%
2nd   15%
3rd   5%
4th   0%

39


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee discussed and reviewed the financial metrics that will be used to calculate the Company portion of the awards and determined that the metrics would not cause executive management to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of the Company and will not encourage the manipulation of reported earnings. The selected financial metrics emphasize long term sustainable growth and not short term results. The Compensation Committee also agreed that these financial metrics will incentivize the right behavior by the NEOs.

        The Compensation Committee has the authority under the incentive compensation guidelines to adjust any goal with respect to any recipient of an incentive compensation award. These decisions are subjective and based generally on a review of the circumstances affecting results to determine if any events were unusual or unforeseen. In addition, the Compensation Committee may at any time amend or rescind these incentive compensation guidelines.

Tax Considerations

        It has been and continues to be the Company's intent that compensation payments generally be deductible unless maintaining such deductibility would undermine our ability to meet our primary compensation objectives or is otherwise not in our best interest. Under Section 162(m) as in effect before the enactment of EESA, we could not deduct annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to our named executives unless the compensation was performance-based. EESA, as further amended by the ARRA, amended Section 162(m) for TARP CPP participants to reduce the annual compensation tax deductibility cap to $500,000 and eliminate the exception for performance-based compensation. Although the majority of the compensation paid during 2009 was deductible, some components of the Company's compensation programs may result in payments from time to time that are subject to the restriction on deductibility. The Compensation Committee believes that it may be appropriate from time to time to exceed limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) to ensure that executive officers are compensated in a manner that it believes to be consistent with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders consistent with the Company's executive compensation philosophy and objectives. In view of all of the circumstances, the Compensation Committee has concluded that no further action with respect to qualifying such compensation for deductibility is necessary at this time. The Compensation Committee, however, reserves the authority to continue to approve non-deductible compensation in appropriate circumstances. Also, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m), no assurance can be given that compensation intended by the Company to satisfy requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m) will in fact do so.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

        Along with the emphasis on stock options, the Compensation Committee established stock ownership guidelines for executive officers in 2004. Under these guidelines, each NEO of the Company is required to own shares of common stock having a market value of at least $25,000. Shares issuable upon exercise of in-the-money stock options do not count toward this requirement. All of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement currently hold sufficient amounts of our common stock to meet or exceed the stock ownership requirements.

Recoupment of Annual Incentives

        In compliance with the TARP requirements, the employment agreements for each of the NEOs was amended to ensure the Company had the ability to recover or clawback certain bonus and incentive payments made if the payments were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or other materially inaccurate performance metrics. In addition, the Company has executed clawback agreements with the 20 most-highly compensated employees that allow the Company to recover any

40


Table of Contents


bonus or other incentive payments paid on the basis of materially inaccurate financial or other performance criteria.

        Other than the TARP requirements, the Company has no formal policy on recapturing salary or incentive awards (equity or cash) granted to an executive in the event that the Company were to have to restate its financial statements (whether arising from conduct or actions of the executive, or otherwise). In the event, however, that the financial results of the Company are restated as a result of fraud or misconduct, the Company would require, in compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, our CEO and our CFO to reimburse the Company for certain incentive- or equity-based compensation and any profits from the sale of securities of the Company received during the 12-month period following the date of the financial statements that were subject to restatement were issued.

        To date, the Company has never been required to restate its financial statements.

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation

        The Compensation Committee oversees the administration of executive compensation plans, including the design, performance measures, and award opportunities for the executive incentive programs, and certain employee benefits. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine, reviews the performance and approves all compensation and awards, to the CEO and other NEOs. The CEO assists in such review as described above. The CEO determines the compensation of other senior officers based in part on market data provided by the compensation consultant, and the Compensation Committee may review the general elements of such compensation. Executive officers do not otherwise determine or make recommendations regarding the amount or form of executive or director compensation.

Excessive Risk

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed all compensation programs relating to the NEOs in order to confirm that such programs: (1) do not encourage the NEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company; and (2) do not encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company.

        2009 Compensation Program.    The Compensation Committee believes that certain design features may have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking, including compensation programs that are highly focused on equity, compensation programs that are heavily weighted towards annual incentive payments and compensation programs that require unreasonable goals or thresholds for payment. The Compensation Committee has discussed its compensation programs for its NEOs with the Company's risk managers and has concluded that the Company's 2009 compensation policies and practices for its NEOs do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking and do not encourage the manipulation of reported earnings for the following reasons:

41


Table of Contents

        2010 Compensation Program.    To the extent that the 2010 compensation program for NEOs has been established, the Compensation Committee has discussed such program with the Company's risk managers and has concluded that such policies and practices do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking and do not encourage the manipulation of reported earnings for the following reasons:


Compensation Committee Report

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

42


Table of Contents

        The compensation committee certifies that:

        Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board:


Summary Compensation Table

        The following table provides compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2009 for the NEOs. The "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement includes information regarding the material terms of plans and agreements pursuant to which certain items set forth below are paid.

Name and principal position
  Year   Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
awards
($) (1)
  Option
awards
($) (2)
  Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($) (3)
  Change in
pension
value
($) (4)
  All other
compensation
($) (5)
  Total
($)
 

Steven Bangert

    2009   $ 522,500   $   $   $   $   $ 90,677   $ 47,906   $ 661,083  
 

Chairman and CEO

    2008   $ 522,500   $   $ 223,275   $ 17,852   $   $ 205,745   $ 42,665   $ 1,012,037  

    2007   $ 500,000   $ 50,000   $   $ 137,125   $ 125,000   $ 272,278   $ 42,072   $ 1,126,475  

Jonathan C. Lorenz

   
2009
 
$

380,000
 
$

 
$

 
$

15,532
 
$

 
$

74,503
 
$

48,319
 
$

518,354
 
 

Executive Vice President &

    2008   $ 380,000   $   $ 171,750   $ 15,302   $   $ 231,890   $ 43,320   $ 842,262  
 

CEO of the Bank

    2007   $ 328,000   $ 25,000   $   $ 80,145   $ 131,200   $ 183,836   $ 36,202   $ 784,383  

Richard J. Dalton

   
2009
 
$

275,000
 
$

 
$

 
$

14,670
 
$

 
$

44,120
 
$

33,585
 
$

367,375
 
 

Executive Vice President and

    2008   $ 275,000   $   $ 68,700   $ 14,453   $   $ 112,250   $ 37,901   $ 508,303  
 

COO

    2007   $ 264,000   $ 10,000   $   $ 78,602   $ 66,000   $ 135,774   $ 35,673   $ 590,049  

Lyne B. Andrich

   
2009
 
$

275,000
 
$

 
$

 
$

14,670
 
$

 
$

45,622
 
$

26,291
 
$

361,583
 
 

Executive Vice President and

    2008   $ 275,000   $   $ 137,400   $ 14,747   $   $ 82,766   $ 27,500   $ 537,413  
 

CFO

    2007   $ 250,000   $ 50,000   $   $ 78,602   $ 62,500   $ 107,220   $ 24,147   $ 572,469  

N. Bruce Callow(6)

   
2009
 
$

267,773
 
$

17,500
 
$

89,400
 
$

89,544
 
$

 
$

 
$

45,371
 
$

509,588
 
 

Executive Vice President

    2008   $   $   $   $   $   $   $   $  

    2007   $   $   $   $   $   $   $   $  

(1)
The amounts in this column are calculated based on ASC 718 and represent the grant date fair value of time-vested restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock. Fair value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares subject to the award by the NASDAQ closing price per share on the date the award was granted. The number of shares used for purposes of calculating the value of performance-based restricted stock was the entire award, with the assumption that 100% of the performance targets will be met.

(2)
The amounts in this column are calculated based on ASC 718 and represent the grant date fair value of the award. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to arrive at the Black-Scholes value are disclosed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report and Form 10-K.

43


Table of Contents

(3)
The amounts in this column relate to awards earned and accrued under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. That plan and these awards are discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.

(4)
The amounts shown reflect the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the NEO's accumulated benefits under the Company's SERP. The benefits to be provided under the plan are described under the heading "Pension Benefits—Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan".

(5)
The following table shows the components of "All other compensation" reported in the Summary Compensation Table above. The cost of each item noted is the actual incremental cost of providing such perquisite or benefit, with the exception of the company provided auto. The cost of the company provided auto was calculated based on the Annual Lease Value Tables published by the IRS multiplied by the estimated personal use of the vehicle.

Name
  401(k) plan
matching
contribution
  Life
insurance
premiums
  Dividends
on unvested
stock awards
  Other perquisite
and personal
benefits (a)
  Total
all other
compensation
 

Steven Bangert

  $ 8,575   $ 13,607   $ 3,250   $ 22,474   $ 47,906  

Jonathan C. Lorenz

  $ 8,575   $ 19,131   $ 2,500   $ 18,113   $ 48,319  

Richard J. Dalton

  $ 4,795   $ 8,608   $ 1,000   $ 19,182   $ 33,585  

Lyne B. Andrich

  $ 8,575   $ 2,677   $ 2,000   $ 13,039   $ 26,291  

N. Bruce Callow

  $ 8,575   $ 716   $ 1,000   $ 35,080   $ 45,371  

a.
Other perquisite and personal benefits generally include amounts for personal use of company autos, parking, physical examinations, health and social club dues, spousal travel expenses and other benefits that are not properly reported in any other column of the Summary Compensation Table.


During fiscal 2009, perquisite and personal benefits valued at $32,500 were paid on behalf of Mr. Callow relating to his relocation from Chicago to Denver. The aggregate cost of the relocation was determined by reference to invoices and receipts submitted to the Company for payment or reimbursement to Mr. Callow. The Company's success in recruiting skilled and qualified executive managers depends in part depends on its ability and willingness to provide a competitive compensation package. The Company believes payments and reimbursements to Mr. Callow relating to the relocation are both customary and reasonable. No other amounts for any other NEO included in Other perquisite and personal benefits above, when aggregated by compensation item, exceeded $25,000.
(6)
Mr. Callow became an executive officer of the Company in 2009. As permitted by SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table shows Mr. Callow's compensation for only 2009, the first year he served as an executive officer.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

        The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to NEOs during fiscal year 2009. Certain terms of the Company's Stock Plan pursuant to which the grants identified in the table were made are described in the "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity-Incentives" section of this proxy statement.

 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  All Other
stock
awards:
Number of
shares of
stocks or
units
(#)
  All other
option
awards:
Number of
securities
underlying
options
(#)
   
  Grant
date fair
value of
stock
and
option
awards
($)
 
 
   
  Estimated future payouts
under non-equity incentive
plan awards(1)
  Estimated future payouts
under equity incentive
plan awards
  Exercise
or base
price of
option
awards
($/Sh)
 
Name
  Grant
date
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Jonathan C. Lorenz

    5/20/2009 (2)                               6,000   $ 6.62   $ 15,532  

Richard J. Dalton

    5/20/2009 (2)                               5,667   $ 6.62   $ 14,670  

Lyne B. Andrich

    5/20/2009 (2)                               5,667   $ 6.62   $ 14,670  

N. Bruce Callow

    1/12/2009 (3)                               30,000   $ 8.94   $ 89,544  

    1/12/2009 (4)                           10,000           $ 89,400  

(1)
CoBiz provides performance-based annual cash incentive awards to our executive officers under our Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. For 2009 and 2008, there were no accruals for the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. The Compensation Committee determined early in the year that the NEOs would not earn any incentive compensation in 2009. Accordingly, the Company has not disclosed a threshold, target or maximum.

(2)
Annual Retention Equity Program stock options granted on May 20, 2009 have an exercise price equal to 110% of the May 20, 2009 closing stock price and vest ratably over three years. These options have a term of seven years. See discussion

44


Table of Contents

(3)
Option awarded as part of Mr. Callow's offer letter agreement. The option's exercise price equals the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of the award and the options have a term of seven years. The value shown reflects the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to arrive at the Black-Scholes value are disclosed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report and Form 10-K.

(4)
Restricted stock with a three year graded vesting period awarded as part of Mr. Callow's offer letter agreement. The value shown reflects the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718 of time-vested restricted stock. Fair value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares subject to the award by the NASDAQ closing price per share on the date the award was granted. Dividends are paid on the restricted stock shares during the three-year period at the same rate as paid to all shareholders. Dividends paid during the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $1,000. Mr. Callow also has voting rights on the restricted shares during the three-year period.

45


Table of Contents


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

        The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by NEOs as of December 31, 2009.

 
  Option awards   Stock awards  
Name
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
exercisable
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
unexercisable
(1)
  Option
exercise
price ($)
  Option
expiration
date
  Number of
shares of stock
that have not
vested (#)
  Market value of
shares of stock
that have not
vested ($)
  Equity incentive
plan awards:
number of
unearned shares
that have not
vested (#)
  Equity incentive
plan awards:
market value of
unearned shares
that have not
vested ($)(3)
 

Steven Bangert

    3,000       $ 19.81     05/19/2012     32,500 (2) $ 154,375     32,500 (2) $ 154,375  

    4,000       $ 19.25     10/14/2012                          

    7,000       $ 21.65     05/17/2013                          

    13,334     6,666   $ 21.07     02/13/2014                          

    4,667     2,333   $ 20.52     05/16/2014                          

    2,334     4,666   $ 12.39     05/14/2015                          

Jonathan C. Lorenz

   
36,840
   
 
$

10.53
   
06/19/2012
   
25,000

(2)

$

118,750
   
25,000

(2)

$

118,750
 

    12,152       $ 12.00     06/19/2012                          

    17,848       $ 12.00     06/19/2012                          

    3,000       $ 19.25     10/14/2012                          

    3,000       $ 18.94     11/07/2012                          

    6,000       $ 21.65     05/17/2013                          

    6,667     3,333   $ 21.07     02/13/2014                          

    4,000     2,000   $ 20.52     05/16/2014                          

    2,000     4,000   $ 12.39     05/14/2015                          

        6,000   $ 6.62     05/20/2016                          

    9,000       $ 8.00     01/03/2011                          

    3,615       $ 9.70     01/16/2013                          

Richard J. Dalton

   
3,000
   
 
$

19.81
   
05/19/2012
   
10,000

(2)

$

47,500
   
10,000

(2)

$

47,500
 

    4,212       $ 10.53     06/19/2012                          

    18,628       $ 10.53     06/19/2012                          

    12,152       $ 12.00     06/19/2012                          

    7,761       $ 12.00     06/19/2012                          

    2,588       $ 12.00     06/19/2012                          

    2,667       $ 19.25     10/14/2012                          

    5,667       $ 21.65     05/17/2013                          

    6,667     3,333   $ 21.07     02/13/2014                          

    3,778     1,889   $ 20.52     05/16/2014                          

    1,889     3,778   $ 12.39     05/14/2015                          

        5,667   $ 6.62     05/20/2016                          

    4,500       $ 7.11     01/10/2010                          

    2,362       $ 7.11     01/10/2010                          

    9,000       $ 8.00     01/03/2011                          

Lyne B. Andrich

   
3,000
   
 
$

19.81
   
05/19/2012
   
20,000

(2)

$

95,000
   
20,000

(2)

$

95,000
 

    15,000       $ 12.00     06/19/2012                          

    75       $ 9.90     01/07/2013                          

    3,495       $ 17.31     05/06/2015                          

    2,667       $ 19.25     10/14/2012                          

    5,667       $ 21.65     05/17/2013                          

    6,667     3,333   $ 21.07     02/13/2014                          

    3,778     1,889   $ 20.52     05/16/2014                          

    1,889     3,778   $ 12.39     05/14/2015                          

    100       $ 11.26     05/14/2015                          

        5,667   $ 6.62     05/20/2016                          

    4,500       $ 7.11     01/10/2010                          

    4,500       $ 5.78     05/05/2010                          

    5,625       $ 8.00     01/03/2011                          

    6,505       $ 17.31     05/06/2015                          

N. Bruce Callow

   
   
30,000
 
$

8.94
   
01/12/2016
   
10,000

(3)

$

47,500
   
10,000

(3)

$

47,500
 

(1)
Unless otherwise noted, all options vest ratably over three years.

(2)
Performance-based restricted stock award shares, vesting between 0-100% depending on performance outcome to be determined no later than the fifth anniversary of the awards or on July 1, 2013.

(3)
Restricted stock award that vests ratably over three years.

46


Table of Contents


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

        The following table shows all stock awards exercised and the value realized upon exercise, by NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 
  Option awards  
Name
  Number of
shares
acquired on
exercise
(#)
  Value
realized on
exercise
($)(1)
 

Jonathan C. Lorenz

    10,000   $ 18,300  

Lyne B. Andrich

    7,000     12,810  
           

    17,000   $ 31,110  
           

(1)
The value realized on exercise is computed using the difference between the closing market price upon the date of exercise and the option exercise price.


Stock Option Plans

        The Company has adopted several incentive stock option plans to reward and provide long-term incentives for directors and key employees of the Company. No option issued under any of these plans may have a term longer than ten years from the date of grant. The significant terms of each plan are set forth below.

47


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth certain information concerning all equity compensation plans previously approved by shareholders and all equity compensation plans not previously approved by the shareholders as of December 31, 2009.

Plan Category
  Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity
compensation
plans
 

Equity Compensation plans approved by security holders

    2,522,243   $ 13.26     959,164  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

             
               

Total

    2,522,243   $ 13.26     959,164  
               


Pension Benefits

        Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.    In 2004, CoBiz implemented a SERP for certain NEOs, at that time, to provide retirement benefits to be market competitive, and to restore and supplement benefits available under the 401(k) plan. The SERP is unsecured and unfunded and there are no plan assets. CoBiz has purchased single premium Bank Owned Life Insurance policies (BOLI policies) on the lives of the NEOs and intends to use income from the BOLI policies to offset SERP benefit expenses. Under the terms of the SERP, participants will be entitled to an annual supplemental retirement and other benefit of up to one-half of their final average annual compensation (the five highest paid years during the first ten years of participation in the SERP), prorated based on their years of participation in the SERP for a period of up to ten years. SERP benefits vest at the rate of 20 percent per year of service and generally are payable at the later of (a) the participant's normal retirement date or (b) after the participant's tenth year of participation in the SERP. The benefit is payable either monthly over 10 years or in a lump sum equal to the actuarially adjusted present value of the right to receive those monthly payments. Vesting, and payment under the plan, is accelerated

48


Table of Contents

upon the disability of the participant or a change in control of the Company. If a participant terminates employment prior to normal retirement age, payment of any earned and vested benefit under the plan will be paid based on the actuarial equivalent value as defined in the plan. If a participant dies while employed by the Company, the retirement benefit is forfeited. The retirement benefits are funded from accruals to a benefit account during the participant's employment. The amount of the accrual is determined annually. In 2009, the Compensation Committee did not accrue a benefit to the participants of the SERP. The 2009 amount reflected in the Summary Compensation Table represents the annual interest cost component.

        The following table shows each participating NEOs' number of years of service, present value of accumulated benefit and payments during the year ended December 31, 2009 under the SERP. During 2009, none of the participants received payments under the plan.

Name
  Plan name   Number of
years credited
service
(#)
  Present
value of
accumulated
benefit
($)
  Payment
during last
fiscal year
($)
 

Steven Bangert

  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan     5   $ 716,014   $  

Jonathan C. Lorenz

  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan     5   $ 577,272   $  

Richard J. Dalton

  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan     5   $ 404,076   $  

Lyne B. Andrich

  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan     5   $ 228,144   $  


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Employment Agreements

        The following discussion should be read with the understanding that during the period in which any obligation arising from TARP financial assistance remains outstanding, the Company will not be required to make any payment under the Agreements to the extent such payment would be in violation of the ARRA restrictions. See TARP Compensation Standards above.

        The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the NEOs, except Mr. Callow. Each such agreement is terminable at will by the Company or the employee and provides for annual salary and eligibility for a bonus and stock option grants. The agreements also provide certain fringe benefits including an automobile allowance or the use of a Company automobile, as well as an allowance for membership dues at a country, health or social club. Each such agreement provides that, during the term of the agreement and for one year thereafter, the employee is prohibited from soliciting any employees or customers of the Company or the Bank.

        In the event that the Company terminates the employment agreement for reasons other than "for cause" or constructively discharges the employee (for example, by materially decreasing his or her responsibilities or his or her compensation) or the employee's employment is terminated because of disability or death, the Company will pay the following severance benefits:

49


Table of Contents

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Employee terminates his or her employment within 24 months after a change in control, Employee shall be entitled to receive a multiple of the amounts specified in clauses (i) and (ii) above and the amount specified in clause (ii) above shall be for an entire year and not prorated to the date of termination.

        Severance arrangements were entered into by the Company to help assure the retention of the CEO and other Officers' experience, skills, knowledge and background for the benefit of the Company. These arrangements also reinforce and encourage continued attention and dedication to duties without the distraction arising from the possibility of a change in control of the Company and provide our business with a smooth transition in the event of a change in control of the Company. In addition, these arrangements provide the Officers with a severance amount to help financially ease their transition from the Company.

Stock Award Acceleration

        The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, in the event of a change in control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide for the acceleration of the exercisability and vesting in connection with such change in control of any or all outstanding options upon such conditions and to such extent as the Compensation Committee shall determine. Any such acceleration shall be conditioned upon the consummation of the change in control.

50


Table of Contents

        The table below represents the lump sum maximum amount each NEO would have been eligible to receive upon a change in control or if their employment was terminated under one of the various scenarios described below as of December 31, 2009. The actual amounts that would be payable in these circumstances can only be determined at the time of the executive's separation and may differ from the amounts set forth in the tables below based on various factors, including whether the company is subject to the limitations imposed in connection with its participation in the CPP.

Benefits and payments upon termination
  Resignation /
termination
for cause
  Involuntary
termination
not for cause
  Termination /
change
in control
  Disability   Death  

Steven Bangert

                               
 

Severance(1)

  $   $ 564,167   $ 1,686,859   $ 564,167   $ 564,167  
 

SERP(2)

  $ 1,063,638   $ 1,063,638   $ 1,276,366   $ 1,063,638   $  
 

Split-dollar insurance(3)

  $   $   $   $   $ 4,973,125  
 

Acceleration of option or award vesting(4)

  $   $   $ 154,375   $   $  
 

Medical and welfare benefits(5)

  $   $ 36,705   $ 36,705   $ 36,705   $ 21,249  

Jonathan C. Lorenz

                               
 

Severance(1)

  $   $ 423,733   $ 1,266,963   $ 423,733   $ 423,733  
 

SERP(2)

  $ 745,238   $ 745,238   $ 894,286   $ 745,238   $  
 

Split-dollar insurance(3)

  $   $   $   $   $ 3,380,000  
 

Acceleration of option or award vesting(4)

  $   $   $ 118,750   $   $  
 

Medical and welfare benefits(5)

  $   $ 39,137   $ 39,137   $ 39,137   $ 17,892  

Richard J. Dalton

                               
 

Severance(1)

  $   $ 297,000   $ 591,030   $ 297,000   $ 297,000  
 

SERP(2)

  $ 572,823   $ 572,823   $ 687,387   $ 572,823   $  
 

Split-dollar insurance(3)

  $   $   $   $   $ 2,758,750  
 

Acceleration of option or award vesting(4)

  $   $   $ 47,500   $   $  
 

Medical and welfare benefits(5)

  $   $ 30,808   $ 30,808   $ 30,808   $ 20,435  

Lyne B. Andrich

                               
 

Severance(1)

  $   $ 295,833   $ 591,667   $ 295,833   $ 295,833  
 

SERP(2)

  $ 516,372   $ 516,372   $ 619,646   $ 516,372   $  
 

Split-dollar insurance(3)

  $   $   $   $   $ 2,143,750  
 

Acceleration of option or award vesting(4)

  $   $   $ 95,000   $   $  
 

Medical and welfare benefits(5)

  $   $ 22,422   $ 22,422   $ 22,422   $ 18,184  

N. Bruce Callow

                               
 

Split-dollar insurance(3)

  $   $   $   $   $ 275,000  
 

Acceleration of option or award vesting(4)

  $   $   $ 47,500   $   $  

(1)
Represents severance payments in accordance with individual employment agreements as detailed in "—Employment Agreements" above.

(2)
Represents the present value of payments in accordance with SERP agreements as detailed under "—Pension Benefits" above.

(3)
Represents payments in accordance with Split-Dollar Endorsed Life Insurance agreements as detailed under "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Retirement and Other Benefits" above.

(4)
Assumes the Compensation Committee accelerates vesting upon a change in control. Value represents: a) what would be realized upon the exercise of options that would vest on a change in control, based on the difference between the option exercise price and the closing market value of the common stock on December 31, 2009 of $4.75; and, b) the value of the unvested restricted stock awards based on the closing market value of the common stock on December 31, 2009 of $4.75.

(5)
Represents the cost of maintaining medical, dental and life insurance coverage, as well as the 401(k) plan benefits valued at the incremental cost to the Company of providing such benefits.

51


Table of Contents


RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

        The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP:

 
  Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009
  Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008
 

Audit fees(1)

  $ 738,000   $ 520,000  

Tax fees(2)

    10,000     25,000  

All other fees(3)

    6,500     7,500  
           

  $ 754,500   $ 552,500  
           

(1)
Audit Fees.    Audit fees for services performed in 2009 and 2008 consisted of:

a.
Audit of the Company's annual financial statements;

b.
Reviews of the Company's quarterly financial statements;

c.
Statutory and regulatory audits, consents and other services related to SEC matters;

d.
Attestation of management's assessment of internal control, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 404; and

e.
Prospectus supplement filed in connection with the Company's underwritten public offering completed in July 2009. Fees of $192,500 and $0 were included for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)
Tax Fees.    Tax fees for services billed and paid in 2009 and 2008 consisted of:

a.
There were no tax compliance services in 2009 or 2008. Tax compliance services are services rendered based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred to document, compute and obtain government approval for amounts to be included in tax filings and consisted of:

i.
Federal and state income tax return assistance;

ii.
Preparation and calculation of estimated tax payments; and

iii.
Assistance with inquiries from taxing authorities.

b.
Tax planning or advice services in 2009 or 2008 totaled $10,000 and $25,000, respectively. Tax planning and advice are services rendered with respect to proposed transactions or that alter a transaction to obtain a particular tax result.

(3)
All Other Fees.    All other fees paid in 2009 and 2008 consisted of fees related to review of the Company's S-8 filings.


Pre-Approval of Services

        The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring its pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides for the general pre-approval of specific types of audit, audit-related, tax and other services, gives guidance to management regarding the specific services that are eligible for general

52


Table of Contents


pre-approval and provides specific cost limits for each such service on an annual basis. The policy also provides that specific pre-approval of services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm will be required if such services have not been generally pre-approved by the Audit Committee or if such services exceed specific de minimis limits.

        The policy provides that the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. Any member or members of the Audit Committee to whom such authority is delegated is required to report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The policy prohibits the Audit Committee from delegating its responsibilities to pre-approve services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management of the Company.

        The policy contains a de minimis provision that operates to provide retroactive approval for permissible non-audit services under certain circumstances. The provision allows for the pre-approval requirement to be waived if all of the following criteria are met:

        During 2009, there were no fees approved under the de minimis provision. All fees were pre-approved in 2009.

53


Table of Contents


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

        In accordance with its written charter, a copy of which is available on the Company's website (www.cobizfinancial.com), the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight role over the Company's financial accounting and reporting process, the Company's system of internal control over financial reporting established by management and the external audit process.

        Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the system of internal controls, including internal control over financial reporting, and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and procedures. The Audit Committee reviews and reports to the Board of Directors regarding the performance of the internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm, the integrity of the financial statements, management's efforts to maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

        The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements included in the Company's 2009 Annual Report and Form 10-K with management. The Audit Committee separately met with representatives of our internal audit department and independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management, to discuss the results of their examinations and their observations and recommendations regarding the Company's internal controls. The Audit Committee discussed with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended by SAS No. 90, Audit Committee Communications.

        The Audit Committee has received from our independent registered public accounting firm, as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committee, a written disclosure, indicating all relationships, if any, between the independent registered public accounting firm and its related entities and the Company and its related entities which, in the auditor's professional judgment, reasonably may be thought to bear on the auditor's independence, and a letter from the independent registered public accounting firm confirming that, in its professional judgment, it is independent of the Company. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm any relationship that may have an impact on its objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditor's independence.

        Based upon the review, discussion, disclosures and materials described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        This report is submitted by the Audit Committee.

Mary Beth Vitale, Chair
Douglas L. Polson
Mary K. Rhinehart

54


Table of Contents


PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

        The following table sets forth, as of March 5, 2010, certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock by (i) each director of the Company, (ii) each NEO and (iii) all of the Company's directors and NEOs as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the Company believes that the shareholders listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to their shares based on information furnished to the Company by such owners.


Stock Ownership of Directors and Management

Name and address of owner(1)
  (A)
Number of
outstanding shares
beneficially owned
  (B)

Right to
Acquire(2)
  (A) + (B)


Total
  Percent of
class(3)
 

Lyne B. Andrich

    53,263     62,301     115,564     *  

Steven Bangert(4)

    1,585,955     41,001     1,626,956     4.42 %

Michael B. Burgamy(5)

    300,556     7,500     308,056     *  

N. Bruce Callow

    10,000     10,000     20,000     *  

Richard J. Dalton

    196,808     81,342     278,150     *  

Morgan Gust

    1,050     4,000     5,050     *  

Jonathan C. Lorenz(6)

    374,442     107,455     481,897     1.31 %

Evan Makovsky(7)

    95,956     13,823     109,779     *  

Douglas L. Polson

    5,278     1,734     7,012     *  

Mary K. Rhinehart

    1,751     1,734     3,485     *  

Noel N. Rothman(8)

    1,649,209     9,665     1,658,874     4.51 %

Timothy J. Travis

    79,368     15,527     94,895     *  

Mary Beth Vitale

    5,000     5,500     10,500     *  

Mary M. White

    1,500     5,000     6,500     *  
                   

All directors and executive officers as a group—19 persons

    4,469,187     483,974     4,953,161     13.31 %
                   

*
Less than 1% of shares outstanding.

(1)
The address of each of the above-named shareholders is c/o CoBiz Financial Inc., 821 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.

(2)
Represents stock options which are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 5, 2010.

(3)
Percentage ownership has been calculated based on 36,734,500 shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding as of March 5, 2010, plus, in the case of each individual and group, any shares that the person or the group has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 5, 2010 (but excluding any shares that any other person or group has the right to acquire).

(4)
Includes 1,141,604 shares owned directly by Mr. Bangert; 240,385 shares held by a family partnership, of which Mr. Bangert is the general partner; 135,000 shares owned by a corporation equally owned by Mr. Bangert and his wife; and 68,966 shares held by Mr. Bangert's wife.

(5)
Includes 35,750 shares held by Mr. Burgamy's wife.

(6)
Includes 1,125 shares held by Mr. Lorenz's children.

(7)
Includes 2,513 shares held by Mr. Makovsky's wife and 56,672 shares held by the Shames-Makovsky Profit Sharing Plan, in which Mr. Makovsky is a participant and trustee.

55


Table of Contents

(8)
Includes 1,265,844 shares owned directly by Mr. Rothman; 44,112 shares held by NaF Limited Partnership, an entity of which Mr. Rothman is a general partner; 75,820 shares held in various family trusts for which Mr. Rothman is a trustee; 104,106 shares held by Namtor Growth Fund Partnership, an entity of which Mr. Rothman is a general partner; 325 shares held in an individual retirement account for the benefit of Mr. Rothman; 56,881 shares held by Mr. Rothman's wife; 6,271 shares held in a trust for which Mr. Rothman's wife is a co-trustee; and 95,850 shares held in trust by Mr. Rothman's wife.


Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

        The following sets forth certain information concerning the only persons known to us who may be considered a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of CoBiz common stock as of March 5, 2010.

Title of class
  Name and address of beneficial owner   Amount and
nature of
beneficial ownership
  Percent
of class(1)
 

Common stock

  T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
    2,681,437 (2)   7.30 %

Common stock

 

BlackRock, Inc.
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022

   
2,396,127

(3)
 
6.52

%

Common stock

 

Banc Funds VI, VII and VIII L.P.
20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 3300
Chicago, IL 60606

   
2,214,339

(4)
 
6.03

%

Common stock

 

Second Curve Capital, LLC
237 Park Avenue, 9th Floor
New York, New York 10017

   
1,886,202

(5)
 
5.13

%

(1)
Percentage ownership has been calculated based on 36,734,500 shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding as of March 5, 2010, plus, in the case of each individual and group, any shares that the person or the group has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 5, 2010 (but excluding any shares that any other person or group has the right to acquire).

(2)
These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors including T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. (which owns 2,500,000 shares, representing 6.8% of the shares outstanding), for which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates) serves as investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

(3)
As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2010, BlackRock, Inc. reports that it has sole voting and dispositive power over 2,396,127 shares of common stock. As previously announced, on December 1, 2009 BlackRock, Inc. completed its acquisition of Barclays Global Investors from Barclays Bank PLC. As a result, [substantially all of] the BGI Entities are now included as subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc. for purposes of Schedule 13G filings.

(4)
As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2010, filed jointly by Banc Fund VI L.P. ("BF VI"), an Illinois Limited Partnership, Banc Fund VII L.P. ("BF VII"), an Illinois Limited Partnership, and Banc Fund VIII L.P. ("BF VIII"), an Illinois Limited Partnership.

56


Table of Contents

(5)
As reported on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 23, 2010, Second Curve Capital, LLC and Thomas K. Brown have shared voting and dispositive power over 1,886,202 shares of common stock.


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

        Our executive officers, key employees, directors and principal shareholders, members of their immediate families and businesses in which they hold controlling interests are our customers, and it is anticipated that such parties will continue to be our customers in the future. All outstanding loans and extensions of credit by us to these parties were made in the ordinary course of business in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Company, and, in our opinion, do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or contain other features unfavorable to us. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate balance of our loans and advances under existing lines of credit to these parties was approximately $4,203,000, or 0.2% of our total loans and leases.

        We lease our downtown Denver banking facility and executive and administrative offices from Kesef, LLC (Kesef), an entity in which Mr. Makovsky owns 20%. Messrs. Bangert, Lorenz, Ross and Rothman (through Namtor) each previously owned a 16% interest in Kesef, but sold their interests in 2002. Kesef purchased the building in January 1998. The initial term of this lease was ten years, with an option to renew for an additional ten-year term at the current market rates. In addition, Shames-Makovsky Realty Company, an entity of which Mr. Makovsky is the majority owner and managing general partner, acts as the property management firm for our facility located in Surprise, Arizona, and receives compensation directly from the owning entity for its services. Shames-Makovsky Realty Company has also been engaged by the owners of our Northeast Denver location to act as their property manager. Rent payments for these related party leases for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $1,997,000.

        The Company completed a private placement of $20,984,000 of Subordinated Unsecured Promissory Notes (the Notes) during the third and fourth quarter of 2008. The notes will mature in 2018, 10 years after the initial issue date (August 18, 2008). The notes bear a fixed annual interest rate of 9.00%, pay interest quarterly, and can be prepaid at par without penalty at any time on or after the fifth anniversary of the initial issue date. The Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. Certain employees and directors of the Company and executive officers of the Company also participated in the private placement. At December 31, 2009, $3,550,000 in Notes was owed to related parties.

        For information on certain other relationships and transactions between the Company and certain officers, directors and principal shareholders, see "Committees of the Board of Directors—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" above.

        The Company has various written procedures in place to identify potential related party transactions, which are reported and reviewed with the Company's Disclosure and Audit Committees. Some ordinary course transactions or relationships are not reviewed by the Disclosure or Audit Committees, including ordinary course customer relationships such as the banking and lending relationships described above. The Company has other written policies and procedures in place to ensure compliance with applicable bank regulatory requirements regarding those banking and lending relationships. Furthermore, the Company's Code of Conduct and Ethics addresses potential conflicts of interest, and requires that conflicts be disclosed to the Company's Compliance Manager, requesting a waiver and cooperating in the establishment of appropriate procedures to neutralize the conflict.

57


Table of Contents


Waivers for directors and executive officers must be approved by the Company's Board of Directors. These procedures are intended to determine whether any such related party transaction impairs the independence of a director or presents a conflict of interest on the part of a director or executive officer.

        On an annual basis, all directors and executive officers of the Company complete a questionnaire that, among other things, requires confirmation of any completed or proposed transaction with the Company that exceeds $120,000 to which they or an immediate family member were involved. The Audit Committee of the Company reviews and approves all related party transactions that are required to be disclosed under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K.

        In addition, each quarter the Company's Disclosure Committee requests all senior officers to identify any related party transaction of which they are aware. Transactions identified through this process are reported to the Audit Committee each quarter. Our procedures for reviewing related party transactions, other than approving waivers of compliance with the Code of Conduct and Ethics and transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404, do not require the approval or ratification of such transactions.


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding common stock to file initial reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Forms 4 and 5 with the SEC. Executive officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.

        Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, each of the Company's directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the outstanding common stock have filed all forms required by Section 16 of the Exchange Act in fiscal 2009.


2009 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

        Included with this Proxy Statement is the Company's 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC.


SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

        Any shareholder of the Company who desires to make his or her thoughts known to an individual director of the Company, the Board or a committee of the Board may do so by mail to: Board of Directors, c/o CoBiz Financial Inc., Corporate Secretary, 821 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. The Secretary will forward all shareholder communications, other than communications that are not properly directed or are frivolous, to the individual director of the Company, the Board or a committee of the Board, as requested in the communication. This policy is intended to apply only to communications from shareholders in their capacities as such. Communications to the Company from one of its officers, employees or agents will only be forwarded to a director, the Board or a committee of the Board if the communication is made solely in the person's capacity as a shareholder. The policy does not apply to shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, which will be handled in accordance with applicable SEC rules.

58


Table of Contents


SHAREHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

        The G&N Committee will consider individuals recommended by the shareholders of the Company to serve on the Board. Shareholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the G&N Committee may do so by submitting a written recommendation to: Director Nominations, c/o CoBiz Financial Inc., Corporate Secretary, 821 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. Submissions must include:

        Submissions must be accompanied by a written consent of the individual recommended to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders of the Company.

        The G&N Committee believes that candidates for director should have the following minimum qualifications:


SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR
2011 ANNUAL MEETING

        Shareholder proposals submitted for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in the year 2011 must be received by the Secretary of the Company not later than December 9, 2010.

        If the Company does not receive notice of a matter or proposal to be considered for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (whether or not the proponent thereof intends to include such matter or proposal in the proxy statement for such annual meeting) on or before February 24, 2011, then the persons appointed by the Board of Directors to act as proxies for such annual meeting will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority with respect to any such matter or proposal raised at such annual meeting.

59


Table of Contents


OTHER MATTERS

        The Board of Directors knows of no matters other than those that are described in this Proxy Statement that may be brought before the meeting. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, persons named in the enclosed proxy or their substitutes will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

        Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote via telephone, via Internet, or by marking, signing, dating and promptly returning the enclosed proxy in the enclosed return envelope.


HOUSEHOLDING

        Only one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report and Proxy Statement, as applicable, will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless CoBiz received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders.

        If a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report and Proxy Statement, as applicable, was delivered wishes to receive a separate copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement, he or she should contact the Company's Corporate Secretary, by telephoning (303) 312-3412, or by writing to CoBiz at 821 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. The shareholder will be delivered, without charge, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report or Proxy Statement, as applicable, promptly upon request.

        If shareholders at a shared address currently receiving multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or Annual Report and Proxy Statement, as applicable, wish to receive only a single copy of these documents, they should contact the Company's transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services LLC (Computershare), by writing to Computershare at 350 Indiana Street, Suite 750, Golden, CO 80401.

UPON WRITTEN REQUEST OF A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF COMMON STOCK ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THIS SHAREHOLDERS MEETING WHO DID NOT RECEIVE A COPY OF THE ENCLOSED ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS, THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH, WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009, ACCOMPANIED BY A LIST BRIEFLY DESCRIBING ALL THE EXHIBITS THERETO AND NOT CONTAINED THEREIN. THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH A COPY OF ANY EXHIBIT UPON THE ADDITIONAL REQUEST OF SUCH PERSON AND THE PAYMENT OF A FEE OF $0.25 PER PAGE. ADDRESS ANY SUCH REQUESTS TO MARY PERROTT SMITH, CORPORATE SECRETARY, COBIZ FINANCIAL INC., 821 SEVENTEENTH STREET, DENVER, CO 80202. THE REQUEST MUST CONTAIN A GOOD FAITH REPRESENTATION THAT, AS OF THE RECORD DATE FOR THE MEETING, THE PERSON MAKING THE REQUEST WAS A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SECURITIES ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE MEETING.

60


Table of Contents


APPENDIX A

COBIZ INC.

2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
   
  Page

1.

  ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND TERM OF PLAN   A-1

  1.1  

Establishment

  A-1

  1.2  

Purpose

  A-1

  1.3  

Term of Plan

  A-1

2.

 

DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION

 
A-1

  2.1  

Definitions

  A-1

  2.2  

Construction

  A-4

3.

 

ADMINISTRATION

 
A-5

  3.1  

Administration by the Committee

  A-5

  3.2  

Administration with Respect to Insiders

  A-5

  3.3  

Committee Complying with Section 162(m)

  A-5

  3.4  

Powers of the Committee

  A-5

  3.5  

Option or SAR Repricing

  A-6

  3.6  

Indemnification

  A-6

4.

 

SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN

 
A-6

  4.1  

Maximum Number of Shares Issuable

  A-6

  4.2  

Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure

  A-6

5.

 

ELIGIBILITY AND AWARD LIMITATIONS

 
A-7

  5.1  

Persons Eligible for Awards

  A-7

  5.2  

Participation

  A-7

  5.3  

Incentive Stock Option Limitations

  A-7

  5.4  

Award Limits

  A-8

6.

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS

 
A-8

  6.1  

Exercise Price

  A-8

  6.2  

Exercisability and Term of Options

  A-9

  6.3  

Payment of Exercise Price

  A-9

  6.4  

Effect of Termination of Service

  A-9

  6.5  

Transferability of Options

  A-10

7.

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

 
A-10

  7.1  

Types of SARs Authorized

  A-11

  7.2  

Exercise Price

  A-11

  7.3  

Exercisability and Term of SARs

  A-11

  7.4  

Exercise of SARs

  A-11

  7.5  

Deemed Exercise of SARs

  A-11

  7.6  

Effect of Termination of Service

  A-11

  7.7  

Nontransferability of SARs

  A-11

8.

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

 
A-11

  8.1  

Types of Restricted Stock Awards Authorized

  A-12

  8.2  

Purchase Price

  A-12

  8.3  

Purchase Period

  A-12

  8.4  

Payment of Purchase Price

  A-12

  8.5  

Vesting and Restrictions on Transfer

  A-12

  8.6  

Voting Rights; Dividends and Distributions

  A-12

  8.7  

Effect of Termination of Service

  A-13

  8.8  

Nontransferability of Restricted Stock Award Rights

  A-13

A-i


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page

9.

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERFORMANCE AWARDS

  A-13

  9.1  

Types of Performance Awards Authorized

  A-13

  9.2  

Initial Value of Performance Shares and Performance Units

  A-13

  9.3  

Establishment of Performance Period, Performance Goals and Performance Award Formula

  A-13

  9.4  

Measurement of Performance Goals

  A-14

  9.5  

Settlement of Performance Awards

  A-15

  9.6  

Voting Rights; Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions

  A-16

  9.7  

Effect of Termination of Service

  A-16

  9.8  

Nontransferability of Performance Awards

  A-17

10.

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS

 
A-17

  10.1  

Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Awards

  A-17

  10.2  

Purchase Price

  A-17

  10.3  

Vesting

  A-17

  10.4  

Voting Rights, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions

  A-17

  10.5  

Effect of Termination of Service

  A-18

  10.6  

Settlement of Restricted Stock Unit Awards

  A-18

  10.7  

Nontransferability of Restricted Stock Unit Awards

  A-18

11.

 

STANDARD FORMS OF AWARD AGREEMENT

 
A-18

  11.1  

Award Agreements

  A-18

  11.2  

Authority to Vary Terms

  A-18

12.

 

CHANGE IN CONTROL

 
A-18

  12.1  

Effect of Change in Control on Options and SARs

  A-18

  12.2  

Effect of Change in Control on Restricted Stock Awards

  A-19

  12.3  

Effect of Change in Control on Performance Awards

  A-19

  12.4  

Effect of Change in Control on Restricted Stock Unit Awards

  A-20

13.

 

COMPLIANCE WITH SECURITIES LAW

 
A-20

14.

 

TAX WITHHOLDING

 
A-20

  14.1  

Tax Withholding in General

  A-20

  14.2  

Withholding in Shares

  A-20

15.

 

AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN

 
A-20

16.

 

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

 
A-21

  16.1  

Repurchase Rights

  A-21

  16.2  

Provision of Information

  A-21

  16.3  

Rights as Employee, Consultant or Director

  A-21

  16.4  

Rights as a Stockholder

  A-21

  16.5  

Fractional Shares

  A-21

  16.6  

Severability

  A-21

  16.7  

Beneficiary Designation

  A-21

  16.8  

Unfunded Obligation

  A-22

  16.9  

Choice of Law

  A-22

A-ii


Table of Contents


CoBiz Inc.
2005 Equity Incentive Plan

        

1.     ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND TERM OF PLAN.

        1.1    Establishment.     The CoBiz Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is hereby established effective as of May 19, 2005, the date of its approval by the shareholders of the Company (the "Effective Date").

        1.2    Purpose.     The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of CoBiz Inc. and its shareholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain and reward persons performing services for CoBiz Inc. and its subsidiaries and by motivating those persons to contribute to the growth and profitability of CoBiz Inc. The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for Awards in the form of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Purchase Rights, Restricted Stock Bonuses, Performance Shares, Performance Units, and Restricted Stock Units.

        1.3    Term of Plan.     The Plan shall continue in effect until the earlier of its termination by the Board or the date on which all of the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan have been issued and all restrictions on such shares under the terms of the Plan and the agreements evidencing Awards granted under the Plan have lapsed. However, all Awards shall be granted, if at all, within ten (10) years from the Effective Date.

2.     DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION.

        2.1    Definitions.     Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have their respective meanings set forth below:


Table of Contents

A-2


Table of Contents

A-3


Table of Contents

        2.2    Construction.     Captions and titles contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of the Plan. Except when otherwise indicated by the context, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. Use of the term "or" is not intended to be exclusive, unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

A-4


Table of Contents

3.     ADMINISTRATION.

        3.1    Administration by the Committee.     The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. All questions of interpretation of the Plan or of any Award shall be determined by the Committee, and such determinations shall be final and binding upon all persons having an interest in the Plan or such Award.

        3.2    Administration with Respect to Insiders.     With respect to participation by Insiders in the Plan, at any time that any class of equity security of the Company is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the Plan shall be administered in compliance with the requirements, if any, of Rule 16b-3.

        3.3    Committee Complying with Section 162(m).     If the Company is a "publicly held corporation" within the meaning of Section 162(m), the Board may establish a Committee of "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m) to approve the grant of any Award which might reasonably be anticipated to result in the payment of employee remuneration that would otherwise exceed the limit on employee remuneration deductible for income tax purposes pursuant to Section 162(m).

        3.4    Powers of the Committee.     In addition to any other powers set forth in the Plan and subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the full and final power and authority, in its discretion:

A-5


Table of Contents

        3.5    Option or SAR Repricing.     Without the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Stock cast in person or by proxy at a meeting of the shareholders of the Company at which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding shares of Stock is present or represented by proxy, the Board shall not approve a program providing for either (a) the cancellation of outstanding Options or SARs and the grant in substitution therefore of new Options or SARs having a lower exercise price or (b) the amendment of outstanding Options or SARs to reduce the exercise price thereof. This paragraph shall not be construed to apply to "issuing or assuming a stock option in a transaction to which section 424(a) applies," within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code.

        3.6    Indemnification.     In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or the Committee or as officers or employees of the Company or any Subsidiary, members of the Board or the Committee shall be indemnified by the Company against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any right granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct in duties; provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after the institution of such action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Company, in writing, the opportunity at its own expense to handle and defend the same.

4.     SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN.

        4.1    Maximum Number of Shares Issuable.     Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 1,250,000 and shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any combination thereof. As a result of that aggregate limitation, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued as Incentive Stock Options under this Plan shall be 1,250,000. If an outstanding Award for any reason expires or is terminated or canceled without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares of Stock acquired pursuant to an Award subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company at the Participant's purchase price, the shares of Stock allocable to the terminated portion of such Award or such forfeited or repurchased shares of Stock shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. Shares of Stock shall not be deemed to have been issued pursuant to the Plan (a) with respect to any portion of an Award that is settled in cash or (b) to the extent such shares are withheld or reacquired by the Company in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations pursuant to Section 14.2. Upon payment in shares of Stock pursuant to the exercise of a SAR, the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced only by the number of shares actually issued in such payment. If the exercise price of an Option is paid by tender to the Company of shares of Stock owned by the Participant, the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by the net number of shares for which the Option is exercised.

        4.2    Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure.     Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, in the event of any change in the Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, whether through merger, consolidation, reorganization, reincorporation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, split-off, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares, or similar change in the capital structure of the

A-6


Table of Contents

Company, or in the event of payment of a dividend or distribution to the shareholders of the Company in a form other than Stock (excepting normal cash dividends) that has a material effect on the Fair Market Value of shares of Stock, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the number and kind of shares subject to the Plan and to any outstanding Awards, in the Award limits set forth in Section 5.4, and in the exercise or purchase price per share under any outstanding Award in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants' rights under the Plan. For purposes of the foregoing, conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be treated as "effected without receipt of consideration by the Company." Any fractional share resulting from an adjustment pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and in no event may the exercise or purchase price under any Award be decreased to an amount less than the par value, if any, of the stock subject to such Award. The Committee in its sole discretion, may also make such adjustments in the terms of any Award to reflect, or related to, such changes in the capital structure of the Company or distributions as it deems appropriate, including modification of Performance Goals, Performance Award Formulas and Performance Periods. The adjustments determined by the Committee pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be final, binding and conclusive.

5.     ELIGIBILITY AND AWARD LIMITATIONS.

        5.1    Persons Eligible for Awards.     Awards may be granted only to Employees, Consultants and Directors. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, "Employees," "Consultants" and "Directors" shall include prospective Employees, prospective Consultants and prospective Directors to whom Awards are granted in connection with written offers of an employment or other service relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary; provided, however, that no Stock subject to any such Award shall vest, become exercisable or be issued prior to the date on which such person commences Service.

        5.2    Participation.     Awards are granted solely at the discretion of the Committee. Eligible persons may be granted more than one Award. However, eligibility in accordance with this Section shall not entitle any person to be granted an Award, or, having been granted an Award, to be granted an additional Award.

        5.3    Incentive Stock Option Limitations.     

A-7


Table of Contents

        5.4    Award Limits.     

6.     TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS.

        Options shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock covered thereby, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Option or purported Option shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Options may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

        6.1    Exercise Price.     The exercise price for each Option shall be established in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that (a) the exercise price per share shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option and (b) no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Owner shall have an exercise price per share less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Option (whether an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option) may be granted with an exercise price lower than the minimum exercise

A-8


Table of Contents

price set forth above if such Option is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another option in a manner qualifying under the provisions of Section 424(a) of the Code.

        6.2    Exercisability and Term of Options.     Options shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Option; provided, however, that (a) no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of 10 years after the effective date of grant of such Option, (b) no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Owner shall be exercisable after the expiration of five years after the effective date of grant of such Option, and (c) no Option granted to a prospective Employee, prospective Consultant or prospective Director may become exercisable prior to the date on which such person commences Service. Subject to the foregoing, unless otherwise specified by the Committee in the grant of an Option, any Option granted hereunder shall terminate 10 years after the effective date of grant of the Option, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its provisions.

        6.3    Payment of Exercise Price.     

        6.4    Effect of Termination of Service.     

A-9


Table of Contents

        6.5    Transferability of Options.     During the lifetime of the Participant, an Option shall be exercisable only by the Participant or the Participant's guardian or legal representative. Prior to the issuance of shares of Stock upon the exercise of an Option, the Option shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or garnishment by creditors of the Participant or the Participant's beneficiary, except transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent permitted by the Committee, in its discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Option, a Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be assignable or transferable subject to the applicable limitations, if any, described in the General Instructions to Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act.

7.     TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.

        Stock Appreciation Rights shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish.

A-10


Table of Contents


No SAR or purported SAR shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing SARs may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

        7.1    Types of SARs Authorized.     SARs may not be granted in tandem with any portion of a related Option. Instead, SARs must be granted independently of any Option.

        7.2    Exercise Price.     The exercise price for each SAR shall be established in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that the exercise price per share subject to a SAR shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the effective date of grant of the SAR.

        7.3    Exercisability and Term of SARs.     SARs shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such SAR; provided, however, that no SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of 10 years after the effective date of grant of such SAR.

        7.4    Exercise of SARs.     Upon the exercise (or deemed exercise pursuant to Section 7.5) of a SAR, the Participant (or the Participant's legal representative or other person who acquired the right to exercise the SAR by reason of the Participant's death or Disability) shall be entitled to receive payment of an amount for each share with respect to which the SAR is exercised equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR over the exercise price. Payment of such amount shall be made in cash, shares of Stock, or any combination thereof as determined by the Committee. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement evidencing such SAR, payment shall be made in a lump sum as soon as practicable following the date of exercise of the SAR. When payment is to be made in shares of Stock, the number of shares to be issued shall be determined on the basis of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR. For purposes of Section 7, a SAR shall be deemed exercised on the date on which the Company receives notice of exercise from the Participant or as otherwise provided in Section 7.5.

        7.5    Deemed Exercise of SARs.     If, on the date on which a SAR would otherwise terminate or expire, the SAR by its terms remains exercisable immediately prior to such termination or expiration and, if so exercised, would result in a payment to the holder of such SAR, then any portion of such SAR which has not previously been exercised shall automatically be deemed to be exercised as of such date with respect to such portion.

        7.6    Effect of Termination of Service.     Subject to earlier termination of the SAR as otherwise provided herein and unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a SAR and set forth in the Award Agreement, a SAR shall be exercisable after a Participant's termination of Service only during the applicable time period determined in accordance with Section 6.4 (treating the SAR as if it were an Option) and thereafter shall terminate.

        7.7    Nontransferability of SARs.     During the lifetime of the Participant, a SAR shall be exercisable only by the Participant or the Participant's guardian or legal representative. Prior to the exercise of a SAR, the SAR shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or garnishment by creditors of the Participant or the Participant's beneficiary, except transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

8.     TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS.

        Restricted Stock Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying whether the Award is a Restricted Stock Bonus or a Restricted Stock Purchase Right and the number of shares of Stock subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Restricted Stock Award or purported Restricted Stock Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the

A-11


Table of Contents


Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

        8.1    Types of Restricted Stock Awards Authorized.     Restricted Stock Awards may be in the form of either a Restricted Stock Bonus or a Restricted Stock Purchase Right. Restricted Stock Awards may be granted upon such conditions as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals described in Section 9.4. If either the grant of a Restricted Stock Award or the lapsing of the Restriction Period is to be contingent upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals, the Committee shall follow procedures substantially equivalent to those set forth in Sections 9.3 through 9.5(a).

        8.2    Purchase Price.     The purchase price for shares of Stock issuable under each Restricted Stock Purchase Right shall be established by the Committee in its discretion. No monetary payment (other than applicable tax withholding) shall be required as a condition of receiving shares of Stock pursuant to a Restricted Stock Bonus, the consideration for which shall be services actually rendered to the Company or a Subsidiary or for their benefit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Participant shall furnish consideration in the form of cash or past services rendered to the Company or a Subsidiary or for their benefit having a value not less than the par value of the shares of Stock subject to such Restricted Stock Award.

        8.3    Purchase Period.     A Restricted Stock Purchase Right shall be exercisable within a period established by the Committee, which shall in no event exceed 30 days from the effective date of the grant of the Restricted Stock Purchase Right; provided, however, that no Restricted Stock Purchase Right granted to a prospective Employee, prospective Consultant or prospective Director may become exercisable prior to the date on which such person commences Service.

        8.4    Payment of Purchase Price.     Except as otherwise provided below, payment of the purchase price for the number of shares of Stock being purchased pursuant to any Restricted Stock Purchase Right shall be made (a) in cash, by check, or in cash equivalent, (b) by such other consideration as may be approved by the Committee from time to time to the extent permitted by applicable law, or (iii) by any combination thereof. The Committee may at any time or from time to time grant Restricted Stock Purchase Rights which do not permit all of the foregoing forms of consideration to be used in payment of the purchase price or which otherwise restrict one or more forms of consideration. Restricted Stock Bonuses shall be issued in consideration for past services actually rendered to the Company or a Subsidiary or for their benefit.

        8.5    Vesting and Restrictions on Transfer.     Shares issued pursuant to any Restricted Stock Award may or may not be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions or performance criteria, including, without limitation, Performance Goals as described in Section 9.4, as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award. During any Restriction Period in which shares acquired pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award remain subject to Vesting Conditions, such shares may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise disposed of other than as provided in Section 8.8. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Stock hereunder and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.

        8.6    Voting Rights; Dividends and Distributions.     Except as provided in this Section, Section 8.5 and any Award Agreement, during the Restriction Period applicable to shares subject to a Restricted Stock Award, the Participant shall have all of the rights of a stockholder of the Company holding shares of Stock, including the right to vote such shares and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to such shares. However, in the event of a dividend or distribution paid

A-12


Table of Contents

in shares of Stock or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described in Section 4.2, any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant is entitled by reason of the Participant's Restricted Stock Award shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as the shares subject to the Restricted Stock Award with respect to which such dividends or distributions were paid or adjustments were made.

        8.7    Effect of Termination of Service.     Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a Restricted Stock Award and set forth in the Award Agreement, if a Participant's Service terminates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (including the Participant's death or disability), then (a) the Company shall have the option to repurchase for the purchase price paid by the Participant any shares acquired by the Participant pursuant to a Restricted Stock Purchase Right which remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant's termination of Service and (b) the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any shares acquired by the Participant pursuant to a Restricted Stock Bonus which remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant's termination of Service. The Company shall have the right to assign at any time any repurchase right it may have, whether or not such right is then exercisable, to one or more persons as may be selected by the Company.

        8.8    Nontransferability of Restricted Stock Award Rights.     Prior to the issuance of shares of Stock pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award, rights to acquire such shares shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or garnishment by creditors of the Participant or the Participant's beneficiary, except transfer by will or the laws of descent and distribution. All rights with respect to a Restricted Stock Award granted to a Participant hereunder shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or the Participant's guardian or legal representative.

9.     TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERFORMANCE AWARDS.

        Performance Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Performance Award or purported Performance Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Performance Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

        9.1    Types of Performance Awards Authorized.     Performance Awards may be in the form of either Performance Shares or Performance Units. Each Award Agreement evidencing a Performance Award shall specify the number of Performance Shares or Performance Units subject thereto, the Performance Award Formula, the Performance Goal(s) and Performance Period applicable to the Award, and the other terms, conditions and restrictions of the Award.

        9.2    Initial Value of Performance Shares and Performance Units.     Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in granting a Performance Award, each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2, on the effective date of grant of the Performance Share, and each Performance Unit shall have an initial value of one hundred dollars ($100). The final value payable to the Participant in settlement of a Performance Award determined on the basis of the applicable Performance Award Formula will depend on the extent to which Performance Goals established by the Committee are attained within the applicable Performance Period established by the Committee.

        9.3    Establishment of Performance Period, Performance Goals and Performance Award Formula.     In granting each Performance Award, the Committee shall establish in writing the applicable Performance Period, Performance Award Formula and one or more Performance Goals which, when measured at the end of the Performance Period, shall determine on the basis of the Performance

A-13


Table of Contents

Award Formula the final value of the Performance Award to be paid to the Participant. Unless otherwise permitted in compliance with the requirements under Section 162(m) with respect to "performance-based compensation," the Committee shall establish the Performance Goal(s) and Performance Award Formula applicable to each Performance Award no later than the earlier of (a) the date ninety (90) days after the commencement of the applicable Performance Period or (b) the date on which 25% of the Performance Period has elapsed, and, in any event, at a time when the outcome of the Performance Goals remains substantially uncertain. Once established, the Performance Goals and Performance Award Formula shall not be changed during the Performance Period. The Company shall notify each Participant granted a Performance Award of the terms of such Award, including the Performance Period, Performance Goal(s) and Performance Award Formula.

        9.4    Measurement of Performance Goals.     Performance Goals shall be established by the Committee on the basis of targets to be attained ("Performance Targets") with respect to one or more measures of business or financial performance (each, a "Performance Measure"), subject to the following:

A-14


Table of Contents

        9.5    Settlement of Performance Awards.     

A-15


Table of Contents

        9.6    Voting Rights; Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions.     Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Stock represented by Performance Share Awards until the date of the issuance of such shares, if any (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing any Performance Share Award that the Participant shall be entitled to receive Dividend Equivalents with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Stock having a record date prior to the date on which the Performance Shares are settled or forfeited. Such Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be credited to the Participant in the form of additional whole Performance Shares as of the date of payment of such cash dividends on Stock. The number of additional Performance Shares (rounded to the nearest whole number) to be so credited shall be determined by dividing (a) the amount of cash dividends paid on such date with respect to the number of shares of Stock represented by the Performance Shares previously credited to the Participant by (b) the Fair Market Value per share of Stock on such date. Dividend Equivalents may be paid currently or may be accumulated and paid to the extent that Performance Shares become nonforfeitable, as determined by the Committee. Settlement of Dividend Equivalents may be made in cash, shares of Stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Committee, and may be paid on the same basis as settlement of the related Performance Share as provided in Section 9.5. Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid with respect to Performance Units. In the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Stock or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described in Section 4.2, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the Participant's Performance Share Award so that it represents the right to receive upon settlement any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant would be entitled by reason of the shares of Stock issuable upon settlement of the Performance Share Award, and all such new, substituted or additional securities or other property shall be immediately subject to the same Performance Goals as are applicable to the Award.

        9.7    Effect of Termination of Service.     Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a Performance Award and set forth in the Award Agreement, the effect of a Participant's termination of Service on the Performance Award shall be as follows:

A-16


Table of Contents

        9.8    Nontransferability of Performance Awards.     Prior to settlement in accordance with the provisions of the Plan, no Performance Award shall be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or garnishment by creditors of the Participant or the Participant's beneficiary, except transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. All rights with respect to a Performance Award granted to a Participant hereunder shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or the Participant's guardian or legal representative.

10.   TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS.

        Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Restricted Stock Unit Award or purported Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Units may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:

        10.1    Grant of Restricted Stock Unit Awards.     Restricted Stock Unit Awards may be granted upon such conditions as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals described in Section 9.4. If either the grant of a Restricted Stock Unit Award or the Vesting Conditions with respect to such Award is to be contingent upon the attainment of one or more Performance Goals, the Committee shall follow procedures substantially equivalent to those set forth in Sections 9.3 through 9.5(a).

        10.2    Purchase Price.     No monetary payment (other than applicable tax withholding, if any) shall be required as a condition of receiving a Restricted Stock Unit Award, the consideration for which shall be services actually rendered to the Company or a Subsidiary or for their benefit.

        10.3    Vesting.     Restricted Stock Units may or may not be made subject to Vesting Conditions based upon the satisfaction of such Service requirements, conditions, restrictions or performance criteria, including, without limitation, Performance Goals as described in Section 9.4, as shall be established by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award.

        10.4    Voting Rights, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Distributions.     Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Stock represented by Restricted Stock Units until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing any Restricted Stock Unit Award that the Participant shall be entitled to receive Dividend Equivalents with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Stock having a record date prior to date on which Restricted Stock Units held by such Participant are settled. Such Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be paid by crediting the Participant with additional whole Restricted Stock Units as of the date of payment of such cash dividends on Stock. The number of additional Restricted Stock Units (rounded to the nearest whole number) to be so credited shall be determined by dividing (a) the amount of cash dividends paid on such date with respect to the number of shares of Stock represented by the Restricted Stock Units previously credited to the Participant by (b) the Fair Market Value per share of Stock on such date. Such additional Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions and shall be settled in the same manner and at the same time (or as soon thereafter as practicable) as the Restricted Stock Units originally subject to the Restricted Stock Unit Award. In the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Stock or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described in Section 4.2, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the Participant's Restricted Stock Unit Award so that it represents the right to receive upon settlement any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant would entitled

A-17


Table of Contents

by reason of the shares of Stock issuable upon settlement of the Award, and all such new, substituted or additional securities or other property shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as are applicable to the Award.

        10.5    Effect of Termination of Service.     Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the grant of a Restricted Stock Unit Award and set forth in the Award Agreement, if a Participant's Service terminates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (including the Participant's death or disability), then the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any Restricted Stock Units pursuant to the Award which remain subject to Vesting Conditions as of the date of the Participant's termination of Service.

        10.6    Settlement of Restricted Stock Unit Awards.     The Company shall issue to a Participant on the date on which Restricted Stock Units subject to the Participant's Restricted Stock Unit Award vest or on such other date determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and set forth in the Award Agreement one share of Stock (and/or any other new, substituted or additional securities or other property pursuant to an adjustment described in Section 10.4) for each Restricted Stock Unit then becoming vested or otherwise to be settled on such date, subject to the withholding of applicable taxes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if permitted by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement, the Participant may elect in accordance with terms specified in the Award Agreement to defer receipt of all or any portion of the shares of Stock or other property otherwise issuable to the Participant pursuant to this Section.

        10.7    Nontransferability of Restricted Stock Unit Awards.     Prior to the issuance of shares of Stock in settlement of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, the Award shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or garnishment by creditors of the Participant or the Participant's beneficiary, except transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. All rights with respect to a Restricted Stock Unit Award granted to a Participant hereunder shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or the Participant's guardian or legal representative.

11.   STANDARD FORMS OF AWARD AGREEMENT.

        11.1    Award Agreements.     Each Award shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the appropriate form of Award Agreement approved by the Committee and as amended from time to time. Any Award Agreement may consist of an appropriate form of Notice of Grant and a form of Agreement incorporated therein by reference, or such other form or forms, including electronic media, as the Committee may approve from time to time.

        11.2    Authority to Vary Terms.     The Committee shall have the authority from time to time to vary the terms of any standard form of Award Agreement either in connection with the grant or amendment of an individual Award or in connection with the authorization of a new standard form or forms; provided, however, that the terms and conditions of any such new, revised or amended standard form or forms of Award Agreement are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.

12.   CHANGE IN CONTROL.

        12.1    Effect of Change in Control on Options and SARs.     

A-18


Table of Contents

        12.2    Effect of Change in Control on Restricted Stock Awards.     The Committee, in its discretion, may provide in any Award Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Award or, in the event of a Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide, for the lapsing of the Restriction Period applicable to the shares subject to the Restricted Stock Award held by a Participant whose Service has not terminated prior to the Change in Control, such lapsing to be effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Change in Control to such extent as the Committee deems appropriate. Any acceleration of the lapsing of the Restriction Period that was permissible solely by reason of this Section 12.2 shall be conditioned upon the consummation of the Change in Control.

        12.3    Effect of Change in Control on Performance Awards.     The Committee, in its discretion, may provide in any Award Agreement evidencing a Performance Award or, in the event of a Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide, that the Performance Award held by a Participant whose Service has not terminated prior to the Change in Control or whose Service terminated by reason of the Participant's death or Disability shall become payable effective as of the date of the Change in Control to such extent as specified in such Award Agreement.

A-19


Table of Contents

        12.4    Effect of Change in Control on Restricted Stock Unit Awards.     The Committee, in its discretion, may provide in any Award Agreement evidencing a Restricted Stock Unit Award or, in the event of a Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide, for the settlement of a Restricted Stock Unit Award held by a Participant whose Service has not terminated prior to such Change in Control, such settlement to be effective as of the date of the Change in Control to such extent as the Committee deems appropriate.

13.   COMPLIANCE WITH SECURITIES LAW.

        The grant of Awards and the issuance of shares of Stock pursuant to any Award shall be subject to compliance with all applicable requirements of federal, state and foreign law with respect to such securities and the requirements of any stock exchange or market system upon which the Stock may then be listed. In addition, no Award may be exercised or shares issued pursuant to an Award unless (a) a registration statement under the Securities Act shall at the time of such exercise or issuance be in effect with respect to the shares issuable pursuant to the Award or (b) in the opinion of legal counsel to the Company, the shares issuable pursuant to the Award may be issued in accordance with the terms of an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority, if any, deemed by the Company's legal counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares hereunder shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. As a condition to issuance of any Stock, the Company may require the Participant to satisfy any qualifications that may be necessary or appropriate, to evidence compliance with any applicable law or regulation and to make any representation or warranty with respect thereto as may be requested by the Company.

14.   TAX WITHHOLDING.

        14.1    Tax Withholding in General.     The Company shall have the right to deduct from any and all payments made under the Plan, or to require the Participant, through payroll withholding, cash payment or otherwise, including by means of a Cashless Exercise of an Option, to make adequate provision for, the federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld by the Company or a Subsidiary with respect to an Award or the shares acquired pursuant thereto. The Company shall have no obligation to deliver shares of Stock, to release shares of Stock from an escrow established pursuant to an Award Agreement, or to make any payment in cash under the Plan until the Company's or Subsidiary's tax withholding obligations have been satisfied by the Participant.

        14.2    Withholding in Shares.     The Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to deduct from the shares of Stock issuable to a Participant upon the exercise or settlement of an Award, or to accept from the Participant the tender of, a number of whole shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value, as determined by the Company, equal to all or any part of the tax withholding obligations of the Company or a Subsidiary. The Fair Market Value of any shares of Stock withheld or tendered to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations shall not exceed the amount determined by the applicable minimum statutory withholding rates.

15.   AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN.

        The Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. However, without the approval of the Company's shareholders, there shall be (a) no increase in the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan (except by operation of the provisions of Section 4.2), (b) no change in the class of persons eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options, and (c) no other amendment of the Plan that would require approval of the Company's shareholders under any applicable law, regulation or rule. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan shall affect any then outstanding Award unless expressly provided by the Committee. In any event, no

A-20


Table of Contents


amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan may adversely affect any then outstanding Award without the consent of the Participant unless necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule.

        Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan, the Committee may amend the Plan and any Award granted and outstanding under the Plan at any time through December 31, 2005 (or such later date as approved in guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service), without the need for shareholder approval and without the need for consent by any Participant, to comply with the provisions of Code Section 409A, as determined by the Committee in its discretion.

16.   MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

        16.1    Repurchase Rights.     Shares issued under the Plan may be subject to one or more repurchase options, or other conditions and restrictions as determined by the Committee in its discretion at the time the Award is granted. The Company shall have the right to assign at any time any repurchase right it may have, whether or not such right is then exercisable, to one or more persons as may be selected by the Company. Upon request by the Company, each Participant shall execute any agreement evidencing such transfer restrictions prior to the receipt of shares of Stock hereunder and shall promptly present to the Company any and all certificates representing shares of Stock acquired hereunder for the placement on such certificates of appropriate legends evidencing any such transfer restrictions.

        16.2    Provision of Information.     Each Participant shall be given access to information concerning the Company equivalent to that information generally made available to the Company's common shareholders.

        16.3    Rights as Employee, Consultant or Director.     No person, even though eligible pursuant to Section 5, shall have a right to be selected as a Participant, or, having been so selected, to be selected again as a Participant. Nothing in the Plan or any Award granted under the Plan shall confer on any Participant a right to remain an Employee, Consultant or Director or interfere with or limit in any way any right of the Company or a Subsidiary to terminate the Participant's Service at any time. To the extent that an Employee of a Subsidiary receives an Award under the Plan, that Award shall in no event be understood or interpreted to mean that the Company is the Employee's employer or that the Employee has an employment relationship with the Company.

        16.4    Rights as a Stockholder.     A Participant shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares covered by an Award until the date of the issuance of such shares (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). No adjustment shall be made for dividends, distributions or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date such shares are issued, except as provided in Section 4.2 or another provision of the Plan.

        16.5    Fractional Shares.     The Company shall not be required to issue fractional shares upon the exercise or settlement of any Award.

        16.6    Severability.     If any one or more of the provisions (or any part thereof) of this Plan shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such provision shall be modified so as to make it valid, legal and enforceable, and the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions (or any part thereof) of the Plan shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

        16.7    Beneficiary Designation.     Subject to local laws and procedures, each Participant may file with the Company a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any benefit under the Plan to which the Participant is entitled in the event of such Participant's death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each designation will revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Company, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in

A-21


Table of Contents

writing with the Company during the Participant's lifetime. If a married Participant designates a beneficiary other than the Participant's spouse, the effectiveness of such designation may be subject to the consent of the Participant's spouse. If a Participant dies without an effective designation of a beneficiary who is living at the time of the Participant's death, the Company will pay any remaining unpaid benefits to the Participant's legal representative.

        16.8    Unfunded Obligation.     Participants shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to Participants pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment obligations hereunder. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust or any Participant account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Committee, the Company or any Subsidiary and a Participant, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Participant or the Participant's creditors in any assets of the Company or a Subsidiary. The Participants shall have no claim against the Company or any Subsidiary for any changes in the value of any assets which may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan.

        16.9    Choice of Law.     Except to the extent governed by applicable federal law, the validity, interpretation, construction and performance of the Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado, without regard to its conflict of law rules.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Secretary of the Company certifies that the foregoing sets forth the CoBiz Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as duly adopted by the Board on April 5, 2005, and approved by the shareholders on May 19, 2005.

      

Secretary

A-22


Table of Contents


FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

COBIZ INC. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

        This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the CoBiz Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is approved and adopted to be effective as of May 15, 2008 (the "Effective Date").


RECITALS

        A.    CoBiz Financial Inc., a Colorado corporation formerly known as CoBiz Inc. ("CoBiz") implemented the Plan effective as of May 19, 2005, the date of its approval by the shareholders of CoBiz.

        B.    CoBiz now desires to amend the Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Amendment.


AMENDMENT

        NOW THEREFORE, effective as of the Effective Date, the Plan is amended as follows:

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Secretary of the CoBiz certifies that the foregoing sets forth the First Amendment to the CoBiz Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as duly adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on January 23, 2008, by the full Board of Directors on March 17, 2008 and as approved by the shareholders on May 15, 2008.

      

Secretary

A-23


Table of Contents


SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE

COBIZ FINANCIAL INC. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

        This Second Amendment (the "Amendment") to the CoBiz Financial Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the "Plan") is approved and adopted to be effective as of May 20, 2010 (the "Effective Date").


RECITALS

        A.    CoBiz Financial Inc., a Colorado corporation ("CoBiz"), implemented the Plan effective as of May 19, 2005, the date of its approval by the shareholders of CoBiz.

        B.    CoBiz now desires to amend the Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Amendment.


AMENDMENT

        NOW THEREFORE, effective as of the Effective Date, the Plan is amended as follows:

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Secretary of CoBiz certifies that the foregoing sets forth the Second Amendment to the CoBiz Financial Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as duly adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on March 17, 2010, and by the full Board of Directors on March 18, 2010, and as approved by the shareholders on May 20, 2010.

      

Secretary

A-24


Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X 0168WB 1 U P X + Annual Meeting Proxy Card Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below C Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. + B Non-Voting Items A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 – 4. Change of Address — Please print new address below. 01 - Steven Bangert 04 - Evan Makovsky 07 - Noel N. Rothman 02 - Michael B. Burgamy 05 - Douglas L. Polson 08 - Timothy J. Travis 1. Election of Directors: For Withhold For Withhold 03 - Morgan Gust 06 - Mary K. Rhinehart 09 - Mary Beth Vitale 10 - Mary M. White For Withhold For Against Abstain 2. Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. 3. Nonbinding shareholder approval of executive compensation. For Against Abstain 4. Proposal to amend the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized under the Plan to 3,750,000 shares and increase the restricted stock award limit to 2,000,000 shares. 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 1234 5678 9012 345 0 2 5 2 1 0 1 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 [1]IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.[1] Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 20, 2010. Vote by Internet • Log on to the Internet and go to www.envisionreports.com/COBZ • Follow the steps outlined on the secured website. Vote by telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call. • Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

 


821 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80202 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned, having duly received the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated April 8, 2010, hereby appoints Steven Bangert and Jonathan C. Lorenz proxies (each with the power to act alone and with the power of substitution and revocation) to represent the undersigned and to vote, as designated below, all shares of Common Stock of CoBiz Financial Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CoBiz Financial Inc. to be held on May 20, 2010 at the Magnolia Ballroom, 817 17th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 at 8:00 a.m., M.D.T., and any adjournment thereof. This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR items 1, 2, 3 AND 4. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ADDRESSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE U.S. Proxy — CoBiz Financial Inc. [1]IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.[1]